HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-02-2026 City Council Work Session Packet
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
Mayor
Amáda Márquez Simula
Councilmembers
Connie Buesgens
Rachel James
Justice Spriggs
Laurel Deneen
City Manager
Aaron Chirpich
City Hall—Shared Vision Room, 3989 Central Ave NE
Monday, March 02, 2026
6:00 PM
AGENDA
ATTENDANCE INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC
Members of the public who wish to attend may do so in-person, or by using Microsoft Teams Meeting
at http://www.columbiaheightsmn.gov/joinameeting ID 244 591 441 962 9, Passcode GH63Mp9D. For
questions, please contact Administration at 763-706-3610.
Auxiliary aids or other accommodations for individuals with disabilities are available upon request when
the request is made at least 72 hours in advance. Please contact Administration at 763 -706-3610 to
make arrangements.
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Columbia Heights City Council and Staff Norms.
While we are accountable to each other for these norms, the Mayor and City Manager will
help us adhere to them with respectful reminders and reinforcement as needed.
WORK SESSION ITEMS
1. Group Ice Breaker: What is your appreciation language in the workplace?
Words of affirmation, quality time, acts of service, tangible gifts, physical touch
(appropriate, consensual gestures, e.g. handshake, high five).
Presenting Item: Amáda Márquez Simula, Mayor
2. Just Cause Tenant Protections Follow-up. (40 minutes)
Presenting Item: Aaron Chirpich, City Manager
Following the work session discussion, staff would like direction on how to move forward
with the proposed just cause ordinance.
3. Overview of Proposed Provisional License for 3932 Central Ave NE. (10 Minutes)
Presenting Item: Daniel O’Brien, Fire Chief
Staff requests that council have a brief discussion regarding the background and conditions
for a proposed provisional rental license for the property due to structural concerns.
4. Discussion Regarding Adoption of the 2025 Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan. (10
Minutes)
Presenting Item: Dan O’Brien, Fire Chief / Emergency Management Director
1
City of Columbia Heights AGENDA March 02, 2026
City Council Work Session Page 2
Staff requests that council review the 2025 Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan and
Resolution 2026-015 so that formal adoption of the plan can occur at the March 9th 2026,
City Council Meeting.
5. Comprehensive Plan Review Committee Resident Appointments. (10 Minutes)
Presenting Item: Ursula Brandt, City Planner
Staff requests the council review the attached applications and confirm who will be
appointed to the 2050 Comprehensive Plan Review Committee so staff can prepare a
resolution for the March 13, 2026 City Council Meeting.
6. Code Amendments to Chapter 5.5 Liquor and Beer. (10 Minutes)
Presenting Item: Mitchell Forney, Community Development Director
Staff are looking for guidance on the proposed amendments and if there are any
unforeseen issues not identified by staff.
7. Yes to Homes Discussion (10 minutes)
Presenting Item: Aaron Chirpich, City Manager
Staff are seeking feedback on the Council’s position regarding support for the Yes to Homes
legislative agenda.
8. Municipal Regulation of Crypto / Virtual Currency Kiosks. (10 Minutes)
Presenting Item: Aaron Chirpich, City Manager
Staff requests council feedback related to their desire for municipal regulation of crypto /
virtual currency kiosks.
9. City Manager Follow-up Regarding Previous Work Session Topics. (15 Minutes)
Presenting Item: Aaron Chirpich, City Manager
10. Council Corner.
Monthly Calendar Sharing
Monthly Event Notification, Attendance and Past Event Updates
Monthly Proclamations and Meeting Guests
Presenting Item: Amáda Márquez Simula, Mayor
ADJOURNMENT
Auxiliary aids or other accommodations for individuals with disabilities are available upon request when the request is
made at least 72 hours in advance. Please contact Administration at 763-706-3610 to make arrangements.
2
Columbia Heights City Council and Staff Norms
While we are accountable to each other for these norms, the Mayor and City Manager will help
us adhere to them with respectful reminders and reinforcement as needed.
Behavioral Norms
1. We will assume others best intentions.
2. We will exercise humility.
3. We will praise publicly and criticize privately.
4. We will focus on the policy and not personalities.
5. We will do our best to de-escalate contentious interactions.
6. We will provide reasonable notice to the Mayor and City Manager of any changes or additions
we wish to make at a Council meeting so that the Mayor is prepared to manage the meeting.
7. We will show respect for one another by:
a. Paying attention to others when they are speaking.
b. Not interrupting others.
c. Listening to understand others, not simply to respond to them.
d. Honoring each other in public and protecting one another in their absence.
e. Not bullying others.
Operational Norms
1. Council members and staff will respect the Mayor’s role to chair our meetings by:
a. Waiting to be called on before speaking so that others can consider our contributions.
b. The Mayor and City Manager will bring closure to policy discussions, public comment, and
other similar “final word” situations.
2. Once a decision has been made by the Council, we will support the implementation of that
decision even if we did not support the decision itself.
3. If Council has a request of staff, they will direct their request to the City Manager and the
Division Director for coordination with staff unless the City Manager decides otherwise.
4. If Council has a question about a staff member, they will raise that with the City Manager
privately before raising it publicly.
5. When Council is considering a topic, it is incumbent upon Council members to ask sufficient
questions to ensure they are making informed decisions.
6. Council and staff will address each other by their titles when engaging each other in any official
capacity and will use first names in informal settings.
3
ITEM: Group Ice Breaker: What is your appreciation language in the workplace?
Words of affirmation, quality time, acts of service, tangible gifts, physical touch (appropriate,
consensual gestures, e.g. handshake, high five).
Presenting Item: Amáda Márquez Simula, Mayor
DEPARTMENT: Administration BY/DATE: Sara Ion / February 25, 2026
CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below)
_Community that Grows with Purpose and Equity
_High Quality Public Spaces
_Safe, Accessible and Built for Everyone
_Engaged, Effective and Forward-Thinking
_Resilient and Prosperous Economy
_Inclusive and Connected Community
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION
MEETING DATE MARCH 2, 2026
4
Item 1.
ITEM: Just Cause Tenant Protections Follow-up
Presenting Item: Aaron Chirpich, City Manager
DEPARTMENT: Adminstration BY/DATE: Aaron Chirpich / February 26, 2026
CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below)
X Community that Grows with Purpose and Equity
_High Quality Public Spaces
X Safe, Accessible and Built for Everyone
X Engaged, Effective and Forward-Thinking
_Resilient and Prosperous Economy
_Inclusive and Connected Community
BACKGROUND
The Council has expressed interest in ordinance updates that enhance tenant protections in the City of
Columbia Heights. In this regard, one option to consider is a just cause protection ordinance. Just cause tenant
protection ordinances are local regulations that require landlords to provide a valid, specified reason (“just
cause”) before terminating a residential tenancy or choosing not to renew a lease. These ordinances are
intended to promote housing stability by protecting tenants from arbitrary or ret aliatory evictions while still
preserving a landlord’s ability to manage and maintain their property. Under a typical just cause ordinance,
landlords may end a tenancy only for defined reasons, which commonly include nonpayment of rent, violation
of lease terms, illegal activity, failure to allow lawful access, or the landlord’s intent to occupy or substantially
renovate the property.
Just cause ordinances do not prevent evictions; rather, they establish clear standards and procedures that
balance tenant protections with property owner rights. Communities that have adopted just cause ordinances
often to cite increased housing stability, reduced displacement, and clearer expectations for both tenants and
landlords. Careful ordinance design is important to ensure compliance with state law and to avoid unintended
impacts on housing providers.
SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS
The Council last discussed just cause tenant protections at the January 2026 work session. The consensus of
the Council at that time was to direct staff to draft an ordinance for consideration by the Council within the
first quarter of the year. Following the work session, staff were contacted by representatives from the
Minnesota Multi Housing Association (MHA). MHA is an organization representing the multi -family rental
housing industry and they provide support to the industry through public policy leadership, education, and
networking. MHA contacted the City because they had learned of the City’s intent to pursue a just cause
tenant protection ordinance. Through a conference call, staff learned that MHA opposes just cause ordinances
and MHA expressed their desire to share their concerns with the Council. For a full breakdown of concerns
stated by MHA, please see the attached summary memo from their organization.
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION ITEMS
MEETING DATE MARCH 2ND, 2026
5
Item 2.
City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 2
Staff updated the Council at the February work session regarding the outreach by MHA and suggested to the
Council that the City invite MHA to an upcoming work session to hear their perspective. The Council agreed to
this approach but also asked staff to invite a tenant advocacy representative to provide a balanced perspective
on the next round of deliberation. To this end, staff reached out to Home Line, a nonprofit tenant advocacy
organization that provides legal support, organizing, and advocacy services to Minnesota renters. Staff from
MHA and Home Line will attend the work session to present their perspective to the Council.
Correction: The staff report for the January work session indicated that the City of Minneapolis has enacted a
just cause tenant protection ordinance. This assertion is incorrect and was brought to the attention of staff by
MHA representatives. Minneapolis did consider a just cause ordinance in 2021 that did not pass; however,
they have implemented other significant tenant protection ordinances that cap security deposits, limit tenant
screening criteria, and impose requirements for specific notifications/disclosures by landlords.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend giving both MHA and Home Line representatives time to share their perspectives on just
cause tenant protections and ask follow up questions before providing direction to staff on next steps.
Requested Council Action/ Discussion Topics / Key Questions
(Briefly state the specific action staff is requesting of the City Council, if any. For example: provide
direction, discuss options, or review information.)
Following the work session discussion, staff would like direction on how to move forward with the
proposed just cause ordinance.
ATTACHMENT(S)
MHA memorandum
HF 997
Home Line presentation
6
Item 2.
1
To: Aaron Chirpich, Columbia Heights City Administrator
From: Minnesota Multi Housing Association
Date: February 10, 2026
Re: Feedback on Just Cause Non-Renewal Proposal
Background
The city council has expressed a goal of addressing alleged racial disparities in lease non-
renewals. A draft policy under consideration appears to draw on Minnesota House File 997 (HF
997), a state bill introduced in 2025 that would require landlords to show just cause before
issuing a termination notice or refusing to renew a lease. The bill’s text identifies specific
permissible reasons for non-renewal or termination, such as non-payment of rent, repeated late
payment, material lease breach, and other enumerated grounds.
This bill was never given a hearing in the House Housing Committee, either last year or in prior
years of introduction. HF4440, introduced February 29, 2024, is substantially similar to HF 997.
This bill was never given a hearing despite full DFL control of the Legislature at that time.
We are using HF 997 as the basis for our comments below:
HF 997 Key Provisions
Under HF 997, landlords could terminate or refuse renewal only for specified reasons, including:
1. Nonpayment of rent (after cure period).
2. Repeated late rent payments (five times in 12 months).
3. Material breach of the lease (after notice and cure opportunity).
4. Tenant refuses to renew or extend when asked in writing.
5. Landlord or family occupancy in good faith.
6. Withdrawal from market (with notice, relocation assistance, and reporting).
7. Rehabilitation/renovation when unit is uninhabitable.
8. Government order to vacate (e.g., condemnation).
9. Occupancy contingent on employment (position terminated).
These provisions, if adopted locally, would constrain a landlord’s ability to exercise discretion
over lease renewals.
7
Item 2.
2
Primary Concerns from Rental Housing Providers
1. Limited Ability to Address Harassment and Safety Threats
HF 997’s enumerated just causes do not include conduct that does not rise to a “material
breach” of the lease but nonetheless seriously impacts safety or well-being, such as:
• Racially or sexually motivated harassment, verbal abuse, or hostile conduct by a tenant
toward minority staff or other residents that does not technically violate written lease
terms.
• Ongoing hostile behavior (e.g., name-calling, intimidation) that creates an unsafe
environment for employees or other tenants but does not clearly fit the current statutory
“material breach” or “nonpayment/late payment” categories.
Under such a regime, landlords could be unable to non-renew a tenant whose conduct, while
discriminatory or hostile, does not neatly fit one of the listed categories — even if that conduct
has the real effect of driving minority staff or residents from the property, and the net effect of
these circumstances would provide less housing stability.
Furthermore, housing providers are obligated under employment law to provide a safe and
harassment-free workplace for their employees. If enacted this ordinance would conflict with
their ability to provide that work environment.
Implication: Providers may be forced to retain harmful tenants or pursue formal eviction
proceedings (which are costlier and take time), undermining the council’s stated public safety,
housing stability, and equity goals.
2. Interaction with State and Federal Anti-Discrimination Laws
Federal and state fair housing laws already prohibit discrimination based on race and other
protected classes. A just cause policy that restricts non-renewal without clear mechanisms to
account for discriminatory conduct could paradoxically limit landlords’ ability to address
racially harassing tenants, even while the law intends to combat discrimination.
• Providers must still comply with fair housing law; policies that impede their ability to
maintain a safe, non-discriminatory environment could create conflicting obligations.
3. Burdensome Compliance and Withdrawal Requirements
The withdrawal provision in HF 997 (Subd. 7) requires:
• Filing notice with the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency.
• 180-day notice and one month’s relocation assistance.
8
Item 2.
3
• Potential liability if units are re-rented within five years (subject to damages/attorney’s
fees).
These requirements could deter legitimate property conversions or reinvestment in the housing
stock. They would add enormous friction for any single-family home being placed on the market.
4. Legal Concerns
A just-cause nonrenewal ordinance raises serious constitutional concerns under both the Contract
Clause and the Takings Clause. Residential leases are enforceable contracts with defined terms,
including the right of both parties to allow the lease to expire. By prohibiting nonrenewal absent
narrowly defined “just cause,” the ordinance substantially impairs existing contractual
expectations and effectively converts fixed-term leases into indefinite tenancies. This is
especially problematic when applied to existing leases, where owners priced rents, screened
residents, and made investment decisions based on the ability to regain possession at lease end.
In addition, forcing landlords to continue housing residents beyond the agreed term interferes
with the fundamental right to exclude and significantly restricts property use, raising regulatory
takings concerns—particularly where the ordinance shifts the public burden of housing stability
onto a discrete group of private property owners without compensation.
5. Litigation Risk.
These concerns are not hypothetical. In 2022, portions of St. Paul’s tenant protection
ordinance—including just-cause provisions—were challenged in federal court, and a federal
judge issued an injunction preventing enforcement. As a result, the city rescinded the ordinance
rather than continue litigation. That case illustrates the real legal exposure cities face when local
tenant regulations go beyond procedural rules and materially alter contract rights and property
interests already governed by state law. Any municipality considering a similar ordinance should
expect comparable constitutional challenges, significant litigation costs, and the risk that the
policy will be enjoined before achieving its intended goals.
Conclusion
While well-intentioned, a strict just cause non-renewal requirement based on HF 997 could have
unintended consequences that hamper reasonable property management, inhibit responses to
harassment and safety threats, and undermine housing quality and stability.
9
Item 2.
1.1 A bill for an act
1.2 relating to civil law; requiring landlords to provide just cause for terminating
1.3 tenancy; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 504B.
1.4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.5 Section 1. [504B.277] TERMINATING THE TENANCY; JUST CAUSE REQUIRED.
1.6 Subdivision 1.Just cause required.A landlord must not issue a notice terminating a
1.7 tenancy or refuse to renew a lease unless the landlord establishes one or more of the grounds
1.8 for termination described in subdivisions 2 to 10. The landlord must provide the tenant with
1.9 sufficient written notice consistent with the lease requirements but not less than a full rental
1.10 period or in compliance with section 504B.135, describing the reason for terminating the
1.11 tenancy.
1.12 Subd. 2.Nonpayment of rent.The tenant fails to cure the deficiency after receiving a
1.13 nonpayment notice from the landlord, and the landlord does not pursue a valid nonpayment
1.14 eviction action under section 504B.291, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), but decides to terminate
1.15 the tenancy at the end of the lease.
1.16 Subd. 3.Repeated late payment of rent.The tenant repeatedly makes late payments
1.17 of rent, at least five times in a 12-month period. The landlord must provide the tenant with
1.18 notice following a late payment that a subsequent late payment may be grounds for
1.19 termination of the tenancy.
1.20 Subd. 4.Material breach.After receiving a written notice from the landlord, the tenant
1.21 fails to stop the action that is a material breach of the lease or fails to take action that would
1.22 cure the deficiency.
1Section 1.
REVISOR MS/ES 25-0238102/10/25
State of MinnesotaThis Document can be made available
in alternative formats upon request
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
H. F. No. 997NINETY-FOURTH SESSION
Authored by Agbaje and Kozlowski02/17/2025
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Housing Finance and Policy
10
Item 2.
2.1 Subd. 5.Refusal to renew.The tenant refuses to renew or extend the lease after the
2.2 landlord requests in writing that the tenant renew or extend the lease.
2.3 Subd. 6.Occupancy by landlord or family member.The landlord, in good faith, seeks
2.4 to recover possession of the rental unit so that the landlord or a family member may occupy
2.5 the unit as the landlord's or the family member's principal residence.
2.6 Subd. 7.Withdrawal from market; building demolishment and dwelling unit
2.7 conversion.(a) The landlord seeks to withdraw the rental property from the residential
2.8 rental market for the following reasons:
2.9 (1) to demolish the property; convert the property into a cooperative, provided the
2.10 landlord complies with the provisions of chapter 515B; or convert the property into a
2.11 nonresidential use, provided the landlord obtains the necessary permits before terminating
2.12 the tenancy;
2.13 (2) to, in good faith, recover the unit to sell it in accordance with a condominium
2.14 conversion, provided the landlord complies with the provisions of chapter 515B; or
2.15 (3) to convert the unit into a subsidized unit under a local, state, or federal housing
2.16 program and the tenant does not qualify to rent the unit under that program.
2.17 (b) A landlord who wishes to withdraw a rental property must:
2.18 (1) file a notice of intent to withdraw with the commissioner of the Minnesota Housing
2.19 Finance Agency;
2.20 (2) provide tenants with 180-day notice prior to the termination of the tenancy; and
2.21 (3) provide one month's rent as a relocation fee to the tenant 30 days prior to withdrawal.
2.22 (c) If the landlord offers units for rent in the withdrawn rental property within five years
2.23 following the withdrawal, the commissioner, the attorney general, or a tenant that was
2.24 removed from the rental property may sue for damages and attorney fees on behalf of
2.25 removed residents.
2.26 Subd. 8.Rehabilitation and renovation.The landlord seeks, in good faith, to recover
2.27 possession of the dwelling unit to complete rehabilitation or renovation work that would
2.28 render the unit uninhabitable for the duration of the rehabilitation or renovation.
2.29 Subd. 9.Complying with government order to vacate.The landlord is complying
2.30 with a government agency's order to vacate, order to abate, or any other order that necessitates
2.31 vacating the dwelling unit.
2Section 1.
REVISOR MS/ES 25-0238102/10/25
11
Item 2.
3.1 Subd. 10.Occupancy conditioned on employment.The tenant's occupancy in the
3.2 dwelling unit is conditioned upon employment on the rental property and the employment
3.3 relationship is terminated.
3.4 Subd. 11.Lease amendments.Nothing in this section alters the landlord and tenant's
3.5 ability to amend the terms of a lease as otherwise allowed by law.
3Section 1.
REVISOR MS/ES 25-0238102/10/25
12
Item 2.
Just Cause
HOME Line
13
Item 2.
Presentation Outline
●What is Just Cause
●How does it help tenants
●Examples of Just Cause currently in place in Minnesota
●Proposed legislation
HOME Line
14
Item 2.
What Is Just Cause
HOME Line
15
Item 2.
What Is Just Cause
●The landlord may not terminate a tenancy or refuse to renew a lease
unless the landlord has a valid reason
●Valid reasons would be defined by law or ordinance
●The goal is to prevent arbitrary, retaliatory, or discriminatory lease
terminations
●Still allow landlords to terminate leases and file evictions for cause
HOME Line
16
Item 2.
Just Cause Doesn’t Prohibit Eviction
●Racially or sexually motivated harassment, verbal abuse, or hostile
conduct by a tenant would be grounds for an eviction
●Ongoing hostile behavior that truly creates an unsafe environment for
employees or other tenants would be grounds for an eviction
●Many types of leases (e.g. subsidized housing) already have just cause and
are able to evict when they need to
HOME Line
17
Item 2.
How Does Just Cause Help
HOME Line
18
Item 2.
How Does Just Cause Help
●Improves housing and community stability
●Strengthens all tenant protections
●Helps prevent discrimination
HOME Line
19
Item 2.
Stable Housing Is a Good Thing
●Just Cause helps tenants maintain stable housing
●Unstable housing is worse for tenants and their families
○Medical care is worse
○Education is worse
○Homelessness is worse
●Many of these issues affect all of us, not just the tenant and their
immediate family
HOME Line
20
Item 2.
Just Cause Strengthens All Tenant Protections
●Retaliation is a real concern for tenants
○The law prevents retaliation in most but not all cases
○However, the burden of proof is often on the tenant
○Asserting retaliation is often too risky
●The most common way to retaliate against a tenant is to non-renew them
●Fear of retaliation prevents tenants from asserting their rights
HOME Line
21
Item 2.
Just Cause Helps Prevent Discrimination
●Like retaliation, discrimination is illegal, but the burden of proof is
generally on the tenant
●One of the most common way to discriminate against an existing tenant is
to non-renew them
●Just Cause makes discriminating in this way more difficult
HOME Line
22
Item 2.
Current Examples of Just Cause
HOME Line
23
Item 2.
Leases That Already Require Just Cause
●Certain types of federally subsidized housing
○Public Housing
○Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs
○Low Income Housing Tax Credit
●Mobile and manufactured homes in mobile home parks
●Affordable housing units in Brooklyn Center
HOME Line
24
Item 2.
Public Housing
“Management shall terminate the Lease or refuse to renew the Lease or evict
the Tenant Family from the Unit only for serious or repeated violations of
Material term of the Lease or other good cause.”
Minneapolis Public Housing Authority Lease
HOME Line
25
Item 2.
Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs
“Grounds. The owner may not terminate any tenancy except upon the
following grounds:”
24 CFR 880.607
“An owner must not refuse to renew a lease solely because a lease term has
expired.”
HUD Handbook No. 4350.3 ¶ 8 -12(C)
HOME Line
26
Item 2.
Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)
“Owner/Landlord may not evict or terminate the tenancy (including refusing to
renew this Lease or refusing to enter into a new lease on substantially the
same terms) except for good cause.”
Minnesota Housing Low Income Housing Tax Credit Lease Rider
HOME Line
27
Item 2.
Mobile Home Parks
“Cause required.A park owner may recover possession of land upon which a
manufactured home is situated only for a reason specified in this section or
section 327C.095.”
Minn. Stat. 327C.09, subd. 1
HOME Line
28
Item 2.
Brooklyn Center
“Just Cause Notice.An owner of an affordable housing unit shall not issue a
notice of nonrenewal of tenancy, refuse to renew, or issue a notice to quit
unless the owner is able to establish one or more of the follow grounds for
such action:”
Brooklyn Center City Ordinance 12-912D(5)(a)
HOME Line
29
Item 2.
Questions?
HOME Line
30
Item 2.
ITEM: Overview of Proposed Provisional License for 3932 Central Ave NE (10 Minutes)
Daniel O’Brien, Fire Chief
DEPARTMENT: Department Name BY/DATE: Daniel O’Brien / February 25, 2026
CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below)
_Community that Grows with Purpose and Equity
_High Quality Public Spaces
XSafe, Accessible and Built for Everyone
_Engaged, Effective and Forward-Thinking
_Resilient and Prosperous Economy
_Inclusive and Connected Community
BACKGROUND
The property located at 3932 Central Ave NE, commonly known as Theatre Heights Apartments, was
previously owned and operated by the Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc. (ACCAP). In 2023,
ACCAP retained BKBM Engineers to conduct a structural assessme nt due to concerns regarding cracking and
settlement. The resulting Structural Assessment dated October 27, 2023 documented settlement -related
serviceability distress, including reopening and widening cracks at the northwest corner, cracking in CMU
walls, slab cracking, bowing of exterior masonry, and interior finish cracking. The report recommended crack
repair and quarterly monitoring but did not declare the building structurally unsafe.
ACCAP relocated tenants and sold the property to MYH LLC on November 11, 2025. After purchase, the new
owner began placing tenants in the building without a rental license. On December 3, 2025, the owner was
notified that occupancy without a rental license was unlawful and that structural issues would need to be
addressed prior to license issuance. On December 22, 2025, inspectors confirmed additional tenants had been
placed in the building. The owner was administratively cited for unlawful occupancy on January 23, 2026. The
initial citation has been paid.
Following enforcement action, the owner retained BKBM Engineers for a follow-up Structural Observation
dated January 14, 2026 (letter dated January 16, 2026). The 2026 report again concluded the building is
experiencing settlement-related serviceability distress but noted no broad new settlement between 2023 and
2026, except for progressive widening of a crack at the west stairwell wall intersection. The report
recommended continued crack repair, quarterly monitoring, and recurring structural condition assessments
every 2–3 years.
The owner has since worked with the City’s Building Official and has passed an initial rental licensing
inspection.
SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS
Both engineering reports conclude:
The building exhibits settlement-related serviceability distress.
Observations are limited to visual inspection; no structural analysis was performed.
The building was not declared structurally unsafe.
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION
MEETING DATE MARCH 2, 2026
31
Item 3.
City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 2
Ongoing monitoring is recommended.
Periodic licensed structural assessments every 2–3 years are recommended.
The 2023 report documented active crack reopening and widening.
The 2026 report indicates most interior repairs have held and no broad new settlement was observed;
however, progressive widening at one exterior wall intersection remains documented.
The Building Official has reviewed both engineering reports and current site conditions. Based on the reports
and inspection findings, staff believe the structure does not meet the threshold for condemnation or unsafe
building action under state law. However, the documented history of settlement, prior unlawful occupancy,
and the progressive widening of a structural crack warrant enhanced oversight.
To balance public safety, housing continuity, and proportional enforcement, staff are proposing issuance of a
Provisional Rental License with enforceable structural monitoring conditions.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Building Official and Rental Licensing Division recommend issuance of a Provisional Rental License subject
to the following conditions:
1. Quarterly Monitoring Requirement.
The owner shall implement and document quarterly structural monitoring of the building consistent
with the recommendations of BKBM Engineers in the 2023 and 2026 reports. Monitoring may be
performed by the property owner, a designated maintenance supervisor, o r a qualified third-party
building professional.
2. City Approval of Inspector Qualifications.
Prior to performing monitoring, the proposed inspector’s qualifications shall be submitted to the City
for review and written approval. The owner shall provide docu mentation sufficient for the City to
determine whether the individual possesses adequate experience in commercial or multifamily
building inspection, construction, or structural observation. Monitoring performed by an individual not
approved in writing by the City shall not satisfy this condition.
3. Monitoring Documentation and Reporting.
Each quarterly inspection shall include:
Dated photographic documentation of all previously identified crack locations and areas of
concern;
Measurement of crack width where observable;
Written comparison to prior monitoring reports identifying any new cracks or enlargement of
existing cracks; and
Submission to the City within fifteen (15) days of each quarterly inspection.
4. Mandatory Professional Engineering Evaluation Upon Movement.
If new structural cracks are observed, or enlargement of previously documented cracks is identified,
the owner shall notify the City within ten (10) business days and retain a Minnesota -licensed
Professional Engineer to evaluate the condition with in thirty (30) days. Written findings shall be
submitted to the City.
5. Recurring Structural Assessment.
The owner shall retain a Minnesota-licensed Professional Engineer to conduct a comprehensive
structural condition assessment no later than January 31, 2028, and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed three (3) years unless otherwise directed by the City.
32
Item 3.
City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 3
6. Exterior Envelope Repairs.
All exterior caulking, flashing, and foundation interface sealing deficiencies identified in the 2023 and
2026 engineering reports shall be repaired within ninety (90) days of license issuance, subject to City
verification.
Policy Rationale
This approach:
Aligns with the recommendations of both engineering reports.
Preserves housing while maintaining structured oversight.
Creates measurable compliance benchmarks.
Provides escalation triggers if structural movement continues.
Protects the City from inaction risk without overreaching beyond documented findings.
Council direction is requested regarding the proposed provisional license framework prior to scheduling
formal license action.
Requested Council Action/ Discussion Topics / Key Questions
Staff requests that council have a brief discussion regarding the background and conditions for a proposed
provisional rental license for the property due to structural concerns.
ATTACHMENT(S)
BKBM Engineers Structural Assessment – October 27, 2023
BKBM Engineers Structural Observation – January 14, 2026
Resolution 2026-014 Provisional License_draft
33
Item 3.
February 16, 2024
Barbara Sopp
Housing Director
Anoka County Community Action Program
121 89th Avenue Northeast, Suite 345
Blaine, Minnesota 55434
Re: Anoka County Community Action Program, Inc
Theatre Heights Structural Assessment
Commission No. 242007
Dear Barbara:
We are pleased to submit the Structural Assessment for the ACCAP property, Theatre Heights
Apartments, located at 3932 Central Avenue Northeast in Columbia Heights, Minnesota.
The attached Assessment was developed by our structural engineer, BKBM Engineers, and includes
updated information based on our site visit on October 27, 2023. The visual assessment of the
existing structure was performed as a follow up from our facility condition assessment done in
November of 2020 that outlined some of the issues that were reassessed in this report.
As outlined in attached Assessment from BKBM, it is recommended that ACCAP provide some
on-going maintenance and repair to existing cracks in addition to long-term monitoring of the
building for signs of additional settlement. It is recommended that this on-going monitoring be
performed once every three months. Please let us know if you have any questions regarding the
recommendations. We are happy to provide additional information or connect you with contacts
who might be able to perform the routine monitoring recommended in the Report.
Sincerely,
Wold Architects and Engineers
Jake Wollensak | AIA
Associate
Attachment
cc: Joel Dunning, Wold
EM/GOV-MN-Anoka/ACCAP/Theatre Heights/242007/Admin/Letters/2024.02.16 Letter to Barbara Sopp
34
Item 3.
Page 1
February 16, 2024
Wold Architects and Engineers
332 Minnesota Street
Suite W2000
St. Paul, MN 55101
Re: Theater Heights Apartments
3932 Central Avenue NE
Columbia Heights, MN 55421
BKBM Project No. 24139.00
We were contacted to observe the existing structural condition of the above-mentioned property to
observe cracks in the existing walls and slab on grade. On October 27, 2023 around 9:00 am, we met with
Wold and ACCAP to make general observations about the condition of the existing structure. BKBM had
previously met with Wold and ACCAP in August of 2020 to observe conditions. Existing renovation
drawings assembled by Darwin Lindahl, AIA Architect dated January 10, 1994 were provided for the
2020 observation that included architectural, mechanical, and electrical for the building, and structural
drawings of the front entry stoop. BKBM still had these drawings for the 2023 observation visit, but no
additional drawings were provided.
Existing Structure
No existing structural drawings were provided for the observation. It is our understanding that the
building was an existing hotel or motel built sometime around 1959 that was converted into housing. The
building appeared to be a flat roof that sloped to the west side of the building. Based on observed
structure at a pipe penetration in the boiler room, it appeared that the floor framing is some type of wood
joist or truss system spanning east-west from the exterior of the building to the corridor. The building
faces Central Ave. on the east side and is situated on a hill that drops down in elevation to the west some
estimated 20 feet beyond the parking lot to an alley on the west side.
Observations
Our observations of the structure were limited in that most of the structure was hidden behind the brick
and stucco at the exterior and gyp/plaster walls and ceilings at the interior. A flashlight and camera were
used to assist in our observations. Our observations were focused on what we could see.
Through our limited observations, we saw several signs of structural distress around the perimeter and
interior of the building.
We observed cracks in exterior brick at the north side of the building around the stair well and at the
northwest corner of the building. Cracks appeared to have been repaired but some showed signs of
reopening. Additional movement was not noticeable at brick on the west side of the building since the
2020 observation. The northwest corner of the building appeared to have signs of movement since 2020,
see images 1 and 2. Patching material in place at the 2020 observation within the vertical cracks appeared
to have fallen out and the cracks appear to have widened.
The brick veneer at the east side of the building mostly appeared to be intact, although the brick appeared
to bow out eastward towards the street at the lower level up to about the elevation of the windowsill of the
level above.
35
Item 3.
Page 2
We observed additional cracks in the stucco that occurred at vents and windows. It appeared that
caulking around windows, AC units, joints, etc. had deteriorated at several locations around the perimeter
of the building.
In the laundry room, large cracks in the slab on grade both parallel and perpendicular to the exterior west
wall were observed. The slab on grade sloped downwards towards the exterior west wall of the building
from the parallel crack. A similar sloping down to the west was observed in one of the units on the upper
floor. At the time of the observation in 2020, some of the cracks had been patched. Cracks were still
visible in the patch at that time, but additional cracking within the patches running parallel to the west
wall was observed in 2023, see images 3 and 4.
In the boiler room, stairstep and horizontal cracks in the east-west CMU walls were observed. Cracks
were observed in the slab as well. The CMU walls along the south side of the boiler room appeared to be
bowing into the building. We could not tell from the observed cracking if additional movement had
occurred in comparison to the 2020 observation.
Cracks in the finishes at the corridor extending up from the door jamb across the corridor ceiling and
down to a door jamb on the opposite side of the corridor were observed at several locations throughout
the building. Per conversations with ACCAP on site, cracks in the corridor had been patched and had
reopened, particularly at the 3rd level. At the time of both observations, cracking through existing patches
was observed.
We observed damage in several units on the lower level of the building. Per the existing 1994 renovation
drawings, these were Units 1, 2, and 5. Units 1 and 5 are located along the east side of the building facing
Central Ave., with Unit 1 located at the northeast corner of the building and Unit 5 towards the south end
of the building. Unit 2 is located at the northwest corner of the building.
In Unit 1, the following was observed (see images 5-6):
• Diagonal crack in finishes extending from the AC unit to the adjacent window header on the
north wall. The crack extended horizontally above the window.
• Cracking in finishes extending from the northeast corner at the ceiling to the north header jamb at
the window on the east wall.
• Cracking in finishes from the south header jamb at the window on the east wall that extended to
the interior bathroom wall, and a horizontal crack extending from that corner to the bathroom
door header. The crack reflected through to the bathroom side of the wall.
• Wedge shaped separation in wood paneling in the bathroom, with the wider separation nearest the
ceiling.
• Patching of the ceiling finishes, indicating that damage may have been repaired prior to BKBM
observation.
• Wedge shaped crack at the stucco/brick interface on the north side of the building along the west
side of the windows on the exterior wall.
In Unit 2, the following was observed:
• Horizontal crack in finishes in bathroom near the light fixtures.
• Patching of the ceiling finishes, indicating that damage may have been repaired prior to BKBM
observation.
• Unit 2 was unoccupied and had recently been cleaned and renovated prior to BKBM observation.
36
Item 3.
Page 3
In Unit 5, the following was observed (see images 7-8):
• Diagonal crack in finishes in bathroom near the light fixtures extending from the east wall up by
the corner of the room down towards the light fixture.
• Cracking in finishes from the north header jamb at the window on the east wall inside the
bathroom that extended to the interior bathroom wall, and a horizontal crack extending from that
corner to the bathroom door header. The crack reflected through to the bathroom side of the wall.
A vertical crack extended along the intersection of the two walls.
• Horizontal crack in the finish below the window inside the living room with vertical cracks at
jambs on both sides of the window, with buckling of finishes on the south side of the window
adjacent to the interior bathroom wall.
• Horizontal cracking in the wall finish below the AC unit, extending from the windowsill to the
interior wall at the corner of the room. The finish appeared buckled along the crack near the
interior wall intersection.
• Patching of the ceiling finishes, particularly in the kitchen, indicating that damage may have been
repaired prior to BKBM observation.
At the north side of the entry stair at the northeast corner of the building, there was a horizontal gap
between the bottom of the stair concrete and the pavement.
Failed caulking/sealant with gaps between the building foundation and pavement along the east and south
sides of the building (see image 9). Flashing along the west side of the building was damaged or missing.
Discussion
No analysis was performed for the scope of this observation. Based on our observation, it appears that the
building is experiencing serviceability issues due to settlement, most prominently along the east and west
exterior walls. Water intrusion along the foundations could be a potential cause for the settlement.
Recommendations
As was the case in 2020, we recommend repairing cracks and caulk joints. Long-term monitoring of the
building for additional settlement should be done quarterly. This will help aid in determining the
magnitude of continuing building settlement. Additional surveying of the grade around the building may
aid in determining how best to move water away from the building envelope efficiently to help limit
further building settlement and movement.
Disclaimer
This report does not express or imply any warranty of the structure but only addresses the condition of the
portion that was readily accessible and observable at the time of investigation. The opinions and
recommendations contained in this report are based on information provided by the Owner and on limited
field investigations performed as a part of this project. This report does not address any portion of the
structure other than those areas mentioned.
The following services and responsibilities are specifically excluded from this report:
1. Discovery, testing, monitoring, clean-up or neutralization of mold, pollutants, or hazardous substances.
2. Determinations or advisement related to the existence or proportion of asbestos, modifications,
installation, abatement or removal of a product, material or process containing asbestos.
3. This report has been prepared exclusively for this project. Without our written approval, we assume
no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluations and recommendations may not
be appropriate for other parties.
37
Item 3.
Page 4
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
BKBM ENGINEERS
Andrew P Morgan, P.E. Direct Line: (763) 843-0458
MN Registration Number 56698
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
F:\24\24139\Correspondence\Letters\ACCAP Theater Heights 2023 letter.docx
38
Item 3.
Page 5
Image 1: Northwest corner cracking, August 2020 Image 2: Northwest corner cracking, October 2023
39
Item 3.
Page 6
Image 3: Laundry room cracks, August 2020 Image 4: Laundry room cracks, October 2023
40
Item 3.
Page 7
Image 5: Cracking at Northeast corner of Unit 1, October 2023
41
Item 3.
Page 8
Image 6: Separation at wood paneling in Unit 1, October 2023
42
Item 3.
Page 9
Image 7: Horizontal crack below windowsill in Unit 5, October 2023
43
Item 3.
Page 10
Image 8: Cracking and buckling of finishes in Unit 5, October 2023
44
Item 3.
Page 11
Image 9 – Failed caulking at southeast corner of the building, October 2023
45
Item 3.
6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700
Minneapolis, MN 55430
3507 Ringsby Court, Suite 105
Denver, CO 80216
January 16, 2026
Muhammed Abumayyaleh
MYH LLC
1880 Old Hudson Road
Attn ofc
Saint Paul, MN 55119
Re: 3932 Central Avenue NE
Columbia Heights, MN 55421
BKBM Project No. 26189.00
We were contacted to observe the existing structural condition of the above-mentioned
property to observe cracks in the existing walls and slab on grade. On January 14th, 2026
around 9:30 am, we met with Muhammed Abumayyaleh to make general observations
about the condition of the existing structure. BKBM had previously met with Wold and
ACCAP in August of 2020 and October of 2023 to observe conditions. Existing renovation
drawings assembled by Darwin Lindahl, AIA Architect dated January 10, 1994 were
provided for the 2020 observation that included architectural, mechanical, and electrical
for the building, and structural drawings of the front entry stoop. BKBM still had these
drawings for the 2026 observation visit, but no additional drawings were provided.
Existing Structure
No existing structural drawings were provided for the observation. It is our understanding
that the building was an existing hotel or motel built sometime around 1959 that was
converted into housing. The building appeared to be a flat roof that sloped to the west side
of the building. Based on observed structure at a pipe penetration in the boiler room, it
appeared that the floor framing is some type of wood joist or truss system spanning east-
west from the exterior of the building to the corridor. The building faces Central Ave. on the
east side and is situated on a hill that drops down in elevation to the west some estimated
20 feet beyond the parking lot to an alley on the west side.
Observations
Our observations of the structure were limited in that most of the structure was hidden
behind the brick and stucco at the exterior and gyp/plaster walls and ceilings at the
interior. A flashlight and camera were used to assist in our observations. Our observations
were focused on what we could see.
46
Item 3.
Page 2
Through our limited observations, we saw several signs of structural distress around the
perimeter and interior of the building.
We observed cracks in exterior brick at the north side of the building around the stair well
and at the northwest corner of the building. Cracks appeared to have been repaired but
some showed signs of reopening. Brick repair had been done prior to BKBM’s 2020 visit,
and no visual signs of movement were noted in 2023 and again in 2026. However, there is
a large crack at the intersection of the southwest corner of the west stair well wall and east
edge of the north wall. Repairs at that location appear to have been done in the past, but
gaps between the walls have since opened. Gaps start roughly 8-10ft from the top of the
wall and widen towards the roof. From photo evidence it appears that the gaps have
opened since BKBM’s 2020 observation to 2023 and have continued to widen since the
2023 observation.
The brick veneer at the east side of the building mostly appeared to be intact, although the
brick appeared to bow out eastward towards the street at the lower level up to about the
elevation of the windowsill of the level above.
We observed additional cracks in the stucco that occurred at vents and windows. It
appeared that caulking around windows, AC units, joints, etc. had deteriorated at several
locations around the perimeter of the building.
In the laundry room, large cracks in the slab on grade both parallel and perpendicular to
the exterior west wall were observed in the previous observations. However, for this 2026
observation a roughly 2’-0” section of the slab on grade parallel to the wall had been
removed and replaced to repair the parallel crack. The perpendicular crack could still be
seen on either side patch, but no signs of additional movement were noted in the
perpendicular cracks from what was observed in 2023.
In the boiler room, stairstep and horizontal cracks in the east-west CMU walls were
observed. Cracks were observed in the slab as well. The CMU walls along the south side of
the boiler room appeared to be bowing into the building. We could not tell from the
observed cracking if additional movement had occurred in comparison to the 2023
observation. There were no signs of new cracks that had occurred since the 2023 visit.
Cracks in the finishes at the corridor extending up from the door jamb across the corridor
ceiling and down to a door jamb on the opposite side of the corridor were observed at
several locations throughout the building. Per conversations with Muhammed on site,
cracks in the corridor had been patched and repainted the previous fall. At the time of this
observation, the majority of the cracks had not appeared to have reopened since the repair
work had been done. There were locations near unit 7, 17, and 20 that showed signs of
cracks reopening through the paint/repairs.
47
Item 3.
Page 3
We reobserved several units on the lower level of the building that had been observed by
BKBM for signs of structural distress in 2023. Per the existing 1994 renovation drawings,
these were Units 1, 2, and 5. Units 1 and 5 are located along the east side of the building
facing Central Ave., with Unit 1 located at the northeast corner of the building and Unit 5
towards the south end of the building. Unit 2 is located at the northwest corner of the
building.
In Unit 1, the following was observed:
• Wedge shaped separation in wood paneling in the bathroom, with the wider
separation nearest the ceiling.
• Warping of wood paneling in the living room space along the north exterior wall of
the building.
• Patching of the ceiling and wall finishes, indicating that damage may have been
repaired prior to BKBM observation. Patching and previous crack locations were
noticeable, but little to no signs of movement/cracks reopening after the repairs
had taken place was noted.
o Some of the ceiling repair had been in place prior to BKBM’s 2023 visit. It
was unclear if repair was from then or had been redone since BKBM’s
previous visit.
o There was one crack that occurred in the ceiling extending out from the
reentrant corner where the kitchen meets the living room space.
• Wedge shaped crack at the stucco/brick interface on the north side of the building
along the west side of the windows on the exterior wall.
In Unit 2, the following was observed:
• One small crack, extending from the corner of the living room closet to the north
wall.
In Unit 5, the following was observed:
• Patching of the wall finishes, indicating that damage may have been repaired prior
to BKBM observation. Patching and previous crack locations were noticeable, but
little to no signs of movement/cracks reopening after the repairs had taken place
was noted.
• Patching of the ceiling finishes, particularly in the kitchen, indicating that damage
may have been repaired prior to BKBM observation.
o Ceiling repair had been in place prior to BKBM’s 2023 visit. It was unclear if
repair was from then or had been redone since BKBM’s previous visit.
At the north side of the entry stair at the northeast corner of the building, there was a
horizontal gap between the bottom of the stair concrete and the pavement.
48
Item 3.
Page 4
Failed caulking/sealant with gaps between the building foundation and pavement along
the east and south sides of the building. Flashing along the west side of the building was
damaged or missing.
Discussion
No analysis was performed for the scope of this observation. Based on our observation, it
appears that the building is experiencing serviceability issues due to settlement, most
prominently along the east and west exterior walls. Water intrusion along the foundations
could be a potential cause for the settlement. No signs of further settlement were noted
between this observation and the previous observation in 2023.
Recommendations
As was the case in 2020 and 2023, we recommend repairing cracks in the brick and interior
finishes and repairing caulk joints.
Long-term monitoring of the building by the building owner/maintenance for signs of
additional settlement should be done quarterly with reoccurring structural condition
assessments carried out every 2-3 years. This will help aid in determining the magnitude of
continuing building settlement.
We recommend that the owner have additional condition surveys be conducted if the
building owner becomes aware of new cracks or enlargement of existing cracks occurring
during those periods, particularly where cracks had occurred prior to repair.
Additional surveying of the grade around the building may aid in determining how best to
move water away from the building envelope efficiently to help limit further building
settlement and movement.
Disclaimer
This report does not express or imply any warranty of the structure but only addresses the
condition of the portion that was readily accessible and observable at the time of
investigation. The opinions and recommendations contained in this report are based on
information provided by the Owner and on limited field investigations performed as a part
of this project. This report does not address any portion of the structure other than those
areas mentioned.
The following services and responsibilities are specifically excluded from this report:
1. Discovery, testing, monitoring, clean-up or neutralization of mold, pollutants, or
hazardous substances.
2. Determinations or advisement related to the existence or proportion of asbestos,
modifications, installation, abatement or removal of a product, material or process
containing asbestos.
49
Item 3.
Page 5
3. This report has been prepared exclusively for this project. Without our written
approval, we assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our
evaluations and recommendations may not be appropriate for other parties.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
BKBM ENGINEERS
Andrew P Morgan, P.E. Direct Line: (763) 843-0458
MN Registration Number 56698
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
F:\26\26189\Correspondence\Letters\3932 Central Ave NE 2026 Letter_BKBM.docx
50
Item 3.
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-014
A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE FOR 3932 CENTRAL AVE NE
Resolution of the City Council for the City of Columbia Heights approving a provisional rental license
pursuant to City Code for that certain rental license held by Muhammed Abumayyaleh (Hereinafter
“License Holder”).
Whereas, the City Council has authority under the City Code to issue, condition, deny, suspend, or revoke
rental licenses to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
Pursuant to City Code, written notice setting forth the causes and reasons for the proposed Council action
contained herein was given to the License Holder of a public hearing to be held on March 9, 2026.
Now, therefore, in accordance with the foregoing, and all ordinances and regulations of the City of
Columbia Heights, the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the License Holder is the legal owner of the real property located at 3932 Central Ave NE,
Columbia Heights, Minnesota.
2. That the property has been evaluated through engineering observations identifying settlement -
related serviceability distress and recommending continued structural monitoring.
3. That the License Holder previously allowed occupancy of the property without a valid rental license
and was administratively cited.
4. That the License Holder has since worked with the City’s Building Official and completed an initial
rental licensing inspection.
5. That the structure does not meet the threshold for condemnation or unsafe building action;
however, continued monitoring and oversight are warranted.
6. That all parties, including the License Holder and any occupants or tenants, have been given
appropriate notice of this hearing according to the provisions of t he City Code.
ORDER OF COUNCIL
The rental license for the property located at 3932 Central Ave NE is hereby granted as a one (1) year
provisional rental license subject to the following conditions:
1. Quarterly Monitoring Requirement.
The License Holder shall implement and document quarterly structural monitoring of the building
consistent with prior engineering recommendations. Monitoring may be performed by the
property owner, a designated maintenance supervisor, or a qualified third-party building
professional.
2. City Approval of Inspector Qualifications.
Prior to performing monitoring, the proposed inspector’s qualifications shall be submitted to the
City for review and written approval. Monitoring performed by an individual not approved in
writing by the City shall not satisfy this condition.
3. Monitoring Documentation and Reporting.
Each quarterly inspection shall include dated photographic documentation of previously identified
crack locations and areas of concern, measurement of crack width where observable, written
comparison to prior monitoring reports identifying any new cracks or enlargement of existing
cracks, and submission of the monitoring log and photographic record to the City within fifteen (15)
days of each quarterly inspection.
4. Mandatory Professional Engineering Evaluation Upon Movement.
51
Item 3.
If new structural cracks are observed, or enlargement of previously documented cracks is
identified, the License Holder shall notify the City within ten (10) business days and retain a
Minnesota-licensed Professional Engineer to evaluate the condition within sixty (60) days. Written
findings shall be submitted to the City.
5. Recurring Structural Assessment.
The License Holder shall retain a Minnesota-licensed Professional Engineer to conduct a
comprehensive structural condition assessment of the building no later than January 31, 2028, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed three (3) years unless otherwise directed by the City.
6. Exterior Envelope Repairs.
All exterior caulking, flashing, and foundation interface sealing deficiencies identified in prior
engineering reports shall be repaired within the license period, subject to City verification.
Council may revoke the license at any time during the provisional period if conditions are not met.
The provisional rental license shall be issued for a period of one (1) year, aligned to the nearest beginning
of a month, and shall expire at the conclusion of that one-year term.
ORDER OF COUNCIL
Passed this 9th day of March 2026.
Offered by:
Seconded by:
Roll Call:
_______________________________________
Amáda Márquez Simula, Mayor
Attest:
_______________________________________
Sara Ion, City Clerk/Council Secretary
52
Item 3.
ITEM: Discussion Regarding Adoption of the 2025 Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan (10 Minutes)
Presenting Item: Dan O’Brien, Fire Chief / Emergency Management Director
DEPARTMENT: Fire BY/DATE: Dan O’Brien / March 2, 2026
CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below)
_Community that Grows with Purpose and Equity
_High Quality Public Spaces
X Safe, Accessible and Built for Everyone
_Engaged, Effective and Forward-Thinking
_Resilient and Prosperous Economy
_Inclusive and Connected Community
BACKGROUND
The Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) is a countywide plan that identifies natural disasters that
could affect our community and outlines steps to reduce damage before disasters happen. Hazard mitigation
means taking long-term actions to reduce risks to people, property, and infrastructure from events like
flooding, tornadoes, severe storms, extreme heat, winter storms, and wildfire.
The Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires local governments to adopt a FEMA-approved Hazard
Mitigation Plan in order to remain eligible for federal disaster and hazard mitigation grant funding.
Communities that do not adopt the plan are not eligible to receive certain types of FEMA funding after a
disaster.
The 2025 Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan is a multi-jurisdictional plan that includes Anoka County and all
cities within the county, including Columbia Heights.
SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS
Anoka County has completed the 2025 update of its Hazard Mitigation Plan. The plan includes:
Updated risk assessments for natural hazards
Information about vulnerable populations
Identification of critical infrastructure
Mitigation goals and strategies
A five-year maintenance and update process
The City of Columbia Heights participated in the planning process. The plan identifies several local
vulnerabilities within Columbia Heights, including:
Senior housing, assisted living facilities, and a nursing home that may require assistance during
evacuations
A large non-English speaking population, which can create communication challeng es during
emergencies
Above-ground power lines that are vulnerable to storm damage
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION
MEETING DATE MARCH 2, 2026
53
Item 4.
City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 2
Low-lying roadway areas prone to flooding
Aging stormwater infrastructure
The need to replace a failing generator at the Public Safety Building to ensure continued police, f ire,
and Emergency Operations Center (EOC) functions
Adoption of the plan does not create a new regulatory requirement for residents. It simply allows the City to
remain eligible for federal and state hazard mitigation grant programs such as:
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)
Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA)
Without adopting the plan, Columbia Heights would not be eligible to apply for these grant funds.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2026-015 approving the Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan.
Adoption of the plan will:
Maintain eligibility for FEMA and state hazard mitigation funding
Allow the City to apply for grants to improve stormwater systems, backup power, warning systems,
and other protective infrastructure
Support long-term planning to reduce risks to residents and property
Improve preparedness for severe weather and climate-related impacts
Adoption does not require immediate spending but positions the City to compete for outside funding that can
reduce future disaster costs and improve public safety.
Requested Council Action/ Discussion Topics / Key Questions
(Briefly state the specific action staff is requesting of the City Council, if any. For example: provide
direction, discuss options, or review information.)
Staff requests that council review the 2025 Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan and Resolution 2026 -015
so that formal adoption of the plan can occur at the March 9th 2026 City Council Meeting.
ATTACHMENT(S)
Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2025
Resolution 2026-015 Adopt Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2025
54
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025
Hazard Mitigation Plan
Department of Public Safety | Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
55
Item 4.
Anoka County
Minnesota
2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan
Terry Stoltzman
Emergency Management Director
Anoka County Emergency Management
2100 3rd Avenue, Suite 700
Anoka, MN 55303
763-324-4761
Prepared By:
U-Spatial
Research and Innovation Office (RIO) | University of Minnesota
389 Kirby Plaza, 1208 Kirby Drive
Duluth, MN 55812
218-726-7438
56
Item 4.
ii
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Contents
Section 1 – Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Hazard Mitigation Planning in Minnesota ................................................................................. 1
1.1.1 Scope .................................................................................................................................. 2
1.1.2 Hazard Mitigation Definition ............................................................................................. 2
1.2 State Administration of Mitigation Grants ................................................................................. 3
Section 2 – Public Planning Process ........................................................................................................ 4
2.1 Planning Team Information ........................................................................................................ 4
2.2 Review of Existing Plans, Capabilities & Vulnerabilities ........................................................... 7
2.3 Planning Process Timeline and Steps ....................................................................................... 8
2.3.1 Stakeholder Coordination .................................................................................................. 8
2.3.2 Overview of Jurisdictional Participation ............................................................................ 9
Section 3 – Risk Assessment and Vulnerability Analysis ..................................................................... 11
3.1 Natural Hazard Identification .................................................................................................. 11
3.1.1 Hazard Prioritization ....................................................................................................... 11
3.1.2 FEMA- and Minnesota-Declared Disasters and Assistance ......................................... 12
3.2 Community Vulnerability ......................................................................................................... 13
3.3 Climate Change ....................................................................................................................... 13
3.3.1 Climate Change Impacts and Resilience Planning ....................................................... 16
3.3.2 Health Impacts of Climate Change in Minnesota ......................................................... 16
3.3.3 Climate Change Adaptation ............................................................................................ 20
3.3.4 Climate Change Data and Tools in Minnesota .............................................................. 20
3.4 Jurisdictional Change in Risk or Vulnerability Assessment ................................................... 20
3.4.1 Jurisdictional Responses ................................................................................................ 20
3.4.2 Future Development ....................................................................................................... 27
Section 4 – Hazards ............................................................................................................................... 33
4.1 Flooding .................................................................................................................................... 33
4.1.1 Probability of Occurrence ............................................................................................... 33
4.1.2 Vulnerability ..................................................................................................................... 34
4.1.3 Flooding and Climate Change ........................................................................................ 36
4.1.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies ..................................................................................... 37
4.2 Wildfire ..................................................................................................................................... 37
4.2.1 Probability of Occurrence ............................................................................................... 37
4.2.2 Vulnerability ..................................................................................................................... 38
4.2.3 Wildfire and Climate Change .......................................................................................... 39
4.2.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies ..................................................................................... 40
4.3 Windstorms .............................................................................................................................. 40
4.3.1 Probability of Occurrence ............................................................................................... 41
4.3.2 Vulnerability ..................................................................................................................... 41
57
Item 4.
iii
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
4.3.3 Windstorms and Climate Change .................................................................................. 42
4.3.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies ..................................................................................... 42
4.4 Tornadoes ................................................................................................................................ 42
4.4.1 Probability of Occurrence ............................................................................................... 43
4.4.2 Vulnerability ..................................................................................................................... 43
4.4.3 Tornadoes and Climate Change ..................................................................................... 44
4.4.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies ..................................................................................... 45
4.5 Hail ............................................................................................................................................ 45
4.5.1 Probability of Occurrence ............................................................................................... 45
4.5.2 Vulnerability ..................................................................................................................... 46
4.5.3 Hail and Climate Change ................................................................................................ 46
4.5.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies ..................................................................................... 47
4.6 Lightning ................................................................................................................................... 47
4.6.1 Probability of Occurrence ............................................................................................... 48
4.6.2 Vulnerability ..................................................................................................................... 48
4.6.3 Lightning and Climate Change ....................................................................................... 48
4.6.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies ..................................................................................... 48
4.7 Winter Storms .......................................................................................................................... 49
4.7.1 Probability of Occurrence ............................................................................................... 49
4.7.2 Vulnerability ..................................................................................................................... 50
4.7.3 Winter Storms and Climate Change .............................................................................. 50
4.7.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies ..................................................................................... 50
4.8 Extreme Cold ............................................................................................................................ 50
4.8.1 Probability of Occurrence ............................................................................................... 51
4.8.2 Vulnerability ..................................................................................................................... 51
4.8.3 Extreme Cold and Climate Change ................................................................................ 52
4.8.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies ..................................................................................... 52
4.9 Extreme Heat .................................................................................................................................. 52
4.9.1 Probability of Occurrence ............................................................................................... 54
4.9.2 Vulnerability ..................................................................................................................... 54
4.9.3 Extreme Heat and Climate Change ................................................................................ 57
4.9.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies ..................................................................................... 58
4.10 Dam Failure .............................................................................................................................. 58
4.10.1 Probability of Occurrence ............................................................................................... 58
4.10.2 Vulnerability ..................................................................................................................... 59
4.10.3 Dam Failure and Climate Change .................................................................................. 59
4.10.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies ..................................................................................... 60
Section 5 – Mitigation Strategy ............................................................................................................. 61
5.1 Community Capability Assessments ...................................................................................... 61
5.1.1 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) ..................................................................... 61
58
Item 4.
iv
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
5.1.2 Repetitive Loss Properties .............................................................................................. 67
5.1.3 Previous Integration of Hazard Mitigation into Planning Mechanisms ....................... 68
5.1.4 Plans and Programs in Place to Address Natural Hazards .......................................... 74
5.2 Mitigation Goals ....................................................................................................................... 79
5.3 Mitigation Action and Project Strategies ................................................................................ 80
5.3.1 Anoka County Mitigation Action Chart ........................................................................... 83
Section 6 – Plan Maintenance .............................................................................................................. 93
6.1 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Updating the Plan ..................................................................... 93
6.2 Implementation ....................................................................................................................... 94
6.3 Continued Public Involvement ................................................................................................ 95
Appendices ............................................................................................................................................. 97
Appendix A – References
Appendix B – Adopting Resolutions
Appendix C – Local Mitigation Survey Report
Appendix D – Plans & Programs in Place
Appendix E – Past Mitigation Action Review Status Report
Appendix F – Planning Team Meetings
Appendix G – Public Outreach & Engagement Documentation
Appendix H – Mitigation Actions by Jurisdiction
Appendix I – Plan Maintenance & Monitoring Worksheets
59
Item 4.
Section 1 – Introduction
1.1 Hazard Mitigation Planning in Minnesota
Hazard mitigation planning refers to any sustained action to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to
human life and property from natural disasters. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
has made reducing hazards one of its primary goals, and a primary mechanism in achieving this goal
is both the hazard mitigation planning process and the subsequent implementation of resulting
projects, measures, and policies (FEMA, 2023b).
Since 1980, damages from natural disasters in the U.S. have exceeded $2.72 trillion. 2023 saw a
record 28 separate billion-dollar weather and climate disaster events in the United States, breaking
the previous record of 22 events set in 2020. Minnesota alone has experienced 59 separate billion-
dollar disasters since 1980 (NCEI, 2024). Hazard mitigation planning is an effective process to prepare
communities and lessen the impact of loss of life and property from future disasters. Although
mitigation efforts will not eliminate all disasters, government at all levels should strive to be as
prepared as possible for a disaster for the well-being of its residents.
The Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) is a requirement of the Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. The
development of a local government plan is required to maintain eligibility for federal hazard mitigation
grant funding programs. To be eligible for future mitigation funds, communities must adopt an HMP.
Researchers at the National Institute of Building Sciences looked at the results of 23 years of federally
funded mitigation grants provided by FEMA, the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA), and
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Their findings revealed that for every
$1 spent on hazard mitigation funding in the nation, $6 is saved in future disaster costs (Multi-Hazard
Mitigation Council, 2019).
Anoka County is vulnerable to a variety of natural hazards that threaten the loss of life and property.
Hazards such as tornadoes, flooding, wildfires, blizzards, straight-line winds, and droughts can
potentially inflict vast economic loss and personal hardship.
This planning document is accompanied by a website that allows for easy stakeholder and community
engagement, as well as interactive maps, dashboards, and infographics.
A broad overview of this companion website’s features is as follows:
• Homepage (featuring Declared Disasters dashboard, feedback forms, links to Anoka
County Emergency Management website, etc.)
• County Profile
• Risk Assessment & Natural Hazard Profiles
• Goals & Implementation
• Climate Change
Anoka County HMP Website
60
Item 4.
Section 1 2 Introduction
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
1.1.1 Scope
U-Spatial, University of Minnesota, was contracted by Minnesota Homeland Security and Emergency
Management using FEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) grant funds to work with Anoka County
Emergency Management to facilitate an update to the 2019 Anoka County HMP. U-Spatial brings
extensive geographic data analysis skills and hazard risk assessment expertise to the process. U-
Spatial also employed the services of Hundrieser Consulting LLC for county and stakeholder outreach
as well as mitigation action development related to this plan.
This HMP evaluates and prioritizes the major natural hazards affecting Anoka County as determined
by frequency of event, economic impact, deaths, and injuries. Mitigation recommendations are based
on input from state and local agencies, the public, and national best practices.
This is a multi-jurisdictional plan that covers Anoka County, including the cities of Andover, Anoka,
Bethel, Blaine, Centerville, Circle Pines, Columbia Heights, Columbus, Coon Rapids, East Bethel,
Fridley, Ham Lake, Hilltop, Lexington, Lino Lakes, Nowthen, Oak Grove, Ramsey, Saint Francis, and
Spring Lake Park, and Linwood Township. The Anoka County mitigation activities identified in this plan
also incorporate the concerns and needs of townships, school districts, and other participating entities.
Members from each of these jurisdictions actively participated in the planning process by assisting
with public outreach, attending planning team meetings, providing local information, identifying
mitigation actions, and reviewing the plan document (see Appendix C). The information in these forms
was used to help identify mitigation actions for local implementation (see also Section 2.2). Each
jurisdiction will adopt the plan by resolution after the plan is approved by FEMA. County and local city
resolutions will be added by Anoka County after final approval by FEMA (see Appendix B).
Anoka County has specified the following goals for this plan update:
• Include more recent data documenting the critical infrastructure and hazards faced by Anoka
County.
• Reformat and reorganize the plan to reflect definitions of hazards as expressed in the 2024
Minnesota State Hazard Mitigation Plan.
• Reflect current hazard mitigation priorities in Anoka County.
• Encourage recipients and sub-recipients of hazard mitigation grants to consider climate
change adaptation, resiliency, and equity in their planning efforts.
1.1.2 Hazard Mitigation Definition
Hazard mitigation may be defined as any action taken to eliminate or reduce the long-term risk to
human life and property from natural hazards. The benefits of hazard mitigation planning include the
following:
• saving lives, protecting the health of the public, and reducing injuries
• preventing or reducing property damage
• reducing economic losses
• minimizing social dislocation and stress
• reducing agricultural losses
61
Item 4.
Section 1 3 Introduction
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
• maintaining critical facilities in functioning order
• protecting infrastructure from damage
• protecting mental health
• reducing legal liability of government and public officials
1.2 State Administration of Mitigation Grants
FEMA currently has two mitigation grant programs that the State of Minnesota administers: the Hazard
Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) and the Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) program. The HMGP and
FMA programs are administered through the Minnesota Department of Public Safety Homeland
Security Emergency Management (HSEM) Division. All applicants must have or be covered under an
approved hazard mitigation plan. Eligible applicants include state and local governments, certain
private non-profit organizations or institutions, and tribal communities.
62
Item 4.
Section 2 – Public Planning Process
2.1 Planning Team Information
The Anoka County HMP planning team is headed by the Anoka County emergency manager, who is the
primary point of contact. Planning team members include representatives from public and
governmental sectors. Table 1 identifies the planning team individuals and organizations that
participated in virtual planning team meetings during the plan update process.
Note: Table 1 is not an exhaustive list of stakeholder participation in the Anoka County HMP update.
Additional participation by jurisdictional and other agency representatives is documented in Table 3 of
this section, as well as in Section 3.4, Appendix C, and Appendix G. The meeting summaries in
Appendix F provide a comprehensive overview of each session. This includes a complete list of invited
planning team stakeholders and information on other significant opportunities for engagement during
the plan update.
Find the planning team members on the Anoka County
HMP website
Table 1. Hazard Mitigation Planning (HMP) Team
Name Agency/Organization Participant Title
Terry Stoltzman Anoka County Emergency
Management Emergency Management Director
Jeffrey Lanenberg Anoka County Emergency
Management
Deputy Emergency Management
Director
Jeff Perry Anoka County Park Director
Joe MacPherson Anoka County County Engineer
John Slusarczyk Anoka County GIS Coordinator
Jim Dickinson Anoka County County Administrator
Julie Jeppson Anoka County Commissioner
Mike Gamache Anoka County Board Commissioner
Kate Heffernan Anoka County Human
Services/Economic Assistance Deputy Director
Rachel Helland Anoka County Public Health Emergency Preparedness Specialist
Colleen Haubner Anoka County Library Director
David Zieglmeier Anoka County County Surveyor
Jim Plemon Anoka County Highway Dept. Senior Manager, Road
Maintenance/Sign Dept.
Dennis Jones City of Andover Fire Dept. Fire Chief/Emergency Management
Director
Ernie Scherger City of Andover Fire Dept. Deputy Fire Chief
Andy Youngquist City of Anoka Police Dept. Captain
Delbert Vancura Anoka Municipal Electric Utility Utility Director
Theodore Anderson City of Anoka City Assessor
63
Item 4.
Section 2 5 Public Planning Process
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Name Agency/Organization Participant Title
Russ Clark City of Blain Police Dept. Captain / EM Director
Joe Sadler City of Blaine Police Dept. Sergeant
Mark Boerboom City of Blaine Emergency Management
Dan Hauck City of Blaine Building Official
Brent Larson City of Blaine Project Engineer/Emergency
Management
Andy Luedtke City of Blaine Assistant Deputy of Emergency
Management
Todd Miller City of Blaine Deputy Fire Marshal/Emergency
management
Cathy Sorensen City of Blaine City Clerk
Tedd Peterson City of Centerville Public Works Director
Matthew Montain City of Centerville / City of Circle
Pines SBM Fire and Centennial Fire District
Aaron Chirpich City of Columbia Heights City Manager
Rachel James City of Columbia Heights City Council Member / Council
President
Daniel Obrien City of Columbia Heights Fire Dept. Fire Chief/Emergency Manager
Brad Roddy City of Columbia Heights Fire Dept. Assistant Fire Chief
Matt Stemwedel City of Coon Rapids City Manager
Tim Himmer City of Coon Rapids Public Works Director
Aaron Johnston City of Coon Rapids Asst. Fire Chief
Rodney Spiering City of Coon Rapids Chief Building Official
Adam Jacobson Coon Rapids Police Department Deputy Chief of Police
Rod Sanow City of East Bethel Fire Dept. Fire chief
Matt Look City of East Bethel Administrator
Nick Schmitz City of East Bethel Building Official
Jeff Cielocha City of East Bethel Fire Chief
Andrew Todd City of Fridley PD Lieutenant/EM
Jason Hiehle City of Fridley Utilities Operations Manager
Michael Raczkowski City of Ham Lake Fire chief
Ruth Nelson City of Hilltop City Clerk
Bill Petracek City of Lexington City Administrator
Erik Edwards Lexington Fire & Rescue Fire Chief
David Pecchia City of Lino Lakes Interim City Administrator
Curt Boehme City of Lino Lakes Police Dept Police Chief
William Owens City of Lino Lakes Police Department Sergeant
Danial L’Allier City of Lino Lakes Fire Dept. Fire Chief
Rob Miller City of Nowthen Fire Chief
Natalie Johnson City of Nowthen Interim City Administrator
Robert Engler City of Oak Grove Fire Dept. Fire Chief
Brian Hagan City of Ramsey City Administrator
64
Item 4.
Section 2 6 Public Planning Process
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Name Agency/Organization Participant Title
Brad Bluml City of Ramsey Police Dept Police Chief
Tim Frankfurth City of Ramsey Police Dept. Captain
Jason Sufka City of Ramsey Fire Dept. Captain
Matt Kohner City of Ramsey Fire Chief/Emergency Management
Director
Thomas Knight City of Ramsey Building Official
Bruce Westby City of Ramsey City Engineer / Public Works Director
Kate Thunstrom City of St Francis City Administrator
Jenni Wida City of St Francis Deputy Administrator
Todd Schwieger City of St Francis Police Chief
Dave Schmidt City of St Francis Fire Chief
Josh Antoine Spring Lake Park PD Police Chief
Matthew Montain
SBM Fire Department (Spring Lake
Park, Blaine, Centerville, Circle
Pines)
Assistant Chief
Jonn Olson Linwood Township Supervisor-Chairman
Andrew Luedtke Linwood Township Town Supervisor
Chris Lindquist St. Francis Area Schools Director of Community Education
Jonathan Spitzer Centennial Schools Director of Buildings and Grounds
Tim Fournier Anoka Hennepin Schools Manager of Security and Emergency
Operations
Jim Skelly Anoka Hennepin Schools Executive Director, Communications &
PR
James Larter Forest Lake ISD 831 Supervisor of Buildings and Grounds
Hannah Reed St Francis Area Schools ISD15 Technology and Safety/Security
Manager
Karsten Anderson St. Francis Area Schools Superintendent
Mark Mickelson Fridley Area Schools Safety and Security Director
Chris Nielsen Anoka-Hennepin ISD#11 Health & Safety Supervisor
Zena Stenvik Columbia Heights Public Schools Superintendent
Bryan Hennekens Columbia Heights Public School
District, ISD #13 Director of Finance and Operations
Colleen Pederson Spring Lake Park Schools, ISD 16 Executive Director of Community
Education
Nathan Flansburg PACT Charter School Superintendent
Clifford Anderson Anoka Ramsey and Anoka Tech
Colleges Public Safety Director
Brent Baker Allina Health EMS EMS Operations Supervisor
Jon Dotterer MN HSEM Regional Program Coordinator
Connie Moore Alexandra House Executive Director
Andy Schreder Rum River Consultants CEO, Chief Building Official
Carri Levitski Rum River Consultants Program Administrator
Barry Brainard Rum River Consultants Assistant Building Official
LaChelle Williams HOPE 4 Youth Executive Director
65
Item 4.
Section 2 7 Public Planning Process
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Name Agency/Organization Participant Title
Steve Griffiths Stepping Stone Emergency Housing Executive Director
Jon Janke Coon Creek Watershed District Director of Operations
Erik Bye Coon Creek Watershed District Planning Coordinator
David Petry Rice Creek Watershed District Project Manager
2.2 Review of Existing Plans, Capabilities & Vulnerabilities
Anoka County and its local communities utilized a variety of planning documents to direct plan
development. These documents included a Comprehensive/Master Plan, Emergency Operations Plan,
Transportation Plan, etc. (see Section 5.1.4 and Appendix D). The planning process also incorporated
the existing natural hazard mitigation elements from previous planning efforts. In addition, the 2024
Minnesota All-Hazard Mitigation Plan was consulted.
In the development of the Anoka County HMP, U-Spatial consultants reviewed and incorporated a
variety of planning documents that direct community development and influence land use decisions
for the county and its jurisdictions. In addition, U-Spatial consultants worked closely with the Anoka
County emergency management director and other key county staff and local city officials to collect
feedback on local mitigation capabilities and vulnerabilities that either support or hinder the ability to
mitigate against natural hazards countywide and at the local level.
Building codes offer a way to incorporate geographically relevant and best available building science
with policies and programs. While Anoka County has not adopted the Minnesota Building Code, all
participating cities and Linwood Township have adopted the state building code. For more information,
see Appendix C, Question 7: Building Codes.
The following is a summary of the assessment tools used to gather information on local capabilities
and vulnerabilities during the planning process:
Capabilities Assessment (hazard-specific): In this assessment, detailed information was collected from
Anoka County on current plans and programs in place (i.e., existing programs, plans, or policies) as
well as program gaps or deficiencies that currently exist to mitigate against damages caused by each
natural hazard addressed in the plan. Section 4 identifies current gaps and deficiencies for mitigation,
and Section 5.1 describes the capabilities that Anoka County has to support mitigation.
Local Mitigation Surveys: As part of Anoka County’s 2025 HMP update, participating jurisdictions, key
county personnel, and additional agency stakeholders were asked to fill out a Local Mitigation Survey
(LMS) form. Questions in the LMS form addressed the following:
• Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment & Vulnerability Analysis
• Local Mitigation Capabilities Assessment
• Local Mitigation Projects
• Survey Participants
66
Item 4.
Section 2 8 Public Planning Process
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
The purpose of the survey was to gather jurisdictionally specific information needed to support the
update of the plan and to help inform development of local-level mitigation actions for the next five-
year planning cycle (for the full Anoka County LMS report, see Appendix C).
2.3 Planning Process Timeline and Steps
To update the 2019 Anoka County HMP, U-Spatial consultants worked in coordination with Anoka
County Emergency Management and members of the planning team. The updated plan includes new
data documenting the types of hazards faced by Anoka County residents and emergency planning
officials as well as new thinking on how to address these hazards.
2.3.1 Stakeholder Coordination
Two planning team meetings took place via Zoom video conference hosted by U-Spatial. Meeting
participants included representatives from Anoka County, city and township governments, neighboring
jurisdictions, and other key stakeholders. Appendix F provides documentation of stakeholder outreach
and participation in the plan update
Survey forms to acquire mitigation ideas and feedback
remain available on the HMP website
To provide the opportunity for public input, Anoka County issued two news releases announcing the
plan update and inviting public review and feedback on the draft plan. The news release provided
information on where to view the plan and submit comments. The Anoka County HMP website, hosted
by U-Spatial, and the feedback and mitigation action ideas survey will remain available through the
five-year planning period to foster public engagement. Table 2 documents dates of Hazard Mitigation
update meetings and public outreach. The public feedback period for the draft plan was open from
12/12/25 to 12/26/25, for a period of 15 days. Appendix G provides documentation of the public
outreach for feedback on the draft plan by Anoka County and jurisdictions.
Table 2. Anoka County hazard mitigation update meetings and public outreach
Event Date Appendix
Kickoff Webinar 6/18/24 Appendix F, Planning Team Meetings
News Release #1 9/18/24 Appendix G, Public Outreach & Engagement Documentation
Planning Team Meeting #1 2/20/25 Appendix F, Planning Team Meetings
Planning Team Meeting #2 12/3/25 Appendix F, Planning Team Meetings
News Release #2 12/12/25 Appendix G, Public Outreach & Engagement Documentation
At the close of the public outreach period, the U-Spatial consultants worked with the Anoka County
Emergency Manager and planning team to incorporate public feedback into the HMP.
For more information on the planning process, see Sections 5 and 6.
67
Item 4.
Section 2 9 Public Planning Process
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
2.3.2 Overview of Jurisdictional Participation
Throughout the planning process, Anoka County and the U-Spatial team worked to engage
representatives from the county and each city in the update of the plan. Key activities for jurisdictions
included assisting with public outreach, participating in planning team meetings, providing local-level
information, and reviewing and providing feedback to the plan update.
U-Spatial and Anoka County actively used the following methods to engage jurisdictions in the HMP
plan update process:
• Zoom Video Conferencing: Planning team meetings were conducted via Zoom video
conferencing hosted by U-Spatial. Virtual meetings proved to be a beneficial addition to the
planning process, resulting in a high turnout from jurisdictional representatives and other
stakeholders, as well as providing the ability for presenters to collect, respond to, and
document feedback from participants through Zoom functions such as surveys, chat, and Q&A.
• Email Correspondence: Email was a primary tool used to communicate with representatives
from Anoka County, municipal governments, and other stakeholders. Emails were used to
distribute news releases for public outreach, to invite participation in meetings and to share
meeting summaries, as well as to request local information and final review of the draft plan.
Email proved to be an effective tool that resulted in increased jurisdictional participation and
collection of locally specific information.
• Surveys, forms, and polls: Input tools such as surveys, forms, and tools were used throughout
the process to efficiently collect information in a format that could directly be fed into the
written hazard mitigation plan. Polls were used to elicit feedback during the planning team
meetings. The Local Mitigation Survey (LMS) was used to ensure feedback from every
jurisdiction for critical input such as building code use, NFIP adoption, and changes in
vulnerabilities. Feedback forms were posted on the website for easy access during the plan
review.
• Phone Calls: Phone calls were frequently used to conduct direct outreach or follow-up to
jurisdictions to ensure participation or to collect information via one-on-one interviews. Phone
calls proved to be an effective tool that resulted in increased jurisdictional participation and
collection of quality information. Phone calls were especially useful in engaging very small
communities that had limited staff or technological capabilities.
Cities participating in Anoka County HMP update varied by population and associated government
resources to participate in the planning process (e.g., personnel, time, and technology). Rural
communities with smaller populations (under 500) typically had part-time elected officials, limited-to-
no city staff, and reduced city hall hours in which to conduct business. Anoka County and U-Spatial
were sensitive to these local challenges and worked to help these local governments to participate
using the methods that worked best to accommodate them, such as phone interviews to complete
local mitigation survey forms (see Appendix C).
Table 3 provides an overview of each city’s participation in the Anoka County HMP update planning
process and a reference to supporting documentation.
68
Item 4.
Section 2 10 Public Planning Process
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Table 3. Jurisdictional participation in planning process
Jurisdiction
(2024 Est. Population, Esri)
News
Release
#1
Planning
Team Mtg.
#1
Local
Mitigation
Survey
Mitigation
Action
Charts
Planning
Team
Mtg.#2
News
Release #2
& Plan
Review
Supporting Documentation App. G App. F App. C Sec. 5.3
App. H App. F App. G
Anoka County (376,203) X X X X X X
City of Andover (33,531) X X X X X X
City of Anoka (17,923) X X X X X X
City of Bethel (481) X X X X
City of Blaine (74,967) X X X X X X
City of Centerville (3,966) X X X X X X
City of Circle Pines (5,014) X X X X X X
City of Columbia Heights
(22,179) X X X X X X
City of Columbus (4,268) X X X X
City of Coon Rapids
(64,292)
X X X X X X
City of East Bethel (12,108) X X X X X X
City of Fridley (30,207) X X X X X X
City of Ham Lake (16,851) X X X X X X
City of Hilltop (1,077) X X X X X
City of Lexington (2,766) X X X X X X
City of Lino Lakes (22,805) X X X X X X
City of Nowthen (4,506) X X X X X
City of Oak Grove (9,227) X X X X X
City of Ramsey (28,847) X X X X X X
City of Saint Francis
(8,462) X X X X X X
City of Spring Lake Park
(7,564) X X X X X X
Linwood Township (5,280) X X X X X X
Other: Coon Creek
Watershed District X X X X X X
Neighboring Jurisdictions:
Chisago County
Hennepin County
Isanti County
Ramsey County
Sherburne County X
Washington County
Wright County
69
Item 4.
Section 3 – Risk Assessment and
Vulnerability Analysis
The goal of mitigation is to reduce or eliminate the future impacts of a hazard, including loss of life,
property damage, disruption to local and regional economies, and the expenditure of public and private
funds for recovery. Sound mitigation practices must be based on sound risk assessment. A risk
assessment involves quantifying the potential loss resulting from a disaster by assessing the
vulnerability of buildings, infrastructure, and people.
The risk assessments in this plan are based on widely accepted tools and databases, consultation
with hazard mitigation planning expertise at FEMA and HSEM, and technical guidance from the MN
DNR State Climatology Office. Geographic Information System (GIS) tools are used throughout to
demonstrate geographically based risk and vulnerabilities.
3.1 Natural Hazard Identification
This assessment identifies the characteristics of natural hazard events, the severity of the risk, the
likelihood of these events occurring, and the vulnerability of each jurisdiction’s population and assets.
See a list of all natural hazards covered in the 2025 HMP
The cornerstone of risk assessment is identifying the hazards that affect jurisdictions. Listed below
are the natural hazards addressed in the 2024 Minnesota State Hazard Mitigation Plan:
Flooding
Dam/Levee Failure
Wildfires
Windstorms
Tornadoes
Hail
Lightning
Winter Storms
Landslides (Erosion and
Mudslides)
Land Subsidence (Sinkholes
and Karst)
Drought
Extreme Heat
Extreme Cold
Earthquakes
Coastal Erosion & Flooding
3.1.1 Hazard Prioritization
As part of the plan update process, the planning team reviewed, updated, and prioritized the hazards
faced by residents of Anoka County, updated the existing mitigation actions published in the 2019
HMP, and proposed new mitigation actions.
The team examined the hazards identified in the 2019 HMP and adjusted them to reflect the
definitions of natural hazards used in the 2024 Minnesota State Hazard Mitigation Plan.
While this HMP focuses on natural hazards, planning took place with the understanding that many
non-natural hazards could occur due to natural disasters (e.g., disruption in electrical service due to
downed powerlines from heavy snow, ice storms, or high wind events).
70
Item 4.
Section 3 12 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
The prioritization of hazards for the Anoka County HMP Update (Table 4) was based upon group review
and discussion of the natural hazards that pose risk to the county during the HMP Planning Team
Meeting #1. In the review of each hazard, the group was asked to consider if the risk to severe natural
hazards had increased or decreased since the last plan, and if this affected their priority level to
mitigate against that hazard. Appendix F provides the discussion notes from the meeting.
Table 4. Prioritization of hazards for 2025 Anoka County HMP Update
Natural Hazards Addressed in the Last Plan Current Priority
Flooding High
Windstorms High
Tornadoes High
Winter Storms Moderate
Hail Moderate
Lightning Moderate
Extreme Cold Moderate
Extreme Heat Moderate
Wildfire Moderate
Drought Low
Landslides Low
Land Subsidence Low
Dam/Levee Failure Low
3.1.2 FEMA- and Minnesota-Declared Disasters and Assistance
Another historical perspective is derived from FEMA-declared disasters and emergencies. The Stafford
Act provides for two types of disaster declarations: emergency declarations and major disaster
declarations (Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 1974). Between 1957
and August 2025, Anoka County was included in 13 federal disaster declarations; see details on the
Anoka County HMP website.
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 12A established a framework for state agencies to help communities
recover from disaster. In 2014, Governor Mark Dayton signed legislation establishing the state’s
Disaster Assistance Contingency Account to assist local communities after a natural disaster when
federal aid is not available. Damage required to declare a disaster is half the threshold of the
federal/FEMA public assistance (only) program threshold (MN HSEM, 2019). Anoka County has been
included in one State Disaster Declaration.
The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), the Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) program, and the
former Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program are FEMA-administered
hazard mitigation assistance programs that provide funding for eligible mitigation planning and
projects that reduce disaster losses and protect life and property from future disaster damages (FEMA,
2021). Table 5 lists the projects in the county funded by a hazard mitigation assistance program.
71
Item 4.
Section 3 13 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Table 5. Historical hazard mitigation funding awarded in Anoka County
DR# Fiscal
Year Subrecipient Project Type Project
Cost
Federal
Share
4290 2017
Minnesota
Amateur Sports
Commission
600.1: Warning Systems (as a Component
of a Planned, Adopted, and Exercised
Risk Reduction Plan);
602.1: Other Equipment Purchase and
Installation
$91,775 $68,831
1419 2002 Anoka County 91.1: Local Multihazard Mitigation Plan $31,973 $23,980
SOURCE: (FEMA, 2025)
3.2 Community Vulnerability
The degree to which a person is vulnerable to the impacts of a hazard depends on how well they can
react before, during, and after a hazardous event. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry (ATSDR) defines social vulnerability as “…the
resilience of communities when confronted by external stresses on human health, stresses such as
natural or human-caused disasters, or disease outbreaks” (ATSDR, 2020). Exacerbating these
stressors are the increasing number of extreme weather events attributed to Minnesota’s changing
climate (MPCA, 2018).
The ATSDR created the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) to help identify vulnerable communities
that need support in preparing for hazards or recovering from disaster. The CDC SVI is created at the
census tract level using American Community Survey (ACS) five-year data.
The SVI is included in the FEMA National Risk Index (NRI) and presented in the Risk and Vulnerability
dashboard on the webpage for each hazard. Additionally, summaries of at-risk populations in each
jurisdiction are available on the county profile page. Vulnerable attributes of a population are
addressed with each natural hazard.
The Risk and Vulnerability dashboard for each hazard also includes the FEMA Community Resilience
Challenges Index (CRCI). The CRCI is a composite index of 22 community resilience indicators,
including population and household characteristics, housing, healthcare, economic factors, and
connection to community. The index value provides a relative composite value by census tract and is
designed for emergency managers to target outreach strategies and understand the resilience
challenges community members face (FEMA, 2024a).
Explore population vulnerability on the Anoka County HMP
Website
3.3 Climate Change
Minnesota’s climate change summary is informed primarily by the Midwest Chapter of the Fifth
National Climate Assessment (NCA5) dated November 2023 and with interpretations from the MN
DNR State Climatology Office (Wilson et al., 2023).
Rising global temperatures and the resulting increases in atmospheric moisture from evaporation of
ocean waters have allowed Minnesota to become warmer, wetter, and more humid during the past
72
Item 4.
Section 3 14 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
several decades. The ten combined warmest and wettest years between 1895 and 2022 all occurred
since 1998. Nights have warmed faster than days since 1970, and winter has warmed several times
faster than summer. Even with the drought conditions of the early 2020s in Minnesota, heavy
precipitation continues to show long-term increases, with damaging rain and snowfall events reported
somewhere in the state each year of the decade through 2023. Despite no increase in the highest
temperatures of summer, maximum annual heat index values (one measure of how hot it feels) have
been rising across the state because of increased humidity during heat waves.
Even though periods of intense growing-season drought have defined the climate of the early 2020s
in much of Minnesota, long-term increases in annual precipitation have continued because of heavy
and even record-setting precipitation during the cold season. For instance, record-dry conditions during
May through mid-August of 2021 led to parts of northwestern and northern Minnesota reaching
“Exceptional Drought”—the worst category on the US Drought Monitor. A shift to a stormy pattern
during the following winter and spring, however, produced unprecedented precipitation between
December in May in the exact same areas, with historic flooding along the Rainy River.
The observed changes in our climate have altered growing seasons, damaged forests, challenged
natural resource management, limited recreational opportunities, destroyed infrastructure, and
affected the conditions of lakes, rivers, wetlands, and groundwater aquifers that provide water for
drinking and agriculture. Climate models project that temperature and precipitation increases will
continue in Minnesota through the 21st century, with hotter summers and increased drought severity
during dry periods as well.
To help the public understand how the changing climate has affected and is expected to affect the
behavior of common weather hazards in Minnesota, the MN DNR State Climatology Office developed
graphical summaries of the scientific confidence associated with each hazard’s relationship to climate
change (Table 6 and Table 7). Climate change in Minnesota has by far the strongest associations with
(1) sharp declines in the frequency and severity of extreme cold outbreaks, tied to a persistent warming
of winters, and (2) sharp increases in the frequency and intensity of extreme precipitation events. For
instance, from 1970 through 2023, Minnesota’s winters warmed at a rate of almost one degree F per
decade, and approximately three-four times faster than summer. During that same period, the coldest
night of the year has warmed almost twice as fast as winter as a whole—up to two degrees F per decade
(or 20 degrees F per century).
Despite major losses to cold extremes, the warming climate and increased abundance of atmospheric
moisture has led to an uptick in many heavy snowfall metrics across Minnesota, leading to moderately
high confidence that the changing climate is increasing heavy snowfall events—even as other winter
characteristics decline. The intensity and frequency of tornadoes and severe convective storms are
weakly connected at best to recent climate changes, and since the 1950s, despite superior detection
and verification capabilities, the number of damaging tornadoes rated at least F-2 or EF-2 in Minnesota
has shown no increases. Dramatic changes in the seasonal and geographical ranges of severe
convective weather have, on the other hand, already affected Minnesota. In 2021, a damaging tornado
crossed the Boundary Waters into Canada, becoming the latest on record so far north in the state.
Then, on December 15th, an outbreak of destructive thunderstorm winds and over 20 tornadoes struck
the southeastern parts of the state, producing the latest tornadoes on record by 29 days.
73
Item 4.
Section 3 15 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
The climatic picture is expected to change further beyond the 2020s and especially as Minnesota
approaches the middle of the 21st century (Table 7). Dramatic losses in extreme cold and additional
increases in heavy and extreme precipitation are expected to remain the state’s leading climate
change symptoms. Although Minnesota has not yet observed increases in the frequency, severity, or
duration of summertime high temperatures or drought (through 2023), climate model projections
summarized in NCA5 indicate that heat waves are all but certain to increase by mid-century. A 2018
study conducted by NOAA scientists indicates that by the 2050s, heat waves in Minnesota will be more
attributable to climate change than to natural variability (Lopez et al., 2018).
Table 6. Confidence that climate change has already impacted common Minnesota weather/climate
hazards
Confidence Hazard Recent & Current Observations
Highest
Extreme cold Rapid decline in severity & frequency
Extreme rainfall and
heavy snowfall Becoming larger and more frequent
Moderately
High Humid heat waves Some increase in maximum dew point and Heat Index
values since 1980
Moderately
Low
Tornadoes, hail,
thunderstorm winds
Intensity and frequency unchanged, but seasons expanding
aggressively
Low Drought and dry spells Intense & major episodes in early 2020s but no long-term
trend
Lowest
Summer high
temperature
extremes
Highest temperatures still well within historical ranges, and
number of hot days increasing only slightly in isolated
locations
SOURCE: (BLUMENFELD, K. MINNESOTA STATE CLIMATOLOGY OFFICE, PERSONAL COMMUNICATION, DECEMBER 21, 2023)
Table 7. Confidence that climate change will impact common Minnesota weather/climate hazards
through 2070
Confidence Hazard Expectations through 2070
Highest
Extreme cold Continued rapid decrease in severity and frequency
Extreme rainfall Unprecedented events more common
High Heat waves Summer high temperatures, maximum dew point and heat
index values all projected to increase
Moderately
High Drought Increased severity likely as summer heat increases;
frequency and duration projections unclear
Moderately
Low
Heavy snowfall Greater extremes, but events less frequent as winter rain
increases
Tornadoes, hail,
thunderstorm winds
Intensity and frequency unclear but continued seasonal
expansion and larger “outbreaks” possible
SOURCE: (BLUMENFELD, K. MINNESOTA STATE CLIMATOLOGY OFFICE, PERSONAL COMMUNICATION, DECEMBER 21, 2023)
74
Item 4.
Section 3 16 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
3.3.1 Climate Change Impacts and Resilience Planning
The NCA5 states that even if the world decarbonizes rapidly, the Nation will continue to face climate
impacts and risks. Adequately and equitably addressing these risks involves longer-term inclusive
planning, investments in transformative adaptation, and mitigation approaches that consider equity
and justice. In the Midwest, rising temperatures, extreme precipitation, drought, and other climate-
related events are impacting agriculture, ecosystems, cultural practices, health, infrastructure, and
waterways. Communities, Indigenous Peoples, governments, and businesses are embracing
adaptation approaches that include climate-smart agriculture, improved landscape management,
innovative green infrastructure financing, and collaborative decision-making.
NCA5 includes these key messages for the Midwest region (Chapter 24: Midwest):
• Changes in precipitation extremes, timing of snowmelt, and early-spring rainfall are expected
to pose greater challenges for crop and animal agriculture, including increased pest and
disease transmission, muddier pastures, and further degradation of water quality. Climate-
smart agriculture and other adaptation techniques provide a potential path toward
environmental and economic sustainability.
• Increasing incidence of flooding and drought is expected to further alter aquatic ecosystems,
while terrestrial ecosystems are being reshaped by rising temperatures and decreasing snow
and ice cover. In response, communities are adapting their cultural practices and the ways
they manage the landscape, preserving and protecting ecosystems and the services they
provide.
• Climate change has wide-ranging effects on lives and livelihoods. Mitigation and adaptation
strategies, such as expanded use of green infrastructure, heat-health early warning systems,
and improved stormwater management systems, when developed in collaboration with
affected communities, have the potential to improve individual and community health.
• Increases in temperatures and extreme precipitation events are already challenging aging
infrastructure and are expected to impair surface transportation, water navigation, and the
electrical grid. Shifts in the timing and intensity of rainfall are expected to disrupt
transportation along major rivers and increase chronic flooding. Green infrastructure and
public and private investments may mitigate losses, provide relief from heat, and offer other
ways to adapt the built environment to a changing climate.
• Climate-related changes to water quantity and quality are increasing the risks to ecosystem
health, adequate food production, surface water and groundwater uses, and recreation (high
confidence). Projected increases in droughts, floods, and runoff events across the Mississippi
River basin and the Great Lakes will adversely impact ecosystems through increased erosion,
harmful algal blooms, and expansion of invasive species.
Key messages from the NCA5 are indicated in green throughout this document.
3.3.2 Health Impacts of Climate Change in Minnesota
Climate change already impacts our health, and these impacts are expected to worsen in the years
ahead. The risks are especially high for Minnesotans who are less able to cope due to their age,
income, housing insecurity, preexisting health conditions, and more.
75
Item 4.
Section 3 17 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Heat, air pollution (including wildfire smoke and allergens like pollen), extreme precipitation, floods,
droughts, and ecosystem changes are all “climate hazards” that impact our health. Some of these
climate hazards have a direct effect, like a heat-related illness from a heatwave, while some have an
indirect impact, like exacerbation of asthma from mold growth in a flooded basement.
Heat
Minnesotans will experience a wide range of impacts from the increased frequency and severity of
extreme heat events. Higher heat, increased humidity, and longer and more frequent extreme heat
events can lead to direct health impacts of dehydration and heatstroke. Untreated heat stroke can
lead to death. Heat-related illness directly accounted for 75 deaths in Minnesota from 2000–2022.
Heat can also worsen existing health conditions, such as respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. The
people most at risk include those who are more exposed and those who may be more susceptible due
to physiological reasons. People more likely to be exposed to heat include outdoor workers in
agriculture and construction, student athletes, people who live in cities (due to the heat island effect),
people without air conditioning, and unhoused persons.
People at higher risk because of physiological reasons include those with underlying medical
conditions, pregnant people, older adults, infants, and young children.
Just as one example of the devastating effects of heat, in the summer of 2011, Minnesota had six
days when the heat index was 105 degrees F or higher—and that same summer there were 1,302
emergency department visits and 3 deaths due to heat. What makes these numbers tragic is that heat-
related illnesses are preventable.
Air Pollution
In general, we breathe clean air in Minnesota, according to federal standards. But on some days and
in some locations, air is unhealthy due to ozone or fine particulate matter. Greenhouse gas emissions
can increase air pollution, and rising temperatures can also affect the formation and release of
pollutants. Unhealthy air days are expected to become more frequent, and more intense due to climate
change.
Climate change is likely to increase three main air contaminants in Minnesota: ozone, particulate
matter (including wildfire smoke), and allergens. These air pollutants can cause or exacerbate
cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), allergies, and
asthma.
Pollen is intensifying with climate change, and can trigger allergies, asthma attacks, and affect other
respiratory conditions. In Minnesota, asthma affects one in 16 children (6.4%) and one in 13 adults
(7.4%). People with asthma need to be especially aware of pollen sources and seasons to prevent an
allergy-related asthma attack.
There are three pollen seasons in Minnesota: trees, grasses, and weeds. Trees are the first to release
pollen, typically starting in early April, grasses usually ramp up pollen release in early June, and weeds
typically begin releasing pollen in mid-June and continue until the first hard frost. Research shows that
the growing season for ragweed pollen, which is highly allergenic, has increased by 15 to 25 days in
and around Minnesota. The lengthening pollen season is strongly related to climate change
characteristics, such as lengthening of the frost-free season and later timing of the first fall frost.
76
Item 4.
Section 3 18 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Indirect health effects from air pollution can include reduced visibility on a high smog day,
reduced productivity at work or school due to allergies or asthma, and reduced productivity
and degradation of crops and water sources, which can lead to economic burdens.
Those most at risk include:
• Children, because they have developing lungs, are outside more, and they play vigorously and
inhale more air per pound of body weight compared to adults.
• Adults over 60, because their bodies are aging.
• People with chronic respiratory or cardiovascular disease because they are more susceptible
to air pollution.
• Individuals living near other sources of air pollution (such as roadways, freeways, and heavy
industry), because they are chronically exposed to air pollution.
• People of color, because they are more likely to be exposed to more air pollution and have a
disproportionate burden of heart and lung diseases, which may increase susceptibility.
Extreme Precipitation, Floods, Drought
Rain is falling more frequently in extreme, heavy, localized events, leading to some parts of our state
experiencing flooding while other areas experience drought.
Increased frequency and severity of heavy rainfalls can lead to flooding, which results in both
direct and indirect health impacts like:
• Injury or even death from drowning.
• Illnesses from being exposed to contaminated drinking water or recreational sources.
• Mental health stress from experiencing the trauma of the event or later from being displaced
or dealing with damaged homes and business.
• Respiratory ailments from exposure to mold from flooded basements.
• Carbon monoxide poisoning from exposure to carbon monoxide when using secondary power
sources, like generators.
• Flooding can also disrupt economic and social networks and put a strain on essential services.
The people most at risk are Minnesotans who are more likely to be exposed to flood waters, like those
who live in a flood plain or near water bodies, or people who cannot easily evacuate or recover from
flooding destruction, such as people who do not have reliable transportation, people who can’t use
the stairs when elevators are out of service, people in wheelchairs, people with disabilities, older
adults, and lower income people.
Heavy rain events can cause standing water in backyards or basements. Many homeowners have
experienced wet basements, which is mentally and financially stressful, and if mold starts to grow that
can become a health problem.
Localized flash flooding can also be a problem where our infrastructure is undersized, and people get
caught off guard by flooded roads. This is an important public health safety concern as almost half of
flash flood fatalities occur in vehicles. It takes as little as six inches of fast-moving water to knock over
and carry away an adult, and as little as 12 inches can carry away a small car.
Another public health concern with precipitation changes exacerbated by climate change is
waterborne disease outbreaks. Heavy downpours can lead to a host of problems, including increased
77
Item 4.
Section 3 19 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
runoff and sewage overflows, which can cause outbreaks of waterborne diseases such as E. coli and
Cryptosporidium. Runoff can carry viruses and other disease-causing agents into wells and
recreational waters, contaminating them and causing health problems.
Zoonotic Diseases
Zoonotic diseases or zoonoses are caused by germs like viruses, bacteria, parasites, and fungi that
spread between animals and people. Increases in temperatures and changes in rain patterns are
changing our ecosystems, which can affect the spread of diseases carried by insects, ticks, rodents,
birds, and other animals.
Diseases from ticks include Lyme disease, Anaplasmosis, and Babesiosis. As temperatures increase,
disease-transmitting ticks will become active sooner and stay active longer, allowing more time to
develop and feed on hosts. Ticks thrive in warm humid environments.
Additionally, there may be a decreased die off over the winter months if temperatures do not get very
cold. An increase in winter temperatures can also lead to new tick species moving into and surviving
in Minnesota, which can lead to the introduction of new diseases.
People more at risk for diseases carried by insects, ticks, and rodents are people who spend more
time outdoors or are more exposed to these pests.
Harmful Algal Blooms
An increase in water temperatures can lead to blue-green algal blooms, which contain toxins that can
pose harmful health risks. People or pets who drink or swim in water with dangerous levels of harmful
algal bloom (HAB) contamination may experience stomach illness, skin irritation, allergic responses,
and damage to the liver and nervous system. In extreme cases, dogs and other animals have died
after drinking water containing these toxins.
Harmful algal blooms in Minnesota lakes result from several factors including runoff from fertilizers,
discharges from waste treatment plants, warmer waters, and higher temperatures. While HABs can
occur naturally, the frequency of outbreaks is increasing in part because human activities create
favorable conditions for the blooms.
Zoonotic diseases and HABs can have an indirect health effect when they threaten the livelihoods of
people who work in recreation-dependent economies that revolve around camping, fishing, and
hunting.
Mental Health
Climate change threatens our mental health through direct exposure to a climate-related disaster (e.g.,
flooding); through the disruption to a major determinant of health, such as a loss of livelihood or a
cultural tradition; and through awareness or uncertainty of climate change as an existential threat.
These experiences may overlap and lead to compounded impacts on an individual or even an entire
community, such as family farmers burdened with decadal drought who are more likely to commit
suicide.
Existing research has associated several mental health conditions with climate change, such as
psychological distress, grief reactions, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, interpersonal
conflicts, drug or alcohol abuse, loss of identity, and suicidal ideation.
78
Item 4.
Section 3 20 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Vulnerable populations such as children, the elderly, communities of color, and other marginalized
communities are most at risk of climate change-related mental health impacts.
3.3.3 Climate Change Adaptation
Climate change adaptation is important for increasing the resilience of communities and the
environment. The shocks caused by more extreme weather events and the stressors of longer-term
changes to the climate affect all natural systems. For human communities, these impacts challenge
the surroundings in which they live, the critically important ecosystem services upon which they
depend, public health, local facilities and infrastructure, the safety of their residences, and the viability
of their livelihoods. Development trends can further exacerbate both climate impacts and population
vulnerability. Communities are only as resilient as the most vulnerable within them.
3.3.4 Climate Change Data and Tools in Minnesota
The University of Minnesota Extension and the University of Minnesota’s Water Resources Center
coordinate the Minnesota Climate Adaptation Partnership (MCAP), which brings together federal and
state agencies, organizations, and individuals statewide with an interest in climate adaptation. MCAP
received funding after the 2021 legislative session to develop high-resolution (2.6 mile/4km grid)
dynamically downscaled climate projections utilizing the University of Minnesota’s Supercomputing
Institute. This data is being made publicly accessible via the new Minnesota CliMAT—Climate Mapping
and Analysis Tool. This interactive online tool provides highly localized climate projections for
Minnesota. MN CliMAT is based on data from the latest generation of global climate models,
called CMIP6. With the dynamically downscaled climate projection data, users can visualize even how
small cities will likely be impacted in the coming decades (Liess, S. et al., 2023).
More resources are available on the climate change page
of the Anoka County website
3.4 Jurisdictional Change in Risk or Vulnerability Assessment
Jurisdictions in Anoka County have varying vulnerabilities to and concerns about impacts to their
communities. Interviews with jurisdictional representatives in addition to the Local Mitigation Survey
resulted in some specific concerns (see Appendix C). Participants were asked to provide feedback on
how their community’s vulnerability to natural hazards had either increased (due to changes such as
development) or decreased (due to local mitigation efforts) over the past five years.
At the local jurisdictional level, several communities did note an increase in development over the last
five years as a factor for an increase in vulnerability to severe weather or disaster events.
3.4.1 Jurisdictional Responses
As part of the Local Mitigation Survey form, Anoka County Emergency Management and each city
jurisdiction were asked to provide a vulnerability assessment that described what structures, systems,
populations, or other community assets were susceptible to damage and loss from specific hazard
events. This information was used to help tie local vulnerability back to the exposure of people,
79
Item 4.
Section 3 21 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
buildings, infrastructure, and the environment to the natural hazards listed in Table 4 and to assist
local governments in development of related local mitigation actions to reduce risk.
The following is a compilation of common responses taken directly from jurisdictional representatives
as preserved in Appendix C: Question 2 – Local Vulnerabilities. Responses here are edited only for
clarity.
Anoka County
Flooding: Overland flooding is a concern in Anoka County for events with high rainfall amounts
over a short time. The prominent soil type in Anoka County is sand which will allow normal
amounts of rainwater to percolate through the soil and move through the stormwater drainage
systems moving water through the six Watershed Districts in Anoka County.
Tornadoes: Although tornadoes have affected Anoka County infrequently in the past, the
probability of damage from this hazard in the future is likely. The entire county is at equal risk
of future occurrences. While higher population and housing densities in the municipalities set
the stage for increased impact, the potential for property damage and loss of life is equally
high for the county's unincorporated areas due to the large number of mobile homes
throughout the rural areas.
City of Andover
Flooding: The City of Andover has low-lying properties along the Rum River and near various
wetlands which are prone to flooding.
All Hazards (Severe Storms): The city has the usual CI/KR protection concerns as most other
communities (i.e., vulnerability of overhead power lines). Our City Hall/Community
Center/water treatment facilities can be considered the hub of activities/services within our
community. The loss of these assets would be unfortunate.
City of Anoka
Flooding: The City of Anoka has both the Rum River and Mississippi River that have
independent flood risks. Along both waterways there are a handful of private properties and
public utilities that are affected by localized flooding. The Coon Rapids Dam may cause ice
jams during winter and early spring.
Flooding: Our city-owned sanitary sewer infrastructure (lift station, manhole, etc.) are located
in the floodplain.
Severe Storms (Power Outages): The City of Anoka has municipal electric utilities providing
services to the cities of Anoka, Champlin, Dayton, and Coon Rapids and Ramsey. The power
grid is a combination of overhead and buried transmission lines, including 5 substations.
Severe storms have the potential to affect overhead power lines.
80
Item 4.
Section 3 22 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
City of Bethel
All Hazards: The city of Bethel has an aging population who may be more vulnerable to severe
storm events. We also have overhead power lines that could come down from windstorms or
heavy snow/ice.
Flooding: During very high rain events our lift station could possibly flood.
Structure Fire/Wildland Fire: We have city sewer, but all private wells in town. We have one fire
hydrant at the fire station. In an emergency, one hydrant may not be able to keep up with a
high demand of needed water capacity.
City of Blaine
Severe Summer Storms: Wind, hail, and tornadoes are a major issue within parts of the city,
specifically the multiple mobile home parks, as storm shelters are limited (out-of-date and
insufficient capacity to shelter the residents.) These storms also have high impacts to portions
of the city with overhead power lines and electrical poles.
Flooding: Flooding is a concern in some multiple mobile home parks without sufficient
evacuation routes (roadways, gates etc.)
Wildfire: Wildfires are an issue with large urban wildland interfaces where homes and wildlands
meet.
All Hazards: Other infrastructure vulnerabilities within the city include critical public
infrastructure (i.e. city hall, PD, SBMFD, public works, water treatment, MAYC that could be
affected by severe storm events.
City of Centerville
All Hazards: Assisted Living Facilities and lack of resident mobility presents difficulty during an
evacuation. We need to upgrade the generator at City Hall/fire station as well as add
connectivity and communication improvements to alert for preparedness and education of
upcoming emergency events.
Flooding: Roadway mitigation is needed on Brian Dr. to alleviate frequent flooding.
City of Circle Pines
All Hazards (Pipeline Failure): The city has an underground gas pipeline which could be
susceptible to a range of different hazards, including floods, storms, landslides, tornados, and
earthquakes.
81
Item 4.
Section 3 23 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
City of Columbia Heights
All Hazards: Within the city there is a nursing home, two assisted living facilities, and numerous
senior living apartment buildings which present challenges for communications and difficulty
of resident mobility during an evacuation or emergency. We also need to replace a failing
generator at the public safety building to ensure continuity of police, fire, and emergency
management EOC operations. Connectivity and communication improvements are needed to
alert for preparedness and education of upcoming emergency events and build resiliency. An
underground gas pipeline runs along the border of the city. We also have a large non-English
speaking immigrant population, which presents barriers to communication.
Severe Winter/Summer Storms (Power Outages): The majority of the electric distribution
system is overhead. Wind-thrown trees and ice laden limbs routinely drop lines resulting in
power outages. The Minneapolis water treatment campus & 70 MGD ultrafiltration plant
(Reservoir Blvd) – mission critical pumps and membranes need continuous power. Wind or
lightning outages may force Minneapolis to curtail supply to Columbia Heights.
Extreme Cold: Shallow water‑service lines can be affected. The city tracks and responds to
frozen‑service calls each winter. Power outages jeopardize apartment complexes and small
businesses.
Winter Storms, Blizzards & Ice Accretion: 14 % of residents are ≥65 yrs; mobility‑limited
seniors and renters in older multifamily units face heat‑loss and medical isolation during
outages.
Flooding: There are low spots on TH 65, University Ave & 37th Ave railroad underpass. Ponding
regularly strands vehicles and results in emergency‑vehicle delays. The city has an aging
storm‑sewer network. The built‑out watershed leaves little infiltration; surcharging basins back
up into basements.
City of Columbus
Wildfire: Wildfire hazard is high risk due to low residential density and approximately 80% of
Columbus is with vegetative cover that is highly susceptible to wildfires. The City water system
only serves 6% of the City and has only limited storage capacity, which would impact water
supply for firefighting.
Winter Storms: Much of the city’s municipal electrical service consists of overhead power lines
and electrical poles. Those overhead lines and power poles are prone to failure in ice storms
and blizzards with heavy snowfall and high winds that may bring down trees and branches.
All Hazards: Access to the business district between Potomac and Pine Street on Lake Drive
has no secondary means of access. This could be a bottleneck to emergency service vehicles
and restrict ingress and egress for entering and exiting traffic.
82
Item 4.
Section 3 24 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
City of Coon Rapids
Severe Storms, Flooding: Within the city we have the following critical infrastructure and
facilities that can be negatively affected by a range of severe storm or flood-related events:
Mercy Hospital; Egret Blvd manufactured housing facility; water production, treatment, and
distribution system (treatment plants, towers, piping, hydrants); sanitary lift stations, including
the Met Council major station on Coon Rapids Blvd Ext.; major roadways; railroad lines;
electrical and natural gas distribution facilities – particularly how they power our pumps for
water & sanitary items mentioned above; Communication – cell & fiber lines that are used for
our SCADA system on the water & sanitary items mentioned above; wells.
City of East Bethel
Severe Summer Storms, Flooding: Within the city we have a multi-story assisted living facility,
a large state land management area (Gordie Mikkelson WMA), and 12 lakes, with Coon Lake
covering 1260 acres, alone. We have MN State Highway 65 which is a main corridor running
north and south and Anoka County Road 22 running east and west. Our community is growing
rapidly with over 300 new homes being developed, a water tower, and a new commercial area.
In general, severe weather is a major concern with high winds, tornadoes, and heavy rain
possible.
City of Fridley
Flooding: The City of Fridley has the potential for some seasonal flooding concerns with the
Mississippi River. When the ice melts at the end of winter, we have some areas of the city that
have flooded in the past. However, we have addressed this issue. We have large pumps on the
north end of the city to keep that area from flooding. We have only needed to use them once
in the last 5 or 6 years.
City of Ham Lake
Winter Storms: Much of the city’s municipal electrical service consists of overhead power lines
and electrical poles. Those overhead lines and power poles are prone to failure in ice storms
and blizzards with heavy snowfall and high winds that may bring down trees and branches.
City of Hilltop
Tornadoes: Tornadoes are our #1 vulnerability. About 66% of our residents live in mobile home
parks. There are 4 separately owned and operated MHPs within the city. With increasing severe
weather incidents and more demand for storm shelter space, the city has been working to
move forward with plans to build a new storm shelter at City Hall. However, obtaining the
necessary funds has been extremely difficult. The basement of our City Hall serves as our
community storm shelter, but it is very undersized. If all MHP residents were to come in they
would not all fit. But the new building we have planned would hold 700 people.
83
Item 4.
Section 3 25 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
All Hazards (Emergency Information): We also have a significant portion of residents who
speak English as a second language. This can present challenges in communicating
emergency information.
City of Lexington
All Hazards (Emergency Information): Within the city there is a large immigrant community in
one apartment complex. It is unknown if they have other housing options. This presents
potential language barriers when conveying emergency information.
City of Lino Lakes
All Hazards: The City of Lino Lakes has two large assisted living facilities that would present
challenges should an evacuation be required. The Rice Creek Water Trail and 5,500-acre Rice
Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve also has limited access for emergency vehicles.
Windstorms, Tornadoes: The city has one medium size manufactured park which would be
vulnerable to severe weather.
Wildfire: Wildfire is a concern as there is a wildland urban interface throughout the city.
City of Nowthen
Windstorms, Tornadoes: Our city has a lack of outdoor warning sirens to alert residents to
dangerous high wind or tornado events.
City of Oak Grove
Flooding: Oak Grove has some floodplains.
Windstorms, Tornadoes: We have a senior living facility that would need help in the event of a
long-term power outage.
Wildfire: We have a lot of wildland-urban interface.
City of Ramsey
All Hazards: The City of Ramsey has 2 Assisted Living Facilities both with memory care units.
In the event of an evacuation these pose a special vulnerability.
Flooding: We have both the Mississippi River and the Rum River running through the city.
Homes along the Mississippi are prone to local flooding, but homes on the Rum have a natural
protection due to the height of the embankment.
Windstorms, Tornadoes: We have 1 mobile home park that has an undersized storm shelter.
84
Item 4.
Section 3 26 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Wildfire: We have a growing wildland-urban interface where large, mixed field/marsh/wetland
environments back up to large housing developments.
City of Saint Francis
Windstorms, Tornadoes: There are numerous parks in the city, some without storm shelters.
City of Spring Lake Park
All Hazards: Within the city of Spring Lake Park we have several assisted living and retirement
homes that would be difficult to evacuate in an emergency.
Linwood Township
Wildfire: Wildfire is a concern as there is a wildland urban interface throughout the town
including approximately 6,000 acres of Carlos Avery Wildlife Management Area. In addition to
this, Anoka County has a regional park consisting of approximately 800 acres within Linwood
Township.
All Hazards: In addition to wildfire, other natural disasters such as tornadoes, flooding, and
windstorms pose a threat as there are many areas/neighborhoods within the township that
are isolated without multiple forms of egress.
Other Stakeholders
Coon Creek Watershed District:
Flooding: The following areas in the Coon Creek Watershed District have been identified as
having a high risk of flooding due to a variety of factors including, proximity to water bodies,
the flat topography of Anoka County, and storm conveyance systems being overwhelmed in
large storm events:
• Creekside Estates manufactured home park south of Egret Blvd. NW in Coon Rapids
• Park of Four Seasons manufactured home park in Blaine
• Blaine International Village manufactured home park in Blaine
• Bridgewater Neighborhood in Coon Rapids
• Northview Villa Community – Buchanon St. in Blaine
• Neighborhood adjacent to Aurelia Park in Blaine
• Northtown Mall along CR 10 NE in Blaine
• Springbrook Apartments SW of University Ave and 85th Ave NW. in Fridley
• Neighborhood NE of East River Rd. and 85th Ave NW in Coon Rapids
• Neighborhood east of East River Rd. on Ironton St. NE and Hugo St. NE in Fridley
• Neighborhood of Polk St. NE and 126th Ave NE in Blaine
• Neighborhood around Broken Oaks Park in Blaine
85
Item 4.
Section 3 27 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
• Neighborhoods adjacent to Coon Creek near the Medtronic campus
• Neighborhoods adjacent to Coon Creek between Main St. NW and Hanson Blvd. NW in
Coon Rapids
• Neighborhood adjacent to Coon Creek between 131st St. and Main St. NW in Andover and
Coon Rapids
• Neighborhood adjacent to Coon Creek between Bunker Lk Blvd NW and 131st St in Andover
• Neighborhood adjacent to Coon Creek between South Coon Creek Dr NW and Bunker Lk
Blvd NW in Andover
• Neighborhood adjacent to Coon Creek between Crosstown Blvd NW and South Coon Creek
Dr NW in Andover
• Neighborhood adjacent to Coon Creek between Hanson Blvd NW and Crosstown Blvd NW
in Andover
• The main stem of Coon Creek which includes ditch 54 and ditch 57 from Hanson Blvd NW
south to its outlet at the Mississippi River was previously excavated, ditched, and
straightened for drainage purposes in the late 1800s. The increase in development and
stormwater runoff since then has created unstable stream banks, water quality issues
from sediment and nutrients, and flooding issues due to the lack of floodplain and storage
in the contributing drainage areas. The remaining natural reaches of the stream are also
undersized for the increase in stormwater runoff it receives from its urbanized drainage
area. The unstable banks of the stream can slough off into the stream which can cause
trees and debris to flow downstream, block drainage, and plug culverts and crossings.
These situations can present major flooding risks even in small storm events when culvert
crossings are unable to pass stream flow.
Erosion: CCWD inspects the entire ditch system of the watershed every 5 years and keeps an
active inventory of active erosion sites in the watershed. This information is used to prioritize
stabilization of these sites and track the amount of sediment and other particulates released
from active erosion sites to evaluate their impact on human health, safety, and welfare.
Water Quality: Coon Creek, Sand Creek, Ditch 11, Ditch 58, Ditch 41, Pleasure Creek, and
Springbrook Creek are each impaired for aquatic life and/or aquatic recreation due to E.coli.
These impairments pose health risks to residents in Anoka County and ecosystems that impact
residents in Anoka County.
3.4.2 Future Development
Because Anoka County is vulnerable to a variety of natural hazards, the county government—in
partnership with the state government—must make a commitment to prepare for the management of
these events. Anoka County is committed to ensuring that county elected and appointed officials
become informed leaders regarding community hazards so that they are better prepared to set and
direct policies for emergency management and county response.
As part of the vulnerability assessment conducted for the Anoka County HMP update, jurisdictions
were asked to describe if there were any factors related to population growth, zoning, or development
they felt have increased their community’s vulnerability to future severe weather or disaster events.
86
Item 4.
Section 3 28 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
The following is a compilation of responses taken directly from jurisdictional representatives as
preserved in Appendix C: Question 4 – Increase in Vulnerability. Responses here are edited only for
clarity.
Anoka County
Commercial, residential, and high-density residential development continues across Anoka
County. The developments increase the amount of water runoff due to the increased
development. Municipal governments have oversight of these matters locally.
City of Andover
As our community ages, we have been adding senior housing, group homes, assisted living,
and other care facilities. We are continually adding 100+ homes a year. We also added a new
154-unit apartment complex with a new senior living Campus breaking ground this spring. This
campus will have senior care, assisted living, independent living, and memory care. All of these
developments have an impact related to stormwater discharging into our stormwater system
and the possible need to evacuate and shelter hundreds of people at other locations. In the
event of a large-scale event, the additional resources needed to ensure a safe and effective
evacuation would most likely overwhelm our community.
City of Anoka
We have several 55+ and assisted living complexes built that have increased our need to
respond to that population in the event of a natural disaster. We have also seen an increase
in the construction of slab-on-grade homes (no basements), which leaves those residents more
vulnerable to high wind or tornado events without the ability to take shelter underground.
City of Bethel
No new development or increase in vulnerability.
City of Blaine
Our community has grown exponentially from all sides and demographics. We have seen large
growth in assisted and care facilities. We have multiple areas of commercial development that
have been completed and are in the process of being developed. Residential housing has
increased in community developments especially in the northeast corner of the city. All this
development has increased our vulnerability.
In addition, a large redevelopment project has just begun at 105th Ave/Radisson Rd where a
5000+ person minor league baseball stadium/event center will be built. This area will also
have new apartments, hotels, and commercial business and is anticipated to host large events
besides baseball games.
87
Item 4.
Section 3 29 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Blaine has an airport in the city with an increase in flights taking off and landing, with expansion
of buildings and hangars on the airport property. Concerns with this new development include
severe weather, fire, and potential flooding.
City of Centerville
We have had an increase in Assisted Living Facilities along with new residential housing. No
increase in vulnerabilities.
City of Circle Pines
No new development or increase in vulnerabilities.
City of Columbia Heights
A 191-unit 55+ complex and a 296-unit residential housing development has increased our
need to respond to an increased population in the event of a natural disaster. Two large low-
to market-rate residential developments are currently being proposed. The two developments
could increase the population by several thousand residents. Vulnerabilities include:
High concentrations of vulnerable populations - Seniors, low-income residents, or those with
limited mobility may need extra planning.
Language/cultural barriers - may inhibit emergency message understanding,
A lack of established community networks - may lack social cohesion to support neighbors,
Insurance gaps or under coverage - Residents may lack flood/fire/disaster insurance despite
elevated risk.
City of Columbus
Columbus has not experienced any increase in vulnerability as a result of new development
City of Coon Rapids
We have experienced continued high-density development and senior/assisted living facilities.
Mercy Hospital continues to expand. Population diversity and making sure our messaging
regarding hazards is communicated properly is important for non-English speaking residents.
The biggest vulnerability is the movement of people (evacuation) in case of natural emergency
(e.g., from a hospital, assisted living, or senior building).
88
Item 4.
Section 3 30 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
City of East Bethel
The city has become visible to those looking to move into a rural community close to nature
and main corridors. As communities grow around us, we are feeling the impact of more
developments. We have plats approved with over 300 new homes and commercial structures.
City of Fridley
Fridley has substantially added several high-density housing units. No new vulnerabilities.
City of Ham Lake
We have added 8 new developments with approximately 250 new homes. No new
vulnerabilities.
City of Hilltop
No new development. We have been fully developed since the 1960s, we have no room for
growth.
City of Lexington
We have had an increase in apartment complexes. No increase in vulnerabilities.
City of Lino Lakes
The City of Lino Lakes has experienced significant residential development on the east side of
the city in the North Pointe and Watermark developments. A large retirement community
consisting of independent, assisted living and memory care was developed in the southwest
portion of the city. The city expects to continue with 100+ homes being added annually. These
developments could result in greater vulnerabilities for property damage and injury from
severe weather.
City of Nowthen
No new development or increase in vulnerability. Nowthen has not seen any new development
that has increased the vulnerability to the city.
City of Oak Grove
The City of Oak Grove has added many new housing developments in the past five years. We
have not had any increase in vulnerability as a result.
89
Item 4.
Section 3 31 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
City of Ramsey
The City of Ramsey has grown exponentially with a large percentage of the residential
development located in the vicinity of the COR area. Ramsey is averaging about 150 new
homes annually. A 133-unit apartment building will be complete in Fall 2025 in the COR.
On the east side of the city (St. Francis Blvd/Nowthen Blvd) a total of 640 multi-family units
have been approved; construction may begin in 2026. Commercial growth continues at a
steady pace.
We continue to gain townhomes in our community (both complexes and detached), and many
of these townhomes are built slab-on-grade, eliminating a basement in which to take cover for
high wind/tornado events
This housing growth has only increased our Wildfire Urban Interface with a resulting increase
in risk for wildfire.
City of Saint Francis
The city has had several new residential housing developments. In late fall 2025 we will also
have a new 134-bed assisted living facility opening. No new increase in vulnerability.
City of Spring Lake Park
We have added a 193-unit retirement apartment complex. This has increased a vulnerability
of potential evacuation issues of moving a large amount of seniors in case of an emergency.
Linwood Township
We have added 4 new housing developments, a new storage facility housing semi-trailers, and
a new electrical substation (Great River Energy). No new vulnerabilities.
Other Stakeholders
Coon Creek Watershed District:
Development has continued to occur within the Cook Creek Watershed District over the last 5
years. Generally, new developments have not increased the risk of flooding or impact to water
quality to surrounding areas due to development regulations and standards in place. CCWD
keeps an up-to-date inventory of all sites of active erosion in GIS, and in those areas of
increased development/impervious surface we can anticipate development near the inventory
of active erosion may get worse unless mitigation occurs.
.
90
Item 4.
Section 3 32 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
In the development of local mitigation actions, all jurisdictions were encouraged to consider hazard
mitigation strategies that would reduce risk in relation to future development, such as the update of
local comprehensive plans, enforcement of ordinances, and incorporation of infrastructure
improvements to reduce local vulnerabilities (see Appendix H).
The Anoka County emergency management director will work to keep the jurisdictions covered by the
HMP engaged and informed during the plan’s cycle. By keeping jurisdictional leaders involved in the
monitoring, evaluation, and update of the HMP, they will keep their local governments aware of the
hazards that face their communities and how to mitigate those hazards through planning and project
implementation.
Section 6 of this plan further outlines the process by which Anoka County will address the maintenance
of this plan, including monitoring, evaluation, and update of the plan, as well as implementation and
continued public involvement.
91
Item 4.
Section 4 – Hazards
As part of the risk assessment, each natural hazard that poses risk to the county was independently
reviewed for its past hazard history, relationship to future trends, and jurisdictional vulnerability to
future events. The county also conducted a capabilities assessment to review the plans and programs
that are in place or lacking (program gaps or deficiencies) for implementing mitigation efforts, as
related to each natural hazard. An assessment was also conducted for local jurisdictions to identify
the plans, policies, programs, staff, and funding they have in place to incorporate mitigation into other
planning mechanisms (see Section 5.1 and Appendix C).
Read more about natural hazard prioritization and view
interactive information on all hazards
The following hazard profiles address hazards that the Anoka County Planning Team deemed
moderate to high risk. Hazards determined to be low risk or without substantive mitigation actions are
not required to be included.
4.1 Flooding
Flooding is the most significant and costly natural hazard in Minnesota. Four of the 13 federal disaster
declarations in Anoka County included flooding.
4.1.1 Probability of Occurrence
From 1996 through May 2025, the NCEI Storm Events Database has recorded 18 flood and flash flood
events. Anoka County has experienced one flash flood event every 1.3 years and one riverine flood
event every 10.4 years on average during this period.
View interactive maps and see information about flooding
history, risk, and vulnerability
Minnesota HSEM has encouraged a potential risk and economic loss analysis for a 1% annual chance
flood using the FEMA tool, Hazus for ArcGIS.
The 1% annual chance flood boundary used in the analysis is a combination of datasets provided by
the Coon Creek Watershed District (CCWD), the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), and FEMA. The
flood boundary data from the watershed districts were treated as the primary datasets and the FEMA
Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data was secondary. The FEMA DFIRM data was not used
within the watershed districts.
A raster layer (10m resolution) of flood water depths within the 1% annual chance flood boundary was
calculated by taking the difference between the elevation of the ground and the surface of the flood
water. Static base flood elevation (BFE) data was available for some flooded areas in the FEMA DFIRM
data, but the water surface elevation (WSEL) had to be calculated for the rest of the flooded areas.
92
Item 4.
Section 4 34 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
The method of calculating the WSEL varied by the data available. For this analysis, water surface
elevations within the flood boundaries were calculated by interpolating the WSEL values of cross
section line data, where available, and the elevation at the flood boundary where cross section data
was not available.
The resulting Hazus 1% annual chance floodplain is shown in the Flood Vulnerability dashboard on the
Anoka County HMP website (Figure 1), where it is available in an interactive form.
Figure 1. 1% Annual chance flood in Anoka County
4.1.2 Vulnerability
Potential economic loss estimates were based on county-specific building data. Anoka County provided
parcel tax and spatial databases that included building valuations, occupancy class, square footage,
year built, and number of stories. The quality of the inventory is the limiting factor to a Hazus flood
model loss estimation. Best practices were used to use local data and assumptions were made to
populate missing (but required) values.
View at-risk populations in Anoka County
Hazus reports the percent damage of each building in the floodplain, defined by the centroid of each
building footprint. After formatting the tax and spatial data, 193,083 points were input to Hazus to
represent buildings with a total estimated building plus contents value of $69.4 billion. Approximately
93% of the buildings (and 73% of the building value) are associated with residential housing. The
estimated loss by occupancy class for the entire county is shown in Table 8.
The distinction between building attributes within a parcel was not known, so the maximum percent
damage to a building in that parcel was used to calculate loss estimates for the entire parcel. The sum
of all the losses in each census block were aggregated to visualize the loss (see flood risk map on the
HMP website). Please note: It is possible for a building location to report no loss even if it is in the flood
boundary. For example, if the water depth is minimal relative to 1st-floor height, there may be 0%
damage.
93
Item 4.
Section 4 35 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Table 8. Summary of 1% annual chance flood loss estimation by occupancy class
General
Occupancy
County
Total
Buildings
County Building
and Contents
Value
Floodplain
Total
Buildings
Floodplain
Building +
Contents Value
Buildings
with
damage
Building +
Contents Loss
Residential 179,254 $50,438,407,682 2,337 $976,445,850 1,254 $41,960,716
Commercial 4,334 $5,832,308,626 67 $137,854,600 64 $1,463,778
Other 9,495 $13,097,637,104 226 $411,679,100 87 $45,110,620
Totals 193,083 $69,368,353,412 2,630 $1,525,979,550 1,405 $88,535,114
SOURCE: (FEMA, 2024C)
Hazus Critical Infrastructure Loss Analysis
Critical facilities and infrastructure are vital to the public, and their incapacitation or destruction would
have a significant negative impact on the community. These facilities and infrastructure were identified
on the HMP website and verified by Anoka County.
Buildings identified as essential facilities for the Hazus flood analysis include hospitals, police and fire
stations, and schools (often used as shelters). Essential facilities are vulnerable to structural failure,
extensive water damage, and loss of facility functionality during a flood, thereby negatively impacting
the communities relying on these facilities’ services. Mary T Hospice in Coon Rapids and Spring Lake
Park, Blaine, Mounds View Fire – located in Blaine – were shown to fall within 1% annual chance
floodplain. The local sites should be reviewed to determine actual vulnerability.
Extreme precipitation resulting in flooding may overwhelm water infrastructure, disrupt transportation,
and cause other damage. Particularly where stormwater, sewage and water treatment infrastructure
is aging or undersized for more intense rainstorms, extreme rain events may pose both health and
ecological risks in addition to costly damage (USGCRP, 2018b).
It is important to identify other critical infrastructure within the 1% annual chance floodplain, given the
higher risk of the facility or infrastructure being incapacitated or destroyed during a flood. In Anoka
County, the following infrastructure was found to be at risk in the 1% annual chance flood: two airports,
three electric transmission substations, and four wastewater facilities. This infrastructure is mapped
on the Anoka County HMP website. This flood analysis did not evaluate flooding bridges, roads, or
other linear features.
There were several other important assets within the 1% annual chance flood boundary and worth
further flood risk review. Buildings considered include places where critical leaders’ offices may be,
historical resources, hazardous waste storage, and places where populations may be exposed, such
as campgrounds or mobile home parks. In Anoka County, the assets vulnerable to a 1% annual chance
flood are the historic Banfill Tavern in Fridley and 40 treatment storage or disposal facilities throughout
the county. These vulnerabilities should be reviewed in more detail.
Community Vulnerability
Potential economic losses were estimated by Census Minor Civil Division. The City of Fridley would
suffer estimated losses of $43.6 million in the 1% annual chance flood, and the City of Blaine would
suffer estimated losses of nearly $16 million. The Cities of Andover and East Bethel also have
significant estimated losses. All jurisdictions with buildings identified in the 1% annual chance flood
zone can also be viewed on the Anoka County HMP website.
94
Item 4.
Section 4 36 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
The status of jurisdictional participation in the National Flood Insurance Program and any repetitive
loss properties are detailed in Section 5.1.1. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
Section 3.4 provides jurisdictional responses to localized vulnerabilities to specific hazards.
4.1.3 Flooding and Climate Change
Higher temperatures globally have evaporated more surface and ocean water into the atmosphere,
which, in turn, has provided more potential moisture for precipitating weather systems. In Anoka
County, the result has been increased precipitation, with annual totals increasing at an average rate
of a quarter inch per decade statewide since 1895 (see Figure 2).
Figure 2. Anoka County annual precipitation, 1895–2024
SOURCE:(MN DNR, 2025B)
Key Message #1 in the Water Chapter of the NCA5 states that climate change will
continue to cause profound changes in the water cycle.
Snow cover will decrease and melt earlier and heavier rainfall is leading to increasing flooding (Payton
et al., 2023). Additional increases in heavy and extreme precipitation are expected to remain the
state’s leading climate change symptoms. Heavy rains are now more common in Minnesota and more
intense than at any time on record. Long-term observation sites have seen dramatic increases in one-
inch rains, three-inch rains, and the size of the heaviest rainfall of the year. Since 2000, Minnesota
has seen a significant uptick in devastating, large-area extreme rainstorms as well. Rains that
historically would have been in the 98th percentile annually (the largest 2%) have become more
common (MN DNR, 2024).
95
Item 4.
Section 4 37 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
This precipitation increase is found in all seasons, but spring and summer are becoming wetter at
faster rates than fall and winter. Whereas temperature increases have been greatest in the northern
parts of the state, precipitation increases have been well distributed geographically, and have
somewhat favored southern Minnesota, which has better access to moisture from the Gulf of Mexico
and is more frequently near the “low-level jet” airflow (a relatively fast-moving zone of winds in the
lower atmosphere) that influences precipitation production.
4.1.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies
Anoka County Emergency Management identified existing program gaps and deficiencies that make
its residents more vulnerable to flooding. The following gaps and deficiencies should be addressed
with new mitigation efforts to reduce that vulnerability:
Stormwater Management: Municipal governments have oversight of local stormwater management
and flood mitigation. Commercial, residential, and high-density residential development continues
across Anoka County. The developments increase the amount of water runoff due to the increased
development. Municipal governments need to continue addressing these issues locally. Ongoing
collaboration is encouraged between Anoka County and local jurisdictions to mitigate repetitive flood
losses.
4.2 Wildfire
Wildfire is an uncontrolled fire spreading through vegetative fuels, posing danger and destruction to
property. Each year between January 1992 and July 2025, Minnesota experienced an average of 427
wildfires that burned at least five acres (MN DNR, 2025c). Wildfires occur throughout the spring,
summer, and fall; however, most wildfires in Minnesota take place in March, April, and May. The history
of wildfire in Anoka County is shown in Figure 3; an interactive map is available on the Anoka County
HMP website. The number of wildfires by type, acres, and cause includes aggregated data for Anoka
County.
View interactive maps and see information about wildfire
history, risk, and vulnerability
4.2.1 Probability of Occurrence
To determine the probability of future wildfires, Minnesota DNR and National Interagency Fire Center
records of previous wildfire events in Anoka County were summed and divided by the dataset’s period
of record, resulting in an annual relative frequency of wildfires for that period. From January 1992 to
April 11, 2025, the relative frequency of wildfire events in the county is 6.4 per year (MN DNR, 2025c;
National Interagency Fire Center, 2025). This relative frequency can be used to infer the probability of
these events occurring in the future.
96
Item 4.
Section 4 38 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Figure 3. History of wildfire in Anoka County
4.2.2 Vulnerability
Wildfires jeopardize the built environment, health, and wellbeing of individuals living near its fuel
source. Some residents are more vulnerable to air quality conditions of wildfire, including children,
older adults, and those with respiratory issues (AirNow, 2021).
Structures located in areas near undeveloped wildland are vulnerable to wildfires. The SILVIS Lab at
University of Wisconsin–Madison created a dataset documenting the changes of the wildland–urban
interface (WUI) in the United States from 1990 to 2020. Radeloff et al. (2018) define WUI as the area
where structures and other human development meet or intermingle with wildland vegetation. With
the increase of development in metropolitan fringes and rural areas, the WUI is growing. The expansion
of the WUI in recent decades has significant implications for wildfire management and impact as it
creates an environment in which fire can readily move between structural and vegetation fuels. Its
expansion has increased the likelihood that wildfires will threaten structures and people (Radeloff et
al., 2018).
There are two main types of WUI: intermix and interface. Intermix WUI are areas where housing and
wildland vegetation intermingle; interface WUI are areas where housing are adjacent to wildland
vegetation (Radeloff et al., 2018). Table 9 shows the change of total WUI (intermix and interface) in
the county from 2000 to 2020, and the percentage of the county’s land, housing, and population in
the WUI area.
Table 9. Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI), Anoka County, 2000–2020
Total WUI
2000
Total WUI
2010
Total WUI
2020
% Change
(2000–2020)
Land Area 37.7% 39.4% 41.0% +8.6%
Housing 19.0% 21.7% 23.3% +22.8%
SOURCE: (RADELOFF, MOCKRIN, ET AL., 2023)
97
Item 4.
Section 4 39 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Communities with higher proportions of WUI areas are more vulnerable to wildfires. The percentage of
WUI within individual jurisdictions in Anoka County is shown in Table 10.
Section 3.4 provides jurisdictional responses to localized vulnerabilities to specific hazards.
Table 10. Percentage of land area classified as WUI per jurisdiction in Anoka County
Township/City Percent WUI
Andover 28.8
Anoka 16.2
Bethel 39.0
Blaine 42.6
Centerville 0.0
Circle Pines 22.3
Columbia Heights 0.0
Columbus 49.4
Coon Rapids 0.5
East Bethel 69.0
Fridley 0.0
Ham Lake 61.8
Hilltop 0.0
Lexington 4.6
Lino Lakes 47.5
Linwood 55.8
Nowthen 27.8
Oak Grove 49.0
Ramsey 26.1
Saint Francis 15.8
Spring Lake Park 0.0
SOURCE: (RADELOFF, HELMERS, ET AL., 2023)
4.2.3 Wildfire and Climate Change
The changing climate poses a complex web of issues for wildfire in Minnesota. Climate change likely
is affecting the frequency and intensity of Canadian wildfires, similar to its effect on wildfires in the
western U.S. and Alaska (Wehner, 2017). Small particulate pollution from smoke plumes has
numerous health impacts as described above, and if severe enough can result in spikes of demand
for emergency services. Based even on intermediate (RCP4.5) future climate projections, many
Midwest counties will experience increased exposure to wildfire smoke (Mills et al., 2018).
According to the NCA5, Key Message #3 in the Midwest Chapter, Climate Adaptation
will require innovative collaborations between public health and other sectors such as
emergency management (Wilson et al., 2023).
Changes in Minnesota’s climate also may be influencing the frequency, severity, and areal coverage
of wildfires. For example, warmer winters with inconsistent snow cover, the arrival of wet conditions
98
Item 4.
Section 4 40 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
prior to the growing season, plus early and more frequent thaws, all combine to prolong the exposure
of susceptible vegetation to dry conditions, potentially extending the peak wildfire season.
Minnesota’s changing climate also may affect fire-damaged areas. For instance, heavy rains in burned
areas can lead to erosion and mudslides. Documented and projected increases in the frequency and
intensity of heavy and extreme rainfall suggest that Minnesota is becoming and will become more
prone to post-fire landscape hazards. Climate change also is having an impact on the pests that
damage the health and composition of Minnesota forests, although the ultimate consequences for
wildfire are complex and uncertain. Shorter winters are allowing two reproductive cycles of the Eastern
Larch Beetle, which has now killed off at least 143,000 acres of mature tamarack forest in Minnesota
since 2001 and affected about 535,000 acres to some degree during that period. The decline in
severity and frequency of extreme cold may allow more rapid establishment of Emerald Ash Borer to
latitudes further north than without climate change. Minnesota forests are home to an estimated 1
billion ash trees. Many of these trees are in nearly pure stands of black ash growing in wet areas. So
while the deaths of these lowland species will increase fuel loading, their decreased transpiration will
increase water on the ground. The ultimate contribution to wildfire will depend on the interplay
between increased precipitation, warming temperatures, extreme heat, and periods of drought as our
climate continues to change.
Temperatures are predicted to rise in the state, which could lead to more extreme heat events and
associated wildfire risks. As Minnesota’s climate changes, weather fluctuations between drought and
extreme rain events and increasing temperatures will result in changes to forest composition and/or
distribution. These fluctuations can lead to dry conditions that may cause increased fire risk in both
grassland and forest environments.
The varied impacts of climate change are complicated by how these changes also interact with and
reinforce one another. Drought and heat may both contribute to wildfires, which may in turn lead to
changes in plant and animal populations and other ecological shifts. Increasing events of extreme
heat and drought can increase the number of wildfires (Blumenfeld, K. Minnesota State Climatology
Office, personal communication, January 9, 2019).
4.2.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies
Anoka County Emergency Management did not identify any program gaps or deficiencies that make
its citizens more vulnerable to wildfire.
4.3 Windstorms
A windstorm is a wind strong enough to cause damage to trees and buildings and typically exceeding
34 mph (Pielke, 2012). Windstorm events encompass a variety of types of damaging wind. The history
of windstorms in Anoka County is shown in Figure 4; an interactive version of this map can be found
on the Anoka County HMP website.
View interactive maps and see information about
windstorm history, risk, and vulnerability
99
Item 4.
Section 4 41 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Figure 4. History of windstorms in Anoka County
4.3.1 Probability of Occurrence
To determine the probability of future wind-related events in Anoka County, records of previous wind-
related events (strong wind, high wind, and thunderstorm wind) in Anoka County were examined since
1996, the period of record all wind events have in common. The relative frequency of all wind-related
events from January 1996 to May 2025 is 5.8 per year. These relative frequencies can be used to
infer the probability of these events occurring in the future.
4.3.2 Vulnerability
The likelihood of a windstorm event does not vary geographically within the county, but the vulnerability
of its residents is not constant. Vulnerability to injury from all kinds of windstorms decreases with
adequate warnings, warning time, and sheltering in a reinforced structure. Therefore, residents living
in rural areas, living alone or with limited mobility, or living in a manufactured home may be more
vulnerable. Also at a higher risk to windstorms are those who work outdoors or do not have permanent
housing.
Structural vulnerability depends in part upon the construction of a building and its infrastructure.
Residents of mobile homes are more vulnerable to fatality or injury from windstorms because mobile
homes are not able to withstand high winds as well as other structural dwellings, with 50 mph (43.4
knots) being the lower limit of wind speeds capable of damaging mobile homes (AMS, 2004). Steps to
mitigate these vulnerabilities have been taken by the state, requiring all mobile home parks to provide
an evacuation plan, and parks with at least 10 homes licensed after March 1, 1988 to provide a storm
shelter (MDH, 2020). However, mobile home parks often do not provide the required storm shelters
(Sepic, 2017). Building codes have also changed to improve the strength of new mobile home
construction but there are still many older mobile homes in use that do not meet these new standards.
Section 3.4 provides jurisdictional responses to localized vulnerabilities to specific hazards.
100
Item 4.
Section 4 42 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
4.3.3 Windstorms and Climate Change
Lack of high-quality long-term data sets makes assessment of changes in wind speeds very difficult
(Kunkel et al., 2013). In general, one analysis found no evidence of significant changes in wind speed
distribution. Other trends in severe storms, including the number of hurricanes and the intensity and
frequency of tornadoes, hail, and damaging thunderstorm winds, are uncertain. Since the impact of
more frequent or intense storms can be larger than the impact of average temperature, climate
scientists are actively researching the connections between climate change and severe storms
(USGCRP, 2018a).
According to the NCA5 Key Message #5 in the Climate Trends chapter, extreme
events are becoming more frequent.
4.3.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies
Anoka County Emergency Management identified program gaps and deficiencies that make its
residents more vulnerable to summer storms, including windstorms. The following gaps and
deficiencies should be addressed with new mitigation efforts to reduce that vulnerability:
Above-Ground Power Lines: Most power lines throughout Anoka County are above ground, exposing
them to potential damage from high-wind events. The county and local jurisdictions continue to work
with electric utility providers to convert overhead power lines to underground or to implement other
measures to reduce the risk of power failure.
Public Education: Ongoing public education is needed during tornado season to inform the public
about what a tornado watch/warning is and what to do when outdoor warning sirens are activated.
Anoka County and local jurisdictions should continue to encourage residents to be aware of and ready
for severe storm events that can lead to long-term power outages.
Storm Shelters and Tornado Safe Rooms: There are areas throughout Anoka County with populations
vulnerable to high-wind and storm events, such as mobile home parks and campgrounds, that do not
have viable storm shelters or tornado safe rooms. A coordinated approach is needed to identify where
storm shelters or tornado safe rooms are needed and to evaluate whether new construction or a
retrofit of facilities is possible. Finding funding for the implementation of such construction projects is
also a barrier. Municipal governments have oversight of these matters locally; Anoka County
Emergency Management would participate in a supporting role as appropriate.
4.4 Tornadoes
With wind speeds reaching up to 300 mph, tornadoes are one of nature’s most violent storms
(Hogeback, 2020). The history of tornadoes in Anoka County is shown in Figure 5; an interactive
version of this map can be found on the Anoka County HMP website.
View interactive maps and see information about tornado
history, risk, and vulnerability
101
Item 4.
Section 4 43 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Figure 5. History of tornadoes in Anoka County
4.4.1 Probability of Occurrence
Estimating the probability of future tornadoes in Anoka County was done using two methods. The first
method summed the total number of tornadoes that either touched down in or traveled through the
county. This sum was divided by the number of years tornado data was recorded, resulting in the
annual relative frequency of tornado occurrences in the county. Based on records in the NCEI Storm
Events Database through May 2025, there has been one tornado every 2.8 years in Anoka County.
These 27 tornadic events occurred in 17 of the 75 years on record.
Because tornadoes often cross county lines and tornadic frequency may be better understood using
events from a larger area, a second method was used to describe the frequency of tornadic events
within a 50-mile radius of any location within the county. A grid of 900 square-meter cells was used to
cover Minnesota and 50 miles beyond its border. From the center of each cell, the number of
tornadoes that intersected a 50-mile radius was counted. Each cell was assigned a total tornado line
count, which was then divided by the tornado dataset’s period of record, resulting in the annual relative
frequency of tornadoes occurring within 50 miles of the respective cell.
For any location in Anoka County, there was an annual frequency of 2–5 tornadoes within a 50-mile
radius. The historical frequency was lowest in the northeast and highest in the southwest of the county.
These relative frequencies can be used to infer the probability of these events occurring in the future.
4.4.2 Vulnerability
The likelihood of a tornado does not vary significantly across geography within Anoka County; however,
certain populations may be more vulnerable and less resilient to the impacts of a tornado. In general,
tornado casualties decrease when people receive adequate warnings with sufficient time to seek
shelter in a reinforced structure. Because communication is critical before a tornadic event, certain
residents may be more negatively impacted by a tornado, including those living in rural areas,
individuals with limited mobility, people who do not live near an outdoor warning siren, or those who
102
Item 4.
Section 4 44 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
do not use social media. Section 3.4 provides jurisdictional responses to localized vulnerabilities to
specific hazards.
View at-risk populations in Anoka County
People living in mobile homes are particularly vulnerable to tornadoes because they cannot withstand
the strong winds produced by a tornado. An analysis by the Associated Press of NOAA storm data found
that since 1996, 53% of tornado fatalities in the United States were people who remained within or
attempted to flee from mobile homes (Borestein et al., 2023). While Minnesota law requires most
mobile home parks to have storm shelters, many do not (Raiche, 2022).
4.4.3 Tornadoes and Climate Change
Minnesota’s climate is undergoing distinct changes, but as reported by the MN DNR State Climatology
Office, these changes are only weakly connected to increases in tornadoes or severe convective
storms. Minnesota, like all parts of the U.S., has seen increases in the weakest class of tornadoes
(rated F-0 or EF-0), but these increases are known to be linked to improved spotting, detection, and
verification procedures within the National Weather Service.
When examining tornadoes that cause significant structural damage and are rated EF-2 or above,
Minnesota has seen no recent trends towards increasing frequencies—whether measured as raw
counts, or as days with one or more of these tornadoes (MN DNR, 2019).
The tornado trends in Minnesota match those found nationally. NCA5 states that while the average
annual number of tornadoes appears to have remained relatively constant, there is evidence that
tornado outbreaks have become more frequent, tornado seasons are extending into later in the fall,
and that tornado strength has increased (Marvel et al., 2023). An October 10, 2021 tornado in the
Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness became the latest on record so far north in the state. Then,
on December 15, 2021, an outbreak of destructive thunderstorm winds and over 20 tornadoes struck
the southeastern parts of the state, producing the latest tornadoes on record by 29 days (Blumenfeld,
K. Minnesota State Climatology Office, personal communication, December 21, 2023).
According to the NCA5 Key Message #5 in the Climate Trends chapter, extreme
events are becoming more frequent.
However, climate scientists are unclear about whether the recent statistical behavior of these severe
convective storm events has any relationship with the changing climate. This uncertainty results from
the fact that tornadoes and their parent thunderstorms operate on smaller scales and more localized
processes than the global climate. There has been some indication that, on a national basis, tornadoes
are being clustered into fewer days, suggesting a greater tendency towards outbreaks. Scientific
modelling studies indicate that the meteorological conditions supportive of severe thunderstorms
should increase in the future, but it is unclear whether the specific conditions required for the
formation of tornadoes, and particularly significant tornadoes, will increase (Kossin, 2017). Until more
studies are completed, the Minnesota State Climatology Office recommends assuming that tornadoes
will remain an important and dangerous part of Minnesota’s climate, even if they do not increase in
frequency or severity in response to changing climatic conditions.
103
Item 4.
Section 4 45 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
4.4.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies
Anoka County Emergency Management identified program gaps and deficiencies that make its
residents more vulnerable to summer storms, including tornadoes. The following gaps and deficiencies
should be addressed with new mitigation efforts to reduce that vulnerability:
Above-Ground Power Lines: Most power lines throughout Anoka County are above ground, exposing
them to potential damage from high-wind events. The county and local jurisdictions continue to work
with electric utility providers to convert overhead power lines to underground or to implement other
measures to reduce the risk of power failure.
Public Education: Ongoing public education is needed during tornado season to inform the public
about what a tornado watch/warning is and what to do when outdoor warning sirens are activated.
Anoka County and local jurisdictions should continue to encourage residents to be aware of and ready
for severe storm events that can lead to long-term power outages.
Storm Shelters and Tornado Safe Rooms: There are areas throughout Anoka County with populations
vulnerable to high-wind and storm events, such as mobile home parks and campgrounds, that do not
have viable storm shelters or tornado safe rooms. A coordinated approach is needed to identify where
storm shelters or tornado safe rooms are needed and to evaluate whether new construction or a
retrofit of facilities is possible. Finding funding for the implementation of such construction projects is
also a barrier. Municipal governments have oversight of these matters locally; Anoka County
Emergency Management would participate in a supporting role as appropriate.
4.5 Hail
Hailstorms occur throughout the year though are most frequent between May and August (NWS,
2020). Although hailstorms rarely cause injury or loss of life, they do cost Minnesota nearly $16 million
in property and crop damage each year (CEMHS, 2023). In 2017, 44% of properties in Minnesota were
affected by damaging hail events (Samanta & Wu, 2017). The history of hail in Anoka County is shown
in Figure 6; an interactive version of this map can be found on the Anoka County HMP website.
View interactive maps and see information about hail
history, risk, and vulnerability
4.5.1 Probability of Occurrence
To determine the probability of future hailstorms in Anoka County, records of previous hail events in
the county were examined for the period of record. From January 1955 through May 2025, the relative
frequency of hail events was 3.6 per year. This relative frequency can be used to infer the probability
of hail events occurring in the future. Please note that public reports of hail are often secondary to
those of thunderstorm winds or tornadoes because if either damaging winds or tornadoes occur, the
damaging wind and/or tornado are more important to the reporter and may result in underreporting
of hail events.
104
Item 4.
Section 4 46 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Figure 6. History of hail in Anoka County
4.5.2 Vulnerability
Anoka County’s agricultural lands and structures are vulnerable to hail damage and its residents to
injury and possibly death. Data from the Spatial Hazard Events and Losses Database for the United
States (SHELDUS) was examined to identify the county’s monetary losses due to hail damage to crops,
property, injury, and death. From 1960 through 2022 Anoka County reported $33,784,417 (2021
ADJ) in hail damages, ranking tenth among Minnesota counties in total hail damages. Anoka County’s
losses are primarily due to property damages reported at $33,399,004, followed by $385,413 in crop
damages.
Within Anoka County, the vulnerability of jurisdictions to hailstorms does not vary geographically. As
with all summer storms, those who work outdoors or do not have permanent housing are at greater
risk during hailstorms.
Section 3.4 provides jurisdictional responses to localized vulnerabilities to specific hazards.
4.5.3 Hail and Climate Change
Trends in severe storms, including the numbers of hail and damaging thunderstorm winds are
uncertain. Since the impact of more frequent or intense storms can be larger than the impact of
average temperature, climate scientists are actively researching the connections between climate
change and severe storms (Marvel et al., 2023). The NCA reports that in Minnesota’s neighboring
Great Plains region, hail size, frequency of large hail, and length of hail season are projected to
increase through the rest of this century (Knapp et al., 2023). The occurrence of very heavy
precipitation has increased in Minnesota in recent decades, and future projections also indicate this
will continue (Blumenfeld, K. Minnesota State Climatology Office, personal communication, December
21, 2023).
105
Item 4.
Section 4 47 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
According to the NCA5 Key Message #5 in the Climate Trends chapter, extreme
events are becoming more frequent.
4.5.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies
Anoka County Emergency Management identified program gaps and deficiencies that make its
residents more vulnerable to summer storms, including hailstorms. The following gaps and
deficiencies should be addressed with new mitigation efforts to reduce that vulnerability:
Above-Ground Power Lines: Most power lines throughout Anoka County are above ground, exposing
them to potential damage from high-wind events. The county and local jurisdictions continue to work
with electric utility providers to convert overhead power lines to underground or to implement other
measures to reduce the risk of power failure.
Public Education: Ongoing public education is needed during tornado season to inform the public
about what a tornado watch/warning is and what to do when outdoor warning sirens are activated.
Anoka County and local jurisdictions should continue to encourage residents to be aware of and ready
for severe storm events that can lead to long-term power outages.
Storm Shelters and Tornado Safe Rooms: There are areas throughout Anoka County with populations
vulnerable to high-wind and storm events, such as mobile home parks and campgrounds, that do not
have viable storm shelters or tornado safe rooms. A coordinated approach is needed to identify where
storm shelters or tornado safe rooms are needed and to evaluate whether new construction or a
retrofit of facilities is possible. Finding funding for the implementation of such construction projects is
also a barrier. Municipal governments have oversight of these matters locally; Anoka County
Emergency Management would participate in a supporting role as appropriate.
4.6 Lightning
Lightning is a common weather phenomenon that typically occurs as a by-product of a thunderstorm.
The potential hazard posed by lightning is significant. Each year in the United States lightning kills an
average of 49 people and injures hundreds more (NWS, 2021b). It is impossible to predict where
individual lightning strikes will occur due to the nature of lightning being widespread, frequent, and
random. People can be struck by lightning through numerous ways, including a direct strike; a side
flash (lightning strikes a taller object and a portion of the current strikes a nearby person); a ground
current (energy from a lightning strike travels outward along the ground surface); and through
conduction (lightning strike traveling through wires, pipes, or other metal surfaces) (NWS, 2021a).
View interactive maps and see information about lightning
history, risk, and vulnerability
While many lightning casualties happen at the beginning of an approaching storm, more than half of
lightning deaths occur after a thunderstorm has passed. Lightning can strike more than 10 miles from
the storm in an area with clear sky above (NWS, 2017). There is little an individual can do to
substantially reduce risk outdoors in a thunderstorm. The safest action is to get inside a building or
vehicle.
106
Item 4.
Section 4 48 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
4.6.1 Probability of Occurrence
The odds of an individual in the U.S. being killed or injured by lightning during a given year is 1 in 1.2
million (NWS, 2018). Given that the NCEI Storm Events Database has no reports of hazardous lightning
events in Anoka County since 1996, the probability of these events occurring in the future is very low
(NCEI, 2025). Please note damage from lightning may be underreported in the Storm Events database,
because there is no formal public alerting program for lightning (alone) and little to no tracking of
lightning damage except through infrequent media reporting.
4.6.2 Vulnerability
All humans and structures in the state are vulnerable to lightning. The risks are greatest during the
summer when outdoor recreational activities are most common. Minnesota lakes, boats, parks, and
trails place clusters and concentrations of people at risk to afternoon and evening thunderstorms,
especially on weekends and during the major summer holidays. As with all summer storms, those who
work outdoors or do not have permanent housing are more at risk. Within the county, the vulnerability
of jurisdictions to lightning does not vary geographically.
Section 3.4 provides jurisdictional responses to localized vulnerabilities to specific hazards.
4.6.3 Lightning and Climate Change
The conditions associated with lightning are uncertain. These conditions—tornadoes, large hail, and
damaging thunderstorms—are difficult to compare historically but may become more concentrated on
fewer days or multiple events may occur at one time. These events could happen without necessarily
increasing overall numbers or severity (ICAT, 2017). Severe rain events are certain to be more common
and may include an additional risk of lightning. Vaisala documents the unusual severe weather of
2021 in December, which caused thunderstorms and lightning in southern Minnesota (Vaisala, 2021).
Climate change may influence the seasonality of hazards such as lightning.
4.6.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies
Anoka County Emergency Management identified program gaps and deficiencies that make its
residents more vulnerable to summer storms, including lightning. The following gaps and deficiencies
should be addressed with new mitigation efforts to reduce that vulnerability:
Above-Ground Power Lines: Most power lines throughout Anoka County are above ground, exposing
them to potential damage from high-wind events. The county and local jurisdictions continue to work
with electric utility providers to convert overhead power lines to underground or to implement other
measures to reduce the risk of power failure.
Public Education: Ongoing public education is needed during tornado season to inform the public
about what a tornado watch/warning is and what to do when outdoor warning sirens are activated.
Anoka County and local jurisdictions should continue to encourage residents to be aware of and ready
for severe storm events that can lead to long-term power outages.
107
Item 4.
Section 4 49 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Storm Shelters and Tornado Safe Rooms: There are areas throughout Anoka County with populations
vulnerable to high-wind and storm events, such as mobile home parks and campgrounds, that do not
have viable storm shelters or tornado safe rooms. A coordinated approach is needed to identify where
storm shelters or tornado safe rooms are needed and to evaluate whether new construction or a
retrofit of facilities is possible. Finding funding for the implementation of such construction projects is
also a barrier. Municipal governments have oversight of these matters locally; Anoka County
Emergency Management would participate in a supporting role as appropriate.
4.7 Winter Storms
Winter storms encompass a number of winter weather events which the National Weather Service
(NWS) organizes into the following categories: blizzard, heavy snow, ice storm, winter storm, and winter
weather. Winter weather events are common in Minnesota and can be costly. According to the Spatial
Hazard Events and Losses Database (SHELDUS), winter weather events in Minnesota have cost more
than $1.02 billion in damages since 1960 (CEMHS, 2023). The history of winter storms in Anoka
County is shown in Figure 7; an interactive version of this map can be found on the Anoka County HMP
website.
View interactive maps and see information about winter
storm history, risk, and vulnerability
Figure 7. History of winter storms in Anoka County
4.7.1 Probability of Occurrence
To determine the probability of future winter-related storm events in Anoka County, records of previous
events (blizzards, heavy snows, ice storms, winter storms, and winter weather) were summed and
divided by the dataset’s period of record, resulting in the annual relative frequency of winter-related
storms. Based on records in the NCEI Storm Events Database through May 2025, the relative
frequency of winter-related storm events in Anoka County is 3.3 per year. This relative frequency can
infer the probability of these events occurring in the future.
108
Item 4.
Section 4 50 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
4.7.2 Vulnerability
Transportation systems, electrical distribution systems, and structures are vulnerable to winter storms
throughout the county. These events do not vary geographically within the county; all jurisdictions are
equally vulnerable. While it is highly likely these events will continue occurring annually, the amount of
snow and ice and number of winter-related storm events to occur each year are unpredictable. People
residing in climates such as these must always be prepared for situations that put their lives or
property at risk. It is important that extra consideration be given to the vulnerable populations
discussed in Section 3.2. Section 3.4 provides jurisdictional responses to localized vulnerabilities to
specific hazards.
4.7.3 Winter Storms and Climate Change
Historically, winter storms have had a large impact on public safety in Minnesota. If the frequency of
snowstorms and annual total snowfalls increase, as anticipated effects of Climate Change, the effects
on public safety will also increase. Pressures on energy use, reduced reliability of services, potential
outages, and potential rise in household energy costs are major climate change risks to public health
that can occur from winter weather.
Table 7 in Section 3.3 discusses confidence that climate change will impact common Minnesota
weather/climate hazards beyond 2025, there is some weak evidence that warming winters may make
heavy snowfall events less frequent as winter warms.
4.7.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies
Anoka County Emergency Management identified several program gaps and deficiencies that make
its residents more vulnerable to severe winter storms. The following gaps and deficiencies should be
addressed with new mitigation efforts to reduce that vulnerability:
Above-Ground Power Lines: Most power lines throughout Anoka County are above ground, exposing
them to impacts/damage from winter high wind and ice events, potentially leading to localized or
extensive power outages.
Public Education: Ongoing public education is needed to encourage residents to be ready for long-term
power outages or to be snowed in during dangerous winter events such as ice storms and blizzards.
4.8 Extreme Cold
Due to Minnesota’s position in the middle of the continent and subsequent climate, the state may
experience extremely frigid temperatures in winter. Winter in Anoka County can be especially
dangerous when low temperatures and wind create arctic-like wind chills. The history of extreme cold
in Anoka County is shown in Figure 8; an interactive version of this dashboard can be found on the
Anoka County HMP website.
View interactive maps and see information about extreme
cold history, risk, and vulnerability
109
Item 4.
Section 4 51 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Figure 8. History of extreme cold in Anoka County
4.8.1 Probability of Occurrence
To determine the probability of future cold-related events in Anoka County, records of previous
cold/wind chill and extreme cold/wind chill events were summed and divided by the dataset’s period
of record, resulting in the annual relative frequency. Based on records in the NCEI Storm Events
Database through May 2025, the relative frequency of extreme cold/wind chill events in Anoka County
is one every 3.2 years. (NCEI, 2025). This relative frequency can be used to infer the probability of
these events occurring in the future.
4.8.2 Vulnerability
The risk of extreme cold does not vary geographically within the county. Citizens living in climates such
as these must always be prepared for situations that put their lives or property at risk. The youngest
and more elderly residents, homeless persons, individuals with chronic medical conditions, and those
who are working or recreating outdoors are most at risk for frostbite and hypothermia (MDH, 2021).
View at-risk populations in Anoka County
It is not always the depth of the cold that poses a threat but rather unpreparedness for the cold, such
as an individual with a vehicle breakdown who lacks a personal winter safety kit in the vehicle. The
cost of propane can make rural residents more vulnerable to issues with extreme cold. A propane
shortage and resulting crisis, such as that which occurred in 2014, may increase the cost of heating
homes and farms to a prohibitive amount (Eaton, 2014). The Minnesota Department of Commerce
presents options and suggestions for homeowners who use propane on their website.
The CDC publication “Extreme Cold: A Prevention Guide to Promote Your Personal Health and Safety”
outlines preparation measures that individuals can take to reduce their vulnerability to extreme cold.
Highlights in this document include advice about travel preparations, securing your home water supply,
and safety during recreation (CDC, 2021).
110
Item 4.
Section 4 52 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Section 3.4 provides jurisdictional responses to localized vulnerabilities to extreme cold.
4.8.3 Extreme Cold and Climate Change
Although climate research indicates that Minnesota’s average winter lows are rising rapidly, and our
coldest days of winter are now warmer than we have ever recorded, cold temperatures have always
been a part of Minnesota’s climate, and extreme cold events will continue.
As the climate changes, an increase in extreme precipitation or storm events could lead to a higher
risk of residents being exposed to cold temperatures during power outages or other storm-related
hazards. Extreme and changing temperatures are already challenging aging infrastructure and are
expected to impair surface transportation and the electrical grid.
Key Message #4 in NCA5 in the Midwest Chapter states that green infrastructure and
public and private investments may mitigate losses, provide relief from heat, and
offer other ways to adapt the built environment to a changing climate.
4.8.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies
Anoka County Emergency Management identified several program gaps and deficiencies that make
its residents more vulnerable to extreme cold. The following gaps and deficiencies should be
addressed with new mitigation efforts to reduce that vulnerability:
Generators for Backup Power to Critical Facilities & Shelters: Not all municipal healthcare facilities
utilized for the care of residents & visitors, including designated severe weather/emergency shelters
(schools, churches, etc.) have backup power to run heating systems in the event of a power outage.
Public Education: Ongoing public education is needed to encourage residents to be prepared for
extreme weather, including power outages during periods of extreme cold. Anoka County Emergency
Management continues to do public education through the local schools, senior and health care
centers, and provides support to local governments for severe weather awareness.
4.9 Extreme Heat
Extreme heat describes weather that is much hotter and/or humid than typical for a place and time of
year. In the United States, extreme heat is the deadliest weather-related hazard and causes more
deaths than flooding, tornadoes, and hurricanes combined. While heat waves are infrequent in a
northern state like Minnesota, they can have severe consequences for residents who are not
acclimatized to their effects (Runkle et al., 2022).
The National Weather Service (NWS) issues extreme heat watches, heat advisories, and extreme heat
warnings based on the heat index, which is a combination of air temperature and relative humidity
that determines how hot it feels. The heat index threshold differs based on locality, since people in
colder climates are less prepared for heat events than people who live in warmer climates (NWS,
2025b).
More recently, the NWS has developed the HeatRisk tool to issue a forecast of heat-related impacts
to occur over a 24-hour period. It is intended to provide risk guidance to decision-makers and heat-
111
Item 4.
Section 4 53 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
sensitive populations. Historical data from the HeatRisk tool, available back to 2015, provide a more
comprehensive look at extreme heat events beyond those reported as Extreme Heat Events in the
Storm Events Database. The HeatRisk tool takes into consideration:
• How unusual the heat is for the time of year
• The duration of the heat, including both daytime and nighttime temperatures
• If those temperatures pose an elevated risk of heat-related impacts based on data from the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (NWS, 2025a).
Impacts of extreme heat are far-reaching and can be severe. Some impacts include infrastructure
failures, such as roads buckling and power outages; strain on essential services, such as increased
demand for emergency medical services and law enforcement (Guo, 2017; Williams et al., 2020); and
disruptions to important social and economic networks, such as school and event cancellations, which
reduce access to education, physical activity, and community support.
View interactive maps and see information about extreme
heat history, risk, and vulnerability
Anoka County’s agricultural lands and structures are vulnerable to heat damage. Residents can suffer
from increased heat-related illnesses, exacerbation of pre-existing chronic conditions, and even death
(Moss, 2017). In the United States, heat is estimated to result in $100 billion in economic losses
annually, primarily due to lost productivity, and it accounts for $1 billion in direct healthcare costs each
year (American Public Health Association, 2025). In 2022, extreme heat led to 682 emergency
department visits, 63 hospitalizations, and two deaths in Minnesota (MDH, 2025).
Extreme heat exacerbates poor air quality conditions because the stagnant air during a heat wave
increases ozone and particulate pollution (Center for Science Education, 2025). Air pollution is
particularly harmful for people over the age of 65, children under the age of five, outdoor workers, and
people with respiratory or cardiovascular conditions. The Minnesota Extreme Heat Toolkit further
details the health effects of poor air quality.
Data from the Spatial Hazard Events and Losses Database (SHELDUS) for the United States was
examined to identify the county’s monetary losses due to heat damage to crops. Ranking 56th among
Minnesota counties in crop indemnity payments, heat-related losses for Anoka County totaled over
$672,000 (ADJ 2021) for the period of record spanning 1989 to 2022 (CEMHS, 2023).
The history of extreme heat in Anoka County is shown in Figure 9; an interactive version of this chart
can be found on the Anoka County HMP website. This dashboard summarizes the occurrences of days
when each HeatRisk category threshold was met for each year from 2015–2025. For the purposes of
hazard mitigation planning, we have considered days in the Major (Red) Category (a level of heat
affects anyone without effective cooling and/or adequate hydration. Impacts are likely in some health
systems, heat-sensitive industries, and infrastructure) and the Extreme (Magenta) Category (level of
rare and/or long-duration extreme heat with little to no overnight relief affects anyone without effective
cooling and/or adequate hydration. Impacts are likely in most health systems, heat-sensitive
industries, and infrastructure) as extreme heat-related events.
112
Item 4.
Section 4 54 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Figure 9. History of HeatRisk in Anoka County
4.9.1 Probability of Occurrence
To determine the probability of future heat-related events in Anoka County, the average number of
days exceeding the major or extreme HeatRisk categories is used to reflect heat events in the county.
While there are no weather stations in Anoka County that report HeatRisk, there are several such
stations in adjacent counties. Minneapolis Crystal Airport Station experiences major or extreme
HeatRisk days an average of 3.2 days per year, and University of Minnesota St. Paul Station
experiences these events an average of 3.6 days per year based on the 11 years of record. This relative
frequency can infer the probability of these events occurring in the future.
Based on records in the Midwestern Regional Climate Center (MRCC) that date back to 1991,
the average daily maximum temperature for July in Anoka County has historically been in the 80–84
°F range (MRCC, 2021), which is below the 90 °F for 2–3 days criteria for “extreme” heat events
(FEMA, 2024b). However, the nearest weather station to Anoka County, University of Minnesota St.
Paul Station in Ramsey County, has reported daily maximum temperatures of at least 90 °F a total of
355 times, an average of 11 days per year. This historical average can be used to infer future events,
although climate change projections show an increase in the number of days that exceed 90 °F by
mid-century (see Section 4.9.3).
4.9.2 Vulnerability
The Minnesota Department of Health updated the Minnesota Extreme Heat Toolkit in 2025 to help
local governments prepare for extreme heat events. In their toolkit, they note extreme heat events are
often dubbed “silent killers” because deaths and illnesses from these events are often misunderstood
and underreported. In fact, extreme heat kills more people in the United States than all extreme
weather events combined (Adams-Fuller, 2023). Minnesota does not have a mandated reporting
system to report deaths and illnesses linked to extreme heat (MDH, 2025), but is important to not
underestimate the danger of extreme heat events within the state.
113
Item 4.
Section 4 55 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
High temperatures can be exacerbated by the urban heat island effect in developed areas, an effect
that amplifies temperatures in areas with a higher concentration of impervious and paved surfaces.
These types of surfaces absorb more heat and hold it for longer than vegetation cover (EPA, 2019).
Impervious surfaces are not spread evenly throughout the county, and attention should be given to
cities or areas within the county where this type of surface cover is most dense. The city with the
highest concentration of impervious surfaces is Hilltop at 39.92% (MDH & University of Minnesota,
2019). The distribution of heat-trapping surfaces and their proximity to tree canopy are more important
than their total area.
The distribution of impervious surfaces can be viewed in the Extreme Heat Risk & Vulnerability
dashboard in the Exposure tab. The metro counties have an additional layer that demonstrates tree
canopy, an effective mitigation of extreme heat: urban tree canopy of at least 40% can result in as
much as 7–9 °F cooler temperatures (Ziter et al., 2019). The city with the lowest concentration of tree
canopy in Anoka County is Nowthen at 19.55% (MDH & University of Minnesota, 2019). The
Metropolitan Council Growing Shade Tool provides data and resources to inform tree planting and
canopy preservation for the Twin Cities region to realize benefits, such as cooler temperatures,
improved air quality, cleaner stormwater, improved mental health, and enhanced biodiversity.
Rural areas have higher rates of heat-related emergency department visits compared with urban areas
(MDH, 2024), and Americans living in rural areas are twice as likely as those in urban areas to have
pre-existing health conditions that make them more vulnerable to extreme heat (Pohl, 2025). Rural
agricultural regions can have higher rates of humidity due to moisture-producing crops like corn
(Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, 2016), which produces evapotranspiration, or “corn sweat,”
that can add as much as 5–10 °F to the dew point temperature (Steil, 2016).
Key Message #3 in the Midwest Chapter of the NCA5 lists strategies, such as
expanded use of green infrastructure and heat-health early warning systems, have
the potential to improve both individual and community health (Wilson et al., 2023).
Everyone is susceptible to extreme heat, but certain individuals are at a higher risk of developing heat-
related illnesses. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), population
groups more vulnerable to extreme heat include:
• Older adults (≥65 years old). The elderly cannot easily adjust to sudden changes in
temperature and are more likely to have a chronic medical condition or take medication
affecting their body’s ability to control its temperature.
• Infants and children. Young children and infants have limited control of their surroundings and
rely on others to keep them cool and hydrated.
• Individuals with chronic health conditions. These individuals are less likely to respond to
changes in temperature, may be taking a medication that exacerbates the effects of extreme
heat, or have a condition that is a risk factor for heat-related illness (e.g., heart disease, mental
illness, poor blood circulation, and obesity).
• People with low income. These individuals may not be able to afford to properly cool their home
and may face transportation challenges when trying to access cooling shelters.
• Athletes and people working outdoors. Both groups are likely to exert energy while being
exposed to the heat (CDC, 2020).
114
Item 4.
Section 4 56 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Table 11 shows characteristics that MDH has determined make individuals more at risk to adverse
health effects from extreme heat, including how that vulnerability ranks among Minnesota counties.
The indicator’s percentile rank within Minnesota determines the vulnerability level of Anoka County for
that indicator (e.g., the 81st – 100th percentile is associated with the highest vulnerability compared
to other Minnesota counties). For more information on what makes individuals and communities more
vulnerable, see the Minnesota Extreme Heat Toolkit.
Table 11. Populations vulnerable to extreme heat in Anoka County
Vulnerability Indicator Percentage of
Population
Percentile Rank within
Minnesota
Vulnerability
Level
Adults with COPD 5.1% 6th Lowest
Adults with a self-care disability 2.7% 5th Lowest
Adults with coronary heart disease 5.9% 10th Lowest
Adults with diabetes 9.9% 16th Lowest
Families at less than 200% of poverty level 13.7% 14th Lowest
Households where a person age 65 or over
lives alone 10.4% 9th Lowest
Households with no computing device 3.4% 6th Lowest
Households with no vehicle available 4.6% 34th Low
Households with rent over 50% of income 4.4% 72nd High
Medicare beneficiaries who are electricity-
dependent 3.8% 20th Lowest
Medicare–Medicaid-enrolled beneficiaries 1.9% 12th Lowest
People age 5 or over with limited English 5.6% 91st Highest
People age 65 or over 15.1% 8th Lowest
People over age 16 who work outdoors 5.2% 8th Lowest
People under age 5 6.0% 63rd High
People who are experiencing homelessness 0.1% 24th Low
People who are uninsured 4.4% 38th Low
People who do not identify as “White alone,
not Hispanic or Latino” 24.0% 91st Highest
Facilities where vulnerable populations may be concentrated, such as prisons, group homes, and
childcare centers, are considered to be at higher risk during heat events. Anoka County’s prison, MCF–
Lino Lakes, has facility-wide air conditioning.
View interactive information about at-risk populations in
Anoka County
Warming temperatures will continue to increase the risk of extreme heat, especially among these
already vulnerable populations. Section 3.4 provides jurisdictional responses to localized
vulnerabilities to extreme heat.
115
Item 4.
Section 4 57 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
4.9.3 Extreme Heat and Climate Change
Minnesota’s annual average temperature has increased more than 3 °F since record-keeping began
in 1895, and nine of Minnesota’s hottest 16 years on record have occurred since the year 2000
(MCAP, 2024). In Anoka County, the average temperature from July to September has increased 0.02
degrees Fahrenheit per decade since 1895 (MN DNR, 2025b).
Nights are warming at a much higher rate than days in Minnesota. In Anoka County, nighttime
minimum temperatures from July to September have increased at a rate of 0.26 degrees Fahrenheit
per decade (MN DNR, 2025b). While 94% of Minnesota households have some form of air conditioning
(including central air, room units, dehumidifiers, and ceiling fans), only 68% have the central air
conditioning that can provide reliable whole-house cooling (U.S. Energy Information Administration,
2023). Furthermore, homes with air conditioning equipment may not use it; for example, low-income
homes might not turn on their units due to the associated costs, and homes in areas with higher crime
rates may be reluctant to use window units for security reasons (EPA, 2006).
The average number of days per year with temperatures
over 90 °F under a very high carbon emissions (SSP 585),
mid-century (2040–2059) scenario is illustrated in the
Climate Dashboard on the Plan website.
Climate models project that temperature and precipitation increases will continue in Minnesota
through the 21st century, with hotter summers and increased drought severity during dry periods as
well. Already, the maximum annual heat index values have been rising across the state, because
increased humidity during heat waves (Blumenfeld, K. Minnesota State Climatology Office, personal
communication, December 21, 2023).
Table 12 compares historical temperature averages to projections under a high emissions (SSP 585)
scenario, demonstrating how many more days will reach above 90 °F and nights where the minimum
does not go below 75.2 °F. The data in the table is taken from Minnesota CliMAT, an interactive online
tool that provides highly localized climate projections for Minnesota and visualize how even specific
towns will likely be impacted in the coming decades (Liess, S. et al., 2023). While models differ on
how many degrees of warming will be caused by climate change, all models agree that temperatures
will continue to rise.
Table 12. Historical vs projected number of days reaching temperature thresholds in Anoka County
Historical (1995–2014) Projected (2040–2059) Change
Days Above 90 18.87 41.3 +22.43
Nighttime Minimum > 75.2 1.5 6.92 +5.42
Greenhouse gas concentrations will continue rising through the century, and the air’s ability to trap
heat from the Earth’s surface will increase accordingly. Warming of the atmosphere will evaporate
even more water into the air, further limiting the amount of cooling Minnesota will be able to achieve
at night and during the winter. As warmer winters and warmer baseline conditions transition into
summer, it will be much easier to attain extreme heat (MN DNR, 2025a).
116
Item 4.
Section 4 58 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
4.9.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies
Anoka County Emergency Management identified existing program gaps and deficiencies that make
its residents more vulnerable to extreme heat. The following gaps and deficiencies should be
addressed with new mitigation efforts to reduce that vulnerability:
Generators for Backup Power to Critical Facilities & Shelters: Not all municipal healthcare and other
critical facilities utilized for the care of residents & visitors, including designated severe
weather/emergency shelters (schools, churches, etc.) have backup power to run cooling systems in
the event of a power outage.
4.10 Dam Failure
The MN DNR Dam Safety Program has the mission of protecting the life and safety of people by
ensuring that dams are safe. Minnesota's Dam Safety Program sets minimum standards for dams and
regulates the design, construction, operation, repair, and removal of both privately and publicly (non-
federal) owned dams (MN DNR, 2020). The federal government is responsible for regulating and
maintaining dam safety of federally owned dams. No single agency regulates all federally owned dams.
42% of federal dams are owned and managed by the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) and the
Bureau of Reclamation. The remaining federal dams are owned and managed by other federal
agencies, including the Fish and Wildlife Service, Forest Service, the Department of Defense, and the
Bureau of Indian Affairs, among others (Normand, 2019). The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC) Dam Safety Program is the largest dam safety program in the U.S. The Commission works with
federal and state agencies to ensure and promote dam safety of over 3,000 dams across the U.S. The
Commission inspects projects on an unscheduled basis to investigate potential dam safety problems;
complaints about constructing and operating a project; safety concerns related to natural disasters;
and issues concerning compliance with the term and conditions of a license (FERC, 2020).
Dam Inventory: The National Dam Inventory reports that there are five dams in Anoka County. Dams
are mapped on the MN State 2024 HMP website. Anoka County has zero dams classified as High
Hazard Dams, two dams classified as Significant Hazard Dams, and three dams classified as Low
Hazard Dams. The Minnesota Dam Safety Program office was consulted to identify dam incidents and
concerns.
4.10.1 Probability of Occurrence
Extreme precipitation is only one factor contributing to dam failure, and the possibility of
failure is dam-specific, relating to both environmental and structural conditions. There are four noted
dam incidents in Anoka County. The Coon Rapids Dam (Significant Hazard) on the Mississippi River
experienced two washouts early in its years of operation, one in 1917 and again in 1925; the dam
was most recently modified in 2005. The Locke Lake Dam (Significant Hazard) on Rice Creek near
Fridley failed in 1990; it was most recently modified in 1994. The Peltier Lake Dam (Low Hazard) failed
by overturning in 1951 and was subsequently repaired. Total dam failures are extremely unlikely if the
dam is maintained in compliance with Minnesota’s Dam Safety Program. The likelihood of failure in
Anoka County is low.
117
Item 4.
Section 4 59 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
4.10.2 Vulnerability
Although dam regulatory authorities differ between various federal and state agencies, all authorities
attempt to classify dams according to the potential impacts from a dam failure or mis-operation. In
response to the numerous classification systems, FEMA’s Interagency Committee on Dam Safety
created a downstream hazard potential classification system that is adaptable to any agency’s current
system. Table 13 provides an overview of the main criteria agencies consider when determining a
dam’s downstream hazard potential. This classification system does not imply that the dam is unsafe,
but rather categorizes dams based on the probable loss of human life and the impacts on economic,
environmental, and lifeline interests (FEMA, 2004).
Table 13. Downstream hazard potential classification criteria
Hazard Potential Classification Loss of Human Life Economic, Environmental, Lifeline Losses
Class III (Low) None expected Low and generally limited to owner
Class II (Significant) None expected Yes
Class I (High) Probable - one or more
expected. Yes (but not necessary for this classification)
SOURCE: (USACE, 2008)
Dams for which a hazard potential has not been designated, or is not provided, are classified as
“Undetermined.”
An Emergency Action Plan (EAP) is a document that identifies potential emergency conditions at a dam
and specifies preplanned actions to be followed during a dam failure to minimize property damage or
loss of life. An EAP is required for Class I dams and strongly recommended for Class II dams (MN DNR,
2020).
4.10.3 Dam Failure and Climate Change
Dams are designed based on assumptions about a river’s annual flow behavior that will determine the
volume of water behind the dam and flowing through the dam at any one time. Changes in weather
patterns due to climate change may change the hydrograph or expected flow pattern. Spillways are
put in place on dams as a safety measure in the event of the reservoir filling too quickly. Spillway
overflow events are mechanisms that also result in increased discharges downstream. It is
conceivable that bigger rainfalls at earlier times in the year could threaten a dam's designed margin
of safety, causing dam operators to release greater volumes of water earlier in a storm cycle in order
to maintain the required margins of safety. Such early releases of increased volumes can increase
flood potential downstream.
Climate change may increase the probability of design failures. Some spillways may not be large
enough to convey the increased flow pattern. An undersized spillway could lead to dam overtopping
and failure.
The partial failure of the Rapidan Dam in Blue Earth County in June of 2024 highlighted the growing
threat climate change poses to the country’s aging infrastructure as extreme weather becomes more
common and severe. The Rapidan Dam is a Significant Hazard Dam in “poor” condition. About 20% of
Minnesota’s Significant and High Hazard Potential Dams are in “fair” or “poor” condition, with a few in
“undefined” condition, and about 70% of these dams were built before 1970 (USACE, 2024). These
118
Item 4.
Section 4 60 Hazards
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
older dams are growing increasingly taxed by extreme weather, especially in the Midwest (Harrison,
2024). Climate change is adding a new level of uncertainty that needs to be considered with respect
to assumptions made during the dam construction.
While the Rapidan Dam partial failure did not result in mass inundation, it sent an estimated 11.6
million cubic yards of sediment downstream. The sediment was high in phosphorus and nitrogen
because of nearby agricultural runoff. The impacts to the fish habitat and ecology of the stream may
not be known for years (MPR News, 2024). The sediment loading behind older dams adds another
compounding threat of dam failure to the stream and structures below.
4.10.4 Program Gaps and Deficiencies
Anoka County Emergency Management did not identify any program gaps or deficiencies that make
its citizens more vulnerable to dam failure.
119
Item 4.
Section 5 – Mitigation Strategy
The goal of mitigation is to protect lives and reduce the impacts of future hazard events, including
property damage, disruption to local and regional economies, the amount of public and private funds
spent on recovery, and to build disaster-resistant communities. Mitigation actions and projects should
be based on a well-constructed risk assessment as provided in Section 3 of this plan and on the HMP
website. Mitigation should be an ongoing process, adapting over time to accommodate a community’s
needs.
5.1 Community Capability Assessments
The capability assessment identifies current activities and existing planning tools used to mitigate
hazards. The capability assessment identifies the policies, regulations, procedures, programs, and
projects that contribute to reducing disaster damages. The assessment also evaluates these
capabilities to determine whether the activities can be improved to more effectively reduce the impact
of future hazard events. The following sections identify existing plans and mitigation capabilities within
all of the communities:
• Appendix D: Lists the plans and programs in place in Anoka County as related to hazard
mitigation.
• Appendix C: As part of the Anoka County HMP update, the county and city governments were
asked to participate in filling out a “Local Mitigation Survey” (LMS) form to report on their
current mitigation capabilities and program gaps. Appendix C provides the LMS reports
gathered for Anoka County.
Information from the capability assessments was used to support development of local mitigation
actions for implementation over the next five years (see column Comments on Implementation &
Integration).
5.1.1 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
The NFIP is a federal program created by Congress to mitigate future flood losses nationwide through
sound, community-enforced building and zoning ordinances and to provide access to affordable,
federally backed flood insurance protection for property owners. The NFIP is designed to provide an
insurance alternative to disaster assistance to meet the escalating costs of repairing damage to
buildings and their contents caused by floods. Participation in the NFIP is based on an agreement
between local communities and the federal government that states that if a community will adopt and
enforce a floodplain management ordinance to reduce future flood risks to new construction in Special
Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs), the federal government will make flood insurance available within the
community as a financial protection against flood losses.
Jurisdictional participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) per Minnesota DNR is
outlined below (G. Bennett MN DNR, personal communication, July 23, 2025).
120
Item 4.
Section 5 62 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Anoka County
Anoka County is in a unique position with respect to the NFIP due to being entirely composed of cities
and one township. While county staff are still aware of floodplain issues, since Linwood Township
enrolled in the NFIP in 2016, the county has not been the floodplain zoning authority (Ceil Strauss, MN
Floodplain Manager, personal communication, January 14, 2026).
Andover
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 6/23/1976 (Emergency Entry); 09/30/1980 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 137
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 11/2/2015 (Effective 11/13/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 11/2/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Joe Janish, Community Development Director
(j.janish@andovermn.gov)
Anoka
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 2/11/1972 (Emergency Entry); 11/30/1973 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 110
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 12/7/2015 (Effective 12/11/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 12/7/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Clark Palmer, City Planner (cpalmer@ci.anoka.mn.us)
Bethel
● Status: NOT Participating
● Entry Date: NA
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas (new on 12/16/15)
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: NA
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: NA
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: NA
● Floodplain Administrator: NA
Blaine
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 6/11/1974 (Emergency Entry); 11/15/1979 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
121
Item 4.
Section 5 63 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/15 (Anoka Co.); 6/4/10 (Ramsey Co. – Note: Only a
small portion is in Ramsey County – there is NSFHA on this portion, so the Ramsey Co. panel
is not included in the city’s ordinance)
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 431
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 11/24/2015 (Effective 12/4/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 11/24/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Scott Johnson, Director of Administrative Services
(scottjohnson@blainemn.gov)
Centerville
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 3/6/1975 (Emergency Entry); 12/4/1979 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 3
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 11/11/2015 (Effective 11/24/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 11/11/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Athanasia Lewis, Interim City Administrator
(alewis@centervillemn.com)
Circle Pines
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 4/15/1974 (Emergency Entry); 09/15/1978 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 4
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 11/24/2015 (Effective 12/8/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 11/24/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Patrick Antonen, City Administrator (pantonen@ci.circle-
pines.mn.us)
Columbia Heights
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 5/28/1974 (Emergency Entry); 09/29/1978 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 5
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 11/23/2015 (Effective 12/4/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 11/23/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Andrew Boucher, City Planner (aboucher@columbiaheightsmn.gov)
122
Item 4.
Section 5 64 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Columbus
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 02/06/2009 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 42
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 11/23/2015 (Effective 12/10/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 11/23/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Jack Davis, City Administrator (cityadmin@ci.columbus.mn.us)
Coon Rapids
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 10/20/1972 (Emergency Entry); 03/15/1977 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 69
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 12/15/2015 (Effective 12/18/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 12/15/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Joan Lensmeier, City Clerk (jlenzmeier@coonrapidsmn.gov)
East Bethel
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 8/16/1974 (Emergency Entry); 05/15/1980 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 92
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 12/2/2015 (Effective 12/11/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 122/2/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Erin McDermott, Zoning Administrator (erin.mcdermott@ci.east-
bethel.mn.us)
Fridley
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 1/21/1974 (Emergency Entry); 03/02/1981 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 21
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 5/12/2025 (Effective 5/30/2025)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 11/23/2015 (and in 5/12/2025 amendment)
● Floodplain Administrator: Rachel Workin, Environmental Planner
(rachel.workin@fridleymn.gov)
123
Item 4.
Section 5 65 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Ham Lake
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 10/24/1975 (Emergency Entry); 07/16/1980 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 137
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 11/16/2015 (Effective 11/20/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 11/16/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Mark Jones, Building/Zoning Official (mjones@hamlakemn.gov)
Hilltop
● Status: NOT Participating
● Entry Date: NA
● FEMA Map: No FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/15 (NSFHA)
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: NA
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: NA
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: NA
● Floodplain Administrator: NA
Lexington
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 6/3/1974 (Emergency Entry); 02/12/1979 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: No FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/15 (NSFHA)
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 2
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: NA
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: NA
● Floodplain Administrator: Bill Petracek, City Administrator
(bill.petracek@cityoflexingtonmn.org)
Lino Lakes
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 4/30/1976 (Emergency Entry); 05/17/1982 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 69
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 11/23/2015 (Effective 12/1/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 11/23/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Tom Hoffman, Environmental Coordinator (thoffman@linolakes.us)
124
Item 4.
Section 5 66 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Linwood Township
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 5/10/2016 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 127
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 12/22/2015 (Effective 2/18/2016)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 12/22/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Susan Bautch, Zoning Administrator
(susan.bautch@linwoodtownship.org)
Nowthen
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 4/26/2012 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 20
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 11/10/2015 (Effective 11/14/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 11/10/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Natalie Johnson, Interim City Administrator
(natalie@nowthenmn.net)
Oak Grove
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 09/05/2008 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 75
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 11/30/2015 (Effective 12/4/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 11/30/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Loren Wickham, City Administrator (lwickham@ci.oak-grove.mn.us)
Ramsey
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 7/8/1975 (Emergency Entry); 11/1/1979 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 51
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 11/24/2015 (Effective 12/4/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 11/24/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Chris Anderson, City Planner (canderson@cityoframsey.com)
125
Item 4.
Section 5 67 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Saint Francis
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 9/29/1975 (Emergency Entry); 03/02/1981 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: 10
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 11/2/2015 (Effective 11/6/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 11/2/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Kate Thunstrom, Community Development Director
(kthunstrom@stfrancismn.org)
Spring Lake Park
● Status: Participating
● Entry Date: 8/12/1975 (Emergency Entry); 08/24/1981 (Regular Entry)
● FEMA Map: FEMA Mapped High Risk Areas (new on12/16/15)
● Current Effective Map Date: 12/16/2015 (Anoka Co.); 6/4/10 (Ramsey Co. – Note: Only a
small portion is in Ramsey County – there is NSFHA on this portion, so the Ramsey Co. panel
is not included in the city’s ordinance)
● Potential Buildings Damaged in Floodplain: NA
● Adoption of Current Floodplain Ordinance: 12/7/2015 (Effective 12/11/2015)
● Adoption of latest DFIRM Map: 12/7/2015
● Floodplain Administrator: Dan Buchholtz, City Administrator (dbuchholtz@slpmn.org)
Following a damaging flood event, any impacted jurisdiction would work with the MN DNR to use a
form to track cumulative improvements and repetitive losses in the floodplain. The affected jurisdiction
would also review the Minnesota Post-Flood Substantial Damage Playbook for Local Officials.
5.1.2 Repetitive Loss Properties
Repetitive loss properties are defined as properties with two or more flood insurance claims of $1,000
or more in any rolling 10-year period. Property owners are asked to consider mitigation activities such
as acquisition, relocation, or elevation, among other options. FEMA’s Repetitive Loss (RL) properties
strategy is to eliminate or reduce the damage to property and the disruption to life caused by repeated
flooding of the same properties. Property owners are notified of their status by FEMA.
A Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL) property is defined as a residential property that is covered under an
NFIP flood insurance policy and:
a) That has at least four NFIP claim payments (including building and contents) over
$5,000 each, and the cumulative amount of such claims payments exceeds $20,000;
or
126
Item 4.
Section 5 68 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
b) For which at least two separate claims payments (building payments only) have been
made with the cumulative amount of the building portion of such claims exceeding the
market value of the building.
c) For both (a) and (b) above, at least two of the referenced claims must have occurred
within any 10-year period and must be greater than 10 days apart.
Anoka County has one RL property and no SRL properties (Ceil Strauss, MN Floodplain Manager,
personal communication, August 8, 2025). The RL property is in the City of Anoka and has three losses.
Net payments for this property total $23,630.
For more on the areas that flood repeatedly in Anoka County, see the Anoka County Flooding page.
5.1.3 Previous Integration of Hazard Mitigation into Planning Mechanisms
Anoka County and its incorporated communities are encouraged to integrate relevant information from
this mitigation plan into their other planning mechanisms. This demonstrates local progress in
mitigation efforts and strengthens the overall mitigation planning process. As part of this plan update,
communities were asked to report whether and how information from the 2019 plan was incorporated
into their existing plans, policies, programs, partnerships, or other documents. The following provides
an overview of their responses.
Anoka County
Anoka County integrated the county’s 2019 Hazard Mitigation Plan across county
departmental efforts. Primary integration has occurred within the Anoka County Emergency
Management (TCEM) program, including:
• We convened the Anoka County Emergency Managers group which includes
representatives from all cities and Linwood Township. Mitigation planning and project
updates were regularly discussed for all hazards.
• Anoka County participated in and promoted the annual National Weather Service’s Severe
Weather Awareness Week, Winter Weather Awareness Week, and National Preparedness
Month. SkyWarn storm spotter training was also coordinated with the NWS.
• Anoka County has replaced our previous community alert system with the Everbridge
emergency notification system. The Everbridge platform provides a powerful geo-targeted
notification tool capable of issuing alerts only to specific, affected areas rather than the
entire county.
• Warning sirens were tested monthly across the county.
• Maintained update of the county Emergency Operations Plan and inventory of emergency
shelters within the county.
Anoka County has further incorporated mitigation across county departments through
planning, project implementation, and related policy enforcement: Highway Dept., (WS4 Permit
compliance and Right of Way maintenance and drainage system management), Environmental
Services Dept. (Planning and Coordination with local watershed districts), and Public Health
Dept. (Public Health preparedness, planning, and coordination), and County Parks (Public
127
Item 4.
Section 5 69 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Watercraft Access Management). Anoka County has several plans and policies we have utilized
to help to address hazard mitigation, including: Ordinance #2022-1, Shoreland Management
Ordinance, Ordinance #2017-1, Anoka County Buffer Ordinance, Anoka County EOP, Anoka
County 2025-2029 Capital Improvements Plan, Anoka County 2040 Transportation Plan,
Anoka County Park Ordinance 2018-01, Last Revised July 23, 2024.
City of Andover
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
City of Anoka
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
• In 2024 city of Anoka completed a feasibility study for modifications and reconstruction of
the dam which included ways to make the dam more responsive to immediate flood
concerns. We are working to advance implementation of the plan in 2026-2027.
• The city implements an annual street reconstruction plan, which includes plans to upgrade
our stormwater infrastructure with street projects to provide protection up to the 100-year
event.
• The city of Anoka Streets and Parks Dept. regularly works to eliminate fuel load by removing
dead trees and cleaning up overgrowth. This helps to reduce risk of wildfire.
City of Bethel
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations and burn permits
City of Blaine
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
• Our 2040 Comprehensive Plan includes a Local Surface Water Management Plan which
helps to address stormwater management.
128
Item 4.
Section 5 70 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
• The city has been working with our 6 mobile home communities to ensure they are
prepared with evacuation and sheltering plans.
• The city has invested in replacing and installing new storm sewer and roadways for
water/flooding issues. We have also utilized and maintained natural ponding areas such
as wetlands for the impoundment and treatment of surface water as well as the extensive
city conveyance system as well as the county ditch system to provide flood protection.
City of Centerville
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
City of Circle Pines
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
• Our public works department continued to maintain our stormwater infrastructure to
ensure the city can handle high rain events.
City of Columbia Heights
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
• We have worked to improve delivery of emergency information to non-English speaking
immigrant populations.
• The city has continued to follow our Surface Water Management Plan (Dec., 2018) to
implement mitigation measures to improve stormwater management. We have continued
to invest in improving our aging storm-sewer network with planned infrastructure
improvements. We also continue the implementation of green infrastructure projects (rain
gardens and permeable pavements).
• We have worked to establish evacuation plans for City Hall for shelter if needed during
inclement weather or in case of a fire.
City of Columbus
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
129
Item 4.
Section 5 71 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
• We have worked with the Sunrise River, Coon Creek and Rice Creek Watersheds to address
mitigation projects related to flooding.
City of Coon Rapids
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
• The city has utilized the following plans to integrate mitigation for stormwater management
and flooding: City Surface Water Management Plan, Wellhead Protection Plan,
Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer and Water Plans; MS4 permit through the MPCA; Coon
Creek Watershed District Comprehensive Plan and various sub-watershed plans.
City of East Bethel
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
City of Fridley
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• The city has upgraded all early warning software. We test warning sirens monthly in
coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
• We have installed large pumps on the north end of the city to keep that area from flooding.
City of Ham Lake
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
• The city has a Surface Water Management Plan (2021) that we use to guide our local
stormwater management.
City of Hilltop
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
130
Item 4.
Section 5 72 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
• We have actively sought state and federal funding to complete construction of a new storm
shelter at City Hall. This is an ongoing effort.
• We work with our 4 mobile home parks to ensure residents are aware of evacuation
protocol for tornadoes.
City of Lexington
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
City of Lino Lakes
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
• Our Fire Department is working to address wildland fuels reduction in wildland-urban
interface areas as well as to promote public awareness of wildfire risk in these areas.
City of Nowthen
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
City of Oak Grove
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
• The city continued to implement our Stormwater Management Program, which consists of
consists of Public Education and Outreach, Public Involvement/Participation, Illicit
Discharge and Elimination, Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control, Post-
Construction Stormwater Management in New Developments and Redevelopment, and
Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations.
131
Item 4.
Section 5 73 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
City of Ramsey
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County. We have maintained
our Siren Watcher Program, which coordinates volunteers to monitor individual sirens and
make sure they are functional during testing on a monthly basis.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and follow the Lower Rum River
regulations.
• The city adopted the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area Program (MRCCA) floodplain
ordinance, which includes specific regulations for areas within the floodplain.
City of St. Francis
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County. We purchased and
installed an additional warning siren on the east side of the city.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
• We have implemented monthly internal EM meetings for department heads.
• We have continued to address stormwater management improvements. The city utilizes
our Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer and Municipal Water Plan that guides our stormwater
management. We have replaced deteriorating culverts under a city street that runs over
the Seelye Brook to prevent flooding issues.
City of Spring Lake Park
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• The city has newly updated our warning siren at City Hall and upgraded our other siren. We
have tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
Linwood Township
• We participated in the NWS severe weather awareness weeks and shared information with
residents using our city website & social media.
• We tested warning sirens monthly in coordination with Anoka County.
• We enforced building regulations, burn permits, and city ordinances for flood control
• We added a generator at the Fire department and Town Hall to be prepared for power
outages.
• We hired a new Emergency Manager to lead EM planning for the township. The EM
coordinates with Anoka County Emergency Management.
132
Item 4.
Section 5 74 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
• We have continued to monitor and address stormwater management planning through the
Linwood 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Linwood Township Road & Bridge Committee
advises the Town Board on township road and bridge projects.
5.1.4 Plans and Programs in Place to Address Natural Hazards
Anoka County has numerous plans and programs in place to address natural hazards. Some of these
programs are hazard-specific, and others address impacts and human safety for many types of events
(“All Hazards”). To group related natural hazards, “Summer Storms” encompasses Tornadoes,
Windstorms, Lightning, and Hail. The plans and programs in place by Anoka County to support
mitigation for the hazards addressed in this plan are described as follows:
All Hazards
All Hazards Emergency Operations Plan: Anoka County Emergency Management maintains an
all-hazards Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) which lays out concepts and operating
guidelines for all incident management and support functions that may be needed to ensure
life safety, incident stabilization, and property preservation during an incident and the
transition to recovery.
Emergency Notification System: Anoka County utilizes IPAWS (Integrated Public Alert Warning
System) to disseminate emergency notifications to both residents and visitors (not an “opt-in”
service).
General Notification System: Anoka County has an “Alert Center” website page that provides
a list of general alerts by category from Anoka County.
Preparedness Outreach & Education: Anoka County Emergency Management utilizes the
Anoka County website, Anoka County Emergency Management website page, and local news
media to communicate with the public on emergency preparedness, severe weather, and other
hazard conditions throughout the year. The Anoka County Emergency Management website
page provides information and resource links for public education on emergency
preparedness. The county also receives all products/statements issued by the National
Weather Service, and in turn shares or incorporates these into its community outreach and
public education. Promotion of the use of NOAA weather radios occurs during the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Week as well as throughout the year. Anoka County Emergency
Management provides special presentations or other planning assistance as requested to
local governments, schools, or other local organizations and facilities within the county.
Mass Care Sheltering: In the event of a disaster where temporary sheltering is needed, Anoka
County Emergency Management works in coordination with Anoka County Human Services
Division (which includes Public Health & Environmental Services), the American Red Cross,
other Volunteer Organizations Active in Disaster (VOAD), and local governments/Fire & EMS to
support mass care services as needed. The county EOP includes plans, procedures, and
resources available for mass care sheltering. Local jurisdictions operate initial staging areas
133
Item 4.
Section 5 75 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
or temporary shelter from the initial request for approximately 12 hours until regular shelter
locations or other accommodations can be setup and ready to receive those in need.
Backup Power: Anoka County works to ensure the continuity of operations of county
government services and critical infrastructure in the event of an extended power outage.
Local jurisdictions are encouraged to assess where backup power is needed and to obtain
emergency generators. A collaboration with local and national critical infrastructure groups
ensures regular communication on needs, updates to plans and available resources in our
service area for mitigation and other improvements.
Schools Support: Anoka County Emergency Management coordinates with local school
districts as needed on related emergency planning and preparedness, including support for
specific trainings, exercises, equipment, and relay of county-level emergency notifications.
School districts have their own policies, decision-making protocols, and communications plans
in place to determine the need to close school and to notify targeted audiences in the event
of severe weather, extreme temperatures, or other events that pose risk to students and staff.
This is in conjunction with the Minnesota School Safety Center.
Regional Collaboration: Anoka County Emergency Management works closely with the
neighboring emergency managers on a range of planning, training, and exercises to support
all-hazards preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery capabilities. Anoka County
Emergency Management also works closely with our regional National Weather Service (NWS)
office, having access to all live and on-demand briefings, announcements, and educational
opportunities, and contact information for direct collaboration as needed.
Weather Stations: Anoka County Emergency Management operates small sized weather
stations located throughout the county. These stations provide weather data to support local
first responders with information that is easily accessible, accurate and for the location they
are nearest to. The location of these weather stations allows for far better coverage of the
entire county to determine weather conditions closest to the incident. The data collected from
these weather stations is available on a real time basis to our first responders, the National
Weather Service, and the public for use in planning and responding to weather emergencies
and emergencies or events that can be affected by the weather.
Severe Winter Storms
Winter Weather Statements (Watch, Advisory, Warning, etc.): Anoka County Emergency
Management works to relay winter weather statements received from the NWS to help alert
residents and visitors to hazardous conditions.
Winter Hazard Awareness Week: Anoka County Emergency Management leads participation in
Winter Hazard Awareness Week and encourages municipalities to share information locally.
We provide links and information on the Anoka County Emergency Management and Anoka
County Public Health website.
134
Item 4.
Section 5 76 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Snow Removal & Ice Control: Anoka County is responsible for plowing 1,600 lane miles of
roadway. Anoka County uses four plowing techniques to prevent ice formation and enhance
roadway surface: Anti-Icing, Pre-treating Salt, Pre-Wetting Salt, and De-icing.
Local road jurisdictions conduct winter road maintenance on their respective road systems in
accordance with each of their established policy and/or practice. The Anoka County website
provides information on “Snow and Ice Control Facts” for the public.
Severe Summer Storms
Severe Weather Statements (Watch, Advisory, Warning, etc.): Anoka County works to relay
severe spring and summer weather statements (such as for thunderstorms, windstorms, or
tornadoes) received from the NWS to help alert residents and visitors to hazardous conditions.
Outdoor Warning Sirens: Outdoor warning sirens are located throughout the county and are
tested monthly by Anoka County Emergency Communications Center (ECC) in coordination with
local jurisdictions. Warning sirens are owned and maintained by the cities and township where
they are located. Anoka County Emergency Communications Center coordinates with local
jurisdictions for outdoor warning siren enhancements and updates.
Skywarn® Program: Anoka County Emergency Management works with the National Weather
Service to offer Storm Spotter training on an annual basis to local fire and law enforcement
departments and area residents that wish to be trained as spotters. SkyWarn Storm Spotters
help to keep their local communities safe by providing timely and accurate reports of severe
weather to their local NWS office.
Severe Weather Awareness Week: Anoka County Emergency Management leads participation
in Severe Weather Awareness Week and encourages municipalities to share information
locally. We provide links and information on the Anoka County Emergency Management and
Anoka County Public Health website.
Anoka County Parks Emergency Action Plans: The Anoka County Parks Department has
Emergency Action Plans that include specific communication protocols for Bunker Beach
Water Park, Chomonix Golf Course, two campgrounds, and multiple outdoor environmental
and recreation programs.
Vegetation Management: The Anoka County Highway Department conducts vegetation
management along county roads to reduce the risk of downed trees or branches resulting from
severe spring and summer storm events. Local road authorities and electric utility providers
also work to manage vegetation near power lines to reduce the risk of downed lines and power
outages.
135
Item 4.
Section 5 77 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Extreme Cold
Emergency Notifications: Extreme cold temperature warnings are issued by the National
Weather Service. Anoka County Emergency Management works to relay extreme cold
temperature warnings from the NWS to help alert residents and visitors to hazardous
conditions. The Anoka County Emergency Management Office also encourages residents to
follow local news or NWS weather applications to receive severe weather and extreme
temperature notifications.
Extreme Cold Safety Awareness: Anoka County Emergency Management and Anoka County
Public Health promote public awareness of personal safety measures to take during periods
of extreme cold, such as sharing information via Facebook posts.
Emergency Sheltering: In the event of an extended power outage coupled with a period of
extreme cold, Anoka County Emergency Management will coordinate with Anoka County Public
Health and local Fire or EMS agencies as needed to assist vulnerable residents, such as the
elderly, who may need temporary sheltering. Local jurisdictions operate initial staging areas or
temporary shelter from the initial request for approximately 12 hours until regular shelter
locations or other accommodations can be set up and ready to receive those in need.
Extreme Heat
Emergency Notifications: Extreme heat temperature warnings are issued by the National
Weather Service. Anoka County Emergency Management works to relay extreme heat
temperature warnings from the NWS to help alert residents and visitors to hazardous
conditions. The Anoka County Emergency Management Office also encourages residents to
follow local news or NWS weather applications to receive severe weather and extreme
temperature notifications.
Public Education and Awareness: Anoka County Emergency Management and Anoka County
Public Health to promote public awareness of personal safety measures to take during periods
of extreme heat, such as sharing information via Facebook posts.
Emergency Sheltering: In the event of an extended power outage coupled with a period of
extreme heat, Anoka County Emergency Management will work with Anoka County Public
Health and local Fire or EMS agencies as needed to assist vulnerable residents such as the
elderly, who may need temporary sheltering.
Wildfire
Public Awareness & Emergency Notifications: In the event of wildfire, Anoka County Emergency
Management works with local law enforcement, local fire departments, the NWS, and the MN
DNR to get the word out on the risk of the level of fire danger and any burning restrictions to
help keep the public informed and protected.
136
Item 4.
Section 5 78 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Burning Restrictions/Permits: Burning restrictions are set by the MN DNR. Burning permits
within Anoka County are obtained through the MN DNR website or local office.
Wildland Fire Fighting: Local fire departments respond to woodland or grassland fires within
their boundaries or in coordination with other fire departments as needed via mutual aid
agreements.
Flooding
Public Information on Flood Insurance: The Anoka County Emergency Management website
page includes information on the National Flood Insurance Program for the public. The NFIP
provides options for homeowners, renters, and businesses to attain flood insurance.
Transportation Infrastructure: Over the past 5-10 years, the Anoka County Transportation
Division has been replacing county road bridges that were in poor condition, or restricting
drainage/flow on ditches and natural water courses. Additionally, in collaboration with several
local partners, the Transportation Division has completed a number of trunk highway and
railroad grade separation projects which help improve emergency response times and
evacuation route resiliency. The Transportation Division utilizes a variety of state and federal
grants and competitive funding sources to replace/rehabilitate aging infrastructure (e.g., State
Bridge Bonds, federal bridge replacement program, and Local Road Improvement Program
[LRIP] funds).
Floodplain Management: Floodplain management, as well as all land use planning and zoning
within Anoka County is a function of its municipalities.
Shoreland Ordinance: Anoka County Ordinance #2022-1, Shoreland Management Ordinance
establishes allowable uses and development standards in shoreland areas designated within
the county.
Buffer Ordinance: Anoka County Ordinance #2017-1 is established to administer and enforce
riparian vegetated buffers in accordance with Minn. Stat. §103F.48 (the Buffer Law). The
ordinance provides for riparian vegetated buffers and water quality protection for state water
resources under the county’s jurisdiction.
Minnesota Buffer Law: In Anoka County, the Minnesota Buffer Law, enforced by the Anoka
Conservation District (ACD), requires perennial vegetative buffers of up to 50 feet along lakes,
rivers, and streams, and 16.5 feet along ditches, to filter pollutants and improve water quality.
One-Watershed One Plan (1w1P): The Anoka Conservation District (ACD) has been a partner
in regional watershed planning and projects with the Upper and Lower Rum River Watershed
Management Organizations, and has participated in the Rum River One Watershed, One Plan.
These planning and project efforts have worked to address issues such as bank stabilization
and stormwater management.
137
Item 4.
Section 5 79 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Dam Failure
Anoka County does not have any plans in place in regards to dam or levee failure. The Coon
Rapids Dam is owned and operated by the Three Rivers Park District and is aligned on the
Mississippi River in between Anoka and Hennepin Counties. Access to the dam on the Anoka
County side is in Coon Rapids and through the Coon Rapids Dam Regional Park. The dam is
ranked as a significant-hazard structure, meaning that a failure would likely cause no probable
loss of human life but may have potential for other downstream consequences, such as
economic losses. Catastrophic failure of this dam would have minimal consequences. It is
maintained to create a recreational pool on the upstream side of the dam. Loss of this pool
would reduce water levels in the upstream area, affecting recreational use only. Downstream
consequences would be determined by a number of local, state and federal partners but would
primarily affect recreation.
5.2 Mitigation Goals
The goals and strategies for natural hazards in the 2024 Minnesota State Hazard Mitigation Plan were
adopted for use in the Anoka County Plan. This framework, as outlined below, will allow for integration
of the mitigation actions that are listed by Anoka County and its jurisdictions into the state plan. The
state will then be able to develop a statewide strategy that will benefit all of Minnesota.
Flooding Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property loss and economic disruption due to all types of
flooding (riverine, flash, coastal, dam/levee failure).
Wildfire Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property loss, natural resource and economic disruption due to
wildfires (forest, prairie, grass, and peat bogs).
Windstorms Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property loss, and economic disruption due to windstorms.
Hail Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property damage, and economic disruption due to hailstorms.
Winter Storms Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property loss, and economic disruption due to winter
storms (blizzard, ice, and ice storm).
Lightning Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property losses, loss of services, and economic disruption due
to lightning.
Tornado Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property loss, and economic disruption due to tornadoes.
Drought Goal: Reduce economic loss and environmental impacts due to drought.
Extreme Heat Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, and economic disruption due to extreme heat.
Extreme Cold Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, and economic disruption due to extreme cold.
Dam/Levee Failure Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property loss, natural resource and economic
disruption due to dam/levee failure.
138
Item 4.
Section 5 80 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Erosion/Landslide/Mudslide Goal: Reduce deaths, injuries, property loss, and economic disruption
due to hillside, coastal, bluff: caused primarily by oversaturation of soil.
5.3 Mitigation Action and Project Strategies
The mitigation actions in this plan are summarized into four main strategy types, as described in the
FEMA publications Local Mitigation Planning Handbook (2013) and Mitigation Ideas: A Resource for
Reducing Risk to Natural Hazards (2013). Minnesota HSEM determined a fifth strategy type for use
within the state: Mitigation Preparedness and Response. The strategies and example actions are listed
in Table 14.
Table 14. Mitigation strategies and action types
Mitigation
Strategy Description Example Mitigation Actions
Local Plans and
Regulations
These actions include government authorities,
policies, or codes, that influence the way land
and buildings are developed and built.
• Comprehensive plans
• Land use ordinances
• Planning and zoning
• Building codes and
enforcement
• Floodplain ordinances
• NFIP Community Rating
System
• Capital improvement
programs
• Open space preservation
• Shoreline codes
• Stormwater management
regulations and master plans
Structure and
Infrastructure
Projects
These actions involve modifying existing
structures and infrastructure to protect them
from a hazard or remove them from a hazard
area. This could apply to public or private
structures as well as critical facilities and
infrastructure.
This type of action also involves projects to
construct manmade structures to reduce the
impact of hazards.
Many of these types of actions are projects
eligible for funding through the FEMA Hazard
Mitigation Assistance program.
• Acquisitions and elevations of
structures in flood-prone areas
• Utility undergrounding
• Structural retrofits
• Floodwalls and retaining walls
• Detention and retention
structures
• Culverts
• Safe rooms
Natural Systems
Protection
These are actions that minimize damage and
losses and also preserve or restore the
functions of natural systems.
• Sediment and erosion control
• Stream corridor restoration
• Forest management
• Conservation easements
• Wetland restoration and
preservation
139
Item 4.
Section 5 81 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Mitigation
Strategy Description Example Mitigation Actions
Education and
Awareness
Programs
These are actions to inform and educate
residents, elected officials, and property
owners about hazards and potential ways to
mitigate them. These actions may also include
participation in national programs, such as
StormReady or Firewise Communities.
Although this type of mitigation reduces risk
less directly than structural projects or
regulation, it is an important foundation. A
greater understanding and awareness of
hazards and risk among local officials,
stakeholders, and the public is more likely to
lead to direct actions.
• Radio or television spots
• Websites with maps and
information
• Real estate disclosure
• Presentations to school groups
or neighborhood organizations
• Mailings to residents in
hazard-prone areas.
• StormReady Certification
• Firewise Communities
Mitigation
Preparedness
and Response
This is a State of Minnesota mitigation
strategy with the intent of covering
preparation and actions that protect life and
property during a natural disaster.
• Emergency operations plan
• Flood fight plans and
preparedness
• Dam emergency action plans
• Warning
• Backup power
• Emergency capabilities
Local leaders work together with the Anoka County emergency management director to assure that
the hazards and mitigation actions included in this plan are accurate and addressed in their
jurisdictions. Development of mitigation actions for the county and each city was informed by a
community’s hazard and risk assessment; identification of local vulnerabilities, and review of
capabilities in place to address mitigation. Planning team members, local elected officials and staff
from Anoka County and each city actively participated in the development and review of mitigation
action charts for implementation through participation in planning team meetings (see Appendix F)
and development of Local Mitigation Surveys (see Appendix C). Additional jurisdictional and public
feedback was incorporated following news releases inviting public input to the planning process (see
Appendix G).
The Anoka County risks and mitigation activities identified also incorporate the concerns and needs of
townships, school districts, and other entities participating in this plan. Appendix H contains the
jurisdictional mitigation action charts for participating cities.
See Mitigation Actions for all jurisdictions and provide
ongoing feedback on the HMP website
The following is an overview of the mitigation action charts and a description of each element of the
chart.
Number (#)
Each mitigation action is identified by a number.
Hazard
Each mitigation action is identified by the natural hazard it relates to. Actions that fall under “All
140
Item 4.
Section 5 82 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Hazards” relate to both natural and non-natural hazards. “Severe Winter Storms” includes blizzards,
heavy snow, ice storms, winter storms, and winter weather. “Severe Summer Storms” includes
windstorms, tornadoes, lightning, and hail.
Mitigation Strategy
Each mitigation action is identified by one of the following five mitigation strategies.
• Local Planning and Regulations
• Structure and Infrastructure Projects
• Natural Systems Protection
• Education and Awareness Programs
• Mitigation Preparedness and Response Support
See Table 14 for a description of each mitigation strategy and related types of actions.
Mitigation Action
Each mitigation action provides a concise, action-oriented description of the action or project to be
undertaken that will help to reduce or eliminate future risk, including in areas with existing or new
development.
Status
The status of each mitigation action is indicated by one of the following categories:
• New – New actions that have been identified since the last plan.
• Existing – Actions that are carried over from the last plan or have been updated.
• In Progress – Actions from the last plan that are currently being acted upon.
Mitigation actions that have been completed or deleted from the 2019 Anoka County Hazard
Mitigation Plan are identified and reported on in Appendix H. Completed and deleted mitigation actions
are not carried over into the updated mitigation action chart.
Priority
In the review and discussion of selected mitigation strategies and actions, the planning team ranked
mitigation actions by priority for implementation. Table 15 provides criteria that were taken into
consideration in the process.
Table 15. Criteria for Mitigation Action Priority Ranking
Ranking Criteria
High
Priority
• Methods for reducing risk from the hazard are technically reliable.
• The jurisdiction has experience in implementing mitigation measures.
• Mitigation measures are eligible under federal grant programs.
• There are multiple mitigation measures for the hazard.
• The mitigation measure(s) are known to be cost-effective.
• The mitigation measures protect lives and property for a long period or are permanent
risk reduction solutions.
141
Item 4.
Section 5 83 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Ranking Criteria
Moderate
Priority
• Mitigation methods are established.
• The jurisdiction has limited experience with the types of measures that may be
appropriate to mitigate the hazard.
• Some mitigation measures are eligible for federal grants.
• There is a limited range of effective mitigation measures for the hazard.
• Mitigation measures are cost-effective only in limited circumstances.
• Mitigation measures are effective for a reasonable period.
Low
Priority
• Methods for reducing risk from the hazard are not well-established, are not proven
reliable, or are experimental.
• The jurisdiction has little or no experience in implementing mitigation measures, and/or
no technical knowledge of them.
• Mitigation measures are ineligible under federal grant programs.
• There is a very limited range of mitigation measures for the hazard, usually only one
feasible alternative.
• The mitigation measure(s) have not been proven cost-effective and are likely to be very
expensive compared to the magnitude of the hazard.
• The long-term effectiveness of the measure is not known or is known to be relatively poor.
Time frame
Each mitigation action identifies the anticipated timeframe for implementation within the next five-
year planning cycle. If a mitigation action is considered an ongoing effort, the next five-year period in
which the activity would occur is listed. If a mitigation activity has a defined period for implementation
(i.e., a specific year), it will be noted.
Responsibility
Each mitigation action identifies what personnel, department, or agency will serve as lead for the
administration or implementation of the action.
Comments on Implementation & Integration
Each mitigation action provides a description of how the jurisdiction will work to implement the
mitigation action and incorporate the activity into other existing planning mechanisms. This can
include description of methods for public outreach, enforcement of policies, development of plans,
and coordination of key staff and partnership efforts.
Possible Funding
Each mitigation action identifies potential funding sources to support implementation of the mitigation
activity, such as existing county or city funding, or state or federal funding. Projects that may be eligible
for future FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grant funding are noted.
5.3.1 Anoka County Mitigation Action Chart
The Anoka County Mitigation Action Chart is provided in Table 16 at the end of this section. Appendix
H provides the mitigation action charts developed for each city participating in the 2025 HMP update.
142
Item 4.
Section 5 84 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
A report on the status of mitigation actions related to natural hazards included in the Anoka County
2019 plan update can be found in Appendix E.
See Mitigation Actions for all jurisdictions and provide
ongoing feedback on the HMP website
143
Item 4.
Section 5 85 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Table 16. Anoka County Mitigation Action Chart, 2026–2031
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility Comments on Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All
Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Utilize effective methods
to share information with
the community about
severe weather, extreme
temperatures, and
personal preparedness.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Anoka County
Emergency
Management
(ACEM) ACEM
in coord with
other county
depts.
Anoka County Emergency Management utilizes the
Anoka County website, Anoka County Emergency
Management website page, and local news media to
communicate with the public on emergency
preparedness, severe weather, and other hazard
conditions throughout the year. ACEM leads
participation in Severe Weather Awareness Week and
Winter Weather Awareness Week with the NWS. We
provide links and information on the ACEM and AC
Public Health website pages.
Internal:
EM Dept./ AC
General Op.
Budget
External:
FEMA EMPG
2 All
Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Fully implement and
promote Anoka County’s
new Everbridge
emergency notification
system.
New
High
2026-2031
ACEM in coord
with other
county depts.
Everbridge software is in the process of being
implemented county wide for both internal and
external messaging. The system is being funded and
lead by Emergency Communications Center / 911
Dispatch. Anoka County Emergency Management will
have a link for residents to sign up on the county
website, and will conduct public messaging to
promote awareness and sign up for the system. Local
jurisdictions will be encouraged to use their websites
/ social media to direct people to the Anoka County
website to sign up and opt-in to receive notifications.
Internal:
EM Dept./ AC
General Op.
Budget
External:
HSEM
3 All
Hazards
Local Planning
& Regulations
Adopt and enforce
regulations governing
new construction to
prevent damage to
buildings and
infrastructure from
severe weather events.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
Local
Jurisdictions
(Cities and
Linwood Twp)
Land use planning and zoning within Anoka County is
a function of its municipalities (by each city and
Linwood Township, respectively). Anoka County does
not have a role in enforcing local regulations.
The Coon Creek Watershed Distrct serves as the
Ditch Authority for Anoka County. The CCWD has a
permitting program that intends to prevent new and
reconstruction from inadvertently flood properties
now or in the future.
External:
Local Govt’s
144
Item 4.
Section 5 86 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility Comments on Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
4 All
Hazards
Local Planning
& Regulations
Implement existing plans
and policies in place that
help to mitigate against
the impacts of flooding
and other natural
hazards to future
development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Anoka County
Administration
Anoka County has several plans and policies in place
that help to address hazard mitigation, including:
Ordinance #2022-1, Shoreland Management
Ordinance, Ordinance #2017-1, Anoka County Buffer
Ordinance, Anoka County EOP, Anoka County 2025-
2029 Capital Improvements Plan, Anoka County
2040 Transportation Plan, Anoka County Park
Ordinance 2018-01, Last Revised July 23, 2024.
Internal:
AC General Op.
Budget
5 All
Hazards
Local Planning
& Regulations
Utilize departmental
staff and elected
officials to work together
to accomplish identified
mitigation efforts.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Anoka County
departments
Anoka County sustains organizational capacity across
departments that support hazard mitigation including
Emergency Management (Emergency Planning and
Coordination), Highway Dept., (WS4 Permit
compliance and Right of Way maintenance and
drainage system management), Environmental
Services Dept. (Planning and Coordination with local
watershed districts), and Public Health Dept. (Public
Health preparedness, planning, and coordination),
and County Parks (Public Watercraft Access
Management).
Internal:
AC General
Operating
Budget – Cross
depts.
6 All
Hazards
Local Planning
& Regulations
Develop and sustain
partnerships with
outside agencies,
organizations,
businesses, and
neighboring jurisdictions
to accomplish mitigation
efforts.
Existing
High
2026-2031
ACEM and
other county
depts.
Anoka County Emergency Management participates
in annual regional planning and training; statewide
AMEM conference. Anoka County departments also
coordinate with other local and regional agencies
involved in mitigation, including neighboring county
emergency managers, SWCD, MN DNR, MnDOT, Rural
and Municipal Electric Cooperatives, and Watershed
Districts. Anoka County continues to collaborate with
public and private partners to promote preparedness.
Internal:
AC General
Operating
Budget – Cross
depts.
7 All
Hazards
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the county’s
Emergency Operations
Plan (EOP) is updated
and addresses policies &
procedures needed to
support EM functions
prior to, during, and
following a disaster.
Existing
High
2026-2031
ACEM in coord
with other
county depts.
Anoka County Emergency Management conducts
ongoing maintenance and updates of the county EOP.
The EOP lays out concepts and operating guidelines
for all incident management and support functions
that may be needed to ensure life safety, incident
stabilization, and property preservation during an
incident and the transition to recovery.
Internal:
EM Dept./ AC
General Op.
Budget
External:
FEMA EMPG
145
Item 4.
Section 5 87 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility Comments on Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
8 All
Hazards
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Identify critical
infrastructure or facilities
that need backup
generators and work to
obtain them.
Existing
High
2026-2031
ACEM in coord
with other
county depts.
Anoka County is working with external power critical
infrastructure partners on collaborations and future
solutions. Local jurisdictions are encouraged to
assess where backup power is needed and to obtain
emergency generators. A collaboration with local and
national critical infrastructure groups ensures regular
communication on needs, updates to plans and
available resources in our service area for mitigation
and other improvements. FEMA HMGP may be one
source of external grant funding to which the county
and local jurisdictions can seek to apply for the
purchase of generators for critical facilities.
Internal:
AC General
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA HMGP
9 All
Hazards
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that plans,
procedures, and
designated facilities are
in place to provide
temporary sheltering due
to a severe weather or
other disaster event.
Existing
High
2026-2031
ACEM, AC
Public Health
and external
MNVOAD
partners
In the event of a disaster where temporary sheltering
is needed, ACEM works in coordination with Anoka
County Human Services Division (which includes
Public Health & Environmental Services), the
American Red Cross, other Volunteer Organizations
Active in Disaster (VOAD), and local governments/Fire
& EMS to support mass care services as needed. The
county EOP includes plans, procedures, and
resources available for mass care sheltering. Local
jurisdictions operate initial staging areas or temporary
shelter from the initial request for approximately 12
hours until regular shelter locations or other
accommodations can be setup and ready to receive
those in need.
Internal:
EM and PH
Dept. budgets
/ AC General
Op. Budget
External:
FEMA EMPG
10 All
Hazards
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Encourage schools and
other facilities that
house seniors or other
vulnerable populations
to have emergency plans
in place to deal with
severe weather, extreme
temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
ACEM in coord
with local
jurisdictions
ACEM continues to work with local jurisdictions
provide outreach to and support to schools and other
facilities on emergency planning. Schools and long-
term care (LTC) facilities are required to have such
plans in place. ACEM provides direct training or
planning support as requested.
Internal:
External:
Schools,
Private LTC
Facilities,
Local Govt’s
146
Item 4.
Section 5 88 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility Comments on Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
11 All
Hazards
Local Planning
& Regulations
Identify and work to
secure internal as well
as external funding
(grant or loan sources) to
help accomplish
mitigation activities in
the county.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
ACEM, Other
County depts
as related
Anoka County operating funds can be used for
mitigation activities, and grants can be applied to
implement mitigation projects. The Transportation
Division utilizes a variety of state and federal grants
and competitive funding sources to
replace/rehabilitate aging infrastructure (i.e. State
Bridge Bonds, federal bridge replacement program,
and Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) funds).
FEMA EMPG funding is used to help support the
county’s EM program.
Internal:
AC General
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA EMPG
12 All
Hazards
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Support the activities of
volunteer and Anoka
County Human Services
agencies in identifying
and assisting vulnerable
populations during
severe weather.
Existing
High
2026-2031
AC Human
Services Dept.
ACEM continues to partner with Anoka County Human
Services to support vulnerable populations in our all-
hazards planning.
Internal:
AC HS budget
13 Flooding Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce policies and
ordinances that address
development in high-risk
flood areas.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Local Govt’s
(All cities and
Linwood Twp)
Floodplain management, as well as all land use
planning and zoning within Anoka County is a function
of its municipalities. Anoka County Ordinance #2022-
1, Shoreland Management Ordinance establishes
allowable uses and development standards in
shoreland areas designated within the county.
External:
Local Govt’s
14 Flooding Local Planning
& Regulations
Work with area
watershed organizations
to address mitigation
plans and projects that
address risk reduction
for localized flooding and
erosion.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Anoka County
in coord with
Watershed
District
partners
The Anoka Conservation District (ACD) has been a
partner in regional watershed planning and projects
with the Upper and Lower Rum River Watershed
Management Organizations, and has participated in
the Rum River One Watershed, One Plan. These
planning and project efforts have worked to address
issues such as bank stabilization and stormwater
management. The Coon Creek Watershed District
works closely with communities in Anoka County on
flood mitigation planning and projects.
External:
ACD,
SWCD, CCWD
Tax Levy
MN BWSR
Clean Water
Fund Grants
147
Item 4.
Section 5 89 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility Comments on Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
15 Flooding
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
measures to address
flood risk reduction
projects for roads,
bridges, and culverts
throughout the county.
Existing
High
2026-2031
AC Highway
Dept.
The Anoka County Highway Dept. utilizes a variety of
state and federal grants and competitive funding
sources to replace/rehabilitate aging infrastructure
(i.e. State Bridge Bonds, federal bridge replacement
program, and Local Road Improvement Program
(LRIP) funds).
Internal:
AC Hwy. Dept.
budget
External:
State Bridge
Bonds, federal
bridge
replacement
program, and
Local Road
Improvement
Program (LRIP)
funds, BWSR
Water Storage
Grant
16 Flooding
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Work with township and
city governments to
address areas of local
flooding concern.
Existing
High
2026-2031
ACEM,
AC Highway
Dept. in coord
with Local
Govt’s
Anoka County maintains an ongoing collaboration
with local jurisdictions to mitigate repetitive flood
losses. This includes collaborating with City and
County organizations to use mapping and databases
to restrict development in defined flood hazard areas
and addressing roadways that are repetitively
damaged by flooding. In addition, the Coon Creek
Watershed District provides customized floodplain
modeling for our cities to use in their flood prevention
work.
Internal:
ACEM,
AC Hwy. Dept.
External:
Twp. Govt’s,
CCWD Tax Levy
17 Flooding Local Planning
& Regulations
Collaborate with City and
County organizations to
evaluate the need to
relocate or acquire
structures in flood
hazard areas.
Existing
Low
2026-2031
ACEM in coord
with local
jurisdictions
Anoka County has on ongoing collaboration with local
jurisdictions to mitigate repetitive flood losses. ACEM
will be available to work with any local governments in
the county that are seeking to apply for external grant
funding such as MN DNR Flood Hazard Mitigation or
FEMA HMGP / FMA grant funding for the purpose of
buying out repetitive flood properties.
External:
FEMA HMGP or
FMA grant
programs,
MN DNR FHM
grant
programs,
CCWD Tax Levy
148
Item 4.
Section 5 90 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility Comments on Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
18 Flooding
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Collaborate with the
Coon Creek Watershed
District (CCWD) to
implement flood
mitigation projects
identified in the CCWD
2024-2033
Comprehensive
Watershed Management
Plan as well as the
Anoka County HMP
update.
New
High
2026-2031
Coon Creek
Watershed
District
(CCWD) in
coord with
Anoka County
Depts and
local
jurisdictions
The Coon Creek Watershed District has identified
multiple areas as having a high risk of flooding due to
a variety of factors. The Coon Creek Watershed 2024-
2033 Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan
includes flood prevention projects within Anoka
County. A list of specific areas of concern are included
by the CCWD in the Anoka County Local Mitigation
Survey Form (see Appendix C to the Anoka County
HMP).
Anoka County will collaborate with the CCWD and
local jurisdictions on these projects as appropriate.
Internal:
CCWD Tax Levy
External:
FEMA HMGP,
FEMA HMA,
MN DNR FHM
program,
Other agency
funding
19
Severe
Winter
Storms
Local Planning
& Regulations
Implement snow removal
and ice control to ensure
the safety of county
roads impacted by winter
storms.
Existing
High
2026-2031
AC Highway
Dept.
The Anoka County Hwy. Dept. is responsible for
plowing 1,600 lane miles of roadway. Anoka County
uses four plowing techniques to prevent ice formation
and enhance roadway surface: Anti-Icing, Pre-treating
Salt, Pre-Wetting Salt, and De-icing. Local road
jurisdictions conduct winter road maintenance on
their respective road systems in accordance with
each of their established policy and/or practice. The
Anoka County website provides information on “Snow
and Ice Control Facts” for the public.
Internal:
AC Transp.
Division Budget
20
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Work with the National
Weather Service (NWS)
to provide SkyWarn
training and develop a
network of trained Storm
Spotters throughout the
county.
Existing
High
2026-2031
ACEM in coord
with NWS
ACEM works with the NWS to offer this training on an
annual basis to local fire and law enforcement
departments and local residents that wish to be
trained as spotters.
External:
National
Weather
Service
21
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure outdoor warning
sirens are located where
needed and functioning
properly.
Existing
High
2026-2031
ACEM & AC
ECC in coord
with local
jurisdictions
Outdoor warning sirens are located throughout the
county and are tested monthly by Anoka County
Emergency Communications Center (ECC) in
coordination with local jurisdictions. Warning sirens
are owned and maintained by the cities and township
where they are located. Anoka County Emergency
Communications Center coordinates with local
jurisdictions for outdoor warning siren enhancements
and updates.
Internal:
AC ECC budget
External:
Local Govt’s
FEMA HMGP
grants
149
Item 4.
Section 5 91 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility Comments on Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
22
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure emergency
action plans are in place
for county-owned public
recreation areas to help
protect the public during
severe weather storm
events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
AC Parks
Dept.in coord
with county
departments
The Anoka County Parks Department has Emergency
Action Plans that include specific communication
protocols for Bunker Beach Water Park, Chomonix
Golf Course, two campgrounds, and multiple outdoor
environmental and recreation programs.
Internal:
AC Parks Dept.
budget
23
Severe
Summer
Storms
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Provide assistance to
schools, mobile home
parks, or other facilities
that house vulnerable
populations in efforts to
obtain backup
generators or construct
tornado safe rooms.
Existing
High
2026-2031
ACEM in coord
with local
jurisdictions
ACEM is able to provide assistance to schools, MHPs
+their municipal government and LTCs regarding
emergency planning or to look into FEMA grant
funding for generators or construction of tornado safe
rooms.
Specific Project Interest: The St. Francis Area Schools
participated in the Anoka County HMP update and is
interested in exploring gymnasium tornado shelter
opportunities within the school district. They are also
in need of replacing a backup generator at the St.
Francis High School.
Internal:
ACEM Dept.
budget
External:
Local Gov’ts,
School
Districts,
FEMA HMGP
safe room
grant
24
Severe
Winter &
Summer
Storms
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Encourage municipal
and rural electric
cooperatives to address
burying powerlines or
strengthening power
poles to avoid power
outages from high wind
events and storms.
Existing
High
2026-2031
ACEM, local
jurisdictions in
coord with
electric utility
providers
ACEM works with our utility coops and local
governments on these efforts as needed. FEMA HMA
grant funding may be a source for powerline
infrastructure retrofits that eligible rural and
municipal electric coops can apply for.
External:
Electric Coops,
FEMA HMGP
grant
25
Severe
Winter &
Summer
Storms
Natural
Systems
Protection
Manage trees and other
vegetation along roads
from severe storm
events to reduce risk to
powerlines and passing
motorists.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
AC Highway
Dept., Local
Jurisdictions
and Utility
Providers
The Anoka County Highway Dept. maintains 421
miles of roads within the county, which includes
brushing or trimming within the right of way as
needed. Local city and township road authorities as
well as utility providers that serve Anoka County work
to manage vegetation near power lines to reduce the
risk of downed lines and power outages.
Internal:
AC Hwy. Dept.
budget
External:
Local Govt’s,
Local Utility
companies
150
Item 4.
Section 5 92 Mitigation Strategy
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility Comments on Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
26
Extreme
Cold/He
at
Temps
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Provide outreach and
education to the public
on personal safety
measures to take during
periods of extreme cold
or extreme heat.
In-Progress
High
2026-2031
ACEM &
AC Public
Health and
local
jurisdictions
ACEM works to share information received from the
National Weather Service when periods of extreme
cold or heat are forecast and occurring. ACEM utilizes
the county EM website page, and EM Facebook. Local
radio and TV stations also provide this information to
the public. School Districts have plans and policies in
place for delaying or closing school to protect
students from extreme temps.
Internal:
ACEM, AC PH
dept funding
27
Extreme
Cold/He
at
Temps
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Work with local
jurisdictions to plan for
temporary
warming/cooling
facilities and promote
their use for those that
are vulnerable to
extremely heat or cold
temperatures (i.e.,
homeless, elderly)
Existing
High
2026-2031
ACEM in coord
with AC PH
and local
govt’s
ACEM addresses planning for extreme temperature
sheltering within the county EOP and in coordination
with Anoka County Public Health and local
jurisdictions. Designated facilities in the county are
identified for use for emergency warming/cooling
centers.
Internal:
ACEM, AC PH
dept funding
External:
Local Govt’s,
Red Cross
28 Wildfire Local Planning
& Regulations
Encourage communities
to implement measures
that reduce the risk of
wildfire to life safety,
existing structures, and
new development in the
county.
New
High
2026-2031
ACEM in coord
with MN DNR
Firewise and
local FD’s
Wildfire mitigation occurs at the local level by cities
within the county as well as Linwood Township. ACEM
encourages these communities to identify and
address local wildfire concerns such as fuel reduction
efforts, creating of defensible space, and ensuring
evacuation plans are in place.
External:
CWDG
Grant,
MN DNR
Firewise
29 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Conduct public outreach
and education on
wildfire risk and
prevention during
periods of high risk for
wildfire.
Existing
High
2026-2031
ACEM in
coordination
with local FD’s
ACEM uses its EM Facebook page to help do outreach
to the public on extreme dry conditions and wildfire
risk as per MN DNR guidance. Local jurisdictions are
responsible to do outreach locally.
Internal:
ACEM general
budget
External:
Local Govt’s
30
Dam/Le
vee
Failure
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Work with local
jurisdictions to address
any dams or levees that
require repair.
Existing
Low
2026-2031
MN DNR
Anoka County will work with the MN DNR on any
issues that may arise with these structures within the
county. There are no high hazard potential dams
within the county.
External:
MN DNR
151
Item 4.
Section 6 – Plan Maintenance
6.1 Monitoring, Evaluation, and Updating the Plan
The Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) should be considered a living document. The plan
should be updated and approved by FEMA at least every five years. The guidance in this section will
function as the primary tool when reviewing progress on the implementation of the Anoka County HMP.
The Anoka County emergency management director (EMD) is the individual responsible for leading all
efforts to monitor, evaluate, and update the HMP within the five-year window. Throughout the five-year
planning cycle, the Anoka County EMD will work with an emergency managers group to help monitor,
review, evaluate, and update the HMP. The group will include township representatives and designated
city emergency managers from cities participating in the plan update, and include other city elected
officials or staff as needed. Representatives from agencies or organizations that are involved with
related mitigation work in the county as well as those that work with underserved communities or
socially vulnerable populations will also be invited to participate in the group. The Anoka County EMD
will conduct quarterly outreach to and communicate with the group on emergency management
matters regarding severe weather awareness, local preparedness, mitigation, and response &
recovery as needed. Additional stakeholders will be added based on need or in response to severe
weather events.
If necessary, the Anoka County EMD will convene the group to meet more regularly to monitor plan
implementation progress and reassess needs and opportunities. This could be done in response to
funding cycles of programs that provide resources for hazard mitigation activities. If there is a need for
a special meeting due to new developments or a declared disaster occurring in the county, the group
will meet to update pertinent mitigation strategies. Depending on Anoka County opportunities and
fiscal resources, mitigation projects may be implemented independently by individual communities or
through local partnerships.
The group will continue to review the HMP goals and objectives to determine their relevance to
changing situations in Anoka County. In addition, state and federal policies will be reviewed to ensure
they are addressing current and expected conditions. The group will also review the risk assessment
portion of the plan to determine if this information should be updated or modified. The parties
responsible for the various implementation actions will report on the status of their projects, and will
include which implementation processes worked well, any difficulties encountered, how coordination
efforts are proceeding, and which strategies should be revised.
Updates or modifications to the HMP during the five-year planning process will require a public notice
and a meeting prior to submitting revisions to the individual jurisdictions for approval. The plan will be
updated via written changes, submissions as the group deems appropriate and necessary, and as
approved by county commissioners.
During the five-year plan period, the EMD will require all relevant county departments and jurisdictions
to report on the status of their mitigation actions using the worksheets provided in Appendix I. This
information will be used to track progress for the next plan update. Additionally, the EMD will establish
152
Item 4.
Section 6 94 Plan Maintenance
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
and implement an HMP maintenance schedule. Forms for these purposes are drawn from FEMA’s
2023 Local Mitigation Planning Handbook and can be found in Appendix I (FEMA, 2023a).
The EMD will also solicit feedback from the emergency managers group using the following prompts
(also found in Appendix I):
• Are there any new representatives from jurisdictions, agencies, or organizations that you feel
should be included in our stakeholder outreach?
• Do you feel your community has any new vulnerabilities that may be impacted by hazard
events? (critical infrastructure, systems, or populations)
• Has your community identified any new mitigation activities that would help reduce risk to
future hazard events?
• Are there any funding opportunities or other resources that may be available to help implement
local mitigation activities?
• How is your community integrating information from the mitigation plan into other planning
mechanisms (such as plans, policies, or partnerships)?
6.2 Implementation
Anoka County and its included municipalities share a common HMP and work together closely to
develop, revise, and implement it. This HMP provides a comprehensive chart of mitigation actions for
Anoka County and its jurisdictions (see Appendix H and Section 5.3). The cities participating in the
HMP planning process identified the specific mitigation strategies that they would seek to implement
in their communities during the five-year planning cycle. These mitigation actions are provided in
Appendix H.
Several implementation tools are available to address hazards. The strategies to use will be part of an
ongoing discussion as Anoka County looks for opportunities for plan implementation. The following
tools will be considered:
Education: In many cases, education of residents has been identified as one of the most effective
mitigation strategies.
Capital Investments: Capital investments such as fire and ambulance equipment, sprinkler systems,
and dry hydrants are tools that can limit risks and impacts of natural and manmade hazards.
Data Collection and Needs Assessments: Data collection and needs assessments can aid in gaining a
better understanding of threats and allow planning for mitigation strategies accordingly. As resources
are limited for this part of the planning process, additional data collection is likely to be an ongoing
activity as resources become available.
Coordination: Responsibilities for mitigation strategies run across various county departments, local
fire and ambulance departments, city and township governments, and a host of state and federal
agencies. Ongoing coordination is an important tool to ensure resources are used efficiently.
Coordination can also avoid duplication of efforts or prevent gaps that are created because of unclear
roles and responsibilities. The mitigation plan review process can function as a tool to have an ongoing
discussion of roles, responsibilities, and opportunities for coordination.
153
Item 4.
Section 6 95 Plan Maintenance
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Regional Cooperation: Counties and public safety services providers throughout the region often share
similar challenges and concerns. In some cases, a regional approach may be warranted as a mitigation
strategy in order to save resources. Mutual aid agreements are a tool already in use for a number of
services. Needs assessments for fire and ambulance services and development of assistance for
volunteer recruiting, training, and retention could benefit from a regional approach. Cooperation
among counties could also help in lobbying for certain funding priorities that address concerns relating
to challenges in service delivery in rural areas. Organizations such as FEMA Region 5 and the
Minnesota Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM) through the Regional
Program Director can offer tools and resources to assist in these cooperative efforts.
Regulation: Regulation is an important mitigation tool for Anoka County. Regulation plays a vital role
in land use, access to structures, and the protection of water resources and public health.
6.3 Continued Public Involvement
Continued public involvement is critical to the successful implementation of the Hazard Mitigation
Plan. The Anoka County Emergency Management Director and the emergency managers group will
continue to engage new public stakeholders in planning discussions and project implementation
during the five-year cycle of this plan.
The Anoka County HMP website provides opportunities for
continued public involvement and feedback
To seek continued public participation after the plan has been approved and during the five-year
window of implementation for this plan, Anoka County will take the following measures:
• The Anoka County HMP website link will be posted on the Anoka County Emergency
Management website. The website provides a PDF of the plan for download and an interactive
experience for the public to understand the planning process, where county-specific
vulnerabilities lie, national best practices, as well as a chance to submit feedback. Collected
feedback will be reviewed during the five-year plan cycle and will be noted for future update of
the plan or addressed as necessary.
• Following any major storms or natural disasters, Anoka County Emergency Management will
seek to gather concerns and new ideas for mitigation from local residents to include in the
next update of the plan. This may be done through public meetings, outreach via social media,
or news releases via local media.
• Each community participating in the plan will be responsible for keeping their local
government, schools, and community members updated and engaged in the implementation
of their respective mitigation action charts (see Appendix H or the Anoka County HMP website).
Each respective jurisdiction will be required to report on the status of mitigation actions in their
charts to the Anoka County EMD.
• Anoka County and its jurisdictions will use numerous means of public outreach to engage new
public stakeholders in providing input on mitigation concerns, including those from
underserved communities or socially vulnerable populations. Outreach methods may include
presentations at city council or township board meetings, sharing information at special
154
Item 4.
Section 6 96 Plan Maintenance
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
events, working with local schools and partner organizations, and posting information in areas
that are used to communicate with the public (bulletin boards, websites, social media, and
local media sources that communities use to inform and engage the public). As mitigation
projects are implemented, jurisdictions will work to keep the public updated and engaged in
those local efforts.
• To ensure an equitable outreach strategy continues after the plan is adopted, the planning
team will continue to seek to engage with underserved and vulnerable populations during the
next five years. This will vary across jurisdictions, as underserved or vulnerable populations will
differ across the planning area. Methods of engagement will include those listed above, as
well as working with partner agencies, local organizations, facilities, or community interest
groups (e.g., schools, nursing homes, Rotary Club) to conduct more targeted outreach or
presentations to share information on hazard mitigation and solicit for feedback on concerns
and ideas.
155
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Appendices
Appendix A – References
Appendix B – Adopting Resolutions
Appendix C – Local Mitigation Survey Report
Appendix D – Plans & Programs in Place
Appendix E – Past Mitigation Action Review Status Report
Appendix F – Planning Team Meetings
Appendix G – Public Outreach & Engagement Documentation
Appendix H – Mitigation Actions by Jurisdiction
Appendix I – Plan Maintenance & Monitoring Worksheets
156
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Appendix A – References
157
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
References
Adams-Fuller, T. (2023, July 1). Extreme Heat Is Deadlier Than Hurricanes, Floods and Tornadoes
Combined. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/extreme-heat-is-
deadlier-than-hurricanes-floods-and-tornadoes-combined/
AirNow. (2021). Fires and Your Health. AirNow; AirNow.gov, U.S. EPA. https://www.airnow.gov/air-quality-
and-health/fires-and-your-health
American Public Health Association. (2025). Extreme Heat Resource Hub. APHA.
https://www.apha.org/topics-and-issues/climate-health-and-equity/extreme-heat
AMS. (2004, October 8). Mobile Homes and Severe Windstorms. American Meteorological Society.
https://www.ametsoc.org/index.cfm/ams/about-ams/ams-statements/archive-statements-of-the-
ams/mobile-homes-and-severe-windstorms/
ATSDR. (2020, September 15). CDC Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). ATSDR.
https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/at-a-glance_svi.html
Bennett, G., MN DNR. (2025, July 23). NFIP status and info for county hazard mitigation plans [Personal
communication].
Blumenfeld, K. Minnesota State Climatology Office. (2019, January 9). Wildfires [Personal communication].
Blumenfeld, K. Minnesota State Climatology Office. (2023, December 21). Thanks and MN State HMP
2024 [Personal communication].
Borestein, S., Fassett, C., & Goldberg, M. (2023, July 28). Mobile homes turn deadly when tornadoes hit.
This year has been especially bad, AP analysis finds. AP News.
https://apnews.com/article/tornado-mobile-home-death-crushed-
b3a0e41ffd83a2681a92b8e4dad0ef06
CDC. (2020, February 28). Extreme Heat. Extreme Heat | Natural Disasters and Severe Weather | CDC.
https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/extremeheat/index.html
CDC. (2021). Extreme Cold: A Prevention Guide to Promote Your Personal Health and Safety.
https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/winter/pdf/extreme-cold-guide.pdf
Ceil Strauss, MN Floodplain Manager. (2025, August 8). Repetitive Loss Properties for HMP [Personal
communication].
Ceil Strauss, MN Floodplain Manager. (2026, January 14). NFIP status and info for county hazard
mitigation plans [Personal communication].
CEMHS. (2023). Spatial Hazard Events and Losses Database for the United States (Version 21.0)
[Dataset]. Center for Emergency Management and Homeland Security, Arizona State University.
https://cemhs.asu.edu/sheldus
Center for Science Education. (2025). How Weather Affects Air Quality. University Corporation for
Atmospheric Research. https://scied.ucar.edu/learning-zone/air-quality/how-weather-affects-air-
quality
Eaton, J. (2014, January 31). Propane Shortages Leave Many U.S. Homeowners in the Cold. National
Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/140129-us-propane-shortages-
leave-homeowners-in-the-cold
158
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
EPA. (2006). Excessive Heat Events Guidebook. United States Environmental Protection Agency.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-03/documents/eheguide_final.pdf
EPA. (2019). Learn About Heat Islands. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/heat-
islands/learn-about-heat-islands
FEMA. (2004, April). Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety: Hazard Potential Classification System for Dams.
https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/fema-333.pdf
FEMA. (2021). Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grants. https://www.fema.gov/grants/mitigation
FEMA. (2023a). Local Mitigation Planning Handbook.
https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_local-mitigation-planning-
handbook_052023.pdf
FEMA. (2023b, March 21). National Preparedness Goal | FEMA.gov. https://www.fema.gov/emergency-
managers/national-preparedness/goal
FEMA. (2024a). CRCI Methodology (Community Resilience Challenges Index Methodology).
https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_2023-community-resilience-
challenges-index_methodology-report.pdf
FEMA. (2024b). Extreme Heat. FEMA Preparedness Communty.
https://community.fema.gov/ProtectiveActions/s/article/Extreme-Heat
FEMA. (2024c). Hazus | FEMA.gov. https://www.fema.gov/flood-maps/products-tools/hazus#2
FEMA. (2025). Hazard Mitigation Assistance Projects—V2 | FEMA.gov. OpenFEMA.
https://www.fema.gov/openfema-data-page/hazard-mitigation-assistance-projects-v2
FERC. (2020, July 21). Dam Safety Program. Hydropower. https://www.ferc.gov/industries-
data/hydropower
Guo, Y. (2017). Hourly associations between heat and ambulance calls. Environmental Pollution, 220,
1424–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.091
Harrison, D. (2024, July 5). The Minnesota Dam That Partially Failed Is One of Nearly 200 Across the Upper
Midwest in Similarly ‘Poor’ Condition. Inside Climate News.
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/05072024/midwest-dams-in-poor-condition/
Hogeback, J. (2020). How Do Tornadoes Form? Encyclopedia Britannica.
https://www.britannica.com/story/how-do-tornadoes-form
ICAT. (2017). Adapting to Climate Change in Minnesota. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
Knapp, C. N., Kluck, D. R., Guntenspergen, G., Ahlering, M. A., Aimone, N. M., Bamzai-Dodson, A., Basche,
A., Byron, R. G., Conroy-Ben, O., Haggerty, M. N., Haigh, T. R., Johnson, C., Mayes Boustead, B.,
Mueller, N. D., Ott, J. P., Paige, G. B., Ryberg, K. R., Schuurman, G. W., & Tangen, S. G. (2023).
Northern Great Plains. In A. R. Crimmins, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, B. C. Stewart, &
T. K. Maycock (Eds.), Fifth National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program.
https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA5.2023.CH25
Kossin, J. T. (2017). Extreme storms. https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/9/
Kunkel, K. E., Stevens, L. E., Stevens, S. E., Sun, L., Janssen, E., Wuebbles, D., Hilberg, S. D., Timlin, M. S.,
Stoecker, L., Westcott, N. E., & Dobson, J. G. (2013). Regional Climate Trends and Scenarios for
the U.S. National Climate Assessment (p. 102) [NOAA Technical Reports]. National Oceanic and
159
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Atmospheric Administration.
https://scenarios.globalchange.gov/sites/default/files/NOAA_NESDIS_Tech_Report_142-3-
Climate_of_the_Midwest_U.S_0.pdf
Liess, S., Roop, H.A., Twine, T.E., & Noe, R., Meyer, N., Fernandez, A., Dolma, D., Gorman, J., Clark, S.,
Mosel, J., Farris, A., Hoppe, B., Neff, P. (2023). Fine-scale Climate Projections over Minnesota for
the 21st Century. Prepared for the University of Minnesota Climate Adaptation Partnership.
Minnesota CliMAT - Climate Mapping and Analysis Tool (CMIP6). https://climate.umn.edu/MN-
CliMAT
Lopez, H., West, R., Dong, S., Gon, G., K., B., Lee, S.-K., & Atlas, R. (2018). Early emergence of
anthropogenically forced heat waves in the western United States and Great Lakes. Nature Climate
Change.
Marvel, K., Su, W., Delgado, R., Aarons, S., Chatterjee, A., Garcia, M. E., Hausfather, Z., Hayhoe, K., Hence,
D. A., Jewett, E. B., Robel, A., Singh, D., Tripati, A., & Vose, R. S. (2023). Climate trends. In A. R.
Crimmins, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, B. C. Stewart, & T. K. Maycock (Eds.), Fifth
National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program.
https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA5.2023.CH2
MCAP. (2024). Changing Temperature. University of Minnesota Climate Adaptation Partnership.
https://climate.umn.edu/our-changing-climate/changing-temperature
MDH. (2020, January 23). Summary of General Requirements for Manufactured Home Parks:
Manufactured Home Parks and Recreational Camping Areas:Environmental Health—Minnesota
Dept. Of Health. Minnesota Department of Health.
https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/mhprca/mhpgenreq.html
MDH. (2021, February). Cold-related illness. Minnesota Department of Health.
https://data.web.health.state.mn.us/web/mndata/cold_related_illness#
MDH. (2024). Heat-Related Illness: Hospitalizations. Minnesota Public Health Data Access.
https://data.web.health.state.mn.us/heat_hospitalizations
MDH. (2025). Minnesota Extreme Heat Toolkit, Version 2.0. Minnesota Department of Health.
www.mn.gov/heat
MDH, & University of Minnesota, U.-S. (2019). Heat Vulnerability in Minnesota.
https://maps.umn.edu/climatehealthtool/heat_app/index.html
Mills, D., Jones, R., Wobus, C., Ekstrom, J., Jantarasami, L., St. Juliana, A., & Crimmins, A. (2018). Projecting
Age-Stratified Risk of Exposure to Inland Flooding and Wildfire Smoke in the United States under
Two Climate Scenarios. Environmental Health Perspectives, 126(4), 047007.
https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2594
Minnesota Supercomputing Institute. (2016). Corn Contributes to Muggy Weather. Minnesota
Supercomputing Institute. https://www-archive.msi.umn.edu/news/corn-contributes-muggy-
weather
MN DNR. (2019, January). State Climatology Office: Average Annual Minnesota F2+ Tornadoes and Days
with F2+ Tornadoes, by Decade.
MN DNR. (2020). Dams and Dam Safety. MN Department of Natural Resources.
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/surfacewater_section/damsafety/index.html
160
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
MN DNR. (2024). Climate Trends. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/climate_change_info/climate-trends.html
MN DNR. (2025a). Climate trends. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/climate_change_info/climate-trends.html
MN DNR. (2025b). Minnesota Climate Explorer. Minnesota Climate Explorer Tool. https://climate-
explorer.dnr.state.mn.us/main/historical
MN DNR. (2025c). Wildfires Tracked by Minnesota DNR. Minnesota DNR - Division of Forestry.
https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-wildfires-tracked-by-mndnr
MN HSEM. (2019). Minnesota State Hazard Mitigation Plan: Including Recommended Actions for Climate
Change Adaptation. https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/hsem/hazard-mitigation/
Moss, P. (2017). Adapting to Climate Change in Minnesota.
https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/p-gen4-07c.pdf
MPCA. (2018, December 21). Effects of climate change in Minnesota. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
https://www.pca.state.mn.us/air/effects-climate-change-minnesota
MPR News. (2024, July 5). Rapidan Dam partial failure sent more than a century’s worth of sediment
pollution downstream. MPR News. https://www.mprnews.org/story/2024/07/05/rapidan-dam-
partial-failure-sent-more-than-a-centurys-worth-of-sediment-pollution-downstream
MRCC. (2021). Cli-MATE: MRCC Application Tools Environment. https://mrcc.purdue.edu/CLIMATE/
Multi-Hazard Mitigation Council. (2019). Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves: 2019 Report (p. 658). National
Institute of Building Sciences.
https://www.nibs.org/files/pdfs/NIBS_MMC_MitigationSaves_2019.pdf
National Interagency Fire Center. (2025). InFORM Fire Occurrence Data Records [Feature layer; Feature
layer]. https://data-nifc.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/nifc::inform-fire-occurrence-data-
records/about
NCEI. (2024). U.S. Billion-dollar Weather and Climate Disasters, 1980—Present (NCEI Accession 0209268)
[Dataset]. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. https://doi.org/10.25921/STKW-
7W73
NCEI. (2025). Storm Events Database. National Centers for Environmental Information, NOAA, Storm
Events Database. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/
Normand, A. (2019). Dam Safety Overview and the Federal Role (p. 18). Congressional Research Service.
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45981
NWS. (2017). Lightning Safety. NOAA. https://www.weather.gov/media/safety/Lightning-Brochure18.pdf
NWS. (2018). How Dangerous is Lightning? National Weather Service; NOAA’s National Weather Service.
https://www.weather.gov/safety/lightning-odds
NWS. (2020). Storm Events Database. NOAA National Centers For Environmental Information.
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/
NWS. (2021a). Lightning Science: Five Ways Lightning Strikes People. National Weather Service; NOAA’s
National Weather Service. https://www.weather.gov/safety/lightning-struck
NWS. (2021b). Lightning Victims. National Weather Service; NOAA’s National Weather Service.
https://www.weather.gov/safety/lightning-victims
161
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
NWS. (2025a). NWS HeatRisk. National Weather Service. https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/heatrisk/
NWS. (2025b). Understanding Heat Alerts. NOAA’s National Weather Service.
https://www.weather.gov/safety/heat-ww
Payton, E. A., Pinson, A. O., Asefa, T., Condon, L. E., Dupigny-Giroux, L.-A. L., Harding, B. L., Kiang, J., Lee, D.
H., McAfee, S. A., Pflug, J. M., Rangwala, I., Tanana, H. J., & Wright, D. B. (2023). Water. In A. R.
Crimmins, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E. Kunkel, B. C. Stewart, & T. K. Maycock (Eds.), Fifth
National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program.
https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA5.2023.CH4
Pielke, R. (2012, February 2). Windstorm. Encyclopedia Britannica.
https://www.britannica.com/science/windstorm
Pohl, K. (2025, May 13). Extreme heat is not just an urban threat: The risk to rural communities.
Headwaters Economics. https://headwaterseconomics.org/natural-hazards/extreme-heat-risk-to-
rural-communities/
Radeloff, V. C., Helmers, D. P., Kramer, H. A., Mockrin, M. H., Alexandre, P. M., Bar Massada, A., Butsic, V.,
Hawbaker, T. J., Martinuzzi, S., Syphard, A. D., & Stewart, S. I. (2023). The 1990-2020 wildland-
urban interface of the conterminous United States—Geospatial data (4th Edition) [Dataset]. Forest
Service Research Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2015-0012-4
Radeloff, V. C., Helmers, D. P., Kramer, H. A., Mockrin, M. H., Alexandre, P. M., Bar-Massada, A., Butsic, V.,
Hawbaker, T. J., Martinuzzi, S., Syphard, A. D., & Stewart, S. I. (2018). Rapid growth of the US
wildland-urban interface raises wildfire risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
115(13), 3314–3319.
Radeloff, V. C., Mockrin, M. H., & Helmers, D. (2023, August). Mapping Change in the Wildland Urban
Interface (WUI), 2000-2020, County Summary Statistics. http://silvis.forest.wisc.edu/data/wui-
change/
Raiche, R. (2022). Nowhere to Hide: Despite State Law, Mobile Home Residents Often Left Unprotected.
KSTP.Com 5 Eyewitness News. https://kstp.com/5-investigates/nowhere-to-hide-despite-state-law-
mobile-home-residents-often-left-unprotected/
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Pub. L. No. 93–288, Y 1.2: (1974).
https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ178/PLAW-117publ178.pdf
Runkle, J., Kunkel, K. E., Frankson, R., Easterling, D. R., & Champion, S. M. (2022). Minnesota State
Climate Summary 2022 (Nos. 150-MN; NOAA Technical Report NESDIS). NOAA NESDIS.
https://statesummaries.ncics.org/chapter/mn
Samanta, A., & Wu, T. (2017). Hail: The Hidden Risk. An analysis of property exposure to damaging hail in
2017 (p. 9). https://www.verisk.com/siteassets/media/campaigns/gated/underwriting/2017-hail-
the-hidden-risk.pdf?__FormGuid=b105adc4-533b-41a0-8bc3-
0eaa9c9d1e6d&__FormLanguage=en-US&__FormSubmissionId=e0a36676-fdfc-4904-b0f3-
37284f4e41b3
Sepic, M. (2017). In storm season, mobile home park tenants seek better shelter.
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2017/06/14/in-storm-season-mobile-home-park-tenants-seek-
better-shelter
Steil, M. (2016, July 22). Feeling sweaty, Minnesota? Blame the corn. MPR News.
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2016/07/22/feeling-sweaty-minnesota-blame-corn-crops
162
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2023). Highlights for air conditioning in U.S. homes by state,
2020. Office of Energy Demand and Integrated Statistics.
https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2020/state/pdf/State%20Air%20Conditioning
.pdf
USACE. (2008, April). National Inventory of Dams Methodology: State and Federal Agency Manual. U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers.
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Public%20Records%202/DEMLR/NIDmanual2008.pdf
USACE. (2024). National Inventory of Dams. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
https://nid.sec.usace.army.mil/#/
USGCRP. (2018a). Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate
Assessment: Vol. II. U.S. Global Change Research Program. https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA4.2018
USGCRP. (2018b). Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate
Assessment, Volume II (p. 1515). U.S. Global Change Research Program.
https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA4.2018
Vaisala. (2021). 2021 Annual Lightning Report.
https://www.vaisala.com/sites/default/files/documents/WEA-MET-2021-Annual-Lightning-Report-
B212465EN-A.pdf
Wehner, M. J. (2017). Droughts, floods, and wildfires. https://science2017.globalchange.gov/chapter/8/
Williams, A., McDonogh-Wong, L., & Spengler, J. D. (2020). The Influence of Extreme Heat on Police and
Fire Department Services in 23 U.S. Cities. GeoHealth, 4(11), e2020GH000282.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GH000282
Wilson, A. B., Baker, J. M., Ainsworth, E. A., Andresen, J., Austin, J. A., Dukes, J. S., Gibbons, E., Hoppe, B. O.,
LeDee, O. E., Noel, J., Roop, H. A., Smith, S. A., Todey, D. P., Wolf, R., & Wood, J. D. (2023). Midwest
Chapter, Fifth National Climate Assessment. In A. R. Crimmins, C. W. Avery, D. R. Easterling, K. E.
Kunkel, B. C. Stewart, & T. K. Maycock (Eds.), Fifth National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global
Change Research Program. https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA5.2023.CH24
Ziter, C. D., Pedersen, E. J., Kucharik, C. J., & Turner, M. G. (2019). Scale-dependent interactions between
tree canopy cover and impervious surfaces reduce daytime urban heat during summer.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(15), 7575–7580.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817561116
163
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Appendix B – Adopting Resolutions
164
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Appendix C – Local Mitigation Survey
Report
165
Item 4.
1
Anoka County
LOCAL MITIGATION SURVEY
As part of the Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan update, the Local Mitigation Survey (LMS)
Form is used to gather jurisdictionally-specific information that is used to meet FEMA requirements and
to support development of local mitigation actions.
Jurisdictions to Complete LMS:
This form is to be completed by representatives from Anoka County, the cities of Andover, Anoka,
Bethel, Blaine, Centerville, Circle Pines, Columbia Heights, Columbus, Coon Rapids, East Bethel,
Fridley, Ham Lake, Hilltop, Lexington, Lino Lakes, Nowthen, Oak Grove, Ramsey, Saint Francis, and
Spring Lake Park, and Linwood Township.
Additional stakeholders on the Anoka County HMP contact list are also invited to provide feedback to
this form in the designated areas. (See “Other Stakeholders” section with each question).
LMS - Main Point of Contact (Name, Work Title, and Email)
Anoka County Terry Stoltzman, Anoka County EM Director,
Terry.Stoltzman@anokacountymn.gov
City of Andover Dennis D. Jones, Fire Chief/EM Director d.jones@andovermn.gov
City of Anoka Andy Youngquist, Police Chief, ayoungquist@ci.anoka.mn.us
City of Bethel Ginger Berg, City Clerk, info@bethelmn.gov
City of Blaine Russ Clark, Police Capitan, rclark@blainemn.gov
City of Centerville Jim Mork, Police Chief, Centennial Lakes Police, JMork@clpdmn.com
City of Circle Pines Jim Mork, Police Chief, Centennial Lakes Police, JMork@clpdmn.com
City of Columbia Heights Daniel OBrien, Fire Chief, dobrien@columbiaheightsmn.gov
City of Columbus Jack Davis, City Administrator; cityadmin@ci.columbus.mn.us
City of Coon Rapids Adam Jacobson, Deputy Chief of Police, ajacobson@coonrapidsmn.gov
City of East Bethel Jeff Cielocha, Fire Chief/EM, jeff.cielocha@ci.east-bethel.mn.us
City of Fridley Andrew Todd, Lieutenant/EM, andrew.todd@fridleymn.gov
City of Ham Lake Mike Raczkowski, Fire Chief, mraczkowski@hamlakemn.gov
City of Hilltop Ruth Nelson, City Clerk, rnelsen@hilltop.govoffice.com
City of Lexington Jim Mork, Police Chief, Centennial Lakes Police, JMork@clpdmn.com
City of Lino Lakes Curt Boehme, Interim Public Safety Director, cboehme@linolakes.us
City of Nowthen Rob Miller, Fire Chief, rmiller@nowthenmn.net
City of Oak Grove Rob Engler, Fire Chief, rengler@ci.oak-grove.mn.us
City of Ramsey Matt Kohner, Fire Chief/EM Director, mkohner@cityoframsey.com
City of Saint Francis Todd Schwieger, Police Chief, St. Francis Police,
tschwieger@stfrancismn.gov
City of Spring Lake Park Josh Antoine, Police Chief, jantoine@slpmn.org
Linwood Township Jim Stockinger, Emergency Manager,
jim.stockinger@linwoodtownship.org
Darryl Ballman Fire Chief, darryl.ballman@linwoodtownship.org
166
Item 4.
2
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Coon Creek Watershed District: Erik Bye, Planning Coordinator,
ebye@cooncreekwd.org
Review: Prioritization of Hazards
During the Anoka County HMP Planning Team Meeting #1, participants determined the following natural
hazards below to be of high, moderate, or low priority as they relate at a countywide level. Hazards
noted as high or moderate priority are considered to be of greatest risk and concern, reflecting the
frequency of past events, the probability of future events, and the severity of impacts that can occur.
Hazards listed as a low priority are considered to be of lower risk and concern, reflecting an infrequency
of past events and/or occurring without significant impacts to local vulnerabilities.
Prioritization of Hazards for 2025 Anoka County Update
Natural Hazards Current Priority
Flooding High
Windstorms High
Tornadoes High
Winter Storms Moderate
Hail Moderate
Lightning Moderate
Extreme Cold Moderate
Extreme Heat Moderate
Wildfire Moderate
Drought Low
Landslides Low
Land Subsidence Low
Dam/Levee Failure Low
SURVEY QUESTIONS (1-15)
#1 - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
Does the priority level listed for any of the hazards in the table above differ for your
jurisdiction? If so, please describe how.
Anoka County No changes. These are the county-level priorities we discussed at the 1st
planning team meeting for our plan update.
City of Andover No changes.
City of Anoka No changes.
City of Bethel No changes.
City of Blaine Yes, currently the city would consider Flooding a Moderate priority and
wildfire a High priority.
City of Centerville No changes.
City of Circle Pines No changes.
City of Columbia Heights No changes.
City of Columbus Yes, Flooding is low and wildfire is high
City of Coon Rapids Yes, we would increase drought to moderate priority. The concerns with
this involve water supply (domestic and firefighting purposes). The entire
167
Item 4.
3
State has been in drought conditions, at times, for several consecutive
years.
City of East Bethel No Changes
City of Fridley No changes.
City of Ham Lake No changes.
City of Hilltop No changes.
City of Lexington No changes.
City of Lino Lakes No changes.
City of Nowthen yes
City of Oak Grove No change
City of Ramsey Yes, we would flop Flooding and Wildfire under current conditions. Also
consider increasing lightning as we have had several extensive damage
strikes to homes the last 2 summers.
City of Saint Francis No changes.
City of Spring Lake Park No changes.
Linwood Township Yes
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Coon Creek Watershed District
Yes. Landslides, mass wasting and streambank erosion due to the
cascading effects of flooding should be higher on the list (or at least is
from the partner perspective of Coon Creek WD) as steep slopes are
common within the Mississippi River corridor and bed and bank stream
erosion can cause unable channel slopes.
Please note, Coon Creek WD, keeps an active inventory of erosion sites
within the watershed in a GIS application. In times of flood TSS increases,
BOD is impacted and a variety of pollutants can enter surface and
groundwater sources such as flooding of feedlots, septic drainfields,
industrial areas, junk yards, highly erodible soils, etc., and can have a
direct impact on human health and ecosystem quality. Another note in
the Hazard Mitigation Strategy section is to include development of an
inventory of vulnerable areas susceptible to flooding that could release
pollutants. Another follow-up mitigation strategy could be to
systematically eliminate vulnerable areas through education, regulation,
enforcement or acquisition.
Drought should also a higher priority, especially with the current and
predicted changes to precipitation frequency, intensity, and durations
having impacts on wetlands and shallow aquifers. A note for later in the
Hazard Mitigation Strategies, we suggest developing a mitigation strategy
of watering bans, turf conversation, limited public area watering, etc. in
times of drought. Related to flooding a cascading effect is flood impacts
to water quality.
#2 - LOCAL VULNERABILITIES
Describe any specific community assets (infrastructure, systems, or populations) that are
susceptible to damage or loss from natural hazard events in your jurisdiction. Consider
how recent severe storms or other natural hazard events have caused damages or
168
Item 4.
4
threatened life safety to people in your community. Please list the natural hazards and
related local vulnerabilities separately.
Anoka County
Overland flooding is a concern in Anoka County for events with high
rainfall amounts over a short time. The prominent soil type in Anoka
County is sand which will allow normal amounts of rainwater to percolate
through the soil and move through the stormwater drainage systems
moving water through the six Watershed Districts in Anoka County.
Although tornadoes have affected Anoka County infrequently in the past,
the probability of damage from this hazard in the future is likely. The
entire county is at equal risk of future occurrences. While higher
population and housing densities in the municipalities set the stage for
increased impact, the potential for property damage and loss of life is
equally high for the county's unincorporated areas due to the large
number of mobile homes throughout the rural areas.
City of Andover The City of Andover has low-lying properties along the Rum River and
near various wetlands which are prone to flooding. We also have the
usual CI/KR protection concerns as most other communities (i.e.,
vulnerability of overhead power lines). Our City Hall/Community
Center/water treatment facilities can be considered the hub of
activities/services within our community. The loss of these assets would
be unfortunate.
City of Anoka
Flooding: The City of Anoka has both the Rum River and Mississippi that
have independent flood risks. Along both waterways there are a handful
of private properties and public utilities that are affected by localized
flooding. The Coon Rapids Dam may cause ice jams during winter and
early spring.
Flooding: Our city-owned sanitary sewer infrastructure (lift station,
manhole, etc.) are located in the floodplain.
Severe Storms (Power Outages): The City of Anoka also has municipal
electric utilities providing services to the cities of Anoka, Champlin,
Dayton, and Coon Rapids and Ramsey. The power grid is a combination
of overhead and buried transmission lines, including 5 substations.
Severe storms have the potential to affect overhead power lines.
Severe Summer Storms and Flooding - The Riverfront Memorial Park,
2201 2nd Avenue, is a large space next to the Rum River. The park
contains memorial displays, green space, and a performance stage where
concerts are held on a regular basis. This area is also used for the city’s
Farmers Market events throughout the summer months. The park is
currently lacking any severe weather shelter, which the city would like to
address.
169
Item 4.
5
City of Bethel All Hazards - We have an aging population who may be more vulnerable
to severe storm events. We also have overhead power lines that could
come down from windstorms or heavy snow/ice.
Flooding - During very high rain events our lift station could possibly
flood.
Structure Fire/Wildland Fire - We have city sewer, but all private wells in
town. We have one fire hydrant at the fire station. In an emergency, one
hydrant may not be able to keep up with a high demand of needed water
capacity.
City of Blaine Wind, hail, and tornadoes are a major issue within parts of the city,
specifically the multiple mobile home parks, as storm shelters are limited
(out-of-date and insufficient capacity to shelter the residents.) These
storms also have high impacts to portions of the city with overhead
power lines and electrical poles.
Flooding is a concern in some multiple mobile home parks without
sufficient evacuation routes (roadways, gates etc.)
Wildfires are an issue with large urban wildland interfaces where homes
and wildlands meet.
Other infrastructure vulnerabilities within the city include critical public
infrastructure (i.e. city hall, PD, SBMFD, public works, water treatment,
MAYC.)
City of Centerville Assisted Living Facilities and lack of resident mobility presents difficulty
during an evacuation.
We need to upgrade the generator at city hall/fire station, add
connectivity and communication improvements to alert for preparedness
and education of upcoming emergency events.
Roadway mitigation is needed on Brian Dr. to alleviate frequent flooding.
City of Circle Pines The city has an underground gas pipeline which could be susceptible to a
range of different hazards, including floods, storms, landslides, tornados,
and earthquakes.
City of Columbia Heights Assisted Living Facilities and lack of resident mobility presents difficulty
during an evacuation.
We need to replace a failing generator at the public safety building to
ensure continuity of police, fire, and emergency management EOC
operations.
Connectivity and communication improvements are needed to alert for
preparedness and education of upcoming emergency events and build
resiliency.
170
Item 4.
6
An underground gas pipeline runs along the border of the city.
The majority of the electric distribution system is overhead. Wind-thrown
trees and ice laden limbs routinely drop lines resulting in power outages.
The Minneapolis water treatment campus & 70 MGD ultrafiltration plant
(Reservoir Blvd) – mission critical pumps and membranes need
continuous power. Wind or lightning outages may force Minneapolis to
curtail supply to Columbia Heights.
Extreme cold - Shallow water‑service lines can be affected. The city
tracks and responds to frozen‑service calls each winter. Power outages
jeopardize apartment complexes and small businesses.
Winter storms, blizzards & ice accretion - 14 % of residents are ≥65 yrs;
mobility‑limited seniors and renters in older multifamily units face
heat‑loss and medical isolation during outages.
Within the city there is a nursing home, two assisted living facilities, and
numerous senior living apartment buildings which present challenges for
communications and difficulty of resident mobility during an evacuation
or emergency.
Flooding - There are low spots on TH 65, University Ave & 37th Ave
railroad underpass. Ponding regularly strands vehicles and results in
emergency‐vehicle delays.
The city has an aging storm‑sewer network. The built‑out watershed
leaves little infiltration; surcharging basins back up into basements.
We also have a large non-English speaking immigrant population, which
presents barriers to communication.
City of Columbus Wildfire hazard is high due to low residential density and approximately
80% of Columbus is with vegetative cover that is highly susceptible to
wildfires. The City water system only serves 6% of the City and has only
limited storage capacity, which would impact water supply for
firefighting.
Much of the city’s municipal electrical service consists of overhead power
lines and electrical poles. Those overhead lines and power poles are
prone to failure in ice storms and blizzards with heavy snowfall and high
winds that may bring down trees and branches.
Access to the business district between Potomac and Pine Street on Lake
Drive has no secondary means of access and this could be a bottleneck to
emergency service vehicles and restrict ingress and egress for entering
and exiting traffic.
171
Item 4.
7
City of Coon Rapids Within the city we have the following critical infrastructure and facilities
that can be negatively affected by a range of severe storm or flood-
related events: Mercy Hospital; Egret Blvd manufactured housing facility;
water production, treatment, and distribution system (treatment plants,
towers, piping, hydrants); sanitary lift stations, including the Met Council
major station on Coon Rapids Blvd Ext.; major roadways; railroad lines;
electrical and natural gas distribution facilities – particularly how they
power our pumps for water & sanitary items mentioned above;
communication – cell & fiber lines that are used for our SCADA system on
the water & sanitary items mentioned above; wells.
City of East Bethel Within the city we have a multi-story assisted living facility, large state
land management area (Gordie Mikkelson WMA), 12 lakes with Coon
Lake covering 1260 acres, alone. We have MN State Highway 65 which is
a main corridor running north and south and Anoka County Road 22
running east and west. Our community is growing rapidly with over 300
new homes being developed, a water tower, and a new commercial area.
In general, severe weather is a major concern with high winds, tornadoes,
and heavy rain possible.
City of Fridley The City of Fridley has the potential for some seasonal flooding concerns
with the Mississippi River. When the ice melts at the end of winter, we
have some areas of the city that have flooded in the past. However, we
have addressed this issue. We have large pumps on the north end of the
city to keep that area from flooding. We have only needed to use them
once in the last 5 or 6 years.
City of Ham Lake Much of the city’s municipal electrical service consists of overhead power
lines and electrical poles. Those overhead lines and power poles are
prone to failure in ice storms and blizzards with heavy snowfall and high
winds that may bring down trees and branches.
City of Hilltop Tornadoes - Tornadoes are our #1 vulnerability. About 66% of our
residents live in mobile home parks. There are 4 separately owned and
operated MHPs within the city. With increasing severe weather incidents
and more demand for storm shelter space. The City has been working to
move forward with plans to build a new storm shelter at City Hall,
however, obtaining the necessary funds has been extremely difficult. The
basement of our City Hall serves as our community storm shelter.
However, it is very undersized. If all MHP residents were to come in they
would not all fit. But the new building would hold 700 people.
We also have a significant portion of residents who speak English as a
second language. This can present challenges in communicating
emergency information.
City of Lexington Within the city there is a large immigrant community in one apartment
complex. It is unknown if they have other housing options. This presents
potential language barriers when conveying emergency information.
City of Lino Lakes The City of Lino Lakes has two large assisted living facilities that would
present challenges should an evacuation be required. The city has one
172
Item 4.
8
medium size manufactured park which would be vulnerable to severe
weather.
Wildfire is a concern as there is a wildland urban interface throughout the
city.
The Rice Creek Water Trail and 5,500-acre Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park
Reserve also has limited access.
City of Nowthen Our city has a lack of outdoor warning sirens to alert residents to
dangerous high wind or tornado events.
City of Oak Grove Flooding - Oak Grove has some floodplains.
Windstorms/ Tornadoes - We have a senior living facility that would need
help in the event of a long-term power outage.
Wildfire - We have a lot of wildland-urban interface.
City of Ramsey All Hazards - The City of Ramsey has 2 Assisted Living Facilities both with
memory care units. In the event of an evacuation these pose a special
vulnerability.
Flooding - We have both the Mississippi River and the Rum River running
through the city. Homes on the Mississippi are prone to local flooding,
but homes on the Rum have a natural protection due to the height of the
embankment.
Windstorms/Tornadoes - We have 1 mobile home park that has an
undersized Storm Shelter.
Wildfire - We have a growing wildland-urban interface where large, mixed
field/marsh/wetland environments back up to large housing
developments.
City of Saint Francis There are numerous parks in the city, some without storm shelters.
City of Spring Lake Park Within the city of Spring Lake Park we have several assisted living and
retirement homes that would be difficult to evacuate in an emergency.
Linwood Township
Wildfire is a concern as there is a wildland urban interface throughout the
town including approximately 6000 acres of Carlos Avery Wildlife
Management Area. In addition to this, Anoka County has a regional park
consisting of approximately 800 acres within Linwood.
Other natural disasters such as Tornadoes/Flooding/Windstorms pose a
threat as there are many areas/neighborhoods within the township that
are isolated without multiple forms of egress.
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS
Coon Creek Watershed District:
Flooding: The following areas in the Coon Creek Watershed District have
been identified as having a high risk of flooding due to a variety of factors
173
Item 4.
9
including, proximity to water bodies, the flat topography of Anoka
County, and storm conveyance systems being overwhelmed in large
storm events.
· Creekside Estates manufactured home park south of Egret Blvd. NW
in Coon Rapids
· Park of Four Seasons manufactured home park in Blaine
· Blaine International Village manufactured home park in Blaine
· Bridgewater Neighborhood in Coon Rapids
· Northview Villa Community – Buchanon St. in Blaine
· Neighborhood adjacent to Aurelia Park in Blaine
· Northtown Mall along CR 10 NE in Blaine
· Springbrook Apartments SW of University Ave and 85th Ave NW. in
Fridley
· Neighborhood NE of East River Rd. and 85th Ave NW in Coon Rapids
· Neighborhood east of East River Rd. on Ironton St. NE and Hugo St.
NE in Fridley
· Neighborhood of Polk St. NE and 126th Ave NE in Blaine
· Neighborhood around Broken Oaks Park in Blaine
· Neighborhoods adjacent to Coon Creek near the Medtronic campus
· Neighborhoods adjacent to Coon Creek between Main St. NW and
Hanson Blvd. NW in Coon Rapids
· Neighborhood adjacent to Coon Creek between 131st St. and Main
St. NW in Andover and Coon Rapids
· Neighborhood adjacent to Coon Creek between Bunker Lk Blvd NW
and 131st St in Andover
· Neighborhood adjacent to Coon Creek between South Coon Creek
Dr NW and Bunker Lk Blvd NW in Andover
· Neighborhood adjacent to Coon Creek between Crosstown Blvd NW
and South Coon Creek Dr NW in Andover
174
Item 4.
10
· Neighborhood adjacent to Coon Creek between Hanson Blvd NW
and Crosstown Blvd NW in Andover
- Riverview Heights neighborhood north of Springbrook Creek
· The main stem of Coon Creek which includes ditch 54 and ditch 57
from Hanson Blvd NW south to its outlet at the Mississippi River was
previously excavated, ditched, and straightened for drainage purposes in
the late 1800s. The increase in development and stormwater runoff since
then has created unstable stream banks, water quality issues from
sediment and nutrients, and flooding issues due to the lack of floodplain
and storage in the contributing drainage areas. The remaining natural
reaches of the stream are also undersized for the increase in stormwater
runoff it receives from its urbanized drainage area. The unstable banks of
the stream can slough off into the stream which can cause trees and
debris to flow downstream, block drainage, and plug culverts and
crossings. These situations can present major flooding risks even in small
storm events when culvert crossings are unable to pass stream flow.
Erosion:
CCWD inspects the entire ditch system of the watershed every 5 years
and keeps an active inventory of active erosion sites in the watershed.
This information is used to prioritize stabilization of these sites and track
the amount of sediment and other particulates released from active
erosion sites to evaluate their impact on human health, safety, and
welfare.
Water Quality:
Coon Creek, Sand Creek, Ditch 11, Ditch 58, Ditch 41, Pleasure Creek, and
Springbrook Creek are each impaired for aquatic life and/or aquatic
recreation due to E.coli. These impairments pose health risks to residents
in Anoka County and ecosystems that impact residents in Anoka County.
#3 - REDUCTION IN VULNERABILITY
In the last 5 years, has your jurisdiction taken any actions to reduce vulnerability against
future severe weather or disaster events? Please describe.
Anoka County Over the past 5-10 years, the Anoka County Transportation Division has
been replacing county road bridges that were in poor condition, or
restricting drainage/flow on ditches and natural water courses.
Additionally, in collaboration with several local partners, the
Transportation Division has completed a number of trunk highway and
railroad grade separation projects which help improve emergency
response times and evacuation route resiliency.
City of Andover We’ve upgraded our technology working with our IT Dept and created
contingency plans. We have also upgraded/trained our dept heads and
175
Item 4.
11
command staff to ICS 400. Our public works dept has upgraded multiple
miles of roads, stormwater systems, and water works delivery.
City of Anoka The city implements an annual street reconstruction plan, which includes
replacement/updating stormwater infrastructure. Additional efforts by
the city to reduce risks include: Adding rain garden infrastructure and
education, Riverbank restoration and stabilization, Dam feasibility study,
and analysis of current structure, and undergrounding of overhead utility
lines.
City of Bethel No new development or vulnerabilities.
City of Blaine The city has been working with mobile home communities (6) for their
EM planning to include COOP, storm shelters, etc. Blaine EM team has
been conducting city wide staff training for emergency incidents.
Infrastructure upgrades include: replacing and installing new storm sewer
and roadways for water/flooding issues as well as upgrades and
extending new water facilities to more of the city for fire coverage. Also,
the state is completing a large roadway construction project on Hwy 65
throughout the city providing quicker emergency access through the city.
City of Centerville The city is working with our facility manager on transportation issues.
City of Circle Pines The city is following best practices for pipelines.
City of Columbia Heights We have worked to establish evacuation plans for City Hall for shelter if
needed during inclement weather or in case of a fire. Training will be
conducted for city staff. All city buildings will have plans established and
in place by the end of the year. IT has upgraded our technology and
created contingency plans/is building resilience into the system. City has
worked in the past five years to implement numerous stormwater
management projects.
City of Columbus No new development or vulnerabilities.
City of Coon Rapids
The city has completed a citywide generator assessment, including doing
a few upgrades; road reconstruction – improvements to the asphalt
surfacing as well as underground utilities to meet current standards;
Training – new technologies & equipment for maintenance/repairs of
items described in question 2; increased underground fiber connections
to our water and sanitary SCADA system; Lift station and well rehab
projects; integration of 800 MHz radios into PW activities.
We have conducted a storm siren upgrade and are adding new staff to
the City’s EM Team.
City of East Bethel We recently updated our EOP, and will begin training staff on it soon. We
have not had EM training in over 14 years
City of Fridley The city has upgraded all early warning software.
City of Ham Lake The city has upgraded all of our early warning sirens
City of Hilltop The city has been working actively over the last 3 years to acquire funding
for our tornado safe room project. We also continue to share
information with residents about tornado safety, and the basement of
our City Hall is our designated storm shelter location.
176
Item 4.
12
City of Lexington City Administration is working with building management to make sure
proper plans are in place.
City of Lino Lakes No changes
City of Nowthen No changes
City of Oak Grove No changes
City of Ramsey No changes
City of Saint Francis The City of Saint Francis added an additional warning siren on the east
side of the city. We replaced deteriorating culverts under a city street
that runs over the Seelye Brook to prevent flooding issues. We have
implemented monthly internal EM meetings for department heads. We
are planning to expand and improve the city’s water/sewer system.
City of Spring Lake Park The city has newly updated our warning siren at City Hall and upgraded
our other siren. Several roads that had flooding have been updated.
Linwood Township Linwood Township has added a generator at the Fire department and
TownHall. The township has also hired an Emergency Manager.
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Coon Creek Watershed District:
The CCWD implements development regulations to reduce risks of
flooding on new and redeveloped properties. Our development
regulations also require developments to prevent or mitigate negative
impacts to water quality. CCWD has implemented multiple projects to
reduce flood risk and improve water quality over the past few decades.
CCWD has implemented these projects individually and in collaboration
with city and county partners as well. CCWD has a robust Capital
Improvement Plan that addresses the main hazards and vulnerabilities in
the watershed. As the local drainage authority, CCWD also ensures
ditches do not cause adverse flooding impacts through our inspection and
maintenance programs.
#4 – INCREASE IN VULNERABILITY
In the last 5 years, has your jurisdiction experienced an increase in new development? Has
this new development created new vulnerabilities to natural hazards in your community?
Please describe.
Anoka County Commercial, residential, and high-density residential development
continues across Anoka County. The developments increase the amount
of water runoff due to the increased development. Municipal
governments have oversight of these matters locally.
City of Andover As our community ages, we have been adding senior housing, group
homes, assisted living, and other care facilities. We are continually
adding 100+ homes a year. We also added a new 154 unit apartment
complex with a new Senior living Campus breaking ground this spring.
This Campus will have senior care, assisted living, independent living, and
memory care. All of these developments have an impact related to storm
water discharging into our stormwater system and the possible need to
evacuate and shelter hundreds of people at other locations. In the event
of a large-scale event, the additional resources needed to ensure a safe
and effective evacuation would most likely overwhelm our community.
177
Item 4.
13
City of Anoka We have several 55+ and assisted living complexes built that have
increased our need to respond to that population in the event of a
natural disaster. We have also seen an increase in construction of slab on
grade homes (no basements), which leaves those residents more
vulnerable to high wind or tornado events without the ability to take
shelter underground.
City of Bethel No new development or increase in vulnerability.
City of Blaine Our community has grown exponentially from all sides and
demographics. We have seen large growth in assisted and care facilities.
We have multiple areas of commercial development that have been
completed and are in the process of being developed. Residential
housing has increased in community developments especially in the north
east corner of the city. All this development has increased our
vulnerability.
In addition, a large redevelopment project has just begun at 105th
Ave/Radisson Rd where a 5000+ person minor league baseball
stadium/event center will be built. This area will also have new
apartments, hotels, and commercial business and is anticipated to host
large events besides baseball games.
Blaine has an airport in the city with an increase in flights taking off and
landing, with expansion of buildings and hangars on the airport property.
Concerns with this new development severe weather, fire, and potential
flooding.
City of Centerville We have had an increase in Assisted Living Facilities along with new
residential housing. No increase in vulnerabilities.
City of Circle Pines No new development or increase in vulnerabilities.
City of Columbia Heights A 191-unit 55+ complex and a 296-unit residential housing development
has increased our need to respond to an increased population in the
event of a natural disaster. Two large low- to market-rate residential
developments are currently being proposed. The two developments
could increase the population by several thousand residents.
Vulnerabilities include: High concentrations of vulnerable populations -
Seniors, low-income residents, or those with limited mobility may need
extra planning. Language/cultural barriers - May inhibit emergency
message understanding, A lack of established community networks - may
lack social cohesion to support neighbors, Insurance gaps or
undercoverage - Residents may lack flood/fire/disaster insurance despite
elevated risk.
City of Columbus Columbus has not experienced any increase in vulnerability as a result of
new development
City of Coon Rapids We have experienced continued high-density development and
senior/assisted living facilities. Mercy Hospital continues to expand.
Population diversity and making sure our messaging regarding hazards is
communicated properly is important for non-English speaking residents.
The biggest vulnerability is the movement of people (evacuation) in case
178
Item 4.
14
of natural emergency (i.e. from a hospital, assisted living, or senior
building).
City of East Bethel The city has become visible to those looking to move into a rural
community close to nature, and main corridors. As communities grow
around us, we are feeling the impact of more developments. We have
plats approved with over 300 new home and commercial structures.
City of Fridley Fridley has substantially added several high-density housing units. No
new vulnerabilities.
City of Ham Lake We have added 8 new developments with approximately 250 new
homes. No new vulnerabilities.
City of Hilltop No new development. We have been fully developed since the 1960s, we
have no room for growth.
City of Lexington We have had an increase in apartment complexes. No increase in
vulnerabilities.
City of Lino Lakes The City of Lino Lakes has experienced significant residential
development on the east side of the city in the North Pointe and
Watermark developments. A large retirement community consisting of
independent, assisted living and memory care was developed in the
southwest portion of the city. The city expects to continue with 100+
homes being added annually. These developments could result in greater
vulnerabilities for property damage and injury from severe weather.
City of Nowthen No new development or increase in vulnerability. Nowthen has not seen
any new development that has increased the vulnerability to the city.
City of Oak Grove The City of Oak Grove has added many new housing developments in the
past five years. We have not had any increase in vulnerability as a result.
City of Ramsey The City of Ramsey has grown exponentially with a large percentage of
the residential development located in the vicinity of the COR area.
Ramsey is averaging about 150 new homes annually. A 133-unit
apartment building will be complete in Fall 2025 in the COR.
On the east side of the city (St. Francis Blvd/Nowthen Blvd) a total of 640
multi-family units have been approved; construction may begin in 2026.
Commercial growth continues at a steady pace.
We continue to gain townhomes in our community (both complexes and
detached), and many of these townhomes are built slab-on-grade,
eliminating a basement in which to take cover for high wind/tornado
events.
This housing growth has only increased our Wildfire Urban Interface with
a resulting increase in risk for wildfire.
City of Saint Francis The city has had several new residential housing developments. In late
fall 2025 we will also have a new 134 bed assisted living facility opening.
No new increase in vulnerability.
179
Item 4.
15
City of Spring Lake Park We have added a 193-unit retirement apartment complex. This has
increased a vulnerability of potential evacuation issues of moving a large
amount of seniors in case of an emergency.
Linwood Township We have added 4 new housing developments, a new storage facility
housing semi-trailers, and a new electrical substation (Great River
Energy). No new vulnerabilities.
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Coon Creek Watershed District:
Development has continued to occur within the Cook Creek Watershed
District over the last 5 years. Generally, new developments have not
increased the risk of flooding or impact to water quality to surrounding
areas due to development regulations and standards in place. CCWD
keeps an up-to-date inventory of all sites of active erosion in GIS, and in
those areas of increased development/impervious surface we can
anticipate development near the inventory of active erosion may get
worse unless mitigation occurs.
#5 - PUBLIC OUTREACH
How does your jurisdiction share information with community members about severe
weather events and personal preparedness? If this is not something that is currently done,
how could it be done in the future?
Anoka County Anoka County Emergency Management utilizes the Anoka County
website, Anoka County Emergency Management website page, and local
news media to communicate with the public on emergency
preparedness, severe weather, and other hazard conditions throughout
the year. The Anoka County Emergency Management website page
provides information and resource links for public education on
emergency preparedness. The county also receives all
products/statements issued by the National Weather Service, and in turn
shares or incorporates these into its community outreach and public
education. Promotion of the use of NOAA weather radios occurs during
the NWS Severe Weather Awareness Week as well as throughout the
year. Anoka County Emergency Management provides special
presentations or other planning assistance as requested to local
governments, schools, or other local organizations and facilities within
the county.
Anoka County Emergency Management leads participation in Severe
Weather Awareness Week and Winter Weather Awareness Week with
the NWS. We provide links and information on the Anoka County
Emergency Management and Anoka County Public Health website.
City of Andover We continually reach out to our community utilizing social media, cable
television, publications, Newsletters, and emergency notification.
City of Anoka City Websites, Social Media, Cable TV, Newsletters, IPAWS
City of Bethel Social media, City website
City of Blaine Social Media, City Website, Civic Ready Alert System, participate in Severe
Weather Awareness Month, local media, and county emergency
notification.
180
Item 4.
16
City of Centerville Social Media, Cable TV, Newsletters
City of Circle Pines Social Media, Cable TV, Newsletters
City of Columbia Heights Social Media Platforms, Newsletters, City Website, Code Red
City of Columbus Social Media, Cable TV, Newsletters
City of Coon Rapids Social media, newsletters, cable tv, community alerts, website, mailings,
postings at city and county properties, working with other media (i.e.
local newspapers), and working with community organizers.
City of East Bethel The city has an active website and Facebook page. The Fire Department
recently implemented a new Facebook page and followers grew from 70
to 1,200 in two weeks. People appear to be wanting information, so we
are working to share it.
City of Fridley Mainly social media.
City of Ham Lake We do outreach through news media and county emergency notification
City of Hilltop We provide informational flyers and pamphlets at City Hall, and we also
use our city website. One primary means of outreach is via postcard
publications - we could do more with this. 3 out of4 MHPs also do their
own newsletter so we could coordinate to share information. We also can
share information at City Council meetings.
City of Lexington Social Media, Cable TV, Newsletters
City of Lino Lakes Through news media, county emergency notification, and social media.
City of Nowthen Anoka county communications and local news
City of Oak Grove Social media and community alerts
City of Ramsey Ramsey has both Public Safety and City Social Media, and in emergencies
both would be leveraged. We also would and have used Anoka
Dispatch’s resources such as the IPAWS system.
City of Saint Francis Everbridge notification system, social media, city website.
City of Spring Lake Park Social Media, Cable TV, Newsletter, Emergency Communication through
dispatch if needed.
Linwood Township We utilize the Township Sign and Township Website.
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Coon Creek Watershed District:
We send out newsletters and keep our website updated with current
risks from natural hazards such as flooding. CCWD also has a GIS web-
based Issue Reporter on our website that allows residents to report
water-resource related issues. CCWD then follows up on these issues with
the appropriate response.
#6 - EMERGENCY NOTIFICATIONS
Does your jurisdiction encourage residents to sign up for the county’s emergency
notification system and/or a local emergency alert system? If yes, how? If this not
something that is currently done, how could it be done in the future?
Anoka County Anoka County does not have an Emergency Notification System. Anoka
County has the capability to send Emergency Alerts via the IPAWS
System. Anoka County has an “Alert Center” website page that provides
a list of general alerts by category from Anoka County.
City of Andover Yes, through various printed and social media means.
City of Anoka No, but messaging via our City website is available.
181
Item 4.
17
City of Bethel No.
City of Blaine Yes. Citizens are encouraged to sign up for the Civic Alert notification
application with information provided on utility bills, city newsletter,
during Nite to Unite meetings, social media posts, and city website.
City of Centerville No
City of Circle Pines No
City of Columbia Heights City website has a feature to add an emergency banner on all pages. The
City of Columbia Heights has partnered with CodeRED on a
text/email/phone citizen alert system. Some platforms are voluntary -
messaging for opt-ins is presented in several ways, via our city newsletter,
social media, community/public education events, etc.
City of Columbus No
City of Coon Rapids Yes, citizens can sign up for various notifications on the city website
“Alert Center”. We communicate this information on our various
communication mediums.
City of East Bethel Emergency Alert information is available on our city website. Residents
can sign up to receive emergency notifications from the city.
City of Fridley No.
City of Ham Lake No. We could share information through our city website or our city
newsletter the Ham Laker.
City of Hilltop We let our residents know that they can sign up for the Columbia Heights
emergency notification system.
City of Lexington No
City of Lino Lakes No, but would be interested in including this information in a future
newsletter.
City of Nowthen Yes, city newsletter
City of Oak Grove Yes City webpage
City of Ramsey No, we do not have an Emergency Notification sign up as our messaging is
not targeted to registrants, it is targeted to anyone following our Social
Media Pages.
City of Saint Francis Yes, city website, National Night Out and other community events, social
media.
City of Spring Lake Park No, but want to start working on this.
Linwood Township We use our Township website to share emergency information.
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS
Coon Creek Watershed District:
No. We could direct residents to the emergency notification system from
our website, add it to our newsletters, and publicize it on social media
channels. Residents can also notify CCWD staff through our Issue Reporter
webpage on our CCWD website.
#7 - BUILDING CODES
Has your jurisdiction adopted the Minnesota State Building Code? Please clearly answer
yes or no and provide supporting detail. IF YES, please describe how it is enforced. IF NO,
182
Item 4.
18
please describe if there are other building codes or permitting processes in place to reduce
the risk to future development.
Anoka County Anoka County does not adopt and enforce the MN State Building Code.
Land use planning and zoning within Anoka County is a function of its
municipalities (each city and Linwood Township, respectively).
City of Andover Yes, the state building code is enforced through our building department
and inspectors. The city’s Building Department reviews and processes
building permit applications, performs on-site inspections of residential
and commercial construction and ensures that all construction activity is
in compliance with state and city building and fire codes.
City of Anoka Yes, the state building code is enforced by the building department and
fire inspector. The city of Anoka website - Building Department Division
page provides information on the permit application process. All building
permit applications must be reviewed and approved. Inspections must
be scheduled with the city upon project completion.
City of Bethel Yes, the state building code is enforced through our contracted building
official.
City of Blaine Yes, the state building code is enforced through our Community
Development Department. Residential and Commercial construction
permits and building codes are available on the city website. Building
inspections are done following project completions.
City of Centerville Yes, the state building code is enforced through our Building Inspections
Department. The Building Department provides residents, developers
and home builders with a variety of services from inspections to site plan
reviews. Building permits are required to be submitted and approved
prior to starting a construction project.
City of Circle Pines Yes, the state building code is enforced through a required building
permit and designated building officials. Rum River Construction
Consultants provides building inspection services for the City of Circle
Pines.
City of Columbia Heights Yes, the City of Columbia Heights, by perpetual ordinance, adopts the
most current Building Code of Minnesota. The city’s Community
Development Department administers Building Permits and Inspections.
All contractors conducting work within the City of Columbia Heights must
have a valid State and/or City Contractor License to do so. Additionally,
permits are required prior to the start of any construction. Property
Maintenance code and fire codes are additionally enforced through a mix
of Fire department and Community Development.
City of Columbus Yes, enforced through the City Building Department. Building permit
applications and supporting documents may be delivered to Columbus
City Hall or submitted online. The City of Columbus Contracts Building
Official Services through SAFEbuilt. With the exception of electrical
inspections, all building inspections are conducted by SAFEbuilt.
City of Coon Rapids Yes, the state building code is enforced by the City of Coon Rapids
Building Inspections Department, which ensures permitting, code
enforcement, and building inspections for residential and commercial
projects.
183
Item 4.
19
City of East Bethel Yes, the city of East Bethel has adopted and enforces the MN State
Building Code. The adoption is written into City Code, Division 1, Sec. 14-
19. The code is enforced by the city’s building inspector.
City of Fridley Yes, enforced through the city building inspector. The City of Fridley
Building Inspections is responsible for administering the Minnesota State
Building Code. Permits are required for residential and commercial
building, demolition, mechanical, plumbing and electrical work. All
permits must be completed online. Inspections are required for all
permits. Upon issuance of a permit, an inspection record card will be
provided and will identify the required inspections for each project.
Inspection requests must be called in to the Building Inspections
Department.
City of Ham Lake Yes, the state building code is enforced through the City of Ham Lake
Building Department. Downloadable building permit applications are
available on the city website. The department includes a Building/Zoning
Official and Code Enforcement Officer and a Building Inspector.
City of Hilltop Yes, the state building code is enforced through a required building
permit and designated building officials. Rum River Construction
Consultants provides building inspection services for the City of Hilltop.
City of Lexington Yes, the city enforces the state building code through a permitting
process, code enforcement, and building inspections. INSPECTRON, INC.
is the inspection agency performing plan review and construction
inspections for the City of Lexington.
City of Lino Lakes Yes, the state building code is enforced through the city’s Community
Development Department. Building permits are required to be submitted
and approved. The state code is enforced through building inspectors
and fire inspection.
City of Nowthen Yes, the state building code is enforced through a permitting process and
building inspectors. Rum River Consultants provides building inspection
services to the City of Nowthen.
City of Oak Grove Yes, the state building code is enforced through a permitting process and
building inspectors. Rum River Consultants provides building inspection
services to the City of Oak Grove.
City of Ramsey Yes, the state building code is enforced through the City of Ramsey
Building Permits and Inspections Department. The department oversees
building permit applications and review, code enforcement, and
inspections by the city Building Official.
City of Saint Francis Yes, the City of St Francis Building Department is responsible for
administering the Minnesota State Building Code, which is enforced by
the city Building Official. Building permits are reviewed and allow the
code official to protect the public by reducing the potential hazards of
unsafe construction and ensuring public health, safety and welfare.
City of Spring Lake Park Yes, the state building code is enforced through our city building
inspector/code enforcement. Separate permits are required for building,
electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilating, and air conditioning.
Linwood Township Yes, the state building code is enforced through our township Building
Department. Building permits are required in Linwood Township to
184
Item 4.
20
ensure that projects are constructed according to building code and
zoning regulations. Rum River Construction Consultants serves as the
Designated Building Official for Linwood Township.
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS
Coon Creek Watershed District:
No. CCWD does not have the authority to implement and enforce building
codes and standards. CCWD does have authority to implement rules for
development affecting land use changes and disturbance. These rules are
laid out in the CCWD 2024-2033 Comprehensive Management Plan. The
rules apply to projects that affect stormwater management, water quality,
erosion control, floodplain management, drainage, and wetlands. CCWD
works closely with its partner communities to regulate and permit
development activity that would have adverse effects on flooding, erosion,
and water quality. City Local Water Plans are also guided by the CCWD
2024-2033 Comp Management Plan.
#8 - OTHER PLANS AND POLICIES
What other plans or policies does your jurisdiction have in place to help mitigate against
the impacts of flooding and other natural hazards to future development? Please describe.
Anoka County Anoka County has several plans and policies in place that help to address
hazard mitigation, including:
Ordinance #2022-1, Shoreland Management Ordinance
Ordinance #2017-1, Anoka County Buffer Ordinance
Anoka County Emergency Operations Plan
Anoka County 2025-2029 Capital Improvements Plan
Anoka County 2040 Transportation Plan
Anoka County Park Ordinance 2018-01, Last Revised July 23, 2024
Parks Plans - The Anoka County Parks Department has Emergency Action
Plans that include specific communication protocols for Bunker Beach
Water Park, Chomonix Golf Course, two campgrounds, and multiple
outdoor environmental and recreation programs.
Mass Care Sheltering - In the event of a disaster where temporary
sheltering is needed, Anoka County Emergency Management works in
coordination with Anoka County Human Services Division (which includes
Public Health & Environmental Services), the American Red Cross, other
Volunteer Organizations Active in Disaster (VOAD), and local
governments/Fire & EMS to support mass care services as needed. The
county EOP includes plans, procedures, and resources available for mass
care sheltering. Local jurisdictions operate initial staging areas or
temporary shelter from the initial request for approximately 12 hours
until regular shelter locations or other accommodations can be setup and
ready to receive those in need.
185
Item 4.
21
City of Andover Our Engineering Department ensures development is not affected or
affected to a lesser degree via surveying and site management through
various city codes/ordinances. The city enforces Title 14, Flood Control
Regulations in the city code of ordinances.
City of Anoka Lower Rum River water management regulations; adopted floodplain
ordinance (Section 78-478 - Flood Fringe Overlay District)
City of Bethel City of Bethel Code of Ordinances, Jan 1, 2025. Subdivision Regulations
include that “All lots within the floodplain districts shall contain a building
site at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation.”
City of Blaine
The city adopts and enforces the City of Blaine Zoning Ordinance, Chapter
32, Overlay Districts - Floodplain Overlay Districts: This ordinance
regulates development in the flood hazard areas of Blaine, Minnesota.
This ordinance is adopted to comply with the rules and regulations of the
National Flood Insurance Program.
The city also is working with Coon Creek and Rice Creek Watersheds.
We enforce city shoreland overlay districts, floodplain, floodway, flood
fringe Code/Ordinances for new developments. 2040 Comprehensive
Plan including a Local Surface Water Management Plan. We utilize and
maintain natural ponding areas such as wetlands for the impoundment
and treatment of surface water as well as the extensive city conveyance
system as well as the county ditch system to provide flood protection.
We have established water resources related agreements with various
agencies and entities.
The city is working with our mobile home parks on implementing
emergency evacuation and updating sheltering of residents. City
participates in NPDES MS4 program requirements. The NPDES MS4
program requires public entities owning or operating municipal separate
storm sewer systems (MS4s) to develop and implement Stormwater
Management Programs (SWMPs) to reduce stormwater pollution.
DWSMA and Wellhead protection plans are in place.
We are increasing access and accessibility to the City’s natural areas by
constructing maintenance trails and acquiring additional all-terrain
equipment.
City of Centerville None
City of Circle Pines None
City of Columbia Heights Working with the two watersheds for our area and following the city’s
stormwater management plan to implement mitigation measures. Plan is
located here:
https://cms5.revize.com/revize/columbiaheights/Public%20Works/Storm
water/SWMP_Final%20051418_approved.pdf
186
Item 4.
22
City of Columbus Zoning Ordinance Review and Enforcement and work with the Sunrise
River, Coon Creek and Rice Creek Watersheds.
City of Coon Rapids
City Surface Water Management Plan, Wellhead Protection Plan,
Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer and Water Plans; MS4 permit through the
MPCA; FEMA floodplain management; Coon Creek Watershed District
Comprehensive Plan and various subwatershed plans.
City of East Bethel City of East Bethel Code of Ordinances, Chapter 34 - Floods. This chapter
regulates development in the flood hazard areas of East Bethel,
Minnesota. This chapter is adopted to comply with the rules and
regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program. We also address all-
hazards planning in our city Emergency Operations Plan.
City of Fridley The City of Fridley Municipal Code, Section 205.27 0-1 Floodplain
Management Overlay District regulates development in the flood hazard
areas of Fridley, Minnesota. This ordinance is adopted to comply with the
rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program. The city
also addresses all-hazards planning in our city Emergency Operations
Plan, updated 2024.
City of Ham Lake The City of Ham Lake City Code, Article 10, Subdivision Regulations, 10-
203, Livability Standards establishes that “All residential lots shall contain
at least 29,500 square feet of land which lies above the 100-year flood
contour.”
City of Hilltop The City of Hilltop City Code includes Division 4. R-MH Manufactured
Housing Residential District, which includes requirements for storm
shelters and evacuation plans: “Each manufactured home park shall
provide a safe place of shelter for park residents or a plan for the
evacuation of park residents to a place of shelter within a reasonable
distance of the park for use by residents in times of severe weather,
including high winds and tornadoes. The park owner shall provide each
resident with a copy of the approved shelter or evacuation plan.” The
city has to sign off on MHP evacuation plans (meaning we are aware of it,
however we are not responsible to approve these plans).
City of Lexington The city’s Code of Ordinances Chapter 13, Stormwater Management
Regulations establishes regulations for illicit stormwater discharge that
may affect the ability of the city to provide for flood control and other
community services.
City of Lino Lakes The city has a 2040 comprehensive plan that guides future development
in the city. City of Lino Lakes City Code, Chapter 1103: Flood Plain
Management regulates development in the flood hazard areas of the city.
This chapter is adopted to comply with the rules and regulations of the
National Flood Insurance Program.
City of Nowthen City of Nowthen City Code, Section 3 District Provisions, Section 11-3-11,
Floodplain District, Sec. B Design Criteria for Structures 1) High Water
Elevations. Structures must be placed in accordance with any floodplain
regulations applicable to the site.
City of Oak Grove The City of Oak Grove City Code, Part II Land Development, Chapter 109,
Article X Floodplain Management regulates development in the flood
187
Item 4.
23
hazard areas of the city and is adopted to comply with the rules and
regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program. The city also has a
Zoning Map and our 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
City of Ramsey Floodplain Management is addressed in the City of Ramsey City Code
zoning requirements for new development. We also follow the Lower
Rum River water management regulations. The City of Ramsey
incorporates a floodplain ordinance as part of the Mississippi River
Corridor Critical Area Program (MRCCA). This program is a coordinated
effort by state, regional, and local agencies to manage land use and
zoning regulations along the Mississippi River corridor. The City of
Ramsey has adopted the MRCCA ordinance, which includes specific
regulations for areas within the floodplain.
City of Saint Francis The City of St. Francis City Code of Ordinances, Section 10-52-00 -
Floodplain Regulations regulates development in the flood hazard areas
of the city. This ordinance is adopted to comply with the rules and
regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program. The city also works
with the Upper Rum River Watershed Management.
City of Spring Lake Park The City of Spring Lake Park Municipal Code, Section 15, Land Usage -
15.12, Floodplain Management District regulates development in the
flood hazard areas of the city. This chapter is adopted to comply with the
rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program.
Linwood Township Linwood Township code of ordinances includes Chapter 14, Floods,
Article II, Floodplain Management. This article regulates development in
the flood hazard areas of the town. The ordinance from which this article
is derived is adopted to comply with the rules and regulations of the
National Flood Insurance Program.
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS
Coon Creek Watershed District:
The CCWD has a 2024-2033 Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan
that is adaptable to changing situations that addresses flooding, water
quality, water quantity, wetland, and public drainage concerns. A capital
improvement plan is integrated in this Plan to invest in capital projects
that reduce flooding risk and improve water quality issues in the
watershed.
The district also has subwatershed plans which serve as more detailed
implementation plans for the 18 subwatersheds in the Coon Creek
watershed district. Subwatershed plans are either completed or in
progress for Oak Glen Creek, Springbrook Creek (ditch 17), Pleasure Creek,
Ditch 39, Ditch 60, Ditch 37, and Ditch 41. The District Rules cited in the
Comprehensive Management Plan also applies to areas of each jurisdiction
within the watershed.
CCWD has authority to implement rules for development affecting land
use changes and disturbance. These rules are laid out in the CCWD 2024-
2033 Comprehensive Management Plan. The rules apply to projects that
188
Item 4.
24
affect stormwater management, water quality, erosion control, floodplain
management, drainage, and wetlands.
CCWD works closely with its partner communities to regulate and permit
development activity that would have adverse effects on flooding, erosion,
and water quality. City Local Water Plans are also guided by the CCWD
2024-2033 Comp Management Plan.
City Local Water Plans are also guided by the CCWD 2024-2033 Comp
Management Plan.
Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD):
The RCWD has a 10-year Watershed Plan which currently runs from 2020-
2029. The 2020 RCWD Watershed Management Plan outlines the key
goals and strategies that RCWD implements to address the challenges
facing the watershed. It emphasizes the importance of water quality
management, flood control, and natural resource preservation. Through a
combination of monitoring programs, watershed modeling, and
implementation of best management practices, RCWD strives to improve
water quality and ensure sustainable water resource management. The
western portion of the RCWD covers the easternmost part of Anoka
County and we work with several communities (cities of Fridley, Circle
Pines, and Lino Lakes) on projects that support flood mitigation.
#9 - ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY
What departmental staff or elected officials in your jurisdictional help to accomplish hazard
mitigation in your community? Please describe.
Anoka County Anoka County Emergency Management (Emergency Planning and
Coordination), Anoka County Highway (WS4 Permit compliance and Right
of Way maintenance and drainage system management), Anoka County
Environmental Services (Planning and Coordination with local watershed
districts), and Anoka County Public Health (Public Health preparedness,
planning, and coordination). Anoka County Parks (Public Watercraft
Access Management).
City of Andover Fire Department Command and Full-time staff. City Staff including CCM.
City of Anoka Police Chief/ Fire Chief/ Public Services/ City Administration/ Building
Official/Anoka Municipal Utility
City of Bethel Public works, city clerk, mayor. We contract police and fire.
City of Blaine City of Blaine has an emergency management division made up of Blaine
PD, City Staff, SBM Fire as well as the involvement of additional trained
city staff as needed.
City of Centerville Police Chief/ Fire Chief/ Public Works/ City Admin/ Building Official
City of Circle Pines Police Chief/ Fire Chief/ Public Works/ City Admin/ Building Official
189
Item 4.
25
City of Columbia Heights Fire Chief/ Police Chief/ Public Works/ Engineering / City Admin/ Building
Official
City of Columbus Fire Chief,City Council, City Administrator, and Public Works Director
City of Coon Rapids The Police Chief is our Emergency Manager. Other staff include: City
Manager, Deputy Police Chief, Fire Chief, Assistant Chief, Other assigned
EM Staff, Public Works Director, Community Development Director,
Communications Staff, Engineering, and Building Official.
City of East Bethel The Fire Chief is the Emergency Manager. We have established a proper
EOC with technology to allow us to gather and share information.
City of Fridley Public Safety Director/EM Coordinator/Mayor or Council Member at
Large.
City of Ham Lake Fire Chief / Building Official / City Administrator
City of Hilltop Mayor, City Council, City Clerk and Public Works
City of Lexington Police Chief/ Fire Chief/ Public Works/ City Admin/ Building Official
City of Lino Lakes The Fire Chief will be designated the EM in the near future. The Police
Chief, Public Works, City Admin, and Community development would be
involved in hazard mitigation.
City of Nowthen 1.0 FTE
City of Oak Grove Mayor and City Council, Planning Dept., Building Official., Fire Dept.
City of Ramsey Fire Chief/Fire Captain/Police Chief/Public Works/Engineering/Building
Official/City Admin
City of Saint Francis City EM committee consisting of Police and Fire Chiefs, City
Administrator, Public Works Director, City Clerk.
City of Spring Lake Park Police Chief/ Fire Chief/ Public Works/ City Admin/ Building Official
Linwood Township Fire Department/ Public Works/ Township Clerk/ Town Board
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Coon Creek Watershed District:
We have an operations manager responsible for all field activities,
inspection, maintenance, and flood and water quality improvement
projects. We have a district engineer to review development permit
applications, design flood mitigation and water quality improvement
projects, and oversee construction activities. We have watershed
development staff that regulates new and redevelopment projects and
enforces District rules. We have field staff to respond to drainage issues,
blocked culverts, localized flooding concerns, streambank failures, and
other waterway encroachment issues. CCWD also engages with member
communities through our Technical Advisory Committee, Board of
Managers, Citizens Advisory Committee, and our Capital Improvement
Plan.
#10 – PARTNERSHIPS
Are there any agencies, organizations, or businesses that your jurisdiction has worked with
to address mitigation efforts in your community? Please describe.
Anoka County Anoka County Emergency Communications is coordinating with our
jurisdictions to update the activation system for the outdoor warning
sirens.
190
Item 4.
26
Anoka County Emergency Management participates in annual regional
planning and training; statewide AMEM conference.
Anoka County departments also coordinate with other local and regional
agencies involved in mitigation, including SWCD, MN DNR, MnDOT, Rural
and Municipal Electric Cooperatives, and Watershed Districts.
City of Andover Regional Watershed and Conservation Districts as well as the DNR.
City of Anoka Anoka Conservation District
City of Bethel The city is a member of MN Rural Water
City of Blaine DNR for wildland fire protection, BWSR and watershed districts for
wetland and floodplains
City of Centerville No
City of Circle Pines No
City of Columbia Heights Mississippi Watershed (MWMO) & Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD)
– Green stormwater infrastructure construction projects and stormwater
retention pond improvements.
City of Columbus DNR for wildland fire protection and Regional Watershed and
Conservation Districts
City of Coon Rapids Coon Creek Watershed District (CCWD); Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA); Minnesota Department of Health (MDH); Anoka
Conservation District (ACD); Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
(DNR); Metropolitan Council Environmental Service (MCES); Minnesota
Department of Transportation (MnDOT); BNSF Railway.
City of East Bethel DNR for wildland fire, Allina for medical response. Others unknown
City of Fridley No
City of Ham Lake The city works with the Coon Creek Watershed District for mitigation of
wetland and flood zones.
City of Hilltop We partner with Columbia Heights for Fire protection and EMS.
City of Lexington No
City of Lino Lakes No
City of Nowthen No
City of Oak Grove DNR and upper Rum River Watershed
City of Ramsey DNR and Lower Rum River Watershed
City of Saint Francis DNR, Upper Rum River Watershed Management, MnWARN, MN
Stormwater Coalition.
City of Spring Lake Park CCWD/ RCWD for wetland and flooding mitigation
Linwood Township We work with the MN DNR. Linwood is a member of the Sunrise
Watershed.
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Coon Creek Watershed District:
CCWD works closely with its partner communities to regulate and permit
development activity that would have adverse effects on flooding,
erosion, and water quality.
We work closely with our city and county partners in the watershed,
Andover, Blaine, Columbus, Coon Rapids, Fridley, Ham Lake, and Spring
Lake Park, Anoka County, and the Anoka Conservation District. We
coordinate ditch inspections, pond maintenance, and flood and water
191
Item 4.
27
quality improvement projects such as: the Sand Creek stream restoration,
Pleasure Creek Stormwater Filter, Woodcrest Stormwater Filter, and the
Aurelia Park Pond project. We work with the MPCA to address water
quality issues. We work with the DNR on floodplain management and
stream restorations. We also work closely with our member communities
through our Technical Advisory Committee, Citizens Advisory Committee,
Board of Managers, our Capital Improvement Plan, and subwatershed
plans.
#11 - PROGRAMS IN PLACE
What sort of programs does your jurisdiction participate in to help raise awareness and
reduce risk from natural hazards in your community?
Anoka County Anoka County Emergency Management takes lead on participation in
Severe Weather Awareness Week and Winter Weather Awareness Week
with the NWS. Links and information are provided on the Anoka County
Emergency Management and Anoka County Public Health website.
Anoka County Emergency Management operates small sized weather
stations located throughout the county. These stations provide weather
data to support local first responders with information that is easily
accessible, accurate and for the location they are nearest to.
City of Andover We participate in weather awareness efforts and utilize community
outreach, newsletter, and social media.
City of Anoka Newsletters/ Facebook and City web page
City of Bethel We use our city website and newsletter to keep residents informed.
City of Blaine Social media and newsletter to communicate participation in Severe
Weather Awareness Week and Winter Weather Awareness Week, or
other notifications.
City of Centerville Facebook or newsletter to communicate participation in Severe Weather
Awareness Week and Winter Weather Awareness Week, or other
notifications.
City of Circle Pines Facebook or newsletter to communicate participation in Severe Weather
Awareness Week and Winter Weather Awareness Week, or other
notifications.
City of Columbia Heights City utilizes the city newsletter, e-newsletter, community engagement
events, and social media to communicate participation in Severe Weather
Awareness Week and Winter Weather Awareness Week, or other
notifications.
City of Columbus Newsletters/ Facebook and City web page. Fire Department provides
information on Firewise.
City of Coon Rapids Use of social media and print media to promote different hazard
awareness including severe weather and major incidents.
City of East Bethel City newsletter, Facebook, and council updates.
City of Fridley Severe Weather Awareness Week, social media posts, newsletters, Night
to Unite and block captains. Fire also has public education.
City of Ham Lake For National weather awareness week we post on our city web page and
reader board
192
Item 4.
28
City of Hilltop We share information on severe weather at City Hall (kiosks with flyers
and pamphlets).
City of Lexington Facebook or newsletter to communicate participation in Severe Weather
Awareness Week and Winter Weather Awareness Week, or other
notifications.
City of Lino Lakes Participation in Severe Weather Awareness Week via social media. Would
like to do more in the future.
City of Nowthen none
City of Oak Grove The city participates in severe weather Awareness Week with social
media. We also implement our Stormwater Management Program,
which consists of consists of Public Education and Outreach, Public
Involvement/Participation, Illicit Discharge and Elimination, Construction
Site Stormwater Runoff Control, Post-Construction Stormwater
Management in New Developments and Redevelopment, and Pollution
Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations.
City of Ramsey Severe Weather Awareness week, Citizen Siren watchers for monthly test
activations, annual school tornado drills, many Social Media options, as
well as community outreach events.
City of Saint Francis Severe Weather Awareness Week, city newsletter to encourage debris
clearing.
City of Spring Lake Park Newsletters/ Facebook and City web page
Linwood Township Township website/ Newsletters (Linwood Ledger)
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Coon Creek Watershed District:
We notify and educate residents who encroach on the drainage ditches
or illegally dump material on the risks of clogging or impeding
drainageways. We operate and maintain our GIS-based Water Resources
Issue Reporter. We work closely with our city partners and county on
Subwatershed Plans where detailed flooding, erosion, and water quality
issues are documented and strategies and projects to mitigate risk from
those hazards are created
#12 - FUNDING & OTHER RESOURCES
What funding sources are available to help your jurisdiction to accomplish implementation
of mitigation activities? Please describe. Include internal local government funding as well
as external funding sources (grant or loan sources from local, state, or federal agencies).
Anoka County Anoka County operating funds can be used for mitigation activities, and
grants can be applied to implement mitigation projects. The
Transportation Division utilizes a variety of state and federal grants and
competitive funding sources to replace/rehabilitate aging infrastructure
(i.e. State Bridge Bonds, federal bridge replacement program, and Local
Road Improvement Program (LRIP) funds).
City of Andover Annual budget and grants may be utilized.
City of Anoka Enterprise funds & annual budget
City of Bethel Annual budget
City of Blaine Annual Budget
City of Centerville Annual budget.
City of Circle Pines Annual budget.
193
Item 4.
29
City of Columbia Heights Majority of expenses are from the city’s general operating and capital
budget. State/federal or Watershed grants.
City of Columbus Annual Budget
City of Coon Rapids
City general and enterprise funds; various local, state, and federal grants;
state legislative requests; CCWD levy.
City of East Bethel Tax base. Annual Budget
City of Fridley Annual budget / Capital budget
City of Ham Lake The city uses its own general operating budget to fund the work of staff
to establish and enforce regulatory ordinances and to share information
with the public. ARPA funding was used to update warning sirens.
City of Hilltop The City’s general operating budget is extremely limited. We have sought
outside grant funding from FEMA , State of MN, and Federal
congressional spending, as well as a variety of private grants.
City of Lexington Annual budget.
City of Lino Lakes Annual budget / capital budget
City of Nowthen None
City of Oak Grove Annual budget/capital budget
City of Ramsey Annual budget/operating budget
City of Saint Francis Operating budgets, capital budget.
City of Spring Lake Park Annual budget/ capital budget
Linwood Township Sunrise Watershed/ Grant application/ Fire Department/ Public Works
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Coon Creek Watershed District:
The CCWD levies taxes to pay for studies and capital improvement
projects addressing flooding and water quality issues. The CCWD has
obtained millions of dollars of grant funding from BWSR, the MPCA, and
DNR for projects such as Sand Creek Restoration, Pleasure Creek Filters,
Aurelia Park Pond, Bridgewater BMPs, and subwatershed planning. The
CCWD has also obtained federal Nine Key Element Plan grant funding for
pet waste stations and a Lower Coon Creek Restoration project to
address water quality, habitat, and flooding.
#13 - LOCAL MITIGATION PROJECTS
Please describe what mitigation actions would help to reduce risk to your community from
future natural hazard events. Please include mitigation activities that address local
vulnerabilities that were identified in Question #2. Please be as specific as possible in your
responses. The mitigation actions you identify will be used to develop your local mitigation
action charts. If you have any mitigation projects you are aware that your jurisdiction will
be seeking to apply for FEMA HMA Grant Program funding for, please make note of that.
Anoka County
Promote multiple ways to receive severe weather alerts and maintain the
existing outdoor warning siren coverage. Continue to partner with Human
Services to support vulnerable populations. Ongoing collaboration with
local jurisdictions to mitigate repetitive flood losses. Continue
collaborating with public and private partners to promote preparedness.
194
Item 4.
30
City of Andover Continue to build regional partnerships. Create and participate in
exercises which test our planning models and resource capabilities. (EOP,
COOP, etc.)
City of Anoka Rum River dam modifications and reconstruction that would be
responsive to immediate flood concerns.
Upgrade stormwater infrastructure with street projects to provide
protection up to the 100-year event.
Develop a forestry management plan to reduce wildfire risk.
Riverfront Memorial Park Storm Shelter / Tornado Safe Room - The city
intends on building a public restroom that would be constructed in such a
way as to double as a severe weather shelter.
City of Bethel Windstorms, Tornadoes - Make sure storm sirens are maintained and
working. Storm shelter needed for homes with no basements.
City of Blaine
Wind, hail, and tornado: Update infrastructure within the mobile home
parks. Move more of the overhead utility lines underground.
Flooding: Provide alternate access routes or improve current routes to
withstand flooding.
Wildfires: Increase public awareness, reduce potential fuel within
wildland adjacent to developments. Develop a plan and implement it to
address the need for water resources outside of the municipal water
system
Infrastructure vulnerabilities: Develop a plan to address scenarios where
critical infrastructure is compromised. Build redundancy.
City of Centerville Upgrade storm sirens.
City of Circle Pines Upgrade storm sirens.
City of Columbia Heights Develop and regularly update tailored evacuation plans for nursing
homes, assisted living, and senior facilities and conduct evacuation drills
with residents and staff.
Fund the replacement of the Public Safety backup generator.
Improve connectivity and communications by exploring multilingual and
accessible communication platforms and partnering with local community
organizations for outreach and education.
Implement resilient communication infrastructure (e.g., satellite phones,
radio networks).
Refresh training of emergency services on gas leak response protocols
and conduct public awareness campaigns about pipeline safety.
195
Item 4.
31
Overhead electrical distribution: transition key portions of the grid to
underground lines where feasible.
Coordinate with Minneapolis for shared contingency planning for water
treatment plant power outages and emergency planning.
Winter storms – elderly and mobility-limited residents. Create check-in
systems for vulnerable residents during storms. Designate warming
centers and provide accessible transportation. Seek funding to establish
an emergency heating kit and blanket program.
Areas prone to flooding - Create detour plans and inform emergency
services in real time.
Aging storm-sewer network: Continue the implementation of green
infrastructure (rain gardens, permeable pavements).
Non-English-speaking immigrant populations - Develop multilingual
emergency communication materials, partner with local cultural
organizations for outreach and trust-building. Use pictograms and simple
language in alerts and signage. Train bilingual staff or volunteers to assist
during emergencies
City of Columbus Add Warning Sirens and Severe Weather Storm Shelters
City of Coon Rapids Coon Rapids has several wells and lift stations located within or adjacent
to local floodplains. Locations needing flood protection and mitigation
efforts include wells 19 and 20, and lift stations 3 and 7. Four private lift
stations also exist in Coon Rapids, generally near the intersection of
Hanson Blvd and Northdale Blvd (within the Coon Creek floodplain).
Additionally, the City’s comprehensive utility plans, street reconstruction
program, and infrastructure maintenance and operations program also
include annual evaluations of needed infrastructure repairs/rehabilitation
and upsizing/expansion to address changing climate and state/federal
rules and standards.
City of East Bethel We have four wells with two having a generator, we are working on a
third generator. We use the Scada system to manage our 500,000-gallon
water tower and part of the wellhead management cooperative. We
could use funds for more public works support to include lighting,
barricades, front end loader attachments, and skid steers.
City of Fridley Pipeline Leaks: Notification and evacuation of the public.
River Floods: keeping pumps going to keep the water at bay.
City of Ham Lake Mobile home park added an addition and added a storm shelter, for
extreme weather conditions post updates on city website, make
arrangements with local schools for placement of residents
City of Hilltop Fulfilling the city’s tornado safe room project is our #1 priority. Extensive
additional funding must be secured, which has been extremely difficult.
196
Item 4.
32
City of Lexington Upgrade storm siren.
City of Lino Lakes Work with the assisted living homes so they can be prepared with
emergency plans for extended power outages.
City of Nowthen Formulating a plan to increase outdoor warning sirens
City of Oak Grove Continue to build regional partnerships.
Continue to implement our Stormwater Management Program. The City
of Oak Grove’s Stormwater Management Program consists of Public
Education and Outreach, Public Involvement/Participation, Illicit
Discharge and Elimination, Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control,
Post-Construction Stormwater Management in New Developments and
Redevelopment, and Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for
Municipal Operations. All of these control measures will ensure clean
stormwater in the City of Oak Grove and a cleaner environment for our
future.
City of Ramsey All Hazard - Ensure the Assisted Livings are a part of the local Healthcare
Coalition and sit down with them to ensure they have their own EOP to
include evacuation and any special needs to include transportation and
staffing. Ensure our Public Information Staff at the City are aware of the
PBS resources like TPT NOW and TPT ECHO for non-English emergency
notifications
Flooding - Have annual messaging for sent out to the homes on the
Mississippi reminding them to be prepared and ready should the river rise
(over and above the annual severe weather awareness week)
Windstorm/Tornadoes - Work with the mobile home park to encourage
them to do a hazard assessment and also update/upgrade their old
undersized storm shelter
Wildfire - Post Educational Materials on our Fire Department City Page as
well as push Wildfire education at City Events regarding defensible space
and eliminating fuel load around properties immediately adjacent to
wildland areas as well as work with our Streets and Parks to eliminate fuel
load by removing dead trees and cleaning up overgrowth
City of Saint Francis Put existing warning sirens on maintenance schedule, enforce water use
restrictions under drought conditions. Shelters at city parks.
City of Spring Lake Park Upgrade one more siren in the city
Linwood Township Continue to maintain and upgrade our current sirens
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS
Coon Creek Watershed District:
The CCWD’s 2024-2033 Comprehensive Management Plan outlines the
mission, goals, and policies of the district that directly relate to natural
hazards and mitigation actions and projects to address them. These
specific actions and projects are funded and detailed in the CIP which we
request be referenced for mitigation actions included in the HMP. The
197
Item 4.
33
following are a summary of the actions and projects to be completed to
address hazards over the next 5-10 years.
· Add storage and improve stormwater conveyance to improve
localized flooding in the Springbrook Creek subwatershed in Blaine, Coon
Rapids, Fridley, and Spring Lake Park.
· Add storage and improve stormwater conveyance to improve
localized flooding in the Pleasure Creek subwatershed in Blaine, Coon
Rapids.
· Add storage and improve stormwater conveyance to improve
localized flooding and emergency access in the Sand Creek subwatershed,
including Ditch 39, 41, and 60 in Blaine and Coon Rapids, especially for
the Park of Four Seasons and Blaine International Village manufactured
home parks.
· Create a comprehensive stream and floodplain restoration plan for
Coon Creek to stabilize banks, reduce localized flooding, and reducing
active erosion sites made worse by large storm events.
· Work with cities and interested landowners to purchase properties
with repetitive flooding damage that is unable to be mitigated.
· Purchase property adjacent to Coon Creek or floodprone land to
create additional floodplain to reduce localized flood risks.
· Design and construct storm ponds, infiltration basins, green
infrastructure, filters to slow rain events, reduce localized flooding, and
reduce erosion downstream caused by large rain events particularly in
the Springbrook Creek, Pleasure Creek, Sand Creek, and Coon Creek
subwatersheds that are federally impaired for aquatic life and recreation.
· Design and construct “smart” stormwater infrastructure to adapt
and respond to forecasted storm events to reduce flood risks and
improve water quality.
CCWD created a hydrology and hydraulics (H&H) model in 2013 using
Atlas 14 rainfall data to create an updated floodplain to submit to FEMA
to update FIRM maps. This H&H model is currently being submitted to
DNR and FEMA for their review and mapping. We hope this updated
FEMA map is produced over the next 3-5 years. CCWD has also begun
using 2D H&H models to more precisely model areas of documented
flooding and inform mitigation actions. CCWD also models 500yr storm
events to investigate impacts of extreme weather events and how to
mitigate impacts from them.
#14 - GAPS OR DEFICIENCIES
198
Item 4.
34
Please describe any specific gaps or deficiencies that are a barrier to implementing local
mitigation measures.
Anoka County Identifying specific projects and funding sources.
City of Andover Funding and human capital are generally the largest deficiencies.
City of Anoka Lack of funding.
Lack of staffing.
City of Bethel lack of funding. Lack of staffing.
City of Blaine Lack of funding
City of Centerville Lack of funding.
City of Circle Pines Lack of funding.
City of Columbia Heights Lack of funding, staffing, and language barriers.
City of Columbus Lack of funding, staffing
City of Coon Rapids Funding and staff
City of East Bethel Funding, training, and real-life experience with disasters.
City of Fridley Lack of funding.
City of Ham Lake none
City of Hilltop Funding, staffing. Our population has also changed and for a large
portion English is a second language. This can provide challenges in
conveying emergency information.
City of Lexington Lack of funding.
City of Lino Lakes Lack of funding and staffing
City of Nowthen Funding is our biggest gap
City of Oak Grove Lack of funding
City of Ramsey Funding and Staffing
City of Saint Francis Funding
City of Spring Lake Park Funding
Linwood Township Funding
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Coon Creek Watershed District:
The CCWD 2024-2033 Comprehensive Management Plan lists numerous
gaps and deficiencies in section 3 – Operational Resource Plans. For
example, there are 310 miles of open channel conveyance in the form of
ditches and streams, 708 miles of storm sewers, and 2,172 stormwater
assets across the watershed. 12.2 miles of storm sewer and 736
structures of unknown age and older than 75 years and considered by the
Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and EPA as aging infrastructure. Many of
the watershed’s legacy stormwater systems, such as those in Fridley,
Spring Lake Park, southwest Blaine, and southern Coon Rapids are now
struggling with the high cost of retrofits that are needed to accommodate
these changes. Upgrading large networks of aging systems that are now
underneath densely populated areas carries significant costs and
engineering challenges.
#15 - SURVEY PARTICIPANTS
199
Item 4.
35
Please list the names & titles of all persons that contributed information to this survey.
Participant information is important to ensure good jurisdictional participation, and each
person’s time will count towards the 25% in-kind match requirement for the HMP update.
Anoka County Ryan Kelzenberg, Anoka County Emergency Management Coordinator
Terry Stoltzman, Anoka County Emergency Management Director
Jeff Lanenberg, Anoka County Deputy Emergency Management Director
Jeff Perry, Park Director
Jonelle Hubbard, Anoka County PHES Director
Joe MacPherson, County Engineer
City of Andover Dennis Jones, Fire Chief/EM Director
Joe Heidelberger, Chief Building Official
City of Anoka Greg Lee, City Manager
Andy Youngquist, Chief of Police
Ted Massicotte, Fire Chief
Mark Anderson, Public Services Director
Lisa LaCasse, Public Services Administrator
Ben Nelson, City Engineer
Doug Borglund, Community Development Director
City of Bethel Ginger Berg, City Clerk
City of Blaine Russ Clark Captain-PD
Joe Sadler Sergeant-PD
Brent Larson Engineer
Andrew Luedtke Fire Marshal
Todd Miller Deputy Fire Marshal
Matt Montain Assistant Fire Chief
Captain Mark Boerboom-PD
City of Centerville Matt Montain SBM/Centennial Fire
Tedd Peterson Head Public Works
Jim Mork Police Chief
City of Circle Pines Matt Montain SBM/Centennial Fire
Rich Lavell Public Works Sup.
Jim Mork Police Chief
City of Columbia Heights Daniel OBrien Fire Chief/Deputy Director EM
Aaron Chirpich City Manager/Director EM
Kevin Hanson Public Works Director/City Engineer
City of Columbus Alan Newman, Fire Chief
Jack Davis, City Administrator
City of Coon Rapids Matt Stemwedel, City Manager
Bill Steiner, Police Chief
Tim Himmer, Public Works Director
Aaron Johnston, Assistant Fire Chief
Adam Jacobson, Deputy Police Chief
City of East Bethel Jerry Streich, Interim Fire Chief /EM
City of Fridley Andrew Todd, Lieutenant
Tony DeForge, Building Official
Jeffrey Jensen, Public Works Manager
City of Ham Lake Mike Raczkowski, Fire Chief
200
Item 4.
36
Mark Jones, Building Official
Nicole Wheeler, Administrative Assistant
City of Hilltop Ruth Nelson, City Clerk
City of Lexington Mike Mohler Lexington Fire
Jim Fisher Public Works Superintendent
Jim Mork Police Chief
City of Lino Lakes Dan L’Allier, Interim Fire Chief
Brian Finke, Fire Lieutenant/Fire Inspector
Curt Boehme, Interim Public Safety Director
Justin Williams - Public Works Superintendent
Michael Grochala - Community Development
Andrea Turner - Communications Specialist
City of Nowthen Natalie Johnson, Interim City Administrator
Rob Miller, Interim Fire Chief
City of Oak Grove Rob Engler Fire Chief
Loren Wickham City Administrator
City of Ramsey Matt Kohner, Fire Chief/ Emergency Manager
Jason Sufka, Fire Captain
Bruce Westby, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Stephanie Hanson, Community Development Director
Brian Hagen, City Administrator
City of Saint Francis Kate Thunstrom, City Administrator
Paul Carpenter, Public Works Director
Jenni Wida, City Clerk
Todd Schwieger, Police Chief
Dave Schmidt, Fire Chief
City of Spring Lake Park Josh Antoine, Fire Chief
Matt Montain SBM Fire
Dan Buchholtz, City Admin
Linwood Township Jonn Olson, Town Board Chair
Darryl Ballman, Fire Chief
Andy Luedtke, Fire Marshal
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Coon Creek Watershed District:
Erik Bye – Planning Coordinator
Tim Kelly – District Administrator
Jon Janke – Director of Operations
Jim Hafner – Board President
Erin Lind – Board Vice President
Mary Campbell – Board Treasurer
Dwight McCullough – Board Member
Jason Lund – Board Secretary
Rice Creek Watershed District:
David Petry – Project Manager
201
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Appendix D – Plans & Programs in Place
202
Item 4.
Anoka County
HMP Plans & Programs in Place Form
EMERGENCY PLANNING CAPABILITIES Yes/No Comments
Emergency Notification System (please
specify, i.e., CodeRED, Smart911, Everbridge,
etc.) Yes
IPAWS
Outdoor Warning Sirens (please note
locations and # per jurisdiction)
Yes
Andover – 14
Anoka – 4
Bethel – 1
Blaine – 23
Centerville – 2
Circle Pines – 2
Columbia Heights – 4
Coon Rapids – 12
East Bethel – 15
Fridley – 8
Ham Lake – 13
Lexington – 1
Lino Lakes – 9
Nowthen – 1
Linwood - 3
Oak Grove – 5
Ramsey – 17
Spring Lake Park – 2
St Francis – 3
Columbus – 0
Hilltop - 0
Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) Yes EOP is updated annually
Mass Care Sheltering Plan / List of Shelter
Facilities Yes
Addressed in EOP and coordination with local
jurisdictions
Tornado Safe Rooms / Storm Shelters (please
list any existing specific locations) No
Addressed in coordination with schools & local
jurisdictions with local vulnerabilities
NWS Weather Ready Nation / StormReady
Certification Yes
Storm Ready
Coordination with Schools Yes Tornado Drills, other trainings
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions Yes Annual regional planning and training;
statewide AMEM conference
Coordination with Local and Regional
Agencies involved in mitigation Yes SWCD, MN DNR, MnDOT, Rural and Municipal
Electric Cooperatives, Watershed Districts
Coordination with organizations or agencies
addressing disaster related issues and
vulnerable populations, emergency
preparedness, access and functional needs
populations (List as applicable)
Yes
Public Health, American Red Cross, Salvation
Army
203
Item 4.
Past storm hazard data and information Yes Damage information from past storm events
and disaster declarations is kept on file.
Other (please describe)
Yes
Public Health has preparedness plans in place.
https://www.anokacountymn.gov/1106/Public-
Health-Emergency-Preparedness
PLANNING & REGULATORY
CAPABILITIES Yes/No Comments
Comprehensive/Land Use Plan No Individual cities and townships manage land Use.
Capital Improvements Plan Yes
Anoka County 2025-2029 Plan.
https://www.anokacountymn.gov/3979/Capital-Plan
Economic Development Plan
Yes
Business Recruitment Plan
https://www.anokacountysuccess.org/wp-
content/uploads/2021/03/Anoka-County-Business-
Recruitment-Roadmap-FINAL-011718.pdf
Regional Economic Development Plan
https://www.anokacountysuccess.org/
Climate Adaptation Plan No
Continuity of Operations Plan
(COOP) Yes
Under Anoka County Administration
Transportation Plan
Yes
Anoka County 2030 Transportation Plan
https://www.anokacountymn.gov/378/Anoka-County-2030-
Transportation-Plan
Stormwater Management Plan
/ Drainage Plan Yes
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program
https://www.anokacountymn.gov/4504/Stormwater
Burning Permits/Restrictions
(i.e., identify if issued through
the Sheriff’s Office or MN
DNR) Yes
Permits are issued by individual jurisdictions and/or DNR
Comprehensive Local Water
Management Plan No
Land use planning and zoning within Anoka County is a function
of its municipalities.
Watershed Plan (One
Watershed, One Plan)
Yes
Anoka Conservation District has a 2021 – 2030 plan in
partnership with the regional watershed districts.
https://www.anokaswcd.org/images/AnokaSWCD/About/Repo
rts%20and%20Publications/2021_2030_ACD_Comp_Plan.pdf
Wellhead Protection Plan
Yes
Municipal-level plans are done in coordination with MDH
Anoka County Municipal Wellhead Protection Group
(ACMWPG)
https://knowtheflow.us/municipal-wellhead-protection/
Forest Management Plan No
Land use planning and zoning within Anoka County is a function
of its municipalities.
204
Item 4.
Community Wildfire
Protection Plan (CWPP) No
Participation in the MN DNR
Firewise Program No
Database of Dry Hydrants/Well
Access No
Other (please describe)
LOCAL POLICY / PROGRAM CAPABILITIES Yes/No Comments
Land Use, Planning, & Zoning Ordinance No
Land use planning and zoning within
Anoka County is a function of its
municipalities.
Subdivision Ordinance No “ “
MN State Building Code Enforcement No “ “
Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP) No
Land use planning and zoning within
Anoka County is a function of its
municipalities.
Adoption of Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps No “ “
Floodplain Ordinance No “ “
Shoreland Ordinance Yes ORDINANCE #2022-1, SHORELAND
MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE
Minnesota Buffer Law / Soil Erosion Ordinance Yes ORDINANCE #2017-1, ANOKA COUNTY
BUFFER ORDINANCE
Home Buyouts for flood or erosion mitigation No “ “
Other natural hazard-specific ordinances
(i.e., stormwater, steep slope, wildfire) No
Maintenance programs to reduce risk Yes Highway Dept. ROW maintenance and
drainage systems
Other (please describe)
ADMINISTRATIVE/TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES Yes/No Comments
Emergency Management Director Yes Anoka County EMD
Sheriff/Police Department Yes Anoka County Sheriff
Floodplain Management Administrator No
Land use planning and zoning
within Anoka County is a function
of its municipalities.
Chief Building Official No “ ”
Highway Engineer Yes Anoka County Highway
Mapping Specialist (GIS) Yes Anoka County Highway
Public Health Coordinator/Department Yes Anoka County Public Health
205
Item 4.
Planning Commission No
Land use planning and zoning
within Anoka County is a function
of its municipalities.
Coordination with Soil and Water Conservation District Yes Anoka County Environmental
Services
Coordination with Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources Yes Anoka County Environmental
Services
Mitigation Planning Committee Yes 2025 HMP Update Planning Team
of Stakeholders
Mutual Aid Agreements in place Yes Regional; MAAs also exist
between local fire departments
Other (please describe)
EDUCATION & OUTREACH CAPABILITIES Yes/No Comments
SKYWARN Program Training with NWS (annual training) Yes
Held in coordination with the
NWS
National Weather Service – Severe Weather Awareness
Weeks
Yes
Emergency Management
participates in coordination with
HSEM and NWS each November
and April.
Promotion of NOAA Weather Radios Yes
During NWS Severe Weather
Weeks and Ongoing
Other (please describe)
206
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Appendix E – Past Mitigation Action
Review Status Report
207
Item 4.
Anoka County
Past Mitigation Action Review Status Report
Following is a report on the status of mitigation actions related to natural hazards included in the Anoka
County 2019 Hazard Mitigation Plan. This report covers the mitigation actions that were listed for
implementation by Anoka County and by city jurisdictions or partner agencies, as applicable. The status
of mitigation actions is defined as the following:
Completed – The action was a defined activity or project completed since the last plan update.
Ongoing – The action is continually being implemented and moving forward. Ongoing mitigation actions
will be reviewed and revised as necessary for inclusion in the plan update.
Deleted – The action is deemed as not relevant and is not considered for inclusion in the plan update.
# Hazard
Mitigation Action
2025
Status Comments
1.1.1
Tornadoes,
Windstorms &
Straight-line
Winds
Encourage expansion of
outdoor warning sirens to
areas that currently do not
have coverage and maintain
existing outdoor warning
sirens.
Ongoing
Continue to promote multiple
ways to receive severe
weather alerts and maintain
existing outdoor warning siren
coverage.
1.1.2
Tornadoes,
Windstorms &
Straight-line
Winds
Continue to review EAS
capabilities and system
requirements. Implement
IPAWS Warning System
Completed
Anoka County can issue
IPAWS alerts.
1.2.1 Severe
Weather
Partner with volunteer
agencies to distribute severe
weather awareness and
preparedness literature at
community events.
Ongoing
Anoka County promotes
having multiple ways to
receive severe weather alerts
in addition to maintaining
existing outdoor warning siren
coverage.
1.2.3 Severe
Weather
Continue and expand
participation in the Severe
Weather Awareness Week
campaign.
Ongoing
Anoka County participates in
the NWS severe weather
awareness weeks and
encourages local jurisdictions
to do so as well.
1.3.1 Severe
Weather
Maintain and update annually,
contact information for
suppliers of drugs, food, water
and fuel.
Deleted
Not a necessary mitigation
action. Falls under broader
category of preparedness
planning.
208
Item 4.
# Hazard
Mitigation Action
2025
Status Comments
2.1.1 Extreme Temps
(Heat/Cold)
Support the activities of
volunteer and County Human
Services agencies in identifying
and assisting vulnerable
populations during severe
weather.
Ongoing
Continue to partner with
Human Services to support
vulnerable populations.
3.1.1 Flooding Use HAZUS-MH to map
100/500-year flood plains. Complete Anoka County GIS has the
data layers.
3.1.2 Flooding
Expand flood plain map data to
include residential,
commercial, occupied and
unoccupied properties on a
case by case basis based on
construction.
Deleted
Updated FIRM Maps have
been provided for Anoka
County by FEMA.
3.1.3 Flooding
Identify repetitive loss areas
and structures and continue to
assess new risks.
Deleted
FEMA provides the
information through the
OpenFEMA Dataset.
3.1.4 Flooding
Collaborate with City and
County organizations to
evaluate the need to relocate
or acquire structures in flood
hazard areas.
Ongoing
Ongoing collaboration with
local jurisdictions to mitigate
repetitive flood losses.
3.1.5 Flooding
Collaborate with City and
County organizations to use
mapping and databases to
restrict development in defined
flood hazard areas.
Ongoing
Ongoing collaboration with
local jurisdictions to mitigate
repetitive flood losses.
3.2.1 Flooding
Collaborate with city and
county organizations to identify
roadways that are repetitively
damaged by flooding.
Ongoing
Ongoing collaboration with
local jurisdictions to mitigate
repetitive flood losses.
3.2.2 Flooding
Collaborate with City and
County organizations to raise
the grade level of identified
roadways.
Ongoing
Ongoing collaboration with
local jurisdictions to mitigate
repetitive flood losses.
3.2.3 Flooding
Collaborate with City and
County organizations to
evaluate the feasibility of
expanding ditch depth and
width along roadways to
mitigate road flooding.
Ongoing
Ongoing collaboration with
local jurisdictions to mitigate
repetitive flood losses.
209
Item 4.
# Hazard
Mitigation Action
2025
Status Comments
3.3.1 Flooding
Collaborate with City, County,
and State Public Works /
Highway to place signage
indicating water depth at
flooding points.
Ongoing
Ongoing collaboration with
local jurisdictions to mitigate
repetitive flood losses.
3.3.2 Flooding
Collaborate with City, County,
and State Public Works /
Highway to install gates to
block roadways and bridges
during flooding.
Deleted
Work has been completed on
the underpass that had
flooding concerns.
11.1.3 All-Hazards
Maintain the Hazard Mitigation
Planning Committee and
schedule periodic meetings to
review plan updates.
Ongoing
Ongoing collaboration with
local jurisdictions and
stakeholders to mitigate
losses.
11.1.4
Tornadoes,
Windstorms &
Straight-line
Winds
Partner with the community to
build storm shelters Ongoing
Ongoing collaboration with
local jurisdictions and
stakeholders to mitigate
losses.
12.1.1 Flooding
Public Outreach in coordination
with public and private
partners. Using print and
multimedia campaigns for
awareness and reduction of
flood-related losses
Ongoing
Ongoing collaboration with
local jurisdictions and
stakeholders to mitigate
losses.
12.1.2 Severe
Weather
Partner with volunteer
agencies and NWS to distribute
severe weather awareness
material at community events.
Ongoing
Ongoing collaboration with
public and private partners to
promote preparedness.
12.1.4 Wildfire Publish news articles to
promote wildfire awareness. Deleted
Not a necessary mitigation
action. Falls under broader
category of preparedness
planning.
12.1.5 Severe
Weather
Develop/maintain a website for
citizen information: on shelter-
in-place, safe room
information, citizen training
opportunities, FEMA course
listing, and links to hazard
preparedness sites.
Ongoing
A preparedness page has been
added to the Anoka County
Emergency Management
website.
https://www.anokacountymn.
gov/3766/Preparedness
210
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Appendix F – Planning Team Meetings
211
Item 4.
Anoka County HMP Planning Team Meeting #1
2/20/25 Meeting Summary & Documentation
Synopsis: On February 20, 2025 Anoka County Emergency Management convened key county, city, and
township representatives, as well as neighboring jurisdictions and other stakeholders to participate in
the 1st Planning Team Meeting for the update of the Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP). The
meeting was held via Zoom webinar video conference and was facilitated by Stacey Stark and Bonnie
Hundrieser of the U-Spatial@UMD project team.
The purpose of the meeting was to present on the update of the Anoka County HMP update and gather
stakeholder feedback on several key discussion items, including:
1) Prioritization of the natural hazards to be profiled in the plan,
2) Identification of local vulnerabilities (i.e., infrastructure and populations),
3) Ideas for local mitigation actions for implementation, and
4) Review of FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grant funding opportunities.
Stakeholder Invitations: Anoka County Emergency Management invited all stakeholders included on
the county’s HMP Update Jurisdictional Contact List, which includes the key County Contacts, City
Contacts, Township Contacts, Other Stakeholder Contacts, and Neighboring Jurisdiction Contacts
identified to be invited to participate in the plan update process. Contacts were encouraged to engage
additional staff or to send someone in their stead if they could not attend.
Presentation Overview: The Power Point presentation covered the following items:
- Welcome & Introductions
- Meeting Purpose & Agenda
- Overview of HMP Key Points
- Overview of Plan Content (Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, Vulnerability Analysis, Update
of Hazard Prioritization)
- Overview of Mitigation Actions and FEMA Grants
- Overview of Mitigation Strategies for the development of mitigation actions
- Discussion of ideas for local mitigation ideas
- Overview of Next Steps following Planning Team Meeting #1
Materials: The following meeting summary includes documentation of the stakeholders that
participated in the meeting, poll results, questions or comments provided during the meeting, and
information on the FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grant Program. A list of stakeholders invited to
participate is also included. A copy of the meeting invitation and a handout of the Power Point
presentation slides accompany this meeting summary.
To submit comments or questions regarding this meeting summary, please contact:
Anoka County Emergency Management
RS-EmergencyManagement@anokacountymn.gov
212
Item 4.
Meeting Participants
Following is a list of representatives that participated in Planning Team Meeting #1. These individuals
will be considered as part the formal planning team recorded in Table 1. Hazard Mitigation (HMP) Team
of the Anoka County HMP Update.
Name Organization Job Title
1 Terry Stoltzman Anoka County Emergency
Management
Emergency Management
Director
2 Jeffrey Lanenberg Anoka County Emergency
Management
Deputy Emergency
Management Director
3 Ryan Kelzenberg & Jeff
Lanenberg (Ryan
Kelzenberg)
Anoka County Emergency
Management
Emergency Management
Coordinator
4 Bill Petracek City of Lexington City Administrator
5 Brent Baker Allina Health EMS EMS Operations Supervisor
6 Matt Look City of East Bethel Administrator
7 Chris Lindquist St. Francis Area Schools Director of Community
Education
8 Adam Jacobson Coon Rapids Police
Department
Deputy Chief of Police
9 Andy Schreder Rum River Consultatns CEO, Chief Building Official
10 Bruce Westby City of Ramsey City Engineer / Public Works
Director
11 Jonathan Spitzer Centennial Schools Director of Buildings and
Grounds
12 Matt Stemwedel City of Coon Rapids City Manager
13 David Pecchia City of Lino Lakes Interim City Administrator
14 James Mork Centennial Lakes Police
Department
Chief
15 Jeff Perry Anoka County Park Director
16 Tim Fournier Anoka Hennepin Schools Manager of Security and
Emergency Operations
17 Cathy Sorensen City of Blaine City Clerk
18 Del Vancura Anoka Municipal Electric Utility electric Dept. Director
19 Josh Antoine Spring Lake Park PD Chief
20 Andrew Todd City of Fridley PD Lieutenant/EM
21 Matthew Montain SBM Fire Department (Spring
Lake Park, Blaine, Centerville,
Circle Pines)
Assistant Chief
22 Jon Janke Coon Creek Watershed District Director of Operations
23 Erik Bye Coon Creek Watershed District Planning Coordinator
24 Mark Boerboom City of Blaine Emergency Management
25 Andy Youngquist Anoka PD Captain
26 James Larter Forest Lake ISD 831 Supervisor of Buildings and
Grounds
27 Dennis Jones Andover Fire Department Fire Chief/Emergency
Management Director
213
Item 4.
28 Joe MacPherson Anoka County County Engineer
29 John Slusarczyk Anoka County GIS Coordinator
30 Rod Sanow East Bethel Fire Fire chief
31 Jim Dickinson Anoka County County Administrator
32 Hannah Reed St Francis Area Schools ISD15 Technology and Safety/Security
Manager
33 Brad Bluml Ramsey Police Dept Chief
34 Tim Himmer City of Coon Rapids Public Works Director
35 Jon Dotterer HSEM RPC
36 Connie Moore Alexandra House Executive Director
37 Aaron Johnston City of Coon Rapids Asst. Fire Chief
38 Julie Jeppson Anoka County Commissioner
39 Mike Gamache Anoka County Board Commissioner
40 Todd Miller City of Blaine Deputy Fire Marshal/Emergency
management
41 Brent Larson City of Blaine Project Engineer/Emergency
Management
42 Kate Heffernan Anoka County Human
Services/Economic Assistance
Deputy Director
43 Rodney Spiering City of Coon Rapids Chief Building Official
44 Erik Edwards Lexington Fire & Rescue Fire Chief
45 Rachel Helland Anoka County Public Health Emergency Preparedness
Specialist
46 Rob Miller City of Nowthen Fire Chief
47 Carri Levitski Rum River Consultants (RRC) Program Administrator
48 Barry Brainard Rum River Consultants Assistant Building Official
49 LaChelle Williams HOPE 4 Youth Executive Director
50 Michael Raczkowski City of Ham Lake Fire chief
51 William Owens Lino Lakes Police Department Sergeant
52 Natalie Johnson City of Nowthen Interim City Administrator
53 David Petry Rice Creek Watershed District Project Manager
54 Aaron Chirpich City of Columbia Heights City Manager
55 Rachel James City of Columbia Heights City Council Member / Council
President
56 Chris Nielsen Anoka-Hennepin ISD#11 Health & Safety Supervisor
57 Andy Luedtke City of Blaine Assistant Deputy of Emergency
Managment
58 Jonn Olson Linwood Township Supervisor-Chairman
59 Jason Sufka City of Ramsey Fire
Department
Captain
60 Tedd Peterson City of Centerville Public Works Directer
61 Matt Kohner City of Ramsey Fire Chief/Emergency
Management Director
62 Zena Stenvik Columbia Heights Public
Schools
Superintendent
214
Item 4.
63 Bryan Hennekens ISD #13 Director of Finance and
Operations
64 Joe Sadler Blaine Police Department Sergeant
65 Thomas Knight City of Ramsey Building Official
66 Dan Hauck City of Blaine Building Official
Discussion Polls
The presentation included several polling questions to generate discussion and gather specific feedback
from participants that would be used to support public outreach, identify local vulnerabilities, and
determine the updated prioritization of hazards for inclusion in the plan. Following are the polling
questions and participant responses.
POLL #1 (Slide 9, Who Participates)
Question 1 - How can you expand participation by the county residents, including vulnerable
populations, in the planning process?
Tim Himmer Go directly to the populations identified - open house at their
location/facility. City Council/Board meetings. Social media, city
newsletters, etc.
Julie Jeppson Sorry, but didn't recall seeing religious institutions. Blaine, specifically,
has a lot of churches, mosques, etc. Communicating with religious
institutions will communicate with diverse populations.
James Larter Social media
Natalie Johnson Notice in our Semi-Annual Newsletter inviting input and volunteers as
well on our social media sights.
Barry Brainard N/A
Rachel James Multiple Language resources - especially Spanish
Matthew Montain Getting the information to them, most is published but not seen or not
looked at.
Jonn Olson Maybe include information in our community semi-annual newsletter.
Chris Lindquist Include information in mass communications from the school district
Rodney Spiering Newsletters, website posts.
John Slusarczyk We could post Survey 123 polls (GIS) on our website that allow residents
to answer questions or leave input and tie that response to a physical
location on a map.
Erik Edwards By closing the loop between the fire service, community and county
through task triage and management.
Del Vancura N/A
Matt Stemwedel Communication at community events. For example, Coon Rapids
Summer in the City Meetings.
Brent Baker As an EMS agency, we interact with vulnerable populations on a daily
basis.
Jon Janke Dedicated website that local media, city newsletters and targeted social
media announcements can direct the public to.
215
Item 4.
Brad Bluml As a new Police Chief, I can expand participation by residents, first by
learning more about Hazard Mitigation myself, and the creating of the
plan.
Cathy Sorensen Outreach events
Jason Sufka Discount on Utility Bill
Dennis Jones Reach out to Anoka County Public Health and Human Services and Red
Cross
Jim Dickinson Use of social media.
Question 2 - Is there someone (or an organization) missing from this planning team who you think
should be involved with the Hazard Mitigation Plan Development?
Dan Hauck Add - Andy Luedtke, Fire Inspector City of Blaine,
aluedtke@blainemn.gov
Andy Youngquist Not sure if Anoka Metro Regional Treatment Center admin was included
in the list. Also wasn't sure if Chemical Dependency facilities are to be
included.
Carri Levitski No, however, there are professional consulting firms such as ours (Rum
River Consultants) that are the designated building official for several
Anoka County jurisdictions.
Rachel James Community College?
Jonn Olson For Linwood Township, Mike Parker is no longer on the board, but please
add Jonn Olson and Lisa Henrickson to the list.
Aaron Johnston Did we include the MN College system (AR Community College and Tech
College)?
Erik Edwards Organizations such as Paul Davis or Restore 24 for post incident
residential recovery.
Matt Stemwedel Perhaps City communications personnel if applicable (may have been on
the list already).
Brad Bluml Add - Nathan Flansburg, Superintendent, PACT Charter School (Ramsey,
MN) n.flansburg@pactcharter.org
Cathy Sorensen Communications staff
Jonathan Spitzer Hi I am not on the spreadsheet contact list.
Dennis Jones AC Public Health and Human Services and Red Cross. Possibly the AC
Communications Center and the AC Atty Office.
William Owens Perhaps the MN Department of Corrections (The prison in Lino lakes)
Jim Dickinson The Health Care sector, Utility Companies serving Anoka County
POLL #2, Slide 13 (Plan Content – Vulnerability Analysis)
Question 1 - Are there any factors in your community that may have increased the community's
vulnerability? (please identify community)
Julie Jeppson Pockets of unhoused populations, individuals
experiencing food insecurity, TH65 aging but
being reconstructed starting in 2026.
Blaine
Mark Boerboom Water resources for increasing populations Blaine
216
Item 4.
Carri Levitski New developments, deteriorated buildings -
the more rooftops in a community, the more
cost in damage and displaced housing in an
event. When buildings are not maintained -
more damage occurs
RRC is either the
Designated BO or has a
supp. contract in:
Andover, Anoka,
Bethel, Blaine, Circle
Pines, Columbia
Heights, East Bethel,
Hilltop, Linwood,
Nowthen, Oak Grove,
Ramsey & Spring Lake
Park
Natalie Johnson Aging infrastructure Nowthen
Rachel James Large population of new immigrants from
Ecuador who do not speak English or have
access to vehicles. If there were an evacuation,
it would be a challenge to communicate and to
move people.
Columbia Heights
Rob Miller Aging infrastructure Nowthen
Matthew Montain Development, Amazon facility, waterways,
access, increased urban wildland interface,
access to list a few
All
Jonn Olson With oak wilt and the emerald ash borer
raging through our township, it has increased
the number of dead standing trees that keep
falling across roads and the deadfall have
increased the changes of fire
Linwood Township
Chris Lindquist Housing developments across the school
district; lack of critical infrastructure such as
city water and sewer in multiple
municipalities. New senior living development
in St. Francis.
St. Francis particularly,
but also East Bethel,
Bethel, Oak Grove,
Cedar, Nowthen, Burns
Twp, Stanford Twp,
Crown
David Pecchia New Developments Lino Lakes
Aaron Johnston Unhoused population is increasing throughout
the city.
Coon Rapids
LaChelle Williams Unhoused population increases. Increased
mental health elevation since the pandemic
Erik Edwards Apartment complexes added. One building
being low income.
Del Vancura denser population Anoka
Rod Sanow new housing developments East Bethel
Matt Stemwedel Additional high-density residential buildings Coon Rapids
Aaron Chirpich Aging infrastructure coupled with large scale
redevelopment increasing population.
Brad Bluml In the City of Ramsey, we have a great amount
of new development occurring; apartments, a
hotel, residential housing, and larger
commercial buildings.
The City of Ramsey, in
Anoka County.
217
Item 4.
Jason Sufka Civil Defense Upgrade from Analog to Digital
Activation – we have had times when sirens
don't sound during testing.
Ramsey
Dennis Jones Increase in population and multiple new
developments since 2019. There are also
multiple new high-rise structures/dwellings
built and scheduled to be built in the coming
24 months. Population Aging.
Andover
Connie Moore Increasing unhoused population, including
victims of domestic and sexual violence.
Jim Dickinson Anoka - aging infrastructure Countywide
Andy Youngquist Railway concerns. City of Anoka
Brent Larson Redevelopment north of 105th Ave and west
of Radisson Ave will include new sports
stadium, hotel, and hotel in the initial phase of
redeveloping this area. Tentative Opening in ~
2027
City of Blaine
Todd Miller we have large sporting events. and new
ballpark in being built
Blaine
Question 2 - Are there specific areas of concern in your community that you would consider to be
more highly vulnerable to damages or danger resulting from future natural hazard events? (please
identify community)
Mike Gamache The City of Anoka is working on rehabbing an
old venue just below the dam and not sure if
this is a concern or not.
City of Anoka, on the
Rum River
Dan Hauck Blaine has many manufactured home parks
that might be more vulnerable to high winds /
tornados
Julie Jeppson 105th Redevelopment Project in Blaine - 5,000
seat baseball stadium, but not for another
couple of years. Including a number of
apartments, restaurants, entertainment
buildings. Nat'l Sports Ctr
Blaine
Mark Boerboom Mobile home park infrastructure and shelters
in severe need of updates
Blaine
James Larter Wildfires Linwood Twp.
Carri Levitski New developments, deteriorated buildings -
the more rooftops in a community, the more
cost in damage and displaced housing in an
event. When buildings are not maintained -
more damage occurs
RRC is either the
Designated BO or has a
supp. contract in:
Andover, Anoka,
Bethel, Blaine, Circle
Pines, Columbia
Heights, East Bethel,
Hilltop, Linwood,
Nowthen, Oak Grove,
Ramsey & Spring Lake
Park
218
Item 4.
Natalie Johnson The City Fire Department building Nowthen
Rachel James Columbia Heights Public Works Service Center
is failing and we do not have funds to replace
it. We've asked for bonding from the state for
2 years. This will impact our ability to serve in
public services.
Columbia Heights
Rob Miller The city of Nowthen has a critical
infrastructure isssue with its City Hall and Fire
Station as both are not resistant to storms and
weather. We also have no room for a proper
EOC.
Nowthen
Matthew Montain We have a lot over the 4 cities All
Chris Lindquist Rural area that is not resource heavy St. Francis particularly,
but also East Bethel,
Bethel, Oak Grove,
Cedar, Nowthen, Burns
Twp, Stanford tTp,
Crown
David Pecchia More new developments Lino Lakes
Aaron Johnston Bunker Hills campground and our one trailer
park
Coon Rapids
DEL VANCURA health partners clinic Anoka
Rod Sanow Townhome development East Bethel
Matt Stemwedel Mercy Hospital campus Coon Rapids
Aaron Chirpich We have concerns with staffing in our fire
department. We may want to consider
collaborating with neighboring communities to
provide fire services.
Jon Janke Manufactured homes within the floodplain Creekside estates in
Coon Rapids and 4
seasons park in Blaine
Brad Bluml The City of Ramsey has one mobile home park,
plus a great deal of new development. Our city
is also bordered by two rivers, with the Rum
River on the east routinely flooding each
spring.
The City of Ramsey, in
Anoka County.
Bruce Westby New Water Treatment Plant (opening Fall
2025)
City of Ramsey
Erik Bye Manufactured home parks in the floodplain -
Four Seasons in Blaine, Creekside Estates in
Coon Rapids, Blaine International Village park.
The cities of Blaine and
Coon Rapids.
Jason Sufka Increase in Senior Housing and Memory
Care/Assisted Living
Ramsey
Dennis Jones New developments which include high-rise
dwellings. A very large uptick in group homes
and in-home assisted living services occurring
in single family dwellings.
Andover
219
Item 4.
Jim Dickinson Utility infrastructure, drinking water
infrastructure
Countywide
Andy Youngquist Federal Cartridge and Pentair are large
facilities, employ thousands, would be
significantly be impacted by a natural disaster.
City of Anoka
Brent Larson National Sports Center is expanding and
hosting many large events
City of Blaine
Todd Miller New development and populations Blaine
POLL #3 (Slide 17) Anoka County 2025 Update of Hazard Prioritization
Meeting participants ranked each of the natural hazards listed below as what they felt was a high,
moderate, or low hazard priority to include in the plan update.
Which of the following hazards would you consider HIGH priority in your county?
Windstorms 36
Flood 30
Hail Storms 29
Tornadoes 28
Lightning 22
Winter Storms 18
Extreme Cold 13
Wildfire 12
Extreme Heat 8
Drought 5
Landslides 0
Land Subsidence 0
Dam/Levee
Failure 0
Would you consider any of the hazards below to be low risk, low priority, or not applicable in your
county?
Flood 4
Winter Storms 9
Windstorms 3
Tornadoes 3
Hail Storms 1
Lightning 4
Extreme Cold 10
Extreme Heat 15
Drought 11
Wildfire 6
Landslides 29
Land Subsidence 31
Dam/Levee
Failure 23
220
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Prioritization of Hazards
The chart below reflects the planning team’s updated prioritization of hazards that will be included in
the Anoka County 2025 HMP Update.
HAZARD Anoka County 2025
Flooding High
Windstorms High
Tornadoes High
Winter Storms Moderate
Hail Moderate
Lightning Moderate
Extreme Cold Moderate
Extreme Heat Moderate
Wildfire Moderate
Drought Low
Landslides Low
Land Subsidence Low
Dam/Levee Failure Low
Other Comments or Questions
Following are additional comments or questions addressed during the planning team meeting and
responses from meeting presenters:
Carri Levitski – Regarding the prioritization of hazards: I think priorities depend on the lens you are
looking through.
Rachel James – Regarding Extreme Heat: In 2019, extreme heat was not profiled. I think that needs to
move up in 2025 (moderate or low). According to National Weather Service, extreme heat was the third
most deadly natural disaster in MN since 1990, behind flooding and tornadoes. My perspective is due to
climate change, increasing density, aging populations and poverty that more folks will be at risk from
injury or death to extreme heat.
Stacey Stark response - Rachel, thank you for the comment. MDH has also expressed that we
include extreme heat profiles in every plan regardless of how it is prioritized - as it is a high
priority to address statewide. The county can still choose not to develop mitigation actions
directly for it, but the information about extreme heat vulnerability is important.
Barry Brainard – Regarding risk assessments: Question: Hazardous structure assessments. Who
conducts the assessments and coordinates mitigation of hazardous building structures?
Bonnie Hundrieser response – In the local vulnerability assessments we are looking for
communities to share their feedback on local vulnerabilities (critical infrastructure, populations,
or other community assets). We do not have personnel as part of the plan update conducting
on-site risk assessments. FEMA does have a requirement for communities to answer if/how
they use building codes to reduce risk to new and existing buildings.
221
Item 4.
FEMA HMA Grant Funding:
As part of the planning team meeting, participants were informed that having a FEMA-approved Hazard
Mitigation Plan in place is a requirement in order to apply for FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grant
Programs. Examples of eligible projects were reviewed for participants to consider for potential
inclusion in their local mitigation action charts, as applicable. It was noted that representatives from the
county, local governments, and other stakeholder agencies/organizations must have documented
participation in the planning process in order to formally adopt the plan and be eligible to apply for
future FEMA HMA grants.
To learn more about FEMA’s HMA grant programs, please review the following:
FEMA Mitigation Assistance Program and Policy Guide, Effective July 30, 2024
At a glance info: See Table 4, Eligible Activities by Program (page 43)
ANOKA COUNTY HMP JURISDICTIONAL CONTACT LIST
Following is a list of the stakeholders that received an invitation to participate in Planning Team Mtg. #1
and will receive the meeting summary.
To submit suggested additions to this contact list, please contact Anoka County Emergency
Management and provide the name of the jurisdiction, agency, or organization along with the person’s
full name, work title, and email address.
REPRESENTATION NAME TITLE
Anoka County Emergency Management Terry Stoltzman Emergency Management Director
Anoka County Emergency Management Jeffrey Lanenberg Deputy EM Director
Anoka County Emergency Management Ryan Kelzenberg EM Coordinator
Anoka County Sheriff's Office Brad Wise County Sheriff
Anoka County Administration Jim Dickinson County Administrator
Anoka County Administration Dee Guthman Deputy County Administrator
Anoka County Property Records &
Taxation Division Alex Guggenberger County Assessor
Anoka County GIS John Slusarczyk GIS Manager
Anoka County Surveyor David Zieglmeier County Surveyor
Anoka County Highway Department Joe MacPherson County Engineer
Anoka County Public Health & Envr.
Services Jonelle Hubbard PHES Director
Anoka County Public Health & Envr.
Services Megan Barry PHEP Coordinator
Anoka County Human Services Cindy Cesare Chief Officer, Human Services
Anoka County Parks Jeff Perry Parks Director
Anoka County Community Social
Services George Borrell Social Services Director
Anoka County Economic Assistance Jessica Leth Economic Assistance Director
Anoka County Board of Commissioners John Heinrich District 1 Commissioner
Anoka County Board of Commissioners Julie Braastad District 2 Commissioner
Anoka County Board of Commissioners Jeff Reinert District 3 Commissioner
222
Item 4.
Anoka County Board of Commissioners Scott Schulte District 4 Commissioner
Anoka County Board of Commissioners Mike Gamache District 5 Commissioner
Anoka County Board of Commissioners Julie Jeppson District 6 Commissioner
Anoka County Board of Commissioners Mandy Meisner District 7 Commissioner
Anoka County Library Colleen Haubner Library Director
Anoka County Economic Development Gregory Frahm-Gilles Economic Development Director
Anoka County Attorney Brad Johnson County Attorney
Anoka County Internal Auditor Chuck Denninger Internal Auditor Director
Anoka County Transit Amy Honer Transportation Operations Director
Anoka County Communications Erik Thorson Chief Communications Officer
City of Andover Sarah Cotton City Administrator
City of Andover Michelle Hartner City Clerk
City of Andover Jamie Barthel Mayor
City of Andover Dennis Jones Fire Chief / Emergency Manager
City of Andover David Berkowitz
Director of Public Works/City
Engineer
City of Andover Joe Heidelberger Building Official
City of Anoka Greg Lee City Manager
City of Anoka Erik Skogquist Mayor
City of Anoka Ted Massicotte Fire Chief
City of Anoka Eric Peterson
Chief of Police \ Emergency
Manager
City of Anoka Mark Anderson Public Services Director
City of Anoka Andy Younguist City of Anoka Police
City of Anoka Ryan Kirby Assessor
City of Anoka Doug Borglund Community Development Director
City of Anoka Municipal Utilities Del Vancura Electric Utility Director
City of Bethel Ginger Berg City Clerk
City of Bethel Todd Miller Mayor
City of Bethel
Mary Wells
Assessor for Bethel, Ham Lake,
Nowthen, St. Francis and Spring Lake
Park, and Centerville
City of Bethel
Erik Sogquist
Assessor for Bethel, Ham Lake,
Nowthen, St. Francis and Spring Lake
Park
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Tim Sanders Mayor
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Michelle Wolfe Manager
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Cathy Sorensen City Clerk
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Dan Huack Building Official
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Dan Retka
Fire Chief (Blaine, Spring Lake Park,
Centerville)
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Brian Podany Police Chief
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Mark Boerboom Emergency Management Director
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Erik Thorvig Community Development Director
City of Centerville Nancy Golden Mayor
223
Item 4.
City of Centerville Mark Statz Engineer
City of Centervile Athanasia Lewis Interim City Administrator
City of Centerville Teresa Bender City Clerk
City of Centerville
James Mork
Centennial Lakes Police Chief \
Emergency Management Director
(Centerville, Circle Pines, Lexington)
City of Centerville Matt Montain
Centennial Fire District Assistant
Chief (Centerville / Circle Pines)
City of Centerville Chris Larson Assessor
City of Centerville Athanasia Lewis Community Development
City of Circle Pines David Bartholomay Mayor
City of Circle Pines Patrick Antonen Administrator
City of Circle Pines Chandra Peterson
Assist City Administrator /
Community Development
City of Columbia Heights Amáda Márquez Simula Mayor
City of Columbia Heights Kevin Hansen
Interim City Manager / Engineer /
Director of Emergency Management
City of Columbia Heights Aaron Chirpich City Manager
City of Columbia Heights Sara Ion City Clerk
City of Columbia Heights Ryan Smith Building Official
City of Columbia Heights Daniel O'Brien Fire Chief
City of Columbia Heights Matt Markham Police Chief
City of Columbia Heights Mitch Forney Community Development Director
City of Columbus Ron Hanegraaf Mayor
City of Columbus Jack Davis Interim City Administrator
City of Columbus Lorie Spangler Deputy City Clerk
City of Columbus Elizabeth Mursko Community Development
City of Columbus Alan Newman
Forest Lake Fire Chief (City of
Columbus)
City of Coon Rapids Jerry Koch Mayor
City of Coon Rapids Matt Stemwedel City Manager
City of Coon Rapids Joan Lenzmeier City Clerk
City of Coon Rapids Rich Gruber Assessor
City of Coon Rapids Tim Himmer City Engineer
City of Coon Rapids Rod Spiering Chief Building Official
City of Coon Rapids John Piper Fire Chief
City of Coon Rapids Bill Steiner
Police Chief / Director of Emergency
Management
City of Coon Rapids Aaron Johnston Assistant Fire Chief
City of Coon Rapids Adam Jacobson Deputy Chief
City of Coon Rapids Matt Brown Community Development Director
City of East Bethel Ardie Anderson Mayor
City of East Bethel Matt Look
City Administrator / City Clerk / City
Treasurer
City of East Bethel Nick Schmitz Building Official
224
Item 4.
City of East Bethel Nate Ayshford Public Works Manager
City of East Bethel Rod Sanow
Fire Chief / Emergency Management
Director
City of East Bethel Aaron Berg Community Development Director
City of Fridley Dave Ostwald Mayor
City of Fridley Wally Wysopal Manager
City of Fridley Joe Starks Finance Director / Treasurer
City of Fridley Melissa Moore City Clerk
City of Fridley Tony DeForge Chief Building Official
City of Fridley Pat Maghrak Assessor
City of Fridley Jim Kosluchar Public Works Director
City of Fridley Ryan George
Public Safety Director / Emergency
Management Director
City of Fridley Maddison Zikmund Deputy Director - Fire Chief
City of Fridley Scott Hickok Community Development
City of Fridley Patrick Faber City of Fridley - Police Division
City of Ham Lake Brian Kirkham Mayor
City of Ham Lake Denise Webster City Administrator
City of Ham Lake Dawnette Shimek City Clerk
City of Ham Lake Mark Jones Building Official / Zoning Official
City of Ham Lake Mike Raczkowski
Fire Chief / Emergency Management
Director
City of Ham Lake Jennifer Bohr Building / Planning Clerk
City of Hilltop Terry Wiggin Mayor
City of Hilltop Ruth Nelsen
City Clerk / Community
Development
City of Hilltop Matt Johnson Public Works Director
City of Lexington Mike Murphy Mayor
City of Lexington Bill Petracek
City Administrator / Community
Development
City of Lexington Mary Vinzant Deputy City Clerk
City of Lexington Erik Edwards Fire Chief
City of Lino Lakes Rob Rafferty Mayor
City of Lino Lakes David Pecchia Interim City Administrator
City of Lino Lakes Roberta Colotti City Clerk
City of Lino Lakes Diane Hankee City Engineer
City of Lino Lakes Patrick Moonen Building Official
City of Lino Lakes John Swenson
Public Safety Director / Emergency
Management Director
City of Lino Lakes Dan L'Allier Deputy Director - Fire Division
City of Lino Lakes Kyle Leibel Deputy Director - Police Division
City of Lino Lakes Curt Boehme Interium Public Director
City of Lino Lakes Michael Grochala Community Development Director
City of Nowthen Shane Hybben Mayor
City of Nowthen Joe Glaze Public Works Supervisor
225
Item 4.
City of Nowthen Administrator
City of Nowthen Natalie Johnson Deputy Clerk
City of Nowthen Rob Miller Interim Fire Chief
City of Nowthen Cindy Nash Community Development
City of Oak Grove Loren Wickham
City Administrator / Community
Development
City of Oak Grove Matt Anderson Director of Public Works
City of Oak Grove Rob Engler
Fire Chief / Emergency Manager (St
Francis, Nowthen, Bethel)
City of Oak Grove Weston Rolf Mayor
City of Oak Grove Billi Larson Deputy City Clerk / Elections
City of Oak Grove Andy Schreder
Building Official (Oak Grove, Hilltop,
Circle Pines, Nowthen,Linwood Twp)
City of Ramsey Ryan Heineman Mayor
City of Ramsey Brian Hagen City Administrator
City of Ramsey Katie Schmidt City Clerk
City of Ramsey Bruce Westby
City Engineer / Public Works
Director
City of Ramsey Thomas Knight Assistant Building Official
City of Ramsey Matt Kohner
Fire Chief / Emergency Management
Director
City of Ramsey Brad Bluml Police Chief
City of Ramsey Stephanie Hanson Community Development Director
City of St. Francis Mark Vogel Mayor
City of St. Francis Kate Thunstrom
City Administrator - Co-Emergency
Management Director
City of St. Francis Jenni Wida Deputy Administrator / City Clerk
City of St. Francis
Dave Schmidt
Fire Chief / Assistant Deputy
Emergency Manager (Emergency
Manager -Nowthen, Bethel)
City of St. Francis Craig Jochum Engineer
City of St. Francis Phil Dahlheimer Building Official
City of St. Francis Todd Schwieger Police Chief
City of St. Francis Jessica Rieland Community Development
City of Spring Lake Park (partly in
Ramsey County) Robert (Bob) Nelson Mayor
City of Spring Lake Park (partly in
Ramsey County) Daniel Buchholtz Administrator / City Clerk
City of Spring Lake Park (partly in
Ramsey County) Wanda Brown Deputy City Clerk
City of Spring Lake Park (partly in
Ramsey County) Jeff Baker Building Official
City of Spring Lake Park (partly in
Ramsey County) Josh Antoine
Police Chief / Emergency
Management Director
City of Spring Lake Park (partly in
Ramsey County) Matt Montain
Assistant Fire Chief / Assistant Chief
of Emergency Management
Linwood Township Alyssa Dehn Township Accountant / Treasurer
226
Item 4.
Linwood Township Vacant Township Clerk
Linwood Township Darryl Ballman Fire Chief
Linwood Township Michael Parker Town Board Chairman
Linwood Township Andy Luedtke Township Board Member
LOCAL & REGIONAL AGENCIES
INVOLVED IN HAZARD MITIGATION
MN HSEM Jon Dotterer
Region 6 Regional Program
Coordinator
Anoka Conservation District Chris Lord District Manager
Anoka Conservation District Mitch Haustein Stormwater and Shoreland Specialist
Anoka Conservation District Jamie Schurbon Watershed Projects Manager
Anoka Conservation District Kathy Kerkness Office Administrator
MN DNR DNR Ecological & Water
Resources Division Wes Saunders-Pearce
Region 3 Metro North Area
Hydrologist
MnDOT Metro District Khani Sahebjam District Engineer
Upper Rum River Watershed
Management Organization John West Board Chair
Lower Rum River Watershed
Management Organization Carla Wirth Administrative Secretary
Lower Rum River Watershed
Management Organization Stephanie Johnson Senior Water Resources Engineer
Coon Creek Watershed District Tim Kelly District Administrator
Coon Creek Watershed District Jon Janke Director of Operations
Coon Creek Watershed District Erik Bye Planning Coordinator
Rice Creek Watershed District Nick Tomczik District Administrator
Rice Creek Watershed District Theresa Stasica Office Manager
Sunrise River Watershed Management
Organization Jamie Schurbon Water Resource Specialist
Vadnais Lake Area Watershed
Management Organization Phil Belfiori Administrator
Coon Lake Improvement District Al Beck District Chair
Mississippi Watershed Management
Organization Kevin Reich Executive Director
Mississippi Watershed Management
Organization MWMO MWMO Contacts Email Address
BUSINESSES, ACADEMIA, AND OTHER
PRIVATE ORGS.
Allina EMS Brent Baker EMS Supervisor
American Red Cross Morgan Sommers Disaster Program Manager
American Red Cross Rachel Sullivan-
Nightengale EM Coordinator
Fairview Clinics Chris Kissell Emergency Manager
M Health Kevin Kane EMS Supervisor
Salvation Army Michele Heaver Division Disaster Services
Connexus Energy Rod Morton Risk and Recovery Manager
227
Item 4.
NONPROFIT ORGS/COMMUNITY-BASED
ORGS THAT WORK WITH
UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES AND
SOCIALLY VULNERABLE POPULATIONS Anoka-Hennepin ISD 11 Cory McIntyre Superintendent
Anoka-Hennepin ISD 11 Michelle Trelstad
Executive Director, Community
Education and Govt Relations
Anoka-Hennepin ISD 11
Jim Skelly
Executive Director of
Communications and Public
Relations
Centennial ISD 12 Jeff Holmberg Superintendent
Centennial ISD 12 Krista Bergert
Director of Public Information and
Community Outreach
Centennial ISD 12 Jody Josephson Assist to Superintendent
Columbia Heights Public Schools ISD 13 Zena Stenvik Superintendent
Columbia Heights Public Schools ISD 13 Stephanie Alvarez
Elections Liaison / Exec Assistant to
Superintendent
Fridley ISD 14 Brenda Lewis Superintendent
Fridley ISD 14 Lori Andler Director of Administrative Services
Fridley ISD 14 Rochelle Cox
Senior Officer of Operations and
System Alignment
St Francis ISD 15 Karsten Anderson Superintendent
St Francis ISD 15 Vanessa Tolle Assistant to Superintendent
Spring Lake Park ISD 16 Jeff Ronneberg Superintendent
Spring Lake Park ISD 16 Ivonne Padilla Executive Assistant
White Bear Lake ISD 624 Dr. Wayne A.
Kazmierczak Superintendent
White Bear Lake ISD 624 Rachael Markuson Assistant to Superintendent
Elk River Area ISD 728 Andrew Almos Superintendent
Elk River Area ISD 728 Shannon Buckingham Senior Administrative Assistant
Forest Lake ISD 831 Steve D. Massey Superintendent
Forest Lake ISD 831 Kari Damon Administrative Assistant
Anoka Ramsey Community College Clifford Anderson Public Safety Director
United Way Julie Ogunleye
DIRECTOR, 211 RESOURCE HELPLINE
AND 988 SUICIDE & CRISIS LIFELINE
United Way Sherry Sanchez Tibbetts
VICE PRESIDENT, DIVERSITY, EQUITY
& INCLUSION
Hope For Youth LaChelle Williams Executive Director
Alexandra House Connie Moore Executive Director
Anoka County Community Action
Program Patrick McFarland Executive Director
Alexandra House John Blamo Director of Operations
Rise Inc Judy Andersen Director of Community Programs
Stepping Stone Emergency Housing Steve Griffiths Executive Director
NEIGHBORING JURISDICTIONS
Isanti County Emergency Management Clinton Maxon Emergency Manager
228
Item 4.
Chisago County Emergency
Management Scott Sellman Director of Emergency Management
Washington County Emergency
Management Doug Berglund Emergency Services Manager
Ramsey County Emergency
Management Judd Freed Director
Hennepin County Emergency
Management Eric Waage Director
Sherburne County Emergency
Management Kyle Breffle Director
229
Item 4.
From:RS-EmergencyManagement
To:Terry Stoltzman; Jeffrey Lanenberg; Ryan Kelzenberg; Brad Wise; Dee Guthman; Jim Dickinson; Alex
Guggenberger; John Slusarczyk; David Zieglmeier; Joe MacPherson; Jonelle Hubbard; Megan Barry; Cindy
Cesare; Jeff Perry; George Borrell; Jessica Leth; Julie Braastad; Jeff Reinert; Scott Schulte; Mike Gamache; Julie
Jeppson; Mandy Meisner; Colleen Haubner; Chuck Denninger; Amy Honer; Erik Thorson;
m.hartner@andovermn.gov; cm.bukkila@andovermn.gov; d.jones@andovermn.gov;
D.Berkowitz@andovermn.gov; j.heidelberger@andovermn.gov; Greg Lee; philrice@ci.anoka.mn.us;
tmassicotte@ci.anoka.mn.us; epeterson@ci.anoka.mn.us; manderson@ci.anoka.mn.us; rkirby@ci.anoka.mn.us;
dborglund@ci.anoka.mn.us; dvancura@ci.anoka.mn.us; info@bethelmn.govoffice2.com;
mnassessormary@gmail.com; Erik A. Skogquist; tsanders@blainemn.gov; mwolfe@blainemn.gov;
csorensen@blainemn.gov; dhauck@blainemn.gov; Dan Retka; bpodany@blainemn.gov;
mboerboom@blainemn.gov; dlove@centervillemn.com; Mark Statz; tbender@centervillemn.com; Jim Mork; Matt
Montain; Chris J. Larson; dbartholomay@ci.circle-pines.mn.us; pantonen@ci.circle-pines.mn.us;
cpeterson@ci.circle-pines.mn.us; amarquezsimula@columbiaheightsmn.gov; khansen@columbiaheightsmn.gov;
sion@columbiaheightsmn.gov; rsmith@columbiaheightsmn.gov; dobrien@columbiaheightsmn.gov;
MMarkham@columbiaheightsmn.gov; mayorjessep@ci.columbus.mn.us; intcityadmin@ci.columbus.mn.us;
deputyclerk@ci.columbus.mn.us; alan.newman@ci.forest-lake.mn.us; jkoch@coonrapidsmn.gov;
mstemwedel@coonrapidsmn.gov; jlenzmeier@coonrapidsmn.gov; Richard U. Gruber;
thimmer@coonrapidsmn.gov; rspiering@coonrapidsmn.gov; jpiper@coonrapidsmn.gov;
bsteiner@coonrapidsmn.gov; kevin.lewis@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; matt.look@ci.east-bethel.mn.us;
Nick.schmitz@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; Nate.ayshford@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; Rod.sanow@ci.east-bethel.mn.us;
aaron.berg@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; scott.lund@fridleymn.gov; wally.wysopal@fridleymn.gov;
Joe.starks@fridleymn.gov; melissa.moore@fridleymn.gov; Tony.deforge@fridleymn.gov;
pat.maghrak@fridleymn.gov; jim.kosluchar@fridleymn.gov; ryan.george@fridleymn.gov;
maddison.zikmund@fridleymn.gov; Patrick.faber@fridleymn.gov; bkirkham@ci.ham-lake.mn.us; Denise Webster;
dshimek@ci.ham-lake.mn.us; mjones@ci.ham-lake.mn.us; mraczkowski@ci.ham-lake.mn.us; Ruth Nelson;
gary.grote@cityoflexingtonmn.org; bill.petracek@cityoflexingtonmn.org; mary.vinzant@cityoflexingtonmn.org;
erik.edwards@cityoflexingtonmn.org; RRafferty@linolakes.us; cityadmin@linolakes.us; RColotti@linolakes.us;
DHankee@linolakes.us; PMoonen@linolakes.us; JSwenson@linolakes.us; dlallier@linolakes.us;
KLeibel@linolakes.us; mayorpilon@gmail.com; jglaze@nowthenmn.net; slehner@nowthenmn.net; Natalie
Johnson; scott@mnspect.com; Loren Wickham; manderson@ci.oak-grove.mn.us; rengler@ci.oak-grove.mn.us;
wrolf@ci.oak-grove.mn.us; blarson@ci.oak-grove.mn.us; andy@rumrivercc.com; mkuzma@cityoframsey.com;
Brian Hagen; kschmidt@cityoframsey.com; bwestby@cityoframsey.com; mkohner@cityoframsey.com;
jkaters@cityoframsey.com; jmuehlbauer@stfrancismn.org; kate.thunstrom@stfrancismn.org;
jwida@stfrancismn.org; dschmidt@stfrancismn.org; craigj@haa-inc.com; pdahlheimer@stfrancismn.org;
tschwieger@stfrancismn.org; rnelson@slpmn.org; Daniel Buchholtz; wbrown@slpmn.org; jbaker@slpmn.org;
jantoine@slpmn.org; Mmontain@sbmfire.org; treasurer@linwoodtownship.org; pam.olson@linwoodtownship.org;
darryl.ballman@linwoodtownship.org; mike.parker@linwoodtownship.org; Jon.Dotterer@state.mn.us;
chris.lord@anokaswcd.org; mitch.haustein@anokaswcd.org; jamie.schurbon@anokaswcd.org;
kathy.berkness@anokaswcd.org; Wes.Saunders-Pearce@state.mn.us; khani.sahebjam@state.mn.us;
John@IPSSEC.com; DMusgrove@ci.ramsey.mn.us; tkelly@cooncreekwd.org; ntomczik@ricecreek.org;
jamie.schurbon@anokaswcd.org; phil.belfiori@vlawmo.org; office@vlawmo.org; brent.baker@allina.com;
morgan.sommers@redcross.org; rachel.sullivannight@redcross.org; ckissel1@fairview.org;
kmkane@healtheast.org; michele.heaver@usc.salvationarmy.org; Rod.Morton@connexusenergy.com;
Cory.McIntyre@ahschools.us; Michelle.trelstad@ahschools.us; jholmberg@isd12.org; kbergert@isd12.org;
stenvikz@colheights.k12.mn.us; alvarezs@colheights.k12.mn.us; lewis@isd14.org; andler@isd14.org; Karsten
Anderson; vanessa.tolle@isd15.org; jronne@district16.org; ipadil@district16.org;
wayne.kazmierczak@isd624.org; rachael.markuson@isd624.org; daniel.bittman@isd728.org;
shannon.buckingham@isd728.org; smassey@flaschools.org; kdamon@flaschools.org;
Clifford.Anderson@anokaramsey.edu; julie.ogunleye@gtcuw.org; sherry.sancheztibbetts@gtcuw.org;
lwilliams@hope4youthmn.org; cmoore@alexandrahouse.org; PMcfarland@accap.org; jandersen@rise.org;
steve.griffiths@steppingstoneeh.org; clinton.maxson@co.isanti.mn.us; Scott.Sellman@chisagocountymn.gov;
douglas.berglund@co.washington.mn.us; judd.freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; eric.waage@co.hennepin.mn.us;
kyle.breffle@co.sherburne.mn.us; cox@isd14.org; kreich@mwmo.org; ajohnston@coonrapidsmn.gov
Cc:hundrieserconsulting@outlook.com; Stacey Stark
Subject:ANOKA COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE – MEETING INVITATION
Date:Wednesday, December 18, 2024 1:29:22 PM
Greetings,
Your presence is requested at a Planning Team Meeting for the update of the Anoka County Hazard
Mitigation Plan. You are requested to participate in this meeting because you have a position of
administrative or departmental responsibility within the county, a municipal government, or are a
key stakeholder related to the planning process. Emergency Managers from neighboring
jurisdictions are also encouraged to attend so we may strengthen our shared mitigation efforts.
We will be holding the meeting virtually using Zoom conferencing:
230
Item 4.
Date: Thursday, February 20, 2025
Time: 1:00-2:30 PM
RSVP: https://umn-private.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_ekZYtqs1Qge1dAWJloWC9A
(Ctrl+Click to follow link) When you register, you will be placed on an RSVP list and will be sent an
email confirmation. If you are not able to attend, please seek to send another representative in your
stead.
About the Hazard Mitigation Plan
In order to maintain eligibility for FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) Grant Program funding,
the county’s hazard mitigation plan must be updated every 5 years. Our last plan is due for an
update and our planning is currently underway. The plan addresses the natural hazards that face
Anoka County and will result in the identification of mitigation actions that will help to reduce or
eliminate the impact of future hazard events.
Meeting Information
This meeting will be facilitated by personnel from U-Spatial at the University of MN Duluth who are
working closely with us on this project. The purpose of this meeting is to present on the update of
the Anoka County HMP update and gather stakeholder feedback on several key discussion items,
including:
1) Prioritization of the natural hazards to be profiled in the plan,
2) Identification of local vulnerabilities (i.e., infrastructure and populations),
3) Ideas for local mitigation actions for implementation, and
4) Review of FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grant funding opportunities.
About FEMA HMA Grant Funding:
To learn more about FEMA’s HMA grant programs, please review the following:
FEMA Mitigation Assistance Program and Policy Guide, Effective July 30, 2024
At a glance info: See Table 4, Eligible Activities by Program (page 43)
Please note that representatives from the county, local governments, and other stakeholder
agencies/organizations must have documented participation in the planning process in order to
formally adopt the plan and be eligible to apply for future FEMA HMA grants.
We look forward to you joining us for this important meeting.
Thank you,
Anoka County Emergency Management
763-324-4740
RS-EmergencyManagement@anokacountymn.gov
231
Item 4.
NOTICE: Unless restricted by law, email correspondence to and from Anoka County
government offices may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act and/or
may be disclosed to third parties.
232
Item 4.
2/22/2025
1
Anoka County
Hazard Mitigation Plan
Update 2025
Planning Team Meeting #1
FEBRUARY 20, 2025
Welcome & Introductions
U-Spatial@UMD Project Leads
Anoka County Project Team
▪ Terry Stoltzman, Anoka County
Emergency Management Director
▪ Jeffrey Lanenberg, Deputy EM
▪ Ryan Kelzenberg, EM Coordinator
PRESENTER: STACEY STARK
Bonnie Hundrieser
HM Planning Specialist
Hundrieser Consulting LLC
Stacey Stark
Project Manager
U-Spatial@UMD
Please type your name and representation in the CHAT – so others know who is here
Meeting Participation
To make a comment or ask a question, please use
the chat or raise your hand to speak.
PLEASE REMAIN MUTED AND VIDEO OFF SO EVERYONE CAN HAVE THE
BEST EXPERIENCE.
USE CHAT:
⮚To send a message to everyone
⮚To send a message to individuals or the presenters
⮚To send a message to host to ask for help or ask a question that isn’t for the whole group.
The host is Stacey Stark.
ASK TO SPEAK:
PRESENTER: STACEY STARK
Meeting Purpose
& Agenda
The purpose of this
meeting is to formally
convene the Anoka
County HMP Planning
Team for a presentation
on the plan update and
to discuss key items
required for the plan
update.
Agenda
➢Overview of HMP Key Points
➢Review of Past Plan Hazard Risk
Priorities, Hazard Profiles, and
Current Hazard Prioritization
➢Overview of Mitigation Strategies
➢Overview of FEMA HMA grant
program
➢Discuss local mitigation ideas
➢Overview of Next Steps
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
Overview of
HMP Key Points
ANOKA COUNTY 2025 HMP UPDATE
PRESENTER : BONNIE HUNDRIESER
Plan Requirement
The Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP)
is a requirement of the Federal
Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000
(DMA 2000).
➢ The development of a local
government plan is required to
maintain eligibility for FEMA HMA
grant programs.
➢ Plans must be updated every 5 years.
➢ Must address all jurisdictions and
engage key stakeholders + the public
➢ Must be approved by FEMA for
meeting all federal requirements.
Anoka County
HMP Update 2025
▪ Last plan was adopted in 2019.
▪ The updated plan will cover a 5-year
window for implementation and grant
program eligibility (2026-2031)
▪ Participating jurisdictions must have
documented engagement in the
planning process and adopt the final
plan.
PRESENTER : BONNIE HUNDRIESER
233
Item 4.
2/22/2025
2
Plan Purpose
The purpose of the HMP is to:
➢ Conduct risk assessment (history, future probability, impacts of natural
hazards)
➢ Conduct vulnerability assessment (at-risk critical infrastructure and
populations)
➢Conduct capabilities assessment (plans, programs, policies,
partnerships, funding, etc in place or that are lacking)
➢ Develop plan of action (strategies and mitigation actions for
implementation).
PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
Who the Plan Covers
PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
This is a multi-jurisdictional plan
that covers Anoka County, including
all cities and townships within the
county.
The plan also takes into consideration the needs
and concerns of other stakeholders such as
schools, watershed districts, and agencies or
organizations involved in mitigation or services
to vulnerable populations within the county.
Who Participates
Key Stakeholders
Local government as well as
related non-governmental
agencies & organizations must
participate.
➢ 2 planning team meetings
➢ Public outreach
➢ Provision of local information
(LMS forms, other data)
➢Mitigation Action Charts
➢Final plan review
The Public
The public must have an
opportunity to learn about and
provide input to the plan update.
➢ Use of news releases, social
media, local bulletin boards, and
public meetings or events.
➢ Must document local-level
concerns and mitigation ideas
➢ Consider how to engage with
underserved communities and
vulnerable populations.
PRESENTER : BONNIE HUNDRIESER
POLL #1
Overview of Plan
Content
ANOKA COUNTY 2025 HMP UPDATE
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
Plan Content
Hazard Identification
➢The HMP addresses the natural
hazards that pose risk to the
county and its jurisdictions.
➢ Manmade hazards are not
required to be addressed (per
the DMA 2000).
➢ Hazards that are deemed to be
of low risk may be omitted from
the plan.
➢Hazard risk may differ in cities
and the county overall.
Natural hazard categories as per
the State Hazard Mitigation Plan
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
Plan Content
Risk Assessment
➢History of events
➢Probability of occurrence
➢Severity
➢Climate Change
➢Identify if and how risk priorities have changed
since the last plan. (Increased / Decreased)
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
234
Item 4.
2/22/2025
3
Plan Content
Vulnerability Analysis
➢Inventory of critical infrastructure.
➢Identify specific, local-level impacts and
vulnerabilities.
➢ Includes local-level capabilities assessment that
supports mitigation or identifies gaps
➢Identify any factors (e.g. new development) that
may increase the community’s vulnerability.
➢Review social vulnerability factors.
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
POLL #2
Timeframe for development
& Plan Format
Timeframe:
The planning process generally
occurs over the course of 14-18
months from start to finish.
➢ The Anoka County Plan will be
completed in 2025.
Format:
➢ PDF document (paper version)
➢ Interactive website companion
➢ Developed and hosted by U-
Spatial at UMD
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
Example HMP website
Hazard
Prioritization
REVIEW OF THE HAZARD RISK PRIORITIES FOR
ANOKA COUNTY
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
Anoka County
Past Prioritization of Hazards
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
HAZARD Anoka 2019
Flooding High
Winter Storms Moderate
Windstorms High
Tornadoes Moderate
Hail High
Lightning High
Extreme Cold Moderate
Extreme Heat not profiled
Drought not profiled
Wildfire Moderate
Landslides not profiled
Land Subsidence n/a
Dam/Levee Failure Low
This is at a
county level
POLL #3
Anoka County 2025
Update of Hazard Prioritization
Considerations:
➢Increase/Decrease of events
➢Local vulnerabilities (impacts)
➢New development/population
growth
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
HAZARD Anoka 2025
Flooding
Winter Storms
Windstorms
Tornadoes
Hail
Lightning
Extreme Cold
Extreme Heat
Drought
Wildfire
Landslides
Land Subsidence
Dam/Levee Failure
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
Hazard Prioritization Poll
results and discussion
Do any of these countywide hazards NOT
apply in a city?
235
Item 4.
2/22/2025
4
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
Comments or Questions?
Overview of
Mitigation Actions &
FEMA grants
DEVELOPMENT OF MITIGATION ACTIONS AND
ACTIVITIES ELIGIBLE FOR FEMA HAZARD
MITIGATION ASSISTANCE GRANT FUNDING
PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
Mitigation Action Charts
PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
➢Must address hazards of moderate to high priority.
➢Must address identified local vulnerabilities.
➢Must identify priority, status, timeframe, responsibility, how
incorporation/implementation will occur, and possible funding.
Eligible FEMA HMA grant activities must be identified in the risk
assessment and plan of action.
MACs reflect each jurisdiction’s plan of action to reduce the impacts of
future natural hazard events. They are based on the information
gathered from each community during the planning process.
FEMA HMA
Grant Funding
➢ All applicants must be covered
by an approved HMP and have
formally adopted the plan.
➢ Projects must be addressed in
the risk assessment and be
identified in the plan of action.
▪ Several different grant programs
▪ State Hazard Mitigation Officer is
the main POC for questions
PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
Example eligible grant activities:
▪ Property Acquisition
▪ Tornado Safe Rooms
▪ Burying Powerlines
▪ Wildfire Mitigation
▪ Soil Stabilization
▪ Minor Localized Flood Reduction
▪ Green Infrastructure
▪ “5% Initiative” (e.g. warning
systems, generators, public
awareness/education campaigns)
Overview of
Mitigation Strategies
THE FOLLOWING STRATEGIES ARE RECOMMENDED
GUIDANCE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL
MITIGATION ACTIONS
236
Item 4.
2/22/2025
5
LOCAL PLANNING & REGULATIONS
These actions include policies or codes
that influence the way land is developed
and structures are built, and also
incorporate mitigation into other plans.
▪ Limit or restrict development in floodplain areas
▪ Adopt and enforce building codes
▪ Improve stormwater management planning
▪ Incorporate mitigation into comp plans
▪ Enforce watering / burning restrictions during
periods of drought
PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
STRUCTURE & INFRASTRUCTURE
PROJECTS
These actions protect structures and
infrastructure by changing them or removing
them from danger.
▪ Construction of tornado safe rooms.
▪ Burying powerlines
▪ Property acquisition for properties at risk to
repetitive flooding or failure to landslides
▪ Infrastructure retrofit (upsizing culverts, other road
& bridge projects)
▪ Protection of vulnerable critical infrastructure such
as lift stations and Fire Halls
PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
NATURAL SYSTEMS
PROTECTION
These actions use a natural systems
approach to minimize damage and losses
from natural hazard events.
▪ Tree management near roads & powerlines
▪ Floodplain and stream restoration
▪ Soil stabilization on at-risk slopes
▪ Wildfire fuels reduction & defensible space
▪ Living snow fences to reduce drifting
▪ Rain gardens to slow impacts of rain events
PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
EDUCATION & AWARENESS
PROGRAMS
PRESENTER : BONNIE HUNDRIESER
These actions inform and educate the
community to raise awareness of
hazards and ways to mitigate risk.
▪Promoting sign up for CodeRED etc.
▪Sharing information on severe weather
awareness
▪Promoting personal preparedness
▪Tornado season education
▪Outreach to vulnerable populations
▪Wildfire safety (creation of defensible
space, burning restrictions)
MITIGATION PREPAREDNESS &
&RESPONSE SUPPORT
These actions are typically not considered
mitigation, but support reduction of the
effects of damaging natural hazard events.
▪ Flood fight plans and equipment
▪ Installing generator backup power
▪ Development of EOPs
▪ Shelter planning and training
▪ Working with facilities that care for vulnerable
populations (e.g. schools, nursing homes)
▪ Installation of outdoor warning sirens.
▪ Joining MnWARN for utility disaster mutual aid
PRESENTER : BONNIE HUNDRIESER PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
Comments or Questions?
Do you have any ideas for specific mitigation
activities for implementation?
237
Item 4.
2/22/2025
6
Following Planning Team
Meeting #1
COMPLETION OF LOCAL MITIGATION SURVEY FORMS
Representatives from Anoka County and each city jurisdiction
will participate in filling out Local Mitigation Survey forms.
These forms include:
▪ Local hazard identification & risk prioritization.
▪ Local vulnerabilities (critical infrastructure, populations or assets)
▪ Local-level capabilities (programs, polices, staff, funding)
▪ Review past mitigation actions/identify new mitigation projects.
PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
Questions?
What questions do you have for
U-Spatial@UMD about development of the
HMP or next steps?
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
Contact Information
Stacey Stark, MS, GISP
U-Spatial@UMD
slstark@d.umn.edu
218-726-7438
Bonnie Hundrieser, HM Planner
Hundrieser Consulting LLC
hundrieserconsulting@outlook.com
218-343-3468
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
238
Item 4.
Anoka County HMP Planning Team Meeting #2
12/3/25 Meeting Summary & Documentation
Summary: On December 3, 2025, Anoka County Emergency Management convened key county, city,
and township representatives, as well as neighboring jurisdictions and other stakeholders to participate
in the 2nd and final Planning Team Meeting for the update of the Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan
(HMP). The purpose of the meeting was to formally convene the Anoka County HMP Planning Team for
a presentation on the draft plan and discussion of key items prior to public review and submission of the
plan to HSEM and FEMA. The meeting was held via Zoom webinar video conference and was facilitated
by Stacey Stark and Bonnie Hundrieser of the U-Spatial@UMD project team.
Stakeholder Invitations: Anoka County Emergency Management invited all stakeholders included on
the county’s HMP Update Jurisdictional Contact List (JCL), which includes the key County Contacts, City
Contacts, Township Contacts, Other Stakeholder Contacts, and Neighboring Jurisdiction Contacts
identified to be invited to participate in the plan update process. Contacts were encouraged to engage
additional staff or to send someone in their stead if they could not attend. A copy of the county’s
Jurisdictional Contact List is included with this meeting summary.
Meeting Participants: A total of 50 people attended the meeting. Representation included elected
officials and departmental staff from Anoka County and the cities of Andover, Anoka, Bethel, Blaine,
Centerville, Circle Pines, Columbia Heights, Coon Rapids, East Bethel, Fridley, Ham Lake, Hilltop,
Lexington, Lino Lakes, Oak Grove, Ramsey, St. Francis, and Spring Lake Park. The cities of Bethel,
Columbus, and Nowthen were not available to participate and were not in attendance. Other
stakeholders, including neighboring jurisdictions, participated in the meeting. A participant list is
provided below:
1 Terry Stoltzman Anoka County Emergency Management, Emergency Management Director
2 Jeff Lanenberg, Anoka County Emergency Management, Deputy EM Director
3 Jeffrey Perry, Anoka County Parks, Park Director
4 Colleen Haubner Haubner, Anoka County, Library Director
5 David Zieglmeier, Anoka County, Anoka County Surveyor
6 Jim Plemon, Anoka County Hwy. Dept., Senior Manager, Road Maintenance/Sign Department
7 Dennis Jones, City of Andover Fire Department, Fire Chief/Emergency Management Director
8 Ernie Scherger, City of Andover Fire Department, Deputy Fire Chief
9 Delbert Vancura, City of Anoka Municipal, Utility Electric Director
10 Theodore Anderson, City of Anoka, City Assessor
11 Youngquist Andy, City of Anoka Police Department, Chief
12 Russ Clark, City of Blaine Police Department, Captain / Emergency Manager
13 Mark Boerboom, City of Blaine Police, Captain
14 Matthew Montain, City of Centerville / City of Circle Pines (SBM Fire and Centennial Fire District)
Assistant Chief
15 Daniel Obrien, City of Columbia Heights, Fire Chief/Emergency Manager
16 Brad Roddy, City of Columbia Heights Fire Department, Assistant Fire Chief
17 Adam Jacobson, City of Coon Rapids Police Department, Deputy Chief of Police
239
Item 4.
18 Tim Himmer, City of Coon Rapids, Public Works Director
19 Nate Ayshford, City of East Bethel, Public Works Manager
20 Nick Schmitz, City of East Bethel, Building Official
21 Jeff Cielocha, City of East Bethel, Fire Chief
22 Jason Wiehle, City of Fridley, Utilities Operations Manager
23 Andrew Todd, City of Fridley, Lieutenant / EM
24 Michael Raczkowski, City of Ham Lake Fire Department, Fire Chief
25 Ruth Nelsen, City of Hilltop, City Clerk
26 Bill Petracek, City of Lexington, City Administrator
27 Danial L'Allier, City of Lino Lakes Fire Department, Fire Chief
28 Curt Boehme, City of Lino Lakes Police Department, Chief
29 Robert Engler, City of Oak Grove Fire Department, Fire Chief
30 Brian Hagen, City of Ramsey, City Administrator
31 Matt Kohner, City of Ramsey, Fire Chief/Emergency Management Director
32 Jason Sufka, City of Ramsey Fire Department, Deputy Chief
33 Brad Bluml, City of Ramsey Police Department, Police Chief
34 Tim Frankfurth, City of Ramsey Police Department, Captain
35 Josh Antoine, City of Spring Lake Park Police Department, Chief
36 Todd Schwieger, City of St. Francis, Police Chief
37 Kate Thunstrom, City of St. Francis, Administrator
38 Andrew Luedtke, Linwood Township, Town Supervisor
39 Clifford Anderson, Public Safety Anoka Ramsey and Anoka Tech Colleges, Director
40 Nathan Flansburg, PACT Charter School, Superintendent
41 Jim Skelly, Anoka-Hennepin School District, Executive Director, Communications and Public
Relations
42 Colleen Pederson, Spring Lake Park Schools, ISD 16, Executive Director of Community Education
43 Chris Lindquist, St. Francis Area Schools, Director of Community Education, Safety and Security
Supervisor
44 Jonathan Spitzer, Centennial School District, ISD12, Director of Building and Grounds Operations
45 Karsten Anderson, St. Francis Area Schools, Superintendent
46 Mark Mickelson, Fridley Public Schools, Safety and Security
47 James Larter, Forest Lake Area Schools 831, Buildings and Grounds Supervisor
48 Erik Bye , Coon Creek Watershed District, Planner
49 David Petry, Rice Creek Watershed District, Project Manager
50 Steve Griffiths, Stepping Stone Emergency Housing, Executive Director
Presentation Overview: The PowerPoint presentation covered the following items about the process
and content of the plan update. A PDF of the presentation slides is included with this meeting summary.
Meeting Purpose and Agenda
About the Project Team
Overview of Plan Update
240
Item 4.
Who the Plan Covers
Who Needs to Participate
Overview of the Structure of the HMP (Website and PDF)
Prioritization of Natural Hazards
Review of Risk Assessment Factors and Hazard Profiles
Overview of Mitigation Action Charts and FEMA HMA Grant Funding
Review of Mitigation Strategies and Actions
Open Discussion (Comments and Questions)
Discussion of Next Steps & answer your questions
The opening PowerPoint presentation covered a re-cap of key points about the plan update, a review of
the Risk Assessment & Vulnerability Analysis, an overview of FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA)
grant funding; an overview of how mitigation actions are developed and an overview of the
jurisdictional Mitigation Action Charts (MACs). Following the presentation, participants were provided
with an opportunity to review and discuss the county and local mitigation action charts. This discussion
period offered a facilitated opportunity for participants to consider any changes or new additions to the
MACs prior to completion of the draft plan for public review.
ANOKA COUNTY HMP PLANNING TEAM MEETING #2 DISCUSSION NOTES
Jason Sufka, City of Ramsey Fire Department, Deputy Chief, Regarding CI Map Data: Ramsey Fire has 2
Fire Stations (15050 Armstrong Blvd & 5650 Alpine Blvd). - We will get this corrected on the map.
Terry Stoltzman, Anoka County Emergency Management Director, Regarding Projects for FEMA HMA
Grant Funding: For the MAC and FEMA qualifying projects. If it is listed in one jurisdiction, does it qualify
as a potential project in another jurisdiction. Example - Storm Shelters. Or does each jurisdiction need to
list in their own MAC to qualify for projects eligible for potential grant funding. - For the purposes of a
future HMA grant application, any mitigation projects should be identified as specific to local
jurisdictions or other eligible applicants.
Chris Lindquist St. Francis Area Schools, Director of Community Education, Safety and Security
Supervisor, Regarding Tornado Safe Rooms: St. Francis Area Schools would be interested in exploring
gymnasium tornado shelter opportunities within our school district. Please let me know how best to
explore our options. chris.lindquist@isd15.org - Bonnie will follow up with you to get more
information and get this included.
Meeting Conclusion: The meeting concluded with an overview and timeline of the upcoming next steps
for public review and submission of the draft plan to HSEM and FEMA for final review and approval.
Included with this meeting summary are the following:
- Anoka County HMP Jurisdictional Contact List
- Meeting Invitation to Stakeholders
- PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Meeting Summary Prepared By: Bonnie Hundrieser, U-Spatial@UMD Project Team
241
Item 4.
ANOKA COUNTY HMP JURISDICTIONAL CONTACT LIST
Following is a list of the stakeholders that received an invitation to participate in Planning Team Mtg. #2
and will receive the meeting summary.
Organization / Agency NAME TITLE
Anoka County Emergency Management Terry Stoltzman Emergency Management Director
Anoka County Emergency Management Jeffrey Lanenberg Deputy EM Director
Anoka County Sheriff's Office Brad Wise County Sheriff
Anoka County Administration Jim Dickinson County Administrator
Anoka County Administration Dee Guthman Deputy County Administrator
Anoka County Property Records & Taxation
Division Alex Guggenberger County Assessor
Anoka County GIS John Slusarczyk GIS Manager
Anoka County Surveyor David Zieglmeier County Surveyor
Anoka County Highway Department Joe MacPherson County Engineer
Anoka County Public Health & Envr. Services Jonelle Hubbard PHES Director
Anoka County Public Health & Envr. Services Randi Prebil
Public Health Assistant Director (lead
on emergency preparedness)
Anoka County Public Health & Envr. Services PHEP Coordinator
Anoka County Human Services Cindy Cesare Chief Officer, Human Services
Anoka County Parks Jeff Perry Parks Director
Anoka County Community Social Services George Borrell Social Services Director
Anoka County Economic Assistance Jessica Leth Economic Assistance Director
Anoka County Board of Commissioners John Heinrich District 1 Commissioner
Anoka County Board of Commissioners Julie Braastad District 2 Commissioner
Anoka County Board of Commissioners Jeff Reinert District 3 Commissioner
Anoka County Board of Commissioners Scott Schulte District 4 Commissioner
Anoka County Board of Commissioners Mike Gamache District 5 Commissioner
Anoka County Board of Commissioners Julie Jeppson District 6 Commissioner
Anoka County Board of Commissioners Mandy Meisner District 7 Commissioner
Anoka County Library Colleen Haubner Library Director
Anoka County Economic Development Gregory Frahm-Gilles Economic Development Director
Anoka County Attorney Brad Johnson County Attorney
Anoka County Internal Auditor Chuck Denninger Internal Auditor Director
Anoka County Transit Amy Honer Transportation Operations Director
Anoka County Communications Erik Thorson Chief Communications Officer
City of Andover Sarah Cotton City Administrator
City of Andover Michelle Hartner City Clerk
City of Andover Jamie Barthel Mayor
City of Andover Dennis Jones Fire Chief / Emergency Manager
City of Andover David Berkowitz
Director of Public Works/City
Engineer
City of Andover Joe Heidelberger Building Official
City of Anoka Greg Lee City Manager
City of Anoka Erik Skogquist Mayor
242
Item 4.
City of Anoka Ted Massicotte Fire Chief
City of Anoka Eric Peterson Chief of Police \ Emergency Manager
City of Anoka Mark Anderson Public Services Director
City of Anoka Andy Younguist City of Anoka Police
City of Anoka Ryan Kirby Assessor
City of Anoka Doug Borglund Community Development Director
City of Anoka Municipal Utilities Del Vancura Electric Utility Director
City of Bethel Ginger Berg City Clerk
City of Bethel Todd Miller Mayor
City of Bethel
Mary Wells
Assessor for Bethel, Ham Lake,
Nowthen, St. Francis and Spring Lake
Park, and Centerville
City of Bethel
Erik Sogquist
Assessor for Bethel, Ham Lake,
Nowthen, St. Francis and Spring Lake
Park
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Tim Sanders Mayor
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Michelle Wolfe Manager
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Cathy Sorensen City Clerk
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Dan Huack Building Official
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Dan Retka
Fire Chief (Blaine, Spring Lake Park,
Centerville)
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Brian Podany Police Chief
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Mark Boerboom Police Captain
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Erik Thorvig Community Development Director
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Russ Clark Emergency Management Director
City of Blaine (partly in Ramsey County) Andy Luedtke Fire Inspector for the City of Blaine
City of Centerville Nancy Golden Mayor
City of Centerville Athanasia Lewis Interim City Administrator
City of Centerville Teresa Bender City Clerk
City of Centerville
James Mork
Centennial Lakes Police Chief \
Emergency Management Director
(Centerville, Circle Pines, Lexington)
City of Centerville Matt Montain
Centennial Fire District Assistant
Chief (Centerville / Circle Pines)
City of Centerville Chris Larson Assessor
City of Centerville Athanasia Lewis Community Development
City of Circle Pines David Bartholomay Mayor
City of Circle Pines Patrick Antonen Administrator
City of Circle Pines Chandra Peterson
Assist City Administrator /
Community Development
City of Columbia Heights Amáda Márquez
Simula Mayor
City of Columbia Heights Kevin Hansen
Engineer / Director of Emergency
Management
City of Columbia Heights Aaron Chirpich City Manager
City of Columbia Heights Sara Ion City Clerk
243
Item 4.
City of Columbia Heights Ryan Smith Building Official
City of Columbia Heights Daniel O'Brien Fire Chief
City of Columbia Heights Matt Markham Police Chief
City of Columbia Heights Mitch Forney Community Development Director
City of Columbus Ron Hanegraaf Mayor
City of Columbus Jack Davis Interim City Administrator
City of Columbus Lorie Spangler Deputy City Clerk
City of Columbus Elizabeth Mursko Community Development
City of Columbus Alan Newman
Forest Lake Fire Chief (City of
Columbus)
City of Coon Rapids Jerry Koch Mayor
City of Coon Rapids Matt Stemwedel City Manager
City of Coon Rapids Joan Lenzmeier City Clerk
City of Coon Rapids Rich Gruber Assessor
City of Coon Rapids Tim Himmer City Engineer
City of Coon Rapids Rod Spiering Chief Building Official
City of Coon Rapids John Piper Fire Chief
City of Coon Rapids Bill Steiner
Police Chief / Director of Emergency
Management
City of Coon Rapids Aaron Johnston Assistant Fire Chief
City of Coon Rapids Adam Jacobson Deputy Chief
City of Coon Rapids Matt Brown Community Development Director
City of East Bethel Ardie Anderson Mayor
City of East Bethel Matt Look
City Administrator / City Clerk / City
Treasurer
City of East Bethel Nick Schmitz Building Official
City of East Bethel Nate Ayshford Public Works Manager
City of East Bethel Rod Sanow
Fire Chief / Emergency Management
Director
City of East Bethel Aaron Berg Community Development Director
City of Fridley Dave Ostwald Mayor
City of Fridley Wally Wysopal Manager
City of Fridley Joe Starks Finance Director / Treasurer
City of Fridley Melissa Moore City Clerk
City of Fridley Tony DeForge Chief Building Official
City of Fridley Pat Maghrak Assessor
City of Fridley Jim Kosluchar Public Works Director
City of Fridley Ryan George
Public Safety Director / Emergency
Management Director
City of Fridley Maddison Zikmund Deputy Director - Fire Chief
City of Fridley Scott Hickok Community Development
City of Fridley Patrick Faber City of Fridley - Police Division
City of Ham Lake Brian Kirkham Mayor
City of Ham Lake Denise Webster City Administrator
City of Ham Lake Dawnette Shimek City Clerk
244
Item 4.
City of Ham Lake Mark Jones Building Official / Zoning Official
City of Ham Lake Mike Raczkowski
Fire Chief / Emergency Management
Director
City of Ham Lake Jennifer Bohr Building / Planning Clerk
City of Hilltop Terry Wiggin Mayor
City of Hilltop Ruth Nelsen City Clerk / Community Development
City of Hilltop Matt Johnson Public Works Director
City of Lexington Mike Murphy Mayor
City of Lexington Bill Petracek
City Administrator / Community
Development
City of Lexington Mary Vinzant Deputy City Clerk
City of Lexington Erik Edwards Fire Chief
City of Lino Lakes Rob Rafferty Mayor
City of Lino Lakes David Pecchia Interim City Administrator
City of Lino Lakes Roberta Colotti City Clerk
City of Lino Lakes Diane Hankee City Engineer
City of Lino Lakes Patrick Moonen Building Official
City of Lino Lakes John Swenson
Public Safety Director / Emergency
Management Director
City of Lino Lakes Dan L'Allier Deputy Director - Fire Division
City of Lino Lakes Kyle Leibel Deputy Director - Police Division
City of Lino Lakes Curt Boehme Interim Public Director
City of Lino Lakes Michael Grochala Community Development Director
City of Nowthen Shane Hybben Mayor
City of Nowthen Joe Glaze Public Works Supervisor
City of Nowthen Administrator
City of Nowthen Natalie Johnson Deputy Clerk
City of Nowthen Rob Miller Interim Fire Chief
City of Nowthen Cindy Nash Community Development
City of Oak Grove Loren Wickham
City Administrator / Community
Development
City of Oak Grove Matt Anderson Director of Public Works
City of Oak Grove Rob Engler
Fire Chief / Emergency Manager (St
Francis, Nowthen, Bethel)
City of Oak Grove Weston Rolf Mayor
City of Oak Grove Billi Larson Deputy City Clerk / Elections
City of Oak Grove Andy Schreder
Building Official (Oak Grove, Hilltop,
Circle Pines, Nowthen,Linwood Twp)
City of Ramsey Ryan Heineman Mayor
City of Ramsey Brian Hagen City Administrator
City of Ramsey Katie Schmidt City Clerk
City of Ramsey Bruce Westby City Engineer / Public Works Director
City of Ramsey Thomas Knight Assistant Building Official
City of Ramsey Matt Kohner
Fire Chief / Emergency Management
Director
245
Item 4.
City of Ramsey Brad Bluml Police Chief
City of Ramsey Stephanie Hanson Community Development Director
City of St. Francis Mark Vogel Mayor
City of St. Francis Kate Thunstrom
City Administrator - Co-Emergency
Management Director
City of St. Francis Jenni Wida Deputy Administrator / City Clerk
City of St. Francis
Dave Schmidt
Fire Chief / Deputy Director
Emergency Management
(Emergency Manager -Nowthen,
Bethel)
City of St. Francis Craig Jochum Engineer
City of St. Francis Phil Dahlheimer Building Official
City of St. Francis Todd Schwieger
Police Chief / Director Emergency
Management
City of St. Francis Jessica Rieland Community Development
City of Spring Lake Park (partly in Ramsey
County) Robert (Bob) Nelson Mayor
City of Spring Lake Park (partly in Ramsey
County) Daniel Buchholtz Administrator / City Clerk
City of Spring Lake Park (partly in Ramsey
County) Wanda Brown Deputy City Clerk
City of Spring Lake Park (partly in Ramsey
County) Jeff Baker Building Official
City of Spring Lake Park (partly in Ramsey
County) Josh Antoine
Police Chief / Emergency
Management Director
City of Spring Lake Park (partly in Ramsey
County) Matt Montain
Assistant Fire Chief / Assistant Chief
of Emergency Management
Linwood Township Alyssa Dehn Township Accountant / Treasurer
Linwood Township Vacant Township Clerk
Linwood Township Darryl Ballman Fire Chief
Linwood Township John Olson Town Board Chairman
Linwood Township Lisa Henrickson Township Board Member
Linwood Township Andy Luedtke Township Board Member
LOCAL & REGIONAL AGENCIES
INVOLVED IN HAZARD MITIGATION
MN HSEM Jon Dotterer
Region 6 Regional Program
Coordinator
Anoka Conservation District Chris Lord District Manager
Anoka Conservation District Mitch Haustein Stormwater and Shoreland Specialist
Anoka Conservation District Jamie Schurbon Watershed Projects Manager
Anoka Conservation District Kathy Kerkness Office Administrator
MN DNR DNR Ecological & Water Resources
Division Wes Saunders-Pearce
Region 3 Metro North Area
Hydrologist
MnDOT Metro District Khani Sahebjam District Engineer
Upper Rum River Watershed Management
Organization John West Board Chair
246
Item 4.
Lower Rum River Watershed Management
Organization Carla Wirth Administrative Secretary
Lower Rum River Watershed Management
Organization Stephanie Johnson Senior Water Resources Engineer
Coon Creek Watershed District Tim Kelly District Administrator
Coon Creek Watershed District Jon Janke Director of Operations
Coon Creek Watershed District Erik Bye Planning Coordinator
Rice Creek Watershed District Nick Tomczik District Administrator
Rice Creek Watershed District Theresa Stasica Office Manager
Sunrise River Watershed Management
Organization Jamie Schurbon Water Resource Specialist
Vadnais Lake Area Watershed Management
Organization Phil Belfiori Administrator
Coon Lake Improvement District Al Beck District Chair
Mississippi Watershed Management
Organization Kevin Reich Executive Director
Mississippi Watershed Management
Organization MWMO MWMO Contacts Email Address
BUSINESSES, ACADEMIA, AND OTHER PRIVATE
ORGS. Allina EMS Brent Baker EMS Supervisor
American Red Cross Morgan Sommers Disaster Program Manager
American Red Cross Rachel Sullivan-
Nightengale EM Coordinator
Fairview Clinics Chris Kissell Emergency Manager
M Health Kevin Kane EMS Supervisor
Salvation Army Michele Heaver Division Disaster Services
Connexus Energy Rod Morton Risk and Recovery Manager
NONPROFIT ORGS/COMMUNITY-BASED ORGS
THAT WORK WITH UNDERSERVED
COMMUNITIES AND SOCIALLY VULNERABLE
POPULATIONS Anoka-Hennepin ISD 11 Cory McIntyre Superintendent
Anoka-Hennepin ISD 11 Michelle Trelstad
Executive Director, Community
Education and Govt Relations
Anoka-Hennepin ISD 11
Jim Skelly
Executive Director of
Communications and Public
Relations
Centennial ISD 12 Jeff Holmberg Superintendent
Centennial ISD 12 Krista Bergert
Director of Public Information and
Community Outreach
Centennial ISD 12 Jody Josephson Assist to Superintendent
Centennial ISD 12 Johnathan Spitzer Director of Buildings and Grounds
Columbia Heights Public Schools ISD 13 Zena Stenvik Superintendent
Columbia Heights Public Schools ISD 13 Stephanie Alvarez
Elections Liaison / Exec Assistant to
Superintendent
247
Item 4.
Fridley ISD 14 Brenda Lewis Superintendent
Fridley ISD 14 Lori Andler Director of Administrative Services
Fridley ISD 14 Rochelle Cox
Senior Officer of Operations and
System Alignment
St Francis ISD 15 Karsten Anderson Superintendent
St Francis ISD 15 Vanessa Tolle Assistant to Superintendent
Spring Lake Park ISD 16 Jeff Ronneberg Superintendent
Spring Lake Park ISD 16 Ivonne Padilla Executive Assistant
White Bear Lake ISD 624 Dr. Wayne A.
Kazmierczak Superintendent
White Bear Lake ISD 624 Rachael Markuson Assistant to Superintendent
Elk River Area ISD 728 Andrew Almos Superintendent
Elk River Area ISD 728 Shannon Buckingham Senior Administrative Assistant
Forest Lake ISD 831 Steve D. Massey Superintendent
Forest Lake ISD 831 Kari Damon Administrative Assistant
PACT Charter School (Ramsey, MN) Nathan Flansburg Superintendent
Anoka Ramsey Community College Clifford Anderson Public Safety Director
United Way Julie Ogunleye
DIRECTOR, 211 RESOURCE HELPLINE
AND 988 SUICIDE & CRISIS LIFELINE
United Way Sherry Sanchez
Tibbetts
VICE PRESIDENT, DIVERSITY, EQUITY
& INCLUSION
Hope For Youth LaChelle Williams Executive Director
Alexandra House Connie Moore Executive Director
Anoka County Community Action Program Patrick McFarland Executive Director
Alexandra House John Blamo Director of Operations
Rise Inc Judy Andersen Director of Community Programs
Stepping Stone Emergency Housing Steve Griffiths Executive Director
NEIGHBORING JURISDICTIONS
Isanti County Emergency Management Clinton Maxon Emergency Manager
Chisago County Emergency Management Scott Sellman Director of Emergency Management
Washington County Emergency Management Doug Berglund Emergency Services Manager
Ramsey County Emergency Management Judd Freed Director
Hennepin County Emergency Management Eric Waage Director
Sherburne County Emergency Management Kyle Breffle Director
Wright County Seth Hansen Director
248
Item 4.
From:Jeffrey Lanenberg
To:Terry Stoltzman; Jeffrey Lanenberg; Ryan Kelzenberg; Brad Wise; Jim Dickinson; Dee Guthman; Alex
Guggenberger; John Slusarczyk; David Zieglmeier; Joe MacPherson; Jonelle Hubbard; Randi Prebil;
Cindy.Cesare@anokacountymn.gov; Jeff Perry; George Borrell; Jessica Leth; John Heinrich; Julie Braastad; Jeff
Reinert; Scott Schulte; Mike Gamache; Julie Jeppson; Mandy Meisner; Colleen Haubner; Gregory Frahm-Gilles;
Brad Johnson; Chuck Denninger; Amy Honer; Erik Thorson; s.cotton@andovermn.gov;
m.hartner@andovermn.gov; cm.barthel@andovermn.gov; d.jones@andovermn.gov;
D.Berkowitz@andovermn.gov; j.heidelberger@andovermn.gov; Greg Lee; erikskogquist@ci.anoka.mn.us;
tmassicotte@ci.anoka.mn.us; epeterson@ci.anoka.mn.us; manderson@ci.anoka.mn.us;
ayoungquist@ci.anoka.mn.us; rkirby@ci.anoka.mn.us; dborglund@ci.anoka.mn.us; dvancura@ci.anoka.mn.us;
info@bethelmn.gov; info@bethelmn.gov; mnassessormary@gmail.com; mnassessorerik@gmail.com;
tsanders@blainemn.gov; mwolfe@blainemn.gov; csorensen@blainemn.gov; dhauck@blainemn.gov; Dan Retka;
bpodany@blainemn.gov; mboerboom@blainemn.gov; ethorvig@blainemn.gov; rclark@blainemn.gov;
aluedtke@blainemn.gov; ngolden@centervillemn.com; alewis@centervillemn.com; tbender@centervillemn.com;
Jim Mork; Matt Montain; mnassessorchris@gmail.com; alewis@centervillemn.com; dbartholomay@ci.circle-
pines.mn.us; pantonen@ci.circle-pines.mn.us; cpeterson@ci.circle-pines.mn.us;
amarquezsimula@columbiaheightsmn.gov; khansen@columbiaheightsmn.gov;
achirpich@columbiaheightsmn.gov; sion@columbiaheightsmn.gov; rsmith@columbiaheightsmn.gov;
dobrien@columbiaheightsmn.gov; MMarkham@columbiaheightsmn.gov; mforney@columbiaheightsmn.gov;
mayor@ci.columbus.mn.us; intcityadmin@ci.columbus.mn.us; deputyclerk@ci.columbus.mn.us; Elizabeth x.
Mursko; alan.newman@ci.forest-lake.mn.us; jkoch@coonrapidsmn.gov; mstemwedel@coonrapidsmn.gov;
jlenzmeier@coonrapidsmn.gov; rgruber@coonrapidsmn.gov; thimmer@coonrapidsmn.gov;
rspiering@coonrapidsmn.gov; jpiper@coonrapidsmn.gov; bsteiner@coonrapidsmn.gov;
ajohnston@coonrapidsmn.gov; aJacobson@coonrapidsmn.gov; mbrown@coonrapidsmn.gov;
ardie.anderson@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; matt.look@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; Nick.schmitz@ci.east-bethel.mn.us;
Nate.ayshford@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; Rod.sanow@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; aaron.berg@ci.east-bethel.mn.us;
dave.ostwald@fridleymn.gov; wally.wysopal@fridleymn.gov; Joe.starks@fridleymn.gov;
melissa.moore@fridleymn.gov; Tony.deforge@fridleymn.gov; pat.maghrak@fridleymn.gov;
jim.kosluchar@fridleymn.gov; ryan.george@fridleymn.gov; maddison.zikmund@fridleymn.gov;
scott.hickok@fridleymn.gov; Patrick.faber@fridleymn.gov; bkirkham@hamlakemn.gov;
dwebster@hamlakemn.gov; dshimek@hamlakemn.gov; mjones@hamlakemn.gov;
mraczkowski@hamlakemn.gov; Jbohr@hamlakemn.gov; rnelsen@hilltop.govoffice.com;
michael.murphy@cityoflexingtonmn.org; bill.petracek@cityoflexingtonmn.org;
mary.vinzant@cityoflexingtonmn.org; erik.edwards@cityoflexingtonmn.org; RRafferty@linolakes.us;
dpecchia@linolakes.us; RColotti@linolakes.us; DHankee@linolakes.us; PMoonen@linolakes.us;
JSwenson@linolakes.us; dlallier@linolakes.us; KLeibel@linolakes.us; CBoehme@linolakes.us;
mgrochala@linolakes.us; MayorHybben@nowthenmn.net; jglaze@nowthenmn.net; Natalie Johnson;
rmiller@nowthenmn.net; cnash@collaborative-planning.com; lwickham@ci.oak-grove.mn.us; manderson@ci.oak-
grove.mn.us; rengler@ci.oak-grove.mn.us; wrolf@ci.oak-grove.mn.us; blarson@ci.oak-grove.mn.us;
andy@rumrivercc.com; rheineman@cityoframsey.com; Brian Hagen; kschmidt@cityoframsey.com;
bwestby@cityoframsey.com; tknight@cityoframsey.com; mkohner@cityoframsey.com;
bbluml@cityoframsey.com; shanson@cityoframsey.com; mvogel@stfrancismn.gov;
kate.thunstrom@stfrancismn.org; jwida@stfrancismn.org; dschmidt@stfrancismn.org; craigj@haa-inc.com;
pdahlheimer@stfrancismn.org; tschwieger@stfrancismn.org; jrieland@stfrancismn.gov; rnelson@slpmn.org;
dbuchholtz@slpmn.org; wbrown@slpmn.org; jbaker@slpmn.org; jantoine@slpmn.org; Mmontain@sbmfire.org;
treasurer@linwoodtownship.org; info@linwoodtownship.org; darryl.ballman@linwoodtownship.org;
John.Olson@linwoodtownship.org; andrew.luedtke@linwoodtownship.org; Jon.Dotterer@state.mn.us;
chris.lord@anokaswcd.org; mitch.haustein@anokaswcd.org; jamie.schurbon@anokaswcd.org;
kathy.berkness@anokaswcd.org; Wes.Saunders-Pearce@state.mn.us; khani.sahebjam@state.mn.us;
John@IPSSEC.com; timesaver.secretarial@gmail.com; Stephanie.johnson@barr.com; tkelly@cooncreekwd.org;
jjanke@cooncreekwd.org; ebye@cooncreekwd.org; ntomczik@ricecreek.org; tstasica@ricecreek.org;
jamie.schurbon@anokaswcd.org; phil.belfiori@vlawmo.org; office@vlawmo.org; kreich@mwmo.org;
contacts@mwmo.org; brent.baker@allina.com; morgan.sommers@redcross.org;
rachel.sullivannight@redcross.org; ckissel1@fairview.org; kmkane@healtheast.org;
michele.heaver@usc.salvationarmy.org; Rod.Morton@connexusenergy.com; Cory.McIntyre@ahschools.us;
Michelle.trelstad@ahschools.us; jim.skelly@ahschools.us; jholmberg@isd12.org; kbergert@isd12.org;
jjosephson@isd12.org; jspitzer@isd12.org; stenvikz@colheights.k12.mn.us; alvarezs@colheights.k12.mn.us;
lewis@isd14.org; andler@isd14.org; cox@isd14.org; Karsten Anderson; vanessa.tolle@isd15.org;
jronne@district16.org; ipadil@district16.org; wayne.kazmierczak@isd624.org; rachael.markuson@isd624.org;
andrew.almos@isd728.org; shannon.buckingham@isd728.org; smassey@flaschools.org; kdamon@flaschools.org;
n.flansburg@pactcharter.org; Clifford.Anderson@anokaramsey.edu; julie.ogunleye@gtcuw.org;
sherry.sancheztibbetts@gtcuw.org; lwilliams@hope4youthmn.org; cmoore@alexandrahouse.org;
PMcfarland@accap.org; jblamo@alexandrahouse.org; jandersen@rise.org; steve.griffiths@steppingstoneeh.org;
clinton.maxson@co.isanti.mn.us; Scott.Sellman@chisagocountymn.gov; douglas.berglund@co.washington.mn.us;
judd.freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; eric.waage@co.hennepin.mn.us; kyle.breffle@co.sherburne.mn.us;
Seth.Hansen@co.wright.mn.us
Cc:hundrieserconsulting@outlook.com; slstark@d.umn.edu
Subject:Anoka County - Hazard Mitigation Plan Update - Meeting Invitation
Date:Friday, November 7, 2025 12:32:01 PM
Attachments:image001.png
ANOKA COUNTY
249
Item 4.
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE – MEETING INVITATION
Greetings,
Your presence is requested at the 2nd and final Planning Team Meeting for the update of the Anoka
County Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP). You are requested to participate in this vital meeting because
you have a position of administrative or departmental responsibility within either the county, a
municipal government, or are a key stakeholder related to the planning process. Emergency
Managers from neighboring jurisdictions are also encouraged to attend so we may strengthen our
shared mitigation efforts.
Please note that all 20 cities + Linwood Township should seek to have at least one representative
at this meeting.
We will be holding the meeting virtually using Zoom webinar. Please click on the link below to
register.
Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2025
Time: 9:00 – 10:30 a.m.
Register here for the meeting
The purpose of this meeting is to provide an overview of the plan and interactive website, including
a review of the updated risk assessment for natural hazards that affect the county. We will also
discuss the Mitigation Action Charts that will be specific to Anoka County and each city, as well as
funding opportunities available under the FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grant programs.
Your participation in this meeting and feedback on the draft plan is important to us. The draft Anoka
County HMP is nearing completion and will be ready for review by planning team members and the
public in the coming weeks.
When you register, you will automatically be placed on an RSVP list. If you are not able to attend,
please consider sending another representative in your stead.
Thank you,
Jeffrey Lanenberg, Deputy Director
Anoka County Emergency Management
Jeffrey.Lanenberg@anokacountymn.gov
Office: 763/324-4762
Cell: 612/401-7659
250
Item 4.
NOTICE: Unless restricted by law, email correspondence to and from Anoka County
government offices may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act and/or
may be disclosed to third parties.
251
Item 4.
12/3/2025
1
Anoka County
Hazard Mitigation Plan
Update 2025
Planning Team Meeting #2
December 3, 2025
Welcome & Introductions
U-Spatial@UMD Project Leads
Bonnie Hundrieser
HM Planning Specialist
Hundrieser Consulting LLC
Stacey Stark
Project Manager
U-Spatial@UMD
PRESENTER: STACEY STARK
Please type your name and jurisdiction in the CHAT –so others know who is here
Anoka County Project Lead
▪Terry Stoltzman, Anoka County
Emergency Management Director
▪Jeffrey Lanenberg, Deputy
Emergency Management Director
Zoom Logistics
PLEASE REMAIN MUTED AND VIDEO OFF SO
EVERYONE CAN HAVE THE BEST EXPERIENCE.
USE CHAT:
⮚Send a message to everyone
⮚Send a message to individuals or the presenters
⮚Send a message to host to ask for help or ask a question
that isn’t for the whole group. The host is Stacey Stark
ASK TO SPEAK:
PRESENTER: STACEY STARK
Meeting Purpose
& Agenda
This meeting formally
convenes the Anoka
County HMP Planning
Team for a presentation
on the draft plan and
discussion of key items
prior to public review and
submission of the plan to
HSEM and FEMA.
Agenda
⮚Recap of Key HMP Points
⮚Preview of Deliverables
⮚Review of Risk Assessment &
Vulnerability Analysis in Website
⮚Overview of FEMA HMA Funding
and Mitigation Action Charts
⮚Review & Feedback
⮚Next Steps
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
Overview of Plan Update
▪Anoka County is updating its Hazard
Mitigation Plan (HMP) to fulfill a state &
federal requirement.
▪The plan must be updated every 5
years. Anoka County’s last plan was
adopted in 2019.
▪The purpose of the plan is to identify &
assess natural hazards that pose risk to
the county and its jurisdictions and
develop long-term strategies and
mitigation actions that will help to
reduce or eliminate the impact of future
hazard or disaster events.
Hazard Mitigation is any action taken to reduce or eliminate
long term risk to people and
property from natural disasters.
PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
Who the Plan Covers
PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
This is a multi-jurisdictional plan
that covers Anoka County, including
all 20 cities and 1 township within
the county.
The plan also takes into consideration the needs
and concerns of other stakeholders such as
schools, watershed districts, and agencies or
organizations involved in mitigation or services
to vulnerable populations within the county.
252
Item 4.
12/3/2025
2
Stakeholder
Involvement
Planning Team
▪Representatives from: Anoka County, all 20 cities & Linwood
Township, neighboring jurisdictions, and related agencies or
organizations.
▪Participation in planning team meetings, public outreach, local
mitigation survey, provision of spatial or other data, and review
of draft plan.
The Public
▪Opportunity to learn about the plan and provide feedback on
local-level concerns, mitigation ideas, and review of draft plan.
PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
DeliverablesPDF document:
•All FEMA required elements
•Limited figures & images
•Integrated links to website
•Local mitigation surveys
•Plans & programs in place
•Past mitigation action review
•Planning team meetings
•Outreach & engagement
documentation
PRESENTER: STACEY STARK
Website companion:
•Links to PDF components
•Interactive maps and context
•Critical infrastructure and assets
•Simple, concise explanations
•Public input form on site
•Risk and vulnerability
of each hazard
•Mitigation actions!
Both formats
Prioritization of Hazards
for Anoka County
⮚Probability and Severity of
natural hazard events (risk)
⮚Observed increase or
decrease in risk since last
plan
⮚Jurisdictional variations in
risk (i.e., local vulnerabilities,
changes in development)
PRESENTER: STACEY STARK
Natural Hazards Current Priority
Flooding High
Windstorms High
Tornadoes High
Winter Storms Moderate
Hail Moderate
Lightning Moderate
Extreme Cold Moderate
Extreme Heat Moderate
Wildfire Moderate
Drought Low
Landslides Low
Land Subsidence Low
Dam/Levee Failure Low
Hazards Risk
Assessment
⮚Validates the prioritization of
hazards
⮚Provides probability and severity
of future events as possible
⮚Identifies vulnerable populations
and structures at risk as possible
⮚Considers variable geographic
vulnerability
⮚Informs Mitigation Actions in the
HMP
PRESENTER: STACEY STARK
Website Demo
z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Comments and Questions?
253
Item 4.
12/3/2025
3
Overview of
Mitigation Action Charts
Mitigation Action Charts are the end product of the HMP.
They demonstrate a community’s 5-year plan to:
▪Reduce future risk to natural hazard events.
▪Address local vulnerabilities through targeted activities.
▪Utilize local capabilities to implement actions.
Eligible FEMA HMA grant activities must be identified in the
plan of action.
PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
“Previous Integration
of HMP”
In addition to jurisdictional review
of local mitigation action charts:
➢Participating jurisdictions
(county and cities) must provide
a description of how the past
HMP was integrated into other
planning mechanisms.
➢If information from the prior
HMP was not integrated, this
just be stated (and if possible,
why).
What are “Planning Mechanisms”?
▪Plans, Policies, Ordinances
▪Public Education & Outreach
▪Implementation of projects (i.e.,
warning sirens, flood mitigation,
installation of generators)
▪Other EM related programs or
projects (i.e., shelter planning)
▪County and partner coordination
FEMA Mitigation
Grant Funding
Examples of eligible grant activities:
•Property Acquisition
•Tornado Safe Rooms
•Bury Overhead Powerlines
•Wildfire Mitigation
•Soil Stabilization
•Flood Risk Reduction
•Green Infrastructure
•Other projects may be eligible (i.e.,
tornado warning sirens, generators
for critical facilities)
FEMA's hazard mitigation assistance
provides funding for eligible long-
term solutions that reduce the
impact of future disasters.
▪All applicants must be covered by
an approved HMP and have
formally adopted the plan.
▪Projects must be addressed in the
risk assessment and be identified
in the plan of action.
PRESENTER: BONNIE HUNDRIESER
Strategy #1 -
Local Planning & Regulations
Anoka County Examples:
▪Enforcement of ordinances that reduce
impacts of high rain events
▪Development of stormwater plans and
transportation improvement plans
▪Coordination with watershed districts on
local flood mitigation
▪Enforcement of state or local regulations
for new development.
▪Wildfire –Forestry plans, CWPP
PRESENTER : BONNIE HUNDRIESER
254
Item 4.
12/3/2025
4
Strategy #2 -Structure &
Infrastructure Projects
Anoka County Examples:
▪Installation of new outdoor warning sirens
▪Construction of tornado safe rooms (retrofit or new
construction)
▪Utility retrofit projects (i.e., burying power lines)
▪Property buyouts for flooding
▪Local stormwater management improvement
projects
▪Wildfire –Installation of External Wildfire Sprinkler
Systems and Metal Roofing
PRESENTER : BONNIE HUNDRIESER
Strategy #3 -
Natural Systems Protection
Anoka County Examples:
▪Conduct vegetation management along roads
to reduce the risk of downed trees and branches
resulting from heavy snow, ice, or high winds.
▪CCWD –Stormwater storage, conveyance and
floodplain restoration projects to improve
localized flooding
▪Other examples:
▪Planting Living Snow Fences to reduce snow
drifting
▪Installing Rain Gardens to reduce impacts of high
rain events
▪Wildland fuels reduction in wildland urban
interface areas
PRESENTER : BONNIE HUNDRIESER
Strategy #4 -Education &
Awareness Programs
PRESENTER : BONNIE HUNDRIESER
Anoka County Examples:
▪Promoting sign-up for emergency
notifications (city / county).
▪Multi-Lingual Improvements
▪Participation in the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Weeks and
Skywarn Storm Spotter Training
▪Public education on requirements for
burn permits and recreational fire
regulations.
▪Promoting MN DNR Firewise and
information on defensible space
Strategy #5 -Mitigation
Preparedness & Response Support
Anoka County Examples:
▪Obtaining generators for backup power
▪Update of county EOP
▪Shelter planning
▪Working with MHPs and LTC Facilities
▪Testing of outdoor warning sirens.
▪Work to improve delivery of multi-lingual
emergency information
▪EM training and exercises
PRESENTER : BONNIE HUNDRIESER
Comments and Questions?December, 2025
Review of Draft Plan
and Public Review &
Comment Period
Following Planning Team Mtg. #2
➢Completion of City MAC reviews
+ description of “Previous
Integration of Past HMP”
➢Internal review of draft plan
➢Public review & comment
period (News Release #2) –
documentation of local postings
PRESENTER : BONNIE HUNDRIESER
255
Item 4.
12/3/2025
5
Dec 2025 –Jan 2026
Draft Plan Submission
to HSEM & FEMA, Plan
Approval, and
Collection of Adopting
Resolutions
⮚Draft plan will be submitted first
to HSEM and then to FEMA for
approval for meeting all Federal
requirements.
⮚Typically requires 1-2 months.
⮚FEMA “APA” letter
⮚EM coordination of adopting
resolutions and submission to
HSEM.
⮚Final FEMA approval letter
PRESENTER : BONNIE HUNDRIESER
Questions?
What questions do you have for
U-Spatial@UMD about the draft HMP or
next steps ?
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
Contact Information
Stacey Stark, MS, GISP
U-Spatial@UMD
slstark@d.umn.edu
218-726-7438
Bonnie Hundrieser, HM Planner
Hundrieser Consulting LLC
hundrieserconsulting@outlook.com
218-343-3468
PRESENTER : STACEY STARK
256
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Appendix G – Public Outreach &
Engagement Documentation
257
Item 4.
Anoka County HMP News Release #1
Record of Public Input & Incorporation
Overview: On September 18, 2024 Anoka County Emergency Management put out a news release titled
“Public Input Wanted as Anoka County Updates Hazard Mitigation Plan” to announce the start of the
county’s Hazard Mitigation Plan. The news release provided information on the purpose and content of
the plan, who the plan covers, stakeholders involved in the plan update and examples of hazard
mitigation activities. Anoka County used the news release to gather feedback from residents and
businesses from across the county to incorporate into the plan, inviting feedback to the following:
• What are the natural hazards you feel pose the greatest risk to your community?
• Are there specific populations or assets in your community that you feel are more vulnerable
to future storm events?
• What concerns do you have, and what sorts of actions do you feel would help to reduce
damages of future hazard events in your community or the county as a whole?
The public was strongly encouraged contact Anoka County Emergency Management to submit
comments, concerns, or questions regarding natural disasters and potential mitigation actions to be
included into the plan update process. The public was also able to post comments electronically on
county or city Facebook sites where the news release was posted.
Distribution: The news release was sent via email to the county’s HMP Jurisdictional Contact List, which
includes the names, titles, phone numbers, and email addresses of key stakeholders to be engaged in
the HMP update, including county, city, and township contacts; other related agency and organizational
stakeholder contacts, and neighboring jurisdiction contacts. (A copy of the Jurisdictional Contact List
can be found in Appendix F). The news release was additionally sent to local media contacts with a
request to carry the news release.
Postings: Attached is documentation of the news release postings by Anoka County, participating
jurisdictions, local media, and other stakeholders. Cities and townships were encouraged to help share
the news release locally by posting it on their websites, social media, or community bulletin boards.
Public Input & Incorporation:
Following is a record of public responses to the news release and how their input will be incorporated
into the plan update, and if not relevant to be addressed, why.
Following is feedback that was received via email and via social media:
Anonymous Comment (Regarding Dead Trees)
One thing I have noticed is the number of dead trees all over the county. They are both city trees and on
private property. This has been a stressful time with the drought for all trees. If we have a severe storm,
258
Item 4.
there will be substantial damage to homes and businesses (from downed trees). People are taking a risk,
because they don't notice or can't afford the cost.
Incorporation: The Anoka County HMP planning process will include vegetation management as a
strategy for Anoka County and local communities to reduce the risks of downed trees and limbs due to
severe storms. Communities may also consider strategies such as planting new tree species that are less
susceptible to disease.
City of Anoka Resident (Regarding blizzard or large snow events)
I've noticed in the city of Anoka my street can go a couple days without being plowed when
we have a snow event. People still try to drive through the snow but coming around the
corner they have trouble making it around then trying to accelerate is difficult, so cars get
stuck in the same spot. Even police cars have difficulty. On garbage day, the trucks have to
make a few attempts to get down our street. The city of Coon Rapids also has issues plowing main street
when we have snow events. One thing I have noticed with county roads while traveling from Anoka to
Coon Rapids for work is that every county road i had to travel was always pristine. Those roads were
plowed and treated. Thank you.
Incorporation: The Anoka County HMP planning process will encourage communities to consider their
preparedness to handle extreme winter events such as blizzards and heavy snow. However, snow
removal policies are addressed by local governments. The focus of hazard mitigation actions for heavy
snow/blizzard events is recommended to focus more on public preparedness to protect life safety, or
the enforcement of building codes for new development so structures such as roofs to not fail due to
heavy snow loads.
City of Coon Rapids Resident (Regarding frequent power outages)
Thank you for providing the opportunity to share experiences related to severe weather. We experience
frequent electrical outages at our house and in our neighborhood. Seems we have multiple outages
every year. Usually the outages here impact 150 customers. It seems that due to the relatively small
number of customers impacted our repairs are not the highest priority. This year alone we have had two
outages that required us to throw away perishables in our refrigerator. Around July 14 we were without
power for 32 hours and on August 26 we lost power for I believe 14 hours or more. It has gotten to the
point that two of our nearby neighbors have purchased whole home backup generators and we are
toying with the idea. Not an expense we are eager to undertake as retirees. Our power lines are above
ground and some lines meander along the hillside edge of the Mississippi flood plain across the street
from us. The crews often seem to have a very difficult time locating the problem location. When the new
Port Riverwalk development, adjacent to our neighborhood, was being planned the plan was to move
power lines underground but that did not happen. Please feel free to contact me if you care to.
Incorporation: The Anoka County HMP plan update will encourage municipal and rural electric
communities, and the communities they serve, to consider where there are opportunities for
infrastructure retrofits (converting overhead powerlines to underground) in order to reduce the risk of
extended power outages. The Anoka County HMP will also include mitigation actions that encourage
communities to promote residents to be aware of and prepared for extended power outages (such as
the purchase of personal generators).
259
Item 4.
Riverdale Village (Cook Rapids) Maintenance Coordinator (Regarding Tree Limbs/Dying Trees)
To whom it may concern, At the Riverdale Village Shopping Center, the hazards that pose the greatest
risks to our community during severe weather events would be tree limbs These tree limbs not only pose
a risk to costumers and tenants as well as their personal property but also cause large amounts of debris
to either be washed down the storm sewer drains into the watershed or cause large debris to block storm
sewer drains so they cannot effectively drain the water from areas. The trees that are most impacted by
severe weather events are ones that have weak limbs. These could be trees that are dead or trees that
have been infected with a disease like Emerald Ash Bore for example. We believe it would be beneficial if
there was a grant to help commercial properties with the cost of either the removal or the replacement
of these trees. This grant would allow commercial properties to remove or replace more trees that pose a
potential risk to the community as well as maintaining a presentable appearance. Thank you for your
time and consideration in this manner.
Incorporation: The Anoka County HMP planning process will include vegetation management as a
strategy for Anoka County and local communities to reduce the risks of downed trees and limbs due to
severe storms. Communities may also consider strategies such as planting new tree species that are less
susceptible to disease.
City of Facebook Page - Comments to News Release, 10/25/24
It would be really great to have programs for low-interest or low-cost AC system repair or purchase. The
air went out in my house last summer and it is super expensive to fix it. I have been in Mercy ER with
heat issues before and so now I leave and don't get the work done I need to get done in the house. I also
had tree branches fall on my power lines and I didn't have a very clear sense of who to call-- I didn't
know if it was on cable, phone, or power lines. But all of this said, I super appreciate the city coming out
and getting the big branch off the power line and picking up the debris. I have super great neighbors as
well and grateful for that.
Incorporation: The Anoka County HMP update will encourage local jurisdictions to consider mitigation
strategies for extreme heat in order to help protect life safety for those who are more vulnerable to
such events. Communities will also be encouraged to consider mitigation actions that address
vegetation management to reduce the risk of downed trees and branches that can cause damages due
to severe storm events.
260
Item 4.
From:RS-EmergencyManagement
To:Terry Stoltzman; Jeffrey Lanenberg; Ryan Kelzenberg; Brad Wise; Dee Guthman; Alex Guggenberger; John
Slusarczyk; David Zieglmeier; Joe MacPherson; Jonelle Hubbard; Megan Barry; Cindy Cesare; Jeff Perry; George
Borrell; Jessica Leth; Julie Braastad; Jeff Reinert; Scott Schulte; Mike Gamache; Julie Jeppson; Mandy Meisner;
Colleen Haubner; Chuck Denninger; Amy Honer; Erik Thorson; Jim Dickinson; m.hartner@andovermn.gov;
cm.bukkila@andovermn.gov; d.jones@andovermn.gov; D.Berkowitz@andovermn.gov;
j.heidelberger@andovermn.gov; Greg Lee; philrice@ci.anoka.mn.us; tmassicotte@ci.anoka.mn.us;
epeterson@ci.anoka.mn.us; manderson@ci.anoka.mn.us; Ryan J. Kirby; dborglund@ci.anoka.mn.us;
dvancura@ci.anoka.mn.us; info@bethelmn.govoffice2.com; Mary L. Wells; Erik A. Skogquist;
tsanders@blainemn.gov; mwolfe@blainemn.gov; csorensen@blainemn.gov; dhauck@blainemn.gov; Dan Retka;
bpodany@blainemn.gov; mboerboom@blainemn.gov; dlove@centervillemn.com; Mark Statz;
tbender@centervillemn.com; Jim Mork; Matt Montain; Chris J. Larson; dbartholomay@ci.circle-pines.mn.us;
pantonen@ci.circle-pines.mn.us; cpeterson@ci.circle-pines.mn.us; amarquezsimula@columbiaheightsmn.gov;
khansen@columbiaheightsmn.gov; sion@columbiaheightsmn.gov; rsmith@columbiaheightsmn.gov;
cthompson@columbiaheightsmn.gov; MMarkham@columbiaheightsmn.gov; mayorjessep@ci.columbus.mn.us;
intcityadmin@ci.columbus.mn.us; deputyclerk@ci.columbus.mn.us; alan.newman@ci.forest-lake.mn.us;
jkoch@coonrapidsmn.gov; mstemwedel@coonrapidsmn.gov; jlenzmeier@coonrapidsmn.gov; Richard U. Gruber;
thimmer@coonrapidsmn.gov; rspiering@coonrapidsmn.gov; jpiper@coonrapidsmn.gov;
bsteiner@coonrapidsmn.gov; kevin.lewis@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; matt.look@ci.east-bethel.mn.us;
Nick.schmitz@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; Nate.ayshford@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; Rod.sanow@ci.east-bethel.mn.us;
aaron.berg@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; scott.lund@fridleymn.gov; wally.wysopal@fridleymn.gov;
Joe.starks@fridleymn.gov; melissa.moore@fridleymn.gov; Tony.deforge@fridleymn.gov; Patrick D. Maghrak;
jim.kosluchar@fridleymn.gov; ryan.george@fridleymn.gov; maddison.zikmund@fridleymn.gov;
Patrick.faber@fridleymn.gov; bkirkham@ci.ham-lake.mn.us; Denise Webster; dshimek@ci.ham-lake.mn.us;
mjones@ci.ham-lake.mn.us; mraczkowski@ci.ham-lake.mn.us; Ruth Nelson; gary.grote@cityoflexingtonmn.org;
bill.petracek@cityoflexingtonmn.org; mary.vinzant@cityoflexingtonmn.org; erik.edwards@cityoflexingtonmn.org;
RRafferty@linolakes.us; SCotton@linolakes.us; RColotti@linolakes.us; DHankee@linolakes.us;
PMoonen@linolakes.us; JSwenson@linolakes.us; dlallier@linolakes.us; KLeibel@linolakes.us;
mayorpilon@gmail.com; jglaze@nowthenmn.net; slehner@nowthenmn.net; Natalie Johnson;
scott@mnspect.com; Loren Wickham; manderson@ci.oak-grove.mn.us; rengler@ci.oak-grove.mn.us;
wrolf@ci.oak-grove.mn.us; blarson@ci.oak-grove.mn.us; andy@rumrivercc.com; mkuzma@cityoframsey.com;
Brian Hagen; kschmidt@cityoframsey.com; bwestby@cityoframsey.com; jszykulski@cityoframsey.com;
mkohner@cityoframsey.com; jkaters@cityoframsey.com; jmuehlbauer@stfrancismn.org;
kate.thunstrom@stfrancismn.org; jwida@stfrancismn.org; dschmidt@stfrancismn.org; craigj@haa-inc.com;
pdahlheimer@stfrancismn.org; tschwieger@stfrancismn.org; rnelson@slpmn.org; Daniel Buchholtz;
wbrown@slpmn.org; jbaker@slpmn.org; jantoine@slpmn.org; Mmontain@sbmfire.org;
treasurer@linwoodtownship.org; pam.olson@linwoodtownship.org; darryl.ballman@linwoodtownship.org;
mike.parker@linwoodtownship.org; Jon.Dotterer@state.mn.us; chris.lord@anokaswcd.org;
mitch.haustein@anokaswcd.org; jamie.schurbon@anokaswcd.org; kathy.berkness@anokaswcd.org;
Wes.Saunders-Pearce@state.mn.us; khani.sahebjam@state.mn.us; John@IPSSEC.com;
DMusgrove@ci.ramsey.mn.us; tkelly@cooncreekwd.org; ntomczik@ricecreek.org;
jamie.schurbon@anokaswcd.org; phil.belfiori@vlawmo.org; office@vlawmo.org; brent.baker@allina.com;
morgan.sommers@redcross.org; rachel.sullivannight@redcross.org; ckissel1@fairview.org;
kmkane@healtheast.org; michele.heaver@usc.salvationarmy.org; Rod.Morton@connexusenergy.com;
Cory.McIntyre@ahschools.us; Michelle.trelstad@ahschools.us; jholmberg@isd12.org; kbergert@isd12.org;
stenvikz@colheights.k12.mn.us; alvarezs@colheights.k12.mn.us; lewis@isd14.org; andler@isd14.org; Karsten
Anderson; vanessa.tolle@isd15.org; jronne@district16.org; ipadil@district16.org;
wayne.kazmierczak@isd624.org; rachael.markuson@isd624.org; daniel.bittman@isd728.org;
shannon.buckingham@isd728.org; smassey@flaschools.org; kdamon@flaschools.org;
Clifford.Anderson@anokaramsey.edu; info@ceap.com; julie.ogunleye@gtcuw.org;
sherry.sancheztibbetts@gtcuw.org; lwilliams@hope4youthmn.org; cmoore@alexandrahouse.org;
PMcfarland@accap.org; jandersen@rise.org; steve.griffiths@steppingstoneeh.org;
clinton.maxson@co.isanti.mn.us; Scott.Sellman@chisagocountymn.gov; douglas.berglund@co.washington.mn.us;
judd.freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; eric.waage@co.hennepin.mn.us; kyle.breffle@co.sherburne.mn.us
Cc:Bonnie K Hundrieser
Subject:Anoka County HMP News Release #1
Date:Wednesday, September 18, 2024 1:31:12 PM
Attachments:Emergency Management Sept 2024 News Release 1.docx
Emergency Management Sept 2024 News Release 1.pdf
Greetings,
Anoka County Emergency Management is commencing work on the update of the Anoka County
Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP). Attached is a news release for your information.
Your assistance is requested to post this news release to help notify the public about the plan
update and to have an opportunity to provide feedback. If you have a website and/or Facebook
page we encourage you to post the news release electronically to those places and we suggest
261
Item 4.
keeping the posting up for a minimum of two weeks, or a month if you can do so. You may also post
a hardcopy of the news release in locations that are common to the public, such as City Hall. We
welcome as many of ways of posting that you can cover. As part of the plan update, we must
document the public outreach that was conducted.
Please send me an email letting me know when and where you posted the news release. If you
have a city website or social media such as Facebook, please post to those locations. You are also
encouraged to post printed hardcopies in areas such as at City Hall, the Post Office, a local
Community Center or Senior Center, etc. Outreach to the public should be done in as many ways
as you can to reach a wide audience.
All city governments within the county are requested to participate in order to meet FEMA
requirements. Townships, businesses, and other agencies or organizations are also strongly
encouraged to participate.
If you receive any return public comments, please notify me so we may document this and
incorporate this feedback into the plan update.
The timely return of your posting documentation within the next 7 days is appreciated.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Thank you,
Anoka County Emergency Management
763-324-4740
RS-EmergencyManagement@anokacountymn.gov
NOTICE: Unless restricted by law, email correspondence to and from Anoka County
government offices may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act and/or
may be disclosed to third parties.
262
Item 4.
From:Erik Thorson
Subject:News Release - Public Input Wanted as Anoka County Updates Hazard Mitigation Plan
Date:Wednesday, September 18, 2024 4:17:15 PM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
9.18.24 Public Input for HMP NR.pdf
I have attached and copied into this message a news release, Public Input Wanted as Anoka County
Updates Hazard Mitigation Plan. If you have any problems with this communication, please let me
know.
September 18, 2024
Contact: Erik Thorson, Chief Communications Officer, 763-324-4612, or e-mail:
Erik.Thorson@anokacountymn.gov
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Public Input Wanted as Anoka County Updates Hazard Mitigation Plan
Anoka County residents, community leaders, business owners, area agencies and
organizations now have an opportunity to share how severe weather events impact their
property and lives. There is also an opportunity to share their ideas on how to reduce local
impacts in the future.
The Anoka County Office of Emergency Management is working with U-Spatial at the
University of Minnesota Duluth to update the county’s Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP). The
plan assesses the natural hazards that pose risk to the county, such as tornadoes, straight line
winds, ice storms, blizzards, wildfire, flooding, and extreme temperatures and identifies ways to
minimize the damage of future events. As the county works to update the plan, it urges
members of the public to provide their input.
The Anoka County HMP is a multi-jurisdictional plan that covers Anoka County,
including all cities and townships within the county. The Anoka County HMP also
incorporates the concerns and needs of school districts, watershed districts, and other related
agencies, organizations, or businesses participating in the planning process. The plan will be
updated by a planning team made up of representatives from county departments, local
municipalities, and other key stakeholders. When completed, the plan will be submitted to the
Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management and the Federal
263
Item 4.
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for approval.
“Hazard mitigation planning is a central part of our emergency management program,”
said Anoka County Emergency Management Director Terry Stoltzman. “Understanding the
natural hazards that can cause serious impact to our communities and taking action to reduce or
eliminate the impact of future disasters makes us more resilient. Hazard mitigation helps us to
break the cycle of damage and repair caused by things like flooding, ice storms, and severe
wind events that can damage property, stress economies, and threaten life safety in our county.”
Examples of hazard mitigation include:
Conducting public outreach on severe weather awareness and preparedness
Improving stormwater management systems to better handle high-rain events
Removing existing buildings from flood or erosion prone hazard areas
Increasing defensible space around homes in high-risk wildfire areas
Constructing tornado safe rooms in vulnerable areas such as mobile home parks
Burying overhead powerlines that may fail due to heavy snow, ice, or windstorms
Some mitigation activities may be eligible for future FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance
grant funding. Public input is an essential part of the plan update. As part of the planning
process, Anoka County is seeking feedback from residents and businesses to incorporate into
the plan. Your input will be recorded and incorporated into the planning process:
What are the natural hazards you feel pose the greatest risk to your community?
Are there specific populations or assets in your community that you feel are more
vulnerable to future storm events?
What concerns do you have, and what sorts of actions do you feel would help to reduce
damages of future hazard events in your community or the county as a whole?
Comments, concerns, or questions regarding natural disasters and your ideas for
mitigation projects should be submitted to Anoka County Emergency Management by phone,
email, or by posting a comment via a social media posting of this article. There will be
additional opportunities for public feedback throughout the planning process. A draft of the
plan will be made available for public review prior to submission of the plan to the State of
Minnesota. Future news releases will be shared with the media to notify the public of these
opportunities.
The Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) requires counties to update
their plan every 5 years to maintain eligibility for FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Assistance
(HMA) grant programs.
For more information or to share comments, concerns, or questions regarding the HMP,
call 763-324-4740 or email to RS-EmergencyManagement@anokacountymn.gov.
-30-
Erik Thorson
264
Item 4.
Chief Communications Officer
Anoka County Administration
Direct | 763-324-4612
Cell | 763-438-2513
Admin | 763-324-4700
Website | anokacountymn.gov
Anoka County Government Center
2100 3rd Avenue | STE 700 | Anoka, MN 55303
Respectful, Innovative, Fiscally Responsible.
NOTICE: Unless restricted by law, email correspondence to and from Anoka County
government offices may be public data subject to the Minnesota Data Practices Act and/or may
be disclosed to third parties.
265
Item 4.
Respectful, Innovative, Fiscally Responsible
Government Center 2100 3rd Avenue, STE 700 Anoka, MN 55303 www.anokacounty.us
Office: 763-324-4740 Fax: 763-324-5490
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
ANOKA COUNTY NEWS RELEASE
September 17, 2024
Public Input Wanted as Anoka County
Updates Hazard Mitigation Plan
Anoka County residents, community leaders, business owners, area agencies and organizations now have an
opportunity to share how severe weather events impact their property and lives. There is also an opportunity to
share their ideas on how to reduce local impacts in the future.
The Anoka County Office of Emergency Management is working with U-Spatial at the University of Minnesota
Duluth to update the county’s Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP). The plan assesses the natural hazards that pose risk
to the county, such as tornadoes, straight line winds, ice storms, blizzards, wildfire, flooding, and extreme
temperatures and identifies ways to minimize the damage of future events. As the county works to update the
plan, it wants to hear from the public.
The Anoka County HMP is a multi-jurisdictional plan that covers Anoka County, including all cities and townships
within the county. The Anoka County HMP also incorporates the concerns and needs of school districts,
watershed districts, and other related agencies, organizations, or businesses participating in the planning process.
The plan will be updated by a planning team made up of representatives from county departments, local
municipalities, and other key stakeholders. When completed, the plan will be submitted to the Minnesota
Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) for approval.
“Hazard mitigation planning is a central part of our emergency management program,” said Terry Stoltzman,
Anoka County Emergency Management Director. “Understanding the natural hazards that can cause serious
impact to our communities and taking action to reduce or eliminate the impact of future disasters makes us more
resilient. Hazard mitigation helps us to break the cycle of damage and repair caused by things like flooding, ice
storms, and severe wind events that can damage property, stress economies, and threaten life safety in our
county.”
Examples of hazard mitigation include:
• Conducting public outreach on severe weather awareness and preparedness
• Improving stormwater management systems to better handle high-rain events
• Removing existing buildings from flood or erosion prone hazard areas
• Increasing defensible space around homes in high-risk wildfire areas
• Constructing tornado safe rooms in vulnerable areas such as mobile home parks
• Burying overhead powerlines that may fail due to heavy snow, ice, or windstorms
Some mitigation activities may be eligible for future FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grant funding.
266
Item 4.
Public input is an essential part of the plan update. As part of the planning process, Anoka County is seeking
feedback from residents and businesses to incorporate into the plan. Your input will be recorded and
incorporated into the planning process:
• What are the natural hazards you feel pose the greatest risk to your community?
• Are there specific populations or assets in your community that you feel are more vulnerable
to future storm events?
• What concerns do you have, and what sorts of actions do you feel would help to reduce
damages of future hazard events in your community or the county as a whole?
Your feedback is wanted. Comments, concerns, or questions regarding natural disasters and your ideas for
mitigation projects should be submitted to Anoka County Emergency Management by phone, email, or by posting
a comment via a social media posting of this article.
There will be additional opportunities for public feedback throughout the planning process. A draft of the plan will
be made available for public review prior to submission of the plan to the State of Minnesota. Future news
releases will be shared with the media to notify the public of these opportunities.
The Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) requires counties to update their plan every 5 years to
maintain eligibility for FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) grant programs.
Contact
Anoka County Emergency Management
763-324-4740
RS-EmergencyManagement@anokacountymn.gov
267
Item 4.
Anoka County HMP News Release #1 (9/18/24)
Chart Documentation of News Release Postings
Jurisdiction or
Agency
Posting Representative
(name and title)
Date & Location of News Release Posting
Anoka County Erik Thorson 09/24/2024 – Anoka County Webpage and posted to
NextDoor App.
City of Andover Dennis Jones, Fire Chief /
EM Director
09/19/2024 - Andover City Webpage and Facebook
Page
City of Anoka Pam Bowman 09/25/2024 – City of Anoka Webpage, Instagram,
and Facebook Page
City of Bethel Ginger Berg, City Clerk 10/14/24, Posted to City of Bethel webpage
City of Blaine Mark Boerboom 09/19/2024 – City of Blaine webpage and Facebook
Page
City of Centerville Athanasia Lewis,
Assistant City
Administrator
09/18/2024 – City of Centerville Facebook Page
City of Circle Pines Chandra Peterson, Assist
City Administrator
10/14/24, City of Circle Pines Webpage
City of Columbia
Heights
Will Rottler,
Communications and
Engagement Coordinator
09/19/2024 – Posting on City of Columbia Heights
Bulletin Board and Facebook Page
City of Coon Rapids Jennifer Anderson,
Communications Manager
09/23/2024 – City of Coon Rapids Webpage
City of East Bethel Ron Sanow, Emergency
Manager
10/14/24, City of East Bethel Webpage
City of Fridley Melissa Moore, City Clerk 09/18/2024 – City of Fridley Webpage
City of Ham Lake Dawnette Shimek, City
Clerk
09/23/2034 – City of Ham Lake Webpage
City of Hilltop Ruth Nelson, City Clerk 10/18/24, City of Hilltop webpage
City of Lexington Ruth Nelson, City Clerk 09/23/2024 – City of Lexington Webpage and
Facebook Page
City of Lino Lakes Andrea Turner,
Communications Specialist
10/07/2024 – Posted to City Website, Facebook and
Twitter Account
City of Nowthen Natalie Johnson, Deputy
Clerk
10/14/24, Posted to City of Nowthen webpage
Linwood Township Pam Olson, Clerk 09/23/2024 – Township Webpage
City of Oak Grove Rob Engler, Emergency
Manager
10/14/24, Posted to City of Oak Grove webpage and
social media
City of Ramsey Brian Hagen, City
Administrator
10/21/24, City of Ramsey website, Facebook, and
hung in lobby of City Hall.
City of Saint Francis Todd Schwieger, Chief of
Police
09-18-2024 - City of St Francis City Hall bulletin
board, Webpage and Facebook Page
City of Spring Lake
Park
Daniel Bucholtz,
Administrator
09-19-2024 – City of Spring Lake Park Website and
Police Department Facebook Page
Hoodline Alexis Johnson, Editor 09/20/2024 – Posting on Hoodline Website
268
Item 4.
Centennial Fire
District
Matt Montain, EM Chief 09/21/2024 – Posting on Centennial Fire District’s
Facebook Page
Fridley School Dist Lori Andler, Dir of
Administrative Services
and Rochelle Cox, Senior
Officer of Operations and
Systems Alignment
09/26/2024 – Posted on the Fridley Community
Center Bulletin Board and District Website.
Centennial Lakes PD James Mork, Police Chief 09/24/2024 – Posted on Department Facebook page
Coon Creek
Watershed
Jon Janke, Director of
Operations
Coon Creek Watershed Website
Anoka County
Sheriff’s
Department
Andy Knotz, Public
Information Officer
ACSO Facebook Page and Nexdoor
Minneapolmedia Tom Akaolisa, Editor 09/26/2024 – Posted on Website
269
Item 4.
Anoka County HMP News Release #2
Record of Public Input & Incorporation
Overview: On December 12, 2025 Anoka County Emergency Management put out a news release titled
“Public Comment Sought for County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan” to announce the completion of the draft
Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan and invitation for public review and comment. The news release
informed jurisdictional stakeholders and the public that a copy of the draft plan, interactive website, and
comment form for public feedback was available online with a website link. The public review period for
the draft plan was open from 12/12/25 to 12/26/25 a total of 15 days.
Distribution: The news release was sent via email to the county’s HMP Jurisdictional Contact List, which
includes the names, titles, phone numbers, and email addresses of key stakeholders to be engaged in
the HMP update, including County Contacts, City Contacts, Township Contacts, Other Stakeholder
Contacts, and Neighboring Jurisdiction Contacts. The news release was additionally sent to local media
contacts such as area newspapers, radio and television channels with a request to carry the news
release.
Postings: Attached is documentation of the news release postings by Anoka County, participating
jurisdictions, and local media. Cities and townships were encouraged to help share the news release
locally by posting it on their websites, social media, or community bulletin boards.
Public Input & Incorporation:
Following is a record of public responses to the Anoka County news release and how the input will be
incorporated into the plan update, and if not relevant to be addressed, why.
Public Input & Incorporation:
Following is a record of public responses to the Blue Earth County news release and how the input will
be incorporated into the plan update, and if not relevant to be addressed, why.
1) 12/15/25 Comment submitted by September Holmblad via Anoka County HMP website
feedback form:
Feedback for Plan: First, thank you for the extensive work that has been done. Second, that said, while I
appreciate the opportunity to review this information; I don't think most citizens, myself included, want
to read over 60 pages of material. Could you please just provide a short summary? After reviewing a
summary, then we have the option to go deeper if we choose. Thank you.
12/16/25 Email response from U-Spatial Project Team
Hi September,
Thank you so much for taking the time to review the Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan; public
participation is critical in order to effectively prepare for natural disasters, so your interest in the plan
and your feedback are truly appreciated. Your comment is included below for reference.
270
Item 4.
We agree that a traditional hazard mitigation plan can be quite detailed, dry, and difficult to wade
through for people outside of emergency management. This is why we have created an Anoka County
HMP website for a streamlined experience that allows the public to more easily access and engage with
the main parts of the plan, and those who wish to dive deeper can download the full PDF document that
contains all of the detailed FEMA requirements. Before we introduced the website component to the
plan, the plans were actually *much* longer (frequently 400+ pages!).
While a hazard mitigation plan can be difficult to briefly summarize due to the comprehensive nature of
the work, I can point you to the Goals & Implementation page, which contains links to Mitigation Action
Charts for the county and each participating jurisdiction. These charts can show you at a glance the
specific actions proposed following the risk assessment (which is also summarized on the website, if that
is of interest).
I hope this helps, and please let me know if you have any further questions or comments on the plan.
Thank you again for your time and effort!
Kind regards,
Jane
Jane Lindelof (she/her)
Project Coordinator | U-Spatial | uspatial.umn.edu
Research and Innovation Office (RIO) | University of Minnesota
389 Kirby Plaza (working remotely)
University of Minnesota Duluth | d.umn.edu
lindelof@d.umn.edu | 508-615-7374 (mobile)
Incorporation: No incorporation into the plan needed.
271
Item 4.
From:Jeffrey Lanenberg
To:Brad Wise; Jim Dickinson; Dee Guthman; Alex Guggenberger; John Slusarczyk; David Zieglmeier; Joe
MacPherson; Jonelle Hubbard; Randi Prebil; Cindy.Cesare@anokacountymn.gov; Jeff Perry; George Borrell;
Jessica Leth; John Heinrich; Julie Braastad; Jeff Reinert; Scott Schulte; Mike Gamache; Julie Jeppson; Mandy
Meisner; Colleen Haubner; Gregory Frahm-Gilles; Brad Johnson; Chuck Denninger; Amy Honer; Erik Thorson;
s.cotton@andovermn.gov; m.hartner@andovermn.gov; cm.barthel@andovermn.gov; d.jones@andovermn.gov;
D.Berkowitz@andovermn.gov; j.heidelberger@andovermn.gov; Greg Lee; erikskogquist@ci.anoka.mn.us;
tmassicotte@ci.anoka.mn.us; epeterson@ci.anoka.mn.us; manderson@ci.anoka.mn.us;
ayoungquist@ci.anoka.mn.us; rkirby@ci.anoka.mn.us; dborglund@ci.anoka.mn.us; dvancura@ci.anoka.mn.us;
info@bethelmn.gov; info@bethelmn.gov; mnassessormary@gmail.com; mnassessorerik@gmail.com;
tsanders@blainemn.gov; mwolfe@blainemn.gov; csorensen@blainemn.gov; dhauck@blainemn.gov; Dan Retka;
bpodany@blainemn.gov; mboerboom@blainemn.gov; ethorvig@blainemn.gov; rclark@blainemn.gov;
aluedtke@blainemn.gov; ngolden@centervillemn.com; alewis@centervillemn.com; tbender@centervillemn.com;
Jim Mork; Matt Montain; mnassessorchris@gmail.com; alewis@centervillemn.com; dbartholomay@ci.circle-
pines.mn.us; pantonen@ci.circle-pines.mn.us; cpeterson@ci.circle-pines.mn.us;
amarquezsimula@columbiaheightsmn.gov; khansen@columbiaheightsmn.gov;
achirpich@columbiaheightsmn.gov; sion@columbiaheightsmn.gov; rsmith@columbiaheightsmn.gov;
dobrien@columbiaheightsmn.gov; MMarkham@columbiaheightsmn.gov; mforney@columbiaheightsmn.gov;
mayor@ci.columbus.mn.us; intcityadmin@ci.columbus.mn.us; deputyclerk@ci.columbus.mn.us; Elizabeth x.
Mursko; alan.newman@ci.forest-lake.mn.us; jkoch@coonrapidsmn.gov; mstemwedel@coonrapidsmn.gov;
jlenzmeier@coonrapidsmn.gov; rgruber@coonrapidsmn.gov; thimmer@coonrapidsmn.gov;
mbrochu@coonrapidsmn.gov; jpiper@coonrapidsmn.gov; bsteiner@coonrapidsmn.gov;
ajohnston@coonrapidsmn.gov; aJacobson@coonrapidsmn.gov; mbrown@coonrapidsmn.gov;
ardie.anderson@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; matt.look@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; Nick.schmitz@ci.east-bethel.mn.us;
Nate.ayshford@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; Rod.sanow@ci.east-bethel.mn.us; aaron.berg@ci.east-bethel.mn.us;
dave.ostwald@fridleymn.gov; wally.wysopal@fridleymn.gov; Joe.starks@fridleymn.gov;
melissa.moore@fridleymn.gov; Tony.deforge@fridleymn.gov; pat.maghrak@fridleymn.gov;
jim.kosluchar@fridleymn.gov; ryan.george@fridleymn.gov; maddison.zikmund@fridleymn.gov;
scott.hickok@fridleymn.gov; Patrick.faber@fridleymn.gov; bkirkham@hamlakemn.gov;
dwebster@hamlakemn.gov; dshimek@hamlakemn.gov; mjones@hamlakemn.gov;
mraczkowski@hamlakemn.gov; Jbohr@hamlakemn.gov; rnelsen@hilltop.govoffice.com;
michael.murphy@cityoflexingtonmn.org; bill.petracek@cityoflexingtonmn.org;
mary.vinzant@cityoflexingtonmn.org; erik.edwards@cityoflexingtonmn.org; RRafferty@linolakes.us;
dpecchia@linolakes.us; RColotti@linolakes.us; DHankee@linolakes.us; PMoonen@linolakes.us;
JSwenson@linolakes.us; dlallier@linolakes.us; KLeibel@linolakes.us; CBoehme@linolakes.us;
mgrochala@linolakes.us; MayorHybben@nowthenmn.net; jglaze@nowthenmn.net; Natalie Johnson;
rmiller@nowthenmn.net; cnash@collaborative-planning.com; lwickham@ci.oak-grove.mn.us; manderson@ci.oak-
grove.mn.us; rengler@ci.oak-grove.mn.us; wrolf@ci.oak-grove.mn.us; blarson@ci.oak-grove.mn.us;
andy@rumrivercc.com; rheineman@cityoframsey.com; Brian Hagen; kschmidt@cityoframsey.com;
bwestby@cityoframsey.com; tknight@cityoframsey.com; mkohner@cityoframsey.com;
bbluml@cityoframsey.com; shanson@cityoframsey.com; mvogel@stfrancismn.gov;
kate.thunstrom@stfrancismn.org; jwida@stfrancismn.org; dschmidt@stfrancismn.org; craigj@haa-inc.com;
pdahlheimer@stfrancismn.org; tschwieger@stfrancismn.org; jrieland@stfrancismn.gov; rnelson@slpmn.org;
dbuchholtz@slpmn.org; wbrown@slpmn.org; jbaker@slpmn.org; jantoine@slpmn.org; Mmontain@sbmfire.org;
treasurer@linwoodtownship.org; info@linwoodtownship.org; darryl.ballman@linwoodtownship.org;
John.Olson@linwoodtownship.org; andrew.luedtke@linwoodtownship.org; Jon.Dotterer@state.mn.us;
chris.lord@anokaswcd.org; mitch.haustein@anokaswcd.org; jamie.schurbon@anokaswcd.org;
kathy.berkness@anokaswcd.org; Wes.Saunders-Pearce@state.mn.us; khani.sahebjam@state.mn.us;
John@IPSSEC.com; timesaver.secretarial@gmail.com; Stephanie.johnson@barr.com; tkelly@cooncreekwd.org;
jjanke@cooncreekwd.org; ebye@cooncreekwd.org; ntomczik@ricecreek.org; tstasica@ricecreek.org;
jamie.schurbon@anokaswcd.org; phil.belfiori@vlawmo.org; office@vlawmo.org; kreich@mwmo.org;
contacts@mwmo.org; brent.baker@allina.com; morgan.sommers@redcross.org;
rachel.sullivannight@redcross.org; ckissel1@fairview.org; kmkane@healtheast.org;
michele.heaver@usc.salvationarmy.org; Rod.Morton@connexusenergy.com; Cory.McIntyre@ahschools.us;
Michelle.trelstad@ahschools.us; jim.skelly@ahschools.us; jholmberg@isd12.org; kbergert@isd12.org;
jjosephson@isd12.org; jspitzer@isd12.org; stenvikz@colheights.k12.mn.us; alvarezs@colheights.k12.mn.us;
lewis@isd14.org; andler@isd14.org; cox@isd14.org; Karsten Anderson; vanessa.tolle@isd15.org;
jronne@district16.org; ipadil@district16.org; wayne.kazmierczak@isd624.org; rachael.markuson@isd624.org;
andrew.almos@isd728.org; shannon.buckingham@isd728.org; smassey@flaschools.org; kdamon@flaschools.org;
n.flansburg@pactcharter.org; Clifford.Anderson@anokaramsey.edu; julie.ogunleye@gtcuw.org;
sherry.sancheztibbetts@gtcuw.org; lwilliams@hope4youthmn.org; cmoore@alexandrahouse.org;
PMcfarland@accap.org; jblamo@alexandrahouse.org; jandersen@rise.org; steve.griffiths@steppingstoneeh.org;
clinton.maxson@co.isanti.mn.us; Scott.Sellman@chisagocountymn.gov; douglas.berglund@co.washington.mn.us;
judd.freed@co.ramsey.mn.us; eric.waage@co.hennepin.mn.us; kyle.breffle@co.sherburne.mn.us;
Seth.Hansen@co.wright.mn.us
Cc:Terry Stoltzman; Bonnie K Hundrieser
Subject:Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan - Public Review and Comment Period
Date:Monday, December 15, 2025 11:19:08 AM
Attachments:image001.png
12-12-25 Anoka County News Release HMP Public Review.docx
Anoka County_NR#1 chart documentation of postings (COMPLETE).pdf
Importance:High
272
Item 4.
ACTION REQUESTED: PLEASE POST ATTACHED NEWS RELEASE
Greetings,
The public review and comment period is now open for the Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan
from Friday, December 12th to Friday, December 26th. This public review period is required prior
to the plan being sent to FEMA for review.
All 20 cities within the county and Linwood Township are requested to post this locally. Other
related stakeholders involved in the plan update are also encouraged to share the news release.
As this is a 15-day review period, please post the news release within 3 days and notify me of the
following:
1. Name & title of person who posted the news release
2. Location(s) of where the news release was posted (i.e., your website, social media, posted
as a hardcopy)
Time to post: Please keep the news release posted through December 26th.
There are website links as well as a QR code in the news release that will take you to the Anoka
County HMP website that includes a PDF of the plan and local mitigation action charts. There is also
an online feedback form to provide any comments, questions, or other feedback.
Thank you for your assistance.
Jeffrey Lanenberg, Deputy Director
Anoka County Emergency Management
Jeffrey.Lanenberg@anokacountymn.gov
Office: 763/324-4762
Cell: 612/401-7659
273
Item 4.
Respectful, Innovative, Fiscally Responsible
Government Center 2100 3rd Avenue, STE 700 Anoka, MN 55303 www.anokacounty.us
Office: 763-324-4740 Fax: 763-324-5490
Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer
ANOKA COUNTY NEWS RELEASE
December 12, 2025
Public Comment Sought for Anoka County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan
Anoka County has completed an updated draft of its Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) and is now seeking
public feedback.
Like all Minnesota counties, Anoka County is vulnerable to a variety of natural hazards such as tornadoes,
windstorms, severe winter storms, flooding, drought, and extreme temperatures, which can threaten the
loss of life and property in the county. Planning for natural disasters minimizes the impact of events that
can cause vast economic loss and personal hardship.
All county residents, interested agency or organizational stakeholders are encouraged to review and offer
feedback on the draft plan and proposed local mitigation actions. The review and comment period is open
for a period of 15 days through December 26, 2025. The public can access the plan using the following
links:
Anoka County HMP Website Homepage (feedback form at the bottom of page)
Anoka County Mitigation Action Charts (feedback form at the bottom of page).
The Anoka County HMP is a multi-jurisdictional plan that covers Anoka County, including all cities and
townships within the county. The Anoka County HMP also incorporates the concerns and needs of other
key stakeholders such as school districts and related agencies, organizations, or businesses participating in
the planning process.
Update of the plan has been under direction of Anoka County Emergency Management in cooperation
with U-Spatial at the University of Minnesota Duluth and representatives from county departments, city
and township governments and other participating stakeholders. Together, the planning team worked to
identify cost-effective and sustainable actions to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life or
property from natural hazards. Examples include infrastructure projects for areas that experience
repetitive flooding; construction of safe rooms in areas where residents and visitors are vulnerable to
tornadoes and severe storm events; burying powerlines that may fail due to heavy snow, ice, or wind
storms; ensuring timely emergency communication to the public through warning sirens and mass
notification systems; and conducting outreach to increase public awareness of severe weather and
personal preparedness.
Hazard mitigation planning helps Anoka County and other jurisdictions protect their residents. Working
with local communities through the process helps identify vulnerabilities and develop strategies to reduce
or eliminate the effects of a potential hazard. In addition, increasing public awareness of natural disasters
274
Item 4.
and encouraging personal preparedness helps to create a community that is resilient to disaster, and breaks
the cycle of response and recovery. Updating the plan further allows Anoka County and its jurisdictions to
be eligible to apply for future FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grant program funding for projects
that help to reduce or eliminate the impacts of future natural hazard events.
Community feedback is vital to the success of the plan. Anoka County invites public review and feedback
of the draft plan prior to submitting it to the State of Minnesota and the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) for review.
Comments, concerns, or questions regarding the draft plan or ideas for mitigation projects should be
submitted either via the Hazard Mitigation Plan website online public feedback form or by contacting
Anoka County Emergency Management.
Contact
Anoka County Emergency Management
763-324-4740
RS-EmergencyManagement@anokacountymn.gov
The following QR code may be used to directly access the Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan
interactive website:
275
Item 4.
Anoka County HMP News Release #2 (12/12/25)
Chart Documentation of News Release Postings
Jurisdiction or Agency Posting Representative
(name and title)
Date & Location of News Release Posting
Anoka County Erik Thorson, Chief
Communications Officer
12/12/25, Website news announcement.
Social media: Instagram, X (Twitter), and
NextDoor posts.
City of Andover Chief/EM Dennis Jones 12/17/25, Posted to City Website
City of Anoka Andy Youngquist, Chief of
Police
12/16/2025 - Social media post & City
website.
City of Bethel Ginger Berg, City of Bethel 12/15/25 - Posted a hard copy at City Hall
City of Blaine Russ Clark, BPD Operations
Captain-EM
12/15/25 - City of Blaine Communications
Manager. Posted on the city of Blaine
website and Blaine pd Facebook.
City of Centerville Teresa Bender, City Clerk 12/16/25, Posted to City Website
City of Circle Pines Patrick Antonen, City
Administrator
12/15/25, Posted to City Website and on
bulletin board in City Hall
City of Columbia Heights Sara Ion, City Clerk
Will Rottler, Communications
Director
12/15/25 Posted on City Bulletin Board
12/16/25 Posted to social media (Facebook
Page)
City of Columbus Aaron Berg, Assistant City
Administrator
12/16/25 City of Columbus Website and a
hard copy on our Public Notice Bulletin
Board outside of council chambers.
City of Coon Rapids Sinead Scott, Community
Outreach Specialist
12/15/2025, Posted to City Website
12/16/2025, Posted on all City Social Media
Sites (City, Police, and Fire).
City of East Bethel Matt Look, City Administrator 12/17/25, Posted to City of East Bethel
Website
City of Fridley Melissa Moore, City Clerk 12/15/25, Posted to City of Fridley Website
City of Ham Lake Nicole Wheeler,
Administrative Assistant
12/15/25, Posted to City Website
City of Hilltop Ruth Nelsen, City Clerk 12/15/2025 City Hall bulletin board
City of Lexington Brenda Beaudet,
Administrative Assistant
12/15/2025 Website, Facebook, city hall
bulletin Board
City of Lino Lakes Andrea Turner,
Communications Specialist
12/15/25, Posted to City website, Facebook,
and X (Twitter) account
City of Nowthen Natalie Johnson, City Clerk 12/15/25 Posted to city website, city
Facebook page and at the city office.
City of Oak Grove Britt Pease, Deputy City Clerk 12/16/25 Posted to city website and posted
at city hall
City of Ramsey Brian Hagen, City
Administrator
12/16/25, Posted on city website, social
media, and posted in City Hall
City of Saint Francis Jenni Wida, City Clerk 12/15/25, Posted to City Website, Facebook
Page, City Hall.
276
Item 4.
City of Spring Lake Park Wanda Brown Assistant City
Clerk
12/16/25, Posted to City Website, City
Facebook Page, PD Facebook Page
Linwood Township Alicia Morris/Natalie
Zabrenski, Media Specialist
12/17/25 - Posted at City/twp office and on
their website.
Coon Creek Watershed
District
Jessica Lindemeyer,
Engagement Coordinator
12/15/2025, posted to CCWD website
St. Francis Area Schools
ISD #15
Vanessa Tolle, Administrative
Assistant to the
Superintendent
12/15/25; posted in our District Office
Vestibule.
Centennial School District
ISD#12
Jody Josephson. Executive
Assistant to Supt
12/15/25 Posted in District Office Vestibule
Fridley School District Lori Andler, Sr Officer of
Administrative Services
12/16/2025, Posted to District Bulletin
Board and District website
Rice Creek Watershed
District
Emmet Hurley, Program
Support Technician
12/16/2025, posted to RCWD website
Mississippi Watershed
Management
Organization (MWMO)
Akadia Johnson,
Communications Manager
12/16/2025, posted to MWMO Website
ISD 728 Londa Chambers, Manager 12/17/25, posted in District Office Vestibule
277
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Appendix H – Mitigation Actions by
Jurisdiction
278
Item 4.
City of Andover Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website, social media,
and cable television. We also
include information in our city
newsletter and post information
in public locations such as City
Hall. We will work to participate
in public awareness campaigns
that encourage residents to be
aware of and prepared for severe
weather events and extreme
temperatures, including the NWS
Severe Weather Awareness Week
(April), NWS Winter Weather
Awareness Week (Nov), and
National Preparedness Month
(Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of Andover encourages
residents to subscribe to our city
messaging service “Notify Me” to
receive emergency notifications
and other information from the
city. A sign-up portal is provided
on the city website. The city will
also encourage residents to sign
up for Anoka County’s new
Everbridge emergency notification
system. We will work with Anoka
County Emergency Management
to provide us with information
and a link we can put on our city
website and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
279
Item 4.
City of Andover Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin
The city of Andover adopts the
MN State Building Code. Code
enforcement is done through our
building department and
inspectors. The city’s Building
Department reviews and
processes building permit
applications, performs on-site
inspections of residential and
commercial construction and
ensures that all construction
activity is in compliance with state
and city building and fire codes.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
Our Engineering Department
ensures development is not
affected or affected to a lesser
degree via surveying and site
management through various city
codes/ordinances. The city
enforces Title 14, Flood Control
Regulations in the city code of
ordinances.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5 All-Hazards
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Continue to build the city’s All-
Hazards emergency
preparedness capabilities
through partnerships and
trainings.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin &
Departments
We continue to build regional
partnerships and create and
participate in exercises which test
our planning models and resource
capabilities. (EOP, COOP, etc.).
We’ve upgraded our technology
working with our IT Dept and
created contingency plans. We
have also upgraded/trained our
dept heads and command staff to
ICS 400. The city will continue to
sustain these efforts.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
280
Item 4.
City of Andover Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
6
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that the city’s outdoor
warning sirens are maintained
and functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
We test our outdoor warning
sirens monthly in coordination
with the Anoka County Sheriff’s
Office. The sirens are maintained
on a regular basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
8
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
9
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city will coordinate with our fire
department and EMS to address
emergency sheltering for those
who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
10 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Address flood risk reduction
measures for low-lying areas
along the Rum River.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
This is an ongoing effort by our
Public Works Dept. The city has
low-lying properties along the
Rum River and near various
wetlands which are prone to
flooding.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
281
Item 4.
City of Andover Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
11 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Information regarding wildfire
risk and reminders on burning
restrictions are actively shared on
the city’s Fire Department
Facebook page. The city of
Andover Fire Department website
provides regulations and a permit
for open burns. The permit must
be submitted to the Fire
Department and approved by the
Fire Official. There is a $30.00 fee
for the applicant.
Internal:
FD Budget
External:
Applicant
Fees
282
Item 4.
City of Anoka Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be
aware of and prepared for
severe weather events, periods
of extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information
with the public by posting
information on our city website,
social media, and cable TV. We
also share information in our
city newsletter and post
information in public locations
such as City Hall. We will work
to participate in public
awareness campaigns that
encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events and extreme
temperatures, including the
NWS Severe Weather
Awareness Week (April), NWS
Winter Weather Awareness
Week (Nov), and National
Preparedness Month (Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign
up for emergency notifications
to receive timely alerts on
severe weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of Anoka encourages
residents to subscribe to our city
messaging service “Notify Me”
to receive emergency
notifications and other
information from the city. A
sign-up portal is provided on
the city website. The city will
also encourage residents to sign
up for Anoka County’s new
Everbridge emergency
notification system. We will
work with Anoka County
Emergency Management to
provide us with information and
a link we can put on our city
website and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
283
Item 4.
City of Anoka Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of
storm damages to new
development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Building
Dept. Division
The city of Anoka adopts the
MN State Building Code. Code
enforcement is done by the
city’s building department and
fire inspector. The city of Anoka
website - Building Department
Division page provides
information on the permit
application process. All
building permit applications
must be reviewed and approved.
Inspections must be scheduled
with the city upon project
completion.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s
long-term plans and policies
for future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The city of Anoka follows the
Lower Rum River water
management regulations. We
also enforce our local floodplain
ordinance (Section 78-478 -
Flood Fringe Overlay District).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Convert overhead powerlines
to underground when
possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
Anoka
Municipal
Utility
The city will work with our
electric providers (Anoka
Municipal Utility, Connexus
Energy) to convert overhead
power lines to underground as
part of existing or new
development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric Utility,
FEMA HMGP
284
Item 4.
City of Anoka Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
6
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Natural
Systems
Protection
Reduce the risk of downed
trees and branches from
severe storms,
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
Anoka Public
Services Dept
(Trees, Weeds &
Landscape)
The city public services
department manages trimming
or removal of trees on city
property to reduce potential
damages from severe storms.
Each year, the city also leads a
community tree planting to
replace diseased or damaged
trees that were taken down
throughout the year. Tree
plantings have occurred within
the neighborhood on the
boulevards, at parks, schools,
etc. This annual tree planting is
just one of the many
requirements of the Tree City
USA program.
Internal:
City Public
Services Dept.
Budget
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that the city’s outdoor
warning sirens are maintained
and functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
We test our outdoor warning
sirens monthly in coordination
with the Anoka County Sheriff’s
Office. The sirens are
maintained on a regular basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
8
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be
aware of severe windstorms
and tornadic weather, to
understand warning siren
alerts, and to be prepared with
personal evacuation or shelter
plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather
Awareness week each April, and
at other times when tornadic
weather is a concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
285
Item 4.
City of Anoka Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
9
Severe
Summer
Storms and
Flooding
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Ensure the city has a severe
storm shelter available at the
Riverfront Memorial Park
where larger civic events take
place.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The Riverfront Memorial Park,
2201 2nd Avenue, is a large
space next to the Rum River.
The park contains memorial
displays, green space, and a
performance stage where
concerts are held on a regular
basis. This area is also used for
the city’s Farmers Market
events throughout the summer
months. The park is currently
lacking any severe weather
shelter, so the city intends on
building a public restroom that
would be constructed in such a
way as to double as a severe
weather shelter.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA HMGP
safe room grant
10
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering
to vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or
cold events that pose risk to
life safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety,
the city will coordinate with our
fire department and EMS to
address emergency sheltering
for those who are most
vulnerable. If sheltering is
required, we will use all city
communication platforms to get
information out to the public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
286
Item 4.
City of Anoka Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
11 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
measures to reduce risk of
localized flooding and
damages to stormwater
infrastructure impacted by
high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city implements an annual
street reconstruction plan,
which includes plans to upgrade
our stormwater infrastructure
with street projects to provide
protection up to the 100-year
event. Our city-owned sanitary
sewer infrastructure (lift
station, manhole, etc.) are
located in the floodplain.
Additional efforts by the city to
reduce risks include: Adding
rain garden infrastructure and
education, Riverbank
restoration and stabilization.
Internal:
City CIP
Budget
12 Flooding /
Dam Failure
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Structure &
Infrastructure
Improvements
Implement recommendations
from the 2024 Rum River
Dam Feasibility Study.
In-Progress
Moderate
2026-2031
Anoka
Municipal
Utility
In 2024 city of Anoka
completed a feasibility study for
modifications and
reconstruction of the dam which
included ways to make the dam
more responsive to immediate
flood concerns.
External:
State of MN
Appropriations,
LCCMR Grant,
solicit for other
State / Federal
funding
13 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department works
to share information on the
level of fire danger with
residents. If there is a burn ban
in effect for the region the city
will enforce it.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
14 Wildfire Local Planning
& Regulation
Develop a forestry
management plan to reduce
wildfire risk.
New
High
2026
City Fire Dept.
Our city fire department will
work on a plan to assess and
address fuels reduction efforts
in wildland urban interface
areas throughout the city. This
may include working with
private property owners to
encourage them to create
defensible space on their
properties.
Internal:
City FD budget
External:
MN DNR
Firewise,
Community
Wildfire
Defense Grant
287
Item 4.
City of Bethel Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of Bethel shares
information with the public by
posting information on our city
website and social media. We also
share information in our city
newsletter and post information
in public locations such as City
Hall. We will work to participate
in public awareness campaigns
that encourage residents to be
aware of and prepared for severe
weather events and extreme
temperatures, including the NWS
Severe Weather Awareness Week
(April), NWS Winter Weather
Awareness Week (Nov), and
National Preparedness Month
(Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of Bethel will encourage
residents to sign up for Anoka
County’s new Everbridge
emergency notification system.
We will work with Anoka County
Emergency Management to
provide us with information and a
link we can put on our city website
and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin
The city of Bethel adopts the MN
State Building Code. Enforcement
is done through our contracted
building official. Building permits
are available on the city website.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
City of Bethel Code of Ordinances,
Jan 1, 2025. Subdivision
Regulations include that “All lots
within the floodplain districts
shall contain a building site at or
above the regulatory flood
protection elevation.”
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
288
Item 4.
City of Bethel Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
5
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
6
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that the city’s outdoor
warning siren is maintained and
functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
We test our outdoor warning siren
monthly in coordination with the
Anoka County Sheriff’s Office.
The siren is maintained on a
regular basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
8
Severe
Summer
Storms
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Assess the possibility to
construct a community storm
shelter for homes without
basements.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
The city will evaluate the
feasibility to construct a storm
shelter or tornado safe room for
homes in the community that do
not have basements. Construct
new facility based on availability
of city funding and/or external
grant sources.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP safe
room
grant.
289
Item 4.
City of Bethel Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
9
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city will coordinate with our fire
department and EMS to address
emergency sheltering for those
who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
10 Flooding Local Planning
& Regulations
Work with the MN DNR to
enroll the city in the National
Flood Insurance Program and
develop a floodplain ordinance.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The city of Bethel has FEMA
mapped flood risk areas but does
not participate in the NFIP. The
city will look into participation
and enroll if it is the directive of
City Council to do so.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
11 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
Our public works department
continues to monitor and address
protection of the lift station,
which could possibly flood during
high rain events.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
12 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
The city of Bethel maintains
information about rules for
burning permits and campfire
safety on the homepage of our
website. If there is a burn ban in
effect for the region the city will
enforce it.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
290
Item 4.
City of Blaine Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be
aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of Blaine shares
information with the public by
posting information on our city
website, social media, city
newsletter, and sharing
information with local media. We
also post information in public
areas such as City Hall. We will
work to participate in public
awareness campaigns that
encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events and extreme
temperatures, including the NWS
Severe Weather Awareness Week
(April), NWS Winter Weather
Awareness Week (Nov), and
National Preparedness Month
(Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of Blaine encourages
residents to sign up for the city’s
Civic Ready Alert notification
system. An application with
information is provided in city
utility bills, the city newsletter,
during Nite to Unite meetings,
and promoted via social media
posts and on the city website. The
city will also encourage residents
to sign up for Anoka County’s new
Everbridge emergency
notification system. We will work
with Anoka County Emergency
Management to provide us with
information and a link we can put
on our city website and to post as
a public information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
291
Item 4.
City of Blaine Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Community
Development
Dept.
The city of Blaine adopts the MN
State Building Code.
Enforcement is done through our
Community Development
Department. Residential and
Commercial construction permits
and building codes are available
on the city website. Building
inspections are done following
project completions.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
We enforce city floodplain,
floodway, flood fringe
Code/Ordinances for new
developments. Our 2040
Comprehensive Plan includes a
Local Surface Water Management
Plan. The city also participates in
NPDES MS4 program
requirements. The program
requires public entities owning or
operating municipal separate
storm sewer systems (MS4s) to
develop and implement
Stormwater Management
Programs (SWMPs) to reduce
stormwater pollution.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric providers (Connexus
Energy and Xcel) to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
292
Item 4.
City of Blaine Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
6
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that the city’s outdoor
warning sirens are maintained
and functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
We test our outdoor warning
sirens monthly in coordination
with the Anoka County Sheriff’s
Office. The sirens are maintained
on a regular basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be
aware of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
8
Severe
Summer
Storms and
Flooding
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Ensure mobile home parks
within the city are prepared
with evacuation plans and
sheltering for damaging wind
storms or flooding.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM in
coord with MHP
owners
The city has been working with
mobile home communities (6) for
their EM planning to include
COOP, storm shelters, etc. Many
storm shelters are limited (out-of-
date and insufficient capacity to
shelter the residents.) We are
working with MHP owners to
evaluate and address storm
shelter improvements within the
mobile home parks. Construction
of tornado safe rooms will be
evaluated. We are also working to
assess evacuation routes for
several mobile home parks where
flooding due to insufficient
evacuation routes (roadways,
gates etc.)
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP safe
room grant
9
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety,
the city will coordinate with our
fire department and EMS to
address emergency sheltering for
those who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
293
Item 4.
City of Blaine Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
10 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city has invested in replacing
and installing new storm sewer
and roadways for water/flooding
issues. We continue to monitor
for any new stormwater issues
that need to be addressed. We
also utilize and maintain natural
ponding areas such as wetlands
for the impoundment and
treatment of surface water as well
as the extensive city conveyance
system as well as the county ditch
system to provide flood
protection.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
11 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department works
to share information on the level
of fire danger with residents – a
link to the State of MN Burning
Restrictions is on the FD website.
If there is a burn ban in effect for
the region the city will enforce it.
Permits are required for residents
to conduct an open pile burn.
Information is provided on the
Fire Dept. website for recreational
fire regulations.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
12 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote creation of defensible
space in wildland urban
interface areas adjacent to
developments.
New
High
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department will post
Firewise educational materials on
our Fire Department City Page as
well as push wildfire education at
city events regarding defensible
space and eliminating fuel load
around properties immediately
adjacent to wildland areas. Our
department may also promote
homeowners to conduct Level 1
Firewise Assessments for creation
of defensible space.
Internal:
FD Budget
External:
MN DNR
Firewise
294
Item 4.
City of Blaine Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
13 Wildfire
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Develop a plan and implement
it to address the need for water
resources outside of the
municipal water system
New
High
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our fire department is working to
assess areas of concern and ways
to have water available outside of
the municipal water system.
Possibilities may include water
cisterns or dry hydrants where
feasible.
External:
MN DNR
Firewise,
Federal
Community
Wildfire
Defense
Grant
14 Wildfire
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Develop a plan and implement
it to address fire risk from city
owned open spaces, including
Pioneer Park, Laddie Lake Park,
and the Blaine Wetland
Sanctuary.
New
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
City EM
The City is working to manage
dead trees and their associated
fire risk through tree removal and
ecological restoration projects.
Special attention will be given to
tree removal in areas posing a fire
threat to residential structures.
External:
FEMA, MN
DNR
Community
Forestry
Grants,
Community
Wildfire
Defense
Grants,
295
Item 4.
City of Centerville Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website, social media,
and cable TV. We also share
information in our city newsletter
and post information in public
locations such as City Hall. We
will work to participate in public
awareness campaigns that
encourage residents to be aware of
and prepared for severe weather
events and extreme temperatures,
including the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Week (April),
NWS Winter Weather Awareness
Week (Nov), and National
Preparedness Month (Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of Centerville encourages
residents to subscribe to our city
messaging service “Notify Me” to
receive emergency notifications
and other information from the
city. A sign-up portal is provided
on the city website. The city will
also encourage residents to sign
up for Anoka County’s new
Everbridge emergency notification
system. We will work with Anoka
County Emergency Management
to provide us with information
and a link we can put on our city
website and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
296
Item 4.
City of Centerville Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Building
Inspections
Dept.
The city of Centerville adopts the
MN State Building Code.
Enforcement is done through our
Building Inspections Department.
The department provides
residents, developers and home
builders with a variety of services
from inspections to site plan
reviews. Building permits are
required to be submitted and
approved prior to starting a
construction project.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The city of Centerville participates
in the National Flood Insurance
Program and we enforce our local
floodplain ordinance, adopted
11/11/2015.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city has emergency
generator backup power for city
services and buildings.
New
High
2026-2031
City PW /
City EM
The city is planning to upgrade
the generator at City Hall/fire
station to ensure we have backup
power to support government
operations and fire response.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
6
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Work with the assisted living
homes so they can be prepared
with emergency plans for
extended power outages.
New
High
2026-2031
City EM
We will work with the owners of
the assisted living facilities in the
city to make sure they have their
own EOP to include evacuation
and any special needs to include
transportation and staffing.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
7
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
297
Item 4.
City of Centerville Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
8
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Upgrade our outdoor warning
sirens.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
We would like to upgrade some
aging warning sirens. We may
seek external grant funding to
support this effort.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP
grant
9
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
10
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city will coordinate with our fire
department and EMS to address
emergency sheltering for those
who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
11 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and address flood
mitigation in any problem areas
within the city.
New
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
Our public works department is
working to address roadway
mitigation on Brian Dr. to
alleviate frequent flooding.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
12 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
As of 1/1/2026 the city of
Centerville will be receiving
firefighting services from the SBM
Fire Department (previously
Centennial FD). The SBM Fire
Department works to share
information on the level of fire
danger with residents. If there is
a burn ban in effect for the region
the city will enforce it.
External:
SBM FD
298
Item 4.
City of Circle Pines Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website and Facebook
page, as well as cable TV. We also
share information in our city
newsletter and post information
in public locations such as City
Hall. We will work to participate
in public awareness campaigns
that encourage residents to be
aware of and prepared for severe
weather events and extreme
temperatures, including the NWS
Severe Weather Awareness Week
(April), NWS Winter Weather
Awareness Week (Nov), and
National Preparedness Month
(Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of Circle Pines
encourages residents to sign up
for the city’s mass notification
system to receive emergency
notifications and other
information from the city. A sign-
up portal is provided on the city
website. The city will also
encourage residents to sign up for
Anoka County’s new Everbridge
emergency notification system.
We will work with Anoka County
Emergency Management to
provide us with information and a
link we can put on our city website
and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
299
Item 4.
City of Circle Pines Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin
The city of Circle Pines adopts the
MN State Building Code.
Enforcement is done through a
required building permit and
designated building officials.
Rum River Construction
Consultants provides building
inspection services for the City of
Circle Pines.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The city of Circle Pines
participates in the National Flood
Insurance Program and we
enforce our local floodplain
ordinance, adopted 11/24/15.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
6
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Upgrade our outdoor warning
sirens.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
We would like to upgrade some
aging warning sirens. We may
seek external grant funding to
support this effort.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP
grant
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
300
Item 4.
City of Circle Pines Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
8
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city will coordinate with our fire
department and EMS to address
emergency sheltering for those
who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
9 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
Our public works department
continues to maintain our
stormwater infrastructure to
ensure the city can handle high
rain events.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
10 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
As of 1/1/2026 the city of
Centerville will be receiving
firefighting services from the SBM
Fire Department (previously
Centennial FD). The SBM Fire
Department works to share
information on the level of fire
danger with residents. If there is
a burn ban in effect for the region
the city will enforce it.
External:
SBM FD
301
Item 4.
City of Columbia Heights Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website and social
media platforms. We also share
information in our city newsletter
and e-newsletter, post
information in public locations
such as City Hall, and share
information at community
engagement events. We will work
to participate in public awareness
campaigns that encourage
residents to be aware of and
prepared for severe weather
events and extreme temperatures,
including the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Week (April),
NWS Winter Weather Awareness
Week (Nov), and National
Preparedness Month (Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of Columbia Heights
encourages residents to sign up
for our CodeRED citizen alert
system (text/email/phone).
Information about the system and
a portal to sign up are provided on
the city website. The city will also
encourage residents to sign up for
Anoka County’s new Everbridge
emergency notification system.
We will work with Anoka County
Emergency Management to
provide us with information and a
link we can put on our city website
and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
302
Item 4.
City of Columbia Heights Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
3 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Work to improve delivery of
emergency information to non-
English speaking immigrant
populations.
New
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city is working to develop
multilingual emergency
communication materials and
partner with local cultural
organizations for outreach and
trust-building. Some approaches
include use of pictograms and
simple language in alerts and
signage, and training bilingual
staff or volunteers to assist during
emergencies.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Community
Development
Dept.
The city of Columbia Heights, by
perpetual ordinance, adopts the
most current Building Code of
Minnesota. The city’s Community
Development Department
administers Building Permits and
Inspections. All contractors
conducting work within the City of
Columbia Heights must have a
valid State and/or City Contractor
License to do so. Additionally,
permits are required prior to the
start of any construction.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The city continues to follow our
Surface Water Management Plan
(Dec., 2018) to implement
mitigation measures to improve
stormwater management. The
city also participates in the
National Flood Insurance
Program and we enforce our local
floodplain ordinance, adopted
11/23/15.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
303
Item 4.
City of Columbia Heights Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
5
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city has emergency
generator backup power for city
services and buildings.
New
High
2026-2031
City PW /
City EM
We need to replace a failing
generator at the public safety
building to ensure continuity of
police, fire, and emergency
management EOC operations.
This will occur through internal
city funding and/or external
funding sources.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP
grant
6
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider (Xcel
Energy) to convert overhead
power lines to underground as
part of existing or new
development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
7
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Work with facilities that house
vulnerable populations to help
ensure they are prepared with
emergency plans for extended
power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
Within the city there is a nursing
home, two assisted living
facilities, and numerous senior
living apartment buildings which
present challenges for
communications and difficulty of
resident mobility during an
evacuation or emergency. The
city of Columbia Heights works to
develop and regularly update
tailored evacuation plans for
nursing homes, assisted living,
and senior facilities and conduct
evacuation drills with residents
and staff.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
8
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that the city’s outdoor
warning sirens are maintained
and functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
We test our outdoor warning
sirens monthly in coordination
with the Anoka County Sheriff’s
Office. The sirens are maintained
on a regular basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
304
Item 4.
City of Columbia Heights Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
9
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
10
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering
and services to vulnerable
residents during periods of
extreme heat or cold events that
pose risk to life safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
We have worked to establish
evacuation plans for City Hall for
shelter if needed during inclement
weather or in case of a fire.
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city will coordinate with our fire
department and EMS to address
emergency sheltering for those
who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public. For winter
storms/extreme cold, we would
also like to seek funding to
establish an emergency heating kit
and blanket program. We would
also like to establish a system to
provide accessible transportation
for those that need to travel to a
warming center if they do not
have transportation.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
11 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city is working to address our
aging storm-sewer network with
planned infrastructure
improvements. We also continue
the implementation of green
infrastructure projects (rain
gardens, permeable pavements).
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
305
Item 4.
City of Columbia Heights Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
12 Flooding
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Develop emergency plans to
support emergency response to
flood events.
New
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM,
City Public
Works
The city of Columbia Heights
works with the city of Minneapolis
on shared contingency planning
for water treatment plant power
outages and emergency planning.
For areas prone to flooding, the
city will work to create detour
plans and inform emergency
services in real time.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
13 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department works to
share information on the level of
fire danger with residents. If
there is a burn ban in effect for the
region the city will enforce it. The
Columbia Heights FD website
page includes a link to the MN
DNR Current Burning
Restrictions.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
306
Item 4.
City of Columbus Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be
aware of and prepared for
severe weather events, periods
of extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website and social
media platforms. We also share
information in our city
newsletter, on cable TV, and post
information in public locations
such as City Hall. We will work
to participate in public awareness
campaigns that encourage
residents to be aware of and
prepared for severe weather
events and extreme
temperatures, including the NWS
Severe Weather Awareness Week
(April), NWS Winter Weather
Awareness Week (Nov), and
National Preparedness Month
(Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will encourage residents
to sign up for Anoka County’s
new Everbridge emergency
notification system. We will
work with Anoka County
Emergency Management to
provide us with information and
a link we can put on our city
website and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Building
Dept.
The city of Columbus adopts the
MN State Building Code.
Enforcement is done through the
City Building Department. The
city contracts for Building Official
services through SAFEbuilt (with
the exception of electrical
inspections).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
307
Item 4.
City of Columbus Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The city enforces our local zoning
ordinances, and we work with the
Sunrise River, Coon Creek and
Rice Creek Watersheds to
address mitigation projects
related to flooding. The city also
participates in the National Flood
Insurance Program and we
enforce our local floodplain
ordinance, adopted 11/23/15.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5
All - Hazards
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support /
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Purchase and install
generators and ancillary
equipment for critical facilities
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
This mitigation action will be
implemented by assessing power
needs at critical facilities,
securing funding, and acquiring
generators and related
equipment. The generator will
help support emergency response
and recovery during natural and
human-caused disasters by
ensuring continuity of essential
operations. Integration will occur
through updates to the city’s
Emergency Operations Plan and
capital improvement schedules
to ensure the equipment is
maintained and incorporated
into response protocols.
Internal:
City Capital
Improvement
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP grant.
6
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed
trees and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider (Connexus
Energy) to convert overhead
power lines to underground as
part of existing or new
development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
308
Item 4.
City of Columbus Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Obtain new outdoor warning
sirens.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
We would like to add warning
sirens within the city. We may
seek external grant funding to
support this effort.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP grant
8
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be
aware of severe windstorms
and tornadic weather, to
understand warning siren
alerts, and to be prepared with
personal evacuation or shelter
plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
9
Severe
Summer
Storms
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Assess the possibility to
construct a community storm
shelter for homes without
basements.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
The city will evaluate the
feasibility to construct a storm
shelter or tornado safe room for
homes in the community that do
not have basements. Construct
new facility based on availability
of city funding and/or external
grant sources.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP safe
room grant.
10
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering
to vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety,
the city will coordinate with our
fire department and EMS to
address emergency sheltering for
those who are most vulnerable.
If sheltering is required, we will
use all city communication
platforms to get information out
to the public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
11 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
Our public works department
continues to maintain our
stormwater infrastructure to
ensure the city can handle high
rain events.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
309
Item 4.
City of Columbus Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
12 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
Forest Lake Fire
& Rescue
The Fire Department works to
share information on the level of
fire danger with residents. If
there is a burn ban in effect for
the region the city will enforce it.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
13 Wildfire
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Develop a plan and implement
it to address the need for water
resources outside of the
municipal water system
New
High
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
We will work with the FD assess
areas of need and ways to have
water available outside of the
municipal water system.
Possibilities may include water
cisterns or dry hydrants where
feasible.
External:
MN DNR
Firewise,
Federal
Community
Wildfire
Defense
Grant
310
Item 4.
City of Coon Rapids Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be
aware of and prepared for
severe weather events, periods
of extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website and social
media, city newsletter, and on
cable TV. We also share
information with local media and
post flyers in public locations
such as City Hall. We will work to
participate in public awareness
campaigns that encourage
residents to be aware of and
prepared for severe weather
events and extreme temperatures,
including the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Week (April),
NWS Winter Weather Awareness
Week (Nov), and National
Preparedness Month (Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of Coon Rapids
encourages residents to sign up
for our “Notify Me” system to
receive emergency notifications
and other information from the
city. A sign-up portal is provided
on the city website. The city will
also encourage residents to sign
up for Anoka County’s new
Everbridge emergency
notification system. We will work
with Anoka County Emergency
Management to provide us with
information and a link we can put
on our city website and to post as
a public information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
311
Item 4.
City of Coon Rapids Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Building
Inspections
Dept.
The city of Coon Rapids adopts
the MN State Building Code.
Enforcement is done by the city’s
Building Inspections Department,
which ensures permitting, code
enforcement, and building
inspections for residential and
commercial projects.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The city utilizes the following
plans to integrate mitigation for
stormwater management and
flooding: City Surface Water
Management Plan, Wellhead
Protection Plan, Comprehensive
Sanitary Sewer and Water Plans;
MS4 permit through the MPCA;
Coon Creek Watershed District
Comprehensive Plan and various
sub watershed plans. The city
participates in the National Flood
Insurance program and we
enforce our local floodplain
ordinance, adopted 12/15/15.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city has emergency
generator backup power for city
services and buildings.
New
High
2026-2031
City PW /
City EM
The city has completed a citywide
generator assessment, including
doing a few upgrades. We
continue to keep all generators
maintained to ensure they are
operational.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP
generator
grant
312
Item 4.
City of Coon Rapids Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
6
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that the city’s outdoor
warning sirens are maintained
and functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
We test our outdoor warning
sirens monthly in coordination
with the Anoka County Sheriff’s
Office. The sirens are maintained
on a regular basis. We have also
conducted a storm siren upgrade.
We will address future siren
upgrades if deemed necessary.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP
warning
siren grant
8
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be
aware of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
9
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety,
the city will coordinate with our
fire department and EMS to
address emergency sheltering for
those who are most vulnerable.
If sheltering is required, we will
use all city communication
platforms to get information out
to the public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
313
Item 4.
City of Coon Rapids Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
10 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Identify and address flood risk
reduction measures for critical
infrastructure within or
adjacent to floodplain areas.
New
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
Coon Rapids has several wells and
lift stations located within or
adjacent to local floodplains.
Locations needing flood
protection and mitigation efforts
include wells 19 and 20, and lift
stations 3 and 7. Four private lift
stations also exist in Coon Rapids,
generally near the intersection of
Hanson Blvd and Northdale Blvd
(within the Coon Creek
floodplain).
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP, MN
DNR Flood
Hazard
Mitigation
grant
program
11 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
Our public works department
continues to maintain our
stormwater infrastructure to
ensure the city can handle high
rain events. The city utilizes our
comprehensive utility plans,
street reconstruction program,
and infrastructure maintenance
and operations program to
address annual evaluations of
needed infrastructure repairs/
rehabilitation and
upsizing/expansion to address
changing climate and
state/federal rules and standards.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP
External:
FEMA
HMGP,
MPCA
Stormwater
Resilience,
MN DNR
FHM grant
12 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department works
to share information on the level
of fire danger with residents. If
there is a burn ban in effect for
the region the city will enforce it.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
314
Item 4.
City of Coon Rapids Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
13 Drought
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Education &
Awareness
Programs
Establish water use restrictions
and conduct public outreach on
water conservation measures
during periods of drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The city maintains information
for the public watering
restrictions on the city website
under the City Water System
page. The city of Cook Rapids has
an established Odd-Even
Sprinkling ban in effect every year
from June 1 – August 31. If
necessary, during periods of
drought, additional restrictions
may be imposed to ensure
sufficient water supply for
firefighting and every day
necessities. Coon Rapids to
consider impacts of drought on its
surface waters and water supply
system.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
NIDIS
FEMA
MDH
MN DNR
EPA
Stormwater
Resiliency
315
Item 4.
City of East Bethel Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website and Facebook
page, East Bethel Fire Department
Auxiliary Facebook Page, and our
NextDoor profile. We also share
information in our city newsletter
and post information in public
locations such as City Hall. We
will work to participate in public
awareness campaigns that
encourage residents to be aware of
and prepared for severe weather
events and extreme temperatures,
including the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Week (April),
NWS Winter Weather Awareness
Week (Nov), and National
Preparedness Month (Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of East Bethel residents
to sign up for our “Notify Me”
system to receive emergency
notifications and other
information from the city. A sign-
up portal is provided on the city
website. The city will also
encourage residents to sign up for
Anoka County’s new Everbridge
emergency notification system.
We will work with Anoka County
Emergency Management to
provide us with information and a
link we can put on our city website
and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
316
Item 4.
City of East Bethel Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin
Yes, the city of East Bethel has
adopted and enforces the MN
State Building Code. The
adoption is written into City Code,
Division 1, Sec. 14-19. The code is
enforced by the city’s building
inspector.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
City of East Bethel Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 34 - Floods.
This chapter regulates
development in the flood hazard
areas of the city. This chapter is
adopted to comply with the rules
and regulations of the National
Flood Insurance Program. We
also address all-hazards planning
in our city Emergency Operations
Plan.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city has emergency
generator backup power for city
services and buildings.
In-Progress
High
2026-2031
City PW /
City EM
We have four wells with two
having a generator, we are
working on purchasing a third
generator.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
6
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Work with the assisted living
home within the city to ensure
they are prepared with
emergency plans for extended
power outages.
New
High
2026-2031
City EM
The city East Bethel has a multi-
story assisted living facility that
would present challenges should
an evacuation be required. We
will work with the facility owner
to discuss their plans for
emergency generators or
evacuation if necessary.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
317
Item 4.
City of East Bethel Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
7
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric providers (Connexus
Energy, Xcel Energy, and City of
Anoka) ) to convert overhead
power lines to underground as
part of existing or new
development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
8
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that the city’s outdoor
warning sirens are maintained
and functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
We test our outdoor warning
sirens monthly in coordination
with the Anoka County Sheriff’s
Office. The sirens are maintained
on a regular basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
9
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
10
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city will coordinate with our fire
department and EMS to address
emergency sheltering for those
who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
11 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
Our public works department
continues to maintain our
stormwater infrastructure to
ensure the city can handle high
rain events.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
318
Item 4.
City of East Bethel Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
12 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department works to
share information on the level of
fire danger with residents. If
there is a burn ban in effect for the
region the city will enforce it.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
319
Item 4.
City of Fridley Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website, social media
and at the annual Night to Unite.
We also include information in
our city newsletter and post
information in public locations
such as City Hall. We will work to
participate in public awareness
campaigns that encourage
residents to be aware of and
prepared for severe weather
events and extreme temperatures,
including the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Week (April),
NWS Winter Weather Awareness
Week (Nov), and National
Preparedness Month (Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will encourage residents
to sign up for Anoka County’s new
Everbridge emergency notification
system. We will work with Anoka
County Emergency Management
to provide us with information
and a link we can put on our city
website and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Building
Inspections
Dept.
The city of Fridley adopts the MN
State Building Code. The City of
Fridley Building Inspections is
responsible for administering the
Minnesota State Building Code.
Enforcement is done through the
city building inspector.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
320
Item 4.
City of Fridley Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The City of Fridley Municipal
Code, Section 205.27 0-1
Floodplain Management Overlay
District regulates development in
the flood hazard areas of the city.
This ordinance is adopted to
comply with the rules and
regulations of the National Flood
Insurance Program. The city also
addresses all-hazards planning in
our city Emergency Operations
Plan, updated 2024.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that the city’s outdoor
warning sirens are maintained
and functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
The city has upgraded all early
warning software. We test our
outdoor warning sirens monthly
in coordination with the Anoka
County Sheriff’s Office. The sirens
are maintained on a regular basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
6
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
321
Item 4.
City of Fridley Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
8
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city is prepared to coordinate with
our fire department and EMS to
address emergency sheltering for
those who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
9 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Be prepared to manage seasonal
flooding concerns with the
Mississippi River.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
Our public works department
continues to monitor our
stormwater infrastructure for any
issues. Seasonal flooding can
occur with ice melt in the spring.
We have large pumps on the north
end of the city to keep that area
from flooding.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
10 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department works to
share information on the level of
fire danger with residents. If
there is a burn ban in effect for the
region the city will enforce it.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
322
Item 4.
City of Ham Lake Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our website and local news
media. We also include
information in our city newsletter
The Ham Laker and post
information in public locations
such as City Hall and the Senior
Center. We will work to
participate in public awareness
campaigns that encourage
residents to be aware of and
prepared for severe weather
events and extreme temperatures,
including the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Week (April),
NWS Winter Weather Awareness
Week (Nov), and National
Preparedness Month (Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of Ham Lake will
encourage residents to sign up for
Anoka County’s new Everbridge
emergency notification system.
We will work with Anoka County
Emergency Management to
provide us with information and a
link we can put on our city
website, in our newsletter, and to
post as a public information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Building
Dept.
The city of Ham Lake adopts the
MN State Building Code.
Enforcement is done through the
City of Ham Lake Building
Department. The department
includes a Building/Zoning
Official and Code Enforcement
Officer and a Building Inspector.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
323
Item 4.
City of Ham Lake Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The City of Ham Lake City Code,
Article 10, Subdivision
Regulations, 10-203, Livability
Standards establishes that “All
residential lots shall contain at
least 29,500 square feet of land
which lies above the 100-year
flood contour.” The city
participates in the National Flood
Insurance Program and we
enforce our local floodplain
ordinance, adopted 11/16/15.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
6
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that the city’s outdoor
warning sirens are maintained
and functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
We test our outdoor warning
sirens monthly in coordination
with the Anoka County Sheriff’s
Office. The sirens are maintained
on a regular basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
324
Item 4.
City of Ham Lake Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
8
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
The city is working on our
sheltering plans. We will work
with our local schools to make
arrangements for community
shelter use when needed. We will
also explore other facility options
for backup. If sheltering is
required, we will use all city
communication platforms to get
information out to the public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
9 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city’s Public Works
Department maintains our
stormwater system. The city has a
Surface Water Management Plan
(2021) that we use to guide our
local stormwater management.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
10 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department works to
share information on the level of
fire danger with residents. If
there is a burn ban in effect for the
region the city will enforce it. Our
city Fire Department website page
provides information on current
burning restrictions from the MN
DNR, Burning Permits, and
regulations regarding recreational
fires.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
325
Item 4.
City of Hilltop Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website, making
announcements at City Council
meetings, and providing
informational flyers & pamphlets
at the kiosk at City Hall. One
primary means of outreach is via
postcard publications - we could
do more with this. We will work to
participate in public awareness
campaigns that encourage
residents to be aware of and
prepared for severe weather
events and extreme temperatures,
including the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Week (April),
NWS Winter Weather Awareness
Week (Nov), and National
Preparedness Month (Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
We let our residents know that
they can sign up for the Columbia
Heights CodeRED emergency
notification system. The city of
will also encourage residents to
sign up for Anoka County’s new
Everbridge emergency notification
system. We will work with Anoka
County Emergency Management
to provide us with information
and a link we can put on our city
website and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
326
Item 4.
City of Hilltop Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
3 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Work to improve delivery of
emergency information to
residents who speak English as
a second language.
New
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
Our city website provides Google
Translate read content in any
language. We will work to include
printed information in flyers or
newsletters in languages (i.e.,
Spanish) to reach residents
regarding our storm shelter
facility and use.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin
The city of Hilltop adopts and
enforces the MN State Building
Code. Enforcement is done
through a required building
permit and designated building
officials. Rum River Construction
Consultants provides building
inspection services for the City of
Hilltop.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The City of Hilltop City Code
includes Division 4. R-MH
Manufactured Housing
Residential District, which
includes requirements for storm
shelters and evacuation plans.
The city has to sign off on MHP
evacuation plans (meaning we are
aware of it, however we are not
responsible to approve these
plans).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
6
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
327
Item 4.
City of Hilltop Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that the city’s outdoor
warning siren is maintained and
functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
We test our outdoor warning siren
monthly in coordination with the
Anoka County Sheriff’s Office.
The siren is maintained on a
regular basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
8
Severe
Summer
Storms
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Continue to apply for external
funding to construct the city’s
new Storm Shelter.
New
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
Fulfilling the city’s tornado safe
room project is our #1 priority.
Extensive additional funding must
be secured, which has been
extremely difficult. The city has
been working to advance our
plans to build a new storm shelter
in the basement of City Hall. The
new 6000-foot building will triple
the storm shelter capacity of the
existing City Hall building.
Internal:
City CIP
budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP safe
room grant
9
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
aware of the city’s existing
storm shelter.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city actively shares
information on our city website
for tornado awareness and
preparedness. The basement of
City Hall is the designated shelter
for mobile home park and city
residents. The shelter is only
open when a tornado warning has
been issued and sirens have been
activated.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
10
Severe
Summer
Storms
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Work directly with the Mobile
Home Park owners to share
information with residents on
severe weather safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM in
coordination
with MHPs
There are 4 mobile home parks in
the city of Hilltop. The city does
outreach to the MHP’s directly to
communicate on evacuation and
sheltering plans. 3 out of 4 MHP’s
have their own newsletter – we
will work to share information
that can be included in these
newsletters regarding tornado
weather and safety.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
328
Item 4.
City of Hilltop Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
11
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city is prepared to coordinate with
our fire department and EMS to
address emergency sheltering for
those who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
12 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
Our public works department
continues to maintain our
stormwater infrastructure to
ensure the city can handle high
rain events.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
13 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
The city works to share
information on the level of fire
danger with residents. If there is
a burn ban in effect for the region
the city will enforce it.
The city of Columbia Heights Fire
Department provides fire services
to the city. We will work to link to
the FD’s Facebook page on our
city website so residents may
follow them for information.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
329
Item 4.
City of Lexington Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website, Facebook
page, and cable television. We
also include information in our
city newsletter and post
information in public locations
such as City Hall. We will work to
participate in public awareness
campaigns that encourage
residents to be aware of and
prepared for severe weather
events and extreme temperatures,
including the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Week (April),
NWS Winter Weather Awareness
Week (Nov), and National
Preparedness Month (Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will encourage residents
to sign up for Anoka County’s new
Everbridge emergency notification
system. We will work with Anoka
County Emergency Management
to provide us with information
and a link we can put on our city
website and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
3 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Work to improve delivery of
emergency information to
residents who speak English as
a second language.
New
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
Our city website provides a
translate option to read content in
Spanish. We can also target
communication to the large
immigrant community in one
apartment complex in the city
with multi-lingual informational
flyers (i.e., sign up for emergency
notifications)
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
330
Item 4.
City of Lexington Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin
The city of Lexington adopts the
MN State Building Code.
Enforcement is done through a
permitting process and building
inspections. The city contracts
with INSPECTRON, INC. to serve
as the inspection agency
performing plan review and
construction inspections for the
city.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The city’s Code of Ordinances
Chapter 13, Stormwater
Management Regulations
establishes regulations for illicit
stormwater discharge that may
affect the ability of the city to
provide for flood control and
other community services. The
city also participates in the
National Flood Insurance
Program, although we do not have
any FEMA mapped high risk
areas.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
6
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Upgrade the city’s existing
outdoor warning siren / Ensure
the city’s existing warning siren
is operational until it can be
replaced.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
The city will seek funding to
purchase a new outdoor warning
siren to replace our aging siren.
We test our existing siren monthly
in coordination with the Anoka
County Sheriff’s Office. The siren
is maintained on a regular basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
331
Item 4.
City of Lexington Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
8
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
9
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city is prepared to coordinate with
our fire department and EMS to
address emergency sheltering for
those who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
10 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
Our public works department
continues to maintain our
stormwater infrastructure to
ensure the city can handle high
rain events.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
11 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department website
provides information on campfire
safety. The FD also works to
share information on the level of
fire danger with residents. If
there is a burn ban in effect for the
region the city will enforce it. The
city website provides information
on the Open Burning Process and
Regulations as well as a Burning
Permit for conducting an open
burn.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
332
Item 4.
City of Lino Lakes Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website, social media,
and sharing information with
local news media. We also include
information in our city newsletter
and post information in public
locations such as City Hall. We
will work to participate in public
awareness campaigns that
encourage residents to be aware of
and prepared for severe weather
events and extreme temperatures,
including the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Week (April),
NWS Winter Weather Awareness
Week (Nov), and National
Preparedness Month (Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of Lino Lakes encourages
residents to subscribe to our city
messaging service “Notify Me” to
receive emergency notifications
and other information from the
city. A sign-up portal is provided
on the city website. The city will
also encourage residents to sign
up for Anoka County’s new
Everbridge emergency notification
system. We will work with Anoka
County Emergency Management
to provide us with information
and a link we can put on our city
website, newsletter, and to post as
a public information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
333
Item 4.
City of Lino Lakes Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Community
Development
Dept.
The city of Lino Lakes adopts the
MN State Building Code.
Enforcement is done through the
city’s Community Development
Department. Building permits are
required to be submitted and
approved. The state code is
enforced through building
inspectors and fire inspection.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The city has a 2040
comprehensive plan that guides
future development in the city.
City of Lino Lakes City Code,
Chapter 1103: Flood Plain
Management regulates
development in the flood hazard
areas of the city. This chapter is
adopted to comply with the rules
and regulations of the National
Flood Insurance Program.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
6
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Work with the assisted living
homes to ensure they are
prepared with emergency plans
for extended power outages.
New
High
2026-2031
City EM
The City of Lino Lakes has two
large assisted living facilities that
would present challenges should
an evacuation be required. We
will work with each facility to
discuss their plans for emergency
generators or evacuation if
necessary.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
334
Item 4.
City of Lino Lakes Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that the city’s outdoor
warning sirens are maintained
and functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
We test our outdoor warning
sirens monthly in coordination
with the Anoka County Sheriff’s
Office. The sirens are maintained
on a regular basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
8
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
9
Severe
Summer
Storms
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Ensure mobile home parks
within the city are prepared
with evacuation plans and
sheltering for damaging storms
or tornadoes. / Pursue funding
for a tornado safe room if
needed.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
The city has one medium size
manufactured park which would
be vulnerable to severe weather.
We will work with the MHP owner
and residents to establish
evacuation and sheltering plans.
If we decide to construct a
tornado safe room we will apply
for FEMA HMGP grant funding.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP safe
room grant
10
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city is prepared to coordinate with
our fire department and EMS to
address emergency sheltering for
those who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
11 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
Our public works department
continues to maintain our
stormwater infrastructure to
ensure the city can handle high
rain events.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
12 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department works to
share information on the level of
fire danger with residents. If
there is a burn ban in effect for the
region the city will enforce it.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
335
Item 4.
City of Lino Lakes Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
13 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote Firewise awareness
and creating defensible space to
homeowners located in areas at
higher risk of wildfire.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City EM,
City FD
Our fire department can work on
adding MNDNR Firewise
information to the Public
Education & Outreach area of our
Fire & Rescue website page. We
can also work on providing direct
to homeowners located in the
wildland-urban interfaces
throughout the city to promote
creation of defensible space. Our
FD may also be able to assist
homeowners in conducting Level 1
Firewise Assessments, or provide
the information on our website.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
MN DNR
Firewise
14 Wildfire
Natural
Systems
Protection
Address wildland fuels
reduction where possible in
WUI areas of the city.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City EM,
City FD
The city continues to address
vegetation management on city
property. We will explore
opportunities to assist
homeowners with fuels reduction
for defensible space.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
MN DNR
Firewise
336
Item 4.
City of Nowthen Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website, local news,
and making announcements at
City Council meetings. We also
include information in our city
newsletter and post information
in public locations such as City
Hall. We will work to participate
in public awareness campaigns
that encourage residents to be
aware of and prepared for severe
weather events and extreme
temperatures, including the NWS
Severe Weather Awareness Week
(April), NWS Winter Weather
Awareness Week (Nov), and
National Preparedness Month
(Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will encourage residents
to sign up for Anoka County’s new
Everbridge emergency notification
system. We will work with Anoka
County Emergency Management
to provide us with information
and a link we can put on our city
website and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin
The city of Nowthen adopts the
MN State Building Code.
Enforcement is done through a
permitting process and building
inspectors. Rum River
Consultants provides building
inspection services to the city.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
337
Item 4.
City of Nowthen Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The City of Nowthen City Code,
Section 3 District Provisions,
Section 11-3-11, Floodplain
District, Sec. B Design Criteria for
Structures 1) High Water
Elevations. Structures must be
placed in accordance with any
floodplain regulations applicable
to the site.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
6
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Increase the city’s outdoor
warning siren coverage. /
Ensure that the city’s existing
siren is maintained and
functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
The city will seek funding to
purchase and install a new
outdoor warning siren to increase
auditory coverage for all residents
in the city. We test our existing
warning siren monthly in
coordination with the Anoka
County Sheriff’s Office. The siren
is maintained on a regular basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
338
Item 4.
City of Nowthen Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
8
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city is prepared to coordinate with
our fire department and EMS to
address emergency sheltering for
those who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
9 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
Our public works department
continues to maintain our
stormwater infrastructure to
ensure the city can handle high
rain events.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
10 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department works to
share information on the level of
fire danger with residents. If
there is a burn ban in effect for the
region the city will enforce it.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
339
Item 4.
City of Oak Grove Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website and Fire
Department Facebook page. We
also include information in our
city newsletter and post
information in public locations
such as City Hall. We will work to
participate in public awareness
campaigns that encourage
residents to be aware of and
prepared for severe weather
events and extreme temperatures,
including the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Week (April),
NWS Winter Weather Awareness
Week (Nov), and National
Preparedness Month (Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of Oak Grove encourages
residents to subscribe to our
Public Alert System to receive
emergency notifications and other
information from the city. A sign-
up portal is provided on the city
website. The city will also
encourage residents to sign up for
Anoka County’s new Everbridge
emergency notification system.
We will work with Anoka County
Emergency Management to
provide us with information and a
link we can put on our city website
and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
340
Item 4.
City of Oak Grove Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
Rum River
Consultants
The city of Oak Grove adopts the
MN State Building Code.
Enforcement is done through a
permitting process and building
inspectors. Rum River
Consultants provides building
inspection services to the City of
Oak Grove.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The City of Oak Grove City Code,
Part II Land Development,
Chapter 109, Article X Floodplain
Management regulates
development in the flood hazard
areas of the city and is adopted to
comply with the rules and
regulations of the National Flood
Insurance Program. The city also
has a Zoning Map and our 2040
Comprehensive Plan.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
6
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that the city’s outdoor
warning sirens are maintained
and functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
We test our outdoor warning
sirens monthly in coordination
with the Anoka County Sheriff’s
Office. The sirens are maintained
on a regular basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
341
Item 4.
City of Oak Grove Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
8
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Work with the assisted living
facility so they can be prepared
with emergency plans for
extended power outages.
New
High
2026-2031
City EM
The city has a senior living facility
that would present challenges
should an evacuation be required.
We will work with the facility to
discuss their plans for emergency
generators or evacuation if
necessary.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
9
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city is prepared to coordinate with
our fire department and EMS to
address emergency sheltering for
those who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
10 Flooding
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Education &
Awareness
Programs
Continue to implement the
city’s Stormwater Management
Program
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City Public
Works
The city continues to implement
our Stormwater Management
Program, which consists of
consists of Public Education and
Outreach, Public
Involvement/Participation, Illicit
Discharge and Elimination,
Construction Site Stormwater
Runoff Control, Post-Construction
Stormwater Management in New
Developments and
Redevelopment, and Pollution
Prevention/Good Housekeeping
for Municipal Operations.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
11 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs /
Local Planning
& Regulations
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department works to
share information on the level of
fire danger with residents. If
there is a burn ban in effect for the
region the city will enforce it. The
city requires permits for open
burns. We also provide a link to
the MNDNR for residents to check
on current burning restrictions.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
342
Item 4.
City of Oak Grove Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
12 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote Firewise awareness
and creating defensible space to
homeowners located in areas at
higher risk of wildfire.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City EM,
City FD
Our fire department can work on
adding MNDNR Firewise
information to the Public
Education & Outreach area of our
Fire & Rescue website page. We
can also work on providing direct
to homeowners located in the
wildland-urban interfaces
throughout the city to promote
creation of defensible space. Our
FD may also be able to assist
homeowners in conducting Level 1
Firewise Assessments, or provide
the information on our website.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
MN DNR
Firewise
343
Item 4.
City of Ramsey Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website and City &
Public Safety social media. We
also include information in our
city newsletter and post
information in public locations
such as City Hall. We will work to
participate in public awareness
campaigns that encourage
residents to be aware of and
prepared for severe weather
events and extreme temperatures,
including the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Week (April),
NWS Winter Weather Awareness
Week (Nov), and National
Preparedness Month (Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of Ramsey will encourage
residents to sign up for Anoka
County’s new Everbridge
emergency notification system.
We will work with Anoka County
Emergency Management to
provide us with information and a
link we can put on our city website
and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
3 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Work to improve delivery of
emergency information to
residents who speak English as
a second language.
New
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
We will ensure that our city Public
Information Staff are aware of the
PBS resources like TPT NOW and
TPT ECHO for non-English
emergency notifications.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
344
Item 4.
City of Ramsey Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Building
Permits and
Inspections
Department
The city of Ramsey adopts the MN
Building Code. Enforcement is
done through the City of Ramsey
Building Permits and Inspections
Department. The department
oversees building permit
applications and review, code
enforcement, and inspections by
the city Building Official.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
Floodplain Management is
addressed in the City of Ramsey
City Code zoning requirements for
new development. We also follow
the Lower Rum River water
management regulations. The city
incorporates a floodplain
ordinance as part of the
Mississippi River Corridor Critical
Area Program (MRCCA). This
program is a coordinated effort by
state, regional, and local agencies
to manage land use and zoning
regulations along the Mississippi
River corridor. The City of
Ramsey has adopted the MRCCA
ordinance, which includes specific
regulations for areas within the
floodplain.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
6
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
345
Item 4.
City of Ramsey Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
7
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Work with the assisted living
homes so they can be prepared
with emergency plans for
extended power outages.
New
High
2026-2031
City EM
The City of Ramsey has 2 Assisted
Living Facilities both with
memory care units. In the event
of an evacuation these pose a
special vulnerability. We will
work with the owners of the
assisted living facilities to make
sure they are a part of the local
Healthcare Coalition and ensure
they have their own EOP to
include evacuation and any
special needs to include
transportation and staffing.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
8
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Continue the volunteer Siren
Watcher’s Program to ensure
that all warning sirens are
operating when tested.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
The city’s Fire Department
oversees our Siren Watcher
Program. The program
coordinates volunteers to monitor
individual sirens and make sure
they are functional during testing
on a monthly basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
9
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
10
Severe
Summer
Storms
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Work with the mobile home
park within the city to address
improvement of their storm
shelter.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
The city plans to work with the
mobile home park to encourage
them to do a hazard assessment
and also update/upgrade their old
undersized storm shelter. If a
tornado safe room is a best option
the city may be able to apply for
possible FEMA HMGP grant
funding.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP safe
room grant
346
Item 4.
City of Ramsey Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
11
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city is prepared to coordinate with
our fire department and EMS to
address emergency sheltering for
those who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
12 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Streets
Dept.
The City of Ramsey Streets
Department is responsible for
maintenance of its storm drainage
system, which includes pipes,
constructed ponds, lakes,
wetlands, ditches, swales, and
other drainage ways. We continue
to monitor and address any areas
of concern.
Internal:
Streets
Dept.
Budget
13 Flooding
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Actively conduct targeted
outreach to homeowners in
high-risk flood areas along the
Mississippi River to be aware
and prepared for flooding.
New
High
2026-2031
City Admin
Have annual messaging for sent
out to the homes on the
Mississippi reminding them to be
prepared and ready should the
river rise (this would occur over
and above the annual severe
weather awareness week)
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
14 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department works to
share information on the level of
fire danger with residents. If
there is a burn ban in effect for the
region the city will enforce it.
Internal:
FD Budget
15 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote wildfire safety
awareness and promote
creation of defensible space to
in areas at higher risk of wildfire
within the city.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department will post
educational materials on our Fire
Department City Page as well as
push wildfire education at city
events regarding defensible space
and eliminating fuel load around
properties immediately adjacent
to wildland areas.
Internal:
FD Budget
External:
MN DNR
Firewise
347
Item 4.
City of Ramsey Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
16 Wildfire
Natural
Systems
Protection
Address wildland fuels
reduction within WUI areas
throughout the city.
New
High
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
The city of Anoka Streets and
Parks Dept. regularly works to
eliminate fuel load by removing
dead trees and cleaning up
overgrowth.
Internal:
FD Budget
External:
CWDG
funding,
MN DNR
Firewise
348
Item 4.
City of Spring Lake Park Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website, social media,
and cable television. We also
include information in our city
newsletter and post information
in public locations such as City
Hall. We will work to participate
in public awareness campaigns
that encourage residents to be
aware of and prepared for severe
weather events and extreme
temperatures, including the NWS
Severe Weather Awareness Week
(April), NWS Winter Weather
Awareness Week (Nov), and
National Preparedness Month
(Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will encourage residents
to sign up for Anoka County’s new
Everbridge emergency notification
system. We will work with Anoka
County Emergency Management
to provide us with information
and a link we can put on our city
website and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
3 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin
The city of Spring Lake Park
adopts the MN State Building
Code. Enforcement is done
through our city building
inspector/code enforcement.
Separate permits are required for
building, electrical, plumbing,
heating, ventilating, and air
conditioning.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
349
Item 4.
City of Spring Lake Park Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The City of Spring Lake Park
Municipal Code, Section 15, Land
Usage - 15.12, Floodplain
Management District regulates
development in the flood hazard
areas of the city. This chapter is
adopted to comply with the rules
and regulations of the National
Flood Insurance Program.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works - Parks
Dept.
The city Parks Dept. manages
trimming or removal of trees on
city property to reduce potential
damages from severe storms. The
city will work with our electric
provider to convert overhead
power lines to underground as
part of existing or new
development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
6
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Work with the assisted living
homes so they can be prepared
with emergency plans for
extended power outages.
New
High
2026-2031
City EM
Within the city of Spring Lake
Park, we have several assisted
living and retirement homes that
would be difficult to evacuate in
an emergency. We will work with
the owners of the assisted living
facilities to make sure they have
their own EOP to include
evacuation and any special needs
to include transportation and
staffing.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that the city’s outdoor
warning sirens are maintained
and functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
The city has newly updated our
warning siren at City Hall and
upgraded our other siren. We test
our outdoor warning sirens
monthly in coordination with the
Anoka County Sheriff’s Office.
The sirens are maintained on a
regular basis.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP
grant
350
Item 4.
City of Spring Lake Park Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
8
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
9
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city is prepared to coordinate with
our fire department and EMS to
address emergency sheltering for
those who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
10 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works –
Streets Dept.
Our public works department
continues to maintain our
stormwater infrastructure to
ensure the city can handle high
rain events.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
11 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department works to
share information on the level of
fire danger with residents. If
there is a burn ban in effect for the
region the city will enforce it.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
351
Item 4.
City of St. Francis Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city shares information with
the public by posting information
on our city website and social
media. We also share information
in our city newsletter, at National
Night Out and other public events,
and post information in public
locations such as City Hall. We
will work to participate in public
awareness campaigns that
encourage residents to be aware of
and prepared for severe weather
events and extreme temperatures,
including the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Week (April),
NWS Winter Weather Awareness
Week (Nov), and National
Preparedness Month (Sept).
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city of St. Francis encourages
residents to subscribe to our city
alert system Nixle to receive
emergency notifications and other
information from the city. A sign-
up portal is provided on the city
website. The city will also
encourage residents to sign up for
Anoka County’s new Everbridge
emergency notification system.
We will work with Anoka County
Emergency Management to
provide us with information and a
link we can put on our city website
and to post as a public
information flyer.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
3 All-Hazards
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Continue to develop an inter-
departmental approach to
hazard mitigation and
preparedness planning for the
city.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
We have implemented monthly
internal EM meetings for
department heads.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
352
Item 4.
City of St. Francis Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
4 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce city regulations that
help to reduce the risk of storm
damages to new development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Building
Dept.
The city of St. Francis adopts the
MN State Building Code. The city
Building Department is
responsible for administering the
code, which is enforced by the city
Building Official. Building
permits are reviewed and allow
the code official to protect the
public by reducing the potential
hazards of unsafe construction
and ensuring public health, safety
and welfare.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
5 All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the city’s long-
term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Admin
The City of St. Francis City Code
of Ordinances, Section 10-52-00 -
Floodplain Regulations regulates
development in the flood hazard
areas of the city. This ordinance is
adopted to comply with the rules
and regulations of the National
Flood Insurance Program. The
city also works with the Upper
Rum River Watershed
Management.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
6
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city public works department
manages trimming or removal of
trees on city property to reduce
potential damages from severe
storms. The city will work with
our electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
353
Item 4.
City of St. Francis Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
7
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure that the city’s outdoor
warning sirens are maintained
and functioning.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
The City of Saint Francis added an
additional warning siren on the
east side of the city. We test our
outdoor warning sirens monthly
in coordination with the Anoka
County Sheriff’s Office. We will
put existing warning sirens on a
maintenance schedule.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
8
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin /
City EM
The city will promote tornado
awareness and safety during the
NWS Severe Weather Awareness
week each April, and at other
times when tornadic weather is a
concern.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
9
Severe
Summer
Storms
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Assess and address the need for
construction of new storm
shelters at city parks.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City EM
There are numerous parks in the
city, some without storm shelters.
We will assess which parks need
attention and determine how to
best address storm shelter needs
with construction of new facilities.
The city will consider tornado safe
rooms in our range of options.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP safe
room grant
10
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the city is prepared to
provide emergency sheltering to
vulnerable residents during
periods of extreme heat or cold
events that pose risk to life
safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Admin,
City EM
During an extreme temperature
event that threatens life safety, the
city is prepared to coordinate with
our fire department and EMS to
address emergency sheltering for
those who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all city communication platforms
to get information out to the
public.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
354
Item 4.
City of St. Francis Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
11 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the city to
handle future high rain events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
City Public
Works Dept.
The city has a Comprehensive
Sanitary Sewer and Municipal
Water Plan that guides our
stormwater management. We are
planning to expand and improve
the city’s water/sewer system. We
have replaced deteriorating
culverts under a city street that
runs over the Seelye Brook to
prevent flooding issues.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
12 Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs /
Local Planning
& Regulations
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
City Fire Dept.
Our city Fire Department works to
share information on the level of
fire danger with residents. If
there is a burn ban in effect for the
region the city will enforce it.
Burning permits are required for
open burns and are obtained by
contacting the St. Francis Fire
Department. A fact sheet is also
provided on the FD website page
on Recreational Burning
Regulations.
Internal:
City Gen.
Operating
Budget
355
Item 4.
Coon Creek Watershed District Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 Flooding
Local Planning
& Regulations
/ Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Collaborate with Anoka
County and local jurisdictions
to implement flood mitigation
projects identified in the
CCWD 2024-2033
Comprehensive Watershed
Management Plan as well as
the Anoka County HMP
update.
Projects are listed below
New
High
2026-2031
Coon Creek
Watershed
District (CCWD)
in coord with
Anoka County
Depts and local
jurisdictions
The Coon Creek Watershed
District has identified multiple
areas as having a high risk of
flooding due to a variety of
factors. The Coon Creek
Watershed 2024-2033
Comprehensive Watershed
Management Plan includes
flood prevention projects within
Anoka County. CCWD will
coordinate with Anoka County
and local jurisdictions and local
jurisdictions on these projects
as appropriate.
Internal:
CCWD Tax
Levy
External:
FEMA grant
funding
(HMGP,
FMA), MN
DNR FHM
program,
Other agency
funding
2 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Add storage and improve
stormwater conveyance to
improve localized flooding in
the Springbrook Creek
subwatershed in Blaine, Coon
Rapids, Fridley, and Spring
Lake Park.
New
High
2026-2031
CCWD in coord
with the cities of
Blaine, Coon
Rapids, Fridley,
and Spring Lake
Park
This project falls under the
CCWD 2024-2033 CWMP.
CCWD will work with individual
jurisdictions on project
planning and implementation.
Internal:
CCWD Tax
Levy
External:
FEMA grant
funding
(HMGP,
FMA),
municipal
funding from
Blaine, Coon
Rapids,
Fridley, and
Spring Lake
Park
356
Item 4.
Coon Creek Watershed District Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
3 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Add storage and improve
stormwater conveyance to
improve localized flooding in
the Pleasure Creek
subwatershed in Blaine, Coon
Rapids.
New
High
2026-2031
CCWD in coord
with the cities of
Blaine and
Coon Rapids
This project falls under the
CCWD 2024-2033 CWMP.
CCWD will work with individual
jurisdictions on project
planning and implementation.
Internal:
CCWD Tax
Levy
External:
FEMA grant
funding
(HMGP,
FMA),
municipal
funding from
Blaine and
Coon Rapids
4 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Add storage and improve
stormwater conveyance to
improve localized flooding
and emergency access in the
Sand Creek drainage area,
including Ditch 39, 41, and 60
in Blaine, Coon Rapids, and
Ham Lake, especially for the
Park of Four Seasons and
Blaine International Village
manufactured home parks.
New
High
2026-2031
CCWD in coord
with the cities
Blaine, Coon
Rapids, and
Ham Lake
This project falls under the
CCWD 2024-2033 CWMP.
CCWD will work with individual
jurisdictions on project
planning and implementation.
Internal:
CCWD Tax
Levy
External:
FEMA grant
funding
(HMGP,
FMA),
municipal
funding from
Blaine, Coon
Rapids, and
Ham Lake
357
Item 4.
Coon Creek Watershed District Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
5 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Add storage and improve
stormwater conveyance to
improve localized flooding
and emergency access in the
Coon Creek drainage area
subwatersheds, including
Lower Coon Creek, Ditch 52,
54, 57, 37, 20, 23, 58, 11, 59,
and 44 in Coon Rapids,
Blaine, Andover, Ham Lake,
and Columbus, especially for
the Creekside Estates
manufactured home park.
New
High
2026-2031
CCWD in coord
with the cities of
Coon Rapids,
Blaine, Andover,
Ham Lake, and
Columbus
This project falls under the
CCWD 2024-2033 CWMP.
CCWD will work with individual
jurisdictions on project
planning and implementation.
Internal:
CCWD Tax
Levy
External:
FEMA grant
funding
(HMGP,
FMA),
municipal
funding from
Blaine, Coon
Rapids,
Andover,
Ham Lake,
and
Columbus
6 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Create and implement a
comprehensive stream and
floodplain restoration plan for
Coon Creek to stabilize banks
and channel, reduce localized
flooding, and reducing active
erosion sites made worse by
large storm events. Also
install alternative channel
stabilization practices such as
two-stage ditches.
New
High
2026-2031
CCWD in coord
with the city of
Coon Creek
This project falls under the
CCWD 2024-2033 CWMP.
CCWD will work with individual
jurisdictions on project
planning and implementation.
Internal:
CCWD Tax
Levy
External:
FEMA grant
funding
(HMGP,
FMA),
Lessard-
Sams
Outdoor
Heritage
Grant, BWSR
Clean Water
Fund Grants
358
Item 4.
Coon Creek Watershed District Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
7 Flooding Local Planning
& Regulations
Work with cities and
interested landowners to
purchase properties with
repetitive flooding damage
that is unable to be mitigated.
New
High
2026-2031
CCWD in coord
with local
jurisdictions
This project falls under the
CCWD 2024-2033 CWMP.
CCWD will work with individual
jurisdictions on project
planning and implementation.
Internal:
CCWD Tax
Levy
External:
FEMA grant
funding
(HMGP,
FMA),
municipal
funding
8 Flooding Local Planning
& Regulations
Purchase property adjacent to
Coon Creek or flood prone
land to create additional
floodplain to reduce localized
flood risks.
New
High
2026-2031
CCWD in coord
with the city of
Coon Creek
This project falls under the
CCWD 2024-2033 CWMP.
CCWD will work with individual
jurisdictions on project
planning and implementation.
Internal:
CCWD Tax
Levy
External:
FEMA grant
funding
(HMGP,
FMA),
municipal
funding
9 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Design and construct storm
ponds, infiltration basins,
green infrastructure, filters to
slow rain events, reduce peak
discharge rates, reduce
localized flooding, reduce
clogging and sedimentation in
culverts, reduce flood risk, fix
undersized infrastructure, and
reduce erosion downstream
caused by large rain events
particularly in the
Springbrook Creek, Pleasure
Creek, Sand Creek, and Coon
Creek subwatersheds that are
federally impaired for aquatic
life and recreation.
New
High
2026-2031
CCWD in coord
with local
jurisdictions
This project falls under the
CCWD 2024-2033 CWMP.
CCWD will work with individual
jurisdictions on project
planning and implementation.
Internal:
CCWD Tax
Levy
External:
FEMA grant
funding
(HMGP,
FMA), BWSR
Clean Water
Fund Grants
359
Item 4.
Coon Creek Watershed District Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
10 Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Design and construct “smart”
stormwater infrastructure to
adapt and respond to
forecasted storm events to
reduce flood risks and
improve water quality.
New
High
2026-2031
CCWD in coord
with local
jurisdictions
This project falls under the
CCWD 2024-2033 CWMP.
CCWD will work with individual
jurisdictions on project
planning and implementation.
Internal:
CCWD Tax
Levy
External:
FEMA grant
funding
(HMGP,
FMA), BWSR
Clean Water
Fund Grants
360
Item 4.
Linwood Township Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
1 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of and prepared for severe
weather events, periods of
extreme temperatures, and
extended power outages.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Township
Admin /
Township EM
Linwood Township shares
information with the public by
posting information on our
township website and the
Linwood Senior & Community
Center Facebook page. We also
utilize the Township Sign and
Township Website. We also post
information in our township
newsletter (Linwood Ledger) and
in public locations such as Town
Hall and the Senior & Community
Center. We will work to
participate in public awareness
campaigns that encourage
residents to be aware of and
prepared for severe weather
events and extreme temperatures,
including the NWS Severe
Weather Awareness Week (April),
NWS Winter Weather Awareness
Week (Nov), and National
Preparedness Month (Sept).
Internal:
Township
Gen.
Operating
Budget
2 All-Hazards
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to sign up
for emergency notifications to
receive timely alerts on severe
weather events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Township
Admin /
Township EM
The Linwood Township will
encourage residents to sign up for
Anoka County’s new Everbridge
emergency notification system.
We will use our Township website,
social media, and printed
information posted in public areas
to promote sign up and direct
people to the Anoka County
website to opt-in to receive
notifications.
Internal:
Township
Gen.
Operating
Budget
361
Item 4.
Linwood Township Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Enforce Township regulations
that help to reduce the risk of
storm damages to new
development.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Township
Building Dept.
Linwood Township adopts the
MN State Building Code.
Enforcement is done through our
township Building Department.
Building permits are required in
Linwood Township to ensure that
projects are constructed according
to building code and zoning
regulations. Rum River
Construction Consultants serves
as the Designated Building
Official for Linwood Township.
Internal:
Township
Gen.
Operating
Budget
All-Hazards Local Planning
& Regulations
Incorporate mitigation
strategies across the Township’s
long-term plans and policies for
future growth and new
development.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
Township
Admin in coord
with other Twp
Depts.
Linwood Township code of
ordinances includes Chapter 14,
Floods, Article II, Floodplain
Management. This article
regulates development in the
flood hazard areas of the town.
The ordinance from which this
article is derived is adopted to
comply with the rules and
regulations of the National Flood
Insurance Program. In 2019 the
township also adopted our 2040
Comprehensive plan, which
guides our land use and planning
decisions through 2040.
Internal:
Township
Gen.
Operating
Budget
All-Hazards
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Work to improve egress options
for areas of concern in the
township to support emergency
evacuation.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Town Board in
coord with Twp.
EM, Twp FD,
and Twp PW
There are many areas/
neighborhoods within the
township that are isolated without
multiple forms of egress. We will
work to assess the possibility of
future road construction projects
for areas of concern to support
community evacuation if needed
from hazards as wildfire and other
severe storms.
Internal:
Township
Gen.
Operating
Budget
362
Item 4.
Linwood Township Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the Township has
emergency generator backup
power for Township services
and buildings.
New
High
2026-2031
Township PW /
Township EM
Linwood Township has added a
generator at the Fire department
and Town Hall. We keep the
generators maintained to ensure
that they are operational.
Internal:
Township
Gen.
Operating
Budget
Severe Winter
& Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Reduce the risk of downed trees
and branches from severe
storms, and convert overhead
powerlines to underground
when possible.
Existing
Moderate
2026-2031
Township Public
Works Dept.
Our township public works
department manages trimming or
removal of trees on Township
property to reduce potential
damages from severe storms. The
Township will work with our
electric provider to convert
overhead power lines to
underground as part of existing or
new development.
Internal:
Township
Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
Electric
Utility,
FEMA
HMGP
Severe Winter
Storms
Natural
Systems
Protection
Maintain township roads for
winter safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Township Public
Works Dept.
Linwood Twp Public Works
manages all snow and ice
treatments for township roads to
maintain safety in winter.
Internal:
Township
PW Dept.
Severe
Summer
Storms
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Continue to maintain and
upgrade our outdoor warning
sirens.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Township EM
We test our outdoor warning
sirens monthly in coordination
with the Anoka County Sheriff’s
Office. The sirens are maintained
on a regular basis. The township
will seek to upgrade any sirens if
we feel necessary.
Internal:
Township
Gen.
Operating
Budget
External:
FEMA
HMGP
grant
funding
Severe
Summer
Storms
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Encourage residents to be aware
of severe windstorms and
tornadic weather, to understand
warning siren alerts, and to be
prepared with personal
evacuation or shelter plans.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Township
Admin /
Township EM
The Township will promote
tornado awareness and safety
during the NWS Severe Weather
Awareness week each April, and at
other times when tornadic
weather is a concern.
Internal:
Township
Gen.
Operating
Budget
363
Item 4.
Linwood Township Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
Extreme
Temperatures
Heat/Cold
Mitigation
Preparedness
& Response
Support
Ensure the Township is
prepared to provide emergency
sheltering to vulnerable
residents during periods of
extreme heat or cold events that
pose risk to life safety.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Township
Admin,
Township EM
The Linwood Senior &
Community Center is our
designated facility for emergency
sheltering if necessary. During an
extreme temperature event that
threatens life safety, the Township
is prepared to coordinate with our
fire department to address
emergency sheltering for those
who are most vulnerable. If
sheltering is required, we will use
all Township communication
platforms to get information out
to the public.
Internal:
Township
Gen.
Operating
Budget
Flooding
Structure &
Infrastructure
Projects
Plan for and implement
stormwater improvement
projects that help the Township
to handle future high rain
events.
Existing
High
2026-2031
Township Public
Works Dept.
The Linwood 2040
Comprehensive Plan includes
Appendix A, Stormwater &
Wetlands Standards which guides
our stormwater management
planning. Our township public
works department monitors and
addresses any local flooding
concerns within the township,
such as culvert improvements.
We also have a Linwood Township
Road & Bridge Committee, who
advise the Town Board on
township road and bridge
projects.
Internal:
PW Dept.
Budget
Wildfire
Education &
Awareness
Programs
Promote public awareness of
wildfire danger and burning
restrictions during periods of
drought.
New
Moderate
2026-2031
Twp. Fire Dept.
Our Township Fire Department
works to share information on the
level of fire danger with residents.
If there is a burn ban in effect for
the region the Township will
enforce it.
Internal:
Township
General
Operating
Budget
364
Item 4.
Linwood Township Mitigation Action Chart
# Hazard Mitigation
Strategy Mitigation Action
Status
Priority
Timeframe
Responsibility
Comments on
Implementation
& Integration
Possible
Funding
Wildfire
Natural
Systems
Protection
Work with the MN DNR and
Anoka County that manage
areas adjacent to Linwood
township to address wildfire
mitigation planning.
New
High
2026-2031
Township
Board, Twp Fire
Dept. in coord
with MN DNR
and Anoka
County
Wildfire is a concern as there is a
wildland urban interface
throughout the township
including approximately 6000
acres of Carlos Avery Wildlife
Management Area (owned by MN
DNR). In addition to this, Anoka
County has a regional park
consisting of approximately 800
acres within Linwood. The
township will work with the MN
DNR and Anoka County to discuss
these WUI areas and wildfire
mitigation activities that we may
partner on, such as wildland fuels
reduction and creating defensible
space on permiter areas of the
township adjacent to these areas.
Internal:
Township
General
Operating
Budget
External:
MN DNR,
Anoka
County
365
Item 4.
Anoka County 2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan z.umn.edu/AnokaHMP
Appendix I – Plan Maintenance &
Monitoring Worksheets
366
Item 4.
During the five-year plan period, the Emergency Management Director (EMD) will require all relevant
departments and jurisdictions to report on the status of their mitigation actions. This information will
be used to track progress for the next plan update. Participating jurisdictions will use these worksheets
to report on the mitigation activities listed in Appendix H.
Mitigation Action Tracking
Name of Jurisdiction
Reporting Period
Describe the action or
project.
Who is responsible for
the action?
Project status:
Complete
In progress, anticipated completion date:
Not started
Canceled
Progress Report
Has there been any
progress with this
project so far?
Are there any
obstacles or
challenges with this
action so far?
What steps do you
need to take to
complete this
project?
Other comments:
367
Item 4.
Hazard Mitigation Plan Maintenance Schedule
Plan Maintenance
Step When How Who
Monitoring Twice per year.
Get status updates on
jurisdictional
mitigation actions,
compile progress
reports and identify
any opportunities for
improvement.
Emergency
Management Director
Evaluating Once a year or after a
disaster event.
Use a standard form
to review how the plan
has been carried out
so far and record
lessons learned.
Emergency
Management Director,
Lead Jurisdiction
Planning Department
Manager
Updating Every 5 years, or after
a disaster event.
Review the plan and
document necessary
updates as necessary
for the next plan
update.
Emergency
Management Director,
Lead Jurisdiction
Planning Department
Manager
The EMD will also seek feedback from the Emergency Managers group on the following:
• Are there any new representatives from jurisdictions, agencies, or organizations that you feel
should be included in our stakeholder outreach?
• Do you feel your community has any new vulnerabilities that may be impacted by hazard
events? (critical infrastructure, systems, or populations)
• Has your community identified any new mitigation activities that would help reduce risk to
future hazard events?
• Are there any funding opportunities or other resources that may be available to help
implement local mitigation activities?
• How is your community integrating information from the mitigation plan into other planning
mechanisms (such as plans, policies, or partnerships)?
368
Item 4.
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-015
A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 2025 ANOKA COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council (the “Council”) for the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota (the
“City”) as follows:
WHEREAS, the City of recognizes the threat of natural hazards to people and property within the City of
Columbia Heights; and
WHEREAS, the City of has participated in the development of the 2025 Anoka County Hazard Mitigation
Plan in accordance with Federal laws, including the Robert T. St afford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act, as amended; the National Flood Insurance act of 1968, as amended; and the National Dam
Safety Program Act, as amended; and
WHEREAS, the 2025 Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies mitigation goa ls and actions to reduce
or eliminate long-term risk to people and property within the City of Columbia Heights from the impacts of
future hazards and disasters; and
WHEREAS, by adoption by the City of Columbia Heights demonstrates its commitment to hazard mitigation
and achieving the goals outlined in the 2025 Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan,
WHEREAS, approval of the 2025 Anoka County Hazard Mitigation Plan by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) will make Anoka County and participating jurisdictions eligible to apply for
FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grants; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights that the City of
Columbia Heights supports the hazard mitigation planning effort and wishes to adopt the 2025 Anoka
County Hazard Mitigation Plan.
ORDER OF COUNCIL
Passed this 9th day of March 2026.
Offered by:
Seconded by:
Roll Call:
_______________________________________
Amáda Márquez Simula, Mayor
Attest:
_______________________________________
Sara Ion, City Clerk/Council Secretary
369
Item 4.
ITEM: Comprehensive Plan Review Committee Resident Appointments. (10 Minutes)
Presenting Item: Ursula Brandt, City Planner
DEPARTMENT: Community Development BY/DATE: Ursula Brandt / February 24, 2026
CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below)
_Community that Grows with Purpose and Equity
_High Quality Public Spaces
_Safe, Accessible and Built for Everyone
X Engaged, Effective and Forward-Thinking
_Resilient and Prosperous Economy
X Inclusive and Connected Community
BACKGROUND
In April the City will kick off its 2050 Comprehensive Plan Update process. To gain input from interested city
residents through out the process, City Council instructed Staff to form a Review Committee made up of city
residents as well as Board and Commission members. Once the Committee is formed members will work
directly with city staff and consultants to review and advise on all elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS
The online application to apply for the Review Committee was available from January 28 to February 23, 2026.
Seven engaged city residents applied to be a part of the committee. The intention is to have the committee be
made up of 10-12 members including both residents and commissioners.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending the City Council appoint all seven applicants to the 2050 Comprehensive Plan Review
Committee.
Requested Council Action / Discussion Topics / Key Questions
Staff requests the council review the attached applications and confirm who will be appointed to the 2050
Comprehensive Plan Review Committee so staff can prepare a resolution for the March 13, 2026 City Council
Meeting.
ATTACHMENT(S)
Redacted Applications
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION
MEETING DATE MARCH 2, 2026
370
Item 5.
371
Item 5.
372
Item 5.
* Type Your Name Here
Degha Shabbeleh
Date
02/04/2026
Format: MM/DD/YYYY
2/23/26, 2:51 PM Revize Online Forms
https://columbiaheightsmn.rja.revize.com/reports/1098945 2/2
373
Item 5.
374
Item 5.
375
Item 5.
* Type Your Name Here
Jodi
Date
02/21/2026
Format: MM/DD/YYYY
2/23/26, 2:49 PM Revize Online Forms
https://columbiaheightsmn.rja.revize.com/reports/1117270 2/2
376
Item 5.
377
Item 5.
378
Item 5.
379
Item 5.
ITEM: Code Amendments to Chapter 5.5 Liquor and Beer
Presenting Item: Mitchell Forney, Community Development Director
DEPARTMENT: Community Development BY/DATE: Mitchell Forney / March 2, 2026
CORE CITY STRATEGIES:
_Community that Grows with Purpose and Equity
_High Quality Public Spaces
_Safe, Accessible and Built for Everyone
_Engaged, Effective and Forward-Thinking
XResilient and Prosperous Economy
_Inclusive and Connected Community
BACKGROUND
City staff have received a request from the local movie theater inquiring whether the City would consider
allowing movie theaters to obtain beer, wine, and intoxicating liquor licenses. Minnesota Statutes permit both
movie theaters and performance theaters to hold on -sale liquor licenses. However, the City’s current code
language is outdated and does not clearly reflect these allowances.
Updating the City Code would better align local regulations with state statute while maintaining appropriate
regulatory safeguards. Staff do not anticipate negative impacts from this amendment, as any movie theater
seeking licensure would still be required to meet the same food-to-alcohol sales ratio and operational
standards applicable to other licensed establishments. Staff are also proposing to exclude live performance
theaters as this would allow concert venues or other theaters to obtain alcohol. Staff do not have a strong
opinion on this item and are open to discussion.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff are recommending the below amendments to City code:
§ 5.503 MALT LIQUORS.
(A) No person, except the holder of intoxicating liquor licenses, wholesalers and
manufacturers to the extent authorized by law, shall deal in or dispose of by gift, sale or
otherwise, or keep or offer for sale, any malt liquor within the city without first having
received a license as hereinafter provided. Licenses shall be of three kinds:
(1) On-sale brewer taproom;
(2) On-sale brew pub; and
(3) Off-sale malt liquor.
(4) On-sale malt liquor.
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION
MEETING DATE MARCH 2, 2026
380
Item 6.
City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 2
(B) On-sale brewer taproom licenses may be granted to a brewer licensed under M.S. §
340A.301, subd. 6(c), (i) or (j), subject to the provisions of M.S. § 340A.26, as it may be
amended from time to time and as follows:
(1) A brewer may only hold one on-sale brewer taproom license; and
(2) The license permits the sale of malt liquor produced by the brewer for consumption of
the malt liquor on the premises of, or adjacent to, a brewer taproom owned by the brewer.
(C) On-sale brew pub licenses may be granted to hotels, clubs, municipal liquor stores,
restaurants, and non-profit organizations for sale and consumption of malt liquor produced on
the licensed premise.
(D) Off-sale malt liquor licenses may be granted to a licensee with either an on-sale brewer
taproom license or on-sale brew pub license, which shall permit the off-sale of malt liquor on
the licensee’s premise, subject to the provisions of M.S. §§ 340A.24 or 340A.28, as it may be
amended from time to time and as follows:
(1) A brewer may only hold one off-sale malt liquor license;
(2) The off-sale of malt liquor shall only be permitted during the same days and hours of
municipal liquor stores, and between the hours of 10:00 a.m. on Sundays and 2:00 a.m. on
Mondays;
(3) The only off-sale of malt liquor shall be the malt liquor produced by the licensee at the
licensee’s premise; and
(4) The packaging of the off-sale malt liquor containers and bottles are subject to M.S. §
340A.285, as it may be amended from time to time.
(B) “On -sale malt liquor” licenses shall be granted only to restaurants which are conducted
in such a manner that at least 55% of the annual gross receipts of the establishment must be
derived from or attributable to the sale of food. A hotel or movie theater shall be eligible for
an on-sale malt liquor license provided that, of that part of the total annual gross receipts
attributable to or derived from the serving of food and malt liquor, 55% or more of the annual
gross receipts for a license year is the serving of food.
§ 5.506 ON-SALE WINE LICENSES.
(B) “On -sale wine” licenses shall be granted only to restaurants which are conducted in such
a manner that at least 55% of the annual gross receipts of the establishment must be derived
from or attributable to the sale of food. A hotel or movie theater shall be eligible for an on-
sale wine license provided that, of that part of the total annual gross receipts attributable to or
derived from the serving of food and wine, 55% or more of the annual gross receipts for a
license year is the serving of food.
§ 5.505 INTOXICATING LIQUOR.
(A) No person, except wholesalers or manufacturers to the extent authorized by state
statute, shall directly or indirectly deal in, sell, or keep for sale any intoxicating liquor without 381
Item 6.
City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 3
first having received a license to do so as provided in this chapter. On-sale intoxicating liquor
licenses may be issued to the following establishments:
(1) Hotels, provided the establishment has a dining area providing seating for at least 30
guests at one time and a minimum of ten guest rooms, and of that part of the total business
receipts attributable to or derived from the serving of foods and intoxicating liquors, no less
that 55% of the business receipts from a license year must be attributable to the sale of food;
(2) Restaurants, provided the establishment derives at least 55% of the annual gross
receipts from the sale of food;
(3) Bowling centers, provided that the establishment is conducted in such a manner that
no less than 55% of the business receipts for the license year shall be derived from the serving
of food and bowling; and
(4) Clubs, or congressionally chartered veterans’ organizations, with the approval of the
commissioner, provided that the organization has been in existence for at least three years;
liquor sales only to members and bona fide guests; and
(5) Movie theaters provided that part of the total business receipts attributable to or
derived from the serving of foods and intoxicating liquors, no less that 55% of the business
receipts from a license year must be attributable to the sale of food;
Requested Council Action/ Discussion Topics / Key Questions
Staff are looking for guidance on the proposed amendments and if there are any unforeseen issues not
identified by staff.
382
Item 6.
ITEM: Yes to Homes Discussion
Presenting Item: Aaron Chirpich, City Manager
DEPARTMENT: Administration BY/DATE: Aaron Chirpich / February 26, 2026
CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below)
_Community that Grows with Purpose and Equity
X High Quality Public Spaces
_Safe, Accessible and Built for Everyone
X Engaged, Effective and Forward-Thinking
_Resilient and Prosperous Economy
_Inclusive and Connected Community
BACKGROUND
Staff from the Yes to Homes MN coalition have reached out to Council members requesting support for their
legislative agenda during the 2026 session. Staff has reviewed the 2026 legislative priorities advanced by Yes
to Homes, a bipartisan statewide effort focused on expanding housing choices across Minnesota. The
collations stated goal is to address Minnesota’s housing shortage by allowing a greater variety of housing
types and reducing regulatory barriers that increase housing costs.
The coalition’s proposal, referred to as the “Starter Home Act,” promotes statewide standards intended to
expand housing supply and affordability. Key elements include:
Allowing More Housing Types: Expanding access to duplexes, fourplexes, townhomes, accessory
dwelling units (ADUs), apartments, and mixed-use residential above commercial spaces.
Restoring Main Streets: Permitting residential units above retail and office uses to encourage
reinvestment in downtown areas.
Parking Flexibility: Reducing or eliminating minimum parking mandates in favor of more flexible,
locally responsive standards.
Reducing Costly Mandates: Limiting certain design and homeowners’ association requirements that
may increase construction costs.
The coalition argues that these changes would create housing options for residents of all stages of life and
better reflect changing household sizes and demographics.
Staff support many of the overarching goals identified by Yes to Homes, including expanding housing choice,
improving affordability, encouraging mixed-use development, and modernizing land use regulations. These
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION ITEMS
MEETING DATE MARCH 2, 2026
383
Item 7.
City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 2
objectives are largely aligned with existing City priorities related to housing diversity, reinvestment, and
economic vitality.
However, staff also notes that our advisory partners at the League of Minnesota Cities have previously
cautioned that similar legislative efforts in recent years have included provisions that preempt local control
over zoning and land use decisions. The coalition’s past proposals have, in some instances, sought to establish
statewide mandates that limit municipal discretion in regulating residential development. While statewide
standards may create consistency, they may also reduce the City’s ability to tailor zoning regulations to the
specific conditions, infrastructure capacity, and neighborhood dynamics unique to Columbia Heights.
Importantly, the City is scheduled to begin a Comprehensive Plan update later this year. This process will
provide a structured and community-driven opportunity to evaluate land use policy, zoning regulations,
housing supply strategies, and redevelopment priorities. Through this effort, the City can consider many of the
same housing strategies promoted by Yes to Homes, such as allowing additional housing types and revisiting
parking requirements, but in a manner that reflects local context and community input.
SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS
Staff reached out to Yes to Homes to obtain a draft of any bills they are putting forward this session. At the
time of this report, drafts were not available for distribution.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Acknowledge alignment between many Yes to Homes goals and existing City housing priorities.
2. Refrain from formally supporting the coalition’s legislation until draft bill language is available so staff
and the Council can evaluate the degree to which local control may be preempted.
3. Utilize the upcoming Comprehensive Plan update process to proactively consider tailored land use and
zoning changes that expand housing opportunities while maintaining appropriate local authority.
Waiting to review the specific legislative language will allow the Council to make an informed decision
regarding whether the proposal preserves sufficient municipal flexibility or imposes a one-size-fits-all
framework that may not fully reflect the needs of Columbia Heights. Staff will continue to monitor
developments and return to Council with additional analysis once draft legislation is introduced.
Requested Council Action/ Discussion Topics / Key Questions
(Briefly state the specific action staff is requesting of the City Council, if any. For example: provide
direction, discuss options, or review information.)
Staff are seeking feedback on the Council’s position regarding support for the Yes to Homes legislative
agenda.
ATTACHMENT(S)
Yes to Homes Platform Summary
384
Item 7.
A bipartisan effort toexpand housing choices forfamilies and communities
WHY THIS MATTERS:
Not Enough Homes
Every Minnesotan belongs in a home they can afford. But this American Dream is
increasingly out of reach as too few homes and rising competition drive up prices
and limit options across the state.
THE PATH FORWARD:
Say YES to more homes!
Meeting Minnesota’s housing needs will take an all-hands-on-deck approach including cities, towns, and rural communities.
The Yes to Homes agenda is a broad, bipartisan movement focused on practical solutions that help create the kinds of
homes Minnesotans want and need, but can’t always find today. By allowing more homes of different types and sizes,
communities can expand choices, increase affordability, and make room for people to live where they choose.
100,000
Number of homes
needed, to own and
rent, for an adequate
housing supply
40
The average age
of a first-time
home buyer
0
Number of counties in
Minnesota where the median-
income family can afford the
median-priced home
The Starter Home Act
Creating shared, statewide standards will give cities and towns the tools they need to expand housing choices while
preserving local character and provide a variety of benefits to cities and towns across Minnesota:
Allowing more home types that work for real life
When communities make room for homes of all shapes and sizes, like fourplexes, townhouses, and apartments, more
Minnesotans can live closer to their jobs, shorten commutes, support local businesses,
and stay rooted in the communities they love.
Restoring main streets
The small downtowns we love, both in larger communities and across Greater Minnesota,
can be built once again by allowing homes to be built above shops, restaurants, and offices.
BY THE NUMBERS:
Prepared by Neighbors for More Neighbors 385
Item 7.
Homes for every stage of life
Young adults who grew up in Minnesota should be able to stay in their hometowns in a
home they can afford. Older adults should be able to remain in the communities where
they've built their lives, even if their housing needs change. By allowing starter homes,
townhomes, accessory dwelling units, and more apartments, communities can create housing
that better fits people’s lives, at prices more families and workers can reach.
Smarter use of land and resources
Instead of wasteful one-size-fits-all parking rules, communities can adopt flexible rules based on what people
actually need, freeing up space and resources for homes that workers and families can afford.
Reduce costly mandates that drive up the cost of homes
Reducing unnecessary design requirements and homeowners' association requirements will lower construction costs,
making homes more attainable for everyday Minnesotans.
Minnesota’s households are changing, our housing should too
Today, the average Minnesota household is just 2.42 people, reflecting changing family sizes, aging populations, and new
household patterns. This shift creates a growing need for more smaller homes, like duplexes, townhomes, backyard
cottages, condos, and apartments located near jobs, shops, and transit.
Yes to Homes Agenda – Who we are
The Yes to Homes Coalition is a broad, bipartisan group of leaders and
organizations from across Minnesota--including housing advocates, community
organizers, home builders, developers, businesses, environmental and labor
organizations, transportation advocates, and faith-based groups.
Together, Yes to Homes advances proven, practical housing policies that help communities create more homes and ex-
pand opportunity statewide.
600,000+
Minnesotans who are paying
more than 30% of their income
on housing costs, leaving too
little for food, medicine, and
other basic needs
$27.27
Hourly wage required
for a full-time worker
to afford a two-bed-
room rental home in
Minnesota
BY THE NUMBERS: 25+
More than half of US
states have taken action
and passed legislation
to allow more homes
Prepared by Neighbors for More Neighbors 386
Item 7.
ITEM: Crypto / Virtual Currency Kiosk Regulation. (10 Minutes)
Presenting Item: Aaron Chirpich, City Manager
DEPARTMENT: Administration BY/DATE: Sara Ion / February 12, 2026
CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below)
_Community that Grows with Purpose and Equity
_High Quality Public Spaces
X Safe, Accessible and Built for Everyone
_Engaged, Effective and Forward-Thinking
_Resilient and Prosperous Economy
_Inclusive and Connected Community
BACKGROUND
At the February 2, 2026, City Council Work Session there was a request to have information brought forward
to the council about regulations for crypto / virtual currency kiosks. These kiosks serve as a location to insert
cash to purchase digital money like Bitcoin. Currently the closest kiosks to purchase cryptocurrency are
located at the Hilltop Tobacco Shop and the Cub Foods on Silver Lake Road in St. Anthony.
Crypto / virtual currency kiosk are a concern for the police department as there can be a substantial risk for
loss of money because of fraud or accident. There are multiple brands of kiosks that sell different types of
cryptocurrency. While some legitimate transactions may take place through these Kiosks, the machines have
quickly become a preferred payment method for scammers as the transactions cannot be undone.
SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS
Kiosk operators are regulated on both a federal and state level. Federally by the U.S. Treasury Department
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”). Kiosk operators must register with FinCEN as
a “money service business” and meet the recordkeeping requirements from the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-
money laundering statutes, but the kiosks themselves are not regulated by this Act.
In Minnesota, there are licensing requirements for virtual currency operators. Currently the State of
Minnesota regulates businesses that run cryptocurrency machines (kiosks). Minnesota Statute § 53B.75
outlines the following regulations for currency kiosk operators:
Disclosure of material risks.
"WARNING: LOSSES DUE TO FRAUDULENT OR ACCIDENTAL TRANSACTIONS ARE NOT RECOVERABLE
AND TRANSACTIONS IN VIRTUAL CURRENCY ARE IRREVERSIBLE. VIRTUAL CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS
MAY BE USED BY SCAMMERS IMPERSONATING LOVED ONES, THREATENING JAIL TIME, AND INSISTING
YOU WITHDRAW MONEY FROM YOUR BANK ACCOUNT TO PURCHASE VIRTUAL CURRENCY."
Terms and Conditions must be clearly disclosed on the kiosk prior to transaction.
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION
MEETING DATE MARCH 2, 2026
387
Item 8.
City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 2
Before each virtual currency transaction for, on behalf of, or with a person, a virtual currency kiosk
operator must disclose the transaction's terms and conditions in a clear, conspicuous, and easily
readable manner. The disclosures under this subdivision must address at least the following:
(1) the amount of the transaction;
(2) any fees, expenses, and charges, including applicable exchange rates;
(3) the type and nature of the transaction;
(4) a warning that once completed, the transaction may not be reversed;
(5) a daily virtual currency transaction limit of no more than $2,000;
(6) the difference in the virtual currency's sale price compared to the current market price; and
(7) other disclosures that are customarily given in connection with a virtual currency transaction.
Kiosk user must acknowledge the disclosures.
Before completing a transaction, a virtual currency kiosk operator must ensure that each person who
engages in a virtual currency transaction using the virtual currency operator's kiosk acknowledges
receipt of all disclosures required under this section via confirmation of consent. Additionally, upon a
transaction's completion, the virtual currency kiosk operator must provide a person with a physical
receipt, or a virtual receipt sent to the person's email address or SMS number, containing the following
information:
(1) the virtual currency kiosk operator's name and contact information, including a telephone number
to answer questions and register complaints;
(2) the type, value, date, and precise time of the transaction, transaction hash, and each virtual
currency address;
(3) the fees charged;
(4) the exchange rate;
(5) a statement of the virtual currency kiosk operator's liability for nondelivery or delayed delivery;
(6) a statement of the virtual currency kiosk operator's refund policy; and
(7) any additional information the commissioner of commerce may require.
Refunds for new customers.
A virtual currency kiosk operator must issue a refund to a new customer for the full amount of all
transactions made within the 72-hour new customer time period, as described in section 53B.69,
subdivision 3b, upon request of the customer. In order to receive a refund under this subdivision, a
customer must:
(1) have been fraudulently induced to engage in the virtual currency transactions; and
(2) within 14 days of the last transaction to occur during the 72-hour new customer time period,
contact the virtual currency kiosk operator and a government or law enforcement agency to inform
them of the fraudulent nature of the transaction.
388
Item 8.
City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 3
Transaction limits.
(a) There is an established maximum daily transaction limit of $2,000 for each new customer of a
virtual currency kiosk.
(b) The maximum daily transaction limit of an existing customer shall be decided by each virtual
currency kiosk operator in compliance with federal law.
It is important to remember that consumers who wish to purchase cryptocurrency are not prevented from
doing so using a computer or an app, where the fees are lower (often a flat rate of $.10 to $1.00 per
transaction) and cash is not required.
CYRPTO CURRENCY AND LOCAL ACTION
Local governments across Minnesota are taking steps to regulate or prohibit the operation of cryptocurrency
Kiosks within city limits, citing a lack of public safety resources to effectively monitor the Kiosks or address the
financial crimes associated with them. Staff have included examples of recent action from the City of
Stillwater, City of Forrest Lake as well as the City of St. Paul for Council’s review.
Requested Council Action/ Discussion Topics / Key Questions
Staff requests council feedback related to their desire for municipal regulation of crypto / virtual currency
kiosks.
ATTACHMENT(S)
MN State Statute 53B.75 VIRTUAL CURRENCY KIOSKS.
FBI Operation Level Up Information
City of Stillwater Presentation and Council Memo
City of Forrest Lake Presentation and Council Memo
City of St. Paul Council Memo
389
Item 8.
53B.75 VIRTUAL CURRENCY KIOSKS.
Subdivision 1.Disclosures on material risks.(a) Before entering into an initial virtual currency
transaction for, on behalf of, or with a person, the virtual currency kiosk operator must disclose in a clear,
conspicuous, and easily readable manner all material risks generally associated with virtual currency. The
disclosures must be displayed on the screen of the virtual currency kiosk with the ability for a person to
acknowledge the receipt of the disclosures. The disclosures must include at least the following information:
(1) virtual currency is not legal tender, backed or insured by the government, and accounts and value
balances are not subject to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration,
or Securities Investor Protection Corporation protections;
(2) some virtual currency transactions are deemed to be made when recorded on a public ledger, which
may not be the date or time when the person initiates the transaction;
(3) virtual currency's value may be derived from market participants' continued willingness to exchange
fiat currency for virtual currency, which may result in the permanent and total loss of a particular virtual
currency's value if the market for virtual currency disappears;
(4) a person who accepts a virtual currency as payment today is not required to accept and might not
accept virtual currency in the future;
(5) the volatility and unpredictability of the price of virtual currency relative to fiat currency may result
in a significant loss over a short period;
(6) the nature of virtual currency means that any technological difficulties experienced by virtual currency
kiosk operators may prevent access to or use of a person's virtual currency; and
(7) any bond maintained by the virtual currency kiosk operator for the benefit of a person may not cover
all losses a person incurs.
(b) The virtual currency kiosk operator must provide an additional disclosure, which must be
acknowledged by the person, written prominently and in bold type, and provided separately from the
disclosures above, stating: "WARNING: LOSSES DUE TO FRAUDULENT OR ACCIDENTAL
TRANSACTIONS ARE NOT RECOVERABLE AND TRANSACTIONS IN VIRTUAL CURRENCY
ARE IRREVERSIBLE. VIRTUAL CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS MAY BE USED BY SCAMMERS
IMPERSONATING LOVED ONES, THREATENING JAIL TIME, AND INSISTING YOU WITHDRAW
MONEY FROM YOUR BANK ACCOUNT TO PURCHASE VIRTUAL CURRENCY."
Subd. 2.Disclosures.(a) A virtual currency kiosk operator must disclose all relevant terms and conditions
generally associated with the products, services, and activities of the virtual currency kiosk operator and
virtual currency. A virtual currency kiosk operator must make the disclosures in a clear, conspicuous, and
easily readable manner. The disclosures under this subdivision must address at least the following:
(1) the person's liability for unauthorized virtual currency transactions;
(2) the person's right to:
(i) stop payment of a virtual currency transfer and the procedure to stop payment;
(ii) receive a receipt, trade ticket, or other evidence of a transaction at the time of the transaction; and
(iii) prior notice of a change in the virtual currency kiosk operator's rules or policies;
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes
53B.75MINNESOTA STATUTES 20251
390
Item 8.
(3) under what circumstances the virtual currency kiosk operator, without a court or government order,
discloses a person's account information to third parties; and
(4) other disclosures that are customarily provided in connection with opening a person's account.
(b) Before each virtual currency transaction for, on behalf of, or with a person, a virtual currency kiosk
operator must disclose the transaction's terms and conditions in a clear, conspicuous, and easily readable
manner. The disclosures under this subdivision must address at least the following:
(1) the amount of the transaction;
(2) any fees, expenses, and charges, including applicable exchange rates;
(3) the type and nature of the transaction;
(4) a warning that once completed, the transaction may not be reversed;
(5) a daily virtual currency transaction limit of no more than $2,000;
(6) the difference in the virtual currency's sale price compared to the current market price; and
(7) other disclosures that are customarily given in connection with a virtual currency transaction.
Subd. 3.Acknowledgment of disclosures.Before completing a transaction, a virtual currency kiosk
operator must ensure that each person who engages in a virtual currency transaction using the virtual currency
operator's kiosk acknowledges receipt of all disclosures required under this section via confirmation of
consent. Additionally, upon a transaction's completion, the virtual currency kiosk operator must provide a
person with a physical receipt, or a virtual receipt sent to the person's email address or SMS number,
containing the following information:
(1) the virtual currency kiosk operator's name and contact information, including a telephone number
to answer questions and register complaints;
(2) the type, value, date, and precise time of the transaction, transaction hash, and each virtual currency
address;
(3) the fees charged;
(4) the exchange rate;
(5) a statement of the virtual currency kiosk operator's liability for nondelivery or delayed delivery;
(6) a statement of the virtual currency kiosk operator's refund policy; and
(7) any additional information the commissioner of commerce may require.
Subd. 4.Refunds for new customers.A virtual currency kiosk operator must issue a refund to a new
customer for the full amount of all transactions made within the 72-hour new customer time period, as
described in section 53B.69, subdivision 3b, upon request of the customer. In order to receive a refund under
this subdivision, a customer must:
(1) have been fraudulently induced to engage in the virtual currency transactions; and
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes
2MINNESOTA STATUTES 202553B.75
391
Item 8.
(2) within 14 days of the last transaction to occur during the 72-hour new customer time period, contact
the virtual currency kiosk operator and a government or law enforcement agency to inform them of the
fraudulent nature of the transaction.
Subd. 5.Transaction limits.(a) There is an established maximum daily transaction limit of $2,000 for
each new customer of a virtual currency kiosk.
(b) The maximum daily transaction limit of an existing customer shall be decided by each virtual currency
kiosk operator in compliance with federal law.
History: 2024 c 114 art 3 s 10
Official Publication of the State of Minnesota
Revisor of Statutes
53B.75MINNESOTA STATUTES 20253
392
Item 8.
Operation Level Up
The FBI’s proactive approach to identify and notify victims of cryptocurrency investment
fraud and prevent further financial loss
Operation Level Up began in January 2024 to identify victims of cryptocurrency investment fraud and notify them of the scam. The operation was
initiated with the support of agents from the FBI and the United States Secret Service (USSS).
Cryptocurrency investment fraud, also known as pig butchering, is a confidence-based scam. In these types of scams, subjects target victims
online and develop a friendship or relationship before introducing a fraudulent investment opportunity in cryptocurrency. Victims are coached to
invest more and more money into what appears to be an extremely profitable platform, only to be unable to withdraw their funds.
Operation Level Up has also identified victims of other types of scams, such as work-from-home scams, where scammers pose as employees of
legitimate companies and recruit victims for work-from-home, online-only positions. When a victim expresses interest, the scammer provides
online training. Once trained, the victim will begin to perform a series of tasks that require the victim to deposit their own money, via cryptocurrency
or money transfers, into a platform for the job to be completed.
These scams originated in Southeast Asia and are being perpetrated by organized crime groups operating from scam compounds in Southeast
Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and South America.
Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud
Cryptocurrency investment fraud, which the media commonly describes as pig butchering, is one of the most prevalent and damaging fraud schemes today.
Impact of Operation Level Up
Sophisticated investigative techniques have enabled Level Up agents to identify victims early in these schemes. Such efforts have likely resulted
in significant savings to victims across the United States.
As of December 2025:
The FBI has notified 8,103 victims of cryptocurrency investment fraud.
77% of those victims were unaware they were being scammed.
The estimated savings to victims is $511,511,288.
Eighty victims have been referred to an FBI victim specialist for suicide intervention.
Some victims have reported that—prior to being notified by the FBI about the scam—they were in the process of liquidating their 401K, selling
their home, or obtaining a sizeable loan. One elderly victim was surviving on disability pay; he had already paid the scammers $1,200 and would
have cut into money he needed for food to pay more.
The estimated savings is calculated by taking the average loss of cryptocurrency investment fraud victims reported to IC3 and subtracting the average loss reported by the victims contacted through each
round of this operation.
Be aware of who you are communicating with online. Here are some signs you may
be a victim:
Meeting someone online or through an unsolicited text message and having that person pitch an investment opportunity.
If the person requests to move the conversation to an encrypted messaging application.
Claims of high returns and a pressure to quickly invest.
If the person you’re talking to requests that you limit contact with financial advisors and family.
Difficulty trying to withdraw your funds or being required to pay previously undisclosed fees and taxes to withdraw your funds.
1
1
393
Item 8.
If you think you are a victim of cryptocurrency investment fraud:
1. Immediately stop sending money and file a report with the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) as soon as possible. Crime reports
are used for investigative and intelligence purposes. Rapid reporting can also help support the recovery of lost funds.
2. Do not release any financial or personal identifying information or pay any additional fees or taxes to withdraw money you have invested in
a potential scheme.
3. Do not pay for services that claim to be able to recover lost funds, as these are often scams as well.
4. One of the most common tactics these criminals employ is a false sense of urgency or isolation. For this reason, the FBI urges the public to
"Take A Beat" by resisting pressure to act quickly, pausing for a moment, and assessing the situation. It’s better to be safe than scammed. For
more information, visit fbi.gov/scams.
What you should know if you're identified as a possible victim and contacted by the
FBI:
When an agent calls a victim, they explain the nature of the scheme and why they believe that person is a victim.
The agent will also provide warnings about other types of scams, guidance on how to file a report with the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center
(IC3) at ic3.gov, and victim resources, if appropriate.
Level Up agents are not investigating individual victim cases; reporting to IC3 is the first step for a case to be considered. Reporting to IC3 can
also help to identify other victims.
When the FBI emails a victim, they also explain the nature of the scheme and instructions on filing a report with IC3.
In addition, Level Up agents often try to contact you via email. In that email, agents provide a warning about the scheme, how the scheme works,
and instructions on how to file a complaint with IC3.
Please pay particular attention to the email address and ensure it comes from an “@fbi.gov” address, as scammers can and will try to impersonate
the FBI using similar-looking email addresses.
Do not take any action until you've spoken to an FBI agent who has verified their identity with you; email is not a secure method of communication
by itself.
It is common for fraudsters to impersonate FBI employees or other government officials and pretend to represent legitimate operations
such as Operation Level Up.
Should you be contacted as part of the Operation Level Up process, the FBI employee will provide you with a means to verify their employment
and affiliation with the FBI. You can also contact your local field office.
Victims are also asked to file a report with the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) at ic3.gov. From an investigative standpoint, the FBI
receives tens of thousands of similar complaints each year. The FBI is unable to open cases on behalf of every individual victim; however, when
victims file reports with IC3, they are in a position to be connected to an ongoing or future case.
Criminals may be aware of our outreach efforts. If you notify the person you are investing with—or receiving investment advice from—regarding
contact from law enforcement, they will likely try to coach you on how to respond to us or tell you not to answer our calls.
Remember, FBI Operation Level Up employees will never:
Offer services or methods to recover lost money or refer you to a service or others promising the same.
Provide financial accounts — traditional banking, cryptocurrency, or otherwise — to which your money should be sent.
Ask for sensitive information, such as your address, social security number, or financial account information.
Ask for login information, such as username and password, for any applications.
Ask for, or provide instructions on, changing security settings to any accounts or devices.
Contact you via social media or ask you to move communications to a different platform.
Ask you to call, speak with, or contact via any other means, another individual apart from the initial caller.
394
Item 8.
Resources
FBI Announces Nationwide 'Take A Beat' Campaign to Increase Awareness of Frauds and Scams
National Crimes and Victim Resources
Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud
Inside the FBI Podcast: Fighting Fraud
Inside the FBI Podcast: Romance Scams, Revisited
Operation Level-Up: How the FBI Is Saving Victims from Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud
FBI Takes Action to Protect Your Hard-Earned Money
Videos
Operation Level Up Electronic Press Kit (for Press/Media Use)
395
Item 8.
Stillwater Virtual Currency
Kiosk Ban Ordinance
Stillwater Mayor Ted Kozlowski
Stillwater Police Chief Brian Mueller
396
Item 8.
What are Virtual Currency Kiosks
Virtual Currency Kiosk
•Also referred to as “Crypto
Currency ATM”
•Allows users to buy or sell
cryptocurrency for cash, or
transfer cryptocurrency to another
person.
•All transactions have a high
percentage-based fee (20-30%)
397
Item 8.
Kiosk Operation
Credit: OCCRP Organized Crime and
Corruption Reporting Project
398
Item 8.
Why Scammers Love Kiosks for Fraud
•Scammers manipulate, threaten,
and intimidate victims with
schemes to insert cash into the
Kiosks
•Kiosks quickly move the victims'
cash into tough-to-trace
accounts owned by the
scammers
•In 2023, $5.6 Billion in reported
in U.S. losses, $2.5 Billion for
people over 50 (FBI 2023 Report)
399
Item 8.
Who Regulates Virtual Currency Kiosks?
Federal Regulation
•31 CFR Subt. B, Ch. X, Pt. 1022
•Fed. Registration requirement for
Operators
•Operators must register with U.S.
Treasury Dept. Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network as a “money
service business” and meet certain
requirements
•Kiosks themselves are NOT
regulated Federally
State Regulation
•Minn. Stat. §53B.69-75
•State Licensing requirement for
Operators
•Operators must obtain a state
license and disclose details such as
fees, liability for mistaken transfers,
basis for recovery and whether a
user can stop payment
•If a Kiosk is used, more disclaimers
are required
•Kiosks themselves are NOT
regulated by the State
400
Item 8.
Stillwater Community Concerns
•40% of Stillwater’s population
is 50 and over
•Stillwater PD has responded to
over 30 scam reports since
2023 with over $156,000 in
reported losses
•Forest Lake reported losses of
$300,000 since 2023
•Woodbury reported losses of
$6.6 million since 2021
•Most scams involve
transactions at Kiosks
401
Item 8.
Stillwater Ord. 2025-125 Kiosk Prohibition
Adopted April 15, 2025
Provisions
•Prohibits Kiosks in the City (under
general City Code, not Zoning
Ordinance)
•Does not ban Virtual Currency
Operators, only the physical Kiosks
•Hosts have 60 days to remove the
Kiosks
•Authority: Police Powers as a
Threat to Public Health, Safety,
Welfare
Penalties
•Administrative Citation ($100 fine)
•Any Licensed Business (i.e., off-sale
liquor) risks Suspension or
Revocation of its City License for
violating other provisions of the
City Code
•Criminal Charges, if necessary
402
Item 8.
Why did Stillwater ban the Kiosks?
•Kiosks are the tools preferred by scammers, targeting the elderly
•Kiosks are not regulated by Fed. or State Laws. The Operators are
regulated, but not the Kiosks, which is only one method to conduct
transactions
•Legitimate cryptocurrency businesses have other tools to transact
business (apps, computers)
•Some cities are choosing a lesser (but included) form of regulation,
beginning with a registration process and if too many crimes are
reported, the registration would be revoked
•Stillwater chose to jump to the finish line
403
Item 8.
DATE: April 5, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor Ted Kozlowski
FROM: Kori Land, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Crypto/Virtual Currency Kiosks Prohibition Summary
In the past few years, the Police Department has seen a significant rise in the number of
reports of scams from cryptocurrency kiosks located in the City and recently approached
the City Attorney’s Office to discuss what options the City has to regulate these kiosks to
protect the community.
Crypto currency kiosks or Virtual Currency Kiosks (“Kiosks”), as referred to in Minnesota
state law, look like an ATM, and are found in convenience stores, pharmacies, tobacco
shops, liquor stores and grocery stores, but instead of dispensing cash, their purpose is
to allow customers to sell and purchase cryptocurrency. The Kiosks accept cash from
customers and then credit it to the account of another person, move it from one account
to another account for the same person , or relinquish control of the currency to another
person. This photo is an example of a Kiosk.
404
Item 8.
2
There are multiple brands of Kiosks that sell different types of cryptocurrency. While some
legitimate transactions may take place through these Kiosks, the machines have quickly
become a preferred payment method for scammers.
1. Current regulations for the crypto currency operators:
• Federal: Kiosk operators must register with the U.S. Treasury Department
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) as a “money service
business” and meet the recordkeeping requirements from the Bank Secrecy
Act and anti-money laundering statutes
• State: A license is required in MN to operate a virtual currency business. (Minn.
Stat. §§ 53B.69-75) And regardless of the method of the transaction (app,
computer, Kiosk) MN law requires the operators to disclose:
o Whether the transaction is covered by insurance,
o The revocability of the transaction,
o Liability for mistaken, unauthorized or accidental transfers,
o The basis for any recovery from the licensee,
o Whether the person has the right to stop payment or revoke the transaction.
If a Kiosk is used, then additional requirements include:
o A disclaimer that explains that this is not a bank transaction and that it is not
subject to any federal oversight or protections,
o Daily transaction limits ($2,000)
o Refunds (for new customers only, and if within 72 hours of the transaction),
o The following statement which must be acknowledged by the customer:
“WARNING: LOSSES DUE TO FRAUDULENT OR ACCIDENTAL
TRANSACTIONS ARE NOT RECOVERABLE AND TRANSACTIONS IN
VIRTUAL CURRENCY ARE IRREVERSIBLE. VIRTUAL CURRENCY
TRANSACTIONS MAY BE USED BY SCAMMERS IMPERSONATING LOVED
ONES, THREATENING JAIL TIME, AND INSISTING YOU WITHDRAW
MONEY FROM YOUR BANK ACCOUNT TO PURCHASE VIRTUAL
CURRENCY."
2. The Crimes/Issues at Kiosks
• All transactions conducted at Kiosks are accompanied by high percentage-
based fees (20-30%). (On Feb. 26, 2025, the Iowa Attorney General
announced that it is suing both BitCoin and CoinFlip for imposing excessive
and often hidden transaction fees, ranging from 21%-23% of the transaction.)
It is important to remember that customers who wish to purchase
cryptocurrency are not prevented from doing so using a computer or an app,
where the fees are lower (often a flat rate of $.10 to $1.00 per transaction) and
cash is not required.
• The host business (where the Kiosk is located) also receives a percentage of
the markup.
405
Item 8.
3
• Based on the investigation by the Iowa Attorney General, the majority of scam
victims are over the age of 60.
o The high volume of scam transactions being performed at Kiosks,
coupled with the excessive fees that are being charged at the Kiosks,
means that both the operator and the host are profiting from the victims.
• Criminals have already found their way around the MN daily transaction limits
by telling victims to use different Kiosks to complete a large transaction .
• Criminals manipulate, intimidate, and threaten their victims into using the
Kiosks to send cash, including schemes such as:
o the victim has committed a crime and needs to pay money to avoid jail,
o that the victim is due a payment or owes a payment on PayPal,
o investment schemes,
o the scammer falsely represents themselves as government officials or
law enforcement officers and requests personal or financial information
for an alleged refund
• In 2023, the FBI reports that there were approximately 69,468 total complaints
in the U.S. with a cryptocurrency nexus for a total loss of $5.6 billion dollars, an
increase of 45% since 2022.
3. Local Impact
According to local reports regarding fraud incidents at Kiosks:
• Forest Lake had losses totaling over $300,000 in the last two years,
• White Bear Lake reported about $125,000 from 2023,
• Woodbury had $6.6 million in reported cryptocurrency losses since 2021,
• Stillwater had nearly $75,000 in losses since 2023 and provided this recent
example:
“On October 22, 2024, a victim was contacted by a suspect via telephone and
told to retrieve $20,000 from her savings due to an “overpayment” to her PayPal
account. The victim was directed to drive to the gas station in downtown
Stillwater and deposit this $20,000 into the Athena Bitcoin ATM at the Amoco
Gas Station. The gas station employee called police. The Stillwater Police
responded and stopped the female after she had deposited $5,820 and
explained to her that she was being scammed.”
Most cities, including Stillwater, do not have sufficient public safety resources to monitor
or regulate the Kiosks or the crimes that result therefrom and the City has a duty to protect
the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens, particularly the elderly , from these
types of financial crimes. The duty to protect the citizens outweighs the benefit of these
Kiosks and therefore, justifies a prohibition on Virtual Currency Kiosks.
406
Item 8.
City of Stillwater
Washington County, Minnesota
ORDINANCE NO. 2025-_____
AN ORDINANCE ENACTING STILLWATER CITY CODE CHAPTER 12, ARTICLE X,
PROHIBITING VIRTUAL CURRENCY KIOSKS
The City Council of Stillwater does ordain:
SECTION 1 ENACTMENT. Stillwater City Code Chapter 12, Article X is hereby enacted
as follows:
ARTICLE X. - VIRTUAL CURRENCY KIOSKS
Sec.12-210. – Purpose.
(a) Virtual Currency Kiosks, or cryptocurrency kiosks, are a significant instrument in
financial fraud and scams. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) reported in 2023, there
were nearly 70,000 complaints and $5.6 billion in losses due to Virtual Currency Kiosk aided
fraud and scams, accounting for almost 50% of total losses relating to financial fraud. The
elderly are overwhelmingly impacted by financial fraud and scams perpetrated with Virtual
Currency Kiosks, with losses reported for those over age 50 totaling $2.5 billion in 2023. The
FBI reports that criminals give their victims detailed instructions, including how to withdraw cash
from their bank, how to locate a Virtual Currency Kiosk, and how to deposit and send these
funds to the criminal using a Virtual Currency Kiosk. (FBI 2023 Cryptocurrency Fraud Report)
(b) Criminals manipulate, intimidate, or threaten victims into using Virtual Currency Kiosks
to send funds. In many Virtual Currency Kiosk scams, criminals falsely represent themselves
as government officials or law enforcement officers to instill a sense of urgency and isolation
in their victims. Because the scams often require the victim to deposit large sums of cash,
Virtual Currency Kiosks cause significant risk to public safety due to individuals carrying
substantial amounts of cash to Virtual Currency Kiosks.
Criminals prefer using Virtual Currency Kiosks for their transactions because of the
anonymity, the avoidance of third-party financial intermediaries validating the transaction and
the fact that the transactions are irrevocable. Criminal actors connected to the internet from
anywhere in the world can exploit victims to facilitate large-scale, nearly instantaneous cross-
border transactions without traditional financial intermediaries that employ anti-money
laundering programs.
(c) In just the past few years, the Stillwater Police Department has experienced a drastic
increase in these scams and are particularly concerned about the high dollar amounts of
these losses. Currently, about 40% of Stillwater’s population is over the age of 50. Since
2023, the Police Department has responded to over 30 virtual currency-related scam reports
from Stillwater residents with over $156,000 of reported losses. In one report alone, a victim
had deposited over $5,800 into a Virtual Currency Kiosk before the Police Department
responded and stopped the victim from continuing to deposit additional funds.
407
Item 8.
2
(d) The Stillwater Police Department has limited resources to investigate, pursue and
prosecute these types of criminal activities. In addition, these virtual transactions allow
transfers of funds overseas, thereby impeding the ability of any US law enforcement agency
to recover such funds. Attempting to allocate the Stillwater Police Department’s resources
toward the pursuit and recovery efforts reduces the Police Department’s ability to adequately
respond to the existing public safety needs of the residents of the City.
(e) Minn. Stat. § 53B.69 uses a defined term of Virtual Currency, which is commonly
referred to as a cryptocurrency. The term is interchangeable, but for purposes of this Section,
the terminology for this and other defined terms found in Minn. Stat. § 53B.69 shall be used.
(f) The Stillwater City Council has determined that an ordinance prohibiting Virtual
Currency Kiosks within the City is necessary and appropriate to prevent crime, protect
personal property, and promote the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens and a prohibition
far outweighs any benefit they provide to the public.
Sec. 12-211. – Authority. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 412.221 subd. 32, the City has the
authority to provide for the prevention of crime, the protection of property and the promotion
of the general welfare by ordinances consistent with state and federal law.
Sec. 12-212. – Definitions. The following words, terms, and phrases, when used in this
section, shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this subsection, except where the
definitions in Minn. Stat. § 53B.69 clearly indicates a different meaning:
(a) Virtual Currency means a digital representation of value that:
(1) is used as a medium of exchange, unit of account, or store of value; and
(2) is not money, whether or not denominated in money, and thus does not have
legal tender status.
Virtual Currency does not include transactions where a merchant grants, as part of a
rewards program, value that cannot be exchanged with the merchant for money, bank
credit, or virtual currency. It also does not include digital representation of value issued
by or on behalf of a publisher used solely within an online game.
(b) Virtual Currency Kiosk (Cryptocurrency Kiosk) means an electronic terminal acting as
a mechanical agent of the Virtual Currency Kiosk Operator enabling the exchange of
Virtual Currency for money, bank credit, or other virtual currency.
(c) Virtual Currency Kiosk Host means the owner or occupant of real property that leases,
allows, authorizes or permits space for the location of a Virtual Currency Kiosk,
whether such authorization or permission is through written or verbal agreement, and
whether or not there is any compensation therefor.
(d) Virtual Currency Kiosk Operator means a person or business that operates a Virtual
Currency Kiosk within the City of Stillwater.
(e) Virtual Currency Kiosk Transaction means a transaction conducted or performed, in
whole or in part, by electronic means via Virtual Currency Kiosks.
408
Item 8.
3
(f) Virtual Currency Transfer means to assume control of Virtual Currency from, or on
behalf of, a person and to:
(1) Credit the virtual currency to the account of another person or business;
(2) Move the virtual currency from one account of a person to another account of
the same person; or
(3) Relinquish control of virtual currency to another person.
Sec. 12-213. – Virtual Currency Kiosks Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for anyone to host,
allow, operate, permit, locate or place a Virtual Currency Kiosk within the City.
Sec. 12-214. – Exceptions. This Section does not apply to any Virtual Currency Transfers
that are conducted without the use of a Virtual Currency Kiosk and does not intend to interfere
with other types and methods of Virtual Currency Transfers.
Sec. 12-215. – Penalty. Violations of this section may result in an administrative citation
pursuant to Chapter 2, Article VI, Division 2, or criminal prosecution pursuant to Section 2-
204 issued to the Virtual Currency Kiosk Operator or Virtual Currency Kiosk Host or both. In
addition, any Virtual Currency Kiosk Host in violation of this section who has a license from
the City where the Virtual Currency Kiosk is located, may have its existing license suspended
or revoked for posing a threat to the welfare and safety of the public.
SECTION 2 SUMMARY PUBLICATION. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 412.191,
in the case of a lengthy ordinance, a summary may be published. While a copy of the entire
ordinance is available without cost at the office of the City Clerk, the following summary is
approved by the City Council and shall be published in lieu of publishing the entire ordinance:
The Stillwater City Council enacts Chapter 12 Article X of the Stillwater City
Code. This ordinance protects public health, safety, and welfare in the City by
prohibiting Virtual Currency Kiosks in the City.
SECTION 3 EFFECTIVE DATE AND REMOVAL OF EXISTING VIRTUAL
CURRENCY KIOSKS. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication according to law. All Virtual Currency Kiosks existing in the City as
of the Effective Date of this Ordinance must be removed within 60 days after the Effective
Date.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Stillwater this ___ day of , 2025.
CITY OF STILLWATER
Ted Kozlowski, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beth Wolf, City Clerk
409
Item 8.
THE NUMBERS:
Crypto ATMs are favored by criminals for their anonymity and general
lack of oversight. Criminals rely on them as a fast, easy and often
untraceable way to get access to victims’ cash.
The Federal Reserve says crypto ATMs were used for at least $35
million in fraudulent transactions in 2022.
In 2023, consumer losses due to scams involving cryptocurrency
ATMs, particularly Bitcoin ATMs, reached a concerning $114 million, a
tenfold increase compared to $12 million in 2020.
During the first half of 2024, losses topped $65 million, with people 60
and older more than three times as likely as younger adults to report a
loss.
Forest Lake had reported losses of nearly $300K in 2023 and 2024. 410
Item 8.
THE CRIME:
Impersonation:Pretending to be from a government agency (e.g., IRS, FBI), a well-known company (e.g., Apple, Microsoft), or even a family member in distress.
Threats:Threatening arrest, legal action, or account closure if the victim doesn't comply – missing jury duty.
Investment Scams:Promising high returns on cryptocurrency investments, often using fake websites or apps.
Romance Scams:Building a relationship online and then asking for money for fabricated emergencies.
Tech Support Scams:Claiming there's a problem with the victim's computer and requiring payment through a Bitcoin ATM to fix it.
411
Item 8.
THE VICTIMS:
Elderly and vulnerable population.
Retirees with established wealth.
Even if a victim is stopped during the scam and does not
suffer a monetary loss, the mental and emotional impact is
severe.
Some scams involve the impersonation of law enforcement,
and the over-the-phone trust from actual law enforcement is
lost.
412
Item 8.
THE INVESTIGATION:
Crypto currency fraud investigations take a considerable
amount of time to investigate, not unlike any other high
level financial crime.
The difference between a “normal” fiat currency financial
crime and a virtual currency crime is the medium on
which the crime occurs, which is a blockchain, and the
level of cooperation you receive from the companies
involved.
Tracing the path that the currency flows also takes
expensive software.
413
Item 8.
THE LOOPHOLE:
Minnesota State Statute 53B.75 attempted to regulate
the virtual currency kiosks to protect Minnesota
residents.
Crypto currency kiosk companies determined a “loop
hole” in the statute regarding the definition of a new
customer.
Scammers will typically send a QR code to their
victims that is linked to an established “wallet” or coin
address, nullifying the entire section protecting new
customers.
414
Item 8.
THE PREVENTION:
Education through presentations. AARP has been a tremendous
resource and partner for the Forest Lake Police Department and has
provided presentations to our community.
Self-regulation through a stricter business model by the kiosk
companies.
Regulation through state statute or local ordinance.
415
Item 8.
THANK YOU
Nathan Olstad
Forest Lake Police Department
421@FLPD.COM
651-209-9926
416
Item 8.
417
Item 8.
418
Item 8.
419
Item 8.
420
Item 8.
421
Item 8.
422
Item 8.
423
Item 8.
424
Item 8.
425
Item 8.
426
Item 8.
427
Item 8.
428
Item 8.
429
Item 8.
430
Item 8.
431
Item 8.
432
Item 8.
433
Item 8.
434
Item 8.
435
Item 8.
436
Item 8.
Rebecca Noecker Megan Jekot
Council President Legislative Aide
City Hall Suite 310B Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102-1615 651-266-8620
Email: ward2@ci.stpaul.mn.us www.stpaul.gov/ward2
AA-ADA-EEO Employer
To: City of Saint Paul City Councilmembers Date: May 14, 2025
Subject: Cryptocurrency Kiosks and Local Government Actions
EXECUTIVE SUMAMRY
• Cryptocurrency Kiosks look like an ATM and are found in convenience stores, pharmacies, tobacco
shops, liquor stores and grocery stores. Instead of dispensing cash, their purpose is to allow customers to
sell and purchase cryptocurrency.
• In 2023, the FBI reports that there were approximately 69,468 total complaints in the U.S. with a
cryptocurrency nexus for a total loss of $5.6 billion dollars, an increase of 45% since 2022.
• The decentralized nature of cryptocurrency, the speed of these irreversible transactions and the ability to
move money all over the world makes cryptocurrency attractive for criminals in general.
• Local governments across Minnesota are taking steps to regulate or prohibit the operation of
cryptocurrency Kiosks within city limits, citing a lack of public safety resources to effectively monitor
the Kiosks or address the financial crimes associated with them.
• Cities have a responsibility to safeguard the health, safety, and welfare of their residents—particularly
vulnerable populations such as the elderly.
• Given these concerns, the need to protect citizens outweighs any potential benefits these Kiosks may
offer, thereby justifying regulatory action at the local level.
BACKGROUND
Cryptocurrency Kiosks or Virtual Currency Kiosks (“Kiosks”), as
referred to in Minnesota state law, look like an ATM, and are found in
convenience stores, pharmacies, tobacco shops, liquor stores and
grocery stores, but instead of dispensing cash, their purpose is to allow
customers to sell and purchase cryptocurrency.
A Kiosk is defined in Minnesota law as “an electronic terminal
acting as a mechanical agent of the virtual currency Kiosk
operator to enable the virtual currency Kiosk operator to
facilitate the exchange of virtual currency for money, bank
credit, or other virtual currency, including but not limited to (1)
connecting directly to a separate virtual currency exchanger that
performs the actual virtual currency transmission, or (2) drawing
upon the virtual currency in the possession of the electronic
terminal’s operator.” (Minn. Stat. §53B.69 subd. 10.)
Example of a cryptocurrency Kiosk
437
Item 8.
The Kiosks accept cash from consumers and then do the following with it:
• Credit it to the account of another person
• Move it from one account to another account for the same person 3
• Relinquish control of the currency to another person
There are multiple brands of Kiosks that sell different types of cryptocurrency. Most Kiosks do not allow a
consumer to withdraw cash (sell cryptocurrency), instead only allowing a consumer to insert cash to purchase
cryptocurrency. While some legitimate transactions may take place through these Kiosks, the machines have
quickly become a preferred payment method for scammers.
CRYPTOCURRENCY KIOSKS & CRIMINAL ACTIVITY
In 2023, the FBI reports that there were approximately 69,468 total complaints in the U.S. with a
cryptocurrency nexus for a total loss of $5.6 billion dollars, an increase of 45% since 2022.
The decentralized nature of cryptocurrency, the speed of these irreversible transactions and the ability to move
money all over the world makes cryptocurrency attractive for criminals in general. When you add the ability to
access a victim’s cash via the Kiosk and the ability to target victims who do not have an online presence, there
is significant opportunity for criminal activity.
Criminals manipulate, intimidate, and threaten their victims into using the Kiosks to send cash, including
schemes such as:
• the victim has committed a crime and needs to pay money to avoid jail,
• that the victim is due a payment or owes a payment on PayPal,
• investment schemes, and
• the scammer falsely represents themselves as government officials or law enforcement officers and
requests personal or financial information for an alleged refund.
Criminals often start with a phone call and are highly skilled at creating a sense of urgency, panic, and isolation
in their victims. The criminals will remain on the phone with the victim throughout the transaction(s) to ensure
that the victims lie to bank employees, local law enforcement, and other bystanders if necessary. In some scams,
criminals falsely represent themselves as government officials or law enforcement officers.
Once cash is deposited into a suspect’s virtual wallet, it is very difficult, if not impossible to recover and these
cases are very difficult and time consuming to investigate.
It is important to note that customers who wish to purchase cryptocurrency are not prevented from doing so
using a computer or an app, where the fees are often a flat rate of $.10 to $1.00 per transaction and cash is not
required.
The Kiosk operator often marks up the cryptocurrency by 20-30%. Frequently the hosting business (often a
convenience store) also receives a cut of the markup. In cases of criminal activity, suspects are often willing to
pay these steep fees in exchange for greater anonymity and a lower risk of being caught—especially since the
fees are effectively covered by the stolen funds. The combination of high transaction volumes linked to scams
and the excessive fees charged suggests that both the Kiosk operators and host businesses are profiting at the
expense of the victims.
438
Item 8.
CRYPTOCURRENCY KIOSKS & CRIMINAL ACTIVITY IN SAINT PAUL
The following information was provided by the Saint Paul Police Department in May of 2025.
• In 2024 there were four cryptocurrency Kiosk scams with a total of approximately $16,900 reporting to
have been lost; overall there were 15 scams involving crypto.
o The majority of these scams involved individuals being contacted on social media by fake
investors.
o No money was reported as recovered from these scams.
• In 2025 there have been two cryptocurrency Kiosk scams with a total of approximately $11,621
reporting to have been lost; overall there have been eight scams involving crypto this year.
o The majority of these scams continue to be from individuals being contacted by fake investors.
o So far, $1,200 has been reported as recovered and returned to the victim of a scam.
All but one of the cryptocurrency Kiosk scams involved an individual being contacted by someone claiming to be
law enforcement and instructing the victim to pay a bail amount to prevent their arrest and directing them to a
cryptocurrency Kiosk. Only one of these scams claimed to be SPPD.
See Appendix A for additional information.
CURRENT REGULATIONS
Federal: Kiosk operators are regulated federally by the U.S. Treasury Department Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”). Kiosk operators must register with FinCEN as a “money service business”
and meet the recordkeeping requirements from the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering statutes, but
the Kiosks themselves are not regulated by this Act.
State: In Minnesota, there are licensing requirements for virtual currency operators. A virtual Kiosk operator
(“Kiosk Operator”) is defined in Minnesota statue as “a licensee that operates a virtual currency Kiosk within
Minnesota.” Minn. Stat. §53B.69 subd. 11. The license requirements, exemptions, and penalties are set forth in
Minn. Stat. §53B generally. The applicable license for a Kiosk operator is a money transmitter license. The
license requires operators to disclose certain details to the consumer such as:
• all fees,
• whether the transaction is covered by insurance,
• the revocability of the transaction,
• liability for mistaken, unauthorized or accidental transfers,
• the basis for any recovery from the licensee,
• whether the person has the right to stop payment or revoke the transaction,
• and at the conclusion, certain information is required in the confirmation of the transaction.
Licensees are required to maintain records of all transactions for 5 years.
In 2024, the Minnesota legislature passed new requirements which apply to any license under Chapter 53B
who operates virtual currency Kiosks. The new law added:
• A disclaimer that explains that this is not a bank transaction and that it is not subject to any federal
oversight or protections,
• Daily transaction limits ($2,000),
• Refunds (for new customers only, and if within 72 hours of the transaction), and 439
Item 8.
• The following statement which must be acknowledged by the customer:
“Warning: Losses due to fraudulent or accidental transactions are not recoverable and transactions in
virtual currency are irreversible. Virtual currency transactions may be used by scammers
impersonating loved ones, threatening jail time, and insisting you withdraw money from your bank
account to purchase virtual currency."
Unfortunately, criminals have also already found their way around Minnesota’s new laws intended to
protect new customers with refund protection and daily transaction limits.
Scammers will send the victim to a QR code to the scammer’s wallet, so even if the victim has never
been to a Kiosk before, they are not considered a new customer because they are using the scammer’s
account.
Likewise, to get around the daily limit, victims will be told to use different Kiosks to complete a large
transaction, often traveling many miles from home and crossing into Wisconsin, to avoid the daily-
transaction limit.
CRYPTOCURRENCY KIOSKS & LOCAL ACTION
Local governments across Minnesota are taking steps to regulate or prohibit the operation of cryptocurrency
Kiosks within city limits, citing a lack of public safety resources to effectively monitor the Kiosks or address
the financial crimes associated with them.
Cities have a responsibility to safeguard the health, safety, and welfare of their residents—particularly
vulnerable populations such as the elderly. Given these concerns, the need to protect citizens outweighs any
potential benefits these Kiosks may offer, thereby justifying regulatory action at the local level.
Two municipalities taking action against these Kiosks in Minnesota include:
Stillwater
The Stillwater Police Department approached the City Attorney’s Office to discuss what options the
City has to regulate these Kiosks to protect the community after seeing a significant rise in the number
of reports of scams from cryptocurrency Kiosks.
Stillwater originally proposed creating an ordinance to help regulate the presence and operation of
cryptocurrency Kiosks within the city by requiring the owner to register their contact information and
registration number. These requirements would be coupled with a city-provided informational warning
placard that would be required to be posted on or very near the Kiosk.
However, the city ran into the issue of knowing where the Kiosks are – they are aware of at least four –
but have no idea who owns and operates them.
Given these challenges, Stillwater shifted to asking for the machines to be banned from operating in the
city all together to avoid wasting the public safety resources it would take to monitor or regulate the
Kiosks or the crimes that result.
The Stillwater City Council adopted an ordinance banning cryptocurrency Kiosks on April 15, 2025.
The ordinance went into effect April 18, 2025.
440
Item 8.
Now Stillwater is working to notify any businesses that have cryptocurrency Kiosks about the new
ordinance. Any business that currently have a Kiosk will have up to 60 days to remove the machine.
Failure to remove will result in an administrative citation or other enforcement action as needed.
Forest Lake
Within the past few years, the Forest Lake Police Department has received a significant number of
reports of scams and fraud arising from multiple cryptocurrency Kiosks located through the city. The
policy department approached the city council with the city attorney to find out what options the city
may have to regulate the Kiosks to better protect the community.
Rather than banning cryptocurrency Kiosks, Forest Lake officials are moving forward with a plan that
would require that all Kiosks located within the city be registered. The city has strong authority to
register businesses and uses with the City. Examples of this are tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, massage
therapists, tattoo parlors, and other businesses that have obvious public health or safety concerns. The
City of Forest Lake sees these Kiosks as no different and having clear public safety concerns because of
the amount of fraud running through the machines, the vulnerable population groups targeted, and the
inability to recover the stolen funds.
Forest Lake’s ordinance will require the property owner (“Hosting Business”) where cryptocurrency
Kiosks are located to register each machine with the city. A Kiosk can only be registered if they confirm
to the following:
• Complete an application providing the name, business address and valid registered agent of the
Kiosk Operator;
• Pay a $2,000 registration fee to cover the City’s actual costs related to registration and
enforcement of the ordinance;
• Provide a copy of a valid state license’
• Copy of the lease/rental agreement between the Hosting businesses and the Kiosk Operator;
• Any information required by the State for the State license;
• Written confirmation from the Forest Lake Police Department that the Kiosk Operator has had
no more than two instances of substantiated fraud, as determined by the FLPD involving any
Kiosk owned or operated by that Kiosk Operator within the City in the past six months;
• Post a sign as provided by the City on the Kiosk warning of the danger of fraud and scams;
• Have a dedicated, close-circuit camera for the Kiosk, positioned as required by Forest Lake
Police Department and shall provide video footage to FLPD within 48 hours of request;
• Pass compliance checks by Forest Lake Police Department.
In addition, if a Hosting Business has had a previous registration denied, suspended or revoked, the
owner of the business may not apply for a new registration for two years.
Because of the nature of the cryptocurrency industry in general, Forest Lake believes enforcing
registration against the property owner is the preferred method because they own the property where the
Kiosk is physically located. The goal of the ordinance is to balance the protection of the community
without instituting a ban on the Kiosks.
The Forest Lake City Council passed their ordinance on April 15, 2025and the ordinance took effect on
April 17, 2025.
441
Item 8.
APPENDIX A
2024 DATA SET FOR CRYPTOCURRENCY SCAMS IN THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL
SCAM TYPE CN CALLDATE PRIMARYRMSOFFENSE DETAILS
24018834 1/6/2024 13:33 FRAUD-SWINDLING Wash Co pay not to get arrested- Cub Foods in Roseville
24810097 2/1/2024 18:19 FRAUD-UNAUTHORIZED USE OF CREDIT CARD SPPD pay to not get arrested- Cub Foods in New Brighton MN
24811071 2/29/2024 13:41 FRAUD-ALL OTHER Ramsey Co pay to not get arrested- Coinstar ATM no known location
24815194 9/25/2024 14:51 FRAUD-ALL OTHER Ramsey Co pay to not get arrested- Coinstar ATM no known location
24811522 3/25/2024 13:09 FRAUD-ALL OTHER Fake Investor; Facebook
24811910 4/15/2024 15:42 FRAUD-SWINDLING Fake Investor; Facebook
24813000 6/7/2024 15:51 FRAUD-SWINDLING Fake Investor; unknown source
24813255 6/23/2024 20:24 FRAUD-SWINDLING Fake Investor; Facebook
24814568 8/26/2024 21:26 FRAUD-ALL OTHER Fake Investor; Plenty of Fish
24816359 11/20/2024 11:05 FRAUD Fake Investor; unknown source
24812358 5/8/2024 12:12 FRAUD-IDENTITY FRAUD Phone hacker
24175154 9/17/2024 10:39 FRAUD-ALL OTHER Computer hacker
24816476 12/1/2024 0:18 FRAUD Computer hacker
24813511 7/2/2024 14:47 FRAUD-SWINDLING AirBnb Fake Job
24813799 7/17/2024 8:59 FRAUD-UNAUTHORIZED USE OF CREDIT CARD Fake Job
ATM Scams
Fake Jobs
Hackers
Fake
Investor
Scams
2025 DATA SET FOR CRYPTOCURRENCY SCAMS IN THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL TO DATE
SCAM TYPE CN CALLDATE PRIMARYRMSOFFENSE DETAILS
25810998 2/26/2025 22:44 FRAUD-IDENTITY FRAUD Police pay to not get arrested- no specific crypto machine
25049765 3/27/2025 8:58 FRAUD Bill Collector; St. Peter's Market ATM
25002205 1/4/2025 19:03 FRAUD-SWINDLING Fake Investor; dating site
25013307 1/25/2025 10:46 FRAUD-SWINDLING Fake Investor; Inestment Company
25811524 3/27/2025 16:13 FRAUD-SWINDLING Fake Investor; unknown source
25811731 4/7/2025 21:51 FRAUD-ALL OTHER Fake Investor; Facebook
25811911 4/14/2025 14:36 FRAUD Fake Investor; Facebook
Fake
Repairperson 25063989 4/17/2025 14:17 EMBEZZLEMENT Fake TV Repair Fee Roku
Fake Investor
ATM Scam
442
Item 8.
ITEM: City Manager Follow-up Regarding Previous Work Session Topics. (15 Minutes)
Presenting Item: Aaron Chirpich, City Manager
DEPARTMENT: Administration BY/DATE: Aaron Chirpich / February 26, 2026
CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below)
_Community that Grows with Purpose and Equity
_High Quality Public Spaces
_Safe, Accessible and Built for Everyone
X Engaged, Effective and Forward-Thinking
_Resilient and Prosperous Economy
_Inclusive and Connected Community
TOPICS
Banner Program Update
Review Upcoming Charter Amendments
Board and Commission Interview Reminder
Tibet Fest
ATTACHMENT(S)
None
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION
MEETING DATE MARCH 2, 2026
443
Item 9.
ITEM: Council Corner.
Monthly Calendar Sharing
Monthly Event Notification, Attendance and Past Event Updates
Monthly Proclamations and Meeting Guests
Presenting Item: Amáda Márquez Simula, Mayor
DEPARTMENT: Administration BY/DATE: Sara Ion / February 25, 2026
CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below)
_Community that Grows with Purpose and Equity
_High Quality Public Spaces
_Safe, Accessible and Built for Everyone
_Engaged, Effective and Forward-Thinking
_Resilient and Prosperous Economy
_Inclusive and Connected Community
ATTACHMENT(S)
City of Columbia Heights Monthly Council Meeting and Event Calendar
Mayoral Proclamation List
Draft Proclamations
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING
AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION
MEETING DATE MARCH 2, 2026
444
Item 10.
1 2/25/2026 2:51 PMCity Council Meetings and Events
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
12345678 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 2829 30 31
March 2026
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
123456789101112 13 14 15 16 17 1819 20 21 22 23 24 2526 27 28 29 30
April 2026March 2026
Mar 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
5:00pm March 2nd EDA
Meeting (City
Meetings; CH -
6:00pm City Council
Work Session - City
Hall - City Meetings
6:00pm Planning
Commission - City
Hall - City Meetings
5:30pm Library Board -
Public Library - City
Meetings
4:00pm Board and
Commission
Interviews (CH -
Shared Vision (Room
107)) - Sara Ion
2:00pm Board and
Commission
Interviews (CH -
Shared Vision (Room
107)) - Sara Ion
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
4:30pm Hold for Board
and Commission
Interviews (Overflow
6:00pm City Council
Meeting - City
Council Chambers
6:00pm Sustainability
Commission - City
Hall - City Meetings
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
6:30pm Neighborhood
Watch Meeting
(Microsoft Teams
Meeting) - Tabitha
Wood
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
6:00pm City Council
Meeting - City
Council Chambers -
City Council Meetings
and Events
6:00pm Parks and
Recreation
Commission - City
Hall - City Meetings
29 30 31 Apr 1 2 3 4
SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY
445
Item 10.
MAYORAL PROCLAMATIONS / DECLARATIONS ISSUED 2017 - CURRENT
2026
January 19, MLK Day 1/12/2026
Tom Lettness / Heights Theater 1/26/2026
Winter Salt Week, Jan 25-31 1/26/2026
Holocaust Remembrance, Jan 27 1/26/2026
February 1 World Hijab Day 1/26/2026
February Black History Month 1/26/2026
Racial Covenant Awareness 2/09/2026
March 2-6, School Breakfast Week Drafted for 3/09/2026
Developmental Disability Awareness Month Drafted for 3/09/2026
Women’s History and International Women’s Day Drafted for 3/09/2026
Transit Employee Appreciation Day Drafted for 3/09/2026
March 31, Trans Day of Visibility Proposed 3/23/2026
April Fair Housing Month Proposed 3/23/2026
April 6-12, National Library Week Proposed 3/23/2026
May, Bike Month Proposed 5/11/2026
2025
January 20, MLK Day 1/13/2025
February 1 World Hijab Day 1/27/2025
February Black History Month 1/27/2025
February 13, Racial Covenant 1/27/2025
March 3-7, School Breakfast Week 2/24/2025
March Developments Disability Awareness Month 2/24/2025
March 8, Int. Women’s Day & Women’s History Month 2/24/2025
March 31, Trans Day of Visibility 3/24/2025
April Fair Housing Month 3/24/2025
April 6-12, National Library Week 3/24/2025
April 22, Earth Day 4/14/2025
April 25 Arbor Day and May Arbor Month 4/14/2025
April Autism Acceptance Month 4/14/2025
April Volunteer Month 4/14/2025
May, Asian and Pacific Islander Month 4/28/2025
May 11-17, Police Week 5/12/2025
May 19-24, Public Works Week 5/12/2025
May Foster Care Awareness 5/27/2025
May, Menstrual Hygiene 5/27/2025
June 6, Gun Violence Awareness 5/27/2025
June Pride Month 6/09/2025
June Immigrant Heritage Month 6/09/2025
June 19, Juneteenth 6/09/2025
446
Item 10.
MAYORAL PROCLAMATIONS / DECLARATIONS ISSUED 2017 - CURRENT
July 1: Somali American Day 6/23/2025
Meditation Center 10th Anniversary 7/14/2025
Dahli Lama 90th Birthday 7/14/2025
July 26, Disability Independence Day 7/14/2025
August 1, Heights Bakery Day 7/28/2025
August 4, Assistance Dog Day 7/28/2025
August 5, National Night Out Proclamation 7/28/2025
August, 14 Monarch Butterfly Day / Monarch Fest 8/11/2025
August 21: Senior Citizen Day 8/25/2025
September National Suicide Prevention Awareness Month 8/25/2025
September, Hunger Action Month 8/25/2025
September 17-23, Constitution Week 9/08/2025
September 13, Columbia Heights Pride 9/08/2025
September 15-October 15: Latine Heritage Month 9/22/2025
October 2025, Pedestrian Safety Month (Walktober) 9/22/2025
October 2025, Polish American Heritage Month 9/22/2025
October 2025, Domestic Violence Awareness Month 9/22/2025
October 5-11, Fire Prevention Week 9/22/2025
October 13, Indigenous Peoples’ Day 10/14/2025
October, National Breast Cancer Awareness Month 10/14/2025
October, Dysautonomia Awareness Month 10/27/2025
Booster Appreciation Proclamation 10/27/2025
November, Housing Inequity Awareness Month 10/27/2025
Paul Dingman Day 11/10/2025
November 11: Veterans Day 11/10/2025
November 20: Trans Day of Remembrance 11/10/2025
November 28, Native American Heritage Month /Day 11/24/2025
November 25, Happy Holidays 11/24/2025
December 10, Universal Declaration of Human Rights 12/08/2025
2024
February 1: World Hijab Day 2/12/2024
February: Black History Month 2/12/2024
April 7-13, 2024: National Library Week 3/25/2024
April: Fair Housing Month 4/08/2024
April 22: Earth Day 4/22/2024
May: ALS Awareness Month 5/28/2024
May: Arbor Day and Month 5/28/2024
May: National Cities, Towns, and Villages Month 5/28/2024
May 19-25: National Public Works Week 5/28/2024
June 7: National Gun Violence Awareness Day 6/10/2024
447
Item 10.
MAYORAL PROCLAMATIONS / DECLARATIONS ISSUED 2017 - CURRENT
June: Pride Month 6/10/2024
June 19: Juneteenth 6/10/2024
July 1: Somali American Day 6/24/2024
July 22, 2024: Fern Ostberg Birthday 7/22/2024
July 22, 2024: MN State Flag posting 7/22/2024
August 4, 2024: Assistance Dog Day 7/22/2024
August 6: National Night Out 7/22/2024
August 8, 2024: Monarch Butterfly Day 8/12/2024
August 21: Senior Citizen Day 8/12/2024
September: National Suicide Prevention Awareness Month 8/26/2024
September 17-23: Constitution Week 9/09/2024
September 2024: Hunger Action Month 9/09/2024
September 15-October 15: Latine Heritage Month 9/09/2024
September 21, 2024: 1944 Warsaw Uprising
US Airlift Day of Remembrance 9/09/2024
September 21, 2024: Columbia Heights Pride Day 9/09/2024
October 2024: Pedestrian Safety Month (Walktober) 9/23/2024
October 2024: Polish American Heritage Month 9/23/2024
October 14, 2024: Indigenous Peoples’ Day 10/14/2024
October: National Breast Cancer Awareness Month 10/14/2024
October: Domestic Violence Awareness Month 10/14/2024
November: National Homeless Youth Awareness Month 10/28/2024
November: National Homelessness Awareness Month 11/12/2024
November: National Native American Heritage Month,
National Native American Heritage Day 11/12/2024
November 11: Veterans Day 11/12/2024
November 25, Happy Holidays 11/25/2024
December 10, Universal Declaration of Human Rights 12/09/2024
December 20, 2024: Terchen Taksham Rinpoche Day 10/02/2024
2023
January Plant Milkweed Month 12/12/22
Jan 16, MLK Day 1/09/23
February Black History Month 1/23/23
March Developmental Disability Month 2/27/23
March 8, International Women’s Day 2/27/23
Ramadan Month 3/27/23
April Earth Day 3/27/23
April 13, Kelli Bourgeois Day 4/10/23
April Library Week 4/24/23
April Arbor Day 4/24/23
448
Item 10.
MAYORAL PROCLAMATIONS / DECLARATIONS ISSUED 2017 - CURRENT
April Fair Housing Month 4/24/23
April National Public Works Week 4/24/23
May Asian and Pacific Islander Month 4/24/23
May 28, Menstrual Hygiene Day 5/22/23
May Police Week 5/22/23
May Public Works Week 5/22/23
June Immigrant Heritage Month 5/22/23
June 2, Gun Violence Awareness 5/22/23
July 1, Somali American Day 6/26/23
July 1, Sister City Galdogob Somalia 6/26/23
International Day of Friendship 7/24/23
September Suicide Prevention 8/24/23
September Constitution Week 9/11/23
September Hispanic Heritage Month 9/11/23
September 23, CHC Pride Day 9/23/23 (not at a meeting)
October 9, Indigenous People Day 10/09/23
October Polish American Heritage 10/09/23
October Pedestrian Safety 10/23/23
November 11, Veterans Day 10/23/23
December 8, ICC Church Day (100th Ann) 11/27/23
2022
2022 Climate Awareness Year 1/24/22
Jan 27 Holocaust Day of Remembrance 1/24/22
January Health Care Month 1/24/22
February Black History Month 1/24/22
February 8, Dolores Strand Day 2/08/22
March Women’s History Month 2/28/22
April Library Week 3/28/22
April Arbor Day 4/25/22
April Earth Day 4/25/22
April Fair Housing Month 4/25/22
April National Public Works Week 4/25/22
May Menstrual Hygiene Day 5/23/22
May Asian and Pacific Islander Month 5/23/22
May Police Week 5/23/22
July 26, ADA Day 7/25/22
August National Black Business Month 7/25/22
August Outstanding Business Commendation 7/25/22
August National Night Out 7/25/22
September Childhood Cancer Awareness 8/22/22
449
Item 10.
MAYORAL PROCLAMATIONS / DECLARATIONS ISSUED 2017 - CURRENT
September Constitution Week 8/22/22
September Hispanic Heritage Month 9/26/22
September Library Card Sign Up Month 9/26/22
September National Recovery Month 9/26/22
October Domestic Violence Month 9/26/22
October Polish American Heritage Month 9/26/22
November Native American Heritage Month 10/24/22
November Todd Estrem Day 10/24/22
December 23, Asia Chow Mein Day 12/12/22
2021
Tibet Day Proclamation 3/10/21
Arbor Day Proclamation 4/26/21
National Library Week Proclamation 4/26/21
Native American Land Acknowledgement 5/10/21
Police Week Proclamation 5/10/21
Somali American Day Proclamation 7/01/21
CH Centennial Day Proclamation 7/12/21
Oromo Week Proclamation 7/26/21
National Night Out Proclamation 7/26/21
Mayors Monarch Pledge Month 9/13/21
Suicide Prevention Awareness Month 9/13/21
Hispanic Heritage Month 9/13/21
Constitution Week Proclamation 9/13/21
Domestic Violence Month 9/27/21
Pride Day Proclamation 9/27/21
Polish American Heritage Month 9/27/21
Native American Heritage Month 11/22/21
2020
Mayoral Declaration re Covid-19 Emergency 3/20/20
Police Week Proclamation 5/11/20
National Public Works Week Proclamation 5/23/20
Domestic Violence Month 9/28/20
Constitution Week Proclamation 9/14/20
Polish American Heritage Month 10/12/20
2019
Tibet Day Proclamation 2/25/19
Census 2020 Proclamation 3/25/19
Arbor Day Proclamation 4/8/19
450
Item 10.
MAYORAL PROCLAMATIONS / DECLARATIONS ISSUED 2017 - CURRENT
National Library Week Proclamation 4/8/19
National Public Works Week Proclamation 5/13/19
Police Week Proclamation 5/13/19
Outstanding Citizen Proclamation 6/10/19
Orono Week Proclamation 08/03/19
National Night Out Proclamation 8/06/19
Domestic Violence Month 9/09/19
Constitution Week Proclamation 9/09/19
Polish American Heritage Month 10/14/19
2018
Youth Art Month Proclamation 3/26/18
Officer Terry Nightingale Proclamation 3/26/18
Arbor Day Proclamation 4/9/18
National Library Week Proclamation 4/9/18
Prayer Breakfast Proclamation 4/9/18
High School Basketball Team Proclamation 4/9/18
St. Matthew Community Theater Day Proc. 4/9/18
National Public Works Week 5/14/18
Outstanding Citizen Proclamation 6/11/18
National Night Out Proclamation 7/9/18
Constitution Week Proclamation 9/10/18
Medicare Education Week Proclamation 9/10/18
Domestic Violence Awareness Month Proc. 9/24/18
Sister Cities Proclamation 10/8/18
Walt Fehst Retirement Proclamation 12/10/18
2017
Day of Action to End Domestic Violence Proc. 2/27/17
Tibet Day Proclamation 2/27/17
Library Week Proclamation 4/10/17
Arbor Day Proclamation 4/10/17
Prayer Breakfast Proclamation 4/10/17
Public Works Week Proclamation 5/22/17
Max Richter Proclamation 5/22/17
Humanitarian of the Year Proclamation 6/12/17
Domestic Violence Awareness Month Proc. 9/11/17
Constitution Week Proclamation 9/11/17
American Legion Day Proclamation 9/11/17
Proclamation for ME Global 100th Anniversary 10/9/17
Northeast Bank Proclamation 10/23/17
Dan Thompson Proclamation 12/11/17
451
Item 10.
MAYORAL PROCLAMATIONS / DECLARATIONS ISSUED 2017 - CURRENT
452
Item 10.
PROCLAMATION
Developmental Disability Awareness Month: March 2026
Disability is a social construct. The "problem" is not the medical condition that resides within the
individual; the "problem" is that society does not create welcoming, supportive environments,
policies, or systems for all.
We observe Developmental Disability Awareness Month in March, a time to celebrate the
contributions and accomplishments of people with disabilities and to promote a better
understanding of the challenges they face.
The most effective way to increase awareness is through everyone’s openness to learn about and
acknowledge the systemic barriers that oppress those with disabilities so that policies are
developed, attitudes are reshaped, and equitable experiences are offered to all individuals,
including those with disabilities.
Society misses out on the rich talents and experiences those with disabilities have to offer their
communities, citizens should do all in their power to:
Recognize the barriers presented to those with disabilities.
Recognize the value of the experiences those with disabilities have in our lives and
the valued role they play in our rich diversity.
Create ways to include everyone, especially those with disabilities, in all aspects of
community life.
Understand the losses (whether that be financial, spiritual, human rights,
contributions to the community, or otherwise) when our communities segregate and
create barriers for those with disabilities.
The city of Columbia Heights is committed to increasing public awareness and understanding of
disability-related issues, as well as ensuring that all individuals, regardless of disability, have
equal access to and full participation in community life.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mayor Amada Márquez Simula, on behalf of the City of Columbia
Heights, do hereby proclaim March 2026, as Developmental Disability Awareness Month in the
City of Columbia Heights, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, U.S.A.
________________________________
Amáda Márquez Simula, Mayor
March 9, 2026
453
Item 10.
PROCLAMATION
National School Breakfast Week: March 2-6, 2026
The School Breakfast Program has served our nation admirably since it was
permanently established in 1975.
The School Breakfast Program is dedicated to the health and well-being of our nation’s
children and plays a vital role in supporting academic success and lifelong healthy
habits.
The School Breakfast Program joins and has been joined through the years by many
other excellent child nutrition programs; and recent research shows students are
receiving their healthiest meals at school.
Public schools serving the City of Columbia Heights actively participate in the School
Breakfast Program, helping ensure that students begin each school day nourished and
ready to learn.
There is evidence of the continuation of the need for nutrition education and awareness
of the value of school nutrition programs
Now, Therefore, be it resolved that I, Amáda Márquez Simula, Mayor of Columbia
Heights, do hereby proclaim the week of March 2–6, 2026, as National School Breakfast
Week and I encourage all residents to become aware of the benefits of the School
Breakfast Program that support good nutrition habits for their children, and the
children of our community.
________________________________
Amáda Márquez Simula, Mayor
March 9, 2026
454
Item 10.
PROCLAMATION
Women’s History Month & International Women’s Day: March 2026
The City of Columbia Heights recognizes and celebrates the invaluable contributions of women
throughout history and in our community today. Women have played and continue to play vital
roles in our social, economic, cultural, and political spheres, shaping the world through their
leadership, resilience, and advocacy for justice and equality.
International Women's Day, celebrated annually on March 8th since the early 1900s, honors
women's achievements and serves as a call to action for gender equality. It is a time to celebrate
progress while acknowledging the persistent challenges women face, including the gender pay
gap, underrepresentation in leadership, and violence against women.
Women’s History Month, officially recognized in 1987, builds on this celebration by amplifying the
voices and stories of women who have fought for suffrage, civil rights, labor protections, and
social justice. Women have led movements that have shaped our country and continue to push for
equity across all aspects of life. Women have paved the way for a more just society, from the early
garment workers' strikes to the activism of abolitionists and labor leaders.
Historically, women have been the backbone of communities, providing essential labor inside and
outside the home, volunteering in charitable organizations, and serving courageously in the
military. Despite systemic barriers, women of all races, cultures, gender identities, and
socioeconomic backgrounds have made lasting contributions to our nation’s progress.
The City of Columbia Heights is proud to honor women's history and achievements and reaffirm
our commitment to gender equity and inclusion. We encourage all residents to celebrate the
contributions of women, uplift their voices, and continue the work toward a future where
everyone has equal opportunities to thrive. Let us honor the women of the past, support the
women of today, and empower the women of the future. Together, we build a more just and
equitable world for all.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Amáda Márquez Simula, Mayor of Columbia Heights, do hereby proclaim
March 2026 as Women’s History Month and March 8, 2026, as International Women’s Day in the
City of Columbia Heights, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, U.S.A.
________________________________
Amáda Márquez Simula, Mayor
March 9, 2026
455
Item 10.
PROCLAMATION
Transit Employee Appreciation Day: March 18, 2026
Public transit connects people to opportunity. Every day, transit employees help
residents reach work, school, healthcare, family, and community spaces that make life
possible and meaningful. In Columbia Heights and across Minnesota, transit is more
than transportation—it is a public service that strengthens equity, access, and
belonging.
Transit workers make our communities safer, healthier, and more connected. They
serve in all weather and under demanding conditions with professionalism, patience,
and dedication. Their work expands mobility for seniors, students, workers, and
families, ensuring that everyone can participate in community life with dignity.
Public transit also plays a vital role in building a more sustainable future. By reducing
congestion and greenhouse gas emissions, transit employees contribute to climate
resilience and environmental stewardship, helping protect the health of future
generations.
Columbia Heights recognizes the essential role of transit workers at Metro Transit, the
Metropolitan Council, and transit systems across Minnesota. Their commitment to
public service reflects the values of care, reliability, and shared responsibility that define
strong communities. Our city looks forward to the planned Bus Rapid Transit
improvements along Central Avenue in partnership with MnDOT, paired with corridor
safety redesign and pedestrian upgrades that will make travel safer, calmer, and more
accessible for everyone who walks, rolls, bikes or rides transit.
Now, therefore, I, Amáda Márquez Simula, Mayor of Columbia Heights, do hereby
proclaim March 18, 2026, as Transit Employee Appreciation Day in the City of
Columbia Heights and encourage all residents to thank and recognize the transit
workers who keep our community moving while helping build a safer, more connected
future.
_____________________________
Amáda Márquez Simula, Mayor
March 9, 2026
456
Item 10.