Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-12-06 P&ZCN COLUMBIA HEIGHTS- Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting December 6th, 2016 7:00pm Columbia Heights City Hall 590 40th Avenue NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 1. Call to Order and Roll Call. a. Approval of November 1st, 2016, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes 2. Public Hearings a. Case # 2016 -1201, Preliminary /Final Plat 4400 Stinson Blvd., Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Thomas Brama, Property Owner b. Case # 2016 -1202, Conditional Use Permit 4259 Central Ave. NE., Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Joey Crary, Indigo Sign Works on behalf of Holiday Station Stores c. Case # 2016 -1203, Zoning Amendment (Rezoning) 3989 Central Ave. NE., Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Nancy Aleksuk, 500 LLC 3. Other Business a. Vacancy on the Planning and Zoning Commission: Connie Buesgens elected to Columbia Heights City Council. b. New Planning and Zoning Commissioner to be appointed in January. 4. Adjourn 12 -6 -16 MINUTES OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 1, 2016 7:00 PM The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm by Chair Szurek. Commission Members present- Schill, Hoium, and Szurek. Buesgens arrived at 7:04 pm. Members Absent: Fiorendino Also present were Elizabeth Holmbeck (Planner), and Shelley Hanson (Secretary) along with Council Liaison, John Murzyn. Motion by Hoium , seconded by Schill, to approve the minutes from the meeting of Oct 4th, 2016 All ayes. MOTIONPASSED. PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE NO.: 2016 -1101 APPLICANT: Brian Beaufeaux, IAE Leasing, LLC. LOCATION: 1016 44th Avenue NE., Columbia Heights, MN 55421 REQUEST: Minor Subdivision At this time, Brian Beaufeaux on behalf of IAE Leasing, LLC has requested a Minor Subdivision per City Code Section 9.104 (k), for the subject property located at 1016 44th Avenue NE. The applicant wishes to split the existing residential lot into two residential lots. The current lot is 19,600 sq. ft. (70' wide X 280' long). Currently, there is a single family home on the northern portion of the lot, and a detached garage on the southern end of the lot. The property has been recently sold and the new owner is proposing to subdivide the existing lot to allow for future residential development on the newly created lot. The proposed subdivision meets the guidelines in the Zoning Code. A narrative provided by the applicant is attached. ZONING ORDINANCE The subject property is located in the R -2A, One and Two - Family Residential District, as are the properties to the north. The properties to the south, east and west, are located in the R -2A One and Two Family District, the R -2B, Built as Duplexes District and R -3, Multiple Family District. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for low density residential development. According to the City's Comprehensive Plan, low density residential development is defined as single family detached, and single family attached dwellings (twin- homes /duplexes). DESIGN GUIDELINES The subject property is not located in the Design Guideline Overlay District. SITE PLAN The applicant has submitted a survey of the existing conditions and legal description for the site, and a survey showing the two subdivided lots and proposed legal descriptions. The proposed subdivision of land meets the City's Zoning Ordinance in terms of lot size and lot width to approve a subdivision for the property. P & Z Minutes Page 2 Nov 1, 2016 FINDINGS OF FACT Section 9.104 (K) of the Zoning Code outlines specific conditions in order for the City Council to approve a minor subdivision. They are as follows: 1. The proposed subdivision of land will not result in more than three lots. The proposed subdivision will result in two conforming lots. 2. The proposed subdivision of land does not involve the vacation of existing easements. No vacation of existing easements will occur as a result of the minor subdivision. 3. All lots to be created by the proposed subdivision conform to lot area and width requirements established for the zoning district in which the property is located. The newly created lots will both conform to the lot width and lot area requirements established for the property for the property's zoning designation. 4. The proposed subdivision does not require the dedication of public rights -of -way for the purpose of gaining access to the property. This is correct. 5. The property has not previously been divided through the minor subdivision provisions of this article. This is correct. 6. The proposed subdivision does not hinder the conveyance of land. This is correct. The proposed subdivision does not hinder the making of assessments or the keeping of records related to assessments. This is correct. 8. The proposed subdivision meets all of the design standards specified in Section 9.115. This is correct. Staff review finds that the application meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the proposed minor subdivision for the property located at 1016 40' Avenue NE., Columbia Heights, MN 55421. Questions from members: Szurek asked how the low area will affect the placement of the house and if soil borings had been done to find out the soil conditions to see if it is actually a buildable lot. P & Z Minutes Page 3 Nov 1, 2016 Holmbeck said Engineering has recommended that a structure be placed as close to 43 % Ave as possible while still meeting the necessary setbacks to avoid the low area that does flood from time to time. She said that flooding occurs across the middle of the property and has flooded the existing garage before and comes close to the existing house along 44`h Avenue. Holmbeck said the lot split submitted does meet the requirements to establish two lots with adequate square footage on each. She stated that corrections will need to be made to the drainage of the lot according to the City Engineer's Report before construction can occur. This will be handled during the permitting and plan review process. Holmbeck said it may cost more to make the necessary corrections, but that is not the issue before the Commission. It is up to the developer how much money they want to put into building a structure on the property. Hoium asked if the owner doesn't build on the extra lot, if it would result in less taxes being collected. Holmbeck didn't know what the tax difference would be. Szurek asked why the lot wasn't split evenly across the middle. Holmbeck said it was split where it was in order for the owner to meet square footage requirements for the existing single family home, as well as the square footage for a possible double bungalow on the vacant piece (once the garage is removed) that will face 43 % Avenue. Szurek stated that the lot may technically meet the square footage requirements, but much of it is unbuildable low area and wondered if it would be large enough to accommodate a double bungalow. Public Hearing Opened. Paul Ramacher from 1025 44"' Avenue said he is a surveyor and that the proposed lot split is questionable in his opinion. He said he would have no problem if it were divided down the middle with plans for a single family home to be constructed. His problem is adding another double bungalow that will be rented out in a neighborhood that is already unkept due to the large number of rental property in the immediate vicinity. Ramacher said he understands the owner is trying to maximize his profit from this investment, but the City needs to make decisions that are best for the community. They should be looking at other things rather than just tax dollars. Ramacher felt that the only way to improve the neighborhood would be to add more single family homes into the mix of apartment buildings and double bungalow rentals. Mike Guzik from 1030 44"' Avenue is two houses up from the existing house. He agrees with Ramacher. He also isn't opposed to a single family home being constructed, but is opposed to more rental properties. It is becoming a neighborhood of all rentals, and he would like to see owner - occupied single family homes. The rental properties aren't kept up now and he is constantly calling the Fire/Police Departments regarding lack of lawn maintenance, noise issues, the unsightly condition of the homes, and debris in the yards. He told the members that it is time they give some thought to the actual homeowners who live in these neighborhoods. Holmbeck reminded the audience and the members that this Public Hearing is for the lot split only to see if it meets City requirements. Future plans for the lot would be discussed later. Brian Beaufeaux, owner of the property and the applicant, told members he had done core sample testing of the site and it is a buildable lot. He has a report if they wish to see a copy. He told members he would be fixing up the existing house so that his son can move into it. He set up the lot split the way he did to meet the requirements of the City Code that would leave him options to construct either a single family home or a double bungalow. He has talked to builders who are hesitant to construct a single family home because they don't think it will sell. If he builds a double bungalow, which it is zoned for, his company would be managing the property. P & Z Minutes Page 4 Nov. 1, 2016 Buesgens disagreed with him and thought a single family home would sell and explained why mixing some additional single family homes into a neighborhood such as this would help make for a better neighborhood all around. Schill asked if he decided to build a single family home if he would leave the lot size the same as this proposal. Beaufeaux stated it would remain the same. He said the low area across the middle in the easement area is unusable anyways so it wouldn't matter which lot it is a part of Paul Craven from 1042 43 %= Avenue lives to the east of the vacant piece. He acknowledged that it is noisy due to a concentration of rental properties and that kids often times play in the streets. He said a double bungalow wouldn't be out of place, but a single family home certainly would be preferred. He thinks parking will be an additional problem. Hoium asked what the conditional use is that will be considered. Holmbeck said this request is for the subdivision of the lot only and if it meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The second item that will be considered is the Conditional Use that is required before the use can operate. If he was proposing a single family home, he wouldn't need a CUP, but because he is considering the construction of a double bungalow, a CUP is necessary. Paul Ramacher wants the Planning & Zoning Commission to deny his request. Mike Guzik asked if the lot split is approved, how many of the members really believed he would ever consider building a single family home. He believes money will drive him to build another double bungalow, which the neighborhood does not need. Buesgens said it is the job of the Commission to enforce the Zoning Ordinance. She said the owner has the right to make the request. The Code allows for this. If we vote against what is allowed by Code, it opens the door for legal action unless a reasonable reason is found that determines the request to be detrimental or harmful. Schill agreed that if it meets requirements, they need to approve it legally. Szurek encouraged residents to attend the City Council meeting on November 14a' as they will make the final decision on this. The Planning & Zoning Commission is an advisory board only. She also said that the City Attorney can answer any of the legal questions they have as he will be present at that meeting. Even though it was the consensus of the Board that they don't want it developed with additional rental units in this neighborhood either, they must make their recommendation based on whether it meets the requirements of the code. Since this meets both the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, they cannot deny the request. Buesgens stated we need to make changes to the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan in order to prevent this in the future if the City would like more control over the type of construction that is proposed. Public Hearing Closed Motion by Hoium , seconded by Buesgens, to waive the reading of Resolution NO. 2016 -104, there being ample copies available to the public. All ayes. MOTIONPASSED. P & Z Minutes Page 5 Nov 1, 2016 Motion by Hoium , seconded by Buesgens, that the Planning and Zoning Commission reluctantly recommends the City Council approve the minor subdivision of the property located at 1016 44Th Avenue NE., subject to certain conditions of approval that have been found to be necessary to protect the public interest and ensure compliance with the provisions of the Zoning and Development Ordinance, including: 1. The applicant shall be responsible for filing the approved subdivision with the Anoka County Recorder's Office. The approved minor subdivision will become invalid if the subdivision is not filed with the Anoka County recorder's Office within one year of the date of City Council action. 2. The applicant shall meet the requirements outlined in the report from the Public Works Director /City Engineer dated October 26m, 2016. 3. The applicant is required to remove the existing garage on the south end of the current lot within 6 months from the dated of City Council action. 4. The applicant shall provide required utility and drainage easements for all newly created lots and be responsible for the cost of filing and recording written easements with the Anoka County Recorder's Office. 5. The applicant shall pay parkland dedication fees for each lot created beyond the original number of lots existing prior to subdivision, except when such fees have been applied to the property as part of a previous subdivision. All ayes. MOTION PASSED. The following Resolution will go to the City Council November 14, 2016. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-104 A Resolution of the City Council for the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, approving a Minor Subdivision in accordance with City Code Section 9.104 (k), for the property located at 1016 44`h Avenue NE. Whereas, a proposal (Case # 2016 -1101) has been submitted by Brian Beaufeaux on behalf of IAE Leasing, LLC to the City council requesting approval of a minor Subdivision from the City of Columbia Heights at the following site: ADDRESS: 1016 44`h Avenue NE. LEGAL DSCRIPTION: On file at City Hall. THE APPLICANT SEKS THE FOLLOWING: Minor Subdivision approval per City Code Section 9.104 (k). Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing as required by the City Zoning Code on November 1, 2016; Whereas, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the effect of the proposed Minor Subdivision upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community and its Comprehensive Plan, as well as any concerns related to compatibility of uses, traffic, property values, light, air, danger of fire, and risk to public safety in the surrounding areas; Now, therefore, in accordance with the foregoing, and all ordinances and regulations of the City of Columbia Heights, the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT Section 9.104 (K) of the Zoning Code outlines specific conditions in order for the City Council to approve a minor subdivision. They are as follows: P & Z Minutes Page 6 Nov 1, 2016 1. The proposed subdivision of land will not result in more than three lots. 2. The proposed subdivision of land does not involve the vacation of existing easements. 3. All lots to be created by the proposed subdivision conform to lot area and width requirements established for the zoning district in which the property is located. 4. The proposed subdivision does not require the dedication of public rights -of -way for the purpose of gaining access to the property. 5. The property has not previously been divided through the minor subdivision provisions of this article. 6. The proposed subdivision does not hinder the conveyance of land. 7. The proposed subdivision does not hinder the making of assessments or the keeping of records related to assessments. 8. The proposed subdivision meets all of the design standards specified in Section 9.115. Further, be it resolved, that the attached plans, maps, and other information shall become part of this Minor Subdivision Approval; and in granting approval the City and the applicant agree that the Minor Subdivision shall become null and void if the Subdivision has not been filed with the Anoka county Recorder's Office within one (1) calendar year after the approval date. CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall be responsible for filing the approved subdivision with the Anoka County Recorder's Office. The approved minor subdivision will become invalid if the subdivision is not filed with the Anoka County recorder's Office within one year of the date of City Council action. 2. The applicant shall meet all the requirements outlined in the report from the Public Works Director /City Engineer dated October 26th, 2016. 3. The applicant is required to remove the existing garage on the south end of the current lot within 6 months from the dated of City Council action. 4. The applicant shall provide required utility and drainage easements for all newly created lots and be responsible for the cost of filing and recording written easements with the Anoka County Recorder's Office. 5. The applicant shall pay parkland dedication fees for each lot created beyond the original number of lots existing prior to subdivision, except when such fees have been applied to the property as part of a previous subdivision. CASE NO. 2016 -1102 APPLICANT: Brian Beaufeaux, IAE Leasing, LLC. LOCATION: 1016 44`n Avenue NE., Columbia Heights, NIN 55421 REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit At this time, Brian Beaufeaux on behalf of IAE Leasing, LLC is requesting a Conditional Use Permit per Code Section 9.109 (F) (3) to allow a two - family dwelling to be built on the property located at 1016 446' Avenue NE. IAE Leasing, LLC has recently purchased the property and is applying to have the lot subdivided to allow for future development of a two - family dwelling on the newly created southern lot. The proposed Conditional Use Permit meets the guidelines in the Zoning Code. A narrative provided by the applicant is attached. P & Z Minutes Page 7 Nov 1, 2016 ZONING ORDINANCE The subject property is located in the R -2A, One and Two - Family Residential District, as are the properties to the north. The properties to the south, east and west, are located in the R -2A One and Two Family District, the R -2B, Built as Duplexes District and R -3, Multiple Family District. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for low density residential development. According to the City's Comprehensive Plan, low density residential development is defined as single family detached, and single family attached dwellings (twin- homes /duplexes). The proposed Conditional Use Permit to allow for a two - family dwelling is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. DESIGN GUIDELINES The subject property is not located in the Design Guideline Overlay District. FINDINGS OF FACT Section 9.104 (H) of the Zoning Ordinance outlines nine conditions that must be met in order for the City Council to grant a Conditional Use Permit. They are as follows: (a) The use is one of the conditional uses listed for the zoning district in which the property is located, or is a substantially similar use as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Two - Family dwellings are specifically listed as a Conditional Use in the R -2A, One and Two- Family Residential Zoning District. (b) The use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area for residential uses. The use is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan as the Conditional Use Permit allows for Two - Family residential development. (e) The use will not impose hazards or disturbing influences on neighboring properties. Theproposed use is defined as low- density residential and should not disrupt neighboringproperties. In order to mitigate any potential disturbances, the City's Zoning Code outlines Specific Development Standards 9.107 (C) (52) and General Provisions 9.109 that address Two - Family Residential Development. (d) The use will not substantially diminish the use of the property in the immediate vicinity. The use ofproperty in the immediate vicinity will not be diminished by residential development at 1016 44Th Avenue NE. (e) The use will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained in a manner that is compatible with the appearance of the existing or intended character of the surrounding area. Since the surrounding area is currently comprised of a mix of singlefamily, two-family and multiple family residential, it is anticipated that the use will be compatible with the existing and intended character of the surrounding area. Additionally, the applicant will have to abide by specific development standards, construction and engineering standards as they relate to any future development on the lot. These standards will help ensure compatibility with the appearance of the existing surrounding area. P & Z Minutes Page 8 Nov 1, 2016 (f) The use and property upon which the use is located are adequately served by essential public facilities and services. This is correct (g) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to minimize traffic congestion on the public streets and to provide for appropriate on -site circulation of traffic. This is correct (h) The use will not cause a negative cumulative effect, when considered in conjunction with the cumulative effect of other uses in the immediate vicinity. Since the surrounding area is currently comprised of a mix ofsingle family, two-family and multiple family residential, it is anticipated that the use will be compatible with the surrounding area and not cause a negative cumulative effect on other uses in the surrounding area. (i) The use complies with all other applicable regulations for the districts in which it is located. This is correct. Staff review finds that the application meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the proposed Conditional Use Permit for the property located at 1016 44"' Avenue NE., Columbia Heights, MN 55421. Questions from members• Hoium asked what the minimum lot width is for this zoning district. Holmbeck told him 60 feet and this lot is 70 feet wide. Hoium then said he believes that "C" & "D" in the Findings of Fact are not met, and therefore he would recommend denial of this request. Buesgens asked why a CUP is needed in the first place since it is zoned "R2" which allows for single family or two family homes already, and he hasn't submitted specific plans yet so that applicable conditions can't necessarily be established. Holmbeck said the Zoning Ordinance requires a CUP in order to construct a two family residence which is why it is brought before the Commission at this time. Public Hearing Opened. Mike Guzik (1030 44`x' Ave) reiterated his reasons for not wanting another double bungalow in the area which would definitely be rental property. Paul Ramacher (1025 44h Ave) agrees that "C" is not met in the Findings in Fact and believes the Commission should use that reason to deny the CUP request. He said all the rentals in this City put additional stress on Police Dept. personnel. Brian Beaufeaux told members he had applied for the Lot Split and CUP in good faith and that his request meets the requirements. He doesn't believe they can change the rules just because they don't like his plan. P & Z Minutes Page 9 Nov. 1, 2016 Public Hearing Closed Motion by Hoium , seconded by Buesgens , to waive the reading of Resolution NO. 2016 -105, there being ample copies available to the public. All ayes. MOTIONPASSED. Motion by Hoium, seconded by Schill, that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that the City Council deny the conditional use permit for the property located at 1016 44'' Avenue NE., based on the fact that "C" & "D" of the Findings of Fact are not met. "C" —The use will not impose hazards or disturbing influences on neighboring properties and "D " -- The use will not substantially diminish the use of the property in the immediate vicinity. This CUP was also subject to certain conditions for approval that have been found to be necessary to protect the public interest and ensure compliance with the provisions of the Zoning and Development Ordinance, including: 1. The applicant shall meet the requirements outlined in the report from the Public Works Director /City Engineer dated October 26, 2016 2. The applicant is required to remove the existing garage on the south end of the current lot within development can occur on the lot. 6 months from the dated of City Council action. The garage must be removed before any future 3. Before a Building Permit can be obtained for future residential development, the property owner must meet with City Engineering Staff to address localized flooding concerns. Any new development will be required to meet any Engineering requirements that are deemed necessary to mitigate future flooding, or soil erosion. 4. Future Two - Family Residential development that occurs on the lot must adhere to the City's Zoning Code requirements. The development is required to provide enclosed parking spaces that meet City requirements. Any outdoor, off - street parking areas containing six or more parking spaces must be screened with landscaping and /or fencing from adjacent residential properties per City Code requirements. 5. The building and site shall be meet all requirements found in the Fire Code and the Building Code. 6 All other applicable local, state, and federal requirements shall be met at all times. All ayes. MOTIONPASSED. The following Resolution will go to the City Council at the November 14, 2016 meeting. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-105 A resolution of the City Council for the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, approving a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with City Code Section 9.109 (F) (3), for the property located at 1016 44`" Avenue NE. Whereas, a proposal (Case # 2016 -1102) has been submitted by Brian Beaufeaux on behalf of IAE Leasing, LLC to the City council requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Columbia Heights at the following site: ADDRESS: 1016 44" Avenue NE. LEGAL DSCRIPTION: On file at City Hall. THE APPLICANT SEKS THE FOLLOWING: Conditional Use Permit approval per City Code Section 9.109 (F) (3). P & Z Minutes Page 10 Nov 1, 2016 Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing as required by the City Zoning Code on November 1, 2016; Whereas, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the effect of the proposed Conditional Use Permit upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community and its Comprehensive Plan, as well as any concerns related to compatibility of uses, traffic, property values, fire, and risk to public safety in the surrounding areas; light, air, danger of Now, therefore, in accordance with the foregoing, and all ordinances and regulations of the City of Columbia Heights, the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT Section 9.104 (H) of the Zoning Ordinance outlines nine conditions that must be met in order for the City Council to grant a Conditional Use Permit. They are as follows: (a) The use is one of the conditional uses listed for the zoning district in which the property is located, or is a substantially similar use as determined by the Zoning Administrator. (b) The use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. (c) The use will not impose hazards or disturbing influences on neighboring properties. (d) The use will not substantially diminish the use of the property in the immediate vicinity. (e) The use will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained in a manner that is compatible with the appearance of the existing or intended character of the surrounding area. (f) The use and property upon which the use is located are adequately served by essential public facilities and services. (g) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to minimize traffic congestion on the public streets and to Provide for appropriate on -site circulation of traffic. (h) The use will not cause a negative cumulative effect, when considered in conjunction with the cumulative effect of other uses in the immediate vicinity. (i) The use complies with all other applicable regulations for the districts in which it is located. Further, be it resolved, that the attached plans, maps, and other information shall become part of this Conditional Use Permit Approval. CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall meet the requirements outlined in the report from the Public Works Director /City Engineer dated October 26`, 2016. 2. The applicant is required to remove the existing garage on the south end of the current lot within 6 months from the dated of City Council action. The garage must be removed before any future development can occur on the lot. P & Z Minutes Page 11 Nov 1, 2016 3. Before a Building Permit can be obtained for future residential development, the property owner must meet with City Engineering Staff to address localized flooding concerns. Any new development will be required to meet any Engineering erosion, requirements that are deemed necessary to mitigate future flooding, or soil 4. Future Two - Family Residential development that occurs on the lot must adhe re to th e City's Zoning Code requirements. The development is required to provide enclosed parking spaces that meet City requirements. Any outdoor, off - street parking areas containing six or more parking spaces must be screened with landscaping and/or fencing from adjacent residential properties per City Code requirements. 5. The building and site shall be meet all requirements found in the Fire Code and the Building Code. 6. All other applicable local, state, and federal requirements shall be met at all times. OTHER BUSINESS Holmbeck told members that the RFP for the Comprehensive plan Con Publications so the process is moving along. sultant has been released in several The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 pm, Respectfully submitted, Shelley Hanson Secretary CH COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PLANNING REPORT CASE NUMBER: 2016 -1201 DATE: November 29, 2016 TO: Columbia Heights Planning and Zoning Commission APPLICANT: Thomas Brama, Property Owner DEVELOPMENT: Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of T3 Addition for Thomas Brama LOCATION: 4400 Stinson Blvd. NE. REQUEST: Preliminary Plat and Final Plat PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Holmbeck, City Planner INTRODUCTION At this time, Thomas Brama has requested a Preliminary and Final Plat for the property located at 4400 Stinson Blvd. NE. The site is currently comprised of 2 lots. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing lot line, and re -plat the property to result in five single family residential lots. Once the plat has been approved, the applicant is proposing to keep the existing home on one of the newly created lots and build 4 new single family residential homes on the remaining newly created lots. ZONING ORDINANCE The site is currently comprised of two lots. The properties are located in the R1, Single Family Residential Zoning District. The properties to the north, south and west are also located in the R1, Single Family Residential Zoning District. The properties to the east are located in the City of St. Anthony. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Low Density Residential Development. The City's Comprehensive Plan aims to identify new areas that can support single family housing and to encourage newer higher valued housing opportunities to provide move -up housing for existing and new residents. Re- platting the property to allow for the construction of new single family homes is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. DESIGN GUIDELINES The subject property is not located in the Design Guideline Overlay District and as such, is not governed by the Design Guideline standards. City of Columbia Heights Planning and Zoning Commission December 6, 2016 Planning Report Page 2 FINDINGS OF FACT Section 9.104 (L), (M) of the Zoning Ordinance outlines conditions that must be met in order for the City to grant a Preliminary and Final Plat. They are as follows: (a) The proposed preliminary plat conforms with the requirements of § 9.115. The proposed Preliminary Plat meets the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance (b) The proposed subdivision is consistent with the comprehensive plan. This is correct. The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for low- density Residential. (c) The proposed subdivision contains parcel and land subdivision layout that is consistent with good planning and site engineering design principles. This is correct. The proposed subdivision meets the City's requirements in terms of lot dimension and lot width. (d) The Final Plat substantially conforms to the corresponding Preliminary Plat. This is correct. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the proposed Preliminary and Final Plat for the property located at 4400 Stinson Boulevard NE. Motion: Move to waive the reading of Resolution No. 2016 -119, there being ample copies available to the public. Motion: That the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary and final Plat, for the property located at 4400 Stinson Boulevard NE. subject to certain conditions of approval that have been found to be necessary to protect the public interest and ensure compliance with the provisions of the Zoning and Development Ordinance, including: 1. All required state and local codes, permits, licenses and inspections will be met and in full compliance. 2. Before a building permit can be issued, the applicant shall meet the requirements outlined in the attached report from the Public Works Director /City Engineer, dated November 23, 2016. 3. The private driveway will need to be constructed to hold the weight of a fire vehicle, approximately 45,000 to 50,000 lbs. Construction plans for the driveway must be approved by the Fire Chief. City of Columbia Heights Planning and Zoning Commission December 6, 2016 Planning Report Page 3 4. The applicant shall be responsible for the cost of filing and recording written easements with the Anoka County Recorder's Office. 5. An approved Preliminary Plat shall be valid for a period of one year from the date of the City Council approval. In the event that a Final Plat is not submitted to the City Council within this time period, the Preliminary Plat will become void. 6. Upon approval of a Final Plat, the applicant shall be responsible for filing and recording the Final Plat with the Anoka County Recorder's Office within one year of the date of City Council action. In the event that a Final Plat is not recorded within this time period, the Final Plat will become void. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016 -119 Preliminary Plat /Final Plat Application Applicant's Narrative Location Map Public Work Report Preliminary Plat Final Plat Subdivision Plans RESOLUTION NO. 2016 -119 A resolution of the City Council for the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, approving a Preliminary Plat and Final Plat for Thomas Brama for the property located at 4400 Stinson Blvd. NE. Whereas, a proposal (Case # 2016 -1201) has been submitted by Thomas Brama to the City Council requesting Preliminary Plat Approval from the City of Columbia Heights at the following site: ADDRESS: 4400 Stinson Blvd. NE. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: On file at City Hall. THE APPLICANT SEEKS THE FOLLOWING: Preliminary Plat and Final Plat Approval per Code Section 9.104 (L) (M). Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing as required by the City Zoning Code on December 6th, 2016; Whereas, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the effect of the proposed Preliminary Plat and Final Plat upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community and its Comprehensive Plan, as well as any concerns related to compatibility of uses, traffic, property values, light, air, danger of fire, and risk to public safety in the surrounding areas; Now, therefore, in accordance with the foregoing, and all ordinances and regulations of the City of Columbia Heights, the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT Section 9.104 (L) (M) of the Zoning Ordinance outlines conditions that must be met in order for the City to grant a Preliminary and Final Plat. They are as follows: (a) The proposed Preliminary Plat conforms to the requirements of City Code Section 9.115. (b) The proposed Subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (c) The proposed Subdivision contains parcel and land subdivision layout that is consistent with good planning and site engineering design principles. (d) The Final Plat substantially conforms to the corresponding Preliminary Plat. Further, be it resolved, that the attached plans, maps, and other information shall become part of this Preliminary Plat and Final Plat Approval; and in granting approval the City and the applicant agree that the Plat shall become null and void if the project has not been completed within one (1) calendar year after the approval date, subject to petition for renewal. CONDITIONS 1. All required state and local codes, permits, licenses and inspections will be met and in full compliance. 2. Before a building permit can be issued, the applicant shall meet the requirements outlined in the City of Columbia Heights - Council Resolution Page 2 attached report from the Public Works Director /City Engineer, dated November 23, 2016. 3. The private driveway will need to be constructed to hold the weight of a fire vehicle, approximately 45,000 to 50,000 lbs. Construction plans for the driveway must be approved by the Fire Chief. 4. The applicant shall be responsible for the cost of filing and recording written easements with the Anoka County Recorder's Office. 5. An approved Preliminary Plat shall be valid for a period of one year from the date of the City Council approval. In the event that a Final Plat is not submitted to the City Council within this time period, the Preliminary Plat will become void. 6. Upon approval of a Final Plat, the applicant shall be responsible for filing and recording the Final Plat with the Anoka County Recorder's Office within one year of the date of City Council action. In the event that a Final Plat is not recorded within this time period, the Final Plat will become void. ORDER OF COUNCIL Passed this 12th day of December 2016 Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: Gary L. Peterson, Mayor Attest: Katie Bruno, City Clerk /Council Secretary CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PRELIMINARY / FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT APPLICATION To be filled out by City CASE NO.: DATE RECEIVED: APPLIC. ORD.: 9.104(K) 9.104(L), 9.114(A) - 9.114(D) DATE LETTER OF COMPLETION: PRESENT ZONING: APPROVAL DATE PER STATUTE: PRESENT LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: REVIEW PERIOD EXTENDED: PRELIMINARY PLAT FINAL PLAT To be filled out by Applicant: PROPOSED NAME OF PLAT: PROJECT ADDRESS /LOCATION: I o,%- LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPPRTY 1 36 - 4o J_y- I I - d Dee /'L,4- 13 VED (a tta h separate age if n ces "� J_ U1li -Onf separate age sa / d) ,I� ^�- I"s�i�l PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: R4,5, Je44-i °) 4 ',\nyJe f",A x PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: 1 le 5��; REASON FOR REQUEST (please attach a written narrative describing yourrequest and justification for approval. The narrative must fully describe the proposal to insure its compatibility with surrounding uses and its consistency with Zoning requirements and the Comprehensive Plan.) APPLICANT % 1 ^6,5 gr` %lu y PHONE E -MAIL ��ahc5.c,. b, -'�M� Dyt -,c.�/ " PAGER c�yov S4,L,san 131��,. ADDRESS CITY Lol �M 6 He' %s FEE OWNER OF PROPERTY ADDRESS CITY �/2_ / -Sq _ q FAX RA CELL;# 612- 7-°t- -S'97% STATE M.,J ZIP s-� y2 PHONE STATE Page 1 of 2 YOU ZIP CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PRELIMINARY / FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT APPLICATION THIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY PLANNER AND REVIEW OF APPLICATION AND NECESSARY MATERIALS BEING SUBMITTED. ENGINEERING APPROVAL MAY ALSO BE REQUIRED AND MUST MEET ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS SET BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR CONTAINED IN THE CITY CODE. ITEMS TO BE GIVEN TO APPLICANT WITH APPLICATION A. Procedures Manual B. Application Checklist C. Schedule of Planning and Zoning Commission Meetings ITEMS TO ACCOMPANY PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION A. Plat submittals as required in the attached application checklist, showing how the property is to be subdivided. B. Two copies of a list of property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. ITEMS TO ACCOMPANY FINAL PLAT APPLICATION A. Plat submittals as required in the attached application checklist, showing how the property is to be subdivided. APPLICATION FEES: A. $500.00 Preliminary Plat Fee + escrow B. $100.00 Final Plat Fee C. Park Dedication Fee D. City Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) E. City Water Availability Charge (WAC) F. Other it a• •r i TOTAL AMOUNT RECEIVED $ Co p)j . ('�p CITY RECEIPT NUMBER CO`+5 16 DATE RECEIVED I (W I ry Acknowledgement: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the City of Columbia Heights to take the action herein requested, that all statements herein are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Columbia Heights and the State of Minnesota: TURE PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE (If different from J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF MEMBER TE - DATE Revised: 2005 Approved by the Columbia Heights Planning Commission on Approved by the Columbia Heights City Council on Page 2 of 2 City of Columbia Heights Prelimary/Final Subdivision Plat Application Narrative To the council members of Columbia Heights and to the city of Columbia Heights: In the spirit of adding upscale additional single - family housing to the city of Columbia Heights, and more directly to the parcel located at 4400 Stinson Blvd. NE in Columbia Heights, I am proposing a subdivision of said parcel from the existing two residential single family parcels into a total of five residential single - family parcels. Three of these parcels would front Stinson Blvd. NE, while two of the parcels woud sit on the western portion of the proposed development and would be accessed by a shared driveway running off Stinson Blvd. NE. This subdivision would not require any variances from the city's code. The property located at 4400 Stinson Blvd. NE offers breathtaking views of the newly revamped Silverwood Park across the street as well as easy access to the city of Columbia Heights' Silver Lake Beach along with all of its other extraordinary amenities. When considering possible uses for the purchased land, I spent time meeting with Mr. Hogeboom, Ms. Holmbeck, Mr. Hansen, several other Columbia Heights employees, my father (who holds an extensive real estate background in the surrounding areas), my realtor Erich Young, the city of Columbia Heights' City Council and several others. The reason for these meetings was to ensure that anything proposed at this site would hold true to the spirit of the existing land, the homes surrounding it, Silverwood Park, Silver Lake Beach and Columbia Heights' Comprehensive Plan. Due to the existing residential single - family homes surrounding the parcel, I decided to strictly look at plans for new residential single - family subdividing (excluding any and all multi - family zoning changes). In its Comprehensive Plan, Columbia Heights notes a concern for a "diminishing and aging housing stock." While only a small dent, four newly constructed homes plus one extensively rehabilitated home will align with that goal. Furthermore, in its Future Land Use plan, Columbia Heights points to a goal of continued investment in low density residential housing. The subdivision request aides in accomplishing that task. I have spent much of my childhood at Silver Lake Beach and am excited for the opportunity to continue working in and enjoying the area. Additionally, I spent time with Mr. Hogeboom and Ms. Holmbeck on more than one occasion discussing what a proposed development like this may bring to the city and how it lines up with its Comprehensive Plan. They both conveyed to me the desire for the city to bring in higher end single family homes, both for able- bodied seniors and young families. This proposal will result in the ability for additional individuals and families to experience what wonderful Columbia Heights has to offer. Thank you so very much for your time and consideration. Very truly yours, TA Bra .NITI 4400 Stinson Blvd. z 4420 COD z 4417 4416 If 4409 f 4410 1 I , 4343 4400 o ' v SILVER scale 11200 LAKE BEACHS { s 4,al Ph to Flp r Sp,m0 of 2014 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Public Works Department TO: ELIZABETH HOLMBECK, CITY PLANNER FROM: KEVIN HANSEN, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER LAUREN LETSCHE, STORMWATER SPECIALIST DATE: November 23, 2016 SUBJECT: 4400 Stinson Blvd I have reviewed the prelim/final plan submittal packet dated 11/09/16, and have the following requirements/comments: • A 4" watermain is identified on plan. Due to the low household demand, PW Engineering recommends a smaller 2" or 2 '' /z" service line to prevent stagnant water in the line. • Provide a copy of the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) permit to the City. No building or land disturbing activity will be approved until the City has received a copy. • A stone water management plan is required by the City of Columbia Heights . This includes temporary erosion control BMPs including but not limited to: temporary rock entrance /exit, perimeter silt fence, storm sewer inlet filters, temporary sediment basins, erosion control mats, soil stockpile areas, and street sweeping. No building or land disturbing activity will be approved unless it includes a storm water management plan, detailing how runoff and associated water quality impacts resulting from development will be controlled or managed. • It is recommended that signs be placed on Stinson Blvd with addresses of the properties as well as mailboxes. • Garbage cans will be required to roll out to Stinson Blvd. • All properties must have the City of Columbia Heights standard apron for the driveways. • To catch some of the stormwater runoff from the long driveway, the city will require that a catch basin be installed with an inverse crown, similar to an alley. • Will there be mass grading of the site or lot to lot grading? If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at (763) 706 -3705. C: Lauren Letsche, Stonnwater Specialist Kathy Young, Assistant City Engineer KH:kh R- D. -n -a0u Rwwt D. Fe.nbne I an Nodiwe /eai / r- 11 jl i an \ \ V \ wa a laic �A l Wf Rhin]re-11 -0052 in Ra aaerf M Etol _ I I I undo Me LLJ Z a a � Hakanson Anderson Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 3601 Anoka, Minnesota 55303 763 - 463-4 27 7 -5860 860 FAX 763 - 427 -0520 www.haa- inc.com ❑EXISTING PROP RTY D ¢r IPTLON (TORRFI S) (PER CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO. 85106) Lot 12, Block 1, Walt—'— Sunny Acres Addition to Columbia Height, according io Me plat thereat on file and of record k Me oHke of the Register of Deeds in and for Anoka County, Minnesota. AND: F-1 EXIE� PROPERTY D Sr IPTION (AB TRACT) (PER OOC. NO. 2134055.002) Lot 13, Block 1, Walt—'— Sunny Acres Addition to Columbk Heights, Make County, Mlnneeota. Municeaity. ally 01 Cell 111911e EYtlM9 2w1ng: R-1 Single Fvniy Raider wl O'etrlat Prepped Uw: Urean R Ukimud Walere'ed Dielr Ct: Rlp pwk sweeed aielrkt (RENO) Read ell o LF or am Mpg SbeM 10tin9 ere rqulrw orpped Unit.. Sewer: Municipal O'ap.Me) Wa4' Ml (awaeple) Two Plot w : ppaArse 0 . i. R m L]I . ep Areal 00 w. It. O.W pre e vk N. ft. - O.W avq D- 40"/$urvewn li-1 Memeen Aewc. Mot Tenlw A—v. Meko, MN wood (763) 427 -5960 1NOTETh- underground utilities shovm hove been located ham field survey Information per Gopher Stale One Call Ticket No 181723616 and available records. The surveyor makes no such utilities in the area either in tsefrvic or shown abandoned aIDe surveyor further does not warrant that Me underground utilities shorn we in the exact location Indicated although he does certify Mot they are located ad accurately as possible ham information available. The surveyor has not physically located Me underground utilities. Prior to any excavation, contact Gopher State One Call for an on -site location (612- 45h0002). The subsurface utility information on this Survey is utility quality level D. This quality level Was determined according to Me guidelines of CI /ASCE 38 -2, entitled 'Standard Guidelines for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data. 2. The Professional surveyor has made no investigation or independent search for easements of record. encumbrance, restrictive covenants. ownership title evidence, or any other facts that an accurate and current title search may disclose. 3. Bearings are based on Me Anoka County Coordinate System NAD83 (1996 Adjustment). 4. Lots 2 and 4 are depicted per Anoka County requirements, Which are as folloew Mhan ptdfbd g Lots that we both Abstract and Tcv se, the Part Of the Lot that Ld Triers should bean Armz numero% Nhde the Abemact portion of Me Lat shauWl be the numem/ Mat *%,.v sed or the Toners portion of the Lot fwasee by Me Le A" ORNNAGE AND UTUtt EMMINTS ARE SHOWN THUA J° - L 0 _ 5 -'j L (NOT TO SCALE) r Being IO.W Nor W Ndth m,d adpnN9 all mt W eery IFw udeq a,_N elprm ek Hot antl being Sad feet M wWM one WiDineg W ede ana rear cat Imee anrow wh—lee m,. p this gat. T3 ADDITION Building sedlca v Front Yee - 30 Feet xi n 10 Fwd 5108 Ye ] Fe Cwnq side Yord - 12 Feet Rem Yvd - 20F o/ Lod De9N Lot wmmmn a Lade. s Largest tot LoNumlw t Lot: O.JBS eves a 16.783 q. R. 0.279 earn 12,1`s, eq. H. z Awa9e Lot Arq 0.342 evq N.R. Oweidn 2.92 Lute pm Mre awm/abalMem: mmwe crams II ]302 J9M q1e. HE SL MMwn MN 55421 (612) ]01 -39J9 N 30 0 30 W M FEET LEGEND 0 = DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT DO = DENOTES GATE VALVE -6= DENOTES HYDRANT 0 = DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ® = DENOTES STORM SEWER MANHOLE O - DENOTES URUTY POLE -I -= DENOTES WATER LINE DENOTES SANITARY SEWER LINE DENOTES STORM SEWER LINE �= DENOTES SIGN e = DENOTES DECIDUWS TREE �p = DENOTES CONIFEROUS TREE = DENOTES EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE jDENOTES PROPOSED COMMON DRIVEWAY EASEMENT AREA LOT LAYOUT EXHIBIT CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA SHEET 1 Preliminary Plat " of " T3 ADDITION 10( " Thomas Brama II " / IvamWle- woxw.rtM1 \ I I I I I I 1 I I ( 1 1 1 1 // ` I I I I I . \��� ` I I /_� II - -_ � - -� F t I !1 I I I I I j j ! I / / ! III I I I I W- 30-24-1 t/'-' ____- ____19'eax+�aa,u oae de / / ' / / I - / / % s i § T J F I I t / , F F I 4r 47 3xF3Fs "SST .0 �� µ18 IttIt mw lz / / / / // / f / l I / / Y � / l / / i / /'---------- - - - - -' DESCRIPTION OF PROP RTY TO BE SUBDIAD D Lots 12 and 13, Block 1, WALTONS SUNNY ACRES ADDITION TO COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MINNESOTA, Mao County. Minnesota. Munlmadaty. Of, or Worm. 1eIg16 [Anding Sadeatls Frmt Yve -,W Feet real ._ _ -. -•/ F 4 °ea'9 xming' R -I SInye family RnitlenYlal WeWCY er Md. nTatl�l3Feel be / l I I I ! / / / / / /�/ / / /I ,/ / > // --� __ - - - F 5 _.� .3 E II / r / / \ ` wateranee oleemY: Ric. w tenhe mewat Let SLmmaY Rear Yore - 2DX of Lot Depth 9tle t / xa- t -ofin 1 I I / / / / / / / / / / / - ! 'i 1 / / \ ( / prodded caa / 9+aWO) xaml,a m Late: s q- 1 1 / Rove unease, D tF a a m Mnea La t we {385 vase = 16 Intel eq. tt. z� 1 -ooe`z smauot Lee o.2n acres = 1zIsa w. tt / / / / \ Street LIgM1tN Average Lot Roe: O.N2 acre 14,980 eq.R KMVi Robe ld_ _ , / / , / / /' / / ++ 9 oe r<qulretl DeanY 2qx Lala pw Aoa e -- ,a.�'�� q /lC^ .-C I I 1 I I / / / / // i / �1' n•-- -- -- / �' / / / / / / 1 I d I / L%'r /r /� ,// f A r-\ F\rl T- I /1 I\ -- ,fig � , / er r/ / / i 1 I s «.n Mamalpm (awaanl.) \ { � / / I propose Wallace / _ I ono « /9ueaWeen m cWuama II �� \J L / / / Waty. Mu -labs (omaoale IL, / / 1/ / / /// / /I //' // / / /// '� / i` ' h/ 'e _ / / / \ - 1 ( '� / / I rr� �I 1 I I ) ( ) 01 I -eV- -/ I U V _ t / / l_ /'� / I Plat Neo: M1ep�MN x55{21 _ / \ 1 / / / / / � �/ // / / / / / / / I/' /'/ / /' i � -NOrM Ilne o /tul11J, Sock 1, WALT[N'S 't 1`1 �+ / / _,� \ 1 1 I fatal ,l R 04,x3 p. ft e t.]aleocrea - l9 /I / a \ Il/ Q_' 4P / \ 1 1 ( P. no Row o ea. n - mz r \� / /� / / wmu''^exs -- / _ J j / lr� i \\ 1 \ \ P. nreq: o aq. x.. aa00o acre. —4 —I J T t-, - x•11 // /1G GLil ../ / / / - cn- 9895T44- _ T -I _ —_- _- _ -___- /� / / /t /// // 40 /_\ 1 1 11 1 I Dolsmar-res,,n xaxeaea, nne.ean H.e. /�� / ��riG.�.i s /G _rte r =-_ -/1 / , /�- \ \ 1 1 11 1 39m maN W Aveme •.w¢' r 1 I I I1 /j / / / / / / /// / / \ I 1 I (763).MN5860 // { - =_ - _ x___sq = _ -_ __� g /' }` -1 \ l I I 1 853)4zT -seen /4ata lM�est le feaam Pinar ktt da ®I!11II fit / Ill / /h� / / /// / „paWIY E-__. _ =_i /Y r /',,h -� \ I I 1 1 _3 ez_ _ / MI I I I I/ // /. /r L' :.wows'= ___- - -�i ,m ° / \ 1 I 1 1 I / ` ) —3 / \�� - // i / I I 1 I 1 I �{i \411 I I 1 ! j1 / i ,�/ Y/1 / F 1 11 i i -iI' .•C _ _ 1368 Sq.Ft��' i p-. /i ire°\\ 1\ I I 11 I ''i"�� 0.26.Aems 1 1 I I Q I I ply 1 K / I / / / / 1 I : ) ( \rl xDdxA- �� tl.wX_ N9�S- -_M `\\\\ \t a 1 it I \\a�T- \ _ 1 I I I \ - i ^�Tf- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I� y II ( ^ - \\ \ A \\ �+ / /'' • °.�r4 ^'� \ J / �l 1 I I I I i 1 The underground utilities shown have been located from field survey information per Gopher Stale One r I Call Ticket No 161723616 and owiable records The curve makes no / /'�' \1 1 \ I1 \�� � g I I r'LAl— _ � \\ ✓, \\ \ 1 \\ e / — I ' J \1 I 11 I 1 1 underground dMerities shown comprises that such Utilities in the area, either iguarantees serviaa ortabandoned. Th \�� °a ground utilities shown are n the exact locution \ \`\ :.� I .I pp �w -` �/\ \ Mekl/ I teY , \ 1 1 I I 1 inmcatee although he does certify that they are located m atturotN as / I \ 1111 III 1 A) - / \ \ \ -- --P=;- _1 / 2a.9p- llr \ 1 I I 1 1 ( 1 \ 1 awilable The surveyor has net Physically located the underground utilities. Prior t oany exaCatlon i)i'I< \ \ I -t= f - T -- - _ -r--I i� I/ I 1 ( 1 1 1 1 \ \ contact Gopher State One Call for an on -site locot'on 612 9454- Y excawtion, Flit 111 e,6a -- \\ \ \\ \ \ 1 / / / / / / ,y T\ ,v �%I, 1 1 1 I 1 1 \ \ Information an this curve is utility ( 0002). The subsurtae utility \ Y iii -\eSLb 1 \ \ \ Y y quality level 0. This quality level was determined acwrtl n to the aryr?I. \ n V \ I l \ ( (>e -1,O- 4- q -aeee / o Mage w ton 1 - -_ 1 1 1 \ guidelines of CI ASCE 38 -2. entitled 'Standard Ga kunes for the Collection and Depiction of Existing t / an Wn M ml N t I tea\ y° \� \\ /iip"Pe iy arOTa y r Ej+emen� �' q \ E� Ih-.w aa1 1 \ \ \ \ \ Subsurface Utility Data. g 9 z.. 4A / 4 \ 9 \ 12393 $ FL 2. The professional ¢urveyor has made no Investigation or independent search for easements of record / l/ ';/ 4 /�'% • III IHr� /' -- III IIII \\ \I \IJ \I \111 I 6;4 �4A) \ 1 v3v \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ current rtitle search cmay disdasets, ownership the evidence, or any other /acts that an accurota and -imass 9 x 5• \ 'h { 3. Bearings are based on the Anoka Count Coordinate System NAD83 (1996 Adjustment). ter Ile\ Site Topography de ld depicted per IINd locations (1 foot Interval). \9i \ \I k 1 It \ 1 \ 5. Lots 2 and 4 are depicted per Make Count requirements, Y which are m follows: \ A- %\ \ ` V S \\ \n 3 \ \\ \\ 11 1 1 Nhpi p /affmg Lot's that we both Abstract and Tomeny the port of Me Lot that /s rorrcns shov /e +, T \ \I\ �\ I��D.11ynq..j Otpµy ��� ��� 1 Y 'B QA$ 1 be an Arob /c numem( wwo the Abstract / S \ \ \ \ 1 1 1 the Twrens portun a/ Me Lot /o/ /owep b l he foam a Lot shoe /d be the numer°/ that Res used ad �\ V Y enP ear VNgt /. \ \ \ I\� �� - `_^ \ \ I / // E.eene \ 4 / 1 -� Q I 1 II I I / // // / •. t 1 1 1 1 \\ l �l \I 1 / \ , ) 1 I I 1 I I 1 16'D / /� /I' / / /t� /i% 'e ' .1I� 1 1 \\ \ 1\ 1 11 1 1 r / / 1\6rJ783 5.J[� / / %• %l¢/ / //I / j/ / 3/,825 5 F 3 ✓� / f %I i / -/ / 0.SB APES / /��- /� //I ,1' //////�/A0.32 Acred' / 1 1 I 1 11111 s .• / i 6� / / / / / /d/ / / I \ 1 1 1 r / / / / / // / 1 1 1 1 \ I 1 I 1 6ASElla s vtUOwrTMilws: I Aso \ 1 I 1 I I 1 Ma4 /^nakrbdy I/ , , / „11 , �- �«a, J / r / / l f � i , '�/ / / / ' _ J J- I I 1 \ 1 I I I I I. -I_ s-J L i_ 11 - -- /i _ \� _✓ /� /� � / %!�i �� - -_- -- ��1T /� � l// I \\ \.-L\ N83'AB' � m { \ 1 1 1 1 1 \ /- (Nor To SCALE) /// �I f{.o(y?+_ ^^Yi ( 1\ 1\ 11 11 \I \I 1111 ngni ni :arrinnMawn: ou..aweieL --m ydtpyv�w'i° / // -_1 _ \ 1 \ ula plat ee eelns Sao rest In MYn '1 , ii i/ /'/ ' / �� \ 11 \1 \ 1 1 I 1 e��leews minerwle. {noon a, this lot. / 11 / 1 b . ell Nee and rear Im IMee .ST' , / /// / / //,� / /// is ax 1 i p aim bandambest. x6 /iiii /yyii'j //i / / /Ii %/ -_ I e IJ I 7� \ l� sll 1 111 111 r : :�5: , * -• - �'i/ //, �i // �_�/ a_ __ iii' / /// GEND � / /' /�/ � /, /i // r //' // i % / // � -- ��'� \ � I 1 1 \ \ 1 • = DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT ' / „ / // _ .. I \- I _ DENOTES CAM VALVE rnarhh -1 as 14.1xim. i' / / /' /i' /iii/' //� /, / / / / /A / / / / /// -max- /' 11 \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ \\ dp ' /k.(n/ /' � _ \ t 1 \ \ \ \ �= DENOTES HYDRANT 1\ 1\ \\ \\ \\ 1\ \\ � ® = DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHQX / '\/ t / (/ / i'' / ' ^- 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ G = DENOTES UTILITY POLE R MANHOLE -I DENOTES WATER LINE > -= DENOTES SANITARY SEWER LINE j� \/ q / / / / �Ity°of uumulta -�'i ht \ \ 1\ \\ \ \\ \\ \ -» -= DENOTES STORM SEWER LINE / / / / / / '1/ / / rl / / / / fF / / X1 o/ �4 I / / ' / ry \e \ \�I \\ \ �! = DENOTES SIGN i i i i /\j/ - /i�/L i i i � � � �.' __ \ �: `.�=� i _ \ I \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \ _ p \ /� \� { ' \ DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE i / v// / / % / �/ / \// / / / / i `/ j / 1 /L r� _ ^-�- -c\ \ \ �\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ 30 0 30 80 = DENOTES CONIFEROUS TREE ill" /lI / /// / / // /J -(-H l \ \\ \ \ \\ 6 a0 \ \ \\\ / / / I AA/�'/ / % % // �lI / / / / / i I y l r \ t }p °y 1 1 I-�, \\ \\ N. \\ \\ SCbl£ IN FEET DENOTES EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE 1, // / /Y // / / ! /�/ 1 / ) ? 4 \ = 4 s T \ a I / \ \ \ \ \ ✓8 l,t/ l / 1 yP / / /# // DENOTES EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE /x' ®/� 1 11 \\ \\ \\ \ \ DENOTES PROPOSED COMMON DRIVEWAY \ \ I EASEMENT AREA DATE REVISION I hereby wmfy at ,hM plan, apeelnmxon, or open woe 12 18 Revise u, .aeon pmi arw by m. or adder my dlrwet to,mlNan antl Mal I sag"t N. Hakonson Anderson 16 , 6 R.xi¢c e. °means we Is da e p bawl d Surreyar antler M. CRC PRELIMINARY PLAT SHEET 25 18 Rev sa sr omman{ laws of f {rani V. Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 04 16 ayse ar omman / ///y/`,� /,� MSS ____ 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 T3 ADDITION L` Date 0 1/16 Lic No. 1 420 olw x: 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763- 427 -0520 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS or e w aeVe ww a,wear,.e xaaN.e�w 8 0. 8 cltc www.hoa- inc.com ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 1 SHEEP Now NL PFABOV9 6Y nEy pPBS Nrb Thot Thames MgmY arrow II. a Wlyc pwFw, o nd, v, M. NBOdnq tl.ovhtl plvpwllo M d'nwxalo 1. WMTMS SUNNY Aa A JW TO W WYaIA Hpa115, Myo ymty. AND Y m As d a :ow�,a F u eX4. M m:�Fe�pkw 00. �Oe F slat` c do, uw,my ea. f Hod ewaotl Me bne b bd w nO,,Od word Nose t w n MGM, and aen NombY dvmMa b Me Wblk b Publk uw, %. dl ma d,d,.a Onto.. A. m tliY pM[ M eHnw.."d told Them- MUwn' ammo 9 11w h..W wt NM do, b,d , 20_. _ day IN lbmm. MINmY ammo n s AIE cf COI,YY a ThY h.hummt - admO"U'do tl b,we m. Mb � -ody IN MMmY Bmma 4 a Oi lf/. pe.m. . 20� by 1M1wnm Way Nib, My cdonmlrbn mpgw I morb, R. Mtl "t,, en av M1,,, ob,tl(y ,o, Mb Plot .oe apeMNm: Nmt 1 wn a WY ucnptl t°q su P'OP. by maw una° my owl °ot ,gte°wlloNtn IN Me boon nap h Me StNe of bgnwta Mot Mb Plot Ie o awlgnobd y. MY a°Y dmr Mot OR modhol iota on, Imde w ewrectly vlNln me ,vC MIN W mbwmwb aepktetl w Mb Pot how ba, d, NI be cmecryY M SOBM. MOO -I' IMevaate "'I' t°Ufkob men M. and 1.,W m w to Sla[ute. secpw waYe a• aM1e we Iabdea m MI. Plat Aid, one d1 "ll. Odto MW —day, of .20 MvMS R tlWdvpNweon, Lkmwa Lww !ki MMpala llwnw Xe taa2p STALE W MINNESOTA CWNTY M ANMA 1M11. N.Wmmt m adnW dpd bekn m. MI. _ da y W . zD_ by cbwtw P. an.twM1°ean. Nolmy Potin, Mgin.M¢ MY twnmWM Bpi µ _ "'y Cw1wA. aty OF Cdumbla H.%hu. Ygmeob rob plot of n A Tt`o vm tppfoytl and an.pba by Mo aty Cdono, W Me Mr IN Cdbnbla HelpM1b, Minnreta at v rogdar nOO nd tl M1Na MN 20_ mtl wla plot b h — der IN subs. z 011mp NM Uy pmddono of ldd, y steWbb. BwCm fiW.OT, MY a of, MY of Mumbk HNpbb. Yhnoeefa By Ya x By a°k MORA WUNTY S ltt I "O" y'-d Gdyd dodo,awb° w% YMwb st-td, ,dues 60.5m. sUb, it. MY plat Iles oor of , 2D —. Lorry 0. Hdwn, MKa coon!, 5map T3 ADDITION ANMA WANT AUDIIOR/IRFAyIREq Pw°Jmt to =l StaWhe 5ton 8021, h —bO`o" ®h. bm pa la Aoa Wn mb a t o BY, 6tlanw tp op tq µ Xw 20_ c Ma Imo Uod 272tz Ne,e me na adblwent two ma !rands mt°ea mi. _- aor er zo_, P„ywty T. Atlmhbb0lc, By D.Wty A A CG,TY RECamFA Oo1mtY Of A stale of Mhnaeefo I M1°MY cerllly awl qh plat of M ADG M .y Gy k do. oryk. of Me GunlY RecwM f Wblk Tevwa m Mb . 2D�, al M di FewtEea h dad IN aaW o'tlod _.Y. °M w DwumM Number D°nty R.Otoe, BY Dyaty ANMA 0.WNTY PEls , n11ES aunty of MKq stab of 4lmewte 1 M1°WY twiny ,ot MY plot of n AW M w. Old U U. oMoe of not Cwnt P WNIc ,sva w Mb -ivy of Y g4tr° IN ntln M mtl w aulY raowtlaJ N BwN _ . w WOU t Naming e'daeY _. _.4. _ county Peg4 of lmw By . Dwutr N 30 0 30 so SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH a 30 FEET Q Devotee MOO. County Mmummt O D.nobe 1/2 hd1 by 14 Fdi il mmummt M ma ."W NM Mbnewta L oon. Np. faf20. • Dwatw Found bet ModUn i C100 00) Dewlw,.ewa obbonc. For Me p.,. of M, plot Me EM the 0' 1pb 12 d n. Mod 1. NULTMS SUNNY AMES ACOn TO L'a4MBlA HDGIIB MINNESOTA k pymp to bem NIW814', CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGF COUNTY OF ANC SEC. 36, T. 30, R. NE Cwntt o1 r I I I I' L 1 - "'! Ibv of Let 13, Boot, 1. WALTON'S 91NW ACRES I a 111 I A I T % \ ^ III App1TNM M C U. 'A Haa1R WNNET,1Tp � 589'ST05 "E 30 ]] P — — � — — — 299.44 M eos. I I I IB2W ___________� Sim I I � I..I IN In I \/ �^ I d K 3 I I • 'G 3 81 _ udlu fl I I I g• _`__ �`$ f prolnv 1 � 9 I 2A 'rw31 :: `�.''- Eawmml Y Owma,e m Utalty_e z .on. I 5;1 I �' swrsTaS'a F rot �\ '��� Iez00 IPm r-------- - - - - -- ____ 24 9 I�- €s¢ I � 11r1ITInt\I � ITn �� I I IS e l Ld I Ij Ih 1 sWln Ike ar tA1], 9 ^3 - p SUNxr ACRES Aownox ro < X /\ _ vm, I sB95Y L> L_ \.i v f N I COWMBIA HOG n MINNESOTA I m m `l 0 _ tA. BNBN I I 1 9maYW'E `Om - (T` A mn N gyh 11)11* ` N '^ r 'smsYast� samtnat a ________�_______ y_^ � CSI I MI r I , -rSe \ I W I h--- saBararE - -> I GMnlotrunllr -mac" -1 F_____ Eavemml I I - -WO Me of Lot 12, SO, 1,---- _ - - --I wpLTM'S SUNNY ACRES AppinM r1 I I (1 A 11 I^ i I C0.UMWA HEICHn MINNESOTA I - I ul/L_IJIVIL�I / -\ rl�_IV�I 15` RI RI I- IVIII VI I OV I I --- LA 129.90 MOOR,_ 1-2 I -- _ _ _ _ L im' // u° 7 15r .0576 _GDi' 00 q— a AcaEmS « N S83-4WO5'W &J� wM 1 Y �Y36- 2V07'W I II w ASP -WITO COLUMBIA ltVJ TS I u NINNEBOTA 1 I _ r' r\ '� I � i/ 1 1 %1/`(x11 ✓ r ( 1(, 1\x`11 ✓ I vr-\` �IVI \ Wtneae CMw m �- Ma the R, Sw.!%, ]S. 130. R,za EASEMENTSCµ[NMONN THUS (NOT TO SCALE) B0nq 10.M Ma In vltltb no Mpininq all xmgnt of wy lmw wYew "n-l" d,am Ml. Plot ma bell I Mat In rbM and adjoining all aloe ono roo, lot lin.. unl.q aMpW.. on .n on M'a W.,. 44TH AVENUE 01 T3 ADDITION SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THOMAS BRAMA II CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 43RD THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY DUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI /ASCE 38 -2, ENTITLED 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." 45TH AVENUE SILVER LAKE BEACH SILVER LAKE 1� I Pao 0 200 400 SCN£ IN FEET v1I I yr COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS THE 2016 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL APPLY. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION, WATERMAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCATION OF MINNESOTA, 2013 EDITION. ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, INCLUDING THE LATEST FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS. SHEETINDEX THIS PLAN CONTAINS 7 SHEETS SHEET NO DESCRIPTION 1 TITLE SHEET 2 1 3 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 4 o� ...�Hakanson UTILITY PLAN Anderson o Cirll Engineers and Land Surveyors -7 3601 Thurelon Ave.. Anoka, Minnuofa 55303 0 763 -427 -5860 FAX 753 -427 -0520 T3 ADDITION SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THOMAS BRAMA II CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 43RD THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY DUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI /ASCE 38 -2, ENTITLED 'STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." 45TH AVENUE SILVER LAKE BEACH SILVER LAKE 1� I Pao 0 200 400 SCN£ IN FEET v1I I yr COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS THE 2016 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL APPLY. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION, WATERMAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCATION OF MINNESOTA, 2013 EDITION. ALL FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, INCLUDING THE LATEST FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS. SHEETINDEX THIS PLAN CONTAINS 7 SHEETS SHEET NO DESCRIPTION 1 TITLE SHEET 2 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND REMOVALS PLAN 3 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 4 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 5 UTILITY PLAN 6 CONSTRUCTION NOTES, PROJECT LEGEND AND DETAILS 7 DETAILS I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct aupervislon and that 1 am a duly Licensed Profess anal Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. TIMOTHY A. EDGE I .E. HAKANSON ANDE� DESIGN ENGINEER 43352 DATE 7/26/16 LIC. NO. SHEET 1 OF 7 SHEETS r j/ / // i /i //i / //' / /'� / / /r/ i i / /' // i 978_____- - - -- - -- -- / // / i / / / / / / / / / / Y > / ! / 0 i // // // i i i �/' //i //i // // / /// // /// / /.977- _____- _- ______ -__ !/ j / : -� -j/ // /� / //' / / / / / / / / / / _ / / -- // / /1 // 9b / / / / / / / / / // / /// / / /' / /' / /_ /' / / 976 ___ _ - - - -1 / / //I / / / I I 1 / / / / / ' / / //l / / / / / /// // / / / '' / /''/ - ' 97 ________ _ __ ____ ______ ____ ____ -__ ___ /i / / / /// �``f ' //%96'5''! �I I I I 1 I l / / / / t I I / / I / / / / / / ' ___ _______________g70 �_a�? -____` _________ _ ___ / / / //n -96 REMOVE I I I I 1 / I l l / / I I 1 I I / / / / // //' �' / /' ---- - - - - -_ — _ __ I I I //1 1 I I 1 / / l / /' /'/ / i / - /___ _ -- --,- ' ___ //i Y I / \ \ CHAINLINK / I 1 I I I I I I / / / / // / // / / / / /r I �- RETAINING _ �// // X96 \ \ FENCE / / j j I II II \ I I / / j % / / /'/ / / //� / / i i I I i // ''¢ _WALL_ __- _ __ -_./. / // 960\ Il II / / / I I 1 \\ \\ 7 I I I I / / / / / / / /' / / o m /� _ \ \ I I I \\ ♦ \I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1! // !/ / m m m m m m rn _ _ \\ / RE =96237 \\ II / / I I \\ \\ I l t l l I___ ( / / / I I 1 1 \ n \ IE N I .' / I \ \ \\�_�_____t -��\ I 1 ! 1 I l I l / 1 \ \ \ 6h� - \ __�. ( )= 951.1 I ,9� / I � \ \ \ \___``` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \1 1 1 � I I i �B'1 � ( I � '•\ \\ \\ \ko0 \\ \\ 01 6ryi __ '�� \ I E (5)= 957.77, I -9g6 / I I \ \ \ 111 \ \ \ \ \\ 1 I I I I 1 n I \ \ \ ¢ \ \ 1 \ 0 // � / \\ v� I � 959 1 I — m a —11 � � III 1,'111 \j 1��1 � I I I 1 � m I\ -_ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ 9 // l / / . / I i I "``��\ \ \�\l I / I I �\ \\ \ \ \ 11� \ __m m m 1\ 1 I�J� \� ����0 �� hI I II `` \\ \ \� \ \\ 1 \\ \\ A60 ♦ I\ \\ 1\ 11 / m m� \\ \\��� 1 \ I \III IIIIII `/ \- ' "` \\ \ \ \ \ 11 \\ 9y9 /' .. / \\ v ,P� 1 11 /• I 9 ° Ian o II m ¢ \ \ \ \ I I t /� /REMOVE / \ v fIIy- 1 1 / �\ 9/ ml I ml ml II r I -___ -' _ -\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 / _ `I / 1 1 / \ °1I I I m \ \ \ I �'� GARDEN / I .. // / f \I j l l 11 l l l l 11 I v ♦ vvvV A \ \V A\ \V A l / % % / / / // //� �v B I 11 I / % '!. I I IJr1' I - \ \ \ \ 1 \ / SB -2 / / �E= 95$.40 I Y r 1 11 1 11111111 1 \\\ \\ \ \\ \I 1\ 1 i i i i j A0�/ i 16(N)= 849.1'0011 / //.- I I I IIII I �v AV A A V A 1 1 A A \ / / / / / `v I� )- 9149.60 \ .. ./ f / ! VI I I I I I I I I I IINI 1 v v A A V l l A A A \! / / / ����LEAR & / 9,�6 / IE S- V 1 / ". / / q. v 1111111111 III 1 1 VvA A 11 I A A A \ / f / GRUB TRE( / _ ♦/ \v �s� 1 1 1 ../ / I I I III I 111 I 1 / / / / / "1-- P / / / . / III Ills i I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 / / (TYP.) / / a"' REMOVE`_ _ \ \ \ \ /� .! III I 1 / I \ \ I I / \ \ \ / ! a I I III 1 I / / I I I 1 \ \ \ \\ 1\ I I 1 / \ I MAILBOX v \\ \ \\ \ \ ' ,• % / III 1 I III 111 1 _ 1 SAWCUT AND \ / 1 1 \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1\ 1 \ \ REMOVE _ \ \ \ \ \ e 1 1 III \ \I // REMOVE l I 1 \ \ l \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ CONCRETE 11 _\ / I \ �S \ \ / // BITUMINOUS +i / A\ \ v vv FVEMENT V v V A /: /. II IIIIII AA �\ LV \ �/ // ^ I I I I I I I 1 \�� \ \ � � PAVEM // / f / / \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ T\ -� � —I / \ � \\ SAWCUT AND REMOVE ' v /� / •. /� / 11 I I I 1 1 A \ \V Avv� - / A V v vv vv A / I I V A I .� ,, / III \ \\�� �\ �\ � v / -- �� � �- � \ \ \ 1 1 / .y I \ \ BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ,, // /// /III \ \ \\ \\�\ � \ / I i I C I I I f 1 I 1 I I 1 � a/ I\ \ I 1 (TYP.) / / /// V A v A A v �� v v I I I I I I / /' /� \\ 1V 1 1 _, / \ \ � � \ \ . 1 I I I I I I I I I / / / / / .. a // 1 \ \\I` 1 \ \ 1 \ \I I I I I I I I I I / / / / / // / / / / / / / / 4/' �' � \H \ 1 1 \ / I A �7��v / / V / I I 1 I % / / // /� / l j i i / /95 v/ 1\ 11 \I l • � �- / \ \ / / / / 1 / / / / ! ! / / / / / / /� / CLEAR & �u � \ l / / / / / \ / / / / / / / / 1 1 1 f 06 00 ra q a / / // // ' i / l I I l / 1 / / / / /� / / / / / / / / gh GRUB TREES I', 1 1 I\ / mo n`a m`O ��M o�ro SB -4 9�\ o i / / l ! l l ! I i % / // l� / / / ! / i // (TYP.) / �' _ v II \\ I\ I SAWCUT AND REMOVE /'--` / / / / / I / 0h / / / / / / / / / / / / / // / / / / / / / / ' I CONCRETE CURB AND .. . • i / / / / / / / / / i / / / j l / / / / / / / / /� / / / / / � 1 � / '9 / \ \ 1 I GUTTER (TYP.) r // / / / / // // // // // i // j / / / /a / / / / /I / / / /� // / �' /' �9y \____ {III, \\ rn 11 1 �`.JI. i // // / //� / '/ �/ _// / // // // / / / /vi / /� / // / // / / / CHAINLINK /' / I \ 1 1 / / / / / / / / ro / / /o / / / / / / / FENCE it / v \ \ 1 1 \ \. , '� i./ � / / �'�'�'�� ____ -__ -_/ i // /' i i i / l / / / /�/ // / �6/ i// i o1h�j i ° I \ \I \\ 11 II \- 987. -\ \ /// % /�' ' ' / / - -- /' /i / / /// / /// / / / /// //f // / / / t I \ \ l 1 _ / '' i / ' _ _ / / / / / / /// %�/ I (' r 1 RE 949. 1 1 1 986 - / //' %�i �i�/ i' /%� �� % y\ __/ / / i /i / /// i' /i / / / / /'� / \II s - I 1 \IE (� °99.511 - /�/ / /%/ i / /'' /' // // / / / // /// /'' /� �_�',_',,___- - -'_ -' iJ' / /% // /ice �� I I 1 I I 1 / i / / / / /� /�/ //' / // i / //i /'� // / // / /// / _ -_ _ /J'•s / \ \\ II EE19489P 2.44 Z0 E 20 ac _- =____ - - -- I �)_ / / / ! / _ —� —��.� . ��\ IIE ($)= 942.4 SGl£ I 1 1 IN rtET I JE REVISION I sere p ' -- 16 N EV I P R W mdlan ihaY ndo Plan. a etlf anHan, or sport was 1 P N EVI IG P ampantl by ma or antler my tllneY auperWslon antl Mol ®� N H G tluly Llcenestl Pnfeealenal Enelnaer antler the lots TAE Hakanson Anderson er Yln SYpY. pr Nln EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY • Ixal a: CIvII Engineers and Land Surve era snccr 3601 Thu E: Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 T3 ADDITION AND REMOVALS PLAN 2 Date 7 26 16iIM0iHT A E E P.E. POmfi 7fi3- 427 -5860 FAX 763- 427 -0520 Ltc. No. 43362 CJJ Gp www.hakansan- a.derson.cam CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA �,� 977 -- - - - - I \_ice T -------- _ -__" = "�-• ---fir, -- ' ==b = °s -------- --- _ -'/ ____ __ ______ • /. I .9g /\ m11111m111 '\ x / °! J 1 13111111111111 y /-. 31 11111111111 • /. / III IIII /e /. / / i• ./ III11111 II •� 1� II 111 \� / III f / /• III I \ ELF= 95y0 -` 462 ' -961 I\ \ \ \1 NN\ 0 06� / 960 1 959y^ ice/ I 9581 B�QCy I I -859 \ EL \ 1 1 / / 96.8/ JIp / ' � / 1111 /4, / m j I \ \ I III I I / HLEV= 17955.8 \ T- 9.5 8 -957.0 \ \ \\ \\ 8 961 \0 \\ �� WOE i l 1 /I / /f / /SI( ��N SB -4 / o / / / / / I' / /q/ y/% % pp /�� `\ -989 ��/-�_- �" "� -• EL ELEV= 956.2 956.0 / FB 06 /GAF -957 a LF4 6 - -- 957 --1-956 \ \ 1 T -956.0 _ FB w 97 GF =953.2 Is LF =945.0 /I I / / L / / I I \ Pd-- as me or nnaer mr df ,W .uP•ryi,inn -.-I L �-�, avlT unm,.a Prvleeal,ml Engineer under m. Inv, I Hakans, a Anderson the State at ul m,m.. _ Clvil Engans and Land Surveyors 3601 63-4 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 a 7/26 /16Y A. E I�. I P.E. 763- 4w.haka s FAX 763 - n.com 20 www.hakanson- anderson.com I / / 1 J ,90 1 b� — 1' on MH \\ \I RE= 962.37 \ 1 -_ IE (N)= 951.1`7 I I IE (S)= 951.13 I o / 959 1 I I I 1 I \ II v 1 I I �g I E= 95�.40I1 I IE\ (N)= 849.00 II J) \\ IE I�S)= 949.00 1 \ 1 v GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET 4 FOR THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAI 2. SEE SHEET 5 FOR UTILITY INFORMATION. 3. AREA OF DISTURBANCE =0.48 ACRES. REFERENCE NOTES: 11) RETAINING WALL SHALL BE DESIGNED BY A LICENSED ENGINEER. SEE SHEET 6 FOR RETAINING WALL GRADES. FUTURE ® DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO POURING CURB. DROP THE BACK OF THE CURB AT THE FUTURI DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS. Q AGGREGATE BASE AND BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DEPTHS SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING DEPTHS ON STINSON BOULEVARD. LEGEND DRAINAGE ARROW FB FULL BASEMENT GF GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION LF LOW FLOOR ELEVATION T -906.3 -TOP OF RETAINING WALL ELEVATION B -904,0 - GROUND ELEVATION AT BASE OF RETAINING WALL T , CONSTRUCT 8618 \ ,CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER MN /DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 (TYP.) V " / IIII \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 \\ l 1 \ �\ ✓ \ 1 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE \ 1 1\ A P ON PER MN /DOT 1 1 STA}OARD PLATE 7035 l I I - \ (TY \ \ I 1 w o a' -JII/ A 1 I I \ > I \I n 11 I\ ca v z v v vii z 1 \ 1 1 1 \ 1 11 \ 1 1 v v 7 \ 1 1 ` id 1 1 1 Sa91\ \ \ \ RE- 9449.0,1 1 s - \ IE (N)= 9313.611 TIE (6y= 93$.51 \ I v v I \ 11 m 11 II I 11 1 1 II I RE= 948.74 I I IE ( )= 9 IIIE )=9442.4 2.4 I I 1 1 1 1 T3 ADDITION L� 20 0 20 0 SC E IN FEET GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 3 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA I/ 7 I SHEETS \I I I I II/ N N. \ ,996 I \1 I 149 / °! J 1 13111111111111 y /-. 31 11111111111 • /. / III IIII /e /. / / i• ./ III11111 II •� 1� II 111 \� / III f / /• III I \ ELF= 95y0 -` 462 ' -961 I\ \ \ \1 NN\ 0 06� / 960 1 959y^ ice/ I 9581 B�QCy I I -859 \ EL \ 1 1 / / 96.8/ JIp / ' � / 1111 /4, / m j I \ \ I III I I / HLEV= 17955.8 \ T- 9.5 8 -957.0 \ \ \\ \\ 8 961 \0 \\ �� WOE i l 1 /I / /f / /SI( ��N SB -4 / o / / / / / I' / /q/ y/% % pp /�� `\ -989 ��/-�_- �" "� -• EL ELEV= 956.2 956.0 / FB 06 /GAF -957 a LF4 6 - -- 957 --1-956 \ \ 1 T -956.0 _ FB w 97 GF =953.2 Is LF =945.0 /I I / / L / / I I \ Pd-- as me or nnaer mr df ,W .uP•ryi,inn -.-I L �-�, avlT unm,.a Prvleeal,ml Engineer under m. Inv, I Hakans, a Anderson the State at ul m,m.. _ Clvil Engans and Land Surveyors 3601 63-4 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 a 7/26 /16Y A. E I�. I P.E. 763- 4w.haka s FAX 763 - n.com 20 www.hakanson- anderson.com I / / 1 J ,90 1 b� — 1' on MH \\ \I RE= 962.37 \ 1 -_ IE (N)= 951.1`7 I I IE (S)= 951.13 I o / 959 1 I I I 1 I \ II v 1 I I �g I E= 95�.40I1 I IE\ (N)= 849.00 II J) \\ IE I�S)= 949.00 1 \ 1 v GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET 4 FOR THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAI 2. SEE SHEET 5 FOR UTILITY INFORMATION. 3. AREA OF DISTURBANCE =0.48 ACRES. REFERENCE NOTES: 11) RETAINING WALL SHALL BE DESIGNED BY A LICENSED ENGINEER. SEE SHEET 6 FOR RETAINING WALL GRADES. FUTURE ® DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO POURING CURB. DROP THE BACK OF THE CURB AT THE FUTURI DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS. Q AGGREGATE BASE AND BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DEPTHS SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING DEPTHS ON STINSON BOULEVARD. LEGEND DRAINAGE ARROW FB FULL BASEMENT GF GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION LF LOW FLOOR ELEVATION T -906.3 -TOP OF RETAINING WALL ELEVATION B -904,0 - GROUND ELEVATION AT BASE OF RETAINING WALL T , CONSTRUCT 8618 \ ,CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER MN /DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 (TYP.) V " / IIII \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 \\ l 1 \ �\ ✓ \ 1 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE \ 1 1\ A P ON PER MN /DOT 1 1 STA}OARD PLATE 7035 l I I - \ (TY \ \ I 1 w o a' -JII/ A 1 I I \ > I \I n 11 I\ ca v z v v vii z 1 \ 1 1 1 \ 1 11 \ 1 1 v v 7 \ 1 1 ` id 1 1 1 Sa91\ \ \ \ RE- 9449.0,1 1 s - \ IE (N)= 9313.611 TIE (6y= 93$.51 \ I v v I \ 11 m 11 II I 11 1 1 II I RE= 948.74 I I IE ( )= 9 IIIE )=9442.4 2.4 I I 1 1 1 1 T3 ADDITION L� 20 0 20 0 SC E IN FEET GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 3 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA I/ 7 I SHEETS ELF= 95y0 -` 462 ' -961 I\ \ \ \1 NN\ 0 06� / 960 1 959y^ ice/ I 9581 B�QCy I I -859 \ EL \ 1 1 / / 96.8/ JIp / ' � / 1111 /4, / m j I \ \ I III I I / HLEV= 17955.8 \ T- 9.5 8 -957.0 \ \ \\ \\ 8 961 \0 \\ �� WOE i l 1 /I / /f / /SI( ��N SB -4 / o / / / / / I' / /q/ y/% % pp /�� `\ -989 ��/-�_- �" "� -• EL ELEV= 956.2 956.0 / FB 06 /GAF -957 a LF4 6 - -- 957 --1-956 \ \ 1 T -956.0 _ FB w 97 GF =953.2 Is LF =945.0 /I I / / L / / I I \ Pd-- as me or nnaer mr df ,W .uP•ryi,inn -.-I L �-�, avlT unm,.a Prvleeal,ml Engineer under m. Inv, I Hakans, a Anderson the State at ul m,m.. _ Clvil Engans and Land Surveyors 3601 63-4 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 a 7/26 /16Y A. E I�. I P.E. 763- 4w.haka s FAX 763 - n.com 20 www.hakanson- anderson.com I / / 1 J ,90 1 b� — 1' on MH \\ \I RE= 962.37 \ 1 -_ IE (N)= 951.1`7 I I IE (S)= 951.13 I o / 959 1 I I I 1 I \ II v 1 I I �g I E= 95�.40I1 I IE\ (N)= 849.00 II J) \\ IE I�S)= 949.00 1 \ 1 v GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET 4 FOR THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAI 2. SEE SHEET 5 FOR UTILITY INFORMATION. 3. AREA OF DISTURBANCE =0.48 ACRES. REFERENCE NOTES: 11) RETAINING WALL SHALL BE DESIGNED BY A LICENSED ENGINEER. SEE SHEET 6 FOR RETAINING WALL GRADES. FUTURE ® DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO POURING CURB. DROP THE BACK OF THE CURB AT THE FUTURI DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS. Q AGGREGATE BASE AND BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DEPTHS SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING DEPTHS ON STINSON BOULEVARD. LEGEND DRAINAGE ARROW FB FULL BASEMENT GF GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION LF LOW FLOOR ELEVATION T -906.3 -TOP OF RETAINING WALL ELEVATION B -904,0 - GROUND ELEVATION AT BASE OF RETAINING WALL T , CONSTRUCT 8618 \ ,CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER MN /DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 (TYP.) V " / IIII \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 \\ l 1 \ �\ ✓ \ 1 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE \ 1 1\ A P ON PER MN /DOT 1 1 STA}OARD PLATE 7035 l I I - \ (TY \ \ I 1 w o a' -JII/ A 1 I I \ > I \I n 11 I\ ca v z v v vii z 1 \ 1 1 1 \ 1 11 \ 1 1 v v 7 \ 1 1 ` id 1 1 1 Sa91\ \ \ \ RE- 9449.0,1 1 s - \ IE (N)= 9313.611 TIE (6y= 93$.51 \ I v v I \ 11 m 11 II I 11 1 1 II I RE= 948.74 I I IE ( )= 9 IIIE )=9442.4 2.4 I I 1 1 1 1 T3 ADDITION L� 20 0 20 0 SC E IN FEET GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 3 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA I/ 7 I SHEETS `\ -989 ��/-�_- �" "� -• EL ELEV= 956.2 956.0 / FB 06 /GAF -957 a LF4 6 - -- 957 --1-956 \ \ 1 T -956.0 _ FB w 97 GF =953.2 Is LF =945.0 /I I / / L / / I I \ Pd-- as me or nnaer mr df ,W .uP•ryi,inn -.-I L �-�, avlT unm,.a Prvleeal,ml Engineer under m. Inv, I Hakans, a Anderson the State at ul m,m.. _ Clvil Engans and Land Surveyors 3601 63-4 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 a 7/26 /16Y A. E I�. I P.E. 763- 4w.haka s FAX 763 - n.com 20 www.hakanson- anderson.com I / / 1 J ,90 1 b� — 1' on MH \\ \I RE= 962.37 \ 1 -_ IE (N)= 951.1`7 I I IE (S)= 951.13 I o / 959 1 I I I 1 I \ II v 1 I I �g I E= 95�.40I1 I IE\ (N)= 849.00 II J) \\ IE I�S)= 949.00 1 \ 1 v GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET 4 FOR THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAI 2. SEE SHEET 5 FOR UTILITY INFORMATION. 3. AREA OF DISTURBANCE =0.48 ACRES. REFERENCE NOTES: 11) RETAINING WALL SHALL BE DESIGNED BY A LICENSED ENGINEER. SEE SHEET 6 FOR RETAINING WALL GRADES. FUTURE ® DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO POURING CURB. DROP THE BACK OF THE CURB AT THE FUTURI DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS. Q AGGREGATE BASE AND BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DEPTHS SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING DEPTHS ON STINSON BOULEVARD. LEGEND DRAINAGE ARROW FB FULL BASEMENT GF GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION LF LOW FLOOR ELEVATION T -906.3 -TOP OF RETAINING WALL ELEVATION B -904,0 - GROUND ELEVATION AT BASE OF RETAINING WALL T , CONSTRUCT 8618 \ ,CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER MN /DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 (TYP.) V " / IIII \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 \\ l 1 \ �\ ✓ \ 1 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE \ 1 1\ A P ON PER MN /DOT 1 1 STA}OARD PLATE 7035 l I I - \ (TY \ \ I 1 w o a' -JII/ A 1 I I \ > I \I n 11 I\ ca v z v v vii z 1 \ 1 1 1 \ 1 11 \ 1 1 v v 7 \ 1 1 ` id 1 1 1 Sa91\ \ \ \ RE- 9449.0,1 1 s - \ IE (N)= 9313.611 TIE (6y= 93$.51 \ I v v I \ 11 m 11 II I 11 1 1 II I RE= 948.74 I I IE ( )= 9 IIIE )=9442.4 2.4 I I 1 1 1 1 T3 ADDITION L� 20 0 20 0 SC E IN FEET GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 3 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA I/ 7 I SHEETS /I I / / L / / I I \ Pd-- as me or nnaer mr df ,W .uP•ryi,inn -.-I L �-�, avlT unm,.a Prvleeal,ml Engineer under m. Inv, I Hakans, a Anderson the State at ul m,m.. _ Clvil Engans and Land Surveyors 3601 63-4 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 a 7/26 /16Y A. E I�. I P.E. 763- 4w.haka s FAX 763 - n.com 20 www.hakanson- anderson.com I / / 1 J ,90 1 b� — 1' on MH \\ \I RE= 962.37 \ 1 -_ IE (N)= 951.1`7 I I IE (S)= 951.13 I o / 959 1 I I I 1 I \ II v 1 I I �g I E= 95�.40I1 I IE\ (N)= 849.00 II J) \\ IE I�S)= 949.00 1 \ 1 v GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET 4 FOR THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAI 2. SEE SHEET 5 FOR UTILITY INFORMATION. 3. AREA OF DISTURBANCE =0.48 ACRES. REFERENCE NOTES: 11) RETAINING WALL SHALL BE DESIGNED BY A LICENSED ENGINEER. SEE SHEET 6 FOR RETAINING WALL GRADES. FUTURE ® DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO POURING CURB. DROP THE BACK OF THE CURB AT THE FUTURI DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS. Q AGGREGATE BASE AND BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DEPTHS SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING DEPTHS ON STINSON BOULEVARD. LEGEND DRAINAGE ARROW FB FULL BASEMENT GF GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION LF LOW FLOOR ELEVATION T -906.3 -TOP OF RETAINING WALL ELEVATION B -904,0 - GROUND ELEVATION AT BASE OF RETAINING WALL T , CONSTRUCT 8618 \ ,CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER MN /DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 (TYP.) V " / IIII \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 \\ l 1 \ �\ ✓ \ 1 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE \ 1 1\ A P ON PER MN /DOT 1 1 STA}OARD PLATE 7035 l I I - \ (TY \ \ I 1 w o a' -JII/ A 1 I I \ > I \I n 11 I\ ca v z v v vii z 1 \ 1 1 1 \ 1 11 \ 1 1 v v 7 \ 1 1 ` id 1 1 1 Sa91\ \ \ \ RE- 9449.0,1 1 s - \ IE (N)= 9313.611 TIE (6y= 93$.51 \ I v v I \ 11 m 11 II I 11 1 1 II I RE= 948.74 I I IE ( )= 9 IIIE )=9442.4 2.4 I I 1 1 1 1 T3 ADDITION L� 20 0 20 0 SC E IN FEET GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 3 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA I/ 7 I SHEETS GENERAL NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET 4 FOR THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAI 2. SEE SHEET 5 FOR UTILITY INFORMATION. 3. AREA OF DISTURBANCE =0.48 ACRES. REFERENCE NOTES: 11) RETAINING WALL SHALL BE DESIGNED BY A LICENSED ENGINEER. SEE SHEET 6 FOR RETAINING WALL GRADES. FUTURE ® DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO POURING CURB. DROP THE BACK OF THE CURB AT THE FUTURI DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS. Q AGGREGATE BASE AND BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DEPTHS SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING DEPTHS ON STINSON BOULEVARD. LEGEND DRAINAGE ARROW FB FULL BASEMENT GF GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION LF LOW FLOOR ELEVATION T -906.3 -TOP OF RETAINING WALL ELEVATION B -904,0 - GROUND ELEVATION AT BASE OF RETAINING WALL T , CONSTRUCT 8618 \ ,CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PER MN /DOT STANDARD PLATE 7100 (TYP.) V " / IIII \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 \\ l 1 \ �\ ✓ \ 1 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE \ 1 1\ A P ON PER MN /DOT 1 1 STA}OARD PLATE 7035 l I I - \ (TY \ \ I 1 w o a' -JII/ A 1 I I \ > I \I n 11 I\ ca v z v v vii z 1 \ 1 1 1 \ 1 11 \ 1 1 v v 7 \ 1 1 ` id 1 1 1 Sa91\ \ \ \ RE- 9449.0,1 1 s - \ IE (N)= 9313.611 TIE (6y= 93$.51 \ I v v I \ 11 m 11 II I 11 1 1 II I RE= 948.74 I I IE ( )= 9 IIIE )=9442.4 2.4 I I 1 1 1 1 T3 ADDITION L� 20 0 20 0 SC E IN FEET GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 3 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA I/ 7 I SHEETS ` id 1 1 1 Sa91\ \ \ \ RE- 9449.0,1 1 s - \ IE (N)= 9313.611 TIE (6y= 93$.51 \ I v v I \ 11 m 11 II I 11 1 1 II I RE= 948.74 I I IE ( )= 9 IIIE )=9442.4 2.4 I I 1 1 1 1 T3 ADDITION L� 20 0 20 0 SC E IN FEET GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 3 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA I/ 7 I SHEETS iE ea GENERAL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO IMPORTING OR EXPORTING MATERIAL FROM THE SITE, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT A ROCK CONSTRUCTION 'Y,/ / / / / / / ' /' /' - ' l _- f / / __�j1 -/' / i ENTRANCE PER 1 / 5 / e 976 - — :___3_____ ! ~� X960\ \ i ljljII 11 Iv vv1 111111i/ / _3- - - ) /ranMH vv vI / / , / w n m m �n m m -r I RE= 962.37 \ 1 py\ - IE (N)= 951.14 1 I f l \\ \� \_l\ n��\ 1 1 1 1 / 1 l / / I I 1_ \ \ i XX a,0 IE (S)= 951.ij 1 / \\ \ 1 I I II 1 I l / 1 I \ \ \ P \ \\ \ ti v_ II 1--9,59 1 11 -S I \\ \1 \V Il \l1lIAA11v o, LEGEND AV /N,AII m _ _ 1V vv v `oihrp \I 11 III ill a I \Vv o �— }. Q \ \ 1 1 11 Tr SILT FENCE PER 8 rnl l m111 m 1IIn 1. —I _v A V v \F' \ �� —'C - 1 I .. � �' \ \I Pll l' Imll l l l0 III m _— \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ I\ /I /I j E =95 40j II DRAINAGE ARROW / lit �' 1 j 1 j j 111111 I( I II �E. (N)= a49.a0 ' / r _ i I III 1 I l 1 \ \ \\ \ I\ \ \ l \ \ \ / j / / I`\ IF I�S)= 9\49OO 11 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG PER 6 y i 111 I R\ 9S f / �� Av 11'111' I' 11111 ICI I I \�V v 1 1 \ V A A MN /DOT SEED MIX 25 -131, TYPE 1 1 l I /4 / \ \ ...__ -- III 11 I \ I I �I 1 1 / / v \ \ \ FERTILIZER AND CATEGORY 0 EROSION h i / III I I /' 1 1 \ \ \ l 1 / \ \ \ \ \ CONTROL BLANKET / • / Z ° y � // a 1 I 1 I'1 I I I III 'I '� Ill II V A A\ \V A A((\ 1\ lV 1 I - ° . / ) 11111111 Ilr I , L0 C\ I \ \ \ \` \I' \\ \ \ \ \\ / \ U6, \ \ \\ \\ \. \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ 1 \\ \ \\ FERTILIZER AND TYPE 1 MULCH, DISK \ \ MN /DOT SEED MIX 25 -131, TYPE 1 \ \ \V AV v v v I lV A AV A ANCHORED. m m m � . m • '// ° / / /� // 7\ \ \ �\ \ \ \\ m o .-o. / m / It I t • �' ��0 0� rpn ,,(o p p l h N v \ 1 1 1 1 Q / /-V / / 1 / / / /' / _r \ o \ \ \ ♦ i i i /' / i / i iii — �i- i ____/ / / / 1 / / / / / _ l V F V \ 1 \ // / / to \ \ 1 MH r RE -949. 1 — _ _ \ \IE ; (N )= 9q 3 3.6% __________ \ {I ■� \[E (Sy= 3$.51 1 - -- '_____ —____ i _ \` /' -- -- - - -- \ I I RE2948.� 4 I _ _� — I �\ I IE (�J)= 9t42.4� /' / /, %/ // // // // /// // / / /// / _'-(T'\ ' /// \� I IIE (5) =9424 20 0 20 a0 DATE KLV1510N M1ar.6y carilyy that this plan, spaciilcalbn. or nport wa 4W ®R; T 6 16 DDE paraParea by me er untlar my alrect sneer uncle one t.at °I TAE Hakanson Anderson EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SHEET 9 29 16 EVISED 1 m a euly ucanzae Profenisnal En9lnaer unaar iM1a Iowa 10 20 16 R GNS R 51 N GES of the State of NI a Civil En in 10 16 5E0 U LO ON ON 1 ttmiR 9 eves and Land Surveyors 4 1 6 5ED P TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 T3 ADDITION o: iIM01HY A. EC E I N P.E. o®R: 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763 - 427 -0520 Date 7 26 i6 Lic. No. 43362 CJJ www.hokonson- anderson.com CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 7 SHEEiS E I GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST CONCRETI SECTIONS PER MN /DOT STANDARD PLATE 4007. 2. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER OVER WATERMAIN AND SERVICES. REFERENCE NOTES: 1Q LOCATION OF EXISTING WATER SERVICES SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIC TO CONSTRUCTION. Q CONSTRUCT WATER SERVICE PER e. 7 ® CONSTRUCT SEWER SERVICE PER 7 ' © THE LOCATION OF THE SERVICES TO THE EXISTING HOUSE SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. PROPOSED SERVICES MAY HAVE TO BE REVISED BASED ON THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING SERVICES. THE EXISTING WATER SERVICE IS CONNECTED TO THE MAIN IN BENJAMIN STREET TO THE WEST. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISCONNECT THE WATER SERVICE AT THE MAIN. Q CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT PER 4). 7 20 0 20 40 fiG1E IN pEET UTILITY PLAN SHED CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA I/ 7 E *s I sxE i I 1 CONNECT TO EXISTING v _ 1" CURB STOP(!) S San MH 3 RE =962.37 1" TYPE "K" — v IE (N)= 951.17 COPPER PIPE I IE (S)= 951.17 V SAWCUT AND REMOVE CLAY 4" PVC SANITARY SEWER AND CONNECT O 2.00% TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER — Q WITH AN 8 "X4" PVC WYE 0 I — V I I V CONNECT TO 1" TYPE "K" COPPER CB EXISTING RE= 955.40 1" CURB STOP 1Q PIPE, 1" CORPORATION _ IE (N)= 949.00 AND 1" CURB STOP IE (S)= 949.00 AND BOX © V SAWCUT AND REMOVE CLAY 1" TYPE "K" SANITARY SEWER AND CONNECT 4 COPPER PIPE TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CONNECT TO EXISTING V WITH AN 8 "X4" PVC WYE Q3 SEWER AND WATER SERVICES 4Q — V I 8`pcK 4" PVC — SAWCUT DIP WATERMAIN V 4" DIP 4" DIP (CL 52) O 2.00% AND CONNECT TO EXISTING PLUG WATERMAIN WATERMAIN WITH AN 8 "X4" DIP TEE AND 4" GATE _ V VALVE AND BOX 1" TYPE "K" COPPER PIPE, 1" CORPORATION I I I I I I SAWCUT CLAY SANITARY AND 1" CURB STOP c > > > v SEWER AND CONNECT TO > > > > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND BOX 19OLF 6" PVC 6 "X4" PVC WYE (SDR 35) O 9.35% SA ITARY SEWER AND 4" PVC v I SAN /MH #1 CLEANOUT ® O 2.00% ® 48° DIA. (R -1733) INV =961.7 1° Ty E °K" COPPER V RIM= 952.59 (N)INV= 942.21 PIPE, 1 CORPORATION CONNECT TO (S)INV= 941.93 AND 1" CURB STOP I EXISTING AND BOX ]a — V I WATERMAIN (W)INV= 943.93 4" PVC O 2.00X 5 SAWCUT AND REMOVE CLAY SANITARY SEWER AND CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER I — WITH AN 8 "X4" PVC WYE Q V V —x V x -- I / / � I San MH I RE= 949.01 I s — IE (N)= 933.61 I IE (S)= 933.51 V / I I I I B \ \ 1 / I RE= 948.04 IE (N)= 942.44 IE (S)= 942.44 I I I I DATE REVISION 18 RE VI P 8 AN DDE EMEN NES PER ht", T 1 81 PER P CHAN honey c.mry mm ml, pinn, .pe.lnemlon. er nP,rR arep"ntl ey ma Or antler my tllncl aMparvlal"n antl Mat m a tluly ❑cenaetl Pnfanianel Enpineer untlar 1ha Iowa of Ma Slate of Mln o aspme _ TAE Hakanson Anderson mMM CIV11 En Y Engineers and Land Surveyors or3 lfi PIA EVI81 18 REV L 18 PIA. 16 REW H0u PAD T10. o TIMOTHY A. EG E I H P.E. Da }e 7/Z6 /16/16 43362 TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 T3 ADDITION 0D1LLp R: 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763 - 427 -0520 18 EVI fili L1a, ryo, CJJ www.hokonson— ander.on.com GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES SHALL BE PRECAST CONCRETI SECTIONS PER MN /DOT STANDARD PLATE 4007. 2. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER OVER WATERMAIN AND SERVICES. REFERENCE NOTES: 1Q LOCATION OF EXISTING WATER SERVICES SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIC TO CONSTRUCTION. Q CONSTRUCT WATER SERVICE PER e. 7 ® CONSTRUCT SEWER SERVICE PER 7 ' © THE LOCATION OF THE SERVICES TO THE EXISTING HOUSE SHALL BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. PROPOSED SERVICES MAY HAVE TO BE REVISED BASED ON THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING SERVICES. THE EXISTING WATER SERVICE IS CONNECTED TO THE MAIN IN BENJAMIN STREET TO THE WEST. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISCONNECT THE WATER SERVICE AT THE MAIN. Q CONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT PER 4). 7 20 0 20 40 fiG1E IN pEET UTILITY PLAN SHED CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA I/ 7 E *s I sxE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION AND SOILS NOTES: 1. TOP OF THE GRADING SUBGRADE IS DEFINED AS THE BOTTOM OF THE CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE OR PAD ELEVATION. ALL UNSTABLE MATERIAL SUCH AS TOPSOIL, SILTS, ORGANIC MATERIALS, MUCK, ETC. ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION SHALL BE REMOVED. 2. STRIP AND REUSE ALL INPLACE TOPSOIL IN AREAS TO BE DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT PREPARED BY HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES DATED AUGUST 5, 2016 FOR ADDITIONAL SITE PREPARATION AND FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS. 4. SAWCUT BITUMINOUS WHEN PLACING NEW PAVEMENT ADJACENT TO INPLACE PAVEMENT AND AT TERMINI OF CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE A UNIFORM JOINT. 5. BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE ITEMS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN /DOT SPEC. 2104.3. 6. USE TACK COAT BETWEEN ALL BITUMINOUS MIXTURES. THE BITUMINOUS TACK COAT MATERIAL SHALL BE APPLIED AT A UNIFORM RATE OF 0.05 GAL /SY TO 0.07 GAL /SY BETWEEN BITUMINOUS LAYERS. THE APPLICATION RATES ARE FOR UNDILUTED EMULSIONS. 7. PERFORMANCE GRADED (PG) ASPHALT BINDER PG 58 -34, SPEC. 3151, SHALL BE USED FOR ALL BITUMINOUS MIXES ON THIS PROJECT. SPECIFIC PG GRADES ARE SHOWN AT THE END OF THE MIX DESIGNATION NUMBER SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL SECTION. S. THE BITUMINOUS MIXTURES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SPECIFICATIONS 2360 AND 3139. 9. IF NECESSARY, THE UTILITY COMPANIES WILL RELOCATE THEIR FACILITIES CONCURRENTLY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION IN COOPERATION WITH UTILITY RELOCATION. 10. EROSION CONTROL SHALL CONFORM TO THE MN /DOT EROSION CONTROL HANDBOOK, 11. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED NO LATER THAN 7 DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ACQUIRE THE NECESSARY MPCA -NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES (BMP'S) PRIOR TO GRADING AND REMOVAL ACTIVITIES. BMP'S SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE HIS OPERATION TO MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBED AREA AT ANY GIVEN TIME. 4. BMP'S SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE CONTRACTOR AND DOCUMENTED IN THE SWPPP INSPECTION LOG. SWPPP SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY. S. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FILE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) WITH THE MPCA WHEN FINAL STABILIZATION IS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. REFERENCE NOTES: 1D PLACE STAKES AS NEEDED TO PREVENT MOVEMENT OF SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS PLACED ON SLOPES OR AS NEEDED DUE TO OTHER FACTORS. 2) PAVEMENT SECTION SHALL BE VERIFIED BY A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 6 S POST LENGTH, 5 FT MIN. — AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING PLASTIC ZIP TIES — - EASEMENT LINE (50LB TENSILE) SETBACK LINE LOCATED IN TOP 8" - - -- EXISTING CONTOUR DIRECTION OF GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36" WIDTH IN. IN. RUNOFF FLOW EDGE OF WOODS = � i DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES ® ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN — > > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER w Go0 ° " w ACHINE SLICE 8 -12" a DEPTH ut 0 b EXISTING HYDRANT a STANDARD MACHINE SLICED L' SILT FENCE DETAILS 6' TO PROFEOT A— FROM SXEEr ROW (SEE SPEC, MSG) 1 "X2 "X24" LONG WOODEN STAKES AS NEEDED. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN OVER THE SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG AT AN ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES WITH THE TOP OF THE STAKE POI SEDIMENT NTING UPSTREAM 1Q CONTROL LOG FLOW _ 45j1 Y �\ EMBEDMENT DEPTH K3-� SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST 6 1.5" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEA2408) 1.5" TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPNWB230B) 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRADE LIGHT DUTY PAVEMENT SECTION (. NO SCALE EwDATE a LEGEND PROPERTY LINE — PROPERTY LINE - — — — — — — — — - EASEMENT LINE — '- — " — " — SETBACK LINE ------ - - - - -- 960 - - - -- EXISTING CONTOUR 960 PROPOSED CONTOUR EDGE OF WOODS DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES ® ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN — > > EXISTING SANITARY SEWER >> >> EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN K EXISTING WATERMAIN VALVE b EXISTING HYDRANT Q EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE x s EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE JY POWER POLE GUY WIRE — P -OH P -OH OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE > > PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER — I I PROPOSED WATERMAIN OR SERVICE !�s PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE Y PROPOSED HYDRANT m PROPOSED GATE VALVE APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION SB -1 1 "X2 "X24" LONG WOODEN STAKES AS NEEDED. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN OVER THE SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG AT AN ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES WITH THE TOP OF THE STAKE POI SEDIMENT NTING UPSTREAM 1Q CONTROL LOG FLOW _ 45j1 Y �\ EMBEDMENT DEPTH K3-� SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST 6 1.5" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEA2408) 1.5" TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPNWB230B) 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRADE LIGHT DUTY PAVEMENT SECTION (. NO SCALE EwDATE a REVISION EVI61 PER REV Heresy P.mry mm Mi. Plan, aPeerneanen, .r re'd rR, Prep =retl by ma or antler my direct auPervlalon entl +M1Of I em u tlhu 4ceneeE ProN.s +enel Engineer under the lets or me sine ..... eMMn Date 7/2fi/i6 Lio. No. 43362 gggp m TAE HGkanson Anderson REw n: Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors TAE 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 aW m 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763- 427 -0520 CJJ www.hakonson- anderson.com T3 ADDITION CONSTRUCTION NOTES, PROJECT LEGEND AND DETAILS CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA SHEET 6 GP 7 SHEETS 2a P EW51 PER PLAN NGES 1 I ] REVi LEG 9, 4072.01 1 1� i 6. MIN. N ri CORPORATION STOP STOP 121 Li" TYPE "K" COPPER WATER SERVICE, PROVIDE SLACK TO ALLOW FOR COMPACTION WATER SERVICE DETAIL NO SCALE 4" PVC PLAN �w w Z 6pJ MAIN LINE m u 2X MIN. SLOPE SECTION �z TYPICAL PVC SEWER SERVICE 7 NO SCALE BRANCH SANITARY :R MAIN LINE FINISHED GRADE (BITUMINOUS) =970.7 FORD TYPE At COVER OR APPROVED EQUAL SCHEDULE 40 PVC CLASS 5 THREADED PLUG. AGGREGATE SET TOP 4" BELOW BASE FINISHED GRADE. rl REFERENCE NOTES: 1Q CORPORATION STOP SHALL BE A FORD FB600 -4 —NL OR APPROVED EQUAL. ® CURB STOP SHALL BE A FORE) B22- 444M —NL OR APPROVED EQUAL. © CURB BOX SHALL BE AN A.Y. MCDONALD 5622, 1.5" OR APPROVED EQUAL. CURB BOX LID AND PLUG HSALL BE AN A.Y. MCDONALD 5623L, 1.5" OR APPROVED EQUAL. 4 " -45' PVC BEND MCC PVC EXTEND 2LF 6" PVC AND INSTALL 6" PVC CAP C1 TYPICAL SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 7 NO SCALE 1-11 ...v....aaa,�aa. a1 "aa„ "aa f-_ 6 18 N R NS PER REVI prepare d by me or under my direct vu,n,f.l.a and that AE Hakanson Anderson DETAILS SHEEP am a duly Licensed Prefeeelonal Englneer under the Iaws of the State of Mln Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors 7 AE „' 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 T3 ADDITION or n: 763- 427 -5860 FAX 763 - 427 -0520 Date 7/26/16 Ua. No. 3362 U! www.hokcnson— onderson.com CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA SHEM COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PLANNING REPORT CASE NUMBER: 2016 -1202 DATE: December 1, 2016 TO: Columbia Heights Planning and Zoning Commission APPLICANT: Indigo Sign Works, Holiday Station Stores DEVELOPMENT: Monument Sign for Gas Station LOCATION: 4259 Central Avenue NE. REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit - Dynamic LED Sign PREPARED BY: Elizabeth Holmbeck, City Planner INTRODUCTION Indigo Sign Works on behalf of Holiday Station Stores is requesting a Conditional Use Permit per Code Section 9.106 (P) (13) (C) to allow a dynamic light emitting diode (LED) sign in conjunction with a commercial establishment for the property located at 4259 Central Avenue NE. Holiday Station Stores is repainting the building and canopy on the site to reflect the store's modern look. The current white will be replaced with a light beige color and the pylon sign will be removed. The applicant is requesting to replace the pylon sign with a monument sign, which will include an LED component which will allow the business to display business related advertising. A dynamic LED sign would include any components of a sign that appear to have movement or that appear to change, caused by a method other than physically removing and replacing the sign or its components. This also includes any moving, flashing, blinking or animated display and any display that incorporates LED lights manipulated through digital input, "digital ink" or any other method or technology that allows the sign face to present a series of images or displays. ZONING ORDINANCE The property located at 4259 Central Avenue NE is zoned GB, General Business. The properties to the north, south and west are zoned General Business and Limited Business, and the properties to the east are zoned One and Two Family Residential. Dynamic LED signs are permitted in the General Business Zoning District as a Conditional Use in conjunction with a commercial establishment. A rendering of the proposed sign, and location map is attached for review. City of Columbia Heights Planning and Zoning Commission December 6, 2016 Planning Report Page 2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan designates this property for commercial uses. The proposed sign is consistent with the types of uses guided for this zoning district. DESIGN GUIDELINES The subject property is located within the Design Guideline Overlay District, and is governed by the "Highway District" standards within the Design Guidelines. The following standards are specific design requirements for signs in the Design Guideline Overlay District: Signs should be architecturally compatible with the style, composition, materials, colors and details of the building, and with other signs on nearby buildings. Signs should be an integral part of the building and site design. Wall and projecting signs should be positioned so they are an integral design feature of the building, and to complement and enhance the building's architectural features. Signs should not obscure or destroy architectural details such as stone arches, glass transom panels, or decorative brickwork. Signs may be placed: • In the horizontal lintel above the storefront windows • Within window glass, provided that no more than 25 percent of any individual window is obscured • Projecting from the building • As part of an awning • In areas where signs were historically attached Wall signs should generally be rectangular. In most cases, the edges of signs shall include a raised border that sets the sign apart from the building. Individual raised letters set onto the sign area surface are also preferred. Projecting signs may be designed in a variety of shapes. Sign colors shall be compatible with the building facade to which the sign is attached. No more than three colors should be used per sign, unless part of an illustration. To ensure the legibility of the sign, a high degree of contrast between the background and letters is preferable. A combination of soft /neutral shades and dark /rich shades are encouraged. Sign materials should be consistent or compatible with the original construction materials and architectural style of the building facade on which they are to be displayed. Natural materials such as wood and metal are more appropriate than plastic. Neon signs may be appropriate for windows. External illumination of signs is permitted by incandescent, metal halide or fluorescent light that emits a continuous white light. Light shall not shine directly onto the ground or adjacent buildings. Neon signs are permitted. Internally lit box signs and awnings are not permitted, with City of Columbia Heights Planning and Zoning Commission December 6, 2016 Planning Report Page 3 the exception of theater marquees. Variable electronic message signs are not permitted, with the exception of existing time /temperature signs. Ground or monument signs are encouraged rather than pylon signs. Sign materials, colors and architectural detailing should be similar to those of the principal building. The area around the base of the sign should be landscaped. FINDINGS OF FACT Section 9.104 (H) of the Zoning Ordinance outlines nine conditions that must be met in order for the City Council to grant a Conditional Use Permit. They are as follows: (a) The use is one of the conditional uses listed for the zoning district in which the property is located, or is a substantially similar use as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Dynamic LED signs are specifically listed as a Conditional Use in the GB, General Business Zoning District. (b) The use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area for commercial uses. The use is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan as the sign is proposed for a commercial establishment. (c) The use will not impose hazards or disturbing influences on neighboring properties. The proposed use will not result in any additional noise and should not disrupt neighboring properties. In order to mitigate any potential disturbances, the City's Zoning Code outlines specific development standards that address the operation of dynamic LED signs. (d) The use will not substantially diminish the use of the property in the immediate vicinity. The use of property in the immediate vicinity will not be diminished by the placement of an LED sign at 4259 Central Avenue NE. (e) The use will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained in a manner that is compatible with the appearance of the existing or intended character of the surrounding area. The applicant will have to abide by specific development standards as they relate to LED signs. These standards will help ensure compatibility with the appearance of the existing surrounding area. (f) The use and property upon which the use is located are adequately served by essential public facilities and services. City of Columbia Heights Planning and Zoning Commission December 6, 2016 Planning Report Page 4 This is correct (g) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to minimize traffic congestion on the public streets and to provide for appropriate on -site circulation of traffic. The use of a dynamic LED sign at this location is not anticipated to affect traffic. (h) The use will not cause a negative cumulative effect, when considered in conjunction with the cumulative effect of other uses in the immediate vicinity. The dynamic LED sign will have to adhere to specific development standards. It is intended that the use will not cause a negative cumulative effect. (i) The use complies with all other applicable regulations for the districts in which it is located. This is correct. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed dynamic LED sign for Holiday Station stores, located at 4259 Central Avenue NE. Motion: Move to close the public hearing and waive the reading of Resolution 2016 -120, there being ample copies available to the public. Motion: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Resolution No. 2016 -120 for a Conditional Use Permit for a proposed dynamic LED sign for the property located at 4259 Central Avenue NE., subject to certain conditions of approval that have been found to be necessary to protect the public interest and ensure compliance with the provisions of the Zoning and Development Ordinance, including: 1. Dynamic LED signs are allowed only on monument signs for conditionally permitted uses in all zoning districts, with the exception of the PO, Public District, in which LED signage may be utilized in existing pylon signs. Motor fuel stations may display dynamic LED signs as part of the pylon sign to promote motor fuel prices only. Such motor fuel price signs do not require a conditional use permit. All dynamic LED signs may occupy no more than 60% of the actual copy and graphic area. The remainder of the sign must not have the capability to have dynamic LED signs, even if not used. Only one, contiguous dynamic display area is allowed on a sign face. 2. A dynamic LED sign may not change or move more often than once every ten seconds for commercial, industrial uses, or public uses, and no more than once every ten City of Columbia Heights Planning and Zoning Commission December 6, 2016 Planning Report I Page 5 minutes for religious and /or educational institution uses, except one for which changes are necessary to correct hour- and - minute, date, or temperature information. 3. A display of time, date or temperature information may change as frequently as once every five seconds, however information displayed not relating to the date, time or temperature must not change or move more often than once every ten seconds for commercial, industrial uses, or public uses, and no more than once every ten minutes for religious and /or educational institution uses. 4. The images and messages displayed must be static, and the transition from one state display to another must be instantaneous without any special effects. Motion, animation and video images are prohibited on dynamic LED sign displays. 5. The images and messages displayed must be complete in themselves, without continuation in content to the next image or message or to any other sign. 6. Dynamic LED signs must be designed and equipped to freeze the device in one position if a malfunction shall occur. The displays must also be equipped with a means to immediately discontinue the display if it malfunctions, and the sign owner must immediately stop the dynamic display when notified by the city that it is not complying with the standards of this section. 7. Dynamic LED signs may not exceed a maximum illumination of 5,000 nits (candelas per square meter) during daylight hours and a maximum illumination of 500 nits (candelas per square meter) between dusk to dawn as measured from the sign's face at maximum brightness. Dynamic LED signs must have an automatic dimmer control to produce a distinct illumination change from a higher illumination level to a lower level for the time period between one -half hour before sunset and one half -hour after sunrise. 8. Dynamic LED signs existing on the effective date of Ordinance 1593, passed April 25, 2011, must comply with the operational standards listed above. An existing dynamic LED sign that does not meet the structural requirements may continue as a non - conforming sign subject to § 9.105(E). 9. Traffic visibility. No planting, structure or other obstruction shall be placed or allowed to grow on corner lots in a manner that will impede vision on the intersecting rights -of- way, in accordance with the following sight triangle: No planting or structure in excess of 30 inches above the abutting curb line shall be permitted within the sight triangle, defined as the area beginning at the intersection of the projected curb line of two intersecting streets, then 30 feet along one curb line, diagonally to a point 30 feet from the point of beginning on the other curb line, then back to a point of beginning. A Site Triangle Map is attached. The Building Official or City Planner will conduct a site inspection at the time a building permit and sign permit is issued to ensure compliance. City of Columbia Heights Planning and Zoning Commission December 6, 2016 Planning Report Page 6 ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016 -120 Application Applicant's Narrative Location Map Site Triangle Map Sign Rendering Sign Location Map RESOLUTION NO. 2015-120 A resolution of the City Council for the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, approving a Conditional Use Permit for a dynamic LED sign for Holiday Station Stores located at 4259 Central Avenue NE. Whereas, a proposal (Case # 2016 -1202) has been submitted by Indigo Sign Works on behalf of Holiday Station Stores to the City Council requesting a Conditional Use Permit from the City of Columbia Heights at the following site: ADDRESS: 4259 Central Avenue NE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: On file at City Hall. THE APPLICANT SEEKS THE FOLLOWING: A Conditional Use Permit per Code Section 9.106 (P) (13) (c), to allow a dynamic LED sign to be located in the General Business Zoning District. Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing as required by the City Zoning Code on December 6`h, 2016; Whereas, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the effect of the proposed Conditional Use Permit upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community and its Comprehensive Plan, as well as any concerns related to compatibility of uses, traffic, property values, light, air, danger of fire, and risk to public safety in the surrounding areas; Now, therefore, in accordance with the foregoing, and all ordinances and regulations of the City of Columbia Heights, the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT (a) The use is one of the conditional uses listed for the zoning district in which the property is located, or is a substantially similar use as determined by the Zoning Administrator. (b) The use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. (c) The use will not impose hazards or disturbing influences on neighboring properties. (d) The use will not substantially diminish the use of the property in the immediate vicinity. (e) The use will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained in a manner that is compatible with the appearance of the existing or intended character of the surrounding area. (f) The use and property upon which the use is located are adequately served by essential public facilities and services. (g) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to minimize traffic congestion on the public streets and to provide for appropriate on -site circulation of traffic. (h) The use will not cause a negative cumulative effect, when considered in conjunction with the cumulative effect of other uses in the immediate vicinity. City of Columbia Heights - Council Resolution Page 2 (i) The use complies with all other applicable regulations for the districts in which it is located. Further, be it resolved, that the attached plans, maps, and other information shall become part of this Conditional Use Permit and approval; and in granting this Conditional Use Permit the City and the applicant agree that this permit shall become null and void if the project has not been completed within one (1) calendar year after the approval date, subject to petition for renewal of the permit. The Conditional Use Permit is subject to certain conditions of approval that have been found to be necessary to protect the public interest and ensure compliance with the provisions of the Zoning and Development Ordinance, including: CONDITIONS 1. Dynamic LED signs are allowed only on monument signs for conditionally permitted uses in all zoning districts, with the exception of the PO, Public District, in which LED signage may be utilized in existing pylon signs. Motor fuel stations may display dynamic LED signs as part of the pylon sign to promote motor fuel prices only. Such motor fuel price signs do not require a conditional use permit. All dynamic LED signs may occupy no more than 60% of the actual copy and graphic area. The remainder of the sign must not have the capability to have dynamic LED signs, even if not used. Only one, contiguous dynamic display area is allowed on a sign face. 2. A dynamic LED sign may not change or move more often than once every ten seconds for commercial, industrial uses, or public uses, and no more than once every ten minutes for religious and /or educational institution uses, except one for which changes are necessary to correct hour - and - minute, date, or temperature information. 3. A display of time, date or temperature information may change as frequently as once every five seconds, however information displayed not relating to the date, time or temperature must not change or move more often than once every ten seconds for commercial, industrial uses, or public uses, and no more than once every ten minutes for religious and /or educational institution uses. 4. The images and messages displayed must be static, and the transition from one state display to another must be instantaneous without any special effects. Motion, animation and video images are prohibited on dynamic LED sign displays. 5. The images and messages displayed must be complete in themselves, without continuation in content to the next image or message or to any other sign. 6. Dynamic LED signs must be designed and equipped to freeze the device in one position if a malfunction shall occur. The displays must also be equipped with a means to immediately discontinue the display if it malfunctions, and the sign owner must immediately stop the dynamic display when notified by the city that it is not complying with the standards of this section. 7. Dynamic LED signs may not exceed a maximum illumination of 5,000 nits (candelas per square meter) during daylight hours and a maximum illumination of 500 nits (candelas per square meter) between dusk to dawn as measured from the sign's face at maximum brightness. Dynamic LED signs must have City of Columbia Heights - Council Resolution Page 3 an automatic dimmer control to produce a distinct illumination change from a higher illumination level to a lower level for the time period between one -half hour before sunset and one half -hour after sunrise. 8. Dynamic LED signs existing on the effective date of Ordinance 1593, passed April 25, 2011, must comply with the operational standards listed above. An existing dynamic LED sign that does not meet the structural requirements may continue as a non - conforming sign subject to § 9.105(E). 9. Traffic visibility. No planting, structure or other obstruction shall be placed or allowed to grow on corner lots in a manner that will impede vision on the intersecting rights -of -way, in accordance with the following sight triangle: No planting or structure in excess of 30 inches above the abutting curb line shall be permitted within the sight triangle, defined as the area beginning at the intersection of the projected curb line of two intersecting streets, then 30 feet along one curb line, diagonally to a point 30 feet from the point of beginning on the other curb line, then back to a point of beginning. A Site Triangle Map is attached. The Building Official or City Planner will conduct a site inspection at the time a building permit and sign permit is issued to ensure compliance. Passed this 12`h day of December, 2016. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: Attest Katie Bruno, City Clerk /Council Secretary ORDER Of COUNCIL Gary L. Peterson, Mayor CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION To be filled out by City. CASE NO.: APPLICABLE ORDINANCE NO.: 9.104(H) PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: DATE RECEIVED: DATE OF LETTER OF COMPLETION: APPROVAL DATE PER STATUTE: REVIEW PERIOD EXTENDED: To be filled out by Applicant: PROPOSED NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: PROJECT ADDRESS /LOCATION: 14a:0 Cx,,1rJ 4ye LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED (attach s 6� fkrw al i ^G I t +i kl PRT jf R'cessa L a+ 3 FEE OWNER OF PROPERTY ADDRESS CITY W �OLM�l��Dh �p�i�C,4 's }c�7r on s�o cCS Q PHONE 95a1/��3v DFAX �SF�16 }U STATE M JV ZIP 1 j y 37 Page 1 of 2 PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: Go C n vev) en Sfo f PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: (�u5 si�.`���o^ I �onJCv^itoce rj'fpre- REASON FOR REQUEST (please attach a written narrative describing the intended use of the property and justification for your request. Describe any modifications and /or limitations of the use that have been made to insure its compatibility with surrounding uses and with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.) l!� APPLICANT �ii>°it Uc�`7 PHONE FAX 3a0-91010161 Ga,ti E -MAIL S , Crkry %0 li� o S ;,r PAGER oT %�S CELL # ADDRESS y) 3,3 70 �g 5f 5� L �UD^ CITY 4lexancCiA fr STATE /1 / , ZIP S 3 FEE OWNER OF PROPERTY ADDRESS CITY W �OLM�l��Dh �p�i�C,4 's }c�7r on s�o cCS Q PHONE 95a1/��3v DFAX �SF�16 }U STATE M JV ZIP 1 j y 37 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION THIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY PLANNER AND REVIEW OF APPLICATION AND NECESSARY MATERIALS BEING SUBMITTED. ENGINEERING APPROVAL MAY ALSO BE REQUIRED AND MUST MEET ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS SET BY THE CITY ENGINEER OR CONTAINED IN THE CITY CODE. ITEMS TO BE GIVEN TO APPLICANT WITH APPLICATION A. Application Checklist B. Schedule of Planning and Zoning Commission Meetings A. Submittals as required in the attached application checklist, detailing what is proposed for the property. B. Two copies of a list of property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. APPLICATION FEES: A. $200.00 Conditional Use Permit Fee TOTAL AMOUNT RECEIVED $ 2.. C7p.cO CITY RECEIPT NUMBER DATE RECEIVED 111lo.tuo Acknowledgement: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the City of Columbia Heights to take the action herein requested, that all statements herein are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Columbia Heights and the State of Minnesota. 11/ Ike DA PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE (If different from Applicant) DATE COMMUNITY Revised: 2006 Approved by the Columbia Heights Planning Commission on Approved by the Columbia Heights City Council on Page 2 of 2 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES 4567 American Boulevard West, Bloom'iroon, MN 55437 (952) 830 -8700 November 3, 2016 To whom it may concern The City of Columbia Heights MN Subject: Letter of authorization - Holiday #58 Columbia Heights MN permit applications To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that Holiday Stationstore #58 at 4259 Central Avenue NE in Columbia Heights MN is applying for a Conditional Use Permit. I, Travis Comer, the (leasing agent/owner) authorize Indigo Signworks to represent Holiday Stationstores, Inc. Holiday Stationstores Inc and Indigo Signworks are to conform to all laws, codes, and regulation by all agencies required by this sign permit process. Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Travis Comer 952- 830 -8713 November 7, 2016 To Columbia Heights City Council, Indigo Signworks is working as Holiday Station Stores sign installer is request the acceptance of the CUP Application for Holiday Station Store # 58 located at 4259 Central Avenue. We are requesting acceptance of this application as they want to remove the existing pylon sign and replace with a monument sign so that a message center can be added to meet city code. Sincerely, Joey Crary Sales Manager/ Corporate Sales joey.crary@indigosignworks.com ,lit L1VV • /%/� SIGNWORKS vww.indigosignworks.com H O I d C r imwm Holiday Columbia Heights, MN 13.17 Square Feet Quote # 42557 FINAL _6' -711 Date: 11/04/2016 ,ATORADE Revised Date: 11/14/2016 Sales Representative: Joey Crary Drawn by: GAN Page Scale: 1/2" = I' -0" - u,- Page Size: llxl7 21.4 Square Feet / n 6 6' Illuminated Double Sided Monument Sian Cabinet: Aluminum (Blue) — — -41-511 25.8 Square Feet 4'-511 File location: G: \ H \ Holiday Station Store \ Working Sketch Files \ ColumbiaHeights_Monument_425! The ideas and designs contained in this original and unpublished drawing are the property of Indigo Signworks, Inc. and may not be used or reproduced in whole or part without written permission from Indigo Signworks, Ir E G � i G -- 7 �1 'AIL2 NO CeP 'v 8 ffl -r $ • ` I �cegp� S1i7 .A4 K moo 11 U/ -1 in t ✓ rn ? 1 -4• do 0 r o n �� w cf z' i r vp A. C� S J. G� 71 (1`l fi 6` .o n 1p cn N m t! 00 x.< a i-m dmo= Oyu J a g `-- -+°mom R. z mum" -4 O N CH COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PLANNING REPORT CASE NUMBER: 2016 -1203 DATE: November 10, 2016 TO: Columbia Heights Planning and Zoning Commission APPLICANT: 500, L-C., Property Owner DEVELOPMENT: Commercial Redevelopment LOCATION: 3989 Central Avenue, 3889 Central Avenue, 950 40`h Avenue REQUEST: Zoning Amendment - Rezoning PREPARED BY: Joe Hogeboom, Community Development Director BACKGROUND 500 LLC., owner of the property at 3989 Central Avenue NE. has petitioned the City of Columbia Heights to change the zoning designation of site from 'Central Business' to 'Mixed Use'. This change would accommodate the relocation of Prodeo Academy to the site. Prodeo Academy, a kindergarten —fourth grade charter school currently located within First Lutheran Church, would occupy a portion of the first and second floors, and the entire third floor, serving as an anchor tenant in the building. Nancy Aleksuk, representative of the owner, states that retail and commercial uses are anticipated for the Central Avenue - facing portion of the first floor of the building, and that commercial office users are anticipated to occupy upper- stories of the building. Aleksuk anticipates bringing exterior renderings of the property before the Planning and Zoning Commission in early 2017 as part of the official Site Plan approval process. 3989 Central Avenue, 3889 Central Avenue, 950 40th Avenue City of Columbia Heights Planning and Zoning Commission December 6, 2016 Planning Report Page 2 FINDINGS OF FACT Section 9.104(F)(5) requires four findings of fact to be made when a zoning amendment petition is made. The findings of fact are as follows: (a) The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for "Commercial ". It has been repeatedly demonstrated throughout the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area that mixed use zoning is consistent with, and primarily comprised of commercial development. In Columbia Heights, mixed use zoning permits residential, commercial and institutional uses. Currently, both commercial and residential uses are permitted on this property. (b) The amendment is in the public interest and is not solely for the benefit of a single property owner. The Northeast Business Center is the largest commercial building in Columbia Heights, and serves as an anchor for our downtown area. The building is unique in that it is the only multi - story, non- residential building along the Central Avenue corridor. Allowing a mix of uses to facilitate occupancy and redevelopment of the building is in the public's interest. (c) Where the amendment is to change the zoning classification of a particular property, the existing use of the property and the zoning classification of property within the general area of the property in question are compatible with the proposed zoning classification. Unfortunately, the building is currently vacant and not in use. The proposed redevelopment will include only uses that are permissible within the Mixed Use Zoning District. (d) Where the amendment is to change the zoning classification of a particular property, there has been a change in the character or trend of development in the general area of the property in question, which has taken place since such property was placed in its current zoning classification. Increasingly, multi -story buildings are including a wide variety of users, including educational institutions. In fact, an educational institution had occupied this building (despite an inconsistency with the Central Business Zoning classification) in the past. City of Columbia Heights Planning and Zoning Commission December 6, 2016 Planning Report Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval the proposed rezoning of the property located at 3989 Central Avenue, 3889 Central Avenue, 950 40th Avenue, based on the aforementioned findings of fact. Motion: Move to waive the reading of Resolution No. 2016 -108, there being ample copies available to the public. Motion: That the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 2016 -108, rezoning the property located at 3989 Central Avenue, 3889 Central Avenue, 950 40th Avenue from 'Central Business' to 'Mixed Use'. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016 -108 Application Applicant's Narrative Location Map Anoka County PID Information Preliminary Renderings City of Columbia Heights Planning and Zoning Commission December 6, 2016 Planning Report Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval the proposed rezoning of the property located at 3989 Central Avenue, 3889 Central Avenue, 950 40th Avenue, based on the aforementioned findings of fact. Motion: Move to waive the reading of Resolution No. 2016 -108, there being ample copies available to the public. Motion: That the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 2016 -108, rezoning the property located at 3989 Central Avenue, 3889 Central Avenue, 950 40th Avenue from 'Central Business' to 'Mixed Use'. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016 -108 Application Applicant's Narrative Location Map Anoka County PID Information Preliminary Renderings RESOLUTION NO. 2016 -108 A resolution of the City Council for the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, approving a Zoning Amendment for the property located at 3989 Central Avenue, 3889 Central Avenue, 950 40th Avenue Whereas, a proposal (Case # 2016 -1203) has been submitted by 500, LLC to the City Council requesting a Zoning Amendment from the City of Columbia Heights at the following site: ADDRESS: 3989 Central Avenue, 3889 Central Avenue, 950 40th Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: On file at City Hall. REQUEST: Zoning Amendment (rezoning). Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing as required by the City Zoning Code on December 6th, 2016; Whereas, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the effect of the proposed Rezoning upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community and its Comprehensive Plan, as well as any concerns related to compatibility of uses, traffic, property values, light, air, danger of fire, and risk to public safety in the surrounding areas; Now, therefore, in accordance with the foregoing, and all ordinances and regulations of the City of Columbia Heights, the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT (a) The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan (b) The amendment is in the public interest and is not solely for the benefit of a single property owner. (c) Where the amendment is to change the zoning classification of a particular property, the existing use of the property and the zoning classification of property within the general area of the property in question are compatible with the proposed zoning classification. (d) Where the amendment is to change the zoning classification of a particular property, there has been a change in the character or trend of development in the general area of the property in question, which has taken place since such property was placed in its current zoning classification. Now, therefore, in accordance with the foregoing, and all ordinances and regulations of the City of Columbia Heights, the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights hereby rezones the property at 3989 Central Avenue, 3889 Central Avenue, 950 40th Avenue to "Mixed Use ". City of Columbia Heights - Council Resolution ORDER OF THE COUNCIL Passed this 12th day of December, 2016. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: Gary L. Peterson, Mayor Attest: Katie Bruno, City Clerk /Council Secretary Page 2 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ZONING AMENDMENT APPLICATION To be filled out by City. CASE NO.:o2ClCp —fJ�)3 DATE RECEIVED: II' I l APPLICABLE ORDINANCE NO.: 9.104(F) DATE OF LETTER OF CO PLETION: o io I IC, REZONING V ZONING AMENDMENT DESIGNATION: C 3 I� APPROVAL DATE PER STATUTE: i Io I I REVIEW PERIOD EXTENDED: n To be filled out by Applicant: PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: 3 q g 9 cem � Avr_ N5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED (attach separate page if necessary): _TfP 2 f " 17e,-j PRESENT ZONING OF PROPERTY: (� P h f v ( a s �s Erri L� PROPOSED ZONING OF PROPERTY: MIX ftI 1%c o SECTION NUMBER OF TEXT TO BE CHANGED: REASON FOR REQUEST (please provide a written narrative that explains how the existing use of the property and the zoning classification of other property within the general area are compatible with the proposed zoning classification. Also describe whether there has been a change In the character or trend of development in the general area that has taken place since the property was originally placed in its current zoning classification. if applicable, provide the existing text that you are requesting be changed and provide the proposed text.) APPLICANT �_o 0 L L C, PHONE E -MAIL S Yb LrNvt PAGER ADDRESS f R %p CELL # _9/ Z CITY �,VlI�/,�,tOoils STATE ZIP FEE OWNER OF PROPERTY Sat) LL C. ADDRESS SgN1�e- a t iskayr,� PHONE CITY STATE Page 1 of 2 FAX ZIP CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ZONING AMENDMENT APPLICATION THIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY PLANNER AND REVIEW OF APPLICATION AND NECESSARY MATERIALS BEING SUBMITTED. ITEMS TO BE GIVEN TO APPLICANT WITH APPLICATION A. Applicabon Checklist B. Schedule of Planning and Zoning Commission Meetings A. Application submitted as heckliry B. Two copies of a list of property owners within 350 feet "off the subject property (for rezoning). APPLICATION FEES: A. $500.00 Zoning Amendment $ _ TOTAL AMOUNT RECEIVED $ CITY RECEIPT NUMBER �£ �'S3� DATE RECEIVED Acknowledgement: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of law, for the purpose of inducing the City of Columbia Heights to take the action herein requested, that all statements herein are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Columbia Heights and the State of Minnasntsr Revised 2005 Approved by the Columbia Heights Planning Commission on Approved by the Columbia Heights City Council on Page 2 of 2 500, LLC 510 1" Avenue N Suite 600 Minneapolis, MN 55403 612 - 332 -8323 11/7/2016 City of Columbia Heights Elizabeth Holmbeck, City Planner Joe Horboom, Community Development Director 590 40 Avenue NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 RE: Zoning Change for 3989 Central Ave NE Dear Elizabeth and Joe, 500, LLC purchased the Northeast Business Center, located at 3989 Central Ave NE as foreclosed property. We are requesting the property be re -zoned to mixed use zoning. Since our acquisition in late 2014 , we have been actively pursuing new tenancy. 3989 Central is a unique building in Columbia Heights. At six stories high and over 100,000 SF, it is the largest building in the central business district. The surrounding buildings are mostly one and two story smaller structures with the focus predominantly on retail based businesses. A mixed use would allow us to focus two smaller retail tenants on the main floor facing Central Ave, Prodeo Academy in the rear of the building, taking up the less desirable middle floors, and then allow the top 2 floors to be used for office users. There are a couple of challenges we have faced in finding the right mix of tenants for this building: 1. The current mechanical systems are expensive to operate and cannot be separated off to accommodate small tenants. We therefore need to find a multi -floor tenant as the first renovation in order to make it financially feasible to operate the building. 2. The building needs extensive updating. We need a large user as the first tenant in, an organization that has stable financials and can sign a longer term lease, in order to make the renovation investment feasible. Currently, we have a large stable user in Prodeo Academy, a K -4th grade charter school. Their goal is to grow to 81h grade and would take the back of the lst floor as well as floors 2 &3. The will cap the school at 8th grade. I also have 3 potential retail users for the 2 spaces on the front of the building, facing Central Ave. They would be the street facing tenants. I also have a previous office tenant who sold their company and has now started up a similar company. They are on an aggressive growth curve and the plan would be to move them to the top floors of this building in about 18 months. The building is set up perfectly for us to accommodate the different types of users and provide adequate parking as well as secured, separate entrances. The front parking lot, just off Central, would service the retail spaces. The retail spaces would be the featured street - facing tenants utilizing the small monument sign that Northeast Bank used. We would also propose signage over the windows on each side of the main entrance. A small medical office and an accountants firm are the two preferred retail tenants I am working with currently. For the reasons mentioned above, I am not able to lease the retail spaces without the presence of a large tenant. The school would use the area on the back of the building (where the old drive thru was) for their main entrance and drop off. They have limited school buses which would use the alley next to the drive thru. Traffic would come in on Gould and exit on 40th. With the MTC bus stop t Central and 40th, anyone using public transportation for the school would use the sidewalk on 40th and come in the main entrance of the school that is in the back. We propose transforming the patio above the old drive thru as the outdoor space for the school. This is consistent with the trend in schools occupying more urban spaces. The large office tenant we are working with is a Logistics company and rarely has clients on site. This tenant would use the parking ramp along with the teachers. Any additional office users would use the ramp for employee parking and the main entrance for clients. The larger monument sign on the corner would list all of the tenants in the building. As part of the renovation, the side retaining wall would be dealt with and new landscaping would be added to enhance the exterior facade. Additional information will be provided as requested Thank you for your consideration, Nancy Aleksuk Project Manager 500, LLC 612 - 998 -9123 (c) Welcome to the web site of Anoka County Minnesota .a T1' Hor Departments Services Elected Officials News Jobs Home -> Departments -> Property Records & Taxation -> Property Search -> Search Results -> Property Summary -> Linked Parcels Linked Para "m Information Property ID Segment Chain Tax Year Linked Parcels Chained Property ID 36- 30 -24 -32 -0110 36- 30 -24 -32 -0261 36- 30 -24 -32 -0258 Printable Version Search Another Property PRT Home Show Payment List Printable Version Developed by Manatron, Inc. @2010 All rights reserved. Version 1.0.5590.10027 Legal Description and Property Identification Number 36- 30 -24 -32 -0261 (3889 Central Avenue) _ =IF ._ THOSE PRTS OF LOTS 27 THRU 31 BLOCK 6 RESERVOIR HILLS & THOSE PRTS OF LOTS 23 AND 24 BLK 1 WALTON'S REARRANGEMENT OF LOTS 33 AND 34 BLK 6 RESERVOIR HILLS & VACATED ALLEY ABUTTING BLK 1 OF SD PLAT LYG WITHIN THE FOL DESC TRACT: COM AT PT ON S LINE OF SD BLK 1, 18 FT W OF SE COR OF LOT 23 SD BLK 1, TH NLY ON A LINE 18 FT W OF & PRLL /W E LINE OF SD LOT 23, 87 FTTO POB OF TRACT TO BEDESC: TH CONT NLY ON EXTN OF SD LINE TO N LINE OF BLK 6 RESERVOIR HILLS, TH WILY ALG SD N LINE OF SD BLK 6 TO A PT 47.23 FT ELY OF NW CDR OF LOT 30, BLK 6, TH SELY TO POB. EX PRT PLATTED AS TRACT A REG LAND SURVEY NO 250, EX RD, SUBJ TO EASE OF REC 36- 30 -24 -32 -0110 (3989 Central Avenue) -L THAT PRT OF LOTS 28 THRU 32 BLK 6 RESERVOIR HILLS & THAT PRT OF LOTS 23 THRU 28 BLK 1 OF WALTONS REARRANGE- MENT OF LOTS 33 & 34 BLK 6 RESERVOIR HILLS LYG SLY & WLY OF FOL DESC LINE, BEG AT PT 18 FT WOF SE COR OF LOT 23 SD BLK 1, TH NLY PRLL /W E LINE OF SD LOT 23 87 FT, TH N WLY TO A PT ON N LINE OF SD BLK 6, 47.23 FT E OF NW COR OF LOT 30 BLK 6 SD ADD & THERE TERM, SUB.) TO EASE OF REC 36- 30 -24 -32 -0258 (950 40`h Avenue) GaVtO<vE.vE TRACT A REG LAND SURVEY NO 250 C1vQ�1vKqq OUNiY 3989 Central Ave. NE. •111 M v 00 40TH AVE NE N N 00 N ao M w cD Z f` rn y M 2 w m j M v 2 m a M Q, ca Ic NE 3961 M 3970 3968 3957 Lo m 3958 3951 M 3948 to 3946 M 3947 N av 3943 M rb 3939 Mv 90, 335 M Om I 391 3 M Ac A; Plnlo Flown SPA S of 2016 3988 3984 ca Ic NE 3982 LICE r� 3970 3968 3960 3958 3952 3948 3946 N m � M 3928 CENTER t� 2 3959 3951 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS LIBRARV.939 3889 c C, G GOULD AVE NE 950 4 rn c§cg[e 1:1200 v o � r M A Location 3989 Central Avenue NE