Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20180604_EDA_Minutes ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF JUNE 4, 2018 The meeting was called to order at 6:00 pm by President, Marlaine Szurek. Members Present: Murzyn, Schmitt, Novitsky, Herringer, and Szurek. Williams arrived at 6:10 and Buesgens arrived at 6:20 pm. Staff Present: Walt Fehst, Joseph Hogeboom, Keith Dahl, Akua Opoku, and Shelley Hanson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE- RECITED CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approve minutes of May 7, 2018. 2. Approve Financial Report & Payment of Bills for April, 2018–Resolution 2018-08 Questions from Members: There were no questions. Motion by Schmitt, seconded by Novitsky, to approve the Minutes of May 7, 2018, and the Financial Report and Payment of Bills for April, 2018 as presented. All ayes. MOTION PASSED. RESOLUTIONNO.2018-08 AResolution of theEconomic Development Authorityof Columbia Heights, Minnesota, Approving the Financial Statements for the Month of April 2018 and the Payment of the Bills for the Month of April 2018. WHEREAS,the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (EDA) is required by Minnesota Statutes Section 469.096, Subd. 9, to prepare a detailed financial statement which shows all receipts and disbursements, their nature, the money on hand, the purposes to which the money on hand is to be applied, the EDA's credits and assets and its outstanding liabilities; and WHEREAS,said Statute also requires the EDA to examine the statement and treasurer's vouchers or bills and if correct, to approve them by resolutionand enter the resolution in its records; and WHEREAS,the financial statement for the month of April 2018 has been reviewed by the EDA Commission; and WHEREAS,the EDA has examined the financial statements and finds them to be acceptable as to both form and accuracy; and WHEREAS,the EDA Commission has other means to verify the intent of Section 469.096, Subd. 9, including but not limited to Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports, Annual City approved Budgets, Audits and similar documentation; and 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 2 June 4, 2018 WHEREAS,financials statements are held by the City’s Finance Department in a method outlined by the State of Minnesota’s Records Retention Schedule, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVEDby the Board of Commissioners of the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority that it has examined the referenced financial statements including the check history, and they are found to be correct, as to form and content; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEDthe financial statements are acknowledged and received and the check historyas presented in writing is approved for payment out of proper funds; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEDthis resolution is made a part of the permanent records of the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority. ORDER OFECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Passed this __4th____ dayof ___June_____, 2018 Offered by: Schmitt Seconded by: Novitsky Roll Call: All ayes BUSINESS ITEMS 1. First Amendment to Contract for Private Redevelopment-Resolution 2018-09 Dahl explained that on October 24, 2016, the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (the “EDA”) approved Resolution 2016-30, a resolution which effectively approved the Contract for Private Redevelopment by and between the EDA and Hy-Vee, Inc. (the “TIF Contract”). Pursuant to the TIF Contract, and subject to unavoidable delays, Hy-Vee was supposed to commence construction of the minimum improvements by June 1, 2018. Since Hy-Vee was unable to satisfy this provision of the TIF Contract, and because they still fully intend to renovate the Central Valu Center into a new grocery store, Hy-Vee has requested an extension to the dates of commencement and completion. Therefore, please find attached a First Amendment to the TIF Contract which extends the commencement and completion dates of construction to January 31, 2019 and February 28, 2020 respectively. Dahl told members that Hy-Vee’s original stores were all sized between 110,000 sf to 125,000 sf. He said they have since modified their design to construct some of the proposed new stores between 75,000 – 90,000 sf. Ours will be one of those stores. Dahl said the major change in the downsizing of this store will be removing the clothing section and to change from the full service restaurant to a Wahlburger’s restaurant. Dahl explained that the site plan approvals for both sites have lapsed and they are submitting new plans for both the Convenience Store/gas thrd station/Starbucks parcel at 47 and Central, and the remodeling for the Hy-Vee store at 43 and Central for the st July meetings. They hope to start construction by October 1. Staff recommends approval of Resolution 2018-09 as presented. 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 3 June 4, 2018 Questions/comments from members: th Herringer asked if the Convenience store would take the whole parcel at 47 and Central. Dahl said no-the convenience store and a walk in Starbucks will be located on the south piece and hopefully a separate restaurant type business will go on the north piece which is owned by a separate party. Szurek asked about the leases still in place at the mall property. Dahl explained that Hy-Vee would like the entire building but Ace Hardware and Dollar Tree had recently renewed their leases (15 years/12 years respectively), and Meineke is operating on a month to month basis. Schmitt asked how approving the First Amendment would extend the dates of construction and how it would affect the TIF District time frame. Hogeboom stated that Hy-Vee wanted the date of construction extended out to June 1, 2019, but staff held firm to a January 3, 2019 start date. He said the 12 year time frame for the TIF District gets pushed back per the date of completion. Motion by Schmitt, seconded by Murzyn, to waive the reading of Resolution 2018-09, there being ample copies available to the public. All ayes. MOTION PASSED. Motion by Schmitt, seconded by Murzyn, to adopt Resolution 2018-09, a resolution approving a First Amendment to Contract for Private Redevelopment between the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority and Hy-Vee, Inc. All ayes. MOTION PASSED. FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the __ day of ____________, 2018, by and between COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic (the “Authority”), established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1081 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) and HY-VEE, INC., an Iowa corporation (the “Redeveloper”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Authority and Redeveloper entered into that certain Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of October 24, 2016 (the “Contract”), providing for redevelopment of certain property (the “Redevelopment Property”) located in the City of Columbia Heights (the “City”); and WHEREAS, the Redeveloper has requested and the Authority has agreed to amend the Contract to allow for an extension of the dates of commencement and completion of construction of the Minimum Improvements as further described herein; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 4 June 4, 2018 1. Amendment of Section 4.3(a) of the Contract. The first two sentences of Section 4.3(a) of the Contract are amended as follows: (a) Subject to Unavoidable Delays, the Redeveloper shall commence construction of the Minimum Improvements by January 31, 2019. Subject to Unavoidable Delays, the Redeveloper shall complete the construction of the Minimum Improvements by February 28, 2020. 2. Except as amended by this Amendment, the Contract shall remain in full force and effect. In accordance with Section 3.5 of the Contract, upon execution of this Amendment, Redeveloper shall reimburse the Authority for all out of pocket costs incurred by the Authority in connection with negotiating, drafting and approval of this Amendment, to the extent that any funds deposited in escrow to pay Administrative Costs are not sufficient for their payment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Authority has caused this Amendment to be duly executed in its name and behalf and its seal to be hereunto duly affixed and the Redeveloper has caused this Amendment to be duly executed in its name and behalf on or as of the date first above written. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY By Its President By Its Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _________________, 2018, by Marlaine Szurek and Walter R. Fehst, the President and Executive Director of the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority, a public body politic and corporate, on behalf of the Authority. Notary Public HY-VEE, INC., an Iowa Corporation By Jeffrey Markey, Senior Vice President By _______________________________________ Nathan Allen, Assistant Secretary 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 5 June 4, 2018 STATE OF IOWA) ) SS. COUNTY OF POLK ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of __________, 2018, by Jeffrey Markey and Nathan Allen, the Senior Vice President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of Hy-Vee, Inc., an Iowa corporation, on behalf of the corporation. ___________________________ Notary Public RESOLUTION NO. 2018-09 RESOLUTION APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT BETWEEN THE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND HY-VEE, INC. BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Commissioners ("Board") of the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (the "Authority") as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS. 1.01. Pursuant to their authority under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1082 and 469.174 to 469.1794, as amended, the Authority and the City of Columbia Heights (the “City”) established the Hy-Vee Tax Increment Financing District within the Downtown CBD Redevelopment Project (the “Project”), for the purpose of facilitating the redevelopment of certain substandard property within the Project. 1.02. the Authority and Hy-Vee, Inc. (the “Redeveloper”) entered into that certain Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of October 24, 2016 (the “Contract”), providing, among other things, for the construction by the Redeveloper of certain improvements (the “Minimum Improvements”) on the property legally described within the Contract (the “Redevelopment Property”). 1.03. Due to an expected delay in commencement of construction of the Minimum Improvements, the parties have negotiated and propose to execute a First Amendment to the Contract (the “First Amendment”) to revise the required construction schedule of the Minimum Improvements resulting from said delay. SECTION 2. FIRST AMENDMENT APPROVED. 2.01. The First Amendment as presented to the Board is hereby in all respects approved, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the First Amendment by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of approval. 2.02. The President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the Authority the First Amendment and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by the Authority, and to carry out, on behalf of the Authority, its obligations thereunder. 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 6 June 4, 2018 2.03. Authority staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. ORDER OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Passed this 4th day of June, 2018 Offered by: Schmitt Seconded by: Murzyn Roll Call: All ayes President Attest: Assistant Secretary 2. Façade Improvement Grant Program Dahl reminded members that on February 5, 2018, the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (the “EDA”) directed staff to collaborate with the Columbia Heights Police Department (the “CHPD”) to develop a grant program to encourage the revitalization, rehabilitation, and restoration of exterior facades, but also to increase the presence of security throughout the Central Avenue NE commercial corridor in the City of Columbia Heights (the “City”). On April 2, 2018, the EDA Commissioners discussed and reviewed the initial draft documents of the Façade Improvement Grant Program (the “Grant Program”), specifically the guidelines, the sources & uses statement, as well as a crime overlay map which delineated where the crime incident rate was more prevalent along Central Avenue NE. Following the meeting staff continued to work with the CHPD, but also engaged the services of Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. to draft the necessary agreements for the Grant Program. Therefore, for further discussion and review, but ultimately approval consideration tonight is the Grant Program. Staff seeks direction from the EDA for the approval of the Grant Program, but also the appropriation of $50,000 annually from Fund 408 – EDA Redevelopment Project Fund to implement the Grant Program. Staff recommends approval of the Façade Improvement Grant Program and appropriation of $50,000 annually from Fund 408 – EDA Redevelopment Project Fund for economic redevelopment expenditures in connection to the Façade Improvement Grant Program. Dahl stated that all the documents were included in the agenda packets for the commissioner’s to review as well as in these minutes which included: the Façade Improvement Grant Program Guidelines, The Sources and Uses Statement, The Façade Improvement Grant Program Agreement, and the Agreement and Grant of License. 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 7 June 4, 2018 Questions/comments Dahl told members that the equipment would be paid for and owned by the EDA and that Police would be able to access and view tapes as needed. He explained that not everyone would be eligible to be part of this program, only those in specific areas where crime rates are higher. He estimates the expenses at $446,000 to cover facade thth and surveillance equipment between 37 Avenue and 45 Ave along Central Avenue. Dahl suggests allocating $50,000 per year which could potentially fund 6-8 projects per year. He estimates this may be a 10 year project. Schmitt asked if alley entrances would be covered by cameras as some of them had access from front and rear. Dahl said he would have to check to see how many businesses this may impact and if the Police had a recommendation about the need. She also asked what “a business in good standing” meant? Dahl said it meant loans would not be given to businesses that were behind in taxes, or had delinquent utility bills, or any other outstanding bills with the City. Murzyn asked if businesses could put cameras in if not in the target area. Dahl said businesses are free to install their own security systems and cameras at their expense any time. Herringer wanted to know if the Police Dept would have to hire more officers to monitor these cameras. Dahl said it should take very minimal police time and that their Information Specialist would be the one monitoring the cameras and most of it would be done digitally and through computers. Buesgens thought this is a good program. Motion by Murzyn, seconded by Novitsky, to approve the Façade Improvement Grant Program, and authorize the appropriation of certain funds from Fund 408 – EDA Redevelopment Project Fund for economic redevelopment expenditures in connection to the Façade Improvement Grant Program. Roll Call: ayes-Murzyn, Schmitt, Buesgens, Novitsky, Williams, and Szurek. Abstain-Herringer MOTION PASSED. FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM GUIDELINES PROGRAM DESCRIPTION In a collaborative effort with the Columbia Heights Police Department (the “CHPD”), the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (the “EDA”) offers a Façade Improvement Grant Program (the “Grant Program”). The purpose of the Grant Program is to encourage businesses and commercial property owners within the Central Business District to revitalize, rehabilitate, and restore exterior store fronts, but also for the CHPD to provide monitored surveillance along Central Avenue NE to reduce the incident rate of criminal activity, as well as increase business vitality and economic performance. The Grant Program reimburses businesses or commercial property owners for eligible improvements up to fifty percent (50%) of the total project cost; for a maximum reimbursement of $5,000. Moreover, if determined by the CHPD that an exterior surveillance system is warranted, the EDA will install surveillance equipment to monitor adjacent businesses and properties, as well as parks and open spaces. 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 8 June 4, 2018 ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS Applicants must be an owner of a commercial property, a commercial tenant with approval from the property owner(s), or a 501(c)(3) organization in the City of Columbia Heights (the “City”) located along Central Avenue NE between 37th and 45th Avenue NE. Applicants must be in good standing with the City, including but not limited to, legally operating with proper licensure; and current on property taxes, utility bills, and special assessments. ELIGIBLE FAÇADE IMPROVEMENTS Façade improvements must be visible from a public street, completed by a licensed contractor, and comply with one or more of the following eligible façade improvements:  Architectural Improvements  Canopy or Awning Installation or Repair  Exterior lighting  Exterior Painting, Re-siding, or Professional Cleaning  Green Façade Improvement (i.e. Living Wall, ecofriendly [non-VOC] paint, reclaimed wood, etc.)  Installation of New or Renovated Attached Signage (Excluding LED)  Masonry Repairs or Tuckpointing  Replacement of Windows and Doors  Restoration of Exterior Finishes and Materials  Any other exterior façade improvement physically attached to the primary structure as approved by the EDA Please note: Labor costs of a contractor, including necessary design work are eligible costs for reimbursement through the Grant Program. Ineligible costs include, but are not limited to, new construction, interior renovations, repair or replacement of a roof, improvements to an alley façade, improvements started prior to receiving a signed grant agreement from the EDA, and any other improvement not listed above. EXTERIOR SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS The CHPD shall review all Grant Program applications submitted to determine if the installation of an exterior surveillance system is warranted. If it is determined that an exterior surveillance system is warranted, the applicant will then be required to enter into a Lease Agreement with the EDA. The Lease Agreement will allow the EDA to (1) install security cameras on the exterior of the primary structure; (2) install recording equipment inside of the primary structure in a locked and secured location to prevent destruction or tampering; and (3) allow for annual maintenance inspections for a period of five (5) years. All surveillance system equipment shall be installed by a consultant selected by the EDA, and reviewed by the CHPD. Since specifications of the surveillance system equipment may vary based on desired coverage, configuration, and size of the commercial property, the following are minimum specifications to be installed: Cameras:  IP - Enabled  Ability to operate in all resolutions up to HDTV 720p/ 1MP  Ability to record thirty (30) frames per second 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 9 June 4, 2018  Capable of recording optimal images in all lighting conditions  Vandal-resistant  Weather-proof in extreme temperatures from -40° to 131 °F Network Video Recorder:  Sufficient memory to retain data from all cameras for a period of fifteen (15) days  Capacity to deliver thirty (30) frames per second, per camera  Ability to produce a DVD-R copy of desired data APPLICATION PROCESS 1.Applications will be open on [DATE HERE 2018] 2.Applications will be accepted from October 29, 2018 to December 21, 2018. 3.Grants will be awarded, and applicants will be notified by February 4, 2019 via email correspondence. A Grant Agreement and if necessary a Lease Agreement for the exterior surveillance system must be approved and signed before commencement of any improvements. Please be sure to obtain all necessary Building Permits. 4.Upon being awarded, a meeting will be established to go over the submitted improvement plan to discuss grant expectations and to address grant concerns. 5.The grant recipient or its contractor must commence the improvements sixty (60) days after an approved Grant Agreement. The façade improvements must be completed within six (6) months after the issuance of the necessary Building Permits. 6.After façade improvements are complete, the grant funds will be disbursed for reimbursement to the applicant after all of the following pieces of information have been submitted: a.Proof of Final Inspection by the Building Official b.A Copy of the Final Invoice Received from the Contractor c.Before and After Photographs d.Proof of Payment to the Contractor (i.e. receipt, invoice, etc.) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED APPLICATION MATERIALS  A complete application  Clear and colored BEFORE photographs of exterior building  A detailed improvement plan of new exterior façade improvements including design (sketches), color scheme, materials, project execution timeline, and overall budget for plan  Proof of good standing with the City  Submit 1 or 2 competitive proposal from licensed and bonded contractors. These proposals should give detailed information about the work to be done, the costs, and the project completion schedule. Any contractor that has submitted a competitive detailed estimate may be used. Contractors cannot be changed unless new proposals have been submitted and approved by the Façade Grant Committee. ***  Owners and merchants may also perform work on their own buildings; however, they will not be reimbursed for time while acting as contractor and/or installing material. Material costs and labor of employees are reimbursable; however, documentation must be produced for the number of hours worked on the project by the employees, the rate of pay of the employees’ social security numbers etc. *** 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 10 June 4, 2018 FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM – PROPOSED BUDGET OVERVIEW USES STATEMENT The Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (the “EDA”) has identified a need to encourage the revitalization, rehabilitation, and restoration of exterior facades throughout the Central Avenue NE commercial corridor in the City of Columbia Heights (the “City”), but also an increased need to protect the vitality and economic performance of businesses with the installation of exterior surveillance systems. Between 2015 and 2017, the Columbia Heights Police Department responded and investigated 955 crimes along Central Avenue NE, including but not limited to arson, assault, burglary, fraud, robbery, shoplifting, theft, and vandalism. Therefore, in an effort to reduce the crime incident rate along Central Avenue NE and improve business vitality, the EDA desires to offer a façade improvement grant program in exchange for the City to install an exterior surveillance system on the exterior of the respective business. As of March 16, 2018, the total project cost has been estimated to be $446,145. This estimate was based on commercial properties between 37th Avenue NE and 45th Avenue NE (the “Project Scope”), but more specifically where the crime incident rate was the highest. Please note that the proposed budget is subject to change based on several dependent and independent variables. Thus, the total project cost should be reevaluated annually to account for any substantive changes. The following table below provides a detailed use breakdown of the anticipated expenses for project completion: USES EXPENSES I.Façade Improvement $ 350,000.00 II.Equipment Costs $70,500.00 III.Design/ Install $18,000.00 IV.Legal Drafting Fees $ 5,275.00 V.Lease Agreement $ 300.00 VI.Recording of Lease $2,070.00 TOTAL USE FUNDS: $ 446,145.00  Façade Improvement – these expenses account for the total amount of eligible commercial properties in the Project Scope receiving the maximum reimbursement for the respective exterior façade improvements.  Equipment Costs – these expenses include the cost of exterior surveillance systems at identified commercial properties in the Project Scope, such as the Network Video Reordering (NVR) device; and the amount of necessary high-performance cameras to be installed for increased security at adjacent businesses and public space.  Design/ Install – these expenses include the design and installation of the exterior surveillance system for the respective grantee, and are estimated based on a standard design and install.  Legal Drafting Fees – these expenses are incurred by the representation of Barna, Guzy & Steffen (BGS) as the legal agent with drafting and preparation of a Grant Agreement, and if necessary a Lease Agreement.  Lease Agreement – in order for a lease agreement to be legally valid, there needs to be an offer, acceptance, and consideration. Therefore, the EDA shall, at a minimum, provide the grantee with consideration in the amount of $1.00. 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 11 June 4, 2018  Recording of Deeds – this expense include the costs of recording the Lease Agreements, and are estimated based on the 2018 fee schedule released by Anoka County. SOURCES STATEMENT The aforementioned expenses in connection with the Commercial Revitalization Project will be paid through the EDA Redevelopment Project Fund 408. Each source fund has its own specific purpose for expenses realized throughout the term length of the project. The EDA Redevelopment Project Fund 408 will fund the majority of expenses related to property acquisition and cost contingences, as well as all expenses realized for title insurance, legal closing costs, recording of deeds, and broker compensation. When and if project expenses exceed the remaining balance of a source fund, the Capital Improvement - Development Fund 420 will provide an interfund loan to the respective source fund. The following table provides a breakdown of the amount of funds that will be used from its respective source for project completion: SOURCES TOTAL BALANCE I.EDA Redevelopment Project Fund 408 $ 446,145.00 TOTAL SOURCE FUNDS: $ 446,145.00 FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT THIS FAÇADE IMPROVEMENT GRANT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), dated this _____ day of ______________, 2018 (the “Effective Date”), is entered into by and between [PROPERTY OWNER] a Minnesota [ENTITY TYPE] (the “Grantee”), and the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (the “EDA”). RECITALS WHEREAS, Grantee is [the owner of] [a tenant at] certain Property located at __________________ in the City of Columbia Heights (the “City”), Anoka County, Minnesota, and legally described in Exhibit A hereto (the “Property”); WHEREAS, the EDA, in cooperation with the City and its police department, has instituted a Façade Improvement Grant Program (the “Program”) for the purpose of revitalizing existing store fronts, increasing business vitality and economic performance, and decreasing criminal activity; WHEREAS, as part of the Program, the EDA has proposed to make grants of money in the maximum amount of $5,000.00 per parcel of real property, to property owners, tenants, or nonprofit organizations, in order to revitalize, rehabilitate, and restore exterior store fronts within the Central Business District in the City (the “CBD”), increase business vitality and economic performance in the CBD, and in certain instances, to provide monitored surveillance within the CBD; and WHEREAS, Grantee desires to participate in the Program, on the terms and conditions set forth below. 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 12 June 4, 2018 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the agreements hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows: 1.Property Improvements: Grantee agrees to complete the improvements at the Property that are identified on Exhibit B attached hereto (the “Improvements”), subject to the following terms and conditions: a.If requested by the EDA, Grantee shall provide plans and specifications to the EDA, detailing the Improvements to be constructed (the “Plans”). If Grantee wishes to revise the Plans, Grantee must submit the revised Plans to the EDA at the address provided herein. The EDA shall give written notice of its approval or disapproval of the revisions to the Plans, and if the EDA does not give such written approval or disapproval within ten (10) business days after receipt of Grantee’s revised Plans, the EDA shall be deemed to have approved the revisions to the Plans. b.The Improvement shall be constructed consistently with the Plans, as the same may be revised pursuant to Section 1(a) herein. The cost to complete construction of the Improvements shall be defined as the “Improvement Costs.” The Improvements shall be completed in a first-class manner, consistent with the Plans, if any, and in compliance with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. Grantee shall obtain all required permits and approvals from the City and any other governing authority with jurisdiction over the Property related to the construction of the Improvements. The out-of-pocket costs for such permitting and approvals shall be the responsibility of Grantee, provided the same shall be included in the definition of “Improvement Costs,” and subject to the provisions of Section 2 of this Agreement. c.Grantee agrees to commence the Improvements within sixty (60) days following the Effective Date, and to complete the Improvements within six (6) months following the issuance of all necessary building permits, but in no event later than eight (8) months following the Effective Date. 2.Payment of Grant Funds: Grantee shall be responsible for making initial payment to all contractors involved in the construction of the Improvements. Upon final completion of the Improvements, Grantee shall make a written request to the EDA for reimbursement of one-half (1/2) of the actual Improvement Costs incurred by Grantee, but in no event shall the reimbursement exceed Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). The written request shall include: a.Proof of final inspection of the Improvements by the City building inspector; b.Before and after photographs of the Property, reflecting the Improvements made (as well as follow-up transmission of electronic files of such photographs), and reflecting that the Improvements were completed consistently with any approved Plans; c.A copy of the final invoice(s) received from the contractor(s) who completed the Improvements; and d.Proof of payment of invoice(s) that comprised the Improvement Costs. Following Grantee’s written request for reimbursement, Grantee shall cooperate with the EDA in delivering to the EDA such follow-up information as is reasonably requested by the EDA in order to review the Improvements and Improvement Costs reimbursement request. Within twenty-one (21) days following receipt of Grantee’s written request for reimbursement of Improvement Costs, the EDA shall: (i) make payment of the reimbursement, (ii) send Grantee written explanation of such other items 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 13 June 4, 2018 of information as are needed by the EDA to evaluate the reimbursement request, or (iii) send Grantee written explanation of the EDA’s reasons for denial of repayment of any of Grantee’s requested reimbursement. 3.Liability for Improvements: Neither the City nor the EDA shall in any event be liable to the Grantee, nor to any of its agents, employees, guests or invitees at the Property for, and the Grantee shall indemnify, save, defend, and hold harmless the City and the EDA from, any claims or causes of action, including attorney’s fees incurred by the City or the EDA, arising from defect or claimed defect of any of the Improvements, or arising from any action of the City or the EDA under this Agreement. This section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 4.Written Notice: Wherever any notice is required or permitted hereunder, such notice shall be in writing. Any notice or document required or permitted to be delivered hereunder shall be deemed to be delivered when actually received by the designated addressee or regardless of whether actually received or not, when deposited in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the parties hereto at their respective addresses, as set forth below, or at such other address as they may subsequently specify by written notice. If to the EDA: If to Grantee: Columbia Heights EDA ____________________ Community Development Department Attn: ________________ th 590 40 Avenue N.E. ____________________ Columbia Heights, MN 55421 ____________________ 5.Captions; Choice of Law; Etc. The paragraph headings or captions appearing in this Agreement are for convenience only, are not a part of this Agreement, and are not to be considered in interpreting this Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements between the parties regarding the subject matter contained herein. There are no verbal agreements that change this Agreement. This Agreement binds and benefits the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. This Agreement has been made under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and such laws will control its interpretation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantee and the EDA have signed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. GRANTEE: [_________________________] a [_______________________] By:____________________________ Name: _________________________ Its:____________________________ Date:__________________________ 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 14 June 4, 2018 EDA: COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY By: Name: _________________________ Its:____________________________ Date:__________________________ EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY EXHIBIT B PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS SUBJECT TO 50% REIMBURSEMENT 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 15 June 4, 2018 AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF LICENSE THIS AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF LICENSE (“Agreement”), dated this _____ day of ______________, 2018 (the “Effective Date”), is entered into by and between [PROPERTY OWNER] a Minnesota [ENTITY TYPE] (the “Owner”), and the City of Columbia Heights, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”). RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of certain Property located at ________________ in the City of Columbia Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota, and legally described in Exhibit A hereto (the “Property”); WHEREAS, the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (the “EDA”), in cooperation with the City and its police department, has instituted a Façade Improvement Grant Program (the “Program”) for the purpose of revitalizing existing store fronts, increasing business vitality and economic performance, and decreasing criminal activity; WHEREAS, as part of the Program, the City has proposed to place surveillance cameras on the front façade of certain buildings whose owners have elected to participate in the Program, and in connection with the placement of such surveillance cameras, house electronic recording equipment on the interior of said buildings (the “Surveillance”); and WHEREAS, Owner, or a tenant of the Property, desires to participate in the Program and desires to have the Property host Surveillance equipment for the improvement of public safety in and around the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the agreements hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows: 1.Grant of License: Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Owner hereby grants a license to the City for ten (10) years, commencing on _______________, 2018, and expiring on _________________, 2028 (the “License Term”), over the area of the façade of the Property described or depicted on Exhibit B hereto, together with space inside of the building located on the Property (the “Building”) for the housing of electronic recording equipment, as described or depicted on Exhibit B hereto (collectively, the “License Area”), for the following purposes: a.The City shall have the exclusive right subject to the terms of this Agreement to install, operate, maintain, repair and replace, all as deemed necessary by the City, the Surveillance equipment in the License Area. b.Though the City shall have the exclusive right to use the License Area within the Building, the City shall give the Owner reasonable advance notice before it accesses the License Area inside of the Building. “Reasonable advance notice” for purposes of this paragraph shall take into account the facts and circumstances giving rise to the City’s needing to enter the Building to access the License Area. 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 16 June 4, 2018 c.The City, and its agents and employees, shall have rights of ingress and egress throughout such portions of the Property as are reasonably necessary to access the License Area for the purpose of accessing the Surveillance equipment, subject to the provisions of Section 1(b) above, regarding interior areas of the Building. 2.License Fee: In consideration of the foregoing, including the Recitals to this Agreement, which are incorporated herein as an integral part of this Agreement, the City shall pay to Owner a one-time license fee of Ten Dollars ($10.00) for the license granted hereunder. 3.Maintenance and Repair: Owner shall at all times during the term of this Agreement keep the Property in commercially reasonable condition and repair, subject to ordinary wear and tear, and not permit through its own acts or the acts of its agents, employees, or invitees, damage to the Surveillance equipment or the License Area. Owner shall promptly report to the City any instance of damage to the Surveillance equipment or the License Area, regardless of causation. Any damage to the Surveillance equipment or License Area caused by Owner, or its agents, employees, guests or invitees (collectively, the “Owner Parties”), shall be repaired at the cost and expense of Owner; provided any such repairs shall be first approved by the City, and at the City’s election, done at the direction of the City. 4.Damage to Property: Any damage to the Surveillance equipment other than that caused by any of the Owner Parties shall be repaired or replaced, if at all, solely at the discretion of the City and at the cost and expense of the City, provided, in no event shall the City’s failure or delay to so repair or replace the Surveillance equipment constitute a waiver by the City of its rights under this Agreement, and the City shall be permitted to continue or discontinue its use of the License Area for the uses granted hereunder at any time during the License Term. 5.Utilities, Taxes, Expenses and Special Assessments: Owner shall be solely responsible for all real estate taxes, special property assessments, and utility expenses for the Property. The City shall be permitted to connect its Surveillance equipment to an electrical power source at the Property, and such electrical power shall be provided at the Owner’s expense, it being acknowledged that the Owner is benefiting from the improved public safety resulting from the Surveillance. 6.Termination of Agreement: This Agreement may not be terminated by the Owner prior to the expiration of the License Term. The City may terminate this Agreement for any reason or no reason, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the Owner. Upon the expiration of the License Term or earlier termination of this Agreement, the City shall remove all of the Surveillance equipment from the License Area, and shall make all reasonable efforts to cause minimal damage to the Property and License Area in so removing the Surveillance equipment. 7.Liability for Improvements: The City shall in no event be liable to the Owner, nor to any of Owner’s agents, employees, guests or invitees at the Property for, and the Owner shall indemnify, save, defend, and hold harmless the City from, any claims or causes of action, including attorney’s fees incurred by the City, arising from any action of the City under this Agreement. This section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 17 June 4, 2018 8.Written Notice: Wherever any notice is required or permitted hereunder, such notice shall be in writing. Any notice or document required or permitted to be delivered hereunder shall be deemed to be delivered when actually received by the designated addressee or regardless of whether actually received or not, when deposited in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the parties hereto at their respective addresses, as set forth below, or at such other address as they may subsequently specify by written notice. If to City: If to Owner: City of Columbia Heights ____________________ Community Development Department Attn: ________________ th 590 40 Avenue N.E. ____________________ Columbia Heights, MN 55421 ____________________ 9.Covenant to Run with Land: This Agreement shall be binding in all respects upon the parties hereto, their respective successors and assigns, and the Property. 10.Captions; Choice of Law; Etc. The paragraph headings or captions appearing in this Agreement are for convenience only, are not a part of this Agreement, and are not to be considered in interpreting this Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements between the parties regarding the License granted herein. There are no verbal agreements that change this Agreement. This Agreement binds and benefits the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. This Agreement has been made under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and such laws will control its interpretation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner and the City have signed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: [_________________________] a [_______________________] By:____________________________ Name: _________________________ Its:____________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of _____________, 2018, by __________________, the ________________ of _________________, a Minnesota _________________, who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of said _________________. __________________________________ Notary Public 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 18 June 4, 2018 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Owner and the City have signed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS a Minnesota municipal corporation By: _________________________ Donna Schmitt, Mayor By: __________________________ Walter Fehst, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of ____________, 2018, by Donna Schmitt and by Walter Fehst, respectively being the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Columbia Heights, a Minnesota municipal corporation, who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of said municipal corporation. __________________________________ Notary Public EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY EXHIBIT B DEPICTION AND/OR DESCRIPTION OF THE LICENSE AREA 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 19 June 4, 2018 OTHER BUSINESS: 1. Business Retention & Expansion Discussion Akua Opoku, intern with the Community Development Dept. since the end of February 2018, introduced herself to the Commission. She explained that one of her responsibilities is to develop the City’s first Business Retention and Expansion (BRE) Program. While developing this program she found it critical to better under Columbia Heights business community directly from the businesses themselves. In order to gain insight from businesses and to better develop a program that accurately reflects their needs, a business survey was developed for new and older business to provide their information and experiences to the City. She explained that the survey is designed to determine the business community’s wants, struggles, needs, and desires in order to be successful within our community. The following documents were provided to the members: *The Business Survey Process for the BRE Program for Columbia Heights *The Short Business Survey *The Long Business Survey *The Alternative Survey Return options *Survey Guidance Script Business Survey Process  STEP 1: How often should businesses take the survey (long & short)? New Businesses should take the short survey within 3-6 months of opening in Columbia Heights o Older Businesses (1 year or more in Columbia Heights) should take the long survey biannually o  STEP2: How surveys are distributed? The Community Development Dept. sends short and long surveys to the Fire Department o The Fire Dept. inspects all commercial property annually, generally October through February. o Rental licensing and property maintenance inspections the rest of the year. The Fire Dept. distributes the surveys o Process:   Fire Dept. welcomes new business to Columbia Heights and ask the manager or owner to complete the (long or short) business survey depending on if the business is new or older  During the building inspection the business survey is being filled out  At the end of the building inspection, the fire fighter collects the survey and leaves the business card of Keith Dahl from Community Development Dept.  Completed business surveys are then sent to Keith Dahl  STEP3: How surveys are collected? Process: Applies to Short & Long Surveys o Once the surveys are collected by the Fire department at the end of the inspection they are  sent to the Community Development Dept. The surveys are sent within one week of collection to the Community Development Dept. to  be entered into the computer system in the BRE Program folder 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 20 June 4, 2018 BUSINESS SURVEY (Short Form) Purpose: To gain a sense of Columbia Heights business community’s needs and desires Date: Business Name: Select Primary Business Sector:  Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing or Transportation/Warehousing Administration/Support/Waste Hunting Management/Remediation  Information Services  Mining  Finance/Insurance   Educational Services Utilities  Real Estate/Rental and Leasing   Health Care/Social Assistance Construction  Professional/Scientific/  Arts/Entertainment/Recreation  Technical Services Manufacturing  Accommodation/Food Services  Wholesale Trade Management of Companies  & Enterprises  Other Services Retail Trade Number of Employees: Part-Time: Full-Time: Facility (Owned or Leased): (Example: Owned- since Date or Leased-since Dates) BUSINESS FUTURE Business Projection: Where do you see you business heading in the coming years, short and long term? Does this business plan to (Check all that apply): □ Invest in new facili Please explain: Business Management Changes: Has the business’s ownership or top management change in the last year? Job Growth: In the next year, do you expect the number of jobs at this facility to:  Increase Decrease Stay the same Unsure BUSINESS SAFETY What are some of the most pressing public safety/crime related issues that impact your business? What can the City of Columbia Heights Police do to address the concerns raised above? City Advantages: Why is your business in Columbia Heights? City Challenges: What can the City do to better serve the business community? 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 21 June 4, 2018 5. Community Strengths/Weaknesses Based on the following factors, please rate this community as a place for your Rate 1-5: 1=Poor and 5=Excellent company to do business:  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.1 K-12 education  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.2 Higher education  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.3 Public transportation  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.4 Highway infrastructure  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.5 Air service  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.6 Telecommunications services  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.7 Business assistance  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.9 Cultural opportunities  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.10 Recreational opportunities  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.11 Crime Rate  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.12 Proximity to suppliers  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.13 Availability of buildings  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.14 Availability of land  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.15 Availability of housing  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.16 Energy reliability  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.17 Regulatory enforcement (fair &  1 2 3 4 5 N/a equitable) 5.18 Energy cost  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.19 Local taxes  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.20 Cost of buildings  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.21 Cost of land  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.22 Cost of housing  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.23 Labor costs  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 22 June 4, 2018 BUSINESS SURVEY (Long Form) Purpose: To gain a sense of the business community’s time in Columbia Heights and continued needs Date: Business Name: Select Primary Business Sector:  Agriculture/Forestry/Fishing or Transportation/Warehousing Administration/Support/Waste Hunting  Management/Remediation Information  Services Mining  Finance/Insurance   Educational Services  Utilities Real Estate/Rental and   Health Care/Social Assistance Leasing Construction   Arts/Entertainment/Recreation Manufacturing Professional/Scientific/   Technical Services Accommodation/Food Services Wholesale Trade   Management of Companies Other Services Retail Trade & Enterprises Number of Employees: Part-Time: Full-Time: Wage Range for Employees: (i.e.) $15-$30hr Types of Positions Available: (i.e.) Manager, Host, Cashier, Assistant, etc. Facility (Owned or Leased): (Example: Owned- since Date or Leased-since Dates) BUSINESS TIME IN CITY: Has your business felt supported by the City since opening your business in Columbia Heights? Has your business utilized the business resources on the city website? If so which one(s)? Do you think the City needs to provide more resources for businesses? If so what kind of resources? BUSINESS FUTURE Business Projection: Where do you see your business heading in the coming years, short and long term? Does this business plan to (Check all that apply): □ Invest in new facili Please explain: 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 23 June 4, 2018 Business Management Changes: Has the business’s ownership or top management change in the last year? Job Growth: In the next year, do you expect the number of jobs at this facility to:  Increase Decrease Stay the same Unsure BUSINESS SAFETY What are some of the most pressing public safety/crime related issues that impact your business? What can the City of Columbia Heights Police do to address the concerns raised above? Does your business have security cameras internally, externally, or both? City Advantages: Why is your business in Columbia Heights? City Challenges: What can the City do to better serve the business community? 5. Community Strengths/Weaknesses Based on the following factors, please rate this community as a place for your Rate 1-5: 1=Poor and 5=Excellent company to do business:  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.1 K-12 education  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.2 Higher education  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.3 Public transportation  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.4 Highway infrastructure  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.5 Air service  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.6 Telecommunications services  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.7 Business assistance  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.8 Sewage treatment  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.9 Cultural opportunities  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.10 Recreational opportunities  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.11 Crime Rate  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.12 Proximity to suppliers  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.13 Availability of buildings  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.14 Availability of land  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.15 Availability of housing  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.16 Energy reliability  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.17 Regulatory enforcement (fair & equitable) 20180604_EDA_Minutes 5.18 Energy cost  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.19 Local taxes  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.20 Cost of buildings  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.21 Cost of land  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.22 Cost of housing  1 2 3 4 5 N/a 5.23 Labor costs  1 2 3 4 5 N/a Alternative Survey Return Options 1.MAIN OPTION: Give completed survey to Fireman after about 45min inspection is complete 2.Provide an envelope for businesses to mail back completed surveys a.Concerns: i.Does the City provide the stamps? ii.How much are stamps? $0.49 each 1.For the City to pay: 50 business surveys cost $24.50 100 business surveys cost $49.00 200 business surveys cost $98.00 iii.Is this a significant obstacle for businesses sending back surveys? 3.Drop off the completed survey at the Fire Department or Community Development Department a.Concerns: i.Can people drop off the survey in the time frame City Hall or Public Safety is open? 1.Possible Solution: Drop off survey in the utility box outside City Hall then the staff in utilities would direct the surveys to Community Development Incentive Ideas: What incentive do businesses have to send the survey back?  Give away Columbia Heights gifts that are in storage  The City will be more likely to tailor resources to help that particular business  City can let businesses know of opportunities and resources  Businesses will be flagged as a “non-complete survey” business  A chance to be entered into some type of prize lottery once a survey is submitted to the City Follow Up Tactics: An effort to obtain a 100% return rate  STEP 1: A red flag will be tagged to the business and recorded with the Fire Dept. & the Community Development Dept. that the City is waiting for their survey  STEP 2: Within two days of receiving survey the Fire Dept. or Community Dev. will call businesses to remind them to submit their completed survey to the City and remind them of the benefits of submitting the survey  Send out a notice to complete the survey Concern: o What’s the cost to send out paper notices?  Who will distribute notices?  20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 25 June 4, 2018 Fire Department Script for Business Survey Distribution & Collection Process There may be some questions that come up when individuals are completing their surveys. Here are some potential answers for sections of the survey.  Basic Business Information This information helps the City gain a sense of what kind of businesses Columbia Heights is o attracting Wages & Positions: To gain a better sense of job opportunities in the City o  Business Time In City To gain a sense of what resources business need to succeed o  Business Future This will help the City be better able to tailor resources and opportunities to help your business o succeed Business Management Question: This helps the City know who to contact in the future if a resource, o opportunity, or concern arises  Business Safety The City wants to know the business perspective on public safety and crime levels in the Columbia o Heights Surveillance: There is a grant program available through the City called the Façade Improvement o Grant Program that’s an opportunity to improve building exterior and get surveillance cameras for the business. To get more information you can contact the City’s Community Development Department.  City Advantages This is to gain a sense of what attracts businesses and help with business recruitment for Columbia o Heights.  City Disadvantages To gain fresh ideas on how to tackle community challenges o  Community Strength & Weaknesses For the City to gain a more detailed sense of the community from the residents o Questions/Comments Murzyn asked if the survey was mandatory and how that could be enforced. Akua stated it will be highly encouraged for them to fill it out as the information provided will help the City develop programs that may help them succeed. She reviewed some of the possible incentives that were included in the “Survey Return Options” that could be used to increase the cooperation of the business owners. Szurek asked if it would go out to all businesses. Akua stated that it would go out to businesses along Central Ave first and then expand throughout the City. If the Fire Dept. disburses these during their annual inspections, it would go out according to their scheduled visits. 20180604_EDA_Minutes EDA Minutes Page 26 June 4, 2018 Buesgens asked if they would have the option of filling it out on-line. Dahl said that is not an option right now, but with the new Communications person on board, it may be sometime in the future. Fehst said businesses already receive a lot of surveys and other routine mail requesting information, so it may be considered “garbage mail” to some. Small business owners don’t have the time to deal with a lot of these requests. Szurek agreed and suggested it be shortened up. She asked if other communities had tried this type of survey. Akua stated that she obtained information from other cities such as Coon Rapids, Blaine, and Anoka who have gone through this process. We incorporated some of the same questions into our survey. Buesgens felt we may get better results if staff would go visit the businesses personally and not do through the Fire Dept inspection time. She felt the personal contact and a chance to speak with the owners may bring better results. Buesgens then asked if we have an updated business list yet. Dahl said staff is still working on that. Fehst asked how long staff thought it would take to get some measureable feedback. Hogeboom thought 1-2 years. Hogeboom told members that another project the City is working on to help the business community is holding a job fair this fall. He said the City is partnering with the School District, Police Dept, Business Council, and other various City Depts. to help match up students and adults with local businesses that may be hiring. Dahl announced that the EDA will not hold a meeting in July. Motion by Buesgens, seconded by Murzyn to adjourn the meeting at 6:40 pm. Respectfully submitted, Shelley Hanson Secretary 20180604_EDA_Minutes