HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-02-20 City Council Work Session PacketMayor
Donna Schmitt Councilmembers
Robert A. Williams
John Murzyn, Jr.
Connie Buesgens Nick Novitsky City Manager Kelli Bourgeois
City of Columbia Heights
590 40th Avenue NE, Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (763) 706-3600
Visit our website at: www.columbiaheightsmn.gov
NOTICE OF
WORK SESSION
Auxiliary aids or other accommodations for disabled persons are available upon request when the request is made at least 48 hours in advance.
Please contact Administration at 763-706-3610 to make arrangements.
Meeting of: Columbia Heights City Council
Date of Meeting: November 2, 2020
Time of Meeting: 7:00 pm
Location of Meeting: Public Safety Training Room- 825 41st Ave NE
Purpose of Meeting: Work Session
NOTICE THAT THIS MEETING MAY BE CONDUCTED BY A COMBINATION OF IN-PERSON AND ELECTRONIC MEANS
Following a determination by City Manager Kelli Bourgeois, and emergencies declared by the United States, The State of
Minnesota, and the Columbia Heights Mayor & City Council, this meeting may, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 13D.021, occur by a
combination of in-person and electronic means. In all meeting formats whether solely in-person or a combination of in-person
and electronic means, members of the public who wish to attend may do so by attending in-person or by calling 1-312-626-
6799 and entering meeting ID 798 821 7248 at the scheduled meeting time. If there are any questions about this notice or
attending/calling in to the meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (763) 706-3611.
1.Library Board Vacancy
2.2021 Budget Discussion
a.Library
b.Public Works
c.Liquor
d.Finance
e.General Government
Amended to add
documents distributed at
the Work Session
AGENDA SECTION WORK SESSION
MEETING DATE NOV 2, 2020
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS - COUNCIL LETTER
ITEM: Library Board Vacancy
DEPARTMENT: Administration CITY MANAGER’S APPROVAL:
BY/DATE: Nicole Tingley/ Oct 28, 2020 BY/DATE: 10/30/20
CITY STRATEGY: Chhhhh hh hhhhh
Additional Strategy? Chhhhh hh hhhhh
SHORT TERM GOAL (IF APPLICABLE): Chhhhh hh hhhhh
Additional Goal? Chhhhh hh hhhhh
BACKGROUND:
The passing of Pat Sowada leaves a vacancy on the Library Board with a term ending April 1, 2022.
City staff is seeking City Council direction on how to move forward with filling the vacancy.
One option is to choose one of the applicants not chosen from the 2020 Board & Commission interviews. Their
applications are attached.
Another option is to seek more applications. We can let the previous 2020 applicants know that their
applications will be considered if that is what the City Council desires. If it is desired to consider the previous
2020 applicants, it will have to be determined if they should be interviewed again.
ATTACHMENT(S):
• Steve Smith Application
• Kristi Weidlein Application
Kelli Bourgeois
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Renee,
Donna Schmitt
Monday, November 2, 2020 2:04 PM
Kelli Bourgeois; Renee Dougherty
RE: Tonight
As a point of information, it would be good to have an annual report of finances for the Friends of the Library and any other group that has ties to the library and is supporting it monetarily. Please include this in with the budget tonight and include it in with future annual reports.
Page 3 -the Objectives 1. -referring to the building beginning to show its age. What is this referring to, specifically? There wasn't a significant increase in building maintenance, just $100 (page 6) so what were you thinking on this item?
Page 3 -Objective 6 -I'm assuming this is referring to the rental policy for the community room. It was sent
back to the board to come up with a plan to have approved by the council. We still have not seen that plan. When is it expected to be done?
Page 3 -Objective 7 -Seeking public art for the building and grounds. Please note, we do love the idea of public art but are cautious because no funding is available for it from the budget. So curious how you are planning on dealing with that part.
Page 4 -Personnel Services -lists 54 hours of public service each week, when the library is only open 32 hours.
Can you give a reason for the difference? I do realize that there are hours each day for restocking and cleaning
but 22 hours needs to be called something else when you are not meeting with the public.
Last year you talked about adding Kanopy, how did that work? It looks like you are not adding a lot to the
downloadable video so wondering if it's not as popular as you thought it would be?
It also appears that E-books has leveled off. Is this true?
Page 7 -Collection agency fees of $900. What is the amount going to the collection agency? When does an item get sent to the collection agency It shows on page 2 that you plan on collecting $11,000 in fines and forfeits for 2021. What percentage of that are you writing off because of getting sent to the collection agency? I would just like to see a summary of what the contract is with this agency.
What is your vision for the library over the next five years? What would you like to see changed or added?
Programing seems to have been very good even with Covid. Is staffing sufficient? How is partnering with schools in getting students to help work part-time? Are you finding it crowded when you limited hours?
Donna Schmitt, Mayor
dschmitt@columbiaheiqhtsmn.gov
1
Distributed 11/2/2020 at the Work Session
Kelli Bourgeois
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Hi Donna -
Kevin Hansen
Monday, November 2, 2020 6:32 PM
Donna Schmitt
Kelli Bourgeois
RE: Tonight -sorry late!
Thanks for the questions -Responses in BLUE below each question.
KH
From: Donna Schmitt Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 4:35 PM
To: Kelli Bourgeois
Cc: Kevin Hansen Subject: Tonight -sorry late!
Kevin,
General Questions:
What is the average life of a bituminous alley vs concrete? Difference of maintenance fees added in?
There 1s good data out there on comparisons for life cycle costs on streets and highways. For alleys, it is a little different.
Our first consideration was the current condition of our existing bituminous alleys (below average to poor to failing). Our
next consideration was drainage -the great majority of our alleys do not have storm sewer -so surface water is
conveyed down the center by inverse crown {the center is the low point). By contrast, our streets have a typical crown
to sheet drain into concrete curb and gutter to convey surface water. Next is how the alleys are used -heavier vehicles
(garbage trucks) with frequent start-stops, and frequent tire turning on the pavement when residents enter or leave
their property Considering all of those factors led us to concrete as the best long term solution for 10 or 12 foot wide
alleys. Anecdotally, our existing concrete alleys experience very little year to year maintenance (occasional joint repair or
panel replacement) vs our bituminous which we work on every year
How do you verify that staff -especially new staff are getting sufficient hours of training for our equipment?
We track all training for our employees and require feedback of their training experience For example, we send new
employees to a 3-day equipment operator training where they have both classroom and live instruction and usage of
equipment, partially sponsored by the 49'er Union. We also include training as a monthly topic at our PW safety
committee meeting where annual training is reviewed Another example, on our new forklift-users have to be trained
and certified (OSHA requirement) before we allow anyone to use it. We also routinely do cross training on our
equipment-for example having someone from another department spend a week on our jetter crew; or having our
foreman train new employees, and then have our Superintendent ride along with new snow plow drivers
Street signs -Can you give me your opinion of our current stop sign policy? Is it really working?
Stop signs are evaluated on a case by case basis and our policy follows the MUTCD manual Requests are reviewed by
staff (PW and PD), MUTCD guidance is presented and then reviewed by the Traffic Commission -with their
recommendation presented to the Council. Relying on the MUTCD provides consistency throughout the City.
1
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session
Parks -we have Prodeo asking to partner with the city to improve Gauvitte Park -Has there been any further discussions?
I met with their Rick Campion on site to review, I think the City Manager may have had a conversation with him, but as
far as I know nothing meaningful has progressed.
Parks -I thought there had been a suggestion from Council member Novitsky to take the amount that we had been setting aside for TIF, and now paid off, to be used for parks. I didn't see where that is in the budget.
Yes -but our budget was prepared back in May/June so that will be updated in the final version.
Do you have a map of Zone 4B and Zone 5 -the area we are looking at for 2021 street/alley maintenance?
Yes-they will appear 1n tonight's presentation. If you want a pdf I can send that to you
Do we have a list of contractors that we need to avoid/ones we may have had issues with in previous contracts?
Due to public bidding, we are limited to MnDOT's debarred list for both prime and sub-contractors.
Do you have a map of water main cleaning scheduled for 2021?
Yes -again on tonight's PowerPoint presentation
Any projects you foresee will be carrying over into 2021?
None.
Because of our partnerships with Kiwanis in recycling, what do you estimate we are saving the city?
We would be saving the weekend staff time to man the Recycling Center during open hours. The Kiwanis provide a great
service to the community and that benefit is to the community for items to recycle that cannot be picked up curbside.
Additionally, proceeds from their efforts fund scholarship grants available to students in the community. You could
argue that there is some cost savings in that some of the material brought to the Recycling Center may have otherwise
wound up in our parks or streets, but I wouldn't know how to quantify that.
What is our policy for donations? If someone donates artwork to the city do we require a maintenance fund along with the donation? What happens if the item is destroyed? Who is responsible for this? Do we have
insurance on these items? Do we have to replace anything that is destroyed?
The Council accepts donations primarily near the end of the year-Finance coordinates that resolution. In PW, we have
not identified a separate fund for maintenance of some of the artwork For vandalism, if it is something that we can
address (such as cleaning) without affecting the artwork -we handle that as part of our normal operations. For example,
we have cleaned the pedestrian bridge columns of graffiti. I am pretty sure we insure our existing major artwork items,
for any detail of that I would have to refer the insurance question to Finance I think the major repair and/or
replacement question is more of a policy question -that would be a discussion with the City Manager and Council, with
insurance and repair/replacement costs certainly factors
Page 13 -electric costs went down significantly. Can you give reason for this?
The costs went down from the adopted 2020 budget -but we also evaluate trending on some larger line items In this
case we adjusted our annual estimate based on that
Page 17 -How many street name signs can be replaced at $3,250 budgeted for 2021? How many do you estimate still need replaced? Is this referring to stop, street name or trunk highway signs?
25 to 30.
Hundreds.
Street name only. We have been replacing Stop signs concurrent with the Street Zone work. MnDOT takes care of
anything on the TH.
Page 56 -Why the decrease for disposal costs because of RTF Closing? A decrease looks like a good thing, but is it really?
2
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session
I think this is an evaluation of our actual experience in quantity oftrash.
Page 86 -E150 Van transfer to Liquor operations. This vehicle is 11 years old, what is the value? We shouldn't show a $40,000 transfer to liquor. What are you planning on purchasing to replace the El50?
Liquor is making a transfer into the Capital Equipment fund based on the 2021 value of the van. The Ford E style van is
no longer available so we will purchase a similar van available off the State of MN Purchasing Contract.
Page 87 -Who is getting the 4 x 4 Ford Explorer?
The Director.
Vision for Public Works -What projects would you like to see accomplished in the next five years?
Many Things!!! I'll highlight a few major:
•Complete the MSC Master Plan and develop a funding plan and timing based on the building Master Plan.
•Conduct an evaluation identifying major updates/rehab/remodel to JPM. When we looked at that in 2019 as
part of City Hall -it needs much refinement
•Develop and implement the Parks Capital Improvement Plan from the Park and Rec Commission CIP. The CIP
could be developed from summary form to a detailed plan and then identify funding (including the 100k per
year). The summary CIP was at $6.9 million in 2019 dollars to complete the remaining parks.
•Complete the 3ih Avenue Reconstruction project in 2023 -estimated at $10 million.
•Update the Street Rehabilitation Program on a city-wide basis in 2024. Pavement evaluation can be conducted
in 2022 and 2023 -taking that information we need to update the long term financials of the plan, along with
funding sources.
•Recon of the worst of the bituminous alleys. That could be 10, or 15 or 20 .............. .
Please let me know if you have any other questions or need additional info -
Thank You!
Thanks!
Kevin Hansen I Director of Public Works/ City Engineer City of Columbia Heights I Public Works 637-38th AVE NE I Columbia Heights, MN 55421
khansen@columbiaheightsmn.gov
Donna Schmitt, Mayordschmitt@columbiaheightsmn.gov
Direct: (763) 706-3705
Main: (763) 706-3700
Cell: (612) 719-9910
Disclaimer: Information in this message or attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government
Data Practices Act; may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege; may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or
otherwise protected. The unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and
then promptly delete this message from your computer system.
3
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session
Kelli Bourgeois
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Joseph Kloiber
Monday, November 2, 2020 5:16 PM
Donna Schmitt
Kelli Bourgeois; Jason Schulz
Attachments:
FW: Questions for tonight -Liquor
Municipal Liquor State Audit Report.pdf
Mayor Schmitt:
See responses below in Blue from Jason and I.
Joseph Kloiber CPA I Finance Director
City of Columbia Heights I Finance Department
590 40th Avenue NE I Columbia Heights, MN 55421
jkloiber@columbiaheightsmn.gov 100 Years of Columbia Heights
From: Jason Schulz
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 3:07 PM
To: Joseph Kloiber
Subject: FW: Questions for tonight
Direct: (763) 706-3627 Main: (763) 706-3600
What is your vision for Columbia Heights Municipal Liquor in the next five years?
My plan for Top Yalu Liquor is to increase\ isibility. sales and profits ;ear over year. I plan to accomplish this by staying on and ahead of trend with what customers are looking for in spirits, wine. beer and non-alcoholic beverages. This will continue to attract new customers and keep our current customer base engaged. Competition is around every corner in the Metro market. so we need to stay viable and visible to our residents and non-resident customers. rll continue to increase our online brand through Social Media marketing, Local SEO optimization. and other online tactics. This is also all mentioned as part of tonighf s presentation regarding strategy for 2021.
I spend a great amount of time researching trends not only in our market, but beyond. as the Midwest is typically a year or two behind trends that appear on the coasts. The vision must include more than sales and profits, but also contributions to the community. r ll continue to find ways that Top Yalu can provide value to the residents past the financial benefits. I'd like to do more educational events. clean-up events and support
local groups and organizations in an) way I can.
Could you provide us with stats for the top 10 Muni stores in MN? You said we were #6 which is pretty much in line with where we have been for several years. I would like to see who we are competing with. Thanks.
The top 7-8 liquor stores in the state have remained consistent for the past several years. I"ve attached a page
from the State Auditor's report showing the ranking of gross sales going back to 2014 so you can see who we
are competing with.
1
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session
Is there anything we could change to increase our profits over the next few years? We seem to continuously stay
at about the same profit margin each year.
The biggest opportunity for us to increase profits in the coming years is to increase traffic and customer counts. The metro is a very competitive market. keeping margins slim. Our non-resident customers drive by several liquor stores to shop at Top Yalu. Capturing ne¼ customers through advertising, events and word of mouth coupled with the completion of the Top Yalu #3 remodel should continue to drive up customer counts. Having 3 branded stores that are comfortable to shop will certainly help in this effort. Other tactics such as continuing to increase our proprietary brands (Total Wine brands with a higher gross profit) and taking advantage of joint buying with other municipal liquor stores will help increase profits as well.
How are Sunday hours working out with limited football and other sports schedules?
Sundays are proving to be a busy day for us. even with the irregular sports schedules. Once we reopened Sunday's for business. they quickly became a busier shopping day than Monday and Tuesday's. even with fewer shopping hours.
Are we competitive with comparable business wages for our clerks?
I feel we are competitive with the market and comparable businesses in regards to wages. Especially once they work through the probation period and hit their first few steps. The gap is closing. but we are still competitive.
Any future events planned in the next couple of months? Can you make sure that you get advertisements to our
city council meetings?
Events are on hold until further notice. Tastings and larger educational events are not possible in the cunent
environment. As soon as they are. we will resume and provide the information to the Council.
Electric budget went down in all three stores, Store 1-$1,100, Store 2 -$500 and Store 3 -$200. What have you
done to accomplish this?
This is in pa11 due to some lighting and cooling upgrades a few years ago. but mostly due to adjustments to actual use and projected price increases not being as high as expected.
You stated that insurance has gone down because of fewer claims, what is this referring to? Fewer thefts or
what? The insurance premiums for liquor liability insurance have declined. According to our insurance agent, the LMC Insurance Trust as a whole has had relatively good (low) experience with liquor liability claims against off-sale municipal liquor stores for issues such as selling to intoxicated persons etc.
What is RITE? It talks about RITE Cloud Retailer, RITE Card Defender and RITE General Support, is this a
new company?
RITE (Retail Information Technology Enterprises) is our Point-of-Sale system provider. CloudRetailer is their new POS system that we are currently upgrading to (using the 2020 budget). Card Defenders are the credit card terminals from RITE that are used on the customer side of the counter. and General Support is for all the
technical support throughout the year from RITE.
Can you verify how many employees you are planning on sending to the annual MMBA Conference? Is it two or six?
2
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session
Two will attend the MMBA Conference. The cost is split over all 3 locations. so it may seem like 2 from each location are going. but only 2 in total each year. Each year. we do rotate which two attend however.
Under the Activity Description it states that funds to support activities such as DARE, yet on p 18 it shows no funds are being transferred out to DARE. Please explain.
The funds we provide for DARE and other Police community programs are included in line item 7210 Transfer to General Fund on page 18. The Line item 7310 Transfer to DARE on page 18 was used in prior years when the DARE program was managed in its own separate fund. DARE and other Police community programs are
now managed as part of the regular Police Depai1ment budget within the General Fund.
Thanks!
From: Donna Schmitt Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 1:26 PM
To: Kelli Bourgeois; Jason Schulz
Subject: RE: Questions for tonight
Jason,
What is your vision for Columbia Heights Municipal Liquor in the next five years?
Could you provide us with stats for the top 10 Muni stores in MN? You said we were #6 which is pretty much
in line with where we have been for several years. I would like to see who we are competing with. Thanks.
Is there anything we could change to increase our profits over the next few years? We seem to continuously stay at about the same profit margin each year.
How are Sunday hours working out with limited football and other sports schedules?
Are we competitive with comparable business wages for our clerks?
Any future events planned in the next couple of months? Can you make sure that you get advertisements to our city council meetings?
Electric budget went down in all three stores, Store 1-$1,100, Store 2 -$500 and Store 3 -$200. What have you
done to accomplish this?
You stated that insurance has gone down because of fewer claims, what is this referring to? Fewer thefts or what?
What is RITE? It talks about RITE Cloud Retailer, RITE Card Defender and RITE General Support, is this a
new company?
Can you verify how many employees you are planning on sending to the annual MMBA Conference? Is it two
or six?
Under the Activity Description it states that funds to to support activities such as DARE, yet on p 18 it shows no funds are being transferred out to DARE. Please explain.
3
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session
Thanks!
Donna Schmitt, Mayor dschmitt@columbiaheiqhtsmn.gov
Disclaimer: Information in this message or attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government
Data Practices Act; may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege; may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or
otherwise protected. The unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and
then promptly delete this message from your computer system.
4
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session
Table 6
Comparison of City Liquor Store Operations -2018
Ranked by Gross Sales
Cross Prunt Operating NunopcruUng Net Profit/(Loss)
Sulc, Cusl ur S•lcs Amount Percent Expenses lncumc/(Loss) Revcnutis t-:11,cnscs Amount Pcrtcnt Net Truasfcrs" Ranking �amc of City Type of Store Footnotes Population (SJ {$) ($) of Soles (S) ($) (SJ (S) (S) of Sales ($)
Lakeville Off-Sale Only 64,334 IS,27M3l 11,465,639 3,810,794 24.9¾ 2,783,SS7 1,027,2)7 1,645.633 157 2.672.713 17.SI', 923,260
E<.liniJ Ofl'-Salc Only 52,535 I J,4U 1,754 9,461,178 3,940,576 29.4�i 2,533,9R I 1,406,595 25,246 1.431.841 10.?�i, 800.00U
Richfield Off-Sal• Only 36,436 11,561,557 8,645,844 2,915,713 25.2% 2,159,720 755,993 39,611 795,604 b.9% 229,920
Eden Priiiric Ort'Salc Only (1J,15b IU,K4M,7:!5 7,718,(,Jl 3,130,093 '.!M,9% 2,255,144 874,949 35,567 54,:!2) 85(1,293 7.'J�U 800.UUU
Apple Valley Off-Sale Only 53,429 9,445,281 6,568,030 2,877,251 30.S¾ 1,766,068 1,111.183 49,418 20,955 1,139,646 12.1% 630,000
C olumb1a l-k1g.hls Uf'f .. ':ih:UnJy 2 )(40 X,588,57(, 6,448,'.!23 2, 140,35] �4 \J"o 1,708,(lH J2 l ltJ 17,Jl/4 CiT,U04 8, ,7011 ,i.'.", <1(,.94�
elk R.iver Off-Sale Only 24,891 7,203,155 5,119,654 2,083,501 28.911, 1,114,046 969,455 55,235 1,024,690 14.24!t 689,174
Octruil Lilkcs ()f'ICSalc Only 9,475 7.1!11,KK7 5, IMJ,916 1,942,971 27.31!� KlJX,46::!. 1,1144,509 30,4% 206,553 XhM.452 12.:!0U 4911,0UO
9 Brooklyn Center Off-Sale Only 32,299 6,743,790 4,K65,400 l,K7H,390 27.9% 1,613,573 264,817 28.363 !Y),IK0 4.3% IKS.707
10 Wt,)'£itla On-& ()JlCS.,k 4,719 (,,3')5,736 l.l 98,ll,7 J,l'J7,3(,9 50.U�� 2,636,737 560.(,31 31,.JXJ 117,•l45 47•),070 7 jl!i, 3 lk,l)jJ
II Hutchinson Off-Sale Only 14,260 6,243,619 4,760,414 1.483,205 23.1% 886.926 596.279 2,792 14,645 584.426 9.4% 500,000
12 Fergus Palls ()flCSok Only IJ,H7 6.!(11,'Jl I 4,327.442 1.M35,�119 29.�% l,0MJ,370 752JJ99 11,.1111 7<1X,2(,1) 11 S'!i1 58�.31,'I
13 Monlieello Off-Sole Only 13,782 6,090,981 4,546,747 1,544,234 25.4% 854,218 690,016 20,337 710,353 11.7% 530,000
l...J I� Bcmillji Off-Sale Only 15,-U,2 6,039,403 4,261,400 1,778,003 29,4�.u 1,2M7,101 490.902 25.1')5 19\i,•17 J25,3MII 5A�, 20(,.75S
IS Fridley Off-Sale Only 28,824 6,029,627 4,458,598 1,571,029 26.1% 1,085,273 485,756 2,332 488,088 8.1% 338.500
16 Alt:xanLlria Oll'Solc Only 13,951 5,K95,43 I 4,517,716 1,377,715 :H.4'�V 994.')11 382,793 3.95R 9,353 377,39R 6.��ii 125.00U
17 Saint Anthony Off-Sale Only 9,067 S,867,452 4,344,76'1 l,S22,688 26.0% 1,265,20 257,439 8,632 266,071 -1.s•,e 197,262
18 Cambrit.lgc Oll'Solc Only 8,977 5,7:!6,l:!S 4,297,814 1,428,311 '.!4.9% �76,136 552,175 11,398 563,573 9.s�;. 563.00U
1q Buffalo O11'-Sok Only 16,479 ,,371,774 3,865,918 1,505,856 28.0'/4 957,624 548,232 115,974 7,1�4 657,022 12.2'/4 425.000
20 S:.111:1gc Oil-Sulc Onl)' 31.407 5,J4 l.2X0 4, ICJS,625 1,235,(155 23.1% l,0M0,KJ6 154.819 12,(,,5N 142,lbl 1 ?�ti
21 Farminpn Off-Salo Only 22,aao 5,256,645 3,923,968 1,332,677 25.4% 966,336 366,341 IS,308 )Kl,64� 7.3�. 194,377
J:! Marshall Otl'SalcOnly 13.7K3 5.ICJ4,513 3,913,265 1,191,248 :!3.31:v 691,343 499.905 33,3(19 74,JJI, 4SX,9.1K 9,01!·Q 300.11110
23 Thief River Falls Off-Sale Only 8,940 4,690,353 3,568,237 1,122,116 23.9°/4 776,933 345,183 18,272 363,455 1.,�. 431,307
24 Robbinsdale Ofl'Sak Only 14,77(, 4,!(1J,77tJ 3, 151,9',7 1,I I0,812 2(,.JI!,;, 936,276 174.53(, 1(1,556 '.!21,761) (30,f,77) .n.7�U 150.Clll0
25 Anoka Off-Sale Only 11,573 4,247,545 3,229,055 1,018,490 24.0�� 849,631 161,859 2'.307 194,166 4.6% 60,000
26 Big: Lake Off-Salo Only 11,456 4,239,ij09 3,061,062 1,178,747 17.8�� 692,756 485.99 I 26,S47 13,2SI 499,557 IL&�;, 4UU.00U
27 Worthinston Off-Sale Only 13,SJO 4,135,970 3,087,930 1,048,040 25.l'Y, 761.897 286,143 I0,204 43,194 2SJ,ISJ 6.1% 225,000
28 l'ri11ccton Off-Sole Only 4,755 4.042,590 2,990,980 l,0Sl,610 16.0"1, 557,057 494,553 28,S99 523.452 lVJ�I, 171,440
t=outnutcs:
[OJ lnfurnmcio11 i._ t:.tkt:n tiun, a cash 1cl:1:ipts anJ Jisbursrn,cnls slalc.:nu:nt. 111,J Thi; cnll·rruisc upc.:ration \\ .is suit.I. 12 IJ The enterprise funJ Jiscontinrn:J opcrutiuns Juring lh..: cum:nl y�;.u·.
ll�J The enterprise !'um.I Wa'\ not in Of')l°Tation, 13�] The ucc;nial basis uf accuuntin� is u:;i:J; howc,-.;r. nu t.lc11n:cialion. Net transfo1s ate cak:ulaled hy subtrat;tint:: transfors in from tr,mst\.'rs out. A positi\"e amuunl imJic.:alL·s a g1-:atc1 lcvi.:I ut'lransl'crs uul than in.
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session
Table 6
Comparison of City Liquor Store Operations -2017
Ranked by Gross Sales
Gron Profit Opcr11ting Nonupcrating Net l'rullt/(L<lss)
Soles Cust urSak:s Amount Pc.•rccnt Expenscl!l lncumc/(Luss) Revenues Expenses Amount Prrccnt Net Tnndcrs• Rankin� 'lorn< of City Type of Sturc Fuvtnotet Popalatiun (SJ (SJ (SJ of Sales (SJ (SJ (SJ (SJ (S) of Sales (SJ
Lakeville O11'-Sale Only 61,99f 14,SIJ,514 11,005.245 3,571,269 24.5% 2,Sll,277 1,059,992 12,651 112,516 960,127 6.6% 536,253
EJina OllCSale Only 52,497 12,991,764 9.442,254 3,549,510 21.3% 2,536,414 1,013,096 23,253 29.�l7 1,007.132 7,fc'!U 750.000
Richfield Olf-Sale Only 36,544 I l,JSl,640 8,SOS,073 2,146,567 25.1% 2,211,S* 635,021 IS,410 650,4]1 S.7% 181,190
EJ�n Pr.iiril! OflCSolcOnly 6),72(1 10,501,449 7,S48,M2 2,'152,607 2K.1% 2,33 l,6Y1 620,915 14.H,::! f>JS,077 6.0% 700.000
Apple Valley Off.Sale Only 52,361 9,113,272 6,473,27' 2,709,997 29.5% 1,750,717 959.280 23,087 26,196 955,471 10.4% 630,000
Culumbi-, Heights Oil-Sak Only ]0,!53 , J:?ci52 .::!M-l,:!�>5 2,IJJ,157 ijj�. 1,f>I ,I 5U".949 '> 54"> lh2..,J1X J >6t::!,1 4. "., (55· 71
7 ElkRi•er Olf-Sale Only 24,567 6,951,911 4,9lSJ31 2,026,457 29.1% 1,105,442 921,0IS 44,010 965,025 13.9'/, 710,166
Dclruil L;ikcs Off-Sale Only 9,4119 6,530,J.l.4 4,7(,1,70(, l,767,63K 27.1% KS I ,KOK 915,830 K,5011 139,0(,2 7K5,2<,K 12.0�;, 553,1191
9 Brooklyn Center Olf-Solo Only 31,145 6,495,300 4,769,144 1,725,456 26.6% 1,434,340 291,116 24.138 31S,H4 4.9'/4 112,898
IO Waytala On-& Ol'ICSuk 4,K04 6,IK4,K91 3,127,3<,7 3,057.524 49.4% 2,625,555 431,969 30,2211 123,570 JJK,619 5.5�-37K.UOU
II H111ehlnson Olf-Sale Only 14,181 6,141,131 4,712,918 1,435,ISO 23.3% 902.131 533,012 l,617 19,253 516,+16 8.-t•;. S00.000
12 Bemidji O11:salcOnly 15,549 5,952,150 4,IK3,461 1.768,689 29.7�-u 1,JJK,357 r,JCJ,332 15,112 420 (145,024 IIU<1!U 75(,.75�
13 Fc1J1U1falls Off-Sale Only 13,754 5,921,595 4,196,175 1,72$,420 29.1% 1,129,070 596,350 15,928 6,110 605,468 10.2% S83,S62
1-1 Monticello Off-Sole Only 13,553 5,755,166 4,23(1,016 1,525.150 26.5% 880.415 64-1,735 19.KO0 1•64,535 11.5�� IK0.000
IS Saini Anthony Off-Sale Only 9,200 5,714,000 4,354,933 1,359,067 23,8% 1,2G9,23S 149,832 S7,Sll 207,343 3.6% 249,060
16 Alexandria Oll'Sole Only 13,673 5,652,816 4,372,398 1,!R0.41 R 22.7% 1.1149,5-17 230.871 :!.IS9 7.072 ::!15,'15K 4.f>'!i, 2.25,000
17 Combrid .. Olf-Solc Only 8,161 5,532,308 4,171,917 1,353,391 24.5% 864,427 411,964 1,116 497,010 9.0'/4 469,000
18 Fridley Off-Sale Only 28,667 5,520,161 4,046,642 1,473,519 26.7% 1,043,973 429,546 2,199 431,845 7.8% 338,500
19 Ruffolo Olf-Sale Only 16,247 S,192,Jn 3,752,676 J,439,699 27.7% 928,709 SI0,990 113.632 12,955 611,667 11.8% 425,000
20 t<"arminglon Oll'Salc Only 22,421 4,W.7,46K 3.707,Jl,3 1,260,105 25.4¾ 927,125 J32,9N0 9,7K0 J42,7b0 (J "�-24K.5n
21 Savoac O11'-Salc Only 30,713 4,817,711 3,710,$40 1,177;241 24.1% 1,171,314 5,864 79,333 (73,469) -1.S%
22 Ma1�h::il1 on:s,tlc Only 13,860 4.753,077 3,1,00,673 1,152,-104 24.2'Vi, 1,71.924 4K0,4N0 10,92K 77,6112 -113.NlH, K7% 225,0(10
23 Thier River Fall, Olf-Sale Only 8,931 4,Sll,364 3,456,$61 1,081,796 23.1% 72<1,327 357,*9 7,447 364,916 S.0% 423,039
14 Anoka on:salc Only 18,205 4,-128,64R 3,405,267 l.023,381 23.l% 853,665 169.716 11.399 IKl,115 4,1% 35,1100
2S Bisl.ake OIT.Sale Only 11,174 4.161,219 2,995,$21 1,165,698 28.0% 632,892 532,1(16 9,241 12,2119 S29,7S8 12.7°/4 350,000
26 Princclon Off-Sale Only 4,728 3,792,138 2,K0K,954 983,184 25.9�� 513.66� 469,520 17,274 486,794 1218�--188.260
27 WorlhinBfon Off.Sale Only 13,430 3,174,433 2,132,916 941,$17 24:9% 446,573 494,944 17,577 30,000 482,Sll 12.8% 225,000
28 f'nirmont Off-Sale Only 10,332 3,685,514 2,604,263 1,081,�51 29.3'/, 565,785 515,466 17,586 533,052 14.5�11 310.000
Fuutnut..:s:
[OJ lnfom1ation is taken from a ush rcl:CifllS and disburscmcnts :ilatcmcnr. [16] The cnh:rprisc upcrntion was suit.I. [2 IJ The t:ntcrprisc fund Jisc.:unlinucd upcraliuns JufinH tin: l'.Um:nt ycou, [32] The i:ntcrprisc f\ln<l wus nul in op._.ratiun. [34] Th1.: au:mal basis ufuccounting is uscJ; hmw,·cr, nu Ji.:pn:ciation. [35] UnaudilcJ numbers uscJ, audikd numbers us1:J in rrc\'iuus yL"ars. Nd tnmsfct'-arc t:alculat1.-J by sublrading transfi.:r.; in frum tmnsfc1s out. A positin� amount inJkatt;s u g11:ah:1 kvd of trunskrs out thun in
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session
Table 6
Comparison of City Liquor Store Operations -2016
Ranked by Gross Sales
Gross Profit Operating Nonopcruting Net l'roOV(Loss)
Sulcs Cost o,-Sales Amount Pcn:cnl Expenses lncome(Loss) Rcvcnut.•s Expenses Amount rcrccnt Net Trunstcrs• Ranking �amc of City Type or Store Footnotes Populalion {$) (SJ ($) or Sales (SJ (SJ (S) (S) ($) of Sales (§)
Lakeville Off-Sale Only 60:965 1-1,130,&30 10,666.687 3,-464,143 24.S¾ 2.453,328 1,010,815 6,667 136,61S 880,867 6.l'Y. 1,074,318
Et.Jina OflCSalcOnly 5 l,R04 12,937,on 9,625,215 3,311,877 25.6�0 2,505,039 KU6,838 21,488 �18,31(1 c,.41!V 700,00U
Eden Prairie Off-Sale Only 63,163 10,747,887 7,733,328 J,014,559 28J)'I, 2,709,869 304.690 14,290 318,980 3.0'/4 700,000
Ri1.:hliclc.J Ot'JCSalc Only 3C.,33K 10,457,JIK 7,82K,%7 2,62K,35 I 25.J�;. 2, 134,t)t)2 49J,)59 :W,07'J 513,43K 4.tl�U )X:!,'.!10
Apple Valley Off-Sale Only 51,JJ8 8,731,804 6,171,691 2,56 ,I 13 29.41/c) 1,682,574 884,539 37,998 28,974 893,563 10.2% 630,000
'ulu111biu l·ktghts { fl-Sah:: Uni 20,15X ,'lhX:� (iJ\J2,U1J0 2,U7h,UOH 24 S"u 16�� � JI 1'11,�0(J I 1>X,Ul J '"u 5<,KJK
Elk River OIF-Sale Only 24,368 7,009,574 4,997,934 2,011,640 28.7'/4 l,06S,988 94S,6S2 287 945,939 13.51/4 704,S67
Detroit L..ikcs ()J'J:Salc Only 9,JXO (1,J 13,527 4,611,,94K 1,696.579 26.9% KOK,'J55 KX7,624 13.7hl 143.772 757,615 12,0�U l5K,7K5
9 Bruoklyn Center Orr-Sole Only 31,23 I 6,197,094 4,611,919 1,585, 17S 25.6'A 1,465.?'IO 119,38S 2S,108 144,493 2.3�0 JJK,935
10 Hulchinson OilCSalc Onl)' 14.146 5,9KK,2 I 9 4,60'),147 1,379.072 '.!3.0�U K17,K59 561,2 IJ 3,729 '.D.Ml<1 541,25() 9 O'�;. 475,111111
II Wayzata On-& Ofr-Sal• 4,671 5,841,519 2,987,361 2,854,158 48.9'1', 2,38),3,1-1 470,814 22,969 124.318 369,46S 6.3% Jl,150
12 Saint Anlhony O11:salc Only 9.:!34 5,8:!'.!.7l0 4.4(,K,066 J,354,717 :!J 31!;. 1,150,372 204,345 59,USK 2(>3.403 4.5'!;, 249J)-t9
13 Bemidji Ofr-Sale Only 15,119 5,817.125 4.156,838 l.�.287 28.5% 955,104 705,183 18,152 10,095 713,240 12.3'/4 450,178
14 Fergus F.ills Otl'Salc Only 13,651 5,797,619 4,154,598 1,643,021 2H.3% 1,049.392 5113.(,29 15,577 13,7-14 51J5;46:! 1113':;, 594,044
15 Monlicello Off-Sale Only 13.409 5.450,630 4,041,224 1,409,406 2S.9o/, 836,048 S73,358 12,663 586,021 I0.8o/1 350,000
11, t\lcxandri:i ()l)CSale Only 13,575 5,445,li JJ 4.'.!62,96\ 1, 1k1,(i5'.! 21.7�0 954.R69 �27,7K3 3,231 7,(109 '.!:!J,405 4.1':;, '.!:!5,000
17 FriJley Off-Sale Only 28,631 5,439,423 3,976,342 1,463,081 26.9% 1,030,169 432,912 (1.113) 431,799 1.9'1, 338,500
18 Ca1nbrid�e OJlCSolc Only 8,749 5,397,066 4,077.693 1,319,373 24 4�.;, 843. 185 476, I 88 8,b05 -184,793 9.0�� 525,0110
19 Bufti,lo OIT-S1lc Only 16,119 4,978,926 3,603,417 1,375,509 27.61/t 972,413 403,096 120,485 19,365 504,216 I0.1•., 450,001
:w fmminglon 011:s;,lc Only 11,3-U 4,742.3 I 3 3,537.858 1,204,455 25.4�d 911.0H :?93,)K\ I J.552 3U4,9JJ h 4'!;, 104,113
21 Thief River Falls OIT-Sale Only 8,845 4,650,648 3,597.554 l,0S3,094 22.6% 637.601 4",493 6.031 421,524 9.lo/1 419,079
21 Mcushall Otl'SolcOoly 13,799 4,5-IX.623 3.J9X.45 I 1,150,172 25.J'!i. 1,34.9115 s1;,2,,1 2,833 94,7117 4:!J.)9J IJ J·�;. 274,91):!
23 Anoka Off-Sale Only 17,995 4,117,403 3.184,117 933,286 22.7% 864.832 68,454 18,443 86.897 2.1•1. J0,000
14 Big l::akc OJ!CSolc Onl)' JU,'JIK 3,940.355 2.78(1,995 1,153,31,0 29 3�;. 703.468 449.892 10,676 13.583 .:1-1(),9:-15 11.J� ;, 330.000
25 Savaec OIT-S1le Only 30,285 3,803,734 2.873.784 929,950 24.4o/, 994,530 (64,580) 368 41.%3 (106,175) 42,s,·o
26 Worthington Oll'S•lc Only 13,288 3,735,141 2,795,190 939,951 25.2�;. 491.859 448,092 12.271 460.363 12 J�i, 115,000
27 F1irmunl Off-Sole Only 10,353 3,683,737 2,616,4)7 1,067,300 29.0'/e S34,591 532,709 14,834 495 547,048 14.9% 372.SOO
28 Princeton QfJCSale Only 4.735 3,670,039 :2,731,436 938,603 25.6% 5i0,932 367,671 24,488 392,159 10.11· .. (24.511l)
29 Ni11wo On-It Off-Salo 2,033 3,512,3S8 2,320,9K6 1,191,372 33.9% 887,479 303.893 J,772 S,626 302,039 8.6% 235,000
Footnotes:
Lill lnformalion is taken from a 1.:ash receipts and disbursenu:nls stat'cmc:nt. [16] The enterprise opc1;itio11 was sold [21] Tht cnh:rprise fund discontinue<! opcra1io11s during the l'Um:nl yc;.ir. [32] The c11h::1prisc fund v..is 1101 in operation [HJ The accural bosis of ,1ccounting is ustd; however. nu ch:pn:cialion Net transl-.!rs are calcul::itcd by suDtrncting transfors i11 l'rom transfers out. A positin: amount indic-,h:s .1 grcalcr level uftransfcri out than in .
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session
Table 6 Comparison of City Liquor Store Operations -2015 Ranked by Gross Sales
Gross Profit Ncl l'rulil/(Lon)
Foot-Cost Percent OperaliDK Nonopcrating Percent Net RankinK Nam-,ul'Ci!2: T�et! ufStun � Pueutatiun Sal•• uf Sal•• Amuant � Execn!CS JncomdjLoss! R�vcnu�s Exeenses Amuunr uf Sales Traasfers*
I Lakeville Off-Sale Only 59,991 SI 3,61 l ,294 $10,322,174 $3,289,120 24.2% $2,358,249 S930,87I $8,866 $177,829 $761,908 5.6% Si,397,972 2 Edina OtlCSale Only 50,766 12,462,387 9,415,449 J,046,938 :!4.4% 2,403, I 53 643,785 9,599 653,384 5.2% 785,000
3 Eden Prairie Off-Sale Only 63,187 11,312,822 8,102,770 3,210,0S2 28.4'/4 2,266,947 943,105 11,133 954,238 8.4% 800,000 4 Richfield on:salo Only 36,557 J0,859,"42 8,21 0,714 2,648,928 24.41Yu 2,024,145 624,783 iJ,621 r,38.404 5.9% 724.4711
5 Apple Valley Off-Sale Only 50,161 8,480,414 6,037,204 2,443,210 28.8"/4 1,626,498 816,712 43,011 II l,731 747,992 8.8% 600,000 11-eo!umbiu Heights Off-Sale Only 19,99 ,)99,94., ,,(JJK,891 2,1161,052 I , ,OOJ '.'.! .3 I 11)] ,,322.745 1 ... ,, �Q
7 Elk Rlver Off-Sale Only 23,987 6,974,336 4,905,302 2,069,034 29.7% 1,039,824 1,029,210 35,687 1,064,897 IS.Jo;.-689,718 8 Brooklyn Center Off-Sale Only 30,864 6,056,668 4,431,501 1,625.167 26.1!% I ,1<,7.050 258.117 20.018 2711,135 4.6% 2 I f>,455 9 Deln>itLakcs Off-Sale Only 9,290 6,003,631 4,393,011 1,610,620 26.8"/4 722,663 887,957 9,044 149,184 747,817 12.5% 626,842
10 Saint Anthuny OflCSale Only 9,277 5,893,916 4,572,858 1,321,058 22.4¾ 1,147,414 173,644 76,287 249,93 l 4.2% 249.049 11 Hutc;hinson Off-Sale Only 14,170 5,850,319 4,485,368 1,364,951 23.Jo/. 749,072 615,879 3,706 27,951 591.634 l0.1% 465,000
12 Bemidji Off-Sale Only 14,969 5,700,262 4,044,785 1,655,477 29.0% 886,027 76\1,450 20,18:? 5,682 783.950 13.K% 728,369 13 Fergus F1l11 Olf-Sole Only 13,288 5,684,343 4,040,200 1,644,143 28.9% 1,009,272 634,871 13,467 20,390 627,948 11.0% 870,034
14 Way,ata On-& Oft'Salc 4,564 5,579, I kk 2,889,826 2,6k9,J62 4k.2% 2,223.107 4(,6,255 20,Jkl 134,257 352,379 6.3% 150,000
15 Monticello Off-Sole Only 13,311 5,493,925 3,969,587 1,524,338 27.7% 801,545 722,793 3,015 725,808 13.2•/4 450,000
16 Fridley OIT-Sale Only 28.547 5,256,840 3,909,856 1,346,984 '.!5,6% 997.347 349,637 11,505 361.142 6.9°/u )38.600
17 Alexandria O11'-Sole Only 13,340 S,184,029 3,963,842 1,220,187 23.So/o 878,150 342,037 201 8,434 333,804 6.4% 200,000
IK Cambridge OflCSalc Only K,4% 5.124,055 3.858,777 1,265,278 24.7% 798,323 466.955 I0,285 477.2-10 Y.)% 47X,UUO
19 Bufl'olo O11'-Salc Only 16,033 4,931,536 3,611,432 1,320,104 26.8°/4 856,241 463,863 113,482 25,399 551,946 11.2% 500,000
20 Thief River Foll• oncsalc Only k,765 4,745,301 3.(,92,771 1,052,530 22.2% "41,524 411,006 ,,,059 417,0"5 K.X% -119,07')
21 Farmington Off-Sale Only 22,451 4,607,417 3,467,487 1,139,930 24.7% 885,110 254,820 9,443 264,263 5.7% 91,504
22 Anoka Off-Sale Onl)' 17,665 4,174,041 3.157,252 1,016,789 24.4�0 828,359 188,430 18,J 19 206,749 5.0% 150,000
23 M111h1ll Off-Sale Only 13,793 4,027,419 3,119,194 908,225 22.6% 667,074 241,151 5,039 112,504 133,686 3.3% 324,996
24 Big Lake O11:sulc Only IU,671 3,914,7K2 2,847,583 1,067,19'! 27.3%591,493 475,70(, 7,XXN IK,2k0 -165.314 11.9% 275,000
25 Suvag,: Off-Sole Only 30,024 3,705,763 2,773,987 931,776 25.1%849,687 82,089 37,660 44,429 1.2%
2(> \Vurthin�ton Ofl'Sal• Only 13,2UK 3,642,919 2,715,975 926,944 25.4% 451,733 475,211 9,286 4X4,4'J7 13.)% 225.11()0
27 Fairmont Off-Sole Only 10,421 3,596,468 2,566,008 1,030,460 28.7% 479,430 551,030 9,719 560,749 15.6% 788,557
28 Princeton Off-Sale Only 4,736 3,487,073 2,588,629 898.444 :?5.8¾ 503,695 394,749 21,150 416,899 12.0o/o 180,182
29 Nisswa On-& Off-Sale 2,019 3,351,557 2,220,869 1,130,6811 33.7% 783,476 347,212 3,524 12,052 338,684 10.1% 280,000
30 Rogers On-& Otl'Salc 12,JX I 3,350,959 2,322,K40 1,028,119 30.7%(,77,469 350,65() (454)12,503 337,<,•)3 1().)% 214.534
31 Robbinsdale O11'-Sale Only 14,757 3,293,452 2,468,776 824,676 25.0% 724,292 100,384 4,901 105,285 3.2•;., 135,358
32 Perham Off-Sale Only 3,281 3,2J0,944 2,379,053 851,891 26.4% 455,129 396,762 13.544 10,980 399,326 12.4¾ 303.250
33 Park Rapids O11'-Sale Only 3,928 3,200,752 2,380,582 820,170 25.6% 518,319 301 ,851 2,352 304,203 9.5% 105,735
34 Lc:<ington O11:sale Only 2.040 3.193,545 2,518,596 674,949 21.1% 560,763 114,186 4,523 16,923 101,786 3.2% 75,000
35 Mora Off-Sale Only 3,51& 3,072,768 2,241,227 831,541 27.1%510,268 321,273 4,880 326,153 10.6% 270,000
3(, Northfield on:sale Only 20,320 3,072,255 2,332,505 739,750 24.lo/o 616,433 123,317 9,925 133,242 4.3·�� 125,000
37 Mound Off-Sale Only 9,209 2,964,851 2,1 84,124 780,727 26.3% 548,254 232,473 481 232,954 7.9% 59,493
JR Stacy On-& OtlCSolc 1,500 2,944.712 1,897,799 1,046,913 35.6% 777,623 169,290 32,100 69,813 231,677 7.9% K0.000
39 Hinckley On-& Off-Sale 1,815 2,713,374 1,154,009 859,365 31.7% 564,422 294,943 98 43,0114 25 1,957 9.3% 111,012
40 Soak Ropid, OftCSalc Only IJ,406 2,6<>4,675 2,046,435 618.240 23.2% 450,694 1(,7,54(, 4,852 172.39R ().5% 90,000
41 Lindstrom On-& Off-Sale 4,463 2,541,788 1,770,311 771,477 30.4% 57S,535 195,942 33,674 229,616 9.0¾ 104,230
42 Ddanu on:sale Only 5,864 2,487,1161 1,792,205 694,856 27.9% 494,898 199,958 1,540 201,498 8.1%100.000
43 Isanti Off-Sole Only 5,497 2,474,708 1,106,637 661,071 27.0'� 357,002 311,069 9,182 320,251 12.9"/4 300,000
44 North llranch OflCSalc Only IO,JJ0 2,358,255 I ,71 3,54X (,44,707 27.3%414,517 230,190 14) 17,119 21),214 9,0% 140.000
45 Litchfield Olf-S1le Only 6.761 2,321,959 1,792,524 529,435 22.8% 312,467 146,968 5,350 2,147 150,171 6.5% 59.000
46 Redwood Fall, OIT-Sale Only 5,214 2,283,952 1,693,233 590,719 25.9"/4 427,090 163,629 6,532 12,035 158,126 6.9"1.1 100.000
47 Monlevideo OIT-Solc Only 5,327 2,271,766 1,680,971 590,788 26.0% 499,954 90,834 2,512 93.346 4.1%100,000
48 Spring Lake Park Off-Sulc Only 6,513 2,174,016 1,622,722 551,294 25.4¾ 551,462 (168) 19.125 938 18,019 0.8% 75,000
49 Saint Francis Off-Sale Only 7,327 2,157,141 1,590,553 566,588 26.3% 396,260 170,328 12,474 IK2,802 8.5% 60.000
50 Two Horbor< OJtCSolc Only 3,685 2,134,571 1,580,475 554,0% 26.0% 361 ,ijX4 1112,112 1,204 1'13,3 JI, lJ,1% 2,0X0
SI Milaca Off-Sale Only 2,914 2,134,294 1,566,470 567,824 26.6% JS0,891 216,933 3,975 17,752 203,156 9.S"/• 52.230
52 Morris OIT-S,tle Only 5,418 2,068,194 1,575,389 492,805 23.8%306,236 186,569 4,945 191,5 14 9)% 121,800
53 Grand Morais Off-Sale Only 1,370 2.002,744 1,434,853 567,891 28.4% 320,069 247,822 3,294 251,116 12.5% 200,000
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session
Table 6
Comparison of City Liquor Store Operations -2014
Ranked by Gross Sales
Gross Profit Net l'rofiU(Loss)
Fool"-Cusl Percent Operating Ntmu11crating Pcrccnl Ncl
RotnkinK N•mc urCitv T�ec ofSton � Pueul•tlun s.,., of Sales Amuu11t � Rxetns�s lncume/iLossi Revenues Ex.eenscs Amount uf S•los ·rrunsfors*
Lakeville Off-S•le Only 59,361 S 14,883,858 SI 1,078,916 $3,804,942 25.6% $2,347,079 Sl,457,863 $52,851 $152,980 $1,357,734 9.1% Sl,369,063
Edina Oll'Sole Only 50,261 13,515,1(,K Q.93(,,41>8 3,578,700 26.5% 2,450,384 I, l:!M,3 lb 23,656 6,366 1,145,60(, M.5°{, 1.0)5,000
J Eden Prairie Off-Sale Only 62,593 12,198,670 8,1105,885 3,392,785 27.ll''lo 2,209,455 1,183,330 22,164 1,205,494 9.9% 1,000,001)
4 Rich lie Id Off-Sale Only 36,157 11,500,417 8,601,930 2,898,487 25.1% 2,01 7,81'1 880,668 15,679 �96)41 78% 7 I 6,4<,0
5 Apple Valley Off-Sale Only 50,330 9,292,224 6,600,147 2,692,077 29.0%1,612,171 1,079,906 94,885 112,141 1,062,650 11.4% 600,000
(, \.1lun;'hru1} lt:igiii", ()flCSolc Only 1,2.,0•1 X,41 5,:171 �J.Jl{1(d 2,07 I 0� 24J( '1u I 53(,.'ISZ 534 7'1, J'�U 223.1):!6 ·1 14 (l]0 (Jt),. 7 Elk River Off-Sale Only 23,730 6,825,342 4,750.195 2,075,147 30.4% 1,026,678 1,048,469 105,639 l,154,108 85, o
K S,iint Anthony Off-Sole Only K,965 6,078,039 4.704,566 1,373,473 2'.!.61!0 I, 174.674 198,7W 64,143 2!>2.942 43% 395,444
9 Brooklyn Center Off-S•le Only 29,889 5,852,465 4,293,383 1,559,082 26.6%1,354,123 204,959 21,810 37,560 189,209 J.2%362,190
IU Detroit Lakes ()flCSolc Only 11,053 5,7YK,K26 4,215,032 1,583,794 :!7.J'}·u !>57,%(, �25,K1M I h, 132 151,KOI 7tJU,151J 13.6% 54�_\}(1(1
II Hutchinson Off-Sale Only 14,124 5,612,423 4,311,031 1,301,392 23.2% 754,706 546,686 3,118 32,045 517,nY 9.2%450,000
12 Warzala On-& Off-Sale 4,47(, 5,581,912 2.78-1.167 2,797.745 SU.I%2.222,430 575.J 15 25.027 142.400 457,1/42 H.2�u 15'1,0U0
I) Fergus Fulls Off-Sole Only 13,280 5,567,249 3,976,930 1,590.319 28.6%943,274 647,045 31,924 26,607 652,362 11.7% 571,539
14 Bi:miclji OllCSok Only 14.376 5,556.520 3,905,273 1,651 ,247 '.:!9,7"'/u 837.815 k 13.432 13,950 21.976 805,406 145% 395,K I 0
IS Monticello Off-Sale Only 13,125 5,166,066 3,876,697 1 ,289,369 25.0%694,567 594,802 13,381 60K,lk3 ll.k% (.00,000
I<, Cambridge OllCSalc Only M,33X 4,1175,797 3,753,437 1,222,360 24.6% 7K3.S6'1 43K,7'11 7,2X7 446.07K lJ.0% 42'1.315
17 Fridley Oft�Sale Only 27,952 4,786,987 3,525,672 1,261,315 26.3•/o 1,070,644 190,671 11,855 202,521, 4.2°/,, 250,000
IK Ale,an<lri.i Off-Sule Only 13,182 4,714,369 3,604,0)2 1,110,337 .!J.6% .. KU7 ,839 302.498 403 9,4% 293,405 {1 2% 200,0110
19 Fannington Off-Sale Only 22,386 4,639,194 3,467,797 1,171,397 25.3%848,037 323,360 323,)60 7.0% 70,016
20 llutfalo Otl'Sole Only 15,911 4,632,524 3,319,129 I ,J 1 3,395 28.4% 787,108 526,287 188,937 J l ,JIJ� 683,921 14.IS�U 550.000
) 21 Thief River Falls Off-Sale Only 8,722 4,567,026 3,492,530 1 ,074,496 23.5%620,554 453,942 8,428 462,370 JO.I'% 373,677 ,, Sa\agc Off-Sale Only 29,047 4,245,/,0K 3,079,994 1,11,5.614 �7.5% 921 ,026 2+1,588 45.)6:! I Y9.226 .1.n<i
23 Anoka Off-Sale Only 17,586 4,179,462 3,253,385 926,077 22.2% 763,387 Hi2,690 37,816 200,506 4.K% 300,000
24 Marshall Of1'Sal< Only 13,719 3,934.677 2,919,504 1.0 I 5,173 :!5.1:J%, 448,948 566,225 1,805 568,030 14.41Vi, 375,000
25 Big Lake Off-Sale Only 10,587 3,725,408 2,649,008 1,076,400 28.9% 546,389 530,01 I 4,415 86,644 447,782 12.0% 312,245 :u, Worthington OflCSalc Only 12,986 3,449.343 2,570,234 879,109 25.5%435,9 14 443,195 6,699 449.�94 130% 225,000
27 Fairmont Off-Sak Only 10,464 3,446,047 2,469,101 976,946 28.3%482,SIIO 494,366 10,420 504,786 14.6% I 87,S0U
2X Park Ropius OllCSalc Only 3.901 J,:;5c,,957 .:!,536,7',17 820,160 2�.41}u 497,954 321,20(, 1,670 323,X76 9.61!0 161,JK0
29 Rogers On-& Off-Sole 12,230 3,354,995 2,294,289 1,060,706 31.6% 724,581 336,125 (1,231) 16,418 J 18,476 9.5%212,987
30 Pt inccton OllCSale Only 4,732 3,279,223 2,439,790 8)9,433 :!S.6% 540,804 2'J8,62<J 27,064 325,69.l 1) 9��55.239
31 Robbinsdale Off-Sale Only 14,512 3,171,109 2,343,440 827,669 26.1%659,839 167,830 16,237 184,067 5.8% 150,000
J::! Nisswa On-& Oil'Sale 2,015 3,167,951) 2. 194,7111 973,240 30.7%729.202 2H,03K l0,4211 233,618 7 4�;. 2Xll,IJO0
33 Northfield Off-Sole Only 20,JIJ 3,158,135 2,328,235 829,900 26.3%601,926 227,974 26,084 2S4,05K 8.0%136,607
34 l'crham OIJCSuk Only 3,204 3,0<iX.1>99 2,21>K,417 X00,2M2 26.1%376,024 424,25K 7,92K 2K, 772 403,414 13 I'¼, 139.250
35 Lexington Off-Sale Only 2,068 2,942,500 2,342,046 600,454 20.4'Y, 514,JJ0 86,124 13,229 19,003 80,350 2.7%75,000
J6 Mound Off-Sulc Only '1,318 '.2,919,731 2,158,289 7(, 1 ,442 26.1% 540,Q'll 220,451 27 220.478 7.6% 61.5'.?l}
37 Mora OflCSale Only 3,523 2,883,872 2,098,114 785,75ft 27.2%505,178 280,SR0 3,301 283,8ft I 9.8•/. 270,000
3M Stacy On-& O11:s.1te 1,501 2,796,166 l,K04,081 992,0H:<35.5% 741,779 250.30<, 32,121 72,931 2119,4%1 s·�v 111,1�10
39 llinckley On-& Off-Sale 1,794 2,55S,l 19 1,745,829 809,290 31.7% S62,917 246,373 1,137 48,833 t98,677 7.8% 107,704
40 S.1uk Rapids Off-Sule Only 13,307 2,493.531 1,920,291 573,240 23.0% 434.385 IJK,H55 7,910 146.765 5 9'¼, 7S.000
41 Delano Off-Sale Only 5,751 2,457,665 1,757,007 700,658 28.5% 453,625 247,033 2,070 249.103 10.1% 150,000
-12 Isanti OllCSak Only 5,-l(N 2,414,87(, 1.751.�38 662,<JJK 27.5% 358,507 304.43 1 14,587 319.0IK 13.2% 200,000
43 Lindstrom On-& Off-Sale 4,458 2,322,727 1,600,445 722,282 31.1 'lo 584,464 137.818 35,748 173,566 7.5% 331,030
44 Nurlh Branch OIT-S,de Only I0.2H6 2.264,471 1,644,771 1>19,700 27.4% 398,520 221.180 139 20,545 200,774 89% 140.U00
45 Montevideo on:salc Only 5,327 2,206,458 1,623,133 583,325 26.4% 472,412 110,913 2,110 113,023 S.1% 100,000
4(, Redwood Falls Ofl'Solc Only 5,207 2.20h.l<J4 l,C.1(,,133 590.0bl 2(,.7% JK<J,K'I0 200.171 X.312 12.739 195,744 �-9�·-100.IIO0
47 Litchfield Off-Sale Only 6,741 2,194,875 1,645,486 549,389 25.0% 361,,621 U2,76R 2,829 185,597 K.5%, 59,000
4K Miluca OllCSulc Only 2.'111 2,113,1111 l,5K2,73!530,36'} 25.J¾335,f,72 194,697 4,084 IY.%1 l 7K,H20 M 5�1" ')5,31(1
49 Saint Francis Off-Sale Only 7,296 2,109,482 1,551,662 557,820 26.4% 396,770 161,050 10,693 171.743 s.1•1. 66,685
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session
Kelli Bourgeois
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Mayor Schmitt:
My responses in blue below.
Joseph Kloiber
Monday, November 2, 2020 4:34 PM
Donna Schmitt; Kelli Bourgeois
RE: Questions for tonight
Columbia Heights 2019 TIF Disclosure.pdf
Joseph Kloiber CPA I Finance Director
City of Columbia Heights I Finance Department
590 40th Avenue NE I Columbia Heights, MN 55421
jkloiber@columbiaheightsmn.gov
100 Years of Columbia Heights
From: Donna Schmitt
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 1:38 PM
To: Kelli Bourgeois; Joseph Kloiber
Subject: Questions for tonight
Joe,
General Question:
How is the CARES funding going to show up on our 2020 budget?
Direct: (763) 706-3627 Main: (763) 706-3600
The grant revenue and expenditures will be reported in the CAFR in a separate fund of the type referred to as "non-major special revenue fund" with the fund name "272 Public Safety Grants -Other" . This fund has been used intermittently over the years, when significant public safety grants have been received, such as the SAFER firefighter grants a little while back.
What contracts do we need to be anticipating for 2021?
•Unions? Yes, not started yet•Insurance? Yes, but more or less completed•Police -towing and car wash? I think these are reviewed every year. I'm pretty sure the towing was just
completed recently.•Garbage/Recycling? Not for 2021•Attorney Contract? Not unless there is a price increase•Auditors? Not unless there is a price increase
Anything else? Anything else is managed at the departmental level.
Can you give us a list of any bonds coming due in 2021 or possibly available for renegotiation? There currently
are no bonds in the position to be refinanced or redeemed early.
1
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session
Also, can we get an up to date list of TIF properties for the city? Dates started and anticipated ending dates? I
have attached it here in pdf, but I think the EDA commissioners may get this when it is published in the newspaper each August.
Finance:
How has the change in staffing worked out? Good-for as much as one can tell in the space of 30 days.
Are all of the departments using the same credit card company for accepting payments? Currently we use three different processors. The trend will be towards even more processors, as the most secure department-specific
software for interacting with customers tends to have the customer "checkout cart" integrated with a particular processor that the software vendor chooses in advance of selling the software. So ultimately there will be nearly one processor for each major department. There will be some overlap. For example, the new processor for Library happens to be the same processor as for Liquor, but the Library has a different processor agreement
with different rules and pricing because it is obtained through a different vendor and has transactions that are
not similar to liquor.
This has been a long process transferring over to the new financial software system. How is the process going? When is the anticipated completion of transferring everything? This is addressed somewhat in the presentation tonight. Unofficially, we have our choice down to one vendor/product, but we are not ready to publicly
announce this until we complete some additional follow up applicable to the final candidate.
Does our new billing software allow us to send bills electronically? It allows customers to log-in and see their bill/accow1t status, including from mobile devices. The customers that opt out from paper bills would receive an email prompting them to log-in.
It was mentioned that the water meters have reached their lifespan and are being replaced as needed. What is the current cost to residents and the city for replacing this equipment? Single family and duplex residential bills have been charged $1 per month (forever) to cover the cost of the meter. These are the meters that are at the end
-of-life. I don't recall the replacement cost. I'll follow up on that later.
Commercial and multi-family customers are billed directly for their meters, but those were all replaced
relatively recently.
Just a point to be changed: PLEASE change all headings in all books referring to Personal Services to Personnel
Services. I am not aware that we are not providing personal services at this time! Don't want to know that that
is! Point taken. We are beginning a multi-year transition of pretty much the entire format used for the
budget. We will look to label that category more logically.
Neither term is ideal. The term Personal Services is used within financial reporting, but it technically should include not just employee labor but also contracted labor, and in some cases professional services such as outside attorneys and outside accountants. The term Personnel Services typically refers to HR type services provided to employees.
Thanks!
Donna Schmitt, Mayor
dschmitt@columbiaheightsmn.gov
2
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session
Columbia Heights EDA
Annual Disclosure of Tax Increment Districts for the Year Ended December 31, 2019
l (T4) KMart/Central
(CB) University Avenue (K2) TIF 4 Multi Plan Avenue [KMart/Central (T6) Huset Park Area
TIF District Name: Redev. [University] Cargill (MURP] Avenue] [Huset Park] Current net tax capacity 0 38,921 257,161 648,747
Original net tax capacity 0 4,721 82,831 18,467
Captured net tax capacity 0 34,200 174,330 630,280
Principal and interest payments due during current year 43,807 3588 0 589,459
Tax increment received 12,199 36,780 202,199 667,996
Tax increment expended 3,445 5,647 231,545 619,875
Month and year of first tax increment receipt Jul-85 Jun-95 Jul-OS Jul-06
Date of required decertification 12/31/2010 12/31/2020 12/31/2020 12/31/2031 Increased property tax imposed on other properties as a
result of fiscal disparities contribution • a ..8,642 •• N/A 0 ..
(Z6) 47th and Grand RB (TIF 9) Crest View
(Z2) Central Valu Center [Leased Housing [Crest View/Real Estate
TIF District Name: [Hyvee] Associates ] Equities] Scattered Site
Current net tax capacity 60,410 0 50,574 35,327
Original net tax capacity 102,068 0 2,631 4,688
Captured net tax capacity 0 0 47,943 30,639
Principal and interest payments due during current year 0 0 48,039 43,807
Tax increment received 0 0 55,372 41,883
Tax increment expended 0 1,042 50,057 7,662
Month and year of first tax increment receipt Jul-19 Jul-20 Jul-02 Jul-15
Date of required decertification 12/31/2044 12/31/2045 12/31/2027 12/31/2040
Increased property tax imposed on other properties as a
result of fiscal disparities contribution • N/A N/A 0 .. 0 ..
• The fiscal disparities property tax law provides that the growth in commercial-industrial property tax values is shared throughout the area. In a tax increment
financing district, this value sharing can either result in a decrease in tax increment financing district revenue or a tax increase for other properties in the
municipality depending on whether the tax increment financing district contributes its share of the growth.
•• Amounts displayed here indicate that the district did not contribute its growth in commercial-industrial property tax values and represent the resulting
increase in taxes on other properties in the City for taxes payable in 2019.
Additional information regarding each district may be obtained from:
Aaron Chirpich, Community Development Director
590 40th Avenue NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421
(763) 706-3675
achirpich@columbiaheightsmn.gov
Distributed 11/2/20 at the Work Session