The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-28-2025 City Council Meeting Minutes CITY COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Amáda Márquez Simula Councilmembers Connie Buesgens Rachel James Justice Spriggs Laurel Deneen City Manager Aaron Chirpich City Hall—Council Chambers, 3989 Central Ave NE Monday, July 28, 2025 6:00 PM MINUTES The following are the minutes for the Meeting of the City Council held at 6:00 pm on Monday, July 28, 2025, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 3989 Central Avenue NE, Columbia Heights, Minnesota WELCOME/CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Mayor Márquez Simula called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm. Present: Mayor Márquez Simula; Councilmember Buesgens; Councilmember Deneen; Councilmember Spriggs; Councilmember James Also Present: Aaron Chirpich, City Manager; Mitchell Forney, Community Development Director; Kevin Hansen, Public Works Director; Sara Ion, City Clerk; Travis Lutz, Assistant City Attorney; Emilie Voight, Community Development Coordinator; Michelle Brask, City resident; Lincoln Avenue Developer, Kyle Brasser; Teresa Carson, City resident; Jared Finkelson, City resident; Walter Horishnyk, City resident; Saynab Jama, COPAL Representative; Mark Odegard, City resident; Caroline Osbourne, City resident; Eva Pena, COPAL Representative; Dirk Schmitz, City resident; Rodney Siefert, City resident; Karen Smith, City resident; Rita Trapp, HKGI Consulting Planner; Rebecca Wratkowski, City resident; MISSION STATEMENT Columbia Heights is a vibrant, healthy and connected City. We are here to actively support the community, deliver equitable services, build and strengthen connections, improve upon our past, and uphold our successes. We strive to be better and ensure Columbia Heights is a great place for everyone, today and in the future. A. Columbia Heights City Council and Staff Norms. While we are accountable to each other for these norms, the Mayor and City Manager will help us adhere to them with respectful reminders and reinforcement as needed. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Márquez Simula mentioned that she would have breaks throughout the meeting since it was a full agenda. Motion by Councilmember Buesgens, seconded by Councilmember Spriggs, to approve the Agenda as presented. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 2 PROCLAMATIONS, PRESENTATIONS, RECOGNITION, ANNOUNCEMENTS, GUESTS A. Heights Bakery Day Proclamation. Accepting Proclamation: Heights Bakery. Mayor Márquez Simula proclaimed August 1, 2025, as Heights Bakery Day, and Councilmember James read the City’s proclamation. Heights Bakery accepted the proclamation and thanked the Council for the proclamation. B. Assistance Dog Day Proclamation. Accepting Proclamation: Christine Okerstrom, Columbia Heights Police Department. Mayor Márquez Simula proclaimed August 4, 2025, as Assistance Dog Day, and Councilmember Deneen read the City’s proclamation. Christine Okerstrom from the Police Department accepted the proclamation and explained that she is looking forward to having the community meet the therapy dog, Kansas. Mayor Márquez Simula mentioned that Kansas is a therapy dog and will provide compassion and space for the police officers and staff at the Police and Fire Department. She added that Kansas is on a strict diet and only her handler can provide her with treats. C. National Night Out Proclamation. Accepting Proclamation: Officer Tabitha Wood, Columbia Heights Police Department. Mayor Márquez Simula proclaimed August 5, 2025, as National Night Out and read the City’s proclamation. Officer Wood accepted the proclamation and thanked the Council. She added that there is still time to sign up for a National Night Out party. D. Consideration of Resolution 2025-063, Being a Resolution Calling for the Presidential Administration to End Its Campaign of Mass Deportations and Family Separation. Accepting Resolution: COPAL (Comunidades Organizando el Poder y la Acción Latina) Representative. Mayor Márquez Simula read a statement that acknowledged the deep harm being done to immigrant families across the country. She stated that “this presidential administration is actively pushing the largest mass deportation effort in modern U.S. history. It is an operation that aims to tear apart 3,000 families per day. It’s not just undocumented people who are being targeted. U.S. citizens, asylum seekers, and long-time community members are being swept up in raids, detained without due process, and treated as enemies in the country they call home. As a daughter of a Mexican immigrant, I know this harm personally. I have seen the racism aimed at my own family, many times, from people in City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 3 power. These kinds of policies don’t just hurt people at the border, they send waves of fear and trauma through families like mine and neighborhoods like ours. And as a City with a sister city in Lomianki, Poland, we are reminded of what happens when people are persecuted simply for being different. History has shown us again and again that when a government singles out a group to blame or execute, it leads to suffering and injustice. Let’s be honest, this is not just about immigration status; it is about racism. Our country has a modern-day battle with racism, and a long, documented history of building systems that have upheld racism, classism, and slavery. Systems that have kept the power in the hands of a few while taking it away from others. These injustices were once written into our laws, but we know better now, and they must stop. Now, ICE is being handed a budget bigger than most countries' militaries, while families lose access to health care and safety. The Minnesota Chamber Foundation recently stated that the future of our state's economy depends on immigrant communities. This confirms what we already know. Columbia Heights is stronger, safer, and more vibrant because of our immigrant neighbors. Our mission says that we are here to actively support our community and make it a great place for everyone, and that includes immigrant families. That is why the Council and I are bringing forward the Resolution.” Mayor Márquez Simula read Resolution 2025-063. Motion by Councilmember James, seconded by Councilmember Deneen, to adopt Resolution 2025-063 being a resolution calling for the Presidential administration to end its campaign of mass deportation and family separation. Councilmember James expressed her gratitude to those who are immigrants in the City. She explained that there is a long history of immigrants coming into Columbia Heights. Many of the mass deportations include asylum seekers and refugees. She added that refugees are the most vetted people who make it into the Country. She expressed her concern about refugees having their legal status threatened. Councilmember Deneen mentioned that she has been impressed by the diversity in the City and how welcoming everyone is. See noted that there are upwards of 36 languages spoken in the City. She explained that it is possible because the City is built on cultural awareness, diversity, and is a place people want to be. She added that if the issue was simply about immigration, then people would not be picked up at their immigration appointments because they are going through the legal process. She expressed her appreciation to the Council and City staff for allowing the Council to move forward with the Resolution. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Eva Pena and Saynab Jama accepted the Resolution. Ms. Pena, COPAL Representative, thanked the Council for passing the Resolution. She added that the Trump administration is escalating a campaign of fear and mass deportation. As a response, the Immigrant Defense Network has brought a new resolution for local governments to take a stance. The City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 4 Resolution calls for the Trump administration to stop mass deportation and separating families, and acknowledges that ICE is escalating its operations against all immigrants, regardless of status and public safety record. ICE has been detaining students who do not have their IDs on them, which is an abuse of US Constitutional rights. Ms. Jama, Ayada Leads Representative, explained that Ayada Leads is committed to uplifting and building political power of the African Diaspora for immigrant communities. She noted that she is a daughter of immigrants and that her parents were seeking safety and an opportunity to give their children a better future. Ayada Leads is proud to stand with the Resolution calling on the administration to end the campaign of mass deportation and family separation. It is not a policy issue, but a moral issue. It is about keeping families together and for children to feel safe to go to school, and for neighbors not to fear simply for existing. Ayada Leads works to create pathways for people of color to lead, tell their stories, take up spaces, and shape the future of the states. Dignity is not something that is asked for, but it is affirmed in leadership, presence, and voices. Honoring dignity means telling the truth. She explained that when she says that they are standing up against mass deportation, she means that she is standing up for families, safety, and dignity for all. Ayada Leads is committed to fighting, organizing, defending, and advocating for the rights of every person, regardless of where they came from. She thanked the Council for passing the Resolution. CITY COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Report of the City Council Councilmember James mentioned that she spoke with some residents regarding the plans at Sullivan Lake Park. She added that she spoke with City staff about having a public engagement process throughout the planning stage. She noted that there was a report from some consultants regarding the Safe Streets for All initiative. She explained that she worked with residents regarding suggestions they had for specific intersections in the report. She expressed her gratitude to the Police and Fire Department as they conclude their work on the Manny Collins case. She thanked Councilmember Deneen for her work with COPAL on the Resolution. Councilmember Buesgens stated she continues to volunteer with Blooming Sunshine Garden, and she attended the Golden Nuts' first-year anniversary celebration. She noted she attended the Parks and Recreation Commission and the soccer field open house. Councilmember Deneen explained that she attended the City’s Charter Commission meeting, the presentation at City Hall regarding Tibetan and Buddhist teaching, a press conference in support of COPAL, and the soccer field open house. Councilmember Spriggs explained that he did not have anything to report since he was on a family vacation. Mayor Márquez Simula stated she has done her regular check-ins with the City Manager and Police Chief to discuss staffing changes, ongoing projects, and staying aligned on priorities. She added that City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 5 she met with the City Manager and Jake Spano regarding leadership training. She hosted a Tibetan and Buddhist gathering at City Hall. She noted she had a planning meeting with staff regarding the bilingual Monarch Festival. She mentioned that she is looking forward to SACA’s expansion. She acknowledged that she was unable to attend some informational meetings, such as for Central Avenue and Sullivan Lake Park, but she stayed up to date with the City Manager and department managers. Report of the City Manager / Response to Previous Community Forum City Manager Chirpich updated the Council on upcoming events. He noted on July 29th, residents are invited to the Eat and Greet event with the Police Department at LaBelle Park from 5:00-7:00 pm. There is a Central Avenue NE open house on July 30th from 5:00-7:00 at the Library to review the preferred design concept. He noted there is a GreenCorps job posting within the City. The application is open. The City is seeking someone who is passionate about sustainability and is eager to engage with the community and ready to undertake hands-on projects that support energy conservation, waste reduction, and environmental education. The service term is October 8, 2025, until September 4, 2026. COMMUNITY FORUM Rodney Siefert, City resident, expressed concern regarding cars parking in front of his home on Gould Avenue. He mentioned that he and his neighbors called the police about a car that was parked on the street for three weeks. A police officer investigated and was helpful, and chalked the car. The next day, the vehicle was still parked on the street even after the six-hour limitation. The neighbors were told that the car had been moved six inches, and therefore, the six-hour limit was required to start over. He shared photos with the Council about the incident. He noted that the neighbors called about the vehicle the next day and were told the vehicle was moved a foot forward. After the fourth time calling the police, the police officer returned and said that they know who the owner of the vehicle is and had contacted the owner to move his car. The vehicle owner made a complaint about the neighbors and accused them of harassing him. He explained that the neighbors were telling the vehicle owner that he was not allowed to park in the same spot for over six hours and to get his car towed or fixed since the vehicle does not run. During this time, Officer Wang showed up at the scene. The neighbors explained that the car was not operating, and the officer said that it was since the car had been moved. He asked the officer to ask the car owner to start up his car to see if it operated. The officer replied that he did not have the authority to do that. He noted that the officer asked him to leave the area and explained that it was a public street and the car owner was allowed to park his car on the street. He mentioned that he told the officer that the car owner is not allowed to store a car that does not operate on the street. He stated that the officer asked him to leave the area again and said that the police officers could not keep coming down Gould Avenue for this. He expressed his frustration that the police officers were not enforcing the Ordinance. He mentioned that the car has been pushed further down Gould Avenue and is still there. He wondered if the Ordinance allowed for a car to move six inches either way to restart the six-hour limit. He pointed out that if that is the case, then cars could sit there indefinitely. He explained that the issues have been going on for three years, and it is not getting better and are only escalating. He asked that the City assist the neighbors. He added that he felt the property values are decreasing because cars are parked in front of the neighbors' houses constantly, and people would not want to purchase a home where they cannot have their friends over. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 6 Mayor Márquez Simula replied that the City is collecting data. She added that she would check in with the Police Department to get an update from staff. She encouraged Mr. Siefert to continue to call the police. CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Councilmember Deneen, seconded by Councilmember Spriggs, to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. 1. Approval of July 14, 2025, City Council Meeting Minutes. MOTION: Approve July 14, 2025, City Council meeting minutes. 2. Accept June 2, 2025, EDA Meeting Minutes. MOTION: Accept June 2, 2025, Regular EDA Meeting Minutes. 3. License Agenda. MOTION: Move to approve the items listed on the business license agenda for July 28, 2025, as presented. 4. Rental Occupancy Licenses for Approval. MOTION: Move to approve the items listed for rental housing license applications for July 28, 2025, in that they have met the requirements of the Property Maintenance Code. 5. Review of Bills. MOTION: Move that in accordance with Minnesota Statute 412.271, subd. 8 the City Council has reviewed the enclosed list to claims paid by check and by electronic funds transfer in the amount of $1,616,820.23. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6. Consideration of Resolution 2025-63, 800 53rd Ave NE EAW Findings of Fact and Record of Decision. Community Development Director Forney stated that the City Council is being asked to take action related to, but not directly a part of, the larger redevelopment project proposed for 800 53rd Avenue NE. More specifically, the review and approval of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the project. An EAW is a state-mandated environmental review document governed by Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410. It serves as a tool to help local governments, project proposers, and the public evaluate a project’s potential environmental impacts. The EAW covers a wide range of topics, including traffic, parking, stormwater management, land use compatibility, and the preservation of natural resources. Community Development Director Forney noted that the proposed redevelopment at 800 53rd Avenue NE is required to complete an EAW under Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, Subpart 19, which mandates environmental review for residential developments that include more than 375 units of high-density housing. The EAW for this project was prepared by the civil engineering firm Louks using the required state forms and was City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 7 submitted on behalf of the project proposer. While the EAW process ensures that the project team considers environmental factors, its broader purpose is to engage state agencies, local government units, tribal nations, and members of the public in identifying and assessing the development’s potential impacts. Community Development Director Forney explained that once City staff reviewed the submitted EAW and determined it to be complete, it was distributed in accordance with the state’s environmental review procedures. A notice of availability and the EAW document were submitted to the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) and distributed to the required list of reviewing authorities, including relevant state agencies, watershed districts, tribal governments, and regional planning organizations. The public comment period opened on June 10th and closed on July 10th, 2025. During this time, the City received written comments from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization (MWMO), the Metropolitan Council, and one local resident. Following the close of the comment period, City staff compiled and reviewed all submitted comments. Staff then prepared formal responses and assembled the City’s Findings of Fact and Record of Decision, which addresses the submitted comments and outlines the basis for the City’s determination. These documents will be sent to all commenting parties as required by Minnesota Rules. Now that the comment period is closed and the Findings of Fact have been completed, the City Council must determine whether the project requires the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Community Development Director Forney stated that in making this determination, the City must consider the following criteria outlined in Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, Subpart 7: - Type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects; - Cumulative potential effects. The RGU shall consider the following factors: Whether the cumulative potential effect is significant; Whether the contribution from the project is significant when viewed in connection with other contributions to the cumulative potential effect; The degree to which the project complies with approved mitigation measures specifically designed to address the cumulative potential effect; And the efforts of the proposer to minimize the contributions from the project; - the extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority. The RGU may rely only on mitigation measures that are specific and that can be reasonably expected to effectively mitigate the identified environmental impacts of the project; and - The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other available environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, including other EISs. Community Development Director Forney mentioned that based on the City’s review of the EAW and comments received, staff makes the following findings of fact: 1. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet, this Findings of Fact and Record of Decision document, and related documentation for the project were prepared in City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 8 compliance with the procedures set forth by Minnesota Rules 4410.1000 to 4410.1700 and the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board. 2. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet, this Findings of Fact and Record of Decision document and related documentation for the project have satisfactorily addressed all of the issues for which existing information could have been reasonably obtained. 3. The proposed project does not meet any of the mandatory EIS thresholds contained in Minnesota Rules 4410.4400. 4. The project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects based upon the above findings and the evaluation of the following four criteria per Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, subpart 7: a. The type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects have been considered, and they do not contain the potential for significant environmental effects b. The cumulative potential of environmental effects has been considered, and the project does not contain the potential for significant environmental effects. c. The extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority indicates that this proposed project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. The mitigation of environmental impacts will be designed and implemented in coordination with regulatory agencies and will be subject to the plan approval and permitting processes as outlined in Question 8 of the EAW. d. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies, and the project proposed has been considered, and it indicates that this project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. 5. Pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, subpart 5, a copy of this Findings of Fact and Record of Decision is being provided within 5 days to all persons on the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board List, the people commenting, and to persons who requested a copy. These Findings of Fact and Record of Decision will also be made available on the City of Columbia Heights’ website. Community Development Director Forney mentioned these findings are supported by the EAW analysis and by the comments received from state agencies, none of which indicated that an Environmental Impact Statement is required. Councilmember James pointed out page 110 of the Agenda Packet and noted a comment from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding chloride and the plan to keep snow and snow melt from impacting the lake. She asked if a plan had been developed. Community Development Director Forney replied that it is a discussion topic with the developer. The State requirements will be met throughout the process. The snow storage has been included in the PUD Resolution. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 9 Councilmember James pointed out page 115 of the Agenda Packet regarding comments from the Minnesota Watershed Management Organization. The comments were in reference to concerns about phosphorus and sediment being kept out of the lake. She added that the comments mentioned that the City would be addressing the comments. She asked when the comments would be addressed. Community Development Director Forney replied that when the developer does further analysis and builds out the project more, they will need to meet the required standards and enter into a stormwater management plan with the City. During that time, the City is required to ensure that the process is enforced. Councilmember James asked if the stormwater management plan would be brought back to the Council. Community Development Director Forney replied that it would be done by the Engineering Department. Councilmember Buesgens referenced page 12 of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet with the table under “Permits and approvals required”. She asked why the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization said “obtain if needed” instead of “to be obtained”. Community Development Director Forney replied that the MWMO is not a required permit and does not have the statutory authority as an organization. Councilmember Buesgens noted page 21 of the EAW and pointed out the section about groundwater being within three feet of the surface. She asked where that would be. She asked how it would affect basements in potential townhomes and an underground parking lot. Community Development Director Forney replied that the proposed townhouses do not have basements. Lincoln Avenue Development Vice President and Regional Development Partner Kyle Brasser added that the groundwater is not within three feet of the surface. The requirement is that the foundation has a minimum requirement of being three feet above the groundwater elevation. Councilmember Buesgens referenced page 26 of the EAW, which mentions state-listed species. She noted that Blanding turtles are included on the list, and they live in Sullivan Lake. She noted that the Blanding turtle is not documented in the DNR. She wondered why that was not coming up in the environmental review. She encouraged residents to take photos and document the Blanding turtle at Sullivan Lake. Councilmember Buesgens mentioned she wants to ensure that the stormwater system meets the State and City Code minimum requirements. 3% of Earth's water is freshwater. A significant amount of the Earth’s fresh water is contaminated. Columbia Heights relies on Minneapolis for drinking water since the City’s water is contaminated. She emphasized the importance of taking care of Sullivan Lake in an appropriate manner. The MWMO is interested in helping the City because Sullivan Lake runs into the Mississippi River. She asked the developer to go above and beyond the minimum requirement. She added that the project allows a partnership with MWMO to help clean up Sullivan Lake. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 10 Councilmember Deneen mentioned that the Council is concerned about the need for native planting and wildlife retention, and green spaces. She thanked the staff for taking the time to include all of the comments in the new PUD requirements for the site. Councilmember Spriggs asked what the current stormwater management is. Community Development Director Forney replied that there are three large stormwater management tanks that would be filtering the water from the site prior to anything moving towards the lake. The are standards for how fast the outflow can go. The stormwater management plan is meeting the standards in place. Councilmember Spriggs noted the MWMO recommendation in paragraph three of their letter. He asked if the study MWMO suggested was planned to be conducted. Community Development Director Forney replied that the MWMO stated specific measurements. The MWMO measurements are above the requirements, so staff are discussing with the developer about potential designs. Mayor Márquez Simula asked how the City could ensure that the environmental protection remains in place during construction and beyond if the Council determined they did not need an EIS. Community Development Director Forney replied that the EIS would simply be an added study of the impacts. He added that there are many opportunities for ongoing enforcement throughout the development. He mentioned that the determination that there does not need to be an EIS means that no further research is needed, and it does not affect the enforcement. The engineering team will be working with the developer to ensure that the standards are being met. The EIS would pinpoint a specific target to study. Mayor Márquez Simula asked how the City could ensure that they are doing the best it can with environmental protection. Community Development Director Forney replied that it is up to staff to maintain that the development is going along as planned and is ensuring the correct mitigations are going in. Mayor Márquez Simula opened the Public Hearing. Michelle Brask, City resident, stated she submitted a two-page letter. Mayor Márquez Simula mentioned that the Council and staff received the letter and have read it. Ms. Brask thanked the Council for the work they have done. She pointed out page 10 of the EAW talks about the current site providing limited habitat for animals and birds. She noted that there are many animals in Sullivan Lake Park, and they are going to be impacted. She expressed concerns regarding the lake water quality. She added her concern regarding the impervious surface that will be increased. She noted that the study mentioned there would be no visual effects, but a six-story building would have a visual impact. She wondered if it was possible to pull back from increasing impervious surfaces and building higher. She urged the Council to consider what Columbia Heights will be like 20-30 years from now. It will not be possible to take back expansion and reclaim the green space. Less is more when looking at development. She asked the Council not to push the project to the limits but instead to scale back to make the project sustainable, while reducing the long-term, negative potential of impact. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 11 Councilmember James asked what the current percentage of impervious surface is and what the proposed percentage is. Community Development Director Forney replied that the current percentage is 54% and the proposed percentage is 67%. The impervious variance is 70% to allow for parks and trails to be added to the current project. Councilmember Buesgens mentioned that there are ways to landscape the property to add to it and take away the negative look of impervious surfaces. Motion by Councilmember Buesgens, seconded by Councilmember James, to close the public hearing and waive the reading of Resolution 2025-065, there being ample copies available to the public. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Motion by Councilmember Buesgens, seconded by Councilmember James, to approve Resolution 2025-065, being a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights approving the findings of fact, record of decision, and the negative declaration of need for an environmental impact statement for the 800 53rd Ave NE redevelopment project. Councilmember Deneen reiterated that the motion simply means that the City does not need to further study a particular portion of the EAW. It is not saying that the City is not going to continue to work towards environmental goals for the site. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. 7. Preliminary Plat; Planned Unit Development; Easement Vacations; and a Shoreland Variance to Allow for the Construction of a Multi-Phased Redevelopment at 800 53rd Avenue NE Including Two 6-story, 132-Unit Affordable Multifamily Buildings, a Mixed- Use Building with 12,000 sq. ft. of Commercial Space and a Range of 150-175 Market- Rate Apartments, 58 Townhomes, and Associated Park and Infrastructure Improvements. Community Development Director Forney introduced HKGI Consulting Planner Rita Trapp. He noted that HKGI has worked on the City’s Comprehensive Plan for 2024, and completed the Comprehensive Plan amendment for the project. Mayor Márquez Simula recessed the regular meeting at 7:30 pm. The regular meeting reconvened at 7:40 pm. Community Development Director Forney reviewed the project’s evolution throughout the years. He noted that in December 2022, Medtronic placed the site on the market. In 2023/2024, the City explored mixed-use concepts for the site that included a variety of housing types, commercial-oriented to major street corridors, and green space. In 2024, the City amended the Comprehensive Plan to change the future land use designation from commercial to transit-oriented development (TOD) and show it as an area of opportunity. In 2024/2025, the applicant explored concepts with the City. Ms. Trapp stated that Kaas Wilson Architects, on behalf of Lincoln Avenue Communities have applied for a Preliminary Plat, Planned Unit Development Mixed Use Development; Easement Vacations; and a Shoreland Variance for the property located at 800 53rd Avenue. The site is the former 11.74-acre Medtronic corporate campus abutting Sullivan City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 12 Lake. The existing building and parking lot would be demolished and redeveloped as part of these requests. The property is owned by Medtronic, but under a purchase agreement with the applicant/developer. Ms. Trapp explained that the proposed project is a multi-phased development entailing two 6-story, 132-unit affordable multifamily buildings, a mixed-use building with 12,000 sq. ft. of commercial space, and a range of 150–175-unit market-rate apartments, 58 townhomes, and associated park and infrastructure improvements, as well as multi-modal bike and pedestrian transportation facilities. Additional project information for the Preliminary Plat, Planned Unit Development - Mixed Use Development, Easement Vacations can be found in the June 3, 2025 Planning Commission staff report, while information about the Shoreland Variance can be found in the Agenda Packet for the July 1, 2025 Planning Commission staff report. Ms. Trapp reviewed the proposed project phasing. Phases 1 and 2 will include the two 132 units which are the affordable multi-family apartment buildings. Phase 3 will include the 58 three-story townhome construction. Phase 4 will include the mixed-use building containing 150-175 market-rate multi-family units and 12,000 square feet of speculative commercial space. Ms. Trapp mentioned that the site is currently zoned General Business District. The request is to be rezoned to Planned Unit Development (PUD) as mixed use. This would allow for flexibility from City Code 9.113 (C). The density and parking are the specific development standards requested to vary from. There would be major improvements to bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Ms. Trapp stated that the subject property is currently located in the General Business District, which does not allow for residential uses. The proposed plan is to rezone the site to a Planned Unit Development District. The R-4 and GB Districts are subject to setback standards, while the PUD district is not. Setbacks of properties in the PUD district are subject to Staff review and Council approval. She reviewed a table that displayed what is currently allowed in the R-4 district versus what is applicant is proposing for their buildings and phases under the rezoned PUD district. The first two apartment buildings are in the center of the subject property and share zero-lot lines and show a building control joint connecting the two structures, resulting in the proposed setbacks described. The parking lots abut the property line of the future phases of the development but are separated. In review of the proposed setbacks. Staff have identified that the project will need flexibility with regard to setting the minimum multi-family front yard setback to 10 feet and setting the multi-family parking setbacks to 0 feet. Ms. Trapp noted that the proposed site plan shows four phases with the first two including two L-shaped apartment buildings both containing 134 units with surface and underground parking; the third phase containing 58 townhouses with tuck-under garages and standalone as well as shared driveways; and the last phase, a mixed-use building containing 12,000 square foot of commercial space (the specific use will have defined parking City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 13 requirements) and 150-175 market-rate apartment units with underground and surface parking shared between the uses which will be an expectation in the development agreement., but will have a specific calculation and other requirements once an end-user is found. The project will provide approximately 675 parking spaces: 250 stalls at grade and 425 underground parking spaces. Each of the townhome units will have two garage stalls and 2 driveway parking spaces. Ms. Trapp explained that in the first two phases, the applicant is proposing two multifamily buildings identical in layout and unit mix. City Code 9.106 General Development Standards (L) Off-street parking and loading (10) establishes off-street parking requirements for the allowed uses within the city. Residential uses have off-street parking requirements, including two enclosed spaces (garages) per single-family and townhome, but that count is different for multifamily buildings, and depending on the unit type. One-bedroom units are required to provide one enclosed parking space (garage); two or more bedroom units are required to provide two total spaces per unit, with one of those being enclosed. Ms. Trapp noted that the Council, at its discretion, may reduce the minimum required parking to not less than 1.5 parking spaces per unit for multifamily structures with seven or more units, after consideration of factors including but not limited to the present or future availability of transit services, shared parking, pedestrian orientation, and occupancy characteristics, which is also the intent of the Transit Oriented Development designation. Ms. Trapp stated that for the first two phases, the applicant is proposing 268 multifamily units with the unit type counts above. Based on that configuration, the applicant is required to provide a minimum of 134 enclosed spaces per building and 82 surface spaces for a total of 270 enclosed spaces and 164 surface spaces totaling 434 stalls between the two buildings or a parking ratio of 1.6 stalls per 1 unit for both buildings and meet the minimum of not less than 1.5 parking spaces. There should be a determination on whether parking is included in the rental pricing, and if that is desired, then it should be considered as part of the development agreement. Ms. Trapp mentioned that the third phase includes 58 townhouses showing two-car garages with driveways capable of parking two passenger vehicles. The applicant is required to provide two parking spaces per townhome unit, and both of them must be enclosed, this configuration meets the minimum required. The last phase includes a mixed- use building with a range of approximately 150-175 market-rate apartment units and a 12,000 sq. ft. speculative commercial space. Because the commercial space is without a defined end user, the space is speculative and numerous commercial uses in the city are held to the 1 per 300 sq. ft. gross floor area standard, so that is what is being used to estimate the commercial parking requirement with the understanding that when a defined end user is identified, those parking calculations could change depending on the type of use. Market-rate apartment units are considered to have more amenities, including enclosed parking; multifamily units are required to provide at least one enclosed parking space per unit, regardless of the unit type, not to decrease the parking ratio below 1.5 spaces (total) per unit, which is the minimum standard. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 14 Ms. Trapp noted that City Code 9.106 (L)(6)(g) and (h) identify provisions that allow joint parking between multi-use structures and proof of parking showing that the anticipated parking demand will be met if the future potential use may generate additional parking needs. As part of the PUD, the City can accept the amount of parking provided for the first three phases of residential development with the understanding that the specific unit count breakdown and definition of the commercial space will require further parking requirements. The parking spaces vary in size from nine feet by twenty feet to a compact size of nine feet by eighteen feet and eight feet six inches by eighteen feet. Most of the spaces for residents are undersized. As part of the PUD, the City can accept the undersized parking for resident spots. Drive aisle depths are noted on the plans at 24 feet in width. This is consistent with the City’s requirements for drive aisle depths. Ms. Trapp mentioned that to accommodate the mixed-use development, the height of the structures, and the high density at this site, the applicants are proposing to rezone the property to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The PUD will allow flexibility with the City’s strict zoning requirements, while also requiring a high standard of building quality and site design. The PUD ordinance requires the Planning Commission to hold an informal public hearing and a formal hearing at the City Council Meeting. She reviewed a table that showed the units per acre for this project and the different types of units available. It should be noted that units-per-acre is a different measurement from floor area ratio. The recent redevelopment of the City Hall at 3989 Central Avenue NE is included as a comparison. Both L-shaped buildings are anticipated to be identical in configurations and unit counts/types. The market-rate is the last phase and includes an anticipated unit count of 150-175; the commercial is speculative and will depend on the developer and market interest in the space. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment would be required to remove the commercial space if the last phase were to deviate from the 85% Residential/15% Commercial guiding. Ms. Trapp noted that the applicants are proposing to vacate one easement, Doc. No. 1330239, provided for sanitary sewer, is on the property. The easement vacation is necessary in order to accommodate the project. The applicants have provided legal descriptions of the easements to be vacated. Ms. Trapp stated that the current Shoreland Overlay District Ordinance, last amended in 2008, is intended to guide the development along the shoreland of public waters. An overlay buffer is applied on property within 1,000 feet of a designated waterway, as determined by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Since the proposed project’s property is abutting Sullivan Lake, which is designated as a General Development Lake, development must follow the standards of the shoreland overlay district, including the maximum amount of impervious surface. Ms. Trapp mentioned that currently, the site consists of the former 135,000 square foot Medtronic building and an 812-stall bituminous parking lot. According to the project’s development plans, there is currently 54% of impervious surface coverage, which is approximately 296,208 square feet or 6.8 acres. It is important to note that the Medtronic City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 15 site was built in 1979 with no stormwater treatment. As this was before the current DNR regulations were adopted, the property is nonconforming. Ms. Trapp noted that the proposed project includes a multi-phase, full-site redevelopment with several new buildings and reconfigured parking and circulation. The proposal increases the existing impervious surface on the property from 54% to 67.7%. A lot-by-lot impervious surface breakdown is attached in the Agenda Packet. Although the project will be phased, processing one shoreland variance permit will allow for a streamlined approval process and construction timeline. In order to meet the City's requirements, the project must receive approval for the shoreland variance and ensure proper stormwater management. As part of the recent approval, the applicant has demonstrated adequate stormwater management utilizing various infiltration features for the site. As there is currently no existing treatment on-site, the proposed improvements will reduce runoff volumes and improve water quality. In addition, the applicant will also meet the MPCA’s NPDES stormwater permit requirements. It is projected that the stormwater features will be installed in the initial construction phases with the affordable housing project. Ms. Trapp stated the Planning Commission held public hearings for all items at their respective June 3rd and July 1st meetings as required by City Ordinance. At the meetings, the Planning Commission reviewed and voted unanimously to recommend with conditions for the Preliminary Plat, Planned Unit Development - Mixed Use Development, Easement Vacations, and the Shoreland Variance to the City Council. Ms. Trapp mentioned that during the June 3rd Planning Commission meeting, commissioners asked several questions and discussed the proposed project. There were initial comments regarding anticipated traffic and circulation impacts of the proposed development. The traffic engineer and city staff clarified that while traffic will likely increase, the projected travel patterns remain within industry-accepted standards. Circulation and access were also mentioned as concerns, with recognition given that MnDOT is planning additional improvements that will help resolve connectivity concerns. Ms. Trapp stated that the Commissioners requested to learn more about the developer’s experience. The developer’s representative referenced past projects such as Luna Apartments and Sora Apartments in Minneapolis, the Robbinsdale REV, and a master planned development in Madison, WI. This will be the developer’s first Planned Unit Development (PUD) in Minnesota. In response to questions on project phasing, the developer’s representative mentioned it will be dependent on the timing of bonding and Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) allocations. At this time, the first phase is expected to begin in the first or second quarter of 2026 with initial demolition and grading planned. Then, construction of the remaining phases would continue through 2028. The development team is preparing for the possibility of delays due to funding or logistical challenges by having a strategy to adjust their plans to work on another phase. Ms. Trapp added that as part of the commission discussion, a commissioner noted the review process for the project, noting that this demonstrated the City’s thorough City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 16 consideration of the proposed development. Lastly, there was a question regarding the property to the north of the proposed project, near a bus stop, which was noted as a separate project. The Chair mentioned Metro Transit is engaged in the development review process, and there may be future improvements to complement this site. Ms. Trapp noted that when the public hearing opened, there were several public comments focused on a range of concerns, including but not limited to the park improvements, connectivity, parking availability, height, density reduction, infrastructure, construction, and phasing impacts. There were also concerns about modifying zoning codes for special projects, emphasizing the protection of Sullivan Lake, and a desire to propose different housing types instead of apartments. The Planning Commission closed the public hearing and ultimately recommended approval of all items. Ms. Trapp stated the focus of the July 1st Planning Commission was solely on the requested shoreland variance. In their discussion, Commissioners requested additional information about how the stormwater system will work, what happens if the site is full, and the depth and vegetative coverage of the stormwater basins. Staff noted that the details of the stormwater system are being developed and that there will be an ongoing management plan with the property owner to ensure the system is working. The developer’s representative provided technical information about the system design, including noting that the system's life expectancy is 50 years and that the storm basin will likely be more of a rain garden. Comments during the public hearing included concerns about density, building height, amount of green space, and environmental impacts. Concerns were also raised about the proposed improvements to Sullivan Park – particularly those that increase overall impervious surface. After the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the shoreland variance with the findings of fact and conditions as provided in the Agenda Packet. Ms. Trapp noted that each request’s criteria, findings of fact, and conditions can be found in the Resolutions and Ordinance in the Agenda Packet. Councilmember Buesgens noted page 373 of the Agenda Packet and thanked staff for including parking in the rent. She noted page 366 of the Agenda Packet, where it mentions the pollinator turf and landscaping. She suggested using the University of Minnesota’s study to determine the appropriate turf that would not require chemicals for weeds. She noted page 368 in the Agenda Packet, item 13, which says “manage prolonged water application if a lithium-ion pack ignites. An 8-10 inch pipeline running along 53rd Avenue carrying non-highly volatile liquid products was identified and poses a risk of vapor clouds produced if disrupted.” She asked what that meant. Community Development Director Forney replied that the Fire Department has concerns regarding EV charging within residential structures. If the EV is in the building and a vehicle catches fire, then the Fire Department cannot get in to put the fire out. The Fire Department recommended moving the EV stations outside to the surface parking lot. He added that there is a large oil pipeline that runs along 53rd Avenue. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 17 Councilmember James mentioned that the PUD says that the maximum density allowed is 65 units per acre. She asked if there was a report for the proposed density per acre is. Community Development Director Forney replied that it is 49 units per acre. Councilmember Deneen asked how the City could be assured that phase three of the development would be completed. Mr. Brasser explained that Lincoln Avenue Development owns and operates their buildings for the long term. While they are a national firm, they take a regional approach to development. He added that they are one of the most active and largest affordable developers in the Country. He noted that they have the experience and financial capacity to tackle complex redevelopment projects and get them done. He noted that they would be long-term, accessible, community partners. He noted that prior to working at Lincoln Avenue Development, he worked for other local developers who worked in the Twin Cities, including Columbia Heights. He noted that he put the Medtronic site under contract in December 2024. He noted that his team and he have researched and understood what the City’s goals for the site were and how to satisfy them. They have worked with City staff and other key stakeholders and community meetings to develop the master plan. Mr. Brasser noted that the presented plan checks all of the boxes of the State Comprehensive Plan amendment, including providing a mix of housing types and uses across the site, with a maximum building height not to exceed six stories, total housing density across the site of 450-600 units, concentrating density toward 53rd Avenue and stepping the height down closer to Sullivan Lake, and improving Sullivan Lake and the surrounding public areas including pathway connections. Mr. Brasser stated that no improvements to the PUD would impact the current public uses. He clarified that the parking stall size has 18 feet of back of stall and curb with a two-foot overhang from the vehicle. There is 20 feet of parking depth. Mr. Brasser addressed Councilmember Deneen’s question regarding ensuring that the phases would be completed. He noted that they are in active discussions with townhome developers and market mix-used developers. He explained that in order to have the townhome developers come in, they would need to develop the lots, which means adding the infrastructure improvements, utilities, and roads. He added that he does not think it will be difficult to secure the builder. Councilmember James mentioned that Lincoln Avenue Development committed to doing the work in the sections of the site to make it building-ready. She asked if it was an investment the firm was making. Mr. Brasser replied that it was. They have not determined the order of operations yet. Mayor Márquez Simula opened the Public Hearing. Caroline Osbourne, City resident, read a letter from Julianne Wyckoff. The letter asked the Council to rethink the Medtronic development. It is far too dense and infringes on a much- City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 18 loved and used park. 53rd Avenue cannot handle any more traffic. The development is not good for the City, and residents deserve better. The City needs more owner-occupied housing with residents who will stay and invest in the City. The site is one of the last great empty spaces in the City. There are several blighted apartment buildings that need to be addressed, space at the old Rainbow site, and the old medical building on Central Avenue that could be developed. She noted that the City should work with a developer who can show the community previous work they have already done. Once the area is developed, it cannot be redone. Ms. Osbourne mentioned that she has spoken with many residents from Park Side Association. Many of the units have been owned for 15-20 years. She noted that Julianne has put into words what many of the residents are feeling. She expressed concerns regarding parking and Sullivan Lake Park. She added that she hoped the Council was listening to the residents and to look at the density and how that would affect the current homeowners. Rebecca Wratkowski, City resident, stated that it seems that the City is looking for a transit- oriented site. She wondered why the City was pursuing the development and wondered what was going wrong since the area that is currently developed is already near a transit connection. She noted that she wants to ensure that the City is reusing its resources well. She mentioned that on the north side of the City, there is not much green space, which means that people cannot have gardens, and there are no off-leash dog parks available. She noted that there is no equitable access to green spaces. She noted it is three miles to the nearest off-leash dog park, which means someone would need a vehicle to get there. She added that the nearest community garden is two miles away from the Medtronic site. She mentioned that as the City draws in renters, it is important to think about what is nearby for residents. Walter Horishnyk, City resident, wondered how much community input the project has had since the beginning. Community Development Director Forney replied that there has been quite a bit of community feedback. He noted that there was an open house where residents were invited to provide feedback. Mr. Horishnyk mentioned that he heard the developer say that they are trying to satisfy the community's input. He asked if part of the community input was to put in a six-story building. Mr. Forney replied that it was included in the Comprehensive Plan amendment, which was a result of the community input. Mr. Horishnyk stated he was curious to learn more about the correlation between the community input and the Comprehensive Plan amendment. He noted that the cities around Columbia Heights are opting for four-story buildings. He added that there seems to be a lot of downsides to having a six-story building. He noted that parking for a six-story building will impact the surrounding lake water. He added that the developer said that they would reach the minimum requirement for lake water runoff. He mentioned that he would like to hear that the developer would go above and beyond the requirement. He asked where a group of citizens could come speak with the Planning Commission, where they would have a voice, and that it would carry a weight of importance. He mentioned that for each resident who is speaking, it is on behalf of at least six other voices since they have City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 19 spoken with their neighbors about the matter. The area needs development, but the proposed project is being overaggressive. He stated that he keeps hearing that nothing is set in stone yet, but he watched as a large concrete slab was put down at Sullivan Lake Park. He added that residents are expressing their concerns, but the Council and the City have already made up their minds. He explained that if there was a group of residents who were providing community input on the project four years ago, he would expect to see them continue to raise their voices throughout the process. He asked the Council to respect the current and future residents. The current residents deserve to be heard. Teresa Carson, City resident, stated she would like to address the density for the small- sized lot. She expressed her concerns regarding overcrowding and noted that it would over-crowd Sullivan Lake Park. She expressed concerns regarding parking, especially after hearing the issues at Ratio apartment. She wondered what would prevent the site from having the same issue as the Ratio apartment building. She added that multi-family units would have more than 1.5 cars, and the overflow parking has to go somewhere. She asked how parking would be addressed on the site and if it would be included in the rent. She expressed concerns regarding noise from the buildings and wondered what would be done about it. She asked what guarantees the builder would give to ensure that they would take care of the issues instead of relying on the community to solve them. She asked if the City would hold the developer accountable for any issues that would come up. Mayor Márquez Simula asked if the developer was taking notes on the questions being asked so that he could address the questions. Mr. Brasser replied that he was. Dirk Schmitz, City resident, stated that a number of the questions he had were his own, but a number of them were asked by others. He addressed the impervious surface being a higher percentage than what is normal. He noted that there would be rainwater storage tanks that would gather the water and slowly release it back onto the site. He asked what the calculation would be in considering the impervious surface. He mentioned that there are nine other stormwater areas that are draining into the lake and are not treated. While the development will make a minor improvement to the quality of the lake, it is not a drastic improvement to the lake. He wondered if 12,000 square feet of non-resident use would be enough space. He mentioned that retail is not a profitable business like others. He noted that there would be family units, and it would be near a bus line. He stated that an on-site day care would be a perfect fit for the site. He suggested having a business service area that would help support at-home businesses in the building and could include a UPS drop-off area. He wondered what the timeline was for the project to be completed. He wondered if there could be condos so that there would be people who own the units. He asked at what population level the City runs out of services to provide a quality of life with a small-town feel. The housing stock in the City is becoming more corporately owned. He asked if the City would still have a small-town feel in the future. He expressed his appreciation for the Council for the time they spent serving the community. Karen Smith, Voyagers Montessori School Administrator, stated that her parents live in the area, and everyone they have talked to is not in support of the proposed project. She City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 20 added that she has not heard of anyone being against the development of the area. People are against how the site is being developed. She noted it was helpful to hear what the goals of the project were. She expressed her frustration that the Planning Commission gave variances for the green spaces at Sullivan Lake Park to be uprooted for the development. She added that it seems like the developers do not want to put in the resources to develop green spaces, and instead will put a little money into Sullivan Lake Park. The developers do not take responsibility for adding green spaces to the development. She noted that the variance on the setbacks does not make sense because it is not accommodating or meeting the goals that the Councils set out to do. She noted that everyone she has spoken to has made a comment about the density, and that residents agree that they are fine with a four- story building. She wondered what the City’s real vision for the development is since they are giving so many variances to the development. She wondered why the developer was not lessening the density if they were truly listening to the concerns of the residents. She thanked the Council for their time and for asking questions and taking the matter seriously. She mentioned that the development would make a world of change in the area, which could be positive or negative. Michelle Brask, City resident, read a letter that she submitted to the Council. She noted that when she moved to the City, the Sullivan Lake Park area was known as one of the gems of the City. She assumed that the City had done its due diligence about the property development and searched for the right developer. She noted that she does not see Lincoln Avenue Communities as the villain because they want to maximize the space and get the most out of their investment. She noted the City’s role is to develop and to protect. She expressed her concern about who would be coming into the development. Lincoln Avenue Communities’ website mentions that 50-60% lower income, less than 30% are extremely low-income, and 30-50% very low-income. She noted that the development would bring in people with high needs. She asked how the City was preparing to help deal with many issues that could be coming in. She asked how the developer would work for all involved, including residents and neighbors. She mentioned that when she was growing up, she lived in low-income housing, and it helped her family get a leg up. She stated that she is not saying to not allow low-income housing residents into the City. She clarified that she is wondering what the City will do to help meet the issues that may arise within low-income families. She expressed her concern regarding the density. She asked the Council to scale back the project. She noted that poverty significantly increases criminal behavior. She added that she does not believe everyone who lives in low-income housing is a criminal. She emphasized the importance of knowing what the impact would be for Target and businesses in the area, and what resources the City will provide. She asked how the neighbors in Sullivan Lake Park would be impacted. She asked the Council to consider the current residents before the future ones. She expressed her concerns regarding traffic and pedestrian traffic. She pointed out that crossing areas for pedestrians need to be addressed. She asked the Council to consider what will be in the future and to continue to keep Columbia Heights with a small-town feel. She asked the Council to scale back to have fewer stories. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 21 Mark Odegard, City resident, stated he spent 40 years as a designer. He noted that he has not seen any photos of the developers’ previous projects. He added that he does not know who the architect is for the project. He mentioned that he sees the proposed project as a way for the developer to make a lot of money. The project requires a lot of variances. He added that the developer designed the project with variances in mind. He encouraged the Council to issue no variances and have the developer design something beautiful with no rezoning. He added that there have been no comments regarding the aesthetics of the building. He asked if an architect had been chosen. Community Development Director Forney replied that the architect is Kaas Wilson. He added that what the building will look like is a part of future approvals, and the community will be included in the process. Mr. Odegard asked how many variances would be needed for the project. Community Development Forney replied that it is to rezone the property, which is not technically a variance. He added that it is edits to the zoning district. There is one variance in the project, which is for the Shoreland overlay variance. Mr. Odegard asked the City to consider not having any variances and to make the project beautiful. He added that he would like to hear more about aesthetics in the future. Jared Finkelson, City resident, stated he was in favor of the project. He noted he liked that it was a transit-oriented development, it is mixed-use, and has a stormwater management system. He mentioned that there will be about 500 families that will need a place to live, and they can either live in the City or they will go elsewhere. Either way, the City will still need to deal with traffic concerns because MnDOT is expanding Highway 65 and other roads. He noted that having a low-density development would have a higher percentage of impervious surface for the number of people living there than with a higher density. He mentioned that he would like to see more four-bedroom options since there are a lot of multi-generational families that live in the City. He mentioned that since there are a lot of multigenerational families in the area, there could be older family members who may need to go to the hospital. It would be easier for them to get into an ambulance by having an elevator in the building than for EMS to try to get into some of the homes in the City. He noted that it would be nice if the commercial space could be renovated to have smaller spaces. That way, smaller, local businesses would be able to move into the commercial space. Larger commercial spaces attract larger corporations, which could damage the small-town feel. He stated it would be nice to have condos included in the development. Mayor Márquez Simula asked Mr. Finkelson to share more about emergency services being able to access people more easily in the proposed apartment than in a lot of homes in the City. Mr. Finkelson replied that it is an easier process to get out of an apartment building because the City has a lot of older homes with hallways that are not as wide. The proposed apartment would have a new level of standards as well. Mr. Brasser mentioned that there were a number of questions regarding how much community input has occurred. He noted he has been involved in the project for eight months, and they have had three one-hour community-specific meetings. He noted that City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 22 this was the third public hearing in five months. The public input has been recorded. He added that there have been comments regarding the developer wanting to maximize the site and put in as many units as possible. He stated that the initial proposal had over 700 units, and it was all apartments. The developers heard from the Council and community members that they would prefer a mixed-use site. There are 440 units proposed now. The developers have revised the building makeup to include for-sale townhomes and have reduced the density. Removing two stories from the building would be financially infeasible. Mr. Brasser addressed the stormwater concerns. The Medtronic site is a highly paved site. 54% of the site is considered impervious. There are currently no drains, gutters, or anything built in for stormwater. The developer is proposing to increase the impervious surface, but with the stormwater management system, it will take the first 1.1 inches of rain and flow into the storm detention tank. It will control the rate at which the stormwater flows off the site. This will help not to overwhelm the lake with water and surface contaminants. He added that there are opportunities to work with MWMO on how to assist in the cleanup of Sullivan Lake. Mr. Brasser mentioned there was a comment that 38% of impervious surface is the norm. He explained that it is not the case. He noted that it is in the Shoreland overlay is a unique situation due to the proximity to the lake. Mr. Brasser referenced comments regarding the size of the commercial site being 12,000 square feet. He noted that they are not in the final design phase of the building, and there will be a separate developer who will develop the commercial space. The commercial developer would go through the Planning Commission and public input process for the design of the space. It will be possible to break up the space into smaller units. Mr. Brasser noted there were concerns regarding the resident profile and demographic based on income. Lincoln Avenue Communities predominantly own apartment buildings for low-income residents. He noted that they own a variety of AMI buildings. The proposed development is intended to be at the 60% AMI, which would be similar to the Col Apartments. Mr. Brasser mentioned that there were comments regarding the design of the building. He explained that they are not in the design phase of the project yet. Kaas Wilson, who will be the architect of the project, is an established company that has designed many apartment buildings in the area. Councilmember James thanked the residents for their comments. She noted that the townhomes were included in the project because the Council did not just want it to be apartment rentals. She noted that the development is on the border of Fridley and is close to Moore Lake Park. She added that since it is a transit-oriented site, people will be able to get around to various locations. She stated that there is a demand for housing located near retail. She mentioned that she heard and agreed with the comment regarding the need for crosswalks. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 23 Councilmember James pointed out that the City website has a section that lists the history of the development and what meetings have taken place. She noted that it is under the development and land use section of the website. On January 9, 2024, there was an open house for the Comprehensive Plan before the developer was chosen. The online comment was open for about a month, and two additional public hearings followed. The first meeting had about 65 residents. Councilmember James agreed with the comment about having various uses in the commercial space besides retail. She added that she would love to see a doctor's office or other commercial uses in the space. Councilmember James asked if the City was offering any setback variances. Community Development Director Forney replied that the current zoning is General Business. By rezoning it with the PUD, it includes the setbacks. The City is essentially establishing a new zoning district and new requirements for it. It does not require a variance, but it is establishing the parameters for the new zoning district. The setbacks are based on multi- family areas. Councilmember James mentioned that she has toured the Col Apartment building and noted that they have great ADA units. She stated she would ask the developer to include ADA units. Councilmember James noted that there was a comment regarding ultra-low and very-low income supportive housing. She stated that she wished the building had some of that, but it would be for regular affordable housing. This development would not be for 30% AMI, and mentioned that it would be for those who fit the higher level. Mr. Brasser explained that there is a different process for housing those who are 30% AMI and below. One way is to build Section 8 housing. The development will still accept a Housing Choice Voucher, which is for those who work with the Housing Authority to get a voucher to help pay for all or part of their rent. Councilmember Buesgens thanked the residents for their comments and mentioned that she has read all of the letters and emails that were submitted. She noted it is her fourth round working with affordable housing developments since being on the Council. She stated the developer would be conforming to the lighting requirements. She added that she is glad to hear that the developer is a long-time owner of the development. Councilmember Buesgens explained that a part of her job of being on the Council is to find the balance between looking “at the forest and at the trees”. She mentioned that the Council wants to ensure that there are all kinds of housing for different income levels. She noted that the housing market is making it difficult for people to purchase homes, so many people are renting, which is why there is a need for higher density in the City. The developer needs to make their means stretch since costs have increased for construction as well. She added that she would have liked to see the site developed into a large commercial complex since it brings in more taxes, and there is only 5% commercial in the City currently. Having more commercial space would help ease the tax burden for City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 24 residents. She mentioned that the need for affordable housing is huge. She added that some of the residents could be seniors who no longer want to take care of a home but would like to stay in the City and have affordable housing. Councilmember Buesgens mentioned that she qualified for the 30% AMI when she was in her 30s and lived in an affordable housing unit. She stated she did not run into issues and that the people who lived in the building wanted a place that was safe and well- maintained. She noted that there are 265 units above City Hall, but it does not feel that way. She added that there are not many cars that are coming and going from the parking garage. She explained that with each affordable housing development that has gone in, people have had concerns about density. She noted that many people walk from place to place, and a lot of the areas with affordable housing are peaceful and quiet. She expected that it would feel the same way with the new development. Councilmember Buesgens noted that poverty can lead to high crime rates; however, that is when it is dense. The healthiest communities that can be created are mixed-income because it keeps the crime rates down. Concentrated poverty is when crime rates can go up. Councilmember Buesgens agreed with the comment regarding the need for more crosswalks. She noted that the Council is listening and doing their best to ensure that it would be a quality development that people would enjoy. Councilmember Deneen thanked the developer for addressing the question about why there are six stories proposed instead of four stories. She noted that there is a demand for the number of units that is proposed. She mentioned that the City is a City of peace, and many people are looking for that. She added that the mixed-use creates a feeling of safety and ownership. Councilmember Deneen explained that no matter what development went onto the site, it would most likely need to be rezoned either way. She added her excitement that parking would be included in the rent. Councilmember Spriggs agreed with the comments that have been shared by the Council and commended Lincoln Avenue Communities for their willingness to work with the City. He added that he wants people to feel welcomed into the community and expressed his pride in the City and what it offers. Overall, adding stormwater management to the development will be beneficial to the lake, with the understanding that more work will need to be done. He added that overall, the project brings in some tax revenue. The tax revenue is to be put back into the City to improve the quality of life for residents. He stated he is in favor of the project moving forward with the understanding that there is a lot of discussion that still needs to be had. Mayor Márquez Simula thanked the residents for their comments and for coming to the meeting. She mentioned that this is not the first developer that have offered a project on the site. She added that the property is privately owned and the Council has been working City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 25 on asking the right questions in order to guide developers to what the City needs. She noted that the Council has said no to some of the proposed plans. She expressed her understanding of the comments regarding residents not feeling heard. She stated that she has the best interests of the entire City. She added that City staff work hard and ask the right questions. Lincoln Avenue Communities have met and worked with all the concerns that the Council has raised. She explained that when developments are presented, it feels like it is more than what it actually is going to be. She referenced other developments that have taken in and how it has impacted the community. She mentioned that the school district has been involved in the discussions in order to provide services for new residents. Mayor Márquez Simula explained that there is a lot to weigh in and consider for the development. She noted that a lot of the improvements from the development will snowball the City into a new future. She emphasized the aesthetics of the building and desired to have a building that looks good in the City. Mayor Márquez Simula stated that she hears the comments from the residents. She explained that the Council is working in partnership with the residents and the developer. She stated that they will continue to move forward with a partnership with the residents and emphasized that she wants to hear the residents' voices throughout the entire process. Motion by Councilmember Spriggs, seconded by Councilmember Deneen, to close the public hearing and waive the readings of Ordinance No. 1716, PUD District #2025-01, Rezoning of Property; draft Resolution No. 2025-043 PUD District Plan for #2025-01; draft Resolution No 2025-044, Preliminary and final Plat Approval; draft Resolutions No 2025-045 Easement Vacations; and Resolution 2025-058 there being ample copies available to the public. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Motion by Councilmember Spriggs, seconded by Councilmember Deneen, to set the second reading of Ordinance No. 1716, PUD District #2025-01, for August 11, 2025, at approximately 6:00 P.M. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Motion by Councilmember Spriggs, seconded by Councilmember Deneen, to approve the PUD District Plan Resolution No. 2025-043 as presented, subject to the conditions of approval. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Motion by Councilmember Spriggs, seconded by Councilmember Deneen, to approve the Preliminary Plat Resolution No. 2025-044 as presented, subject to the conditions of approval. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Motion by Councilmember Spriggs, seconded by Councilmember Deneen, to approve the Easement Vacations Resolution No. 2025-045 as presented, subject to the conditions of approval. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 26 Motion by Councilmember Spriggs, seconded by Councilmember Deneen, to approve the Shoreland Overlay Variance Resolution 2025-058, as presented, subject to the conditions of approval. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Mayor Márquez Simula recessed the regular meeting at 9:48 pm. The regular meeting reconvened at 9:56 pm. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION Ordinances and Resolutions 8. First Reading of Ordinance 1718, Amending Alcohol Ordinance Restrictions in Silver Lake Beach Park. Community Development Director Forney noted that in the past, local community organizations have hosted events such as Polar Plunges at Silver Lake Beach Park, specifically on Silver Lake. Earlier this year, one of those organizations contacted city staff to explore the possibility of continuing the event. Upon review, staff found that the current City ordinance prohibits the possession and consumption of alcohol at Silver Lake Beach Park. This prohibition is inconsistent with past events and appears to be an outdated code provision that may warrant reconsideration. Community Development Director Forney stated that currently, Chapter 10.201, Section (O) of the City Code permits, with an affirmative vote of the City Council, a variety of events to possess or consume intoxicating malt liquor in City parks between 8:00 a.m. and 9:30 p.m. However, Silver Lake Beach Park is specifically excluded from this provision, as highlighted in the ordinance language below. These regulations were established through Ordinance 866, which was adopted in 1977. Staff reviewed archived records but were unable to determine the original rationale for excluding Silver Lake Beach Park. Community Development Director Forney explained that Ordinance 1718 would remove the exclusion of Silver Lake Beach Park from Chapter 10.201, Section (O). This amendment would align the park with the same requirements and opportunities as other City parks. Any event wishing to possess or consume alcohol would still be required to obtain City Council approval prior to the event. Motion by Councilmember James, seconded by Councilmember Buesgens, to waive the reading of Ordinance No. 1718, there being ample copies available to the public. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Motion by Councilmember James, seconded by Councilmember Buesgens, to set the second reading of Ordinance No. 1718, being an ordinance amending chapter 10.201 of the Columbia Heights City Code to allow, upon council approval, alcohol at events within Silver Lake Beach Park, for August 11, 2025, at approximately 6:00 P.M. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 27 9. Consideration of Resolutions 2025-061 and 2025-062, Resolutions of the City Council for the City of Columbia Heights, Identifying the Need for Livable Communities Funding and Authorizing Application for Grant Funds. Community Development Coordinator Voight stated Lincoln Avenue Communities is applying for the Metropolitan Council’s 2025 Livable Communities grant funding program for redevelopment of a site located at 800 53rd Ave NE. Qualifying applicants for Livable Communities funding include cities or townships in the seven-county metro region that participate in the Met Council’s Local Housing Incentives program. Since developers cannot apply directly for this funding, Lincoln Avenue Communities is working with the City of Columbia Heights’ Community Development Department as its government partner in order to apply for these grants. Community Development Coordinator Voight mentioned the goals of the Pre-Development program are to add new housing types and create affordable housing, to create or preserve long-term living wage jobs or support economic opportunity for people experiencing the most economic hardships, to increase density and make it easier for people to travel between housing, jobs, services, and amenities, to minimize climate impact by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and conserving natural resources, and to further equity outcomes by fostering regional connections, mitigating climate impacts and implicit bias, removing barriers to accessing affordable housing, creating living wage jobs, and supporting the creation of small businesses owned and operated by historically marginalized populations. Eligible costs for Pre-Development funds include activities like design workshops, financial studies, project impact analyses, and community engagement. Community Development Coordinator explained that the goals of the LCDA and TOD Development programs are to maximize connections between housing, jobs, services, and transit and regional amenities like parks, trails, and cultural centers, to create more housing choices through introducing new housing types or preserving affordable housing, to support dense, diverse developments that emphasize pedestrian activity, multimodal transportation, and increased transit ridership, to mitigate climate change through sustainable site design and building practices, to advance racial equity by increasing access and opportunity for under-represented communities and historically marginalized populations, and to contribute to an economically prosperous and equitable region by creating living wage jobs and economic opportunity. Community Development Coordinator Voight explained that TOD projects are required to meet certain criteria concerning proximity to public transit. Eligible activity costs for Development funds may include site preparation, stormwater management systems, renewable energy systems, utilities, shared infrastructure, and public realm improvements, as well as engineering, design, and community engagement. Community Development Coordinator Voight stated Lincoln Avenue Communities is requesting $300,000.00 in Pre-Development grant funding and $2,000,000.00 in Development grant funding, for a total combined grant request of $2,300,000.00. Funding decisions for both programs are set to be made in fall 2025. In support of Lincoln Avenue City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 28 Communities’ pursuit of Pre-Development and Development Livable Communities grant funding for its project at 800 53rd Ave NE, Community Development staff recommend approval of Resolution 2025-061 and of Resolution 2025-062. Councilmember James noted that Resolution 2025-061 says in the Agenda Packet that the grant application is anticipated to be submitted on or before July 21st. She asked if that should be edited. Community Development Director Forney replied that the grant has already been submitted. The LCDA indicated that it would be acceptable for the Council to pass the Resolution after the grant submittal. If the Resolution did not pass, then the LCDA would pull the grant application. Motion by Councilmember Buesgens, seconded by Councilmember James, to waive the reading of Resolution 2025-061 and 2025-62, there being ample copies available to the public. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Motion by Councilmember Buesgens, seconded by Councilmember James, to approve Resolution 2025-061, being a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights identifying the need for Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding and authorizing application for Pre-Development grant funds. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Motion by Councilmember Buesgens, seconded by Councilmember James, to approve Resolution 2025-062, being a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights identifying the need for Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding and authorizing application for Development grant funds. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. 10. Consideration of Resolution 2025-064: Safe Streets for All Transportation Safety Action Plan. Public Works Director Hansen stated the City’s Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Citywide Safety Action Plan project kicked off in June 2024 with the help of the consultant hired, Bolton & Menk. Collection and analysis of crash data is a primary basis for the creation of the High Injury Network (HIN) in the plan. The consultant worked on multiple community and stakeholder outreach efforts to gather feedback on areas of concern throughout the City. Extensive public engagement is a primary component in preparing the plan. The final open house was held the week of June 24 for public review of the draft plan, and a public invitation for review and comment of the plan was pushed through the City’s social media platforms. Based on the HIN and public feedback, recommendations are then developed in the plan aimed at reducing crashes and fatalities with the ultimate goal of zero deaths and serious injuries on City Streets. At the July 7th work session, Connor Cox from Bolton & Menk reviewed: the community engagement conducted to prepare the plan, the high injury network, and the draft of the final plan with discussion/feedback from the Council. The public comment period for the draft plan was open until July 13th. Public Works Director Hansen noted that at the July 7th work session, the Council asked for a redline version of the plan based on the draft plan public feedback and comment period, which closed on July 13th. The redline version, dated June 2025, is attached to the Agenda Packet, incorporating changes made to the plan from both Council feedback (July work City of Columbia Heights MINUTES July 28, 2025 City Council Meeting Page 29 session) and Public comments (period closed July 13). The final Safety Action Plan (clean version) dated July 2025, is attached in the Agenda Packet. The Council also indicated support for formalizing a commitment toward a goal of zero deaths on City streets by 2040, and a 50% reduction in deaths and serious accidents by 2035. Upon approval of the plan, final documentation will be submitted to the FHWA to meet the grant completion date of September 16, 2025. Councilmember James asked if all of the demonstration projects would come back to the Council as they come up. Public Works Director Hansen replied that there are two demonstration projects. Staff are recommending that they work with ISD 13 to get the high school project this fall or next spring. The other demonstration project is shifting Jefferson to 7th Avenue. This project would likely occur next spring. He agreed that the demonstration projects would come back to the Council to review. Councilmember Deneen asked if there would be an opportunity for public input. Public Works Director Hansen replied that they typically have an opportunity for that. After the neighborhood is identified and there is a cost estimate, staff will notify the neighborhood for public input. Mayor Márquez Simula mentioned it has been a long process to get to this point and expressed her excitement about the work the staff has done to get the Safe Streets for All plan implemented. She added that by 2040, the City could see zero deaths on the streets due to the work that is happening now. Councilmember Buesgens thanked Public Works Director Hansen for the work that he has done. Motion by Councilmember Deneen, seconded by Councilmember Spriggs, to waive the reading of Resolution 2025-64, there being ample copies available to the public. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Motion by Councilmember Deneen, seconded by Councilmember Spriggs, to adopt Resolution 2025-64, being a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights approving the City of Columbia Heights Safety Action Plan and establishing a goal of zero traffic deaths and serious injuries on all City streets by 2040. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Councilmember James, seconded by Councilmember Spriggs, to adjourn. All Ayes, Motion Carried 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 10:14 pm. Respectfully Submitted, ______________________________________ Sara Ion, City Clerk/Council Secretary