HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995 Public Hearing
590 40th Avenue N. E.
Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878
(612) 782-2800
Mayor
Joseph Sturdevant
Councilmembers
Donald G. Jolly
Bruce G. Nawrocki
Gary L. Peterson
Robert W. Ruettimann
City Manager
Patrick Hentges
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
TO:
CITIZENS OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
FROM:
MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, AND CITY MANAGER
DATE:
NOVEMBER 28, 1994
RE:
NOVEMBER 30TH CITY TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
Enclosed please find a summary and highlight of the proposed 1995 Budget for the City of Columbia
Heights, for calendar year beginning January 1, 1995, through December 31, 1995.
The information represents a synopsis of the 296 page budget document submitted to the City Council
on August 8, 1994. The budget proposal was reviewed at a series of work session meetings over the
last one hundred days. The budget document not only encompasses the Tax Supported Funds (General
Fund or Library Fund), but also the Proprietary Funds (Water Utility, Worker Fund, etc.), Capital
Funds (State Aid Construction, Park Fund, etc.) and Intergovernmental Funds (ParaTransit Fund,
DARE Fund, etc.). The Truth in Taxation notice and corresponding property tax information deals
only with the tax levy impact of the General Fund and Library Fund. The information herein provides
. a profile of the total budget.
The proposed budget is an attempt to maintain the present level of services enjoyed by the citizens of
the community. As such, the City Manager and the City Council analyzed various areas of the budget
in an attempt to balance expenditures with the availability of revenue sources. To this end, the City
Council will ultimately make decisions that will reduce or eliminate past expenditure activity in favor
of bolstering or increasing other areas of the budget. Together, it is always the Council's intent to
minimize the impact of any tax increase on the citizens of Columbia Heights.
Again, thank you for your interest in and support of the city budget process.
cb
EncIs.
"SERVICE IS OUR BUSINESS" EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS
OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 1995 PROPOSED BUDGET
AND PROPERTY TAXES
Table of Contents
1995 Budget Preparation Calendar .................................... 1
1994 City of Columbia Heights Profile .................................. 2
Major City Revenues-Pay 1994 .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3
Composition of the 1994 Total Tax Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4
Composition of the 1994 Tax Base .................................... 5.
Policy Budget Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6
Expenditures-Comparative Analysis by Fund ........................... 13
Expenditures-Comparative Analysis by Expenditure Objective ............... 14
Revenues-Comparative Analysis by Fund. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 15
Revenues-Comparative Analysis by Revenue Source ..................... 16
General Fund Budget ............................................. 17
General & Library Fund Comparison-1995-1994 Expenditures & Revenue ...... 18
General & Library Fund Summary Budget by Type ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19
General Fund and Library Fund Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 20
General Fund and Library Fund Expenditures-Functional Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 21
General Fund and Library Fund Expenditures-Classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 22
Comparison of Revenue Sources to Total Revenue-1986-1995 .............. 23
Where Your Tax Dollars Go . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 24
Who Gets Your Property Tax Dollars? ($70,000 Home) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 25
Who Gets Your Property Tax Dollars? ($80,000 Home) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 26
What Will $20/Month Buy? ......................................... 27
Result of $25,000 Increase in Tax Levy ................................ 28
Summary of Computations for 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 29
Identified Final Budget Changes ..................................... 30
Market Value Comparisons ......................................... 34
Factors Affecting Tax Increase. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 35
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
1995 BUDGET PREPARATION
April 4, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Department begins preparation of
requests
May 19, 1994
All department requests are received
by the Finance Department
June 7, 1994
City Manager reviews requests with
each department
July 7, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. City prepares final recommended
budget
August 8, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. City Council receives City Manager
Recommended Budget and conducts
review to determine maximum possible
tax levy increase
to
September 12, 1994
City Council passes preliminary "not to
exceed" tax levy
September 13, 1994
City Council conducts a review of each
department or fund and identifies
cuts/changes
to
November 28, 1994
City Council attempts to provide an
indication of adjustments to tax levy
November 30, 1994
Truth in Taxation Hearing; by law, City
Council cannot adopt final budget
Tentative date to adopt 1995 Budget
Last day to certify tax levy to Anoka
County
December 12,1994
December 28, 1994
- 1 -
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
1995 PROPOSED BUDGET
1994 PROFILE
Tax Base
1993 Population: 18,999
Dollars Per Capita
1994 Total Tax Capacity 9,228,787 485.75
1994 Powerline Tax Capacity 0 0.00
1994 Captured TIF Capacity 1,034,989 54.48
1994 Fiscal Disparities Contribution 608,086 32.01
1994 Taxable Tax Capacity 7,585,712 399.27
1994 Fiscal Disparities Distribution 2,701,198 142. 18
Revenues
1994 LGA 2,025,418 106.61
1994 HACA 964,991 50.79
1994 Certified Levy 2,583,778 136.00
Total 5,574,187 293.39
Average Tax Rates
1994 City Tax Rate 25.70/0
1994 County Tax Rate 29.90/0
1994 School Tax Rate 69.20/0
1994 Special Tax Rate 5.40/0
1994 Total Tax Rate 130.20/0
Market Value Composition of Tax Base
Residential 75.40/0
Apartments 11 .20/0
Commercial/Industrial 12.40/0
Farm 0.00/0
Other 1.10/0.
- 2 -
(')
m
~
......
.;:..'!l
O'>m
~o
'm
~
-<
~~
~'b
O':t="
_ 3 -
~s
~)>
o
s
):='
-nc..-
00
:D:D
10
rn~
0-<.
:=\
-<:D
~~
om
oz
~c
~m
OJ(f)
-
:P,
~'
rn-o
C5~
~
(J)-'"'
c.o
c.o
~
()
0
~
-0
0
."cn
0-
m(J) (\)0 :D::!
~o ~O -\0
(\):c tOe ffiZ
-I (J10 ~~ gO
0 V)O
-I ef' ~-< -\.."
~ 0 -<-\
-I
$< ~:J:
:0 om
~
r':' 0-'-'
..... EtO
v:>
9 ~(O
1\)
~ co~
0
--\
)>0
ffi--\
-)>
9"0 G)r
~-\ (\) ~
~ffi (J1 (J)-\
ef:D :....to ~
(\)~
JJ
0
~ ~
0
m
. - l\. -
~~
~:t.
o rn
:D
~
C1>
-J-
(J10
~rn
o z
~
()
o
~
-n-o
00
~(J)
:t.~
rn--
aO
:4Z
-<0
~-n
a--\
OJ:
~rn
~........
'Ec..o
".c..o
:t.~
t.:n--\
~$(
C1>OJ
".
(J)
rn
~~............................~ -
~~~~ ~
,~.T~
~ ~~ ," ",,,, .:..:~"'-'"
~..... ~~~~
0:" ~~ ~""~.....~""...~
~~~~~~~~~
.~ ~~~~~
-
~,~~~' 0:
~~~"~
:S::""S'" ~~
~~::.'~"-"~"'-= ...:
a/ ~~~
~.....~.
0 ,,'-' :." ~ :-.......'.....' ~
-,,:,,- ,,~~ ...:
~ ..." '~'
..,,~~'"
~ ~"~ ~
- ~~~
-
z
-
~
NO
cf.c
~
~
~
'?O
)>
~~
~~
o rn
~
(f)
_ 5 -
POLICY BUDGET ISSUES
Transmitted below is identification and discussion of the significant policy issues affecting the development
of the 1995 annual budget for the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota. As in past years, the City of
Columbia Heights will operate under a line-item type of budget. In order to finalize a line-item budget, the
City Council should not only have an understanding of the financial trends affecting the City, but they must
also pass judgment and provide direction on significant policy issues that will have a direct affect on the
formulation of this year's budget. This is a deviation from the line-by-line review approach that past City
Councils have taken in the approval process. By first reviewing the budget analysis and budget policy
issues, the Council may have a greater understanding of the "cause and effect" relationship of the multitude
of line items that make up the City budget.
The following is a discussion of the significant budget issues within various City funds. Please note there
is an explanation referred under each topic paragraph that provides an updated status of each one of these
policies/budget issues.
CounciVPolice ContinQencv Fund
The 1994 Police Contingency Funding has been re-budgeted for $50,000 in 1994 using cash reserves. It
is anticipated that the contingency will not be expended in 1994. The Police Department has prepared a plan
for utilization of an additional police officer.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that the hiring of an additional police officer be
scheduled for further discussion in an early fall, 1994, Work Session.
NOTE: In October, 1994, the City Council authorized the use of approximately $7,000 of the
Police Contingency Fund to finance an additional police officer. It is expected that the
remaining $43,000 in the 1994 budget will go towards funding the officer in 1995.
Election Law Impact
The State Election Law changes require uniform local elections, including mandating fall school district
elections and making it easier for local governments to change their election dates from odd- to even-year
elections. Together, these changes would facilitate a changeover to even-year local elections for both the
City and the school district, with the potential of over $24,000 in budget savings by discontinuing odd~years.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that the City Council closely review the financial
benefits of shifting local elections to even years. A similar shift by the Columbia
Heights School District and the City of Hilltop would have mutual savings for the three
jurisdictions in operating elections.
NOTE: The City Council has entered into discussions with Columbia Heights School District
to facilitate a change from odd-year to even-year local elections. If the change is ultimately
approved, budget savings will not be realized until 1999.
Sheffield Levv For HousinQ Administration
The Executive Director of the HRA has requested that the 1992 and 1993 agreement (which reflects one-
quarter time reimbursement to the HRA) for planning services be reinstated in 1995. The City Manager
recommends that an adjustment to approximately one-fifth time reimbursement be reinstated for the cost of
additional Sheffield administration. Further, an additional $5,000 should be added as an alternative to the
Sheffield/City-wide Housing Study grant application to MHFA that was not approved. It is recommended that
the City use the funding to conduct a housing inventory and compile strategy recommendations for long-term
housing initiatives. They would be implemented through an in-house process using interns.
- 6 -
Policy Direction: It is recommended that the 1995 proposed levy be increased in part
by $5,000 for the Sheffield/City-wide housing and approximately $10,000 for HRA
reimbursement for planning assistance in Sheffield.
NOTE: Approximately $15,000 is included in the 1995 budget proposal as an offset
reimbursement to the HRA for their role in the Sheffield Redevelopment Project. Further, the
City and the HRA are currently evaluating a merger of the HRA staff with City staff to facilitate
additional savings and to improve the coordination of effort between the two bodies.
Sheffield Levy for'PolicinQ
The City Manager added $5,000 to the Overtime Regular Employee Account and $5,000 to the Part-Time
Employee Account to reflect special police attention to Sheffield and the potential of a joint jail/detox transport
program. It is unlikely at this point that a grant application will be submitted by the Sheriff or other
cooperative cities. Thus, the only alternative may be a contract for services with the Sheriff's department
or, alternatively, utilize Police Reserves in this capacity.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that the 1995 levy be increased by an additional
$10,000 to reflect additional policy attention to the Sheffield area since the current
Community Oriented Policing Grant will expire in 1995 and, accordingly, specific
Sheffield attention will be cut somewhat.
NOTE: With the addition to the pOlice force of the two federally funded police officers and one
locally funded police officer, the City Council is considering removing the $10,000 additional
costs for Sheffield policing. Originally, $5,000 was recommended to fund overtime for special
police operations in the Sheffield or other problem spots in the City, and $5,000 to fund a
jail/detox transport program that would in turn bolster the personnel available for traditional
policing.
Recreation Maintenance OrQanization
As the Recreation program grows, it is suggested that the Public Works supervisory and maintenance staff
have a greater role in maintaining Murzyn Hall. In a greater sense, it may be wise to additionally look at the
consolidation of Recreation under Public Works and the Parks Department in an effort to promote greater
efficiency, cooperation, and planning efforts.
Policy Direction: The City Manager recommends that a potential consolidation of the
Recreation Department into a Public Works division be further evaluated. The objective
of the consolidation would be to improve the maintenance levels at Murzyn Hall and
improve the long-range park planning/maintenance function.
NOTE: The proposed budget contemplated transferring the maintenance of Murzyn Hall from
the Recreation Department to the Public Works Department. The change in responsibilities
would result in the custodial staff being utilized in other buildings throughout the City. The
City Council desires further information on the change prior to its implementation.
Silver Lake LifeQuards
Due to declining attendance and water quality, it is recommended that Silver Lake Beach remain open, but
on-duty lifeguards be eliminated at an annual savings of $6,800. Other counties and cities operate swim
beaches without lifeguards by simply posting the beach area, indicating that lifeguards are not on duty.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that lifeguards be eliminated from the Silver Lake
Beach budget but the beach remain open and maintained.
- 7 -
NOTE: The City Council throughout the budget discussions has supported eliminating the
lifeguards at Silver Lake. Prior to implementation, they requested formal acknowledgement
from the City's insurance carrier.
Sand/Salt StoraQe
The City Manager cut the development of a sand/salt storage building that would ultimately cost $60,000.
This type of facility and/or containment area will likely be required in future years by the MPCA.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that the City pursue joint project development with
perhaps Fridley, New Brighton, or MNDOT as an alternative to constructing an
independent storage facility.
NOTE: Construction of a sand/salt storage facility was eliminated from the budget in favor
of a jointly developed project between neighboring cities. A grant application for funding a .
joint project was not approved. City staff is currently evaluating other alternatives for
consideration in the 1996 budget.
Volunteer ProQram
It is recommended that the Volunteers Budget be reduced to a one-quarter time position. This essentially
involves elimination of the Volunteer Coordinator position or, alternatively, a reduction in hours. It is possible
that a one-quarter time position would work seasonally in order to sustain the ongoing Beautification Program
and Heights Pride activities. It is emphasized that without the Volunteer Coordinator position, or some
alternative thereof, the neighborhood planning program cannot be undertaken.
Policy Direction: To undertake a neighborhood planning program such as discussed
by the City Council would require a reinstatement of approximately $33,000 for a
comprehensive neighborhood planning and problem-solving (beyond neighborhood
crime watch meetings) program. It is anticipated that a fully implemented neighbor-
hood planning program would take approximately two years. A three-quarter time
position would be necessary to assure timely and orderly planning with the various
neighborhood groups or associations (most scheduled during evening meetings).
NOTE: At this point in the budget approval process, the Volunteer Coordinator position is not
included within the budget proposal. The City Council has directed staff to prepare a report
to be filed at a future work session concerning the redirection of responsibilities and activities.
Additionally, the City Council directed the City Manager to contact the Beautification
Committee to discuss specifically what financial and staffing resources are needed to continue
the goals of the program.
General Fund ContinQencies
The Contingencies Account is established at $200,000 to cover unforeseen budget costs and contract awards
to bargaining units. The $10,000 transfer to Para Transit was eliminated primarily due to the significant fund
balance that has accumulated in the Para Transit Fund. The City Council's $15,000 Contingency Account
was discontinued. All other contingencies except Police Contingencies (that was re-budgeted using cash
reserves) have been eliminated.
Policy Direction: City Staff should meet to discuss a labor negotiations strategy that
will affect the use of the 1995 Contingency Account. At this time, the Council may wish
to determine whether or not the level of the Contingency Account is set high enough.
NOTE: The contingency account within the General Fund has been established at $200,000.
Part of the contingency account is established to cover labor contract- renewals with the
- 8 -
various bargaining units. To date, no contracts have been approved. Additionally, the City
Council has discussed establishing the Mayor/City Council contingency at $28,365 to reflect
contingencies for unforeseen special projects, Heights Pride, establishment of a youth
program, and the possibility of additional funding for a Fire/Housing Inspections part-time
clerical position.
Volunteer Fire Pension
The Volunteer Fire Pension is currently funded at a 125% level. Despite the overfunding, the City is required
to annually contribute $30,000 of normal costs.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that a special bill be introduced for the 1995
Legislative Session that enables the City to delay contribution to the Volunteer Pension
Fund in the event the fund sustains a level of 105% funding. This could save the
General Fund about $25,000 in each year's levy as a result of normal cost contribu- .
tions. The City Council should direct City Staff to meet with appropriate legislative
officials and state officials concerning preparation of a bill achieving this directive.
NOTE: As required by law, the funding of the Volunteer Fire Pension cost is included within
the 1995 budget despite the fund being at a 125% level. The City Council will discuss at a
future work session whether to pursue a special legislative initiative to allow the contribution
to be self-funded.
Street Rehabilitation
City Staff has filed a proposed Street Rehabilitation Program with the City Council. The program calls for
a combination strategy involving thin coat overlays/patching, sealcoating, mill/overlay, in-place recycling, and
full reconstruction. The assessment costs for the above components will remain relatively equal and uniform,
and will be implemented over eight sections of the City, plus alleyways and parking lots.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that the Street Rehabilitation Program be finalized
during the fall of 1994, and then formally adopted by January, 1995. The adoption of
the program would be preceded by an informational newsletter explaining the specific
elements of the program. The actual implementation would involve a neighborhood
informational meeting followed by the actual special assessment meeting for those
property owners living in the first of the eight street improvement districts.
NOTE: $25,000 from the Liquor Fund revenues is included within the budget as a contribution
to a special Street Rehabilitation Fund. Plans for a new street rehabilitation program are
currently underway and will be presented to the public in the next 60 days.
Pension Reserve Fund
The City Manager previously suggested the establishment of the Pension Reserve Fund to receive the
pension cost savings from 1994, as a result of Police/Fire Relief-P.E.R.A. Pension Consolidation. In future
years, all pension revenues would be transferred from the General Fund to the Pension Reserve Fund. The.
pension savings from 1994 would be used to maintain level payments or eliminate spike increases in yearly
pension obligations due to actuarial changes.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that during the budget process, City Council
formally approve the transfer of budget savings in 1994 as a result of the Police/Fire
Relief-P.E.R.A. consolidation for initial funding for the Pension Reserve Fund.
NOTE: The establishment of a pension reserve fund will occur in 1995.
- 9 -
Para Transit Fund Transfer
The $89,609 Para Transit Budget will operate at a year-end deficit of $12,614 in 1995. The operating transfer
from the General Fund is proposed to be eliminated in 1994. Revenues from the County and the State have
been reduced from the levels received in previous years. Together, further evaluation of this program should
be conducted by the City Council.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that the Para Transit Program be evaluated at a
future 1994 City Council Work Session. Possible alternatives could involve the
reinstatement of the General Fund support, increase in the fares, or a cap on the
number of rides.
NOTE: City Council will be further evaluating the Para Transit Program in early 1995.
Police Grant Fundinq
In 1994, the City Council fully funded three years of the Federal Police Grant utilizing $134,000 of General
Fund Balance. When the grant expires in 1997, the City is obligated to fully fund the two supplemental
positions.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that the City Council schedule a review of the
Acting Police Chief's plans to achieve the grant objectives. At that time, the City
Council may wish to further discuss the source-method of funding authorized to match
the grant, and what advance steps should be taken to address the City's obligations
to fund the officers in future years.
NOTE: No decision has been made to establish a contingency account to fund the police
officer in future years, after the grant funding expires.
Refuse Fund
The Refuse Collection and Disposal Budget was based upon the pro forma that was prepared for the rate
adjustments in 1994. The reductions in rates were primarily due to contractor pass-through of the Anoka
County tipping fee reduction. City Staff is suggesting that we may want to look at further restructuring of the
low volume service rate and recycling reimbursement under SCORE funding.
Policy Direction: City Staff has discussed the possibility of further reductions in the
low-volume rate that the City offers. Essentially, this would provide an incentive for
recycling. It is recommended that this issue of the low volume rate structure, together
with the County's reimbursements under the SCORE funding, be further examined in
1995.
NOTE: This item will be further discussed during 1995.
Sewer Rates
The cost of operation, coupled with MWCC costs and flow changes, have resulted in an operating deficit for
the Sewer Budget. The ending fund balance by 1993 will reach a three-year low of $966,531 , or a projected
change in equity reduction of $466,000 over a three-year period.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that the City Council implement a sewer rate
increase aimed at leveling off the operating deficits of the Sewer Fund. It may not be
realistic to reinstate previous year losses in equity. City Staff should first begin by
preparing for City Council review a five-year operating pro forma for the Sewer Fund.
- 10 -
NOTE: This item will be further discussed in a City Council work session during the early part
of 1995.
Storm Sewer Cost
For years, the cost of maintaining and improving the City's storm sewer system has been funded from the
Sewer Collections Budget. In part, the logic was to offset the cost of reducing rain water/runoff infiltration.
The inclusion of storm sewer cost has contributed significantly to the overall sewer operating deficit, as the
City in the recent past has incurred a number of significant storm water improvement projects and/or
maintenance costs. Of course, the elimination of the storm water maintenance/improvement costs from the
Fund will require an alternative source of funding.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that City Staff prepare a report offering
alternatives to the current practice of funding storm water maintenance and improve-
ments from the Sewer Fund. Alternatives could include a storm water surcharge and
a proportionate split of the sewer infrastructure funds that are dedicated to finance
capital improvements for the Fund.
NOTE: This item will be further discussed in a City Council work session during the early part
of 1995.
Water Rates
An 8% consumer increase in the water costs from Minneapolis will result in an operational deficit of
$189,708. At this point, Minneapolis has not indicated if an additional increase in consumer costs would
occur in the near future. However, the City can expect an additional double digit increase when the supply
contract is renegotiated in 1995.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that, at the very least, the City initiate a gradual
phase-in water rate increase over the next few years to offset the likelihood of
significant increases that will be necessary in 1995/96.
NOTE: This item will be further discussed in a City Council work session during the early part
of 1995.
Cable Television Fund Improvements
A significant capital outlay budget item involves cost for the Council Chambers improvement and cable
televising upgrades using cable franchise fees. It is recommended that the $30,000 budgeted for 1994 be
deferred and matched with the $60,000 that is proposed in 1995. Logistically speaking, other 1994 budgeted
improvements to City Hall should not occur until Anoka County Court discontinues utilization of the building
in 1995.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that plans for Council Chambers upgrade and
utilization of the court space are finalized in 1994, and the actual improvements be
implemented in 1995. The City Council is due to discuss plans during an early fall
Work Session.
NOTE: In light of the rate dispute settlement that calls for, among other things, a $45,000
purchase of cable equipment on the City's behalf, the original expenditure for City Council
chambers upgrades will be dramatically decreased in the 1994 and 1995 budgets. In total,
$89,400 worth of improvements will be eliminated. An additional $19,450 would be added
from the Governmental Buildings fund to complete the upgrade of the City Council chambers.
- 11 -
HRA Tax Levv/BudQet
At the time of printing, the HRA levy and budget are being finalized. The HRA has committed to a $71,000
annual levy pledged to the retirement of interfund loans for the Sheffield area. The HRA staff is
contemplating the use of about $7,000 to $8,000 of excess levy to offset their operational needs.
Policy Direction: It is recommended that during a fall Work Session the City Council
review the operational needs of the HRA and compare this with a potential consolida-
tion plan of HRA into the City organization.
NOTE: The HRA has approved an approximate levy of $79,000 ($71,000 for Sheffield
repayment of infrastructure loan and $8,000 towards overall HRA program administration).
City Council will be considering in the near future a plan to partially consolidate the HRA and
City staff.
Other BudQet Items
During the course of the budget discussion, the City Council and staff identified further revisions to the
budget, including the following:
. Reducing the Council preliminary levy by $33,466. It is approximately $25,000 over 1994.
. Utilizing approximately $68,905 of cash/fund balance reserves as opposed to the original $50,000.
. Funding increase of $2,000 for Council training.
. Funding increase of $1,000 for Police training/continuing education.
. Funding an additional $1,600 to complete the purchase of a 9 mm carbine rifle for Police Department
in lieu of shotguns in the patrol cars.
. Funding an increased $1,100 to equalize board and commission annual meeting expenses and
recognition.
. Reducing the Traffic/Sign budget by the delay/elimination of $4,000 involved with the conversion to
the metric system.
. Funding of $4,000 in conjunction with a continued volunteer program effort after elimination of the
Volunteer Coordinator position.
- 12 -
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
EXPENDITURES - ALL FUND
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BY FUND
1993 1994 1995 1995 1995 INCREASE! PERCENT
ACTUAL ADOPTED DEPT MANAGER COUNCIL DECREASE INC/DEC
EXPENSE BUDGET PROPOSED PROPOSED REVISIONS FROM 1994 FROM 1 994
-----------.....---------..-..--...------..-..-------------...-------------------------------------..-...---------..----------------..------------------------......--------
GENERAL FUND 6,251,603 6,756,905 7,110,607 6,586,680 6,604,775 (152,130) -2.25%
STATE AID MAINTENANCE 80,859 56,867 81,894 79,394 79,394 22,527 39.61%
CABLE TELEVISION 65,457 182,026 133,209 132,029 102,629 (79,397) -43.62%
PARA TRANSIT 161,811 177,971 89,609 89,609 89,609 (88,362) -49.65%
LIBRARY 382,780 425,407 418,679 418,679 418,679 (6,728) - 1 .58%
DARE PROJECTS 4,507 4,965 5,781 5,781 5,781 816 16.44%
POLICE GRANT 0 0 98,569 98,569 98,569 98,569 N/A
COMMUNITY POLICE FUND 55,090 48,027 0 0 0 (48,027) -100.00%
PROJECT PRIDE 994 959 1,850 1,850 1,850 891 92.91 %
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 237,208 401,550 704,715 714,165 695,165 293,615 73.12%
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A
CAP'L EQUIP REPLACEMENT 289,436 643,760 764,601 573,153 604,1 53 (39,607) -6.15%
WATER UTILITY 1,160,548 1,190,612 1,306,611 1,304,21 1 1,304,211 113,599 9.54%
SEWER UTILITY 1,135,702 1 ,172,502 1,279,388 1,274,888 1,274,888 102,386 8.73%
REFUSE 1,399,767 1,521,568 1,310,668 1,309,758 1,309,758 (211,810) -13.92%
LIQUOR FUND 5,432,100 7,399,430 6,257,738 6,255,408 6,255,408 (1,144,022) - 15.46%
WATER CONSTRUCTION 114,781 95,000 145,000 145,000 145,000 50,000 52.63%
SEWER CONSTRUCTION 138,010 131,000 147,500 147,500 147,500 16,500 12.60%
CENTRAL GARAGE 266,879 341,041 358,844 345,999 345,999 4,958 1.45%
ENERGY MANAGEMENT 335,053 267,399 340,196 340,196 340,196 72,797 27.22%
DATA PROCESSING 0 77,714 77,714 94,470 94,470 16,756 21.56%
PENSION RESERVE 0 0 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 N/A
-------------..----------------------------...-----------------------------------------..------..---------------------------------
G ROSS TOTAL 17,512,585 20,894,703 20,808,173 20,092,339 20,093,034 (801,669) -3.84%
LESS: Inter-Fund
Transfers 1,045,815 1,11 1 ,179 852,455 852,455 852,455 (258,724) -23.28%
---...-......-------------...--...-------..-.....-------...-----.....--....---------------------..----------........------------.....----------------------..-----
TOTAL 16,466,770 19,783,524 19,955,718 19,239,884 19,240,579 (542,945) -2.74%
Debt Service 6,022,187 16,642,547 2,875,977 2,875,977 2,875,977 (13,766,570) -82.72%
Less: Inter-Fund
Transfers 2,693,528 8,059,273 1,444,015 1,444,015 1,444,015 (7,850,378) -82.08%
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------....------------...--..---
3,328,659 8,583,274 1,431,962 1,431,962 1,431,962 (7,151,312) -83.32%
GRAND TOTAL
INCLUDING DEBT SERVICE 19,795,429 28,366,798 21,387,680 20,671,846 20,672,541 (7,694,257) -27.12%
------------ - -- =
Sheffield 0 1,729,010 0 0 0 N/A N/A
* Adopted by Council -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------..------------------------...--------------
7-18-94 Res #94-40 0 1,729,010 0 0 0 N/A N/A
GRAND TOTAL
INCLUDING SHEFFIELD 19,795,429 30,095,808 21,387,680 20,671 ,846 20,672,541 N/A N/A
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
D:IBUDGET951NEW951SUM6
- 13 -
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
EXPENDITURES - ALL FUND
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BY EXPENDITURE OBJECTIVE
1993
ACTUAL
EXPENSE
1994
ADOPTE'D
BUDGET
1995 1995 1995 INCREASE! PERCENT
DEPT MANAGER COUNCIL DECREASE INC/DEC
PROPOSED PROPOSED REVISIONS FROM 1994 FROM 1994
PERSONAL SERVICES 5,570,711 5,957,044 6,142,958 5,857,470 5,895,470 (61,574) -1.03%
SUPPLIES 1,849,010 1,921,127 2,162,847 2,139,656 2,137,256 216,129 11.25%
OTHER SERVICE CHARGES 3,968,270 4,316,026 4,138,045 4,124,660 4,128,760 (187,266) -4.34%
CAPITAL OUTLAY 953,425 1,466,908 2,069,341 1,799,546 1,782,146 315,238 21.49%
MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE 4,273,140 6,051,160 5,116,461 5,116,461 5,116,461 (934,699) -15.45%
CONTINGENCIES & TRANSFERS 898,029 1 ,182,438 1,178,521 1,054,546 1,032,941 (149,497) -12.64%
------------------...-------------..-----------..-------------------------..-----------......-----...---..---------..-.....------...-...------....
GROSS TOTAL 17,512,585 20,894,703 20,808,173 20,092,339 20,093,034 (801,669) -3.84%
Less: Inter-Fund
Transfers 1,045,815 1 ,111 ,1 79 852,455 852,455 852,455 (258,724) -23.28%
-----------------..-------------....--------------------------..--------......--------------....---------..--...------------------------------.
TOTAL 16,466,770 19,783,524 19,955,718 19,239,884 19,240,579 (542,945) -2.74%
Debt Service 6,022,187 16,642,547 2,875,977 2,875,977 2,875,977 (13,766,570) -82.72%
Less: Inter-Fund
Transfers 2,693,528 8,059,273 1,444,015 1,444,015 1,444,015 (7,850,378) -82.08%
----..........-----..----------...--------------........-------..................----.........-------...........-------..----------------.....------......---------------....--.
3,328,659 8,583,274 1,431,962 1,431,962 1,431,962 (7,151,312) -83.32%
GRAND TOTAL
INCLUDING DEBT SERVICE 19,795,429 28,366,798 21,387,680 20,671,846 20,672,541 (7,694,257) -27.12%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheffield 0 1,729,010 0 0 0 N/A N/A
.. Adopted by Council ----------------...-----------------------------------------..--.....-..-----..------..-----.....-..----------................----------...........-..-.."'..---.
7-18-94 Res #94-40 0 1,729,010 0 0 0 N/A N/A
GRAND TOTAL
INCLUDING SHEFFIELD 19,795,429 30,095,808 21,387,680 20,671 ,846 20,672,541 N/A N/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
D:\BUDGET95\NEW95\SUM6
- 14 -
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
REVENUES - ALL FUND
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BY FUND
1993
ACTUAL
REVENUE
1994
ADOPTED
BUDGET
1995 1995 1995
DEPT MANAGER COUNCIL
PROPOSED PROPOSED REVISIONS
INCREASE
DECREASE
FROM 1994
PERCENT
I NC/DEC
FROM 1994
------..---- ----....--..------..---------...--..---------------------.....--..-- .....------..-----------------..-.........------..--.................-----------------...--......----...-------------
--..-----...-------------------
GENERAL FUND 6,507,676 6,626,078 6,677,749 6,536,680 6,536,680 (89,398) -1.35%
STATE AID MAINTENANCE 143,466 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 0 0.00%
CABLE TELEVISION 99,930 85,500 97,900 97,900 97,900 12,400 14.50%
PARA TRANSIT 175,546 160,000 76,995 76,995 76,995 (83,005) -51.88%
LIBRARY FUND 408,649 416,343 409,448 409,448 409,448 (6,895) -1.66%
DARE PROJECT 4,193 5,000 5,900 5,900 5,900 900 18.00%
POLICE GRANT 0 0 49,285 49,285 49,285 49,285 N/A
COMMUNITY POLICE 53,333 39,167 0 0 0 (39,167) N/A
PROJECT PRIDE 333 5,750 500 500 500 (5,250) -91.30%
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 333,373 316,050 313,482 313,482 313,482 (2,568) -0.81%
INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 24,485 265,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 (110,000) -41.51%
CAP EQUIP REPLACEMENT 454,313 323,850 381,600 381,600 381,600 57,750 17.83%
WATER UTILITY 1,158,692 1,231,200 1,116,903 1,116,903 1,304,211 73,011 -9.28%
SEWER UTILITY 1,081,344 887,708 1,035,854 1,035,854 1,274,888 387,180 16.69%
REFUSE UTILITY 1,586,455 1,529,864 1 ,416,295 1 ,416,295 1,416,295 (113,569) -7.42%
LIQUOR FUND 5,457,273 7,559,941 6,291,886 6,291,886 6,291,886 (1,268,055) -16.77%
WATER & SEWER CONSTRUCT 167,498 160,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 (60,000) -37.50%
CENTRAL GARAGE 278,135 349,865 307,925 307,925 307,925 (41,940) -11.99%
ENERGY MANAGEMENT 381,566 332,153 270,586 270,586 270,586 (61,567) -18.54%
DATA PROCESSING 0 77,800 77,800 77,800 77,800 0 0.00%
PENSION 0 0 157,846 157,846 157,846 157,846 N/A
COMPENSATED ABSENCES 108,794 150,000 0 0 0 (150,000) N/A
------------------------------..----------------....----------------------..-----...------..----------------.....------------------------....
GROSS TOTAL 18,425,054 20,636,269 19,057,954 18,916,885 19,343,227 (1,293,042) -6.27%
LESS: Inter-Fund
Transfers 1,045,815 1,111,179 852,455 852,455 852,455 (258,724) -23.28%
----------------------------..--------------------------------------.......-----......-------..--..---------------......------------------------,
TOTAL 17,379,239 19,525,090 18,205,499 18,064,430 18,490,772 (1,034,318) -5.30%
Fund Balance
I nc rease/Decrease 912,469 (258,434) (1,750,219) (1,175,454) (1,175,454) (917,020) 354.84%
----....-.....----..----------.....---..-----..-------..------..------------------....-------------..--....----..-..-..---------..-----------------......--...-...-....
TOTAL 16,466,770 19,783,524 19,955,718 19,239,884 19,666,226 (117,298) -0.59%
DEBT SERVICE 5,039,133 9,443,813 2,544,015 2,544,015 2,544,015 (6,899,798) -73.06%
LESS: Inter-Fund
Transfers 2,693,528 8,059,273 1,444,015 1,444,015 1,444,015 (6,615,258) -82.08%
CHANGE TO FUND BALANCE (983,054) (7,198,734) (331,962) (331,962) (331,962) 6,866,772 -95.39%
------------------------------------------------------------------------..--------..--..----------------------------..-..----------.
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 3,328,659 8,583,274 1,431,962 1,431,962 1,431,962 (7,151,312) -83.32%
------..-----------------------------------------..-----------------..---..-----..-------------..-----.
GRAND TOTAL INCLUDING
DEBT SERVICE 19,795,429 28,366,798 21,387,680 20,671 ,846 21,098,188 (7,268,610) -25.62%
------------------------------------
SHEFFIELD 0 1,729,010 0 0 0 N/A N/A
* Adopted by Council ----------..--...---------....------------..---------------------------------------------..------------------------------..---------...
7-18-94 Res #94-40
GRAND TOTAL INCLUDING
SHEFFIELD 19,795,429 30,095,808 21,387,680 20,671 ,846 21,098,188 N/A N/A
===============================
D:\BUDGET95\NEW95\REvrOT 4
- 15 -
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
REVENUES - ALL FUND
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BY REVENUE SOURCE
1993
ACTUAL
REVENUE
1994
ADOPTED
BUDGET
1995 1995 1995 INCREASE
DEPT MANAGER COUNCIL DECREASE
PROPOSED PROPOSED REVISIONS FROM 1994
PERCENT
INC/DEC
FROM 1994
--------------------------- -...-------------...-....------...-----------------------..------------------------------------------------------.....-----.....---------------------..-------
CURRENT PROPERTY TAX
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
CHARGES FOR CURRENT SERVICE
LICENSE, PERMITS & FINES
MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
GROSS TOTAL
LESS: Inter-Fund
Transfers
TOTAL
Fund Balance
Increase/Decrease
TOTAL
DEBT SERVICE
LESS: Inter-Fund
Transfers
CHANGE TO FUND BALANCE
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE
GRAND TOTAL
INCLUDING DEBT SERVICE
SHEFFIELD
· Adopted by Council
7-18-94 Res #94-40
GRAND TOTAL
INCLUDING SHEFFIELD
D:\BUDGET95\NEW95\REVTOT 4
2,439,334 2,590,699 2,595,860 2,620,860 2,620,860 30,161 1.16%
3,837,077 3,836,794 3,920,260 3,762,414 3,762,414 (74,380) -1.94%
4,049,368 4,053,189 3,875,696 3,844,973 4,271,315 218,126 5.38%
234,907 250,600 238,450 238,450 238,450 (12,150) -4.85%
5,204,404 7,517,441 6,270,086 6,270,086 6,270,086 (1,247,355) -16.59%
1,178,082 971,502 978,737 1,001,237 1,001,237 29,735 3.06%
1,481,882 1,416,044 1,178,865 1,178,865 1,178,865 (237,179) -16.75%
--------...-------------------..---...---------------------------------------------..--------.......-------.....-------........-----------------------
18,425,054 20,636,269 19,057,954 18,916,885 19,343,227 (1,293,042) -6.27%
1,045,815 1,111,179 852,455 852,455 852,455 (258,724) -23.28%
17,379,239 19,525,090 18,205,499 18,064,430 18,490,772 (1,034,318) -5.30%
912,469 (258,434 ) (1,750,219) (1,175,454) (1,175,454) (917,020) 354.84%
16,466,770 19,783,524 19,955,718 19,239,884 19,666,226 (117,298) -0.59%
5,039,133 9,443,813 2,544,015 2,544,015 2,544,015 (6,899,798) -73.06%
2,693,528 8,059,273 1,444,015 1,444,015 1,444,015 (6,615,258) -82.08%
(983,054 ) (7,198,734) (331,962) (331,962) (331,962) 6,866,772 -95.39%
3,328,659 8,583,274 1,431,962 1,431,962
1,431,962 (7,151,312)
-83.32%
19,795,429 28,366,798 21,387,680 20,671,846
21,098,188 (7,268,610)
-25.62%
o 1,729,010
N/A
N\A
o
o
o
19,795,429 30,095,808 21,387,680 20,671,846
N/A
N\A
21,098,188
-----------------------------------.
-----------------------------------.
- 16 -
1995 PROPOSED TAX SUPPORTED EXPENDITURES
GENERAL AND LIBRARY FUND
1994
ADOPTED
BUDGET
1995
MANAGER
PROPOSED
INCREASE!
DECREASE
FROM 1994
PERCENT
INC/DEC
FROM 1994
1995
COUNCIL
REVISIONS
MAYOR COUNCIL 238,727 231,379 212,874 (25,853) -10.83%
CITY MANAGER 283,836 287,544 287,544 3,708 1.31 %
ELECTIONS 32,639 28,198 28,198 (4,441) -13.61%
FINANCE 455,342 453,397 453,397 (1,945) -0.43%
ASSESSING 109,348 113,304 113,304 3,956 3.62%
CIVIL PROCESS 185,115 170,615 170,615 (14,500) -7.83%
PLANNING 19,683 32,352 32,352 12,669 64.37%
GENERAL GOVERNMENT BLDG. 165,512 172,848 172,848 7,336 4.43%
POLICE 1,926,000 1,812,221 1,846,821 (79,179) -4.11%
FIRE 695,123 608,175 608,175 (86,948) -12.51%
PROTECTIVE INSPECTION 121,351 113,837 113,837 (7,514) -6.19%
CIVIL DEFENSE 26,019 27,078 27,078 1,059 4.07%
ANIMAL CONTROL 10,812 11,130 11,130 318 2.94%
PUBLIC WORKS 0 0 0 0 0.00%
ENGINEERING 271,866 268,422 268,422 (3,444) -1.27%
STREETS 542,843 561,634 561,634 18,791 3.46%
STREET LIGHTING 122,072 135,691 135,691 13,619 11.16%
TRAFFIC SIGNS & SIGNALS 41,953 50,431 46,431 4,478 10.67%
WEED CONTROL 2,900 5,695 5,695 2,795 96.38%
RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 126,696 143,979 143,979 17,283 13.64%
YOUTH ATHLETICS 28,862 28,917 28,917 55 0.19%
ADULT ATHLETICS 18,776 19,470 19,470 694 3.70%
TRAVELING ATHLETICS 13,973 14,018 14,018 45 0.32%
SILVER LAKE BEACH 7,828 730 730 (7,098) -90.67%
TRIPS & OUTINGS 32,257 22,505 22,505 (9,752) -30.23%
SENIOR CITIZENS 50,396 51,173 51,173 777 1.54%
VOLUNTEERS 47,971 16,927 20,927 (27,044) -56.38%
MURZYN HALL 167,098 179,609 181,609 14,511 8.68%
PARKS 566,862 542,436 542,436 (24,426) -4.31 %
TREE TRIMMING 14,413 16,881 16,881 2,468 17.12%
DUTCH ELM SANITATION 105,035 96,854 96,854 (8,181) -7.79%
DUTCH ELM REPLACEMENT 43,249 47,801 47,801 4,552 10.53%
CONT I NG EN CI E S & TRANS FE RS ............ ...... .2..a.2.!:3.~.8..................... ~2.1. A2..~. .......... ........ ..:3.?.1.A?.9...... ..... ............. :3.~ !.o.~.1.................
....J .:3.'.a.~ ?o..
TOTAL GENERAL FUND ttt::tt:::::::~Wt.s.jtm1.~t:::t::/:':'tt/$.;~;mlQ::::::::r,:,m,:,:::::::r~l~iWt1$t:r:::ttttttu:$~aSQh/:':':':'t/::::::t:::::g~;2$.%)
r::::::::r:::::::::::::::::::::#g~~i{l.t::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Mjjij~,-~gII:r:::::::::::::::::::::::::::11:~~~~lI::::::::r::::::::::::::::::::I::{~~t.~~}:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::Itl;$.~%i:::
rrtr:::::::::::::ti'igjisi2f'f'::f':::::r:}f'WiooitS59.fffr::r::f:t1i~$Jt54.)::t:i:\t:::i)fi5al'i:i58)';::::::t:}::)i}/}~221%\
TOTAL LIBRARY
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUES FOR GENERAL FUND AND LIBRARY FUND
Non Tax Revenue 1,213,145
Intergovernmental 248,168
Local Gov't Aid 2,025,418
H.A.C.A. 964,991
Area Wide Tax 634,839
Penalties & Interest 7,000
SubTotal
Use of Fund Balance
Local Levy
5,093,561
139,891
1,948,860
1,205,517 1,205,517 (7,628) -0.63%
96,067 96,067 (152,101 ) -61.29%
2,058,693 2,052,835 27,417 1.35%
964,991 978,510 13,519 1 .40%
634,839 603,621 (31,218) -4.92%
7,000 7,000 0 0.00%
0
4,967,107 4,943,550 (150,011 ) -2.95%
59,231 74,826 (65,065) -46.51 %
1,979,021 2,005,078 56,218 2.88%
TOTAL REVENUE & FUND BALANCE
.............................,.......................................... ...................................................................... .......................................................
.............. ..............., ...... ............
:tt:::::::::::)::::::t:;:t82;$t~ )))))))7l005la$l:H:))):::tt:::t:;ool3i'454 rr::r::::rrr::~+5B;B5ai
t@;2[21:%:
CERTIFIED LEVY
:::::::::t::::i:::::::t?;.;~~~::::::::t::r::t::::::::?;iQ~;~~~:t::::::::::::::i::::::t:::g;Mi;~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i::::::::::i&ipQQ.:::::::::::::::t::::::::::::i:::::::P;~tfl.~:::
PAT'S 2
- 17 -
~ .,. (') -l reen "U~I5z-lz~"or:IJ -l oooen"Um
~ ~ m 0 Oene m:IJ> -l:IJOenzIom 0 O~-lem><
-: ~ ::D -l OmOJ zm" Om>z m~ < -l z"UI"U:OIJ
-l ~ ~o-l ~~O~:IJZIOen:IJJ20m ~ -l-lm"Uenm
." r r"o r:E>r en:IJm G)"UZ r . ~:IJCOZ
m ::D ~,,~ -l_" G)8"mFJ20mme m J20renmzO
m mo O<~~~"en:IJm >< -lomen~-l
i? 0 < <er "U
z -<z enm <menzffi~,,~en :IJe:IJ re
0 r m
< J20 ~-l< en:IJ
:f m 0 J20~ ~:IJ-eo"O-l Z Zro mm
< " OJ Z oZzmem:IJen 0 en~m :IJen
-< e ~ -l ~ :IJen-len -l
Z r m Z m enm e -<en <
0 ~ a
OJ Z :IJ -l a :IJ :IJ m
m ~ m < m en
~ a en r "U a en
r m -l -l m
en en
ro
......
(0
w
W
0'1
......
ro
ro
......
CD
W
0'1
......
w
(0
o
w
.,J::o..
CD
w
(0
o
w
.,J::o..
CD
ro
01
CD
s..u
0>
(0
(0
ro
0>
o
CD
0>
(0
(0
Q
~
~
o
0>
-....I
0'1
0>
(0
o
0'1
...... 0'1
~ ~
0'1.....0
O'1WO')
OOO-....J
0,000,
.....1\)0')
I\)-....JO')
0>
0>
o
~
-....I
-....I
0'1
..... ~
0') co
.....0')1\)
~0'1~
. . ~
-....J0'1~
WCOO'1
00'10
~
ro
0'1
~
o
-....I
W
co I\)
:::>50.0'1
WOCO
~O')CO
OO~O'1
~
......
CD
0>
-....I
(0
W
co .....
:::> ~co .co
WI\).....
~wo
00.....0
-....I
...... 0'1
~ ~
co.....o
~wco
00 COW
~ ~ ~
00000'1
0') coO')
0...........
......
CD
ro
w
......
ro
-....I
o
ro
w
~
0'1
~
I\) ~
o co
O-....J~
O'1~W
~ ~ ~
0000'1
-....J1\)0'1
000')0
.
N
N
.....
~
o
I
~I
I\) en I\)
O:l udo
CO~U1
fflfflffl
I\)
O')COOI\)W ..........~.....
WO')I\)~CO""'I\)OO~
-....I~~O'1ool\)-....Iooocoo
'Ooo'(o~:""'O'ofu:""fu~
owCO.....O')WOO'1O'1O')O'1
oco......oooo.....ooocoo
j\)
O')coo ~ ...........w.....
O-....lO'1CO..........-....JO~1\)
-....IWOOI\)O')O'1-....JOOO-....lOO
'Omo,oo'O:""'O:""'Om'".r:>.
OI\).....WO')I\) 00000')0'1
0.....00'1-....J0')000.....0
.....
~-....I 0 00
0'1 'O~
o 0 co
o 00'1
.....
OCO
'0:""
00
00
I\)
O')COOI\)CA) ...........p......
WO')I\)~CO.....I\)..........~
-....I~~O'1ooCO-....JooO-....lO
'Ooo'(o~:....o,'Ofu:....':...l'".r:>.
OW co..... O')W 00'10'1 0')0'1
OCO.....oooo.....OOO~O
I\)
O')COO ~ ..........W......
O-....lO'1CO..........-....I.....O'1I\)
-....IWOOI\)O')O'1-....JOOOO')OO
'Omo,oo'O:....'O:....'O':...l~
OI\).....WO')I\)OooOO')O'1
0......00'1-....J0')000......0
I I
I en WI~I
O~~~~WOCl:lO~CI:l
cdo ~ W N Co cdo :.... en u.
ONOU1U)OOW~O~
fflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflffl
- 18 -
0')
-....I
0'1
0')
co
o
0'1
..... ~
~ ~
W ~WO')
~1\)0'11\)0
"",~"",,,,,,.....
(,.)'Ofu'Ofu
~OOWI\)"'"
OOOCOO'1W
0')
0')
o
~
-....J
-....J
0'1
..... ~
W '".r:>.w~
0'1-....J.....0'1.....
.....-....JWI\)O
(,.)00:""(,.):""
1\)000')00
~WI\)OO')
~
I\)
0'1
~
o
-....I
I\)
.....O')O')-....J
0').....00000
~oo'O'".r:>.m
O')..........COI\)
-....IwO')O.....
~
.....
00
0')
-....I
co
I\)
..... 0'10')"'"
l\)-....JooCO.....
'0(,.):"":""'(0
~O-....J-....J-....J
COOCOO'1O')
-....I
..... ~
~ ~
CA) O1WOO
O'1W.....CO-....J
WO'1-....JO'1CO
oooofuo,oo
.....COO'1.....w
O'1WO'1O'1~
.....
00
I\)
W
.....
I\)
-....I
o
I\)
W
~
0'1
~
..... ~
W ~~m
0')00-....11\)00
WO'1..........1\)
'i:..J:""fuo,:""
-....I 000 W 0')
WW.....O'1I\)
~
N
~
~
o
~
W I I
I\)......wen~
~:....ou.o
OOWCOU1
fflfflfflfflffl
.....
coG)
com
~z
m
:IJ
~
r
....."
~o
0'1
.....
cor
co_
~OJ
:IJ
~
:IJ
-<
....."
~o
0'1
.....
co
co
~-l
~
~
r
......
co
co
0'1
"TI-
-l::x:JZ
000
~=:~
U)~)>
U)U)cn
CI'IU)
~m
G')
~m
u)z
U)m
U1::x:J
-I>
o~
~'h. 0
U)".,.~-
U)ZU)-I
~CU)<
m~c.nO
><-"'tJ"TI
"'tJm::x:JO
m::x:Joo
z>"'tJ~
C::x:JOc:
=i<en=:
c:"TImm
J;JC:C-
mZm>
enCc:::r:
>OC!!!
ZOG')G')
c3:m::I:
::x:J"'tJ-I-I
m> en
<:!:!
men
zO
c:z
mO
'Ti
~ ~
i I
~
~
'go
-<>
~
'"
""
:2:
"
<
:J:
~
o
o
"
Z
o
::c
m
>
C/l
m
I
4>0
(:)
U"I
~
o
Q'I
en
m
~
o
I
Co)
(:)
Co)
:,!!
o
...
Co)
:-J
...
o
~
o
I
4>0
tD
N
4>0
~
o
Z
>
J
N
N
...
~
o
52
"
"
m
::c
m
Z
o
m
-
...
tD
-..j
Q,
-..j
~
N
Q'I
"'0
N
o
-
4>0
U"I
iD
-..j
~
4>0
tD
N
...
o
-
...
-..j
4>0
N
N
~
...
m
Co)
.......
m
o
-
...
U"I
m
0,
U"I
$
~
o
o
"
-l
o
-l
>
I'""
Q'I
Q'I
en
Q'I
:,!!
o
Q'I
(:)
o
~
o
N
o
io
U"I
~
o
...
N
...
'#.
N
en
Q'I
~
o
N
en
N
~
o
...
o
o
(:)
o
:,!!
o
...
tD
tD
U"I
:!!:
>
Z
>
C')
m
::c
"C
::c
o
"C
o
C/l
m
o
...
tD
tD
4>0
>
o
o
"C
-l
m
o
CD
c:
o
C')
~
4>0
Q,
m
wN
...
~
4>0
0,
-..j
tD
0,
Co)
4>0
4>0
N
...
1n
Co)
U"I
Co)
tD
U"I
1n
...
U"I
...
~
-..j
...
N
m
...
...
1n
...
-..j
N
U"I
U"I
m
wU"l
...
o
Co)
Co)
U"I
0,
tD
Co)
...
-..j
tD
1n
tD
Co)
Co)
U"I
Co)
0,
...
U"I
...
m
Co)
.......
m
o
o
-..j
"'0
N
Co)
j:".
U"I
4>0
-..j
......
~
w
...
N
.. .
..........
..
..........
:Wi''!:'O
,-::m,
ilt:~
.<~
:6tz
:~l'~
Iit::1 C')
::.:::i:.:.:i~
::::::::::::m, ::c
:r:r::J~: ~
I~
._,...~.CD
-.5. ::c
:m::I:>
:iliM~
:ffimr::m ~
Z
o
II
:::::::::::::::::::::: C/l
li.11
:%::::0:
::(A::~
.M.:.=:
!~::I
~;~i~rit
ll.:&!
;S;:9
:m,:~:
:~:,:,~,:,::
~~~~~j~jjfJ~~~j~
......................
tttH
::::ttl
ttt~
..
..........
- 19 -
'#.
o
"
Z
o
::c
m
>
C/l
m
N
Co
m
~
o
I
4>0
io
N
<f!.
I
Co)
~
Co)
~
o
I
m
in
4>0
:,!!
o
.
...
4>0
en
o
:,!!
o
I
o
:...
4>0
:,!!
o
Co)
N
:....
tD
~
o
Co)
io
o
:,!!
o
.
...
Co2
Co)
<f!.
52
"
"
m
::c
m
Z
o
m
U"I
Q'I
N
...
m
-
Co)
...
N
...
m
-
-
...
...
...
......
Q'I
U"I
-
-
...
N
"'0
o
o
-
-
Q'I
...
"'0
o
Co)
-
-
...
U"I
o
-
4>0
tD
iD
Co)
o
.....
U"I
1n
tD
U"I
-
tD
Co)
.......
tD
Co)
-
~
o
o
"
-I
~
>
I'""
N
m
Co
Q'I
:,!!
o
m
en
tD
:,!!
o
4>0
U"I
(:)
.....
~
o
...
Co
U"I
<f!.
~
...
Co)
:,!!
o
.....
in
m
<f!.
N
io
.....
~
o
U"I
io
-..j
~
o
.....
o
o
(:)
o
:,!!
o
.....
tD
tD
U"I
:!!:
>
Z
>
C')
m
::c
"C
::c
o
"C
o
C/l
m
o
N
"'0
o
U"I
"'0
~
Q'I
o
Co)
a.
N
.....
Co)
......
N
-..j
~
...
N
...
N
m
~
U"I
o
Co)
U"I
Q'I
.......
Q'I
.....
.....
.....
o
"'0
o
o
N
o
,!')
.....
m
o
4>0
...
U"I
......
N
Q'I
Q'I
iD
4>0
m
Q,
N
m
.....
tD
tD
4>0
>
o
o
"C
-I
m
o
CD
c:
o
C')
~
':';':':':... .
.....
iD
4>0
m
0,
~
:*::6:
iii~
:"",,:::,',f:":':'
::::::::::::::::::::::
Q'I
Co)
4>0
0,
Co)
tD
':i::::':::>,:
I
:@@:,::m
j5.taa
I~
,i:::,~'m
:I.:.:::::::::~
>
!1!1!1!~
i:.~ ::c
:~!I!ffll ~
:,::,t:{{,::~
ill
lil:li:rn
Co)
N
Co)
m
1n
::j
.....
4>0
o
~
U"I
o
4>0
.....
-..j
.......
Q'I
4>0
.....
.....
o
......
U"I
o
li:I:;1
:m:;:l'!1,
.m..0.
.:-.:...:
:mt,:,,(
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
.....
U"I
N
N
U"I
o
III!:I!
:il..i.
:I::::I:'::
,ttt;:!:
';.:.:.:.:.:.E'
1I111I
:::::::::::::i.
Co)
tD
tD
'"en
Co)
.....
-..j
"'0
4>0
N
~
.....
11111::11:::11:
:mrr:1
C')
m
Z
m
::c
>
I'""
>
Z
0"'0
!::tD-
CDtD-l
U"I<
::c"Co
>::c"
~oo
"ego
C:C/ll'""
zmC:
OO:!!:
C/lCD!!:!
C:c:>
:!!:O:J:
:!!:C')m
>mj5
::tl-l:J:
< -l
CD C/l
c:
o
C')
m
-I
CD
<
-l
-<
"C
m
- -;
z grn Q ()
-\ tu""
rn -0) 2- rn ---
~:P rv- Z --\
(f) ....Ci> ....0 rn -<
0 ....0 (Qrn :0
c :Oc::::. -12.,-\
:0 -Jrn o .,.. ~ 0
() <1:P )<.
rn
(f) ~Z -n -n
0 (j\~ C
1"\ -12.,rn Z ()
G> o Z 0
~ -\ ~cOO
.,..
~ \ ""tl
:P ow. E
f=. ....0
1"\ - ""tl
C <:?trn COJ ~
z ~~ OJC
0 :000)
~ gs-< ')::l-Q
0 00 ~m---
c rv2. ~".
OJ ~z
:0 -n
o rn C ~
; :P Z
-< (/) rn
1"\ 0
c :D ---
z G>
0 ~
:0 tu(/) ~-\ ~
~ ~m ~ ....:P rn
~ --J ~ ~o (j\"" ~
c - ~ -.... z (J)
rn 0)_ ~:s: rv(/) rn
....0 0)'"11
(J'Im om O)rn
-12.,(/) O):P -12.,:P
0 -12., o (/)
0
_ '2.0 -
~
rn
a
-'>~
cprn
~~
()J-
t\,)o
CP"Z
-.1
-:R
o
(i)
~
tT\
"JJ
"?
."
C
Z
o
~ ()
o~O
r- <.0 ......
to (J\ 'C
"JJ OJ -?
""- C -==-
~~ OJ
~~~
~ :c.
\11 rn
~ ---
~ Ci)
g ~
C (j)
~
(J)
()
~
-<
o
11
-0
tn-;
~"
~ (f)
t;
cpCp
-:R
o
."
C
OJ
C
t\,)o
~ cp (f)
S~
~-n
~~
~..(
~
-:R
o
Z
~O-o
~~~c
-o~ (f) ~
rn -'> -
'Zo ~ a
C) to -.1
~ -:R
C 0
:0
rn
(f)
~
"'T'\
C
'Z
~
-
~
f:-
~
rn
G;
Q
rn
"Z
rn
.;:..~
~'? "Z
~ I""'\-'>~
~ ~, Cp ""'7
~o~~
to.(;::.~ a
~ tn ..n
-\ to \..
tn-.1
-.1
o -:R
0' 0
C-
O)
-'>~
~-;
s-<
tOcp
-:R
o
<3
()J:t
~rn
~-'> ~
~tn
-:R
o
;
~
o
~
tn'
00
00
--'> C
~'Z
CPo
-
r
-.1
-:R
o
_ '2.1 -
~
'"t)
rn
z
o
~
C
:P
m
~
?
~
(f)
::n
'B
~
o
z
<3
~:r.
~m
~::o
~
~(J)
~~
{'V<::.
~-
~(")
o 01
(J)
~o(")
~~c~
0-\-
CJ:)~-\
~~:P
..:f!.. '
o
(")
o
CJ:) Z
~c;20:::1~(J)
~ -\Z~C
~ ::0 Q ~(J1 -0
CJ:)~m~~
,e-Z -
~. (") 0"> t;tA
o _ ..:f!.. v'
010
(J)
_ 22 -
-0
~
.t:>(J)
~CP 0
~Z
~~ "?
~(J)
t1'\
ca::o
..:f!..<::'
o -
()
01
(J)
Q()
~ ~
t] -<
~ 0
~ 1\
o . ()
c..... 0
OJ to
:D to ..--
". (J'\ 'c ~
~OJ
-n~ ;
~Q OJ
~m---
o ~ "..
~ :c.
~ rn
z ---
g Q
~ ~
m (f)
."
~ [
;J> ~
~ ~
>
~
":l
....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L 1J
co co co co co co co co co co .....
00 00 00 00 00 CO CO CO CO CO 0 -<
01 (j) ::::! 00 CO Q ....L ~ ~ ~ "C m
- - - - - 0
00 00 00 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO en )>
(j) ""-I 00 CO a ....L I\:) W ~ 01 CD ::D
a.
w w w w w w w w w w ~ r
I\:) 01 01 a w a 01 ~ 01 (j)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (')
....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L I\:) )> )>
-
....L W ~ ~ (j) 01 co 00 co a ~ r
(j) ""-I (j) ....L ~ 01 a a ~ a 0 r
00 ....L ""-I 01 ....L co ....L a 00 01 m
""-I 00 en ):,. co ....L ~ i\:l 00 a C <
(j) I\:) co ""-I I\:) I\:) a 00 (j) ""-I Z -<
a a 01 ....L W (j) ....L ""-I a 00 -i
-
."
CfJ)>
~ (')::D
0 )>m
....L ....L ....L ....L ....L r)>
(j) (j) 00 co co W ....L I\:) ....L ....L
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0:E
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CfJ_
)> 1J0
)>m
I\:) I\:) w ~ ~ (j) 01 (j) (j) (j) ~ ::D-i
w ~ ~ a w (j) ""-I ~ W a 0
a co s.u -I\:) 01 -""-I a P f:>- s.u C -i)>
(j) W ""-I ....L 00 a ~ ""-I 00 (j) z niX
w ""-I 01 ""-I 01 00 (j) (j) w I\:) -i CfJ
w w ~ W ""-I ....L (j) a co ....L --
m
~ 0
....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L C:c
~ ~ ~ I\:) (j) 00 ""-I 00 ""-I ""-I 0
)>,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C)>
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N'
)> )>p
~ 01 01 01 00 co 00 co co co ~ -1;t>
00 01 00 ""-I a ....L co ~ (j) ""-I 0 0)>
co co a -~ -~ :-J (j) f:>- -~ 00 C Zz
I\:) co I\:) a I\:) 00 ""-I I\) co 01 Z )>0
I\) I\) ~ ~ ""-I (j) I\) 00 co ....L -i
w I\) a 01 (j) I\:) 00 01 ....L a 0
r
0
(')
~ )>
0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w w w w r
00 01 W co w a 00 (j) (j) (j) (j)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ?ft. ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )>~
)> -m
....L ....L ....L I\) I\) I\:) I\) ....L _I\) I\) ~ OJ)
""-I ""-I ""-I W ....L a a co a a 0 Z
W ""-I ""-I W 01 ""-I I\) ....L I\) 01 ~
W I\) a I\) w (j) I\) co 01 I\) C
'"...,J 01 i\:l (j) co Co ....L ):,. ~ 00 z m
w (j) ~ a w ""-I ....L W ....L W -i Z
w a ~ ....L I\) (j) co co 00 01 -I
)> )>-1
zO
s.u s.u -~ -~ .!.11 01 .!.11 01 .!.11 .!.11 ~ O~
(j) co ....L ""-I a i\:l w W 01 (j) 0
I\) 01 (j) I\) w I\:) co a ""-I ~ C rr
I\) w ....L ~ 01 ....L a ~ f:>- a ' r
W i\:l '"...,J '"...,J 0 z Pm
(j) co co a ....L -i
~ ""-I W co 00 ~ ....L ""-I a ~ )><
co 01 w a 00 01 ~ ....L 00 ~ -<
)> ::D
....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L ....L mO
- - ~
co ....L ....L ....L ....L (j) ~ ~ ~ w 0 <-i
00 ~ 00 ....L co W I\) (j) (j) a m:c
_'-.I 00 <Xl -~ ....L I\) 01 I\) 00 00 c zm
01 01 a ""-I a 01 i\:l a w 01 Z CJJ
01 01 00 (j) co co W 01 ....L 00 -i m
01 co (j) 00 ....L ....L ""-I 00 W ~
f:>- 01 01 01 (j) (j) (j) (j) -""-I S" ::D
m -i
(j) ....L W 00 I\) 00 00 ""-I a co < 0
a a 01 w I\) 01 ....L (j) ~ ~
co I\:) a co ""-I W 01 (j) 00 m ~
co i\:l a a 0 en co 00 ~ en z
a w ....L 01 ""-I W 01 I\) I\) I\) C r
~ ~ co 00 co (j) ....L co ....L 00 m
-----------
00
00
O:J:
s:m
"'tJC
:J>C:
:Dr-
_m
000
0"T1
Z-i
O:J> 0
"T1><.....-
:DmU)-i
mOOU)-<
<r-(110
mm"'tJ"T1
Z<:DO
c:iiiOo
mc"'tJr-
oo.....Oc:
OU)OOs:
c:c:omm
:DQ)c-
o-im:J>
m:I:C:::I:
oo:Dcm
-i0C>G)
oC:m:J:
-IC>-I-I
0:J: 00
-I.....
:J>~
r-m
:D"'tJ
m:D
<0
m"'tJ
ZO
C:oo
mm
c
()
~
-<
(J) C> 0
(J'\C>
O):t. ~g -4 ."
~ ~o "*~()
:t. o 0 ~z
gj \ o ~ 'in 'f6 0
rn
-< ~ (J'\ \'
0 -<OJC
C
:D :t. c Sa
""'" mO OJ
~ ". (i) --
0 a~)>
0
~ z ~
-; G> rn
(j) --
(j) G>
0
<3 ~
.....(") (f)
..l:>
~:t. to 3.
o m ~
:0 0
_ 24 -
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
Based on Payable 1994 Property Taxes
Who gets your property tax
dollars?
EXAMPLE:
Property Tax on a $70,000
Columbia Heights home is
$975.66 (1000,10)
'"
RETURNED AS SERVICES
$184.53
· Police & fire
protection
· Street
maintenance
& plowing
· Parks & trails
· Recreation
programs
· Bldg & health
inspections
· Other City
services
- 25 -
School District #13
$541.67 (560/0)
Anoka County
$208.22 (21%)
Special Districts
$41.24 (40/0)
City of Columbia
Heights
$184.53 (190/0)
Prepared November 28, 1994
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
Based on Payable 1994 Property Taxes
Who gets your property tax
dollars?
EXAMPLE:
Property Tax on an $80,000
Columbia Heights home is
$1,226.53 (100%)
RETURNED AS SERVICES
$231.98
e Police & fire
protection
· Street
maintenance
& plowing
· Parks & trails
e Recreation
programs
· Bldg & health
inspections
· Other City
services
School District #13
$680.95 (560/0)
Anoka County
$261.76 (210/0)
Special Districts
$51.84 (4%)
City of Columbia
Heights
$231.98 (190/0)
Prepared November 28, 1994
WHAT WILL $20 A MONTH BUY?
$20/Month Buys Quality and Quantity
in Columbia Heights
Telephone
o Q
Cable TV
o~
.0
v
Garbage pick-up
Columbia Heights City Services
~
Parks
Streets
Police
Fire
The average home in Columbia Heights pays less than $20 per month in City real estate
taxes. The average Columbia Heights' resident will spend $20 eve/}' month on various
services and pleasures, i.e. pizza and pop for 4 at a local restaurant, basic cable TV for
the family, monthly phone services, etc. The best value for your money in Columbia
Heights is still all of the City services that $20 of your monthly property tax will buy!
(Based on an $81,550 home in Columbia Heights.)
- 27 -
-0)>..............
CD3<O<O
......0<0<0
geO'l~
:::J:::l'"tJ-I
- -...... n>
000 X
- -"0 CO
- - 0 en
:::J :::l en
(')(')CO
mma.
$.1>n>-I
cnenn>
CD COx
CO
en
-I~
n>)>
xJJ
a"
~m
n>-I
Q.<
~)>
<r
n>C
-m
! c: ,..-....'
'co '"tJ
)>
-<
)>
OJ
r
m
.......
<0
<0
~
"-"
.......
a 0
0.......0
6 c.uc.u5i\:>0
. _OJOJ_OJO
01.......01\)'<00
~. .. ..
;:;,g<O-...J-...J 00
o ~(j) 0'1....... 0 0
a
J\) c.uc.u;::;:
. c.u I\) '<
O)OJ-...JOJ
U). . .
~~~~
(j)
(')
-L ::r
-L.......<OOJO
. O<OOJO
000'100'1-
(0 iv :.:.. tv
~I\)OJ(j)
o
-
::r
~ -...J(j)CO
0) (j)O'IOJ......
",. . .
;:;,g(j)~-...J
o 0'1 0 0'1
..............-1
- - 0
"'.......-...J(j)-
. .......OJ(j)~
-LOJ~O'I
J\)' . .
~0'I00'l
o 0'1 0'1 0
'"tJ)>..............
co 3 <0<0
......0<0<0
2eO'l~
:::l:::l'"tJ-I
--......n>
o 0 0 X
--"0 co
--Oen
:::l :::l en
(')(')co
mma.
n>n>-I
enenn>
co co x
co
en
-I~
n>)>
xJJ
a"
~m
n>-I
Q.<
-<")>
<r
n>c
c-m
co-
'"tJ
')>
-<
)>
OJ
r
m
.......
<0
<0
~
"-"
a OJ
o 0
6 1\)1\)5OJO
. _(j)(j)_OJO
0'I..............c.u'<00
.....L. .. ..
oc.u-...J....... 00
0.'::5J],(j)....... 00
a
1\)1\);::;:
!'0 c.u I\) '<
(j)0'I.......(j)
c.u. . .
~<O<Oo
o~OJ~
(j)
(')
::r
....... (j)(j)0
:-"-...JOJOO
OJI\)OOJ-
OJweoOi
~c.u0'l1\)
o
-
::r
~ O'I~CO
(j)~.......-...J"""
<0' . .
~O'IOJI\)
oOJ~(j)
..............-1
- - 0
-...J 1\).......-
. OJI\)~n>
..............(j)0'I
1\)' . .
~0'I0'10
o 0 c.u c.u
'"tJ)>.............. -I~
co 3 <0<0 n>)>
......0<0<0 xJJ
2eO'l~ a"
:::l:::l'"tJ-I ~m
--......n>
o 0 0 x n>-I
__"0 co Q.<
--Oen
:::l :::l en ~)>
(')(')co <r
mma. n>C
n> n> -I em
en en n>
co co x co-
co '"tJ
en )>
-<
)>
OJ
r
m
.......
<0
<0
~
"-"
a -...J
0 _0
I I\)l\)e -...JO
9_00a. 00
0'1 ....... OJ <0 '< 99
.....L. . .
~01\)1\) 00
o ~~ I\) <0 00
a
.....L .....L :::;:
!'0 OJ -...J '<
(j)~~<O
c.u. . .
~-...JO'IOJ
o c.u c.u 0
(j)
(')
....... ::r
O'I~O
:-"O'I~OJo
OJ-...J.......~-
<0' . .
~O'im......
o ~-...Jc.u
0
-
::r
~ ~c.uco
(j)c.u.......-...J......
OJ' . .
~(j)I\)(j)
o ~ ~ 0
-I
<0<02
:"I(j)-...J.......n>
.......~0'I0
1\)' . .
~OJo)oo
o ~ 0) I\)
. - 28 -
'"tJ)>.............. -I~
co 3<0<0 n> )>
......0<0<0 xJJ
2eO'l~ a"
:::l:::l'"tJ-I ~m
--......n>
000 x n>-I
__"0 co Q.<
--Oen
:::l:::len -<")>
(')(') co <r
...... ma.
co n>c
n>n> -I c-m
en en n>
co co x co-
co '"tJ
en ?<
)>
OJ
r
m
.......
<0
<0
~
"-"
a 0'1
0 P
I ..............e 0'10
9_~~a. 00
0'1 0 OJ <0 '< 00
1\)' . . 00
~-...J-...JO'I
o ~-...J c.u 0 00
a
.....L .....L ;=;:
!'0 c.u I\) '<
0) c.u....... OJ
c.u. . .
~c.uOJ~
o OJ.......c.u
(j)
(')
::r
....... c.uc.uo
:-"~OJ~o
OJ.......O)O'I-
<0' . .
o......!.C,OCO
0.'::0..............
0
-
::r
~ I\) I\) co
0)1\)<00)......
OJ' . .
~o)~OJ
o 0 0) 0)
-I
0)0)2
:--J~<OO'In>
.......0)0)0
1\)' . .
~UJc.om
o .............. 0
-I
:J:
m
m
~~,
5:cn
'Om
hic
cno
:J:Z-
> 'TI z(")
<-
zZ:JJ(")
_>m_
WI r- > -I
-I-Icn<
:J:>mo
m><z'TI
cnr-(")(")
>m 0
5:<-
m<~r-
_ c:
<Z'05:
>("):JJCJ
r-:JJO-
C:m'O>
m>m:J:
'TIcn:JJm
om~5
:JJO :J:
...I.'TI-1-1
CD0>cn
CDN><
,I::l.CTIm
S20bcn
'00
:JJR
00
'00
0>
cnZ
mC
c
...I.
CD
CD
CTI
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
*****~********************~*********************~*******************~*******************~**************************~
SUMMARY OF COMPUTATIONS FOR 1995
.****+********************~*********************~*******************~*******************~***************************
MANAGERS COUNCIL COUNCIL
EXPENSE PROPOSED CHANGES PROPOSED
General Fund
Mayor-Council 231,379 (18,505) 212,874
City Manager 287,544 0 287,544
Finance-Assessing-Elections 594,899 0 594,899
Civil Process 170,615 0 170,615
Planning 32,352 0 32,352
General Buildings 172,848 0 172,848
Public Safety 2,572,441 34,600 2,607,041
Public Works 1,016,178 (4,000) 1,012,178
Sanitation 167,231 0 167,231
Recreation 477,328 6,000 483,328
Parks 542,436 0 542,436
Unallocated- Transfers 321 ,429 0 321,429
Total General Fund 6,586,680 18,095 6,604,775
Para Transit Fund 89,609 0 89,609
State Aid 79,394 0 79,394
Cable Television Fund 132,029 (29,400) 102,629
Library 418,679 0 418,679
Dare Project 5,781 0 5,781
Police Grant 98,569 0 98,569
Project Pride 1,850 0 1,850
Capital Improvements Fund 714,165 (19,000) 695,165
Infrastructure 0 0 0
Capital Equipment Replacement Funds:
General Fund 475,460 31,000 506,460
Water Fund 49,374 0 49,374
Sewer Fund 48,319 0 48,319
Central Garage Fund 0 0 0
Central Garage Fund 345,999 0 345,999
Liquor Fund 6,255,408 0 6,255,408
Water Utility Fund 1,304,211 0 1,304,211
Sewer Utility Fund 1,274,888 0 1,274,888
Refuse Fund 1,309,758 0 1,309,758
Water & Sewer Construction 292,500 0 292,500
Energy Management 340,196 0 340,196
Data Processing 94,470 0 94,470
Pension Reserve 175,000 0 175,000
Debt Service Fund 2,875,977 0 2,875,977
----------------------------..----------------------------------------------..-
Total 22,968,316 695 22,969,011
===============================================
D:\BUDGET95\NEW95\RES95
- 29 -
.........................................
.......................................
..............................
.........................................
.........................................
'/'00
..............................-.-......
~;~!'~~~~~<<~~~~~~~~~~~~~o
Ja,s.:,s;: CD ::l c: -!2. !2. iil !2.!2.!2. !2. !2. I>> I>> I>> I>> I>> I>> I>> 0
J!;:et"!!J < I>> N Cli c: c: ::;: c'i" o' o' 0' 0' '< '< '< '< '< '< '< c:
IIIli1Iiill'lii!llliill
""""""",m,.,tc)",. CD en 3: (") CD ~ en CiS" ~ ee 0 ~
f:~j~: ~ 3' ~ ~'c8 ~~.~~ g 0
% ::l CD 0 -~~~I>>-~~
.,.,.,.,::l ::l OI>>CDOO<fg::l..,
~ 0300~ ~CD
aOOI>> 5el
3" 0 a a. _. CD
ee a 5' en CD
. 5' cp en
cp
.:.:.:.:.;.;.;.
;......
;:;;;:::;:x;:;;:;;;;;:
-:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.;
:::;::;::::;;;;:;;:;::
;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
co
i\)
U)
0 ......
'.'
.'.'.'.
:~:
:'8
0 :9;
0 CD ::l
0 c: (")
"0 ~ ro
'< ee
3 CD I>>
co en
Pol CD
(") ~ 5'
~ c:
5' en CD
CD CD ~
e. g, -
co (") ..,
I>> 0
.., 3
::l en
S!a. ~ ......
....
<" 0 co
CD 3 co
cn ~
I I>> ~
3 5' ..,
S- o
I>> "0
5' 5' 0
S- CD en
CD
5' ::;: ~
5' 0 CD
;:l. c:
C' 0 ~
c: 0 ee
~ ~ CD
ee -
CD CD
- ....
.., :r
CD
S."O
CD I>>
::E;:l.
S!a. ~.
:T :T
CD (")
.... 0
3' ::l
....
CD ::l
ee
g, CD
::l
C' (")
a: co'
~ en
5'
ee
~:~:;:~:
.:.;.;,;
::::;:;:;;:;;::;;;:;;::
-
.-....-....-...,.J:lI. ..... CJ1
~ ~ ~~~""""""NCON~"""NOO
o 0 bbbb~b~b~~bbb
o 0 OOOOOOCOOOOOOO
ooooooooooo~oooooo
- - -
.-... .-... ~.-...~.-....-....-....-....-...""'~~
~ ~ ~ ~~~""""""NCON~"""NOOu)
~ 0 0 bbbb~b~b~~bbb~
o 0 0 OOOOOOCOOOOOOO~
000090000000~000000~
Ci>
CD
O~::l
O..,CD
c: 0 ~
::l "8 e.
s:2,en '"11
-CDC:
~~::l
a-~
"03
0"0
en I>>
CD (")
~....
,0
CD::l
~g
-en
5<:
.."
CD CD
I>> <
~'<
-
U)~
u)o
~b
~o
~o
..
"',
:';'.':','.'.'
t:3V': U) N
U)Jil U) ~
~.:$i':c:.. b
~:~~g
IO>>OOOoo>>>~OO::l>>>mo..oo
, CD ~~CD CD c: c: c: ~~~CD c: -~~~=;::;:""",::,;::;:;::;:
~s~~<<-=""~~~C'"O~~~~~'<.'<'<
0,<C'C'~~3iil~(")~~~~::l~~0::l0~0~
?>~~~.g.g ~i1l ~ ~~a~ m ~~ a~$-gj~:H~~~ ~
- N '" ~"O "0 0'"0 iii' 5' I 5' - - :? ::l 5' 0 ::ltf(::l I>>
6bi~SSRo-~ eeg~en~eeoelg~g~
>O_ee::l::lee;:l.~::l~-c:aC:I>>-C:"O"'.~'"
oC'c:SS::l~.~ee~Qen~"O-Q5!2.&~ro"O
~en I>> I>> .., (") OOOC;; CD CO::l CD _~9:-,=_,c:}b\=a
>~(")a.!CDoee~~3CD~"OCD::l50g(").3"O
..,-~en~l>>::liil"'C:3::E"O..,en::l"'0 ~_-o
meeen::l~ ro~~3~~(")"Oog~~~men~~g.~.~~
en Hen -, -.0....3 ::l(")-'~'OOC;;""
~-~ enl>>-elCD=O~=O_.., CDeeCDOA _
-::l::l <coo _::lC'(,,)::l~OCDOCD"'"O~CDC:
!:l.(")o;:; ::lnCD-5,CD:j"::l::lCD -:e....;o",<::l
CDo(") E=(")ga:~CDO......_~!g~l>>o.~~
~~,~ a~g::l 3"2'Sg-coQ g-ee::l CD en-g:~}!C'
<::ll>> CDO--<:=::l CDCO,<::l~genl>>en.-~
~~~ ~o ~~ee8"'~g ~~g~&lm~CD
ffig~ -gg, el- 3 C:S: 0~'@QCD[j#j'3~
o en C' ::l g, "E.. ~"O i' 2'::l N'~ """CD -
!~~ ~m aU) ~ ~a g~.CD RaQ
'2' s: c: 0 c: C' a. CD ::. ee ~ I>> ~,,;;;r," 00
en I g: ::l ~ c: "0 0 iil ee (") e .~. ~
3~~5~' ~3.r ~~ ~ ;3 ~CD~d ~ ~
CD _ CD (") - 0 .;;: = ,..,e. .,., -CD'
::l 0 -, 0' - CD a) c: ~ ooc;;:'1\l::: -
::.Q~ ~::l &.., en R C' _ ~
~-<:en -_ CD::l 0 _
Ii. ~1. i tl
en::l I>>ro 0-'
CDee ~(") ::l ~
~(") -,~ (") ~
tlJg cg_ CD::l
aen 30 5' en
eeO CD(") I>>
CD=::lO -
-g. -3
QO~ 03
~o --,
CD::l g.~
~ ffi'CD
S en
o'
::l
_ ')n
:;~i
......
o
......
Q
-<:
g,
o
o
E
3
C'
iii'
I
CD
10'
~
ur
O~ ......
co
~CD co
I>> ::l ~
::I=:. ~
ee -
CD co' a
~ "0
0
en
CD
~
03 tlJ
1>>"0 c:
en I>> ~
~(") ee
-- ~
'"110
~::l
CD
e.
~3
~-g
~
0
::l
0 a:
CD CD
~ ::l
-
::;;
.., co'
-s ~
o' '"11
::l 5'
- e.
0
0 CD
3 c:
~
3 ee
CD CD
::l -
ur 0
~
I>>
::l
ee
CD
en
+'>-
.....
I\:)
-c
I>>
'Q; ...... :;, :;,
OJ OJ
5. E.
0::0:
S'S.
lQ lQ
fIlen
.. ..;.;.;.;.........:
:.;.:.
..........
:.;.;.
.......
...........;.;...
................;.:
.. ::;;::~::..-. .........-.. ~
...!I~I~~~~~~~
'::':'~'O 0 0 0 0 0 0
i~;:; :;:;:i~'- - - - - --
;:::;:::::::::
~:
,i~t
:m:
,000',
':j;;:
...... .................. 0
1\:)1\:)000C11C11CC
'0'0'0'0'0'0'0(:1)
0000000C11
00000000
(")(")(")o(")oo-c
s.s.s.~s.~~a
CD =t CD ~ !;Q~ ~ "8
"2.~"O :I:<I-C~
I>> ::r!!:!.c: co 0... C-
o ... ... fIl ... 3 co
co co 0' co I -' !a. c:
0'0 CO-I>>I>> co fIl
-co I>>::E":;'3co
re-so co co 2r.o 0
ol>>::r!a.OJa:;,::::
~~-geores.as
Cil~~3g.CDS.o.
E. g c5 iii'"2."2. CD g
:I:"O 0" 2 9 ~ "2. ii)
~ ~ ..... c: o' co ~ 5
co~ ~en3coco
- "'::rC03
~ m~aco
.... C:eo a
1'0 ~ ...
:#: I>>
C11 52.
:;,
lQ
(")
I>>
...,o"o:~
;.:::;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:;::::
.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
..
....
..
,o'...II!i;
:......;.;.;
.;:::;:;::::
}~j~jr
::::::::
Z$1
i:
L~
~-:::
_>0)
0) 0
'0 ~
o I\:)
..9 I\:)
>::IJ-C
o.co'"
0.0'0
(")c:"8
o 0. en
c: lQ co
:;,~o.
52. ..... c:
-ccen
(")ccCO
::r+'>-o
1>>1>>-
3"Oc:
0'"0 :;,
~ao.
fIl<O'
_co I>>
c:o.-
33!!l
iii'o'~
::r...
-'0
:;,-
lQ=
fIl3
I>> -"
:=:;,
co~
... :;,
00
0...
C:o.
~co
-...
re6"
< 0
COo
en:;,
fIl
c:
co
...
!!t
-
co
...
:;,
E.
~.
en
+'>-
(0)
.....
(")
\bi,"bi,' ~ ~ Q ~
'fiE$; c: -.-<
.,
.,
.;.:.:.:.
.: Ij~j~?jj~j
.;.;
..
:.:.
::::
:::;:;:;:::::;::::
;.;.:.:.:.:.....'.
j:j:j:i:;
....... :::::::::
1!llillil!I!~~~
::::::,:::1:888
....
...
.:.:.::.:.
-,
Ii
~
(CC;:;>':j;;:
'0'0 -.,..
00 C11
00 0
>>::IJC
0. 0. co en
0. 0. O'CO
(")1>> c: 0
00.0.-
c: 9: Cf6 &5
:::J~""'cn
52. g .....::r
n I>> cc I>>
::r_CC:=
I>>O+'>-CO
3 0 I>> ...
0' !a."O S'
CD-"~""
... 0 0 co
en ... < CD
c: "0 CO fIl
"0 !2. 0. -
~ o'gre
~COo.3
CO ~lQ S"
I>> o' ~lQ
:=COO'fIl
~I>>~
o ...co I>>
o c:
c: I>> en
~ co
CD S.
~ 0.
CO ~
fIl I>>
~
S"
o
o
c:
~
3
~
+'>-
.....
.....
- 31 -
I\:)
I\:)
C11
(")
I>>
..
..
.,., "0' co
i!li,tCil
W ...... ...
;.;.;.:...;.;............
I\:)
(0)
o
-C
I>>
...
I>>
:;I
I>>
:;,
fIl
;::;:
-
.....
I\:)
(:I)
.....
+'>-
C
en
CO
S.
o
I>>
fIl
::r
6"
o
o
C6
...
0.
co
5-
;::.:
o
o
:;,
en
c:
CO
~
-
I>>
CD
,
0'
o
><
I>>
0.
c'
fIl
3
CO
a
.....
.; ".:
::......
:;
::
:......
:;g;:
Ii
-
..-. ..-. .-. ..-. (,J CIJ
+'>-..........(o)ccO+'>-
'0",'(0'0(:1)'0-"'"
0000001\:)
oooooocc
(")m-cmmm-c
g.g CD.g 3'3'a
CD "6" ~ "6" S" s'"8
g,3a3E.E.~
_.co I>> co co co 0.
<g.ag.ac.c.c:
c:::t:;,:;,:;,o.o.en
C"o_oC:C:co
c:-c:-coCOo
1::122.26"6"::
S"<enC6O*C:
lQ~2:...I>>+'>-o.:;'
_' co :;, co 0' C11
a o.lQ 0. CD '00'
~s'oS"~ g~
coo...o==~:;,
'91>>!:':l1>>-ii)0
COO'I>>O'COO'co
5CD~CD~CD
COen en:;'en
::E cojg co-co
-. a c: a ==
s: co -" co CD
o3~3 3
I>> co co co co
sta:;,a :;,
CO,c:::t ~
g-(")g- I>>
o -. 0 0.
1>>.c:1>> 0.
0.00. ;::;:
o::rO 0"
I>> I>> I>> :;,
!a.3~ !!!..
0':;' *
co lQ 0)
~ 0
3 '0
g g
is 3"
~ as
3 +'>-
o
5 ~
-
S"
co
:;,
o
-
0'
co
fIl
"0
co
:;,
-
Q
-<
S.
(")
o
2"
3
0'
Qi'
:I:
co
cS'
::r
1ii
(")0. .....
cc
::rco cc
I>> :;, C11
:;'Cl: -c
lQ -
co 15' a
0. "0
0
en
co
63 0.
OJ
1>>"0 c:
fIl I>> 0.
::ro lQ
-- 5e.
"0
c.:;,
OJ
!!t
!;3
~-g
g,
0
:;,
0 0:
co CO
Q ~
"6' 15'
- 0.
cr "
:;, S'
- !!!..
(")
0 OJ
3 c:
3 0.
lQ
co ~
:;,
1ii (")
::r
I>>
:;,
lC
CO
fIl
i
"0
~
"T'I"O~
~. 0 --
(j) 5'0
.~='
"0 :D
s. $
0. ~
<
~
"T'I
c:
='
0.
~
....
~
->:icl$$~~tt;t;l>\';l~~~'"
~o~~~w~~~~~o~o~S
':J:
\? g' ~ \€ :< $ ~ \.? ;;? \.? If!' ~ \? ~ !jJ
'='!' ~ ~ :e ~ c: c: "O;'ct "0. i:;t -i. ~ (0 i:;t "'c
\>>a_~~olll---"'w~ w
"O-<~"'o...~rnrnrn~$le..~~z
a; "0 -@-@-@ 0: " ." S!. 0: "
01:\) 9.=, _._._......_.o~~(f)
~=' --11l "O"O"O..,o.-a>'
~I:\) w...... :D:D:Dg~O"'iiis.
.;a~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~5
_;;> _---c: ':!.\" ='
~ ~~~o ~ p:lC1
~ ~~~l:::'. ~ =,':J:
.... 333g .... 0'J"
(I)~~ ~~
a. a. a. 101'
(j)~W m
~~~
g~~
~
~
(f)
~
~~
o ....
"0 .
~:D
~i
_.~
.g~
~
....
o
:::l
a
~
::r
~
"Os.
....(1)
0'"
"0'
O:D
$i
o.~
-.:::l
.g~
~
-
o
='
a
~
:::r
C1
.?i
g.
C1
\
6).
':J:
~
~
'iii
C1-
::T~
p:l~
.... l'I:> .... ~~
~~ ~ ~ ~~
0.
-~-~ .0 ~
00 ~
C13
?h"O
:::r~
.... -....
.... ~ "T'IO
~~ co ~ o.='
--I>- -(,,:l .~ -g 03
~~ e..
~3
~~
....
0
='
0 0
........ i c 0
COCO ~ ~
~~ <A
g. s. ....
-\-\ -6"
....... 0 a ~.
~~ ~ ~ 0
:::l
~~ ?" ?" -
~~ ~ ~ %
.......
:::t::r
00 9;- 9;-
33 ~ ~ ~
tJ~ ~ ~
$ :e ~
:::l:::l S.
~~ :e (I)
e.e. ~ ....
....
."." .... S.
S.
c:s $ m
ao.
'C'C
ee
$$
0.0.
~~
:=:==
s.s.
aO
00
a-a-
g:g:
l:::'.t:r.
00
=,:::l
lIIlII
g.g.
~~
00
"0"0
rnrn
:D:D
'J"'J"
~~
... ....
lCllCl
~~
~~
"In
.....
$
(J1
"0
a
't:l
%
0.
03
c:
g-
$.
5-
~
~
(5.
0-
"T'I
S"
e..
'@
g-
$.
9
~
~
III
~ l
0
is' l
s.
'li
~
i 0
So ~
III
N S-
O
0
2"
~ 3
C"
t' ti)"
~ :J:
CD
ca"
::::r
en
1\:)1\:)
CnOO)
000
~CJ'1C.:l
CnoCn
CO-...jl\:)
CO~......
0')>
CD 0 ....
;:l.oCD
-"Ill III
~~:E
c. CD --
,<c.
CD '< CD
< ,
CD
~
"
::;-
!:!t
,
~
.~:.
E);
'0,;
~:t
;1:'~9
..~.~g
"I" CD 0 )>
L~II
..a
:::g'
i:l~
"I'~
1~~l
I\:)
Cn_
0C.:lC.:l
~C.:lC.:l
Cn~~
CO 0)0)
CO 0)0)
0000
o ~~_.
c:'<'<
gooo
=000
'"0555
a o. o. O.
"0 ---
~~5"~
CDOQO
c. "0 CD "0
o~~~
CD CD CD CD
;:l.c. c.
:ii,:Il,
CD CD CD CD
c.~ ~
~:Ilf"
<CDCJ'1
c.CJ'1
c:
5l
o'
:;,
:E
o
....
"
en
CD
~
o'
:;,
o
-
......
......
N
I\:)
- 33
I\:) ............
CnO)CcCc
0C.:l-...j~1\:)CJ'1
~~C.:l~CJ'10
Cnoooo-~Oo
COC.:lO)O)oo
cocooooo
O)>"'tIOti)ti)O
. ........c:CDCD-.
:S::CDO~:;,:;,-<
" I1l"OCDCDCD:s::
~:E~3.ii3ii311l
oC:c.-<;;;;~
oCD,CDc:c:(C
CIl'O~:;':::lCD
CDCDo c.c.....
c.~ ~ b "'tI "'tI "'tI
a? ~fJaa.g
;:l. <-"0"00
_. ,<,OOCll
:::!> CDCIlCllCD
~ ~ ~~c.
!; ~5r
~CD
_0
:;,-
0"
CD 5
~c.
CI)\IJ
III
g)
:;,
o
CD
00:: ......
co
::::rCD co
III :::l CJ'1
:::le:!: "'tI
co ::::
CD CD a
c. "0
0
CIl
CD
C.
0- \IJ
III 3 c:
CIl"O c.
::::rill (C
-5l CD
"0 -
c.:;,
\IJ
~
,-
CD 3
<"0
'<Ill
0
-
0
:::l
0 0::
CD CD
~ ~
.... CD"
"S c.
0" "
:;, :j"
- !:!t
0
0 \IJ
3 c:
c.
3 (C
CD CD
:::l -
en 0
::::r
III
::l
(C
CD
CIl
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS BUDGET HEARING
ANOKA COUNTY
CITY OR
TOWNSHIP
1993
SCHOOL MARKET 1994
DISTRICT VALUE TAX
1994 % CHANGE
MARKET 1995 MARKET
VALUE TAX VALUE TAX
ANDOVER 11 94,800 1,287 100,300 1,496 5.8
15 94,800 1,387 100,300 1,523 5.8
ANOKA 11 77,000 950 79,800 1,073 3.6
BLAINE 11 80,400 1,013 83,500 1,126 3.9
12 80,400 1,073 83,500 1,156 3.9
16 80,400 992 83,500 1,100 3.9
@igmlmJ.I::m~:I.:lmig::::::::::::::::::::::::::::':::::::::::::::~::m:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::@~:a:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.~::::::::::::::::::'::::::::::i~~iQQ::::::::::::::::::::
::::~~~,::::'::':::::::::::::::'::I;:~:::::::::::::::::::':::
COON RAPIDS 11 80,400 973 83,200 1,084 3.5
EAST BETHEL 15 69,800 810 74,100 891 6.2
831 69,800 782 74,100 877 6.2
FRIDLEY 11 77,700 928 79,600 1,011 2.4
13 77,700 1,028 79,600 1,149 2.4
14 77,700 1,040 79,600 1,107 2.4
16 77,700 908 79,600 987 2.4
HAM LAKE 11 84,700 1,012 89,600 1,163 5.8
831 84,700 1,062 89,600 1,168 5.8
L1NO LAKES 12 97,700 1,630 105,600 1,874 8.1
624 97,700 1,728 105,600 2,088 8.1
831 97,700 1,597 105,600 1,825 8.1
OAK GROVE 11 80,600 1,164 87,100 1,366 8.1
15 80,600 1,244 87,100 1,390 8.1
RAMSEY 11 85,700 1,089 91,800 1,285 7.1
728 85,700 1,193 91,800 1,275 7.1
SPRING LAKE PARK 16 78,600 983 81,000 1,090 3.1
SOURCE: STAR TRIBUNE
NOVEMBER 21, 1994
PAGE 3B
A:PROPTAX
- 34 -
'16.2
9.8
13.0
11.2
7.7
10.9
....................
':,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,::;.;::,:,1'),':'
~j\~t~~tt,~)4~~~
. 11.4
10.1
12.2
9.0
11.7
6.5
8.7
14.9
10.0
15.0
20.9
14.3
17.4
11.7
18.0
6.9
10.8
FACTORS AFFECTING PROPOSED CITY
PRELIMINARY TAX INCREASE
. THE CITY NOW PROPOSES TO REDUCE BY $33.466
THE PRELIMINARY TAX lEVY.
. THE CITY PROPOSES TO HOLD THE lEVY INCREASE
TO $25.000 OVER THAT WHICH WAS lEVIED IN 1994.
. THE CITY Will RECEIVE A $31.691 REDUCTION IN
AREA-WIDE TAX (FISCAL DISPARITY). THE NET
RESULT Will BE A CORRESPONDING INCREASE TO
THE lOCAL SHARE OF THE PROPERTY TAX BilL.
. COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL VALUES DECREASED
SLIGHTLY, THUS SHIFTING A GREATER BURDEN ON
RESIDENTIAL VALUES.
. SOME RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VALUES INCREASED,
THUS THOSE OWNER'S STATEMENTS Will REFLECT
SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER TAX INCREASES; OVERAll
THE PROPERTY VALUES REMAIN STABLE.
- 35 -