HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeptember 3, 2008
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
590 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (763) 706-3600 TDD (163) 706-3692
Visit Our Website at: www.ci.columbia~heights.mn.us
MEMBERS.
Marlame Szurek, Chair
Donna Schmitt
Rob Fiorendino
Mike Peterson
David Thompson
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
7:00 PM WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2008
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
590 40TH AVENUE NE
1. Roll Call
2. Minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of
August 6, 2008
3. Publie Hearings:
Case #2008-0901 WITHDRAWN
Case #2008-0902 Variance, CUP, Site Plan
3801 Hart Blvd.
New Perspectives
4. New Business
5. Other Business
6. Adjourn
The Responsibility of the Planning Commission is to:
. Faithfully serve the public interest.
. Represent existing and future residents, and base our decisions and recommendations
on the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
. Recognize the rights of citizens to participate in planning decisions.
. Protect the natural environment and the heritage of the built environment.
. Exercise fair, honest, and independent judgment.
. Abstain fi'om participation when they may directly or indirectly benefit from a planning
decision.
THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCR!MINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 6, 2008
7:00 PM
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm by Chair-Marlaine Szurek.
Commission Members present- Thompson, Fiorendino, Sclmlitt, Peterson, and Szurek.
Also present were Jeff Sargent (City PlaMer), Gary Peterson (Council Liaison), and Shelley Ha11Son
(SecretaTY).
Motion by Schmitt, seconded by Peterson, to approve the minutes from the meeting of July 1. 2008. All
ayes. MOTION PASSED.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
2008-0801
Buetow & Assoc.
825 41st Avenue
Preliminary Plat Approval, Vacatiou of Jackson St. right of way, and
Site Plan Approval
INTRODUCTION
Sargent explained that at this time, the City of Columbia Heights is requesting three approvals in
conjunction with the construction of a public safety facility located at 825 - 41 st Avenue. They are as
follows:
1 . A PreliminaTY Plat approval.
2. The vacation of a portion of the Jackson Stl'eet right-of-way.
3. A Site Plan Approval.
In early 2008, the City Council explored many options in locating the new public safety building and it was
determined this site which was purchased by the City of Columbia Heights for future redevelopment
opportunities, meets all the logistical criteria for the new public safety building.
On JUlle 23, 2008, the City Council reviewed and approved the second reading of Ordinance No. 1549,
rezoning the subject pal'cel from R-4, Multiple-Family Residential, to PO, Public and Open Space. On July
24, 2008, the ordinance became effective.
BACKGROUND
The necessity for a new public safety building is based on lack of space and poor building conditions of the
CUlTent police and fire stations. Sargent reviewed the list of deficiencies of the current facility with the
members.
The City Council has hired Buetow and Associates to help design the new building. Randy Engel, the
Principal-in-Charge aTchitect with the firm, has received input to address all the concerns of the current
public safety facility. MT. Engel and his team have designed a building that meets today's standaTds for a
functional and civilian-friendly facility. City staff also held a neighborhood meeting that took place on July
24, 2008, to help address some concerns that neighboring property owners may have regarding tins project.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 2
AUGUST 6, 2008
A common concern from the neighboring property owners is the amount of noise that will be generated
from the police and fire vehicles leaving the site. The Police and Fire Departments are aware that the new
building will be located in the middle of a residential area, and will do everything they can to reduce the
amount of noise generated from the emergency vehicles. Because of the building's proximity to Central
Avenue, and the fact that Central A venue is one of the main arterials of the city, most of the emergency
vehicle traffic will be directed to Central Avenue first, away from the residential properties to the west.
Sargent reviewed routes the emergency vehicles would use on overhead maps.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Promoting the health, safety and general welfare of the public is a goal of the Comprehensive Plan. By
constructing a new public safety building, the city will be able to provide better and more efficient police
and fire services to Columbia Heights. For this reason, the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan.
ZONING ORDINANCE
On June 23, 2008, the City Council reviewed and approved the second reading of Ordinance No. 1549,
rezoning the subject parcel fTOm R-4, Multiple-Family Residential, to PO, Public and Open Space. On July
24, 2008, the ordinance became effective. The surrounding area is all residentially zoned, with Medium
Density classifications to the south and east, and One and Two Family classifications to the north and west.
Preliminary Plat
The city has decided to plat the current property to make it easier to record the new necessary drainage and
ntility easements. The existing drainage and utility easements will be vacated through quitclaim deeds
prior to the approval of the final plat for this project.
Vacation of Jackson Street
The proposal includes the vacation of the southern portion of Jackson Street that abuts the property. The
purpose for the vacation of this section of right-of-way is to square off the plat in that area, while making it
easier to establish necessary curb cuts, boundary fences and drainage and utility easements. The portion of
Jackson Street to be vacated is legally described on the Preliminary Plat.
Site Plan Approval
Randy Engel and David Olds from Buetow and Associates spent a considerable amount of time designing a
building that is functional and located in the best place in relation to the existing topographic grades and the
best access to the major thoroughfares in the city. The final design places the building on the south end of
the property, adjacent to, and facing 41st Avenue.
BUILDING DESIGN. The 43,000 square foot public safety building design utilizes a traditional approach,
with the entire of the bnilding constructed of brick, stone and glass. The Police Station area of the building
ranges fi'om 14 feet to 21 feet in height, while the majority of the Fire Station will be 28-32 feet in height.
The bell tower is the highest portion of the building, with the edge of the masomy at 39 feet in height.
PARKING. The 43,000 square foot public safety bnilding has approximately 12,500 square feet of office
space and also incorporates a 1,400 square foot Emergency Operations Center (EOC). The City Code
requires one parking stall for each 300 square feet of office space and one parking stall for every 3.5 seats
in an assembly place, based on design capacity. In total, the public safety building requires 42 parldng
spaces for the office component and 27 parking stalls for the EOC, based on a maximum seating capacity
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 3
AUGUST 6, 2008
of 94 people. In total, 69 on-site parking stalls are required. The site design includes 113 surface parking
stalls with additional enclosed parking stalls used for the emergency vehicles.
LANDSCAPING. The City Code requires landscape plans that include a minimum of one tree for every 50
feet of street frontage or fraction thereof. Parking areas shall also have a minimum of one over-story tree
for each 20 spaces or fraction thereof as well. The property at 825 - 41 51 Avenue has approximately 1,008
feet of street frontage along 4151 and 42nd Avenues and Jackson Street, and incorporates 113 surface parking
stalls. This requires twenty regular trees and six over-story trees. The proposed plans indicate a total of 79
trees, all of which are over-story trees, meeting the City's minimum requirements.
One of the main efforts in the lillldscaping design was to place trees and shrubs in a manner that would help
screen the building from adjacent residential views. A City Code requirement is to screen the parking lot
area from adjacent residential properties with a screening mechanism that provides illl 80% opaque screen
on a year-round basis. There are two parking areas adjacent to residential properties. The eastern property
line abuts a townhouse development, however the parking lot area will site approximately 10 feet above the
abutting grade. This land will be retained by a wall, which will provide the necessary screening. The
western propeliy line abuts several single-family homes. The landscape plans indicate the use of a
decorative, 4-foot wrought iron fence with a mix of deciduous and coniferous trees to provide screening.
However, in order to maintain 80% opacity, some of the deciduous trees will be replaced with conifers
along those sections directly adjacent to the residential homes.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Preliminary Plat
Section 9.1 04 (K) of the Colwllbia Heights zorung code requires that the City Councilmalce each of the
following findings before approving a preliminmy plat:
1. The proposed preliminary plat conforms to the requirements of 99.115.
Code Section 9.115 is the Subdivision Regulations. The preliminary plat application meets all the
requirements outlined in this section.
2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed preliminary plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as it is a redevelopment
initiative that will provide police and fire protection to the general public, thus ensuring the health,
safety and general welfare of the public.
3. The proposed subdivision contains parcel and land subdivision layout that is consistent with good
plal111ing and site engineering design principles.
The preliminary plat includes a vacated section of the Jackson Street right-ol-way in an attempt to
promote good planning design principles. The vacation of the right-ol-way will allow for larger
drainage and utility easements, as well as a better site layout when the project is complete. The
City Engineer has reviewed the preliminary plat and has approved the proposed easements
throughout.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 4
AUGUST 6, 2008
Vacation
Section 9.104 (I) of the Columbia Heights zoning code requires that the City Council make each of the
following findings before vacating a street, or other public alley or right-of-way:
1. No private rights will be injured or endangered as a result of the vacation.
The entire portion of the Jackson Street right-of-way to be vacated is bounded by the property
located at 825 - 41'1 Avenue. The vacation of the right-of-way will allow for larger drainage and
utility easements, as well as a better site layout when the project is complete.
2. The public will not suffer loss or inconvenience as a result of the vacation.
The previous use of the proposed right-o.f-way to be vacated was as an access into the NEI School's
parking lot. The proposed use of this land is also a driveway to gain entry into the public service
building property. For this reason, the public will not suffer any loss or inconvenience as a result
of the proposed vacation.
Site Plan Approval
Section 9.104 (M) requires that the Planning and Zoning Conunission shall malce each of the following
findings before approving a site plan:
1. The site plan conforms to all applicable requirements of this article
The site plan meets all the requirements for setbacks, on-site parking stalls, landscaping and storm
water management, and conforms to all other applicable requirements of the code.
2. The site plan is consistent with the applicable provisions of the city's comprehensive plan.
The site plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as it is a redevelopment initiative that will
provide police and fire protection to the general public, thus ensuring the health, safety and general
welfare of the public.
3. The site plan is consistent with any applicable area plan.
There is no applicable area plan for this section of the city.
4. The site plan minimizes any adverse impacts on property in the immediate vicinity and the public
right-of-way.
The building and related parking lot meets all the required setbacks as established in the zoning
code. Ample screening jiWl1 adjacent residential views has also been incorporated to ensure that
there will be no adverse impacts on the property in the immediate vicinity and public right-of-way.
approval of the Preliminary Plat, the vacation of the right of way, and approval of the
Members:
Fire Trucks would exit from the building. Sargent explained the trucks will drive
and enter from the rear and they will exit from the front onto 41 st Avenue. They
in vehicles as it has been done at the present location.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 5
AUGUST 6, 2008
Sclunitt asked ifthe emergency vehicles had to use their lights and sirens when leaving the building. Gary
Gorman, Fire Chief, stated it is a State Law that tiley do have to use lights and sirens when responding to a
call for liability reasons. They wouldn't be used when leaving for non-emergency calls. She then asked
how often tile Fire Dept. responds to calls at night. Gorman said that varies, but an average would be about
2 a night. Most often it is just one vehicle going out for a medical call.
Schmitt then asked why some of the bedrooms shown on the drawings didn't have windows, since she
thought it is mandatory. The architect stated that these are not tile final plans. They were supplemental
plans to give the members an idea of the building layout potential. The approval tonight is only for the Site
Plan, not the building plan approval.
Fiorendino wanted details on the screening that would be used next to the residential areas. Sargent
explained it would be a mixture of trees and/or fencing. Staff thought greenery would look better than just
fencing. Whatever the plan, it will be 80% opaque. He said the trees would be at least 6 ft. tall along the
alleyway and that Birch trees would be used around the retention pond area.
Thompson liked the building design. He questioned the thiclmess ofthe concrete being used on the
driveway areas. He noted that some of the areas didn't have the heavy-duty concrete design. The Architect
stated that since tins plan was submitted they have corrected tilat so all driveway areas will be a heavy duty
design. The Architect also reviewed the parking areas for the building and noted areas that could be used
for additional parking, if needed.
Thompson asked if the noise ordinance applies whereby the decibel rating must be below a certain level.
Gorman stated that only applies to commercial structures, not to Fire and Police services.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
Steve Smith of 3 813 Lincoln St was present as a member of Immaculate Conception Church. He asked if
41 st Avenue was designed to handle the weight of the trucks. He was told the streets are designed to handle
the Fire Trucks, and emergency vehicles are exempt from the spring weight limits. The Engineering Dept.
has been involved in the planning process and does not have concerns with the construction ofthe street.
Smith also expressed concern with people driving the wrong way on Jackson St. It happens frequently now
and he expects that to increase with people trying to access a public building. Szurek agreed Jackson St.
needs to be better marked for church members, residents, and people accessing the Police and Fire Facility.
She suggested malcing the signs larger or adding flashers when emergency vehicles would be in use.
Sclnnitt suggested possibly adding a stop light at 40th and Jackson St. that would utilize the white flashing
light notifying drivers of an emergency vehicle approaching.
Gary Peterson suggested these items go to the traffic commission for a recommendation on how to handle
these concerns. Peterson asked the Arclntect if any type of warning light is being considered at tins time.
The Architect stated it has not been addressed, but it is a policy issue, not an architectural issue. Gorman
stated that it has not been needed at the present location, and he doesn't see it as a problem for the new site.
It is common practice for the trucks to pull out slowly, shut the door, and then to proceed.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED:
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 6
AUGUST 6, 2008
Motion by Peterson, seconded by Schmitt, that the Planning Commission recommend the City Council
approve the preliminmy plat based on following conditions of approval that have been found to be
necessary to protect the public interest and ensure compliance with the provisions of the Zoning and
Development Ordinance, including:
1. The stormwater features, which include the pond, infiltration basin and trench, shall be constructed
first in the grading sequence and then protected
2. Ditch checks shall be preformed until turf is established
3. All construction traffic shall be directed through the vehicle tracking pads, as indicated on the plan.
The Planning Commission recommends limiting construction site access to 41"' Avenue and
prohibiting construction access from Jackson off of 42nd Avenue.
4. All erosion control measures shall be installed and impected by the Engineering department prior
to any site activities beginning.
5. All restoration of twi areas in the Public Right-o.fWay (ROW) shall be by 4 inches of
topsoil/sodding.
6. Catch basin inlet protection, such as Wimco's or equivalent shall be provided on 41"' Avenue.
7. All slopes greater than 3: 1 shall be provided erosion control blanket.
B. The type and size of rip rap to be usedfor slope protection must be specified
9. Site/Civil work shall be inspected by the City Engineering Department. 24-hour advance notice of
an inspection is required
10. Any site grading prior to final plat approval will require an excavation permit, obtained from the
Engineering department.
11. An NP DES permit will be required, at the time of construction. Additional erosion control
measures may be required during construction, as conditions warrant.
12. Coarse grain removal should be provided for surface runoff prior to entering the infiltration basin-
all parking lot runoff should bepresettled - CB 5, 6, and 7 should have sump manholes.
13. The riprap for the flared end inlet at the retention pond should be extended through the 10:1 bench
area.
14.171e stormwater plan does not include the property to the north - a separate stormwater
management plan will be required when this property is developed:
15. Due to the pond slopes above the NWL, the pond should be provided with a continuous perimeter
fence.
16.Any revisions to the sidewalk in the Public ROW shall meet the most current ADA and City
requirements for pedestrian ramps and grade.
17. Conduit sleeves should be provided at driveway crossing for future use (electrical or irrigation).
1B. All utilities (water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer), shall meet the City of Columbia Heights
specifications for materials and installation.
19. Disconnect any existing utility service stubs in accordance with Public Works requirements.
All ayes. Motion Passed.
The following Resolution will go to the City Council August 11, 2008.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 7
AUGUST 6, 2008
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-XXX
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBDIVISION
FOR 825 41 ST AVE NE
WHEREAS, a proposal (Case No. 2008-0801) has been snbmitted by the City of Colnmbia Heights requesting a
Preliminaty Plat for a parcel of land at the following location:
ADDRESS: 825 - 41" Avenue NE
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot I, Block I, Northwestern 2"d Addition
PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRlPTION: Colnmbia Heights Public Safety Center First Addition.
THE APPLICANT SEEKS APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBDIVISION.
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission
regarding the effect of the proposed subdivision upon the health, safety, atld welfare of the community and its
Comprehensive Plm, as well as any concerns related to traffic, property values, light, air, datlger of fire, and risk to
public safety, in the surrounding area; and has held the required public hearing on this proposal on August 6, 2008.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights after reviewing
the proposal, that the City Council accepts and adopts the following findings ofthe Plal1l1ing Commission:
I. The proposed preliminaty plat conforms to the requirements of S9.1 IS.
2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The proposed subdivision contains parcel and latld subdivision layout that is consistent with good planning
md site engineering design principles
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the attached condition, plans, maps, and other information shall become part
ofthis snbdivision approval.
CONDITIONS:
I. The stormwater features, which include the pond, infiltration basin atld trench, shall be constrncted first ul
the grading sequence and then protected.
2. Ditch checks shall be prefonneduntil turf is established.
3. All construction traffic shall be directed through the vehicle tracking pads, as indicated on the plan. The
Plmning Commission recommends limiting construction site access to 41 " Avenue and prohibiting
construction access fi'om Jackson off of 42"d Avenue.
4. All erosion controllueasures shall be installed and inspected by the Engineering depattment prior to atlY site
activities beginning.
5. All restoration of turf areas in the Public Right-of-Way (ROW) shall be by 4 inches of topsoil/sodding.
6. Catch basin mlet protection, such as Wimco's or equivalent shall be provided on 41"' Avenue.
7. All slopes greater than 3:1 shall be provided erosion control blatlket.
8. The type and size of riprap to be used for slope protection must be specified.
9. Site/Civil work shall be inspected by the City Engineering Depattment. 24-hour advance notice of atl
inspection is required.
10. Any site grading prior to fmal plat approval will require an excavation permit, obtained from the Enguleering
depattment.
II. An NPDES permit will be required, at the time of construction. Additional erosion control measures may be
required during construction, as conditions warrant.
12. Coat'se grain removal should be provided for surface runoff prior to entermg the infiltration basin all
parking lot runoff should be presettled - CB 5, 6, atld 7 should have sump manholes.
13. The riprap for the flared end inlet at the retention pond should be extended through the 10: I bench area.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 8
AUGUST 6, 2008
14. The stormwater plan does not include the property to the north - a separate stortnwater management plan
will he required when this property is developed.
15. Due to the pond slopes ahove the NWL, the pond should he provided Witll a continuous perimeter fence.
16. Any revisions to the sidewalk in the Public ROW shall meet the most current ADA and City requirements for
pedestrian ramps and grade.
17. Conduit sleeves should he provided at driveway crossing for future use (electrical or irrigation).
18. All utilities (water main, sanitaty sewer and stonn sewer), shall meet the City of Columhia Heights
specifications for materials and installation.
19. Disconnect any existing utility service stuhs in accordance with Puhlic Works requirements.
Motion by Fiorcndino, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the
requested vacation of the Jackson St Right of Way as described herein based on following conditions of
approval that have been found to be necessary to protect the public interest and ensure compliance with the
provisions of the Zoning and Development Ordinance. All ayes. Motion Passed.
Thefollowing Ordinance will go to the City Council August 11,2008.
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
BEING AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE
JACKSON STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY
The City of Columbia Heights does ordain:
Section 1:
The City of Columbia Heights hereby vacates a portion of the public street over, across, and under
the following described property, to wit:
That pati of Jackson Street N.E., lying witllin the plat of NORTHWESTERN 2ND
ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota, which lies southerly of the following described
line:
Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Northwestern 2nd Addition, Anoka
County, MilUlesota; thence North 00 degrees 02 minutes 27 seconds East, along tlle Westerly
line of said Lot 1, a distance of 359.87 feet; thence South 89 degrees 36 minutes 35 seconds
East, along the Northerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 129.01 feet to the westerly right of
way line of Jackson Street N.E., and the point of beginning of the line to be described;
thence continuing South 89 degrees 36 minutes 35 seconds East a distance of 60.00 feet to
the easterly right of way line of said Jackson Street N.E. and there terminating.
Section 2:
The vacation of the right-of-way described above shall be subject to the following condition:
[None at this point]
Section 3:
This ordinatlCe shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days after its passage.
Motion by Fiorendino, seconded by Schmitt, to waive the reading of Resolution No. 2008-PZ14, there being
ample copies available to the public. All ayes. Motion Passed.
Motion by Fiorendino, seconded by Peterson, to adopt Resolution No. 2008-PZ14, being a resolution
approving a site plan for the City ofColumbid Heights Public Safety Building located at 825 - 41" Avenue.
All ayes. Motion Passed.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 9
AUGUST 6, 2008
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-PZ14
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A SITE PLAN FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING LOCATED AT 825 - 41 ST AVENUE WITHIN
THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, a proposal (Case #2008-0801) has been submitted by the City of Columbia Heights to the Planning &
Zoning Commission requesting a site plan approval from the City of Colwnbia Heights at the following site:
ADDRESS: 825 - 41" Avenue
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot I, Block 1, Northwestern 2nd Addition
THE APPLICANT SEEKS THE FOLLOWING PERMIT: Site Plan approval for the
construction of a new public safety building located at 825 - 41 s, Avenue.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing as required by the city Zoning Code on August 6,
2008;
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has considered the advice and recommendations of the City staff
regm'ding the effect of the proposed site plml upon the health, safety, and welfm'e of the community mld its
Comprehensive Plan, as well as any concems related to compatibility of uses, traffic, property values, light, air,
danger of fire, and risk to public safety in the surrounding areas; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Plamling and Zoning Commission of the City of Columbia
Heights after reviewing the proposal, that the Planning and Zoning Commission accepts and adopts the following
findings:
I. The site plan confol1ns to all applicable requirements of this article, except signage.
2. The site plml is consistent with the applicable provisions ofthe city's comprehensive plan.
3. The site plan is consistent with mlY applicable m'ea plml.
4. Tbe site plan minimizes any adverse impacts on property in tbe immediate vicinity and the public rigbt-of-'
way.
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, tbat tbe attached conditions, maps, and otber information sball
become pali of this permit and approval; and in grmlting this permit the city and tbe applicant agree tbat this permit
shall become null and void if the project has not been completed within one (]) calendar vear after the approval date,
subject to petition for renewal oftbe permit.
Passed this 6th day of August 2008,
Offered by:
Seconded by:
RollCall:
Fiorendino
Peterson
All Ayes
CHAIR Marlaine Szurek
Attest:
SECRETARY, Shelley Hanson
'"
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 10
AUGUST 6, 2008
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
2008-0802
City of Columbia Heights
City Wide
Zoning Amendment for LED Signage
INTRODUCTION
On multiple occasions business owners have approached the City asking for permission to incorporate LED
and dynamic signage to promote their businesses. The current Sign Code and Design Guidelines
specifically prohibit the use of variable electronic message signs, and a code amendment would be required
before these businesses could be allowed to use this signage.
Much research on dynamic signage has been done, and many other cities have recently amended their
ordinance to regulate electronic signs. A report was enclosed in tlle packet that included the City of
Columbia Heights' standards regarding dynamic signage, and tlle different types of dynamic signs
available.
At this time, staff recommends amending the sign code in order to address and control LED and dynamic
signage, in an effort to promote the economic vitality of the city, while ensuring that the signage is not
obtrusive, distractive or incompatible with the overall character of tlle commercial districts throughout the
city.
WHAT IS LED SIGNAGE AND DYNAMIC SIGNAGE?
"LED" stands for Light Emitting Diode, and is the industry-standard way of describing a changeable
electronic sign. Per a study conducted by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. for the City of Minnetonka, a
definition of Dynamic Signage was given as:
Any characteristics of a sign that appear to have movement or tllat appear to change,
caused by any metllod other than physically removing and replacing the sign or its
components, whether the apparent. movement or change is in the display, the sign
structure itself, or any other component ofthe sign.
This includes a display that incorporates a technology or method allowing the sign face to change the image
without having to physically or mechanically replace the sign face or its components. This also includes
any rotating, revolving, moving, flashing, blinking, or animated display and any display tllat incorporates
rotating panels, LED lights manipulated through digital input, "digital ink" or any other method or
technology that allows the sign face to present a series of images or displays.
Examples of such signage include ElectrOllic Changeable Copy signs, Electronic Graphic Display signs,
Video Display signs, and Time andTeI)iperature signs. Figme 1 is an example of some proposed sign
standards used by the City of Bloomington, and shows the difference between the above-listed signs.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
One of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan is to preserve and enhance the existing viable commercial
areas within the connnnnity, and to promote reinvestment in properties by the connnercial and industrial
sectors. Allowing dynamic signagelsaway to enhance economic vitality by giving the commercial
owners a mechanism to advertise theirbusiriess ill. an efficient and aesthetic maimer.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 11
AUGUST 6, 2008
ZONING ORDINANCE
Section 9.106 (P)(6)(e ~ f), Prohibited Signs, lists "an animated or rotating sign, except barber poles and
signs displaying time and temperature information only in the animated or rotating portion thereof' and "a
flashing sign, including indoor flashing, electronic signs visible fi-om the public right-of-way, other than
time and temperature signs limited to such time and temperature infonnation", as specifically prohibited in
the City of Columbia Heights.
The Design Guidelines state, "Variable electronic message signs are not permitted, with the exception of
existing time/temperature signs".
The zoning code and Design Guidelines would have to be amended to help regulate the use of dynamic
signage throughout the city.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Section 9.104 (F) of the Columbia Heights zarling code requires that the City Council malce each of the
following four findings before apptoving a zoning amendment:
1. The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
One of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan is to preserve and enhance the existing viable
commercial areas within the community, and to promote reinvestment in properties by the
commercial and industrial sectors. Allowing dynamic signage is a way to enhance economic
vitality by giving the commercial owners a mechanism to advertise their business in an efficient and
aesthetic manner.
2. The amelldrnent is in the public interest and is not solely for the benefit of a single property
owner.
The proposed amendment would affect all business owners throughout the city and not solely for the
benefit ofa single property owner.
3. Where the amendment is to change the zoning classification of a particular property, the existing
use of the property and the zoning classification of property within the general area of the
property in question are compatible with the proposed zoning classification.
The amendment would not change the zoning classification of a particular property.
4. Where the amendment is to change the zoning classification of a particular property, there has
been a chatige in the character or trend of development in the general area of the property in
question, which has talcen place since such property was placed in the current zoning
classification.
The amendment would not change the zoning classification ofa particular property.
RECOMMENDATION
Sat'gent explained the two options the Commission could choose.
If the City Council chooses to allow all or certain types of dynamic signs, Staff recommends that
regulations be imposed on such. signage.
Ii
;J
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 12
AUGUST 6, 2008
Recommended Regulations Include:
. Allowing such signs only in the CBD, GB, MXD, and PO Districts.
. Allowing high schools and religious institutions the use of such signs, regardless of the
zoning district they are located in.
. Prohibiting motion, animation and video electronic signs.
. Restricting the time duration of message changing to no less than once every 10 minutes in
non-residential zones and no less than once 30 minutes in residential zones.
. Allowing electronic signs only as a component of a monument sign. .
. Limiting the electronic signs to occupy no more than 50% of a monument sign.
. Requiring an automatic dimmer control.
. Requiring electronic signs to be no less than 35 feet from other electronic signs.
If the City Council chooses to prohibit electronic and dynamic signs, Staff recommends that the
current City Code be amended in order to clarify that these types of signs are indeed prohibited. A
definition of electronic and/or dynamic sign should be added to the Code with specific references
made to them in the text. However, staff also recommends that gas station price signs be exempt, and
electronic signs may be allowed to display gas prices only, with no limitation to the number of times
during the day in which the price may be changed.
Ouestions bv Members:
Fiorendino asked why the duration for changing a message in a residential zone is set at 30 minutes when
signs aren't permitted in residential zones. Sargent clarified that a dynamic sign could be used in a
residential zone ifthe site is used as a school or church.
He asked how it would increase the vitality or profitability of a business. Sargent said he has received quite
a few requests over the years for this type of signage. Businesses can then advertise their specials and draw
attention to their business. If this type of signage is allowed, we would need to keep some controls on the
design and usage to make sure they are aesthetically pleasing. He admitted it is a balancing act of sorts.
Fiorendino didn't think this accomplishes whatwe've been trying to do with the sign regulations currently
in place. He believes it will 'junk up" thearea,tather than clean it up as we've been trying to do.
Schmitt agreeu with Fiorendino. SMdoesn't think these types of signs belong on Central Ave. She stated
they should be limited in size. Sargent to1d11er the size is included in the Ordinance. They would have to
be monument type signs with a maximUm square footage of 40 sq. ft. and only 50% of that could be LED
advertising.
S=ek clarified tllat the messages couldrtotbescrolling. The messages can change, but only once every
10 minutes for the Commercial zones. Sargeilt reviewed the standard in the Ordinance. He said this may
prompt businesses to change from py10rtsigns to monument signs, and that it would probably reduce the
oftemporary banners that are being used now.
three businesseS intoWfithatutilize a LED sign. They are the Credit Union, NE Bank
& Steve's. These businesseswol1ldneed to comply with the standards of the new
could only change theirnie$sage~e"ery 1 0 minutes.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 13
AUGUST 6, 2008
Public Hearing Opened:
Noone was present to speak on this issue~
Public Hearing Closed:
Motion by Peterson, seconded by Schmitt, that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council
approve the proposed zoning amendment.
Ayes: Thompson, Peterson, Szurek Nays: Schmitt and Fiorendino MOTION PASSED.
The following Ordinance will go to the City Council for consideration August 11, 2008.
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1490, CITY CODE OF 2005 RELATING TO
LED, DYNAMIC, AND OTHER SIGNAGE WITIDN THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
The City of Columbia Heights does ordain:
Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9.103 ofthe Columbia Heights City Code, is proposed to include the following additions
and deletions:
~ 9.103 DEFINITIONS.
For the purpose of this article, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a
different meaning.
SIGN, DYNAMIC LED. Any characteristics of a sign that appear to have movement or that appear to
change, caused by any method other than physically removing and replacing the sign or its components. This
includes a display that incorporates a technology 01' method allowing the sign face to change the image without
having to physically or mechanically replace the sign face or its components. This also includes any moving,
flashing, blinlting, or animated display and any display that incorporates LED lights manipnlated throngh
digital input, "digital ink" or any other method or technology that allows the sign face to present a series of
images or displays.
SIGN, ELECTRIC. A sign that uses electrical wiring on, in or near such sign to effect msvemcnt and/or
illumination, inclusive of illuminated signs.
SIGN, VARIABLE ELECTRONIC MESSAGE. A dynamic LED sign that changes its message more
freqnently than once every ten (10) minntes for commercial and industrial propeliies located in the LB, GB,
CBD, 1-1 and 1-2 zoning districts and a dynamic LED sign that changes its message more frequently than once
every thirty (30) minutes for religious and/or educational institutions located in the R-l, R-2A, R-2B, R-3, R-4
and LB zoning districts.
Chapter 9, Article 1, Section 9.106 (P)(6) of the Coiumbia Heights City Code, is proposed to include the following
additions and deletions:
99.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign regulations.
(6) Prohibited Signs. Signs that are not specifically permitted in this division are hereby prohibited in
all districts unless eriteria is presented to allow the Planning Commission to deem that the sign, design preserves
and maintains the community's unique historical and cultural elements. Without restricting or limiting the generality
of the provisions of the foregoing, thefollowing signs are specifically prohibited:
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 14
AUGUST 6, 2008
(a-p) [SECTIONS TO REMAIN UNCHANGED}
(q) Variable electronic message signs.
Chapter 9, Article 1, Section 9.106 (P) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is proposed to include the following
additions and deletions:
S 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign regulations.
(8) Dynamic LED sign age.
(a) Regulations. Dynamic LED sign age is allowed as a conditional use in those zoning districts
specified in this code. All dynamic LED sigllage is subject to the following conditions:
1. Dynamic LED siglls are allowed only on monument signs for conditionally permitted
uses in all zoning districts, with the exceptioll of motor fuel stations, which may display dynamic LED signs as a
part of the pylon sign. Dynamic LED signs may occupy no more thanf'ifty percent (50%) of the actual copy and
graphic area. The remainder of the signll/lIst not1wve the capability to have dynamic LED signs, even if not
used. Only one, contiguolls dynamic display area is allowed on a sign face.
2. A dynamic LEDsigtpnay Ilot change or move more often than once every ten (10)
minutes for commercial or indllstrial uses, al/dllo more than once every thirty (30) minutes for religiolls and/or
edllcational institlltion IIses, except aile for which changes are necessary to correct hOllr-and-minllte, date, or
temperatllre information.
3. A display of tim,!,. dlite or temperature information may change as freqllently us once
every ten (10) seconds, however illformationiifisPlayed not relating to the date, time or temperatllre must not
change or move m01'e often than once ever)' tell (1 0) Ininutes for commercial or indllstrial IIses, and no more than
once every thirty (30) minlltesfor reli'gii}lIslilld/oredllcational institution IIses.
4. The image~ ailifllfessagesdisplayed mllst be static, and the transition from one state
display to another must be instanta1'eou~witho/lt/lnyspecial ~fJects. Motion, animation and video images are
prohibited on dynamic LED signdispl/lYs.
5. The images and messages displayed mllst be complete in themselves, withollt
continllation in content to the next image or message or to any other sign.
6. Dynamic LED signs mllst be designed and eqllipped to freeze the device in one position if
a malfllnction shall occllr. The displays must also be eqllipped with a means to immediately discontinue the
display if it malfllnctions, and the sign owner mllst immediately stop the dynamic display when notified by the city
that it is IlOt complying with the standards of this ordinance.
7. Dynamic LED signs may not exceed a maximllm illllmination of 5,000 nits (candelas per
square meter) during daylight hours and a maximum illumination of 500 nits (candelas per square meter)
between dusk to dawn as measured from the sign's face at maximum brightness. Dynamic LED signs must have
an automatic dimmer control to produce a distinct illumination change from a higher illumination level to a lower
level for the time period between one-half hour before sunset and one half-IlOur after sunrise.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGElS
AUGUST 6, 2008
8. Dynamic LED signs existing on the effective date of this ordinance must comply with tlte
operational standards listed above. An existing dynamic LED sign that does not meet the structural requirements
may continue as a lwn-conforming sign subject to section 9.105 (E).
Chapter 9, Article L Section 9.106 (P)(8) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is proposed to include the following
additions and deletions:
~ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign regulations.
f&1(9) Signs in Residential Districts R-1, e.ml R-2A, and R-2B.
(a) [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(b) Restrictions on permitted signs. Permitted signs in the R-l, Single-Family Residential, and R-2A
and R-2B, Two-Family Residential Districts aTe subject to the following restrictions:
1. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
2. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
3. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
4. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(c) Conditional Use signs. In the R-1, R-2A and R-2B Districts, the followings signs shall
require a Conditional Use Permit:
1. A Dynamic LED Sign used in conjunction with a religious institution.
2. A Dynamic LED Sign used in conjunction with an educational institution.
(d) Restrictions on Conditional Use Signs. Signs requiring a Conditional Use Permit in the R-l,
Single-Family Residential, and R-2A and R-2B, Two-Family Residential Districts are subject to the following
restrictions:
1. All signage must be approved through the Conditional Use Permit process as outlined in
~ 9.104 (H) of the zoning code.
2. All signage must meet the requirements for Dynamic LED signs, as outlined in section
9.106 (P)(8) ofthis ordinance.
3. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a frequency of no less than one (1)
message for each thirty (30) minutes of display time.
Chapter 9, Article L Section 9.106 (P)(9) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is proposed to include thefollowing
additions and deletions:
~ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign regulations.
1:91(10) Signs in Residential Districts R-3 and R-4.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 16
AUGUST 6, 2008
(a) [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(b) Restrictions all permitted siglls. Permitted signs in the R-3, Limited Multiple Family Residential,
and R-4, Multiple-Family Residential Districts are subject to the following restrictions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
[SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
[SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
[SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
[SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(c) COllditiollal Use siglls. In the R-3 and R-4 Districts, the followings signs shall reqnire a
Conditional Use Permit:
1. A Dynamic LED Sign nsed in conjunction with a religious institution.
2. A Dynamic LED Sign used in conjunction with an educational institution.
(d) Restrictiolls all Crmditiollal Use Siglls. Signs requiring a Conditional Use Permit in the R-3,
Limited Mnltiple-Family Residential, and R-4, Multiple-Family Residential Districts are subject to the
following restrictions:
1. All signage must be approved through the Couditional Use Permit process as outlined iu
~ 9.104 (H) of the zouiug code.
2. All signage must meet the requirements for Dynamic LED signs, as outlincd iu scction
9.106 (P)(8) of this ordinance.
3. Dynamic LED Signs m~~change its message with a frcquency of no less than one (1)
message for each thirty (30) minutes of display time.
Chapter 9, Article 1, Section 9.106(P)(lO}ojih~(;(jrutrtbia Heights City Code, is proposed to include thefol/owing
additiolls and deletions:
~ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign regulations.
(-'W1(1l) Signs in LB, Limited Business District.
(a) [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(b) Restrictions on permitted signs. Permitted signs in the LB, Limited Business District, are subject
to the following restrictions:
I. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
2. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
3. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(c) the followings signs shall rcquire a Conditional
Use Permit:
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 17
AUGUST 6, 2008
1. A Dynamic LED Sign used in conjnnction with a commercial bnsiness.
2. A Dynamic LED Sign used in conjunction with a religious institution.
3. A Dynamic LED Sign used in conjunction with an educational institution.
(d) Restrictions on Conditional Use Signs. Sigus requiriug a Conditional Use Permit in the LB,
Limited Bnsiness District, are subject to the following restrictions:
1. All signage must be approved through the Conditional Use Permit process as outlined in
99.104 (II) of the zoning code.
2. All signage must meet the requirements for Dynamic LED signs, as outliued in section
9.106 (P)(8) of this ordinance.
3. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a frequency of no less than one (1)
message for each ten (10) minutes of display time for commercial businesses.
4. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a freqnency of no less than one (1)
message for each thirty (30) minutes of display time for religious or educational institutions.
Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9.106 (P)(11) ofthe Columbia Heights City Code, is proposed to include the following
additions and deletions:
99.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign regulations.
8+J(12) Signs in CBD, Central Business District,
(a) Permitted signs. In the CBD, Central Business District, the following signs shall be permitted:
1. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
2. Olle freestanding P)'JOIl sign ollly if the building or strueture is loeated adjacent to a state
tmul, highway and loeatod 20 foet or more fram the front lot litle, not to eoleoed 75 square feot ]'lor stracture, aIld
limited to two surfaees. Pravided, hO'.Ye'ier, t-hat (a) if tJle building contains more !hUB 80,000 squlU'e fcot of gross
floor aTea arthe site an w-hich the building is located contains more than 90,000 square feet of surface area, (b) if tho
street frontage of the sito OB '.','hioh the building or struotm'o is loeated exeoods 150 foet iB length, and (0) if the
bailding is located 20 feet or mare from the front lot line and is located adjacent to a stato trunk highway, a second
freestanding signs not to eJleoed 75 squEIl"o feet and limited to two surfaces shall be permitted at a loeation at lea3l 50
feet distant from any other freoslfmding sign aIld at loast 25 foet distant from the lot lino of any adjoining ]'larcol of
land othor than a street or alley,
",2. If not located adjacent to a stato or trunk highway and/or 'shere tho 20 foot sotback CanIlot
be met, one One monument sign not to exceed 40 square feet in size, limited to two sides, not to exceed 8 feet in
height, and set a minimum of 5 feet fi'01n any property line.
+'3. Any pylon or monument sign must be a minimum of five feet from allY building or structure
on the same lot.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 18
AUGUST 6, 2008
~4. One wall sign on each side ofthe bnilding that faces a pnblic alley, not to exceed fonr sqnare
feet per snrface and limited to one snrface per sign.
60S. One area identification sign for each shopping center not to exceed 100 square feet per
snrface, and limited to four surfaces; one wall sign for each primalY nse bnsiness, not to exceed 100 sqnare feet per
snrface and limited to one surface.
'1-,6. One identification sign for each user other than the primary use, not to exceed two square
feet per surface, and limited to one snrface.
&9. One wall sign per bnilding with an are of the lesser of 20 square feet or Vi square foot for
each front foot of a bnilding or structure provided that the said sign is located on the Sal11e side of the building as an
entral1Ce approved by the City Building Official as a public entrance and provided that the said public entrance and
sign faces a parking facility designated by the city as approved public parking.
(b) Restrictions all permitted siglls. Permitted signs in the CBD, Central Business District al'e snbject
to the following restrictions:
I. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
2. The maximuHl height of a pylon sign, inclusing its structures, shall not excees 20 feet above
the grase at street le'lel or at the base of the sign, '.','hieheyer is greater. The maximum height of a monument sign,
including its structures, shall not exceed 8 feet above grade at street level or at the base of the sign, whichever is
greater.
3. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(c) COllditiollal Use siglls. In the CBD District, the followings signs shall require a Conditional
Use Permit:
1. Dynamic LED sign age.
(d) Restrictiolls on Conditional Use Signs. Signs requiring a Conditional Use Permit in the CBD,
Central Business District, are subject tll the following restrictions:
1. All signage mllst be approved through the Conditional Use Permit process as outlined in ~
9.104 (II) of the zoning code.
2. All signage mustmcet the requirements for Dynamic LED signs, as outlined in section
9.106 (P)(8) of this ordinance.
3. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a frequency of no less than one (1)
message for each ten (10) minutes of display timc.
Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9.106 (P)(12)ofthe Columbia Heights City Code, is proposed to include the following
additions and deletions:
~ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENTSTAJ'ffiARDS.
(P) Sign regulations.
fJ41(13) Signs in GB, General Business District.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 19
AUGUST 6, 2008
(a) [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(b) Restrictions on permitted siglls. Pennitted signs in the GB, General Business District are subject
to the following restrictions:
1. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
2. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
3. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
4. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(c) Conditiollal Use siglls. In the GB District, the followings signs shall require a Conditional
Use Permit:
1. Dynamic LED signage.
(d) Restrictiolls 011 COllditiollal Use Siglls. Signs requiring a Conditional Use Permit in the GB,
General Business District, are subject to the following restrictions:
1. All signage must be approved through the Conditional Use Permit process as ontlined in
~ 9.104 (II) of the zoning code.
2. All signage must meet the reqnirements for Dynamic LED signs, as outlined in section
9.106 (P)(8) of this ordinance.
3. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a frequency of no less than one (1)
message for each ten (10) minutes of display time.
Chapter 9, Aiticle 1, Section 9.106 (P)(13) of the Colwnbia Heights City Code, is proposed to include the following
additions and deletions:
~ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign regulations.
fH1(14) Signs in 1-1 and Ie] Industrial Districts..
(a) [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(b) Restrictions 011 permitted siglls. Permitted signs in the I-I, Light Industrial District, and the 1-2,
General Indnstrial District, are subject to the following restrictions:
1. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
2. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
3. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(c) COllditiollal Use siglls. In the 1-1 and 1-2 Indnstrial Districts, the followings signs shall
require a Conditional Use Permit:
1. Dynamic LED sign age.
(d) Restrictiolls 011 COllditional Use Siglls. Signs reqniring a Conditional Use Permit in the 1-1,
Light Indnstrial District, and the 1-2, General Indnstrial District, are subject to the following restrictions:
1. All signage mnst be approved through the Conditional Use Permit process as outlined in
~ 9.104 (II) of the zoning code.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 20
AUGUST 6, 2008
2. All signage must meet the ..equi..emeuts fo.. Dynamic LED signs, as outlined in section
9.106 (P)(8) of this o..dinance.
3. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a f..equency of no less than one (1)
message fo.. each ten (10) minutes of display time.
Chapter 9, Article 1, Section 9.106 (1')(14) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is proposed to include the following
additions and deletions:
~ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign regulations.
8-4)(16) Signs for nonconfor1l1ing residential uses. Sign number and area for residential nses in
commercial, business or industrial zones are limited to the maximum nnmber and area for the actnal use of the
subject property.
Chapter 9, Article 1, Section 9.106 (P)(15)ofthet;:dlumbia Heights City Code, is proposed to include the following
additions and deletions:
~ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign regulations.
(15) Signs in the PO, Public aJldopellSpace District.
(a) Permitted Signs. Int\le<PO, Public and Open Space District, the following signs shall be
pe..mitted:
1. Any numbe..()fwllIFsi~nson any side of a building not to exceed 200 squa..e feet of total
su..face a..ca fo.. all wall sign su..raee~a.n~linIited to one su..face pe.. sign. P..ovided, howeve.., that if a pa..cel
of land on which a building islocateddi~eetlyabutsa ..esidentially zoned land, no wall sign may be located on
the side of the building that faces t\l.elll1l1tti11g~esidential pa..cel. .
2. One monument sign pe.. st..eet f..ontage fo.. those pubic facility pa..cels that include
govemmentaI offices. Such signs shall not exceed fo..ty (40) squam feet in a..ea, and shall be located no close..
than five (5) feet f..om any p..operty line.
3. Any numbe.. of f..eestanding identification signage used to pmmote the name of a public
city, ..egional 0" state pa..k. Such signs shall be no g..eate.. than forty (40) squa..e fcct in a..ea, shall not exceed
ten (10) feet in height, and shall be located no close.. than five (5) feet fmm any pmpe..ty line.
(b) Restrictions on permitted signs. Pe..mitted signs in the PO, Public and Open Space District
a..e subject to the following ..estrictions:
1. Total signage shall not exceed two square feet fo.. each front foot of building or st..uctu..e.
2. The maximum height of a monument sign shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height.
3. The sign number and a..ea permitted by this section a..e considered maximum. These
maximums, 0" any portion the..eof, which a..e ~ot utilized by the ownCl" 0" user of the p..operty are non-
tmnsfemble to any other property owned, occupIed or used by such pe..sons or to any othe.. owne.. or use.. of
pmperty located in the same 0" othe.. districts.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 21
AUGUST 6, 2008
(c) Conditional Use signs. In the PO District, the followings signs shall reqnire a Conditiomil
Use Permit:
1. A Dynamic LED sign used in conjunction with a govel1lmental facility.
(d) Restrictions on Conditional Use Signs. Signs requiring a Conditional Use Permit in PO,
Public and Open Space District are snbject to the following restrictions:
1. All signage mnst be approved through the Conditional Use Permit process as outlined in ~
9.104 (H) of the zoning code.
2. All signage mnst meet the requirements for Dynamic LED signs, as ontlined in section
9.106 (P)(8) of this ordinance.
3. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a freqnency of no less than one (1)
message for each thirty (30) minntes of display time.
EBj(17) Minimum yard requirements:ft'eestonding signs. The nllnnTIUm front, side and reaT yard
requirements for freestanding signs shall be ten feet from any property line or as otherwise stated in this article.
When the bottom edge of the freestanding pylon sign is eight feet or more above grade, the leading edge ofthe sign
may extend within one foot of the pl'operty line. Provided, however, no fi'eestanding sign shall invade the area
required for traffic visibility by this division.
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
2008-0803
City of Columbia Heights
City Wide
Zoning Amendment for Garage Sales
INTRODUCTION
Based on complaints Teceived by City Council, there is some concern regaTding the numbeT of garage sales
that aTe permitted peT property per calendaT yeaT. The current zoning codes states, "residential gaTage sales
shall be limited to a total of 12 days of operation per calendar yeaT at any residential location". Staff has
realized this is difficult to enforce, and recommends amending the zoning code to restrict the number of
garage sale events per calendar yeaT.
An article has recently been written in the papeT (attached), listing the number of gaTage sale events
allowed in some cities. Staff conducted some reseaTch and found regulations for other cities not mentioned
in the article. They aTe:
1. Edina:
2. Minneapolis:
3. Maplewood:
4. Sf. Louis PaTk:
5. Richfield:
6. New Hope:
7. Maple Gmve:
8. Bloomington:
9. Crystal:
1 pel' yeaT
2 per yeaT
2 per year
2 per yeaT
3 per yeaT
3 per yeaT
4 per yeaT
4 per year
4 peT yeaT
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 22
AUGUST 6, 2008
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
One of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan is to promote and preserve the single-family housing stock as
the community's strongest asset. By amending the zoning ordinance to allow no more than two garage
sales per property per calendar year, the city would be allowing activities normally conducted in residential
neighborhoods, while ensuring that residents do not turn garage sale events into commercial activities. The
ordinance change would also preserve the housing stock by making sure that neighborhoods remain
uncluttered with constant garage sale traffic.
ZONING ORDINANCE
The current zoning codes states, "residential garage sales shall be limited to a total of 12 days of operation
per calendar year at any residential location". Staff has realized this is difficult to enforce, and
recommends amending the zoning code to restrict the number of garage sale events per calendar year. The
proposed change would restrict the number of garage sales per calendar year to two.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Section 9.104 (F) of the Columbia Heights zoning code requires that the City Council make each of the
following four findings before approvingazonirtgaillendment:
1. The amendment is consistent withth~Colnprehensive Plan.
The amendment is consistent witHtlteComprehensive Plan, as it would help preserve the city's
single:family housing stock a$itS>$tl"qngqst asset.
2. The anlendment is in the publ!cit1tet~$taJ,ldis not solely for the benefit of a single property owner.
The proposed amendment would (tffectthi! entire city and would ensure that activities conducted in
residential neighborhoddsarethqsi!l1ormallyfound in such zoning districts. The amendment would
also ensure that properties wQuFrinQtlpeable to turn garage sale events into commercially related
activities.
3. Where the
use of the property
in question are
The amendment
of a particular property, the existing
property within the general area of the property
classification.
of a particular property.
4. Where the
a change in
which has
The amendment
of a particular property, there has been
in the general area of the property in question,
in the current zoning classification.
of a particular property.
Staff recommends
per calendar year,
purpose of this
conducted on a property.
complaints being
more than two (2) garage sales per property
exceed three (3) consecutive days. The
way to measure the number of garage sales
of this provision would only occur upon
sale.
Ouestions from Members:
Szurek asked if notices would
complaint was received to i.n:D
said notices would only be sent if a
in the Ordinance.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 23
AUGUST 6, 2008
Schmitt asked if the definition should be expanded to include antique sales, yard sales, runmlage sales, etc.
Sargent answered he didn't think it was necessary since the intent of the Ordinance is clear and a general
overall definition encompasses all the "sales" listed above.
Fiorendino asked how staff arrived at "2" sales. He thought it may be too limiting. Sargent explained that
anything more would be disruptive to a neighborhood since they are seasonal and would be concentrated in
a short amount of time
Thompson thought it is too constrictive and that the City shouldn't be regulating this type of thing.
Sclunitt thought this Ordinance is more generous than the old one that used to be in place that only allowed
2 sales per year for a 2 day timeframe.
Sargent stated that this matter was brought before the City Council and they were comfortable with the "2"
sales per year limit.
PUBLIC I-IEARlNG OPENED:
No one was present to spealc on this,
PUBLIC HEARlNG CLOSED.
Motion by Schmitt, seconded by Peterson, that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council
approve the proposed zoning amendment, requiring that no more than two (2) garage sales per property
per calendar year, with the duration of each garage sale not to exceed three (3) consecutive days.
Ayes: Schmitt, Peterson, Szurek Nays: Thompson, Fiorendino. Motion Passed.
The following Ordinance will go to the City Council August 11, 2008
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1490, CITY CODE OF 2005 RELATING TO
GARAGE SALES IN THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
The City of Columbia Heights does ordain:
Chapter 9, Article 1, Section 9.106 (G)(1) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is proposed to include the following
additions and deletions:
~ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(G) Temporary uses and structures. The following tempor81'y uses and structures shall be permitted in all
zoning districts unless specified otherwise, provided such use or structure complies with the regulations of the zoning
district in which it is located and all other applicable provisions of this article:
(I) Garage Sales. Residential garage sales shall be limited to a total of 12 days of operation per
calendar year no more than two (2) garage sales per property per calendar year, with the dnration of each
garage sale not to exceed three (3) consecutive days at any residentialloeation.
Section 2:
This ordinance shall be infttllforce and effectfrom and after 30 days after its passage.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 24
AUGUST 6, 2008
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
2008-0804
City of Columbia Heights
City Wide
Zoning Amendment for Real Estate Signs
INTRODUCTION
Based on complaints received by the City Council, there is some concern regarding the number and size of
residential real estate signs allowed in the City. Staff conducted a survey of the sizes of various real estate
signs used by different real estate companies. "The sizes of signs ranged from 6 square feet to 14 square
feet, depending on the company. Twosecti(jfls Of the sign code currently address real estate signage. The
first is at Section 9.106 (P)(5)(i), referring to signsin which the provisions of the code do not apply. It
states as follows:
(i) Temporary on"site signS advertising the sale, lease, or rental of the lot or
premises upon which Sl.lC~si~nsare situated, provided the combined area of such
signs fronting upon each. street which bounds such lot or premises shall not exceed a
ratio of 1 square footofsi~~are~ for each 1,000 square feet. No such temporary
on-site sign shall exceedSsqtlare feet nor remain past tlle date of termination of
such offering.
The second reference is at Section 9.106 (P)(5)(n), referring to signs in which the provisions of the code do
not apply. It states as follows:
(n) One
of tlle lots or
tlle total area
signs
for each
32
or be
tlle
days
advertising tlle sale, lease or rental
or pennant is situated, provided that
not exceed the ratio of 1 square foot of
area plus 1 square foot of sign area
such bauner or pennmlt need be less thml
shall remain past the date of the offering
120, whichever is shorter. At the end of
a banner or pennmlt until at least 240
Staff feels that these
allowed, mld for
residential real estate
in area. Staff also
signage.
the types of signs allowed, the number of signs
amending the sign code to allow one
six (6) feet in height and fifteen (15) square feet
to conunercial and industrial real estate
COMPREHENSIVE
One of tlle goals
the
real estate sign
from properties
mld preserve the single-family housing stock as
ordinance to allow no more tllan one residential
the residential housing stock Will be protected
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 25
AUGUST 6, 2008
ZONING ORDINANCE
The proposed ordinance amendment will affect all areas of the city. The proposed changes to the ordinance
will help clarify what is allowed in each zoning district.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Section 9.104 (F) of the Columbia Heights zoning code requires that the City Council make each of the
following four findings before approving a zoning anlendment:
1. The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as it would help preserve the city's
single-family housing stock as its strongest asset.
2. The amendment is in the public interest and is not solely for the benefit of a single property owner.
The proposed amendment would affect the entire city and is not for the benefit of a single property
owner.
3. Where the amendment is to change the zoning classification of a particular property, the existing
use of the property and the zoning classification of property within the general area of the property
in question are compatible with the proposed zoning classification.
The amendment would not change the zoning classification of a particular property.
4. Where the anlendment is to change the zoning classification of a particular property, there has been
a change in the character or trend of development in the general area of the property in question,
which has taken place since such property was placed in the current zoning classification.
The amendment would not change the zoning classification of a particular property.
Staff recommends amending the sign code to allow one residential real estate sign per property, at a
maximum of six (6) feet in height and fifteen (15) square feet in area. Staff also recommends retaining and
clarifying the sign code in relation to commercial and industrial real estate signage.
Ouestions bv Members:
Peterson asked how the size limit of 15 sq. ft. was arrived at. Sargent explained he went out and measured
the vmious signs used by realtors now. The size he is suggesting is one of the larger ones currently used
and could be considered an Industry Standard.
Schmitt asked why tills only addresses signs in the yard. Sargent stated that was deliberate because there
me instances when legal notices must be placed on the house itself, such as in the case of foreclosures or
Sheriff s Sales.
Thompson asked if this ordinance would allow action to be taken if signs were leaning over in a hazardous,
unsightly way. Sargent said that he could address those problems if the ordinance is in place.
z=.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 26
AUGUST 6, 2008
Public Hearing Opened:
No one was present for this matter~
Public Hearing Closed.
Motion by Peterson, seconded by Fiorendino, that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council
approve the proposed zoning amendment. All ayes. Motion Passed
The following Ordinance will go to the City Council August 11, 2008.
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1490, CITY CODE OF 2005 RELATING TO
REAL ESTATE SIGNS IN THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
The City of Columhia Heights does ordain:
Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9. 106 (P)(5)(i)-(o) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is proposed to include the
following additions and deletions:
~ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign Regulations.
(5) Exempt Signs. In all districts, the provisions of this section shall not apply to the following signs:
(i) In residential districts, one temporary on-site, freestanding real estate signs
adveliising the sale, lease, or rental of the lot or premises upon which such signs are is situated, provided the'
comhined area of such signs fronting "flea each. street which hounds Sl;ch lot or premises shall Bet exceed a ratio of 1
,,,!oore foot of sign area for each 1,00(1 sEjuare feet sign does not exceed six (6) feet in height and fifteen (15)
sqnare feet in area. On corner lots, a sectJnd such sign may be located on the property if said sign abuts a
second street right-of-way. No such temporary on~site sign shall exceed 8 s'!Hare feet nor remain seven (7) days
past the date of termination of such offering.
Gl In commercial Qtindustrial districts, one temporary on-site, freestanding real
estate sign advertising the sale, lease,.l1rrental of the lot or premises upon which such sign is situated,
provided the sign does not exceed six (6)feetinheight and thirty-two (32) square feet in area. On corner lots,
a second such sign may be located on the pr"petty if said sign abuts a second street right-of-way. No such
temporary on-site sign shall remain seven (7)d'1:l's past the date of termination of such offering.
ffi(k) Oneon-sitetempol'ary signs advertising a group oflots for sale within a snbdivision
or a group of homes for sale within a project along each street frontage which bounds such subdivision or project,
provided that the total area of such sign shall not exceed the greater of 64 square feet with no single dimension in
excess of 16 feet or 8 square feet per lot Or house for sale. No such on-site temporary sign shall remain past the sate
of sale of the last lot within the subdivisionorthe last house within the housing project.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 27
AUGUST 6, 2008
E*)(I) Temporary on-site signs indicating the name mld nature of a construction or
demolition project, plus the nml1es of the contractors, subcontractors and professional advisors, provided the
combined area of such signs fronting upon each street which abounds such project shall not exceed a ratio of2 square
feet of sign area for each 1,000 squm'e feet of lot area. In no case shall the combined area of such signs fronting upon
each street exceed the greater of 64 square feet with no single dimension in excess of 16 or 8 square feet per house or
lot on which such construction or demolition is located. The display of such sign shall be limited to a period not to
exceed the duration of the said construction or demolition project, at which time such signs shall be removed.
fl1(m) One wall sign per dwelling for pennitted home occupations not to exceed two squm'e
feet per surface and limited to one surface.
EmJ(n) Time and temperature signs not to exceed 20 square feet per sign and one sign per
side of building,
fHj(o) In commercial or industrial districts, one temporary on-site bmmer or peI111mlt
advertising the sale, Icase er reafal of the lots or premises on which such a bm11ler or pennant is situated, or one
temporary on-site banner or pennant advertising the lease or rental of a tenant space, provided that the total
area of sueh BatlHCr or peI111at1t shall Hot exceed the ratio ef I square foot of signs area for eaeh 1,000 square feet of
building area plus I square foot of sigH area for each 1,000 square feot of lot area. No such batlner or pem-lant need
be less than 32 square feet. No sueh Banner or pennatlt shall remain past the date of the effering or Be displa) ed for a
period of more tlHlH 120, whiehe':or is sRorter. t.t tile end of tile display period, the site may not display a Batlner or
pennant until at least 210 days have elapsed. the banner or pennant shall not exceed forty-eight (48) square feet
in area when advertising the sale of the lot or premises, and thirty-two (32) square feet in area when
advertising the lease or rental of a tenant space. No such banner or pennant shall remain past the date of the
offering.
Section 2:
This ordinance shall be infUllforce and efJectfrom and after 30 days after its passage,
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
2008-0805
City of Columbia Heights
City Wide
Zoning Amendment for Governmental Temporary Signs
INTRODUCTION
The City's sign code currently does not address temporary signage that a governmental entity might display
to promote citywide events. As currently allowed, ilie City would have to obtain a pernlit and display the
sign on a governmental building. Also, the City would only be allowed to obtain four pelmits per year.
This requirement is restrictive and would not allow the city to promote activities mld events to the general
public, as it should.
At this time, staff recommends amending the sign code to allow for the city government to display
temporary signage to promote citywide functions, at its own discretion. This is consistent with the
practices of many other cities in the metro area.
~
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 28
AUGUST 6, 2008
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
One of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan is to support intergovernmental efforts that benefit the
community. Allowing temporary signs that promote citywide functions and activities would benefit the
community. For this reason, the proposed anlendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
ZONING ORDINANCE
The current zoning ordinance does not address signage for governmental entities to display. The proposed
amendment would allow for the city to display signage at its discretion in order to promote city functions
and events, such as the Jamboree, blood drives, etc.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Section 9.104 (F) of the Columbia Heights zoning code requires that the City Council malce each of the
following four findings before approving a zoning amendment:
1. The amenclment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
One of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan is to support intergovernmental e,fforts that benefit the
community. Allowing temporary signs that promote citywide functions and activities would benefit
the community. For this reason, the proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan.
2. The amendment is in the public interest and is not solely for the benefit of a single property owner.
The proposed amendment would allow the city to promote public events and jUnctions.
3. Where the amendment is to change. the zoning classification of a particular property, the existing
use of the property and the zoning cla.ssification of property within the general m'ea of the property
in question m'e compatible withthe.proposed zoning classification.
The amendment would not chdnge.thezoning classification of a particular property.
4. Where the amendment is to change the zoning classification of a pmiicular property, there has been
a chmlge in the character or trend of development in the general area of the property in question,
which has taken place since suchpr6perty was placed in the current zoning classification.
The amendment would not change the zoning classification of a particular property.
Staff recommends amending the signcQde.. to alloW for the city government to display temporary signage to
promote citywide functions, at its oWn discretion. This is consistent with the practices of many other cities
in the metro area.
Questions from Members:
None
Public Hearing Opened:
No one was present to speak on this issue.
Public Hearing Closed.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 29
AUGUST 6, 2008
Motion by Peterson, seconded by Fiorendino, that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council
approve the proposed zoning amendment. All ayes. Motion Passed
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1490, CITY CODE OF 2005 RELATING TO
GOVERNMENTAL TEMPORARY SIGNS IN THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
The City of Columbia Heights does ordain:
Chapter 9, Article 1, Section 9.106 (P)(5)(g) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is proposed to include the following
additions and deletions:
~ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign Regulations.
(5) Exempt Signs. In all districts, the provisions of this section shall not apply to the following
signs:
(g) Temporary signs peliaining to drives or events of charitable, educational or religious
organizations, and governmental signs used for the promotiou of citj"'.vide functions and/or events, provided that
such signs shall not be erected or posted for a period of more than 14 days prior to the date of the event and shall be
removed within 3 days thereafter.
Section 2:
This ordinance shall be injUll force and ~ffect from and after 30 days after its passage.
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
2008-0806
Albrecht Signs
4110 Central Avenue
Site Plan Approval for signage
INTRODUCTION
At this time, Albrecht Signs is requesting a site plan approval for new signage at 4110 Central Avenue.
The tenant space had been vacant for some time and will now be occupied by a grocery store named
Cuernavaca. The proposed new signage for the tenant space requires a site plan approval because the
property is located within the Design Overlay Central Business District.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Commercial related activities. The proposed sign plan meets
all the requirements of the Design Guidelines, and for this reason is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 30
AUGUST 6, 2008
ZONING ORDINANCE
The property is located in the CBD, Central Business District, as are the propeliies to the north, south and
east. The properties to the west are zoned R-4, Multiple-Fmnily Residential. The subject parcel is also
located within the Design Overlay Central Business District, and is subject the regulations for such
propeliies.
The City Code at Section 9.106 (P)(ll) states that total signage in the CBD District shall not exceed two
square feet for each fi-ont foot of tenant space provided in the multi-tenant building. The tenant space
occupied by Cucrnavaca is 30 feet in width. For this reason, the total amount of signage allowed for the
tenant is 60 squal"e feet. The applicant's sign plan indicates one wall sign totaling 28 square feet in area,
meeting the minimum sign code regulations.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
SIGNAGE. The Design Guidelines prohibit intemally lit box signs. The proposed wall sign incorporates
intemally lit channel letters on a raceway. For this reason, the proposed sign plan meets the design
guidelines.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Site Plan Approval
Section 9.104 (M) requires that the Planlling and Zoning Commission shall malce each of the following
findings before approving a site plan:
1. The site plan conforms to all applicable requirements of this article
The proposed site plan meets all the Design Guidelines standards for wall siKns in relation to the
color of the sign and thetypesofmat~rials used to construct it.
2. The site plan is consistent wit4th()apjJlicableprovisions of the city's comprehensive plan.
The proposed sign planlscorlSi~terit'fl!iihtWe Comprehensive Plan, as it is consistent with the
Design Overlay Central.lJusin~ss.I)isttict;
3. The site plan is consistent with ffilY applicable area plan.
There is no applicable area plan for this area.
4. The site plan minimizes any adverse impacts on property in the immediate vicinity and the public
right-of-way.
The proposed signage meets all the minimum square footage requirements and all Design Guideline
requirements. For this reason, the property in the immediate vicinity should not be adversely
impacted.
The signage plan conforms to all stffildards outlined in the Design Guidelines. Staff recommends approval
of the site plan for the Cuernavaca located at 4110 Central Avenue.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
!'AGE 31
AUGUST 6, 2008
Questions by members:
None
Public Hearing Opened:
No one was present to speak on this.
Public Hearing Closed.
Motion by Fiorendino, seconded by Thompson, to waive the reading of Resolution No. 2008-PZ15, there
being ample copies available to the public. All ayes. Motion Passed.
Motion by Fiorendino , seconded by Thompson, to adopt Resolution No. 2008-PZ15, being a resolution
approving a site plan for new signagefor Cuernavaca located at 4110 Central Avenue. All ayes. Motion
Passed.
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-PZ15
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A SITE PLAN FOR
SIGNAGE AT 4110 CENTRAL AVENUE WITHIN THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, a proposal (Case #2008-0806) has been submitted by Albrecht Signs, doing business for Cuernavaca,
to the Plarl11ing and Zoning Commission requesting a site plan approval fi'om the City of Columbia Heights at the
following site:
ADDRESS: 4110 Central Avenue
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: On file at City Hall.
THE APPLICANT SEEKS THE FOLLOWING PERMIT:
Cuernavaca located at 4110 Central Avenue.
Site Plan approval for signage for
WHEREAS, the Plarming Commission has held a public hearing as required by the city Zoning Code on August 6,
2008;
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has considered the advice and recommendations of the City staff
regarding the effect of the proposed site plan upon the health, safety, and welfare of the cOlmnunity and its
Comprehensive Plan, as well as any concerns related to compatibility of uses, traffic, property values, light, air,
danger of fire, and risk to public safety in the surrounding areas; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Columbia
Heights after reviewing the proposal, that the Planning and Zoning Commission accepts and adopts the following
findings:
l.The site plan conforms to all applicable requirements of this article, except signage.
2. The site plan is consistent with the applicable provisions ofthe city's comprehensive plan.
3. The site plan is consistent with any applicable area plan.
4. The site plan minimizes any adverse impacts on property in the immediate vicinity and the public right-of-
way.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 32
AUGUST 6, 2008
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the attached conditions, maps, and other information shall
become part of this pennit and approval; and in granting this pennit the city and the applicant agree that this permit
shall become null and void if the project has not been completed within one (]) calendar vear after the approval date,
subject to petition for renewal of the pennit.
Passed this 6"' day of August 2008,
Offered by: Fiorendino
Seconded by: Thompson
Roll Call: All ayes
CHAIR Marlaine Szurek
Attest:
SECRETARY, Shelley Hanson
Approval is contingent upon execution andretllrll ofthis document to the City Planning Office.
I have read and agree to the conditions ofthi$ resolution as. outlined above.
Date
S.R. Albrecht
CASE NUMBER:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
2008-0807
Nelson Building and Developmeut
4707 Central Avenue
Site Plan Approval for signage
INTRODUCTION
At this time, Nelson Building and Development is requesting a site plan approval for new signage at 4707
Central Avenue. The site plan for the proposed building was approved at the June 3, 2008 Plmming
Commission meeting, and now there has been a request to approve the sign plmls for two of the tenant
spaces. The two tenants in question are Aldi 's and Buffalo Wild Wings.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Commercial related activities. Properties along Central
A venue must conform to the Design Guidelines for commercial-related activity. The proposed sign plml
meets all the requirements of the Design Guidelines, and for this reason is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
ZONING ORDINANCE
The property is located in the MXD, Mixed Use Development District, as is the property to the east. The
property to the north is zoned GB, General Business, and the property to the south is zoned R-3, Multiple
Family Residential. The property to the west is located in the City of Hilltop. The subject parcel is also
located within the Design Overlay Highway District, and is subject the regulations for such properties.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 33
AUGUST 6, 2008
The MXD, Mixed Use District defers to the other commercially zoned properties when determining the
perfonllance standards of the district. The City Code at Section 9.106 (P)(12) states that total signage in
the GB District shall not exceed two square feet for each front foot of tenant space provided in the multi-
tenant building, with a cap of 200 square feet.
The Buffalo Wild Wings restaurant has 100 feet of frontage along Central Avenue. For this reason, the total
amount of signage allowed for this space is 200 square feet. The applicant's sign plan indicates two wall
signs totaling 68 square feet in area, meeting the minimum sign code regulations.
The Aldi grocery store has 92 feet of frontage along Central Avenue. For tlus reason, the total amount of
signage allowed for this space is 184 square feet. The applicant's sign plan indicates two wall signs
totaling 94 square feet in area, meeting the minimum sign code regulations.
Both Aldi and Buffalo Wild Wings are considering freestanding monument signs as part of their sign plans.
The monument sign used by Buffalo Wild Wings will be 38 square feet in area and placed on the southwest
corner of the property, five feet from the property lines. The sign will also be ten feet in height. These
dimensions meet the city's minimum requirements for monument signs.
The monument sign used by Aldi will be 40 square feet in area and placed five feet from the property line.
The sign will also be no more than ten feet in height. These dimensions meet the city's minimum
requirements for momnnent signs.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
SIGNAGE. The Design Guidelines prohibit intemally lit box signs. The Buffalo Wild Wings signage
incorporates routed letters on opaque backgrounds. When lit, only the white and yellow portions of the
sign will be illuminated. This meets the intent of the Design Guidelines, as the sign will have the
appearance of having channel letters.
Aldi proposes to use internally lit bbx signs for the permanent wall signage, as this is the type of sign that
donbles as their corporate logo, and identifies the store in a uniformed manner. The Design Gnidelines
specifically prohibit intemally lit box signs, so Aldi is requesting a deviation from the Design Guidelines in
this respect. The monument sign will meet the city's requirements for dimension and setback and will also
be externally illuminated.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Site Plan Approval
Section 9.104 (M) requires that the Planning and Zoning Commission shall malce each of the following
findings before approving a site plan:
1. The site plan confonlls to all applicable requirements of this article
The proposed site plan for Buffalo Wild Wings meets all the Design Guidelines standard~ for wall
signs and monument signs in relation to the color of the sign and the types of materials used to
construct it.
Aldi is requesting a deviation from the Design Guidelines in order to incorporate the type of
signage that is used on their other stores, which doubles as their corporate logo and identity.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 34
AUGUST 6, 2008
2. The site plan is consistent with the applicable provisions of the city's comprehensive plan.
The proposed sign plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as it is consistent with the
Design Overlay Highway District. Although the proposed signagefor Aldi does not meet the
Design Guidelines, the overall building design and use is consistent with the types of designs and
uses that would promote the economic vitality of the city, making the use consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
3. The site plan is consistent with any applicable area plan.
There is no applicable areaplanfor this area.
4. The site plan minimizes any adverse impacts on property in the inunediate vicinity and the pnblic
right-of-way.
The proposed signage meets all the minimum square footage requirements and all Design Guideline
requirements. For this reason, the property in the immediate vicinity should not be adversely
impacted.
The signage plan for Buffalo Wild Wings conforms to all standards outlined in the Design Guidelines. Staff
reconmlends approval of the site plan for the Buffalo Wild Wings located at 4707 Central Avenue.
Although the signage plan for Aldi does not conform to all standards outlined in the Design Guidelines, the
majority of the building design and layout does. The proposed deviation from the Design Guidelines would
enable the store to retain its corporate identity. Staff withholds a recommendation either way on this
request. Sargent explained it is up to the Planning Commission to decide whether or not to allow it.
Qnestions from Members:
Schmitt was disappointed there weren't any pictures of the monument signs in the packets. Sargent said it
was inadvertently left out of the packet, but Sargent said it does meet the size and setback requirements,
and would have a brick base.
Szurek asked if they could get the same affect by using external lights that would shine on the sign, rather
than an internally lit sign. Sargent explained that it is a corporate requirement that has never been deviated
from in the past. They may actually withdraw from this location if it is turned down. Sargent said he was
told they have done so in other proposed locations in the past. Aldi's feel it is the only way they identify
their business since the bnildings are not a specific design. Szmek then stated since it meets all other
reqnirements, and it is their way of identifying their bnsiness, she had no problem with allowing the
deviation for it to be an intemally lit sign.
Fiorendino asked if a different business ever located at that site, if they would be allowed to use that non-
confonning sign. Sargent explained that a different business could come in and have that sign re- faced and
use it as designed. However, it could not be altered or expanded without coming before the Planning
Commission for approval. Fiorendino. was uncomfortable with allowing the deviation from om
requirements and setting precedence. He said it is Aldi's choice to use that type of signage, and we
shouldn't necessarily let them force us to change om requirements for them. He asked if the size of the
sign was within the parameters. Sargent explained that the sign is their standard corporate sign and that is
less than Yz of the allowable sq. ft.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 35
AUGUST 6, 2008
Gary Peterson stated he thought it is a subtle sign and is the only way they choose to identify themselves.
He thinks it is silly not to accept this slight deviation if it helps establish another business in our city.
Thompson also felt that we shouldn't deviate from our sign regulations. They were established for a
reason. We shouldn't let corporations dictate what tlle requirements should be.
Schmitt asked if any other variances were asked for. Sargent stated no. Sargent was asked if there was any
proof that Aldi's Corporate had ever withdrawn from a location because their signage was denied. He
responded that he had not asked them for proof of this.
Public Hearing Opened:
No one was present to speak on this.
Public Hearing Closed.
Motion by Peterson, seconded by Schmitt, to waive the reading of Resolution No. 2008-PZ15, there being
ample copies available to the public. All ayes. MOTION PASSED.
Motion by Peterson, seconded by Schmitt, to adopt Resolution No. 2008-PZ16, being a resolution
approving a site plan for new signage for the Grand Central Commons located at 4707 Central Avenue.
All ayes. MOTION PASSED.
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-PZ16
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A SITE PLAN FOR
SIGNAGE AT 4707 CENTRAL AVENUE WITIllN THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, a proposal (Case #2008-0807) has been submitted hy Nelson Building and Development to the
Planning and Zoning Commission requesting a site plan approval from the City of Columbia Heights at the following
site:
ADDRESS: 4707 CelltralAvenue
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: On file at City Hall.
THE APPLICANT SEEKS THE FOLLOWING PERMIT: Site Plan approval for slgnage
for Buffalo Wild Wirlgs and Aldi located at 4707 Central Avenue.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing as required by the city Zoning Code on August 6,
2008;
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has considered the advice and recommendations of the City staff
regal"ding the effect of the proposed site plan upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community and its
Comprehensive Plan, as well as any concerns related to compatibility of uses, traffic, property values, light, air,
danger of frre, and risk to public safety in the surronnding areas; and
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 36
AUGUST 6, 2008
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE)) by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Columbia
Heights after reviewing the proposal, that the Planning and Zoning Commission accepts and adopts the following
findings:
1. The site plan conforms to all applicable requirements of this alticle, except sigJ1age.
2. The site plan is consistent with the applicable provisions of the city's comprehensive plan.
3. The site plan is consistent with any applicable area plan.
4. The site plan minimizes allY adverse impacts on property in the immediate vicinity and the public right-of-
way.
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the attached conditions, maps, and other information shall
become pm of this permit and approval; and in granting this pennit the city and the applicant agree that this permit
shall become null and void if the project has not been completed within one (1) calendar veal' after the approval date,
subject to petition for renewal of the permit.
Passed this 6th day of August 2008,
Offered by:
Seconded by:
RollCall:
Peterson
Schmitt
All ayes
CHAIR Marlaine Szurek
Attest:
SECRETARY, Shelley Hanson
Approval is contingent upon execution andretul1l ofthis document to the City Planning Office.
I have read and agree to the conditions of this resolution as outlined above.
Date
Jacob UlleJY
OTHER BUSINESS
Sargent repOlted that Border Foods.calledilndthanked staff for the cooperation they have gotten regarding
the re-building of Taco Bell. Theyarehappyldseethe progress of the project and the improved look of
their business here.
Sargent stated that the Comp PlanUpdate;sJ'l,1ovihgihto the alternative phases and that a meeting will be
scheduled soon to review the updates with the members. Staff will apply for an extension in case it is
needed to complete this process.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:05p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Shelley Hanson
Secretary
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
PLANNING REPORT
CASE NUMBER: 2008-0902
DATE: September 3,2008
TO: Columbia Heights Planning Commission
APPLICANT: New Perspectives
LOCATION: 3801 Hart Boulevard
REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Approval, and Variance
PREPARED BY: Jeff Sargent, City Planner
INTRODUCTION
New Perspectives is a senior living provider that specializes in providing assistance to
seniors with medical disabilities and memory loss. With 10 facilities in the Midwest, they
have created a reputable business that focuses on the care of the individual. New
Perspective Senior Living combines a vast background of experiences and resources over
the course of two decades into an innovative and practical approach to vibrant senior
based communities.
Representatives from New Perspectives approached city staff with a proposal to overtake
the Comforts of Home project located at 3801 Hart Boulevard. With the Comforts of Home
project struggling financially, the construction on the project has stopped completely, with
the underground parking area, foundation and elevator shaft currently built. Without the
proposal from New Perspectives, the remainder of the project would unlikely be
constructed.
The proposal from New Perspectives includes completing the construction of the project,
as well as taking over all management responsibilities once the building is complete. As
part of the proposed takeover, New Perspectives would also like to add 24 more units than
the original Comforts of Home project incorporated. These units would be located on the
same building footprint as the proposed Montessori School, with the Montessori School not
being a part of the proposed plan.
At this time, New Perspectives is requesting three (3) approvals in association with the
construction of a senior assisted living facility. They are as follows:
1. A Conditional Use Permit for a senior assisted living facility in the R-3, Multiple
Family Residential District per Code Section 9.109 (G)(3)(i).
City of Columbia Heights Planning Commission
New Perspectives proposais
September 3, 2008
Case # 2008-0902
2. A Site Plan Approval.
3. A 19-foot front yard parking setback in the R-3 District per Code Section 9.109
(C).
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
Comprehensive Plan
The Comprehensive Plan guides the Comforts of Home parcel.as Medium Density
Residential, which is consistent with the proposed zoning of the land and the proposed use
of the land as a senior assisted living facility.
Zoning Ordinance
The property at 3801 Hart Blvd. is zone R-3, Multiple Family Residential, as are the
properties to the north. The properties to the east and south are zoned GB, General
Business, and Hart Lake is located to the west.
As stated previously, New Perspectives is taking over the Comforts of Home Project, and
will be expanding on the approved number of units. The City Council approved the
Comforts of Home project with 52 assisted living units, and New Perspectives is proposing
to construct a total of 76 units. The Montessori School, which was approved via the
Comforts of Home project, will no longer be a part of the plan, as the additional 24 units will
occupy the space that the Montessori School would have taken up.
The R-3, Limited Multiple Family Residential District requires a minimum of 400 square feet
of land area for everyone (1) unit for a congregate living facility. The proposed assisted
living facility will have 76 units, requiring a minimum of 30,400 square feet of land. The
proposed land area for the parcel will be 107,593 square feet, meeting the minimum land
area requirement for the district.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. The zoning ordinance at Section 9.109 (G)(3)(i) requires a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for any type of senior living facility in the R-3, Multiple-Family
Residential District. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that by the year 2010, an
estimated 25.7% of Columbia Heights' population will be 55 years of age or older. A
housing goal as listed in the Comprehensive Plan is to provide a variety of life-cycle
housing opportunities within the community. The proposed CUP would help supply senior
housing and provide the life-cycle housing opportunities needed in Columbia Heights.
Although a CUP was approved for the Comforts of Home project, a new CUP is required
for New Perspectives because of the additional 24 units added to the site.
VARIANCE. New Perspectives is requesting a 19-foot front yard setback variance at this
time. As a function of the location of the building and a large storm water holding pond on
site, the applicant's only alternative for the location of some of the parking stalls was a
location 11 feet from the front property line. The proposed variance would enable the
Page 2
City of Columbia Heights Planning Commission
New Perspectives Proposals
September 3, 2008
Case # 2008-0902
applicant to have good traffic flow throughout the site and would help facilitate a pedestrian
link to a future pedestrian trail along the west side of Hart Boulevard. It should be noted
that this variance was approved for the original Comforts of Home project. New
Perspectives is required to re-apply and receive approval for the requested variance
because one year has elapsed from the date the City Council approved the variance, and
no construction has been completed for on-site parking.
Site Plan
PARKING. The City Code requires a minimum of 1 parking space for every 2 units in an
assisted living facility. The proposed New Perspectives building will have 76 units,
requiring 38 parking stalls. The parking breakdown is as follows:
The proposed plans indicate that there will be 32 underground parking stalls servicing the
New Perspectives building, and an additional 44 parking stalls at grade level for a total of
76 parking stalls on site. Being that the development is only required to have 38 parking
stalls, the project will be adequately parked.
LANDSCAPING. The City's landscaping requirements require a minimum of one tree for
every 30 feet of street frontage or fraction thereof. The trees shall be planted within the
front yard and may be arranged in a cluster or placed at regular intervals to best
complement existing landscape patterns in the area. The landscaping code also requires
parking areas to have a minimum of 100 square feet of landscape area and 1 over-story
tree for each 20 spaces, or fraction thereof.
The proposed development has approximately 345 feet of frontage along Hart Boulevard,
requiring 12 trees planted in the front yard area. The proposed plan indicates that there
will be 20 trees planted within the front yard of the property. There are also 44 above-
ground parking stalls located on the property, requiring at least 2 over-story trees to be
planted in the parking area. The proposed landscape plan indicates that there will be 12
over-story trees planted in the parking lot area. It should be noted that the proposed
landscape plan is the same that was approved for the Comforts of Home project, with no
changes made.
UTILITIES AND STORMWA TER MANAGEMENT. All utility and stormwater management
plans have been reviewed by the City Engineer and approved for the Comforts of Home
project. New Perspectives will not alter the plans as approved, and will continue with the
construction of these elements as initiated by Comforts of Home. No changes are
proposed from the originally approved plans.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Conditional Use Permit
Section 9.104 (H) of the Columbia Heights zoning code requires that the City Council make
each of the following 9 findings before approving a Conditional Use Permi!:
Page 3
City of Columbia Heights Planning Commission
New Perspectives proposals
September 3, 2008
Case # 2008-0902
1. The use is one of the conditional uses listed for the zoning district in which the
property is located, or is a substantially similar use as determined by the Zoning
Administrator.
A senior assisted living facility is specifically listed as a conditional use in the R-3,
Multiple Family Residential District.
2. The use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the comprehensive
plan.
The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Medium Density Residential housing.
The use of a senior assisted living, 76-unit building is in harmony with this
classification.
3. The use will not impose hazards or disturbing influences on neighboring
properties.
The proposed use will not impose hazards or disturbing influences on neighboring
properties. An assisted living facility is tranquil in nature and the building itself will
upgrade the current use of the land and complement the surrounding area.
4. The use will not substantially diminish the use of the property in the immediate
vicinity.
The use of the property in the immediate vicinity will not be diminished in any way
with the proposed use of the land as a senior assisted living facility.
5. The use will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained in a manner
that is compatible with the appearance of the existing or intended character of
the surrounding area.
The use will be designed, constructed and operated by New Perspectives. As a
company, New Perspectives ensures that their facilities are operated in a manner
consistent with all state and local laws. The subject parcel and surrounding area
are intended for redevelopment purposes. The proposed use would be compatible
with the intended character of the area for this reason.
6. The use and property upon which the use is located are adequately served by
essential public facilities and services.
The existing use of the property is the abandoned Apache Theatre, which was
adequately served by public facilities and services. The proposed use of the land
will tie into the existing facilities on site to adequately serve the building.
7. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to minimize traffic congestion on
Page 4
City of Columbia Heights Planning Commission
New Perspectives Proposals
September 3, 2008
Case # 2008-0902
the public streets and to provide for appropriate on-site circulation of traffic.
Assisted living facilities generally do not generate an excess amount of traffic on the
surrounding public streets. The proposed project would generate an additional 146
trips per day on average, and would increase the traffic volume by 6.5 vehicles per
hour on average during the peak evening peak rush hour. Kevin Hansen, City
Engineer, has reviewed the proposed plans and has indicated that the increase in
traffic would be minimal and that the local and regional road networks would be able
to accommodate the increase in traffic.
The on site circulation of traffic has been addressed as well. The applicant is
requesting two variances in association with the parking setbacks and stall lengths
to better help the circulation.
8. The use will not cause a negative cumulative effect, when considered in
conjunction with the cumulative effect of other uses in the immediate vicinity.
The proposed use will cause a positive cumulative effect on other uses in the
immediate vicinity. This area was one of the areas that the City Council wanted
redeveloped. The proposed plan will get rid of an abandoned, unused theater and
will replace it with a senior housing use needed throughout the Twin Cities metro
area.
9. The use complies with all other applicable regulations for the district in which it is
located.
The use complies with all other applicable regulations for the district in which is it
located.
Site Plan
Section 9.104 (M) of the Columbia Heights zoning code requires that the Planning
Commission make each of the following 4 findings before approving a Site Plan:
1. The site plan conforms to all applicable requirements of this article.
The site plan conforms to all applicable requirements of this article as they pertain to
the building setback. The proposed site plan will require a 19-foot front yard
setback variance for hard surface parking.
2. The site plan is consistent with the applicable provisions of the city's
comprehensive plan.
The City's Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Medium Density Residential.
The proposed use of the land for senior assisted living is consistent with the
provisions of the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 5
City of Columbia Heights Planning Commission
New Perspectives Proposals
September 3, 2008
Case # 2008-0902
3. The site plan is consistent with any applicable area plan.
There are no area plans for the project site.
4. The site plan minimizes any adverse impacts on property in the immediate
vicinity and the public right-of-way.
The properlies most affected by the proposed site plan are those properlies to the
east and norlh ofthe subject parcel. The applicant has placed the building in such
a manner as to screen the remainder of the properly from the east and the norlh.
The parking setback variance requirement is along the western properly line, in a
location that does not pose adverse impacts to the surrounding properlies.
Variance
Section 9.104 (G) of the Columbia Heights zoning code requires that the City Council make
each of the following 5 findings before approving a variance. The following findings of fact
pertain to the 19-foot front yard setback variance for hard surface parking:
1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, or the shape, configuration,
topography, or other conditions of the specific parcel of land involved, strict
adherence to the provisions of this article would cause undue hardship.
The parking lot setback was placed 11 feet from the front properly line in order to
promote better traffic flow throughout the project, and would still provide for
adequate green space between the parking and the street curb. The orientation
and placement of the building would make it difficult to locate the proposed parking
in an alternate location.
2. The conditions upon which the variance is base are unique to the specific parcel
of land involved and are generally not applicable to other properties within the
same zoning classification.
The properly has more frontage along Harl Boulevard than is has depth. Because
of the configuration of the properly, it makes it difficult to place the required storm
water retention pond and associated features, the building, and the parking lot
without encroaching on the properly lines. The 19-foot front yard setback variance
for hard surface parking is required because of the orientation of the building on the
properly. The orientation of the parcel is unique to this specific parcel.
3. The difficulty or hardship is caused by the provisions of this article and has not
been created by any person currently having a legal interest in the property.
The R-3 District has strict guidelines as they perlain to both building and parking lot
setbacks. The strict guidelines force the building and parking lot areas to be
confined to a specific area on the parcel. The City's R-4 District, which allows for a
higher density use, has more lenient setback requirements for the building
Page 6
City of Columbia Heights Planning Commission
New Perspectives Proposals
September 3, 2008
Case # 2008-0902
placement. The provisions of the article cause the difficulty in placing the required
elements on the property without needing variances to do so.
4. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of
the comprehensive plan.
The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Medium Density Residential, which is
consistent with the proposed use of the land as a senior assisted living facility. The
variance is needed for accessory uses to the principal use of the land, so granting
the variance would also be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
comprehensive plan.
5. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or materially injurious to the enjoyment, use, development or value of
property or improvements in the vicinity.
The granting of the 19-foot front yard setback variance for hard surface parking
would not be materially detrimental or injurious to the public because the location of
the parking lot is adjacent to the Hart Boulevard right-of-way. Across the street is
Hart Lake, so neighboring properties are not affected.
CONCLUSION
The Apache Theatre site is an area that the City Council called out as one of the major
redevelopment focus sites in the City. The proposed use of the land required a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, a Rezoning, a new plat, a Conditional Use Permit, a
Site Plan approval and a variance, and is consistent with the type of use that would be
beneficial to the city.
New Perspectives is willing to overtake the previously approved Comforts of Home project
in an effort to ensure that the senior assisted living facility is constructed.
RECOMMENDATION
Motion: That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the
Conditional Use Permit to allow a senior assisted living facility in the R-3, Multiple Family
Residential District per Code Section 9.109 (G)(3), based on the following conditions of
approval that have been found to be necessary to protect the public interest and ensure
compliance with the provisions of the Zoning and Development Ordinance, including:
1. All required state and local codes will be met and in full compliance.
2. All application materials, maps, drawings and descriptive information
submitted with this application shall become part of the permit.
Page 7
City of Columbia Heights Planning Commission
New Perspectives proposals
September 3, 2008
Case # 2008-0902
placement. The provisions of the article cause the difficulty in placing the required
elements on the property without needing variances to do so.
4. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of
the comprehensive plan.
The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Medium Density Residential, which is
consistent with the proposed use of the land as a senior assisted living facility. The
variance is needed for accessory uses to the principal use of the land, so granting
the variance would also be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
comprehensive plan.
5. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or materially injurious to the enjoyment, use, development or value of
property or improvements in the vicinity.
The granting of the 19-foot front yard setback variance for hard surface parking
would not be materially detrimental or injurious to the public because the location of
the parking lot is adjacent to the Hart Boulevard right-of-way. Across the street is
Hart Lake, so neighboring properties are not affected.
CONCLUSION
The Apache Theatre site is an area that the City Council called out as one of the major
redevelopment focus sites in the City. The proposed use of the land required a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, a Rezoning, a new plat, a Conditional Use Permit, a
Site Plan approval and a variance, and is consistent with the type of use that would be
beneficial to the city.
New Perspectives is willing to overtake the previously approved Comforts of Home project
in an effort to ensure that the senior assisted living facility is constructed.
RECOMMENDATION
Motion: That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the
Conditional Use Permit to allow a senior assisted living facility and Montessori school in the
R-3, Multiple Family Residential District per Code Section 9.109 (G)(3), based on the
following conditions of approval that have been found to be necessary to protect the public
interest and ensure compliance with the provisions of the Zoning and Development
Ordinance, including:
1. All required state and local codes will be met and in full compliance.
2. All application materials, maps, drawings and descriptive information
submitted with this application shall become part of the permit.
Page 7
City of Columbia Heights Planning Commission
New Perspectives Proposals
September 3, 2008
Case # 2008-0902
Motion: That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the 19-
foot front yard setback variance for hard surface parking per Code Section 9.109 (C).
Move to waive the reading of Resolution No. 2008-PZ17, there being ample copies
available to the public.
Move to adopt Resolution No. 2008-PZ17, being a resolution approving a site plan for the
construction of a new senior living facility located at 3801 Hart Boulevard.
Attachments
. Location Map
. Site Plans
. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution
. Draft Variance Resolution
. Site Plan Approval Resolution
Page 8
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-XX
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR
NEW PERSPECTIVES
WITHIN THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGl-ITS, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, a proposal (Case #2008-0902) has been submitted by New Perspectives Senior Living
to the City Council requesting a conditional use permit from the City of Columbia Heights at the
following site:
ADDRESS: 3801 Hart Boulevard
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot I, Block I, Hart Lake Addition.
THE APPLICANT SEEKS THE FOLLOWING PERMIT: A Conditional Use Permit per
Code Section 9.109 (G)(3)(i), to allow an addition to a senior living facility in the R-3,
Limited Multiple-Family Residential District.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing as required by the city Zoning
Code on September 3, 2008;
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendations of the Planning
Commission regarding the effect ofthe proposed conditional usc permit upon the health, safety, and
welfare of the community and its Comprehensive Plan, as well as any concerns related to
compatibility of uses, traffic, property values, light, air, danger of fire, and risk to public safety in the
surrounding areas; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ofthe City of Columbia Heights
after reviewing the proposal, that the City Council accepts and adopts the following findings of the
Planning Commission:
I. The use is one ofthe conditional uses listed for the zoning district in which the property is
located, or is a substantially similar usc as determined by the Zoning Administrator.
2. The use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The use will not impose hazards or distributing influences on neighboring properties.
4. Thc use will not substantially diminish the use of propelty in the immediate vicinity.
5. The use will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained in a manner that is
compatible with the appearance of the existing or intcnded character of the surrounding area.
6. The use and property upon which the use is located are adequately served by essential public
Resolution No. 2008-XXX
Page 2
facilities and services.
7. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to minimize traffic congestion on the public
streets and to provide for appropriate on-site circulation of traffIc.
8. The use will not cause a negative cumulative effect, when considered in conjunction with the
cumulative effect of other uses in the immediate vicinity.
9. The use complies with all other applicable regulations for the district in which it is located.
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the attached conditions, maps, and other information shall
become pmt ofthis permit and approval; and in granting this permit the city and the applicant agree
that this permit shall become null mld void if the project has not been completed within one (1)
calendar vear after the approval date, subject to petition for renewal of the permit.
CONDITIONS ATTACHED:
1. All required state and local codes will be met and in full compliance.
2. All application materials, maps, drawings and descriptive information submitted with
this application shall become pmt of the permit.
Passed tlus _ day of September, 2008
Offered by:
Seconded by:
Roll Call: Ayes: Nays:
Mayor Gary 1. Peterson
Attest:
Patricia Muscovitz, CMC
City Clerk/Council Secretary
Approval is contingent upon execution and return of this document to the City Planning Office.
Resolution No. 2008-XXX
Page 3
I have read and agree to the conditions of this resolution as outlined above.
Todd Novaczyk
RESOLUTION NO. 200S-XX
RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE
FROM CERTAIN CONDITIONS
OF THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ZONING CODE
FOR NEW PERSPECTIVES SENIOR LIVING
WHEREAS, a proposal (Case # 2008-0902) has been submitted by New Perspectives Senior Living
to the City Council requesting a variance from the City of Columbia Heights Zoning Code at the
following site:
ADDRESS: 3801 Hart Boulevard
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot I, Block 1, Hart Lake Addition.
THE APPLICANT SEEKS THE FOLLOWING RELIEF: A 19-foot front yard setback
varimlce for hard surface parking per Code Section 9.109 (C).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing as required by the City Zoning
Code on September 3, 2008;
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendations of the Planning
Commission regarding the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare ofthe
cOlmnunity and its Comprehensive Plan, as well as mlY concern related to traffic, property values,
light, air, dffilger of fire, and risk to public safety, in the surrounding area;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ofthe City of Columbia Heights
that the City Council accepts and adopts the following findings ofthe Plmming Commission:
1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, or the shape, configuration, topography,
or other conditions of the specific parcel ofland involved, where strict adherence to the
provisions of this Ordinance would cause undue hardship.
2. The conditions upon which the variance is based are unique to the specific parcel ofland
involved and are generally not applicable to other properties within the same zoning
classification.
3. The difficulty or hardship is caused by the provisions ofthis Ordinance mld has not been
created by mlY person currently having legal interest in the property.
4. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan.
5. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
materially injurious to the enjoyment, use, development or value of property or
improvements in the vicinity.
Resolution No. 2008-XX
Page 2
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the attached plans, maps, and other information shall becomc
part ofthis variance and approval; and in granting this variance the city and the applicant agree that
this variance shall become null and void if the proj ect has not bcen completed within one (I)
calendar year aftcr the approval date, subjcct to petition for renewal of the permit.
Passed this _ day of September, 2008
Offered by:
Seconded by:
Roll Call: Ayes: Nays:
Mayor Gary L. Peterson
Attest:
Patricia Muscovitz, CMC
City Clerk/Council Secretary
Approval is contingent upon execution and return of this documcnt to the City Plmming Office.
I have read and agree to the conditions of this resolution as outlined above.
Todd Novaczyk
Date
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-PZ17
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APl'ROVING A
SITE PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SENIOR LIVING FACILITY AT
3801 HART BOULEVARD WITHIN THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS,
MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, a proposal (Case #2008-0902) has been submitted by New Perspectives Senior Living
to the Plmming mId Zoning Commission requesting a site plan approval from the City of Columbia
Heights at the following site:
ADDRESS: 3801 Hart Boulevard
LEGAL DESCRlPTION: Lot I, Block I, Hart Lake Addition.
THE APPLICANT SEEKS THE FOLLOWING PERMIT: Site Plan approval for the
construction ofa new senior living facility at 3801 Hart Boulevard.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public heming as required by the city Zoning
Code on September 3,2008;
WHEREAS, the Planning atld Zoning Commission has considered the advice and recommendations
of the City staff regarding the effect ofthe proposed site plan upon the health, safety, and welfare of
the conununity and its Comprehensive Plan, as well as any concerns related to compatibility of uses,
traffic, propeliy values, light, air, danger of fire, and risk to public safety in the surrounding areas;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zorling Commission of the City of
Columbia Heights after reviewing the proposal, that the Planning and Zoning Commission accepts
and adopts the following findings:
1. The site plan conforms to all applicable requirements of this article.
2. The site plan is consistent with the applicable provisions of the city's comprehensive plan.
3. The site plan is consistent with any applicable area plan.
4. The site plan minimizes any adverse impacts on property in the immediate vicinity and the
public right-of-way.
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that the attached conditions, maps, and other information shall
become pmi ofthis permit and approval; and in grmIting this permit the city and the applicatlt agree
that this permit shall become null and void if the project has not been completed within one (1)
calendar vear after the approval date, subject to petition for renewal of the pennit.
Resolution No. 2008-PZ17
Page 2
Passed this 3rd day of September 2008,
Offered by:
Seconded by:
RollCall:
Ayes:
Nays:
CHAIR Marlaine Szurek
Attest:
SECRETARY, Shelley Hanson
Approval is contingent upon execution and return of this document to the City Planning Office.
I have read and agree to the conditions of this resolution as outlined above.
Todd Novaczyk
Date
3801 HART BOULEVARD
3946 3949
3940 3941 3936
3934 3935
3930
3928 3929
3924
3922 PRESTEMON PARK
3916 3919 3918 0 3900
0:: Z
:::> 3912 <( 38
3910 I 3913 .....I
W
... '" M I- 3906 >
M M <:t 3906 0:: 3905
00 00 00 W
... ... ... <( .....I
1853 3901 3900 0
AVE
0 '" N
M M <:t 38
00 00 00
... ... ...
3839 38
38
38
>-
W 37
.....I
3801 Z
~
0 23
2:
?
"'.....
<:t<:t 31'\0
.......... 2
......
25
7
Location Map
~~
w~~~ E
S
\,
liiI-
ReVIseD SOUTHweST eXTeRIOR eLeVATION - I"~ONT I"ACADe
NOT TO 8CAUl
GENEI1AI florES-
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1. REFERENce CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR GRADING,
UTILITIES, STORM WATER ANO INFILTRATION
DESIGN.
2. SEE SHEET Ll FOR LANDSCAPE DESIGN.
), REFERENCE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR $ITE
LIGHTING OE51GN AND REQUIREMENTS
"
11'I.IIN.
1'1 GA.!>Tl..61GNWI
PAltmP SYW~OL & t~nnlllG
p~~ D.O.T. R~QUIR~IoI~NT5
CD COHeRETE CURe." GUTTER, Sff CIVIL DRAWINGS
@ ACCES51e.LECURe RAt.lP, SEE C1VJL DRAWINGS
o ACCES511lLE PARKING 5IGN, SEE DETAIL 6/A1.1
o PA1NTe.O HANDICAP 8YMIlOL
o 4' WIDE WHITE PAINT STRIPING
@ IlITUI.I!NOUSPAVING
o fIRE OEF'ARTNENT SIAMESE CONNeCTION, SEe PLUMIlING DRAWINC3S.
ci
>
-'
10
f-
-'"
<l:
I
v
~
~
~OVlDE 'l'AllACCE6SIBL~
SIQIlAS lNP1CATEOOll THE
"""
lN5;~~~Tf~:A~~GH ,
'&LUe>6~OL
MC~GRIXINO
l' ~A.P~S:rLIj.IS~O WTL.
~~ 6~Jlfkc6tlTlACTO~
@ .... CONCR!!Tf WALK WI 6K6 WI.... K WI.... W.W.P. ON 6' COMPACUD FILL
@ 6' CONCR!!T!! PAP WI 6X6 WL<I K Wl.4 W.W.F. ON 6' COMPACT!!D FILL
COl.~S, "O~~~N' Lnn~1IQ
f,TRn"OfIA~lwmlO
[[.m=~I]
~~----
~
~
0/
@)
(j])
@
@
@
@
CONCR!:T!: PI!>E ~DLLARO AT ENCLOSURE, SEE DETAIL 2/A1.I
~
/Z-C;;-~i
,,' /<J~DNP J.'J':
----::---<-:.:::_~--~~----,'
~_______ n____ __ ___ -
.
:~r:~~~:;0 ~
RErAtNmG WALL, SEE SIMILAR DETAIL a/AU AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.
'.
~
MONUMENT SIGN FLOOD LIGHTS PER ELECTRICAL DRAWmGs.
~T &T1~1'~~~~ 9L~~Vl! TO
2 lH' M 24' ANCHO~ ~Xntl510N
CHILLER mm. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR eXACT UNIT SIZE
SIZE, UNIT ENCLOSURE AND CLEARANCE RfQUIREMENTS.
~~~1;11:~~Tlm~i~TEtf6~V~
~~lOW GRAD~
~WRH~lk%~eo~Ngo~x~~T~EMfR]M~lr'!E.AL. SEe ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS
sITe PLAN
9 C ALe 1 1'. Ml'-O'
6 ACCeSSI&Le PARKING SIGN
AU seA L I:! , lJ1" -\'-()I
~~r!fL~ce LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR MO-fILTeR AND LANDSCAPE AR!!AS,
LIGHTHOUSE OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
ASSISTED LIVING
A NEW PERSPECTIVES SENIOR LIVING
36 ASSISTED LIVING UNITS
044 MfMORY~CARE ASSISTED UNITS
80 ASSISTED LIVING UNITS TOTAL
~~R~t~~~S~NLDA~~R8 ~ ~ ~
"~~
~?:S~
23,051 S.F, FOOTPRINT
75,656 S.F. TOTAL ALL LEVELS
:2.5 UNDERGROUND PARKING SPACES
33 SURFACE PARKING SPACES
58 TOTAL PARKING SPACES
/
CONC.CURBAND
UTlER
"
~
'~'---- --
-~",,- ~,
Lec5T:2 -~_. \ \
( 2,42 acree :~~\ I \
40S?Q6 d, "ni': I':
II i I: :
, ,
, ,
I
PEDEST
LIGHT!
\fLfCTR
~
la'-oD COlIC, CUR
U1LD!NG AND Gum
ElM
RETAtNIG AD
PE P-1.A
\5'
P-RKfe
ElMK
g-
-"
r.
00
Z :
.
BllllMINOU PI.'
-<'5(1__
5"OU
PARKING
ElM
"
"
~
~45'-Q1l
I: I
: I: ~
r-;--:J-
iI: r
II' ,
r- ' ,
II I b
~
N
m
.!:O
"
o
o
-'
M'-QII
BUILDI
sETM
3'-011
H'_Oil
RETAIL BUILDING
11,oSO S,F,
IN,I.C,I
Il. I
ffi'B~
/>.01
---1
,
I , n
I I IJ
I I II
I_.L~J
I I lJ
I I II
] : u
2<11..0"
I
'I
I
46 Parking Slalle :1
IN.I,C,j I :1
I I I I I r= I I
I I I I I ! '\ 30'_QU
I I I I I I 1 '
<=.J."".Ld.=k.d_l--, ----.lJ
I I
LOT 1
1,06 acres
,45,942 eJ,
I I I I I I P
I I I I I I I I f2
-L~d~L--.J_.l.~,=.J_".._
,
I
I I I I I I
:::-~_'-d_b~1
,
"
-~
"~'~
NORTH
~
q
CONC, CURB ANtlGLJTTER
37 AVENUE NE
,-......-..........-
"'-"'-_.."''''........
~~~~~
~ ~
~I
la
~~
AN
'"
PLAt
o
z
'i
os
m
o
z
c
.
5
~ '"
E-<
- U
p;.l
~ E-<~
i-ooo(>:
tI) p::;
- U~
.
~ ~~
...:;
LIGHTIlOUSE
OF
COLUMBIA
HEIGHTS
A NEW PERSPECTIVE
SENIOR LIVING
COMMUNTIY
PRO..li:CT NO.
REVISION 1: 6/07/07
REVISION 2: 7/11/07
REVISION 3: 8/23/07
REVISION 4: 8/04/08
ARCHITEClURAL
SITE PlAN
Cl:MfNTMMD
pAfleL,'np.
EXTEND TRASH
CHUTE VEI'IT TO
T.O.ENCLOSURE
DeCORATIVE WALL ~RACKET, 'nP.
PRE-FINISHED ALUM,
FASCIA,'nP.
CONTlNUOUS RIDGE VENT,TYP.
SIMULATEDVlfNLSHINGLe-
'STMOEREOl:!OGl:!NOTCHeO
PANEL' (6' EXPOSUREI TYP.
SIMULATEO VINYL SHINGLE-
'STAGGElI:ED EOGr: NOTCHr:O
PANEL' (6' EXPOSUREI TYP.
DECORATIve WALL ~RACKET
$ eLEV. _ 1~:2"4 ~/4'
[TRUSS ~RGJ
$ELev..l~O'-5118'~
rr.o.WINt>oWSI
F.F.e. _ 12~"~ liS'
THIROr'LOOR
$ ~i.gVW;N~~~~)
1',I'.E..\\:2'-O'
$ISr:CONO FLOOR)
$ ~T~g\';N~6~~;
F,F.f,- 00'-0'
I,IAlNFL
$ ~~'~A~E8~~~El[i'
Ii: II
cb_~
" ,
ARCH, BRECAST CONC. ~UILOING SIGN: :ENGRA~O NUMERAI.9 I PANEL, TYR. I
~~~~U~~ STONC::-~EeR'=-'=- .=-.-:-,;;-.;;-.=-.=- -= -= -'.'-='-=-'-"- = ==-:: =-::: =-::::::::::: = = = == = =:::: = - = 1:5-= J = =- ~O;::&it~::~5i'iORi::~i>f::: -=::: =~::::::::: == ::b::d-c::::::: - - .
" '
..I.,"._.__IJ
PRE-I'INI9HfO ALUM.
PfRFORATEO SOFFIT, TYP.
PRE-PlNISHEO ALUM.
FASCIA,TYP.
SII.lULATEOVINYLSH1NGLl:-
'STA(lGERED EDGE NOTCHfD
PANfL'I6'fXPOSUREITYP,
VINYL LAP SIDING,
(6'EXPOsURfl,'np.
beS TRIM, TYP.
h,4TRII,I,'nP.
S'VERTlCALVlNYL
SIOING,TYP.
, ,
!~.RE-FAlICOLUI,INWRAJ>,
TiP.
ARCH,PRECASTCONC.
SILL,'nP.
.:: :(:Ul..TaRiD-=ST<:iife=-vetreeif. =-:::::: =-::: =-=- =- = ==-:::::: ==- - - - -1- - - - - - - -- - - -
PRE-FINISHeO MTL. GUTTER '_.L,__________________~ 6' OIA. STEEL PIPE
l:~~::: . --. - --- -~:~~~~'o~~: ~~IJ
FOUNDATION PER STRUCT.
1
A3.1
REVISED SOUTHWEST EXTERIOR EL.EVATION
FRONT FACADE FACING HART BL.VD.
SCALe: ~/~2ft..l1-0"
RAISED PANEL EMMsseD
INsULATEO STEEL GARAGE
OOOR,TYP.
,____""'-..:m>t
"'___"l€tIl_'"
lKm........_.....,....<U-.
-..,."".....................
~.-
~~
~ [J'J
E-<
~ U;
~ >LI~
,
E-<j
I--l>:
tI) :tj
~ U~
,
~ ~~
<~
LIOHTIIOUSE
OF
COLUMBIA
HBIOHfS
A NEW PBRSPECI1VE
SENIOR UVING
COMMUNITY
f'f\O..ECTNO.
REVISION 1: 6/07/07
REVISION 2: 7/11/07
REVISION J; 8/23/07
REViSION 4: 8/04/08
EXTERKlR
ElEVATIONS
\
\
\
\
,
,
,
\
"
"
((l"C'Ufi"~HDM\1IR
\
\.
,
\,
,
-~
"
"\
J.
,
PlAYGltOUNO
I'LANIINllJroIES,
1.AlllIOBsplaoledwilhlnparllinglatlslandsorolharhardsvrlaceareaso(In llreas with compacled soils
~~~~~:~f :OW~~::ilu~ ~::;gu~~\~ f:~eotl~\~rflf~'en~'r'amr:1:;~~~~t~%r~?J:~~~yg~ ~f~I~~rcnt. This
2.AlIso<ldingshollbedonobelweenlhedale5orAp~115tha(ldOc:lober151h.
~a~~~aeSr~~I~~,s~~el~ 5.~~'~~~,n~~~\~~r~~e~~~~ f;~~~:1 fr~fh~O~u~~l~t~~~ ~~~lt~~~~~j~l as to nol
staggeredJolnISarldsfr!psbultedlightly.SlKIshallbela1dparallellotheslope llnd pegged to prevenl
movement.
~~\
\ '\
\\~\.~,;;" .'
"..A...........
..".
~
~
,~//-~ "\,,'
_.
\
/
4. Newly Installed sod shall be watered Irnn1f.!dialaly aflerlaylng until completely soaked and thelllolled to
maim complete oontactllotwacnUlosod andlhe soil.
~u~~~~~~~ z~r~U::~~~~~~W~~~~~~n o~:t~~~v~~a::uea~ri6;;,i~~~ :i1t~~~t~ ~~m~s~1~~~ec~:.
Materials:
Sod shsll be Dny approved nurse!)' grown hybrid, low oul, Kentucky Bluegrsss blond, Sod sllsll be well
rooled and well covered w~h turf grass, Sod shall be free from noxious weeds and poll annua, The
OWnorreselVoslhorlghltorejoolnon.conformlngsod,
:,eod~oa:oe;~ ~:~~S~I~~~rra~c~Ill~~~~~~~ IriJ~l~u~~ho~~~ ~g~r~~a~rll~~~~~~i~~r~1:pproved
equal.
\MJod and rock mulch shall bo Inslalled 10 a minimum depth of 4" lhlck.
PllIntMat.dalI: All plantmalerial shallconformto and be installed In accordanco with tllo mos lcurront
~~I%Oenr;?~~~~ ~~o~~~s~1~~~r~~i~~~uu~,os7a~~~~:~f~~i~~,rsi~~ bhyet~~~~~A;;~~eaJ\3~nO~f lhe
~~~~f;;lro~?Onslrucllon Reference Manual as published by the Mlnnesola Nurseiy and LandsC<lpe
GIMralMllntlMllnce RlIquk'lmflnts: The landscoplng shall bo keplfreeofrefuse,d ebrisandallplanls
notlncludedonlheapprovodlandscaper.lan.Theownerandthoowna~slespoctivoagcnlssllalljolntly
~1l.de~:'ri:I~~~~~;~~~?Js~?~~~~~h:s~~~J~~e~~~u~ie~~~~~c~p~~~s~J~1%~II~~I~i~I~I~Jrri ~~~1~I~y~nd
gnJWingcond~lonatalltimes..
R.plllcerrMlnl: Plant male rials which exhlb~ evidence oflnsccls, pesls, diseases ordamoge shall be
~1~~\OI~~l~~':n~fe~~~~I:p~~gv~ 1:;gs~~~ ~~~.IISI sholl be removed and replaced w~h anolher living
Pllbllc:l.Iindlc:lplnllcara:TheC~yshallhavolhorfghltoplanl,prune,mainlainand remove trees,
C~~~r ~~~I~~~fl~I~~~~cf~lrtnU~ii~u~~~~I~~~~~~~Wb~~[~~~~~~~a~p::rb~~ ~:f~:~~70 I~I~~~~ ~~c
enhance the symmet!)' and beaulyofsuch public ground,
PLANTING SCHEDULE
.. --
"J,
'1
\
"
,
,\
\'\
-\ ;.
.,
\
~
\ '
" \\
\
",
'I"
, j
\ \
"\ i
\
,
\ ')
\ ~,
\ J,
\ :>
\ ,
\ )
i'
t !,
,
t
I
I.
I:
I
1
,
W.t#d"d"&f"<fj'.t#E.t#E$'P///'E.t#g?d1f1"d".f.$7d1f1ff"j1.
COf.'C.r."""AIIDliU<"O
,>
~"
~
<<"
-. ...
I
I
I
b
.
,",..mi'L.Ch""
,"""L\I"
'al'",,"''''' f.'!~''-C[)
~ ?
Wlw='>l.mmrw;"'UCHm"",,^,,
""',-ITY.A,,,,"mITWI""'-'A>nn
"',,","^IDW.""'"
n"'.-""""i-<:h'-V~Wmm""rMm'"
SEHFfi^,="",^"",
......"'..."'''''''''1''=''1.....
''''-''''-''''''''''''''''''''''''''''-''''''''(1)1''''
'''''''''''''''Ul
<<>=An"'OfBALl~,,",-L"M""".'
'Of "'-Of"-"-""""""""U.!M"-"-'.....""'L
~WJ.OE'01""-''''''''''O
_""".0=>"""=""""""'....1""""
'MOfO"""",,",ilAO<JU
_T"""""'<>i"OY,""'''"'M
"""'M11VJI''''''L
...........'''lIOrrno,,"'.....
,<rA",...'-""'~""''''''''l',.,....'O.'''''
""",,^,'OPOC'ALl5>""-'-"CUl.RE"""
,"",,,"''''''->>.''''''..OOEGAAD....LE
......""..;.""'''..'0''''.....''''''''"
.'NI.."fM'M."O'()ffi)~..";m'"
,....""""""""""-"'<fll
-,-,o;.""""L~""L9[AA
.......""""I"'"..."'y
:J[J.'=~=A>IT
"""''''-'''''''='n......
""'''00l""-"",,,,,,,,,,,",,,,-
''''='0''''"
f<lUl"""'a"'Ji~'ID''''''''''''
'''Of''-''-''''.'''.....''''''''''''''''
'"""$""D"''''''''or.......
~""'O""-""",",
'''''.o=>,""''''''",,,,",L
O=TUUJS""'''''-''''''.",,,,,,,.,,,,
"",,"""--'
(
BlO FILTER Pt..ANTS
Key Sdentific Name
Ac Aquilegiaeanadensis
As Asclepiassyriaea
An Aslernovae-ar"lgllae
Ca Cear"lolhusamericanus
Em Eupalolium maculatm
Is lrisshrevel
Lp Ualrispycnoslachya
L Looolia'QuennVictoria'
Pv Panicumvirgalum
Pp Pelaloslemum purpureum
Rh Rudbeckiahirta
Sr Solidagoligida
Za Zlzlaaurea
Common Name
Columbine
Butterfly weed
New England Asler
New Jersey Tea
Spotted Joe-pye
Wid Iris
PrallieBlezingSlar
Cardinal Flower
Switch Grass
PurplePralrieClover
Black.eyedSusan
SllllGoldenrod
GoidenAlexandors
.....
Ollcld~OUli
".'"Imum I RndscRpA Roqulremellts.for.Lol.2
1 Ireeper50If of slreelfronlage
- 340 If of slreel fronlage
" 340 /50 :: 6,8 rounded 10 7 trees streel required
41reesper1 acre Impervious surface
- 66,720 sf or 1.5 acres of Impervious surface
-1.5x4::6trees required
1 overs{orylreeper20parking spaces
-44pafking spaces
-44/20:: 2,2 rounded to 3 trees required
LEGEND
Hybrid bluegrass sod
Cypress mulch over weed barrier-refer notes
Bio Filter P!antings
Riparian {tall/wet) Grass Mixture-rerer notes
Annual flower bed
2,5" River rock
Vinyl landscape edging - refer notes
......-
""""""""""
Aco,lr""m,n'I'Jerrersred'
l1!lI.omerksna'lIoulovard'
Qu",ou'p,luWis
aOlulonlgr.
Qu."u,blcolor
z.s' "'" ,
~.5' "'" ,
~.s- "'" ,
~.5. "'" ,
~.5" "" , '-'
"
10t.1 " .
..
"
'" ." . "
'" "'" " ~
tOl.1 H !
il
'" "'" , ~
'" ." ,
'" "'" ,
'01>1 "
Pin"".,lno"
Pice'glauca-oc""la'
M,lu"RodSplcndor'
Corel,ca",d.n,lo
AC<>f gi"nal' 'Fla"'c'
o O"mr Bumlng Bush wonymu. 0101"0 'Compoo,""
o Crim'on Pygmy B"rberry a.ri>e,i, tltu"i>e'gll m'OP"1'oa 'Crim,an Pygmy'
o Chloagol.nd Creon aoxwood Bum,'men<",,'
o CranberiyCotol,...to, Cotonoe;t"'.plculatu,
00 Cranb./ryViownum Vib"rnumtr1lobum'aalloyCornpilct.
U CornmonWhI'elll.c Syrmg.\/lJlgari,var.albil
Culltbe,t Grant ~o>c ~o.a 'CU111bert Grant'
C 1.."UOogwood Comu,s.rioeo'I;,"U'
"'l JimO'ndyWlrllelberry ~exv.rtJo,[I'ta'Jrm DBody'
UllI. r,lnce" Spl,e. Splroo'J'ponlca'LilUor'lnce,.'
2> ~ed SpritoWlrlt.'i>erry ~ex verUoill'ta '~.d Sprito'
Q TochnyNbolVitae Th"k,oOC'deo'al,,'Toohny'
is ConI.
IS Cont.
is ConI
~5 Cont.
n ConI.
15 ConI.
n Cont,
15 ConI.
PSoCoot.
15 Cont.
PS ConI,
n ConI.
10101
'"""'"~
o C,lgsry C"'pOl JunIper
e- SoondlaJunlpe'
Q Hugllo' Junlp.'
"'-
Sive, re.Ule, C,."
JUnlper(IU"aolna'Mon.'
Junlper(IU' ,.ol"a 'S<nn~I.'
Junlper(IU,horlzootolis'lIugItO,'
" com, "
" Cont. "
" ConI. "
'0'01 '"
" Cont. "
" , ~~
, ~
i I;;
~ I 0
~ m
0
! m
I
..Ii 0
00
P M
. .0
~ E;
0'0
~ ~~
~ I: 0
, ,
!
~ 1;;
<< ~ OJ
~ ~ ~
,
~ I
Mi"anU"".lne."ls'Sllberredo,'
~
.~
00
.
~
'"
@
]
1
..I'; "'
..I; ~
CI~
--1f
f:)~ ~
8!
"
N
3~~N
J::Ior,o,'O
~t:<;q~
a::> v or,
N . 'N
"€~;3;;,;
o II< ........
Z l:J ~':":
aa~~
"
"
"
"'
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
m
~
5~
f~
.."
-g:5g
'00
g.~41
"-'
"'fl~
t'l"s'<J
,~.
"'g..
.[g~
~'lO.,s
.s'~.!3
'fl g.M
~:.
~.~.';:
.~.
;S'3
~~~
:: a...l
'i;( f~
Ii
-u
Ii
TYPICAl 10' J[ 10' Bl0 FILTER PlANTING PLOT
~~~ ~~~~dti~~':':Urg'a~:i.d~~~~~t~~~Ji~~::' In the (I.trlil \0 tho loR
-- ....-...""""'- .
,.~ ;';'~.."'~ii~i~ .n;..'i'4../tt'A,;o > 1C"r. /' Z
A- B <(
SECTION (Hortzontal acaI.: 1"-20' VdcelKa!t: 1~.10'1 -I
Quanlitypcr100sf Size Bloom Time Bloom Color Height Spacing >-0..
6 4"pol May-June red&yeHow 1103" 12" oe:W
6 4"pot July-Sept orange 1102" 12" <(0..
8 4"pol Aug-Ocl purple & orange 4105' 12" z<(
6 4"pot June-Aug while 1\03" 1" _u
8 4"po\ July-Sepl pink 2106' 12" :2:Ul
7 4"pol May-June purple & yellow 1t03" 12" -0
7 4"pot July-Sept purple 2104' 12" -IZ
3 4"pol July-Sepl searlel 1103" 24" ~<(
3 4"pot Aug-Ocl gold 3104' 24" 0..-1
6 4"pot. June-Aug purple 2t03' 12"
7 4"pol June-Aug yellow & brown 1103" 12" SIlEETNO
8 4"pot Aug-Oct yellow 2104' 12" L1
7 4" ! Ma ..June allow 1 to 3' 12"
N
,;
"
"
~
S!
w
o
g
'-
,
'-
~
0.
~
"
o
o
,
ID
~
~
<;;
~
o
.-
N
o
o
,
ID
,
~
,;;
.
v
.',
o
~
.-
W
GENERAL NOTES
WE CURRENT EDlTlaN OFTHE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATlON 'STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" GOVERNS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BY THE CllY OF COlUr~BIA
HEIGHTS CODES, ORDINANCES, STANOARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
fURNISH, INSTAlL, INSPECT, MAINTAlfl AND REMOVE ALL NECESSARY TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE.
All TRAFFIC CONlROL DEVICES AND SIG~GE SHAl.l CONFORM TOAlI.LOCAL, COUNTY AND !HATE
TRAFfiC CONTROL GUIDELINES, INCIDENTAL TO PROJECT.
,
THE EXISTING lITlUTY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BI:
ACCURATE CRAlL INCLUSIVE. CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (651-454.(}{)02) FOR THE
LOCATION OF All UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, VALVES, MANHOLES, OR
OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. REPAIR ANY OF TI-lEABOVE WHICH ARE REMOVED
DR OAlMGEO DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO Tl-IE OWNER
THE EXACT LOCATION OF All UTILITIES AND UTILITY CONNECTIONS MUST BE VERIFIED PRIOR 'ra
COMMENCING WORK. LOCATE, FIELD VERIFY ANO PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND
TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO START OF SITE CONSTRUCTiON. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFYTl-E
ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES DR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLAN,
SECURE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WITH UTILITIES ON SIl"E
PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OFTHE PROJECT. ADHERE TO ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE,
ANDIOR FEDERAL LAWS FORANY COST INCURREO DUE TO THE DAMAGE OF SAID UllUTIES.
EXISTING SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED BYCORNERSTONE lAND
SURVEYING INC. HUMPHREY ENGINEERING ING.IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OF
INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS.
UTILITY NOTES
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL ANO VERTICAL CONTROL ONCE THE
ALIGNMENT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED nYTHE SURVEYOR ADDITIONAl. COST FOR RESTAKING
AND/OR REPLACING DAlMGED STAKES IS THE RESPONSllllLlTY OFTHE CONTRACTOR
PROVlDEMN AND ALL TESTING TO INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO SOIL COMPACllONTESTING,
WATER MNN PRESSURE, CONDUCTIVITY AND BACTERIA TESTING, SANITARY SEWER PRESSUFlE
AND MANDREL TESTING, CONCRETE CURB AND GOllER SAMPLING AND TESTING TO OCCUR 1\0
LESS Tl-IAN EVERY 500' AND ADDITIONAL TESTING DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CITY OR ENGIHEER
WITH NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION.
N1. EXCESS MATERlN.., BITUMINOUS SURFACING. CONCRETE ITEMS, REMOVED lITlUTY ITEMS AND
OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONlRACTORAND S ~ALL
BE DlsrOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITB ALl APPLICABLE LAWS AND
REGULATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS ARETO PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE, PAVEMENT
OR TOP OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
CARE MUST BE TAKEN DURING ALL CONSTRUCTION AND EXCAVATION ACTiVTTlES TO PROTEc'r ALL
SURVEY MONUMENTS AND/OR PROPERTY CORNERS,
REPAIR ANY AND ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND SITE FEATURES DUE TO
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.
ALL PROPOSED UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE COMPLETED USING APPROVED MATERIALS,
METHODS OF PLACEMEl'IT AND TESTING AS REQUiRED BY ALL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS.
HYDRANTS LOCATED 4' FROM BACK OF CURB, MAINTAIN 78 OF COVER OVER TOP OF ALL
PROPOSED WATER MAIN. MEGALUGS SHALL BE USED ON ALL WATER MAIN FmINGS.
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
SANITARYSERVlCEPIPE
WIIT8lMl\lNPlPe
WIlTERSERVlCEPIPE
HYDRA/llTLE/lDS
~~
S'SOR55PVC
S'SOR26PVC
6'OIP,cv.sS62
6'OIP,ClASS52
6"DIP,ctASS52
WAlEROUSPAceRWB~
INSTALL MH #115
48- DIAMETER
RIM ELEV. 241.00
INV ElEV. 237.76
R-1642 CASTING
&3' 18" RCP CLIII OO.~
INSTAll MH #117
48- DIAMETER
RIM ELEV. 241.00
INV ELEV. 237.98
R-1642 CASTING
,>C' ~/~
37'18'RcP~~
INSTAll MH #118
4Bn DIAMETER
RIM ELEV. 242.90
INV ELEV. 238.14
R-1642 CASTING
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL SYSTEM 651.454.0002
\
\
----I;" BlOFILTER UNDERORAIN
PIPE. SEE GRADING PLAN
.------ FOR INVERT ELEVATIONS.
V
\
\===-~:
'"" 8"GV&BOX
, 8" DIP PLUG Wj8LOCKING
~ .. - ~ INSTALL HYDRANT wi FINISH
EX SAN GROUND ELEV. 254.1
m~;it~ grl. [Z J
~ \ INSTALL C8 #114
\~~ \ ~"7~ -- - I ~ ~~'~&T~~ri:gg II II ~
--:'~ "' ~ I R-3067V CASTING II
,~( \.4J'~'._
I" V,' .,
\ \~(~\ "% ~':f \
V ~ d ~"
./' ?t ~ \ .'<<
\ ~:'T~\);M~':J"' /' / l \ ~~'1-" iff4.)0 0"
~~ ~tt~: ~~~:~~ ~ ~~/ =, . \-, '~~. ~~.. .~'}.
~ R-30G7V CASTING \ . _ ~ ~ y ./' ."'0,
\\ INSTAll CB #112,./' ,/c ','%'"
48" DIAMETER"'''-/ (f ~
RIM illV, 249.83 ~ (> '"
\ ~~~o~lftc~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,t"
\ '\ ~~__\~~q ~ i
"f> "X6" E \- \ < ~ ~ ,
'l'... ' , "/0," . '~':~:"~\"~"'"
;{. / "" ~ OI.I:/j'ffJl6 '" '" 'w, ~"bf \'n
~ \7~ S)C%, '"'<.
INSTALL CB #111 X.. '0", '" """
RIM 4~J.!A2M4~~ -1 ,/ / .~ ~tit~~~g/6~1IN
'NV ElEV. 243.32 \ ~ DETA'" SHEET C3.1 I:
R_306E7~V ~'^.:;;~~ ~sj\' ~i 'NSTAll CB #1D5 h~ ,~
INV ELE @ EN,~~243;,~OO 48" DIAMETER ~ 1';,'11. :0 0 ~
RIM ELEV, 25028 \ / -lOti ,po
lNST~ C8 #123 ~i'L:2.0 INV ELEV, 241.98 (S&NE) r1. cY 0.>:\ 0
30 DIAMETER ~INV~23 .\4 ~ ~ INV ELEV. 24233 (E) ~"# ,."
RIM ELEV. 243.00 - t R-3067V CASTING '0'" , ,~ J
'NVElEV.2'O.19 ~ l!~'~ ,.> _.~-
~t< ~'O':f'''- _,~ '\ ",'W- -//' . . ._--::::--- _ _
R-4341A.~::::"- H' _z..L ~,'> 26"5' RC~~ ___R.:r'..:~2.l:.0!._~""-'"
. J ---'"')l" CLlV OO,67X.... \
INSTALL MH 1122 !_ ~w-' f-!.lL_- -------",. -p'///#/'/00'////U//#ff.i00 ,////,0 0: 00.-:; =
48" DIAMElER ~ ~ ~ "- '
RIM ELEV. 244.40.... ~ ...- Ii{ I % INSTAll MH #104 INSTALL CB {jl07
INV ELEV. 240,11 ~ .'. / \. _ I . it 48- DlAMElER 48" DIAMETER
R-1612 CASTING ~ >" I INSTALL CB #103,...-- RIM ElEV. 247.80 RIM ELEV. 247.50 0
T It 48" DIAMETER INV ELEV. 241.81 INV ELEY. 242.98 ~
~ I d ~ f~~ i:i~: i.t:li R-1642 CASTING R-2561 CASTING
INSTALL MH {f121 ~ d R~3057V CASTING
48" DIAMETER :J 0
RIM ELEV. 245.30); 0
INY ELEV. 239.63
R-1612 CASTING
. . 4/l).
~.
-
-.
%
"
0/
,
~
~
"1!f!/f//;^~4~~
TOP OF WM ELEV. 0
FOOTING 242.33. INSTALL 6"
DIP PLUG AT END. VERIFY
EXACT END lOCATION WlTH
MECHANICAL
\
\
\
\ "
\
\ "
\
, ~
e
.
"
0
.
"
"
\
\
\
\
\~
\
\
\
6- SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
END ELEV 241.BO. INSTALL
6" CAP AT END. VERIfY
EXACT ENO lOCATION WlTH
MECHANICAL.
CONNECT TO EXISTING 8- VCP SANITARY
SEWER UTILIZING SADDLE VHH STAINLESS
STEEL BANDS, INVERT ELEVATION AT
CONNECTION 238.40 SHALL BE VERIFIED
PRIOR TO CONNECTION.
J
37TH AVENUE
NORTH EAST
~
INSTAll. MH #116
3D" DIAMETER
RIM ElEV. 24-0.00
INY ELEV. 237,84
R-4341A CASTING
N
INSTALL MH {fl0l
4B~ DIAMETER
RlM ELEV. 243.10
INV ELEV, 240,09
R-1642 CASTING
-.
~
~
t~ "
I INSTALL CS #120
2'X3' RECT.
Ih.,. JdJ RIM HEY. 244.74
1<11'4 I I INY ELEV. 241.24
R-3067V CASTING
E~e24~ let "I
0'.' I
30' 12" RCP CLl( 0 I.OJ!:
~
"
INSTAll MI-! #102
48~ DIAMElER
RIM ELEY. 245.40
INY ElEV. 240.71 (N&W)
INV ELEV, 240,94 (s)
R 1642 CASTING
/" Wh
..,
~",.A\::\I)J
\11001,'1-1- "EXCSfJh
"~? RlM_24284
6:i\1I=~_ J INV_2J904
~ ~~f~!lil:11 J ., t' ;,.i~H"~~i~~"-'"
L8'15"RCPCLlIIOIO:C q, 1-23170 I/.-r I
13' 18" RCP CUll @ It
0.67% (INCL FES) / r /
INV ELEV 0 END 24000 / ) I ~~~~2& I , I
II It'ly-
124' IB" ~Cl' CLIIl 0 M:V;; '- II,
,-:=;I ~
[f"l I I < , CO .~,
RIMm24\.5 I. J EX SAN RI -241.~;; V
INV:238.88.~RII.!~241.8(}1t'l-n9.20
INV_238.7 N ItIV-2JI.30
INSTALL MH #119
48" DIAMETER
RIM ELEV, 242.10
INV ElEV. 238.66
R-1642 CASTING
CONSTRUCT MANHOLE
OVER EXISTING IBM PIPE
~%
((
26' 15" RCP CL1V 0 0 l:----i
~rM; 427!l 1\
INV_~39.49 II
-<<l5'RCP "
P#00"#####/n//
I FUTURE SANITARY SEWER
AND WATER SERVICE
CONNECTIONS BY OTHERS ...........
l.tll LlJHIJI~
'.
t
,-,+
'I
,
BEt'lCHMORK
NlJ_24S.11
./
12" VCP (PER PLAN)
\
\.
CONNECT TO EXISTING 10" WATER MAIN. ASBUILTS
INDICATE A IO"Xl0~ TEE WAS INSTALLEO AT THE
CONNECTION POINT WITH TIiE RUN TO NORTH AND
8RANCH TO WEST. INSTAll. A IO"X8" REDUCER TO
TEE AND 8a GAVE VALVE IMMED1AlELY AFTER.
BLlRRIEDTEL. C/\BLE...J
(PER PI.AN)
"
- '"
'"
#.....
e COPVRJGHT 2004 HUMPIIREY ENGINEERlNU INC. (HEI~ ALL RIGHTS RElJERVEO. UtESE DOCUMENTS ME AN lNSTRUMEtIT OF SERVICES IINOARETHE PIlOPERT'I OF HElI1NO MAY NOT BE Usa) ORCOPIED W11HOUT PRIOR WlmTBf CONSENT.
._~
,-~
INSTAll C8 #109
<tBM OlAMElER
RIM ElEV. 251.50
INV ElEV, 248.50
R-2561 CASTING
y, "
"
"
,
'"
, 7
~ l5
~ ;5
, ro
'"
z
, CO
, ~
;i 8
,
,
<>:% %:.-:
*
"-..
'-
INSTALL MH 'lOB
4B" DIAMETER
RIM ELEV" 251.90
INV ELEY. 245.90 (N)
INY ElEY. 244.00 (VI)
R-1642 CASTING
"-I!" 810FILlER UNDERDRAIN
PIPE, SEE GRAOlNG PLAN
FOR INVERT ElEVATIONS.
--
---1r?
~y~ ,
~'f!{
~ \'.'1::<.';~'
\~7
~
~
/
"
SCAl..E:
I
,
"
"
g!~~ ~
~~~~~ 1
~ ~ E ,dl ~ ,
~~~ g ~ .
j E~-ij,~ ~ .
o.1i''cafi'O ,
~1! ~~ ~ '"
c
gl'Ui2C1l .
.
~~~J~ .
~ ID
liB' 0
~1i.ni ,,;
0
, d
~~'5~ , !~ ~
~ ,
o
N
~
~ q
b
c
c
.
0::
,
"
o
iP
<
J\
-0
c
.5
,
"
~
~~':., .~
". r:;
'.r""{ -. lLJ M ""
',.....,....... N If'.
'~l' oi.
~ ::::
If'.IC\ E
3=~~
r:;"J'!'t:
~. 0
-u 0 g
::J N'6i)
~qij
-u~r
~ tr;--c
~~ It
11~...E
6~~
q
~
z
o
l-
n
~~
uJ~
y"2
~ <f ~
~.Jg:
~~ ~
~<(uJ
I.. 1::
".L. If)
~
o
:'J
~ z
" <f
~ ..J
Ii /L
~ ~
;0 w ...J
'3 ~ f-
8 i :J
REVlSIOt'lS:
No: Oille:
00110,00.00
00212,03.00
cl\youl>mM/lI
FhaIIOJAmilfol
"
PROJEGTNO: 475-002
DRAWN BY: JDH
CHEClIEOIlY: JRR
OATE: 10.06,06
SIiEETNO:
C2.1
GENERAL NOTES
THE CURREr-IT EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARmENT OF TRANSPORTATION
.STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. GOVERNS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED
BY11-lE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CODES, ORDINANCES, STANDARDS ANO
SPECIFICATIONS,
FURNISH, INSTALL, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REMOVE AlL NECESSARYTRAFFIC
CONTROL SIGNAGE. AlL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGt>lAGE SOOt CONFORM
TO AlL LOCAl, COUNTY AND STATE TRAFFIC CONTROL GUIDeliNES, INCIDENTAL TO
PROJECT.
THE EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS IS NOT
GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. CONTACT GOPHERSTATE ONE
CAll (651..1l54.ooo2) FOR THE LOCATION OF All. UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES,
CONDUITS, PIPES, VALVES, MANHOLES, OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURIOS BEFORE
DIGGING. REPAIR ANY OF THE ABOVE WHICH ARE REMOVED OR DMlAGED DURING
CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER
TJ-lE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES AND UTILITY CONNECTIONS MUST BE
VERIFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. LOCATE, FIELD VERIfY AND PROTECT All
EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO START OF SITE
CONSTRUCTION. IMMEDIATelY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR
VARIATIONS FROM THE PLAN.
SECURE All NECESSARY PERMITS AND NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES wrrn
U11L1TIES ON SITE PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. ADHERE TO ALL
APPLICABLE lOCAl, STATE, ANDIOR FEDERAL LAWS FORANY COST INCURRED DUE
TO ,HE DAMAGE OF SAID UTILITIES.
EXISTING SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDEO BY CORNERSTONE
U>.ND SURVEYING INC. HUMPHREY ENGINEERING INC. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
ACCURACY OF INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS.
GRADING NOTES
USE ONLY BUITABLE MATERIAL AS APPROVED BYTHE ENGINEER FOR BUILDING PAD
AND STREET CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE UNSUITABLE AND UNSTABLE MATERIAlS
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TOPSOIl, ORGANIC MATERIAL, AND DEBRIS FROM
THE BUILDING PAD AND STREET AREAS. COMPACT THE UPPER 3 FEET OF
EMBANKMENT IN THE STREET TO 100% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY.
COMPACT STREET EMBANKMENTS BELOW11-IE UPPER 3 FEET AND BUILDING
FOUNDATIONS TO NO LESS THAN 95% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY.
BACKFILl.ALl. BELOW GRADE EXCAVATIONS IMMEDIATELY UPON REMOVAl OF TliE
UNSUITABLE SOILS. BACKFIll. EXCAVATIONS ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENTS
PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT.
SALVAGE AND PROVIDE AMIN1MUM DEPTH OF 6-INCHES OF TOPSOIL TO ALL AREAS
DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AlL HORIZONTAl AND VERTICAL CONTROL ONCE
THE ALIGNMENT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BYTHE SURVEYOR.. ADomoNAl.. COST FOR
RESTAKING ANOIOR REPLACING DAMAGED STAKES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OFTHE
CONlRACTOR.
PROVIDE ALL SOIL TESTING AT INTERVALS NO LESS THAN EVERY 600' AND
ADDITIONAl TESTING DEEMED NECESSARY BY CITY STAFF, GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEER OR PROJECT ENGINEER WITH NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION.
Tl-IE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD OF COMPACTION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL PORTIONS
OF PERMANENT CONSTRUCTION. STANDARD COMPACTION IS REQUIRED FORAN\'
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION.
DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS,
REMOVED UTILITY ITEMS AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIALS OFFlflE
CONSTRUCTION SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE lAWS AND
REGULATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED GRADE, PAVEMENT
SURFACE OR TOP OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
NOTIFY THE CIn' OF CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, 48
HOURS IN ADVANCE OF WORKING WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY. CITY INSPECTORS
MUST OBSERVE ALL WORK COMPLETED, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING
CURB & GUTTER, EXCAVATION OF lRENCHES, PLACEMENT OF STORM
DRAIN,CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY LINES, BACKFILLING AND REPlACEMENT
OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ANDIDR CONCRETE CURl'l AND GlITTER.
COMPLETE ALl PROPOSED SlREET CONSTRUCTION USING APPROVED MATERIALS,
METHODS OF PLACEMENT AND TESTING AS REQUIRED BY ALL GOVERNING
SPECIFICATIONS.
N
oi
~
"
~
~
m
g
N
"-
'"
~
"
~
"
o
o
,
~
"
;;;.
~
o
"
N
o
o
,
~
"
v
,;;
m
.
,
o
o
V
"
W
CARE MUST BETAKEN DURING CONSTRUCT!ONAND EXCAVATION TO PROTECT ALL
SURVEY MONUMENTS AND/OR PROPERTY IRONS ON AND ADJACENT TO THIS SITE.
REPAIRALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING fACILfTlE"S RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.
PROVIDE A SMOOTH AND THOROUGH TRANSITION BElWEEN PROPOSED SITE
GRADES AND DRAINAGE WAYS AND EXlSTING SURROUNDING SITE GRAUES AND
DRAINAGE WAYS.
RIPRA? SHALL BE 050 = 12", UNLESS OTHERWJSESPECIFIED.
ALl CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE CONCRETE BII12, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIEO.
SEE DETAIL.
WRmEN DIMENSIONS PREVAIL OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS.
EXISTING SURVEY l' VERTICAL CONTOUR INTERVAL, CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS VERTICAL
DATUM. VARIABLE CONTOUR INTERVAL FOR PROPOSED GRADING.
CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT LAND
DISTURBANCE DOES NDT OCCUR OUTSIDE
GRADING LIMITS.
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL SYSTEM 651.454.0002
I
'-
,
I
/
/
/
_/
i
,
-----
I
. -== ~~ ~~ ~ - ~~-=-_~-=~~?:-::~-:W5=~~'-~-~-'--!~~~=~::'~
........ __ <j,.q< ,~_'l:5 --- 2515 -\ \
" . :'
',-----------~" :
, ,
, ,
, ,
: :
/ -;h;. ~!
I: !
,
i
BIOFIL TER #1
BOTTOM ELEV, 251.5
TOP ELEV. 252,5
MATCH EXISTING C&G
- /
/
I
."1
,
I
I
II 7. X
If
lIfVEm"21112 ,
I
I ,
,
IM'RT.W
:
,
,
,
,
,)
o
z
ij
1 5
m
o
z
F
~
X
, w
X"
I~
~ H1'<\.:2UO
'.,
<,
~
m,
/
INSTALL 8612 C&G TO WIlli
FLOWlJNE AT PROPERTY UNE.
PONtl10ETAlL
:-'/PII
I~
~ 1fII1.l2~o.o
'0,
"
I
I
I
I
\
C::='--'
PONO 2 DETAIL
,-,
HART LAKE
""BOIFILTER #2
-gOlTOM ELEV. 248.0
~ ELEV. 249.5
NlVL 239.70
100YR IDiL 240,50
251,0
50
251.
--
:83
:7fi.~
.--'
'""""T",U
GRADING LIMITS
~ -'/lROPOSE~
2 ~.86 BUILDING-
%::: 11,050 SF
-----..N!k~_2!~0
CQNSmUCT WOOD POND SKIMMER.
SEE DETAIL SHEET C3.1
Il.ET SEDIMENTATION POND #2
Nm.. 240.0. 100}\" HWL 240.62
/0
')2'0'l
7//4
47.95
~7.G2
2 ~?_-
.,
GRADING
-- -2~7__________~ -~-
---
4r;l.6
G5:.>I8.,..\..... I
- - J
..... .....- -I
~,
~' !iT~ISTING C&G
26.:~/ ~-~ e
~~,..".,'...
~...- ,:,,'..1.,"1',Y.
......... ;:".:,.",;&9"
\
"
"----
G
G
,
:--}15
244_
co
co
I
I
I
~
7
"
,
\
\
I
,
'6
I
/
BURRIEl>'lELCABl..E
(PER PL"""'l
37TH AVENUE
NORTH EAST
I
I
I
~-
/
,
/
SCALE:
~,
-
,~
))
il'
/,,-
II
,y
"
'"
e [;O?YRlGHT 2004 HUMPHREY EHGINEERING !NC. (HEI). AU. RIGI-ITS RESERVED. lHESE (}(){;UME/lTS ARE AN INS'TRUMEt/TOF 6ERVlCESAND AREllJ!; PROPERTYOFHEI AND MAY NOT aE USal OR COPIED I\IffilOUTPRlOR WRITTEN CONSENT.
g~~E
fjlii-6lii
E1! 1Il"D.l'l
&~~~~
~"'1ii"~
!~~:t~
;g~Wi5fa
'iiIUi.fjw:
~J.~~!l
i i ~A:'6
~a-i1ij
j ~~j
_ 0 -
.
~
0:
o
o
Jj
~
o
"'
o
d
1"- ~
,
"
o
o
"
ii:
,
,
"
IT'
,
J)
"0
o
3
,
,
"
"
o
.~
uJ
o
N
~
~ q
~ ~
1("0,,,, E
3~~
c.~~ '(:
g. U
"00"
, N 0
I: <<:l .~
. q u
-g ~ ~
[) 'I)....r::
f:t::::~ ~
li~.1
?""li
O~~
q
N ~
N '"
~
"
z
0
I-
D
~ ~ ~
0
uJ z ~ Z
ILl
~ ~ z :5
ILl ~
:s > ~ !L
~ 0 J: \j
~ IL \:J
91-IL iJ Z
~ cL ;?; J: a
~
~ <( ILl ~~
M r f- '3
~ - 8 i\j
. \J)
REVISIONS:
H'" D"le:
0011D.00,00
0021Z0ll.lJ6
PROJECTNO:
DMWHBY,
CHECKEDav:
DAlE:
"
SHEET NO:
C2.2
"""'
clyGlIbIn'llaI
An3Ipl.I~1
475.()02
JDH
JRR
10.06.06