Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/04/2013 Work Session Pete CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Mayor Ga ry L, rson Cn un cilmem bets Robert A. Williams 590 40`n Avenue NE,Columbia Heights,MN 55421-3878 (763)706-3600 TDD(763)706-3692 Bruceblav,ocki 1?sit our website at.www.ci.columbia-heights.mmus Tammera Doh at Donna Schmia (Sty Manager Walter R.Fehst ADMINISTRATION Meeting of: COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL Date of Meeting: MARCH 4, 2013 Time of Meeting: IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT HEARING AT 6:45 PM Location of Meeting: CONFERENCE ROOM 1 Purpose of Meeting: WORKSESSION AGENDA 1. Update and direction for Northeast Business Center Project— Scott Clark 2. Emerald Ash Borer (EAB): 2013 Management Plan 3. Wading Pool Update 4. Central Avenue Transit Study Update (Minneapolis Central/Nicollet Transit Alternatives Study 5. City-Wide Bike Loop Study—Update 6. Adjourn The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to,or treatment or employment in,its services,programs,or activities. Upon request,accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all City of Columbia Heights' services,programs,and activities. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Council Secretary at 763-706-3611,to make arrangements. (TDD/763-706-3692 for deaf or hearing impaired only.) CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS To: Mayor and City Council Walt Fehst, City Manger From: Scott Clark, Community Development Director. , Date: February 27, 2013 Re: 40th and Central Redevelopment-Northeast Business Center This memo is being sent in regards to the Northeast Business Center redevelopment proposal that was initially addressed to the City Council, Library Board and Library Task Force on January 24, 2013.The Task Force has discussed this redevelopment since then and has forwarded to the City Council a motion "encouraging the City Council to proceed with a market survey" ( Entire February 12, 2013 memorandum attached). The idea that was discussed at the January roll out meeting was if the Council so desired,the next steps in the due diligence process would be for the City to commission a senior market study in order to determine both the market capacity and the rent levels that could be achieved. If the Council desires to move forward, staff is prepared for the March 11, 2013 meeting to bring an action regarding the same. If the Council desires any additional information prior to the work session, please contact me at 763.706.3672. February 12, 2013 Mr. Mayor Members of the City Council City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Ave NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: At our meeting of February 11, 2013, the Library Task Force unanimously approved the following resolution in regard to the proposed redevelopment of the Northeast Business Center property: The Task Force is favorably impressed with the redevelopment site at 40th and Central Avenue and encourages the City Council to proceed with a market survey. The Task Force recognizes that a new library that embodies our vision for a facility to serve Columbia Heights could be created on one of several different sites. Furthermore, the Task Force discussed advantages and shortcomings of the property and plan which are outlined below: Advantages of Redevelopment of Northeast Business Center 1. If the city makes a major investment in a library and city hall, this is a visible location at a key corner of downtown Columbia Heights. It will improve downtown Columbia Heights and aid in the redevelopment of the Mady's property. 2. 369 parking spaces in a 4-story structure with multiple entries from the surrounding streets 3. The ability for the library and city to share facilities including meeting rooms and parking spaces. 4. The Task Force has had numerous discussions of a combined-use facility incorporating a library and housing. 5. Redevelopment at this site would free three properties in the city for sale or development: the site behind the Public Safety Building, the current Library, and the current City Hall. 6. The current plan includes one large, open space for the library which can be appropriately planned by architects experienced in library design. 7. This proposal could cause the rebirth, renewal, and resurrection of the only modern, multi-story office building in Columbia Heights. 8. The location would provide a gateway into a Columbia Heights cultural region which would include the Library, Heights Theatre, and the Dairy Queen. 9. Preliminary drawings elicited a"Wow!" response at the January 24, 2013, meeting of the Council, Library Board and Task Force. 10. The proposed build-out warms up a building that is contemporary and aesthetically cold. 11. It is our hope that the building can be purchased at a reasonable price. 12. We assume the soundness of the building will be certified by a structural engineer before proceeding. Shortcomings of Redevelopment Plan 1. Building out the Library and City Hall to the curb means there is no room for expansion of either space should future need warrant it. 2. The plan lacks green space and natural landscaping. Is it possible to use some of the 21 parking spaces in the northeast surface lot to add green space? 3. The site location on a commercial thoroughfare may be noisy. 4. Two elevators are not sufficient for 60 residences. 5. Does subterranean storage space exist in the current building? In conclusion, the Task Force thinks the redevelopment of 40t'and Central Avenue is an exciting proposal with much merit which would strengthen the downtown area. We look forward to continuing the conversation. The Task Force plans to present a final report and recommendation regarding a new library for Columbia Heights to the City Council at the April 8,2013, meeting. Sincerely, O"� David W. Larson Chair, Library Task Force Cc: Walt Fehst, Scott Clark, Library Task Force, Library Board CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: March 4, 2013 AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESSION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY NO: PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER ITEM: EMERALD ASH BORER (EAB) BY: Kevin Hansen BY: UPDATE DATE: 2/26/13 DATE: In the 2013 adopted budget, a line item was added that provided Emerald Ash Borer(EAB)treatment for City-owned trees in the amount of$7,500. The intent was to begin treating our trees to provide reasonable protection for Ash trees in city parks and to a lesser extent, public right-of-ways. To provide additional background regarding the EAB problem, attached is a two-page summary that details the problem of EAB and provides signs of EAB and which type of Ash trees are most susceptible.The realization is not one of`if,' but`when' we will contract EAB in the City of Columbia Heights. While EAB has not been detected in Columbia Heights, we do border two quarantine areas where the insect has been identified (see attached map). While the discovery of EAB is relatively new in the United States (2002—Michigan), there has been much more study of the insect and resulting management information available recently.Attached is a Decision Guide produced by the Indiana DNR and Purdue University that details which trees can be saved, treatment options, and provides a flow diagram for the management of EAB. Rather than just starting to treat public trees, staff is recommending developing a management plan that begins with a complete inventory of Ash trees on public land. We propose to use an intern(University of Minnesota Forestry Department)in 2013 to conduct the inventory,which would include the number of Ash trees, location (GPS), size of tree, and a qualitative ranking of each tree. Based on this, staff would make a determination of Ash trees worth saving, and then develop cost estimates for treating those trees on a 1 or 2-year cycle. There are three primary treatment techniques to provide the insecticide to Ash trees: soil drench; injection; and bark spray. An injection type treatment has the benefit over a soil drench type treatment in that it provides a direct injection of the insecticide as opposed to larger dispersal of liquid on the ground at the base of the tree. Injection is also on a 2-year cycle reapplication as opposed to soil drench on an annual basis. Spray applications are applied to the bark of a tree also at one year intervals. Many require a state license to apply the insecticide. Environmental considerations will also need to be part of the management plan. Resources: http://www.mda.state.mn.us/plants/pestmanagement/eab.aspx Attachments: EAB—Complete Management protocol(2-sided) EAB —Decision Guide(2-sided) COUNCIL ACTION: Complete Management Protocol Emerald ,ash Borer overview of the (Problem The Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) has killed millions of ash trees since its discovery in southeastern Michigan in 2002. Native to Asia, this insect was probably introduced to the United States in wood packing material carried in on cargo ships or airplanes. Through a combination of natural spread and human activity it is now found in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Pennsylvania, Maryland, West Virginia, i Virginia,Wisconsin, Kentucky,Minnesota,and Iowa,placing millions of additional ash trees at risk. It will continue to spread. Symptoms of EAB Adult beetles feed on leaves and it is uncertain what impact adult feeding has on tree health. Larvae, on the other hand, feed on the inner bark and disrupt the movement of water and minerals within a tree causing eventual dieback, decline, and death of the tree. Symptoms of an early infestation may be difficult to diagnose. Be on the look-out for multiple declining ash in a given area. As an infestation progresses, small vertical splits in the bark can be seen on twigs or the main trunk and woodpecker holes may be present on trees.Trees may die after 2-4 years or less(small trees). r � e Typically the top 1/3 of • As the top of the tree • Distinct"S" shaped frass .D-shaped exit holes crown dies first and continues to decline filled larval galleries that works its way down epicormic shoots form score the outer sapwood .Exit holes are the tree and phloem underneath generally present -Epicormic shoots can the bark after an infestation •Trees appear to lose arise at the interface has been present about 30%-50%of their between healthy and •Galleries in an affected for 1 yr. or more canopy after 2 years dead tissue anywhere in area can range from 4 of infestation. the canopy 20 inches in length . Approximately 1/6 inch in diameter • Dense root sprouting -Galleries from an may occur after death of individual larvae a tree become progressively wider as the larvae grows technical support, protocols,research 1-877-272-6747 www.treeczrescl•nce.com 0 2010 Rainbow Treecare Scientific Advancements Understand and Manage Emerald Ash Barer Agrilus planipennis , .•T'�O�: Signs of EAB r a adult EAB Adulfa Larvae • Usually bronze or golden green with dark • Slender, flattened,segmented (10 total abdomen metallic emerald green wing covers segments)cream colored larvae with a brown •Adults are slender and can be 1/4 inch to head can be found by peeling back loose bark 1/2 inch in length on infested trees • Top of the abdomen under the wings is • Larvae range in size from 1 -1 1/4 inches in metallic purplish red(seen when wings length are spread) • Pincer-like appendage on the last segment • Larvae hatch from eggs deposited in bark Adults may be difficult to detect even in areas of crevices high infestation as they are very small • Larvae chew through the bark and begin feeding • Short period of activity(3-6 weeks of activity) on phloem • Generally active during the day • Feeding is completed in autumn and pre-pupal (sunny and warm days) larvae over winter in the outer sapwood or bark. • Adults will hang out in bark crevices or on • Pupation begins in late April or May foliage during rain, heavy cloud cover, high • Newly formed adults will often remain in pupal winds, or when temps reach above 90 degree F. chamber for 1-2 weeks prior to emergence in late a Adults can be found most years beginning May into Mid-August from late May into Mid-August • Some larvae may require a second year of • Peak Mid to Late June maturation feeding prior to emerging the following year as adults Hosts Hosts listed from most susceptible to less susceptible Distinguishing from Green Ash Black Ash White Ash Blue Ash Similar Species Fraxinus pennsylvanica F nigra F. americans F. quadrangulata EAB has distinct features, but it can be confused with the Al will be attacked if beetle populations are high enough following beetles: Some evidence to suggest that green ash may be preferred over other species 'Autumn Purple'white ash has shown more tolerance to EAB o Banded Ash Borer than'Marshall Seedless'green ash in trials o Japanese Beetle o Six-spotted Tiger Beetle • EAB can infest ash trees as small as 1" DBH up to the largest specimen trees o Bronze Birch Borer • Stress may contribute to the vulnerability and speed that a tree declines o Two-lined Chestnut Borer from EAB o Caterpillar Hunter • EAB has also killed seemingly vigorous trees growing under optimum conditions (especially as beetle densities build) technical support, protocols,research 1-877-272-6747 wwwtreecarescience.com 0 2010 Rainbow Treecare Scientific Advancements c 0 lw. . - $ z + am 'a a A); a" 1 ,A 1 a N Managing Emerald Ash Borer: DNR A B B,` Neighbors Against Bad Bugs r Decision G P URDUE i c? r.�,t Save treys,Save$. - AulAerr. Amrmart M.AL-rys and C:`7 Sadd t • • Trees CAN be saved if they are: Homeowners can ;protect healthy ash trees: • Healthy and vigorously growing,with more than, half their leaves, With a 1—tank less than 20 in. Dia.,neter at t Enhancing the landscape. Breasa He g�t isee Ieverse for 3t • Valuable to the owner. showing only few outward s rd,,; f FA L7 infestation. With over 'he co-.i^ter'so? i drench prod�.,cls cc!-1taining 1.47% imidactoprid.These • s�� Aaw products are most effective wher. applied r m J--twe..en Apr i; _'r a iC: i'':r�,-3 5 nth" Professionals can protect ash trees: i ti 3 'tr t:tk greater than 20 in. DBH. lii�.. :�-• y ._ ;� • Later in the year, using specialized equipment to apply pesticides that contain imidacioprid, dir�otE Ea,ar., car �:,rraf�--ec—lzi-i benzoate. 1rggs,should NOT be saved if they. are: • Unhealthy,with more than half of their leaves missing. Want more information on hiring a Planted in poor sites or are not important to the professional to treat your larger trees? landscape,. Visit: 4R{1P�iAl treesaregood.torn = Showing many ourtward signs of EAR infesMion,Such ass woodpecker damage,bark splits,and water sprouts at the tree base. Which new trees should be planted? The tree species you choose should match the co,ndiriors of the site. Remember that some trees czar! a.� " 5eccrne very large. contart your city forester, or your local garden center or n+a:":e;;y for advice on choosing a good replacement. For list ofre lacement trees - p ,visit.- www.eabindlana.info EMEMBER: Choose Replant with several different tree species to increase S.� your neighborhood's to Contactyourdtyforeste raboutloarl ordinances before future pest problems. perform/ng any tree world DNR Managing Emerald Ash Borer: NAB B wr .� S Bad B PURDUE Act Save trees.It Save ugs Decision Guide Amen 0:.11-d Off Sadof � ` 0, Yes. No. Y, NO. Are some worth saving? Do you want to �i Ash trees will '�� 44t Valuable to landscape or owner?) dk Healthy and few signs of EAB? save your ash be killed and ik Located in the right site?,,,* trees from need to be :�� :,:� �. EAB? cut down. No. ;0 7- Yes. I don't know, Save money. Have want t r ash Dm L A professional 0 • unwanted ash removed can help. 0 before they die. Ensure that 0 • 1�1;` drenches are 4 applied to bare sollw"InIft.of the trunk. 9 1 UR4.72 Yes. You will need professional pesticide �- � Are treatment. fameter d 'J-j.Zi'A they Homeowners can treat 7 No trees themselves. Determine how big your greater • Use a soil drench containing trees are. Get DSH. than Imiclacloprid. Treattrees Measure the distance around the trunk(at 4.5 20 In.DSH between April I"and May 15th. ft.above the ground)and divide it by three to Always follow all pestldde label get J21ameter at Breast Height. directions, Protect your urban forest. Act Now. Save Trees. Save $1 CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting o£ March 4, 2013 AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESSION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER NO: PUBLIC WORKS ITEM: ADA COMPLIANCE FOR CITY WADING POOLS BY: Kevin Hansen BY: DATE: 2/26/13 DATE: In November 2012, the City Council authorized the preparation of plans and specs for meeting ADA rules that are now in effect. Based on lack of available funding and the desire to keep the pools open, the Park & Recreation Commission recommends modifying the pools with a zero entry type modification,which staff also recommends for a lower,long-term maintenance cost. Staff also believes this is an overall safer installation for pools without a lifeguard. The Park &Recreation Commission also recommended pursuing this option at all three pools, but phased in over a three to five year time period—contingent upon State approval. Staff has contacted the MN Department of Health (MDH) for a phased in type approach for our three pools, which they have conditionally agreed to contingent on final plan approval. The selection of which pool to begin with was reviewed and discussed with the Park & Recreation Commission at their February 27th meeting. The Commission is recommending proceeding with the McKenna Park pool in 2013, followed by the Huset Park pool in 2014 or 2015. The schedule is to prepare final plans in March, receive bids in April, and have the pools ready for use in early June, following County inspection. Another issue is that of overall pool circulation which we were grandfathered in on in 2008,the MDH has also agreed to review plans based on the ADA requirements only. Attachments: Zero Entry diagram COUNCIL ACTION: 3-3013 4 +Cg� 2 x x x x x z x x x I M x cn p_ m I vp-i z rF D i � v G) i 0 W 0O €i? I SHADE AREA WITH 5 BENCHES Nowom Ma„ RMS DeLL PRA,Ms(EPdNR °an°"OW PM ,rg HuSeT PPAK DING f i A UAT®S IS It MMEOIMIe,fA,@bOMp.b ll ll POOLS 1�IIf��� f�f3bN1ldff3��.>,ml,b. C« .M CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: March 4, 2013 AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESSION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY NO: PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER ITEM: CENTRAL—NICOLLET BY: Kevin Hansen BY: TRANSIT STUDY UPDATE DATE: 2/26/13 DATE: Engineering staff has been attending Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meetings within the last six months for the Central-Nicollet corridor study being conducted by the City of Minneapolis. The purpose of the TAC is to review the conceptual street cross-sections, stop locations, and service plan assumptions for the Nicoll et-C entral Transit Alternatives Study—focusing on options for improving transit on Central Avenue. The City of Minneapolis has also recently conducted multiple public open houses (mid-late February of 2013). Attached is an 8-page report, prepared by the City of Minneapolis, that details the study including: r' Providing a corridor description. y Goals and focus of the transit study. i� Alternative evaluation for enhanced bus, streetcar, and no-build. y Comparisons of Enhanced Bus — Streetcars, and Streetcars and Light Rail. Y Next Steps of the study. This information is being provided as an update of the study and schedule only, no action is requested at this time. Attachments: Transit Study Report(City of Minneapolis) COUNCIL ACTION: wcros1p-104246.pdf ht(P://wWw-ni aPolismngov/www/grojps/public/@publicworlcs/d... -_..� F*bruaryr 2013 Options for Improving Transit Vol. 2 Why Do We Need Transit improvements? Corridor Fads The N"icollet-Central corridor is one of the busiest transit corridors in the Twin [Sties, connecting downtown • Length:��miles, Ninneapoiis -with rnixed-use urban neighborhoods. The • Frimarr Bus Routes:113 and i8. Corridor is gro%ving,especially in and near downtown.We • Po u do : 90,000 residents within one-half Wit need a transit system that supports this growth, makes —one of the Most detrsely populated areas in the 'tin around' without a car a balder swrin Cities,Expectedtogtowby25,000inthe neat getting option far more people,and attracts more people,jobs and Investment to 20 years,mostivin and near downtanrm. the corridor • Jobs ! ,5,1_10e jobs within one-half mile,, VirnatitV w4bi,downtown. mo jetted to grow by 50,00, in Fall 20-12;. the Project: engaged the public and • In addition to lairs and horning, sta.I�eFuaiders. through Interviews, open pauses in In cocr�dor includes 6s� hostel rooms, the September 20'_c, stakeholder organization meetings and Minneapolis Convention Center; the Minneapolis an online survey(making contact with over Z,QQO people) Institute of/Art the Central library,Urthestra Hall, to develop the project.'s purpose,need,and goals. Niaollet Mal, and several restaurant/sha pD r On October 25, —7012, the Policy Advisory Committee districts outside downtown, approved the folla,y-in purpose • Nicollet Mall and powrrtaewr: N billet. Maw is the pp g far improving;transit: in the Corridor ecumnlic center of downtown and a priority for government and business investrnents, the purpose of the /Ilfcalkt-Cerdrul rmnsrt AltemaujAw • �Abmd yg,Wpedestrians walk onNicallet Project is to Improve transit aonnodivity, enhance the Mail each day attrac veness of transitsawke,and catolyre development . lid Demand for Shmt Tiranslt Tram.-Of the 20,0CC trrcagi?an iwestment In transit fr*astructure within the bus rides each day on Routes 10 and 18,over half Nico:4fl-Central Corridor. take place entirelybetween loWy Amore and Lake i he goals of the Project area to: Street—just a couple of miles from downtown. • Many People H*on Transit: Twenty-five percent • moo;�necc people and r�laces of households within one-hale mile have no car,and • !,:crease the ottracdveness of transit twenty-four percent of residents iWe in poverty— • Ccrclyze and support economic development figures higher than city and regional averages. u hnegrare with the Vvnsportatian system • De"J912ment Rt_f0_r_TmosiL Walking and Biking: • &4u o,.heairhy communities and environmental practices 'transit,walking and biking are compatible with the • Deve.�cp an:implementable project with community support. Corridor's compact,mixed-use development. • Getting on the Bus is Going:In a ho-demand The Project's purpose and goals guide development of the corridor,boarding everyone through the front door alternatives described In the following pages, of the bus.paying fares on the bus,and stopping every block can be slow- one-quarter to one4bird of travel time on routes 10 and 18 is spent hoarding and alighting passengers,notto mention additional delays stopping attiaffic signals. r;tc;`>'•r.•r+:,;.n,;,rnF�t:�%jrrt,goL/n:�oi�e�-g..ror 1 Of8 e.n17 DIX wcmslp-104246.pdf htq):/'/www.rdnneapolismtLgoviwww/groups/public/CapublicworICS/cL.. The Nicollet-Central Corridor 4L t OAR- ! r OT's)%�'fll narat 7 *I*V rho Waft(-Conka Akwooffm study wN A*M6,a preferred hwW anh"ammt in the audy O"dm~cow M"As 0 fird pham eta Aovar4arw vaia" tbr MMU soft*thmughM Vie 9.2 i The&U*wit t7138 ge afidy wft*bThe emkta•the bonwb,cow,OW F Park: kipmu or mptafflmft a &wart mod"and nrv;co"m zV Z' bus,to ftigm/ft bOWpmbfMd I 1p� ' afiWlW"lOr&"$/W#?ft ^n:: wt Aftuaparam Gaw4ft MW i"t I 7i 7►-�fti-Y mea. MD.-TOO My OfAdaraspoks is ru ;r`• WLIL, -A *Tom*Sammet 2012 to&maw 2M Mem The SUM)00"nld*br extends 4,f vr ftm MO 4&h StmeM-35W IMW -,k- stahm vdMboWAvwenama-own Mwp Oft"h dbwnbm A"Mwm"on MODOk mW,to of Cokw*o h*QWS Tmmd C*nW on s!Ant as ft two m CW*wAvaius. Ives N",0' A RNIF 000 Craw Lb.W tcb*"WW"whom) all tow A 7�Pvf 2 of 8 2/28/2013 4:07 PM wcros1p-1G4246.pdf http://www.minneapolismn.gov/wwwi groups/public/(gpublicwor)csi'd.., Initial Screening of Transportation Options To de=fine the alternatives `or detailed evaluation,a high- Results of Initial Screening level screening of a variety of mode and alignment options of Alignments 419 Ave vras conducted to screen out alternatives that do not meet the project's purpose and goals.The criteria used to screen mode and alignment options Include: Potential right-of-way impacts • Provides access to community • Compatible with local and regional plans • Consistent-with e)asting community character s • Provides appropriate level of transit capacity • Community and stakeholders sentiment 1awry • Ave C:nnects a�ivit`,�centers ••�••�!••i• •i�iif • 1 • Efe_tfve alignment that provides for direct access Mode OptSions BI � F The mode.options evaluated include: • Conventional bus('°no-build"°)• •'•. • Enhanced bus(in rnixedl tr&Mc)* ••. .i • Modem streetcars •• • Bus rapid transit fin a dedicated busway) •• .�,s+�1� `:` • Light rail transit •••�_:'' ' • � eav`t/rail ••• •• �� k4aglev j' i• • Personal rapid transit • Commuter rail ••�•••••• T•@a*** {i v "Node o9i•;ons that were found to best meet the pwnose and yams for the project and are iecommended for deter,"ed ; • evr,lua ton. Alignment Options A variety of alignment options on and near Nicollet and ' Central Avenues were screened(see map). The alignment ....,.... • �••••Lake st options recommended for detailed evaluation are: • Generally, Central Avenue NE, Nicollet Mail and �* Nicollet Avenue S LEGEND • Two Mississippi River crossing options (Hennepin/ 3 �•";;; Afr nentakarnedwae advanced Into Ietaded First Avenue and Central/1•hird Avenue S) ;j Evaluation • Tw-- Lake Street connection options (First/Blaisdell T Altsnnuntakarnaliva: Avenue and a reopened Nicollet Avenue S) out during and Sweening : 46th 9t 1 Jww"37.2013 -;� F�;;%.'n•r:k•.^^nnenaoS;.•��,go:!o:;b;,•;_a�tra! 3 of nano 11Wn I'I A All mi wcros1p-104246.pdf http://www.niinmapolismmgov/www/groups/public/Cpublicworlcs/d... Alternatives for Detailed Evaluation An enhanced bus; modern streetcar and no-build Proposed 41st/c�rc alternative are proposed for the detailed evaluation. Route Key features of the enhanced bus and modern streetcar and Stops 37th Ave alternatives include: 35th Ave • Frequent service • Fewer stops than existing local bus 32ndAv • Complementary bus service V Fewer signal delays 2fthAv 11 Faster boarding 26th/27thAve • Larger, more recognizable vehicles W WwryAve • Better stop amenities 22W Ave a Use same lanes as cars and trucks 1SthAve It is anticipated that the modern streetcar altem,ative Uth Ave v.,culd need to be implemented in phases due to funding Routing between Broldway� constraints and experience in other U.S.cities. In addition rivercraningand to the 9-mile corridor, an approximately 3,5-rnile starter Nicallet Mail TSD v Spring St ; streetcar line between Lake Street and Ent Hennepin nhSt Avenue �.Jiil be evaluated and refined as necessary based $Hennepin Ave on evaluation results, University Ave �� SE2WSVMWn Common Elements of Enhanced Bus and 4th stn Modern Streetcar V 5th S�°; 7thStp " �ngtonAw Frequent Service; Enhanced bus and modern streetcar r 9th St�j `, a will be as frequent as bus service today,,running every 7.,5 11th St,6 i to 20 minutes, 13th St 14th/isthSt � ` Fewer Stops than Existing Local Bus: The mails on the,left 18th St l shcv;s a concept for enhanced bus and odern streetcar Franldin Ave Q st ops,By stopping every other block instead of every block,, 24th St enhanced bus and modern streetcar will travel faster than 2M St = bus service today and still get you where you need to go 28th� r,a without signiflcantly increasing Your walk. two St a Complementary Bus Service: The enhanced bus: and e 32nd modern streetcar would replace local bus service:, but bus service in the corridor north of the Columbia i�fe"igtrts, 34th St etween 28th St.and Transit Center and south of 46th Street would continue to BD 36th 5t serve downtown via a limited stop service. lye changes 38th St are expected for routes 11, 17 and 25. 40th St LEGEND Fewer Signal Delays: New traffic signal technology would v=in Proposed route 42nd5t — —Routs options alloy enhanced bus and modern streetcar to move more 44th St a Proposed Stop location quickly through intersections along the corridor. 46th St a January 30,ZM3 http:/fwww.MinneapolisMMBev/niCO11etce&fOi - ¢ • • • • i • ! ! • • • • • O • • • i • • • !- f ! • ! • ! • • ! • � 4 of 8 2/28/2013 4:07 PM wcros 1p-104246.pdf http://www.ninmapoliri=gov/www/groups/public/epublicworks/d... Faster Boarding: Paying for your `are be'ore getting on Better 5t,pArneni:ies:Enhancedbusandmodernstmetcar the bus or modern streetcar and boarding through any stops typically have mcre amenities than conventional bus door will alloy, you to get on enhanced bus and modern stops, including curb extensions to enable level or near streetcar service raster than today's bus service. level boarding and real-time information displays to shoe: when the next vehicle Is due to arrive at the stop. w� Ewma,WA llansw errs Larger. Klore Easily Recognizable Vehicles: Enhanced bus and modern streetcar vehicles typically carry mare passengers compared to a 40-foot conventional bus: ' • Ccnve:ntional bus:40 to 50 + Enhanced bus,(60-foot articulated):70 to 90 • l'vlcdern streetcar(67-foot):100 to 120 Enhanced bus and modern streetcar vehiclss, will also include branding so you can tell it apart frorrr regular bus service, Seat!!e { ° Use Same lanes as Cars and Trucks: Enhanced bias and i` "' modem streetcar will operate in existing traffic lanes with 9 go cars and trucks in the Nicollet-Central corridor. SIT' UP N01"Yli i,• ' k Cleveland _. Portland ht tp:/,�www.minneoovPis^an,�cry/�rcolr�t-ce�r.:? 5 of '1 M4?111nI'I A.Mf m• wcros 1p-104246.pdf http://www.minneapolisrnn.gov/www/groups;public/Cwpublieworlcsid... How Do Enhanced Bus and Modern Streetcar Lost to Build Differ' Modern streetcar costs more to build and operate than While they have many common elements,enhanced bus enhanced bus but less than light rail, and modern streetcar have key differences,namely: Route Flexibility Infrastructure Because it has rubber :fires, bus can easily get around • Modern streetcar runs on tracks to the street, obstacles, be rerouted and its route extended while Installing tracks will entail some roadway modern streetcar is fixed on rails. reconstruction, typically only where tracks are laid, not the entire street. - Modern streetcar uses an electrical power systam.. There are overhead wires connected to street lights: or special poles approximately every BO feet and substations every one-half mile that are about 25%et s" by 20 feet. t Everett,WA(photo.Dan Honan) Economic Development Benefits Modern streetcar is generally associated with more a e economic development outcomes than bus.It is a unique Portland amenity that attracts development and attention, Modern streetcar requires a sepal storaV seed maintienance fadlity close to the tine. A two- to ; three-acre site can accommodate 10 to 35 streetcar x vehicles. �s Flat .t J E, Seattle Maintenance Fadlky Seattle(photo:Reconnect America) hrp://www.mrnneapolismn.govinicoltet-central J • s • A ! • • • Q Q • • s • • • • • • • • i • • • s • • • s • • ' 6 of 8 2/28/2013 4:07 PM wcros1p-104246.pdf http:/iwwwJrinneapolismn gov,,www/groups/publicr'Ca ublicworks/d... How Do Modern Streetcar and Light Rail Differ? The Twin Cities'first light rail line opened in 2D04 and Itssecond line isscheduled to open in 20-4.Modern streetcar is new to the region.So hmk are they different from each other? Lanes/Tracks v • Modern Streetcar:Sarne lanes as cars and trucks r • Light Rail:Separate from cars and tracks pout & Train Length i _i s• - , • Modern Streetcar: Single-car trains; Portland's are •_, �+' �"r.. ,4, about 70 feet long each r • Light Rai: Trains are made up of tyro to three cars; c each car is about 90 seat long Distance between Stops • K'+odern Streetcar: 'Every t-..ti•o to Four blocks • Light Rail: =verb four blocks to one mile f _ - Length/Type of Trips Served -`► ___ • Nodern Streetcar.Short(typically less than 4 miles); Saint Paul VVk R dl serves short trips in downtowns and activity canters, n Ut i1: Long (typically 8 miles or more); serves longer,regional trips fE Avemge Cost to Build(per mile) • Modern Streetcar:$30 to 560 rnillion Light Rat: to 125 million Construction Impacts • Modern Streetcar.Less extensive • Light Rail:More extensive I Sample Systems(Clperad agJUnder C'onstrucdon) Modern Streetcar:Portland, Seattle, Tacoma;Tucson, Salt Lake • Lia-hit Rai: lVinneapolis-St. Paul, San Francesca, Portland,Seattle, Charlotte,Salt Lake,Buffalo Pbdbnd Modern Shvetcm S MiaArtra gar•rA• sa4•ai•ar LRT-94, LRT•94' Now ART 41' UU-W LRT•M' •v WW1 rrb"e=f"rr,n.?ov..'nlroA'•:-:f r,r�% • • • • • • • * • • • • • • • ! • • • • • • • • • • • • • 7 7OfR n/nn nnn nwm. wcroslp-104246.pdf http://www.mimieapolisn n.gov/www/groups/public/a:publicworks/d... Next Steps During the next phase of the Study,the Detailed Evaluation of Alternatives,the following information will be prepared for the enhanced bus, modern streetcar and no-build alternatives, and for the conceptual starter streetcar alternative: • Cost to build • Cost affectiveness • Number of people who would ride it (,generally cost divided by riders) • Effects on the environment • Ability to attract more housing and businesses/jobs • Effects on the traffic flow tot he Corridor • Cost to operate and maintain 0 Public and stakeholder sentiment (annual recurring cost) This information will assist in determining which alternative best meats the project's purpose and goals and selection of a Locally Preferred Alternative for transit in the corridor. The_hart belcv.,shows the current study process and timeline,as ti. all as the subsequent work needed to advance the project. 2012—2013: Nicollet-Central Transit Alternatives Study IIA Purpose and Need 0 • K [vtndorKohlems and Chatlenpi i, vtslon tor the Corridor Goals and ObfectivesaodEvaluationCriteria initial Development and Screening of corridor Transportation Options l Wnid Mode Optwrd C.arridor SMment Optioru DeWiled Definition and Evaluation of Alternatives Coca ty Preferred Airerrativr. Metropolitan Council-Approval of LPA Secure Construction •� Funding _. Operations The study is being led by the City of Minneapolis in co airor wt rth,he,b"etropol tan Council and Metro Transit. http:11wwm:minneopo4s mn.gov/nicollet-centre! • • • • • • • ! • • • ! • • • • • • • • • ! 6 • ! • ! • ! • • • w""° 8 of 8 2/28/2013 4:07 PM CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: March 4, 2013 AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESSION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER NO: PUBLIC WORKS ITEM: CITY-WIDE BIKE LOOP STUDY BY: Kevin Hansen BY: DATE: 2/26/13 DATE: In the fall of 2011,Anoka County Community Health and Environmental Services(CHES)announced they had received grant funding from the State for its Statewide Health Improvement Program or SHIP.CHES then began the process of contacting communities in the County to review SHIP strategies.The goal of SHIP is to create a healthier environment and reduce health disparities. CHES's goal is to create and maintain safe and convenient places to be physically active for people regardless of age by designing and/or redesigning systems that decrease the barriers that prevent citizens from engaging in routine physical activity. Throughout 2012 staff met with the County in response to their interest in forming a partnership with the City to meet SHIP's goals. Through those discussions,we focused on one of the Minnesota Design Team goals of creating a Bike Loop and connecting the City's 13 parks,along with the Anoka County Park.The Mississippi River Regional Trail (MRRT) is also located just to the west of the city. It links the cities of Anoka, Coon Rapids, Fridley and connects to the Minneapolis parkway system. In 2012, the City of Fridley received a Transportation Enhancement grant that will provide pedestrian and bicycle connection over I-694(on Main Street)and between our communities.Because of these resources,CHES suggested a partnership and provided funding for a City-wide Bike Loop study,meeting SHIP's goal of promoting healthier,more environmentally friendly modes of transportation,increasing residents'physical activity and enhancing the quality of life in the community. Based on the original MN Design Team recommendations, attached are three bike loop layouts and a description of each: Option 1 —Bike Lanes: This figure shows the impacts to the existing roadways if on-street bike lanes are striped on the roadways.In this scenario,a 5'bike lane would be provided for each direction of travel.In most cases,parking would need to be removed from at least one side of the roadway. Option 2—Bike Lanes(One Direction Only): This figure shows the impacts to the existing roadways if an on- street bike lane is striped in only one direction. In many cases, a 5' bike lane in only one direction can be striped without removing the existing on-street parking if the existing travel and parking lanes are narrowed. All lane widths would be consistent with State-Aid standards (which permit 8' parking lanes and 11' travel lanes in many cases). From a cyclist perspective, a bike lane in only one direction is less desirable than bike lanes in both directions; however, it is more desirable than no bike lanes at all. It is uncommon to provide a bike lane in only one direction,but also not unheard of. Shared Lane Markings can be used to demarcate the path for cyclists traveling in the direction where a dedicated bike lane is not provided (see below for more discussion of shared lane markings). Option 3—Off Street Paths: This figure shows the areas where we believe it would be feasible to construct an off-street path adjacent to the roadway within the existing right-of-way.In these areas,off-street paths maybe provided rather than(or in addition to) on-street bike lanes. Option 4—Shared Lane Markings:The final option(no figure attached,but see image below)is to use Shared Lane Markings(a.k.a. Sharrows) in both directions. Shared Lane Markings (as shown in the image below) encourage bicyclists and motorists to share the existing travel lanes.As they do not require dedicated space on the roadway, they can be used on any roadway without having any impacts to the existing lane widths or CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting o£ March 4, 2013 AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESSION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER NO: PUBLIC WORKS ITEM: CITY-WIDE BIKE LOOP STUDY BY: Kevin Hansen BY: DATE: 2/26/13 DATE: configurations.Generally,most cyclists will perceive Shared Lane Markings to be less safe and less desirable than dedicated on-street bike lanes. In addition to designating and providing connectivity to our City parks and the City of Fridley plans that will provide a connection over to the MRRT,the bike loop supports ISD 13's efforts of biking/walking through their Safe Routes to School Grant(SRTS). No action is requested at this time—information is provided for discussion and feedback. Attachments: Layout options 1-3 Sharrow Diagram W 0 ps • COUNCIL ACTION: ., ,; `. wl ,v-i i l fi:'.:,. F'�4$ 1 x ,i�' :_$': — Fia,ff' - _- i✓°y�l.. � :4^ -r- , ya., "': L .i: si- •� -Y��' ��.. �r'1y - i. f - � I n"r.'�.' �r"+7"r." _�'' _ nsd, f„ �' ,ei ,¢ 4� • • • - •- r•,, .. i Jilt`e14 .`d. � '-, �; -ice• � �' �•: 1�rl '.irt- _ �':� - Y .,e. s7', - ',�. '1 ,F' �. idd - • - '. • • •- • � • _ - • - • ' , • � - r_ e_. : ," ,. S`-E _' �:,i,. . ,�,�[ �' 1 �11�>s`"-,. y%4 ti n, _ _ tl =C't" i a�;,,�, .. S', 4 ,:� ,. �:.. 'Si '!. �., _ ".`; •1,.4.-... f._�J.�A A� �C.-,. � �-+s' 3S-...rr - N. R'{n''}�d�+.•�Jy >Ir f+ w��-J • •- " - -' ..` '`'� l:�e±L 'k.44 ,a, �r ,;-: � �Y • • ��. ',�°' � � i�.,� IfKL� -- ` � � r .aCi7 �.. t4 1' • • - •- + rp J I ;._�� t.. iy '` a • •. ''�}, ,�+.;f , •#, I a v i�t'� • __ •. ,� ' Y..' F. 'T c tr.Y:r .'{� r, v ' N /7' - • ••• -• �:ii rieF cf Il F ".+ _ f ,,4.• �rf I.,1.>t �i1 •X ,'�L daC F .gyp 4-w} - - ` y. .��-.✓? J � � — - � l�lC 7� �.. ,- �:. � ." ��x - • ••• -• 177'-� � ;.�.i �I,�. . t���l� { °,�• _ �� �I - � .,. � � �:. `�;'�' Jr, yr•x} ff: ,-`I. � 5' .: €y��' L <i�., A :,�a `.:_:�l • •. "F' 1Jt�"' R:fL_ - Remove .1 _ y' - _ `II. ,ll� r `�. • c ' :."r _ _ - ` .f • • y Both Sides 7F, �1•. � - � ri"° �i 4 1 r � _ • • •• - ,f 1 s 11 4 r • w.� 4 'IF _ 11 }y •. • • .., � r RSiI" '.a At. R one side only) h#'yf ay „a ;.x_�._ '.�i, .}:!. -�' r_w - -:7,:'��:a -: '� I ��-, 3 t 1 •5 '�t� �� � �w_� �`S- .G F� Y. , ,. , a• �-�, - � ,, r.�,• _ ., :,: <-• ..: '� _. .�; `- t �� � �t 4 - emu, ;x '!:. ..�: ��.iX. f:,i, ax .-, .:... •�_ :. ai-�':�i �• ., ,n 1 x .,�" f r � } 'Y rT' _ '�\."�� 1°I +',- sr • .f '. �. � �'. n.� *.;:: :.t,a •1'...�'�!" { ''�4�.:_� per '!S .i �. q �.'.:�. 4 _ � � r s tL OF Jet , ., Js •,,q • ;r+ -•. '.::"'r,, ;r �t j t'. ,, f : . r_ .tF y • • w -_,y�-F'" ,}1'4 :. 1?Y �f7 t'� ++q � s�� ..._ ,-Y c . �..' to ,._,�,,..� i,''. t~ _-k• i _.- - xi ,A� -'a'.i �+�41. • • - •- '' '�' i �►pls�. ,_ � :tee- ,1,�>• -,,.. _ • L `� � � � I,: *` i �' ".� �`� a -y,- E� (•t =±:,.},ry :r '.S � nom. ,� :'rr, - � } P �� •}fa ^t '�- .'t 38� -~. � 'i � � � F ate.=- •� n` u` i"'r - T �!""�'j'ti.c __. L _ � .:Y. 1" .s.. �?, a. "'pyir_<s. - 4- � �.. � �..� � y'rFl ei°VR::7• fY�g �.: rrr [= ti ,Y&. 7 -3 -,� wi�F - -rte. ,�.�i,,L•.. _ ,(� 3. p. -1:�, nil: t N •j. _ - wL f:: yx„ a- -a•>+^+ y �� LS' - �T�: -y,:, „ '$ r r dt+, .. j ax.a >��`�"., ,., s .;r.ee 7< [5 ''gyp• • ' ' • :• •- j"d x '� - �' ¢. .ut .:�k' l -J`'.,�'.. C.I. a ,t _iii _ _ _ '� o ,Y'., _ _,r� .fir_ 'T'' ;Sj� �F"i'.` •.• - �l$' -r' A ." -9*"!" n' f - ° �V.S li:. .. • -_ � ai:' -i,' ,f t _ t �t .1`.. 4 � i:. .S:u. �x r'RY. •$. w - , lf , . i ..,'n 4'- � ,. e•,} ,��,.r, r � E-r:. :.� `.., �_ ,' i $!� i'-' �a �'�� .�.� 6 .i�,�,. ;�;f' �.-,- parking • •"$r� .F'�:y. _ - .R. - _v '�+ _6 7 f- - ,•sw. 1 :�,:. -� 7. .,,. :fX e - - _. "'.: �,.' i'�b�' _ ��� :?r r,1�'-i �''.f �'.�' ♦c�Y a �'., �.t<- _ �: r v r ,L f� v ' -'J. } "'' __." �i ..< .. ? "' r w -� .�-7 - � •1::"r�i ?,. ,x'47" w 'r. ��_- -P Y,(f_°O a jr • del , - - - 5. ik . J•� , rte+ y, ..r' -i fs. -." .,MS. f q L. r �f 1 , .•. .. t ' -.s.; - ' N F ten•. , ,.... , _ �' 1.. .,r 3 ..0�': :. ]�„' ` ,, T (. � w,, ...•! ,rr_. Ir< Jii - C' ,'i ?.•.. - .yi. � �1. c C .ssa •S Y,.'R c L - - e , �6 y w u ( i, • r�. ..: ,f.£--�. . � r' � y. :r.' . :.: - yj,.,. 'd 't 'i'tk.�, _.'q, F�.,_' 'y;� :�,,...• p`: ` r ,� - � <S-' .•. .•3 __: '. _:- ... ... .. .,.':, -ice '. - � �, 1 �..': lr � �.�-' �'�L.. w * e �'.�' , i����c•� ,f.c��sv .Fk� T ,� 'n•'�'sJ�n, �!' k!'r,+n!�r i!lrr�°' - �'s.. k♦ 1 +' ,�g c �.�:h'i. i f^ j Jy w P. T - fj l•: �S ei1% .^ y�cti a: ..:t�: .C. � ,1C cr- .'y,�`?- , . "� � � !. ; _ �'r> � _ ,,� � •1J' .�.f -'y'J. #r i .: �I' 4r'�'`•v':'� F. 1 ;,� � .� i' "[,.'` *+:`?fir .i. <s� _'4'/ "r'` !'-;P 5._ �.� �< --�_ �. `• "' t •�� i--��`,-a. a:1. ktr ,,� �_, .. Y- �., ,� ♦ i _. li5„ p,7 e�h.`� i •.1,�'"- _ 9p;• V-�.,/r� �:, s.::. ;"�`-. • • • '• • rt ,�=r �� o ''�`� r ,sa .. K!•�t` :�4�. -."i �%� f� .�t4Ft�r'a ;�a _ ;� i •� ��.; ,dF • • • - • -- ter' ,} ! -��( fi:� ,:: �.. ,, +"t.. y[, .,�} �� - r4' �`.;i�s/,•�:a"1� i� ,�. `:•' •�'>� _ !,�` :.t i��' ���� �1M«,. L•'. - : 5. Q .tr �.k r � w7;� '� �- >>r r+i+�ivYi� 1,a - � :��7�1s ., i I> +� ;Vii• _ - • - � ~ ' r`..:,r �..'`;!! ,:d ! j�';p •' �1 1, =1 �r = "�' � �``'�s •, ty • • •_ � �'� � I� �'�:' ' �� i+ 6 �J{'" ,-Tp�: - ♦ X: -a:.• Y t - • ••• -• f-•�r- �,'�T.3 4-',yyy�a�' 73.r Y s If -- -tA, 'fr"7�.. [. + y •� 3� .y' 1 y�•.J� y': #-�i.•. :T':., - y► ,,�.-t � - �C � t ij �-�T L 4�1i...�'+ 1 �// i// •11 - - ff t p _t • y..,,. �.,-:eY .-.Jrl= a„+5�' ,s Tr •' ��, r,7 ,.. } b y;'45 �:.. ;,. i - .n '..{;YV- ;�i^ri-r , •. '� J.� :.�.. - L .'j.•{ � }.�,�. �IUS ,�. r�' .�es: . { 1' 'h.r , �:. •ti. .,. '..1 -9'4`.0. .3, "7«.« 1 ♦ - "t f 'S '• t s rr • 1' .aa oID,,,:-•,. .�� r ... � y,_� ,�1i1 S. i � .:i ^c S ''a xT, `t � _- ��:�:e�E ��-�' _:, .i 1. !tom •'t P r. �,_.�j,,.� - a,c, a ._.> .,r ',' :r, �( '�n :c �. .: ,.,. .e t!r� .: 'n.w: •.. �• i' '.s... _ .. ...�� � -,: ,.tr Ax,'^,R: - _!.-.Y�: i'+, L 5 - �,�, - .. , .. ",.. .y1 [. 4 t_.' ... n .it. �'-^`..` 4f> .t.-� -,1.. ,�. f�.�, 4 •,'f-' �'I J� ... � �-Y �_ , a :i s ■,T,+.� '� r • • R.. � -�' '� x- s - I� �'.}��4;i�'�,:� �:-.sa ra J°+'J�"` �A_f• � 'iF, '4°` -�� �.: �,t"„ w. �'•. • • - •- ` -- ^'l.v _ - K 1�e 4! .t■ r * - c ,� �.1, k s >r� ,. l�. �� r y'�. �'#rsd ) � a=:� '��' r ii Yl. jT t '{•r }. .a i3 n..,� P�- 2; E _F ='� !•. `• y , ,M • y l,•'. !. '.T .X eL ,R.':. der 5, 1 _ • vy' ,:.. •{'. {_ .5.[J .'i: I 'y� T � ,i ,_. :Y r• .', $a+. 't'i. -.L A'.• "��n�,! i'f---f �!�, Y�'�k?..�. •J" `.§�' '.'�,". .. .,�i ,-. •' ,(..,/`: ,� � '-F "-.a F- + . r ,N H ..«l :wi:. "S,' :� a � jW } p '- Y. _ ry� i + 'i -a - ...'!!i•..'^' -t•4 u :' :. -. T - :. ,rqt .: _ ..:'{'r .3'M. *z. '_�` � i° , .z ° ��Ir - _ " i` I;l' '�"' ,�::.! �'•.x :�+I r:�'._:f'.3�` _3 f�- - _ -.� - "a :z�, b a. `:.�. ., "iP+ - f. ,tA . -s. _ F:- __ :R' k'.Jf- t• 7 v� - jk �Sy -k lin , 11. ,.iiz ,- a ,_`,. r[,i :.. 0.t �- Er�+. � ., '� e•••%t.,+' « t;; °i��: �' , ':>�, :i' { �:` i•' } f d ,�:� .fir.• .� /„' . • .;�,• •_� „ .. -• „ �. .Q • ,,s �, '.. 4 � ..'_:. .,, � �:': .r'a...'} '# y' •'l`'- d9-t," 1:«,a a. �+ .'4' Tf''�1... >w -v_" .,r:•'r�:� .':v- t:;' ! c7.,�. _ •+ - •#t - ;'f° .r� ` 'u" - Y -'• �: M �l$ - �°' g�--...�i :.ail: •:a-. - x�', i :eaa' :R ,� ' i. • -' '�' d' y y-v, �.. i .. -• '. a x'r.° - �:� +$ice. •' '.' - 5_ 3 ...� fe,�r-_ �[ �4�', p� - ..!; �t v'E'r�. - .P - t •-9 'i a. � •p• 1 ::Js-, �- 1.� 4. .'- :`a-'S`._,mac' - I;- ,. _. �•, .+ „ .-.:-: -- {- . .tic �r,7a t.,w �4 �e �,. - M. U� � ..A.� •, ... ,...�- ,.-, f... ,_"`- iRj?• ... .r:r - ,q_ • . •_ �{r.r Yii. ..I4' 'Y �_'. r .. },.: �-' F-r, a r"t .. ^6 , .. -., .• l r;.-.t -t...,.-•: .: "L -<-� :i, ■ {<'` r1 F Y,j:. :1- rs ry _ :._r �f ..': "� f*, ,+Fg �• g F �. Pet 516`P -Ar. �_ �.: `d. ,-r_:r�_'S.,..I.V _.. .:.JP: -.>�_.,.. �:_. �;. - .�`-Fa..-. .• a,;.:`r. w .�r r•��„j 1� l,11- - -row 70 .- fi_t-1�1t - �'�- 4..-' -w� ••w . tt ar- - �_ • -r" B+r a. ,; •_ ->�,... ,.� pr .try �. ,:. .. _ '� _ __ Y� ''nra p �.iF�'y'!" 1 :i-.` �' - �, - _ .. ,'t. .P ;d°. �.•; }. � ,,,y_'d ,,,Fw: }S'^'+1 �.tl' - �.Y7- i>'. � ,• _A_ i.. t 4 1 �! :$: �+: .� �.: .r .�'• ��1 v''•.7` p R' �.:.J••1 ,,�1I+A_ r�; }. �,:.3. '•..� tom. 1 _�- _ �:� �.AX ;; �: _ p _i,� 1 1: .1 • `•' � g -i -'_ fJ. -:. >, "1 ..:.. ,. A Pz+ - • - • a:' - .> .4' _ r' �1�, �--'.j' l-�-'k:' ij":� L v ' s E,.,_ ... -,,... �R - 5": '-:,_:.:. .. .,,, '�" '., na .a ,.b ,,,, •-�.�,r :.�. t f �'•-. - :i. -,;1 -� ,3 ab" ''fv:�- :+. ff ,; .. .;' � _ >,�..: ;,. t.�•+"R ,. _ } -�,�• +tt .,.. .i.. .w.:: RM �,� .� /,; K ..:' �4;� � 1-',1.. •` '.+ .�:j+T�S-,'F .� �. _�': �. 1�'-, ;'S i �'• iK_� a'_. k - •t` r, � {, r - r.� y ±dr: t 1 -'�` i� ,� S� 12� -t: y,"*`� •¢ L _ `�"�,A- .1`L:- '•F : �°�. , in rr ` . s ; a! �''s, z " '�' -:�' - i �• J�' - RAM • • • r • • , • • • • ,y w+Y ,: : �� B'1r 1.♦- , .. :,� �' ; ,�j:. �^'�-� i `:� y 64:4° _ T.!!. t 5..� �■f�- �'�` - � _ y „•,, w., .. -:�: -: ',� :,-` {�� rt �t Y,, .pis r -� F�J. -',`" .;� ::Y.r -� �}s .•c r._.: .. �.. .: ;,._ �._ ail ,'`- .�F q E1r}' `L,, :r,.�''1�, - , LL , a_ '� M•* '*w'r - r: .1 j _ — • p .: -- .} ti r- M j - .y�.z 7 i _o � .e= I`. .y 11n•�-� _ -:rr. ■ .-y I 1 �c�fi�`"`^.•" t. L' r - ' ZL,' ;i r, Ty �, '..d♦'� ':-lt 1 t�: .]A • -- A' Lal.'�f;�.l + r ,`� :�3 Sa! - a, y t +r: # ..i 'k: a. � aq � �F �' r,3i' � i t a4 � �1i�i,�� •• • �,, �„` Lt'k __ -.-�: awe r 1+ 1FJ -• ♦ 1• • _ `7#,�"_ A ��iiis ' • r.;ir; > . 'M-k ."k . A0 Right-of-Way T4 0� i i,k� � i_ • • _• � P _ � :a:. � � �` I� �. w°'�� i+T � 1:1., 3f1 .,�f�,=. e � � �, s J• f-� -g+1l�F �..j" � �� 'y .-n� y`� � r1 Yr'2 - r -�-{f .�. a _ No Impact ~ lit ,a3.'i 1.>da nyS �' 1 , 4,- �� • _ •# .� N ' -.L ,a _ - • - - • - ,y. .5.,:..� _ "'3'..+K ' 1 � 11 i11 •11 �' � l� � _� 1 �r - Mt "- � �'' �-1�" 3a'I. � �• - -'' fg�l k� - i ��, +�} ?' �` ,�• # 1Y ..�h-r' � > f � , • ♦ _ • '•rte-a k �:�"' �,,�;a,-�, F.,_, .=.1 .1 �-.:r +a'.: an F'. d�lx .tt :Y 1, •r` 1 4 rrl _ ''R �� r` � 'h '�!i •.}:. - . .e . 4 } •d.i a. t #'aP 4� '.. r > r , V Off-Street Path Kam`• �.j•. 4•-. �'}-:.�C� ,. :i� IF r - 1 r 41!1, -- a';' �l. �-JS fJlf d -ql � :.e L x: �.,. ,. ,g ,i r r ,. : .. . .. ._.y i} ,a,' :i�' ■ - ''^' z ' r.,.- .,4,` ti;T `std' ',I•-••tlT jl - 'r� 7y r F .: ;�� 7•!` t - .;' .,-, w,;{ ;•. r' • t' •' is �' r a ''}■�' ,; .J� - ;1 s '�,.. !_� -3' - *r � • `.y `�' r. I - �'K�: - m ,. :�• � - a?,. fir. �'_ �. r T I ..r' ,. t,{y, ' « ,...y�+_-a. ,>ti -f ■l.�f'X ..r 1• �',t - I .i1 •r' `- _ _ a �'� rl 1 ,- , u. > v,,. � ;_ _ -: :,'t .a- .:. -,•�r" '� l.Yr ri '!� r:�,... .a'.'.Z �7.. L. -:�. � a..:}.�•�. ._.._.,. � -_:. , ,!4' :r' -. 1' i�:.. .--�i, 'M � �'._ 'SZ.___�'.��'� � t�T i"ks' 3`.'.tt.•"git•'s°f - , r Y �.• -- It- . �', '•.•1, 1�, 1 V'a} :r - 1rJ it M 1s.' M" - rM Off-Street f` j :�� � - , =.� L' - • • a IS 'Right AL .s■..' t ;;, .t i 'Ix j.a:F`i_., ��., �� _ .f- .�5'r` ',!•I? w � _'a. a �,� �S± rs:. (�._ - -ii •'- ;�, »a R*.r.. fd', zs t ,•- Y. I •' _;, _ ,tom •. .., -F _ ,:., , , vY :•■_ , ' - {,a 'c' .. a. r-R r ._ F�•::,t *'° ;'fir. �. •y `r'§'..,,' .$ .► Q r .� 47 - ` > k.T. k'::. .k, �,. ..y". .• �:. .-.. � ., ..,-.r , •'�: :,. •:: . •a,. t _ *ice ,� ..i�r,�. • :.r,#. .t•r aagr r, .� :�v v I.�,.. r Irot ;':� '4r` 3 �'r•. _ �:,1ati = .�•P� S .f}� .'1'.y. rR._ y.. •.r■ .Y-'t' - >�'�•y;-.. 'i� :�, s O `�,. ' - :..r ,-_.-a' '" ^�. ... r -.. Y _ .. .. 'y,f;•. 'i' 'r �' � •M1��': i. _ ,� r:�Y. '�•I,� r r :r��' "i ,,.:4 ^F? -w r�l ,�, :�;•F _ .xt'�yyj� i� µa1 �•:] •:a�' �t 1 I'-:11, .I�L�' ,.4 �. ��jx. �'�, f .�1:�r - . A ..2 �,y ,'1'. -:r14. ?RJ .,a!' �„` F•e a r , A �,�; � - `S'y .: ;. A Al r F Aw y - _ r _ T � I• , •Y .r -� -„...� -.a ...r•: � .,-� -'{1• z. ..- ,� � -z. `�'.r r._ ..rg t->z j'-h. �� ,� ., .s.• ... ..l, -.. ■ : .�. :,' �; s:y �. .. f 6_. � .a --�- ” Y 'z. :S rA�, C-: �i ..>_ ..'�� •myµ . y*: - .yr�_ .. 1 :._ � r -.:. — W ,,p•"!f r,4� I is� �.� .� l �=Y �.--. t , f � F ,F` _ q Y d , , ,,fs „qt �13' • .w. �. `6j ' I ♦- _ r, lriL ..-..'"►�sl ,sue _ il.f�� y R.. _ ti > , � _r.' - ,, r }, _y, la, .. t� > � "w ..rte'- f°=Y•4 •Y r �; ld.'1k: �i -a-: �;.�_ t•' �.i +#?. °C , :�'" `�"._� �)' r 7 ♦ - - - i G. .. , •.. ,^.., :,:ice ., � � - :.;� - !". 4`. J r �, -- ' r. ♦� .'Y.�♦I R " '1 � - . '1,°� _ - /. L '•r,'t: a'.Y L - a * :y 0•_ u.. •• •.. $: y � * y sir F 1 { j: - ."'#sk.$' � � } ,may '� ,•dt~ i r J - �' , � i > •$ r -C .. ,,{tri -'