Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/08/11 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 8, 2011 The following are the minutes for the regular meeting of the City Council held at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, August 08, 2011 in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 590 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights, MN. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL/INVOCATION Pastor Bob Lyndes, Crest View Senior Communities, gave the Invocation. Present: Mayor Peterson, Council member Williams, Council member Nawrocki, Council member Diehm, Council member Schmitt PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - recited ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO MEETING AGENDA Nawrocki requested to remove items C, D, and E from the consent agenda and to discuss the budget. Schmitt wishes to add a comment about National Night Out. PROCLAMATIONS, PRESENTATIONS, RECOGNITION, ANNOUNCEMENTS, GUESTS A. Congressman Keith Ellison Peterson introduced US Congressman Ellison. Congressman Ellison stated his commitment to visit the City Council at least once a year. He congratulated everyone on the Pedestrian Gateway Bridge. It is a safe, beautiful amenity. He stated his honor to help with this project. This was known as an earmark. It is not above the budget and is locally directed spending. He stated his pleasure to defend this project. Ellison gave the background on current Washington issues, such as the debt ceiling debate. He stated he would not let our nation go into default. When it was clear that the debt would be raised, he voted no because he did not agree with the bill. He referred to the 2/3 of businesses that do not pay taxes and should help those that do. Transportation funding will not be cut; we are driving on our grandparent's infrastructure. If the unemployment rate was lower, our debt would be lower. The deal to pass the debt ceiling increase was a three step process to cut $917 million. It creates a 12 member committee to determine another $1.5 billion cut. Food stamps, social security, Medicare, and defense have not been cut this round. Social security does not contribute to our debt; we borrow from it. He stated he would oppose benefit cuts in Medicare or Medicaid. The committee must vote by November 23, 2011 and Congress must pass a bill by December 23` Amendments will not be allowed. Transportation is important, but they are having a difficult time putting together a bill. Six of the twelve bills were passed. He addressed the credit downgrade by Standard and Poors from AAA to AA. There are two other agencies that have not downgraded us. He believed the downgrade was due to the political wrangling. The comments are favorable on some areas of our economy. This will effect some states and cities and cause a greater expense. Ellison commented on a previous error by Standard and Poors. In the next few months he will work on budgetary changes that do not fall on the middle class. Everyone should step up and help with the debt reduction. He thanked the Council for their service. He invited anyone to his office in Washington. He asked to continue to be invited to our community events. Nawrocki spoke on social security and its financial viability and asked if the annual payouts are more than or less than the annual receipts. Ellison stated that Social Security can pay out until City Council Minutes Monday, August 08, 2011 Page 2 of 9 2037 with no reduction in benefits. They may change the way inflation is measured, which may change the amount paid out. There are ways to obtain solvency. Social Security is a great program to help seniors and those with disabilities. Miscellaneous Peterson stated that the next dessert dinner theater experience, "The Beatles Slept Here ", will be held this Thursday at Murzyn Hall. Schmitt stated she attended several National Night Out picnics and the group at 3900 Arthur Street, requested a sign on 37 Avenue to help people find their street. Kevin Hansen, Public Works Director, stated that he would check the State and County road rules on this, but it should not be an issue. Peterson stated this would go before the Traffic Commission. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve minutes of the July 25, 2011 City Council meeting. Motion to approve the minutes of the July 25, 2011 City Council meeting. B. Accept minutes of Boards and Commissions Motion to accept the minutes of the May 24, 2011 HRA meeting. Motion to accept the minutes of the June 6, 2011 EDA meeting. Motion to accept the minutes of the August 3, 2011 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Motion to accept the minutes of the July 6, 2011 Library Board meeting. C. Authorization to seek en.ineerin• ' ro.osals for the Argonne sanitar sewer lift station improvement. - removed D. Municipal Service Center: Surface Water Management Improvements (Phase 1) - removed E. Adopt Resolution 2011 -73, being a Resolution calling a Public Hearing for Scattered Site Housing TIF District - removed F. Approval of attached list of rental housing applications. Motion to approve the items listed for rental housing license applications for August 8, 2011 in that they have met the requirements of the Property Maintenance Code. G. Approve Business License Applications Motion to approve the items as listed on the business license agenda for August 8, 2011 as presented. H. Review payment of the bills Motion that in accordance with the MN Statute 412.271, subd. 8 the City Council has received the list of claims paid covering check number 139842 through 140018 in the amount of $791,799.85. Motion by Nawrocki second by Schmitt, to approve the Consent Agenda items, with the exception of items C, D, and E. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried. C. Authorization to seek engineering proposals for the Argonne sanitary sewer lift station improvement. Hansen stated this is a request to seek proposals for an engineering consultant to design and construct a sanitary sewer lift station on Argonne. This lift station serves about 60 homes in the City Council Minutes Monday, August 08, 2011 Page 3 of 9 area and is necessary to lift sewage out of the area. The current station costs more to repair than reasonable. We would look at 2012 for reconstruction. Motion by Schmitt, second by Williams, to authorize staff to obtain engineering proposals from consultants for the design, inspection, and construction management of the Argonne sanitary sewer lift station improvement. Nawrocki stated this is a residential area and asked where it would be put. Hansen stated it would be placed in the street or on the north side of Argonne. The engineer would look for the most cost effective place to put it. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried. D. Municipal Service Center: Surface Water Management Improvements (Phase I) Hansen stated this improvement is to treat surface water on the Public Works Maintenance building site. This is to meet the requirements of our storm water management program and would include a unit to run the water through to filter it. Nawrocki questioned the current dirt piles in the open area. Hansen stated one is dirt from the water main lining project and the other is clean fill sand for water main breaks. Nawrocki questioned what would happen if we did not do this. Hansen stated that we would not meet our water management requirements and we would risk issues /fines with the water authority. Nawrocki stated there is no standing water now. Hansen stated rain water leaves the site without treatment. Fehst stated this improvement has been requested in the last five budget processes. There is more emphasis being put on the enforcement of the standards. The new water shed we will join will make sure that we do comply. The penalties are in the form of fines. Hansen stated that they check your plan and operation. Nawrocki indicated that we should wait until they require the improvement. He questioned the adjacent property that does not treat run off water. Hansen stated that with any development they would be in the same situation as we are. Schmitt questioned if we could be grandfathered in and not have to do this. Hansen stated the rule is for all cities. The MPDS permit is updated every five years and this is a critical component. Fehst questioned compliance by other cities. Hansen indicated that the new St. Anthony maintenance building treats run off water. Hansen stated that they will levy fines to non- compliant cities. Fehst referred to a past fine in the Hart Lake area. Fehst stated that we have budgeted for this work. It is either do it now or do it later and face fines. Peterson asked why we would be a member of the water shed district and not comply by the rules. Fehst stated that we have been dodging this bullet for five years. Nawrocki again stated that he did not see a problem. We are just building more swamps /ponding areas. Schmitt mentioned the Hart Boulevard fine of $10,000. Hansen stated it was during the construction/redevelopment of the movie theater. Schmitt stated that the cost of the fines scare her and they would also look at other items such as chemicals and contaminants. Hansen stated this request would meet the minimum State requirement. Fehst stated that anything over an acre must provide a runoff pond. Motion by Williams, second by Schmitt, to authorize the purchase of one Stormceptor unit, along with the storm sewer and paving materials as detailed for the MSC Surface Water Management Improvements, up to the budgeted amounts. Upon vote: Schmitt, aye; Williams, aye; Diehm, aye; Nawrocki, nay; Peterson, aye. 4 ayes — 1 nay. Motion carried. E. Adopt Resolution 2011 -73, being a Resolution calling a Public Hearing for Scattered Site Housing TIF District Fehst stated this resolution will request a public hearing on October 10th. City Council Minutes Monday, August 08, 2011 Page 4 of 9 Motion by Williams, second by Schmitt, to waive the reading of resolution 2011 -73, there being ample copies available to the public. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried. Motion by Williams, second by Schmitt, to adopt Resolution 2011 -73, being a Resolution calling for a public hearing by the City Council on the proposed modification of the Downtown Central Business District (CBD) Revitalization Plan for Downtown CBD Redevelopment project and the proposed establishment of the city -wide Scattered Site Housing Tax Increment Financing District therein and the adoption of the TIF plan therefore. Nawrocki stated this would mean approval to move ahead with the program and he would not support this. Increased taxes would be put in a fund for additional housing type purposes and not used for police /fire or general purposes. Fehst stated that we are a diverse body and the police and fire departments are a major portion of our budget. We also have the needs of our Internal Goals. He asked Council member Nawrocki to keep an open mind through the public hearing phase. Fehst suggested a tour of an area where this worked. This would take a substandard home and freeze the level, with the additional tax funds going back to the redevelopment program. The result would be a new, larger home and be pleasing to the neighborhood. Nawrocki stated that while police and fire costs increase, this would not and you would have to increase the amount to other taxpayers to cover the difference. Fehst stated this resolution is only to set the public hearings. Fehst referred to the Sheffield area and the positive results there. Peterson stated this is a program that the Council agreed on and asked staff to pursue. Schmitt asked that staff explain this program. Scott Clark, Community Development Director, gave the history of this program through the EDA and the City Council to purchase substandard homes with the intent to establish this TIF District at the end of the process to recoup funds and begin the process again. The City Council established the abandoned/vacant properties ordinance, identified how we do rental property inspections, and started the scattered site housing program recognizing that at the end there would be the establishment of this district. Now our average price to purchase a substandard home is $30,000 and with demolition it totals about $50,000. We have purchased and tom down about 20 homes in deplorable condition and the County has also bought homes in the city. We can still buy another four or five homes under this program. It was determined that the phase two establishment of the district was to recapture the money and reuse it. Schmitt questioned if the original intention was to take the money from the sale of the homes to buy more substandard homes. Clark stated that and from the TIF district. Schmitt questioned what happens to the money when the program is done. Clark stated that if the City Council ended the program, funds would go back to Anoka County and be redistributed at $.40 on the dollar. The funds have to be used for specific purposes. Schmitt questioned if this resolutuion establishes the district. Diehm indicated it is only to set a public hearing date. Clark stated that the EDA would have to make a recommendation to the City Council prior to the hearing. Upon vote: Schmitt, aye; Williams, aye; Diehm, aye; Nawrocki, nay; Peterson, aye. 4 ayes — 1 nay. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Adopt Resolution 2011 -074 being Resolution for the Approval of an assembly /manufacturing/ processing operation located at 5150 Central Ave, and Resolution 2011 -075 being a Resolution for the Approval of a Minor Subdivision at 5150 Central Avenue. Jeff Sargent, City Planner, described the request of sale from Mr. Herringer to Mr. Lu. The sale City Council Minutes Monday, August 08, 2011 Page 5 of 9 depends on Council approval of the lot split. The building currently has offices on the upper level and a ball court on the lower level. Mr. Lu is requesting approval for an assembly/ manufacturing/ processing operation. The mezzanine level will be turned into office space. As for parking, the code would require 57 stalls, and this would have 87 spaces. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted approval of both items by a 3 -2 vote. Diehm stated she did not see a general definition of assembly /manufacturing /processing in the zoning code. The Conditional Use Permit (CUP) will attach to the property and transfer to future businesses. She questioned if it should include things like hours of operation and it does not prevent other types of manufacturing in the case of a resale. Sargent stated that our code does not define assembly /manufacturing. The assembly portion of the building only has access from the rear of the building. In our estimate, no other business will be impacted by this use. The Council may add conditions if they wish. Diehm stated that the entire building could be turned into manufacturing. With parking based on what is proposed by this prospective owner (retail and assembly), what is the requirement if they do not have retail and only have manufacturing? Would they still comply? Sargent stated it would be reviewed then. Diehm indicated that any change in operation would not have to come back to the City Council without the requirement in the CUP. Sargent stated they would if the use was changed. Diehm indicated that the parking requirement should be based on any possible use of the building. Nawrocki questioned the entrance, areas on the map, and driveway access. Sargent pointed out the lot portion to be split and the driveway easement. Nawrocki questioned creating two lower levels. Sargent described the building structure and the request to change the large room into two levels. Diehm indicated that in the staff report there were no concems with delivery traffic. She questioned if Sargent was comfortable with the site access, even if there is a different use of the building in the future. Sargent stated he did not see that being a problem. Motion by Williams, second by Diehm, to waive the reading of Resolution 2011 -074, there being ample copies available to the public. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried. Motion by Williams, second by Diehm, to adopt Resolution No. 2011 -074, approving the Conditional Use Permit for an assembly /manufacturing/processing business located at 5150 Central Avenue, subject to the conditions outlined in Resolution No. 2011 -074. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried. Motion by Williams, second by Nawrocki, to waive the reading of Resolution 2011 -075, there being ample copies available to the public. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried. Motion by Williams, second by Nawrocki, to adopt Resolution No. 2011 -075, approving the Minor Subdivision of the property at 5150 Central Avenue, subject to the conditions outlined in Resolution No. 2011 -075. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried. B. Establish the date for the 2011 public special assessment levy hearing for: Zone 5 Seal Coat Program, Zone 6 Street Rehabilitation, and delinquent accounts Motion by Williams, second by Schmitt, to establish Monday, October 3, 2011 at 6:00 p.m. as the Public Special Assessment Levy Hearing for City Project #1101 Zone 5 Seal Coat Project, to be held in the City Council Chambers. Nawrocki indicated the hearings should be during a regular council meeting night. The timing of City Council Minutes Monday, August 08, 2011 Page 6 of 9 the hearings conflicts with the EDA meeting. Schmitt included the conflict with the Traffic Commission meeting. Hansen stated there is nothing currently scheduled for the Traffic Commission and it has been discussed to move those meetings to 5:30 p.m. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried. Nawrocki requested to amend the motion. Peterson asked if maker and second of the motion wished to remove the motion. They did not. Motion by Nawrocki to establish Monday, October 10, 2011, during the regular Council meeting as the Public Special Assessment Levy Hearing for City Project #1102 Zone 6 Street Rehabilitation. Schmitt seconded the motion. Diehm indicated it would make sense to hold all of the hearings on the same date. Peterson reminded them that the public hearing on the scattered site TIF district would be held on October 10. Fehst indicated that residents prefer these hearings not be on camera. Upon vote: Schmitt, nay; Williams, nay; Diehm, nay; Nawrocki, aye; Peterson, nay. 4 nays - 1 aye. Motion failed. Motion by Diehm, second by Schmitt, to establish Monday, October 3, 2011 at 6:15 p.m. as the Public Special Assessment Levy Hearing for City Project #1102 Zone 6 Street Rehabilitation, to be held in the City Council Chambers. Upon vote: Schmitt, aye; Williams, aye; Nawrocki, nay; Peterson, aye. 4 ayes — 1 nay. Motion carried. Motion by Diehm, second by Schmitt, to establish Monday, October 3, 2011 at 6:30 p.m. as the Public Special Assessment Levy Hearing for Delinquent Accounts, to be held in the City Council Chambers. Motion to amend by Nawrocki to set the date for the hearing at the regular City Council meeting of Monday, October 10. Peterson called for a second. Motion died for lack of a second. Upon vote of the original motion: Schmitt, aye; Williams, aye; Diehm, aye; Nawrocki, aye; Peterson, aye. 5 ayes. Motion carried. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION - none ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Report of the City Manager Fehst stated the City Council would receive a copy of the 2012 budget at the next meeting. It will include the five year budget plan approved by Council, with an increase in property tax of 3.98 percent and receiving the same local government aid of about $859,000. It is likely with this governor we will not have an un- allotment at the end of the year. We will receive the same homestead credit. Next year it may be distributed differently. The money will be made up by non - homesteaded properties. We may be in a better position than we anticipated. Nawrocki indicated concerns about the budget. At the national and state level people showed displeasure at government spending more money. Nawrocki referred to hiring our own cleaning crews and that the library will pay more with this system. The County is cutting back on the County library budget. There is a state requirement to match funding. Nawrocki requested more information on what the County has done and what the impact will be. He stated that he expressed concern City Council Minutes Monday, August 08, 2011 Page 7 of 9 regarding the EDA budget at their meeting. He proposed a staff reduction and suggested the City Manager handle some of the administrative duties. The 201 fund has proposed revenues less than the expenditures. Nawrocki questioned the training referred to in the green sheet. Fehst stated that is for the new web site. Nawrocki referred to the agreed one percent increase and indicated that the EDA increase is eleven percent. Fehst requested to be shown that information. Fehst pointed out our two point credit rating increase because of the five year budget plan established by the City Council. Fehst compared our one percent increase to the City of Fridley and their 12.9 percent increase. Nawrocki stated that we need to seek bids for legal services and a financial advisory. Peterson asked that information on legal services and financial advisors be discussed at a work session. Nawrocki questioned the status of homes with storm related water backups. Hansen stated that Public Works staff has visited many of the homes and has sent out information to residents regarding the need to clean the backup valve. The League of MN Cities, our insurance agent, is contacting and setting appointments with affected residents. Nawrocki indicated there was a water issue on 40 and McKinley. Hansen stated he would research this. Nawrocki indicated that he attended a breakfast at the "Lighthouse" and the turn out caused parking problems. He questioned if eliminating parking in this area was a good idea. Report of the City Attorney — nothing to report CITIZENS FORUM Peterson stated: Don't forget our service men and women, especially following the downing of the helicopter this week. Keep them in your thoughts and prayers. Don't take ourselves too seriously and do a random act of kindness. ADJOURNMENT Peterson adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p.m. Patricia MuscovitL,,.CM City Clerk RESOLUTION 2011 -73 CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF THE DOWNTOWN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) REVITALIZATION PLAN FOR THE DOWNTOWN CBD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CITY -WIDE SCATTERED SITE HOUSING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT THEREIN AND THE ADOPTION OF THE TIF PLAN BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council ") for the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section 1. Pu blic Hea ring. This Council shall meet on October 10, 2011, at approximately 7:00 P.M., to hold a public hearing on the proposed modification of the Downtown Central Business District (CBD) Revitalization Plan for the CBD Redevelopment Project, the proposed establishment of the City -Wide Scattered Site Housing Tax Increment Financing District, (a scattered site housing district), and the proposed adoption of a TIF Plan therefor, all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 through 469.1082 , and Sections 469.174 to 469.1799, inclusive, as amended, in an effort to encourage the development and redevelopment of certain designated areas within the City; and Section 2. Notice of Public Hearing, Filing of Plans. City staff is authorized and directed to work with Ehlers to prepare the modification to the Downtown Central Business District (CBD) Revitalization Plan for the CBD Redevelopment Project and a TIF Plan for the City -Wide Scattered Site Housing Tax Increment Financing District and to forward documents to the appropriate City Council Minutes Monday, August 08, 2011 Page 8 of 9 taxing jurisdictions including Anoka County and Independent School District No. 13. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the hearing, together with an appropriate map as required by law, to be published at least once in the official newspaper of the City not later than 10, nor more than 30, days prior to October 10, 2011, and to place a copy of the Plans on file in the Deputy Clerks office at City Hall and to make such copy available for inspection by the public. RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -074 APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DAVID LU TO ALLOW AN ASSEMBLY/ MANUFACTURING / PROCESSING BUSINESS IN THE GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN WHEREAS, a proposal (Case #2011 -0801) has been submitted by David Lu to the City Council requesting a conditional use permit from the City of Columbia Heights at the following site: ADDRESS: 5150 Central Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: On file at City Hall. THE APPLICANT SEEKS THE FOLLOWING PERMIT: A Conditional Use Permit per Code Section 9.110 (E)(3)(I), to allow an assemb ly /manufacturing/processing business in the GB, General Business District at 5150 Central Avenue NE. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing as required by the city Zoning Code on August 3, 2011; WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission regarding the effect of the proposed conditional use permit upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community and its Comprehensive Plan, as well as any concerns related to compatibility of uses, traffic, property values, light, air, danger of fire, and risk to public safety in the surrounding areas; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights after reviewing the proposal, that the City Council accepts and adopts the following findings of the Planning Commission: 1. The use is one of the conditional uses listed for the zoning district in which the property is located, or is a substantially similar use as determined by the Zoning Administrator. 2. The use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The use will not impose hazards or distributing influences on neighboring properties. 4. The use will not substantially diminish the use of property in the immediate vicinity. 5. The use will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained in a manner that is compatible with the appearance of the existing or intended character of the surrounding area. 6. The use and property upon which the use is located are adequately served by essential public facilities and services. 7. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to minimize traffic congestion on the public streets and to provide for appropriate on -site circulation of traffic. 8. The use will not cause a negative cumulative effect, when considered in conjunction with the cumulative effect of other uses in the immediate vicinity. 9. The use complies with all other applicable regulations for the district in which it is located. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the attached conditions, maps, and other information shall become part of this permit and approval; and in granting this permit the city and the applicant agree that this permit shall become null and void if the project has not been completed within one (1) calendar year after the approval date, subject to petition for renewal of the permit. CONDITIONS ATTACHED: 1. The applicant will apply for all necessary building permits prior to any construction to the building. RESOLUTION NO. 2011-075 RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION AT 5150 CENTRAL AVENUE NE WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS FOR THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS WHEREAS, a proposal (Case No. 2011 -0801) has been submitted by Gerry Herringer requesting a subdivision from the City of Columbia Heights Subdivision Code at the following site: ADDRESS: 5150 Central Avenue NE EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: On File at City Hall PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: On File at City Hall THE APPLICANT SEEKS APPROVAL OF A MINOR SUBDIVISION. City Council Minutes Monday, August 08, 2011 Page 9 of 9 WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission regarding the effect of the proposed subdivision upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community and its Comprehensive Plan, as well as any concerns related to traffic, property values, light, air, danger of fire, and risk to public safety, in the surrounding area; and has held the required public hearing on this proposal on August 3, 2011. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights after reviewing the proposal, that the City Council accepts and adopts the following findings of the Planning Commission: 1. The proposed subdivision of land will not result in more than three lots. 2. The proposed subdivision of land does not involve the vacation of existing easements. 3. All lots to be created by the proposed subdivision conform to lot area and width requirements established for the zoning district in which the property is located. 4. The proposed subdivision does not require the dedication of public rights -of -way for the purpose of gaining access to the property. 5. The property has not previously been divided through the minor subdivision provisions of this article. 6. The proposed subdivision does not hinder the conveyance of land. 7. The proposed subdivision does not hinder the making of assessments or the keeping of records related to assessments. 8. The proposed subdivision meets all of the design standards specified in the §9.114. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the attached condition, plans, maps, and other information shall become part of this subdivision approval. CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant will reestablish any necessary driving or parking easements in relation to the minor subdivision and shall record them with Anoka County.