Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-13-1993AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1993, 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 590 40TH A VENUE NE The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all City of Columbia Heights' services, programs, and activities. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Council Secretary at 782- 2800, Extension 209, to make arrangements. (TDD/782-2806 for deaf only) 1.Call to Order and Roll Call 2.Pledge of Allegiance I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. 3.Consent Agenda (All items listed with asterisks[***] are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted as part of the Consent Agenda by one motion.) ***4. Minutes of Previous Meeting(s) 5.Open Mike/Proclamations/Presentations (Open Mike is an opportunity for residents to address or raise any issue to the City Counci: However, the City Council ash that the resident provide their name, address, and a statement of the item. The matter win be considered by the City Council or referred to staff for a future response. 11' orcler to expedite business, residents will be allotted five minutes to present their statement or issue.) 6.Public Hea1-ings/Ordinances & Resolutions a.Resolution 93-___ ; Being a Resolution Adopting a Proposed Budget for the Year 1994 and Sett"ing the Proposed Tax Levy Collectable for the Year 1994 :.;. Resolution 93-___ ; Heing a Resolution Approving a Lotspiit (4545 and 4557 J\fadison Jtreet NE) Reference Planning and Zoning minutes, Item 7A. c.Resolution 93-__ ; Being a Resolution Approving a Lotsplit (4025 Stinson Boulevard) Reference -Pl?.:,ning and Zoning minutes, Item 7A. d.First Reading of Ordinance 1270; Being an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of l.977, Pertaining to Conditional Use Permits e.First Reading of Ordinance 1272; Being an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, as amended, Pertaining to Non-Conforming Signage f.First Reading of Ordinance 1274; Being an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977 as amended, pertaining to Flood Plain g.First Reading of Ordinance 1275; Being an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, as amended, pertaining to the Housing Maintenance Code h.First Reading of Ordinance 1276; Being an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, as amended, pertaining to Penalties for Violation of the Housing Maintenance Code i.Other Ordinances and Resolutions 7.Communications a.Planning· and Zoning Commission 1.Variance/Site Plan Approval, 455 NE 37th Avenue, Frank and Mary Jo Miske, Jr. ***2. Special Purpose Fence, 4423 Arthur Street NE, Cynthia Joseph ***3. Conditional Use Permit, 5003 University Avenue NE, Kay Kuba, Global Computronics ***4. Variance, 200 NE 44th Avenue, Grace and Truth Chapel b.Traffic Commission c.Appointments to Various Boards and Commissions d.Other Communications 8.Old Business •••a. Authorization to Purchase IBM AS400 ***b. Authorization to Replace Wooden Window Sills and Door Frames at Library c.Other Old Business 9.New Business a.Duration of a Light Duty Meter Reader Position b.Authoriu.tion to El'.ec�!:� Agre,'.!1r.ent with l\fforrfable Suburban Housing, Inc. Consortium•••c.Supplemental Agreement to Increase/Decrease Quantities for Project #9300 -Misce1laneous Concrete d.Award of Bids for Projects #9113, #9123, and #9125 e.A ward of Bid to Repair/Resurface Tennis Courts -Project #9303 & 9305 ***f. · Authorization to Dispose of City Vehicles •••g. Authorization to Seek Bids to Seal Well at Jackson Pond h.Other New Business 10.Reports a.Report of the City Manager b.Report of the City Attorney •• • 11. Licenses ***12. Payment of Bills Adjournmen t 93/109 Pat Hentges City Manager � Mayor Donald J. Murzyn. Jr. Councilmembers Sean T. Clerkin Bruce G. Nawrocki Gary L. Peterson Robert W. Ruettimann City Manager Patrick Hentges '· * CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIG 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (612)782-2800 LINDA MAGEi: ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER September 10, 1993 The following is the agenda for the regular meeting of the City Council to be held at 7:00 PM on Monday, September 13, 1993, in the City Council Chambers of City Hall at 590 40th Avenue NE, Columbia Heights, Minnesota. The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all City of Columbia Heights' services, programs, and activities. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Council Secretary at 782-2800, Extension 209, to make arrangements. (TDD/782-2806 for deaf only) 1-Call to Order and RolJ Cali ·"),., Pledge of Allegiance' I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. �Consent Agenda (All items listed with asterisks[***] are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted as part of the Consent Agenda by one motion.) RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt the consent agenda items as indicated with an asterisk (* **)on the Regular Council Agenda. "-4. Minutes of Previous Meeting(s) " *** RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of August 23, 1993, as presented in writing; and such reading be dispensed with. 5.Open Mike/Proclamations/Presentations (Open Mike is an opportunity for residents to address or raise any issue to the City Council. However, the City Council asks that the resident provide their name, address, and a statement of the item. The matter will be considered by the City Council or referred to staff for a future response. In order to expedite business, residents will be allotted five minutes to present their statement or issue.) "SERVICE IS OUR BUSINESS" EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2 Council Meeting of September 13, 1993 6.Public Hearings/Ordinances & Resolutions � Resolution 93-__ ; Being a Resolution Adopting a Proposed Budget for the Year 1994 and Setting e Proposed Tax Levy Collectable for the Year 1994 J ECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies \ (j available to the general public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution 93-__ ; being a Resolution Adopting a Proposed Budget for the Year 1994 and Setting the Proposed Tax Levy in the amount of$ ___ _, establishing a budget hearing date of December 8, 1993, at 7:00 PM and a continuation date of December 15, 1993, at 7:00 PM in the City Council Chambers. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve a proposed HRA levy and budget of $71,040 for the year 1993. \i,_ Resolution 93-__ ; Being a Resolution Approving a Lotsplit (4545 and 4557 Madison Street NE)IV Reference Planning an� Zoning minutes, Item 7A. _ IJ RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies _ \ available to the general public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution 93-__ ; Being a Resolution Approving a Lotsplit ( 4545 and 4557 Madison Street NE) . • �/Resolution 93-__ ; Being a Resolution Approving a Lotsplit (4025 Stinson Boulevard) { Reference Planning and Zoning minutes, Item 7A. M RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies J available to the general public. U RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution 93-__ ; Being a Resolution Approving J { a Lotsplit ( 4025 Stinson Boulevard). First Reading of Ordinance 1270; Being an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, Pertaining to Conditional Use Permits RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the ordinance, there being ample copies available to the general public. RECOMMENDED MQTIQ.N-r-(ME)ev-e-to...schedule the second reading of Ordi�1270; Being an Ofilinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of f977, and Pertam1ng"1o°"'Conditional Use • I 1' � -I Permits for September 27, 1993. e.First Reading of Ordinance 1272; Being an Ordinance Amending Ordinance-No. 853, City Code "of1977, as amended, Pertaining to Non-Conforming Signage _ l.&,_ECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the ordinance, there being ample copiesv-;;ailable to the general ublic. \ , J COMMENDED MOTION: Move to schedule the second reading of Ordinance 1272; Being aOrdinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977,ing Signage for September 27, 1993. �J=· IA--\ (�� COUNCIL AGENDAPage 3 Council Meeting of September 13, 1993 �;-First Reading of Ordinance 1274; Being an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of1977 as amended, pertaining to Flood Plain RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the ordinance, there being ample copiesavailable to the general public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to schedule the second reading of Ordinance 1274; Being anOrdinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977 as amended, pertaining to Flood Plainfor September 27, 1993. i:rst Reading of Ordinance 1275; Bemg an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, Tu1977, as amended, pertaining to the Housing Maintenance Code RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the ordinance, there being ample copiesavailable to the general public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to schedule the second reading of Ordinance 1275; Being anrdinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, as amended, pertaining to the HousingMaintenance Code for September 27, 1993. / ·First Reading of Ordinance 1276; Being an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of1977, as amended, pertaining to Penalties for Violation of the Housing Maintenance Code RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the ordinance, there being ample copiesavailable to the general public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to schedule the second reading of Ordinance 1276; Being anOrdinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, as amended, pertaining to Penalties forViolation of the Housing Maintenance Code for September 27, 1993. 1.Other Ordinances and Resolutions � 7.Communications a.Planning and Zoning Commission Please reference the minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission of September 7, 1993. !\Variance/Site Plan Approval, 455 NE 37th Avenuer Frank and Mary Jo"'Miske, Jr. I RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to apprnve the request for a variance of 28 parking spaces (\f/ from the 87 spaces required for the proposed construction at 455 NE 37th A venue provided the V above items-number 1-5 are satisfied. However, should the ownership of the property and/or the use of the facility be changed from the current proposed usage, the variance would no longer apply. ***2. Special Purpose Fence, 4423 Arthur Street NE e .�nthia Joseph _1,. J�'tcoMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the five foot high special purpose privacy fence\)Y as requested for 4423 Arthur Street. COUNCIL AGENDA Page 4 Council Meeting of September 13, 1993 **�. �onditional Use Permit, 5003 University Avenue NE 1:Kay Kuba, Global Com.putronics us r RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the conditional use permit to allow the installation of a tent in the parking lot of 5003 University Avenue from September 28-30, 1993, provided a $500 check is submitted to the City prior to the erection of the tent to assure its removal by October 1, 1993. �**� Variance, 200 NE 44th Avenue ? -Grace and Truth Chapel ('\ )J RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the 24 foot front yard setback variance to allowV the existing freestanding sign to remain in its present location at 200 NE 44th A venue. b.Traffic Commission As there was not a quorum present, the Traffic Commission had no items for approval by the City Council. c.Appointments to Various Boards and Commissions RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to appoint the following residents to various boards and commissions: Ruth Graham ....... Cable Communications Commission Term to Expire April, 1994 Gerald Foss ........ Park & Recreation Commission ...... Term to Expire April, 1998 Daniel Duda . . . . . . . Traffic Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Term to Expire April, 1997 Joseph Sturdevant . . . Traffic Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Term to Expire April, 1999 8, Old Business .. *a. Authorization to Purchase IBM AS400 RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to table this item until the Council Meeting of September 27, 993. ***b. Authorization to Replace Wooden Window Sills an oor Frames a_tT c.Other Old Business COUNCIL AGENDA Page 5 Council Meeting of September 13, 1993 OMMENDED MOTION: Move to create a light duty meter reader position, due to Worker's ompensation disability, not to exceed one year or until the retirement of Myrtice Degenstein, and to appropriate $5,272 from Retained Earnings in the Water Fund and Sewer Fund administrative bu*ts for this position. utho/izatio.n to Execute Agreement with Affordable Suburban Housing, Inc. Consortium COMMENDED MOTION: Move to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the preliminary agreement for exclusive negotiations with Affordable Suburban Housing, Inc. Consortium on Sheffield Neighborhood. ** tSupplemental Agreement to Increase/Decrease Quantities for Project #9300 -Miscel \� RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve Supplemental Agreement #1 to the Miscellaneous j ¥ Concrete Contract, Project #9300; and, furthermore, to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to'\ enter into an agreement for the same. f vJ:-o"'-�}' J...7 l'Y'JA� of Bids for Projects #9113, #u'I 11 � .. ,. � MMENDED MOTION: Move to award bids for Projects #9113, #9123 and #9125 to Lametti a�Sons of Hugo, Minnesota, as the lowest, qualified responsible bidder in the amount of $134,283udgeted in line item 652-49499-5130; and, furthermore, to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement for the same. of Bid to Repair/Resurface Tennis Courts -Project #9303 & 9305 , o/:'§E MMENDED MOTION: Move to award bid for Projects #9303 and #9305 Option __ to �i minous Consulting and Contracting Company, Inc. of Minneapolis, MN, as the lowest, qualifiedsponsible bidder in the amount of$ _______ , budgeted in line item 101-45200-5130; and, furthermore, to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement for the same. orization to Dispose of City Vehicles COMMENDED MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to dispose of Municipal Units �0410 -1984 Ford Crown Victoria, #PD46 -1988 Chevrolet Caprice, #0406 -1985 Ford Crown Victoria and #0408 -1984 Ford Crown Victoria at the Hennepin County Auction scheduled for October 2, 1993. **•g. Authorization to Seek Bids to Seal Well at Jackson PQ RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to authorize sta Jackson Pond. �e, New Business COUNCIL AGENDA Page 6 Council Meeting of September 13, 1993 10.Reportsa.Report of the City Managerb.Report of the City Attorney11.Licenses***RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the 1993 license applications as listed upon payment of proper fees. 12.Payment of Bills*"'*RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pay the bills as listed out of proper funds. Adjournment RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adjourn. v��:1ry!J . 1 . /. -£-t ;-.,vr;;r ,�� PH:bs 93/109 Attachments � :r.... ? V ';r';2:!e 0, <.___/ i J ��t Hentg. es /L'r r �1{._ ,A � / l ity Manageif 1 , vi�� -J r-'!": j, -l -- ,_,, -, -&'7 -sz . a K 0:/t ,.,,.- :� , v� �f,J:ufl,t, -rr �· Jl/f v. , � �r,c · (nf� {I � -rJ-,J- � �) �-�-A r' . u lfiA"A�-· .. -� w,J-J;F/G 9 �o;, Jf. OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 23, 1993 The Council Meeting was called to order at 7100 p.111. by Mayor Murzyn. l. 2. 3. 4 s. ROLL CALL Nawrocki, Clerkin, Ruettimann, Peterson, Murzyn -present PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CONSENT AGENDA The followino items were approved on the Consent Aoenda: Minutes of Previous Meeting The Council approved the minutes of the August 9, 1993 Council Meetino as presented. Establish Date for Public Special Assessment Levy Hearing The Council established Monday, November 29, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. as the Public Special Assessment Levy Hearinq to be held in the Council Chambers. License Applications The Council approved the license applications as listed upon payment of proper fees. Payment of Bills The Council approved the payment of bills as listed out of proper funds. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Nawrocki, second by Clarkin to approve the Consent Aoenda as presented. Roll call: All ayes • OPEN MIKE/PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS A resident suooested that City crews check for trees which cover stop signs. He also felt there had been limited response from the Council and the Police Department to the di•cua�ions had at the Town Meeting for the Sheffield llel9hboYhood. Members of the Counci 1 adviaed him thi• was not accura·h1r and cited numerous ataff activities which responded to connents or requests made at the Town Meeting . A resident from the Sheffield Neighborhood atated it is much more enjoyable to live in her area recently. She has seen dramatic improvements and appreciates these changes. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 23, 1993 PAGE 2 6. a. PUBLIC HEARINGS/RESOLUTIONS/ORDINANCES Resolution No. 93-39; Being a Resolution for Collection of Annual Water Testing Fee for the State Department of Health The annual fee for the water testino ta $5.21 for each aervice connection in the City. Councilmember Nawrocki recalled that last year one half of the fee was paid by the City. He felt this practice should be continued. Motion by Nawrocki, second by Ruettimann to direct staff to draft a resolution that would keep the policy of handlino this fee the same as last year and that the funds should be taken from the General Fund if it appears that the Undesiqnated Fund is becoming depleted. The motion was withdrawn as the City Attorney recommended language to change the resolution in the agenda packet which would accomplish the same end. He read the resolution in its amended form. RESOLUTION NO. 93-39 RESOLUTION FOR COLLECTION OF ANNUAL WATER TESTING FEE FOR THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WHEREAS: the federal government has mandated a water testing program; and WHEREAS: the Department of Heal th has been authorized to assess an annual fee of $5.21 for every service connection to a public water supply; and WHEREAS: the public water supply operator (City) is to collect the fees and remit said fees to the State on a quarterly basis. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS: :l. That the fee of $2.61 be placed on the utility bill as an annual fee. 2.The bal,nce be expended from the Water Fund. 3.That it be clearly delineated on the utility bill thatthis is a State water testing fee for a federallymandated testing prooram. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 23, 1993 PAGE 3 b. Passed this 23rd day of August, 1993. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll call: Nawrocki Ruettimann All ayes Mayor Donald J. Murzyn, Jr. Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary Resolution No. 93-40; Beina a Resolution Offering Early Retirement Incentives Motion by Murzyn, second by Peterson to waive the reading of the resolution there being ample .copies available for the public. Roll call: All ayes Councilmember Nawrocki noted he will abstain from voting on this resolution as he may be impacted by this law. Councilmember Ruettimann indicated he intends to abstain from voting as he feels there should be more information regarding money which could be saved. RESOLUTION NO. 93-40 RESOLUTION TO OFFER EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVES WHEREAS, Laws 1993, Chapter 192, authorizes cities to offer an early retirement incentive to certain employees, and WHEREAS, the early retirement incentive proqram is limited to employees who: 1.Have at least 25 years of combined aervice credit in any, state pension plan or are at least aoe 65 with at least one year of combined crediti 2.Are immediately eligible upon retirement for an annuityfrom a defined benefit plan; 3.Are at least 55 years old, and 4.Retire on or after May 17, 1993 and before January 31,1994. WHEREAS, the City of Columbia Heights can make one of the two authorized options available at no direct cost to the City or its taxpayers. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 23, 1993 PAGE 4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota: 1.City employees who are eligible under Laws 1993, Chapter192, and are covered under Minnesota Statutes, Section 353.29and 353.30, are hereby authorized to accept and receive themultiplier percentage increase authorized by Laws 1993,Chapter 192, Section 108, aubdivision 3(b}. 2.It is not the intent ofemployer paid hospital,continuation benefit optionCity employees. the resolution to authorize any medical, or dental insurance for any City employees or former 3.Any vacancy created when an e�ployee has taken an earlyretirement incentive as authorized by this resolution, shallbe filled only after passaoe of a resolution or motion passedby the City Council in which the vacant position is describedand the need to fill the position is stated. Passed this 23rd day of August, 1993. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll call: Murzyn Peterson Clerkin, Peterson, Murzyn -aye Nawrocki, Ruettimann -abstain Mayor Donald J. Murzyn, Jr. Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary c.Resolution No. 93-41; Being a Resolution DesignatingElection Judges for the 1993 Primary/General Elections . Motion by Nawrocki, second by Clerkin to waive the reading of the resolution� there being ample copies avai !able for the public. Roll call: All ayes RESOLUTION NO. 93-41 BEING A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE 1993 PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTIONS Pursuant to City Charter, Section 30 and M.D.S. 204A, the Council shall appoint at least twenty-five (25) days before election, qualified voters in each election district to be judges of election. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 23, 1993 PAGE·S NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights does appoint the attached list of judoes, by precinct, for the Primary Election on September 21, 1993 and the General Election on November 2, 1993, with an hourly remuneration of $6.SO for a Head Judge and $6.00 for an Election Judqe. Passed this 23rd day of August, 1993. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll call: Nawrocki Clerkin All ayes Mayor Donald J. Muryzn, Jr. Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary 7.COMMUNICATIONS a.Science, Technology and Energy Commission On August 12th, Sara Harms, and Enqineerinq Intern, made a presentation to the Science, Technolooy and Enerqy Commission regarding a proposed catch basin stencilino program. She made the same presentation to the Council at this Council meeting. The pilot project will begin near Hiqhland Lake with LaBelle Pond being the second priority. The funding for the project will come from the rebate received from the Six Cities Water Management Organization. b.Appointments to Boards and Commissions This item was removed from the agenda for discussion at the August 24th Council work session. c.Letter from Commissioner Kordiak A letter received from Commissioner Kordiak advi•ed that there will be a county delegation going to Washington, D.C. to meet with George Latimer, of HUD. Councilmember Nawrocki suggested that the City Manager advise Conmiaaioner Kordiak of the plans for the Sheffield Neighborhood and that this be discussed at the HUD meeting relative to the procurement of federal funding. S.OLD BUSINESS a.Authorization to Purchase IBM AS400 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 23, 1993 PAGE 6 Councilmember Nawrocki felt no actual aavinos would be realized with this purchase. He felt the .upgrade of the present system is preferable and would cost only $5,000. He also noted that there could be an anticipated decrease in the purchase costs in the future as has been the case with muchcomputer equipment. Counci lmember Peteraon inquire,d how lono an upgrade would meet the needs of the City. The Finance Director responded It would probably serve the City's needs for about one year. Motion by Nawrocki that authorization to purchase the AS400 computer system not be granted based on the lack of cost effectiveness of the proposed procurement. Motion dies for lack of a second. Councilmember Ruettimann felt the hard costs for upgrades was necessary before any decision can be made. $30,000 has been budgeted for this system purchase. Councilmember Nawrocki noted that the City Manager is proposing a twelve percent increase in taxes in the bud9et for 1994. He felt this $30,000 savings would not make a significant difference in the budget if it were not spent but it would help. He also agreed that "hard" costs for upgrades and alternatives to this purchase should be prepared by staff. Motion by Clerkin, second by Nawrocki to table this matter unt i 1 the next regular Counci 1 meeting for further information. Roll call: All ayes b.Architectural Services After viewino the bids received, Councilmember Peterson observed that the past experience with large contractors by the City has not been very oood. He felt the on-ooino supervision and inspections have not been beneficial and •ome of the projects have resulted in poor qual 1 ty work and finishino. Motion by Peterson, •econd by Nawrocki to award a contract to Gary Larson, Architect, for architectural •ervices for the design and and bids •pecifications for the inatallation of a lift and modifications of the lower level restrooms at the Columbia Heights Library to meet Americans with Di•abilities requirements at a cost not to exceed SB,900 as outlined in their proposal and that there will· be no reimbursable local expense. Funds for this project will come from the Community Development Block Grant Fund. Roll call: All ayes REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 23, 1993 PAGE 7 c.Special Tax on Refuse Service Motion by Murzyn, second by Nawrocki to direct staff to implement the special assessment on refuse service as passed by the 1993 Leoislature and to oive a credit of 1001 of the 1993 special assessment fee to each residential customer on their refuse charge and to expend the payment from the Refuse Fund. Roll call: All ayes d.Water Problem on Tyler Street Councilmember Nawrocki inquired what has been done to address the water problems beino experienced in the alley behind 3704 and 3710 Tyler Street. The Public Works Director responded it has been corrected this spring with the installation of a drain. e.Parcels Purchased by Property Owners Counci !member Nawrocki noted that a few years aoo various parcels had been purchased by residents. In the past he has been told all of the titles for these parcels have been transferred. He is still receivinq some inquiries reqarding the completion of a sale on Maiden Lane. The City Attorney will follow up on this matter. f.Recycling/Solid Waste Brochure Counci !member Nawrocki noted what appeared to be two errors in the new brochure. One addressed wrapping qarbaoe before it is placed in the oarbaoe can. He noted this is not a requirement and if plastic wrap is used this is very undesirable. The second error dealt with the location of oarbaoe cans for pick up. They need only be accessible for the hauler not visible as was stated . 9.NEW BUSINESS • a.Renewal of State Grant for Community Policing 1.Resolution No. 93-42 Authorizing Execution ofAgreement Motion by Ruettimann, second by Peterson to waive the readinq of the resolution there beino ample copies available for the public. Roll call: All ayes REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 23, 1993 PAGE 8 RESOLUTION NO. 93-42 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Columbia Heiohta/Columbia Heights Police Department enter into a cooperative aoreement with the Office of Druo Policy in the Minnesota Department of Public Safety for the project anti tled CorrmunitY/Problem Oriented Policing during the period of September 1. 1993 through August 31, 1994. Patrick Hentges, City Manager, is hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the City of Columbia Heights. I certify that the above resolution was adopted by the Columbia Heights City Council of the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota on August 23, 1993. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll call: SIGNED: Ruettimann Peterson All ayes (signature) WITNESSETH: (sionature) Councilmember Nawrocki inquired if the City of Hilltop is participating in this project. Chief Mawhorter responded that it is. Councilmember Nawrocki noted that no services should be provided if Columbia Heights is not paid for them by Hilltop. He also requested the Chief to check to see if the fee has been received for last year. 2.Transfer of Funds Motion by Ruetfimann, second by Peterson to authorize the transfer of $6,667 to existino Fund 275 to Conmunity Policing Funds from General Fund 101 as a cash match for the federal orant. Roll call: All ayes 3.Authorization to Enter into Agreement Motion by Ruettimann, aecond by Peterson to authorize the Mayor and City Manaoer to enter into the agreement by siqning the Certification Cash Match and Certification of Disbarment forms required by the qrant. Roll call: All ayes REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 23, 1993 PAGE 9 b.Sale of Tax Forfeit Property to David and Marlaine Szurek.. Motion by Clerkin, second by Ruettlmann to accept the offer of $3,000 from David and Mar laine Szurek for tax-forfeit property located at 1419 42nd Avenue and furthermore, direct the City Attorney to proceed with the preparation of the ordinance and appropriate paperwork. Roll call: All ayes c.Authorization to Replace Wooden Window Silla and DoorFrames at the Library Motion by Nawrocki, second by Ruettimann to table further consideration of the bids received until additional bids are procured and the bids are based on the opening sizes. Roll call: All ayes d.Certification of Rate Regulation Motion by Ruettimann, second by Clerkin to direct staff to file for certification for the City of Columbia Heiqhts to be a rate regulator and that inquiries be made of other systems to seek cooperation on some level for the utilization of professional services needed to conduct the duties required as a rate regulator. Roll call: All ayes e.Cable Grant Motion by Clerkin, second by Peterson to approve the $505 grant· application request of Alex Deyo and Adam Davis for production of cable prooramminq, subject to proof of copyright clearance; if proof of copyriqht clearance is not received the amount of $210 will be deducted from the amount requested on the application with monies to come from 1225-49844-4300 and be paid upon receipt of invoices showing expenses incurred. Roll call: All ayes f.Housinq Maintenance Code -Judicare -Jacobs et.al.Temporary Restraininq Order The City Attorney stated that the essence of this complaint ls that there ls no opportunity in place for tenants to be heard when the building in which they reside has been posted for violations and they are ordered to move within aizty days. He noted that the City has implemented no charoes against tenants nor has it commenced any proceedinos aoainst them. Judicare maintains the tenants should have the same opportunity to be heard as the landlords. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 23, 1993 PAGE 10 Councilmember Nawrocki felt the City ehould be very careful when qettino involved with what i• a contractural �elat1onship between a landlord and tenant. He felt it would be very difficult to aerve a tenant with a notice for vacatinq apremise when there are 2,200 rental units in the City and people frequently move out without noti.ce. Motion by Murzyn, •econd by Clarkin to direct City etaff to prepare an ordinance amendinq the Housinq Maintenance Code and implementing a due process hearino for tenants to coincide with the landlords' due process hearinq. Roll call: All ayes O· Pollina Places Councilmember Nawrocki noted that one pol lino place, Ostrander Park, has been eliminated. This precinct includes voters at Heights Manor. Councilmember Nawrocki felt these voters may experience a hardship in oettino to the polls. He suooested that the City-owned bus may be used to transport voters to the new pol lino place at Shiloh Bethany Church. The City Manager felt this would deny equal access if the bus were not available to all voters in the City. He suggested that his assistant could explore a special rate for the Shared Ride cab service. 10.REPORTS a.Report of the City Manager The City Manaoer's report was submitted in written form and the some items were discussed briefly. b.Report of the City Attorney , The City Attorney had nothino to report at this time. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Ruettimann, second by Peterson to adjourn at 10:25 p.m. Roll call: All ayes Mayor Donald J. Murzyn, Jr. Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary CITY COUNCIL LEITER MEETING OF: SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCE AND ORIGINATING DEPT.: CITY MANAGERRESOLUTION CITY MANAGER APPROVAL NO: 6 ITEM: BEING A RESOLUTION AOOPTING A BY: PATRICK HENTGES BY:�# NO: PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 1994 AND SETTING THE PROPOSED DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 1993 TAX LEVY COLLECTABLE FOR THE YEAR 1994 6.A. At the work session of August 30, 1993, the City Council reviewed the proposed 1994 budget and the new tax laws reJated to adopting a proposed levy for 1994. Under the current law, it is necessary for the City to certify a proposed levy, public budget hearing date and continuation meeting date to the County Auditor by September 15th. The proposed levy is the maximum amount the City can levy for 1994. On or before December 20th, 1993, the City must certify a final levy to the County Auditor. The final levy can be less than the proposed levy but it cannot be more than the proposed levy. For this reason, it is in the best interest of the City to adopt a proposed levy at the maximum level being considered. Later it can be decreased but it cannot be increased. The major change in the 1993 law is that the City Council must hold two meetings to consider the budget: a budget hearing and a continuation meeting. The proposed budget and proposed levies must be adopted at the continuation meeting. It cannot be adopted at the budget hearing meeting. At the August 30th work session, the City Manager submitted a recommended schedule to hold the property tax levy increase to $2,072. This proposal was based on using fund balance for several one-time transfers or expenditures rather than levying for these costs. The cost changes include $157,500 in compensated absences, $35,801 funding for the volunteer fire pension, and $25,000 for the contingency account. The same schedule also outlines increases the Council had identified to increase the levy by $85,072. The potential increases include an additional police officer, reinstatement of Murzyn Hall maintenance levels, and an increase in the City Council contingency account. The 1993 levy before the H.A.C.A. deduction was $3,463,645. For 1994, it is anticipated that the City will see a reduc tion in property values and a reduction in what the City receives in fiscal disparities. These changes could result in a two or three percent increase in local property taxes, in addition to whatever the City Council sets for a levy. In addition to the City resolution, also attached is the HRA's resolution 93-adopting a proposed tax levy and budget for 1994-the proposed HRA levy and budget should have City Council approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available for the public. Move to adopt Resolution 93-, Being a Resolution Adopting a Proposed Budget for the Year 1994 and Setting the Proposed Tax Levy in the amount of$ ____ establishing a budget hearing date of December 8, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. and a continuation date of December 15, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Move to approve a proposed HRA levy and budget of $71,()40 for the year 1993. COUNCIL ACTION: Note: City of Columbia Heights Proposed Budget Local levy Increase City Manager Recommended Adjustments Original proposed levy Increase was $220,373 or 12.25% Fund compensated absenses from fund balance 150,000 Fund volunteer fire relief from fund balance & work on legislative change 35,801 Reduce contingencies to zero 25,000 Fune Library compensated absenses from fund balance 7,500 City Council Increases Levy Increased by $85,072 or 4. 73°/4 The computations above are based on 1993 Tax Capacity Values, Fiscal Disparities and other 1993 factors. By prior years' trends it can be anticipated that both Property values and Fiscal Disparities will go down. If this is the case the local levy will increase. PNl)Ued 30-Aug-93 Clll'2 RESOLUTION 93-BEING A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 1994 AND SETTING THE PROPOSED TAX LEVY COLLECTABLE FOR THE YEAR 1994 BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights as follows: Section A. The budget for the City of Columbia Heights for the year 1994 is hereby approved and adopted with appropriations for each of the funds as follows: General Fund Para Transit Fund State Aid Cable Television Fund Library Dare Project Community Police Project Pride Capital Improvements Fund Infrastructure Fund Capital Equipment Replacement Funds: General Fund Water Fund Sewer Fund Central Garage Fund Central Garage Fund Liquor Fund Water Utility Fund Sewer Utility Fund Refuse Fund Water & Sewer Construction Funds Energy Management Data Processing Debt Service Fund Total Expense Including lnterfund Transfers Section B: The estimated gross revenue to fund the budget of the City of Columbia Heights for all funds, including general ad valorem tax levies as hereinafter set forth for the year 1994: General Fund Para Transit Fund State Aid Cable Television Fund Library Dare Project Community Police Project Pride Capital Improvements Fund Infrastructure Fund Capital Equipment Replacement Funds: General Fund Water Fund Sewer Fund Central Garage Fund Central Garage Fund Liquor Fund Water Utility Fund Sewer Utility Fund Refuse Fund Water & Sewer Construction Funds Energy Management Date Processing Debt Service Fund Total Revenue Including lntertund Transfers Expense 6,701,744 177,971 56,867 182,026 425,407 4,965 48,027 959 377,750 0 768,624 1,540 35,910 0 339,841 7,274,430 1,190,612 1,172,502 1,521,568 282,000 267,399 n,114 16,642,547 37,550,403 Revenue Available 6,701,744 177,971 56,867 182,026 425,407 4,965 48,027 959 377,750 0 768,624 1,540 35,910 0 339,841 7,274,430 1,190,612 1,172,502 1,521,568 282,000 267,399 n,114 16,642,547 37,550,403 Section C: The following sums of money are levied for the current year, collectable in 1994, upon the taxable property in said City of Columbia Heights, for the following purposes: General Fund Bond & Interest LessH.A.C.A. Certified Levy Be it further resolved by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights that: The budget hearing shall be held on December 8, 1993 and a continuation date of this hearing shall be held on December 15, 1993 at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers. The City Cler1< is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Anoka County, Minnesota. Passed this _th day of ___ 1993 Offered By: Seconded By: Roll Call: Total Donald J. Murzyn Jr., Mayor Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary 0 964,991 =-------z==---- RESOLUTION 93-15 USOLUTION OJ' BOUSING ARD UDEVELOPMEN'l' AIJTBOllI'l'Y OP '.rEE CI'l'Y OJ' COLUDIA UIGB'l'S, MN ADOPTING A PROPOSED DA TAX LEVY BtJDGET POR PISCAL YEAR 1994 AND APPROVAL TO CERTIJ'Y SAME TO uon COtrH'l'Y. WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Columbia Heights, Minnesota herein referred to as the "Authority" is a public body corporate and politic organized pursuant to MN Statutes, Section 469.001 et seq; and WHEREAS, the Authority has and will continue to develop and implement housing and redev elopment programs and provide relocation services pursuant to provisions of M.S. 469.001 to 469.047; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to prepare a statement of proposed BRA Tax Levy operating expenditures and revenue estimates for FY 1994; and WHEREAS, the Authority Commissioners have reviewed and determined that the proposed HRA Tax Levy expenditures and revenue estimates for FY 1994 are listed on the attached HRA Tax Levy Budget for Fiscal Year 1994; and WHEREAS, pursuant to M.S. 469.033, subd. 6, the Authority, upon approval of the City Council is authorized to levy a special tax upon all property, both provided in M.S. 469.001 to 649.047. (as amended) WHEREAS, pursuant to M.S. 27S.065(1) on or before September l the Authority is required to adopt a proposed budget and certify the same to the County auditor. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Columbia Heiights, MN hereby approve and adopt the proposed BRA Tax Levy Budget for FY 1994 as attached; and authorizes the Executive Director to file the same with the City of Columbia Heights by August 1, 1993 and to certify the same to the Anoka County Auditor prior September 15, 1993. • PASSED THIS 13th OAY OF JULY OFFERED BY: SECONDED BY: Murzyn Jindra ROLL CALL: All Ayes: Jindra, Dustin, Murzyn, Nawrocki Absent: Heintz Donald-R. Schneider, Executive � Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Columbia Heights CommluJon .. E1aelliuaHeimz JtaiclaJncn lnaHallrDdci Alc:fwdDuaan Dan&ldJ.M&nyn.Jt. 590 N.E. -'0th Avenue, Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Fax: (612) 782-2857 • (612) 782-2854 REVENUE DA TAX X.ZV'Y Bm>Gr? POR 7%80>.L YEll 199� (January 1 -December 31, 1994) Levy for HRA Housing and Redevelopment Purposes on real and personal property $542,287,800 X .0131% • 71,039 . TOTAL BRA LEVY PBOPQSEP EXI'tNPITURES $ 71,040.00 * $ 71,040.00 Redevelopment Expenses in Sheffield Neighborhood $71,040.00 TOTAL $ 71,040.00 •Based on anoka cO'Unty Property Tax OepartJDent Assessor's TaxableMarket Value on personal and real property for taxes for 1993 andpayable in 1994. levy Equal Opportunity Employer G CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: September 13, 1993 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTION ORIGINATING DEPT.: -CITY MANAGERNO: 6 Planning & Zoning APPROVAL ITEM: Lotsplit, Alois Kroll BY: Evelyn Nygaard J')---BY:� NO: Case #9308-20 6.8. DATE: September 9, 1993 The lotsplit of a portion of property known as 4557 Madison Street in order to provide enough land for an adequate side yard setback for 4545 Madison Street by combination was unanimously approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission together with the required driveway easements and maintenance agreements as shown in the attached documents. Approval was conditioned upon additional paved parking (as shown on Exhibit lA) being installed within 60 days of Council approval. The additional parking will bring both multi-family dwellings up to code as far as on-site parking requirements are concerned. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of Resolution 93-, there being ample copies available to the general public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Moved to approve Resolution 93-;Being a resolution approving a lotsplit (4557 and 4545 Madison Street). COUNCIL ACTION: I RES O LU T I O N NO. 93 - SUBDIVISION REQUEST CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40TH A VENUE NE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN 55421 I, Alois D. Kroll, Hereby request a split of PIN 26 30 24 43 0092 Legally described as: Lot 2, Block 1, Julian Johnson Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota. Subject to utility and drainage easement over East 5 feet. THE DESCRIPTION HENCEFORTH TO BE: 1."A" (PARCEL TO BE ADDED TO LOT SOUTH) That part of Lot 2, Block 1, JULIAN JOHNSON ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 2, distant 6.00 feet, northwesterly from the most southerly corner of said Lot 2, measured along the arc of said southwesterly line of Lot 2; thence running northeasterly to its intersection with the east line of said Lot 2, distant 26.00 feet, northerly from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 2 and there terminating. RESERVING AND SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY PURPOSES AS DESCRIBED IN THE FIVE PAGES OF THE DECLARATION OF EASEMENT ATTACHED. 2. "B" (REMAINING LOT 2 AFTER SPLIT) That part of Lot 2, Block 1, JULIAN JOHNSON ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota lying northerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 2, distant 6.00 feet, northwesterly from the most southerly corner of said Lot 2, measured along the arc of said southwesterly line of Lot 2; thence running northeasterly to its intersection with the east line of said Lot 2, distant 26.00 feet, northerly from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 2 and there terminating. RESERVING AND SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY PURPOSES AS DESCRIBED IN THE FIVE PAGES OF THE DECLARATION OF EASEMENT ATTACHED. Be it further resolved that special assessments of record in the office of the City of Columbia Heights as of this day, against the above described property, in the amount of $-0-be divided. Any pending or future assessments will be levied according to the new split as approved this day. Any lot split given approval shall become invalid if the resolution, motion or other Council action approving the said lot split is not filed with the County Auditor within one (1) year of the date of the Council action. PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ACTION: Approved provided the hard surface parking be completed within 60 days from Council approval and that the five page Declaration of Easement and Maintenance as attached be recorded to each parcel. This 7th day of September, 1993. Offered by: Larson Seconded by: Peterson Roll Call: All Ayes k l��1/�rSignature of Owner, Notarized Owner's Address 4549 Polk Street NE Columbia Hei&hts MN ss421 Telephone No. ,.5:.,,7...,1 ;;,a· 2 .. s ..J.,.3___ _ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME this 10th day of September, 1993. ----.,,----. l -.J�_NE AN� �L��:�� . {f_-,r� ct'-u-t:v�� ) H e .. r. _,-,;, _u.,;� 1 v � �blic · �. My commi .. :.1on ""'�""• �-11·97 -....-........ _.,. ___ ,.. ____ ... ., _____ .., -Jle£-$10.00 DATE PAID 7/16/93 RECEIPT No.: 30903 THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPER TIES ARE TORRENS, THEREFORE, THE EASEMENTS WILL BE RECORDED AS MEMORIALS PER THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES AT ANOKA COUNTY. CONTINUED ON PAGE 2 RESOLUTION 93- CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Tbis ____ day of _______ , 1993. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: Secretary to tbe Council Donald J. Murzyn, Jr., Mayor ATTACHMENT INCLUDED, AS A CONDITION OF 1HE LOT SPLIT, JS 1HE FIVE PAGE DECLARA TJON OF EASEMENT WI'llf DIUVEWA Y AND PARKING SURVEY. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY llfl•IGO -,._.'\')(-• .. _.,.,._') ,oR b..L KROLL. ,v.oi>o:i,c,:o �-':!'� 1,0.)bOI\J1-::.1oi..L :�:.=��,:�'i . ,u,ono ..... .,� '""'� ............ 1, ....·"·····1'" ........... , ............. , ......... ,_ •-• _,.,. _., •••on Na•-n ••te•M .I ... UHh• ............ "' �=••tH1 IU••".,._ .................... .__. _,,_ ...... � .. ......... " -=-eit,-c.( ... �-A-"�··· 4 .. ., ... tWl el ........ .... u .... ,. ft ... ., e..eu• " ....... ,.. •.... , .. uo, .. au,tTaATIO• •O. C l•H•••u• , .... . ---......... , ...... . -<-t u.,. ....... r 'V 0 ' ' ' A-.v��'-)� -��-� '-'--... , , ..... ,_:) ,_ -- ............ � ....... c. ---�···� \.l.t:_ � I --�---� I _-: .. -:c';\ __ ''B'' i ".'!,,_I'.I ., I , ,..I / 11� I � .• . -· ,. . .,; 0 fJ ----- '/ 1 ·o rI (l � ,. cl � � cl� r .). ,fJ :1. • 111, .. � ;, J. � .,.• J � � r' I � � � -· "C'' ' . J i.._ ,:·� -�-i p ---------7--- ' � --� �·� .. , ··-�&M� <- � !J I ' ....... ) / • I U CCI -• , •"L •-..t., .. •• �I J ·• ...., 11 .... � ......... ,, ... � --1"41....S- __ L�e:.�1... t>E.�C.R_l_f''i" 10�--- �o..,..., , .... t> ", ,1..0Lv, 1, Jl.)�•-..w.. j-"-'':>O!s! A:>!),'TIOU ) ..... .._ ... c,o_,..,.,...,, l�\• M\.!�-=-::rf ,,,._, uu.. ...... �,.,. ... � 48Wtt-Cn'Y 01' COLUHIIA HEIGHTS M�Tl'OR . @-1Mn0N) a.EJUCr WILLIAM ELRITE mTE: SEPTEMBER 10 ll 93 MQUl:Sn:D aY I 112 CMIIE1l Alols D. Krol I OJt D?VUJCII Ga IO'f SPJ.11' Am>RESS 4549 Polk Street NE, Columbia Heights, "N 55421 CON'l'MCT PIJRl:HASER ---------------------------CCOPY CIF C0NTMt."'1' IIUIT U DICUJDED) AZIDJIESS ------------------------------- ltESDl.t72'J0N DcumED: n:NP � S'l'ATElilffl' TO: @) mt •o SAHE P I N LEGAL DESCRIPTION MSmm'JOR •o._______ _ 26 30 24 43 0091 Lot I, Block 1, Julian Johnson Addition, Anoka County, Minneso t a, AND out of 26 30 24 43 0092 Tha t par t of Lot 2, Block 1, Julian Johnson Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota lying southerly of t he following described line: COMBINED LEGAL: Beginning at a point on the southwes terly line of said Lot 2, dis tant 6,00 feet, northwesterly from t he most sou t herly corner of said Lot 2, measured along t he arc of said sou t hwesterly line of Lo t 2; thence running northeasterly to Its intersection wi t h the east line of said Lot 2, dis t ant 26.00 feet, northerly from the sou t heas terly corner of said Lot 2 and there terminating. Lot 1, Block I, Julian Johnson Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota. Together with: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Julian Johnson Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning a t a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 2, distant 6,00 feet, northwes t erly from the mos.t southerly corner of Hid Lot 2, measured along the arc of said sou t hwesterly line of Lot 2; thence running northeasterly to i t s intersection with the east line of said Lot 2, distant 26.00 feet, northerly from the southeasterly corner of sat·d Lot 2 and there terminating. RESERV'ING AND SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY PURPOSES AS DESCRIBED IN THE FIVE PAGES OF THE DECL ARATION OF EASEMENT ATTACHED AND INCLUDED IN THE MEMORIAL OF THE TORRENS CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. �' n IJ.�SEE PARCEL N0.1 of EXHIBIT A. ,{ _ "(J /' s-,...:Gi!=;:N ;,;;ED� ... v :....:..-rt""t..,.:;:;oUN-t:t,v,;mml"ft'-r.-:ul'l:'k�cHA":'i"i"s'FiER;;---­<cRoss OUT INAPPLICABLE ONE) D •IIOPEJl'l'V C0NTIGUOUS CON'l'RAC'l' DICUJm:D FOil nxES PAYABLE %H -FOJt AUDI'l'ORS CIFTJCE_OSE om,y-__ ns mt 110 ns mt 110 DI.TE m:c:EIVZD: DECLARATION OF EASEMENT � This Declaration of Easement is made and entered into this 3�-day of August, 1993. W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the undersigned is the fee owner of Lot 1 and part of Lot 2, Block 1, Julian Johnson Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota (hereinafter "Parcel No. 1" and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto). WHEREAS, the undersigned is the fee owner of part ot Lot 2, Block 1, Julian Johnson Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota (hereinafter "Parcel No. 2 11 and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto). WHEREAS, Parcel No. 1 and Parcel No. 2 are contiguous parcels and share a common driveway which provides ingress and egress. WHEREAS, the undersigned wishes to create a reciprocal easement for ingress, egress and maintenance over and across Parcel No. 1 and Parcel No. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoi ng, the undersigned hereby covenants as follows: 1. Easement Grant. The undersigned does hereby create for the joint benefit of the present and future owner or owners of Parcel No. 1 and Parcel No. 2 the perpetual easement for ingress and egress over and across Parcel No. 1 and Parcel No. 2 (Easement Area). such easement area is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and is hereby declared to constitute ingress and egress areas available for use by the owners, occupants and invitees of Parcel No. 1 and Parcel No. 2, which parties shall have the right to use the easement area described on Exhibit A attached hereto jointly with each other. 2. Maintenanoe. The easement area shall be maintained jointly by the owner or owners of Parcel No. 1 and Parcel No. 2. In the event of any injury or damage, the easement area shall be repaired or rebuilt at the joint expense of owner or owners of Parcel No. 1 and Parcel No. 2, provided, however, that each party shall be responsible for the consequences of its own negligence or wrongful acts. 3. Perpetual Easement. The aforesaid easement and the benefits and obligations thereof, shall be perpetual and shall annex to and run with Parcel No. 1 and Parcel .No. 2. The easement area which has been created herein, shall exist notwithstanding the ownership of Parcel No. 1 and Parcel No. 2, by the undersigned. It is the express intention of the undersigned that the rights created by this easement shall not merge into the present existing fee interest of Parcel No. 1 and Parcel No. 2. 4.This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to thebenefit of the undersigned, his successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned causes this instrument to be executed this 3tJ day of August, 1993. STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoing instrument has this � day of August, 1993, by THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD. 400 Northtown Financial Plaza 200 Coon Rapids Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55433(612)780-8500 (MFH) mfh\kroll.eas dk�� --. -----. me EXHIBIT A PARCEL NO. 1 Lot 1, Block 1, JULIAN JOHNSON ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota. Together with: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, JULIAN JOHNSON ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 2, distant 6.00 feet, northwesterly from the most southerly corner of said Lot 2, measured along the arc of said southwesterly line of Lot 2; thence running northeasterly to its intersection with the east line of said Lot 2, distant 26.00 feet, northerly from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 2 and there terminating. Reserving and subject to an easement for driveway purposes in favor of the property adjacent northerly over those parts of Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, JULIAN JOHNSON ADDITION, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 2, distant 6.00 feet, northwesterly from the most southerly corner of said Lot 2, measured along the arc of said southwesterly line of Lot 2; thence running northeasterly a distance of 100.00 feet on a line which extended would intersect with the east line of said Lot 2, distant 26.00 feet, northerly from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 2; thence deflect southeasterly at a right angle, a distance of 10.00 feet; thence deflect southwesterly at a right angle, to the westerly line of said Lot l; thence northwesterly along the westerly line of said Lot 1, and the southwesterly line of said Lot 2 to the point of beginning. PARCEL NO. 2 That part of Lot 2, Block 1, JULIAN JOHNSON ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota lying northerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 2, distant 6.00 feet, northwesterly from the most southerly corner of said Lot 2, measured along the arc of said southwesterly line of Lot 2; thence running northeasterly to its intersection with the east line of said Lot 2, distant 26.00 feet, northerly from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 2, and there terminating. Reserving and subject to an easement for driveway purposes in favor of the property adjacent southerly over that part of Lot 2, Block 1, JULIAN JOHNSON ADDITION, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 2, distant 6.00 feet, northwesterly from the most southerly corner of said Lot 2, measured along the arc of said southwesterly line of Lot 2; thence running northeasterly a distance of 100.00 feet on a line which extended would intersect with the east line of said Lot 2, distant 26.00 feet, northerly from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 2; thence deflect northwesterly at a right angle, a distance of 10.00 feet; thence deflect southwesterly at a right angle, to the southwesterly line of said Lot 2; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot 2, to the point of beginning. EASEMENT AREA That part of Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, JULIAN JOHNSON ADDITION described as follows: Beginning at a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 2, distant 6.00 feet, northwesterly from the most southerly corner of said Lot 2, measured along the arc of said southwesterly line of Lot 2; thence running northeasterly a distance of 100.00 feet on a line which extended would intersect with the east line of said Lot 2, distant 26.00 feet, northerly from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 2; thence deflect southeasterly at a right angle, a distance of 10.00 feet; thence deflect southwesterly at a right angle, to the westerly line of said Lot l; thence northwesterly along the westerly line of said Lot 1, and the southwesterly line of said Lot 2 to the point of beginning. That part of Lot 2, Block 1, JULIAN JOHNSON ADDITION described as follows: Beginning at a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 2, distant 6.00 feet, northwesterly from the most southerly corner of said Lot 2, measured along the arc of said southwesterly line of Lot 2; thence running northeasterly a distance of 100.00 feet on a line which extended would intersect with the east line of said Lot 2, distant 26.00 feet, northerly from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 2; thence deflect northwesterly at a right angle, a distance of 10.00 feet; thence deflect southwesterly at a right angle, to the southwesterly line of said Lot 2; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot 2, to the point of beginning. ---, J ,, ,,<J ,, I \ -----\ . l , __ ..... ., I ' 1 t • f ' I I . 0 A , J I • _,/ r 'l C ,, u: J ,..1 . f ,· CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Application For: Application Date: 7/;& lt/,3Rezoning Variance Privacy Fence Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval Site Plan Approval Other Case No: 9 3oi-2<) Fee: �Q . 0 0 Date Paid 3/b /p3 l.eceipt No: 3Q 9 0,6 1.Street Address of Subject Property:is-1'.'. 5 V c/-S 5 J /]&d.o-Cn, St 2.Legal Description of Subject Property: _______________________ _ 3.Applicant: Name: @c /5 � Address: s/5-f 9 CJtd£-� L J/ Phone: 571-,h?f'/ 3 4.Owner: Name: ',..5ArnE Address:------------ Phone:------------- 5.Description of Request:_,--::7( �-��� '-f �.J / / /�7, //. c�4£? 6.Zoning: 7. Applicable City Ordinance Number ___________ Section ____________ _ Present Zoning _________________ Proposed Zoning __________ _ Present Use __________________ Proposed Use ___________ _ Jleason for Request, ... /4 td(,p,j &?cH4-/a---44«} az� d,,4/4,J d/4fJ . B.Exhibits Submitted (maps. diagrams, etc .) ______________________ _ 9.Acknowledgment and Signature: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of thepenalties of law. for the purpose of inducing the City of Columbia Heights to_ take theaction herein requested. that all statements herein are true and that all work hereinmentioned will be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Columbia Heights and the laws of the State of Mr,esota /J ii// / /::? {#) / / Signature of Applicant�J.!4 £1 � Date: £ 1 /if /?2 > /.,, • Taken By :..,,/L'"""". _____ _ II,. BID Home: 434-7128 Shop: 718-1187 PLOCHOCKI CONSTRUCTION & CONTRACTING CO. IRUCE PLOCHOCKI 12537 f.ut Beltlll BMI., Cedar, MN 55011 •To:•,4-L /( flDLL•yr'l1 1,#. st .. Jl/f J 6 L ,1--t, l) ... �,s o.,. 2-;,-� .i' '(«i 'I� � f/SS7 r',Alss-. St. IIE­ �'71� u-, ts �-ss vi-f•&/.,Yvl 'dA ll, f,-1"w-5'"s-o // Date ,7/ --�, Job Description wt l( \) ;r O Vi-/]e,_s, � t "G-. 3-f .,, c...L � • e,__...-o j I ..J fop 2 '' t ....,_,,a.<---/4 tJ ( lf<.2 l '{I) t:.J/J D"l'l &..A'°�" 5 trJ �.,.,. f: (r _,� "'-4S p� ,,.b r A.� I "'?CA y.> ,.-o )C •lJo O 56 f'f. wort q-o st4.rf 1-;),O -7 3 .. Amount 5 I e,o_c,-o CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: September 13, 1993 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS I ORIGINATING DEPT.:NO: 6 Planning & Zoning ITEM: Lotsplit, Helen & JOS. Ga�lus6.C.I BY: Evelyn Nygaard� NO: Case #9309-24, 4025 Stinson Blvd. I DATE: September 9, 1993 BY: CITY MANAGER APPROVAL A request for a lotsplit of property known as 4025 Stinson Boulevard, legally described as Lot 16, Block 1, Silver Lake Addition, was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting of September 7, 1993. Based on the findings that (a)A 70 foot width will exist at the building line of the newly created lot asrequired by Section 9.107(4); (b) A 62 foot width will exist at the building lineof the existing lot per Ordinance 1043, Section 9.407(2) which allows a ten footreduction of the lot width by City Council approval, the Commission voted torecommend that the City Council approve the resolution provided all requirements ofa lotsplit are met, that drainage and public utility plans be submitted for reviewprior to City Council action and that no permits be issued for construction on thenew lot until the demolition and reconstruction of the existing house are completedand meet the minimum square footage requirements of the R-1 Zoning District. See minutes enclosed in agenda packet. Several neighbors were present at the public hearing and voiced their objections to this lot split. A petition from owners of 17 neighboring parcels was received registering their concerns about this lotsplit and requesting that •no lotsplit be allowed until the remodeling (removal of an encroachment by the existing home of approximately 23.5 feet into the proposed new lot) has taken place and that no variances be granted on any building permits for either house•. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available to the general public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution 93- Stinson Boulevard). COUNCIL ACTION: Being a Resolution approving a lotsplit (4025 RESOLUTION NO. SUBDIVISION R·t4-o-t'""'sf--Fee $10.00 Date Paid: f?'-,5'-f"a Recefpt No.: ,/�-£ I • CITY OF COLUKBIA HEIGHTS 590 -40th AVENUE N.E. Joseph B & Helen C. Gallus Hereby request a split of PLAT 3517 8 PARCEL 640 KEY _____ P.IN 36 JO 24 41 0087 Legally described as: Lot 16, Block 1, Silver Lake Addo. THE DESCRIPTION HENCEFORTH TO BE: Proposed Tract "A"-The easterly 70.0 ft. of Lot 16, Block 1, Silver Lake Addo, to Columbj Heights, MN.·A noka County. AND Proposed Tract "B"-That part of Lot 16, Block 1, lying �·esterly of the easterly 70.0 ft. thereof in Silver Lake Addition to Columbia Heights, MN,Anoka County. Be it further resolved that special assessments of record In the office of the City of Co lumbia Heights as of this_day,_agalnst the above described property,in the amount of $ __ NONE be divided. Paid. Any pending or future assessments will be levied according to the new split as approved this day. PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ACTION: l I \ \.... 1 , I "-·-�--.' .. ._:. '-'--('Signature of Owner, Notarized , Approved provided drainage and public utility plans be submitted for review prior to City Council Action, that* This �day of September 19--2J., l'..J-: , (_� " j ,:' .1 j I i/ --··' .· " \... \. . t.l ,· , .. ...... ' . I I ,.,,,.__•. t Offered by: Szurek Seconded by: Fowler Ro 11 Ca 11 : A 11 Ayes .. � �Jr-Y, v>:;.;, :y5:z-.c �Zoni n-g �U i CITY COUNCIL ACTION: This day of 19 • - Offered by: Seconded by: Rol 1 Ca 11: Secretary to the Council Owner's Address .. -.\· / _ C)c-( J_:: Telephone No. / . , :i ._) ·- Subscribed and sworn to before me th)s /:f day of (t.: . .,-,�r,a;t 19L,_2 , V N��!H=!-.=!� ·1ANOKA COUNTY My cOlllllliuion .,.,. 3-11-97 ....... ·-··· �g.,.........., Doaald Murzyn,..;:_ . Mayor *all requirements for a lotsplit are met and that no permits a-re issued for constructionon the new lot until the demolition and reconstruction of the existing house arecompleted and meet the minimum requirements for square footage of the R-1 District.· -,.. -- ---OO'O'e<e.--- I rn I-7II z z .. -; 7 I ·I ti 7 ---330,00--- --��"!.--o 'ii ---30S.OO--- ;, . t·· 7 I I / -.... CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Application For: Application Date, lf [Jt; 2 1. 2. RezoningVariance Privacy Fence Conditional Use PermitSubdivision Approval Site Plan Approval Other {1 J Case Ho: ( 3 Q j ¢ f § , } Fees //). 00 ��Receipt Ho: 3/ 00 �I Street Address of Subject Propertya 4 C � ,5 .s + ; )'\ S (: D B l v' J Legal Description of Subject Property: l.. o f-I<.-: t3 I ti(_}:-I S; Iv '.Sr,.,---L ::J k <'. _\ ·. ;. ./ 1 f J. t >J +c . I /-. ) A --/(__ l· L· h1 b, ,� {Jq £,' l)2fJ/na ka. C, /)J/i, ,_ I / 3. Applicant: Name : ·: "-,: (_ (; . ,7 // '-_, -I I 1· Address:·/ -·, �, '--..., f 1 ,, \ c ;J l.'1 ___ .,II'�. Phone : · t:· -� _ · I ) __ 4. Owner: I Name: J :� " a� 11 \; Ci._., I I�· f · Address: 1/,·..:,; :;· -S/-.,)r.·,·,,,. 6).,)Phone : ·z k I -J _s -I .(_ 5.Description of Request: L c:. • f 5 p / , -f-/ 6.Zoning:Applicable City Ordinance Number ___________ Section ____________ _Present Zoning, __________________ P.roposed Zonin ___________ _Present Use ___________________ Proposed Use ____________ _ 7.Beason for Request: _k 1 � 8.Emibits Submitted (11ap1, dia1ram1, etc.) _____________________ _ 9.Acknowledgment and Signature: The undersigned hereby repre1ent1 upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the City of Columbia Hei ghts to take the action herein requested, that all 1tatement1 herein are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in accordance vith the Ordinances of the City of Columbia Heightsand the laws of the State of Hinneaota. (' Si gnature of Applicant;;). '-4 L-. -.. Q_ \.. /'• � Gl..s1--,Date: /) -=-'t 3Taken By:_�!!f::::!..._, _____ _ > / P E T I T I O N We the undersigned do herewith indicate our· objections to the division of Lot 16, Block 1, Silver Lake Addition, Columbia Heights. We feel that another home built on this lot would detract from the neighborhood's appearance of presently generous-sized lots. This indeed could decrease surrounding property valuations. We also feel that the plan of tearing down 23' of the existing house would leave a house with less than the minimum 1120 square feet. Once the lot is split, the neighborhood has no guarantee that the remodeling will be done as planned. We therefore reque·st that no lot split be allowed until the remodeling has taken place and that no variances be granted on any building permits for either house. � � 1-,?-73 _wk4-zj,,.cf<2J¼_�---I ·. -. . ( (..}., I . , , , -� -::Jt.c.f O) �-, 'jd...vvv.-,( c, .PL-• � t: l.J (,,� � � c) o t,/ d��<if � 2 l/ 0 I S, /Ve v Lt:A u.. ./ 1_ • .r':/1 , o...rk ,,>d. L,; --�I-/· ,-;L.t.,-/ . \_ I t'\:&c::( ,....__ = ..Va4 L.L£z k--J i> Y r Ab·d nn'-_Hpvd_ ...... '. ' ·':' -... t ---00·0�1e--- b· I ,0 I· 7 % ,..._ I I .9.103 (37) ,, Ord. 1043.!ff. s111is3 Lot of.Record: 4Dy lot which ia one (1) unit of a plat heretofore or hereafter duly approved and filed, or one (1) unit of an Auditor'• Subdivision or a Begiatered Land Survey, or a parcel of land not ao platted, subdivided or regiatered for which a Deed, Auditor'• Subdi­vision or Regi1tered Land Survey baa been recorded in the office of the Register. of Deeda or l.egiatrar of Title• for Anoka. County, Kinne­aota prior to the effective date of this Ordinance • • • • � lot of record 1• alao any parcel created by a lot aplit pursuant to Section 9.407 of thia Ordinance. ·9.103 (38) Lot Area: The area of • lot In • horizontal plan bounded l>y th e.Jot Jines, but not Including any area �cup led by the waters of a duly recorded lake or area which has been dedicated as a public right-of-way. 9.103 (39) Lot Area per Dwell Ing Unit: The number of squa"'re feet of lot · area required per dwelling unit. 9.103 (Ito) Lot -Corner: A lot �ltuated at the Junction of, and abutting on two (2) or more lnterJectlng streets, or• lot at the point of def1e�tlon In alignment of a continuous street, the Interior angle of which does not exceed one hundred thirty-five (135) degrees. 9.103 (�1) lot Depth: The mean horizonta l distance between the front lot llne and the rear lot lfne of a lot. 9.103 (�2) Lot line: A lot llne Is the property line bounding a lot except that where any portion of a lot extends Into the public right-of­way or a proposed public right-of-way shown on• reco rded official map, the line of such public right-of-way shall be the lot llne for applying thl_s Ordinance. 9.103 (�3) Lot Line -Front: That boundary of• lot which abuts• public street, and In the case of a corner·J ot It shall be the shortest � dimension on a public street. If· the dimensions of a corner lot are equal, the front lot line shall be desi gnated by the owner and filed with the City. 9.103 (4�) Lot Line -Rear: That boundary of a lot which Is opposite the front lot lfne. If the rear lot line Is less than ten (10) feet In length, or If the lot forms a point et the rur, the rear lot line shall �e a llne ten (10) feet In length within the lot, parallel to, and at the •xlmum ,istance from the front lot llne. 9.103 (45) Lot Line -Side: Any boundary of• lot which Is not• fro�t lot line or• rear lot llne. 9.103 (lt6) Lot -Through: A lot which has • pa-Ir of opposite lot I Ir.es abutting two (2) substantially parallel streets, and which i.s not a corner lot. On a through lot , both street lines shall be front lot Jines for applying this Ordinance • -285 - ·"-',· • • '1 .. i ,, I ,.103 (47) &.ot Vldth : �� ._, .. .IIDrlUDta141atence ... t.-n the •Ide lot I Ines of• lot _,ured within the first �t1'1rty "(JO) '-t-�f. the. lot tlepth. 9.103 (48) Kobtle Home: A a:,blle heme ae-ns a factory•bullt structure or structures equipped with the necessary service connections and ude·� as to be readily aovable as a unit or units on Its or their own running gear and designed to be used a� a dwelling unit or units without a permanent foundation. The phrase "without a perunent foundation" Indicates that the support 1y1tam Is constructed withthe Intent that the mobile home placed thereon wlll be aoved fromtime to time at the convenience of the owner. 9.103 (49) Moblle Home Park: A parc�l of land 10 designed and Improved withutilities, parking pads, walks, access roads, etc. to accomnodate1110blle homes which are to be used as dwellings that have receivedState approval • 9.103 (50) "otor Court, Motor Hotel or Hotel: A parcel of land upon which Is located a bulldlng or group of buildings other than• hotel andused primarily as a temporary residence �f a aotorlst. J.103 (51) Motor Freight Termlnal: A building or area where freight arrives, is removed or both "'1'or rout Ing In lntra-st11te or Inter-state ship­ment by motor truck. •9.103 (52) Motor fuel Station: A retall place of business engaged primarilyin the sale of motor fuels, but uy also be engaged In supplying goods and services generally required In the operation and maintenance of motor vehlcles. 9.103 (53) Motor Fuel Station• Major: A prlmarlly retall place of businesswhich may engage In Major 1110tor vehicle repair, shall be located within three hundred (300) feet of a •Jor thoroughfare, •Y Include auto wash as an accessory use, Ny operate a T.I.A. store. 9.103 (54) Hotor Fuel Station• Minor: A retall place of business whichshall have two service bays, and •Y engage In Minor 1110tor vehicle repair. 9.103 (55) Hotor Vehicle Repair• M1Jor: General repair, rebuilding or reconditioning of engines, aotor vehicles or trallers, lncludlngbody work, frame work and •Jor painting service. 9.103 (56) .9.103 (57) Motor Vehicle Repair• Minor: The replacement of any part orrepair of any part which does not require the removal of the engine head or pan, engine, transmission or differential; lnclden·tal body and fender work, alnor painting and upholstering service when said service •bove stated Is applied within •n enclosed building. ,Jlon-Conformtng Structure: Any structure which 11 legally existing -upori the effective date of this Ordinance, which would not confor11 tothe applicab le regulations If the structure were to be erected under the provisions of this Ordinance. 286 i I -07(4) Lot Area, Hei9ht 1 Lot Width and Yard Regulrements (a)No structure or building shall exceed three (3) storiesor thirty-five (35) feet In height, whichever Is lesserin height, except as provided In Section 9.116(16). {b) A side yard abutting a street shall not be less than twelve(12)feet in width. {c) The following minimum requirements shall be observed subject to the additional requirements, exceptions and modifications as set forth In this Section and Section 9.116 (16 ). Heisbt Lot Area Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard 1 story 8,400 Sq. ft. 70 ft. 25 ft. 7 ft. 30 ft. 2 stories 8,1,00 Sq. ft. 70 ft. 25 ft. 7 ft. 30 ft. 3 stories 8,400 Sq. ft. 70 ft. 25 ft. 10 ft. 30 ft. 9.107(5) Floor Area Requirements for Dwelling Units Dwelling units erected In the "R-1" District shall have the following mi nimum floor areas: � Ord. 1223 eff. 7/8/91 Ord. 1223 eff. 7/8/91 • l {a) One story dwelling containing three bedrooms or less, 1,120 square feet or more plus 120 square feet for each additional bedroom. (b)One and one-half story dwelling containing 2 bedrooms or less,1,020 square feet or more plus 120 square feet for each additionalbedroom. Cc) Two story dwelling containing three bedrooms or less, 800 squarefeet on fi rst floor or more plus 60 square feet for each additionalb�room. - {d) Split level design containing three bedrooms or less, 1,020 square feet or more olu� 1?.n sauare feet for P.�ch �nnltlnnal bedroo�. Split level design shall be defined as any design wherein the entry way together with some living space Is located at ground level with additional liNing space located above such level and/or partially below such level. (e)Split entry design containing three bedrooms or less, 1,120 squarefeet plus 120 square feet for each addi·tional bedroom on the mainfloor. Split entry design shall be defined as any design wherein the entryway is the only area located at ground level and all living spaceis located above such level and/or partially below such level. 307 ... SECTION 7 -r 9.407 (1) • � 9.407 (2) Ord. 1043, eff. 8/11/83 9.407 (3) LOT SPLIT When the lands of a •ubdiv1•ion are the:ruelve• contained 1D and are a part of a plat already approved by the City, or if 11ot app�ed, are '.of a plat recorded DDD& the County record• prior to ud with­out the 11eceasity of approval by the City, or of a resi•terec! luc! ciirvey recorded among the County records u provided by lav an4 the proposed "lot ap11t" is vitb respect to one of the fore101D&, tbe ·eouncil by ujority YOte _,. apprne aucb lot aplit. Whenever •uch "lot •plit" 1a to 'be aade hereunder, auch pbd ivision can be made without further platting with approval of the Council if the Council shall find that auch aubdiviaion facilitates and does not binder the trans­fer and conveyance of the land; does not binder the making of assessments and keeping of records connected therewith; does not ruu�t 1D the creation of any parcel (within or without the subdivision) of a size 1D area which is less than is required for purposes of construction of a 'bu ilding on such parcel under the zoning laws and building regulations of the City, and does not result in the creation of any parcel vbicb 1• more than 10' less than the minimum lot width required by the Zoning Code for 'building on the said parcel. The Council 1111st further find that the aubd1vu1on to be made is not 1118de for the purpose of avoiding aucb conditions and restric­tions with respect to the land as might be impoeed upon a platting; that the subdivision is in accordance with the goals of the prevailing zoning ordinances and City plan; and that the aubdivision has provided auch plans for drainage, atreets, sewers, 11nd other public utilities as is consistent with aound engineering and planning standards. Upon application for a lot split, the aubdiv1der ahall aubmit an application fee of $10.00, or aucb other amount as uy be •ubseq uently set by resolution of the Council, and ahall aubmit a aketcb ahowing the proposed lot •plit and necessary drainage and public utility plans to the Columbia Beights Public Services Department. Such plans shall be submitted to the Plann1na and Zoning Commiaaion vhicb aball give a report to the City Council either recommending approval or defeat of the propo•ed lot split. No person ahall make or record any lot or parcel of land in a •ubdiviaion 1n vhicb a lot bas been split without having firat having •111bmitted the aae to the Council for approval and without having the Council approve the lot aplit by Council resolution hereof and by an:y other agencies and officials whoseapproval is required 'by law, includin& County Platting authoritiea and shall have 'been duly recorded • . -477 - • -,�. , '1111111111 CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: September 13, 1993 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPT.: CITY MANAGER NO: 6 Planning & Zoning APPROVAL ITEM: Conditional Use Permits BY: Evelyn Nygaard� BY: -li_ J.. - NO: Ordinance #1270 6.D.DATE: September 10,1993 Ordinance #1270 allows the approval by the Zoning Administrator of accessory structures of 120 square feet or less (primarily utility buildings) as an exception to the requirement for a Conditional Use Permit. Sheds and other accessory buildings over 120 square feet would still require a Conditional Use Permit and review by the Planning and Zoning Commission and approval by the City Council. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of Ordinance #1270 as there are ample copies available. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to schedule the second reading of Ordinance #1270, being an Ordinance amending Ordinance #853, City Code of 1977, Pertaining to Conditional Use Permits at the Council meeting of September 27, 1993 . • COUNCIL ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 1270 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 853, CITY CODE OF 1977, AND PERTAINING TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS The City of Columbia Heights does ordain: Section 1: Section 9.105(5) (g) of Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, which is currently reserved, shall be amended to hereafter read as follows, to wit: 9.105(5) Conditional Use Permit (g)Exceptions: Section 2: (i)Accessory Structures: Any conditional usepermit for an accessory structure that is 120square feet or less and that has been appliedfor properly and pursuant to Section9.105(5) (b) may be granted by the ZoningAdministrator, provided that said accessorystructure will not be detrimental to theComprehensive Plan or the development of thesurrounding neighborhood. Decisions of theZoning Administrator are appealable pursuantto Section 9.105(3). This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after its passage. First Reading: -----------Second Reading: ----------Date of Passage: ---------- Offered By: ------------Seconded By: Roll Call: ------------ Donald J. Murzyn, Jr., Mayor Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: September 13, 1993 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS I ORIGINATING DEPT.:NO: 6 Planning and Zoning CITY MANAGER APPROVAL ITEM: Non-Conforming Signage BY: Evelyn Nygaarv---, I B DATE: September 10, 1993NO: Ordinance #1272 6.E... Ordinance #1272 is an amendment to,the Sign Ordinance which sets criteria for non­conforming signage to be brought into compliance. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of Ordinance #1272. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of Ordinance #1272 as ample copies are available to the general public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to schedule the second reading of Ordinance #1272, being an Ordinance amending Ordinance #853, City Code of 1977, Pertaining to Non-Conforming Signage at the Council meeting of September 27, 1993. COUNCIL ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 1272 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 853, CITY CODE OF 1977, AS AMENDED, PERTAINING TO NON-CONFORMING SIGNAGE The City of Columbia Heights does ordain: Section 1: Section 9.117A (2) (b) of Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, which currently reads as follows to wit: 9.117A (2) (b) Signs which are lawfully in existence and in use prior to and on July 13, 1981, may remain in use until July 13, 1993, even though such signs do not conform with Section 9.117A of the City Code. is herewith amended to read: 9.117A (2) (b) Signs which were lawfully in existence and in use prior to and on July 13, 1981, may remain in use even though such signs do not conform with Section 9.117A of the City Code. However, all such non­conforming signs will be required to be brought into strict compliance with Section 9.117A of the City Code if any one of the following should occur: Section 2: (i)if application is made for building permitsfor the property, equal to or greater than$5,000.00 in estimated construction costs; ( ii)if the non-conforming sign comes intodisrepair such that, in the opinion of thezoning administrator, it requires significantrepairs or replacement; (iii)if the sign face requires replacement (i.e.change of tenant etc.); and/or (v)if the property is sold. This• Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after its passage. First Reading: __________ _ Second Reading: __________ _ Date of �assage: _________ _ Offered by: ____________ _ Seconded by: ___________ _ Roll Call: ____________ _ Donald J. Murzyn, Jr., May or Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: September 13, 1993 AGENDA SECTION: Ordinances/Resolutions ORIGINATING DEPT.: CITY MANAGER NO: 6 Building Inspections APPROVAL ITEM: Flood Plain Ordinance BY: Evelyn Nygaard._,_... __ BY:� NO: Ordinance #1274 6.F.DATE: September 10, 1993 When the model Flood Plain Ordinance was adopted on May 24, 1993, there was a typographical error in the wording supplied by the State. The error was discovered when we submitted the signed adopted Ordinance back to the State. This amends the erroneous wordage. A second reading and adoption of the Ordinance needs to take place on September 27, 1993 as that date has already been advertised as its public hearing. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the Ordinance #1274 as there are ample copies available. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to schedule a second reading of Ordinance #1274, being an Ordinance amending Ordinance #853, City Code of 1977, pertaining to Flood Plain for the City Council meeting of September 27, 1993 • • COUNCIL ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 1274 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 853, CITY CODE OF 1977, AS AMENDED, PERTAINING TO FLOOD PLAIN The City of Columbia Heights does ordain: Section 1: 9.311.13 Chapter 9, Article 3, Section 11, of Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, as amended, which currently reads as follows, to wit: The cost of any structural alterations or additions to any nonconforming structure over the life of the structure shall not exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure unless the conditions of this Section are satisfied. The cost of all of the Community's initial flood plain controls must be calculated into today's current cost which will include all costs such as construction materials and a reasonable cost placed on all manpower or labor. If the current cost of all previous and proposed alterations and additions exceed 50 percent of the current market value of the structure, then the structure must meet the standards of Section 9. 304 or 9. 305 of this Ordinance for new structures depending upon whether the structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe, respectively. is herewith amended to read 9.311.13 The cost of any structural alterations or additions to any nonconforming structure over the life of the structure shall not exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure unless the conditions of this Section are satisfied. The cost of all structural alterations and additions constructed since the adoption of the Community's initial flood plain controls must be calculated into today's current cost which will include all costs such as construction materials and a reasonable cost placed on all manpower or labor. If the current cost of all previous and proposed alterations and additions exceed 50 percent of the current market value of the structure, then the structure must meet the standards of Section 9.304 or 9.305 of this Ordinance for new structures depending upon whether the structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe, respectively. section 2: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after its passage. First Reading: -----------Second Reading: -----------Date of Passage: ---------- Offered By: ___________ _Seconde d By: ___________ _Roll Call: --------------- Donald J. Murzyn, Jr., Mayor Jo-Anne student, Council Secretary CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MEETING OF: September 13, 1993 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MGR NO: 6 CITY MANAGER'S APPROY,._AL ITEM: HOUSING MAINTENANCE CODE 6.G. BY: P.HENTGES B�NO: ORDINANCE 1275 DATE: 09/10/93 The proposed housing maintenance amendments are in response to the Judicare lawsuit responding to the enforcement measures the City follows for posting and enforcement of laws associated with tenants who are occurring rental units that are not lawfully licensed or whereby a landlord is in jeopardy of losing the rental license. Ordinance No. 1275 provides that the tenant shall be served with the same compliance order that the landlord receives after his/her building is inspected and the violations are set forth. A notice for the tenant shall be determined to be properly served if a copy is posted on the outer door of each dwelling unit affected. Moreover, the ordinance provides that after the correction period, the posting notification and revocation/suspension hearings also include notice and an opportunity for each tenant or occupant of the affected dwelling units to be given an opportunity to be heard by the City Council. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the ordinance, there being ample copies available to the general public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to schedule the second reading of Ordinance 1275; Being an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, as amended, pertaining to the Housing Maintenance Code for September 27, 1993. COUNCIL ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 1275 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 853, CITY CODE OF 1977, AS AMENDED, PERTAINING TO THE HOUSING MAINTENANCE CODE The City of Columbia Heights does ordain: SECTION 1: Section 3: SA. 303 ( 1) Chapter SA, Article III, Section 3, of Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, as amended, which currently reads as follows to wit: COMPLIANCE ORDER Whenever the Building Official determines that any dwelling, dwelling unit or premises surrounding any of these fails to meet the provisions of this Ordinance, he/she may issue a compliance Order setting forth the violations of the Ordinance and ordering the owner, occupant, operator or agent to correct such violations. The compliance order shall: (a)Be in writing; (b)Describe the location and nature of theviolations of this Code; (c)Establish a reasonable time not greater than 6months for the correction of such violationand advise the person to whom the notice isdirected of the right to appeal; and (d)Be served upon the owner or his/her agent orthe occupant, as the case may require. Suchnotice shall be deemed to be properly servedupon such owner or agent, or upon suchoccupant, if a copy thereof is: .(i) Served upon him/her personally, ( ii)Sent by certified mail return receiptrequested to his/her last known address,or (iii)Upon failure to effect notice through (i)and (ii) as set out in this section,posted at conspicuous place in or aboutthe dwelling which is affected by thenotice. is herewith amended to read, 1 Section 3: SA. 303 ( 1) SBCTION 2: Section 4: 5A. 304 ( 1) COMPLIANCE ORDER Whenever the Building Official determines that any dwelling, dwelling unit or premises surrounding any of these, fails to meet the provisions of this Ordinance, he/she may issue a Compliance Order setting forth the violations of the Ordinance and ordering the owner, occupant, operator or agent to correct such violations. The compliance order shall: (a)Be in writing; (b)Describe the location and nature of theviolations of this Code; (c)Establish a reasonable time not greater than 6months for the correction of such violationand advise the person to whom the notice isdirected of the right to appeal; and (d)Be served upon the owner or his/her agent, asthe case may require. Such notice shall bedeemed to be properly served upon such owneror agent, if a copy thereof is: (i)Served upon him/her personally, (ii)Sent by certified mail return receiptrequested to his/her last known address,or (iii)Upon failure to effect notice through (i)and ( ii) as set out in this section,posted at conspicuous place in or aboutthe dwelling which is affected by thenotice. (e)Be served upon the tenant(s) of the affecteddwelling or dwelling units. such notice shall"be deemed to be properly served upon suchtenant(s), if a copy thereof is posted on theouter door of each dwelling unit affected. Chapter SA, Article III, Section 4, of Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, as amended, which currently reads as follows, to wit: Posting to Prevent Occupancy The Building Official may post any building or 2 structure covered by this Ordinance as being in direct violation of the Ordinance preventing further occupancy. Posting will occur if any owner, agent, licensee or other responsible person has been notified by inspection report of the items which must be corrected within a certain stated period of time and that the corrections have not been made. current occupants shall have not more than 60 days to vacate a posted property. current occupants shall vacate posted property immediately if such occupancy will cause imminent danger to the health or safety of the occupants. No person, other than the Building Official or his representative, shall remove or tamper with any placard used for posting. No person shall reside in, occupy or cause to be occupied any building, structure or dwelling which has been posted to prevent occupancy. is herewith amended to read, Section 4: 5A.304(1) SBCTIOH 3: Section 8: Posting to Prevent Occupancy The Building Official may post any building or structure covered by this Ordinance as being in direct violation of the Ordinance preventing further occupancy. Posting will occur if any owner, agent, licensee or other responsible person has been notified, by inspection report, of the items which must be corrected within a certain stated period of time, and that the corrections have not been made. Upon the posting of any dwelling or dwelling unit(s), the tenant or occupant of said dwelling or dwelling unit(s) shall be given notice of the posting. current occupants shall have not more than 60 days to vacate a posted property. Current occupants shall vacate posted property immediately if such occupancy will cause imminent danger to the health or safety of the occupants. No person, other than the Building Official or his representative, shall remove or tamper with any placard used for posting. No person shall reside in, occupy or cause to be occupied any building, structure or dwelling which has been posted to prevent occupancy. Chapter 5A, Article 4, Section 8, of Ordinance No. 853, as amended, which currently reads as follows, to wit: Suspension or Revocation 3 SA.408(1) A license issued or renewed under this section may be revoked or suspended upon a finding of noncompliance with the provisions of this Chapter. Reinstatement of a suspended license shall be accompanied by an amount equal to 50% of the license fee. Issuance of a new license after suspension or revocation shall be made in the manner provided for obtaining an initial license. Revocation and suspension procedures shall be those prescribed in Chapter 5 of the City Code. is herewith amended to read, Section 8: SA.408(1) SECTION 4: Suspension or Revocation A license issued or renewed under this section may be revoked or suspended upon a finding of noncompliance with the provisions of this Chapter. Reinstatement of a suspended license shall be accompanied by an amount equal to 50% of the license fee. Issuance of a new license after suspension or revocation shall be made in the manner provided for obtaining an initial license. Revocation and suspension procedures shall be those prescribed in Chapter 5 of the City Code, additionally however, a Statement of cause and a Notice of Public Hearing shall also be served upon each tenant or occupant of the affected dwelling or dwelling unit (s) . At said public hearing the tenant(s) or occupants shall be given an opportunity to be heard by the City Council. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after its passage. First Reading: -----------Second Reading: -----------Date of Passage: _________ _ Offered By: ____________ _ Seconded By: ___________ _ Roll Call: ------------- Donald J. Murzyn, Jr., Mayor Jo-Anne student, council Secretary 4 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS NO: 6 ITEM: HOUSING MAINTENANCE CODE 6 H. NO: ORDINANCE 1276 , , MEETING OF: Se,ptember 13. 1993 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S BY: P. HENTGES DATE: 09/10/93 CITY MGR APPROVAL This ordinance is the second ordinance related to the J udicare lawsuit regarding the posting and citation of tenants who occupy unlicensed rental units. In simple terms, this ordinance provides that the tenant may not occupy a dwelling property posted under the terms of the ordinance. However, that person will not be charged under this section until such time the hearing is held and specific findings are made by the City Council indicating that they are revocating or not intending to issue the license. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the ordinance, there being ample copies available to the general public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to schedule the second reading of Ordinance 1276; Being an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, as amended, pertaining to Penalties for Violation of the Housing Maintenance Code for September 27, 1993. COUNCIL ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 1276 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 853, CITY CODE OF 1977, AS AMENDED, PERTAINING TO PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION OF THE HOUSING MAINTENANCE CODE The City of Columbia Heights does ordain: SECTION 1: Chapter 5A, Article VI, Section 1, of Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, as amended, which currently reads as follows, to wit: SA.601 No person, firm, corporation, or licensee shall own and maintain or operate or rent to any other person for occupancy any rental dwelling, rental dwelling unit, or premises in which a rental dwelling unit is located in violation of Chapter SA, Article II (§SA.201, et. seq.), maintenance standard. is herewith amended to read, SA.601 No person, firm, corporation, or licensee shall own and maintain or operate or rent to any other person for occupancy any rental dwelling, rental dwelling unit, or premises in which a rental dwelling unit is located in violation of Chapter SA, Article II (§SA.201, et. seq.), maintenance standard. No person shall be charged under this section, until such time as specific findings are made by the City Council and authority granted, pursuant to a public hearing in accordance with Sections SA. 408 ( 1) and 5.104(1) of the City Code. SECTION 2: Chapter SA, Article VI, Section 9, of Ordinance No. 853, city Code of 1977, as amended, which currently reads as follows, to wit: SA. 609 No person may occupy a dwelling or property posted pursuant §SA.304. is herewith amended to read, SA. 609 No person· may occupy a dwelling or property posted pursuant SSA.304. No person shall be charged under this section, until such time as specific findings are made by the City Council and authority granted, pursuant to a public hearing in accordance with Sections SA.408(1) and 5.104(1) of the City Code. SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after its passage. First Reading: -----------Second Reading: -----------Date of Passage: ---------- Offered by: ------------Seconded by: __________ _Roll Call: ------------- Donald J. Murzyn, Jr., Mayor Jo-Anne student, Council Secretary PL.ANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING -MINUTES SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 1 ,j)j /. /;jtr. The Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of September 7, 1993 was called to order at 7:03 p.m. Members present were Fowler, Hansen, Larson, Peterson and Szurek. Also present vere Evelyn Nygaard (Building/Zoning Administrator), Don Schneider (Director of B.R.A.) and Leann Bocvinski (City Attorney's office). Motion by Larson, seconded by Peterson, to approve the minutes from the meeting of August 3, 1993 as presented in vrit:Lng. Roll Call: All Ayes. OLD BUSINESS: A.Site Plan ApprovalCase #9308-17 Jeff Bahe/Conoco Express 3701 Central Avenue Columbia Heights, Mn. Ms. Nygaard stated that this case vas tabled from the August 3rd Planning and Zoning meeting due to inadequate and incorrect information presented on the site plan and to allow Mr. Bahe time to obtain an accurate, architecturally signed site plan for review by Staff prior to the September meeting. She stated that, as of this date, no new plans or additional information has been received from Mr. Bahe for Staff review. Motion by Peterson, seconded by Larson, to deny the site plan as presented due to inadequate and incorrect information. Roll Call: All Ayes. B.Public BearingLotsplitCase #9308-20 Alois Kroll 4557 Madison Street Columbia Heights, Mn. Mr. Kroll's request for a lotsplit of a portion of 4557 Madison Street to be combined with 4545 Madison Street was tabled from the August 3rd aeeting to allow Mr. Kroll time to provide a written maintenance agreement for driveway access to be recorded on both deeds or install a separate driveway for each building within 60 days from the lotsplit approval and that Hr. Kroll present a site plan indicating adequate hard surface parking for each building with a minimum of two spaces per dwelling unit. � The Commission reviewed the Declaration of Easement submitted by Kr. Kroll providing a ten foot driveway easement for each property. Be also has obtained a bid from a contractor for additional hard surface parking for each four unit building to provide a minimum of eight parking spaces per building. Motion by Larson, seconded by Peterson, to recommend to the City Council the approval of the lotsplit as proposed provided additional parking be installed JI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING -MINUTES SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 2 within 60 days from the approval of the lotsplit. Roll Call: All Ayes. **THIS ITEM TO APPEAR OH THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FOR SEPTEMBER 13, 1993. C.Public HearingVariancesCase #9308-21 Scott Smith REt 450 H.E. 38th Avenue Columbia Heights, Mn. Ms. Nygaard indicated that Mr. Smith's request for a nineteen (19) foot front yard setback variance and a variance on parking spaces to allow an addition onto the existing building at 450 N.E. 38th Avenue was tabled from the August 3rd meeting to allow Mr. Smith time to submit an accurate, architecturally drawn site plan. She stated that, as of this date, a new site plan had not been submitted by Mr. Smith for Staff review prior to this meeting. Motion by Larson, seconded by Peterson, to deny the requested variances due to inadequate information on the site plan. Mr. Smith will need to reapply at a later date when he has the proper drawings completed. Roll Call: All Ayes. NEV BUSINESS: A.Public HearingVariance/Site Plan ApprovalCase #9309-22 Frank & Mary Jo Miske, Jr. RE: 455 N.E. 37th Avenue Columbia Heights, Mn. Commissioner Larson excused himself from participation in this case as it would be a conflict of interest stating he is the architect for the project. Ms. Nygaard presented the request of the Miske's for site plan approval and request for a variance of 28 parking spaces from the 87 parking spaces required for the construction··of a 30,160 plus square foot industrial building with a partial second floor at 455 N.E. 37th Avenue. She informed the CommiBBion the grading and drainage of the lot would be reviewed by the Engineering Department. The Traffic Commission would also be reviewing the request at the October meeting. Ms. Nygaard stated that landscaping for the parking areas would be required to provide a minimum of 200 square feet of landscaping for each 20 parking spaces. The parking area would be required to be striped and the handicap spaces and their signage to be per State requirements. She also stated a maximum of 100 square feet of wall signage would be allowed plus one freestanding, two-sided sign forty feet high with a 11.Uimum size of 100 � l 1 II I j·· PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING -MINUTES SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 3 square feet. Ks. Nygaard indicated that the site lighting for the parking area shall be shaded or diffuaed 10 as to reflect the light away from the adjoining property and avay from the abut.ting traffic flow H per Section 9.116(3) (b) of the Zoning Ordinance. .. - Gary Laraon, architect for the project., 1tated that the reason for the variance request was due to the pie-shaped lot and the rail ayatem running through the property. Be indicated that the aezzanine area would be used aolely for storage, not office area. Be felt the number of parking spaces indicated on the site plan would be sufficient for this buaineu a, there would be a amall number of employees. Mr. Miske informed the Commission that his business was unufacturing envelopes which requires a large amount of storage area for the paper as well as for the dies used in the process. Be stated that he will have eleven (11) employees, thereby not needing all the parking required. Be indicated that if further redevelopment of the area were to occur, he vould be interested in purchasing additional lot area to •square off• pis lot. Steve Jonak, owner of industrial property at 533 N.E. 37th Avenue, expreued his concerns regarding variances on the required parking in the area. Be felt that a variance should not be granted, especially of this percentage, when everyone else must provide the required parking under the Zoning Ordinance. Be indicated that there is a shortage of parking in the area due to the abutting duplexes on the Minneapolis side of 3 7th Avenue and the tenant.I parking on the atreets. Be felt that the proposed building was too big for the odd-shaped lot. There could be a parking problem if the building would be sold or the use changed and the building is used to full capacity with more employees. Commissioner Peterson questioned Attorney Bocvinski if future changes to the site or sale of the property can be reason for reconsideration of the variance as far as parking. She explained that it 1hould be 1tated in the aotion. Don Schneider indicated that this could be atipulated in the redevelopment agreement as well. Kot.ion by Fowler, seconded by Peter1on, to approve the 1ite plan and rec011111end to the City Council the approval of the 28 1pace parking variance due to the hardship of the shape of the lot and to add that, if the property i• ,old or the use changes, the parking requireaents for the 1ite au1t be fulfilled. �oll Call: All Ayes. **THIS ITEM TO APPEAR ON THE AGENDA POR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IEGULAR MEETING -MINUTES SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 4 B.Public BearingSpecial Purpo1e Pence CHe #9309-23 Cynthia Joseph 4423 Arthur Street Columbia Heights, lfn. Evelyn Nygaard preaented the request of Cynthia .Joseph for penii11ion to in1tall a five (5) foot high cedar privacy fence on the north 1ide property line of 4423 Arthur Street. The propo1ed fence location would be beginning at the front comer of the hou1e eztending 118.5 feet toward the rear of the lot abutting a proposed chain link fence that will eztend to the rear property line. Ms. Nygaard 1tated that the abutting owner at 4429 Arthur Street has given consent in writing to allow the fence on the property line. Ms. Nygaard informed the Commission that the neighbor at 4429 Arthur has ezcavated out a portion of his property which has not been 1tabilized with a retaining wall. Be was directed to install a retaining wall, but has not done so yet. Ber concem was that the fence be erected far enough away from the excavation and to ensure the fence is well anchored to avoid collapsing of the fence. Commissioner Szurek asked Building Inspector Nygaard how far inside the property line the fence would need to installed in order to be on stable ground. It was suggested that the Building Inspector assist Ms. Joseph on determining the stability of the area prior to any fence installation. George Virtz of 4429 Arthur Street stated that he did not want to be responsible for the removal of any of the trees existing near the area of the proposed fence installation. Ms. Joseph stated that she would take that responsibility. Commissioner Szurek questioned Hr. Wirtz on his ezcavation of his lot and when he would complete whatever it is he is doing. Be 1tated that he had intended to construct a garage. However, he started the work without the required building permit and is now having difficulty in fulfilling the requirements for obtaining a building permit. Commiuioner Szurek 1uggested that Hr. Wirtz take whatever action nece1sary to 1tabilize his property•• eoon •• po1eible eo as to eliminate the po11J.bility of further erosion of his property or any adjoining property. Motion by Fowler, 1econded by Peter1on, to reco1111end to the City Council the approval of the five foot high special purpose privacy fence reque1t for 4423 Arthur Street•• reque1ted. Roll Call: All Aye1. **THIS ITEM TO APPEAR ON T8E CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FOR SBPTEHBER 13, 1993. Commissioner Lar1on left the aeeting a� this time. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING -MINUTES SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 5 c.Public BearingLotlplitCase #9309-24 301eph and Belen Gallu1 4025 Stinaon Blvd. Columbia Heights, lfn. Ms. Nygaard pre1ented the request of Kr. and Kr1. Gallu1 for a lot1plit of property legally described as Lot 16, Block 1, Silver Lake Addition, addre11ed as 4025 Stinton Boulevard. Approziaately 23 feet of the ezilting hou1e would be removed in order to aeet the 1even (7) foot required 1ide yard eetback. She stated that both parcels would meet the criteria required for a lot 1ize in the R-1 Zoning District. A minimum of 8,400 aquare feet of lot area i1 required in the R-1 Zone. She informed the Commi1sion that Parcel A would have 23,100 square feet of lot area and a frontage of 82.27 1quare feet while Parcel B would have 21,300 1quare feet of lot area witb a frontage of 72.87 1quare feet. Ms. Nygaard suggested that action on this request be contingent upon the e1isting structure being rebuilt within one year to a size to meet the minimum requirements of the R-1 building size and that a building permit NOT be i1sued for the vacant lot until the encroaching portion of the structure on Parcel B is removed. Ray Zurek of 4015 Stinson Boulevard voiced his concerns 1tating that spli�ting the lot detracts from the neighborhood giving a crowded effect due to the smaller lots and smaller house that could be built. Be felt the larger lots would be worth more money. Be also felt the difference in the topography could create drainage problems. Warren Shaffer of 4050 Stinson Boulevard stated that the lotsplit proposal and the intent to remove a portion of the house to gain the lotsplit approval vas an •architectural abortion•. Eileen Evans of 4024 Stinson Boulevard asked what the guarantee would be that the proposal to remove a portion of the ezi1ting house and reconatruct it would be fulfilled once the lot split is granted and aigned by the City. She felt this was an eztreme measure to undertake to gain the lot1plit. She al10 1tated that the measurement of lat width at the front of the lot i1 not the 1ue as toward the rear of the lot and that ehe had a problem with that criteria. Dennis Hikkel1on of 4040 Stin10n Boulevard etated that the DD recommend• a 75 foot lot width be utilized for 1horeline property. Be 1tated that the County info1"11ed hill that the City 1hould have a ehoreline ordinance enacted to protect the larger lake propertie1 in the City from being 1plit into eaaller lot1. Ellen Shaffer of 4050 Stinson Boulevard 1tated that thi1 area i1 a nicer area in the City, everyone aaintains their property, etc. She felt 1maller lots would downgrade the area. The area ahould be left as it is. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING -lflNUTES SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 6 Mark OYens Kurtz of 4020 Stinson Boulevard atated his occupation as a realtor indicating his basil for knowledge of property values. Be felt that ·the lotsplit creating 1maller lots would lower property values in the area. Gerry Berringer of 1721 Innsbruck Parkway 1poke 011 behalf of hb father who lives at 4121 Stinson Boulevard. llr. Berringer stated that in 1990 when the Gallus' s propoaed a lotsplit, it was 1uggested an ordinance be enacted to protect the larger lou in the area, bt,t it was ·not done. Be a1lced that the Commission consider the impact this lotsplit would have 011 the neighborhood. Norm Hiakowiec of 4003 Stinson Boulevard 1tated he moved to this area because of the aesthetics of the larger lots. Be felt the City should not grant splitting of the lots. Councilrepresentative Bruce Nawrocki was in attendance due to number of inquiries he received from residents surrounding the lotsplit property. Be felt that the lot width to be considered should be measured across the lot, side to aide, not along the front of the lot, which in this case is on the diagonal and is wider at the front than farther toward the rear. Belen Gallus of 4025 Stinson Boulevard referred to the Guzik property at 4231 Stinson that was split in 1980 stating that the lotsplit width was figured at the front which was an angle as vell. She felt a few people cannot dictate rules for everyone else when they don't follow them theirselves, refering to her neighbors. She stated the intent was to sell the vacant lot and continue to live in the existing house. She stated 1he felt that 1he was being discriminated against by not wanting her to utilize her property to its full extent. Commissioner Szurek stated that her concern with the lotsplit is the creation of the smaller lots allowing additional buildings 011 the lake as the water quality of the lake ia deteriorating rapidly. She stated that the requirements of the lotsplit ordinance must be fulfilled indicating that the Planning and Zoning Commiasion can recommend provisions onto a l0t1plit a, the Commis1ion is an advisory board to the City Council. Council Representative Peterson pre•ented a petition he received indicating objection to the lotsplit from a number of re1identa in the area. Notion by Szurek, 1econded by Fowler, to recoaend to the City Council the approval of the lot,plit provided all requirement• of a lotaplit are aet, that drainage and public utility plans be 1ubmitted for review prior to City Council action and that no peraitl be iuued for construction 011 the new lot until the demolition and rec0111truction of the existing houae are completed and aeet the minimum 1quare footage requirementl of the 1.-1 Zoning District. I.all Call: All Ayes. **THIS ITEM TO APPEAR ON THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FOR SEPTEMBER 13, 1993. PLANNING ARD ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR. MEETING -MINUTES SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 7 D.Site Plan ApprovalCase #9309-25 Steve Jonak Ua 533 N.! 37th Avenue Columbia Beightl, Kn. Evelyn Nygaard stated that this request was removed from the agenda due to inadequate inforaation provided on the 1ite plan. E.Public BearingConditional Use PermitCate #9309-26 Jtay Kuba Global Computronics 5003 University Avenue Evelyn Nygaard presented the request of Ms. Kuba for permiuion allow the installation of a tent in the parking lot of 5003 University Avenue to conduct a technology trade show from September 28-30, 1993. The shov would be in celebration of five years of auccessful business in Columbia Heights. The latest computer products from major vendors vould be on display for her customers. The event would be an • invitation only• event. The tent is proposed to be located in four of the unstriped parking spaces at the front of the building. Ms. Kuba stated that she has contracted with a bus company to pick up clients at various places of busi.ness and bring them to her trade show 10 as to decrease the impact of additional traffic and parking in the area. Moti'on by Peterson, seconded by Szurek, to approve the Conditional Use Permit to allow the installation of a tent in the parking lot of 5003 Univeraity Avenue from September 28-30, 1993 provided a $500 check is aubmitted to the License Clerk prior to the installation of the tent to asaure ita removal no later than October 1, 1993. **THIS ITEM TO APPEAR. ON THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FOR SEPTEMBER 13, 1993. F.Public BearingVarianceCase #9309-27 Grace and Truth Chapel 200 N.E. 44th Avenue Columbia Beighta, Kn. Evelyn Nygaard presented the request of Audeen Uchetto, repreeenting Grace and Truth Chapel, for a variance of 24 feet on the required 25 foot front yard setback required on th� placement of a freestanding 1ign. She ezplained that the current aign was installed in 1990, approxiutely one (1) foot inside the front property line. (Building permit #25020 obtained 11/21/90 by De Mars Signs vas for a 5'x3' freestanding aign set ten (10) feet inaide the front property line. The current sign installed is a 6' x 4' 1ign.) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR. MEETING -l!INUTES SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 8 Ms. Nygaard indicated that, if the 1ign were aoved to the 25 foot 1etback, it would not be ••en from the east due to tree• on neighboring properties blocking visibility and the view from the west blocked by tree• on this property. Motion by Fowler, 1econded by Ban1on, to reco-end to the City Council the approval of the 24 foot 1etback variance due to the hard1hip of the tree• on the adjacent properties and on thJ,1 property blocking the view of the 1ign. Roll Call: All Ayes. **THIS ITEM TO APPEAR ON THE Clff COUNCIL AGENDA FOR SIPTEMBll 13, 1993. G.Public BearingSpecial Purpose FenceCase #9309-28 Darwin and Vilma Lorance 1814 N.E. 40th Avenue Columbia Heights, Mn. Evelyn Nygaard stated that this case was withdrawn by the applicants. No action required. The Commission temporarily adjourned this meeting at 8z40 p.m. to act on the appeal request before commencing with review of Staff reports. Motion by Peterson, seconded by Hanson, to temporarily adjourn the meeting. Roll Call: All Ayes. The Board of Appeals vas called to order at Bz40 p.m. Members pre1ent were Fowler, Hanson, Peterson and Szurek. Commissioner Larson vas not in attendance. Also present vere Evelyn Nygaard (Building/Zoning Administrator), Don Schneider (Director of B.R.A.) and LeAnn Bocwinski (repres,enting the City Attomey' s office). RTI!IOBS: • A.Public BearingAppeal CHe #9309-29 Tiaothy Bradach 4400 Stin1on Boulevard Columbia Beight1, Mn. Evelyn Nygaard presented the request of Mr. Bradach to appeal her decision to require frost footings under a atructure located at 4400 Stinaon Boulevard which he ia attempting to rehab. She explained the history of the building to the Commi11ion as well •• reading a letter sent to Hr. Bradach dated July 16, 1993 indicating her findings regarding an inspection of the premises and the corrections that would be necessary to continue rehabing the 1tructure. . PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION UGULAR MEETING -MINUTES SEPTEMBER 7. 1993 PAGE 9 Mr. Bradach'1 contention wa1 that the building has 1tood on the lot for a long time without frost footings. the wall• are 1traight, etc. and he felt he 1hould not be required to bring an old building into code with today'• requirements 1tating it would change the •old farmhouse• ae1thetic1. . Be informed the Commission that he spent all hia extra funds on the repairs he ha1 already made to the 1tructure and hie bu1inen. Be would not have any additional aonies to put into rehabing the property� Be requeated the Comaiasion give him permiuion to live in the building while he work• on it aa he ia currently living in one of his warehouses. Be indicated that he did dig under a portion of the house and e:zposed footings of 24 inchea deep. Be apologized for not contacting the City before starting the rehab work, but he assumed that he could do his own work in the house. Be stated that his friends, who are contractors. told him they didn't think he needed permits to work on his own house. Mr. Bradach's attorney. Phil Nelaon, aaid he felt Hr. Bradach got off on the wrong foot with the City by atarting the work without the required permits. Be felt Mr. Bradach should be allowed to live in the home while he is working on it, stating that Mr. Bradach probably would not have bought the house if he knew of the problems he would encounter. Evelyn Nygaard stated that the City records indicated a building permit obtained in 1957 for a remodel indicating work to be done as •concrete slab entrance to back door, fireplace, already put foundation in, fixing up inside of house•. The Building Code in effect for 1957 was the code of 1952 which required frost footings. She stated that doing cosmetic work to the property would not be sufficient. Major corrections must be made to allow occupancy of the structure. Discussion was held regarding what Kr. Bradach needed to do to the house to gain occupancy. Be was informed by Evelyn Nygaard that Mr. Bradach should put together a plan outlining his intention for the rehabilitation of the property to code and submit it to her office for review. She stated that his plans must address the plumbing, electrical and heating repairs as well as the atructural items he plans on correcting. Upon the completion of certain items, occupancy may be granted. Motion by Peterson. seconded by Fowler, to deny the appeal of Kr. Bradach. Roll Call : All Ayes • Motion by Fowler, seconded by Ranson, to adjourn thia aeeting at 9125 p.m. l.oll Call: All Ayes. The Commission reco111111enced the regular Planning and Zoning meeting at 9125 p.m • PLARliIHG DD ZOIIIIIG CODISSIOR UGIJLil IIDTD'G -MDUTE:; SEPTEDD. 7. 1ggg3 P�E 10 STAPP RBPOI.TS: A.Ordinance #1269 was presented for review. Evelyn H7gaard explained thatOrdinance #1269 would refine the requireaenta for private garages in the 1.-1 anda-2 Zoning Districts to allow only one private garage per residence. It alsoincludes the 1tipulation that acce11ory buildin11 cannot exceed the equarefootage or height of the principal building nor a auillwD of 18 feet in heightor 1,000 1quare feet in total 1ize. Discussion was held regarding the impact on the City if this change was implemented. Attorney Bocwinski 1tated that the Zoning Ordinance defined a private garage as a detached acceuory building or portion of a principal building, including a carport, which i1 used primarily for 1toring pa11enger vehicles, trailers or trucks. She reminded the Commi11ion that thi1 Ordinance change would allow only one garage, which would greatly affect existing properties with ,mall attached or detached garages. It was decided that more dilcuuion was neceuary prior to adoption. It was the contention of the Commissioners that they should think about this proposal and submit questions or comments to Evelyn Nygaard. Motion by Szurek, seconded by Peterson, to table action of Ordinance #1269 to the next meeting in October for further discussion. 1.oll Call: All Ayes. B.Ordinance #1270 was presented for review. Evelyn Nygaard explained thisOrdinance would allow the approval of accessory structures of 120 1quare feetor less to be granted by the Zoning Administrator 10 that a building permit forsmall utility buildings could be handled in a aore timely aanner •• has beendone administratively in the past at the direction of the Planning and ZoningCommission. Motion by Szurek, seconded by Peter1on, to recommend approval of Ordinance #1270 to the City Council. 1.oll Calla All Ayes. • C.Ordinance #1272 vas presented for review. Evelyn Nygaard explained thisamendment to the Sign Ordinance would site criteria for non-conforming 1ignageto be brought into conformance with the Sign Ordinance. !lotion by Szurek, aeconded by Peter1on, to recouend approval of Ordinance #1272 to the City Council. �11 Calli ill Ayes . PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR D!TING -MINUTES SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 PAGE 11 Motion by Szurek, 1econded by Peter1on, to adjourn the aeeting at 10100 .p.m. Roll Call: All Ayes. Planning and Zoning Commi11ion kp • CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: September 13, 1993 AGENDA SECTION: Communications ORIGINATING DEPT.: I I CI'l'Y MANAGER NO: 7 Planning & Zoning APPROVAL ITEM: Variance, Frank Miske, Jr. 7.a. I. BY: Evelyn Nygaard � BY:('-.�� NO: Case #9309-22, 455 N.E. 37th Ave. DATE: September 9, 1993 A request for a variance of 28 parking spaces from the 87 parking spaces required by Ordinance 9.116(4)(bb) for the· proposed construction of a 30,160 square foot industrial building to be located at 455 N.E. 37th Avenue was approved due to the hardship of the shape of the lot provided: 1.The grading and drainage of the parking lot shall be according to a planapproved by the City Engineer. 2.The Traffic Commission review and approve the circulation plan and what impactthere will be on 37th Avenue and 5th Street. 3.Lighting for the parking areas shall be per 9.116(3) (b) of the Zoning Ordinance. 4.A maximum of 100 square feet of wall signage is allowed plus one freestandingsign forty (40) feet high with a maximum of 100 square feet on two sides. 5.Landscaping for the parking areas shall be provided with 200 square feet oflandscaping for each 20 spaces. The parking spaces are to be striped. Signage forhandicap parking and parking space size to be per State requirements. However, should the ownership of the property and\or the use of the facility be changed from the current proposed usage, the variance would no longer apply. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the request for a variance of 28 parking spaces from the 87 spaces required for the proposed construction at 455 N.E. 37th Avenue provided the above items numbered 1-5 are satisfied. However, should the ownership of the property and/or the use of the facility be changed from the current proposed usage, the variance would no longer apply. COUNCIL ACTION: I - CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Application For: Rezoning Variance Privacy Fence Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval Site Plan Approval Other X y- Application Date, Aup,ust 11, 1993 Case No: q O q -�·· Fee a 1/,1> { Date Paid � /(; Receipt Noa ? 6 Cj 9 ·3 l.Street Address of Subject Property,_4_5_5_3_7_th_A_:v_e_n_u_e _N;...;..;. E;;.;•;.... ______________ _ 2.Legal De1cription of Subject Property a __ s_e_e,_A;;;.. t_t-a_c_h:.;:;e;,;:;d ________________ _ ("l'iS" 17T# Av· c:-/I/ c) 3.Applicant:4.Owner: s. Name: Frank and Mary Jo Uiske2 Jr.Name:Sarne as applicant Address: 10078 Twin Lake Road Elk Riyer MlJ 55330 Address: ------------- Phone: 441-3067 Phone: --------------. � Description of Request: Site plan approval / VA�l. Rtv( c;;: £GI? Jf?.CJCI,L.J(:. 7 7 :;c4c.e-.r 61irs1? l2LJ,t_ <.:: T ttAt;P f n:;r,' ,6,1) 5·� P _ � /I.I -:;-·It,,,,, Pf;:; <2C 6.Zoning: Applicable City Ordinance Number 9.115 Section 15 ·----------------- Present Zoning I-1 Propose d Zonin g ___ .._-.-______ _ Present Use Vacant Industrial Proposed Use Manufacturing and Storage 7.Reason for Request: Site plan approval on attached proposed deyelgpmept • 8.Ezhibits Submitted (ups, diagrams, etc.) _____ S_i_t;.;;e�P-=l:::.an:::... ____________ _ 9.Acknovledgment and Signature: The undersigned hereby repre1ent1 upon all of thepenalties of lav, for the purpose of inducing the City.of Columbia Beight1 to take theaction herein requeated, that all 1tatement1 herein are true and that all work hereinmentioned will be done in acco��nce vith the Ordinances of the City of Columbia Heights and the lavs of the State of Signature of Applicant: . < coc:: ,, • , ;'"I y 2 J>ate: 8-11-93 Taken By: ______ _ Parcel 1 PROJECT SITE EXHIBIT A TO EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATIONS AGREEMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 32, 33, 34 and 35 and the West 10 feet of Lot 36, Block 89, Col umbia Heights Annex to Minneapolis, in Anoka County, Minnesota, together with that part of the South 1/2 of vacated alley adjoining said Lots and lying between the Northerly ext ensions of the West line of Lot 32 and the East line of the West 10 feet of Lot 36, in said Block 89. Parcel 2 Lot 6, Aud itor's Subdivision No. so, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the South .2 feet thereof. Parcel 3 That part of vacated 37th Avenue Northeast described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of Lot Eight (8), Auditor's Subdivision Number Fifty (50), Anoka county, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof on fil e and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds, Anoka County, Minnesota, distant 131.S feet West from the Southeast corner thereof; thence West along the South line thereof 40 feet; thence South at right angles 11.25 feet; thence East 40 feet to a point on a line drawn from the point of beginning and at right angles with the South line of said Lot Eight (8) di stant 11.3 feet South from said point of beginning; thence North ll.3 feet to the point of beginning; being a part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SE 1/4 SW 1/4) of Section Thirty-five (35), Township Thirty (30), Range Twenty-four (24). Parcel 4 Lot Eight (8), Auditor's Subdivision Number Fifty (50), Anoka County, Minnesota. That part of Block "G", Columbia Heights Annex to Minneapolis described as follows, to-wit: Commencing at a point on the East line ot said Block "G" which point is 263 feet North of the Southeast co rner of said Block "G"; thence West on a line parallel to the South line of said Block "G" to the East line of the right of way of the Minnea polis, St. Paul and Soc Ste. Marie R.R.; thence Northeasterly curving to the right with said rightof way line (which right of way line is East of and parallel withand 25 feet distant from the center of said railroad track, beingon a curve of 5 degrees 30 minutes) to a point which is on a lineparallel with the South line of said Block "G" and Norththerefrom 417.6 feet; thence East 76.1 feet along said line to a point on the East line of said Block "G", said point 417.6 feet North from the South line of said Block "G"; thence South along the East line of said Block "G" 154.6 feet to the point of beginning; the above described premises now known and des�ribed as Lot Se ven (7) and the South .2 feet of Lot Six (6), Auditor's Subdivision No. so, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said Anoka County. Being registered land as is evidenced by Certifi cate of Title No. 16588. .. dVV\I 3.LIS ' � J.IBIHX3 , OE/ ,. "' 3N , olS - OOLE 3 z Pl "I. 'HSi o 9E M ,. 'II 0 .. "I ' • --:----.-, -.-,..-,.Ji.,.. . ....,::-.,r-ro-=-o:.c::-,-._=-• .-::: ... =-----c--· -----···-··-........ -····-��-··· -·--.--..-··· ···--�--- GARY LARSOt. � ARCHITECT, It., USO ARTHUR PLACE 11£ IIINNEAPOLIS, MINN. .Ulf (11�)'1•1-01,J FAX(l1IJ1•1•01•J To: Citu of Columbia Heights Buildino 500 38th Ave. NE. Columbia Heights. Minnesota From: Garv Lenon Architect, Inc. Related to property et 5th St. NE end 37th Ave. NE., Envelope Specialties Property. Re: Approval agreement called for in Section 15, ·r Industrial District, section 9.115( 4) lot Area, Height, lot Widths, end Yard Requi remenb, (e) 'tthich states: ( e)One side yerd mav be reduced to zero if the wner, of the ebutti no lot, file a signedagreement 'ttith the Citv. The other side vsrd shall be 12 feet or more end developedto permit "'hicular arcess unless said lot is served b\l a public alley. If yo•J agree that the abutting property mav reduce one side verd to zero per the Columbia Heights Zoning Ordinance stated above. please sign belw. » ft>':-'='IP}\r:--Date 'o {9 (q� Title ,www11:::, • , ..,.v .. -, --� .,� Thank you for your cooperation. U<}/JA-- GARY LARSO. ARCHITECT, IA 44$0 ARTHUR l'LACE NE. MINNEAPOLIS, IIINN. .U21 (l12J711•011J ,AX(lflJ7•f•01IJ To: Grief Bros. Corporation 3755 Univer1itv Ave. NE. Minneapolis, Minnesota from: Ger!J Lenon Architect, Inc. Related to propert!J at 5th St. NE and 37th Ave. NE., Envelope Specialties Propert!J. Re: Approval agreement celled for in Section 15, ·r Industrial District, aection 9.115( 4) Lot Area, Height, Lot Widths, end Yard Requirements, (e) v�ch ,tates: (,) One side 1J1rd may be redtad to zero if the ovnen of the ebutti ng lots file a signed agreement vith the City. The other side !Jlrd shell be 12 feet or more and developed to permit vehicular acces, unless said lot is ,erved b!J a public alley. If IJOU agree that the abutting propert!J may reduce one side 1J1rd to zero per the Columbia Heights ZonirwJ Ordinance stated above, please sign belw. No�<� /4--A�rv Title �.$7<L" Date �/qJ Thank you for IJOUr cooperation. • . """, -., GARY LARSO� .AlfCHlnCT, IN...__ "60 ARTHUR PLACE NE. IIINNEAl'OLIS, IIINN. "411 1•1zJ1•1-01•i �Axt11a1,11-01•1 To: Steel Tech, Inc. 450 38th Ave. NE. Columbia HeiQhts, Minnesota From: GerlJ Lar,on Architect, Inc. Related to propertv at 5th St. NE and 37th Ave. NE., Envelope Specialties Propertv. Re: Approval agreement celled for in Section 15, ·r Industrial District, aection 9.115( 4) Lot Area, Height, Lot Widths, and Yard Requirements, (e) vhich states: (e)One side vard mey be reduced to zero tf the wners of the 1butti111J lots file • SiCJnedagreement .ith the Citv. The other side vard shall be 12 feet or more and developedto permit vehicular access unless said lot is served bu a public alleu. If IJOU agree thet the abuttilllJ property fflllJ reduce one side vard to zero per the Columbia HeiCJhts Zoning Ordinance stated above, please sign belw. Name � -:- :; ;:tfas; , ;-4:Pt Title fr-J:.S , 1 J«rf- Thenk IJOU for IJOUr cooperation. Sincerlyf ���k--Gary E. a� A.I.A. Date. �-/o-9,3 r f �-� �. • 9.116(4) cont. II • Code and to allov the Cit7 to obtain •ucb leaal ud equitable re­ lief•• a Court of competent juriacliction UJ provide. The cove­ nant aball further provide that the aaid owner or owners uecut­ in& the contract aball pay all attone7s' fees, court costs, and administrative fee• incurred b7 Che Cit7 in Che enforcement of the covenant. . ·. 7)Any covenant entered into hereunder and any contractualparking permit iasued hereunder ahall automaticall7 expirewent:, five (25) yeara after the date of filing of die aaidcovenant in the office of the County llecorder • (�) Banks, Offices and/or Public Office Buildings: At least one (1)·parking space for each two hundred (200) •qua� feet up to 6,000square feet of floor area (net) ,plus one (1) parkiD& •pace for eachtwo hundred fifty (250) aquare feet over 6,000 •quare feet (net). (w)Undertaking Establishments: One (1 ) parking apace for each five (5),eats or thirty five (35) square feet of aeating area where thereare no fixed seats, ·,1us one (l) parking space for each two hundredfifty (250) square feet of floor area·not used for seating. (x)Furnit�re Store, Appliance Store, 'Wholesale and Warehouse: At leastone (1) parking space for each four hundred (400) square feet offloor�area (gross) up to 6,000 square feet, plus one (1) parltiDgspace for each 1,000 square feet over 6,000 square feet. (y)Open Sales Lots, Lumber Yards, Auto Sales:� One· (1) parking apace foreach two th ousand (2,000) square feet of lmid up to the first eightthousand (8,000) square feet plus one (1) parking space for eachfour thousand (4,000) square feet of land up to a parcel of 24,000square feet plus one (1) parking space for each six thousand (6,000)square feet thereafter. (z)Auto Repair, Boat and Marina Sales, Garden Store, Trade Service Shops:Four (4) parking spaces·plus one (1) for each eight hundred (800)square feet of floor area over the first 1,000 square feet. (aa) Skate, Dance Balls, Miniature Golf, Private Clubs, Ice Arenas and Other Recreation Centers: Ten (10) 'Parking spaces plus one . (1) addi­tional. space for each two hundred (200) square feet of floor area (net). · (bb) Manufacturtng, PabricatiDg or Processing of a Product OT Material: :Four (4) dff-atreet parldq spaces plus one (1). for each four hun-dred (400) square feet of floor area (1roas). 9.116(5) Off-Street Loading and Unloading Areas -�,L (a)Location:. All required loading berths •hall be off-street. A load­ing berth shall not be located leas than fifty (SO) feet from thelot line of an abutting lot in an "R" District. Loading berths shallnot occupy front yards or side street yards. (b)Loading Berth: Unless otherviae specified in this Ordinance, a re­quired loadiDg berth •hall be not leas than twelve feet (12') inwidth, blentJ five feet (25') in length and fourteen feet (14') inheight, uclusive of aisle and aaneuveriDg space. -343 - • CITY COUNCIL LETTER AGENDA SECTION: Communications NO: 7 ITEM: Special Purpose Fence, C. Joseph 7.a.2.NO: Case #9309-23, 4423 Arthur Street _ Meeting of: September 13, 1993 ORIGINATING DEPT.: I CITY MANAGER Planning & Zoning APPROVAL BY: Evelyn Nygaar 11 -BQ d:l :+ DATE: September 9, 1993 "' A request for permission to install a five foot high special purpose privacy fence on the north side property line was approved provided the fence be installed on stable ground. The neighbor to the north has excavated the south side of his property up to Ms. Joseph's property line. This excavation, which is more than four (4) feet deep in some areas, was done without permits. The neighbor has been ordered to install a retaining wall in this area. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the five foot high special purpose privacy fence as requested for 4423 Arthur Street. COUNCIL ACTION: - -- -if i CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Application For: llezoning Variance Application Date: _____ _ Case No: 0 36 q -eS 1Privacy Fence "L Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval Site Plan Approval Other Fees _____ Date Paid ___ _ Receipt Hoa __________ _ Qstreet Address of Subject Property, 2'%73 ,J/1/4-< :ft'-/Jf: 2. Legal Description of Subject Propert:,a ______________________ _ �) s. �- ,. :::�c ?�4 �/2 Addre.:.=�= 0; /1� Phone : 70 -/ ·-;, I ._-=?-. -�') Owner:(.. _:; _....::::s.�_dd.t._,,:1111_t�---_- _-_---- Name: ·1/ Address: Phone: ------:---� Description of Request. :(./1'"" k-gd:, eL.d?.,.,.___ � Ly -' t:v:4r1i./-1 «zi-<U?I, .4Yf__p *� "'ll / 7 Zoning: 0 �-;:; Applicable City Ordinance Number ___________ Section:.,_ ___________ _ Present Zoning, _________________ P.roposed Zoning, __________ _ Present Use ___________________ Proposed Use. ___________ _ Reason for Request: ��p 0-:zy �_£.; d1= «1<:d Pli:<2;,!:g £ 0 ;'.' ,. 'I (_,/�J """' � .. / ��( B. Ezhibiu Submitted (aaps, diagrams, etc.) ______________________ _ 9.Acknowledgment and Signature: The undersigned hereby repre1ent1 upon all of thepenalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the City of Columbia Beight1 to take theaction herein requested, that all 1tatement1 herein are true and that all vork hereinmentioned will be done in accordance vith the Ordinances of the City of Columbia Heightsand the lavs of the State of �� 9 -4 >I Signature of Applicant,><'�� �� Taken By: :2 -c-7-·,(_ .-..... •-� 1: CERI'Di\.!A'lE CP 'Jl!!NCE ·a:JmNT 1. q@�� �,ao/h z,,quest � �_, -to�� a 1<� �.f; 1 1 • 5r� a� J::, b at#tf��;�f ll)Cil 1119' n,, • •••l_v •� fence will be situated t:1/ C distance j � Dr pq,ex•ty line. A true and accurate sketch or the locatia, or the tence C11 the applicant 'aprq,ertY. (Be accurat�1n your neasweeuts; it will avoid later misunderstandings � cairu.cts. ) 't' \--. c, ·"' . .... I ,._ i ---. ' :�'-J . -1- ! v' - ,1 �)I "': ·. I �! !.,.1, ' -�j;i :::), ·-!� ';"� \!i i ------Co c "'er-St.Alt�__,;:, {;_..le f b' e, o..� e·�, �,!, ,. lf-o IISC...,. •mder81sied fully \l1derstanrSs tne requestto its heigtlt. type m1 locat1C11. Si&nature �Y\R_\ \JY h I tt.J4/J..•Address 4:l/ 2 q QA t:0. 1,6S:lsiature .j . A&nss ---------&,,lature •Address ---------81cm tllr'e ___________ ; Address ________ _ ', . .... ••• '· ', ' ,I , .. !· ,. ..., ·, \ ---. • .. -,, � . -I I J •1"J-..---I I I ! I •• ' ' .. I • I . I ; · •1····· I . I I- �- I· • J I i .�·····�·I ',I �-:-'·. . . . . • I, • • .. -.... - ,., .. J. .): ., ., I .. ; I 1: CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: September 13, 1993 "I AGENDA SECTION: Communications ORIGINATING DEPT.: I CITY MANAGER NO: 7 Planning & Zoning I APPROVAL ITEM: Conditional Use Permit, Kuba 7. 3. .a ..BY: Evelyn Nygaard� BY:�iJ NO: Case #9309-26, 5003 University Ave. DATE: September 9, 1993 The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommend to the City Council the approval of a request by Kay Kuba of Global Computronics for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the installation of a tent in the parking lot of 5003 University Avenue for a period of three days from September 28-30, 1993. The approval was contingent upon a $500 check be submitted to the City prior to the erection of the tent to assure removal by October 1, 1993. The tent would be used to house a technology trade show with a display of the latest computer products by major vendors. The event would be by invitation only and the guests would be picked up at their businesses by chartered bus so no parking problems should be encountered. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the Conditional Use Permit to allow the installation of a tent in the parking lot of 5003 University Avenue from September 28-30, 1993 provided a $500 check is submitted to the City prior to the erection of the tent to assure its removal by October 1, 1993. COUNCIL ACTION: - � ==--- -- - � I"""""' I"""""' -- �- -- I I I - ,. CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Application For: Q Rezoning Variance Privacy Fence Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval Site Plan Approval Other Application Date: R-j Cj -ci 3 Case No: q3oCJ-d6 Fee: _____ Date Paid ----- ...2L T-e n t.� S'€. pt�e"-1.eceipt Nor _________ _2�, 2-9�2:>o Street Address of Subject Property: 5 c o3 L{ ,, ; "E' r � i-t a' /-\ \/ e... i"4 E: 2.Legal Description of Subject Property: ______________________ _ t) _,,--.... I ' .-\ (_Sy· \ \: K\i Applicant: Name: kA 'I KUB� , /4.'\ Ovner: C_:,J .Jch,"-Name: -_ ,-1 ·, 11-e r Address: Soo,3 L\N1'-tE;,�·,T'( f\\/t NE Address:Soo9 On�"€l"s,\;iA'iet.J1 Phone: (G,2.) -s;-7, -259 \ ·Phone:( b \2) S 7 2. -1662 Description of lleques"Jo Ce. te. 6-rc� � a -e...0..."1�a-'", 0 fQ T �TI c">.. S�ce..s�u_L b'--�·LY\..��1 I Li...'.)O\J-l.d.. �e. .±a. h.o..vc a_.. te V\. t. u, ---l.h. e.. �'""' t o -L "'-€.. bu.·, \ ct \ � -ll--\e.lot 6 -.::f 4; _/4-,, _-£._,.__��f hl n 4f1l-t.� / 8j 17, ;,..Cj..l I Id/(: 1 �7, Zoning: Applicable City Ordinance Number __________ Section ___________ _ Present Zoning ________________ Proposed Zonin _________ _ Present Use _________________ Proposed U se __________ _ G huon for Request: s pc--w;.cy 0.., ± .. ecJ,,V\O \ 0 a'& ..to.cl E.. $;) V\.!Y\Ll , d ; SJ? �"' � L,__fu Q::'.: � � "-t .-d,,u Ks tC\M., "!':aj Qr "e..,..sd..a..: Ji.J:Jc.... { -¼�\e_:t:t, P�, :CSM-, AppLL. ta. «AJ.L O\AJ\.J ��c�.._ 8.Exhibits Submitted (maps, diagrams, etc.) _____________________ _ /4.--) Acknowledgment and Signature: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the L .. penalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the City of Columbia Heights to take theaction herein requested, that all statements herein are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Columbia Heights and the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature of Applicant: �----• Date: �-/9 -9 3 . Taken By: ______ _ [(II] GLOBAL COMPUTRONICS, INC. \c, k�'i {).,� FisC'\N': Ko..� � P--e: �N�•' 1.,� -9.<.u/' • GLc.ba..1... ���� 5003 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, N.E. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55421-1642 TELEPHONE (612) 571-0578 (612)571-2591 FAX: (612)571-0746 8 {2..0 /ct 3 U o.. -6u...ll s;ie.-. U---=-� _, '3d...:_.. (! Jb l\a.u.d t,o._11V•<C. "'4 u1�.o , ·wr-J.,n_u<e-'$u.c-c D� y �,.l_,._t:.,Ll.,_, �\..v::>'---'-'"'-.c>�� .f\s.o �-l�� --� o.>-/v c�/'� C)..l,� ..L� -\-l,\..C -M..Ope F,_;__.,� ·-½eA-f � �. b ,';f--°� ct' be� �� � L �'-Oif � �ecJ,u�lon­ .3o �30 ��lr J-...a��� F 0); i)L<�Q \M''-'-' O\A . .CS , :J_ u.:,� h� ��=. 1'-i(l ._,.,...,_d..& O..""-o_ �" --\t\..Q_, r·...J: u. er l;.t" .i..1.:, '-t\i� -tc-c\.,d,,.. °b �l'-L b u..J&_\..A.<f J'. iu::,.s<e� .9-Q LJr•d 0. _Q,�::t;_ E' S:C' �-f" o,�ll_"-..:/i::o O ,._j fey,,.__ G L,,�d: C"""':\'"-c.ill.�LcQ '\\= '-"--C)_'-.Q \ k t"'-tc Q �r � C:v--4"'- S>..o DP-�� _b,..;J.d,G I u-,-l'-'--Cl.\. ---� v\�e. -\\,� o.,::l,..c:,.q,� 1fY �L -\t� "--'f "'zr <>. Si . � C>O J) Cl>� � 1'C� L>..,. ';.U �Qe. de...J. (:_u,. $..:.:Ls,. � t-��- -\\e� � \51. �� �o-.� • ��< (t e\A · ..... , .z . rn • •& I .� I = .. , • "Z� • •?I' : <>? --·-r -'-i I .,.; , I I .. .I. i -·. -��-,,a, .y.·., ,_.., ---._, 'c>'il--- .,,<. � .. ..,,,, �(1,,1.;I:"' '\: \_ ., .,, �.:,, J,/ -1 -o--·- -------·-�____ ._...,,_.._�_,__..., __ ..,,,.._,.._ tf'!/' I �� -�0 • y� • ...:., () .,, • ,. ·. �I. I "-' ?:_. r ., � CITY COUNCIL LETTER AGENDA SECTION: Communications NO: 7 ITEM: Variance, Grace & Truth Chapel �, 7.a.-r.NO: Case #9309-27, 200 N.E. 44th Ave. Meeting of: September 13, 1993 ORIGINATING DEPT.: Planning & Zoning BY: Evelyn NygaardY--­ DATE: September 10, 1993 The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recommend approval of a request by the Grace and Truth Chapel for a variance of 24 feet to the requirement of a 25 foot front yard setback for an existing freestanding sign presently located one foot from the front property line at 200 N.E. 44th Avenue. The approval was based on the hardship of trees on adjoining properties blocking visibility of the sign. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the 24 foot front yard setback variance to allow the existing freestanding sign to remain in its present location at 200 N.E. 44th Avenue. COUNCIL ACTION: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Application For: llezoningVariance X: Privacy Fence Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval Site Plan Approval Other Application Date: -,--,·� Case No: , _ __, ...... , c,o <, Fee: � OD l>a te Receipt No: 0 / CJ ;q !; 1.Street Address of Subject Property: Z.oo -4-471'1 1/vr Al-e-- 2.Legal Description of Subject Proper�:,: ______________________ _ 3.Applicant: Name: /JubEe/J R.. ICHETTO Address: 0 Ee ft77)'#-Cl-ft:b) Phone: 82 B -35" 99 (wo�/<..) 4.Owners Name : 6 � If C. £ +-7/L u -n-1-Clftte€L Address: Zoo 4--4-n+ Ave A/.E. Phone: ------------- ·s.Description of Request :_...i() e-.S_£..;.£_._..;it_7_7_,t...:..c..;.H;..;1=;;;;.::t>;., )1---------------------- 6.Zoning: Applicable City Ordinance Number ___________ Section ____________ _ Present Zoning, __________________ Propo1ed Zoning, __________ _ Presen t Use ____________________ Proposed Use. ____________ _ 7.i.ea10n ior :iequest: (sec 1/-TT,tC!fEl>) • 8.Ezhibits Submitted <••P•, diagrams, etc.) (se-e-/tTfif-C fft:-7:>) s.Acknowledgment and Signature: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose o.f inducing the City of ColWDbia Heights to take the action herein requested, that all statements herein are true and that all work herein aentioned will be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Columbia Heights and the laws of the State of Kinnto:a· Signature of .Applicant: � � l)ate: fl/._zD/9J Taken By: ______ _ EX 1ST ING SIGN LOCATION GRACE AND TRUTH CHAPEL . ' 200 44th Avenue Grace and Truth Chapel Property I i ne � : Existing signI location I [0.8' ----.. --. ----: _. . -.. ---=-""7+=-=-.-::-. =-=-��.:t:- 44th Ave 62 I .j Center I ine of --­westbound I one +,) Q) Q) +,) U) C N 74 AL TERNA TE S I GN LOCAT I ON GRACE AND TRUTH CHAPEL 200 44th Avenue IA I ternate sign , location Property I ine � ! ! ]10 I I---··--·-----·--... --'1'- 44th Ave -• -• -· 1..39 I ..I Center I ine of---­westbound I one Grace and Truth Chapel +-' Q) Q) +-' (/) C N • 61 I • North ..---Center I ine of eos tbound I one ATTACHMENT to APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE Regarding Location of Freestanding Sign at Grace and Truth Chapel 200 44th Avenue N.E. Section 3 Applicant Address: Through 8/27193: Grace and Truth Chapel c/o Audeen Richetto, Treasurer 6225 Perry Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Section s Description or Request: Starting 8/28193: Grace and Truth Chapel c/o Audeen Richetto, Treasurer 9143 Ranchview Lane Maple Grove, MN 55369 City code requires our freestanding sign to be 1 0' from the prQJZeT{y line (along 44th avenue). The sign manufacturer incorrectly installed the sign 10' from the &Hil2. (0.8' from the property line). We request permission to leave the sign at the current location to allow for better visibility and readability from 44th avenue. Section 7 Reason For Request; The sign is currently installed 10 feet from the curb along 44th avenue. In order for the sign to be in compliance it would have to be 19 feet from the curb. We believe this would be a disadvantage for the following reasons: 1)Reduced "Window of Readability". The sign utilizes 4" high letters and is designed to be readable from a distance of 100 feet Since the sign is double-sided and mounted perpendicular to the road, it can be read from both directions along 44th avenue. As traffic passes by. readabili ty of the sign will start when the passengers are 100 feet from the sign and will conclude when the angle of sight is greater than 45°. This defines a "window of readability" or a distance of travel along 44th avenue over which the sign is readable. The attached scale drawings show that if the sign is moved back to 19 feet, the window of readability will be reduced from 7 4' to 61' on the eastbound lane and from 62' to 39' on the westbound lane. This calculates out to a combined 26% reduction in readability. 2)Reduced Visibility. If the sign were moved back to 19 feet, visibil ity of the sign would be partially obstructed by the tree on the corner of 44th avenue and 2nd street (see attached drawing showing alternate location of sign). The tree is about 30 feet in diameter and about 50 feet tall. 3)Cost of Move. The sign manufacturer estimates that the cost to move the sign will be over $500 (including re-installing electrical service). Section 8 Exhibits Submitted; See attached drawings: 1)Scale drawing showing existing location of sign. 2)Scale drawing showing alternate location of sign (with code compliance). 3)Plat survey drawing (for reference only). CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS AGENDA SECTION: COMMUNICATIONS NO: 7 ITEM: APPOINTMENTS TO VARIOUS BOARDS NO: 7, C. AND COMMISSIONS MEETING OF: September 13, 1993 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S BY: B. STANLEY DATE: 09/09/93 CITY MGR APPROVAL Based on previous discussion by the City Council, staff is recommending the appointment of the following residents to our various boards and commissions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to appoint the following residents to various boards and commissions: Ruth Graham ..... Cable Communications Commission ...... Term to Expire April, 1994 Gerald Foss ...... Park & Recreation Commission ......... Term to Expire April, 1998 Daniel Duda ..... Traffic Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Term to Expire April, 1997 Joseph Sturdevant . Traffic Commission ...... 1-i·; � • • • • • • • • • Term to Expire April, 1999 COUNCIL ACTION: CITY COUNCIL LEITER MEETING OF: SEPTEMBER__l3, 1993 AGENDA SECTION: OLD BUSINESS OR IGINATING DEPT.: CITY MANAGER NO: 8 FINANCE APPROVAL ITEM: PURCHASE OF IBM AS400 BY: WIL� ELRITE BQ�p_ NO: B.A .wu� DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 This item was tabled at the August 9, 1993 City Council meeting and discussed at the August 16, 1993 work session. It was tabled again at the August 23, 1993, City Council meeting. This item was tabled to be brought up at the September 13, 1993, City Col.,J.Ilcil meeting. At this time, �taff is still gathering additional information related to the purchase of the AS400 system, and it is staff's recommendation that this item be tabled until the September '27, 1993, meeting. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to table the purchase of an IBM AS400 computer system to the September 27, 1993, City Council meeting. Alternate motions: Recommended Motion: Move to authorize the purchase of an IBM AS400 Computer System for $38,424 based on the state contract price. Recommended Motion: Move to authorize the sale of the IBM System 36 at a price of $4,000 or higher based on informal bid. Recommended Motion: Move to amend the 1993 budget in line item 101-41510-5170 by $9,424 and in line item 101-41510-3050 by $3,700 with funds to come from Unreserved General Fund Balance. WE:dn 9309071 COUNOL ACTION: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MEETING OF: September 13.1993 AGENDA SECTION: OLD BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MGR NO: 8 CITY MANAGER'S APPROVAL ITEM: AUTHORIZATION TO REPLACE WOODEN BY: LOADER/NYGAARD B�� NO: WINDOW SILL$/D00R FRAMES 8.8. DATE: 09/09/93 This item was tabled from the meeting of August 23, 1993. After authorization 11 the June 28, 1993, City Council Meeting, aair has sought quowiom to replace the muen wooden window sills and door fnmcs at the library (sec llllChed drawing). The 1993 pneral buildings budget conwns $8,000 designated for this project. In lhe process of obtaining quotations, staff has learned dial if and -when the windows are rmovlled at their current size they must have safety glass installed. Two, which are �nt replacemerm, are ahudy safety glass and could be re-used. This added a significant cost to the project. Two proposals have been received (see auached). $10,583 1.Franzen Consuuction proposes replacing window jambs and stops on all indicated windows and replacing sevenwith safety glass. All priming and painting of wood is included. 1be doors and transoms were not addressed. $8,345 2.Lexington Glass and Screen proposes decreasing the size of the windows so that safety glass is not required. Theypropose leaving the windows on the east side of the building as is because the sills there were replaced in 1992.Their quote does not include painting. · Staff is recommending acceptance of the proposal from Lexington Glus and Screen for $8,345. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Moved to aulhori7.e replacement of window and door sills, accompanying glass, andappropriaie panel!! as detailed in quotation from Lexingu>n Glass and Screen for the amount of $8,345 based on lowinformal quotation; and fu.nhennore, LO authoril.e 1he Mayor and City Manager to enter inlo an agreement for the same. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to table this item until the Council Meeting of September 27, 1993. COUNCIL ACTION: s PARKING .----------------i.--------------· � COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PUBLIC LIBRARY MAIN FLOOR CHILDREN'S ROOM DOWNSTAIRS i I --1 � I I ii 1 i !,------, 5 EAST ROOM �I I E3 STAIRWAY BULLETIN BOARD w 0 i • it,." I I LOBBY CHECKOUT DESK REFERENCE BOARDROOM OFFICE WORK ROOM ' AK IC� )l )t'� 40TH AVENUE ENTRANCE " JC )t )I( -i )l I ADULT READING ROOM i tJ J .1 Page No. of Pages FRANZEN C::::::CTION CO. l 4250 5th Street N.E. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55421 (612)788-4071 PHONC .:zf'-9.3 -= -·-:./27�-�e JJ £ · IP===='=======-== __ t,�: 1,:� -17uiPHONI We ht!reby =,ubm1t spec,hcalionl, '""' "l.tunall:l> lor .Jl.da-lfl � --W� !l.,;.J.,_ J� �� -hvf ��., � � ,.,,._� .-w.d'/d/LUL��� � .,;z-��� ef � .-v.Jd/411;( /U<l/1-�� -��--� rJ� � .-d'-d/ �����,,;/4�. � � y7«AV� ,V,'-_;t:.,;i "/�r . � d���?�/4� .ffe;/,t/'17 �. I: -=··· -� �---·-. ·-· ...:·:.a,· __ __,_ ___ ........ _......._ _ __...._ ___ .....a.,........,....._===-======a-=I acc;ordance with above specifications, for the sum of: a.� N 4� :�#<!!1_1.! ... _�_,/'41,+£..,4"<+-'VZ�. <rr?9Jf44o/,Lnlt-<L A-.? '1ollars ($ �5;37 -�- All material is 1uaranlHCI la be H IPK1l1eel All war• tu be cumplelecl in a .,.,•manlike manner accorC11n1 la atanelarel prutoce• An1 11teral,an or dev,�l,an ham •-1p,,col1ca tian1 1nvalv1n, eatra ca.11 w,H be eaec,lled anl1 upon wrollen urder•. and w1H •-ame 111 eatra char .. -r Ind abD .. the Ht1m11e. All a11rnment1 canlln�nl UP<lf1 1111•e•. acc,CS..nl• Of e1e1a,,. lleyond our contrat. Owner la carry lore, tarnMlo and other ne<:e1ur1 lfl1Ura11ce Our _..,. arw lully -reel by Warunen·, Compenutoon ln1U1 .. nce . .-·-··-------------- Authorized Signature , \ � /t,L · · � b-= Note: This proposal may be .::> 0 withdrawn by us it nol accepted w,thm __ C:il.=;..;....---------days. .A.rtfptanrf Jlf ,rOpJJJlal -Tilt/ llbove prices, spec,hcalion� and cond1hon1 are utislaclory and ilre hereby acceplt,d. You are authorized Signature---------------------------­ to do the work H 1pecit1ed. Payment will be made as oullmed al>ove. Date of Acceptance: -------------------Signature------------------------- ._. ... �-.--IINl�lo--lQI;,· ... , ...._ . . . -·· ...--,·-·--·��.... • 0 • ....-:--• �-�, -:-.,_ --:--�-� �·�·--: • • • ". �.� I I ·,o-.�c..a-,""�c..,i 1lt _, Paa• No. 1 of l Piles FAX1 782-2801 ATJ'N: aard ;uarnpnsw. LEXINGTON GLASS & SCREEN 9434 NE Naples Street BLAINE, MN 55449(612) 714-2320 FAX (612) 714-7721 '"°"' Do\TI 788-9221 8/3/93 590 -40th Aveae• North -rary aTY,-fJATIE ANO IW COOi -u,c.\TIOII Columbia Height&, MN 55421 -3 MCttn 820-40th Ave. NEQATf o, ,U\1111 Ji)lfttONI Columbia Heights, MN W1 tier� awmit •PKificationr. 1nc1 11$t1,,..tt1s tor: Installing insulated glas& and panels: Please refer to the attached sketch. -' ....... -·· ·-···--·· ····-···· ··-----. --.. .......... .... .. . ....... ··-----·,-....... ,, .. ____ ... , ..... --········ ·····--···--·-···-··-··· .,,-.......... _,,, ... ·-·----... - .. 1) ... _ .. 1.n.s_;�.l.l ��.�ul�.c�d sa,e_�:�-g�-�.s.� .. -�h-�;�_r.!q�t!.!� . .!' ...... 2)""_.. Install insulated glass ac exterior as •hown. • ... tf--········�:!!-i¼�·c{n.t�1·��!--�i-�2·1;·-:�¥;:aJ�·:--t·f �f:�3�i-i·2fi·1f·�-:�1·a·t1on·;····vapor ·-·---····. · , ·-·-·--�a .. ;_;j_�; .. �n� she.e.t-r.c,c;-.. � .. at. i.P.��r_i.�r· .. ·---�.�.��-�J.Q� ... �.f. P.�!l-�_i ... �.9-�i.._ll.�.�-·--·-.. --..... _....., ... 5)·--·-�ti���.��.w.!.;�o;�i-�.;�_�_:e 8_;��!;_�.;-��.!:�� ..... �1!.�.r ... � .•. 4.�9.9-4..• .... --.. -··"··-···-"····-·-·---··�-t:... Jt .. ___ .:;�J_!!;.g �tr_ �t�;.;:.� .. 1�.lA�. �.t; .. (�.Q�� ... �1�-�-��.i.Q�.· ·---· .. -· .. -.. --.. ·····---· .. ---.. ·--�_jf8) Licenses and permits by Owner. •-----····----·-·· ........... , .. ···-----9···-·"·· ·-----·······-··---·--···--- Tax, Material & Labor included . ...... -.. -... ·-�-. -· ·-·---··· ............. ·····-·--·--............. -.................... _,..,.,_,, ____ ............ -·· ....... -....... • ........ ··-···· ,,--- --··-·-·-·-·· .. -· ... --·---· .... ·-····-·"·----······ .. •···. -··---· --····---· "·-·------··--.......... -..... -···----- ·------··-·-······-.. -··--· ................. ····--··---·--····· , .. ·-··-·---.. --.. ..-----······--·-· .. ··---------.. -. ----···--·-·" .... ··----· .. ··-·-··---·--·--··· ·. ----------···--·-··---------------- ., frap.ut hereby to furnish material. and labor -complete In accordance with above IPIClflcationl, for the aum of: !lCRT THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FORTY-FIVE AND N0/100------8 1 345.00 , I do11ara c,· >. m IA lie llllda .. fQflows: at_andard All ---ii ....... to .... -�ifltG. All WM! Ir» lie -,-.4 la ... rM\Pliat ......., -cit.1 11 __,, P'•cticA •-. .... " o, -. .. uon ,,_ ,...,. �-Allltlorind .-.... IIMMIII _,. •" WIii .. -vs.o OIIIJ 11pen ,.,_..-·"·�Mil .-cat.,. Si1n1tuN "�Jf:'� _ 14.p ''h;< •"• t!\11111-MCI..,. lft• ffOINII*. Ml •11.-nHia CIOll&ln .. .c 1"611 .,.,.., � C Q er._...,._ -•nreL Owflft w � ,n, wae1e MO •1111 � iatl,,-1. Nala: Thi,..,. .. , ffllll Ollr _..,. -...u,-.-._ .,MIIIII•"• � ...... IMoltanot. wltMrlWfl at, u1 if not --'-' •itflin ... ,.. Lnnfmut af Jf DJU1Jll-The above prices. spe�lication& ';,;"'�.;;-;. lltili.dor}I Mid are "''-•cc•ptcd. VOM are 1irtl'lorind Si&natw• --------------------- ID dO .. wort& .. .,.Hied. Payffielll wOl III mada H Oulhnad •boll•. �1naturt--------------------- N IL •I .5 I-1.!) z: ""'4 :� 1)'1 •Si (I) IJ\ ' (I) ,:s) � � il&.IJ z .,, 5-0 l<N G ._._c,, ·-ON z cngi j Olz.,. lir• z �.I-i. � � ..�i:s CD ' -··. ' I ' --·. --1. ·-·· -· .... ! ·'-. ' . �.. . .; . ' ' i' .; .. ·!·· � s -0 • < 0 ,. ,, w Mayor Donald J. Murzyn, Jr. Councilmembers Sean T. Clerkin Bruce G. Nawrocki Gary L. Peterson Robert W. Ruettimann City Manager Patrick Hentges Date: Project: Location: Bid Due Date: Submit Bids To: Phone: Fax: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (612)782-2800 REOUFST FOR BID August-27,1993 Columbia Heights Public Library Window Replacement/Repair 820 40th Ave. N.E. September 7, 1993 City of Columbia Heights Att. Joe M. Voels 590 40th Ave. N .E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421 782-2817 (Joe M. Voels) 782-2801 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS All questions shall be directed to Joe M. Voels at 782-2817. Contractors may inspect the project site by contacting Becky Loader (Library Director) at 782-2805. Bids submitted by the contractor shall include all labor, materials, equipment, permits, drawings, and services necessary for the completion (including painting, caulking, etc.) of the project in accordance with industry standards. Sizes, quantities, location and measurements indicated are approximates. Contractor shall be held to have visited the site and checked all dimensions an<;! methods of construction to ensure all needs are properly addressed to satisfactorily complete all work as identified in the Work Write-Up. See attached floor plan of existing Library for locations of window areas as called out in the Work Write-Up. "SERVICE IS OUR BUSINESS" EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Alternatives: The contractor may submit an alternative bid that is written up on a separate form titled Alternatives when an item is not listed and/or when the contractor feels that there is a better method for the corrective work than what has been proposed in the Work Write-Up. THE ALTERNATIVEBID DO:ES NOT RELIBVE THE CONTRACTOR FROMBIDDING THE ITEMAS WRITTEN UP IN THE WORK WRITE-UP. At no time shall the attached instructions override any code requirements. If contractor does not submit an amended construction method, it shall be the responsibility of the contractor to make all necessary changes to comply with applicable code at NO cost to the owner. Work must be completed by October 15, 1993. Contractor must submit with his bid drawings (elevations, sections, etc.) that detail all construction materials and methods bid. Contractor is responsible to verify that all code requirements are being met. GENERALSPECIFICA TIONS Guardrails (horizontal member) shall be installed at 34" A.F.F. Material shall be aluminum metal and shall be of sufficient strength to prevent an individual from impacting the glass. Minimum width shall be 1 1/2 inches. All wood exposed to the outside elements shall be of appropriately treated material. All exposed surfaces (painted or prefinished) shall be of a color as chosen by the owner from standard manufacturer's selections. Contractor shall warrant all work for a period of two (2) years. Glazing shall be of clear 1 inch insulated glass. Safety glass shall be used where specified or as required by code, all other glazing shall be plate glass (or reuse of existing). WORK WRITE-UP Bid No. 1: Wood Framing North Entrance: Replace all rotted wood frames, sills, etc. with new treated wood. New sills must be sloped to shed water. Relocate (if size is correct) existing labeled safety glazing (2nd window from east) to either side of door, install new safety glazing at other side of door. If possible (correct size), relocate existing glass to west of door to window that safety glass was removed from. Repair or replace existing wood door frames and install safety glaring in same. Install guard rails at both sides of both the interior and exterior side of all 4 windows. Vestibule: Install a guardrail on both sides of both windows. South Entrance: Replace all rotted wood frames, sills, etc. with new treated wood. New sills must be sloped to shed water. Repair or replace existing wood door frame and install safety glazing in same, install new safety glazing at door sidelight. Install guard rails at both sides of both the interior and exterior side of sidelight. South Windows: Replace all rotted wood frames, sills, etc. with new treated wood. New sills must be sloped to shed water. Replace east glazing that has a hole in it with new glass, reuse existing west glass. Install guard rails at both sides of both the interior and exterior side of both windows. East Windows: Replace all rotted wood frames, sills, etc. with new treated wood. New sills must be sloped to shed water. Reuse all three (3) existing lites. Install guard rails at both sides of both the interior and exterior side of both windows. Bid No. 2: Wood Clad Same as Bid No. 1 except ALL exposed wood components shall be covered with an aluminum cladding. NOTE: The intention of this specification is to prevent future rotting of all wood components. Contractor is encouraged to submit a voluntary alternate with drawings detailing all materials and methods of construction. Alternate shall be submitted under a separate bid titled Alternate to Bid No, 2 as outlined in Instructions To Bidders. LIST ALL FIVE (5) AREAS AS SEPARATEDOLLARAMOUNTS. Bid No. 3: Extruded Aluminum System Replace all wood com·ponents (jambs, sills, panels, etc.) with an extruded aluminum system. Reuse all existing glazing as outlined in Bid No. 1. Install guardrails as outlined in Bid No. 1. NOTE: Vestibule glazing would now have to be safety glazing as per code (door and sidelights). LIST ALL FIVE (5) AREAS AS SEPARATEDOLLARAMOUNTS. Bid No. 4: Insulated Top and Bottom Panels lnstaU insulated top and bottom panels at all windows except three (3) east windows and Vestibule windows. Three (3) east windows and vestibule area shall be renovated as outlined in Bid No. 1. Panels to be clad in aluminum on the exterior and interior faces. Bottom panels to be a minimum 18 inches A.F.F. in height. Window heights to be 5 feet in height. Window widths to be the same as existing. Framing for window jambs, panels, etc. shall be wood. Bid No. 5: Insulated Panels / Aluminum Cladding Same as Bid No. 4 except ALL exposed wood components shall be covered with an aluminum cladding. Bid No. 6: Winter Conditions The library will be open during the above noted construction, please indicate dollar cost if winter conditions must be dealt with (enclosures, etc.). Please give calendar dates that contractor would institute winter condition procedures. o <AT H PARKING B ,------------i COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PUBLIC LIBRARY MAIN FLOOR CHILDREN'S ROOM DOWNSTAIRS �� tJ, . .Is I '70 iO'"' t. _,,� !'I /" I I I w u 5,-1..__==� -11 �[ ....._____ !i I I � !I I � EASTAOOM ·I I E3. IOAAOAOOU I OFFICE 4 WORKROOM i( ""' ,c_ BULLETIN BOARD LOBBY UJ ... 'I,," AK IC )c £ .. : :!:A�: f•OTl-fAV� :11-.l. r £�-sf' ) � � �,11-,,o ..,s � ,: )I ----JO ,,,:,If [t,,rttAIKl (!,.e•: 'i)i,o.;:_, ADULT READING ROOM Vts r1B"t., (ffllCI.. . .,.,_,.,.-e,u•� i)oo£)/ XXX window.sf �CI.S i1'clt-e.ded. i,, .p�;�c-f � -NoflTII lNr11.�Nt:t. /lc/1,1qJ_ (.r"'c', t"tf.r�,e1d� 1) •• �o i rJ CITY COUNCIL LEITER MEETING OF: SEPJ'EMBER 13, 1993 AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS NO: 9 ORIGINATING DEPT.: I CITY MANAGERFINANCE APPROVAL ITEM: DURATION OF A LIGHT DUTY METER READER POSIDON BY: WIL� ELRITE lJLflt,r- NO: q. A.DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 1993 On or about June 12, 1991, Myrtice Degenstein, a part-time meter reader, fell and was injured while on duty. Frem June 12, 1991 to August 25 , 1992, Myrtice worked primarily in a light duty capacity with the Oty. From the period of August 25, 1992 through February 2, 1993 she was out for surgery on her shoulder and drew worker's compensation in the amount of $221.49/week, which was based on her average earnings for the six month period preceding her accident. During this six month period, Myrtice worked additional hours because of vacancies in the second meter reader position. On February 3, 1993, Myrtice returned to work for the Oty in a light duty capacity. It has been determined by her doctor and the doctor the Oty referred her to that she will not be able to return to meter reading as a result of her on-duty injury and subsequent surgery. The City has two options: 1) create a light duty position for Myrtice and retain her in this position, or 2) have her draw worker's compensation. Her current hourJy rate i� $8.84/hour which equals $176.80 at 20 hours/week. Wit h benefits, the weekly cast to the Oty would be $202.77. Under worker's compensation, she will draw $221.49 /week. Our worker's compensation policy requires that we reimburse 120 percent of this amount to the LMC Insurance Trust Fund at a cost of $265.79/week. In addition to this, Myrtice plans to retire in less than one year. If a light duty position is created and she retires she will not be eligible to draw worker's compensation. If she is being paid from worker's compensation when she retires, she can continue to draw worker's compensation for an indefinite periad of time. Based on this information it is in the Gty's best financial interest to create a light duty position for Myrtice until her retirement. In summary, by creating a light duty position, the Oty saves $3,277 a year until Myrtice retires, and $13,821 per year after she retires. If Myrtice draws worker's compensation it will also have a negative effect on the City's experience rating and will increase total worker's compensation costs. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to create a light duty meter reader position, due to worker's compensation disability, not to exceed one year or until the retirement of Myrtice Degenstein, and to appropriate $5,272 from Retained Earnings in the water fund & sewer fund administrative budgets for this position. WE:dn 9309072 COUNOL ACTION: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MEETING OF: September 13, 1993 AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MGR NO: 9 CITY MANAGER'S APPROVAL ITEM: AFFORDABLE SUBURBAN HOUSING q_ B. BY: P. HENTGES BQ.i� NO: AGREEMENT DATE: 09/10/93 Be advised that the HRA approved at their August 31st meeting the exclusive negotiating agreement with Affordable Suburban Housing, Inc. for the acquisition, rehabilitation, and resale of duplexes within the Sheffield Neighborhood. In summary terms, the agreement calls for an exclusive sixty-day period (from August 31, 1993) whereby Affordable Suburban Housing, the HRA, and the City would develop specific feasibility information necessary to implement a home ownership housing program for the Sheffield Neighbor - hood. The feasibility of renovating duplexes and reselling them for partial homestead or conversion to single family dwellings would be determined by October 31, 1993. The agreement calls for Affordable Suburban Housing to: •Finalize an overall design proposal and work program •Estimate the cost of acquisition/rehabilitation of 40-60 structures •Determine an adequate resale price of rehabilitated structures •Provide marketability and resale information •Determine the level of private financial participation •Finalize fees, commissions, and cost of services to be provided •Assist with development of commitments for mortgage financing or other State, Federal, or other sources of revenue for the project •Submit a time schedule for the project •Prepare a list of covenants restricting resales and rentals by new owner-occupants •Determine the economic feasibility of an ongoing maintenance program for the project Under the terms of the agreement, the City and the HRA agrees to: •Estimate the HRA's and City's level and method of financial participation in the development •Develop a financial plan for the HRA's and City's participation in the project As an update, Affordable Suburban Housing has inspected many of the units already. The City has had preliminary discussions with Springsted and Public Corp concerning the development of a financial model that will assist in determining the economic feasibility of the project. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute the preliminary agreement for exclusive negotiations with Affordable Suburban Housing, Inc. Consortium on the Sheffield Neighborhood. COUNCIL ACTION: o�� �/;,':; / , '.:-./£: Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Columbia Heights Comm1ae1on .. Euaelllua Heintz Plllricla Jridra Bruce Nawroc:ld Richard Duadn Danald J. Mlnyn, Jr. 590 N.E. 40th Avenue, Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Fax: (612) 782-2857 • (612) 782-2854 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager Patrick Hentges Don Schneider, HRA Executive Director�"?'""'--­ August 3, 1993 PRELIMINARY AGREEMENT FOR EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATIONS WITH AFFORDABLE SUBURBAN HOUSING, INC. CONSORTIUM ON SHEFFIELD NEIGHBORHOOD At their Special Meeting on August 31, the HRA Board of Commissioners approved the proposed joint HRA/City Agreement cited above. The agreement was approved subject to City Council approval of the same agreement. Please advise me if you want me to prepare the necessary City Council letter for the September 13 City Council meeting. Please call me at 855 if you have any questions. cc: HRA Comm Equal Opportunity Employer G) EXCLUSIVE PJlET,IVINAllY AGJlBDCEHT . THIS AG �EE!'fENT is made this_ day of August, 1993 by and among theHousmg Author1ty m and for the City of Columbia Heights (the "HRA") the City of Columbi_a Heights (the "City") and the Affordable Suburban Ho�sing, Inc. consoruum ( the "Developer") . WITN ESS TH: WHEREAS, the HRA, on behalf of the City, bas studied the Sheffield Neig�borhood pa�g particular attention to the type and quality of the housing, stability of the res1dents, number of responses by community service officers and the overall socio-economic conditions present; and WHEREAS, the HRA has determined that there exists an overabundance of non-owner occupied housing which is physically deteriorating and undergoing a deterioration of the tenant base which is contributing to the hi&'h turnover of residents of rental properties, declining property values, socio-economic problems and general instability in the Sheffield Neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Developer has submitted a proposal to improve the Sheffield Neighborhood with the assistance of the HRA and the City; and WHEREAS, the HRA, the City and the Developer have entered into discussions to arrive at a joint means to stabilize and improve the Sheffield Neighborhood (the "Development"); and WHEREAS, the HRA, the City and the Developer are willing and desire to undertake the Development if: (i) a satisfactory agreement can be reached which will (a) indicate the HRA's commitment for public costs necessary for the Development and (b) indicate HRA 's strategy and responsibilities for the Development; (ii) satisfactory revenue commitments for other Development costs are secured from state, federal and other governmental entities as well as from private foundations; (ill) satisfactory commitments for mortgage financing are secured from lenders doing business in the City; and (iv) the economic feasibility and social responsiveness of the Development and other necessary preconditions have been determined to the satisfaction of the HRA, the City and the Developer; and WHEREAS, the HRA is willing to negotiate on behalf of itself and the City with the Developer and evaluate the Developer's proposal and to work toward the preparation of the ne-ces1ary ap-eements to permit the HRA, the City and the Developer to jointly undertake the Development; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual premises, covenants and obliptions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: Section l. Purpose. It is the intention of the parties that this Agreement documents the present understanding and commitments of the parties and will provide a period of time for the parties to exclusively negotiate the terms of a mutually satisfactory "Private Contract for Redevelopment" (the "Contract"). The Contract, along with any other agreements entered into by the parties hereto and 8'1157258 CZ.160-71 l contemporaneous therewith, will when executed, aupersede all the obligation.a of the parties under this Ap-eement. Section 2. Negotiations. Ne�tiations between the parties shall proceed in an attempt to formulate a definitive Contract and will be based on the followin�: (a)The Developer's current proposal which provides for theacquisition, rehabilita tion and resale of Development properties; (b)The Developer's ability to obtain other aources of revenue tofinance Development costs; (c)The HRA's ability to provide a portion of the sources of funds tofinance some of the Development costs; (d)Documentation regarding economic feasibility of the Developmentand the maximum dollar level of HRA participation and subsidization; and ( e)Other terms and conditions to be ne&atiated and ap-eed upon andincorporated in a mutually satisfactory Contract. Section 3. Representations by and Obligations of the Developer. During the terms of this Agreement the Developer agrees to: IIN57251 c.110-71 (a)Submit an overall design proposal which shall include the num berof structures to be acquired and rehabilitated, the scope of rehabilitation to be performed, any new construction requi red and any public improvements deemed necessary; (b)Submit an overall cost estimate and a per unit cost estimate forthe Development; (c)Submit a time schedule for all phases of the Development; ( d)Submit commitment letters or photocopies of applications for otherstate, federal or other sources of revenue for financing the Development; ( e)Submit a Marketing Plan for the rehabilitation and resale ofstructures acquired by the Developer; (f)Negotiate with the HRA regarding sources of revenue to beprovided by the HRA and/or the City to finance the Development; ,. ( g)Indicate the Developer's level of financial participation and provide a statement of fees, commissions and costs for services to be provided by the Developer; and (h)Indicate any changes to the Affordable Suburban Housing, Inc.Consortium which primarily consists of: Affordable Suburban Housin1, Inc., a nonprofit housing corporation and William Schatzlein, its President; John Beal and Associates, real estate brokers and John Beal, its President; America's Home Team, housing maintenance program and James Larson, its President; and Dovolis, Johnson, Ru1gieri Architects and Dean Dovolis, its principal. 2 Section 4. Repreaentatiom by and Obligations of the HRA and the City.During the term of this Aa;reement the HRA agrees to: (a)Estimate the HRA's and the City's level and method of financialparticipation in the Development and develop a financial plan for the HRA 'a participation; and (b)Study and prepare an appropriate structure for the BRA 's andthe City's participation in the Development. Section 5. Nature of the Agreement. It is expressly understood that this Agreement provides the Developer with the exclusive right to neKQtiate with the HRA and the City for the Agreement's term. It is also expressly understood that execution and implementation of a Contract shall be subject to: IN57251 (a)A determination by the HRA that the Development proposal isfeasible based upon: (i)the estimated costs of acquisition and rehabilitation of from40 to 60 structures; (ii)the estimated resale price of the acquired and rehabilitatedstructures; (iii)the marketability of the Development; (iv)the maximum amount of subsidy or "gap financing"provided by the HRA to account for the difference between the acquisition price and the resale price after rehabilitation of the structures; ( v)the number of dwelling units converted from rental toowner occupancy; (vi)the availability of other sources of Development financing; (vii)the fees and commissions charg;ed by the Developer foreach dwelling unit marketed; (viii)the suitability and economic feasibility of the maintenanceprogram for the Development; (ix)the ability to provide covenants restricting resales andrentals by new owner occupants; and (x)the best interests of the BRA and the City. (b)A determination by the Developer that the Development is feasibleand in the best interests of the Developer. (c)The availability of permanent mortpge financing. (d)Execution of the Contract by the parties. CJ.I0-71 3 Section 8. !!!3. Thia Acreement fa effective for a teftll end1nc lixty {SO) days from its date, UDlesa extended by mutual acreement of the partiea. The Developer shall reimburse the BRA for costs reuonably expended by the BRA in reprd to the Development in an amount not to exceed $1,000. Section 7. Notice and Grounds for Termination. This Acreement may be terminated upon five (5) days' written notice by the HRA to Developer ff: (a)an essential precondition to the execution of a Contract cannot bemet; or (b)an impasse has been reached in the neeotiation of any materialterm or condition of this Ap-eement. If the HRA terminates the Ap-eement under this Section 7, the Developer shall remain liable to the HRA for costs reasonably incurred by the HRA throuch the date of termination. Section 8. Severability. If any portion of-this Ap-eement is held invalid by a court of competent ju risdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of any l"l!maining portion of the Apeement. Section 9. Waiver. In the event any covenant contained in this Ap-eement should be breached by one party and subsequently waived by another party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach. Section 10. Notice. Notice or demand or other communication between or among the parties shall be sufficiently pven if sent by mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested or delivered personally: GIB'7251 C:Z,H0•'71 (a)As to the City: (b)As to the HRA: . ( c)As to the Developer: City ot Columbia Hei1hts 590 40th Avenue NE Columbia Hei1hts, MN 55421 Columbia Hei1hts Housing and Redevelopment Authority 590 40th Avenue NE Columbia Heichts, MN 55421 Affordable Suburban Housin1, Inc. 4032 Grand Avenue South Min:leapolis, MN 55409 4 Section 11 • Counterparta. Thia Ag'l"Nment may be executed simultaneously in any number counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same illstrument. avs,251 CL11C1•71 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the HRA and the City bave caused this AP"98ment tobe duly executed and the Developer baa caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF____ ) COLUMBIA HEIGHTS HOUSING AN D REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY By --:E=-u_s _e"":'b""'l'iu-s---=-H=-e "":'in_t _z ______ _ Its Chair By _ _,.,,,.._.......,.....,.....----,-.,....-------Donald Schneider Its Executive Director The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of =--�--' 1993, by Eusebius Heintz and Donald Schneider, the Chair and Executive Director, respectively, of the Columbia Hei�hts Housing and Redevelopment Authority. ""'572!!1 C.110•71 6 Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF____ ) CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS By ---=D_o_na--:I�d:-J":".-:-:M:-u--r--zyn"""""""'-, -:::J;--r-. ---- Its Mayor By_-=-_.,...........,......,,.,,,----------Patrick J. Hentps Its City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of -��___,,..,,....., 1993, by Donald J. Murzyn, Jr. and Patrick J. Hentges, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Columbia Heights on behalf of the City. aw,7251 CLJ.I0-71 , Notary Public 7 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF · ) AFFORDABLE SUBURBAN HOUSING, INC. By --w-iJ __ Ji_e_rn_S,...c...,.ha-t-zl,!"'"e�in------ Its President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of =--�--' 1993, by W!Wam Schatzlein, the President of Affordable Suburban Housing, Inc., a Minnesota not-for-profit corporation, on behalf of the corporation. t:PIB7251 C:Z.1I0•71 .• Notary Public 8 CITY COUNCIL I.ETIER Meeting of:-=9 .... 11 __ 31'Ji-:..3 __ _ AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER NO. 9 PUBLIC WORKS ITEM: SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO BY: M. Winson p/ �BY�*NO. INCREASE/DECREASE QUANTITIES C/.e. DATE:9n/93 DA FOR PROJECT #9300-WSC. CONCRETE The actual quantities for this project will exceed 125% of the bid quantities on most line items. According to the Mn/DOT specifications, a supplemental agreement is required. The attached supplemental agreement allows the City Engineer to increase or decrease the actual quantities above 125% or below 75% of the bid quantities without a change in unit prices. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve Supplemental Agreement #1 to the Miscellaneous Concrete Contract, Project #9300; and, furthermore, to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement for the same. MAW:jb 93-582 Attachment COUNCIL ACTION: MN/COT TP-02134-03 (5188) STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Supp. ID Canlract No. ·- Conttac:Ulr: SUPPLEMENT AL AGREEMENT No. _1 _ F.oaaiPnljece Advanced Concrete Inc. �unicipal Project: 9100 UICllian: ShN!_l_ ot _l_ StllaPffl!KlNo.: 1143 Riverwood Dr. Miscellaneous Concrete Repairs & Installations -City-wic Burnsville, MN PIii. No. I F.Y. I Accaunt LD. �lv-1 Seqi,IIIIC»No. I� 1� Iv---I T:-I MDJraPurCllue Terms I AINI No. C.CD.1 1,��2 I C.CD.3 I C.CD.4 I C.CD.S ' OOONET .. TYPE OF A40( ) Mi ( ) Dated Number Enterad by TRANSACTION: A44 ( ) A45 ( ) A46 ( ) Dated Number Entered by This contract is amended as follows: WHEREAS: This contract contained certain proposed bid quantities, and WHEREAS: The actual construction quantities may exceed 125% or be less than 75% of the bid quantities, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MlJT01u.LY AGREED AND UNDERSTOOD THAT: 1.The contractor shall furnish and install all concrete structures as directed by theCity Engineer. 2.The unit prices for the work will not change due to increase/decrease in quantity. 3.Contract time will not be revised except as may be provided for under the contract provisions of Mn/DOT 1806. 4.The contractor shall not make any claim of any kind or character whatsoever for any other costs or expenses which he may have incurred or which he may hereafter incur in performing the work or furnishing the materials required by this Agreement. APPROVED: APPROVED: Original Contract Oa18d ;/&,J, {tl1� Commissioner of Commisisoner of $75,093.75 Administration Finance AppnMtd as to fonn Dmd By Callral:mr' By and execution Dated Dated Dimtcs&lgines Aalillafft ,,.,,_,, 0---llqlltrr:yH-, Oriainal to State Auditor -Coov to Aaencv e AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS NO. 9 ITEM: AW ARD OF BIDS FOR PROJECTS NO. #9113, #9123 AND #9125 CITY COUNCIL LETIER Meeting of: 9/13/93 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT:CITY MANAGER PUBLIC WORKS BY: M.WwonA/,r,,}BY:Q,� t;. l>. DATE: 9n/93 DATE: The budgeted amounts for these projects were based on bids received in 1992. Neither contractor from 1992 bid on the projects this year. Staff does not feel the project costs will decrease substantially by rejecting these bids and rebidding in 1994. Project 9113 -Highland Lake Outlet The low bid for the project is under the budget amount of $21,000. Project 9123 -Stinson/Argonne Outlet The low bid for the project is over the budget amount of $31,000 by almost $5,000.00. The scope of the project changed in 1993 due to a change in ownership at 717 Stinson Blvd. (New Brighton). The Qriginal project was designed to re place the pipe. Now the majority of the pipe is being lined Lining the pipe will not disturb the trees on the property at 717 Stinson Blvd. This change in project scope increased the cost of the project. Project 9125 -Jackson Pond Inlets/Outlet The low bid for the project is over the budget amount of $57,000 by approximately $20,000. There are unused funds budgeted for other upgrades at Jackson Pond to cover the additional amount It is important that this project be done in 1993. The outfall pipe of the east side of the pond has worked loose at the pipe co.nnection and is in the pond. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to award bids for Projects 9113, 9123 and 9125 to Lametti and Sons of Hugo, Minnesota, as the lowest, qualified responsible bidder in the amount of $134,283.00 budgeted in line item 652-49499-5130; and, furtbennore, to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement for the same. MAW:jb 93-570 COUNCIL ACTION: - BID TABULATION 1993 STORM SEWER PROJECTS MUNICIPAL PROJECTS 9113, 9123, AND 9125 BI DDER'S LIST 1 Bituminous Consulting and Contracting Co. 2 W.B. Miller 3 Davies Water Equipment 4 Northern Water Works Supply, Inc. 5 Lametti and Sons 6 CCS Contracting 7 Ro-So Contracting Company 8 Progressive Contactors BID A: PROJECT 9113, HIGHLAND LAKE OUTLET PIPE No. Description Quant. Unit 1 Remove concrete street 130 S.F. 2 Remove storm sewer 171 LF. 3 Furnish and Install common borrow (L. V.) 200 C.Y. 4 Pipe bedding 25 C.Y. 5 Aggregate base Class 5 15 Ton 6 24" RCP storm sewer 64 1 T. 7 24" RC arch pipe storm sewer 101 LF. 8 24" RC transition pipe 1 LS. 9 24" Dia trash guard 1 LS. 10 Riprap -Class II 7 C.Y. 11 8" Cone street w/ integrant curb & gutter 130 S.F. 12 Erosion barrier 40 LF. 13 Topsoil (LV.) 365 C.Y. 14 Sod 950 S.Y. 15 Mobilization 1 LS. BIDA: PROJECT 9113 BUDGET AMOUNT $21,000.00 No bid No bid No bid No bid Bid No bid Bid Bid LAMETTI & SONS, INC. Unit Price Total $1.00 $130.00 $5.00 $855.00 $4.00 $800.00 $20.00 $500.00 $20.00 $300.00 $48.00 $3,072.00 $65.00 $6,565.00 $700.00 $700.00 $600.00 $600.00 $50.00 $350.00 $5.00 $650.00 $8.00 $320.00 $1.00 $365.00 $1.50 $1,425.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $20,132.00 PROGRESSIVE CONT. Unit Price Total $2.50 $325.00 $7.00 $1,197.00 $7.50 $1,500.00 $15.00 $375.00 $20.00 $300.00 $56.05 $3,587.20 $72.00 $7,272.00 sno.oo sno.oo $250.00 $250.00 $50.00 $350.00 $12.00 $1,560.00 $5.00 $200.00 $12.00 $4,380.00 $3.50 $3,325.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $28,391.20 AO-SO CONTRACTING Unit Price Total $4.50 $585.00 $10.00 $1,710.00 $9.50 $1,900.00 $30.00 $750.00 $20.00 $300.00 $42.00 $2,688.00 $60.00 $6,060.00 $925.00 $925.00 $500.00 $500.00 $75.00 $525.00 $5.50 $715.00 $5.00 $200.00 $12.00 $4,380.00 $1.75 $1,662.50 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $24,900.50 BIO TABULATION -PROJECTS 9113, 9123 AND 9125 BID B: PROJECT 9123, STINSON -ARGONNE OUTLET PIPE No. Description 1 Clearing 4"-10" tree 2 Clearing 11 "-20" tree 3 Grubbing 4"-10" tree 4 Grubbing 11 "-20" tree 5 Remove concrete street 6 Remove bituminous driveway 7 Remove storm sewer 8 Salvage catch basin casting 9 Salvage manhole casting 1 o Salvage fence 11 Install common borrow (L. V.) 12 Furnish and install common borrow (L.V.) 13 Granular borrow (LV.) 14 Pipe bedding 15 Aggregate base Class 5 16 18" PVC liner with grout 17 20" Polyethylene liner with grout 18 20" Storm sewer 19 21" RCP F.E.S. w/trash guard 20 Riprap -Class II 21 Grouted riprap -Class II 22 Realign manhole adjusting rings 23 Realign catch basin adjusting rings 24 Install salvaged manhole casting 25 Install salvaged catch basin casting 26 8" Cone street w/ lntegrant curb & gutter 27 Patch bituminous driveway 28 Transplant 4" -6" dia. tree 29 Transplant Choke cherry trees 30 Transplant shrub 31 Norway pine 32 8' -1 O' Colorado blue spruce 33 2 112" B & B Weeping willow 34 2 112" B & B Fruit trees 35 Reoonstruct garden 36 Reinstall fence 37 Erosion barrier 38 Topsoil (LV.) 39 Sod 40 Crown vetch 41 Mobilization BID B: PROJECT 9123 BUDGET AMOUNT Quant. Unit 6 Ea. 4 Ea. 6 Ea. 4 Ea. 128 S.F. 23 S.Y. 30 LF. 1 Ea. 1 Ea. 1 LS. 170 C.Y. 200 C.Y. 17 C.Y. 12 C.Y. 30 Ton 1 LS. 130 LF. 30 LF. 1 LS. 21 C.Y. 4 C.Y. 1 LS. 1 LS. 1 Ea. 1 Ea. 128 S.F. 23 S.Y. 1 Ea. 1 LS. 1 Ea. 1 Ea. 7 Ea. 1 Ea. 3 Ea. 1 LS. 1 LS. 40 LF. 200 C.Y. 700 S.Y. 333 S.Y. 1 LS. $31,000.00 LAMETTI & SONS, INC. PROGRESSIVE CONT. Unit Price Total Unit Price Total $50.00 $300.00 $150.00 $900.00 $100.00 $400.00 $300.00 $1,200.00 $25.00 $150.00 $75.00 $450.00 $40.00 $160.00 $125.00 $500.00 $1.00 $128.00 $2.50 $320.00 $5.00 $115.00 $5.00 $115.00 $5.00 $150.00 $7.00 $210.00 $75.00 $75.00 $75.00 $75.00 $75.00 $75.00 $75.00 $75.00 $500.00 $500.00 $250.00 $250.00 $3.00 $510.00 $2.00 $340.00 $5.00 $1,000.00 $7.00 $1,400.00 $15.00 $255.00 $15.00 $255.00 $20.00 $240.00 $20.00 $240.00 $20.00 $600.00 $18.00 $540.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $90.00 $11,700.00 $91.60 $11,908.00 $65.00 $1,950.00 $85.50 $2,565.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $690.00 $690.00 $40.00 $840.00 $50.00 $1,050.00 $60.00 $240.00 $80.00 $320.00 $150.00 $150.00 $200.00 $200.00 $150.00 $150.00 $250.00 $250.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $5.00 $640.00 12.00 $1,536.00 $30.00 $690.00 $20.00 $460.00 $100.00 $100.00 $500.00 $500.00 $400.00 $400.00 $600.00 $600.00 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $100.00 $250.00 $250.00 $300.00 $300.00 $150.00 $1,050.00 $450.00 $3,150.00 $200.00 $200.00 $450.00 $450.00 $200.00 $600.00 $375.00 $1,125.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $325.00 $325.00 $10.00 $400.00 $5.00 $200.00 $4.00 $800.00 $12.00 $2,400.00 $2.00 $1,400.00 $3.50 $2,450.00 $2.00 $666.00 $2.50 $832.50 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $35,984.00 $46,581.50 PAGE 20F 3 RO-SO CO_l.lTRACTING Unit Price Total $200.00 $1,200.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $500.00 $3,000.00 $600.00 $2,400.00 $4.50 $576.00 $3.00 $69.00 $20.00 $600.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $500.00 $500.00 $5.00 $850.00 $9.50 $1,900.00 $10.00 $170.00 $30.00 $360.00 $20.00 $600.00 $800.00 $800.00 $9,000.00 $49.00 $1,470.00 $975.00 $975.00 $75.00 $1,575.00 $125.00 $500.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $5.50 $704.00 $30.00 $690.00 $250.00 $250.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $200.00 $200.00 $400.00 $400.00 $800.00 $5,600.00 $550.00 $550.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $50.00 $50.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $5.00 $200.00 $12.00 $2,400.00 $1.75 $1,225.00 $3.00 $999.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 -- $54,313.00 BID TABULATION -PROJECTS 9113, 9123 AND 9125 PAGE 3OF3 BID C: PROJECT 9125, JACKSON POND STORM SEWER BUDGET LAMETTI & SONS, INC. PROGRESSIVE CONT. RO-SO CONTRACTING AMOUNT No. Description Quant. Unit Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total 1 Remove curb & gutter 128 LF. $3.00 $384.00 $5.00 $640.00 $6.00 $768.00 2 Remove bituminous street / alley 270 S.Y. $5.00 $1,350.00 $3.50 $945.00 $3.00 $810.00 3 Remove storm sewer 202 LF. $8.00 $1,616.00 $15.00 $3,030.00 $23.00 $4,646.00 4 Remove catch basin 2 Ea. $100.00 $200.00 $125.00 $250.00 $150.00 $300.00 5 Remove tri-unit catch basin 1 Ea. $400.00 $400.00 $300.00 $300.00 $400.00 $400.00 6 Salvage catch basin casting 5 Ea. $150.00 $750.00 $85.00 $425.00 $50.00 $250.00 7 Salvage chain link fence 1 LS. $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 $750.00 $750.00 8 Furnish and install common borrow (l.V.) 10 C.Y. $10.00 $100.00 $20.00 $200.00 $15.00 $150.00 9 Pipe bedding 33 C.Y. $20.00 $660.00 $20.00 $660.00 $30.00 $990.00 10 Aggregate base Class 5 140 Ton $20.00 $2,800.00 $15.00 $2,100.00 $20.00 $2,800.00 11 24" PVC storm sewer 32 LF. $80.00 $2,560.00 $72.00 $2,304.00 $70.00 $2,240.00 12 2r RCP storm sewer 29 LF. $90.00 $2,610.00 $68.00 $1,972.00 $75.00 $2,175.00 13 36" PVC storm sewer -SD R 26 62 LF. $110.00 $6,820.00 $71.00 $4,402.00 $60.00 $3,720.00 14 48" RCP storm sewer 17 LF. $140.00 $2,380.00 $120.00 $2,040.00 $190.00 $3,230.00 15 60" RCP storm sewer 60 LF. $180.00 $10,800.00 $155.00 $9,300.00 $220.00 $13,200.00 16 Concrete pipe support collars -4 total 1 LS. $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,600.00 $2,600.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 17 60" Dia trash guard 1 LS. $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,350.00 $1,350.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 18 Construct catch basin 1 Ea. $900.00 $900.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $750.00 $750.00 19 Construct trHJnlt catch basin 2 Ea. $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $2,15P.00 $4,300.00 $2,200.00 $4,4QO.OO 20 Tri-unit catch basin casting 2 Ea. $1,200.00 $2,400.00 $660.00 $1,320.00 $850.00 $1,700.00 21 Install salvaged catch basin casting 1 Ea. $150.00 $150.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 22 Concrete curb and gutter-8618 128 LF. $20.00 $2,560.00 $15.00 $1,920.00 $25.00 $3,200.00 23 Patch bituminous street / alley 270 S.Y. $35.00 $9,450.00 $22.00 $5,940.00 $25.00 $6,750.00 24 Reinstall chain link fence 1 LS. $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 25 Erosion barrier 150 LF. $8.00 $1,200.00 $420 $630.00 $5.00 $750.00 26 Topsoil (L V.) n C.Y. $12.00 $924.00 $12.00 $924.00 $12.00 $924.00 27 Sod 147 S.Y. $2.00 $294.00 $3.50 $514.50 $1.75 $257.25 28 Crown vetch 542 S.Y. $2.00 $1,084.00 $2.50 $1,355.00 $3.00 $1,626.00 29 Granular filter 86 C.Y. $15.00 $1,290.00 $30.00 $2,580.00 $30.00 $2,580.00 30 Quarry run riprap 133 C.Y. $45.00 $5,985.00 $45.00 $5,985.00 $75.00 $9,975.00 31 Mobilization 1 LS. $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 BID C: PROJECT 9125 $57,000.00 $78,167.00 $67,536.50 $79,141.25 ..am-----· -----------· ---------------- TOTALBID $109,000.00 $134,283.00 $142,509.20 $158,354.75 BID SECURITY 5%8idbond 5% Bid bond 5%Bidbond TIME TO START (CONSECUTIVE DAYS) 10Days 10Days 10Days TIME TO COMPLETE (WORKING DAYS) 60Days 30Days As specified CITY COUNCIL LETIER AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS NO. 9 ITEM: AWARD OF BID TO REPAIR/RESURFACE NO. TENNIS COURTS -PROJECT 9303 C/.E.. AND 9305 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS BY: M.Winson U�DA TE: 9/8/93 Meeting of: 9/131')3 CITY MANAGER BY: Q DATE: On July 26, 1993, Council authorired staff to seek bids to repair/resurface tennis courts at Sullivan Lake Park and Huset Park WesL Specifications were provided to 12 vendors. One bid was received for the bid opening at 11:00 A.M. on September 8, 1993. Four options are provided in the proposal. Option A-1 -$14,854.43 Repair cracks in tennis courts at Sullivan Lake Park. Mill and overlay athletic courts, resurface tennis courts at Huset Park West. Option A-2 -$19,235.71 Same as Option A-1 with the addition of engineering fabric to retard reflective cracking prior to overlay at Huset Park WesL Option B-1 -$18,249.43 Resurface tennis courts at Sullivan Lake Park. Mill and overlay athletic courts, resurface tennis courts at Huset Park West. Option B-2 -$22,630.71 Same as Option B-1 with the addition of engineering fabric to retard reflective cracking prior to overlay at Huset Park West Staff recommends Option A-2 or B-2. Staff budgeted $5,000 to resurface the tennis courts at Sullivan Lake Parle and $10,000 to overlay and resurface the tennis courts at Huset Parle West, in line item 101-45200-5130. If necessary, additional funds are available in this line items to cover the amount over the budget. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to award bid for Projects 9303 and 9305 Option _ to Bituminous Consulting and Conttacting Co., Inc. of Minneapolis, MN, as the lowest, qualified responsible bidder in the amount of ____ budgeted in line item 101-45200-5130; and, furthermore, to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an �ment for the same. MAW:jb 93-584 COUNCll, ACTION: TENTATIVE AWARD: SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 BID BJD BIDDER SECURITY A ... J lituminous Consulting &Bid $14,854.43 Contracting Co., Inc, Bond :pls., MN 5% . : \ : BID A...,2 CI TY OF COLUHB I A tlE I GHTS, HIN NE SOTA a I D T A K U L � T t Q N �uni�l�al Projects #9303 and #9305 TENNIS COURT RESURFACING Sullivan Lake Park Huset Park West .. DID �ID TIME TO B�1 B ... 2 ·. START' .. $19,235, 71 $18,249.43 $22,630.71 5 days I ' .. .' : .� BID OPENING: S�PTEMBER 8 TIME TO REMARKS COMPLETE 45 days ·.. -:- BID OPENING PROPOSAL CITY OF COLUM BIA HEIGHTS TENNIS COURT RESURFACING SULLIVAN LAKE PARK HUSET PARK WEST MUNICIPAL PROJECTS #9303 AND #9305 WE DNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1993; 11 :00 A.M. Bidders: mffl�lm] AUGUST 30, 1993 The undersigned, as bidder, hereby proposes and agrees to enter in10 a Contract on the form attached here10 with the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, to supply all labor, materials, and equipment necessary for the completion of the Tennis Court Resurfacing, Municipal Project Numbers 9303 and 9305 within the City of Columbia Heights, all in accordance with the Specifications-prepared by the City Engineer, City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, and in strict accordance therewith, for the following sum: OPTIONA-1 NO. DESCRIPTION SULLIVAN LAKE PARK 1 Repair cracks HUSET PARK WEST 1 Remove net posts 2 Install net posts Milling -1 1 /2" Overlay -1 1 /2" 5 Resurface tennis courts 6 Paint playing lines -basketball court QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE 175 L.F. $2.60 1 LS. $ 285.00 1 LS. s nso.aa 1887 S.Y. $J.B9 156 Ton $ Ja1QQ 1 LS. $ 3300 I 00 1 LS. $ 170.00 TOTAL BID FOR OPTION A -1 OPTION A -2 {yylTH FABRIC} NO. DESCRIPTION SULLIVAN LAKE PARK 1 Repair cracks HUSET PARK WEST 1 Remove net posts 2 Install net posts 3 Milling -2" 4 Fabric 5 Overlay -2° 6 Resurface tennis courts 7 Paint playing lines -basketball court QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE 175 LF. $ 2.60 1 LS. $ 285.00 1 LS. $ ll�Q.00 1887 S.Y. $2.J21887 S.Y. $.96 208 Ton $ 36 50 1 LS. $ 3300.00 1 LS. $ 170.00 TOTAL BID FOR OPTION A -2 TOTAL $ 455.00 $ 285.00 $ ]150.QQ $ 3566.�J $ 5928.00 $ 3300.0Q $_170.00 ===== $ 14,854.43 J TOTAL $ 455.00 285.00 $ $ 1150.00 $ ��22.19 $ 1811.52 $ 2592 (l(l $ 3300.00 $ 170.00 =='=,=== $ 19,235.71/ , PROPOSAL FORM PAGE2 OF 3 OPTION B -1 NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 SULLIVAN LAKE PARK Resurface tennis courts HUSET PARK WEST Remove net posts Install net posts Milling -1 1 /2" Overlay -1 1 /'Z' Resurface tennis co urts Paint playing lines -basketba�I court • a-• 1 LS. $ 1 LS. $ 1 LS. $ 1887 S.Y. $156 Ton $ 1 LS. $ 1 LS. $ TOTAL BID FOR OPTION B -1 OPTION B -2 (WITH FABRIC} 3850.00$ 3850.00 285.00$ 285.00 l l 50 00 $ J J 50 co 1.69 $ :3566.�J38. 00 $ 5928.003300. 00 $ 3300.00 170.00 $ 170.00 ========= $ l8 249 43/ I NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTA_L SULLIVAN LAKE PARK 1 Resurface tennis courts 1 LS. $ 3850.00 $_3850. 00 HUSET PARK WEST 1 Remove net posts 1 LS. $285.00 $ 285.00 2 Install net posts 1 LS. $ lJSQ,QQ $ J JSQ.QQ 3 Milling -2" S.Y. 1887 $ ,.J7 $ 447,. 19 4 Fabric 1887 S.Y. $.96 $ 1811.52 5 Overlay -2" 208 Ton $ 36 50 $ :2592 00 6 Resurface tennis courts 1 LS. $ J3QQ.QQ 7 Paint playing lines -basketball court $ J300.00 1 LS. $ 170.00 $ 170.00 --=--== TOTAL BID FOR OPTION 8 -2 $_22 ,630_. 71 ./ It is understood that the Owner may accept or reject any Proposal. A certified check or bidder's bond in the amount of: 5% bf bid Do llars($ _____ _, drawn to the order of the City of Columbia Heights, is attached hereto. tf this proposal is accepted and _______________ refuses, fails, or neglects to execute the Contract and furnish a satisfactory surety bond within ten (10) days of the date of accep1ance of this Proposal, it is understood and agreed that ____________________ Dollars{$ _____ _, --said amount being the same as bid security abovemen1ioned--will be liquidated dama ges occasioned by such refusal, failure, or neglect Thereupon said City of Co lumbia Heights shall realize upon said bid secu rity and use the proceeds in the payment of said damages. Said certified check will be prompUy returned upon completion of the con1ract documents. This Proposal is submitted after caref ul study of the Specifications and from a personal knowledge of the conditions at the site, which knowledge was obtained from our own sources of information and not from any official or employee of the City. It is understood and agreed that this Proposal cannot be withdrawn within sixty (60) days after scheduled time for receipt of bids. PROPOSAL FORM PAGE3 OF 3 The following is a schedule for completion of the work. 1.Time required after Contract Documents are completed to start work:5 days. 2.Time required from commencement of work to completion (working days only; does not include Satur days and Sundays): 45 days. Bituminous consulting and contracting co.,Inc. Legal name of Person, Firm or Corporation S,7!i#--�,,,P.Jj VP (Sign e) By· Stephen R. Frauenshuh, Jr. (Print or type name) Address 2456 Main Street N. E. Mpls, MN 55449 Phone (612)755-1888-------------- Legal Residence --=-s:am=e _______ _ UST OF SUBCONTRACTORS 09/08/93 Date Bidders must list subcontractors tentatively scheduled to work on this project All changes must be submitted to the City Engineer. Recreational surf acers BIDDER'S REFERENCES NAME TELEPHONE NO. 1.Maier Stewart & Assoc.77 4-6021 2.�292-4400 a Comstock & Da�is 784-9346 AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS NO. 9 ITEM: AUTHORIZATION TO DISPOSE OF NO. CITY PROPERTY C/. t=: CITY COUNCIL LETIER Meeting of:...,9.._/l_.,3/9 __ 3 ___ _ ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MA NAGER PUBLIC WORKS 'BY: M. Winson ,t/ftvJ BY� DATE: 9n/93 DA Staff requests permission of the City Council to dispose of Municipal Units #0410 -1984 Ford Crown Victoria, #PD46 -1988 Chevrolet Caprice, #0406 -1985 Ford Crown Victoria and #0408 -1984 Ford Crown Victoria. The request is to place the units on the Hennepin County Auction scheduled for October 2, 1993. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to dispose of Municipal Units #0410 -1984 Ford Crown Victoria, #PD46 -1988 Chevrolet Caprice, #0406 -1985 Ford Crown Victoria and #0408 -1984 Ford Crown Victoria at lhe Hennepin County Auction scheduled for October 2, 1993. MAW:jb 93-569 COUNCIL ACTION: AGENDA SECTTON: NEW BUSINESS NO. 9 ITEM: AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK BIDS NO. TO SEAL WELL AT JACKSON POND CITY COUNCil.. LEITER Meeting of: ___ 9 __ f1=3/9=3�-- ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER PUBLIC WORKS BY: M.Winson � B�, 9.G DATE: 9n/93 DA The inverted well was installed in 1943. The-well is 290' deep. The pwpose of the well was to drain Jackson Pond into the ground water. The pond water entered the well through perforated pipe at the north end of the pond, refer to attached plan. The well has been valved off since the mid-sixties. Both the Minnesota Health Department and the MPCA have knowledge of the well and are interested in having it sealed and abandoned. The estimated cost to abandon the well is $15,000. Funds are available for this work in line item 652-49499-5130, Jackson Pond Upgrade. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to authorize staff to seek bids to seal the inverted well at Jackson Pond. MAW:jb 93-580 COUNCll.. ACTION: • I -�..,,-:, ,_,,,A.Dl&I.._. 'O'.,/,r 1111,,,1.,M 'l•AJ ''* ":,r11� .,,,,.� '<7..7�,v,,rr·, ',,,I.� IVO.tl'I "-,.1.r '17 S�/ ,, o..t �A,.., .... ,,.,1r:,.,.2, "l#kl'I lll't';,,no, "t?.Jr ,N,l'A ,,,.,.,no:, .,. OJ ;,,·w·:, OIJ,,,J/10�.,,� .,,... 'S'Jh'Otr �·�.Ir.,.,� �.IS',,,,,., DNI' Tt7N,,, ,,/VrlW/70::, �JI" .NIS°l'I D,,,,,,A";,.16'QJ J#'W".;, •1411'�¥.li•ltlON 771' ,o,; 0-0 IVO/.b§S ==-N L-:v,_ ________ o_•..J �-+----------11-----.1.,r t,-t,,' NOI.L:J_;,S •or#$' ,,Al? J,, '71,n .71 O.,J, Sl_,I., (:r�).r,,.,J.NIA .r ,,-... .. ., ·;,.· --=--N 0 _J_ NfNH�Ol 1 ,o,M .. , SINtl'r:, N/ ,,DIN .,,/,A:, -�,•JN-/711' ,,)N'IJ�d O.,i ,JOIN ..,,, or .11¥11":> ,.,.,,,,,,. IJft/llll,Q ,I ,.,,,NS' .,.,,.,,.>I::,,;,, .�l>,t,NS',,,:, T7IM d'IJ.IIIANl�OI 'Jtl "Slr7.I' '"""�:,r,,o:, ..,,_,,,::,1¥, _,. ,OJ,,,,,,_.,/,n1N/19 • \.I" ND J&'I# 0-1 (J:11.,,,.•:> ,w ,r170,A' JNIA ti 4'" • t "JIM)-�t.1Sr:> 'lf''MI' "'DT .,;7 i:7.1$' TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS PAT HENTG�, CITY MANAGER MANAGER'S REPORT SEPTEMBER 10, 1993 1)OPERATIONAL REPORTS FOR AUGUST-- lo.A. Attached are operational reports from various Division Heads indicating the significant items undertaken or accomplished for the month of August. I trust you will find the reports to be informational and beneficiaJ with regard to major undertakings occurring within the divisions in this past reporting period. 2)COMMUNITY SERVICE WORKER HOURS-- During the month of August, staff utilized the following hours of volunteer service: Administration/City Hal] . . . . 42:35 hours -City Volunteers & Anoka-Hennepin-Ramsey Library . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2:00 hours -Fare Share Fire/Public Works . . . . . . . . . 34:00 hours -Anoka-Hennepin-Ramsey 78:35 hours -Total 3)SHARED RIDE RECAP-- See attached Shared Ride Expansion and Origination -Destination reports for the month of July, 1993. 4)JULY SOLID WASTE REPORTS-- Enclosed please reference the Solid Waste Report for July, 1993. If you have any questions, contact Valorie Gifford, 782-2813. 5)PROMOTIONAL VIDEO-- Valorie Gifford and Michele Rivera have prepared a promotional video on Columbia Heights. The video is ten minutes long and gives an overview of the City and its structure. The video will be helpful for new employees and other civic organizations. 6)IDGHWAY 47 TRAFFIC REROUTING-- We have been notified of a weight restriction that will be placed on Highway 47 (University A venue) bridge over the railroad tracks south of St. Anthony Boulevard, effective September 1, 1993. This restriction will be in place until the bridge is reconstructed which is not anticipated in the next five years. MTC will be rerouting 14 AM buses and 15 PM buses up to Central Avenue to 37th Avenue to University. Public Works Director Winson also indicated we can anticipate an increase in truck traffic on Central Avenue, 37th Avenue, 40th Avenue, and 44th Avenue as result of the rerouting and restrictions. MANAGER'S REPORT Page 2 September 10, 1993 7)ACCAP CENTRAL A VENUE PROJECT-- Enclosed please find a letter from ACCAP regarding the status of the 3932 Central Avenue apartment project. The letter indicates that although they do not plan. to displace anyone, but the building through resident attrition will eventually become a senior and disabled housing project. ACCAP hopes to get underway with the renovation by November 1, 1993. 8)RAil.ROAD HUMPING OPERATION NOISE-- Councilmember Nawrocki brought to my attention complaints regarding the "noise" emitting during the humping operation at the Burlington Northern Northtown Rail Yard. Enclosed please find a response from the Rail Yard Terminal Superintendent, Tim Godsil. In the event any citizens or City Council wish to meet directly with rail yard officials, I can arrange a meeting later in September or early October. 9)POST OFFICE ROAD RESTRICTION REPLY-- The City Council recently reviewed in a work session the enclosed reply from the post office legal department on the applicability of the road restrictions on the post office operations. The Traffic Commission will review this matter formally at their next meeting and the City staff will also off er both to the post office and the Traffic Commission the potential of establishing a separate segregated entrance off of 44th A venue for the truck traffic. Hopefully, the Traffic Commission's final recommendation to the Council will be reported at an October City Council meeting. 10)METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ISSUE.�-- Enclosed please find background information submitted by the North Metro Mayors Association on Metropolitan Council issues and the State Advisory Council on Metropolitan Governance. Please take an opportunity to review the information and provide comments to me at your earliest convenience. I will attempt to forward your comments or concerns to the North Metro Mayors Association so that they can be formulated as part of NMMA's legislative efforts. 11)LIBRARY WINDOW SILL REPLACEMENT-- City staff has prepared a basic work plan for the va.rious glazing companies that are providing proposals for the replacement of the window sills at the Library. We have attempted to include more local contractor involvement and have proposals presented in a more uniform basis. This item will be before the City Council at the September 27th meeting. 12)40TH A VENUE STREET LIGHTING PROBLEMS-- Last week, one of the older ornamental street lights on 40th Avenue between University and 5th Street fell onto the lane of traffic. Upon inspection, it was found that the base of the light had rusted out and a similar condition exists on nearly all of the remaining fourteen lights. The Public Works Department is gathering cost estimates and information on replacing the lights. In the meantime, four of the lights will be inactive. MANAGER'S REPORT Page 3 September 10, 1993 13)SPECIAL ELECTION DAY TRANSPORTATION-- As the City Council is aware, we discussed a proposal by Suburban Taxi Corporation to provide election day transportation to any of the precincts in the City of Columbia Heights. After further discussion, the City Council determined that the absentee voting laws have been liberalized to the extent that persons having difficulty getting to the polls can be accommodated through the absentee voting process. 14)TAX-FORFEIT LAND-- An ordinance is being prepared for City Council consideration at the September 27th meeting for the Szurek property purchase on 42nd Avenue. The City Attorney is requesting the necessary deed from the County and State for the request to purchase tax-forfeited property near Maiden Lane. The deeds will move through the normal channels in a reasonable timeline. 15)STINSON BOULEVARD/ 39TH AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION-- Be advised that the St. Anthony City Council has reconfirmed their commitment for traffic signalization on Stinson Boulevard at 39th Avenue. The Public Works Department is preparing the necessary traffic warrant study and will proceed with getting necessary approvals on the project as expeditiously as possible. Sometime in the near future, a joint powers agreement between St. Anthony and Columbia Heights will be formally presented for consideration. 16)HA YF.S STREET HOUSING COMPLAINTS-- The Building Inspections Department finally received permission to inspect both 4030 Hayes Street NE (John and Jacqueline Lang residence) and 4020 Hayes Street NE (Daniel Koch residence). The Lang residence appears to have a non-conforming apartment in the-lower level. However, this apartment was approved through a building permit, as the inspection cards indicate the inclusion of a basement apartment. Currently, the rental dwelling is being occupied by an in-law and, as a matter of past precedent, we have not enforced the licensing requiiements or determined the property to be rental, if the case of in-laws. In the case of Dan Koch's property, we found that it is not legally separated in terms of access into and between living areas and the two residences appear to share common facilities, with the exception of a smaJI kitchenette in the lower level. Sometime in the near future, our housing maintenance code and zoning ordinance should clearly delineate the circumstances whereby rental license fees and dual utility charges apply as they relate to relatives, mother-in-law apartments, and rooming house arrangements. 17)HEALTH CARE CLINIC, SISTERS OF ST. JOSEPH-- Carol Frey, Volunteer Coordinator, has attended a number of meetings in Fridley regarding the development of a health care clinic that will provide free or low-cost health care services to individuals who are not otherwise covered by medical assistance, medicare, or traditional health care plans. For the most part, this service is aimed at unemployed individuals, young adults, or individuals working at lower income jobs that do not provide health insurance. It appears that the health care clinic proposed in Fridley will open September 30th. The same group is interested in opening a clinic in Columbia Heights, however, the availability of providing clinic space appears to be the necessary element. If the City Council is interested in pursuing this program further, I will set up a meeting with Carondelet Life Care officials. MANAGER'S REPORT Page 4 September 10, 1993 18)RF.SIDENTIAL METER REPAIR-- A question was asked at a recent Council Work Session about who pays for residential meter repairs. We have, in the past, charged for parts (but no labor/installation) such as a seal replacement. If major repairs are necessary, it is generally less expensive to replace the meter. Most recently, we have replaced about thirty meters in the past year which is somewhat higher than our previous years' replacements. Of course, the owner pays for the new meter. PH:bj 93/108 Attachments / COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FIRE-DEPARTMENT TO: PAT HENTGES, CITY MANAGER FROM: CHARLES KEWATT, FIRE CHIEF SUBJECT: OPERATION REPORT DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1993 OPERATION REPORT August 1993 A.Significant Accomplishments .., L Emergency Medical Calls -13.L total calls 2.Fire or Good Intent Calls -....2fL total calls 3.Classification of AlarmsStill Alarms -143 Company Alarms -11 General Alarms -5 4.Total Calls for the Month of August 5.Other -159 165 Hours Station-Duty (paid-on-call personnel)288 Hours Training (all personnel) B.Status of Department Goals 1.No Report. C.Issues or Problems 1.No Report. @hi-�/<_) /2��� CWK:cf 93-127 TO: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Public Works Department PATRICK HENTGES CITY MANAGER FROM: MARK A. WINSON ,A/,IJ PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: OPERATIONAL REPORT -AUGUST SEPTEMBER 8, 1993 DATE: SIGNIFICANT ACCOMPLISHMENTS General *Responded to 70 Gopher State One-Call requests. Street * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Parks * * * Participated in promotional video taping. Hauled milling base material to storage yard. Hauled yard materials to Midwest and Gallagher's. Performed general patching City-wide. Cleaned basins City-wide 3 times. Swept streets including business district. Filled cesspools (3). Assisted in building volleyball court Huset east. Rechecked trees on contractor's list. Patched some alleys (3). Repaired lower rear parking lot at JPM. Stockpiled materials in storage yard. Finished patching water break repair at 49th and Fairway Drive. Cleared brush from some areas and chipped. Performed pool and restroom maintenance repairs. Emptied trash receptacles City-wide weekly. Picked parks and ponds -cleaned LaBelle Pond. Operational Report -August September 8, 1993 Page 2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mowed grass City-wide. Performed ballfield maintenance and prep work. Performed beach maintenance. Painted park signs. Lined fields for football and soccer. Repaired rotted wood at LaBelle Park. Installed new horse shoe pits at Sullivan Lake. Installed new volleyball courts at Huset east off of Quincy. Repaired vandalism at all parks especially Sullivan Park Closed beach and secured far winter August 9th. Performed maintenance and repairs to playground equipmenL Final DED inspections. Set out soccer goals. Repaired sod at parks. Took water samples from Sullivan Lake. Replaced basketball nets City-wide. Sewer & Water * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Shut off 15 delinquent water users. Performed lift and pump station maintenance. Repaired catch basins (7) Cleaned sanitary manholes (27) and storm basins (25). Cleaned Jackson Pond. Cleaned ponds and outfalls, operated outfall valves. Repaired sod. Repaired manholes. Rodded 4,560 L.F. of sanitary sewer and performed general maintenance. Completed DED inspections. Installed cabinets at Administration building. Performed fountain maintenance at Wargo and LaBelle. Repaired sidewalk blocks on Central Ave. Checked utilities on overlayed streets. Met Layne Well at Jackson Pond about sealing the well. Repaired gate valve stacks (8). Repaired stop box stand pipes. Worked several days on a water main break at 1860 49th Ave. as it was also necessary to repair sanitary sewer and manholes. Adjusted storm and sanitary manholes to a better grade (6). Cleaned and performed maintenance to storm line at 52nd and Central. Operational Report -August September 8, 1993 Page 3 Engineering *Continued work on several projects as follows: 1993 Miscellaneous Concrete Project 1993 Sealcoat Project. MAW:jb 93-583 1993 M.S.A.S. Overlay Projects. 1993 Storm Sewer Projects. Tennis court resurfacing at Huset Park West and Sullivan Lake Park. Miscellaneous surveys. Storm water public education program. Continued working with MSA and Honeywell on Pump Station #2. Continued working with City of Fridley en North Corporate· Limit storm drainage and Highland Lake diversion. --·-�, ; r/Dt, 820 • 40th AVENUE N. E. ' I � i : . \ .. . , . ,.JI \, .· f" • H • "---I . �-"---) 1· COLUMB.IA HEIGHTS PUBLIC LIBRARY COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN 55421-2996 PHONE: (612) 782-2805 FAX: (612) 782-2804 ' __,__ , TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Patrick Hentges, City Manager M.Rebecca Loader, Library Director� August, 1993, operational report September 3, 1993 I.Significant AccomplishmentsA.Reading Club, Starring Library Kids.'' ended 8/14 with a grand total of752 participants.B.The Board met on 8/3 with four members present •.C.The Friends met on 8/2 with seven members preseni.D.Seniar Citizen Filmtime on 8/11 had 20 people in attendance. II.Departmental GoalsA.On 8/3 Ross Sutter, a folksinger, entertained 94 children. This programwas sponsored by the Kiwanis.B.On 8/10 Sean Brown, a storyteller, entertained 87 children.C.On 8/17 DoQdles: the Clown performed for 130 people. This program wassponsored by the Boosters.D.On &/24 James Gerholdt brought his reptile show to the library to entertain129 people. Th;i.s program was sponE1ored by the Boosters.E.The library received a new 20" colc1r televis'ion from the Cable Commissionon August 6 to be used with the library's character generator. It has ahigh-resolution screen and a built·-in closed caption decoder.F.Becky met with the directors of Ani,ka County and Anoka Public Librarieson 8/5. Updates on the automa,ted ,circulation system and planning forthe coming fiscal year were discussed.G.The pages met wit� Becky on 8/17 to negotiate fall schedule. III.Issues and ProblemsA.None Adult Juvenile Work days 1992 6,745 8,355 15,100 25 Ci rculation ��i:CI. 1993 6 .-895 8,238 15,133 26 July Reference Dir. A Dir. B Work days 1992 2,071 S94 72 25 LIBGIS 1993 1,906 350 51 26 @ niqdedpaper TO: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS RECREATION D,EPARTMENT PATRICK HENTGES. OTY MANAGER G)�@�ow�ru1uo LE) .:iEP 7 1993 MANAGER CITY OF COLUMBIA HEJGHTS I FROM: 1f(MARK S. CASEY, DIRECTOR OF RECREATION SUBJECT: OPERATIONAL REPORT. AUGUST 1 THROUGH 31, 1993 DATE: SEPIEMBER 3. 1993 A.Administration I.Silver Lake Beach closed on August 8, 1993. Attached is an hourly attendance average. 2.I have accepted an invitation to be on the Columbia Heights/Fridley Community Education Advisory Board. 3.With the assistance of Bill Ehite, Finance Director, upgraded registration software was installed on our computers. The new system will greatly add to our capabilities in program registrations. 4.The Columbia Heights Athletic Boosters graciously donated $2,850 towards a new coaches certification program that the Department will implement this fall. B.Recreation 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. C.Seniors 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Summer Cub Leagues finished in a post season tournament where c<H:hampions were crowned. Camps were conducted in football, cheerleading and soccer. Participation was nineteen, twelve and thirty­ four respectively. Practice began for tackle football and soccer. 5 traveling football and 4 traveling soccer teams have been formed. Adult softball summer leagues concluded their season with their respective divisional playoffs. The following recreation activities were conducted in August: Camp Heights summer playgrounds, summer cub, football� soccer, cheerleading and adult softball. 36 Seniors participated in a 10 day trip to Colorado from August 1st -10th. The Senior Coordinator attended a meeting on August 11th concerning the Living at Home Block Nurse Program. 25 seniors participated in an outing' to KS1P and were on "Good Company" August 13th. 27 seniors participated in a picnic at Sullivan Lake Parlt on August 24th. 27 seniors attended the Defensive Driving class on August 26th and 27th. 36 seniors attended Senior Day at the State Fair on August 30th. OPERATIONAL REPORT -AUGUST 1 -AUGUST 31 PAGE TWO D.Volunteer 1.The Volunteer Coordinator provided each of the citiz.ens who responded to the Sheffield survey with a volunteer application and a list of volunteer oppormnities. We received 23 applications from people interested in serving on task or advisory groups. The people who are responding to the call for citizen involvem ent will bring a high level of skill in a variety of areas. 2.On August 17th the Vohmteer Coordinator attended a meeting in Fridley at which the Sister of St. Joseph presented a plan to develop a health call clinic in Fridley. The clinic serves people who do not have health insurance and do not qualify for medical assistance. A second meeting will be held September 7th. The City Manager has been given the Volunteer Coordinator's summery of the meeting and hand outs from the meeting. 3.The Volunteer Coordinator also attended the Human Services Commission meeting where she explained the process used to recruit and develop volunteer positions. Also discussed were the policies and procedures used to coach a volunteer who is not following through with their responsibilities and the process to release a volunteer, E.John P. Murzyn Hall 1.In 1993, 30 out of 52 Fridays and 48 out of 52 Saturdays are booked. and in 1994, 15 out of 52 Fridays and 45 out of 52 Saturdays. 1993 SILVER lAlE BEACH ADULTS CHILDREN SUN BATHERS FRI, JUNE 11 0.8 11.3 6.8 SAT, JUNE 12 0 0.3 0.3 SUN, JUNE 13 0 0 0 HON. JUNE 14 0.5 2.3 0 TUE. JUNE 15 0 5 8.2 VED, JUNE 16 0 0.8 0 THU, JUNE 17 0.5 0.7 0.8 F RI. JUNE 18 0.7 9.3 10 CAKP HEIGHTS SAT, JUNE 19 0 0 0 SUN, JUNE 20 0 0.7 I KON, JJNE 21 8.5 23.8 22.5 TUE, JUNE 22 2 8. 3 9.5 WEii. JUNE 23 1 6.5 6.8 CASTLE HEIGHTS THU, JUNE 24 C.5 0.7 0.8 FRI, JUNE 25 7 IO .1 O CAMP HEIGHTS HT, JUNi 26 2 1.8 3.2 SUN, JUNE 27 1. 2 5.5 15.8 HO�. JUNE 28 0.2 3.3 9.8 TUE, JUNE 29 2 6.4 3.5 VED, JUNE 30 !0.6 7 .2 CASTLE HEIGHTS THU, JU�Y 1 0 0 0 FRI, JULY 2 1.3 27.7 13 CAKP HEIGHTS S!T. JULY 3 o.�0 0.5 SU�, JULY 4 j • � 5.3 4.�KON. JULY � o.e ' i.5j TUE. JULY E 0.8 5.8 9.8WED, JULY 7 0 7.8 6.8 CASTLE HEIGHTSTHU. JUU S 0. J 1.2 2.JFR:. JULY 9 1 13.7 20.7 CAMP HEIGHTS SAT, JULY l C C 0 0 SU�. J�LY I l 0.3 1.5 4.7 MOti, JUL�' l 2 2 9.8 2·4. 2 TUE. JULY 13 C 1.7 0.2 VED, JULY 14 2.2 17 18.5 CASTLE HEIGHTS MON, AUG 2 0 .1 0.2 0 .1 THU, JULY 15 1.2 21 14. 7 TUE, AUG 3 0.2 0.2 0.3 FRI, JULY 16 0.6 10.2 10.2 CAMP HEIGHTS VED, AUG 4 0 10.2 O CASTLE HEIG� SAT, JULY 17 0.8 4.2 7.2 THU, AUG 5 0 1.1 l.2SU�, JULY 18 I. 7 9.8 13.7 FRI, AUG 6 0 10.3 11 .I CAMP HEIGHTS KON. JULY 19 1 6.2 7.8 SAT, AUG 7 0 1.2 2 TUE, JULY 20 1.5 13.2 14.7 SUN, AUG 8 0.5 3 2.7 WED, JULY 21 0.1 7,7 1.3 CASTLE HEIGHTS ---------------------·----- THU. JULY 22 0 0 0 52.'I 346 .8 373.2 FR�, JULY 23 0 13.5 15.7 ClHP HEIGHTS SAT, JULY 24 0.5 3 4.5 DULY AVERAGE o.s 5.9 6.3 SUK, JOLY 25 0.5 6 2.7 HON, JULY 26 1. 7 9 6.8 TOE, JULY 27 0.I l.1 2.3 WED, JULY 28 1. 9 0.4 11 .2 CASTLE HEIGHTS THU, JULY 29 0.J 0 0.2 FRI, JULY 30 0.5 11. 2 10.4 CAKP HEIGHTS SAT, JULY 31 0 2.4 1.9 SUN, AUG J 0.7 11.8 17. 8 DATE: TO: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 PATRICK HENTGES CITY MANAGER FROM: WILLIAM ELRITE v,J()/' FINANCE DIRECTOR RE: OPERATIONAL REPORT AUGUST 1993 DEPARTMENTAL GOALS: 1994 BUDGET PROCESS The proposed budget and proposed levy are scheduled to be adopted at the September 13th City Council meeting. LIQUOR OPERATION Phil Suckerman is continuing to negotiate with Kraus-Anderson for the renewal of the lease at Top Valu Liquor on Central Avenue. The list of concerns has been narrowed to a few items and we anticipate having a renewal lease to present to the City Council before year-end. 1993 CITY ELECTION The primary election will be held on September 21st. On Monday, September 14th, we will have the official public testing of the election equipment. This is a standard event that occurs prior to each election; however, we have been informed that at this testing representatives from the County and Secretary of State's office will be available to verify the procedures we are using. I do not anticipate any problems with the test and/or the presence of the representatives from the County or Secretary of State's office. WE:dn 9309071 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT TO: FROM : Mayor and City Council Members Chief David Mawhorter Operational Report, August, 1993 September 9, 1993 Jr' SUBJECT: DATE: I.Events/ Accomplishments A.The Sheffield patrol is going well. We have had nine shifts since August 21 to September 5. The total cost in overtime thus far is $3,577.38. The officers have made apprnximately 60 enforcement contacts and many various other nonenforcement contacts. We will continue to evaluate the results and continued need for this activity. B.National Night Out was held on August 3 and was a very successful effort There were 35 block parties and officers attended most all of them. Il. Projects/Goals A.The monthly activity report for August, 1993, is attached. Ill. Issues/Problems A.None to report. DPM:mld 93-341 AUGUST -199,1 TRAFFIC LAM v!OLATION5 lOTAl l1£IOEMTS R£POkTfO BY RfPO�TIN6 6RIO COOE CALL DESCRIPTION l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 16 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TOTAL ------------------------..... ----------------------------------------------·-----··------------------------------------------------------8000 All Other Traffic Violations 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 12 8001 Citizen Traffic Complaint 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 9 8002 Open Bottle 0 8003 Speed/Radar 1 2 9 1 1 2 11 2 1 2 3 6 41 8004 S�etd/Non-radar 0 8005 Sop Sign 1 2 3 2 1 1 2 12 8006 Careless Driving 3 J 8007 Reckless Driving 0 8008 Unreasonable Acceleration 0 8009 Over Center Line/Mrong Side Road 0 8010 Mrong May on One-May 0 8011 Ia�roper Passinf 0 8012 fo louing Too C oseJy 0 8013 fail to Yield Right of May 1 2 3 8014 m K·OLI Emergency V-ehith 0 8015 No Or le�roper Signa1 0 8016 Vision O scured 0 8017 Permitting Jlleial ,Operation 0 8018 Illegal Use df i9hts 0 8019 School Bus Violation 0 8020 I�peding Traffic 0 8021 I�pro�er Turning I l 8022 Semap ore 1 l ' 8051 Oe.fect,ive Brakes 0 8052 OefectJve lignts I 1 2 80b3 Seat Belt� 1 1 11 l l ,, 5 l 23 ' 8054 Oefectil(e Tins 0 80$5 kotorrycle Equipment �iolation 0 8056 E)housl Violation 0 8057 Bu�per Violation 0 8058 Other Equipment Violctions 1, 1 8100 Parking Ali Othrr I 1 3 8101 Parked Mrong Side of Road ··-l 3 ' 810i Overtime Parking l 1 1 1 4 810� Ooubie ParUng 0 8104 Parking 2a to 6a {Snoubirds) 0 810$ Forked In No Parking Zon� l l 1 1 1 5 8106 Parked In H:ndicapped lon� 1 1 8107 Parking On Highijay u 8108 Parked Bloc�ing Oriveuay 0 8109 Abandoned Vehicle ) l 18110 Parked In fire lane 4 4 8200 License Violations/All Other 2 I 1 1 l i 8201 No Driver's License 0 8202 No MN Driver's License 1 1 2 8203 Mrong Na�e or Address 1 1 2 4 am No DL in Possession • 3 1 l 5 8205 DL Canceled/Revoked/Suspended l Ii 1 2 1 1 l l l I 16 8212 No Insurance 1 6 1 1 2 1 1 1 4 1 19 8213 Expired Tabs 1 I l 2 4 2 2 3 3 l 4 24 8214 Illegal Use of Plates I 18215 No R,egistration 0 821& Other Registration Violations 3 l 2 1 7 8221 Bicycle Violations 0 8223 Roped Violations Ci 8225 Snoijmobile Violations (On Vieu) 0 8226 Citizen Snou�obile to,plaint 08227 ATV Violation 0 8228 Citizen ATV Co1plaint 8229 D.L. Pick Up 0--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL OTHER TRAFFIC 2 2 2 7 0 3 5 60 5 8 12 6 l 27 18 10 8 Ii 33 4 219 Percent of total by grid u au 3t Ot u 21 27t 2t 41 St 31 Ot 12t 81 st H 3' 151 2t 100\ PART II INCIDENTS -LOST AND FOUND TOTAL INCIDENTS REPORTED BV REPORTIN6 &RIO CODE DESCRIPTION 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TOTAL ---------------------·-----------.-----•-• --I ------------.---.-.-----------------• • --------• ... • ---• ---• ----• ---------------------------------8300 8301 8302 8303 8310 8311 8312 lost All Other Nissing Persons lost Property �alkaijars (Adult)found A l Other found Person Found Property TOTAL LOST ANO FOUND Percent of total by grid PART III NOTOR VEHICLE AND OTHER ACCIDENTS CODE DESCRIPTION 8400 8410 8420 8430 8440 8450 8460 8500 8501 8502 8503 8510 8511 8512 8513 8520 8521 8522 8523 8540 8541 8542 8543 8544 8550 8551 8552 B553 Motor Vehicle Accident !All Other) Fatal Notor Vehicle Accident PI Notor Vehicle Accident PI Hit and Run PD Accident PO Hit and Run Bicycle ACOT (No Notor Vehicle) All Other �TV/Sno�mobile Acdt. Fatal ATV/Snomobile accidents Personal Injury ATV/Snomobile acdt. Property Damage ATV/Sn�mobile acdt. All Other Boating accidents fatal Boat Acctdents Personal Injury Boat Accidents Property Dama!' Boal AccidentsAll Other Pub ic Accidents Electrical Shoe� Public Falls Public Burns Public A ll Other Occupational Accidents Electrical Shoe� Fa 11 s Handling Objects (Lifting, etc.) Cuts Firearms Accidents Other Pistol Accidents Rifle Accidents Shotgun Accidents TOTAL ACCIDENTS AND fAtlS Percent of total by grid 0 1 4 1 2 1 4 0 0 . 0 1 1 1 4 1 1 3 2 1 4 2 2 4 1 29 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 4 0 2 1 3 0 2 1 6 4 2 4 2 37 3t Ot 3t Ot 51 St Ot 111 Ot 51 3t 81 Ot St 3\ 16\ 11t St llt St 100\ 1 I 2 3 I I TOTAL INCIDENTS REPORTED BY REPORTING &RID 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TOTAL 0 0 I " l 5' 1 11 ·1 1 2 1 1 1 2 10 I 13I2 4 I 9000 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 2 1 4 0 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 4 40 5% 3t 3% Ot 3t 51 3\ lOt Ot St 3t 5\ St Ot 01 0\ 0\ 0\ 43\ 10% 1 PART IV NISC. OTHH --------------------------------------------8560 All Other Ani1al Co1plaints 8561 Dog Bite 8562 Cat Bite 8563 Lost Ani11als 8564 Found Ani1als 8565 Dead Animal Pick Up 8566 Animal Complaint/Do� 8567 Ani1al Co1plaint/Wi d Ani1al8568 Ani1al Co1plaint/Cat 8569 Ani1al Co1�laint/Other8570 Ani11al Pie up/Dog 8571 Ani1al Pick up/Cat 8572 Ani1al Pick up/Mild 8600 fires / Assisted CHFO 8601 fires / Illegal Burning 8700 Suicides 8701 Suicide Attempts 8702 Suicide Threats 8720 Sudden Death/Bodies Found 8730 Sick Cared For / Medical Assist 8731 Emergency Nedi�al Committment mo Nental Cases &i 41 Emergency Nental Committment TOTAL ACCIDENTS AN� FALLS Percent of total by grid CLASS V INCIDENTS MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC CODE CALL DESCRI�TION --------------------------------------------8800 All other 8801 Domestic Disputes 8802 Nei9hborhood Disputes 8803 Civil Assists 8804 Unuanted Persons 8805 Loud Parties 8806 Juvenile Co�plaints 8807 Car Lockout 8808 Suspiciou� Person 8809 Suspicious Vehicle 8810 Suspicious Occurrence 8811 Welfare Check 8812 Eter�ency Nessage Delivery8813 Buil ing Check 8814 Disturbance 8815 Public Assist Person 8816 Public Assist Vehicle 8817 A'1ar1s{Bank 8818 Alarms/Other Business 8819 A la r1s /Home 8820 Alar•s{Other 8821 Funera Escort 8822 Hazardous Conditions 8823 Health Haiard 8824 Nuisance Violations 8825 Vacation House check 8826 Fire Works Discharage TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICPercent of total by grid TOTAL INCIDENTS REPORTED BY REPORTING &RIO 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TOTAL ----------------------------------. -------------------------------------------------- 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 3 2 4 5 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 I 46 1 I 2 1 1 1 I 2 1 2 1 1 1 6 1 1 2 4 1 1l11 1 l 51 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 ., 0 l 2 2 2 1 4 1 13 1 Ii 3 2 15 2 4 1 5 5 3 73 1 I 21 l 1· 1 4 1 1 -------�----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 3 6 6 4 9 6 20 4 13 9 4 3 23 5 7 8 9 10 8 159 1\ 2\ n 4\ 3\ 6\ 4t 13' 3\ 8\ 61 3' 2'141 3t 4\ 5\ 6\ 6\ 5\ 100t TOTAL INCIDENTS REPO�TED BV REPORTING &RID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TOTAL -----------------------·----------. --------. --------------------------·---------------1 5 5 4 1 1 4 19 1 3 2 1 2 5 2 5 3 4 10 1 1 4 3 28 9 4 4 2 8 2 3 2 1 1 2 I 7 3 2 2 1 1 1 I 1 12 2 4 1 8 4 2 1 5 1 1 1 3 1 I 2 4 4 1 3 3 2 1 1 5 1 1 2 1 1 2 21 2 Ii 4 7 2 6 1 6 1 2 12 2 2 ·,2 2 3 11 1 1 2 1 3 3 1 2 1 13 1 2 2 1 3 1 14 3 10 2.7 2 3 2 1 3 1 6 3 2 i 2 1 7 1 2 1 2 l 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 5 8 2 2 3 2 5 2 5 1 2 4 2 3 3 1 2 1 9 5 2 3 4 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 l 2 15 2 3 1 3 2 8 1 4 2 2 3 1 2 1 1 15 3 1 1 3 1 14 2 1 8 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 5 1 2 1 1 1 5 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 . ------·-----------------------------------------------------------. 24 25 28 19 5 22 27 186 13 58 26 37 24 55 14 53 25 18 74 3' 3\ 3' 2' 1t 3' 3\ 23\ 2' 7' 31 51 3t n 2' n 3\ 2, 91 9 87 9 82 18 8 45 1 13 4 2i 3 86 3 53 8 72 3 33 5 51 1 41 1 4 1 1 5 54 3 62 2 19 1 3 20 12 12 0 2 1 1 s° 69 802 9\ 100, TOTAL INCIDENTS REPORTED BY REP ORTING 6Al0 NISCELLANEOUS OFFICER 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TOTAL --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8900 All Other Non-Classified 1 1 2 1 2 2 9 8901 Outsite Assist ACSO I 1 1 3 2 7 8902 Outside Assiit MN State Patrol 0 8903 Outside Assist NN DNR 0 8904 Outside Assist Other PD 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 4 2 26 8905 Outside Asstst Other Agency 2 z 4 8906 DETOX 1 1 3 1 1 1 5 2 2 1S s 31 8907 Police Inforeation 1 1 8908 Open Door(Business 0 8909 Open Door/Other 1 1 2 8910 Serve Su11ons/Cri1inal 0 8911 Serve Su11ons/Civil 0 8912 Bank Run 0 8913 Bank Run(City 0 8914 Uarrant Arrest/City 0 8915 Warrant Arrest(Outside Agency 0 8916 Warrant Hennepin County 1 1 l 1 2 6 8917 Warrant Anoka County s 1 l 2 9 8918 Warrant Ramsey County 1 1 8919 Uarrant Juvenile 2 1. 3 8920 Search Warrant Arrest 0 8921 EmergencJ lransport 0 8922 Vehicle nspection 0 8923 Special Detail 0 8999 Assist/2 1an Call CHPO 9 16 9 16 13 23 162 4 34 2S 27 8 55 11 36 28 13 78 71 638 -----------·-----------------------------------------------V --------------------------TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS OFFICER 11 16 13 17 1 15 26 178 4 37 27 30 11 67 12 43 34 15 101 85 743 Percent of total by grid 1\ 2' 2' 2t 0\ 2\ 3t 24\ 1t St 4\ 4' u 9\ 2' 6\St 2t 14\ llt lOOt &RAND TOTAL NOH-CRIMINAL CALLS I 42 47 s1 49 13 53 65 452 26 120 76 82 41 174 50 119 19 so 239 112 2000 GRANO TOTAL PERCENT BY GRID 2\ 2\ 3\ 2\ 11 3\ 3\ 23\ 1\ 6t 4\ 4\ 2\ 9\ 3\ 6\ 4\ 3\ 12t 9t 100\ PART 1 CRINE llurder Rape Robbery Assault Burglary Larceny Auto Theft Arson TOTAL PART 1 CRIIIE Percent of total by grid PART TIIO CRIME -----------------------·-------------------Other Assaults Forgery/Counterfeit fraud Embezzlement Stolen Property Vandalism Utapons Prostitution Other sex offenses Narcotics Total Gamblin� Totalfamily/ hildren 0. U. I.liquor la11s Drunkenness Disorderly Varancy Ot er (e�. Traffic) TOTAL PA�T 2 C�IME Percent of total by grid TOTAL PA�T l ANO 2 CRIME Percent of total by grid GRANO TOTAL FOR THE IIONTH Percent of total by grid 1 2 3 1 5 3 TOTAL INCIDENTS REPORTED BY REPO�TJNG GRID 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TOTAL 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 7 2 1 1 4 1 2 5 9 1 1 1 5 3 4 5 3 40 3 1 2 3 7 3 3 1 6 1 1 5 4 3 27 17 96 1 1 1 2 4 1 10 1 2 3 1 5 3 4 1 5 7 17 0 15 4 5 7 6 4 5 8 4 38 22 161 ll 31 21 21 11 31 41 111 01 91 21 31 41 41 2t 31 51 21 241 14% 1001 TOTAL INCIDENTS REPORTED BY REPORTING 6RIO 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TOTAL ----------------------------------------------·-------------------------------------------1 2 l H 1 2 1 1 3 2 2 31 6 1 2 9 2 7 9 0 1 1 2 4 3 1 3 3 3 3 12 5 4 1 4 3 1 6 1 4 ti} 0 0 l 2 I I I 6 7 1 1 1 ' 12 0 1 1 1 3 1 l l 3 l 7111 2 1 1 2 8 3 I I 504 1 2 1 2 8 20 I 9 1 7 5 10 1 3 3 1 7 15 101 -------------------------------------------------------------------------·-------------18 4 I 9 4 8 12 61 ' 19 8 9 11 15 3 5 13 2 31 19 Z54 ' 71 2% 0% u 21 31 5%20 1\ 7% H 41 41 61 u 2' Sl n 12, It lOOtI 19 9 4 13 5 13 19 78 2 34 12 14 18 21 7 10 21 6 69 41 415 5% 2% u 3' u 3' 5\ 191 0\ 8% 3' 3' 0 5% 21 2% 5% 1% lH 10% 100%I 61 56 55 62 18 66 84 530 28 154 88 96 59 195 57 129 100 56 308 213 2415 3% 2% 2t 3\ 1% 3% 3% 22\ 1\ 61 41 4t 2% 8\ 2% St 4l 2t 13\ 9% 100% • CLEARANCE BV a�ID AUGUST -1993 OfffNSH ACT UH OFFENSES PEWNT GRID REPORTEO UNFOUNDED OFFENSES CLEARED CLEARED 19 19 7 36.8 9 9 3 33.3 3 4 l 3 1 33.3 13 13 3 23 5 5 5 0 0 6 13 13 4 3 0. 7 19 B 3 15.7 78 78 41 52.5 0 10 34 I 33 9 2' '; I '• 11 l, 12 6 5 (I It H 14 6 42.8 I} 18 18 4 23. 5 14 21 1 20 9 4� l�7 !, i> 2 3�.3 16 1 iJ 10 7 70 17 {i I 21 4 19 18 6 6 0 0 I 9 70 7 0 37 52.8 20 41 41 17 H.5 TOTALS 41i 5 412 163 39.56 Amm AUfi -1993 CLASSlfICATION THIS IIONTH THIS HAi SUE IIONTH LAST rEU Of TO DA TE LAST YEAR TO DATE OFFENSE Adult Juvenile Adult Juvenile Adult Juvenile Adu! t Juvenile ClAS5 1 Cri1inal Ho1icide 0 0 0 0 Rape 0 0 1 0 Robbery 1 1 2 1 1 Aggravated Assault 1 7 2 I 7 l Burglary 1 1 4 2 2 9 Larceny H 14 107 65 15 1 104 41 Auto Theft 3 1 25 0 32 Arson l b 0 1 CLASS 1 TOTAL 18 18 121 102 16 I 115 91 CLASS 2 Other Assault 1i' 6 107 27 21 1 97 32 forgery/Counterftng 0 3 1 1 l 0£ Fraud 11 1 79 l 9 74Embezzlement 0 0 0 0 Stolen Property 1 6 0 0 Buy, Sell, Etc l 0 1 2 0 2 Vandalism 7 8 21 4 15 23 Meapons Violations 3 3 l 4 5 Prostitution 0 0 0 0 Other Sex l 1 1 1 1 Narc-Drug Laus 6 l 24 7 I 11 3 Gambling 0 0 0 0 Fa111ily-Children l 1 0 0 0 0 .M. I. b 4i l 5 23 0 Liquor Laus 3 4 9 14 2 ·4Disorderly Conduct 4 2 38 8 7 28 14Other/Except Traf. 23 4 192 49 34 2 156 26Curfeu/Loitering 40 0 60 3 1 28 Runauay 0 0 0 0 CLASS 2 TOTAL 73 67 513 6i 82 9 413 139 6RANO TOTAL 91 85 6H 169 98 10 528 230 � POLICE VEHICLE DAT� AUGUST 93 THIS YEAR SANE NONTH LAST YEAR MILEAGE OF VEHICLE THIS NONTH TO DAlf LAST YW TO DATE VEHICLE 142 189 2050 VEHICLE 145 493 3009 VEHICLE 150 853 8652 VEHICLE 151 691 15518 VEHICLE 152 704 3270 VEHICLE 153 326 8539 VEHICLE 154 42 7118 VEHICLE 155 1260 9091 VEHICLE 156 4H 2377 VEHICLE 15i 1J 33 16995 VEHICLE 158 H21 20828 VEHICLE 160 1211 2349 VEHIClE fol 2959 7650 VEHICLE h, 2710 4168 VEHICLE 163 3138 7751 OTHEF. VEHICLES 56,4 TOTALS 17666 125589 15731 118251 GALLONS uf 6A5 USED VEHICLE 142 19 200.8 VEHICLE 145 36.�21 i . Ii VEHICLE 150 9 9. 7 857.8 VEHICLE 151 8.4 1861.3 VEHICLE 15;: 13.6 185.5 VEHILCE 15:, i.8 799 VEHICLE 154 9.1 996.9 VEHICLE 155 190. 3 1117 .8 VEHICLE 151i 23.2 m.1VEHICLE t5i 106.i 1591.1VEHICLE 158 139. 7 2018.5VEHICLE lliO 103.4 218.9VEHICLE l!il 297 .4 783.6 VEHICLE Hi 267 403 VEHICLE f6j 314.8 770. 5OlHH \IEHICLE5 625.6 TOTALS 16:H 12793 1445.4 1246,.6 AUGUST 930FFENSES CLASS 'I AND CLASS II ,n,LL OTHER GRIDS 227-55% TOTAL -415 GRID 8 78-19% CALLS FOR SERVICE AUGUST -1·993. HILLTOP ALL OTHER GRIDS 1137 57% TOTAL -2000 GRID 8 �DJ�� @fRIOIQ) 1993 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ANOKA COUNTY , MINN -----�----M LY I NOT[: ··-··-·-·-�:r---E.='.EF-'=--=----- -.. - T CITY Of FRIDl.£Y • OTY Of NEW BRIGHTON OTY Of ST. ANlHONY CITY OF COLUQIA HEIGHTS TO: PATllClt IIENTGES, CITY KAHAGD. ROIi: VALOB.IE GIFFORD, SPECIAL P.OJECTS COORDIBATOB. DATE: AUGUST 27, 1993 SUBJECT: SOLID VAS'l'E REPORT -JULY, 1993 1)Tonnages for July, 1993(parentheses indicate figures for 1992) Curbside llulti-Unit and B.ecycling Center Tonnage Curbside . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107.25 7.51 1.82 Multi-Units •...•.•..Other commingled accounts Recycling Center: Scrap Iron •••• Corrugated Other Yard Waste Curbside Other llaterials Abated Appliances Oil. (LaBelles) City Hall Commingled Recyclables llixed llunicipal Solid Waste Collected no pick up 2.47 5.17 53.20 138 units . . . . no oil abated •• 48 tons Curbside . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 545.40 129.50 7.36 Multi-Unit • • • • • . •••••Municipal Service Garage •••.•.• Participation bte Recycling Program Per Above Statistics 48.7% tons tons tons tons tons tons (104.69) ( ·6.64) ( 2.74) ( .63) ( 2.02) (59.93) 9.31 tons (110 units) ( 7.42) tons tons tons (627.76) (110.62) (10.21) ( 53.8%) Page 2 2)Anoka County Solid Vaste Abateaent Advisory Task Poree 3) 4) Ve met July 7th at Blaine City Ball. Ve received a legislative update on therecently completed legislative session from l!arcia Bennett, IntergovernmentalCoordinator. Ve also had a detailed presentation on major appliance recycling vitha number of local appliance haulers. They emphasized the importance of educatingpeople about why appliances need to be recycled: they contain hazardous wastes whichhave to be handled by technicians using proper procedures. Composting Pilot Program The Composting Pilot Program is proceeding. I have visited numerous sites and videotaped the bins in use. The weathe,r this year has been eztreme Jnd has speeded up the de-composition of the bins. They are not holding up as we had hoped. However,,, most of the residents using them find them adequate. Ve will continue to monitor program as we enter the fall leaf collection season. Vaste II.eduction ¥eek Waste Reduction Veek will take place on September 27-0ctober 2, 1993. I will be presenting waste reduction material at the Bootstrap Days Celebration and we will do an in-house series of staff meetings to increase waste reduction in routine city functions. City of Columbia Heights Shared Ride Expansion January 1, 1993 -December 31, 1993 !Ridership !Ticket Sales !Cash Fare I !Expenses I I Share 1---------------------1------IPrtor I 1---------------------ITicket 1----------11------------------------------------------I Total 1-----------1----------- Nonth !Elder Child Hand Reg.I TotallYear I Diff. !Elder ChildHand Reg.I Sales I S !Transl Asst.Seer. COntract Other I Expenses I Local 40X I RTB 601 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1--------------------·«· ----------- January I 1551 180 446 306 I 2483 I 2975 1-16.5411 495 55 135 160 S845 S570.00 104 S731.37 S774.39 S8,402.40 S75.00 I 19,983.16 S3,993.26 S5,989.90 I I I I I I February I 1812 249 485 I Narch I 2169 392 399 I April I 2221 317 464 I Nay I 2122 I June I 2300 I July I 2029 I August I I Septeaberl I October I I Novelllher I I Decetllber I I 368 571 357 540 286 582 385 I 2931 I 2906 I 0.8611 785 I I I 604 3564 I 3164 I 12.6411 875 I I I 585 3593 I 3063 I 17.30%1 1030 I I • I 476 3537 I 2892 I 22.30%1 810 I I I 567 3764 2778 I 35.4911 825 I 445 3342 2719 22.9111 720 I I I I I I I I I I 195 215 220 $1,415 S622.50 125 S2B0.10 345 225 690 $2,135 S631.50 175 $233.42 120 150 460 $1,760 $582.00 200 $217.85 135 195 380 S1 ,520 S582.00 226 $124.49 90 180 550 S1 ,645 S814.50 175 $420.15 I 90 260 400 S1,470 S703.50 I 150 $233.42 I I 1292.54 $11,354.45 S181.87 I s12,1os.96 I $381.42 $13,810.35 1407.91 I 114,833.10 I $399.05 $13,865.05 S5.00 I S14,486.95 I $484.61 $13,731.45 S3.20 I $14,343.75 I $382.12 $14,640.15 so.oo I 115,442.42 I $442.97 $13,300.70 so.oo I S13,977.09 I I I I I I I I I I $4,843.58 $5,933.24 $5,794.78 $5,737.50 $6,176.97 $5,590.84 I I $7,265.38 $8,899.86 $8,692.17 $8,606.25 $9,265.45 $8,386.25 TOTAL 114210 2149 3487 3368 123214 120497 I 13.2611 5540 1030 1360 2860 1S10,790 114,506.00 11155 1S2,240.80 S3,157.10 189,104.55 1672.98 I 195,175.43 1138,070.18 1157,105.25 I I I I I I I I I I I I ••-•••-•••-••••-••••••••-••••••••••••••••••••·••••••••••••·•••---••••••.••••••••••a.•;._. ..... m•a::••• .. ••••·•••• .. •••ac.ta:&aaaaaaaa:a:amaa-•.a•••••--••-•••••••••••-•-••••••••·•-.. ••••••••••••• AVERAGE I 2030 307 498 481 I 3316 I 2928 I 13.2611 791 147 194 409 I S1,541 I I I I I I See attached for detailed breakdown by origination and destination S643. 71 I 165 I 1320.11 1451.01 S12,729.22 S96.14 I 113,596.49 I 15,438.60 I SS,157.89 I I I City of Columbia Heights Shared Ride Expansion January 1, 1993 -December 31, 1993 !Ridership I I !Ticket Sales I !Cash Fare I !Expenses I I Shere 1---------------------1------I Prior I 1---------------------ITfcket 1----------1 1------------------------------------------j Total l-----------1----------- Month !Elder Child Hand Reg.I TotaljYnr I Diff. !Elder ChildHend Reg.I Sales I $ !Transl Ant. Seer. Contract Other I Expenses I Local 40% I RTB 60X -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-----1------------------------------------------1------------1-----------1------· --- January I 1551 180 446 306 I 2483 I 2975 1-16.5411 495 55 135 160 S845 I S570.00 I 104 I S731.37 S774.39 SS,402.40 S75.oo I $9,983.16 I $3,993.26 I S5,989.90 I I I I I I I I I I February I 1812 249 485 385 I 2931 I 2906 t 0.8611 785 195 215 220 s1,415 I S622.50 I 125 I s280.10 S292.54 s11,354.45 S181.87 I s12,1oa.96 I S4,843.58 I S7,265.38 I I I I I I 1 I I I Narch I 2169 392 399 604 I 3564 I 3164 I 12.6411 875 345 225 690 SZ,135 l S631.50 I 175 I S233.42 S381.42 $13,810.35 S407.91 I $14,833.10 I $5,933.24 I sa,899.86 I I I I I I I I I I April I 2221 317 464 585 I 3593 I 3063 I 17.3011 1030 120 150 460 S1,760 I S582.00 I 200 I S217.85 S399.05 $13,865.05 s5.oo I $14,486.95 I S5,794.78 I sa,692.17 I I I I I I I I I Nay I 2122 368 571 476 I 3537 I 2892 I 22.3011 810 135 195 380 S1,52D I S582.00 I 226 I S124.49 S484.61 S13,731.45 S3.2D I $14,343.75 I S5,737.50 I S8,606.25 I I I I June I 2300 357 540 567 I 3764 2n8 I 35.4911 825 90 180 550 S1,645 I S814.50 I 175 I S420.15 S382.12 S14,640.15 so.oo I $15,442.42 I 16,176.97 I s9,265.45 July I 2029 286 582 445 I August I I Septetlberl I OCtober I I Novetlber I I Decetlber I I 3342 I 2719 I 22.9111 I I I I I f I, i I I I I I. 720 90 260 400 I s1,470 I S703.50 I 150 I S233.42 S442.97 S13,300.70 I I I I I I I I I I TOTAL 114210 2149 3487 3368 123214 120497 I 13.2611 5540 1030 1360 2860 1110,790 IS4,506.00 11155 IS2,240.80 $3,157.10 $89,104.55 I I I I I I I I I so.oo I S13,977.09 I S5,590.84 I SB,386.25 S672.98 I $95,175.43 IS38,070.18 IS57,105.25 I I I ··--·-···---··----·····························•••:••···· .. ·····-································--·············----·······-----·········-··-···-···········-········:--··--·-··-----···· AVERAGE I 2030 307 498 481 I 3316 I 2928 I 13.2611 791 147 194 409 I $1,541 I I I I I I See attached for detailed breakdcMn by origination end destination S643 .71 I 165 t320.11 S451.01 s12,729.22 S96.14 I S13,596.49 I S5,438.60 I sa,157.89 I I I TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Patrick Hentges, City Manager Valorie Gifford, Special Projects Coordinato,I 1� Promotional video availability September 8, 1993 As you know, we unveiled the promotional video "The City of Columbia Heights: A City of Contrasts" last Friday. I ha"e made several copies and they are now available for internal use, and to share with community groups. The video is 10 minutes long and gives an overview of our city and its structure. I believe it may be usefuJ for new employees who do not live here. I plan to make it available to HRA, the Chamber of Commerce, the Boosters, Lions, Kiwanis and other civic organizations. If you have any suggestions for its use l would appreciate hearing them. ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, INC. 1201 89th AVENUE NE • SUITE 345 • BLAINE, MN 55434 • PHONE 783-4747 • FAX 783-4700 August 31, 1993 Patrick Hentges City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Ave Columbia Heights, Mn 55421-3978 Dear Mr. Hentges, rn��rnawrnrn SEP 'l 1993 MANAGER CITY OF COLUMB� HEIGHTS Anoka County Community Action Program has purchased 3932 Central Ave. We are in the process of arranging the first mortgage financing that the City of Columbia Heights had previously agreed to do and then will commence with the renovation and implementation of our other program objectives. As we have previously represented we expect to invest $150,000, or almost $7,000 per unit in the renovation. We will reduce the rents so that the existing renters which are over 80% very low income will have the rental burden reduced. We do not plan to displace anyone. All existing renters will be asked to stay. The building through resident attrition will eventually become senior and disabled housing. Our plans for the building also involve integrating social services with the ownership and management of the Project. Through this integration we hope to improve the management of the building and the status of residents at 3932 Central through educational and job training support and self sufficiency training. We hope to be underway with the renovation by November 1, 1993. Because of the approaching winter months, some of the exterior work may have to be delayed until spring and summer. We will be working with City on the renovation and building issues and are already in regular communication with them. If you have any questions or comments please give us a call. We appreciate the interest and cooperation that the City has shown. Specialist AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • AUmedl/#ay �y TERMINAL SUPERINTENDENT Northtown Hump Tower 80 -44th Avenue Northeast Minneapolis. MN 55421 Patrick Hentges, City Manager City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Avenue NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 Dear Mr. Hentges: [M�&�D\VJ�/]] �EP ·1 1993 MAN.A GERCITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS September 2, 1993 Regarding our conversation and your letter of August 31, 1993, concerning retarder "noise" emitting during the humping operation at the Northtown yard, I can offer the following information. We have not made any physical changes to the retarder system in the last two years with the exception of replacing the master retarder with an identical rebuilt unit. During that period of approximately 30 days, the retarder noise reduction walls were down; however, they were put back in place before early April. The 9 retarder units all have noise absorbing steel walls approximately 8 ft. high to absorb and deflect the emitted frequencies vertically. Our increased activity account the recent Midwest flooding has subsided at this time and we are almost back to "normal H . This detouring accounted for an approximate 25% increase in the operation here at Northtown yard. In talking with the Signal Dept., who is responsible for the maintenance of this equipment, they advise there may be a different retarder brake shoe that may be quieter. I will report those results in a couple of weeks. I would be willing to meet with you and any citizen's groups regarding this problem. We do try to be responsible neighbors. Sincerely, � ��L· U· T. J. Godsil Terminal Superintendent P.S. I will be on vacation from September 6-19, back in the office Sept. 20. SEP 03 '93 10=06HM USPS LAW DEPARTMEMT P.2 � U11.1TE:> ST4Ttt ;:>osrA:. SE��1::E 476 L'!:NFIINT -UZ£ SW WAS,4eNC:TQN cc 202BO September 3, 1993 Mark A. Winson, P.E. __ .. Public Works Director city of Colwnbia Heights 637 38th. Avenue N.E.Colwnbia Heights MN 55421-3806 Dear Mr. Winson: 1[[:c_ This follows up on our telephone conversation of yesterday morning regarding application of city Regulation 7.201(2) to vehicles carrying u.s. Mail via Tyler Place N.E. and 43�th. Avenue N.E. to the u.s. Post Office on 44th. Avenue N.E. To recap the sit uation as I understand it, the city Regulation in question provides as follows: The council may regulate the use of streets DY vehicles in excess of 15,000 pounds gross vehicle weight as follows: (a)The council may designate truck routes and require suchvehicles to use said routes at all times, except asotherwise provided hereinafter. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as prohibiting any vehicle in excess of 15,000 pounds gross vehicle weight from using any City street where absolutely necessary to reach a particular destination within the City. The u.s. Postal Service has been •erving th• Post Office with tractor-trailer vehicles, which exceed l�,ooo pounds GVW, via the streets identified above, altho�gh the the Council ha s not des ignated those streets as truck routes. Th• Postal Service regards the streeta in question as "post road•" within the meaning of title 39, U.S. Cod• ••ction !003, which provides in pertinent part as follows: The following are post roads: •• •(4)public roads, highways, and t�ll roads during thetime the mail is carried thereon •••• SEP 03 '93 10: 07Hl'I USPS LAI-.J DEPARTMENT -2 - P.3 It is well established that poatal vehicles, while operating on poat t-oads, are •ubjact to state and local law• of 9eneral applicability relating to the •ate operation of vehicles. Postal vehicle• are, tor example, clearly •ubject to local apeed laws. However, the case law maJc•• it clear that atate and local laws other than tho•• relating to th• aate operation of vehicles are preempted by federal law the extent that the federal and atate or local achem•• ue in conflict. The Po•tal Service would.regard application ot Section 1.201(2) to Po•tal Service vehicles enqaged in transportation ot 1D&il a• preempted �Y the federal achame for transpoftin9 tbe Mail• in title 39, U.S. Code ••ctions 5003 and ,o4(a). The latter aection provides among the apecitic powers ot the Postal sei-vica th• power "to provide for the collection, handling, transportation, delivery, forwarding, returning, and holdin9 of mail •••• • Indeed, ware the Postal &entice aubjact to th• local laws of every community aatabliahin9 reatrictiva aotor vehicle characteristics, it i• difficult to ... how we could effectively accompli•h our atatutory miaaion under title 39 u.1. code aection 101(a) to "provide prompt, reliable, ed efficient ••rvic•• topatrons in all areas and ••• render po•tal ••rvice• to all communities." The Postal Service places qreat value in bein; a ;ood nei;hbor anc! citizen. It there are any specific probl•111• retardin9 vehicle aafety, property damage or other mat�•r• between the city and the Postal Service, I hope you will bring them to the attention of our Col'Wllbia Hei;hta Station Manager Tom Peterson •o that they can be addr••••d in a cooperative manner. If you would like to diacu•• this or any other matter vith ••, pl•••• feel fr•• to call me on (202)218-3021, Sincerely, M·YOltK.XJ Michael J. VandaamSenior Coun••l Purcbaaing Law TO: NORTH METRO MAYORS ASSOCIATION Memorandum r-� r::i r-::·-, n n ,1n I? t r, I \ '·· · ·' i i. ,•}/ I..., I ::'\ l � J • • II . -. I ��. It: .' u' ·'. -� ·-. :._� w ,_... i ; 'L·G ..: tJJ �' ,�·j3 :-/ � .. .:..�·.�=� =-�� FROM: Board of Director Joseph D. Strauss Sarah M Nelson Phil Cohen ( ...... ,, ,,·-· · .. ·., ,;,•1· L-1rqTS j; � ;· \..:,-�-:....:�u :-;·.::J.f� 11t.;brJ1 DATE: September 1, 1993 RE: REQUEST FOR ACTION 1)Metropolitan Council Issues 2)State Advisory Council On Metropolitan Governance The Metropolitan Council is actively moving into a decision making mode regarding the referenced subject. The challenge for NMMA is whether we approach these issues on a pro-active basis or react to decisions as they are being made over the next several months. NMMA has been directly involved with the committees working on these issues and has provided input when the opportunity has arisen. However, staff needs input from the Board as these working papers will shortly be recommended for full Metro Council adaptation as Council Policy. Enclosed find the following information which has been released in the past few days: I)Current Major Issue Areas 2)Blueprint timeline and Work Group Schedule 3)Transportation i\1emorandum 4)Work Group Proposals -Summary of MUSA Issues -A Regional Redevelopment/Reinvestment Strategy -Proposed Regional Economic Development Strategies Also included is information regarding the State Advisory Council of Metropolitan Governance. This includes the membership of the Council and their preliminary work schedule. 8525 EDINBROOK CROSSING, SUITE 5, BROOKLYN PARK, MINNESOTA 55443 TELEPHONE 612•493-5115 FAX 612-424-1174 We are fortunate to have the President ofNJvIMA, Elvvyn Tinklenberg, as a men1ber representing the cities in the Metropolitan area. Please review these documents and.respond with your thoughts and comments. This is.Jt key time fur NMMA to have input, Contact our office or your Metropolitan Collllcil Representative if you have any questions, comments and/or recommendations regarding these Metropolitan Collllcil issues. # CURRENT MAJOR ISSUE AREAS August 30, 1993 TRANSPORTATION Histoey Regional·transportation planning activities in the Twin Cities have taken place for over 30 years, with voluntary arrangements made as early as 1958. The 1962 Federal Highway Act encouraged a comprehensive, continuing and coordinated metropolitan planning process (3C process) involving the state and local units of government. Eventually the process became a requirement to qualify for federal funds. Prior to the Council, this p� was coordinated by the Minnesota Department of Highways and the Metropolitan Planning Commission. Since its creation in 1967, the Council became involved in the process. In 1973, the Council was designated by the governor as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) to carry out regional transportation planning mandated by federal law. The Council's role has changed over the years. Initially, the Council was primarily responsible for long range planning and process coordination (i.e ensuring city, county and state participation). In 1974, the Council role in regional transit planning and oversight was expanded in the Metropolitan Reorganization Act (MR.A). The Council was given authority to approve the transit capital budget and a five-year transit development program (the budget approval authority was taken away by the legislature starting in 1989). The MRA also created a Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) as a forum for dehberation among state, regional and local elected officials. In 1984, the RTB was created to perform mid-and short-range transit planning and administer transit services under Council oversight. In 1991, the federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (IS1EA) significantly expanded the role of metropolitan planning organizations, particularly in the area of setting priorities for federally funded projects. It also emphasizes integration of land use and transportation planning, goods movements, economic efficiency and environmental protection. The IS1EA legislation provides significant funds (up to 80 percent of the planning costs) to go with the added responsibilities. The Council provides the 20 percent funding match. Wbv is the Council Involved Toe regional transportation systems (i.e. highways, transit and airports) require large infrastructure investments and significant operating and maintenance costs. The Council plays an important role in setting regio� transportation investment priorities. Transportation also strongly interacts with the overall regional development patterns. The Council performs a critical role in ensuring metropolitan land use/transportation coordination. The Council deals with transportation issues that go beyond local community borders. It also ensures that local governments and the region as a whole receive fair, consistent responses from federal and state funding agencies. The Council advocates regional needs to counter piecemeal actions. The Council's plans, backed up by its own independent research, are the basis for project and program implementation activities developed and implemented by Mn/DOT, RTB and the MAC. The Council sets regional direction and policies to determine where major transportation facilities go, how to best manage those already in place, where to have transit, LRT or buses; and has a major role in determining major airport needs. The Council helps develop transportation financing policies that are equitable, effective and efficient. Impact on the Council's Purpose Statement Transportation has economic, environmental and societal impacts. It provides many vital linkages that enable the metropolitan area to function as a single unit and improve the productivity and competitivity of the regional economy. Transportation is, after housing, the second largest household expenditure. Transportation impacts the environment through energy consumption, storm water runoff and tailpipe emissions and noise. From a societal viewpoint, transportation meets basic needs such as access to work, home, school, business, recreation and health care. For instance, the average metropolitan resident makes four trips/day on a typical weekday to meet those basic societal needs. SOLID WASTE History With the establishment of the Council in 1967, the Legislature required a study of the need for and financing of facilities to dispose of solid waste. In 1971 the Council prepared the region's first solid waste management plan. The Waste Management Act (WMA) of 1980, as amended, mandates that the Council prepare and update the region's policy plan and that the counties prepare plans consistent with it. The Council planning and oversight roles require it to review and approve county plans and certification reports, as well as, facility permits, designation plans and waste contracts. In addition, the Council distnoutes nearly $25 million a year from the Metropolitan Landfill Abatement Account to cities, counties, business and nonprofits. Whv is the Council Involved A regional perspective is necessary to oversee private, county and municipal programs or facilities, in the management and disposal of solid waste. The Council has fIVe stated goals: reduce toxic materials in the waste stream, maximize reuse and recycling, operate waste processing facilities efficiently, integrate the system, and allocate costs to the waste generators. Impact on the Council's Purpose Statement Solid waste impacts primarily the economic and environmental elements of the purpose statement. A decade ago, this region depended on landfills to manage the waste. None of them were lined or had systems that collect liquid flowing out of landfills to protect ground water. None had a methane collection system to protect the air. Through the work of the Council, today landfills are designed and operated to protect the environment. The solid waste system has public and private recycling programs throughout the region and includes facilities to process waste for use as fuel. In 1991, the system cost over $380 million to operate and had 200 private firms collecting waste from residences and businesses or operating facilities. LAND USE History The Council's 1967 enabling legislation requires it to prepare a metropolitan development guide that addresses the physical. social or economic needs of the metropolitan area and any future developm.ent "which will have an impact on the entire area including but not limited to such matters as .. .land use ... " The guide serves as the basis for decision-making by the Council. Its first major regional land use plan was the Metropolitan Development Framework adopted in 1975. To implement it, the Council sponsored legislation requiring all local governments within the region to prepare comprehensive plans that address land use, public services and implementation. Since passage of the Land Planning Act in 1976, all local governments in the region adopted comprehensive plans with land use components that were reviewed by the Council. The Council now reviews all revisions and amendments to those plans. The development framework was updated in 1986 and renamed the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework (MDIF) because it included a new emphasis on overseeing and coordinating investments in regional facilities and capital programming throughout the region. By the end of 1993, the MDIF, now referred to as the Regional Blueprint, will have undergone a complete revision. The Council also has statutory authority to review matters of metropolitan significance. Although thls authority dates back to the Council's inception, it was not until 1976 that the Council actually adopted rules for reviewing what it considered to be regionally significant land use and development issues. Also, the Council has been involved in land use through its interest in environmental and natural resources protection. This has taken many forms including acquisition of a natural resource-based regional park system, adoption of regional environmental policies, and promulgation of model ordinances for protecting significant environmental features. The Council's interest in environmental management also led to a significant role in implementing the Mississippi River Critical Area designation. This interest is evolving into a major planning and implementation responsibility for the Council as the designated agency for the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area. The MDIF designates farmland as a primary land use to be protected within the region. Consequently, the Council sponsored the Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Act in 1980, for which the Council still has implementing responsibility. Whv is the Council involved As part of the Council's mission to coordinate the planning and development of the metropolitan area, it was required to prepare and adopt a metropolitan development guide describing the orderly and economic development, public and private, of the metropolitan area. Land use was cited as one element of the guide. Relation to Council Purpose Statement The Blueprint is the Council's keystone policy plan for the economic, societal and environmental health of the metropolitan area and the basis for Council actions and decisions. Issues include: providing necessary regional services to support economic development and growth within an urban service area; ensuring that metropolitan area residents have adequate housing at a reasonable cost; concentrating major commercial and industrial development so that public services and facilities can be provided in the most economic and efficient manner; maintaining a strong, diversified economy; and, making efficient use of existing public investments before making new ones. WATER :MANAGEMENT Historv In 1967 the need for a regional :;ewage treatment system established a greater need for a regional planning and coordinating agency -the Metropolitan Council. A sewer plan was developed in 1968, the Metro Sewer Board was created in 1969, and the Council has bad planning, coordinating, oversight and funding roles for th.e sewer system. The Council's role in water management over the years expanded due to federal and state legis.lation. The 1972 federal Water Pollution Control Act and amendments required planning for pollution control from sewage and runoff. In 1976, the Council was designated the Areawide Water Management Planning Agency. It then prepared a "208 Plan" for sewers in 1979 and for runoff pollution in 1982. The plan provided the basis for the passage of the Metro Area watershed planning state legislation of 1982. The "208" plans were key to federal and state funding for sewer and nonpoint source pollution abatement projects. Because of the drought of 1987, the second in 10 years, and the lack of preparedness of state and local agencies, the Legislature directed the Council to prepare both short and long-term water supply plans for use by local government Whv is the Council involvedThere is a regional investment and pollution impact of water management in the region. The issue crosses jurisdictional boundaries. The sewer system is an important tool to manage regional growth and land use. A research database is essential to identify trends, cause and severity of water quality problems and solutions. Impact on the Council's Purpose Statement A Council role in water management has an environmental impact due to its review of local comprehensive plans and the adequacy of water supply. In addition, groundwater extraction is monitored to ensure it does not harm the environment. The societal impact is due to expenditures for wastewater treatment and nonpoint source pollution control being addressed in a system approach in order to monitor the impact on the regional citizen's health and welfare. The economic impact is due to its system approach to sewering the metro area and oversight of the MWCC to minimize sewer expenditures. In addition, the Council is beginning to evaluate the cost of nonpoint pollution and the alternatives for controlling it. HOUSING History In 1971 the Metropolitan Council adopted a housing plan in response to two major regional concerns: a)the growing need for affordable housing for low-in.come households; and b) the heavy concentrations of low income persons in parts of the two central cities. Providing directions for "suitable" housing for all residents " throughout" the region was the central goal of that first housing policy. In the 1970s, the Council influenced the distnbution of affordable market-rate and subsidized housing in the region by using two main tools: the federally mandated A-95 review and comment process for local government plans, and working directly as the Metro HRA with suburban governments in implementing federal Section 8 housing. With the first tool, the Council assigned lower priority to local requests for federal funding if the municipality did not have plans in place to provide low-and moderate-income housing. As funding for federal housing programs decreased drastically in the early 1980s and the A-95 review was terminated, the Council's ability to implement housing policy also diminished. Tools to implement housing policy adopted by the Council after 1985 were limited to advisory comments. By the late 1980s old housing problems intensified and new ones appeared: a larger gap between the number of low-income households and the number of affordable units; concentrations of low-income housing; homelessness; loss of federal tax benefits for rental property (Tax Reform Act of 1986), and others. In 1992 the Council began revising its 1985 housing policy plan with an extensive public process. Three issues were prominent: a) an inadequate supply of housing for low income people; b) need to link affordable housing with jobs and transportation throughout the region; c) rapid aging of the housing stock in older areas of the region and accompanying economic and societal impacts. Why Is the Council involved The Council's basic mission as defined in legislation calls for regional planning for land use. Housing uses the largest share of available land. In addition, housing development and location has direct impact on demand for clean water, sewer capacity, roads and transit, and other infrastructure investments. As housing problems resurfaced in recent years, various constitutencies (represented on the 1990 Regional Housing Task Force) urged the Council to pursue regional strategies to solve the problems. Impact on the Council's purpose statement Housing has an environmental impact on the region because of the high demand for land, water, sewers, and the possibility of underground water pollution when septic tanks fail Housing developments can also affect wetlands and other regional natural resources like rivers, lakes, and open space. Concentrations of low-income housing in the central cities and older neighborhoods contnbute to a societal environment that is often characterized by unemployment, crime and heavy demand for social services. That places a heavy financial investment burden on the school districts that have to serve high numbers of low-income children, and may have an impact on the perceived overall quality of life. The existing housing stock represents a major economic investment that is in !he region's interest _to preserve. A well-maintained housing stock benefits not only its owners (m the form of equity preservation or buildup) but also contributes to neighborhood stability and to the tax base of the local government where it is located. RESEARCH Historv The Metropolitan Council and its predecessor the Metropolitan Planning Commission have always maintained a strong general research function. Past and current research focus on information and analysis about the changing physical, social, and economic conditions in the region. The Council's research displays a regional viewpoint in describing and analyzing issues. As the Council implements regional solutions to some of these issues, Council research findings and services are used by local governments, legislators, businesses and others, to support regional policy. The Council provides research expertise in demographics, economics and development to ensure that data becomes information, and that it is used in the policy-making process. Since the mid-1980s the Council has used research to explore emerging issues through its involvement in strategic planning. In addition to analyzing this basic infonnation about regional growth and development, the Council does research in functional programs. Examples include: collection and analysis of a regional travel behavior inventory; travel forecasts; analysis of the U.S. Census transportation planning package; primary data collection and analysis of water quality in the region; a survey of park use. Wbv is the Council involved Through research, the Council maintains a strong and u,nique base of regional information and expertise to provide the necessary context for analysis of current and emerging issues. Research provides the basis for Council decision-making and allows the Council to implement rel!ional policy by putting subregional analysis in a regional context and regi onal analysis in a state or national context. For example, the Council recognizes that the decisions made by individuals and businesses (e.g., where they choose to locate or invest) determine whether regional policy will be successful. Also the Council uses research as a tool to monitor outcomes of its policies. Impact on the Council's purpose statement Basic research is essential to the purpose of a planning agency --particularly in the areas of societal and economic issues. The large centralized repository of current and historical information about social and demographic trends in the region is used to perform a wide variety of activities, such as: forecasting population, households, and employment for systems planning work; estimating population annually for use in the State Aid formula; identifying emerging issues --e.g., Trouble at the Core Repon. In addition, this collection of regional information and analysis is used by the outside world, particularly �usinesses. Economic research is used for a variety of activities, such as: monitoring the economic health of the region; estimating regional economic benefits for important issues like the Mega-Mall or the Target Center; and planning for major regional facilities like the airport. REGIONAL INVESTMENT FINANCING, MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT Histon Regional investment is the chief oversight mechanism for ensuring accountability with the metropolitan governance system. The Council has the authority to review transit, sewers, aviation and parks expenditures by approving the financial plans of the RTB and MWCC, the capital program of MAC and the distnbution of grant funds for parks. Through these mechanisms the Council can ensure that the operating agencies provide their services consistent with Council directives in the policy plans. The Council also has authority to issue bonds for capital facilities and to distnbute the proceeds of the bonds only for projects previously approved by the Council. In addition, the Metro Governance Act of 1986 directed the Council to collect, analyze and publish information on the finances of the seven metropolitan agencies (Council, MWCC, RTB, MAC, MSFC, MPOSC, MTC) to assist the legislature in overseeing the metropolitan agencies. Prior to 1992, when the Council began tracking public expenditures across taxing jurisdictions in health care, education, welfare and transportation, it was not analyzed. It became evident at a series of Council-sponsored forums in 1989-90·that there was a lack of basic information on (1) how much aggregate tax is expended in the metropolitan area and (2) what we are getting for these expenditures. From 1991 through 1993, Council staff collected information from the State, the seven counties, 187 municipalities ( as well as from non-profit organizations) to develop a big picture of how public dollars are "invested" in the region. Whv is the Council Involved In its broadest connotation, regional investment relates to virtually every area the Council is inwlved in -land-use, metro systems, housing, aging, etc. Through decisions or recommendations on whether and how to expend funds within the region on public or quasi-public services, the Council influences the orderly and economic development of the region. The Council has a major role in determining how federal transportation, aging and housing :funds are spent The Council also determines the level, timing and location of regional investments in transit, sewers and airports through the policy planning{implementation plan process. And state funds for regional park acquisition, development and operations are distnbuted by the Council in accord with its parks policy plan. Over the past two to three years, others have called on the Metropolitan Council to play a role in regard to regional public expenditures for services and programs. There is no other agency that provides a cross-system and cross perspective-the larger context in which specific decisions can be made. For example, recent legislation calls on the Council to look at public investments in major infrastructure, e.g libraries, school buildings, a "public facility inventory," etc. Impact on the Council's Purpose Statement Regional investment is the cost-effective, efficient and equitable use of regional financial resources to meet the region's economic, societal and environmental goals. METRO INITIATIVES FOR THE '90'S Histoq Minnesota Statutes (chapter 473.244, the Council's basic enabling legislation) states that: "the Metropolitan Council shall engage in a continuous program of research and study conceming ... the necessity for the consolidation of common services of local government units and the kind of consolidation most suitable in the public interest." Examples of past work include the metro-wide 911 system and the start up of the regional trunked radio project. Early in 1991, Governor Ame Carlson assigned the Metropolitan Council to assess how the delivery of government services in the region can be improved. In response to this request the Council set a priority to assist local governments in this area. As part of its on going work and in response to the Governor's latest request, the Council activities include: ·For 1992: Regional Trunked Radio Project; a March forum featuring Ted Gaebler, author of "Reinventing Government"; service sharing survey; Intergovernmental Resource Center; monitoring other groups; assisting five N .W. Hennepin County communities; New Ventures Advisory Task Force; dispute resolution; and papers on Barriers and Service Redesign. ·For 1993: Regional Trunked Radio Project; Lake Minnetonka Cities Project; Generations Project; Regional Library and Information Study; "Best Practices" developing standardized measurements; international economic development and business promotion strategy; Regional Blueprint economic strategy; werk with Board on Government Innovation and Cooperation; Regional Information and Referral System; business enterprise and work force development; joint venture on regional economic database; lake water quality; Intergovernmental Resource Center; Sound Ideas Newsletter; Peter Brokenshire on auditing; and Meeting of the Minds forum. Whv is the Council involved The Council's basic mission as defined in legislation calls for " ... planning and coordinating the orderly and economical development of the seven county area." The Council has carried out this charge historically through regional systems planning in areas like 911, sewers, highways, and parks, and a variety of regional service delivery/coordination. The Metro HRA, Solid Waste, the Area Agency on Aging are examples of areas where the Council has improved the coordination and implementation of service delivery. Impact on the Council's purpose statement The Metro Initiatives activities focus on the economies of government service delivery, which has obvious societal implications. While not a primary component of all project activities, the environment is a factor in some of the Metro Initiatives. Examples include street sweeping and the lake water quality project. BLUEPRINT TIMELINE •September: Work groups finalize reports •Role of the MUSA •Redevelopment and Reinvestment •Jobs/Regional Economic Strategy •Regional Investment Policy •October: Committee of the Whole reviews reports, work groups disband •November, December: Committee of the Whole reviews draft Blueprint •Early 1994: Public review of Blueprint draft, revisions based on public input, adoption August 31, 1993 EMP00093.BLU CURRENT WORK GROUP SCHEDULE Role of MUSA Tuesday, Sept. 7 at 4-8 p.m. (Room 2A) Tuesday, Sept. 14 at 4-8 p.m. (Room 2A) Tuesday, Sept. 21 at 4-8 p.m. (Room 2A) Redevelopment and Reinvestment Wednesday, Sept. 15 at 12-2:30 p.m. (Empire Builder) Monday, Sept. 20 at 12-2:30 p.m. (Empire Builder) (TENTATIVE, IF NEEDED) Wednesday, Sept. 22 at 12-2:30 p.m. (Room 2A) Jobs/Economic Strategy Wednesday, Sept. 15 at 3:30-5:30 p.m. (Room 2A) Wednesday, Sept. 22 at 3:30-5:30 p.m. (Rooms lB & C) Investment Strategy Tuesday, Sept. 14 at 7:30 a.m. (Room lA) _Tuesday, Sept. 28 at 7:30 a.m. (Room lA) Next Committee of the Whole Meeting on Blueprint: Tuesday, Sept. 28, 4-6:30 p.m. August 31, 1993 EMP00093.BLU SAMPLE POLICY DECISIONS •Role of the MUSA • • • Does the Council want to retain the urban service area and rural service area concept, and what role does each play? Does the Council want to retain or change its geographic policy area concept for setting policies and priorities within the region? Does the Council want to use its MUSA/RSA concept, geographic policy areas, and/or other policies and authorities to alter development patters to achieve other objectives, such as geographic balance, a different distnbution of commercial/industrial development, or distnbution of low cost housing? •Redevelopment and Reinvestment •What should the Council recommend as elements of a regional strategy to break the cycle of disinvestment and create a climate for reinvestment? •What should the Council recommend as elements of a regional strategy to support and foster healthy communities and to strengthen the region's core economically and socially? •What should the Council recommend as elements of a regional strategy to facilitate the rehabilitation, reuse or clearance of obsolete or deteriorated structures and infrastructure? •Jobs/Regional Economic Strategy •How does the Council want to promote economic development in the region? •How should the Council approach improving the tax and regulatory climate in the state? •How does the Council want to approach discussion of regional benefits and sharing methods? •How should the Council encourage targeted solutions, and what areas should the Council emphasize? •How does the Council want to take business needs into account in its current and future infrastructure planning? •How does the Council want to participate in the process of redefining educational systems to get people employable and working? •Regional Investment Policy •Do the investment policies in the current framework provide sufficient guidance for capital investment planning and decision-making by the Council and metropolitan agencies? REIATED PROJECTS AND STUDIES •Transition Process Direction (September, December milestones) •Fully Developed Area Study (February 1994 deadline) •Blueprint Implementation Program (October-November) •Water Quality Strategy/Environmental Policy •Land Use and System Capacity Analyses •Governan ce Policy and Strategy •Housing Policy •Legislative Program •Communications Strategy •State of the Region Event August 31, 1993 EMP00093.BLU TRANSPORTATION History Regional transportation planning activities in the Twin Cities have taken place for over 30 years, with voluntary arrangements made as early as 1958. The 1962 Federal Highway Act encouraged a comprehensive, continuing and coordinated metropolitan planning process (3C process) involving the state and local units of government. Eventually the process became a requirement to qualify for federal funds. Prior to the Council, this process was coordinated by the Minnesota Department of Highways and the Metropolitan Planning Commission. Since its creation in 1967, the Council became involved in the process. In 1973, the Council was designated by the governor as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) to carry out regional transportation planning mandated by federal law. The Council's role bas changed over the years. Initially, the Council was primarily responsible for long range planning and process coordination (i.e ensuring city, county and state participation). In 1974, the Council role in regional transit planning and oversight was expanded in the Metropolitan Reorganization Act (MRA). The Council was given authority to approve the transit capital budget and a five-year transit development program (the budget approval authority was taken away by the legislature starting in 1989). The Council was also given approval authority of access­controlled highway projects. The MRA also created a Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) as a forum for deliberation among state, regional and local elected officials. In 1984, the RTB was created to perform mid-and short-range transit planning and administer transit services under Council oversight. . In 1991, the federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) significantly expanded the role of metropolitan planning organizations, particularly in the area of setting priorities for federally funded projects. It also emphasizes integration of land use and transportation planning, goods movements, economic efficiency and environmental protection. The ISTEA legislation provides significant funds (up to 80 percent of the planning costs) to go with the added responsibilities. The Council provides the 20 percent funding match. Why Is the Council Involved The regional transportation systems (i.e. highways, transit and airports) require large infrastructure,investments and significant operating and maintenance costs. The Council plays an important role in setting regional transportation investment priorities. Transportation also strongly interacts with the overall regional development patterns. The Council performs a critical role in ensuring metropolitan land use/transportation coordination. The Council deals with transportation issues that go beyond local community borders. It also ensures 1that local governments and the region as a whole receive fair, consistent responses from federal and state funding agencies. The Council advocates regional needs to counter piecemeal actions. The Council's plans, backed up by its own independent research, are the basis for project and program implementation activities developed and implemented by Mn/DOT, RTB and the MAC. The Council sets regional direction and policies to determine where major transportation facilities go, how to best manage those already in place, where to have transit, LRT or buses; and has a major role in determining major �rt needs. The Council helps develop transportation financing policies that are equitable, effective and efficient. Impact on the Council's Purpose Statement Transportation has economic, environmental and societal impacts. It provides many vital linkages that enable the metropolitan area to function as a single unit and improve the productivity and competitivity of the regional economy. Transportation is, after housing, the second largest household expenditure. Transportation impacts the environment through energy consumption, storm water runoff and tailpipe emissions and noise. From a societal viewpoint, transportation meets basic needs such as access to work. home, schoo� business, recreation and healt_h care. For instance, the average metropolitan resident makes £our trips/day on a typical weekday to meet those basic societal needs. 1.Is the issue still an issue? SCREEN A: REGIONAL SCOPE Transportation continues to be a major regional issue although its nature has changed somewhat since 1967. The interstate system and most of the other metro freeways have been completed. Their maintenance and upkeep have become a major issue. Land development patterns have been strongly influenced by the presence of these roads and a high mobility levels between various parts of the region. Transit service has not evolved as quickly to serve a bigger, low density region. The challenge today is to maintain these roads and existing mobility levels, to improve transportation modes other than the single occupant automobile and to develop intermodal connections. The Council has been involved in aviation planning since 1968. The nature of the issues here have not changed as much as in land transportation. The Council's initial aviation work was looking a siting a new major airport (Ham Lake) and this issue is still not resolved, as evidenced in the current dual track process which is looking at expansion of MSP International or relocating the airport. The role of the reliever airports is also an issue that needs atention. 2.Is the issue or regional importance? Transportation touches the life of most metropolitan residents on a daily basis and plays a critical role in the regional economy. Almost twenty percent of the average American household income is spent on transportation products and services. The transportation system interconnects the various portions of the region and permits them to function as a single metropolitan area It also connects the region to the rest of the state, the country and the world. The transportation system has played a very significant role in defining overall regional development patterns. The influence of the transportation system on future land use and economic development policies continues to be a major regional issue. The size of regional transportation investments in an era of diminishing resources and increasing competition for services makes setting regional transportation priorities another major regional issue. Metropolitan residents need an advocate for regional needs to counter piecemeal actions. The Council is a regional voice that deals with issues beyond local borders and sees they receive fair, consistent responses from federal and state funding agencies. It also advocates for the region in the allocation of state transportation resources. 3.Does the issue cross locaJ government lines? Major transportation issues tend to affect several local government units. Freeways cross city, county and state boundaries. Transit is provided throughout the urbanized portions of the region, crossing many government boundaries. Although airports may be located in only one municipality, since there are so few, they serve residents and businesses of the entire region, state and western Wisconsin also. The external impacts of airports, such as noise, also cross jurisdictional lines. Land use decisions by one government have transportation impacts on their neighbors. 4.Does this issue affect/concern equity within the region? Balancing the roadway and transit needs of central city/downtown/suburbs, north versus south, east versus west, access to/from outstate agricultural and tourism markets versus improving access that allows development to move out into the rural area are all issues of transportation equity that the Council must continually consider. S.Is regional financing/oversight required to ensure cost effective/efficient operations or service delivery? The large magnitude of regional transportation investments and the diversity of implementing agencies and funding sources makes it necessary to have a strong regional financial oversight, particularly of capital investments. This oversight is needed to improve the efficiency of those investments to make the most out of limited resources and to ensure that regional goals, objectives and policies are effectively implemented. These concepts have been strongly reinforced in the new federal Inte�odal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Under federal regulations, each metropolitan area must have an agency designated as the "Metropolitan Planning Organization" in order for the area to receive any federal transportation funds for transit, highways and other surface modes. SCREEN B: IS TIIIS RELEVANT IN TIIE LONG RANGE PLANNING PICTURE? 1.Does the issue need to be addressed at regional level to assure implementation or the Regional Blueprint, other Metropolitan Development Guide policies? Transportation issues are the basis of two metropolitan development guide chapters, transportation and aviation. The issue is an integral component of the Regional Blueprint since transportation so strongly influences land use. Most development issues cannot be separated from transportation. Council's policies provide direction to Mn/DOT, RTB and the MAC and are used to provide oversight and monitor adhe.rence to policy direction. 2.Is the issue a matter or regional public good? Provision of roads has been a public good in Minnesota for over 100 years. There are no private roads for public use other than a few private toll bridges. Transit was almost abandoned by the private sector in the late 1960s with the demise of Twin City Lines and the creation of the Metropolitan Transit Commission. Today transit does cross public/private lines with some of the services provided by private companies. Air carriers and railroads are private sector companies. However, air carriers are dependent on public terminal facilities (airports) so this is an issue crossing public/private domains. With the ISTEA encouragement of intennodal cooperation, there may also be an increasing public role with railroads and other modes. As discussed in previous sections, there are many state and federal mandates on the Council regarding transportation issues. If the Council did not fullfill those mandates, federal funds could be lost unless another regionwide comprehensive planning agency was created. 3.What are the potential regional impacts with or without action? The lack of regional transportation planning could result in the fragmentation of the various components of the metropolitan transportation systems (i.e highways, transit and airports). Multijurisdictional issues would not have an adequate forum for discussion and resolution. Regional, state and federal resources would not be allocated with a metropolitan wide approach. An inadequate transportation system would have a negative impact on the regional and state economy. �-What is tla: putt:nt!aJ impact on i111..astru1...._ The lack of regional transportation planning could have a significant impact on infrastructure investments, and on land use and development patterns. The interrelationship between transportation and land use/development tends to be increasingly important S.What is the potential impact on the following: •Efficient and effective transportation services cannot be delivered without adequate planning. •An efficient and effective transportation system is critical to the vitality of the regional economy •Transportation impacts on the environment need to be mitigated •Adequate transportation accessibility and services are very important to maintaining healthy communities. 6.Is the issue necessary for Council to maintain a comprehensive, long-range perspective and direction? Yes, definitely. METRO POLIT AN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612 291-6359 TDD 612 291-0904 DATE: August 31, 1993 Committee of the Whole TO: FROM: Role of the MUSA Group Summary of MUSA Issues SUBJECT: During August the Role of the MUSA Group has devoted its efforts to discussing and sorting out what the members heard and saw during the MUSA tours and community meetings. Below is the summary of those issues. They are organized under four categories and their relationship to land use: economic, societal, environmentail and cost effective/efficient services. •Economic 1.Intra-regional competition is an issue; development in one community can have ripple effects on the economic vitality of other communities. 2.Unlevel playing field between older and developing communities; What should be the relationship between development at the fringe and the health of the urban core? 3.Should development at the fringe be discouraged through disincentives to encourage redevelopment within the urban service area? 4.Should new development pay for itself? Should new development help to pay for redevelopment? 5.The long-term economic viability of agricultural land use in the region is an issue; is agriculture a transitional land use until an area is needed for urban development or is it a permanent land use to be protected from expansion of the urban area? 6.Planning for commercial and industrial development needs to be done in a more comprehensive and regional manner than has been done to date. Several issues need to be addressed: linkage to housing for the workforce to be employed, availability of transit service, relationship to or effect on regional business centers (RBCs including the Metro Center(s)). 1 •Societal 1.A range of housing types and prices in a community is imponant to meet: the lifecycle needs of residents (young adults typically move into apanmems; o1der, retirement-age people often prefer maintenance free places, such as condos or apartments; divorced parents may not be able to keep their same residence; households in their peak earning years often want move-up homes with more amenities). to house the workforce of businesses and industries located in the community or surrounding areas. to facilitate the linkage between home and place of employment, thus easing congestion problems, heavy reliance on automobile for work trips and/or long commutes. 2.Economic disincentives (tax consequences) to investment/maintenance in rental housing; there is a need for propeny_ tax reform to bring rental propeny taxes in line with taxes on homesteaded propeny (rental taxes are about three and a half times higher). Lower tax rates would not only help make rental housing more affordable, but would also help the cash flow of rental property owners who in many cases have let buildings deteriorate in the last few years. 3.Given the variation in size of communities, housing markets within the region, transponation/service corridors, should the distribution of affordable housing be assessed at the subregional or community cluster level and not on a community-by­ community basis? Should it be assessed in relationship to availability of jobs and transponation linkages? In other words, should the goal be balanced, self-sufficient sectors? 4.The concentration of poveny and "affordable" housing in the central cities is a major regional issue. How should the region address the issue? Should the Council attempt to achieve regional housing goals could be achieved through incentives or tradeoffs? For instance, when a community or sector needs to have regional services extended or major improvements/investments made (sewer interceptor, highway interchanges, bridges, freeway lanes added), the Council and/or regional agencies could do it contingent upon local plans, policies and management practices that show how the community will meet regional housing goals --range of home types and prices, housing rehabilitation programs, or any other major goal. 6 Aging of housing stock and need for and rehabilitation is an issue for central cities as well as older suburban and freestanding communities. Maintenance of the investment in the housing stock is important at the household level (maintenance of equity), at the neighborhood level (to prevent neighborhood deterioration and commercial disinvestment) and at the local government level (to maintain and increase the property tax base for municipalities, counties, school districts). 2 7.To date fiscal disparities operates as a tool to redistribute revenues from new commercial and industrial tax base. From time to time the idea of expanding fiscal disparities to include new residential propeny has surfaced. The suggestion has been to pool a ponion of the revenues to set up an incentive fund for the production of affordable housing or housing rehabilitation. •Environmental 1.There are many layers of environmental regulations and review agencies that have to be dealt before a development project can occur (wetlands, shoreland, riverfront and so on). Wetlands legislation is an example of "blanket" legislation that doesn't always make sense when applied to urban development. Should environmental features and protection be incorporated into the comprehensive planning process? 2.Should the three major rivers --Mississippi, Minnesota and St. Croix --in the region be made focal points in the future shaping of the region? 3.There is a lack of integration of environmental planning with the development process. For example, what role should surface and ground water quality play in determining regional and local development patterns and decisions? 4.A number of communities, both fully developed and developing, have land uses that have become obsolet_e. They range from small lots to sizeable acreage --railroad yards and corridors, trucking terminals, auto recycling centers, tank farms/oil storage facilities, mining pits, landfills and so on. Many of these sites have pollution problems that need to be addressed before redevelopment/reuse can occur. The high cost of environmental cleanup needed before much of that land can be redeveloped puts these communities at a competitive disadvantage over communities that don't have to deal with these cleanup problems and only develop on new land. This situation calls for new redevelopment tools tqat would create a more level playing field. •Cost Effective/Efficieat Services 1.This Metropolitan Area has developed at very low densities--it ranks 23 among the 25 largest metropolitan areas). Low density development patterns are associated with: higher infrastructure costs (highways, sewers); higher cost of transit service and difficulty in making transit work; higher housing costs related to larger lots and thereby higher lot prices; and loss of open space resources and agricultural land. While major changes in region-wide density may not be possible since most of the urban service area is already developed and the development pattern is largely set. Should development policies guide future development, infill and redevelopment, to take place at higher densities, where services already exist or are planned (highways, transit nodes), and designed to preserve and enhance environmental features, such as ponds, lakes, rivers? 3 2.Leapfrogging both outside of the seven counties (congestion of highway corridors) and into the rural area (loss of agricultural land). 3.Public financial resources at all levels are limited. What is regional role? For example, septic systems often have serious water contamination problems which will put pressure on the local governments and eventually the region to extend central sewer service to those subdivisions. If and when that is done, who should bear responsibility for the cost? All citizens of the region, the local government, or the affected homeowners? 4.Infrastructure costs; Should new development be linked to having necessary infrastructure in place to serve it (schools, transponation, water supply, etc.)? 5.Impact of transportation on the urban form needs to consider the following points: The form, location and size of urban settlements have been strongly influenced by changes in transportation technology. The highway network and the automobile have significantly influenced the region's development pattern and locational decisions over the past 50 years. Almost 600 miles of freeways and expressways have been built, creating a ubiquitous transportation network that crisscrosses the entire region and provides a very high level of accessibility. This situation makes it very difficult to have a strong impact on the regional development patterns with additional transportation investments. Individual projects can have an important impact on local development. However to have broader impact, transportation investments for highways or transit need to be part of a longer term strategy that will eventually bring about changes in regional accessibility (guiding future growth along transportation corridors where major transit investments are going to be made). Guiding growth along selected transportation corridors does not necessarily happen spontaneously. It requires strong private/public cooperation and specific conditions such as: land availability along the corridor; removal of zoning and other development constraints; overall favorable regional economic conditions; financial incentives for developers; community support and acceptance. 6.Should rural development occur in such a manner that it allows the "orderly" expansion of the urban service area? Should a "greenbelt" (agricultural land, open space, parks, forest land, bluffs, natural preserve) around the urban service area, around freestanding growth centers, and/or between urban service area and freestanding growth centers be established? 4 7.Too much of a dependence on sewers, and highways to a lessor degree, to coordinate local and regional development and to guide investments; schools, jobs. transit, housing affordability, and social services should be integral parts of regional/local planning and coordination. Should expansion of urban services be made contingent on local governments or clusters of communities meeting other regional goals (such as housing goals, environmental protection, transit supponive urban design/land use pattern)? 8.The complexity of development issues and right size of an area needed to effectively deal with the issue often cross political boundaries and need to be dealt with in a larger context than the municipal level. What is the best geographic area to effectively implement programs and to provide the resources to pay for the programs? 9.Extreme difficulty in locating LULUs (locally unwanted land uses) (landfills, airports. affordable housing) in the region. How should urban-related "service activity centers" in the rural area be treated? These include uses such as the proposed new metropolitan airport, landfills, etc. · that are a direct result of urban life but are LULU's" and cannot easily be located or expanded inside the urban service area? 10.Conflicts between local community needs/aspirations (adequate land available for residential development) and regional goals/issues. 11.Regional parks act as physical barrier to residential development and divide communities. 12.The difficulty caused by "blanket" or "one-size-fits-all" approaches to problems fails to recognize legitimate differences and need for flexible "outcome" based solutions (use performance based criteria instead of specific standards). 13.How should the Council deal with rural enclaves --basically suburban places within the urban service area (Sunfish Lake, North Oaks, Dellwood) --that do not want central sewer service nor other urban scale services? 14.Many communmes have planned and zoned large acreages for future commercial­ industrial (C/1) development. In aggregate the region has at least a 50-year+ C/I land supply. Many communities have reserved sewer capacity and, to some degree transportation capacity, for this land .. Some communities with large amounts of vacant C/1 land need more residential land, should some of the vacant C/1 land be reallocated for residential development? • 5 REDEVELOPl\lENT AND REINVESTMENT ISSUE GROUP A REGIONAL REDEVELOPMENT/REINVESTMENT STRATEGY Working Draft 8-27-93 Based on the information gathered by the Redevelopment and Reinvestment Issue Group, there appear to be some basic principles and objectives that can fonn the basis of a regional redevelopment and reinvestment strategy. The intent of this strategy is to outline a broad, comprehensive approach to redevelopment It would be carried out by the Council in partnership with other organizations and governmental levels. PRINCIPLES A.Recognize that the region functions as one economy that transcends political boundaries of cities, counties, school districts. Cities within the metro area competing against each other can work to the detriment of the region. Acknowledge and work with marketplace forces for the benefit of the region as a whole. B.Emphasize new thinking and fresh perspectives, to adapt to current realities and opportunities. Slaughter 'sacred cows' if necessary. C.Recognize that any strategy to strengthen and reinvest in the region's older areas to achieve healthy communities must be holistic. This means addressing physical, economic and social aspects in an integrative way, capitalizing on individual neighborhoods'/cities' assets, and identifying their respective needs, objectives and needed resources. D.Use and build upon successes as a foundation for redevelopment. Don't 'reinvent the wheel' for every redevelopme!1t challenge. E.Acknowledge that change is inevitable and can be managed in a positive way for neighborhoods and cities. Maintain what is viable but don't fix what's obsolete. F.Recognize and address underlying conditions--e.g. poverty, racism, economic disparities, limited public resources, the barriers of political boundaries. Recognize that these disparities can be products or adverse consequences of development and growth patterns. G.Promote collaboration, not confrontation among public, private and nonprofit sectors, so that each sector can understand the other's needs and constraints. OBJECTIVES: A.Target financial resources by geographic area and·use/type, for greatest benefit and to 'level the playing field.' For example, permit continued use of tax-increment financing with more specific citeria for its use, and accountability requirements. B.Reclaim and adapt neighborhoods to retain and attract residents. Recognize that theregion will inevitably have all kinds of neighborhoods, but that healthy neighborhoods arethose in which residents feel safe and confident in the area's future as a viable place to live, and that offer parks, playgrounds, shopping and other services. C.Identify redevelopment opportunities and objectives consistent with community goalsand market realities. Promote information-sharing among communities aboutsuccessful redevelopment models and methods. Identify adaptable models and maketechnical assistance available to implement them; promote a climate of cooperationwhereby public, private sector and nonprofit actors work toward common goals. D.Address the issue of poverty concentrations, both in the areas of concentration and inproviding opportunities or access to opportunities--housing, employment, training--outsideof those areas. E.Balance expansion of urban infrastructure investments with reinvestment needs . ., 2 SUMMARY OF IDEAS FROM 8-11-93 FORUM WAYS TO REDEVELOP AND REINVEST IN THE REGION'S OLDER AREAS The ideas for redeveloping and reinvesting in the region are organi zed under five main objectives. Ideas from all four small group discussions at the forum are summarized for each objective. OBJECI1VE A. TARGETING FINANCIAL RESOURCES Suggestions for funding sources/mechanisms/purposes: •A redesigned tax-increment financing program. •Fund for polluted land cleanup in distressed areas -e.g. surtax on sale of hydrocarbons (materials commonly the cause of soil pollution) to create a large fund to be distributed to local governments to clean uppolluted soils and create developable sites .. •Regional reinvestment fund-sources:-metro surcharge on all new development to contribute toredevelopment of commercial/industrial and residential areas. -Expanded tax base for revenue-sh aring (fiscal disparities) - parking space tax -road access charge -suggested uses:-pollution clean-up ( as above) -remove blighted property and replace it with housing to meet current unmet needs. -employee training and retrain· .1g -clearance for commercial/industrial redevelopment. -continue and increase funding for housing rehabilitation and new construction. •Increase and target state funding for schools, using concentration of poverty, AFDC/compensatory aid in state school aid formula. •Property tax break to property owners for cleaning up polluted land used for redevelopment. •Make venture capital available for business expansion in older areas, usually at the point of business expansion. Suggestions for how to target: -identify dusters of cities/areas without regard to municipal boundaries, and based on identified criteria.-target to most distressed areas -ensure that aid is geographically balanced -targeting should consider the degree to which financial resources are already distributed; some communities gain property tax revenues, others lose in fiscal disparities, local government aids vary. -include a local effort component or match. Other suggestions: -streamline the process to distribute funds for cleanup; shorten response time. OBJECTIVE B. RECLAIM AND ADAPT NEIGHBORHOODS Funding Several participants mentioned targeting of funding in this category, too. These ideas are included above. E.g. funding for additional housing, ownership and rental. In addition: -Establish a trust fund to guarantee equity in owner-occupied housing, targeted tocentral city neighborhoods. -Offer financial incentives to retain and attract small businesses -Create a fund through a luxury sales tax on houses over $200,000 in value, to write down mortgage interest rates to a maximum of 3 percent writedown ( onepercent in selected cities, one percent in selected neighborhoods, one percent for selected houses that need attention). Making Neighborhoods Places That Attract People •Ensure that there are parks and playgrounds, shops, green space, parking, other amenities. Good Planning at Neighborhood Level •Ensure proximity to shopping, day care, schools, family resource faci�ities, health care, youth and elderly recreation. Neighborhood Involvement to Improve Neighborhoods •Allow neighborhood residents and business interests to allocate resources in accordance with their priorities and needs (URAP model). •Develop incentives which promote community-oriented policing (or similar strategies) focusing on crime prevention in high-crime areas. •Create opportunities for youth to help organize/ work with organizers to create neighborhood crime watch groups, block clubs, etc. 2 Prevention/Early Intervention •Enforce existing building and health codes to prevent existing structures from deteriorating. Schools •Allow for establishment of neighborhood schools. Council should play a convening role in accomplishing this. •Keep quality of schools high. OBJECTIVE C. REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNmES AND OBJECTIVES •Identify redevelopment opportunities and objectives and agressively market them. A sub­ idea of this was to persuade Chambers of Commerce to create a metropolitan infonnation and promotional exchange, like that used in Denver, that cooperates to present all possibilities in all municipalities to prospective businesses in the area. •Seek out and study successful redevelopment projects. Share this information with cities, learn from it. Perhaps they can be replicated. •Develop criteria for when cleaning up polluted land should be a regional responsibility, rather than a local responsibility. •Disband all local HRAs in favor of creating one region-wide HRA and redevelopment agency. •Regionalize all infrastructure, including solid waste. water management, transportation management, K-14 schools. Objective is to reduce the overall taxation and financing necessary to operate these systems. •Eliminate county and city government; go to a regional and village system. OBJECTIVE D. ADDRESS CONCENTRATIONS OF POVER1Y •Provide affordable housing in suburban locations for workers employed there: -programs to assist construction of affordable housing -reduce regulatory barriers -expand use of tax-increment financing for housing. -Provide information about affordable housing options in the suburbs to low- income residents. -reduce housing discrimination. 3 •Improve access to suburban employment from the low-income neighborhoods. -reverse-commute programs -create better/different public transit routes; employment center as hub and spoke system. •Create jobs in low-income areas -nuture entrepreneurship and make capital available for small minority-owned and managed businesses. -create programs that allow employers to pay less wages to hire people that need training and work experience. •Promote diversity in neighborhoods to reduce poverty concentrations. •Support the Orfield legislation. •Co-locate housing and services, e.g. employment training, job placement. •Invest heavily in programs that support families •Increased access to all schools. Eliminate independent school districts in favor of one tax base for all metro area schools. OBJECTIVE E. BALANCE EXPANSION OF URBAN AREA WITH REDEVELOPMENT GOALS •Establish a green belt one to three miles wide (like _Oregon's) at the edge of the MUSA •Allow no further MUSA expansion until existing service area is fully developed. •Make MUSA expansions a metro issue requiring a master plan change rather than only a local amendment, e.g. amendments to expand the MUSA to provide affordable housing. .., i.�--..iin and maintain the aJvant::.ges hclJ by the ukler arc;..;;, e.g. g.:iud ai:.ces.,, historical significance, mature trees, etc. •Make development pay its full share of the cost for infrastructure and services, at present and in the future. 4 Draft: August 30, 1993 Proposed Regional Economic Development Strategies Issue Group #3 proposes the following outHne of issues, directions and general strategies as our contribution to the new Regional Blueprint. We start out with a general vision of how the public sector can best promote economic development Within this context, we identify six specific goals, each of which bas measurable outcomes. These goals are consistent with the state's economic development agenda and emphasize the importance of the metropolitan area in the overall state economy. Finally, we propose five general strategies for achieving these goals. During the month of September, our group will develop specific implementation proposals for these strategies and bring them to the full Council for your discussion. Vision: The region should have a business environment that stimulates business creation, innovation, expansion and retention. The region's economic future is based on a vital, market-driven private sector. Government's role in this future is to invest in foundations which the economy needs in order to grow, adapt and compete-foundations such as an educated workforce; infrastructure which serves current and future business needs; a stable, equitable tax system; and a well balanced regulatory system. Goals: • • • • • • Sustained, above-average economic growth, that is consistent with environmental protection. Internationally competitive levels of productivity growth. Family incomes adequate to provide a re:isonable sumdard or living. Cnpital investment in the region to ensure economic renewal and competitiveness. Improved employment and economic opportunity for all citizens in the region. A diversified industry mix to insulate the regional economy from shocks and national business cycles. Strategies: Promote a regional economy that is more competitive in national and international markets -­ building on the idea that we are one region/one economy . •Promote economic development at the grass roots level. •Chip away at business climate issues -both tax and regulatory. •Examine ways to share regionally the benefits of economic development. Draft: August 30, 1993 Provide high quality, cost effective infnistructure. • • • • Integrate infrastructure planning (regional CIP). Prioritize infrastructure investments with an eye to economic needs. Identify and provide for future •new" infrastructure needs. Maintain and replace essential infrastructure. Concentrate educational efforts on improving the quality of the region's labor force. • • Facilitate businesses and educators working together to meet the training needs of a changing job market and a changing labor force and/or adapting to changes in technology. Initiate collaborative approaches to ensu1re that a person with education/training enters the job market --including transportation initiatives, work readiness programs, daycare, etc. Target public fundinwsubsidy efforts to get the most value out of public investments -initial targets should include: • • • • • "Demanding" populations . Areas with severely declining properly values. Areas in "transition." Areas needing environmental clean-up. Reinvestment in aging infrastructure. Develop broad regional economic goals and monitor progress. •See attached memo op State's goals. . APPENDIX STATE GOALS AND INDICATORS COPIED FROM ECONOMIC BLUEPRINT GOAL 1: Sustained, Abo've-Average Economic Gro,vth, That Is Consistent With Environmental Protection I. 2:i.. :?b. ,\ctu:al D:ata lndir:110r 19SJ 19llS 1986 1987 AVCr.:IJC :uviu:al growlh in MiMeso1a's n:� perapit:1. CSP will be S perccnl hi1hcr chan . U.S. ocr c:10i1:i GOP rrowth. Minnc,01.1. 9.S2%I 3.29 J.03 2.36 United S1:11cs 6.2S'!'n f 3.09 I VO 2.43 ,\rtu:il O:ii:a lndic-.110r l'JllO 19:12 I 1984 1936 Pcl'C'Cnt:1.gc of :i.v:ail:iblc full-1i111c jobs 10 Mi1u1cso1:uu Jcsinng full-time wnrt .,..jll b-= cqu:,,I lo U.S. :,,ver:,ec or :ii lc:ist 9.S ocr,:;cnt. :Vlinncsnt:i S'>.9%f s.s.o I :!7.::? I 88.J UnilcJ S1:itcs ·n.9% I 1)0.0 I 9:!..S I 9J.I lndic-:itor I Actual D:11:i 19ll2-19ll4 I 19SJ-19S6 1986-19RR �inncso1:i m:i.nu{:u.."luring jnbs I Iwill continue to irow :ii :,, rntc sieniric:in1lv fo�h:r th:u1 \he U.S. Mi1111c$nl:1 I � Qr.'. , .... .,, I ·.J.2 I 6.6 I UnitcJ S1:ucs I J.0% I -2.3 I 2.'.I Not.:: Dat:i r.:tlcct� lnt:il �rowth for c:icl1 twn-yc:ir pcrioJ. AC'lU:U D::lt:1. lnui�tor 19:!7 I 1?88 I J:i. Mi1u1cso1:i will :iccount for 1.9 percent of U.S. I.SO% I 1.70 rn1:1nufoctun:i.J e�non�. I ,\rlu:u D:u.:i lndi,-Jtor 1 1):17 l'>ll!! I Jb. Mi,uu:,ot:l will :i.:count for) i,crcent o( U.S. I l.:<6% • 1.4.5 I v:i.luc-�i.Juci.J fooJ l>rnJu.:1 c.,oon�. DISCUSSION Coals I 19ll3 I 1989 1994 1997 2000 3.18 2..49 1.89 1.95 1.55 I 4.03 1.40 I.SO 1.36 1.48 Coals 19118 I 1990 1994 1997 I 2000 90.7 I 9'.l. I 9J 9.5 I 9.5 94.7 I 9J.7 . I · Co:a.l.f 1988-1990 t992-199J t99J-1996 I t998-2000 I 1.7 .1.J J.O I t.6 -1.2 t.6 I 0.J I -t.O Co:us 19S9 t?9J I 1997 ::?000 1.70 1.7.S I 1.30 1.90 Go:&Js 19�() 19'?-l I I '}'17 I 2000 1..5) 2.00 I :?..SO I 3.00 SustJ.ined economic growth above the national average, which is consistent with environmencal protection, is the cornerstone of an improved standard of living for all Minnesotans. 'Nhile an individual's standard of living is Jffecced by many factars. improved income that is generated t�ro·ugh economic growth and full-time job growth is essential. In addition. Minnesota's economic growth is increasingly influenced by our ability to compete in incem;tional markelS. The li!vel of international exports of Minnesota products is :i good indicator of the scace·s international competitiveness. Goal 1 indicators show increasing levels of per capita Gross Scace Product (GSP) growth: full-time employment, manufacturing job growth :ind Minnesou share of U.S. exports including value-.idded food products. For environmental protection goals please refer to Mi1111esora Milestones. 1,.,. GOAL 2: Internationally Competitive Levels Of Productivity Growth Actual Cni:a Coals lndic-:uor 1979-1989 1979-1982 l-1982-1989 1990-1994 199-1-1997 1997-2000 4:i. MiMcSCll:i ·1 amu:il :ivcr:agc rc:il growll1 r:atc iu over:aJI 0roduaivi1v will re:ich 2.1 oe'"nl. MiMCSOt:I t.:w�. 1.oi 1.47 1.70 !.90 '2..:?0 Uni1cd S1:i1cs .0.73'1o -0.58 I.JO . . . OECO countries 1.94'1'o 1.29 2.23 . .. Actual Cn1:1 Coalslndic:11or 1979-1989 1979-1981 I 1982-1989 1990-1994, 1994-L997 1997-2000 4b. Mi,v1cso1:i·s :innu:il :ivcr:agc re:il :row1h r.uc in ·In,:inuf:icturing prouuaivi1y will cxcccu hi�1oric:1I OECD r:11cs. Mim1C$OI:\ I J.2�"'�3.ll6 2.SS 3.20 I 3.80 4.00 . MiJwc$I 2.11'7-I.Ill 2.65 . ·1 . U11i1ed Sl:\IC$ I :Ull':"o 2.4l! 4.21 . I -.OECD countries 3.367. I 2.37 3.79 . I . .Note: 71,c countries incluueu in the Org:iniz:ition for Economic Coovc:r:ation :ind Ocvclopn,ent (OECD) group :ire un:id:i. J:ip:in. Bcll!ium. O,:1u11:in:.. Frnno:. Ccnn:iny, h:ily. Nc1h.:rl:111Js. Norw:iy. Swcucn. the Uni1cl.l KingJom :1nJ the Unitcll St:i1cs. OECD J:11:i excluJcs U.S. ll:11:i. TI1c MiJwcs1 s1:i1c:s induJc: Mi1uic�n1:i. Nonh O;ilau:i. Sourh D:u:01:i. low:i. Kms:is. Ncbr:uk.1. Missouri. Wisconsin. Illinois. Michig:in. lnJi:in:i :inJ Ohio. Note: T11e J.:11:i for thc Uni1,:J S1:11,:�. MiJwcsl :inJ Mi,uic�nt:i cxc:luJc� SIC JS ro :iJjust for rhc r:apiJ Jecrc:isc in producer prices in 11011-,:lc.:tri.::il 111:icl_1incry :inJ cn111pu1,:r c11uipm.:111. Ac-tual l):i t:i 1992 . I Co:i.ts lndk:itor 1')90 1991 I l?94 1997 I 2000 5.Mi1V1csot;i will h:ivi: :i high �h:m: o( silC . I Yisits 10 Jinns for th,: M:ilcolm B:illlri�.: i'-:itinn:il Ou.,lilY ,\w:irJ. Mi1u1��111:i 2 I � J � I 5 I 6 U11i1cJ St:irc� I 12 19 I 17 -I . DISCUSSION In order to achieve the relatively high rates of per c:ipip. GSP (Go:il 1) and re:il income growth (Goal 3), Minnesota productivity must be internationally competitive. Productivity is simply the output that can be produced with il given le�cl of input With better tools; improved technology and incre:ised skills. workers can produce more and better goods for the same cost. 2t.v GOAL 3: Family Incomes Adequate To Provide A· Reasonable Stan9ard Of Living Actu:al D:it:11 Coals lndic':itor 1980 19s2 I 1984 I 19116 1988 1990 1994 1997 6. MiMeiota's per c:spiui disposable income will exceed U.S. level by l nercenl CIO'l'lo o( U.S.) Min11csota SS.410 9.S97 I I.JOB 12.730 13 .797 15..593 IS.IJO 21.862 Plains Suues SS.076 · 9.JJ,1 I 10.S 14 12.078 IJ.100 15.067 .. Unicci.l St:i1cs S8.424 9.721 11.157 12.492 14.109 15.878 IS.IJO 21.646 U.S. R:inl: 17th 24th I 16th 14th 17th 19th 18th 16th Note: The Pl:iins s1:ucs inciuJc: MiMesola. Nonh Calco1:i. South 0:llcot� low:i. K:1ruas, Nebr:uka :incl M�souri. Actu:il D:at:i Co:iis lndit--:itor t\li:S 191:9 I 1990 1989 1994 1997 I 7. Cost of livinr. in&Ju will be nomore than 2 percent :ibovc 102.4 100.7 IOI.I 101.9 102 102 U.S. urbnn avcmec (100!. I Actu:il 0:ll:i Coals lndic-:,tor l\lSO I 1'}81 I 1984 1986 I 1988 1990 1994 I 1997 Sa. Avcmgc annu."\I n::tl growth in 1-2.4� I I Iavcmgc w:ige:s per worl:cr will J.O 1.2 ::t.O 0.0 O.J 1.5 I..S be 2 p�l'C\:nl. I Actu:i.l D-.a1:i Co:ds lndlc-:,ror 19!1.!l 19R'l l'J'JO 1994 1997 Sb. Aver.i�e·anuu:il n::,.1 growth in the mcJi:,.n I -2.4� -0.6 3.9 1 • .S 1 • .s wue will he 2 o,:rcenr. 2000 . 25.S IO . 25.010 14th 2000 101 I 2000l.O 2000 l.O Note: 01:inr.es in rhc s1:i1cwiJc .nu:Ji:in w:ii;e may be in p:in Jue lo an increase in the number of occup�ions surveyed. The Ccp:1nmcn1 oi Jobs :inJ Tmininr. p!:1ns lo continue inc�asing oc:cup:uion:il coYer:igc Juring the 1990s. Also, meJi:in w:age is c.,lcul:itcJ from w:ige infom1:i1ion from linns with :ii lc:11! 25 employees. DISCUSSION The ultimo.te goo.I for econo,nic development is a good standard of living for o.11 Minnesoc:ins now and in the future. Income adequate to meet basic needs and provide a comfortable lifestyle is essential to an improved standard of living. As a result, Goal 3 calls for incomes that can provide for a reasonable standard of living for all Minnesocn.ns. Goal 3 is achieved through the employment growth, GSP growth and productivity growth describ�d in Goals 1 and 2. GOAL 4: Capital Investment In The State Adequate To Ensure Economic Renewal And Competitiveness Actu:ll D:il3 Goals �19112 I 193.c I lndk:itor , 1972 1977 1986 1987 19118 1989 I99.C 1997 2000 9.Mi1vieso1:i's level ofapical inves1mcn1 per n\anufac1urin& worker -12..scr .. -21.2 • I.I +19.S +0.S +lS.I +16.2 +14.4 +9.0 +9.0 +9.0 will be 9 pcrcenl hi�hcr 1h.,n chc n:11ion:il :ivcrnec. Actu:il 0-Jt::i Goals lncik:110r r 19:11 I 19:13 I 19llS I 1987 1989 199d 1997 I 2000 10. Minnesot:i invc,1111cn1 in c:ommcrc:i:il :mu I Iin�usuial cons1nic1inn will n::ic:h J p:rc:cnl of 1.06% :uu,u:il GSP. 0.97 I 1.17 I A.-tu:i.J O:11.:i 0.97 O.S9 1.00· 1.00 1.00 Golds lndic-:itor I 19llS I J9ll6 19117 I 19118 I t9R9 199J 1997 I 2000 JJ. Minncsoc:i invcs1mc�1 in public inlr:i.•1ni.:1un: I 6-,; Iwill n::ich I.SS ucra:m of :1nnu:il GSP. 1.4 • 1..57 J.61 I J..57 I 1..5-1 I..SS 1..5.S I 1..5.S ,\<'111al Da1a Go:us Ind ic-Jlor I 191i. I l'}�o I t •}:12 l'):IJ 1•,:-6 I 19:11 I 1<.i:1:1 I 19:19 I 1994 I 1991 I zooo ll.Mi1111csa1a will aCL-OUnl I I I I I for 2 percent nf fon:il!n 1.1% 1.4 IA 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.0 o.lin:ct inve,1men1 in U.S. DISCUSSION Our future incomes and stancl::i.rd of living will depend on our productivity and competitiveness. In a world of rapidly changing technology and increasing glob:il compt:tition, Minnesota needs ro renew its economy constantly in order to mai nuin economic strength, produce new products and services, provide new tools and equipment. increase producrivicy and creare rhe jobs of the future. The three measures used co assess Minnesoc::i.'s capital investment in the state are: inv estment per manufacturing worker, investment in commercial and industrial constn1crion, and imermnional investment. 2.0 Investment in human c:rnital throu!!h business traininir and education is also critical. 6 -� • For educational goals, ple ase refer to Miw1esora Mileswnes. GOAL 5: A Business Environment That Stimulat'es Business Creation, Innovation and Retention Acu,:il D:iu ·Go:iJs · lndic-.11or 1979 1981 1983 J t9l!S 19X'7 1989 1990.19941199S-1997l 199S-2000 13. MiMcs01.:r.'s priv:uc sector spcncJing on n:sc:irch :uni dcvclnpmcnc (R&:DJ will red, 2 . .5 c,,erccnl n( 1uu,u11I CS r>. MiMC5nl:I I.S67o 1.739 I.SS 1.97 I 2. I.S l.')7 2.30 2.�0 I 2..50 Uni1cJ S1111cs I 1.16,;-,, ·2.19 2.94 NA 2.77 2.21 . . I . NA = Nol :iv:iil:iblc: ,\ ccual 0-J c:i Ga:iJs Ind ic-J tor l'):10-l•)SJ I 1%J-IIJSS I l'N0.1')94 191}4-1998 I 1998-�002 14:i. Milu1cs01:1 's binh r:uc nf new huJi!1css c51:1hli$h111en1J will re:ich U.S. :ivcr.12.: r.ue. Mi1UIC$Ol:I JJ.97o 33.9 J5.0 36.0 39.1 U.S. Rnnk :--,, 451h JOih I '.1.S1h 301h MiJwc$1 R;i,1� NA ':1h .. Unircl.l S1:i1es I 3S.3% I 39.t . I . . Note: The MiJwcsl s1:11es im:lul.le: .'rli1v1e$Ol:I. North D:iko1:.. South O:u:01:i. low:., K:ins:is. Ncbr:isl::i. Missouri. Wisconsin. Illinois. Michig:111. lnJi:in:i :inJ Ohio. O:11:i n:no:cts 101:11 r;rowrh r:uc for e:11:h faur-yc:ir perioJ. Incl il":l!or I-lb. Tin: oumb.:r of Mi1u1.:,n1:1 b,J5im:ss e,t:iblishments will r;row :ii :i r:110: cnu:il 10 rhe U.S. 'r:uc. ,Vlinnc$n1:1 Unitcu Sr:ic�J I ,\rwa.l l>ata 11)�2-1 1JXJ I 11):!J. 1'):!6 I 1 11ll6-19X:t I 19:1�-1')1)0 I 6.5'::, I J.4 ].2 4.7 I 5.-1','l, I S.7 7.1 I -1.6 No,�: O:11:i n:Occt5 101:il grC1w1h r:ue inr c:ich twn-yc:ir pcrioJ. DISCUSSION • Go:.Js 1?92-19?JI 1?9.:-19961199S-2000 -'.J I 4.1 2.0 4.3 -'.I 2.0 Innov:ition is important for the state co remain competitive. produce the new pro?ucts and services of the future :ind grow. An increase in private sector industrial research and development (R & D) expendimres :ire needed to fuel this innovation .. New businesses :ire the comer-stone of Minnesota's economic future. They will produce milny of the products il.ndjobs th:it .ire key to Minnesot:i's future economic success. Minnesota must offer an environment where businesses can st:1n-up il.nd succeed. Three indic:i.tors are used to measure Minnesota's business environment: private sector R & D expenditures as a percent of GSP, Minnesota's business birth r.ue il.nd growth in the number of Minnesota business establishments. GOAL 6: Improved Employment and Econom�c Opportunity For.All Citizens In All Regions ,\ctu:al 0-.iL:l Coals lndll":ltor 19110 1990 1994 1997 I 2000 15.Pcrcen&:igc of popul�ion livinJ belnw 1hc,. :!.7-X. 12.0 12.0 10.S I 9.0 oovcnv line will i.lcclinc: 10 1980 level. . Nocc: lni.lic:110r I.S w:u i.lcvclopcll by Mi1u11:sot:i Pl:11v1ing for Mim1cst11a Milcstn11cs. TI1c GOALS were i.lcvcloped by DTED. ,\cru:il D:it.:1. Co:ils lndlc-:itor 19!l2-19SJ I 19SJ.19116l 19S6-19SS 19118-1990 1991.199-1 I 199.1.1996 I 199s.2000 16. M:inuf:ic1uring jobs will irow I20 pc:rcc:n& faster in Grc:uer . MiMcsoc:i 1h:111 in Twin Ci1ics. Grc:11cr Mi1u1c�n1:1 I �.J':'n I.J 10 . .S I 5.9 J.9 3.J l.ST"'in Ciclcs :-1S A I 7.6% -:?.4 J.6 -0.6 u :?.S u Unilci.l S1:11cs I :l.0% I •:?.) 2.3 I •l.2 1.6 0.4 •l.O N01e: MSA is :a mctmpoli1:111 s1:uis1ic:il :irc:i. 0:11:i n:llc:c1� 1n1:il irow1h r:i1c for e:ich two-ye:ir pcrioJ. 17. IS. lrc!IC"':ltor I 19:15 I l'J:16 Min�ri1y uncmplnymc:111 r:uc 1,1.,,� I will be: no more 1h:111 14.J 11 ocrci:nc. "lndiC':ltor I )•):I� TI1c propnninn or 111inori1ics in 11131\:l�cri;il. pmfcssion:il. amJ h:chnic:il posi1ions will be :ii lc:iM el1u:il 10 1hc minnri1v sh:in: of onoob1in11. Minority sl�n: n{ 1n1:il I 2.7b�. Im:in:igcmcnl. prolcs5ion:il. nnJ lechnic:il iob5 Minori1y sh:in: n{ pnpul::.1in11 I J ., ,. I16 ._:l,n over ye:in l'.1:\6 1.-IJ J.73 ,\c-tu:il O:it:i I 19:l7 I 19:!S I 1.5.9 I ,�.:! I Ac-ru:il l>:il:i 19:17 I 19:1:I 1\1:l'} 2.14 ,.s:s I 1.99 4.01 I -1.01 I 4.01 Goll.ls 1')89 I 1990 1994 I 1997 I 2000 17.S I 14.J 14 l lJ 12 I Cows I l'.1()0 I 1991 1994 I 1997 :?000 I J . .;J J.01 -1.00 4.40 uo I 3.9.S I -1.16 . I . I No1c:: -Minori1icsM is Jcfinci.l hen: .:is lhc i.liffcn:nc.,: hc1wcc11101:il :u1i.l whi1e popul:ttions. People cl:i.,�i_lici.1 :is while 111:iy :ilso incluuc people of hisp.,nic origin in c.-.:1Lius Jcfini1in1u; 111inori1y i.l:i1;i 1hcn:fon: slil,!hrly w1i.lcrs1:i1cs 1hc hisp:inic popul:uion. Geriiraplric Prrifilr ,f Enr11lt,_vmrr11 u11,J U11rn1pl11;m1c-11t tGPEU). b:uci.l on :a sur,ey. unucrs1:11cs lhc: popul;i1i011 sh:in:s n:ponci.l in lhc 1990 census. In c.-onlr.i�I to the i.lcccnni;il Censu5 o( Pnpul:ition. chis source reports only· non-i11s1i1u1ion;ilizci.l popul:irion over l 6 ye;in oli.1. DISCUSSION Goals 1 through 5 :ire primarily :ibout economic growth, reflecting the import:1.nce of growth co :J.n improved quality of life for Min nesotJns. In contra.st. Goal 6 is about economic opporrunicy. It js important to ensure the greatest possible access to employment and other economic opporcunitie�. among all group s :ind regions of the state. GOAL 7: A Diversified Industry Mix To Insulate The State_ Economy From Shocks and �ational Business Cycles I ,\ t'tu:d D::ica Co::ils lndit":IIOI" 193:l I 19:t4 19SS I 19116.1987 198� 19S9 1994 I 1997 2000 _19. Minneso1:1's economy will m.-iin1:1i11 :i hi,h level of Jive�i1v. GSP Diveni1v lnJcx .073 .OS:! .073 .on .OS1 ,0j0 ,Oj-1 .053 .OjJ .0.5) U.S. R:1nk . . . I .. 7th I-JO 1-10 I 1-10 0=GSP Jisuibution s:11110: :as U.S. GOP At"tu:.al D:it:.a Go::ilslnclir-J(Ol" 1�80 l'}S'.1 I l'}lU l'):IS I 1•):!6 I 19:!7 I 19SS I i 9R9 I 1990 1994 I 1991 I 200020. Mi1uu:sot:i will h:ivc 2.JO . -pc:rccnl o( U.S. hiJ;h•lcch employment :mJ 2.45 . pcrci:nt of U.S. n:soun:e i111,:n�iv,: c1111,lnv1111:n1. Hi!!h Tcchnnl.-,,v -11.9S7n I 2.04 2.12 I 2.0S 2.0J 2.06 2.0') 2.04 I 2.02 2.26 2.28 2.JORo:soum: ln1cn,ivc 2.14% (.•}7 1.97 1.9'} 2.04 2.10 2.1 J I 2.20 I 2.2.S :.38 2.41 2AS No1c: Do.:iini1in11s for ·1tii;h 1echnoloJ;y'" :inJ ·n:sourco: i111cnsivi:'"111:111uf:ic1uring inJustrics en be founJ unJcr the J:ii.i sourco.:s for Go:il 7 on p:1�c JJ: I ,\,-tu:il 1):11:1 Goals (uclit-:Hor 1%0 I l'JS2 19:i-1 19S6 19:!S 19')0 l'}l}J 1997 2000 21. Mi1v1i:s01.'1 's 101:il t:t.•h fann n.,-cip1s j will r:111lc :1111n11� lhc Inn S ,1�1es. U.S. R�n� I �lh 5th bth 6111 6th 6th 5th 5th .Slh MiJw.,,1 R:inl: I .lrJ I )nJ 4111 -llh I ,hh -llh . . I ,\\'IU:i.l D-Jt:i Go:.a.ls lmllt·Jtor l'}:!7 I 1911� I J'}:(IJ ICN� 1')'17 I 2000 22. Minncsol:i Jnmc,1 i.: 1r:ivcl-icncr:i1�J t>usincss I I I In:c�io1s will r:inJ.: :imn1111 11',c 1no 17 mucs. U.S. R�nl: I l'hh I l'l1h I 19111 IS1h I S1h I 171h MiJwc:,1 R:ink I S1h I S1h I S1h . . I - t-01c: TI,c :Vliuwc.,1 �1:1&&:l incluJo:: Mi11no.:so1:1. Nonh Dakota. St1u1h D:11;!11:1.. Iowa. K:llu:15. Nebr:uk:1.. Missouri. Wisc:onsin. Illinois. Mi.:hi�:in. lnJi:in:i :inJ Ohio. DISCUSSION Economic diversity is essential to a stable Minnesota econoniy. Heavy reliance on any single industry can le:.1d to a boom and bust economy. This goal reflects the imponJnce of all industries, including manufacturing, agriculture and service industries such as tourism. to a he::i.lthy, stable statewide economy. • SE:\T �y: 8-31-93 ;tl:09AN;MN. STATE S�ATE� 612 424 1174:� 2! 3 State Advisory Council on Metropolitan Governance Date: August 27, 1993 To: From: Rep. Betty McCollum Rep. Tun Pawlenty Mr. Bill Johnstone Mr. El Tinklenberg Ms. Polly Bowles Ms. Mazy Hauser Mr. Wayne Popham Rep. Myron Orfield Co-Chair (296-9281) Sen. Ted Mondale Sen. Pat Parisfl.aU Mr. Yusef Mgeni Ms. Hazel Rcinluudt Ms. Diane Harberts Mr. James Hetland Sen. Carol Flynn Co-Chair (296-4274) RP.: M�ting Nnrir.P Wt: 21re very plt:Wied to wmounce the first meetings of the Advisory council and hope that even with this short notice they fit with your schedule. Orpnim1icnal Meetmg Thursday, September 9, 10:00 A.M. -12 Noon, Room 15 State capitol PublicP.lognlm Apnda lntroductions Discussion of our Mission Background Llterature Advisory Council Budget Meeting Schedule Friday, September 17, 12:30 P .M. -2:00 P .M.,r.;mchnark Cenrrr) Rice Park, Downtown St Paul David Rusk, author of "Cities Without Suburbs," and Neal Peirce, author of "CitiC3tatcs: I low Urban America Cau. Pruspt:r in a Competitive World" will open our substantive discussion by presenting their views on metropolitan reform. We have ordered copies of each of these books for Advisory Council members and will have them delivered to you as soon as they amve. hopefully in adwince of this program. (over) SENT BY: 8-31-93 ; 11 : 1 OA.\f State Advisory Council on Metropolitan Govemance Meeting MN. STATE S�ATE- Saturday, September 18, 9:00 AM.. -12 Noon. Room 107 Stale Capitol Agenda 612 424 11 74: # 3/ 3 August 27, 1993 Pagc2 The Advisory Council will meet with David Rusk mid Neal Peirce to discus.! your particular interests or question them on points they mad.? in their books or �encadon on Friday. We wDl also set the agenda for our next meeting. Pull Day Retteat Wednesday, October 6 (J-OC"BriOD md times tD be dctcrmined) We were concerned about setdng these dates without contacting each me!llber of the Advisory Council, but we were fommate enough to be able to schedule Rusk and Peirce together on Scptermber 17 • 18 and decided to take rhe opportunity and hope that it was convenient for you. We certainly appreciate the posS10ility t:1:wt you may have ct conflict with some of these dates. Please call Senator Flynn,s office, 296-4274 and let � know if you cannot attend any of these meetings. We will discuss our future meeting schedule at these first meetings so as to avoid any future �onflicts. We look forward to working with you in the coming months as we review the governance system we have here in the Twin. Cities and its effecth-eness as we enter the 21sl amtury. cc: Advisory Council Staff Gaiy Pagel Tom Weaver Amy Vennewitz Dan McGowan Tom Todd DP.b Oy,;on Kathy Novak I<ris IlallSOn Marge Romero " �-. " ..... 'f4, � �- SUBURBAN* TAXI CORPORATION August 31, 1993 City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Avenue Northeast Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Attn: Ms. Linda Magee Assistant to the City Manager 3315 North Second Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55412 Tel. 612-588-0000 Fax.612-588-0339 '!Itlltr ill � @ � o wrn [ID SEP 1 1995 MANAGER CITY OF COLUM!lA HEJOOTS RE: Group transportation of residents to/from polling locations on September 21, 1993. To Whom it may concern; We, Suburban Taxi, propose to transport Columbia Heights residents to and from polling locations within Columbia Heights on September 21, 1993. The rules of transportation will be: 1.Group loading of passengers permitted.2.All trips to be reserved at least 24 hours prior totransport through Suburban Taxi.3.Suburban Taxi will be paid $3.00 per passenger round trip.4.All trips take place between 10am and 3pm on September 21. The City of Columbia Heights will reimburse Suburban Taxi for all scheduled trips. Suburban Taxi will, upon request, furnish the City with copies of all reserved trips prior to 10am, September 21, 1993. Suburban Taxi will submit the bill for transport by October 1, and the City will pay by October 30, 1993. The City of Columbia Heights shall notify Suburban Taxi by Sept 16, 1993 if this program is to be implemented. The City assumes all responsibility for advertising this program to it's residents. Suburban acts only as a transportation provider. We hope that this program fits your needs, and we are loking forward to helping you "get out the vote". Please call me at 588-0000 if you have any questions or comments. Thank you. Sincerely, w� �,"2�-t..---... _ William Holderness Account Services Manager l_S\!;lSUL:lS I ill � f2 rs n \V 7 IT ml�· L:J CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS RECREATION DEPARTMENT SEP 9 t9)3 ,. �A!"-' .4, r: ;-:;.;-,.,!. ,. � ...... ,-; CITY ttl=" c:T ! !�&:), :· h' :;:,r-:.}Tf ' \:I .... LJ•f; ... ·:.� ,._1-.,:t1,: TO: DONALD MURZYN, MAYOR PAT HENTGES, CITY MANAGER FROM: CAROL FREY, VOLUNTEER COORDINATORlD SUBJECT: HEALTH CARE CLINIC, SISTERS OF ST. JOSEPH DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1993 The neighborhood health care clinic proposed in Fridley will open September 30th. The group is in the process of recruiting Doctors, Nurses and support staff for the clinic. It appears the group has formed a strong collaborative with Anoka County, Fridley S-chool District and Unity Hospital. All three grdu.ps had representatives at the meeting last night. Steward Laird of Carondelet Life Care is very interested in meeting with us to discuss the possibility of a similar clinic in Columbia Heights. In order to establish a clinic here we must provide the clinic space. Please let me know if you are interested in meeting with Mr. Laird. I will be glad to set up th� meeting. cc: David Mawhorter, Chief of Police Mark Casey, Director of Recreation /nf EMMANUEL/ST. MARY'S HEALTH CLINIC Focus Group Meeting August 17, 1993 The first meeting of the Focus Group of Emmanuel/St. Mary's Health Clinic was held at Emmanuel Christian Center, 7777 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, at 7:00 p.m. on August 17th. The following membersattended: Corwin Bradford, ABC Newspapers Barbara Lee Carlson, City Council -Spring Lake Park Shirley Denyes, Ministry to Women (Emmanuel Christian Center) Mark Denyes, Senior Pastor, Emmanuel Rosemary Esler Carol Frey, City of Columbia Heights Cynthia Hendricks, ACCAP Senior Programs Bethany Jones Craig Malm, Unity/Mercy Hospitals Karen Packer Mary Sandmann, Emmanuel Cathey Weidmann, ACCAP Senior Outreach Sister Mary Madonna Ashton, Carondelet LifeCare Ministries Mary Lou Dynan, Carondelet LifeCare Ministries Stewart Laird, Carondelet LifeCare Ministries Pastor Mark Denyes gave the opening prayer. Sister Mary Madonna Ashton gave a brief history of the Sisters of St. Joseph, Carondelet LifeCare Ministries and St. Mary's Health Clinics. Stewart Laird discussed the development of a clinic in suburban Anoka County, and that we had been invited by the Emmanuel Christian Center to establ.ish a clinic at this location. The Emmanuel Christian Center is willing to donate space for a clinic. Mr. Laird explained that the purpose of the Focus Group was to discuss the medical need of this area, the time and day of the week for the clinic operation, the suggested methods of gaining trust, how we can recruit volunteers from the area to work in the clinic and other groups that should be included in developing this plan. After a short break the Focus Group divided into two sections to discuss the items outlined by Mr. Laird. Need for Clinic. In the reporting session of the two groups the consensus was that there is a need for a clinic that provides care for people who "fall through the cracks" of our present health·care system, people who are with low income and without health benefits. Most of those people seek health care on a crisis basis through the emergency room of local hospitals. There is al so a need for immunizations, STD and HIV screening, teen health, women and families in crisis, and transportation to the clinic. Emmanuel/St. Mary's Clinic Focus Group Meeting August 17, 1993 Page 2 The time of operation and day of the week received a varied response. There was a consensus that Wednesdays and Fridays are not good days to run a clinic. Mondays seem to be the best day, with the hours 2:00 to 6:00 p.m. or 4:00 -to 8:00 p.m. Further studies will be done on operating hours and day of week. Gaining trust in advertising the clinic's availability. The group felt that using the ACCAP Newsletter, the ABC Newspapers, Fridley Focus, the school nurses, church organizations, service clubs, flyers and neighborhood meetings would be the most effective. On recruiting volunteers. The group felt contact should be made with the Unity Hospital Medical staff, the Blaine/Fridley Senior Center, use of church bulletins. Some specific individuals names were mentioned: Ed Spinney, Dt. Nyarian, Marlene Jezierski, Barbara Schnacht, Relta McGanns, Amy Lacey, dietician, Bob Spark, mental health. Also, volunteers could be developed to provide parenting and cooking classes. Other people or organizations to be involved. The committee felt that the Community Block Grants should be investigated for future funding of the clinics (CDBG Funds). All municipalities in Anoka County have those discretionary grants and the municipalities should be contacted in January of each year for support. Other organizations not previously mentioned were: Blaine JC's, VFW, Fridley Lions and contacting school nurses in Anoka County. Several names were mentioned as people who should be included in the Focus Group. Those mentioned are currently on the mailing list. Future Planning. Carondelet LifeCare will do further research on the suggestions that were made tonight by the committee members, and will talk to existing providers of health care. We would be prepared to start a clinic during the week of September 27 if the plans develop on schedule. Next Meeting: The next meeting of the focus Group will be September 7 at 7:00 p.m., at Emmanuel Christian Center. Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Stewart W. Laird Chief Operating Officer TO CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 *Signed Waiver Form Accompanied Application APPROVED BY BUILDING INSP. II II II II II II SAFETY & HEALTH SAFETY & HEALTH, FIRE & BLDG. SAFETY & HEAL TH, FIRE & BUILDING St.Board of Ag. FIRE & BLDG • FIRE DEPT. II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II . POLICE DEPARTMENT 1993 LICENSE AGENDA CONTRACTORS LICENSED AT *All-American Mechanical 496 N. Prior Ave. *Electric Light Sign Co 926 Dale Street N. *Wm. Kranz Const.7040 Lakeland Ave. N. *Rudy's Plumbing 4934 Thomas N. FOOD/BEVERAGE VENDING MACHINES *Mn. Viking Food Service 825 N.E. 41st Ave. FRESH FOOD OPERATION *Sahibs Flowers,Produce & Imports 4303 Central Avenue GROCERY SALES *Arun Bedi d/b/a 4303 Central Avenue Sahibs Flowers, Produce and Imports MULTIPLE DWELLINGS Chies Rentals ONE/TWO UNIT RENTALS Jeffrey Beaudette ACCAP Hark Lewis/Russ Nelson John Lundberg Olubunmi Odumade Louis Horvath Nelson Gregg Co. Wi 11 i am Shutte Rosemary Frauly Rosemary Frauly Haakon Oksenevad Jeffrey HcNair . 'TAXICAB DRIVERS *Lloyd Paul DuVall10541 Blaisdell Ctrcle, Blmtn. 4347 Tyler Street 4152 N.[. 7th St. 1321 N.E. 45½ Ave. 1156 Cheery Lane 1207/09 Circle Terrace 1325 Circle Terrace 4550 Fillmore St. 3807/09 Pierce St. 3801/03 Pierce St. 4613/15 Pierce St. 4619/21 Pierce St. 1091/93 Polk Circle 4541 Taylor St. within the City I I. FEES $ 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 90.00 25.00 50.00 40.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 30.00 15.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 15.00 20.00 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/10/93 09�12�16 FUND F�ECP.1P = FU�ID DESCRIPTION :I. 0:1. 2:1.;:: 225 230 240 376 40:t. 402 415 601 602 ov� 609 70:t. 880 881 883 884 885 887 GEl,IEF�P-1I... STATE AID MAINTENANCE CABLE TELEVISION PAI�:(.\ TRAl'mIT I...IBF�AF;;y TAX INCREMENT BONDS CF,f-'.' I TAI... I f"'IPF;:oVEMEt·,rrs STATE AID CONSTRUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT -PIR Wt,TEI;: UTII.. ITY m::l,l)EJ;: UTII...ITY J:;.:EFUSE FUl·-ID LI CH.JO!=� C[l·fl"l�:i;I... GAR,�GE PE::F:i'I IT Bu::icl .. l(1F<:C·)i::: CONTRIBUTED PROJECTS-REC CONTRIBUTED PROJECTS-GEN I l·-�SURt-,l···lCE Ef)CF.:Di,i.) FLEX BENEFIT TRUST FUND TOTt,I... t-,1...1... FU1·-.::os Bt-,1--11< l?ECAF' � B (1 I·-.: I< l·,J t, I': E: BANK CHECKING ACCOUNT TOT AL {:1I...L BAI·-� l<S Check H:i.stor-y I) I SBl.mSEMEl·,fff> 60,729n86 1,066.09 1,310.73 12,597.20 9,660.23 2,535n66 22,259.90 393.30 f.3 " �.,�:: :t.0,684.68 1,858.30 :t.08,080.01 283,702.79 7,32:t..36 95.89 633.00 11,575.73 41,664.06 216,273.97 13,339.22 f:� () �.) !l �;• <_;;• () n �J 0 DI�1BURS[r'll::MTr; E� () �-' !I 7 <y () .. �=-=, () 80 �j, 790 .. �:iO BF:C Fil··-ltil··-IC::It-,1. .. f:;YSTl:::l'i () -=i ./ :t. () .. ,/ 'I :.:) () ("l :: () Check History 09/13/93 COUNCIL LIST E-:t,1--ll< '·.iEI--IDOF� BANK CHECKING ACCOUNT WORDPERFECT PUBLISHING C AT & T COMMUNICATIONSAMERICAN WAl.ER.WORKS ASS Bt, l<EF�/ ,JCJAl··.fl··-IEBARTON SAND & GRAVEL BELLBOY CORPORATION B,:JEJ;:KE/E .. ,J .. BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS DELEGARD ,·ooL co ..FRANK & NICKS BARBER SHU F l.J ::::,:;;ST/BF;.: YO i·-1GRIGGS-COOPER & CO JOHNSON BROS. LIQUOR CO. JOHNSON PAPER & SUPPLY rKUEl.HER DIST. CO. MEDICINE LAKE TOURS MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCT MINN CELLULAR ONE I"'! I 1·,lf··.f C::CH..li--lT I E:S CDl•n::·uTu;: C MINN STRT SUPERINTENDENT 1''1 I HT [J::, ... :,tJC I SI"'! t,t--1 l··-1 �3 F'Pt,h: l<TJ(/P(,T IC I<Pr�F;:T:::; F'l. .. 1...1�3F"ETTY Ct,9·I -.. Kr.-,mJ·,1 I·1 IDE::I. .. LPETTY CASH-JANICE MCGHEPH I 1...1... :u::·f� ��: t;Or·-n CCl/[D PINE CONE NURSERY & GARD PI. .. E:: fCHE:1:;.:'.:; i::·i::: I or:: l!J I :·-iE SAN JOSE HILTON AND TOW[ STAN'S DOOR SERVICE INC SWANBERG/FLORENCE US WEST COMMUNICATIONS tt.J Et, 'v'E FU,::, 01 .. 11-..1 WILLIAMS STEEL & HARDWAR h(,F:P ANOKA COUNTY MOTOR VEHIC r-11:;i::·u·,1 Euu:i:r -r,11:J·,rr co BARKALOW/RICHARD BELLBOY CORPORATION BERGFORD TRUCKING c::0I·;:i::-uTE:R cor-:.:i::- GR I GGs-cooPER & coJOHNSON BROS. LIQUOR CO. ,JCi�3E:PH/l··-I I COL.E: ,J l<titiS/,.JOi::;[f'H I... CHECI< l--iUl•1Bl:�F� 43442 43444 43445 43446 43447 43448 43449 43450 43451 43452 43453 43454 43455 43456 43457 43458 43459 43460 43461 43462 43463 43464 43465 43466 43467 43468 43469 43470 43471 43472 43473 43474 43475 43476 43477 43478 43480 43481 43482 43483 43484 43485 43486 43487 43488 43489 43490 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS GL540R-V04.10 PAGE 1 t-i1•·1ou1--1T 24.00 88.84 140.00 87.39 369.80 2,342.54 215.00 216.84 263.53 215.00 305.00 1,910 .. 21 1,315.98 225.51 16,487.90 1,120 .. 00 202 .. 98 �?:.:� II (_.? �=,=. :3() II ()() ���=: " () () 6,433.69 3,178.92 8.00 117.45 [! �:·: II '? (_;> :t (��) II �3 ��I 3,106.28 8,434.73 213.00 {, �71 -:_;:, 11 () f3 320.10 7,000.00 36.00 2,070 .. 37 16.00 46.34 216.00 20.50 67 .. 88 110 .. 00t.) !I :I. �=�:5" s;•:7 :.:) �50 " �:'. () 594.55 2,631.32 1,664.11 275 .. 00 209.00 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/10/93 09:0 Check History 09 /13/93 COUNCIL LIST CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS GL540R-V04.10 PAGE r•, "=· I: t·, l··-11< 'v'E�·-1:0DF.: CHECK 1·,II..JIYfB[};; Ar1IDUl··-IT BANK CHECKING ACCOUNT �(El,1JATT /CHt,RI...ES I< F..:AU 13 ··-F1f···I D EF\SCJ 1--1 KUETHER DIST. CO. I... t1 F� �3 Ci J··-1 /BF� l.J CE� LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS 1•·1t1HPEl�:D 1·;1IDltJEST Bl...11::-It•IESS F'F�DDU CT 1•·1 Il...l...FFUF�Ol---il·-� IE� 1·;111·-.:1·,1::::SOTh DEF:·T DF HE{:,f...TH I·-� \:; F' PET1·y CASH -KAREN MUELL PHILLIPS & SONS CO/ED PF;.: l OFi bl I t·,JE PF;:UDEI--IT I f'.':il... I ... I FE I l··-l\31..ff::til'-lC QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS FiOBEF;:GC/F0 r=:1UI... EF:CHJ:::oEDE:i::.:/TEFiFiY :::; T t1 l··-1 TH CJ l··-1 Y L IO l··-1 \:; f:;Y�::-TEl"'l:3 su:::,1::,1...y IHC .. U �::-P0::3TM,Y:;TER us l,i.JEr:T crn·,11·qu1·,1 I Cf.1T I Cl!·-1�;r�F'.3Cl'"i[ANOKA COUNTY SOCIAi... S[RVCOMMISSIONER OF REVENUEFIRST COMMUNITY CREDIT UGREAT WEST LIFE & ANNUITuF::oUF' HE::t,I...THHENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORTHi:: !·,IT UE::::; /F' ti Tl? IC VICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 45MED CENTER HEALTH PLAN1•·11:::D I Ct1 CHO I CE1·<1JCl<i:J .. .SDr--:, TW..l��TEE/;J ,JMINN STATE RETIREMENT SYt,lt1TI... I ... Et1GUE OF CITIESNORTHEAST STATE BANKOPPERMAN & PAQUINP,�'r'l�:01...1... ACCOU I--IT Pr::J�t, F"Cll... I CE i:;:l:�I... I E�F PUBLIC MANAGERS ASSOCIAT STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNI U 1·-.1 J U i··-1 1 :? :i. /.:,U I-� I Cil"·-1 :.3 2 0 U l··-1 J U 1··-I l.l c;· Ul·-�ITED li_l/'.�Y til··-ICHOP Pt,i::·u� 43491 43492 43493 43494 43495 43496 43497 43498 43499 43500 43501 43502 43503 43504 43505 43506 43507 43508 43509 43510 43511 43513 43514 43515 43516 43517 43518 43519 43520 r.r.:) �521 I..� ::) �.:, �� �-:·� ti:·:';�_i2:·:'; 4:::;�_i;.-=:4 43525 43526 43527 43528 43529 43530 43531 4::) �)::·)�::,q. �·:) !) :.) ::)43534 43535 43536 43537 43539 53.03 8,414.75 4,061 .. 80 80 .. 00 32,460.50 20.00 45.94 27.54 5.00 10,635 .. 41 72 .. 64 7,776 .. 08 569 .. 44 705 .. 74 145 .. 94 200.00 100 .. 00 2,700 .. 00 206 .. 59 3,157.02 332.40 436.19 301.00 7,118u37 2,149 .. 00 4,470.50 9,440 .. 70 125 .. 00 1,902.00 � ·nc �� �,67JnL/ 5,785.60 19,488.30 350.00 320.00 325.00 31,660.72 85.87 101,393 .. 60 18,849.49 363.09 50 .. 00 740 .. 00 100.00 "le":-�� .. ()() �-=· (.) '? • () () :1.:1.2 .. 00 '.?i-l :1. "0:1. BRC FINANCIAi... SYSTEM () 1�;-/� l () // '·? :::·; () ·;:· � () Check History 09/13/93 COUNCIL LIST Bt11·,11< ',J EI·,! I) 0 F: BANK CHECKING ACCOUNT BELLBOY CORPORATION BEI--ISOl-�/MICHAEI... C BE::!-:)T/GIMt-1 CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTO DEI...EGARD TOOL CO. GI FFCJFW/VAl...CII�: IE: GRIGGS-COOPER & CO JOHNSON BROS. LIQUOR CO. JOHNSON PAPER & SUPPLY C KUETHER DIST. CO. 1·,1t-1CT (1 CDi··-ii=T:i:;:i::J·-ICE FiEG I STF: :·,1t1 l</BF� I (�l··-1 1·1iEDICP1 CHDICE MINN STRT SUPERINTENDENT NDRTH SUBURBAN MUTUAi... AI 1·-.1ov,�1 l{/DEBOF;:AH F'(.:-1l.JE;T I\:; 8: SOI"-!�:\ Pl::R1-:) PHIL.LIPS 8: so1·,1s CO/ED QUALI1·y WINE & SPIRITS SENIOR F"UND-KAREN MOEL.LE SYS"fEMS SUPPLY I�C. (1(1 FUU I i::•1·,11::J-l"f COMl::,r-11-.rY AAA/PRIORITY VIDEO INC ADVANCED CONCRETE INC AGATE AL.ARM & U.S. SECUR t-il...t1D:O IN PODl...f.; til ... B I l··-11::;CJl"·-I AMERICAN AGENCY INC AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO ANOKA COUNTY LIBRARY API FUND FOR PAYROLi... EDU ARTS MANUFACTURING & SUP ASPEN MILLS, INC. t,UDIO EDITIOHS B & B SEAT COVER B (.:ii{ f.:R ,S: T (.l'( I... cmBATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE BEAR COMMUNICATIONS INC BERGFORD TRUCKING BIO SAFETY SYSTEMS BLAINE VELO SPORTS BE:ODf�r-�T BF;:CJtiJl'-l/�3EAN c -�: 1< SEED !• I 1·,1c Ct'.:il�:1...so1·-.1 TF�ACTCJF;: CATCD PARTS SERVICE CHE:CK MUi"'IBEF;: 43540 43541 43542 43543 43544 43545 43546 43547 43548 43549 43550 43551 43552 43553 43554 43555 43556 43557 43558 43559 43560 43561 l.� :::·) �.=. t:-::) 4::::!5(;4 43565 43566 435674356843569 43570 43571 43572 43573 4357443575 4357643577 4357843579 43580 43581 43582 43583 43584 ,�::-; !:.)f.:: �} 4.,. o::,:, ,:. ,.)-..I C:)i..J 4 ::) �-:• El �1 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS GL540R-V04.10 PAGE AMOUt,IT 19,834.69 191.02 200.00 17.05 33.07 27.63 6,689.58 995.71 200.28 23,565.40 380.00 200.00 19,278.35 44.00 50.00 40.17 150.00 265.40 3,516.22 698.57 :1.70 .. 00 �.=.=. �3 II �=� ���='. ::; (:, n �:) *::: 122.21 19,530 .. 67 338.25 36.20 101 .. :_::;!j 8,966.00 106.39 274.55 175.00 �.:,�_:, .. �-:·::::·'. ::;:.:)4. 00 ::; �:: II -l ;:·: 99.00 1,778.95 316.21 1,875.43 645.08 374.00 100.00 24.27 75.00 �·:·�t.) " �:,:) !5 s-.;, II �·:·: �? V-1 lI • 0 :::-; ·-:1 ._, BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/10/93 09�0 Check History 09/13/93 COUNCIL LIST Bf\t,tl{ VEJ·,mm;: BANK CHECKING ACCOUNT CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITO CITY BEER DIST. INC. CITY OF MAPLE GROVE CITY OF ST PAUi... CI TY Pt1GES CLEVELAND COTTON PRODUCT COCA-COLA BOTTLING MIDWE COMMERCIAL Am�HALT CREr.1TI'v'E SIGl·,IS CROWN FENCE & WIRE :0 C HE::Y CO!"'lef.1!·,tY D i:;:CCI< CEJ�TER DhL.CD DAVIES WATER EQUIP CO. DEr,:co DIAMOND VOGEi... PAINTS DORADUS CORPORATION EAST SIDE BEVERAGE CO EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUC FIDELITY PRODUCTS CO FIF:E CHIE:f:· FIRE DEPT SAFETY OFFICER FLANAGAN SALES INC FOCUS NEWSPAPERS FRIENDLY CHEVROLET GEO, GALE RESEARCH CO. GANZER DIST. INC. Gt,,;:;:EI... IC I< �3TEEI... CO Cit,YI...OfiD BF�OS GENERAi... REPAIR SERVICE GENUINE PARTS/NAPA AUTO GESTETNER CORPORATION GREATER ANOKA CNTY.HUMAN Hf�l·,JCCl CCJF�F' Ht1Yl··-iEf.)/TF:I CIA HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE HD:·,IEF;: Sl.JF'Pl..Y Hff�TY PRJ.t-H�3 :JYC PF:HlTH-IG JOHNSON FIRST AID JOHNSON PAPER & SUPPLY C JORIMAN INC/DENNIS G. I< trlARf KAI...INA,WII...I...S,WOCJDS,GISVO KOCH 1·,:t1TEFUhl .. .S CO. l<Ol<E::3H l..f1GEJ;:Dl.JIST com:,. CHECK l··ll.lf'IBER 43588 43589 43590 43591 43592 43593 43594 43595 43596 43597 43598 43599 43600 43601 43602 43603 43604 43605 43606 43607 43608 43609 43610 43611 43612 :.1-::)(:) :I.:.:) 43614 43615 436:1.6 43617 436:1.8 43619 43620 43621 43622 43623 43624 43625 43626 43627 43628 43629 43630 43631 {.� ::; t.:, ::) �� t.l, :·� (:) :3 ::) 4:::)6::31.t CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS GL540R-V04.10 PAGE AMOUMT :I. .!-14. 00 l :_:) �=.=. u �j �-'1.rno. oo �� �-:� .. <7 �:) 328.00 109.65 1,497.11 :1.93.96 192.77 5.05 :1.18.65 8.52 16.83 �� �� JL.JJ :1.,164.27 68.84 :1.51.06 '.':i"l �Bl?. !50 .� �-=� ;:� .. �) �-:' 28.14 78.00 60.00 418.58 523.41 37.49 :3 ej -;;• II :.::: �3 26,889.70 16.50 135.:1.:1. �:�2::;.-u ()() :1.94.61 787.30 1,591.07 10.94 125.00 2,729.23 363.97 108.98 312.88 157.58 200.59 388.00 :1.37.95 18,056.21 456.89 173.00 n� �� OJnJJ 1..1 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/10/93 09�0 Check History 09/13/93 COUNCIL LIST Bt,1"-11< VEl·,JDOF;: BANK CHECKING ACCOUNT LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER LAWSON PRODUCTS INC LEEF Br;:os. LORENZ BUS SERVICE INC. MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT CO. MADDEN & ASSOCIATES/FRAN 1·,1r:,R �( I.I I I DI ST. 1•·1(.:i��;ys CClRP. t1lt1TTf.;c:11·,: C:IF"FICE PF�ODUCTSMENARDS CASHWAY LUMBER MIDWEST ASPHALT CO. MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCT 1 ·<1 I Dl,o.Jl:::ST DI E!::-1:::1... 1•·1 I Dl.J,!E!::>T MI c1:::0F I 1...1'"1 EClU I Pl'1 MINN CELLULAR ONE MINNEAPOLIS EQUIPMENT CO l.,i I Hl··-IESDT t, Hr1::.: SUF'PI...Y 1,·1 I 1·-.IJ··.,Ef;CJTP1 BI...UEPF� I t··-IT1·1 1 I l··-il··-1!:SOT A EI...E',Jh TDf-iMI l··-1 T [J(··-l.,,I EI :::Wli'.:i l··-1 1·,::·-.1 DE:FY1F(fME1·,rr DF h'.EVJ·,IJ..JE MN STATE TREAS BUILDING 1·;;u::::1...1...E::h:/ l<(-'.1F;:E1,1 MOORE MEDICAL CORP MOTOR PhRTS SERVICE INC. trir::rroi:;:01...r� I HC. MUELLER PHD/RICHARD MULTICHANNEL NEWS l··-l b p :·.JUF(rH :::rrpi1:;: ICE: 1·,lOFiTHEl:;_:1·-.1 (:,JF;: NORTHERN SAHITARY SUPPLY NORTHERN STATES POWER ODYSSEY TRAVEL AGENCY Ol··IL..IM SAL.ES • OLSOl--1 '�3 PI...Ul'1B I t··H3 OMNIGRAPHICS, INC OSI ENVIRONMENTAL INC PM': en I... It-IC PEP::31 ··-COl...,�·-··7 UP PHILLIPS & SONS CO/ED PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. PI...Ul·-lf<ETT 'S, It--!C F'F< I 1·-rr 1'1t,1:�T F:(ffi IO SHr.1C:: K RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING i:;.:t,PIT F'F:11·,rrIND CHECK t-lUMBEI:� 1.1-.• �--.• r.: "(•,.)\ •• •"-) ._I ,:J ::) 6 ::-; f.) 4�:;ci:::;7 4:36::m 4:16:59 4:·:)640 1..1 ::>f.:.l-1 :!.'-l :.:'; 61.J �-� ,q�:)o'.:)1..1::; 4::V:-44 l.� :J t, l.� �::, 43646 43647 43648 43649 43650 43651 43652 43653 43654 43655 43656 43657 43658 43659 43660 43661 43662 43663 43664 43665 43666 43667 43668 43669 43670 43671 43672 43673 43674 43675 43676 43677 43678 "43679 43680 43681 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS GL540R-V04.10 PAGE AMDUr-lT 250.00 260.37 257.56 208.00 46.85 1,162.85 21,646.75 821.78 160.43 163.87 3,417.30 221.97 92.17 �::, j_ •"9 n )1 �:·: �:: () a :·:·) �:, 87. 6�:) {',"'�) :1. .. f.)() �37 11 "?r •4.J6B .. �.',O 17,726.87 8,178.40 95.89 13.10 :.} l :; II �:: :.:) 185.18 109.50 81 .. 00 260 .. 00 531.05 2,015.36 1,456.13 419.82 B,t..160.17 '.300 .00 �;� t!:l f.� a :·:; �.:I 111.44 85.00 275.00 331.51 :1.��u:1..01.i ��::>�• n El() 171.30 60.71 58.58 89.89 42.44 191.70 r:: ,., BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 09/10/93 09:0 Check History 09/13/93 COUNCIL LIST CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS GL540R-V04.10 PAGE 6 I-:t1MI< VEl·,IDOF� CHECK t�Ul•IF::ER AMOUl·,fT BANK CHECKING ACCOUNT REX DISTRIBUTING CO SBS SOFTWARE SYSTEMS SCHERER BROS LUMBER SENTRY COMMUNICATIONS SHEDL.OV /Cl... I FFDf-::D SKIPS CENTRAL AUTO PARTS f.)T t1!=�: Tf;; I BI..Jl,11::: STATE OF MINN.DEPT.LABOR STATE OF MINNESOTA STREICHER GUN'S INC/DON f;l..JB! ... li:;.:i-::(il·-1 F�t,TE P1UTHDf-;:ITY SUBURBAN STAMP AND PRINT SUBURBAN TAXI CORPORATID SUBURBAN TIRE SERVICE SUNBURST-LEE CHEMICALS TOWN & COUNTRY OFFICE CL TUX(il ... EF(f, :H--IC. TULL BE{1F� I 1··-!G TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CD TWIN CITY PHOTOCOPY US TIRE & EXHAUST UNIFORMS UNLIMITED l..fr-lIOUE BODI<�:> IMC UNIVERSITY FILM & VIDEO UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA VASSAR/HARRIET & KENDALi... 1./F�RrICAI ... HI...Il··H) F{�CTOffY VIKING LABORATORIES, INC ',./C):3�3 I... I GHT I l··-!C·) Lt.I 1,o.J D r-;.:r.·1 I l·-.11::-:; [ i:;; WAL.I... STREET JOURNAL/THE WESTERN BADGE & TROPHY C WHITE'S N.E. RENTAi... �,.JI 1-,1�)Dl·-l/l"1(1F;: K WOODLAKE SANITARY SERVIC WORLDWIDE CHAMB OF COMM tiJ1...1 i:rrH us,� ZIFGI...E:R IMC 43682 43683 43684 43685 43686 43687 43688 43689 .q ::·; (':) <;.:i () 4:36?:I. ,q ::) t) r:;-;:� 4::::c>-=1::> 43694 43695 43696 43697 43698 43699 43700 43701 43702 43703 43704 t.l :·:) ""}' () �=.=. 43706 43707 43708 43709 43710 43711 43712 43713 43714 43715 43716 43717 43718 43719 43720 19,473.25 118.75 63.84 200.06 520.00 213.00 78.00 45.00 20.00 54.08 750.00 17.61 12,597.20 45.13 L0 �� 0�u7J 1,251.38 328.00 124.44 49.00 25.00 54.92 408.25 566.21 45.50 1,555.00 40.00 18.00 649.87 86.69 16.74 50.90 149.00 60.75 47.93 991.00 107,864.49 29.00 63.95 53.50 80 5, 7'JO a �.10 *** BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM () �} ./ :i. ()./CJ::·) () '7' :! () I-:r.":-ii·,11< vE1·,:nor-� 1�:E::i::·rn=a TCJTAL:3 � Check History 09/13/93 COUNCIL LIST CHE:C �( t,fl .. li"ff-:ER CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS GL540R-V04.10 PAGE 7 Al'IDUl·..JT BO :.'.i , 7·:;o • �50 RECORDS PRINTED -001146