Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-05-2025 City Council Work Session Packet CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION Mayor Amáda Márquez Simula Councilmembers Connie Buesgens Rachel James Justice Spriggs Laurel Deneen City Manager Aaron Chirpich City Hall—Shared Vision Room, 3989 Central Ave NE Monday, May 05, 2025 6:00 PM AGENDA ATTENDANCE INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC Members of the public who wish to attend may do so in-person, or by using Microsoft Teams Meeting at columbiaheightsmn.gov/joinameeting ID 271 361 336 205, Passcode sd66JM7R. For questions, please contact Administration at 763-706-3610. Auxiliary aids or other accommodations for individuals with disabilities are available upon request when the request is made at least 72 hours in advance. Please contact Administration at 763 -706-3610 to make arrangements. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL WORK SESSION ITEMS 1. Rainbow Site Development Update. (20 Minutes) 2. MnDOT: Layout Recommendations for Central Avenue. (Continued from April 7, 2025) (60 Minutes) 3. Gould Ave NE and Peters Pl Parking Update. (20 Minutes) 4. GreenStep Cities Progress Discussion. (20 Minutes) 5. Malt Liquor at City Events. (20 Minutes) 6. City Hall Emergency Action Plan. (20 Minutes) 7. Leadership Retreat – Executive Summary Review. (30 Minutes) 8. Council Corner. Discussion Items Suggested by Mayor Márquez Simula: Review Language for Consent Agenda / Public Hearings. Review St. Anthony Village Commercial Tobacco Ordinance. Monthly Calendar Sharing. Monthly Event Notification, Attendance and Past Event Updates. Jamboree Parade Participation. Monthly Proclamations and Meeting Guests. ADJOURNMENT 1 City of Columbia Heights AGENDA May 05, 2025 City Council Work Session Page 2 Auxiliary aids or other accommodations for individuals with disabilities are available upon request when the request is made at least 72 hours in advance. Please contact Administration at 763-706-3610 to make arrangements. 2 ITEM: Rainbow Site Development Update DEPARTMENT: Administration BY/DATE: City Manager – 4/29/25 CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below) _Healthy and Safe Community X Equitable, Diverse, Inclusive, and Friendly _Trusted and Engaged Leadership X Thriving and Vibrant Destination Community _Strong Infrastructure and Public Services _Sustainable BACKGROUND: In July of 2021, The City partnered with Alatus LLC, to acquire the priority redevelopment site at 4300 Central Avenue NE. To facilitate the acquisition and preparation of the property, the City made a bridge loan that allowed Alatus to purchase the property and demolish the existing buildings. To provide the loan, the City issued Taxable General Obligation Temporary Tax Increment Bonds (Series 2021A), in the amount of $5,935,000. The original maturity date of this bond issuance was February 1, 2024. Ultimately, the project stalled due to post-pandemic global economic strains and subsequent rising interest rates. This left Alatus unable to begin phase one construction and repay the loan/bonds in time. To account for this and extend the repayment timeline, the City issued a new series of bonds (2023A) in the amount of $6,615,000 in late 2024. These bonds were used to refund the Series 2021A bonds and a new amended loan was provided to Alatus. The new bond issuance was $680,000 more than the first to account for closing costs and capitalized interest. The new loan maturity date was set for July 31, 2025, and the new bond maturity date is February 1, 2026. In addition to financially facilitating the acquisition of 4300 Central Avenue, the City established the Alatus Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District in 2021. This district was created to offset qualified costs of development including land/building acquisition, public improvements, utilities, and demolition. The only qualified expenditures completed to date are site acquisition and demolition. This is of important note because state statutes require that all TIF eligible development activity be finished within a five-year period that begins with the certification of the district. The five-year expiration date for completion of eligible activity in the Alatus TIF district is August 3, 2026. SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS: Following the federal elections at the end of 2024, economic uncertainty and instability have only grown worse under the new administration. Interest rates are not lowering, and trade wars are shaking the foundations of the global economy. These factors have made it very difficult to finance the developme nt of new market rate high-density housing in Minnesota and across the Country. Despite these headwinds, Alatus has been working diligently to develop new funding options and strategic partnerships. Some of their new partners are looking at the full Alatus development pipeline and have interest in funding and developing multiple projects with Alatus. However, it is unlikely that any new partner will be ready to help Alatus and the CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION ITEM MEETING DATE MAY 5, 2025 3 Item 1. City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 2 City meet the constraints of current deadlines related to bond funding and TIF expenditures. Therefore, the City must develop a strategy with Alatus to stabilize the project and create the time and space necessary to develop the site in a manner consistent with the current vision. NEXT STEPS: To keep the project moving forward, staff will be working through the following steps throughout the rest of the year:  Modify loan agreement with Alatus. The current maturity date is July 31, 2025. Alatus cannot make this deadline.  Determine what bond refunding strategies are available and execute a plan to ensure that the City and Alatus are prepared to repay the Series 2023A bonds by February 1, 2026 and issue new debt in place of the 2023A Series. Or, alternatively, close on phase one construction financing by the same deadline.  Prepare a plan to present a bill to the MN legislature during the 2026 session requesting special legislation for an extension of the five-year deadline related to the completion of TIF eligible site improvements. Staff from Alatus will be at the work session to provide more in-depth information on their new funding partners/strategies and to answer general questions regarding the potential timeline for development. 4 Item 1. ITEM: MnDOT: Layout Recommendations for Central Avenue (continued from April 7, 2025) DEPARTMENT: Public Works BY/DATE: City Engineer / May 1, 2025 CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below) _Healthy and Safe Community _Equitable, Diverse, Inclusive, and Friendly _Trusted and Engaged Leadership _Thriving and Vibrant Destination Community X Strong Infrastructure and Public Services _Sustainable BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has recommendations on the preferred layout for Central Avenue from 37th to 53rd Avenues, and will be reviewing those with the Council. Work will be shifting from the layout phase to preliminary and final design phases of the Central Avenue project following consultant contract award by MnDOT later this spring or early summer. MnDOT had asked for continued discussions on Central Avenue from the April 7 th 2025 work session. SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS: At the April 7th work session, MnDOT’s began the discussion to share their recommendations for the corridor, and to have a check in with the Council based on agency, public, and council feedback and make sure the project is headed in the right direction. To reiterate, if the recommendations present questions, issues, or concerns - these should be addressed by the time Municipal Consent is considered by the Council later this year or early in 2026. Two items seem to warrant continued discussion: Reservoir Boulevard closure and the lane configuration for the northbound direction of TH 65. Additional information is as follows: Reservoir Boulevard closure: As discussed at the April 7th meeting, access from Reservoir Boulevard to the signal at 37th Avenue and Central Avenue will be removed. MnDOT has shown a ‘right-in’ only from Central Avenue north of the 37th Avenue. Staff recommends a full closure of Reservoir Boulevard and designing a cul - de-sac to accommodate City needs for truck turn around including fire trucks. Attached is a detailed listing of public feedback on Reservoir Boulevard provided by MnDOT through their outreach efforts. Approximately 70% of the respondents support the full closure of Reservoir Boulevard at 37th Avenue. TH 65 North Bound Lane Configuration: City Staff, in addition to other agencies, are advocating for 2 lanes in the northbound direction. This configuration would be either a dedicated bus lane or second travel lane. Considerations for a second northbound lane: CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION ITEM MEETING DATE MAY 5, 2025 5 Item 2. City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 2 1. Aligns with the 2-lane configuration in Minneapolis south of 37th Avenue (two lanes). 2. Supports bus traffic (stops and re-entering traffic) with the addition of the BRT line in 2028. 3. Allows traffic to by-pass when buses are stopped, traffic is waiting to turn at an intersection, or maintenance crews are working on the street or boulevards. 4. A second lane would only add 6.5 feet to the overall crossing distance for pedestrians. 5. Allows for City maintenance activities to function ‘in-traffic’ with a lane closure as opposed to shutting down all traffic and detouring under a single lane configuration. 6. Allows for trash pickup or deliveries on Central where side streets or alleys are not available. Additionally, the Council asked for costs of a traffic detour under the single lane scenario to support MnDOT, County, or City maintenance activity. MnDOT provided a cost range of $7,500 to $10,000 for traffic control per occurrence. While some maintenance activities can be provided by the new trail, some cannot such as sewer cleaning, water main breaks, road maintenance (pothole patching, street sweeping, lane striping, crack sealing). Staff is also providing additional information on a road diet (two lane to single lane) attached. While not all lane reductions will have similar results, this does indicate higher traffic volumes can influence some of these negative outcomes following implementation. I would also note that the issue identified are most influenced during peak hour times. Chris Bower from MnDOT, along with the project team will be attending. MnDOT is working towards finalizing the project layout to ensure alignment with the community’s needs and priorities, and to shift to the design phase, STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None – information only. RECOMMENDED MOTION(S): None – information / discussion only. ATTACHMENT(S): Public Comments on Reservoir Boulevard (MnDOT) Traffic volume impact on road diets (web) 6 Item 2.   Reservoir Boulevard feedback City of Columbia Heights  Central Avenue Northeast  Survey results   Most respondents who don't use Reservoir Blvd. shared that the closure is a good idea.   About 60% of respondents who use Reservoir Blvd. would be okay with this change, and  the remaining 40% would find it inconvenient.   Closing Reservoir Blvd. is a popular idea among non‐users passing by on Central, but  frequent users of the roadway are more divided on whether this is a good change.  One idea to reduce delays at 37th Avenue while still improving safety is to close southbound Reservoir  Boulevard at the Central and 37th Avenue intersection. What do you think about this change? (select  all that apply)  I don’t use  Reservoir  Boulevard and  think this is a  good idea  I don’t use  Reservoir  Boulevard, but  think closing  this is a  mistake  I use Reservoir Boulevard  and would be okay with  this change; I can get to  Central Avenue  Northeast via 40th  Avenue or 39th Avenue  instead  I use Reservoir  Boulevard and  would find this  change very  inconvenient  Other (please  specify)  41.53% 7.33% 29.62% 17.89% 12.90%  141 25 101 61 44  Business outreach   No major feedback from businesses in the area.  Additional comments   A few people did ask/request a full closure, but a partial closure is what was  shown/reacted to in the survey and open house.   Additional concerns for this area included safer bike/ped crossings, backups caused by  the train, and people potentially cutting through side streets or alleys with the closure.   7 Item 2. Source Comment Topic Sentiment Survey, Q13 - responses Most respondents who don't use Reservoir Blvd., shared that the closure is a good idea. About 60% of respondents who use Reservoir Blvd. would be okay with this change, and the remaining 40% would find it inconvenient. Closing Reservoir Blvd. is a popular idea among non-users passing by on Central, but frequent users of the roadway are more divided on whether this is a good change.Support 32 Supportive comments Project email Project email expressed strong support for improving pedestrian crossing opportunities and safety at the 37th Ave. Intersection Support 8 Unsupportive comments Business outreach No major feedback from businesses in the area Other Mpls OH, comment card The traffic back ups at the railroad tracks on 37th are going to be insane. If there are only two lanes. Add in the fact that there are always emergency vehicles in front of the nursing home, so the bus viewers into the car lanes. Tracks Other Mpls OH, layout comment 3 lane arrangement does not solve or even address backup from trains just south of 37th - could make a significant challenge much worse Tracks Other Mpls OH, layout comment A lof cut thru traffic at Bobby and Steve's Other CH OH, layout comment In support of closure! Hard to drive this at night, especially with the complicated signage. Support CH OH, layout comment There’s an alley behind buildings that people use to cut thru the intersection onto reservoir. How will that affect the new closure option? Alley Other CH OH, layout comment Maybe even consider fully closing so people can't skip central to get to 39th/40th Close entirely Support CH OH, layout comment Concerns about people still routing up reservoir when traffic is congested. Do not support Mpls VOH comment Just curious, is there a reason to keep access to Reservoir with just one lane? I live nearby, don’t use it much. Would it improve traffic to just remove access entirely? Keep bike/ped, obviously. Close entirely Support Survey, Q13 - write in STRONGLY in favor of this change, it is so confusing and dangerous navigating this intersection SB from Reservoir onto Central, I nearly turned into the NB lanes on Central the first time I went this way Support Survey, Q12 - write in I rarely use Reservoir, I think this is a great idea! It will keep traffic flowing better at intersection of 37th/Central. As long as there is a good/safe left turn option at 39th or at 40th.Support Survey, Q12 - write in I use the Reservoir Blvd intersection every day and feel like it needs to intersect Central at a 90 degree angle (likely where the bus stop is currently), to increase pedestrian safety and slow the speeds coming off of Central onto Reservoir. Bus stop could also benefit by being closer to the 37th intersection. No issues with a 90 degree intersection being right turns only, 39th or 40th can currently handle left hand turns.Other Survey, Q12 - write in Reduce safety how? Very inconvenient and nonsensical Do not support Survey, Q12 - write in That is how access to 37th eastbound is often used since the reduction of lanes on 37th and a dangerous narrow width of a turn lane from Central ave north bound to 37th west bound Other Survey, Q12 - write in I didn't have an opinion Other Survey, Q12 - write in Accessing the gas station on onlybome side would create more safety issues and traffic build up. Other Survey, Q12 - write in This is the only safe way for me to get to my home on 45th because central is such a nightmare. That goes for both car and bike travel. I also use it to run to the golf course. This road is so important to the neighborhood Do not support Survey, Q12 - write in I take this route every day, there is very rarely congestion at this point of Central, it is further north Other Survey, Q12 - write in I dont use it Other Survey, Q12 - write in It’s a confusing intersection and if you closed it, it would have to be really obvious or people will still turn to go there. Other Survey, Q12 - write in THIS IS A GOOD IDEA Support Survey, Q12 - write in The 5 way intersection feels unsafe whenever I use it. Support Survey, Q5 I don't drive this portion, so no opinion Other Survey, Q14 Reservoir should have been closed at this location long ago, it's a clusterfuck.Support Survey, Q14 I don’t use it so I have no opinion Other Mpls OH, comment card Waste of money but otherwise I don't care except that it just shuffles traffic off onto 2 other streets that may not be able to handle inlux.Other 8 Item 2. Mpls OH, comment card Make the "No Turn on Red" signs at 37th more visible. They do not make a presence and are easily ignored or missed. 39th is just a stop sing intersection. At leat 37th has a traffic light for southbound vehicles. Seems contradicting to force traffic to a lesser controled intersection to make a left turn.Other Mpls OH, comment card I don't see any benefit to closing Reservoir Blvd at that junction.Do not support Mpls OH, comment card Might be a good idea to take the old rails out when you do this project.Other Mpls OH, layout comment I live nearby on Polk, seems like a good idea Support Mpls OH, layout comment Could you turn it into a cul de sac and remove northbound access as well?Other Mpls OH, layout comment Agree with this. Fifth road here adds a lot of complexity, and it is EASY for anyone using this southbound to find another route that at worst adds like 30 seconds to their drive.Support Mpls OH, layout comment In my experience, most of the delays at 37th are either from construction or a train at the level crossing.Other Mpls OH, layout comment I don't use Reservoir Ave but would like to see it closed and put a roundabout at 37th Support Mpls OH, layout comment I don't understand this question. The map only shows what's open, not what's closed Other Mpls OH, layout comment I use Reservoir Blvd but can get to Central at 37th. There is no light at 39th and a left turn is not always feasible.Other Mpls OH, layout comment How will we stop traffic from going the wrong way?Other Mpls OH, layout comment Doesn't Southbound Reservoir Blvd end at Central Ave and 37th?Other Mpls OH, layout comment I don't want to have to go four blocks out of my way because that's my route back from the grocery store it's not fair I live on 40th that means I would have to go up to a different street come back down to get home Do not support Mpls OH, layout comment I don't use this road and have no opinion.Other Mpls OH, layout comment What a dumd idea Do not support Mpls OH, layout comment I don't use it so I don't have a strong opinion either way Other CH OH, layout comment This would mean if I'm going south and reservoir boulevard I would have to go over to Central and go back North that makes no sense Do not support CH OH, layout comment I think minimizing car delays should not be a priority. The priority should be creating strong neighborhoods and transportation systems that serve everyone. Other CH OH, layout comment I have no opinion on this change Other CH OH, layout comment I think there are better options. Take the house down on the corner of Reservoir & 37th Other CH OH, layout comment I've had no issues with the 37th/Central/Reservoir corner as a driver. I've lived 2 blocks from this corner for 29 years.Do not support Mpls VOH 39th Needs a traffic light to turn safely on to Central Other Mpls VOH Will there be a light at alternate spaces?Other CH VOH I don't live there an don't feel that I have a stake in this part of the project. I do know that if I need to get across heights I will take reservoir instead of Central given the proposals.Other I don't use reservoir and I'm unsure if this is a good idea to close or not.Other I cross Central on 37th Avenue NE and think the closure is worth doing. Access from 39th is acceptable.Support I live on Reservoir and fully support it being closed off. Commuters on reservoir routinely drive past our home going over 50 mph due to the long sight lines on Reservoir. I’ve never heard a neighbor on reservoir complain that they can’t access central fast enough, residents routinely express concern about traffic speed and volume on reservoir and capping it at one end would help. MNDOT could implement this tomorrow and I’d be happy. I’d also like to see truck restrictions on Reservoir.Support 9 Item 2. 10 Item 2. 11 Item 2. Central Avenue Redesign: Best Practices review, Public Works and Traffic Safety Concerns (DC) Summary: MnDOT proposes reducing Central Avenue to one lane in each direction, despite traffic volumes exceeding 20,000 vehicles per day - a level where national best practices caution against full road diets without strong mitigations. While the plan improves safety by reducing crashes and slowing vehicles, major operational and traffic concerns remain unaddressed. Key Risks: • Traffic congestion and detours will become common. • Higher Public Works costs for closures and maintenance. • Bus stops blocking traffic during peak periods. • Side street safety issues from diverted vehicles. • Emergency response delays due to no alternative lanes. Action Requested: • Implement adaptive traffic signals • Plan University Avenue improvements now. • Include pull-outs or bus lanes for safe bus stops and maintenance. • Model full side street impacts and mitigation plans. • Design a flexible traffic management system for emergencies. Conclusion: Addressing safety in the corridor is primary, the current MnDOT plan leaves Columbia Heights vulnerable to traffic gridlock, high operational costs, and Public Works safety risks. City staff recommends a balanced approach with stronger mitigation measures moving forward. 12 Item 2. ITEM: Gould Ave NE and Peters Pl Parking Update. DEPARTMENT: Community Development BY/DATE: CD Coordinator / April 30, 2025 CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below) X Healthy and Safe Community _Equitable, Diverse, Inclusive, and Friendly _Trusted and Engaged Leadership _Thriving and Vibrant Destination Community X Strong Infrastructure and Public Services _Sustainable BACKGROUND: In December 2024, Staff presented the City Council with a proposal to alleviate on-street parking congestion in the neighborhood immediately south and east of City Hall. The principal objectives were:  to preserve driveway access to existing off-street parking; and  to ensure municipal service operators such as trash and recycling can provide services; and  to protect passage and access needs for emergency services vehicles and snowplows. The City Council approved this plan on December 9th, 2024, and moved to delegate to the City Manager the act of establishing certain parking regulations (Resolution 2024 -93). Following this approval, Staff proceeded with implementation of Step 1 of the plan and then provided an initial update to the City Council in January 2025. SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS: Since the implementation of Step 1 (designation of three parking zones) went into effect on January 2nd, Staff have monitored parking conditions in the neighborhood. Staff have observed that the north “No Parking (except for emergency services)” zone extending the entire north street frontage of Gould Ave NE from Peters Pl to Reservoir Blvd has been effective. This frontage was previously the most at-risk for driveway blockages due to parked cars. The elimination of parking on the north side of the avenue has also ensured that Gould’s drive lane remains wide enough to accommodate trash and recycling trucks and emergency services vehicles, even in snowy conditions. The “No Parking (except for emergency services)” zone on portions of the east and west frontages of the north arm of Peters Pl between Gould Ave NE and the 90-degree turn to the east has also been successful. Staff observed that during the winter parking season, a few cars did park illegally in this zone and received citations from CHPD. Overall, and particularly since the change from winter parking to summer parking on March 16th, this zone has remained free of cars. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION ITEM MEETING DATE 05/05/2025 13 Item 3. City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 2 An unexpected observation over the past four months has been the intense use of the “Commercial Parking Only – 3-hour Limit” zone on the north and south frontages of Gould Ave NE between Central Ave NE and Peters Pl. Staff have observed that this zone is often full, with cars parked bumper-to-bumper even early in the morning. This zone presents a challenge because the regulation of these spaces relies primarily on the honor system: enforcing the use requirement would be impractical and invasive, while enforcing the time limit would require a substantial investment of City staff resources. Since January 2nd, two residents have contacted Staff to discuss the regulations. One of these individuals wanted clarification on rules for cars with disability parking hangtags, while the other wanted to express frustration with congestion in the “Commercial Parking Only – 3-hour Limit” zone. Several neighborhood residents also shared their feedback during a recent City Council meeting. Residents’ comments during the meeting included acknowledgement of success in terms of trash pick-up and recognition of improved conditions overall but also concern about congestion in the “Commercial Parking Only – 3-hour Limit” zone and about enforcement of parking violations. In preparation for this work session, CHPD provided parking violation incident statistics for the neighborhood. The attached charts detail parking citations in 2024 and year-to-date in 2025 (January-April), excluding winter parking overnight (2 AM – 6 AM) violations. In 2024, a total of eighty violations were recorded. In the period of January-April 2025, a total of twenty-three violations were recorded, including at least four vehicles towed. The most substantial change in the data is the number of citations for violation of MN State Statute 169.34.1(a)(14), Traffic Regulation - Stopping/Standing/Parking Where Signs Prohibit Stopping: only six violations were recorded in all of 2024, whereas thirteen violations have already been recorded in 2025. The increase in citations in this category demonstrates that CHPD is enforcing compliance in the posted “No Parking (except for emergency services)” zones. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Because the Step 1 implementation actions (designation of three parking zones) achieved the three principal objectives, Staff recommend no changes to the parking regulations on Gould Ave NE and Peters Pl. That being said, Staff have remarked that on Peters Pl, the combination of snow and cars parked on both sides of the street can create an extremely narrow drive lane in the winter season. Furthermore, when cars remain parked on the street overnight despite winter parking regulations, they also cr eate challenges for snowplows. Staff are of the opinion that limiting parking to one side of Peters Pl would likely create safer conditions for drivers and for pedestrians. However, it is important to recognize that neighborhood residents might prefer maintaining all available on-street parking on Peters despite these safety concerns. Staff recommend no change at this time but will continue to monitor seasonal conditions on Peters Pl. Finally, Staff recommend that the City Council consider whether it would like to address the “Commercial Parking Only – 3-hour Limit” zone congestion on Gould Ave NE through increased parking enforcement by CHPD. ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Neighborhood Parking Regulations Map (Current Conditions) 2. Parking Violation Data from CHPD 3. Copy of Parking Plan Council Letter, as presented to the City Council on December 9th, 2024 14 Item 3. Neighborhood Parking RegulaƟons Map (Current CondiƟons) City Council Work Session 05/05/2025 15 Item 3. 16 Item 3. 17 Item 3. ITEM: Gould Ave NE and Peters Pl Parking Solutions DEPARTMENT: Community Development BY/DATE: Community Development Coordinator / December 5, 2024 CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below) X Healthy and Safe Community _Equitable, Diverse, Inclusive, and Friendly _Trusted and Engaged Leadership _Thriving and Vibrant Destination Community X Strong Infrastructure and Public Services _Sustainable BACKGROUND The City Council directed Staff to develop solutions to alleviate on-street parking congestion in the neighborhood immediately south and east of City Hall. Gould Ave NE, extending from Central Ave NE to Reservoir Blvd, and Peters Pl, between Gould and Reservoir, have been the main locations of congestion. The principal objectives were:  to preserve driveway access to existing off-street parking; and  to ensure municipal service operators such as trash and recycling can provide services; and  to protect passage and access needs for emergency services vehicles and snowplows. These objectives align with § 7.102(B)(2) of the City Code, which states, “Any public street, alley, municipal parking lot or portion thereof is subject to regulation by the Council or by the administrative service, as is necessary to prevent accidents, to eliminate traffic congestion, to provide public access to adequate parking facilities, or to otherwise promote the safety and welfare of the city.” SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS Because there is no east-west alley between 40th Ave NE and Gould Ave NE, most residential properties along the north side of Gould have parking access—driveways—from the street. This development pattern created a street frontage with many curb aprons and small, irregularly sized spaces between them. The south frontage of Gould does not have the same conditions because most properties on the south side of the street access parking from the alleys between Gould and Peters Pl. Neighborhood residents have expressed concerns about pedestrian safety on these streets and have told Staff and members of the Council that cars parked between the closely spaced curb aprons have repeatedly blocked access to driveways. The narrowness of the street combined with the presence of parked cars on both sides has made it difficult for emergency vehicles to pass down the street. Trash and recycling trucks have struggled to access cans on collection day. CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA SECTION ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION MEETING DATE DECEMBER 9, 2024 18 Item 3. City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 2 The west portion of Gould, between Central and Peters, is part of the city’s Central Business District. This portion of the street was widened during the City Hall redevelopment project and does not face the same congestion challenges. However, based on a comprehensive analysis of the neighborhood, Staff believe that a reduction in parking on the east portion of Gould could have the unintended effect of shifting residential congestion westward, interfering with on-street commercial parking for nearby businesses. Peters Pl is a narrow, winding street with several hills and no pedestrian infrastructure. When faced with parking congestion in residential neighborhoods, some cities have established permit parking districts. The creation of parking districts is supported by legal precedent in U.S. Supreme Court case County Board of Arlington County, Virginia, v. Rudolph A. Richards (1977). Cities that have chosen this strategy have often done so to regulate parking between different uses, for example, between residential parking and institutional parking for a hospital or a school. Cities have also used parking districts to limit on-street parking for the safety and well-being of residents, for example, to prevent hazardous conditions for emergency vehicles. Although permit parking districts can limit the number of cars parked on a street or restrict parking to residents, they also have disadvantages. The creation and enforcement of a parking district incurs substantial staff time and cost for implementation, enforcement, and ongoing administration. Crucially for this neighborhood, parking districts cannot ensure that parked cars do not block driveways or trash cans. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on our analysis, Staff concluded that using existing regulatory tools available to the City Council would be the fastest, least expensive, least administratively burdensome, and most effective method of addressing the identified objectives. City Code provides, per § 7.202(A), that “[t]he Council may regulate traffic flow and prevent traffic congestion by designation of certain streets or portions thereof as “no parking, no stopping, or no standing” zones and may limit the hours in which the restrictions apply,” and per § 7.202(B), that “[t]he Council may regulate access to public parking areas by designating areas where the right to park is limited to a specified duration of time. The Council may limit such restrictions to specified hours of the day.” Staff recommend a three-step phased approach to resolving the parking congestion, with the first two steps provided for in the attached Resolution 2024-93. This proposal was originally presented at the December 2 nd, 2024 City Council Work Session and received a positive recommendation from the Council to move forward. Step 1: Designate three zones:  a “No Parking (except for emergency services)” zone extending the entire north street frontage of Gould Ave NE from Peters Pl to Reservoir Blvd; and  a “No Parking (except for emergency services)” zone on portions of the east and west frontages of the north arm of Peters Pl between Gould Ave NE and the 90-degree turn to the east; and  a “Commercial Parking Only – 3-hour Limit” zone on both the north and south frontages of Gould Ave NE between Central Ave NE and Peters Pl. 19 Item 3. City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 3 “Emergency services” use shall include fire, police, public safety, and emergency vehicles such as, but not limited to, ambulances. Step 2: If on-street parking congestion persists, designate a fourth zone:  a “No Parking (except for emergency services)” zone extending the entire west, south, and southwest street frontages of Peters Pl. Step 3: If the objectives are still not achieved, create a residential permit parking district in the neighborhood:  a residential permit parking district along the south street frontage of Gould Ave NE between Peters Pl and Reservoir Blvd; and  a residential permit parking district along the remaining east, north, and northeast street frontages of Peters Pl. Note that in Step 3 implementation, all four zones detailed in Step 1 and Step 2 would also be maintained. Today, Staff recommend advancing Resolution 2024-93 providing for the implementation of Step 1 and Step 2. The implementation process for Step 1 shall begin immediately following the passage of the resolution, subject to signage fulfillment and installation timelines. If evaluation of the impacts of Step 1 shows that additional action is necessary, Staff will inform the Council and proceed with implementation of Step 2. If evaluation of the impacts of Step 2 shows that additional action is still necessary, Staff will inform the Council and present draft legislation for adding residential permit parking district powers to City Code. RECOMMENDED MOTION(S): MOTION: Move to waive the reading of Resolution 2024-93, there being ample copies available to the public. MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution 2024-93, a resolution of the City Council for the city of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, delegating to the City Manager the act of establishing parking regulations on Gould Ave NE and Peters Pl. ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Resolution 2024-93 2. Map of Proposed Parking Zones: Step 1 and Step 2 20 Item 3. ITEM: GreenStep Cities Progress Discussion. DEPARTMENT: Community Development BY/DATE: Andrew Boucher / City Planner, May 1, 2025 CORE CITY STRATEGIES: _Healthy and Safe Community _Equitable, Diverse, Inclusive, and Friendly _Trusted and Engaged Leadership _Thriving and Vibrant Destination Community _Strong Infrastructure and Public Services X Sustainable BACKGROUND: Over the past two years, the City has sought to increase participation in the GreenStep Cities program and progress towards a Step 3 recognition. As a result, there has been a variety of reporting on past actions as well as introducing new policies and ordinance amendments. Some of these items include but are not limited to: - Making no/low-cost indoor lighting and operational changes to city-owned/school buildings to reduce energy costs (i.e. replacing lighting fixtures with LEDs, installation building controls, and creating on- site renewable energy for multiple public buildings as well as increasing the amount of renewable energy credits purchased). - Implementing a solar permit checklist and pursuing additional actions through the SolSmart designation process including a GIS dashboard to track solar capacity as well as establishing solar rights as permitted uses in all zoning districts. - Adopting a Complete Streets Policy and incorporating it into zoning code through the design standard district language as well as participation in Safe Streets for All and preparation of a citywide Transportation Safety Action Plan. - Creation of a City Sustainability Commission and goal-setting activity to determine their future priorities, which has also contributed to the development of an Energy Action Plan for consideration new month. There are still specific items that are required to be completed before the City can be recognized as a Step 3 GreenStep City and should be prioritized by staff in the relevant departments responsible as applicable . These actions include: - BPA 15.1: Adopt a sustainable purchasing policy or administrative guidelines/practices directing that the city purchase at least EnergyStar and EPEAT certified equipment and appliances as well as paper with a post-consumer recycled content. o Have a written policy/guidelines/practices specifying at a minimum purchase of Energy Star and/or EPEAT equipment/appliances, and/or recycled-content paper (at least 50% post- consumer, or at least 10% of copy paper with 100% recycled content); require the purchase of remanufactured toner cartridges or high yield OEM cartridges when purchasing monochrome printer cartridges. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION ITEM MEETING DATE 05/05/2025 21 Item 4. City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 2 - BPA 24.2: Organize goals/outcome measures from all city plans (social, environmental, economic) and report to community members data that show progress toward meeting these goals. o Report goals/outcomes annually from plans such as comprehensive, parks, library, housing, stormwater, drinking water, transportation, economic development, energy, sustainability . - BPA 29.1: Prepare to maintain public health and safety during extreme weather and climate -change- related events, while also taking a preventive approach to reduce risk for community members. o In consultation with the county, every two years review the county (or city if there is one) Hazard Mitigation Plan and identify who is responsible for city preparedness, emergency response, and recovery efforts for each hazard. Routinely p articipate in updating the County/City Plan to include equitable actions for climate adaptation and community resilience. (Category A & B cities must achieve a 1-star rating plus either a 2- or 3- star rating for Step 3 recognition). Report community engagement efforts under BPA 29.3. o Address how all diverse populations in a jurisdiction are served by emergency communication, evacuation and sheltering, mitigation and prevention, planning and preparedness. Develop targeted emergency communications in appropriate languages (or get access to existing versions) for each population of non-English speakers in your community for each hazard. These three items have to be completed prior to the City receiving recognition as a Step 3 GreenStep City. This item is being presented as an informational update for the Council. As part of this effort, we welcome any input or direction from the Council how to delegate and prioritize these actions. SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS: Council informational item. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None. ATTACHMENT(S): 1. 2025 Assessment 22 Item 4. 1 Assessment 2025 City of Columbia Heights: Category A City Table of Contents About the Program ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Information and GreenStep Status ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Notable Actions .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Step Advancement Guidelines ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Best Practice Actions: .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Buildings and Lighting (BPs 1-5) ................................................................................................................................. 4 Land Use (BPs 6-10) ................................................................................................................................................... 9 Transportation (BPs 11-14) ...................................................................................................................................... 15 Environmental Management (BPs 15-23) ................................................................................................................ 19 Resilient Economic and Community Development (BPs 24-29) .............................................................................. 28 About the Program The GreenStep Cities program is a five-step program for cities and tribal nations to work towards sustainability. There are 29 best practices which each provide required and recommended actions. Recommended actions are placed into the following categories: buildings and lighting, land use, transportation, environmental management, and resilient economic and community development. Each action submitted by a city receives a ranking based on a three-star system. Assessment Date: 4/15/2025 Assessment completed by: Erica Bjelland 23 Item 4. 2 Information and GreenStep Status Preliminary submission for city review: Yes Final April 1st recommendation to League of MN Cities: No All required BPs done for Step 3?: No Step 3 BP distribution requirement met?: No Recommend June 2025 recognition Step 3?: No Current Distribution of BP Categories: Star-Rating of Actions: Notable Actions ● Library built on brownfields site revitalized community’s “main street” and recognized with 2016 ReScape award. ● Sump pump inspection program reviewed every property and removed sump pump and roof drain cross-connections to the sanitary sewer. ● Sustainability Commission started in 2023 includes 9 members and a Councilmember liaison. ● Youth Commission includes 7-13 members with students between 14 and 18 years of age. ● City Hall vertical mixed-use development built in 2023 includes 266 apartments, 3,500 sf café space, and community room. ● Employee bikes available for staff to travel from City Hall to other City offices located within one mile. 17% 25% 8% 29% 21% Buildings & Lighting Land Use Transportation Environmental Management Resilient Economic & Community Development The star-rating system represents the rating of the city’s action, where Not Rated (NR) is an uncompleted action, 1- star represents basic completion, 2-star is full completion, and 3-star is the maximum completion of the given action. See all city-reported actions at https://greenstep.pca.state.m n.us/city-detail/11932 Joined: February 2013 Status: Step 2 Total Best Practices (BPs) Complete: 10 Total BP Actions Complete: 24 Columbia Height’s GreenStep Page 43% 48% 9%★ ★★ ★★★ 24 Item 4. 3 Step Advancement Guidelines Guidelines for Step 2: As a Category A city, to be recognized as a Step 2 GreenStep City, ANY 8 Best Practices must be reported. Any 8 Best Practices Guidelines for Step 3: As a Category A city, to be recognized as a Step 3 GreenStep City, the following must be reported, at minimum: Any 16 Best Practices (currently: 11) Public Buildings: 1.1, 1.2, and any one additional action from 1.3-1.7 Buildings & Lighting: any one additional Buildings & Lighting BP (2-5) Comprehensive, Climate & Energy Plans: 6.1 and 6.2 Land Use: any one additional Land Use BP (7-10) Living & Complete Streets: 11.1 and any two additional actions from 11.1-11.6 Mobility Options: any two actions from 12.1-12.6 Sustainable Purchasing: 15.1 and any one additional action from 15.2-15.8 Community Forests & Soils: any two actions from 16.1-16.7 Stormwater Management: any one action from 17.1-17.6 Environmental Management: any one additional Environmental Management BP (18-23) Benchmarks & Community Engagement: 24.1 and 24.2 Green Business Development: any two actions from 25.1-25.7 Climate Adaptation & Community Resilience: 29.1 at a 2- or 3-star rating Guidelines for Steps 4 and 5: Steps 4 and 5 focus on metrics – what are the outcomes of all of the actions that the city has implemented over time? ● Step 4: Measure and report a minimum number of core and optional metrics for the previous calendar year or the most recent available data. o Category A communities: In addition to the CORE metrics, include 5 additional metrics of choice. ● Step 5: Demonstrate improvement three eligible metrics measured in Step 4, from one data year to the next. o Category A, B, and C communities: Improve upon 3 eligible metric elements. Learn more about Step 2 Learn more about Step 3 Learn more about Steps 4 & 5 25 Item 4. 4 Best Practice Actions: Detailed Descriptions Buildings and Lighting BP 1: Efficient Existing Public Buildings BP 2: Efficient Existing Private Buildings BP 3: New Green Buildings BP 4: Efficient Outdoor Lighting and Signals BP 5: Building Redevelopment Best Practice 1: Efficient Existing Public Buildings BP 1 Completed? YES Total actions completed: 3 Actions to Complete BP 1: 1.1, 1.2, and any one additional action Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 1.1 ★★ Enter/update building information and monthly usage data into the MN B3 Benchmarking database. 5 main buildings entered into B3 system back to 2007 2/21/2014 1.2 ★ Make no/low cost indoor lighting and operational changes in city- owned/school buildings. Evaluating older buildings with MSC since 2010 12/24/2014 1.3 ★ Invest in larger energy efficiency projects. Lighting switched to LED as lighting fails or due for upgrades 12/22/2014 1.4 Choose an item. Implement IT efforts and city employee engagement to reduce plug loads, building energy use and workflow efficiency. 1.5 Choose an item. Meet the SB 2030 energy standard or qualify under a green building or energy framework. 1.6 Choose an item. Improve operations and maintenance of city-owned/school buildings and leased buildings. 26 Item 4. 5 1.7 Choose an item. Install one or more of the following: -A ground-source, closed loop geothermal system. -A district energy/microgrid system. -A rainwater harvesting system Best Practice 2: Efficient Existing Private Buildings BP 2 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 1 Actions to Complete BP 2: Any one two actions Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 2.1 ★ Create or participate in a program to promote energy and water efficiency. Welcome packet includes info on Home Energy Squad, waste collection 11/7/2023 2.2 Choose an item. Integrate green building and EV charging best practices information and assistance into the building permit process. 2.3 Choose an item. Implement an energy rating/disclosure policy for residential/commercial buildings. 2.4 Choose an item. Describe energy/water efficiency outcomes and other green building practices at local businesses and not- for-profit organizations. 2.5 Choose an item. Create one of the following: -Water-wise landscaping ordinance/ guidance -WaterSense purchasing program -Guidance on rainwater harvesting and home water softener use 2.6 Choose an item. Provide a financial or other incentive to private parties who add energy/sustainability improvements, meet the SB 2030 energy standard, or renovate using a green building or energy framework. 27 Item 4. 6 2.7 Choose an item. Customize a model sustainable building renovation policy that includes the SB 2030 energy standard and adopt the language to govern private renovation projects. Best Practice 3: New Green Buildings BP 3 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 0 Actions to Complete BP 3: Any one action from 3.1-3.2 and any one action from 3.3-3.5 Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 3.1 Choose an item. Require by city policy that new city- owned buildings be built using the SB 2030 energy standard and/or a green building framework. 3.2 Choose an item. Work with the local school district to ensure that future new schools are built using the SB 2030 energy standard and/or a green building framework. 3.3 Choose an item. Adopt a sustainable building policy for private buildings; include the SB 2030 energy standard; adopt language governing new development projects. 3.4 Choose an item. Provide a financial or other incentive to private parties who build new buildings that utilize the SB 2030 energy standard and/or a green building framework. 3.5 Choose an item. Adopt environmentally preferable covenant guidelines for new common interest communities addressing sustainability. 28 Item 4. 7 Best Practice 4: Efficient Outdoor Lighting and Signals BP 4 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 0 Actions to Complete BP 4: Any two actions (including one from 4.5-4.8) Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 4.1 Choose an item. Require energy efficient, Dark-Sky compliant new or replacement outdoor lighting fixtures on city- owned/private buildings/facilities. 4.2 Choose an item. Purchase LEDs for all future street lighting and traffic signals. 4.3 Choose an item. Replace city street lighting with Dark Sky-compliant LEDs, modifying any city franchise/utility agreement and adding smart grid attributes. 4.4 Choose an item. Coordinate traffic signals; optimize signal timing to minimize car idling at intersections yet maintain safe and publicly acceptable vehicle speeds. 4.5 Choose an item. Use LED/solar-powered lighting for a flashing sign or in a street/parking lot/park project. 4.6 Choose an item. Relamp/improve exterior building lighting for city-owned buildings/ facilities with energy efficient, Dark- Sky compliant lighting. 4.7 Choose an item. Replace city-owned parking lot/ramp lighting with Dark-Sky compliant, energy efficient, automatic dimming lighting technologies. 4.8 Choose an item. Replace city's existing traffic signal indications with LEDs. 29 Item 4. 8 Best Practice 5: Building Redevelopment BP 5 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 0 Actions to Complete BP 5: Any one action Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 5.1 Choose an item. Adopt an historic preservation ordinance/ regulations and encourage adaptive reuse. 5.2 Choose an item. Implement the Minnesota Main Street model for commercial revitalization. 5.3 Choose an item. Plan for reuse of large-format retail buildings, or work with a local school, church or commercial building to either add-on space or repurpose space into new uses. 5.4 Choose an item. Create/modify a green residential remodeling assistance/financing program to assist homeowners in adding space or sustainable features. 5.5 Choose an item. Adopt development/design standards and programs that facilitate infill, redevelopment, and adaptable buildings. 30 Item 4. 9 Land Use BP 6: Comprehensive, Climate and Energy Plans BP 7: Resilient City Growth BP 8: Mixed Uses BP 9: Efficient Highway and Auto-Oriented Development BP 10: Design for Natural Resource Conservation Best Practice 6: Comprehensive, Climate and Energy Plans BP 6 Completed? YES Total actions completed: 2 Actions to Complete BP 6: 6.1 and 6.2 Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 6.1 ★★ Adopt a comprehensive plan or a future land use plan adopted by the county or a regional entity. Comp Plan adopted 2010 8/1/2010 6.2 ★ Demonstrate that regulatory ordinances comply with the comprehensive plan. Comp Plan referenced in Chapter 10: Land Use 2/27/2014 6.3 Choose an item. Include requirements in comprehensive and/or other plans for intergovernmental coordination. 6.4 Choose an item. Include ecological provisions in the comprehensive plan that explicitly aim to minimize open space fragmentation and/or establish a growth area with expansion criteria. 6.5 Choose an item. Adopt climate mitigation and/or energy independence goals/objectives in the comprehensive plan or in a separate policy document; include transportation recommendations. 31 Item 4. 10 Best Practice 7: Resilient City Growth BP 7 Completed? YES Total actions completed: 1 Actions to Complete BP 7: Any one action Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 7.1 Choose an item. Eliminate barriers and actively encourage higher density housing in city zoning ordinance and map. 7.2 ★ Achieve higher density housing with one of the following: a. Flexible lot size/frontage requirement for infill development. b. Density and floor area ratio (FAR) bonuses in selected residential zoning districts. c. Clustered residential development. d. Allowing accessory dwelling units, single-room occupancy housing, senior housing, co-housing or tiny houses / apartments by right in selected zoning districts. e. Implement a vacation rental property registration policy and/or special tax. Grand Central Lofts development only allows condos and town homes 12/19/2014 7.3 Choose an item. Achieve higher intensity commercial/industrial land uses through at least one of the following strategies: a. Include a commercial district with zero-lot-line setbacks and a FAR minimum of 1. b. Set targets for the minimum number of employees/acre in different commercial zones. 7.4 Choose an item. Provide incentives for affordable housing, workforce housing, infill projects, or for life-cycle housing at or near job or retail centers, or for 32 Item 4. 11 achieving an average net residential density of seven units per acre. 7.5 Choose an item. Use design to create social trust and interaction among neighbors and allow developments that meet the prerequisites for LEED for Neighborhood Development certification. Best Practice 8: Mixed Uses BP 8 Completed? YES Total actions completed: 2 Actions to Complete BP 8: Any two actions Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 8.1 Choose an item. Organize or participate in a community planning process for the city/a mixed-use district, including specific community engagement practices that engage cultural and income diverse community members. 8.2 ★★ Locate or lease a property for use as a school, city building or other government facility that has at least two of these attributes: a. Adjacent to an existing employment or residential center. b. Designed to facilitate and encourage access by walking, biking, or other non-vehicle travel modes. c. Accessible by regular transit service. 2023 City Hall located along Central Avenue with transit, 250 apartments above municipal center, EV charging; central business district does not require parking 12/1/2023 8.3 Choose an item. Modify a planned unit development (PUD) ordinance to emphasize or require mixed-use development or affordable housing, to limit residential PUDs to areas adjacent to commercial development, and/or to add sustainability features. 33 Item 4. 12 8.4 Choose an item. Report that a (re)development meets a city/community-determined minimum point threshold under the Equitable Development Scorecard or LEED-Neighborhood Development. 8.5 ★★★ Have a downtown zoning district that emphasizes small and destination business, entrepreneurial spaces, and allows or requires residential and residential-compatible commercial development. Central Business District encourages mix of retail, financial, office, service, civic, and educational uses with residential allowed above first floor commercial 12/1/2023 8.6 Choose an item. Incorporate form-based zoning approaches into the zoning code, in those areas where a diverse mix of uses is desired. 8.7 Choose an item. Create incentives for vertical mixed- use development in appropriate locations. Best Practice 9: Efficient Highway and Auto-Oriented Development BP 9 Completed? YES Total actions completed: 1 Actions to Complete BP 9: Any one action Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 9.1 ★★ Establish design goals for at least one highway/auto-oriented corridor/cluster. Corridor design guidelines adopted 2003 which includes Central Ave corridor streetscaping, pedestrian infrastructure, plantings, etc. 11/20/2014 9.2 Choose an item. Participate in regional economic development planning with representatives from surrounding townships, cities, the county and business interests to: a. Estimate commercial/industrial needs among all jurisdictions. b. Jointly implement recommendations to stage 34 Item 4. 13 highway/auto-oriented commercial development in order to avoid overbuilding and expensive low- density development. 9.3 Choose an item. Adopt infrastructure design standards that protect the economic and ecologic functions of the highway corridor through clustering of development, native plantings and incorporating access management standards. 9.4 Choose an item. Adopt development policies for large- format developments, zoning for auto- oriented commercial districts at the sub-urban edge and/or in tightly defined and smaller urban development corridors/nodes that have some bike/walk/transit access. Best Practice 10: Design for Natural Resource Conservation BP 10 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 0 Actions to Complete BP 10: Any one action Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 10.1 Choose an item. Conduct a Natural Resource Inventory or Assessment; incorporate protection of priority natural systems or resources such as groundwater through the subdivision or development process. 10.2 Choose an item. For cities outside or on the fringe of metropolitan areas, conduct a build- out analysis, fiscal impact study, or adopt an urban growth boundary and a capital improvement plan that provides long-term protection of natural resources/systems, and agriculture outside the boundary. 35 Item 4. 14 10.3 Choose an item. For cities within metropolitan areas, incorporate woodland best management practices addressing protection of wooded areas into zoning or development review. 10.4 Choose an item. Adopt a conservation design policy; use a conservation design tool for pre- design meetings with developers and for negotiating development agreements in cities with undeveloped natural resource areas. 10.5 Choose an item. Preserve environmentally sensitive, community-valued land by placing a conservation easement on city lands, and by encouraging/funding private landowners to place land in conservation easements. 10.6 Choose an item. Conserve natural, cultural, historic resources by adopting or amending city codes and ordinances to support sustainable sites, including roadsides, and environmentally protective land use development. 10.7 Choose an item. Support and protect wildlife through habitat rehabilitation, preservation and recognition programs. 36 Item 4. 15 Transportation BP 11: Living & Complete Streets BP 12: Mobility Options BP 13: Efficient City Fleets BP 14: Demand-Side Travel Planning Best Practice 11: Living & Complete Streets BP 11 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 1 Actions to Complete BP 11: 11.1 and two one additional actions Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 11.1 ★★ Adopt a complete streets policy, or a living streets policy, which addresses landscaping and stormwater. City Council adopted a Complete Streets Policy January 13, 2025 1/23/2025 11.2 Choose an item. Adopt zoning language or approve a skinny street/development project that follows green street and/or walkable streets principles. 11.3 Choose an item. Modify a street in compliance with the city's complete streets policy. 11.4 Choose an item. Identify, prioritize and remedy complete streets gaps and lack of connectivity/safety within your road network. 11.5 Choose an item. Identify and remedy street-trail gaps between city streets and off-road trails/bike trails. 11.6 ★★ Implement traffic calming policy/measures in at least one street redevelopment project. Roundabout built at Jefferson and 39th 11/19/2014 37 Item 4. 16 Best Practice 12: Mobility Options BP 12 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 0 Actions to Complete BP 12: Any two actions Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 12.1 Choose an item. Increase walking, biking and transit. 12.2 ★★ Conduct an Active Living campaign such as a Safe Routes to School program. Program with Columbia Heights Police Department where unclaimed bicycles are refurbished and given to the school district 6/10/2024 12.3 Choose an item. Prominently identify mobility options: transit; paratransit/Dial-A-Ride; ridesharing/cab services; rental cars; bikes; airports. 12.4 Choose an item. Promote carpooling or ridesharing among community members, city employees, businesses, high schools and institutions of higher education. 12.5 Choose an item. Implement workplace multi-modal transportation best management practices - including telework/ flexwork - in city government, businesses or at a local health care provider. 12.6 Choose an item. Add/expand transit service, or promote car/bike sharing. 38 Item 4. 17 Best Practice 13: Efficient City Fleets BP 13 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 1 Actions to Complete BP 13: Any two one actions Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 13.1 Choose an item. Efficiently use your existing fleet of city vehicles by encouraging trip bundling, video conferencing, carpooling, vehicle sharing and incentives/technology. 13.2 Choose an item. Right-size/down-size city fleet with the most fuel-efficient vehicles that are of an optimal size and capacity for their intended functions. 13.3 Choose an item. Phase-in operational changes, equipment changes including electric vehicles, and no-idling practices for city or local transit fleets. 13.4 ★★ Phase in bike, e-bike, foot or horseback modes for police, inspectors and other city staff. Two city bikes available for City Hall staff to travel to Public Safety Building, Community or Municipal Service Centers 5/21/2024 13.5 Choose an item. Document that local school bus fleet has optimized routes, start times, boundaries, vehicle efficiency and fuels, driver actions to cut costs including idling reduction, and shifting students from the bus to walking, biking and city transit. 13.6 Choose an item. Retrofit city diesel engines or install auxiliary power units and/or electrified parking spaces. 39 Item 4. 18 Best Practice 14: Demand-Side Travel Planning BP 14 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 0 Actions to Complete BP 14: Any two actions Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 14.1 Choose an item. Reduce/eliminate parking minimums; add parking maximums; develop district parking; install meters and charge for parking at curb and city- owned lots/ramps. 14.2 Choose an item. For cities with regular transit service, require/provide incentives for the siting of retail services at transit/ density nodes. 14.3 Choose an item. For cities with regular transit service, require/provide incentives for the siting of higher density housing at transit/density nodes. 14.4 Choose an item. Require new (re)developments to prepare a travel demand management plan or transit-oriented development standards or LEED for Neighborhood Development certification. 40 Item 4. 19 Environmental Management BP 15: Sustainable Purchasing BP 16: Community Forests and Soil BP 17: Stormwater Management BP 18: Parks and Trails BP 19: Surface Water BP 20: Efficient Water and Wastewater Systems BP 21: Septic Systems BP 22: Sustainable Consumption and Waste BP 23: Local Air Quality Best Practice 15: Sustainable Purchasing BP 15 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 0 Actions to Complete BP 15: 15.1 and any one additional action Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 15.1 Choose an item. Adopt a sustainable purchasing policy or administrative guidelines/practices directing the city purchase at least: a. EnergyStar and EPEAT certified equipment and appliances. b. Paper containing post-consumer recycled content. 15.2 Choose an item. Purchase energy used by city government with a higher renewable percentage than required by MN law. 15.3 Choose an item. Establish purchasing preferences that support local, Minority, Disability, and Women-Owned businesses and, working with a local business association, develop a list of locally- produced products and suppliers for common purchases. 15.4 Choose an item. Require purchase of U.S. EPA WaterSense-certified products. 41 Item 4. 20 15.5 Choose an item. Set minimum sustainability standards to reduce the impact of your concrete use, asphalt, roadbed aggregate, or other construction materials. 15.6 Choose an item. Require printing services to be purchased from companies using sustainable practices. 15.7 Choose an item. Lower the environmental footprint of meetings and events in the city. 15.8 Choose an item. Use national green standards/ guidelines for purchasing/investments such as cleaning products, furniture, flooring/coatings. Best Practice 16: Community Forests and Soil BP 16 Completed? YES Total actions completed: 2 Actions to Complete BP 16: Any two actions Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 16.1 ★ Certify as a Tree City USA. Tree City USA for 22 years; May arbor month declaration 11/19/2014 16.2 Choose an item. Adopt best practices for urban tree planting/quality; require them in private developments and/or use them in at least one development project. 16.3 Choose an item. Budget for and achieve resilient urban canopy/tree planting goals. 16.4 Choose an item. Maximize tree planting along your main downtown street or throughout the city. 16.5 Choose an item. Adopt a tree preservation or native landscaping ordinance. 16.6 ★★ Build community capacity to protect existing trees by one or more of: Certified Forester on staff conducts inspections for city 12/22/2014 42 Item 4. 21 a. Having trained tree specialists. b. Supporting volunteer forestry efforts. c. Adopting an EAB/forest management plan or climate adaptation plan for the urban forest. trees and private hazardous and diseased trees; Diseased Tree Management Program 16.7 Choose an item. Conduct a tree inventory or canopy study for public and private trees. Best Practice 17: Stormwater Management BP 17 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 0 Actions to Complete BP 17: Any one action Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 17.1 Choose an item. Adopt and use Minnesota's Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS). 17.2 Choose an item. Complete the GreenStep Municipal Stormwater Management Assessment. 17.3 Choose an item. Adopt by ordinance one or more stormwater infiltration/management strategies to reduce impervious surface. 17.4 Choose an item. Create a stormwater utility that uses variable fees to incentivize and educate property owners. 17.5 Choose an item. Adopt and implement guidelines or design standards/incentives for stormwater infiltration/reuse practices. 17.6 Choose an item. Reduce de-icing and dust suppressant salt use to prevent permanent surface water and groundwater pollution. 43 Item 4. 22 Best Practice 18: Parks and Trails BP 18 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 0 Actions to Complete BP 18: Any three actions Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 18.1 Choose an item. Make improvements within your city's system of parks, offroad trails and open spaces. 18.2 Choose an item. Plan and budget for a network of parks, green spaces, water features and trails for areas where new development is planned. 18.3 Choose an item. Achieve minimum levels of city green space and maximize the percent within a ten-minute walk of community members. 18.4 Choose an item. Adopt low-impact design standards in parks and trails that infiltrate or retain all 2 inch, 24-hour stormwater events on site. 18.5 Choose an item. Create park/city land management standards/practices that maximize at least one of the following: a. Low maintenance turf management; native landscaping; organic or integrated pest management; pollinator/monarch- safe policies. b. Recycling/compostables collection; use of compost as a soil amendment. c. Sources of nonpotable water, or surface/rain water, for irrigation. 18.6 Choose an item. Certify at least one golf course in the Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary Program. 44 Item 4. 23 18.7 Choose an item. Document that the operation and maintenance, or construction / remodeling, of at least one park building used an asset management tool, the SB 2030 energy standard, or a green building framework. 18.8 Choose an item. Develop a program to involve community members in hands-on land restoration, invasive species management and stewardship projects. Best Practice 19: Surface Water BP 19 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 1 Actions to Complete BP 19: If the city has a State public water, 19.4 and any one additional action. If the city does not have a State public water, any one action. Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 19.1 Choose an item. Consistently monitor surface water quality/clarity and report findings to community members. 19.2 Choose an item. Conduct/support multi-party community conversations, assessments, plans, and actions to improve local water quality/quantity. 19.3 Choose an item. Adopt and publicly report on measurable surface water improvement targets for lake, river, wetland and ditches. 19.4 ★ Adopt a shoreland ordinance for all river and lake shoreland areas. Shoreland Overlay District 12/22/2014 19.5 Choose an item. Adopt goals to revegetate shoreland and create a local program or outreach effort to help property owners with revegetation. 19.6 Choose an item. Implement an existing TMDL implementation plan. 45 Item 4. 24 19.7 Choose an item. Create/assist a Lake Improvement District. 19.8 Choose an item. Reduce flooding damage and costs through the National Flood Insurance Programs and the NFIP’s Community Rating System. Best Practice 20: Efficient Water and Wastewater Systems BP 20 Completed? YES Total actions completed: 3 Actions to Complete BP 20: 20.1, 20.2, and any one additional action Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 20.1 ★ Compare the energy use and financial performance of your facilities with other peer facilities. Engineering study and CIP for drinking water system every 5 years 12/22/2014 20.2 ★★ Plan and budget for motor maintenance and upgrades. SCADA data used; VFD installed 12/22/2014 20.3 ★ Establish an on-going budget and program for decreasing inflow and infiltration into sewer lines and losses in drinking water systems. Sump pump & roof drain disconnections; sump pump inspection for every property; manhole corrections; sewer lining; smoke testing 11/20/2014 20.4 Choose an item. Optimize energy and chemical use at drinking water/wastewater facilities and decrease chloride in wastewater discharges. 20.6 Choose an item. Implement a wastewater plant efficiency project or a program for local private business operations. 20.7 Choose an item. Create a demand-side pricing program. 46 Item 4. 25 Best Practice 21: Septic Systems BP 21 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 0 Actions to Complete BP 21: Any one action Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 21.1 Choose an item. Report to landowners suspected noncompliant or failing septic systems as part of an educational, informational and financial assistance and outreach program. 21.2 Choose an item. Use a community process to address failing septic systems. 21.3 Choose an item. Clarify/establish one or more responsible management entities for the proper design, siting, installation, operation, monitoring and maintenance of septic systems. 21.4 Choose an item. Adopt a subsurface sewage treatment system ordinance. 21.5 Choose an item. Create a program to finance septic system upgrades. 21.6 Choose an item. Work with homeowners/ businesses in environmentally sensitive areas to promote innovative waste water systems. 21.7 Choose an item. Arrange for assistance to commercial, retail and industrial businesses with water use reduction, pollution prevention and pretreatment prior to discharge to septics. 47 Item 4. 26 Best Practice 22: Sustainable Consumption and Waste BP 22 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 0 Actions to Complete BP 22: Any one action from 22.1-22.3 and any one action from 22.4-22.8 Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 22.1 ★★ Improve city operations/ procurement to prevent/reuse/recycle/compost waste from all public facilities, and minimize use of toxics and generation of hazardous waste. Police Department has program where they will refurbish and donate left/unclaimed bicycles 6/10/24 22.2 Choose an item. Address concerns over consumer products and packaging through education, reuse options, recycling/composting options, credits, fees, mandates or bans. 22.3 Choose an item. Improve profitability, legal compliance and conserve resources through adoption of ordinance language, licensing and resource management contracts. 22.4 Choose an item. Publicize, promote and use the varied businesses/services collecting and marketing used, repaired and rental consumer goods, especially electronics, in the city/county. 22.5 Choose an item. Arrange for a residential and/or business/institutional source- separated organics collection/ management program. 22.6 Choose an item. Improve recycling services/expand to multi-unit housing and commercial businesses. 22.7 Choose an item. Improve/organize residential trash/ recycling/organics collection by private/public operations and offer significant volume-based pricing on 48 Item 4. 27 residential garbage and/or incentives for recycling. 22.8 Choose an item. Adopt a construction and demolition ordinance governing demolition permits that requires a level of recycling and reuse for building materials and soil/land-clearing debris. Best Practice 23: Local Air Quality BP 23 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 0 Actions to Complete BP 23: Any two actions Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 23.1 Choose an item. Replace small internal combustion engine lawn/garden equipment with lower polluting equipment. 23.2 Choose an item. Reduce residential burning of wood and yard waste and eliminate ‘backyard’ trash burning. 23.3 Choose an item. Decrease air emissions from vehicle idling, business trucking, and pollutants/noise from stationary engines/back-up generators. 23.5 Choose an item. Install, assist with and promote publicly available EV charging stations or public fueling stations for alternative fuel vehicles. 49 Item 4. 28 Resilient Economic and Community Development BP 24: Benchmarks and Community Engagement BP 25: Green Business Development BP 26: Renewable Energy BP 27: Local Food BP 28: Business Synergies and Ecodistricts BP 29: Climate Adaptation and Community Resilience Best Practice 24: Benchmarks and Community Engagement BP 24 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 2 Actions to Complete BP 24: 24.1 and 24.2 Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 24.1 ★★ Use a city commission/committee to lead, coordinate, report and engage community members on sustainability best practices. Sustainability Commission added 2023 10/11/2023 24.2 Choose an item. Organize goals/outcome measures from all city plans and report to community members data that show progress toward meeting these goals. 24.3 Choose an item. Engage community members/ partners in identifying, measuring, and reporting progress on key sustainability and social indicators. 24.4 Choose an item. Conduct/support a broad sustainability education/action campaign. 24.5 Choose an item. Conduct a community visioning/ planning initiative that engages a diverse set of community members & stakeholders and uses a sustainability, resilience, or environmental justice framework. 50 Item 4. 29 24.6 ★★ Engage wide representation of community youth/students by creating opportunities to participate in city government. Youth Commission with high school students 11/7/2023 24.7 Choose an item. Engage Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC), renters, low-income, new Americans, differently abled and other traditionally under-represented community members. Best Practice 25: Green Business Development BP 25 Completed? YES Total actions completed: 2 Actions to Complete BP 25: Any two actions Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 25.1 Choose an item. Grow new/emerging green businesses and green jobs through targeted assistance and new workforce development. 25.2 ★ Create/participate in a marketing/ outreach program to connect businesses with assistance providers. Partner with Xcel Energy for Business Incentive & Sustainability Rider, Energy Design Assistance, Energy Efficient Buildings 11/7/2023 25.3 Choose an item. Promote sustainable tourism. 25.4 Choose an item. Strengthen value-added businesses utilizing local "waste" material. 25.5 ★★★ Lower the environmental and health risk footprint of a brownfield remediation/redevelopment project; report brightfield projects. New Library positioned on “Main Street;” MN Brownfields recognized the Library with a 2016 ReScape award 11/18/2016 25.6 Choose an item. Promote green businesses that are recognized under a local, regional or national program. 51 Item 4. 30 25.7 Choose an item. Conduct/ participate in a buy local campaign for community members and local businesses. Best Practice 26: Renewable Energy BP 26 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 1 Actions to Complete BP 26: Any two one actions Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 26.1 Choose an item. Adopt wind/biomass ordinances that allow, enable, or encourage appropriate renewable energy installations. 26.2 Choose an item. Promote resident/business purchases and/or generation of clean energy. 26.3 Choose an item. Promote financing and incentive programs for clean energy. 26.4 Choose an item. Support a community solar garden or help community members participate in a community solar project. 26.5 Choose an item. Install a public sector/municipally- owned renewable energy technology. 26.6 Choose an item. Report installed private sector-owned renewable energy/energy efficient generation capacity. 26.7 ★ Become a solar-ready community, including adopting ordinance/zoning language and an expedited permit process for residents and businesses to install solar energy systems. The City of Columbia Heights has started the SolSmart designation process and received the memo from the SolSmart technical staff, which city staff took the recommendations from to establish solar energy rights in the City Zoning Code as well as providing guidance on permitting in a handout. 3/18/2025 52 Item 4. 31 Best Practice 27: Local Food BP 27 Completed? YES Total actions completed: 1 Actions to Complete BP 27: Any one action Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 27.1 Choose an item. Incorporate working landscapes - agriculture and forestry - into the city by adopting an ordinance. 27.2 ★★ Facilitate creation of home/ community gardens, chicken & bee keeping, and incorporation of food growing areas/access in multifamily and residential developments. Multi-family gardens allowed; 48 rental garden plots; edible schoolyard plot 12/19/2014 27.3 Choose an item. Create, assist with and promote local food production/distribution within the city. 27.4 Choose an item. Measurably increase institutional buying and sales of foods and fibers that are local, Minnesota-grown, organic, healthy, humanely raised, and grown by fairly compensated growers. 27.5 Choose an item. Assess, plan for, and enhance the community’s local food system. Best Practice 28: Business Synergies and Ecodistricts BP 28 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 0 Actions to Complete BP 28: Any one action Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 28.2 Choose an item. Document that at least one business/ building uses waste heat or water discharge from another business or 53 Item 4. 32 conducts materials exchange activities with another organization. 28.3 Choose an item. Require, build or facilitate at least four sustainability attributes in a business/industrial park project. 28.4 Choose an item. Use 21st century ecodistrict tools to structure, guide and link multiple green and sustainable projects together in a mixed-use neighborhood/development, or innovation district. Best Practice 29: Climate Adaptation and Community Resilience BP 29 Completed? NO Total actions completed: 0 Actions to Complete BP 29: 29.1 at 2- or 3-star level Best Practice Action: Completed: (Star Level out of three stars) Action Description: (View on GreenStep Website for full description) Action Summary: (Provided by GreenStep Staff) Date of Last Entry: 29.1 Choose an item. Prepare to maintain public health and safety during extreme weather and climate-change-related events, while also taking a preventive approach to reduce risk for community members. 29.2 Choose an item. Integrate climate resilience into city or tribal planning, policy, operations, and budgeting processes. 29.3 Choose an item. Increase social connectedness through engagement, capacity building, public investment, and opportunities for economically vulnerable residents. 29.4 Choose an item. Encourage private sector action and incentivize investment in preventive approaches that reduce risk and minimize impacts. 29.5 Choose an item. Protect public buildings and natural/ constructed infrastructure to reduce physical damage and sustain their 54 Item 4. 33 function during extreme weather events. 29.6 Choose an item. Reduce the urban heat impacts of public buildings/sites/infrastructure. 29.7 Choose an item. Protect water supply and wastewater treatment facilities to reduce physical damage and sustain their function during extreme weather events. 29.8 Choose an item. Improve local energy resilience. 55 Item 4. ITEM: Malt Liquor at City Events DEPARTMENT: Comm Dev/Communications BY/DATE: 4-29-25 CORE CITY STRATEGIES: _Healthy and Safe Community _Equitable, Diverse, Inclusive, and Friendly _Trusted and Engaged Leadership XThriving and Vibrant Destination Community _Strong Infrastructure and Public Services _Sustainable BACKGROUND: Earlier this year, the Communications Director observed that other communities were partnering with local breweries to provide alcoholic beverages at city-sponsored events. This prompted a review of our current ordinance regarding alcohol in parks, specifically Chapter 10.201, Section O, of the City Code. As it currently stands, the ordinance prohibits the possession or consumption of intoxicating liquor or non -intoxicating malt liquor in all city parks, parkways, and bathing beaches. However, the City Council may gran t exceptions for specific gatherings, including family events, employee-related events, and events hosted by non-profit, public service, charitable, educational, or religious organizations within the community. These exceptions only apply to 3.2% malt liquor and are limited to the hours between 8:00 a.m. and 9:30 p.m. Alcohol consumption is not permitted at public bathing beaches or within Silver Lake Beach Park. Additionally, the general prohibition does not apply to Huset Park on Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays between 8:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m., nor does it apply to Murzyn Hall (Columbia Heights Fieldhouse) at any time. With the goal of aligning with modern practices and supporting community engagement, staff are proposing an amendment to the ordinance. This ordinance change retains the city’s current framework for alcohol use in parks but expands the allowance for the sale and consumption of malt liquor at city-sponsored events in city parks. The proposal also includes removing the 3.2% malt liquor restriction, as this requirement inadvertently limits the Columbia Heights Lions Club Beer Garden from operating on Thursdays, as the beverages served typically exceed 3.2% alcohol content. The proposed revision modernizes our ordinance to reflect current City standards and simplifies enforcement. Ultimately, staff aim to increase participation in city events and enhance the overall event experience for attendees. Allowing malt liquor at designated city events can help foster a livelier and more engaging atmosphere, encourage local partnerships (such as with breweries), and support economic and cultural development. If any concerns or issues arise, city staff retain the authority to make administrative decisions regarding when and where alcoholic beverages will be served at city events. ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Proposed Amendment to Chapter 10.201, Section O CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION ITEM MEETING DATE 05/05/2025 56 Item 5. Proposed Amendment to Chapter 10.201, Section O (O) No person shall have in their possession or consume any intoxicating liquor or non- intoxicating malt liquor in or upon any city park, parkway, or bathing beach within the city. (1) Provided, however, the City Council may by affirmative vote grant permission to persons attending family gatherings, employees and their families attending gatherings in conjunction with their employment, and persons attending gatherings of or gatherings sponsored by non-profit public service, charitable, educational, or religious organizations within the community to possess and consume 3.2 malt liquor in city parks, except before 8:00 a.m. and after 9:30 p.m. No such permission may be granted for such possession or consumption in or upon any public bathing beach or anywhere in Silver Lake Beach Park. (2) The prohibitions of this division shall not apply on Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays, or legal holidays to Huset Park between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m., and shall not apply to John Murzyn Hall (Columbia Heights Fieldhouse) at any time and shall not apply during City- sponsored events at any location. 57 Item 5. ITEM: Emergency Action Plan – City of Columbia Heights-City Hall. DEPARTMENT: Fire BY/DATE: Fire Chief / May 05, 2025 CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below) X Healthy and Safe Community _Equitable, Diverse, Inclusive, and Friendly _Trusted and Engaged Leadership _Thriving and Vibrant Destination Community _Strong Infrastructure and Public Services _Sustainable BACKGROUND: As part of the City’s ongoing commitment to safety and preparedness, emergency management staff have developed a comprehensive City Hall Emergency Action Plan. This plan outlines clearly marked evacuation routes, and safety instructions for employees and visitors in the event of a fire or severe weather emergency . The plan ensures an orderly evacuation of personnel and visitors to designated meeting points. SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS: During this work session, staff will present an overview of the plan, highlight key components, and discuss the implementation process, including signage, training, and ongoing updates. Feedback from council members is welcomed to ensure clarity and effectiveness prior to the final rollout. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: N/A RECOMMENDED MOTION(S): N/A ATTACHMENT(S): City Hall Evacuation Maps Council Chamber Evacuation Maps CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION ITEM MEETING DATE MAY 5, 2025 58 Item 6. 59 Item 6. 60 Item 6. ITEM: Leadership Retreat – Executive Summary Review DEPARTMENT: Administration BY/DATE: City Manager – 5/1/2025 CORE CITY STRATEGIES: (please indicate areas that apply by adding an “X” in front of the selected text below) _Healthy and Safe Community _Equitable, Diverse, Inclusive, and Friendly X Trusted and Engaged Leadership _Thriving and Vibrant Destination Community _Strong Infrastructure and Public Services _Sustainable BACKGROUND: In February of 2025, the City Council and senior staff participated in a workshop focused on creating a framework for high performance teamwork and improved interpersonal communication and relationships. The two-day workshop addressed five primary focus areas:  Establishment of a clear understanding of roles for staff and Council using a governance model as the framework.  Creation of an agreed upon set of behavioral and operational norms.  Relational learning work using the True Colors assessment tool.  Discussion on potential process changes. SUMMARY OF CURRENT STATUS: Since the retreat, staff and Council have engaged in the following retreat-related activities:  Deployed new shared language around True Colors training. (using colors in conversation)  Planning for True Colors branding on name plates and elsewhere.  Planning for the expansion of True Colors assessment for additional staff.  Exercised norms around behavior and operations.  Planning for codification of norms.  Initiated steps to amend rental density cap ordinance. (governance exercise)  Implemented new deadline for Council packet delivery. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff would like to discuss the retreat summary and seek feedback from the Council on their impressions of the training. Staff would also like input on recommendations from the report, specifically the following:  Norms summary – are the norms in the report agreeable to all? Are any changes needed? Staff would like to codify the norms through Council action and make plans to display them publicly.  Agenda topic proposal system. CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION ITEM MEETING DATE MAY 5, 2025 61 Item 7. City of Columbia Heights - Council Letter Page 2  System approach to organizing policy topics. ATTACHMENT(S):  Spano Group Executive Summary 62 Item 7. 1 FINAL Summary Report Winter 2025 City Leadership Workshop Columbia Heights, Minnesota February 2025 Submitted by: 63 Item 7. 2 Jake Spano /spano-group-advisors 3978 Dakota Ave. S. jake.spano@spanogroupadvisors.com St. Louis Park, MN 55416 952.649.0315 March 21, 2025 Mayor, City Council and Staff City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota 3989 Central Ave. NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Mayor, Council, and staff, On behalf of Kori Shingles and myself, thank you for your collaboration th ese past few months! The time we spent together is the next step in building a high performing team on behalf of your neighbors. Attached is a report and supporting documents which represent deliverables from our time together and provide a reference for you as you move forward. They include: • This cover letter • An executive summary • A “Priority Practice List” which are areas that deserve particular attention as you work to ensure a high performing team. • A “Reflections and Observations” section which provides additional feedback, context, and recommendations based on observations during our work together. • “Parking Lot” items which include topics raised in the course of our work together which were not fully resolved. These may merit further discussion or action by the council and staff at their discretion. • An appendix including documents provided during our work as part of the public record. • Finally, I’ll include PDF attachments of the Power Point slides used during the workshop via email with this report. Finally, as part of our agreement we have time set aside for check ins with the me and the planning group however based on the workshop survey, we may want to use a portion of that time to revisit some of the content presented, especially in the second day which was very full. Let me know your thoughts on that and thank you again for placing your trust in us . I look forward to watching you all take on even bigger and better things wi th your new awareness! Best, President, SGA, LLC. 64 Item 7. 3 Executive Summary During February of 2025, the City Council and senior staff (referred to here as the “leadership group/team”) undertook a workshop focused on becoming a higher performing team. The outcomes from the workshop were impactful including work on relational learning (using the True Colors assessment tool) and norms creation the first day, followed by exploration of governance concepts and systems and processes on the second day. Based on the post workshop survey results, attendees felt they were working from a solid foundation due in part to the success of the workshop. Staff also expressed that they would appreciate additional time to explore the content in greater detail – something we will address in our upcoming check in process. In January Jake Spano, President of SGA met with a planning group from the city. This group's role was to inform and shape the content of the workshop in addition to supporting the logistics and mechanics of the workshop. This group included: • Mayor Marquez-Simula • Councilmember Buesgens • City Manager Aaron Chirpich • City Clerk Sara Ion SGA also conducted interviews with all participants in advance of the workshop to help flush out a “current state” assessment of where the group was at and validate that the proposed workshop content was aligned with the needs of the group. The interview summary can be found in the appendix, but key findings of the interviews included: • Attendees are optimistic about the future of the council, staff, and community at large and are eager to move forward following the actions of a former council member which resulted in hardship for this leadership team and the community. • There is a great deal of change happening in the city as longstanding staff members retire, new expectations are placed on the leadership team, and as the broader community demographics shift. While exciting and providing opportunities for growth, with this change comes some stress, which is normal. This stress is exacerbated by experiences of the past five years including: o Managing and adapting to a global pandemic. o Social unrest related to officer involved shootings. o The actions related to CM Jacobs tenure on the council. • In interviews council members shared specific examples of the incredible work of city staff which often goes unseen. The council has an opportunity to change that by being more intentional in acknowledging those contributions in public spaces. • Greater clarity around everyone’s roles on the team and how certain processes are handled by the team. • A need for stronger personal and professional connections between members of the team. 65 Item 7. 4 Based on this, SGA facilitated a two-day workshop to address these five areas that included: ● Establishing clear understanding of roles for this team, using the Carver governance model as a framework for that understanding. ● Helping the leadership group create an agreed upon set of behavioral and operational norms for the team. ● Relational learning using the “True Colors” assessment facilitated by Kori Shingles, a certified Advanced True Colors practitioner. ● A discussion of processes and procedures that could be changed to b ring greater clarity and transparency to the work of this team. 66 Item 7. 5 Priority Practice List Improving a skill takes practice and the SGA team has identified three areas of particular focus for workshop attendees as they continue the work of creating, strengthening, and refining their work as a high performing team. These will be the items that we will reflect on at our check-ins. 1. Normalizing, deepening, and embedding the use of True Colors in the city Columbia Heights is fortunate to have a leadership team that works together well and is generally able to address interpersonal challenges in a healthy manner. For times when there are disconnects between team members, and to deepen their understanding of how they can best work together, it can be useful to have a shared language around not what someone thinks about an issue but how they might approach an issue. How do they process information, what are their natural preferences in terms of how information is presented to them, what do they find value in when ma king decisions and interacting with others? True Colors is a proven relational learning assessment tool that has respondents answering a series of questions and the answers provided result in scores in each of four colors: gold, green, orange, and blue . Each color represents a series of behavioral characteristics or preferences and indicates where the respondent feels most natural or comfortable operating. More detailed information is contained in the True Colors books that were provided to attendees, but it is important to know: • Everyone has some element of each color type. • There is no right or wrong color. • Colors are not an excuse for failure to perform job duties. The assessments were administered by Kori Shingles, a certified Advanced True Colors facilitator who also led the group through an analysis of their scores (found in the appendix) and she and Jake Spano shared practical strategies of how to apply this newfound information in the team’s daily work. By the end of the workshop, participants had a foundation on how their True Colors show up in their work and daily life. Some toplines from this teams True Colors exercise: • While the general population tends to have gold or orange as their “brightest,” i.e., highest scoring colors, the Columbia Heights leadership team is decidedly green and gold. o Green was the brightest (9) or second brightest (5) color for 14 of the 19 attendees (73.6%). o Gold was the brightest (5) or second brightest (7) for 12 of the 19 attendees (63.1%). o Combined, this means that 68.4% of the attendees have either green or gold as one of their two brightest colors. • As discussed during our time together: o A group with this makeup will generally prioritize clarity, rigorous analysis of data, and adherence to deadlines which has great benefit AND can be 67 Item 7. 6 seen as overly rigid, time consuming, and less able to adapt to the evolving needs of a team or initiative. o This group will need to brighten or channel their “orange” traits and not let “perfect be the enemy of the good” as well as realize that others will lead with their “blue” and prioritize the human impact and feelings that th eir work may create. o Of note, this color grouping may demonstrate a desire to consider the strengths of other colors but can find it difficult to truly slow down and make space for other colors given a gold’s belief that there is a ‘right way’ of approaching a project or problem. o Collaborative teams like this one would be wise to consider the color composition of those they interact with and ensure that they: ▪ Remember that there isn’t a right or wrong style/color. ▪ Brighten their own pale colors as needed. ▪ Make space for those with different bright colors so they can contribute with their skills. Further context for this group around relational learning: • People with gold/green personality types are strong at building a plan. What happens when the plan needs to pivot? How will they successfully flex to another necessary action, or adapt quickly if things do not go to plan (which would come naturally to a bright orange)? • Who will ensure they can be flexible, and approach things collaboratively when there isn’t a bright orange or blue present? • How do green/gold personality types allow for other perspectives when making decisions? Are they relying too much on rules and research/logic/information What happens when another person joins the group with a different bright color? Will others value their contributions, or could they feel frustrated, have conflict arise or leave? • Some of the attendees mentioned a desire to have their staff take the True Colors assessment and we agree that this would be a worthwhile investment. • Much like council and senior staff may now talk about “small bowl” issues in governance, members of this leadership group should normalize talking about how their colors may impact their work, work to “brighten” their pale colors when useful, as well as supporting those with Orange and Blue as their brightest colors. 2. Acknowledging and adhering to the principles of good governance Over the years the leadership team in Columbia Heights has organically developed a pretty clear understanding of what each team members role is and makes an effort to align their actions with their roles at the city where council acts as policy deciders an d staff are the policy implementers. That said, there have been instances where the lines around who is doing what and who is accountable to whom, have become blurred and with the addition of new members to the council and staff, now is a good time to codify a governance structure that works for the council/manager form of government. While not designed for local government, the Carver Governance Model, created by John Carver, is well suited to helping cities with the council /manager form of 68 Item 7. 7 government clarify roles both internally in the organization and externally to the broader public where: • The council must remain focused on the policy outcomes (“ends”) they are seeking and allow staff to formulate a plan (“means”) to achieve those outcomes. • If staff comes back with a request for additional resources or a change in policy to achieve those ends, council may choose to re-evaluate but should make every effort not to “cherry pick” the plan. • Provided it is not illegal, immoral, unethical, or something council specifically tells staff NOT to do, council should assume that staff has the freedom to achieve the agreed upon ends. Thankfully, the city has several tools already in place that support adhering to Carver. One, for example, is the reports prepared by staff for council consideration with concise and well-structured executive summaries at the beginning. While it is always a work in progress, these summaries do an excellent job of ensuring that the policy question for council is clear, and the issue is well summarized with supporting documentation . This document should undergo continual refinement to reflect the evolving needs of council and the community as it is a public document. There are specific opportunities to better align the work of the group with the principles of Carver, both around how the council manages policy consideration at a high level and on a case-by-case basis. At its biggest bowl for example: • Engaging in a strategic goal setting process that begins with a community wide needs assessment – sometimes called a “visioning exercise” - framed council and staff but conducted by an outside party. Visioning is a process of creating a compelling statement about what a community aspires to be or accomplish in the future. It is a mental picture of the ideal future which is shared by its leaders, residents, staff, community organizations and businesses. This process would produce a report which would tell council and staff among other things: o Who makes up the community? o What do they value? Want more of? Less of? o What is their threshold for change, and do they have the capacity to support the change they seek? o What are emerging trends in the community and how will they change demands for service and amenities? • Council and staff then use this report to: o Revisit the city’s six “Core City Strategies” (CCS) to ensure they align with the community's needs. o Use the visioning report and CCS to inform the city’s comprehensive plans. o Staff can then use all of these to develop a city-wide work plan that actualizes the vision. • At a more granular level are examples of council getting small bowl by setting policy, then managing the process by which to achieve the policy outcomes they seek. For example: o The residential rental policy and specifically how exemptions to that policy are handled. The council set this policy two to three years ago, which is more than enough time for a community to adapt to its implementation. It is also appropriate to have exemptions to that policy, however as it is 69 Item 7. 8 currently constructed the policy can be appealed by anyone for any reason and the council is the arbiter of these exemptions hearing them on a somewhat regular basis. • Unfortunately, despite the considerable effort and time invested, the current policy and exemption practice has yielded only a handful of actual residential rental permits. Put simply, the juice isn’t worth the squeeze. • As discussed, what council might find more effective, less time consuming and in alignment with their governance role, would be setting the outcomes they want from the policy and if they want to go one bowl smaller, create a list of allowable exemptions to the policy that staff can use to administer the program. They might even consider empowering staff to allow exemptions that are not on the approved list, but fit the spirit of exemptions the list, thereby delivering on councils intended outcomes and minimizing unneeded staff and council time spent hearing each exemption request. If the staff is unclear about a specific request, they can always ask the council for clarification. While Carver draws bright lines around roles, the reality of running a city is less defined so questions to be considered or ask oneself and others as you are doing your work: • Is the council giving clear direction to staff on the ends they seek ? • Are staff providing the council with the best information to make their decisions? • Is council in the “biggest bowl” possible when discussing policy meaning are they focused on ends/outcomes and not managing the process by which those ends are achieved? • Is the council holding staff, especially the city manager, accountable for achieving the ends they seek vs trying to manage the process themselves? • It’s normal that in the course of their shared work the council and staff will come across policies, practices, or procedures they believe may be useful in their city. This is especially true as this leadership group gathers products, ideas and best practices from vendors, colleagues and association groups that support civic entities. As you share those with this leadership group it will be important to consider: o Are we staying in our governance roles or “crossing the line”? o If we are crossing the line, is it reasonable and in the best interests of the city? o If we’re crossing the line, are we acknowledging it when it happens and returning to our role as soon as is reasonable? 3. Healthy adherence to the norms adopted by the group Perhaps the biggest step the council and staff took towards becoming a higher functioning team was to craft a set of norms (found in the appendix) that will help them manage some of the many “gray” areas that are not codified in documents like a city charter, council rules of procedure, or Roberts Rules of Order. The norms broadly fell into two areas; behavioral and operational and a greeing on them was an important first step. Finding healthy ways to hold each other accountable when they are broken can be challenging but when practiced properly, healthy accountability can be even more powerful than the norm itself. Key to achieving this will be: • The ability to realize our own shortcomings not as failings but as traits of being a human is key to the success of a high performing team. This means that when a 70 Item 7. 9 norm is violated it is respectfully pointed out, perhaps privately at first but publicly if necessary, focusing on the behavior, not the person exhibiting the behavior. It’s done in a calm and respectful manner, and we assume the persons’ best intentions were not to violate the norm in the first place. • This practice is not just so the members of this group can “get along,” although that is an important part of norms. It’s also important because failure to address a violation of the agreed upon norms engenders hostility, both towards those responsible for enforcing those norms. o Therefore, while they are expected to adhere to and practice accountability around their norms, the leadership team explicitly empowered the mayor and city manager to support their efforts with healthy reminders as needed. Put simply, the group wants the mayor and city manager to nudge them when they need it. • Healthy accountability to norms is important because council and staff must be able to work together, disagree, provide direction to staff, and support the implementation of that direction (especially if they didn’t agree with it), and come back the next week and do it all over again. 71 Item 7. 10 Reflections and Observations Below are general reflections, observations and points raised throughout the workshop process. Should city leadership wish to discuss these matters further, please contact Jake Spano at SGA. Ongoing professional development: • During our time several questions came up as well as requests for additional support to individual members of the council and staff. As such, we would suggest that the city review their professional development program for both staff and council with appropriate resources devoted to support the growth and maturation of a high functioning team. Ongoing annual retreats like the one recently completed, coaching opportunities both through the SGA network as well as various professional and industry resources, are just a few of the bare minimum investments the council and staff must make in ensuring a high performing team for the residents of the city. Resources to support staff as a strategy to build organizational resilience: • Given the council’s interest in much needed improvements as well as adapting to the changes underway in the community broadly, the city should consider additional resources, so that staff can carry out the important work of the city. The council acknowledged that they may need to add resources or shift existing priorities to achieve this goal. Some options include: o The city wisely supports ongoing learning and professional development through tuition reimbursement as part of the compensation package for employees and should regularly evaluate its funding levels and ROI, and update the program as needed. In addition to building the skills of existing employees, it’s a useful strategy in attracting the best candidates to work in the city. o Job shadowing programs can build connection, improve communication, and grow leadership skills between staff. Additionally, they are a proven strategy for providing enterprise-wide resiliency in the organization. o Peer support groups, employee resource groups, and similar systems of connection will provide staff with powerful connections between members of the team. o As discussed, the city provides training and mentorship to new employees AND there’s value in building relationships outside the department through a “mirror” or partner of some sort. One straightforward way to achieve this is to pair new hires who are encouraged to use each other as resources and partners as they navigate their new workspace. New hires bring not just their skills but their experiences with them and the city should take advantage of them by: • Creating a group of new hires that meets quarterly to share their ideas and experiences from prior workplaces, questions about how/why the city functions as it does, build personal connections. • The group would be “rolling” which is to say, at each meeting those hired in the last quarter would join the group while those who had been in the group for four quarters would drop off. 72 Item 7. 11 • One or two division heads could come to each meeting and do a brief 10-minute presentation on their department again, building knowledge and connection across the organization. • City leadership could then incorporate the practices and policies brought forward by these new employees. Balance responsive and responsible: • Just because someone makes a request does not mean it should be granted. Is what is being asked of you in alignment with the community's broader wishes? Is the request within your role? If not, is there a way to be responsive to the request while still being responsible to the broader community goals? Never forget that today’s gift can quickly become tomorrow’s expectation. Organizational Culture: • Covid Impacts: Generally speaking, the culture of the city is particularly good. Staff believe that they are engaged in important work and feel appreciated by leadership. Staff are also struggling post covid to re-establish the important personal connections, bonds, and support networks around the city that they once enjoyed. • Giving each other grace: As one of the staff noted, “we’re all human and trying our best.” Implicit in this is the fact that despite our best efforts, we are imperfect and will fall short of the mark. The role of leading a city is exhilarating, exciting, and rewarding. It is also demanding, conflicting, and draining and requires empathy from everyone to everyone. • Appreciation: The council respects city staff and sees their professionalism daily. However, the public does not share that access and as such, the city should find ways to recognize and support city staff internally and externally. Suggestions include: o Employee profiles on social media and internal communications provide the team a chance to share their story, experience and their “why” for what brought them to the city. o Employee recognitions and awards and accompanying presentations at council meetings. These could be recognitions created by the city such as employee of the month awards or it could be public acknowledgement of awards given by professional associations, industry representatives, community groups and others. Council as leaders: • While every job has its stressors public service is unique. • For local elected leaders, they establish priorities for the organization each week, based on competing demands, limited resources, and the feedback they receive from the community. This means they will have to say “no” to their neighbors and friends often and should be prepared to accept the consequences of that decision. While seemingly simple, for many council members it can be so difficult to manage that it eventually drives them out of public service. • As discussed in our workshop, elected officials, especially newly elected ones, should remember that while they will retain their identity as a private citizen, the public may not see it that way. Questions at dinner with friends, at the grocery store and kids events for example, are common and each person will find ways to manage those demands but it’s important to remember that when elected 73 Item 7. 12 officials speak or act, it carries with it the imprimatur of the city whether intended or not and even when they explicitly say they ARE NOT representing the city. Improve outcomes and team performance by streamlining the practice of how community requests/complaints are handled: • People are of course imperfect and from time to time will not meet the expectations (realistic or not) of others, which may result in complaints being shared with council members. Setting aside any legal or previously stated HR reporting requirements, when Council receives a complaint about staff, they should remember that: o The council acknowledged at the workshop that staff are competent, trained professionals often with years of expertise in their field. o They are carrying out council direction as articulated through the city manager and supervisors and as such, the complaint may be less about staff’s actions and more about councils' decision that set the actions in motion. • An effective process to manage these situations looks like: o First, check with staff before replying. Staff can provide historical context for the situation as well as a professional assessment through the lens of city policy and practices. It also gives them ownership in acknowledging and correcting mistakes they make – and they will make them because they are human. o At that point what you may realize is many complaints that are directed at staff about what they are doing (means) are really frustrations about a decision the council made in the first place (ends). o If it’s something that needs to go to staff for follow up, replying to the constituent and copying the city manager and the department head for the issue they are emailing about with an acknowledgement of receipt, informing them that “staff” will follow up with them, and a reminder that if they do not hear back from staff in a reasonable timeframe, to please let you know. o Then, unless you hear from them again, or there are unique circumstances, make every effort to refrain from cumbersome requests to be included on emails, meetings, and follow up. • While a person may complain about staff, Council should approach complaints with the assumption that staff are doing their job effectively. • Of course, if there is a pattern where a staff member is not following through with their duties, the city manager should be made aware of that privately for them to follow up on. Slowing down to improve outcomes: • Often, especially with a group of newer council members, there will be a n understandable urgency to complete items a large and ambitious “to do” list. These policies likely represent feedback provided to the members by the public during the campaign and since taking office however, what might appear to some as active, responsive, and a mbitious will appear to others as ill considered, performative, hasty, or worse yet, unprofessional. Using True Colors parlance, resist the urge to brighten up your “gold” color by ticking items off your to-do list and instead slow down so you can truly dig into the issues at hand, 74 Item 7. 13 consider the implications, and unintended consequences of decisions before you make them. Put simply, slow down to go deep. • One common frustration for council, staff and the public are requests for community input that appear performative because shortly after providing the feedback, the vote is taken on the item. So, another opportunity to deliver better outcomes is by interrupting that cycle by breaking up the feedback loop by not voting on an item of substance on the same night as the feedback is provided. Instead, staff should record the questions asked and opinions provided. They then research the questions (not opinions) and share the answers/responses in the council packet before the vote at a subsequent meeting . The downsides of this are obvious, it takes longer than some may wish and may require attendees to come back at a later meeting if they wish to see the outcome firsthand, however the benefits of a better and more informed council and community far outweigh the drawbacks. Effective use of the council and staff's time: • Not surprisingly, the most valuable asset this leadership team has is time, so it is important to prioritize its use. Two specific strategies and tools were shared with the group related to this. • Agenda Proposal Form/process o It appears that the current process of deciding what goes onto the council’s calendar largely includes input from the right people but could use some structure to give it greater clarity. o SGA shared a document and process that would be used by a council member to propose a topic for council to consider that would be focused on the core city strategies. The form would be completed by a member with a brief description of the issue, and that document would be included with council materials for consideration. At the next work session, the council would then explicitly vote on whether they wanted to take the matter up future work session – this is not a vote on the merits of the proposal, only if the proposed topic meets the threshold of being worth discussing. If a majority supported it, the city manager would work with relevant staff to slot the topic into an appropriate meeting. • Systems approach to organizing policy topics o SGA presented a framework for organizing the council’s calendar into sections that were organized around the city’s strategic priorities. o So, for example, let us say Sustainability was the focus of January and February. This means that barring something time sensitive or an emergency, all sustainability policy discussions would happen in January and February. o This would allow the staff and council to take a holistic approach to policy discussions seeing the full “Venn diagram” of policy implications instead of on an ad hoc basis, minimizes the actual amount of time spent to achieve policy decisions thereby reducing costs, and eliminates much of the jockeying of council members to get their topics heard quickly. o This concept requires discipline from council and thoroughness from staff but when maintained, vastly increases the outcomes of the policy making process. 75 Item 7. 14 Learnings from Covid: • City leadership would be wise to explore Covid’s impact on city processes and procedures, to expand the civic and democratic process/culture in the city. • What practices did we change because of covid? • Of those practices, were there ones that we found led to better decision making, a more informed community, etc.? • Which do we want to continue/expand and which of those do we want to abandon either in favor of the way those practices were handled pre -covid or perhaps there’s a third way to move forward that is better than what was done historically or during Covid. • For example, perhaps if council meetings were live streamed, and comments were taken by phone or in writing at the meetings instead of in person only because of covid restrictions at city hall. Did these changes open the council and staff to new and better community engagement? Communication to/from leadership and the community: • Media requests o When a council member(s) receives a media request they should forward it to the city manager, communications director, and the mayor. o That group will work to decide, is this something that staff will respond to or will the mayor/council? o The city manager or communication director will also send an email to relevant staff with the council as a Bcc, to make sure everyone is aware that the request has come in and who is managing it. o The idea here is that there should be a thoughtful approach to managing media requests rather than multiple people offering their interpretation of the issue which can create confusion and frustration for everyone, especially the public. o Special attention should be paid to open meeting laws. • The city should never underestimate the power of the mayor and council to be a reassuring voice to their neighbors. Assets like an informal weekly “Mayor’s Minute” or “Council Corner '' video will require some planning, support, and intentionality on the part of council and staff; however, the return on this relatively minor investment makes it well worth the effort. • Social Media... Can you “unring” the bell? o Social media is by its very nature a rapidly evolving tool which when used effectively can be powerful in its ability to support the city’s work. It can also rapidly devolve and thrust the city and its leadership, staff, and residents into chaos. Therefore, it is recommended that: ▪ The city should at a minimum, review this policy annually to ensure it is compliant with data practices rules, is adding/removing platforms as the city’s social media evolves, etc. ▪ The council would be well served to consider the pitfalls of engaging in policy discussions/debates with residents via social media. While there can be legitimate engagement through those tools, they often lack the substance and context that more direct and personal communication brings to the work. ▪ Finally, engaging via social media can set an expectation, realistic or not, that you will engage with all social media. 76 Item 7. 15 Parking Lot Items These include items or topics that were discussed but not fully resolved . Included here for further consideration by staff as they deem appropriate. • Evaluating city structures for greater efficiency and transparency. o Whether it was the process for managing and escalating communication throughout the organization, the 3-ring binder for routing front desk calls, or the process for managing complaints related to property maintenance now is the time to re-evaluate how information flows through the organization, how technology can improve that process, and most importantly who handles what? There are “legacy” processes, roles, and structures that were established when the city was staffed and managed in a vastly different way than it is now which likely are cost staff time and the public some frustration when they are “handed off” to others. o A notable example of this was evidenced when Jake asked, “Who handles road repairs?” and the response from staff was “It depends.” While many departments may be responsible for the execution of some tasks, whenever possible a person or department should “own” it in terms of interacting with the council and public. • Internal communication o While different division heads may send information to the council as an update, the city should consider an “End of the Week” email to council and division directors coming from or coordinated by Aaron, detailing: ▪ Significant items or updates that the leadership group should have awareness of ▪ Events and activities happening over the weekend. ▪ Links to media stories that may have included/impacted the city. ▪ Other items that cannot wait until Monday to share. o More cross-department communication to ensure awareness of big picture issues for staff. 77 Item 7. 16 Appendix 78 Item 7. 17 Columbia Heights Leadership Workshop Agenda Day One Time: • 3:00 – 9:00pm Attendees: • Mayor, Council, City Manager, and Senior Staff Theme: The importance of building connection and trust between members of the group to create a high performing team by: • Understanding not what your colleagues think, but how they think through relational learning using the “True Colors” personality assessment tool. • Creating “norms” for the group that inform not what we will work on but how we will work together and, in the process, build trust. Schedule: 3:00 – 3:30pm: Introductions and ice breaker 3:30 – 4:00pm: Review and discuss pre-workshop interview summary 4:00 – 6:00pm: Relational Learning True Colors assessment review with Kori Shingles (with a break) 6:00 – 6:30pm: Dinner 6:30 – 8:30pm: Norms review and creation by council and staff (with a break) 8:30 – 9:00pm: Review of the day / Closing thoughts from attendees 79 Item 7. 18 Day Two Time: • 8:30am – 4:00pm Attendees: • Mayor, Council, City Manager, and Senior Staff Theme: Building trust by having a clear governance model, transparent and improved systems, processes, and procedures that govern our work by: • Reviewing the “Carver Governance Model” booklet and workshopping examples of how this model works in a city to ensure we remain a high performing team. • Building greater trust and efficiency through simplified and transparent processes and systems. Schedule: 8:30 – 9:00am: Breakfast 9:00 – 9:30am: Check in from yesterday and morning warm up 9:30 – Noon: Governance Review (with breaks) Noon – 12:30pm Lunch 12:30 – 1:00pm: Questions/follow up on governance 1:00 – 3:00pm: Process refinement (with breaks) 3:00 – 3:30pm: Parking lot/bike rack follow up (items raised during the workshop) 3:30 – 4:00pm: Closing thoughts from the group 80 Item 7. 19 2025 Pre-Workshop Interview Summary for Columbia Heights OVERALL THEMES • Optimism - Staff and council love Columbia Heights and are optimistic about the trajectory of city government and the community as a whole. • Future facing - Council and staff are also eager to “turn the page” on recent drama and start fresh which is part of why this workshop is underway. • Change management - Both the city and the community are undergoing changes which are broadly seen as positive but are not without the associated growing pains that come with change.  Several people used the phrase “good old boys club” when they described what the past culture was like in the Heights. • Trust - The city is blessed to have strong professional staff that are generally trusted by council – council will need to find ways to align their words and actions. • Stress – This leadership group has collectively experienced stress and trauma which began with the pandemic in 2020 and continue with upcoming staff departures. Specifically:  Managing a global pandemic.  Large number of high-level staff departures and the processes for filling their positions.  Social unrest surrounding around metro area officer involved shootings.  The tenure, censure, lawsuit and recall process of former CM Jacobs.  Use of Mayor/Council office seen by some on staff as bringing council closer to them, seen by others as micromanaging. • Words aligning with behavior – Council says they trust staff and that should be consistent with their behavior. Council and staff will need to craft processes that validate that trust. This will fall to Aaron to drive, and he is fortunate to have broad support from staff/council on this. • The workshop - Finally, lots of excitement for the workshop to get to know each other at a more personal level and fine tune the engine in Columbia Heights. COUNCIL RESPONSES 1. Why did you choose to work/serve the city and what gifts or talents do you bring to the city/your role? 81 Item 7. 20 • The most common response, while not technically a talent, was that their prior service in the community was an important factor/experience that led them to the council along with being mission driven problem solvers, focused on ensuring community voices are heard (although each person defined that differently). • They did not say they see themselves as “cheerleaders” for the community. 2. How would you describe the Organizational Culture of the city / examples? • Generally, council described the culture of the city in positive and change based language using words like “optimistic”, “evolving”, & “improving”. • Generally council trusts staff and sees them as capable, “collaborative” professionals, focused on problem solving, and wants to support them moving forward. There are however, like in any organization, specific issues that create tension between some members of the group. 3. Do you feel there is a clear understanding of the role of council members as compared to staff / examples? • Members expressed that they felt there was some overreach in both staff and their council colleagues when it came to governance. That overreach, real or perceived, is creating trust issues between members. • Council members who served/worked for the city must ensure they transition fully to their new role. 4. Do you believe there is anything council and staff should be doing differently so they can be a higher performing team / examples? • Greater visibility into the long-term impacts on our budget as we are considering a specific project. • More chances to get to know staff. • More staff to meet community needs. • Greater clarity around agenda setting and priorities for the council’s time. • Workshops like this and strategic planning so we can set a clear long -term vision. • Anticipate that norms will help manage interactions and behaviors in meetings. 5. What else do you think we should know to ensure the workshop is relevant for you? • Excited about setting norms activities. • Eager to get to know folks at a more personal level through this workshop. STAFF RESPONSES 1. Why did you choose to work/serve the city and what gifts or talents do you bring to the city/your role? • Consistent themes relating to being mission driven and appreciating the civic mindedness, strong volunteerism, and small town feel of the city. 82 Item 7. 21 • Staff say it’s fun to work in CH, they get to work on a diversity of issues/tasks and see positive momentum in the city. One person said the city is “right sized” to take on big things. • Staff is personally connected to Columbia Heights as several of them lived/live there. 2. How would you describe the Organizational Culture of the city / examples? • “Evolving”, “Shifting”, and “Adaptive” (in a positive way) were the common adjectives staff used to describe the culture of the organization.  The specific phrase “good old boys' network” was used by multiple staff respondents to describe the past culture in the city.  One person described the past culture as “ossified” and at times, “abusive” but noted Aaron was continuing a positive shift that began with Kelly Bourgois. • “Trust” - This issue came up in nearly every staff interview in two ways:  Staff feel that council sees them as trusted, competent professionals who do their homework, and are thoughtful and helpful.  Some staff expressed that they’d “lost some trust” in the council either through a specific interaction they’d had or a broader sense that council was focusing on issues/policies/services that in their opinion should be handled by others. • “More formal” - staff understood that this needed to flex to fit the organizations needs but more tenured staff talked about the value of having interactions with past council members via impromptu visits to their workspace. A few wondered if proximity mi ght lead to overreach, especially with the Mayor/Council office at city hall. 3. Do you feel there is a clear understanding of the role of council members as compared to staff / examples? • Responses were mixed and specific to people/departments. Generally, staff feels there is an understanding of roles and council doesn’t micromanage them. • Staff concerns around governance fell into two categories:  People/processes: Requests from council to be included in staff processes like staff hiring, follow up on resident requests, and some examples of council members going around Aaron when dealing with staff.  Policy: Some concern around micromanaging policy details (ex. winter parking policies and the rental exemption appeal process).  Roles: CM’s having roles on Council versus Heights Next versus... can confuse staff. • Staff was also self-aware, noting times they were acting more in a policy making role than policy implementation role. It was not clear if those instances were intentional. 4. Do you believe there is anything council and staff should be doing differently so they can be a higher performing team / examples? • This workshop to build trust between council and staff. • More opportunities for personal connections. • We need to be challenged by council. • More staff to complete the work plan from council. 83 Item 7. 22 • More transparent agenda setting and council policy priorities to make best use of time. • Overarching goals to guide our work. • Better communication and connections between departments. • Clarify our processes and unwritten commitments to ensure continuity and clarity. 5. What else do you think we should know to ensure the workshop is relevant for you? • “We’re in this to be great and if not that, why are we here?” • Really looking forward to building greater teamwork between staff and council. • Staff are experiencing some trauma related to events over the past few years. 84 Item 7. 23 True Colors Results 85 Item 7. 24 86 Item 7. 25 Columbia Heights City Council and Staff Norms While we are accountable to each other for these norms, the mayor and city manager will help us adhere to them with respectful reminders and reinforcement as needed. Behavioral Norms 1. We will assume others best intentions. 2. We will exercise humility. 3. We will praise publicly and criticize privately. 4. We will focus on the policy and not personalities. 5. We will do our best to de-escalate contentious interactions. 6. We will provide reasonable notice to the Mayor and City Manager of any changes or additions we wish to make at a council meeting so that the mayor is prepared to manage the meeting, and staff are prepared to address questions council may have. 7. We will show respect for one another by: a. Paying attention to others when they are speaking. b. Not interrupting others. c. Listening to understand others, not simply to respond to them. d. Honoring each other in public and protecting one another in their absence. e. Not bullying others. Operational Norms 1. Council members and staff will respect the mayor’s role to chair our meetings by: a. Waiting to be called on before speaking so that others can consider our contributions. b. The Mayor and City Manager will bring closure to policy discussions, public comment, and other similar “final word” situations. 2. Once a decision has been made by the council, we will support the implementation of that decision even if we did not support the decision itself. 3. If council has a request of staff, they will direct their request to the City Manager and the Division Director for coordination with staff unless he City Manager decides otherwise. 4. If council has a question about a program or staff member, they will raise that with the City Manager privately before raising it publicly. 5. When council is considering a topic, it is incumbent upon council members to ask sufficient questions to ensure they are making an informed decision. 6. Council and staff will address each other by their titles when engaging each other in any official capacity and will use first names in informal settings. 87 Item 7. 26 Columbia Heights City Council Study Session Topic Proposal Date: 2/22/25 Submitted by: Mayor Ecklund Proposed Agenda Topic: Requiring cash as a payment option in the city Please provide a brief description of the topic (Max. 200 words): In Minnesota and nationally, BIPOC people are disproportionately less likely to have bank accounts, according to the FDIC. Rates are highest among low-income, black, Hispanic and native American households, as well as homes headed by a person with a disability. Nearly half of the unbanked people surveyed told the FDIC they can’t afford to maintain the required minimum balances at most banks. Some businesses in our community do not accept cash as payment. By requiring businesses in the city to accept cash, council can prevent retailers from discriminating against unbanked people, even if it’s unintentional. Several cities/states have implemented this including, NYC, Phila, San Francisco, Washington DC and the state of Massachusetts. Cash is a legal tender form of payment and not allowing it is discriminatory. Here’s an article I found on the subject from the Pew Charitable Trust. www.pew.org/unbankedetcetcetcetcetc Which of the Core City Strategies (CCS) is this topic in alignment with and how? If it is not aligned with any of the CCS, please provide a rationale why council should consider the topic (Max. 100 words):  Healthy & Safe Community  Equitable, Diverse, Inclusive, & Friendly  Thriving & Vibrant Destination Community  Sustainable  Trusted & Engaged Leadership  Strong Infrastructure & Public Services 88 Item 7. 27 City Council Study Session Topic Proposal Staff Report Date: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved by: Proposed Agenda Topic: Staff Recommendation: ___ Yes ___ No Summary of Staff Analysis: • Scope of Issue in the City: • Resources Required (staff, financial, etc.): • Legal/Regulatory Considerations: • Health Considerations: • Economic Considerations (for city/community/etc): • Alignment with Core City Strategies: • Anticipated timing in systems policy calendar: • Support Materials/Links: • 89 Item 7. 28 Governance Tabletop Exercise Clearbrook prioritizes being a city where people can travel safely, reliably, and affordably. To achieve that goal the council recently approved Connect Clearbrook” (C2), a strategic plan to create more non- motorized infrastructure in the community. Included in C2 is a multi-modal gap analysis and a plan to address the gaps with infrastructure improvement projects, which may include sidewalks, walking trails, and bike ways. There are several older neighborhoods in the plan like the “North Innsbruck / Mary Bergen-York" neighborhood, which don’t have multi-modal infrastructure. The Clearbrook city council is now reviewing specific road, curb, and gutter improvement plans and in keeping with C2, staff included bike trails in the plan for NIMBY, including staff’s rationale of how the plan meets C2 criteria. Staff shared the plan with folks in the neighborhood at a meeting last week and several people contacted Councilmember Costello who represents them, to say they don’t want the trail included because it will bring more people through their neighborhood, decrease safety, and disru pt the “unique and historic” character of NIMBY. A local PTA expressed support for the trails because many children ride bikes or walk through that neighborhood to get to a nearby school located on the north side of the improved road. Tonight, staff presented the plan with the original north side alignment to the council for approval and residents in attendance re-iterated their concerns. Staff informed council in their staff report that they considered both sides of the road but chose the north side because it cost less to build, required the removal of fewer trees overall, better connected to existing trails in an adjacent neighborhood, and avoided some existing wastewater systems. CM Costello asked the neighbors in attendance if movin g the trail to the roads’ south side where fewer residents lived, would satisfy their concerns? Of the ten people in attendance, three said no, five said yes (two with the caveat that no trees on their southside property were cut), one wasn’t sure, and one apartment dweller from the neighboring city said they lived six blocks from NIMBY and just learned of the project this morning. CM Costello moved to amend the project to a southside alignment provided, “... we don’t take the trees off those two properties.” He then said staff should offset the increased cost of the southside design by transferring funds from the park improvement f und (PIF) and putting it into C2 stating, “Both funds come from the same taxpayers and since there’s no parks in NIMBY, they end up paying for something they don’t use - this events that out.” Finally, he offered to help staff by joining in meetings with the neighbors on how to save the trees on the two southside properties. Questions: 1. What governance questions does this scenario raise? 2. Does the amendment meet the ends the city seeks? 3. How might this amendment impact the means? 4. How would you vote on the amendment? 90 Item 7. 29 Using Systems Thinking to Deliver Better Outcomes “Systems thinking” (ST) is a way of organizing the work of a team that ensures the highest and best use of the teams’ resources while delivering better outcomes for its stakeholders. ST does this by shifting a team from ad hoc cycles of start-stop policy consideration to a more thoughtful and comprehensive approach. Implementing this requires an understanding of how a policy, program, or initiative in an organization is connected, influenced, and impacted by other parts of the organization. How it works for a city council and staff: • Using an annual calendar, staff places “landmark” events on the calendar with as much certainty as is possible. Landmark events are activities that require substantive city resources to deliver and must be accounted for in work planning. These may be annual or recurring calendar items and while there will be unforeseen additions to this calendar, all efforts should be made to be as comprehensive as possible. Examples might include:  New Councilmember Onboarding (January)  City Leadership Workshop (February 27-28)  Hiring a new Division Director (March 30)  Annual Strategic Planning Workshop (April 4)  LMC Annual Meeting in Rochester (July 12-14)  Central Ave 2030 master planning approvals (August)  City Visioning (various milestones throughout the year)  State of the City (October 10)  Annual Capital Improvement Plan approval (October 30)  Elections (Nov 4)  NLC Annual Meeting (Nov 18-21)  Budget adoption (December) • The calendar is then divided into sections of time called, “systems”, which match the strategic priorities of the city. The length of each section will vary to reflect the demands of that section, frequency of landmark events, staff capacity, time specific decisions, and the impact on other projects, while leaving space for • For example, a ST calendar might look like this: 2024 SYSTEMS STRATEGIC PRIORITY January – February Community and civic engagement February – May Connected infrastructure June - July Environmental stewardship August Open September – October Race, equity, and inclusion October – November Housing and community development December Open 91 Item 7. 30 • As policy items are added to the team’s calendar they are slotted in their respective system. For example, assume in January the council agrees to consider a policy requiring all buildings in the city to have electric vehicle charging stations, it would be assigned to the “Environmental Stewardship” system and discussed with related items in that system, between June and July.  If a policy is connected to multiple strategic priorities, staff will use its judgement to choose the system that best fits the policy. • The systems calendar can be adjusted to accommodate urgent/immediate policy matters as well as unofficial/personal impacts like members observing religious holidays, vacations, etc. however, every effort should be made to ensure there is clear criteria for what meets the threshold of “urgent” and discipline exercised to adhere to those criteria. • Before the start of each system, a general outline is provided to the city council that details the items that will be addressed within the system. At this point council and staff can fine tune the system to ensure connections across the policy system are accounted for or any outstanding omissions are addressed. Again, maintaining discipline about what qualifies in these categories is key. The ST approach streamlines policy making for councils and ensures policy implementation is thoughtful, economical and comprehensive, resulting in: • Better outcomes for stakeholders. • Policy makers that practice good governance by focusing on the big strategies and avoiding getting bogged down in the implementation details whenever possible. • Making the best use of staff and council time by eliminating time spent considering redundant policies or programs that are no longer “best in class”. • Better decision making that minimizes council and staff being whipsawed by “urgent,” real or perceived, policy demands. • Better use of time avoiding the start-stop cycle of ad hoc policy consideration. • Minimize financial impacts. 92 Item 7.