HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/06/2011 Work Session CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Mayor
Ge /_. Peterson
Co Inc J m em b en
Robert A. WHliams
590 40 Avenue NE, Columbia Heights, MN 55421 -3878 (763)706 -3600 TDD (763) 706 -3692 ljruce ;You !vela
Visit our website al: www.cicolumbia-heiphts.mn.us Temmer a Diehm
Donor Schm
City Manager
Waller ft. Fehsr
ADMINISTRATION
NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING
* * * * * * * * * * **
to be held in the
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
as follows:
Meeting of: COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL
Date of Meeting: MONDAY, JUNE 6, 2011
Time of Meeting: 7:00 P.M. or immediately following EDA meeting
Location of Meeting: CONFERENCE ROOM 1
Purpose of Meeting: WORK SESSION
1. 50th Avenue: Turn Lane (RT) on east side of intersection.
2. Bituminous Pathway on west side of Hart Blvd - 37th to 39th Avenues.
The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to,
or treatment or employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Upon request, accommodation will be
provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all City of Columbia Heights' services,
programs, and activities. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request when the
request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk at 763 - 706 -3611 to make
arrangements. (TDD /706 -3692 for deaf or hearing impaired only)
CITY COUNCIL LETTER
Meeting of: June 6, 2011
AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESSION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY
NO: PUBLIC WORKS MANAG
ITEM: ADOPT RESOLUTION 2011 -33 ACCEPTING BY Kevin Hans; to BY: /1/4/V44
THE FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR 50 AVENUE DATE: 6/2/201 XI DATE:
TURN LANE, EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE AND
la. ORDERING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
HEARING, CITY PROJECT NO. 1108; or 1b.
ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT AND
PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR THE 50"' AVENUE
TURN LANE, CITY PROJECT 1108.
Background:
Staff has developed a site layout plan and prepared a Feasibility Report for the construction of a right turn
lane on 50 Avenue, east of Central Avenue. The proposed work is similar to the right turn lane on 50
Avenue, west of Central Avenue, installed by the City in 2008.
Analysis /Conclusions:
The turn lane is proposed following the recent retail developments of Jimmy John's and ALDI's adjacent to
the intersection to improve the overall operation of the intersection. Specific issues are presented below.
1. Proposed Construction
The work would involve developing a right turn (RT) lane within the northerly ROW and existing easements.
The current road width is 32 feet, and adding a RT lane would modify the width to 40 feet. This would
provide for a 14 foot eastbound lane, a 12 foot through /left turn lane, and a 14 foot RT lane. Existing catch
basins would need to be moved along with the loop detectors and wiring for the signal system. The estimated
construction cost is $69,750. For comparison, the RT lane across the street was built for $79,270. This turn
lane also required moving the signal pole at the SW corner at a cost of $21,650 for a total construction cost
of $100,920. The liquor store provided the funding for this work. It is not anticipated by City staff that the
signal pole would require modification — but is subject to MnDOT plan review.
This work would also require minor modifications to the new ALDI's driveway access as the taper is being
developed through this area — again similar to the work that was conducted at the liquor store on the west
side. If ordered by the Council, staff would work with the ALDI's development to adjust the driveway grades
to allow for minimal impact when the turn lane is constructed.
2. Project Funding /Methodology
The turn lane on the west side was funded with liquor store funds. State -aid funds could be used for the east
side turn lane. If, along with City funds, assessments are to be considered, the amount proposed to be
assessed would need to be determined along with the methodology. For assessments in this case, one of two
scenarios is presented: using a) front foot or b) trip generation.
a) Front Foot: the concept is straight forward, but it should be noted that the footages used would be
along 50 Avenue and also along the frontage road that accesses this intersection.
b) Trip Generation: the concept is using the number of trips (in and out) that a business generates to
determine a pro -rated share of an assessed amount. An industry standard for trip generation for
CITY COUNCIL LETTER
Meeting of: June 6, 2011
AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESSION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY
NO: PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER
ITEM: ADOPT RESOLUTION 2011 -33 ACCEPTING BY: Kevin Hansen BY:
THE FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR 50" AVENUE DATE: 6/2/2011 DATE:
TURN LANE, EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE AND
la. ORDERING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
HEARING, CITY PROJECT NO. 1108; or lb.
ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT AND
PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR THE 50" AVENUE
TURN LANE, CITY PROJECT 1108.
Page 2 of 3
business type has been developed by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) over the last several
decades, and is region specific.
Attached are the two assessing methodology scenarios using 25 %, 33 %, and 50% construction cost for the
assessments. Staff does not recommend assessing the total construction cost for the RT lane.
3. Financing
The estimated turn lane construction cost is $69,750. For consideration, tables have been prepared that
identify 25 %, 33% and 50% of the turn lane project cost as assessments to abutting property owners.
Abutting here includes retail property abutting 50 Avenue and abutting the frontage road that accesses this
intersection.
4. Project Development
If assessments are used, the project will have to follow the 429 process, requiring notices and a public
hearing. Additionally, the potential of a State shutdown could have an impact on the plans and specifications
as they require MnDOT approval. During a shutdown, not only would plan reviews not be conducted but will
be backlogged following a state budget resolution.
Two other intersections may also benefit from an addition of a right turn lane. Eastbound 49 Avenue at
Central Avenue (in front of Walgreens); and westbound 40' Avenue at University Avenue (in front of Food -
n- Fuel). Staff has conducted traffic counts at these intersections and has also been in contact with Anoka
County as these are on County roads. From a cost - effectiveness perspective, it may be advantageous to
package the work as a "right turn lane" type of improvement program. Work on these other intersections
would need to be coordinated with both Anoka County and MnDOT.
5. Meeting Dates
If it is the direction of Council to build the turn lane in 2011 — the earliest a Public Hearing could be
scheduled would he either July 11 or 25th, 2011. This would provide for Fall 2011 construction.
Recommended Motion: Move to waive the reading of Resolution 2011 -33, there being ample copies
available to the public.
CITY COUNCIL LETTER
Meeting of: June 6, 2011
AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESSION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY
NO: PUBLIC WORKS MANAGER
ITEM: ADOPT RESOLUTION 2011 -33 ACCEPTING BY: Kevin Hansen BY:
THE FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR 50 AVENUE DATE: 6/2/2011 DATE:
TURN LANE, EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE AND
1 a. ORDERING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
HEARING, CITY PROJECT NO. 1108; or lb.
ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT AND
PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR THE 50 AVENUE
TURN LANE, CITY PROJECT 1108.
Page 3 of 3
Recommended Motion: Move to adopt Resolution 2011 -33, being a resolution accepting the Feasibility
Report for 50 Avenue turn lane, east of Central Avenue, City Project No. 1108 and ordering the Public
Improvement Hearing beginning at 6:30 p.m. on either July 11 ` or 25` 2011.
Attachment(s): Resolution 2011 -33
Feasibility Report
Construction Cost Estimate
Site layout plan
Assessing Table scenarios
COUNCIL ACTION:
RESOLUTION 2011 -33
BEING A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR 50TH
AVENUE RIGHT TURN LANE , EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE, AND ORDERING
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT HEARING
CITY PROJECT NO. 1108
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 2011-30, a report has been prepared by the Director of
Public Works with reference to the 50 -111 Avenue right turn lane east of Central Avenue, and
WHEREAS, the turn lane is located on the east side of Central Avenue on 50 Avenue, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is feasible,
necessary and cost effective, and
Said report is hereby received by the City Council of Columbia Heights on June 13, 2011.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF COLUMBIA
HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
1. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with the report
and the assessment of abutting or benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of
the improvement of 577,000.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 11 day of July,
2011, in the City Council Chambers at 590 40 Avenue N.E. at 6:30 P.M. and the City
Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as
required by law.
Passed this 13 day of June, 2011
Offered by: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
Seconded by:
Roll Call: BY
Mayor Gary L. Peterson
Patricia Muscovitz, CMC
City Clerk
City of Columbia Heights
FEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR
2011 STREET IMPROVEMENT:
50 AVENUE RIGHT TURN LANE
AT CENTRAL AVENUE
CITY PROJECT 1108
MAY, 2011
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
637 38 Avenue NE, Columbia Heights, MN 55421
763 - 706 -3700 4 763 - 706 -3701 (Fax)
STREET REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
50 AVENUE RIGHT TURN LANE
PROJECT NUMBER 1109
LOCATION: 50 AVENUE NE, EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE
This feasibility study includes an analysis of proposed right turn lane construction
on 50 Avenue.
IMPROVEMENTS: 50 Avenue Right Turn Lane Construction —
Concrete curb and gutter, granular sub -base if needed, new aggregate base and
new concrete or bituminous surfacing.
INITIATION: City Council in response to existing traffic concerns and new commercial
development.
OWNERS Property Owners
ABUTTING 4911 Central Avenue
4915 Central Avenue
OR 4955 Central Avenue
IMPACTED: 5001 Central Avenue
ISSUES: The following is a study of the key project issues.
Turn Lane Construction
The existing 50 Avenue roadway is 31 feet wide from back of curb to back of
curb. There are two travel lanes with parking allowed on each side. The
proposed roadway adjacent to 4955 and 5001 Central Avenue would widen to 40
feet to provide for two travel lanes and one right turn lane onto northbound
Central Avenue. In addition, no parking would be permitted on 50 Avenue from
Central Avenue to the east property lines of 4955 and 5001 Central Avenue. The
roadway configuration would generally match the construction of 50 Avenue on
the west side of Central Avenue.
To improve the operation and reduce vehicle conflicts of the intersection, the
Traffic Commission has suggested designating the frontage road south of 50
Avenue as right turn only. Vehicles on the frontage road can access north bound
Central Avenue from the southerly end of the frontage road. A drawback to this
would be it may send more vehicles easterly into residential areas.
Sidewalk will need to be reconstructed to provide for pedestrian ramps to meet
2
current ADA requirements crossing both Central and 50 Avenues.
Utilities
City utilities will be minimally impacted with minor modifications to existing
water main, sanitary and storm sewer utility surface structures in order to meet
proposed finish grades.
The semaphore (traffic signal pole) on the northeast corner of 50 Avenue and
Central Avenue will be about 1' from the back of curb on the new turn lane. City
staff is discussing the proposed construction with Mn/DOT to accommodate the
turn lane without moving the semaphore. If the semaphore needs to be moved,
required Mn/DOT approvals will probably delay the project until 2012
construction season. In addition, that portion of the plans and specifications will
need to be designed by a registered traffic engineer.
Xcel Energy, Qwest and Comcast have aerial service lines along the north side of
50 Avenue. The easterly pole nearest the driveway entrance will need to be
moved north.
FEASIBILITY: The proposed turn lane construction and other project elements are necessary to
improve intersection operation, traffic flow and reduce potential traffic conflicts
at the signal on 50` Avenue. The project is cost - effective with the inclusion of
partial city funding, and technically feasible as prescribed in the construction
recommendations found elsewhere in this report. The project and project
elements should be implemented as proposed in this study. The improvements,
once completed, will provide a benefit to the properties served.
SCHEDULE: Construction may begin in late summer of 2011, with substantial completion
occurring in fall of 2011, or begin early spring of 2012 with summer 2012
depending on the required agency approvals.
Council receives Feasibility Report and orders Public Improvement Hearing June, 2011
Public Informational meeting prior to Public Improvement Hearing July, 2011
Public Improvement Hearing and Council orders Public Improvement Project July, 2011
Council Approves Plans and Specifications, Authorizes Advertisement for Bids August, 2011
Bid Opening Sept, 2011
Council Awards Contract Sept, 2011
Begin Construction Sept, 2011
Construction Completed Nov, 2011
FINANCING: Financing would be a combination of assessments to benefitted properties,
infrastructure fund including Municipal State Aid funds (population
apportionment), and utility funds.
3
The estimated project costs for each option are as follows:
Type of Construction Proposed Assessments Infrastructure Fund
Turn Lane Construction $19,250 (25 %) $63,055
$25,410 (33 %) $56,895
$38,500 (50 %) $43,805
Engineering and Administration $12,555
The assessments reflect a flat fee of 10% of the construction cost included in the
amount to assess for a portion of the Engineering and Administration costs.
Utility work performed as part of the project will be paid for from the appropriate
utility fund.
ASSESSMENT: Assessments can be based on a per foot basis or a parcel basis. This assumes that
all parcels benefit equally for the strategy in front of their property or abutting it,
in the case of the Turn Lane construction.
An alternative methodology to calculate assessment in a retail type business area
would be to estimate the traffic generated by the businesses benefitting from the
improvement. Using established vehicle trip generation tables, such as from the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), a percentage of the assessed cost may
be apportioned based on the traffic generated from each of the businesses.
4
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN
50TH AVENUE TURN LANE
PROJECT 1108
State Aid
Item No. No. Item Description Unit Unit Price Quantity Amount
2021.501 1 Mobilization Lump Sum $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00
2102.501 2 Pavement marking removal Sq. Ft. $2.00 215 $430.00
2104.501 3 Remove concrete curb and gutter Lin. Ft. $2.00 210 $420.00
2104.503 4 Remove concrete walk Sq. Ft. $1.00 125 $125.00
2104.503 5 Remove concrete driveway apron Sq. Ft. $1.00 350 $350.00
2104.505 Remove bituminous pavement Sq. Yd. $6.00 365 $2,190.00
2104.505 7 Remove bituminous driveway _.. Sq. Yd. $4.00 40 $160.00
2104.509 13 Remove manhole /catch basin Each $235.00 2 $470.00
2104.513 8 Sawcut bituminous Lin. Ft. $3.00 360 $1,080.00
2105.501 9 Common excavation, CV(P) Cu. Yd. $27.00 285 $7,695.00
2211.501 10 Aggregate base class 5 or 7, CV Cu. Yd. $36.00 175 $6,300.00
2232.603 11 Mill bituminous pavement (2 ") Sq. Yd. $2.90 370 $0.00
2350.501 12 SP wearing course mixture _.. Ton $78.00 90 $7,020.00
2350.501 13 SP non - wearing course mixture Ton $97.00 100 _.... $9,700.00
2357.502 14 Bituminous material for tack coat Gallon $4.00 45 $180.00
2506.502 46 Construct drainage structure design spec 1 (Type B) Each $2,400.00 1 $2,400.00
2506.502 47 Construct drainage structure design spec 2 (Type X) Each $2,200.00 2 $4,400.00
2521.501 15 Concrete walk _.. Sq. Ft. $5.60 125 $700.00
2531.501 16 Concrete curb and gutter Lin. Ft. $19.00 205 $3,895.00
2531.602 17 Pedestrian curb ramp Each $445.00 2 $890.00
2531.618 18 Truncated domes Sq. Ft. $35.00 26 $910.00
2531.618 19 8" Concrete driveway apron Sq. Ft. $7.00 175 $1,225.00
2563.601 20 Traffic control Lump Sum $1,800.00 1 $1,800.00
2564.531 21 Sign panels type C Sq. Ft. 25 $750.00
2565.616 22 Revise signal system (loop detectors and hand holes) System $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00
2573.502 23 Silt Fence type heavy duty Lin. Ft. $3.30 215 $709.50
2573.530, 24 Storm drain inlet protection Each $250.00 5 $1,250.00
2575.505 25 Sodding, type lawn Sq. Yd. $3.50 200 $700.00
2575.607 26 Select topsoil borrow (CV) Cu. Yd. $11.00 35 $385.00
2582.501 28 Pavement message (Left -thru arrow) paint Each $100.00 1 $100.00
2582.501 28 Pavement message (Right arrow) paint Each $100.00 1 $100.00
2582.502 29 4" Solid double line yellow - paint Lin. Ft. $0.50 430 $215.00
2582.502 30 4" Solid line white - paint Lin. Ft. $0.50 , 85 $42.50
2582.503 31 Crosswalk marking - paint (Central Ave) Sq. Ft. $2.60 325 $845.00
2582.503 32 Crosswalk marking - poly preformed tape (50th Ave) Sq. Ft. 40 125 $2,300.00
TOTAL PROJECT 1108 $69,737.00
Page 1 of 1
50TH AVENUE TURN LANE
CITY PROJECT 1108
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $77,000.00
ASSESSMENT BASED ON FRONTAGE ROAD OR 50TH AVENUE FOOTAGE
BUSINESS FOOTAGE PERCENT OF PROJECT COST
25% 33% 50%
4911 Central Avenue NE 83 $2,496 $3,295 $4,993
4915 Central Avenue NE 242 $7,279 $9,608 $14,558
4955 Central Avenue NE 135 $4,061 $5,360 $8,121
5001 Central Avenue NE 180 $5,414 $7,147 $10,828
TOTAL 640 $19,250 $25,410 $38,500
ASSESSMENT BASED ON TRIP GENERATION
TRIP
BUSINESS GENERATION PERCENT OF PROJECT COST
25% 33% 50%
4911 Central Avenue NE 17.97 $81 $107 $162
4915 Central Avenue NE 1028.75 $4,639 $6,123 $9,278
4955 Central Avenue NE 1111.50 $5,012 $6,616 $10,024
5001 Central Avenue NE 2110.73 $9,518 $12,564 $19,036
TOTAL 4268.95 $19,250 $25,410 $38,500
CITY COUNCIL LETTER
Meeting of: 06/06/11
AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESSION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER
NO: PUBLIC WORKS /�rp
ITEM: BART BOULEVARD TRAIL: DIRECTION TO BY: K. Hanse B de / /.�( t
PROCEED OR ABANDON DATE: 6/02/1 DATE:
Background:
As part of the Hart Lake Development approved in 2007, which became the City Liquor Store and the Lighthouse
Assisted Living facility, the Development Contract included a provision for a paved bituminous trail on the west side of
Hart Boulevard, to the extents of the proposed plat. The Contract included up to $25,000 to cover this improvement.
Analysis/Conclusions
Through the development process, the work proceeded, stalled, and proceeded under a different a different development
group. While the requirements of the original development contract have been fulfilled, the trail has not yet been
constructed. In 2010, the City prepared plans (attached) that included the trail to 39 Avenue, introduced a small
median on the south side of 39`" Avenue, and removed some of the trees along the Hart Lake slope to create a view
shed. Staff also applied for grant funding through the DNR trails program to help fund the work. Bids were received
and ranged from $70,000 to $89,000.
The application for funding was not selected by the MN Department of Natural Resources as the DNR received 31
applications for trail projects totaling $3.1 million, with only $655,000 to allocate. A trail of this type will not rank high
within the criteria that the DNR has established (Park Criteria for Regional or Statewide Significance). Trail
applications are ranked on the following DNR criteria: Priority for irailpro,>ect funding will he given to projects that
provide connectivity, enhanced opportunities for commuters, and enhanced safety. Significant considerations also
include trail length, expected use, and resource quality and attractiveness
The trail and median improvements would be eligible for State -Aid funding. The Developer has repeatedly called
inquiring as to the status of the trail improvement or to release the development from its obligation from 2007.
Recommended Motion: None — for discussion and direction on whether to proceed with the trail or release the
developer from the trail obligation.
COUNCIL ACTION:
�.J I i Jl 1 -- - -� 7 ` INTER C N B LIGHT 0 r
( I C E t r t POR P AT"SE CORNS• •
f l' I ! i / , OF 39TH AND HART ENV
j `' / 3 , PROPOSED LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS) __ SEE INSET ^ i r_.
r J ' INSTALL SILT FENCE ) -- —_ (ry "- / f
is _ SAWCUT t FROM FACE OF EXISTING CURB AND — _ -- .. _' _ —` (TlP ! r l /.-ht` ,
L REMOVE EXISTING UGHT POLE "'�
f / ,� REMOVE BITUMINOUS STREET (TYP) \--1 r' „' `
1 ¢ EXTRA DEPTH INSTALL 'N0 PARKING" AND "BEGIN" SIGNS ( r"It )17 I�- { END CONCRETE CURB AND GU ItR REMOVAL AT NEAREST JOINT (TYTP) �--� I % J `
s : BEGIN CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL AT NEAREST .IOINT El
� i 1 PROPOSED LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS) el/
14 '
INSTALL PARKING
i �f :,\,,,,ilil, j IF ! 1 ' "" AND "END' S4GN5 ? , \\Its 7 /
PROTE t Exls IN -`� j I ! � PROPOSED LIGHT POLE (BY CONORCTE P ERS)CUR RE REMOVE NC LIDHt POLE TTER(TYP) ,..---.r _y Jam' ,..4. I � V PROTECT EXISTING
. \ r/ �� q � I �
STORM STRUCTURES II ‘PW II 7 `i ,� ; 4 PR O p S S NflTH A 7AC E WARN G _ - - "�" , r �"` _ ,sin. �� �I t I I II
r \ PROPOSED LIGHT POLE (Y OTHERS) .:� ,� \\ \ 8 ��� P ROTECT EXISTING t' . .� � , CONCRETE CURfJ AND GUTTER I I i DECT EXISING l i , ��7 "` R TT n ` f , a 1 i -_' j a, STORM STRUV"TURE a ,, : i 1 ,,,.. . S � L . 411 0 h 4. s✓ n 1 I 1 ` .J�.!�'�' �/ ! __ , � t_ CONSTRUCT S' BITUMINOUS TTtAIL _ f��
� � �" � $ -°"� �� r R VE PA MENT MARKING y - _ INSTAL - .-- \ x 7 ,=xL ,�' .. $ r f OW SKIP CENTERLINE �� I_ L..,- j� LYE , ,,, „�.. V i _ _ I I r�� 14 FROM WEST CURB STA 3 + tlO T 7 +0 0 (INC 3 - - _ �.. TAPER) l !
j Fl$UD VE RIFY LOCATION OF I IRR1G I I dl PAINT YELLOW SKIP CENTERLINE r ∎� �-- i I , = 37tH AVE TO STA 3 +Q0 & STA 7 +70 TO STA 9 +70 q �-�` IiI INSTALL SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE AT ME,D7AN I -{ III R -_.,T .. -,- ( ' Y . Y ... r ! N. ` ' 1 i l{ 1 EXTEND BITUMINOUS ENTRANCE AS NEC:E5SARY x31
& �(`- - ,� .,- .� ` 1y ! .d I , - EXTEND CONCRETE APRON AS N ECESSARY 1 G- �_� T t BnNC sIOEWALK °' �:I tt�R� / EfQ�C y PRO7 EX ISTING HYDRA ! / J !1 POWEd2 PO T BY COR G NER V ! .. � , , � FIELO k ' l P � � `I' __ : `I 1 i i1 / 1 y 111 9 t I I I
i ' OF 37TH AND HART BVLD 1 ( a
BITUMINOUS TRAIL TYPICAL SECTION GRADING WRF RESTORATION
•CONTRACTOR TO PREPARE SUBBASE FOR PATH AND EROSION CONTROL "PLACE TOPSOIL, SEED AND EROSION CONTROL
fee nee N*SOB REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE' CURB & GUI ie< MATCH EXISTING GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT • CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL SILT FENCE TO PROTECT BEHIND WEST CURB A5 DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER.
ac e 0,570E8 EXISTING TREES OR SLOPE GRADES. HART LAKE DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION •PLACE TOPSOIL AN0 SOD
- -- _ w FC T DNQ,
PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER OF CRA PLACE TOPSOIL SEED ARO EROSION CONTROL BEHIND EAST CURB 49 DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER,
_ " r f fl 4CA MD D1ER %MEET BENCHMARK BLANKETS ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS AS DIRECTED
T"*TMEW BENCHMARK - TRH OF HYDRANT AT SW CORNER OF BY THE CON ENGINEER, UTILITY LOCATIONS
'
��� REMovE alTuVmOUS - EXTRA DEPTH ARTHUR AND 39tH, ONR TOP NUT HYDRANT ELEVATION^^ 987.10 ^CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES "UPUTIES ARE SHOWN IN THE APPROXIMATE
-- - "� DNR BENCHMARK - SHOT TOP NUT OF HYDRANT m DIFFERENCE IN DATUMS IN CATCH BASIN ADJACENT TO PROJECT AS NEOSSSARY LOCATION, QUALITY LEVEL "0°. CONTRACTOR
f'1/2* 00*E Ekb F sr R NMIXTURE 967,70 - 257.40. 710,07 SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO
f TIT' TP
Rcus rL 4407- RC-z I R%
W ttA./av DRAINAGE ARROW DNR REPORT DENOTES 949.38 AS HIGHEST RECORDED WATER LEVEL CONSTRUCTION.
4 n - as T mve 7 a00RE cAIE S east 949.38 - 710.30 4 239.08 49 HIGHEST RECORDED WATER LEVEL • DIMENSIONS ARE FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURS
I hereby certffy that this plan Woe prepared by me or under DESIGNED BY ; ANDREW HDLG SCALE 9 ZONE 5
my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Profeselonol DRAWN BY: ANDREW HOCG
(1) CITY O tl A I _ I T .. ALTERNATE #3 PROJECT NO. 1002 SAP 113 -4Q8 -007
HART BLVD
Engineer under the lows of the State of Minnesota!, DATE ; APR 2010 'vI I ti
CONSTRUCTED; '? HORIZONTAL :T = 30'
Dote License Np, vERncAL ; s (37TH TO 339TH) SHEET 160
H ASBUILT1 BITUMINOUS 39TH) TRAIL
I CONSTRUCT 6 CONCRETE T INTERSECTION LIT BY LIGHT ON
I MEDIAN L _ POWER POLE AT SE CORNER 1
II ( CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB OF 39TH AND HART BVLD I
1 '-� AND GUTTER '
11, L I L ) - CONSTRUCT PEDESTRIAN � �/ p
RAMP 1
� ( � r REMOVE TRAFFIC / '.I$ �<r / SIGN
( JJ PROPOSED LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS) SIGN ' / /wry"
T INSTALL SILT FENCE (TYP) �`� •// ins. -" �
t f ( . ( SAWCUT 7' FROM FACE OF 6X CURB AND I /, // . • _
REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE ` /`
r / / / �7
j � R €MOVE BITUMINOUS srREEr (rrP) 1 % „
j
,
-
I EXTRA DEPTH INSTALL "NO PARKING" AND "BEGIN" SIGNS _(L ( / / /` // / / I / p r �"' ';
1 END CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL AT NEAREST JOINT (TYP) .-f 1 / � / • / / T' eo F `� ��
II I t I BEGIN CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL AT NEAREST JOINT \ / 2 / // i t/ iA R &���� 0
I I- , PROPOSED LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS) ' 4 /' / / ii SIGN ���
II INSTALL NO PARKING" AND "END" SIGNS y // /,
� / / / III
( } PROTECT EXISTING -.('� f� ,*>,..,
'� g / • II } I CONCRETE CURB REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER(TYP) M - j �. j/j * ) ✓ t p I ll
I F L J - .G' �i<j / i /j / 11
T as- ) PROPOSED LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS) REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE ✓ / 44* / -------Y j / n r c. , • TRUCT�6 CONCRETE \ ( I I • 4 j '+�` i / / _ / / / WALK 1
�� Yj I _ ( f f���'ii. / / r •
I \t PROTECT EXISTING j am _. - �''� /R 't V NCRETE CUR I Ilr)
Id II // \ \ \.i, STORM PROpOSED PEDESTRIAN � M: --1-3,3d i 5�J ? r / / / j, / -' ' GUTT BB /1 ' I \
AND ER
F
II I/
1 1 I \ I \ 1 ti RAMP 43 till
. , F� � / rI J 1 li
1 II
1, I ■ 1 ti' ----.b.,- yy -_ I 'I
r
I I I I I ( A V . PROPOSED LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS) X' <C.-- ' s - _ /,, ,`,'',"p(\ _ ROTECT EXISTING \ l I . ( 1 1 Ii \ i41.1.111flit i
� I � \
I I l � . 111 i'-' ) . I., T ST CORMSTRUC � 2. STRUCTURES ,.... i - T r f � /� �� $ . / +` .4 / / � CGNCRL -- CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 1 ∎ ( I I � I I
ill � [I��I
111 11 I rY I � .,. r . ... v � � V im . V /- ) � � � 34 �' / / V ■ / �� — -_,---..0 1 .. � 1 1 g
V 1 11 1 I I ," f �. t �d- . e' '
- —I� I �- ) °.�� ♦ ♦♦ / _ I CONSTRUCT 8' BITUMINOUS f�', I - / S ♦ Iii ! I i ) 1 1
x t. � / i / \ --A....-,„,„2„..t- _ - _ „ � ' t \ "*.40003 �� ♦ +♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ 1 \ � e gg - EMOVE T PAVEMENT SK M ARKING LINE IL I I I
�� �� 0. �0 Z % 1 1 14' FROM WEST CURB STA 3 +00 i0 7 +00 (INC 30' TAPER)
c
a1
� " � -�r ♦ ♦t♦� �` C.,.,..-
' II _ PAINT YELLOW SKIP CENTERLINE I ( '. � i i
Y \ - ♦ �: A = 37TH AVE TO STA 3 +00 & STA 7 +70 TO STA 9+70 1 1 04
% / �/1 S FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF IRRIGATION i 1Y--
I INSTALL SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE AT MEDIAN
• ,
I .
♦ s / �• „ • I PROTECT EXISTING HYDRANT • ail
4 4444. ■ a r l � A � H v�uuo /_ , �nnv♦�♦ ♦ ♦���♦ - h:, Y � Exls nn c SIDEWALK ; t i i i . t li
a N TD s '
L I POWER POLE AT SF CORNER / ill A-_ / 4 C.>"' _ -- / �l� � I� � 1
INTERSECTION LIT BY LIGHT ON
V
d OC PO RIE
r _ / / - y' „e'
FIELD VERIFY ( • L - I
I I
n OF 37TH AND HART BVLD , ` / /i v
TURF RESTORATION
GRADING EROSION CONTROL •PLACE TOPSOIL, 5EED AND EROSION CONTROL
® o•® REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER •CONTRACTOR TO PREPARE SUBBASE FOR PATH AND •CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL SILT FENCE TO PROTECT BEHIND WEST OURS AS DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER.
MATCH EXISTING GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT HART LAKE DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON COMPLETION •PLACE TOPSOIL AND 50D
N itinameenirm PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DISTURB EXISTING TREES OR SLOPE GRADES. OF GRADING, PLACE TOPSOIL, SEED AND EROSION CONTROL BEHIND EAST CURB AS DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER.
BLANKETS ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS AS DIRECTED
BY THE OTY ENGINEER, UTILITY LOCATIONS
EM REMOVE BITUMINOUS - EXTRA DEP111 •CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES • UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN THE APPROXIMATE
IN CATCH BASIN ADJACENT TO PROJECT AS NECESSARY. LOCATION. QUALITY LEVEL "D". CONTRACTOR
SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO
P '. :a 6" CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION.
• DIMENSIONS ARE FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB
I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under DESIGNED BY : ANDREW 5000 SCALE ZONE 5
my direct supervision ontl that I am a duly Licensed Professional DRAWN BY : ANDREW 5000 _ [� — o n m
Engineer u der the lows of the Stote of Minnesota DATE : APR 2010 C Y ( C G __ L, V v. A G ALTERNATE #3 PROJECT NO. 1002
.- nx oafs , 1 lovorN. CONSTRUCTED: HORIZONTAL .1" = 30' HART BLVD BITUMINOUS TRAIL
Date 4 Anln tieense No. I 1 ASBUILT VERTICAL 1" = 5' ° (37TH TO 39TH) SHEET 16 OF 18