Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-09-2024 City Council Meeting Minutes CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Amáda Márquez Simula Councilmembers Connie Buesgens Kt Jacobs Rachel James Justice Spriggs City Manager Aaron Chirpich City Hall—Council Chambers, 3989 Central Ave NE Monday, December 09, 2024 6:00 PM MINUTES The following are the minutes for the Meeting of the City Council held at 6:00 pm on Monday, December 09, 2024, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 3989 Central Avenue NE, Columbia Heights, Minnesota WELCOME/CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Mayor Márquez Simula called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm. Present: Mayor Márquez Simula; Councilmember Buesgens; Councilmember Jacobs; Councilmember Spriggs; Councilmember James Also Present: Andrew Boucher, City Planner; Aaron Chirpich, City Manager; Mitchell Forney, Community Development Director; Kevin Hansen, Public Works Director; Sara Ion, City Clerk; Joseph Kloiber, Finance Director; Scott Lepak, City Attorney; Emilie Voight, Community Development Coordinator; Kathleen Bennett, City resident; Nancy Chesney, City resident; Patti Constant, Senior Program Manager at Anoka County Opioid Solutions; Paul Edner, City resident; Mike Lies, City resident; Davin Ormberg, City resident; Allysa Ronquillo, City resident; Tony Rotero, City resident; Mark Steffl, City resident; Mark Veronikas, City resident. MISSION STATEMENT Columbia Heights is a vibrant, healthy and connected City. We are here to actively support the community, deliver equitable services, build and strengthen connections, improve upon our past, and uphold our successes. We strive to be better and ensure Columbia Heights is a great place for everyone, today and in the future. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag: "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." APPROVAL OF AGENDA Motion by Councilmember James, seconded by Councilmember Spriggs, to approve the Agenda as presented. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. PROCLAMATIONS, PRESENTATIONS, RECOGNITION, ANNOUNCEMENTS, GUESTS A. Anoka County Opioid Solutions Initiative Patti Constant, Senior Program Manager at Anoka County Opioid Solutions, explained that the slide showed to the audience provided information on different ways that people can get connected with her and learn more about the efforts around opioids within the County. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 2 The website is still in its infancy stage and will continue to expand. She mentioned that her role is to determine with the community how to reduce opioid initiation, misuse, overdose, and death. Opioids have been a challenge within the community for more than 20 years. In the US, more than 130 people die every day from opioid-related overdoses. Last year in Minnesota there were 947 opioid-involved overdose deaths. In 2022, Anoka County had 64 opioid-related overdose deaths, which is the third-highest County in the State. In 2023 there were 43 opioid-related deaths in the County, which is the fifth highest County in the State. For every fatal overdose, there is an estimated 13 non-fatal overdoses. Ms. Constant stated the County received the opioid settlement funding a year ago. As part of the large multi-settlement Anoka County will have approximately $18 million over the next 18 years to direct towards reversing some of the trends. Anoka County created the Anoka County Opioid Solutions Initiative which is an advisory council consisting of over 30 community members directly involved in the opioid crisis. It includes individuals with lived experience, community-based organizations, EMS, law enforcement, recovery community organizations, and medical and pain medicine providers. The advisory council discussed where the County should start to focus on funding and their efforts. The top two priorities that came out of the process were prevention and naloxone education and distribution. Ms. Constant announced that the County’s first request for proposal for opioid funding related to prevention went out last Friday. The funding will be awarded within the community to a handful of organizations that apply and meet the funding requirements. On November 2nd, in Columbia Heights, Opioid Solutions Initiative hosted the first opioid- related community event called Spotlight on Opioids and Overdose. Over 100 community members attended. Ms. Constant explained the second priority is Naloxone (Narcan) education and awareness. Naloxone is a medication that can be safely used to reduce an opioid overdose. The County has partnered with Steve Rummler Hope Network to increase access to free naloxone within the community. There are currently six sites in the County where people can pick up free naloxone. Within the next month, all Anoka County libraries will have naloxone available. The County is actively engaged and is seeking ways to partner with the community to increase awareness. Councilmember Jacobs mentioned that she works in the field and expressed the importance of making naloxone available. She added that she has been in the field for 20 years and that people do not think there is an issue in Columbia Heights. She added that people would be stunned if they could see the reality of the issue. She thanked Ms. Constant for her work. Mayor Márquez Simula mentioned that the City would be reaching out to Ms. Constant about doing more events in the community. B. Universal Declaration of Human Rights Proclamation. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 3 Mayor Márquez Simula proclaimed December 10, 2024, as Universal Declaration of Human Rights Day and read the City’s proclamation. Councilmember James read the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. C. Recognition of Councilmember KT Jacobs for Four Years of Service. Mayor Márquez Simula recognized Councilmember Jacobs for her four years of service. She mentioned there is a plaque in recognition of her services and wished Councilmember Jacobs the best in her future endeavors. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Márquez Simula mentioned she did not want to pull items 13 and 14 from the Consent Agenda but requested that there be time to ask questions and elaborate on the items. City Manager Chirpich explained Item 13 on the Consent Agenda is in regard to the typical slate of alleys that are being proposed for reconstruction next year and how the assessments would be levied on the adjoining property owners. Public Works Director Hansen added that as part of the process of reconstructing the alleys, the City follows statutory requirements which are found under Minnesota State Statute 429. The Resolution is a requirement of the State statute. The Safe Street Program established zones in the City that would be cycled through every 8-10 years to have work done. It is possible that there are some properties that currently have existing or past assessments on them. There are a couple of alley segments that have been identified as having past assessments on the properties. Councilmember James explained that the City is aware that there are some residents who may still be carrying a balance from the last assessment. She added that the work needs to get done and the City is hopeful that it will help services such as trash and snow removal. She encouraged residents to attend the resident informational meeting and the public hearing. City Manager Chirpich explained Item 14 on the Consent Agenda is in regard to the 20250-2026 snow and ice control policy. The City updates the policy bi-annually. The policy includes the new changes to the snow amount trigger and the winter parking regulations. Public Works Director Hansen stated two of the biggest changes to the policy include triggering City snow plows to plow after 2 inches of snow. In addition, cars will need to be removed from the street in the event of snow removal from November 15th until April 15th. Councilmember Jacobs asked if there would be more ticketing and towing for cars that are on the street during a snow removal event. Public Works Director Hansen replied that the first approach is for people to understand the policy and then there may be more enforcement. Councilmember Jacobs added that there would not be ticketing on holidays. Motion by Councilmember Spriggs, seconded by Councilmember James, to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. 1. Approve the November 25, 2024 City Council Meeting Minutes. MOTION: Move to approve the November 25, 2024, City Council Meeting minutes. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 4 2. Approve the December 2, 2024 City Council Work Session Meeting Minutes. MOTION: Move to approve the December 2, 2024 City Council Work Session Meeting minutes. 3. Accept November 4th, 2024, Regular EDA Meeting Minutes. MOTION: Move to accept the November 4th, 2024 EDA meeting minutes. 4. Accept October 1, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. MOTION: Move to accept the October 1, 2024 Planning Commission meeting minutes. 5. Acceptance of November 6, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. MOTION: Move to accept the November 6, 2024 Planning Commission meeting minutes. 6. Accept September 25 and October 23, 2024 Park & Recreation Commission Minutes. MOTION: Move to accept the September 25 and October 23, 2024 Park & Recreation Commission minutes. 7. Accept October 8, 2024, Sustainability Commission Minutes. MOTION: Move to accept the October 8, 2024, Sustainability Commission minutes. 8. Accept November 6, 2024 Library Board Minutes. MOTION: Move to Accept the Library Board minutes from November 6, 2024. 9. Resolution 2024-92 to Amend the Fund 411 Budget to Authorize Window Film Application and Garage Floor Repairs in the police department. MOTION: Move to waive the reading of Resolution 2024-92, there being ample copies available to the public. MOTION: Move to the adopt Resolution No. 2024-92 amending the Fund 411 budget to authorize the project to apply window film to the exterior police department windows and repair the garage floor coating from the listed vendors. 10. Adopt Resolution 2024-096 Establishing the City of Columbia Heights Fee Schedule for 2025. MOTION: Move to waive the reading of Resolution No. 2024-96, there being ample copies available to the public. MOTION: Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2024-096, approving the 2025 City Wide Fee Schedule. 11. Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2024 Parks Capital Improvement Fund Budget. MOTION: Move to waive the reading of Resolution No. 2024-94, there being ample copies available to the public. MOTION: Move to approve Resolution No. 2024-94, a resolution of the City Council for the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, authorizing an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024 Parks Capital Improvement Fund budget. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 5 12. Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2024 Infrastructure and Buildings Capital Improvement Budget, City Project 2412. MOTION: Move to waive the reading of Resolution No. 2024-95, there being ample copies available to the public. MOTION: Move to approve Resolution No. 2024-95, a resolution of the City Council for the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, authorizing an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024 Infrastructure Fund 430 and Buildings Capital Improvement Fund 411, City Project 2412. 13. Adopt Resolution 2024-97 Accepting the Feasibility Report for Concrete Alley Reconstruction and Ordering The Public Improvement Hearing, City Project No. 2506. MOTION: Move to waive the reading of Resolution 2024-97, there being ample copies available for the public. MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution 2024-97, being a resolution accepting the Feasibility Report for Concrete Alley Reconstruction, City Project No. 2506, and ordering the Public Improvement Hearing beginning at 6:00 p.m. on January 27, 2025. 14. Resolution 2024-98 Adopting the 2025/2026 Snow and Ice Control Policy. MOTION: Move to waive the reading of Resolution 2024-98, there being ample copies available to the public. MOTION: Move to approve and adopt Resolution No. 2024-98, being a resolution adopting the 2025/2026 Snow and Ice Control Policy for the City of Columbia Heights. 15. Transfer of Funds from Special Projects Fund 226 to Capital Improvement Fund 420. MOTION: Move to waive the reading of resolution 2024-100, there being ample copies available to the public. MOTION: Move to approve Resolution 2024-100, a resolution of the city council for the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, authorizing and amending the transfer of funds from fund 226 special projects to 420 capital improvement for concrete repairs in accordance with the Van Buren ramp’s capital improvement plan 16. Resolution 2024-103, Approving Contract with Spano Group for 2025 Leadership Workshop. MOTION: Move to waive the reading of Resolution 2024-103, there being ample copies available to the public. MOTION: Move to approve Resolution 2024-103, a resolution approving professional services agreement with Spano Group Advisors LLC for consulting services related to the 2025 leadership workshop. 17. 2024 Supplemental Recycling Grant Agreement with Anoka County. MOTION: Move to accept supplemental SCORE (recycle grant) agreement with Anoka County in the amount of $24,962 to support Columbia Heights new curbside organics collection program. 18. Disaster Recovery Site Equipment Purchase. MOTION: Approve purchase of host, licensing and network switch from Converge Technology Solutions in the amount of $48,214. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 6 MOTION: Approve purchase of servers and storage for data backup from Core4 Solutions in the amount of $13,845. 19. License Agenda. MOTION: Move to approve the items as listed on the business license agenda for December 9th, 2024, as presented. 20. Rental Occupancy Licenses for Approval. MOTION: Move to approve the items listed for rental housing license applications for December 9, 2024, in that they have met the requirements of the Property Maintenance Code. 21. Review of Bills. MOTION: Move that in accordance with Minnesota Statute 412.271, subd. 8 the City Council has reviewed the enclosed list to claims paid by check and by electronic funds transfer in the amount of $1,345,409.33 PUBLIC HEARINGS 22. Public Hearing on the Renewal of SJB Enterprise’s Currency Exchange License. Community Development Director Forney stated On November 7, City staff received a letter from the Minnesota Department of Commerce regarding the renewal of SJB Enterprise’s (dba Your Exchange) Currency Exchange License. The City does not have a dedicated currency exchange license nor does it independently license check-cashing businesses. However, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 53A.04, it is the City's responsibility to review the renewal application and forward a decision to the State within 60 days. Community Development Director Forney mentioned as part of the State's review, the application includes: - Background checks conducted by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, - A fee schedule for services provided by the business, - A $10,000 surety bond valid through December 31, 2025, and - The $500 renewal fee. Staff have reviewed the application and supporting materials submitted to the State and have found them to be complete. Community Development Director Forney explained Minnesota Statutes Chapter 53A.04 delegates authority to the City for reviewing and providing a decision on currency exchange licenses. The statute states that the City must provide published notice of its intention to consider the license renewal and solicit testimony from interested parties, including community members. The statute further requires the City to make a determination based on whether the licensee meets all applicable City codes. Community Development Director Forney stated in reviewing the renewal application, staff considered: City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 7 - Compliance: No significant compliance issues were identified in the submitted materials. - Background Checks: The owners and officers passed the State’s required background checks. - Community Impact: In consultation with the Police Department, the business has not been associated with a high call volume or significant community disturbances. Community Development Director Forney noted Staff recommends that the City Council approve the renewal of SJB Enterprise’s Currency Exchange License and forward this decision to the Minnesota Department of Commerce. Councilmember James asked if there was a reason that the City does not have a license. She added that there is no way to collect a license fee to compensate for Staff time. Community Development Director Forney replied that Staff could review and see if the City is allowed to license and if it is something that the City is interested in taking up. Councilmember Spriggs asked if it would be a yearly business license that the Council would review each year. Community Development Director Forney asked if City Attorney Lepak knew the answer. City Manager Chirpich mentioned that during his six years at the City, it was the first time that the City was approached by the State with the request to authorize. City Attorney Lepak replied that he was unable to find the answer for how long the license would be good for. Mayor Márquez Simula opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Motion by Councilmember Buesgens, seconded by Councilmember James, to close the public hearing and waive the reading of Resolution 2024-99, there being ample copies available to the public. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Motion by Councilmember Buesgens, seconded by Councilmember James, to adopt Resolution 2024-99, being a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota approving the license renewal of SJB Enterprises Currency Exchange License. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. 23. Resolution 2024-90, Adopting a Budget for the Year 2025, Setting the City Levy, Approving the HRA Levy, and Approving a Tax Rate Increase. Finance Director Kloiber stated as required under the city charter, the City Manager provided the City Council with a proposed 2025 budget in August 2024. That document, available on the City’s website, explains the proposed 2025 budget with 110 pages of summary and detailed information, including comparisons to the current year and two prior years. This information was then reviewed at three Council work sessions (Sept., Oct. Nov.) Finance Director Kloiber mentioned In November, Anoka County mailed a notice to each property owner listing their property’s share of the proposed 2025 property tax levy included in the City’s proposed 2025 budget. This notice also reports the proposed 2025 City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 8 property taxes for all other applicable jurisdictions (County, school district, HRA, and other special taxing districts.) Finance Director Kloiber explained beginning with this year’s notice, comparative levy information for all cities and school districts in Anoka County is now included on the back of each notice. While this additional information has value, Staff caution taxpayers that merely knowing that one entity’s proposed increase is greater or less than another entity’s proposed increase is not enough information to conclude whether either proposal is appropriate. Finance Director Kloiber reviewed the summary of the current status of the budget for 2025. The proposed 2025 gross tax levy is an 8.4% increase in the amount received by the City. The annual portion of the City tax levy subsidized by the Metro Area Fiscal Disparities program will increase by 20% for 2025 under the state formula for that program. These two changes combine to yield a 5.6% average increase to local property owners for the portion of the City levy not subsidized by the Metro Area Fiscal Disparities program. Under state statute, the City Council cannot adopt a 2025 tax levy greater than the amount reported by Anoka County in the individual notices sent to each property owner in November. Mayor Márquez Simula opened the public hearing. Mark Steffl, City resident, explained that he is a landlord in the City and mentioned that his gross tax levy percentage is 13% which is on top of a 10% increase from last year. He added that he has been a landlord and owned his property for 20 years and typically does not see such big jumps. He expressed his opinion that it demoralizes him and does not feel great to see such big a tax increase. He asked if there was something he could do about it. Mayor Márquez Simula replied that there are steps that can help move forward. There is an assessment meeting coming up with the County for property taxes. City Clerk Ion added that the Local Board of Appeals and Equalization will meet in the new year. She explained there is an opportunity to have his property reviewed by the assessors or could write ahead of time to them. Mayor Márquez Simula expressed her appreciation for people speaking up on the topic since it can be difficult to do so. Tony Rotero, City resident, agreed with Mr. Steffl’s comments. He explained that he has been in Columbia Heights since 1992 and the property taxes continue to increase. He added that he retired in July and the increase is greatly affecting him. He mentioned that it is getting out of control with how high the taxes are getting. Councilmember Buesgens expressed her understanding of how hard the increased taxes are hitting people. She added that Staff are putting in hard work to figure out what is needed and to try to keep costs down. She added about half of the budget goes to Public Safety, a quart of the budget goes to Public Works, and the rest goes towards the library, admin, and other services. She explained that they are working hard to try to keep costs City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 9 down and understand how hard it can be on residents. She explained that the City only has 5% commercial buildings which means that the residents suffer a lot from the tax increases. Mr. Rotero wondered if the City accepts the lowest bids on projects. Mayor Márquez Simula replied that the City accepts the lowest and most responsible bid. Sometimes it is not the lowest bid since the City verifies if it is a responsible business. City Manager Chirpich agreed and added that there are different projects that are bound by State statutes. The City’s internal policies have a competitive bid process when possible. The City manager's spending authority before it would go to the Council is set at $15,000. Anything above that threshold for a contract would be approved by a Resolution or a motion by the City Council. Councilmember James expressed her appreciation her those who care about the matter. She explained that the Council asked each department what was necessary. She added that there has not been much Staff turnaround and that there has been an increase in pay for the cost of living in order to retain the Staff. The City spending is public information. Mayor Márquez Simula mentioned that her property tax has increased. She added that the City has a lean budget and that Public Safety receives a lot of the budget. She explained the importance of retaining the Staff for Public Safety and providing them with good training and equipment. She added that the City was able to build the new City Hall without adding extra debt. Mayor Márquez Simula read a letter from Pam who is a local landlord. The letter was also sent to the County and highlighted the property tax and appraisal increase for the two apartment buildings she owns. The letter mentioned that her increase in 2024 was $4,500 and it will increase by $3,100 in 2025. The letter expressed that the County and City are not business-friendly for small business owners due to all of the property increases and increases in property values. Mayor Márquez Simula mentioned that the letter is included in the Agenda Packet. Motion by Councilmember Buesgens, seconded by Councilmember Spriggs, to close the public hearing and waive the reading of Resolution 2024-90, there being ample copies available to the public. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Motion by Councilmember Buesgens, seconded by Councilmember Spriggs, to adopt Resolution 2024-90, being a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights adopting a budget for the year 2025, setting the city levy, approving the HRA levy, and approving a tax rate increase. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION Ordinances and Resolutions City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 10 24. Gould Ave NE and Peters Pl Parking Solutions. Community Development Coordinator Voight stated the City Council directed Staff to develop solutions to alleviate on-street parking congestion in the neighborhood immediately south and east of City Hall. Gould Ave NE, extending from Central Ave NE to Reservoir Blvd, and Peters Pl, between Gould and Reservoir, have been the main locations of congestion. Community Development Coordinator Voight explained the principal objectives were: • to preserve driveway access to existing off-street parking; and • to ensure municipal service operators such as trash and recycling can provide services; and • to protect passage and access needs for emergency services vehicles and snowplows. Community Development Coordinator Voight noted the objectives align with §7.102(B)(2) of the City Code, which states, “Any public street, alley, municipal parking lot or portion thereof is subject to regulation by the Council or by the administrative service, as is necessary to prevent accidents, to eliminate traffic congestion, to provide public access to adequate parking facilities, or to otherwise promote the safety and welfare of the city.” Community Development Coordinator Voight mentioned because there is no east-west alley between 40th Avenue NE and Gould Avenue NE, most residential properties along the north side of Gould have parking access—driveways—from the street. This development pattern created a street frontage with many curb aprons and small, irregularly sized spaces between them. The south frontage of Gould does not have the same conditions because most properties on the south side of the street access parking from the alleys between Gould and Peters Pl. Community Development Coordinator Voight stated neighborhood residents have expressed concerns about pedestrian safety on these streets and have told Staff and members of the Council that cars parked between the closely spaced curb aprons have repeatedly blocked access to driveways. The narrowness of the street combined with the presence of parked cars on both sides has made it difficult for emergency vehicles to pass down the street. Trash and recycling trucks have struggled to access cans on collection day. Community Development Coordinator Voight explained the west portion of Gould, between Central and Peters, is part of the city’s Central Business District. This portion of the street was widened during the City Hall redevelopment project and does not face the same congestion challenges. However, based on a comprehensive analysis of the neighborhood, Staff believe that a reduction in parking on the east portion of Gould could have the unintended effect of shifting residential congestion westward, interfering with on- street commercial parking for nearby businesses. Community Development Coordinator Voight noted Peters Place is a narrow, winding street with several hills and no pedestrian infrastructure. When faced with parking congestion in residential neighborhoods, some cities have established permit parking City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 11 districts. The creation of parking districts is supported by legal precedent in the U.S. Supreme Court case County Board of Arlington County, Virginia, v. Rudolph A. Richards (1977). Cities that have chosen this strategy have often done so to regulate parking between different uses, for example, between residential parking and institutional parking for a hospital or a school. Cities have also used parking districts to limit on-street parking for the safety and well-being of residents, for example, to prevent hazardous conditions for emergency vehicles. Community Development Coordinator Voight explained that although permit parking districts can limit the number of cars parked on a street or restrict parking to residents, they also have disadvantages. The creation and enforcement of a parking district incurs substantial staff time and cost for implementation, enforcement, and ongoing administration. Crucially for this neighborhood, parking districts cannot ensure that parked cars do not block driveways or trash cans. Community Development Coordinator Voight stated that based on our analysis, Staff concluded that using existing regulatory tools available to the City Council would be the fastest, least expensive, least administratively burdensome, and most effective method of addressing the identified objectives. City Code provides, per § 7.202(A), that “[t]he Council may regulate traffic flow and prevent traffic congestion by designation of certain streets or portions thereof as “no parking, no stopping, or no standing” zones and may limit the hours in which the restrictions apply,” and per § 7.202(B), that “[t]he Council may regulate access to public parking areas by designating areas where the right to park is limited to a specified duration of time. The Council may limit such restrictions to specified hours of the day.” Community Development Coordinator Voight noted Staff recommends a three-step phased approach to resolving the parking congestion, with the first two steps provided for in the attached Resolution 2024-93. This proposal was originally presented at the December 2nd, 2024 City Council Work Session and received a positive recommendation from the Council to move forward. Community Development Coordinator Voight noted the three steps would be: Step 1: Designate three zones: • a “No Parking (except for emergency services)” zone extending the entire north street frontage of Gould Ave NE from Peters Pl to Reservoir Blvd; and • a “No Parking (except for emergency services)” zone on portions of the east and west frontages of the north arm of Peters Pl between Gould Ave NE and the 90-degree turn to the east; and • a “Commercial Parking Only – 3-hour Limit” zone on both the north and south frontages of Gould Ave NE between Central Ave NE and Peters Pl. “Emergency services” use shall include fire, police, public safety, and emergency vehicles such as, but not limited to, ambulances. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 12 Step 2: If on-street parking congestion persists, designate a fourth zone: • a “No Parking (except for emergency services)” zone extending the entire west, south, and southwest street frontages of Peters Pl. Step 3: If the objectives are still not achieved, create a residential permit parking district in the neighborhood: • a residential permit parking district along the south street frontage of Gould Ave NE between Peters Pl and Reservoir Blvd; and • a residential permit parking district along the remaining east, north, and northeast street frontages of Peters Pl. Note that in Step 3 implementation, all four zones detailed in Step 1 and Step 2 would also be maintained. Community Development Coordinator stated Staff recommend advancing Resolution 2024- 93 providing for the implementation of Step 1 and Step 2. The implementation process for Step 1 shall begin immediately following the passage of the resolution, subject to signage fulfillment and installation timelines. If the evaluation of the impacts of Step 1 shows that additional action is necessary, Staff will inform the Council and proceed with the implementation of Step 2. If the evaluation of the impacts of Step 2 shows that additional action is still necessary, Staff will inform the Council and present draft legislation for adding residential permit parking district powers to the City Code. Councilmember Jacobs assured Community Development Coordinator Voight that she did a good job researching. She explained that residents in the area have had more than two years of blocked driveways and alley access which affects curbside trash pickup, parking in yellow curb zones, and in front of fire hydrants. The residents experienced a number of neighborhood meetings with no answers from the City. The homeowners are being presented with a phased remedy that could take an additional one to three months to roll out due to signs needing to be ordered. She explained that it is troubling to her that a custom sign for businesses is ready to go but the signs needed for the phasing will take months. She asked if the towing company was in place. She added that nothing has been done to provide permitted street parking for the homeowners on Gould Avenue either temporarily or permanently. The current fix is a start. Councilmember Jacobs explained that the residents need to be considered, including the Ratio of residents who have been refusing to pay for underground parking because it is exorbitant or to use the City parking ramp. She wondered where the accountability for Alatus was for fixing the problem they created during their development. She stated it is a Ratio and Alatus problem and the City should not be encumbering its Staff or itself financially on their behalf. She expressed her disappointment that the City had not done anything about the issue until the last work session in 2024. She added that the residents City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 13 deserved more. She encouraged the Council and leadership to get to work for the residents. She added that she would like to hear from the residents. Mayor Márquez Simula mentioned that it was not a public hearing. She asked Councilmember Jacobs where the signs were that she was referring to. Councilmember Jacobs replied that they are on Gould Avenue adjacent to the Dairy Queen parking lot. Councilmember Jacobs noted that there was a business that had orange cones in front for parking and asked if it was legal to do so. City Manager Chirpich replied that it is not legal. Councilmember Jacobs asked why it has not been addressed while the parking in front of resident’s homes is being addressed. City Manager Chirpich added the sign that Councilmember Jacobs was referring to was not installed by the City. Staff are unaware that the signs have been installed and can address them with the business owners. Councilmember Jacobs noted that the signs are controlling City streets. Councilmember Jacobs expressed feeling troubled that the residents would not see any results for one to two months and that it is an open-ended solution. City Manager Chirpich stated that Staff does not believe it will take the entire two months to enact the solution. Councilmember Jacobs asked if the signs had been ordered. City Manager Chirpich replied that they have not been because the Resolution needs to get passed first. Mayor Márquez Simula expressed her appreciation that Staff have waited to order the signs until they have Council direction. Mayor Márquez Simula thanked Staff for their work on the issue. She added that the City is listening to the residents and is working on a solution. She mentioned it has been a lot of work with a number of discussions with Staff, the police, Ratio, and local businesses. Councilmember Jacobs requested that residents be allowed to speak during the portion of the meeting. Mayor Márquez Simula replied that the Council listened to a number of people last week. She asked the City Attorney if she could allow residents to speak during the item on the Agenda. City Attorney Lepak replied that it was within the mayor’s prerogative. Kathleen Bennett, City resident, explained that someone parked right in front of the driveway. Instead of the police ticketing the car or towing it, the police drove around and woke up all the neighbors and could not find the driver of the car so they just left the car there. The homeowners were unable to get out of their driveway. She explained that if there is one side parking it will be on her side of the street and no one will be able to visit her since there will be no parking available. Nancy Chesney, City resident, stated she lives on Peter’s Place and showed the Council a number of pictures that display the large oversized vehicles that drive down the road and the difficulty of emergency vehicles or garbage trucks from getting down the street. She pointed out the issue of garbage and litter being on the curb each week. She noted that she cannot mow a portion of her lawn if there are vehicles parked on the street. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 14 Paul Edner, City resident, noted he lives on Gould Avenue and there is already an excessive number of cars on both sides of Gould Avenue and Peter’s Place. If parking is only allowed on the south side it will make things worse for those who live on the south side of the street. He explained that he is the only one who has a driveway on the south side of Gould Avenue and his driveway is frequently blocked by cars parking there. He added that during the work session, residents were asked to play nice and not to call the police in order to find more cordial means to solve the issue. He noted that when a car blocked his driveway, the police told him to wait a few hours before calling back. Driveways are used for emergencies and day-to-day outings. David Ormberg, City resident, stated he does not have a garage but has one spot off-street. By taking away the north side of the parking, it takes away his other parking spot. He added that he has been fighting for that spot for the last two years. He explained that he has a permit through the City to park on the street but sees a number of cars parked overnight with no permit and they do not get ticketed. He stated he was ticketed three times. One ticket for parking on his lawn by his other car, and two other times because the police did not see his permit. He noted that cars are constantly doing a U-turn to find a parking spot which means there are headlights flashing in his house. Mark Veronikas, City resident, stated it was a horrible plan because it would cause chaos with traffic. He mentioned that there was a plan in September that would require permit parking and now the new plan will only make things worse. He added that it is a Ratio issue and that the neighborhood did not have issues before the apartment was put in. He mentioned that the permitted parking for the residents would have helped the issue. He asked that the City would return to the original plan instead of doing the new plan. Mike Lies, City resident, explained that if residents have guests visit, there will be no place to park. He asked if Ratio residents were promised on free parking spot with their rent. He wondered why the City was not holding Ratio accountable for promising one free spot. He explained that he comes home from work at 5:00 am and there are people blocking his driveway. He added that he had called the police three times in two weeks and the police did nothing. He asked if there was only going to be south-side parking and why it would not be permitted. He suggested that police start holding people accountable by ticketing and towing cars. He asked if there was anything else that could be done. Mayor Márquez Simula replied that it is possible to tow cars and what she is hearing from residents is that there needs to be more police presence. Mr. Lies explained that if cars start getting towed, people are going to learn quickly to stop parking there. Allysa Ronquillo, City resident, expressed her concerns about the proposed plans. She expressed her understanding that Staff put a lot of time into coming up with a plan that could accommodate residents, Ratio residents, and businesses. She stated she disagreed with the plan because it would impact her side of the street and she would have to tell visitors that they may not be able to find a parking spot that is close to her house. There are about 296 units at Ratio and she hoped that they made the accommodation to have parking for all of their residents. On September 12th she met with the Police Chief and City City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 15 Manager and came up with a solution for residential-only parking. She explained that she was in favor of it. She added that she disagrees with the new proposed plan but would love to collaborate and partner with people to find an alternative solution. Mayor Márquez Simula thanked those who shared and thanked them for their patience as she deliberated how the residents could speak during the meeting. She reiterated that Ratio also has residents along Gould Avenue and wants to be respectful toward them as well. She mentioned that step three of the plan includes having a discussion about requiring permits. She added that discussions from the September meeting are reflected in the plan. Mr. Edner asked if there was any administration from Ratio present at the meeting or part of the regular planning. He explained that feedback from residents or staff from Ratio would be helpful. Community Development Director Forney replied that before the meeting Staff reached out to Ratio management to invite them to the meeting. Moving forward, Staff plans on reaching out to Ratio to work on solving the behaviors holistically. Councilmember Buesgens mentioned that she was unable to attend the work session meeting last week because she was out of the country. She explained that this situation reminded her of her bad landlords when she started on the Council and how it took tightening up rules in order for things to improve. She stated she would like to see cars be towed. She asked if the Resolution could be amended. City Manager Chirpich replied that towing is still an option under the proposed plan. The signs that are proposed would increase the City’s ability to tow more rapidly once it is designated as an emergency vehicle parking only. He added that the City needs to work with the Police Department to inform them of their rights and to be clear on the plan and what is possible. Police are allowed to two after they ticket a car, unless it is blocking a drive in which case the car can be towed immediately. He mentioned that it can take a lot of time from the Police Department. He noted there has to be enforcement of the Ordinances along with the proposed plan. Councilmember Buesgens asked if it was possible to put a sign in Ratio that excess parking for Ratio goes into the ramp. Community Development Director Forney replied that Staff could reach out to Ratio on that solution. He added that Staff had an idea of having a welcome letter for new Ratio residents that explains the excess parking ramp. Councilmember Buesgens asked if it was possible to have permanent parking in front of Mr. Ormberg’s residence. City Manager Chirpich replied that it is a unique situation and noted that Mr. Ormberg’s residence is close to the perimeter of the north Gould Avenue no parking district. One solution could be pulling back the sign in order to accommodate a spot in front of his house, however, it would not guarantee him the spot. There is an opportunity to expand the area of parking in front of his house with a permeable paver system. Before the Ratio was put in, the resident in the home was limited to one parking spot except for the permit that could be granted. He added that Staff will need to explore the residence more. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 16 Councilmember Buesgens requested that the police no longer knock on doors to see whose car is who. If a car is blocking a driveway it needs to be towed, or if it should not be there it gets ticketed. Councilmember James explained she was disturbed to hear about cars blocking driveways and not being towed when the police were called. She added that she would like to continue to address that with the Police Department. She agreed with the resident comment that it is vital that emergency vehicles can get through the street. The proposed plan provides immediate emergency access. She mentioned that she is in favor of the plan as presented. The residential permit process would take a long time to implement while the proposed plan can get started immediately. She encouraged the residents to continue to call the police if their driveway is blocked. Councilmember Jacobs agreed that something needs to be done immediately and asked that the proposed plan be better spelled out so that the Council knows exactly what is being approved and not approved. Ticketing and towing have not been mentioned in the presentations for the proposed plan and there needs to be a timeline established. She added that she would not approve the proposed plan because there are too many open- ended issues and it needs to be more specific. Councilmember Spriggs noted that the issue is complex that there would not be a perfect plan and that it would take a lot of tweaking. He agreed with Councilmember Jacobs’ comments regarding having a timeline in order to address whether the plan is working or not. He mentioned that the proposed plan is a step in the right direction. Ideally, the City would be able to permit the residents on both sides of the street but then there is an issue of emergency access. He stated that he would vote in favor of the proposed plan and noted that in the future permitting is something he would be interested in doing. He added the proposed plan does not mean much without enforcement. Councilmember Jacobs asked if it was true that Ratio management was invited to the meeting and they did not show up. Community Development Director Forney replied that Ratio management was contacted but not directly invited to the meeting. Staff provided Ratio with information to spread out to their residents. Community Development Coordinator Voight mentioned that when towing may or may not occur, it is expressed by State statute. The authorizations do not change. Creating no parking areas would provide an additional lever to learn about some of the towing- authorized situations. Councilmember Buesgens requested an amendment to the third sentence of the final paragraph before the recommended motions to include “in three months of the signs posted the City shall evaluate the impacts of Step 1 to show if additional action is necessary.” City Attorney Lepak suggested Councilmember Buesgens request that from Staff instead of amending the Resolution. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 17 Councilmember Buesgens requested Staff to evaluate within three months of the signs posting to see how it is going. Councilmember James noted that the Resolution includes all of the actions in step one and step two. She added that there is no timeline included because it is approving both steps. Councilmember Buesgens stated she would like to see an evaluation after three months of the signs being posted. Councilmember Buesgens asked if she needed to make a motion to include the Staff directive from the Council. City Attorney Lepak replied that the Resolution could be to adopt Resolution 2024-93 and direct Staff to report back. Community Development Coordinator Voight asked Councilmember Buesgens if she would like for Staff to report back after the implementation of the first three parking zones. She asked for more details on the timing of when to report back. Councilmember Buesgens replied that after the signs are up and posted she would like Staff to report back after three months. Community Development Coordinator Voight noted that after the signs have been posted for the first step of the proposed plan, Staff would report back to the Council. Councilmember Buesgens agreed. Community Development Coordinator Voight explained that the Resolution provides the power for the City Manager to do steps one and two in whatever timeline sees fit. Councilmember Buesgens asked if steps one and two were happening at the same time. Community Development Director Forney explained that the Resolution is a delegation of authority to the City Manager to enact parking restrictions. The City Manager would have the authority to make minor changes to the plan as the situation evolved. Staff can implement steps one and two through the City Manager’s directive and then Staff will revisit the matter in three months depending on how the situation evolves. Councilmember Buesgens asked if after implementing step one Staff would report back to the Council during the work session. City Manager Chirpich replied that the switch from step one to step two could be made independently. He explained that the Council directive could be put into the Resolution, or the Council can trust that Staff are going to follow through on the clear directive. He noted that step one is phase one and Staff will give it three months and implement step two and give it an additional three months. He added Staff will look at the Ordinance for the parking district and the permit parking system. He mentioned that the authority given to the City Manager is for a specific geographic area that is spelled out. Mayor Márquez Simula asked City Manager Chirpich to clarify what he meant when he said step one would be three months and step two would be an additional three months. City Manager Chirpich replied if the Council wants to implement steps one and two right away it could be possible. Mayor Márquez Simula asked if the second step was intended to be implemented if further action was required. City Manager Chirpich agreed. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 18 Councilmember Jacobs asked if the Council approved the Resolution there would be six months of assessment time. City Manager Chirpich replied that it was not specified. City Attorney Lepak noted that Resolution 2024-93 has been established to delegate the function to the City Manager. The intent of that was to allow tweaking as needed and to implement it. He added that there are no more Council meetings until January so the Resolution would speed up the process by having the City Manager take action immediately. He added that the three months the Council is requesting is longer than the Staff was anticipating the process to take. Councilmember Buesgens responded that she would keep it as presented. Mayor Márquez Simula mentioned that the Staff is aware that the Council does not want the issue to drop. The goal of the proposed wording in the Resolution is to take care of the matter efficiently. Councilmember Jacobs expressed her confusion about the proposal. During the work session, there was no mention of the timeline to access how the system was working. She added that there needs to be a timeline to ensure that the issue does not extend for a long period of time. If there are areas that need to be tweaked it needs to be addressed immediately and not six months down the road. Councilmember Buesgens stated she was fine with the way the City Attorney explained the Resolution. She added that she would not be making a motion to amend the Resolution. Motion by Councilmember Buesgens, seconded by Councilmember Spriggs, to waive the reading of Resolution 2024-93, there being ample copies available to the public. 4 Ayes, 1 Nay, Motion Carried 4-1. Ayes: Márquez Simula, James, Spriggs, Buesgens. Nay: Jacobs Motion by Councilmember Buesgens, seconded by Councilmember Spriggs, to adopt Resolution 2024-93, being a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights, delegating to the City Manager the act of establishing parking regulations on Gould Ave NE and Peters Pl. 4 Ayes, 1 Nay, Motion Carried 4-1. Ayes: Márquez Simula, James, Spriggs, Buesgens. Nay: Jacobs Councilmember Buesgens requested a recess. Mayor Márquez Simula recessed the regular meeting at 8:31 pm. The regular meeting reconvened at 8:36 pm. 25. Reuter Walton 3901 University Ave Preliminary Bond Resolution. Community Development Director Forney stated in early October, Reuter Walton approached City Staff regarding potential redevelopment opportunities. Following initial conversations, Reuter Walton identified a property for redevelopment that aligned with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The developer presented its initial proposal to the Economic Development Authority (EDA) at the November 4th meeting, where commission members provided feedback and raised questions. Based on this input, Reuter Walton revised its plans and presented an updated proposal at the December 2nd City Council work City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 19 session. While the proposal remains subject to minor adjustments, the substantive details are sufficient to advance the project to its next phase. Community Development Director Forney explained in accordance with State Statutes, the City is authorized to develop and administer a housing program to provide financing for the purpose of constructing new multi-family housing developments. Furthermore, State Statutes provide that such programs for multi-family housing developments may be financed by revenue bonds or obligations issued by the City. Therefore, Reuter Walton has requested that the City help to finance their proposed project with the issuance of tax- exempt conduit revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $20,000,000. Bonds of this type are not an obligation of the City or its taxpayers, but rather an obligation of the developer. Only project revenues of the developer, in this case, rent collected after completion of the project would be pledged for repayment of the bonds. While the City must approve the issuance of the bonds and all bond documents, the transaction is largely handled by the private borrower and the underwriter who serves as the initial purchaser of the bonds. This is a common practice for the City, which has previously issued similar bonds for developments such as Sullivan Shores townhomes, Crestview senior care facilities, the Legends of Columbia Heights, the COL, and Grand Central Flats. Additionally, the City will receive a 1% issuance fee based on the total principal amount of the bonds. Community Development Director Forney added before the City may issue tax-exempt bonds on behalf of Reuter Walton, the City must first adopt a preliminary resolution approving the issuance of the bonds specific to the subject property, and submit a housing program to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment. In addition, the City will need to prepare and submit an application requesting the allocation of multi-family housing bonds to the Minnesota Department of Management and Budget (MMB). The preliminary approvals contemplated in the Resolution in no way constitute an obligation of the City to issue the bonds. Final approval of the bond issuance will take place at a subsequent Council meeting following the required public hearing(s). Mayor Márquez Simula expressed her appreciation for the time that was put into making the adjustments from listening to the Council. Motion by Councilmember James, seconded by Councilmember Spriggs, to waive the reading of Resolution 2024-101, there being ample copies available to the public. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Motion by Councilmember James, seconded by Councilmember Spriggs, to adopt Resolution 2024-101, being a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights granting preliminary authorization to the issuance of revenue bonds or other obligations under Minnesota statutes, chapter 462c, as amended, to finance the costs of a multifamily housing development; approving the preparation and submission of a housing program with respect thereto; approving the submission of an application for an allocation of bonding authority; establishing compliance with certain reimbursement regulations under City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 20 internal revenue code of 1986, as amended; and taking certain other actions. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. 26. Consideration of a Rental License Exemption for 3916 Tyler Street NE. City Planner Boucher stated on December 4, 2024, the owner of 3916 Tyler Street NE, reached out to the Community Development Department requesting an exemption from the single-family rental density cap. Section 1 of Ordinance 1685, which established the single-family rental density cap, states that a property owner may request a temporary license to allow an additional rental property for that block. The property is located on Block 229 which has a total of 46 single-family houses and an allotment of five rentals with the block over the capacity containing seven existing rentals. The City Council may grant or deny a temporary license in its sole discretion. As it is the homeowners’ right to appeal to the Council. Staff brought forth the appeal along with supporting documents for discussion and review. City Planner Boucher noted if approved, Resolution 2024-102 would grant a temporary rental license exemption to the homeowner with a few additional requirements. The homeowner is required to complete the license application process within three months from the passage of the resolution by March 9, 2025. This puts a limit on how long it can take to bring the house into rental compliance if needed. The temporary rental license will be valid for one year from the date that the license is approved. This provides the homeowner and tenant the ability to rent the home for a full one-year lease. After the term of the temporary license, the persons requesting a temporary license must make an annual application to the City. No property owner shall hold a temporary rental license for the same property for more than two consecutive years. City Planner Boucher explained Staff recommends denial of the rental density exemption request because the applicant, RM Houses LLC, is a limited liability corporation, that purchased the property with the sole intent of establishing a long-term rental. This action runs in direct conflict with the purposes of the rental density cap. Mayor Márquez Simula explained that she read the letter from the property owner. The property owner mentioned in the letter that he specifically purchased the property for income. He has also been completing the repairs that are required. Even though it is over the moratorium limit, if it were approved, the property owner would still need to go through the rental license process. She added that it would only be good for one year which could give the property owner time to sell the property if he wanted to. She added that she would be in favor of allowing the exemption. Councilmember Buesgens disagreed. She noted the property owner was not present in the meeting. She added that the Council does not know if the property owner owns a large corporation or a small business, or how long he has been renting properties. She explained that it was the realtor’s job to inform him of the City’s Ordinances. She stated she does not support the exemption. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 21 Councilmember Jacobs agreed with Councilmember Buesgen's comments. She explained that business owners have an obligation to find out what is required of them. It is the homeowner’s responsibility to do the research on what is allowed in the City. She stated she does not support the exemption. Councilmember Spriggs agreed with Mayor Márquez Simula’s comments. He mentioned that the City is looking to provide affordable housing for people at different levels. Not everyone can afford to purchase a home to rent. The property owner will still need to go through the licensing process and be up to Code. He stated he is in favor of the exemption. Councilmember James mentioned that there are seven other homes listed under the property owner’s LLC. She stated she is not in favor of granting the exemption because it is a corporate owner. Motion by Councilmember Spriggs, seconded by Councilmember James, to waive the reading of Resolution 2024-102, there being ample copies available to the public. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Motion by Councilmember Spriggs, seconded by Councilmember James, to deny Resolution 2024-102, being a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights approving the single-family rental exemption request for the rental application at 3916 Tyler Street NE, Columbia Heights, MN 55421. 3 Ayes, 2 Nays. Motion Carried 3-2. Ayes: James, Jacobs, Buesgens. Nays: Márquez Simula, Spriggs. CITY COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Report of the City Council Councilmember Jacobs reported that Brian Clerkin passed away at age 41 on November 30th. The Clerkin family has been a contributor to the community for decades. Brian has been involved with the Lion’s Club and the Jamboree. The Clerkin’s started the boxing gym in the old City Hall. He is one of the people who is responsible for bringing the St. Patrick’s Day Parade and the dinner into the City. Mr. Clerkin and his brother own Tasty Petes and Hanger 45. She asked that people would keep the Clerkin family in their prayers. The celebration of life will take place in January. Councilmember Jacobs stated she has held steadfast to her commitment to the residents of Columbia Heights. She added that she did not let personal agendas rule decisions. She thanked the community members who stood by her side, and the support of employees and Staff that continued their belief in her. She recognized Councilmember Buesgens and City Clerk Ion for their professionalism. She noted that City Clerk Ion was in the crossfire many times and mentioned she would not forget the upheaval it caused City Clerk Ion personally and professionally. She noted that Councilmember Buesgens was professional on the Council and offered friendship both in and out of the Council chambers. She explained that she has been vocal about imploring the City to include senior citizens when considering affordable housing. She explained there are grants and ways to make it possible for seniors to remain in their homes. She encouraged the community to challenge a limitation and to be the person who still tries. She thanked the community for allowing her to serve. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 22 Councilmember James mentioned she attended the EDA meeting, the Council work session, the Planning Commission meeting as the Council liaison, a meeting with other local elected officials, the high school production of Shrek, and the League of Women Voters holiday luncheon. Councilmember Buesgens explained that the Council allowed her to represent the City at the National League of Cities in Tampa, Florida. She explained that she attended the Sustainability Commission, the swearing-in ceremony for Officer Swangstue, the Metro Council’s policy meeting for economic and housing, and an open house for a local artist Katie H. Councilmember Spriggs stated he had nothing to report. Mayor Márquez Simula mentioned she has been finishing the monarch pledge activity in their database, and she had a meeting with the Police Chief. She noted she attended the EDA meeting, the Council work session meeting, and an operation pollination meeting. Art to Change the World presented at the rotary meeting that was hosted at City Hall. She extended an invitation to community members to attend the rotary meetings on Wednesday at 7:30 am. She stated she attended the New American leader’s alumni mixer, and Shrek the Musical at the high school. She participated in the League of Women Voters holiday gathering and saw White Christmas at the Heights Theater. She added that she attended the Regional Council of Mayor’s meeting. She expressed her condolences to the Clerkin family. Report of the City Manager City Manager Chirpich reminded residents that the City’s water meter replacement project is underway. The project will continue throughout 2025. City offices will be closed on December 24th, 25th, and January 1st. The Police Department has seen an uptick in vehicle thefts and asked community members to turn off vehicles, remove any valuables or garage door openers, and lock doors. Call 911 if any suspicious activity is viewed. City manager Chirpich stated the holiday train is coming to town on Thursday, December 12th at 8:00 pm. It will be at the intersection of 27th Avenue and Stinson Boulevard. The Eastside Neighborhood Services Group will be collecting money and non-perishable food donations before the train arrives. The City’s holiday tour will occur on Tuesday, December 17th from 5:00-6:45 pm. Watch for a festive fire truck to tour the City with special guests. Following the tour, celebrate at Murzyn Hall from 6:00- 8:00 with free cocoa, cider, cookies, crafts, games, and more. SACA and Magnify Financial will be collecting toys along the route and at Murzyn Hall. He thanked Magnify Financial for sponsoring the cookies and cocoa. More information can be found on the City’s website and Facebook page. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Spriggs, to adjourn. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 9:08 pm. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES December 09, 2024 City Council Meeting Page 23 Respectfully Submitted, ______________________________________ Sara Ion, City Clerk/Council Secretary