HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 4, 2008 Work Session<i+r+T 7.. Pr;tcr_tivm
1 1 ®f ®~~f~il~~rl ~i~'VI 1 1 V VIaYOr
Councilmembers
Kobc~rt : i. Id'+l/fum,e
S90 40"' Avenue NE, Columbia llei hts, MN 55421-3878 763 706-3600 TDD 763 706-3692 /3+ucr Nay, rnch,
g t ) t 1 7`~~nnnu~ru !)mhrn
6isilnurwehsiteat: wwrv.ci.colurrrbia-hei+=hts.nur.rrs Hrucc~K'elzivehtr~;
City b7anager
Id~ulterR. heha~r
ADMINISTRATION
NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING
to be held in the
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
as follows:
Meeting of: COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL
Date of Meeting: AUGUST 4, 2008
Time of Meeting: 7:00 P.M.
Location of Meeting: CONFERENCE ROOM 1
Purpose of Meeting: WORK SESSION
Consent Agenda
1. Dedicated left turn lane on 49th Avenue
Agenda
1. Parking Ramp agreement - 40th and Central Avenue
2. Financial. help w/facade improvements
3. Change in ordinance regarding LED signs
4. Water shut off rates
S. Discussion regarding retaining walls
The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or
employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with
disabilities to participate in all City of Columbia Heights' services, programs, and activities. Auxiliary aids for handicapped
persons are available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk at 763-706-
361 1 to make an•angements. (TDD/70G-3692 for deaf or hearing impaired only)
CITY COUNCIL LETTER
Meeting of: 8/4/08
AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESS[ON ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER
NO: PUBLIC WORKS ~
ITEM: EVALUATION OF A DEDICATED LEFT TURN BY: K. Hanse BY: ~ ~'
LANE ON 49T" AVENUE FROM FILLMORE STREET TO DATE: 7/31/0 DATE:
JOHNSON STREET
Background: At the June Traffic Commission meeting, Mr. Howard Seim of 1425 Molan Terrace requested a dedicated turn lane
be designated on 49`'' Avenue between Fillmore Street and Johnson Street. The turn lane has the potential to allow through traffic
to continue east bound or west bound on 49`h Avenue when school is in session or when there are special events at the school.
The Traffic Commission passed a motion to recommend the City Council request a traffic study from the Anoka County Highway
Department for 49`h Avenue NE from Fillmore Street to Johnson Street to evaluate a dedicated turn lane by reducing the parking
zone for two blocks (excerpt of minutes are attached).
Analysis /Conclusions: City staff supports the idea of a traffic study by Anoka County Highway Department near the High School
to evaluate traffic operation on 49`'' Avenue with a dedicated left turn lane. The existing street width is 44 feet face of curb to face
of curb. It would be required to eliminate parking on both sides to accommodate a left turn lane.
Recommended Motion: Direct staff to request Anoka County Highway Department to conduct a traffic study on 49`x' Avenue
between Fillmore Street and 3ohnson Street, with an evaluation of a left turn lane in this segment boundary.
KH:cb
COUNCIL ACTION:
,~ -
Draft Minutes from "Traffic Commission Meeting
June 2, 2008
A. REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A DEDICATED TURN LANE ON 49T" AVENUE BETWEEN
FILLMORE STREET AND JOHNSON STREET
Mr. Howard Seim of 1425 Molan Terrace has requested a dedicated turn lane be designated on
49`h Avenue between Fillmore Street and Johnson Street, The turn lane ~ has the potential to
allow through traffic to continue east bound or west bound on 49`'' Avenue when school is in
session or when there are special events at the school.
49`'' Avenue is a County State Aid Highway and under the jurisdiction of Anoka County.
Provided the Traffic Commission and City Council approve the request, staff will request Anoka
County do a traffic study of the area to add a dedicated turn lane.
Mr. Seim summarized the problems of traffic congestion in this area with 49`~ Avenue dividing
the school district and traffic being congested during school and special events. He outlined
several possible solutions but thought that adding a turn lane by eliminating two blocks of
parking would be the easiest and most cost-effective way to reduce the traffic problem. Chief
Nadeau spoke with school staff and ran an accident report for this area. Accidents weren't a
problem, but school staff raised concerns about traffic congestion when special events or school
events are going on. Chief Nadeau liked the proposal of removing 12 parking spots to create a
turn lane. Commissioners Anderson, Carlson, Doty, and Councilmember Kelzenberg concurred
with this option. Commissioner Goodman favored the idea but thought a traffic study should be
done by the County to determine if this is a feasible option. Commissioner Sturdevant felt traffic
congestion was only a problem during special events and thought traffic control could be
achieved through the use of traffic police at those times.
Motion by Goodman and seconded by Anderson to request a traffic study from Anoka County for
49`'' Avenue NE from Fillmore Street to Johnson Street to add a dedicated turn lane by reducing
the parking zone for two blocks. Upon Vote: Commissioner Anderson -Yea, Commissioner
Carlson -Yea, Commissioner Doty -Yea., Commissioner Goodman -Yea, Commissioner
Sturdevant -Nay. (4-Yeas, 1-Nay -1`Zotion Carried)
Mayur:
~ I TY a F (~ C} L U M B I A N E I H T S Gary L Peterson
Counciirnemtrers:
Bruce Na«~rocki
590 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (763) 706-3600 TDD (763} 706-3692 Bobby Williams
Visit Our Website nc www.c~i.cnlumbia-hei,~lu.r.,nu.aas Tammera Diehm
Bruce Kelzenberg
City Manager:
Walter R. P'ehst
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: July 30, 2008
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Sheila Cartney, Assistant Community Development Director ~j~
RE: Parking Ramp Agreements
On July 20, 1982 a "Management Agreement for Parking Facilities and Lease of the
Plaza by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Columbia Heights and Terry Evenson" was executed. The agreement had two parts:
Part I Lease of the Plaza property and Part II Management Provisions. It appears the
amendments to the Agreement throughout the years mainly affect Part II Management
Provisions. An additional agreement was produced in 1988 between the City of
Columbia Heights and Zaidan Holdings for the "Operation of the Parking Ramp"
The 1988 "Operation of the Parking Ramp" Agreement designates Zaidan as the
operator. Prior to that designation. the Agency (city) was the operator and was able to
subcontract the work (Section 2.03 and 2.04 1982 agreement}. These amendments
remove the city from any operation commitments. The operator is responsible for
routine maintenance and essentially manages and operates the ramp. The owner of the
office building is responsible for the costs incurred by the operator. In addition the
owner is responsible for all major repairs and replacement of structural elements fo the
parking ramp (Section 2.01 1982 agreement).
In March 2008, The Northeast Bank Building, located at 3989 Central Ave was sold to
Stadium Village Properties (SVP), LLC. SVP has presented the city with an agreement
titled "Agreement Between the City of Columbia Heights and Stadium Village
Properties, LLC for the Operation of the Parking Ramp." This agreement would replace
the 1988 Operation agreement. Stadium Village is the owner of the office building and
therefore, is responsible for the operating costs of the ramp. SVP would like to beco>ne
the "Operator" as well. The proposed agreement has a different breakdown and
modifies that language slightly but does not change the terms (maintenance, hours,
rates etc). The 1988 agreement remains in place with the proposed modification.
Attached is a summary of agreements broken down in a table format and a historical
summary of all agreements and processes.
Recommendation
The agreement that Stadium Village Properties, LLC has presented represents the terms
THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMIhlATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
and conditions in the 1988 agreement (modified term in 1991 to end of Management
Agreement) by replacing the operators name from Zairian Holdings, Inc, to Stadium
Village Properties LLC. Staff supports this amendment.
1982 First Management Agreement for Parking Facilities and Lease of the Plaza property.
Use Maintenance Term Insurance
Walkway Public, leased to Redeveloper 99 years Redeveloper
redeveloper assumes full covers all risk
res onsibility of loss
Ramp 369 stalls. General Redeveloper 40 years max. Agency
public who are tenants, responsible if 40 years covers all risk
business invitees, for all repairs redeveloper of loss
licensees, agents, Agency can buy ramp
employers or guests of responsible $1 if
the office building. for operations purchased
Agency can add public (maint. Agency will
parking for general Upkeep) negotiate
parking anytime public
parking
1988 First Operation Agreement between City of Columbia Heights and Zaidan Holdings Inc.
(Agreement designates and operator)
The 1982 Management Agreement is still in effect
Maintenance Term Insurance Other
Operator Routine & repairs. Redeveloper 5 years June 30, Provides Provides
pays operators costs 1993- Amended in liability bookkeeping,
1991 to extend pays utilities
term to remaining
duration of
1V.lanagement
A reement
1990 Agreement for Modification of Management agreement for Parking Facilities
Public Office building Term
tenants/other
Parking 40 % designated Remaining - Remaining duration of
permits - permits Management agreement
can't exceed four hours r~m~~
Parking Ramp Agreements
July 20, 1382 (Original} "Management Agreement far Parking Facilities and
Lease of the Plaza Property"
Contract between HRA "Agency'' and Terry Evenson "Redeveloper"
Terms: HRA to construct 369-stall parking ramp and pedestrian walkway
"open plaza area"
- Redeveloper to construct office building
- Management agreement agreed upon for use of parking ramp and
plaza area.
Lease of Plaza Property: Redeveloper aggress to lease the property
Term: lease of 99 years beginning 12/1/1982 and ending 11/20/2081
- $1.00 per year
- HRA may sell property to redeveloper if desired
Use: During term, redeveloper will use and maintain the plaza
(cleaning, upkeep of landscaping) Section 3.01
- Shall allow free use and enjoyment to the general public with no
restrictions (Section 3.01)
Maintenance and Repair: Redeveloper assumes full and sole
responsibility for the condition, repair and
maintenance (Section 4.01)
Management Provisions for Ramp:
Construction: HRA to construct ramp
Use: Parking ramp only used by affice tenants and guest between 6:00
am and 6:00 pm on every business day (Part II, Section 1.02(a))
- If entire ramp is not utilized, an agreement between the HRA and
redeveloper could be established for use by the general public
between 6:00 am and 6:00 pm.
- HRA could impose parking fees and charges for general public,
but must be agreed upon
- No parking fees initially
Maintenance: Redeveloper assumes full responsibility for all repairs and.
maintenance of structural elements such as: foundation,
walls, parking decks and roof, plumbing, elevators, lighting
and heating systems.
- HRA is responsible in full for pavement markings, bumper
guards, wheel blocks, gates and barricades, premises in
clean condition, removal of snow and ice, minor repairs to
plumbing, lighting and heating, signs
Payment: HRA to subcontract maintenance work
- Redeveloper shall pay directly to such party as they come
due, any and all costs incurred by the Agency pursuant to
such subcontract.
Option to Purchase: Term of agreement = 20 years
- Redeveloper may renew agreement in l0-year
increments up to 40 years.
- Redeveloper has option to purchase only if renewed
up to 40 years
October 26, 1982 "Agreement Between The Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City of Columbia Heights and Gay
Realty, Inc. for the Operation of the Parking Ramp"
- HRA enters into agreement with Gay Realty, Inc. for maintenance
of ramp
- 5-year agreement, expiring 9/20/1987
June 27, 1988 "Assignment for Management Agreement for Parking Facilities
and Lease of the Plaza Property"
- Terry Evenson assigned responsibilities to Zaidan Holdings, Inc.
June 30, 1988 "Agreement Between the City of Columbia Heights and Zaidan
Holdings, Inc. for the Operation of the Parking Ramp"
Recitals: State that the Authority's (HRA) interest has been assigned to the City.
(No official Assignment Agreement found in the file between the HRA
and the City)
- Agreement between City and Zaidan for the performance of the City's entire
obligation for the operation and maintenance of the parking ramp.
- All responsibility far maintenance shifted to Zaidan Holdings, Inc. (Section
2.4)
Teens: 6/20/1988 to 6/30/1993 (5 yrs.)
Hours: 6:00 am to 6:00 pm M-F
Rates: None established
November 7, 1990 "Agreement far Modification of Management Agreement for
Parking Facilities"
Term: Duration ol'inanagement agreement and ramp operation agreement
Use of Ramp: Zaidan. shall maintain 40% of tlae stalls for short-team. use by
members of the general. public
- Short-term. use by public will be available for periods not to exceed
4 hours.
- Zaidan shall determine number and location of stalls for use of
tenants, et al. and monthly permit holders.
February I1, 1991 "Agreement for Modification of Management Agreement for
Parking Facilities"
Use: Zaidan shall supply 40°% of parking to general public on short-teizn basis
not to exceed 4 hours
- Zaidan shall maintain 60% of stalls for long-term, monthly permit parl~ing.
November 23, 1994 "Amended and Restated Assessment Agreement (City of
Columbia JFleights Office Center}
Original Assessment Agreement: September 27, 1984
Minimum Marl~et Value: $4,800,000
Amendment: Minimum Market Value adjusted to $1,630,800 for ad valorem tax
pufposes, as of January 2, 1995
March 10, 1995 "Purchase Agreement"
Purchase agreement for property from Zaidan to Gordan Awsumb
July 10, 2000 "Parking Certificate"
Bank loan established. No amendments to agreement may be made without the
authorization of the bank
Mayor:
I TY O F (~ C} L U B I HEIGHTS Gary I. Peterson
Councilmembers:
Bruce Naw~rocki
590 40th Avenue N.E. , Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (763) 706-36U0 TDD (763) 706-3692 Bobby Williams
Visit Our Web.rite nt: rrww~.ci.coll~n76ia-hei,~hts.n2n.us Tammera Diehm
Bruce Kelzenberg
City Manager:
Walter R. Fehst
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: July 30, 2008
TO: Mayor and City Council Members - fi
FROM: Sheila Cartney, Assistant Community Development Director ~U'-',
RE: Northeast Bank facade improvements
In March. 2008, the Northeast Bank Building, located at 3989 Central was sold to
Stadium Village Properties (SVP), LLC. Since then, SVP has made numerous
improvements to the site including cleaning of the parking ramp, re-facing and hiring
security. Repairs have also been made to the Plaza that has ranged in a cost of
$350,000.00.
SVP would like to "re-skin" the Northeast Bank Building, which would be a much
needed facade improvement. The estimated. cost to re-skin the entire building is
$500,000.00. SVP is requesting financial assistance from the City of Columbia Heights
for this project. SVP has also expressed interest in owning "The Plaza" which is
currently owned by the City. Their proposal is to purchase "The Plaza" from the City
for $250,000.00 and the City will provide a like amount to SVP for re-skinning the
building. SVP will be at the workshop to discuss this proposal.
THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR 'rNE PROVISION OF SF_RVICF_S
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Stadium Village Properties L.L.C.
1313 Fifth Street S.E. • Minneapolis, MN 55414 ° (612) 379-3800
July 16, 2008
Scott Clark
Community Development Director
City of Columbia Heights
590 49`" Avenue NE
Columbia Heights, MN. 55421
Dear Scott:
We are writing to propose a significant improvement to the Columbia Heights Central Business
District. Apparently everyone at City Hall has noticed the stained panels and the added ugly tape
joints when passing our building; it would be hard to miss. In a meeting at your offices prior to
the closing a City representative asked me if a new skin was part of the $1.2M being spent on
repairs and upgrades around the property. As you know it was not an item SVP was considering
with the other largely structural improvements that were necessary. The cost of the new skin is
approximately $500,000.
It is a fact of real estate that improving the appearance of the most obvious landmark building in
the area enhances the entire CBD and will encourage a better grade of development in the
surrounding properties. SVP wants to make this improvement; but needs some consideration
from the community to off set the huge expense. To that end Doug Walker asked you in a
previous meeting if there were any programs or grants that could provide financial assistance for
the re-skinning project. Unfortunately there were not. This brings me to the second part of this
proposal.
As you are also aware SVP would like to purchase "The Plaza" from the City. The Plaza. is the
second floor open air deck azea attached to the building and the driveway underneath it that is
being used as the bank drive-up. SVP is in the process of making considerable repairs to the
Plaza at a cost of around $350,000. These repairs are the result of deferred maintenance and
improper storage of snow by previous Owners of the building.
Attaching the Plaza parcel to the building makes sense from a financial standpoint by adding
value to the property. From a practical standpoint it alleviates concerns expressed by our Lender;
1) we are currently making substantial improvements to the Plaza and will continue to maintain
property we do not own and in fact it can be sold by the City to a third parry, and 2) it is a
permanent structure akeady attached to the building that is also being used by nearly every
tenant in the building.
Our proposition is that SVP will purchase the Plaza from the City at some agreed to
price -say 50% of the cost of adding the new skin, so approximately $250,000, The City
would in turn provide a like amount of financial assistance to SVP that will allow us to
install the new skin. The assistance would be in the form of a grant or some other vehicle
which would not require the money to be paid back to the City. It must also be in
immediate cash to avoid further complicating our need to raise $500,000. We are not
asking for tax relief on the Plaza and a modest tax coming back to the City after the sale
should further the attractiveness of our proposal.
If this concept is workable we will need to move forward as quickly as possible to
complete the work this fall. It makes sense to get the new shinny aluminum skin on the
building as soon as possible and freshen up the appearance of 40`" and Central. Doug
Walker will handle all the coordination forme. Please call him at 612-379-3800 with any
questions.
Yours truly,
Stadium Village Properties, LLC
avid P J per, President
Mayor:
Gary L. }'etcrson
C'ouncilmembers:
Bobby Williams
"1'ammera Diehm
Bruce Kelzenberg
Bruce Nawrocki
City Manager:
Walter R. Fehst
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: August 4, 2008
TO: Columbia Heights City Council, Mayor Peterson
hROiv1: .ieti Sargent, City Planner
RE: LED Signage and Dynamic Signage
INTRODUCTION
City staff has proceeded with the creation of an ordinance regulating the use of Dynamic LED
Signage throughout the city. The proposed ordinance was created in an effort to both stimulate
and promote the economic vitality of the city, while ensuring that the signage is not obtrusive,
distractive or incompatible with the overall character of the commercial districts throughout the
city.
The attached information will. be submitted to the Planning Commission. on August 6, 2008 for
their review. In summary, the proposed ordinance accomplishes the following:
Allows for Dynamic LED signage ill all zoning districts with a Conditional Use Permit.
Only religious and education institutions may utilize dynamic LED signage in
residentially zoned districts.
2. Prohibits animation, scrolling, flashing, and blinking and videos on dynamic LED signs.
Messages may change no more frequently that once every ] 0 minutes in commercially or
industrially zoned districts, and no more than once every 30 minutes in residentially zoned
district.
4. Dynamic LED signs may only be used in conjunction with a monument sign.
CITY OE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PLANNING REPORT
CASE NUMBER: 200$-0802
DATE: August 6, 2008
TO: Columbia Heights Planning Commission
APPLICANT: City of Columbia Heights
LOCATION: City Wide
REQUEST: Zoning Amendment for LED Signage
PREPARED BY: Jeff Sargent, City Planner
INTRODUCTION
On multiple occasions, business owners wishing to incorporate LED and dynamic signage
to promote their business have approached the City asking for permission to incorporate
this type of signage into their building. The current Sign Code and Design Guidelines
specifically prohibit the use of variable electronic message signs, and a code amendment
would be required before these businesses could be allowed to use this signage.
Much research on dynamic signage has been done, as many other cities have recently
amended their ordinance to regulate electronic signs throughout their respective cities.
The following report includes the City of Columbia Heights' standards regarding dynamic
signage, the different types of dynamic signs available.
At this time, staff recommends amending the sign code in order to address and control
LED and dynamic signage, in an effort to both stimulate and promote the economic vitality
of the city, while ensuring that the signage is not obtrusive, distractive or incompatible with
the overall character of the commercial districts throughout the city.
WHAT IS LED SIGNAGE AND DYNAMIC SIGNAGE?
"LED" stands for Light Emitting Diode, and is the industry-standard way of describing a
changeable electronic sign. Per a study conducted by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. for the
City of Minnetonka, a definition of Dynamic Signage was given as:
Any characteristics of a sign that appear to have movement or that appear
to change, caused by any method other than physically removing and
replacing the sign or its components, whether the apparent movement or
City of Columbia Heights Planning Commission August 6, 2008
City of Columbia Heights, LED Signage Case # 2008-0802
change is in the display, the sign structure itself, or any other component
of the sign.
This includes a display that incorporates a technology or method allowing the sign face to
change the image without having to physically or mechanically replace the sign face or its
components. This also includes any rotating, revolving, moving, flashing, blinking, or
animated display and any display that incorporates rotating panels, LED lights manipulated
through digital input, "digital ink" or any other method or technology that allows the sign
face to present a series of images or displays.
Examples of such signage include Electronic Changeable Copy signs, Electronic Graphic
Display signs, Video Display signs, and Time and Temperature signs. Figure 1 is an
example of some proposed sign standards used by the City of Bloomington, and shows the
difference between the above-listed signs.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
One of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan is to preserve and enhance the existing viable
commercial areas within the community, and to promote reinvestment in properties by the
commercial and industrial sectors. Allowing dynamic signage is a way to enhance
economic vitality by giving the commercial owners a mechanism to advertise their business
in an efficient and aesthetic manner.
ZONING ORDINANCE
Section 9.106 (P)(6)(e - f), Prohibited Signs, lists "an animated or rotating sign, except
barber pales and signs displaying time and temperature information only in the animated or
rotating portion thereof" and "a flashing sign, including indoor flashing, electronic signs
visible from the public right-of-way, other than time and temperature signs limited to such
time and temperature information", as specifically prohibited in the City of Columbia
Heights.
The Design Guidelines state, "Variable electronic message signs are not permitted, with
the exception of existing time/temperature signs".
The zoning code and Design Guidelines would have to be amended to help regulate the
use of dynamic signage throughout the city.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Section 9.104 (F) of the Columbia Heights zoning code requires that the City Council make
each of the following four findings before approving a zoning amendment:
The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
One of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan is to preserve and enhance the
Page 2
City of Columbia Heights Planning Commission August 6, 2008
City of Columbia Heights, LED Signage Case # 2008-0802
existing viable commercia! areas within the community, and to promote
reinvestment in properties by the commercial and industrial sectors. Allowing
dynamic signage is a way to enhance economic vitality by giving the commercial
owners a mechanism to advertise their business in an efficient and aesthetic
manner.
2. The amendment is in the public interest and is not solely for the benefit of a
single property owner.
The proposed amendment would affect all business owners throughout the city
and not solely for the benefit of a single property owner.
3. Where the amendment is to change the zoning classification of a particular
property, theme existing use of the ~property,.}and the zoning classification of
propel ty vritl iin the general area of ti ie pr opal Cy in question ar e vompatibin ~,~f;th
the proposed zoning classification.
The amendment would not change the zoning classification of a particular property.
4. Where the amendment is to change the zoning classification of a particular
property, there has been a change in the character or trend of development in
the general area of the property in question, which has taken place since such
property was placed in the current zoning classification.
The amendment would not change the zoning classification of a particular property.
RECOMMENDATION
If the City Council chooses to allow all or certain types of dynamic signs, Staff recommends
that regulations be imposed on such signage.
Recommended Regulations Include:
• Allowing such signs only in the CBD, GB, MXD, and PO Districts.
• Allowing high schools and religious institutions the use of such signs, regardless
of the zoning district they are located in.
• Prohibiting motion, animation and video electronic signs.
• Restricting the time duration of message changing to no less than once every 10
minutes in non-residential zones and no less than once 30 minutes in residential
zones.
• Allowing electronic signs only as a component of a monument sign.
• Limiting the electronic signs to occupy no more than 50% of a monument sign.
• Requiring an automatic dimmer control.
• Requiring electronic signs to be no less than 35 feet from other electronic signs.
Page 3
City of Columbia Heights Planning Commission August 6, 2008
City of Columbia Heights, LED Signage Case # 2008-0802
If the City Council chooses to prohibit electronic and dynamic signs, Staff recommends that
the current City Code be amended in order to clarify that these types of signs are indeed
prohibited. A definition of electronic and/or dynamic sign should be added to the Code with
specific references made to them in the text. However, staff also recommends that gas
station price signs be exempt, and electronic signs may be allowed to display gas prices
only, with no limitation to the number of times during the day in which the price may be
changed.
Motion: That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the
proposed zoning amendment.
Attachments
• l,raft Zon;ng nrrNlinan~n"
• Figure 1
Page 4
~~
Type of Sign Electronic Changeable Copy
Moving pictures, with or without text
--- -r-------
Eitctronic Graphic Display Video Display Time and Temperature
~,
Description Text only, no pictures
Districts Not in Bluff Protection
(BP)
Orientation Must not be visible from residential if within
150 feet
Static pictures, with or without text
Not in residential, SC or BP
Must not be visible from residential
if within 150 feet
Not in residential, SC or BP
~''~r~~r°icnro ~f Fr~o~a~ased Sign Standards
Time and temperature
information only
Not in residential, SC or BP
Must not be visible from residential or any No limit
motored way (public streets, drive aisles, etc.)
Minimum
Duration 8seconds innon-residential, l hour in
residential 20 minutes No limit 2 seconds
Color Amber in residential No limit No limit No limit
Text Limits 10 words No limit No limit No limit
Brightness No limit 5000 nitsl500 nits 5000 nitsl500 nits No limit
Dimmer Control Not required Required Required Not required
Setbacks Sign edge must be 100 feet from an abutting
residential district. 35 feet from other
electronic changeable copy signs Sign edge must be 100 feet from an
abutting residential district. 35 feet
from other electronic changeable
co si ns Sign edge must be 100 feet from an abutting
residential district. 35 feet from other
electronic changeable copy signs No limit
Audio or Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed Not allowed
Report to the City Council October 9, 2006
Division of City Planning
.~
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
I3EING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1490, CITY CODE OF
2005 RELATING TO LED, DYNAMIC, AND OTHER SIGNAGE WITHIN THE CITY
OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
The City of Columbia Heights does ordain:
Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9.103 of the Columbia Heights City Code, is proposed to
include the following additions and deletions:
§ 9.103 DEFINITIONS.
For the p>>rpose of this a,-riciP, tl,P I'niin~xl~ng defn2t:ons sl.all atrpl}j unless the ConteXt
clearly indicates or requires a different meaning.
SIGN, DYNAMIC LED. Any characteristics of a sign that appear to have
movement or that appear to change, caused by any method other than physically
removing and replacing the sign or its components. This includes a display that
incorporates a technology or method allowing the sign face to change the image
without having to physically or mechanically replace the sign face or its
components. This also includes any moving, flashing, blinking, or animated display
and any display that incorporates LED lights manipulated through digital input,
"digital ink" or any other method or technology that allows the sign face to present
a series of images or displays.
SIGN, ELECTRIC. A sign that uses electrical wiring on, in or near such sign to
effect m°~~°~°r* .,~a~°w illumination,
SIGN, VARIABLE ELECTRONIC MESSAGE. A dynamic LED sign that
changes its message more frequently than once every ten (10) minutes for
commercial and industrial properties located in the LB, GB, CBD, I-1 and I-2
zoning districts and a dynamic LED sign that changes its message more frequently
than once every thirty (30) minutes for religious and/or educational institutions
located in the R-1, R-2A, R-2B, R-3, R-4 and LB zoning districts.
Chapter 9, Article T, Section 9.106 (P)(6) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is proposed
to include the following additions and deletions:
§ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign s°e~tslatioi~s.
(6) Pr°vd~ibited Signs. Signs that are not specifically permitted. in this division
are hereby prohibited. in all districts Lmless criteria is presented to allow the Plamling
Commission to deem that the sign, design preserves and maintains the community's
tuzique historical and cultural elemezits. Without restricting or limiting the generality of
the provisions of the foregoing, the following signs are specifically prohibited:
(a-p} [SECTIONS TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(q) Variable electronic message signs.
Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9.106 (P) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is proposed to
include the following additions and deletions:
S 9~1 Oh f F.NEu Ai , iIEyEL(IPNiEriT c•rA;~rDAuDc.
(P) Sign r~egarlc~tions.
(8) Dy~zanzic LED signage.
(a) Regulations. Dynamic LED signage is allowed as a conditional use
in those zoning districts specified in this code. All dynamic LED signage is subject
to the following conditions:
1. Dynamic LED signs are allowed only on monument signs for
conditionally permitted uses in all zoning districts, with the exception of motor fuel
stations, which may display dynamic LED signs as a part of the pylon sign.
Dynamic LED signs may occupy no more than fifty percent (50%) of the actual copy
and graphic area. The remainder of the sign must not have the capability to have
dynamic LED signs, even if not used. Only one, contiguous dynamic display area is
allowed on a sign face.
2. A dynamic LED sign may not change or move more often
than once every ten (10) minutes for commercial or industrial uses, and no more
than once every thirty (30) minutes for religious and/or educational institution uses,
except one for which changes are necessary to correct hour-and-minute, date, or
temperature information.
3. A display of time, date or temperature information may
change as frequently as once every ten (10) seconds, however information displayed
not relating to the date, time or temperature must not change or move more often
than once every ten (10) minutes for commercial or industrial uses, and no more
than once every thirty (30) minutes for religious and/or educational institution uses.
4. The images and messages displayed must be static, and the
transition from one state display to another must be instantaneous without any
special effects. Motion, animation and video images are prohibited on dynamic
LED sign displays.
5. The images and messages displayed must be complete in
themselves, without continuation in content to the next image or message or to any
other sign.
6. Dynamic LED signs must be designed and equipped to freeze
the device in one position if a malfunction shall occur. The displays must also be
equipped with a means to immediately discontinue the display if it malfunctions,
and the sign owner must immediately stop the dynamic display when notified by the
city that it is not complying with the standards of this ordinance.
7. Dynamic LED signs may not exceed a maximum illumination
of 5;000 nits (candelas per square meter; during daylight hours and a lllax~lllulll
illumination of 500 nits (candelas per square meter) between dusk to dawn as
measured from. the sign's face at maximum brightness. Dynamic LED signs must
have an automatic dimmer control to produce a distinct illumination change from a
higher illumination level to a lower level for the time period between one-half hour
before sunset and one half-hour after sunrise.
8. Dynamic LED signs existing on the effective date of this
ordinance must comply with the operational standards listed above. An existing
dynamic LED sign that does not meet the structural requirements may continue as a
non-conforming sign subject to section 9.105 (E).
Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9.106 (P)(8) of the Colombia heights City Code, is proposed
to include the following additions and deletions:
§ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign ~~egulcztions.
{-8-}(9} Szgns in Resic~'e~tial Dzst~°icts K-1, c-r~tl R-2A, and R-2B.
(a) [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(b) Kestr~ictions on permitted sig~~zs. Permitted signs in the R-1, Single-
Family Residential, and R-2A and R-2B, Two-Family Residential Districts are subject to
the following restrictions:
L [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
2. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
3. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
4. [SECTION "TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(c} Conditio~zal Use sighs. In the R-1, R-2A and R-2B Districts, the
followings signs shall require a Conditional Use Permit:
institution.
institution.
1. A Dynamic LED Sign used in conjunction with a religious
2. A Dynamic LED Sign used in conjunction with an educational
(d) Restrictio»s oar Con~litionnl Use Signs. Signs requiring a
Conditional Use Permit in the R-1, Single-Family Residential, and R-2A and R-2B,
Two-Family Residential Districts are subject to the following restrictions:
1. All signage must be approved through the Conditional Use
Permit process as outlined in § 9.1.04 (H) of the zoning code.
2. All signage must meet the requirements far Dynamic LEll signs,
as outlined in section 9.106 (P)(8) of this ordinance.
3. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a frequency of
no less than one (1) message for each thirty (30) minutes of display time.
Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9.106 (P)(9) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is proposed
to include the following additions and deletions:
§ 9.1.06 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign regulations.
(-9}(10) Sighs in Reszcz<ential Districts R-3 c~nc~ R-~.
(a) [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(b) Reslrietio~zs on permitted signs. Permitted signs in the R-3, Limited
Multiple Family Residential, and R-4, Multiple-Family Residential Districts are subject
to the following restrictions:
1. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
2. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
3. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
4. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(c) Conditional Use signs. In the R-3 and R-4 Districts, the followings
signs shall require a Conditional Use Permit:
1. A Dynamic LED Sign used in conjunction with a religious
institution.
2. A Dynamic LED Sign used in conjunction with an educational
institution.
(d) Rcstrictio»s on Co~iditiorzal Use Signs. Signs requiring a
Conditional Use Permit in the R-3, Limited Multiple-Family Residential, and R-4,
Multiple-Family Residential Districts are subject to the following restrictions:
1. All signage must be approved through the Conditional Use
Permit prnePgc ac outlined in ~ 9.104 ~I-Ti~r 6f the ~onirig %fide.
2. All signage must meet the requirements for Dynamic LED signs,
as outlined in section 9.106 (P)(8) of this ordinance.
3. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a frequency of
no less than one (1) message for each thirty (30) minutes of display time.
Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9.106 (P)(10) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is
proposed to include the following additions and deletions:
§ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) .Sign regulations.
(~8-)(11) Signs in LB, Lin~iteci Bz~siness Dish^ict.
(a) [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(b) Restrictiof~s on ~erniitted sigr~is. Permitted signs in the LB, Limited
Business District, are subject to the following restrictions:
1. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
2. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
3. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(c) Co~iditioizal Use sigizs. In the LB District, the followings signs shall
require a Conditional Use Permit:
1. A Dynamic LED Sign used in conjunction with a commercial
business.
institution.
institution.
2. A Dynamic LED Sign used in conjunction with a religious
3. A Dynamic LED Sign used in conjunction with an educational
(d) Restrictio~~s orz Conditional Ilse Signs. Signs requiring a
Conditional Use Permit in the LB, Limited Business District, are subject to the
following restrictions:
1. All signage must be approved through the Conditional Use
Permit process as outlined in § 9.104 (H) of the zoning code.
2. All signage must meet the requirements for Dynamic LED signs,
as n~itlir~e~l in cPetion 9.106 (P)(S) of this ordinance.
3. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a frequency of
no Less than one (1) message for each ten (10) minutes of display time for
commercial businesses.
4. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a frequency of
no less than one (1) message for each thirty (30) minutes of display time for religious
or educational institutions.
Chapter 9, Article I, Section. 9.106 (P)(11) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is
proposed to include the following additions and deletions:
§ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P} Szgn regulcztzvrzs.
{-El-}(12} Signs in C'BD, C'entr~al Bus•ir~ess Dzstr•ict.
(a) Permitted signs. In the CBD, Central Business District, the following
signs shall be permitted:
1. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
f ~ ,
~2.
in ¢,,,,+ rn+r,.,,,~, ,,,,,~,,,,+ ~.,, n+ One monument sign not to exceed 40 square feet in
size, limited to two sides, not to exceed $ feet in height, and set a minimum of 5 feet fTOm
any property line.
4.3. Any p~k~~=r-er monument sign must be a minimum of five feet from
any building or structure on the same lot.
~-:4. One wall sign on each side of the building that faces a public alley,
not to exceed tnZtr sq~2are feet per c>>rfaeP ar~rl limited to nne s„rfar~e r~er cigp,
g:-5. One area identification sign for each shopping center not to exceed
100 square feet per surface, and limited to four surfaces; one wall sign for each primary
use business, not to exceed 100 square feet per surface and limited to one surface.
?6. One identification sign for each user other than the primary use,
not to exceed two square feet per surface, and limited to one surface.
;~9. One wall sign per building with an are of the lesser of 20 square
feet or '/2 square foot for each front foot of a building or structure provided that the said
sign is located on the same side of the building as an entrance approved by the City
Building Official as a public entrance and provided that the said public entrance and sign
faces a parking facility designated by the city as approved public parking.
(b) Restrictions orz permitted sig~zs. Permitted signs in the CBD, Central
Business District are subject to the following restrictions:
[SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
2. ,
gre The maximum height of a monument sign, including its structures, shall not
exceed 8 feet above grade at street level or at the base of the sign, whichever is greater.
[SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(c) Coi~iditior~al Use signs. In the CBD District, the followings signs
shall require a Conditional Use Permit:
1. Dynamic LED signage.
(d) Restrictions o/a Co//ditio//al Use Signs. Signs requiring a
Conditional Use Permit in the CBD, Central Business District, are subject to the
following restrictions:
1. All signage must be approved through the Conditional Use
Permit process as outlined in § 9.104 (H) of the zoning code.
2. All signage must meet the requirements for llynamic LED signs,
as outlined in section 9.106 (P)(S) of this ordinance.
3. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a frequency of
no less than one (1) message for each ten (10) minutes of display time.
r'hapter 9, Artir.le I, CPrtinn 9,1(10, (Pl(l~) of tl~e ("nl,,;;;hhia I-Ieigl:tg ('it~~ (`Od;, 1g
proposed to include the following additions and deletions:
§ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign r•egulalions.
{~-}(13) Signs in GB, General I3i~si~ess District.
(a) [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(b) Resh°ictio~s o// permitted sig//s. Permitted signs in the GB, General
Business District are subject to the following restrictions:
1. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
2. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
3. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
4. [SECrI'ION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(c) Conditio//al Use signs. In the GB District, the followings signs shall
require a Conditional Use Permit:
1. Dynamic LED signage.
(d) Restrictions o// Conditional Use Sig/ts. Signs requiring a
Conditional Use Permit in the GB, General Business District, are subject to the
following restrictions:
1. All signage must be approved through the Conditional Use
Permit process as outlined in § 9.104 (I-1) of the zoning code.
2. All signage must meet the requirements for Dynamic LED signs,
as outlined in section 9.106 (P)(8) of this ordinance.
3. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a frequency of
no less than one (1) message for each ten (10) minutes of display time.
Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9.106 (P)(13) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is
proposed to inchide the following additions and deletions:
§ 9.1.06 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign ~°ega~lcxtions.
(~-~-1041 .C'iav~U ,irk I_ 1 c;,"2c.~ 7 ~ 1;2c;'~,~~i~•i~~1 ~' l r .
(a) [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(b) Rest~~ictions o~z permitted signs. Permitted signs in the I-1, Light
Industrial District, and the I-2, General Industrial District, are subject to the following
restrictions:
1. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
2. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
3. [SECTION TO REMAIN UNCHANGED]
(c) Coizditiorra/ Use signs. In the I-1 and I-2 Industrial Districts, the
followings signs shall require a Conditional Use Permit:
1. Dynamic LED signage.
(d) Restrictio~zs on Coizditio~zal Use Sig~zs. Signs requiring a
Conditional Use Permit in the I-1, Light Industrial District, and the I-2, General
Industrial District, are subject to the following restrictions:
1. All signage must be approved through the Conditional Use
Permit process as outlined in § 9.104 (H) of the zoning code.
2. All signage must meet the requirements for Dynamic LED signs,
as outlined in section 9.106 (P)(8) of this ordinance.
3. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a frequency of
no less than one (1) message for each ten (1.0) minutes of display time.
Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9.106 (P)(14} of the Columbia Heights City Code, is
proposed to include the following additions and deletions:
§ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P} Sigy~ ~°egulations.
04}(16) Szxns for• ~~onconfor•mi~~g residertlial a~~ses. Sign number and area for
residential uses in commercial, business or industrial zones are limited to the maximum
number and area for the actual use of the subject property.
Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9.106 (P)(15) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is
proposed to include the following additions and deletions:
§ 9.106 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
(P) Sign regi.~lations.
(15} Sigrzs in the PO, Public and Open Sp~rce District.
(a) Permitted Sigrzs. In the PO, Public and Open Space District, the
following signs shall be permitted:
1. Any number of wall signs on any side of a building not to exceed
200 square feet of total surface area for all wall sign surfaces and limited to one
surface per sign. Provided, however, that if a parcel of land on which a building is
located directly abuts a residentially zoned land, no wall sign may be located on the
side of the building that faces the abutting residential parcel.
2. One monument sign per street frontage for those pubic facility
parcels that include governmental offices. Such signs shall not exceed forty (-10)
square feet in area, and shall be located no closer than five (5) feet from any
property line.
3. Any number of freestanding identification signage used to
promote the name of a public city, regional or state park. Such signs shall be no
greater than forty (~0) square feet in area, shall not exceed ten (1.0) feet in height,
and shall be located no closer than five (5) feet from any property line.
(b) Restrictions on permitted sig~rs. Permitted signs in the PO, Public
and Open Space District are subject to the following restrictions:
1. Total signage shall not exceed two square feet for each front foot
of building or structure.
Z. The maximum height of a monument sign shall not exceed eight
(8) feet in height.
3. The sign number and area permitted by this section are
considered maximum. These maximums, or any portion thereof, which are not
utilized by the owner or user of the property are non-transferable to any other
property owned, occupied or used by such persons or to any other owner or user of
property located in the same or other districts.
(c) Co~~zditiotial Use signs. In the PO District, the followings signs shall
require a Conditional Use Permit:
1. A Dynamic LED sign used in conjunction with a governmental
facility.
(d) Restrictioyzs on Conditional Use Signs. Signs requiring a
Conditional Use Permit in PO, Public and Open Space District are subject to the
following restrictions:
1. All signage must be approved through the Conditional Use
Permit process as outlined in § 9.104 (H) of the zoning code.
2. All signage must meet the requirements for Dynamic LED
signs, as outlined in section 9.106 (P)(8) of this ordinance.
3. Dynamic LED Signs may change its message with a frequency
of no less than one (1} message for each thirty (30} minutes of display time.
(~5-}(17) Minimzzrn yaz°d r°equirements.fi~eestanding signs. The minimum front,
side and rear yard requirements for freestanding signs shall be ten feet from any property
line or as otherwise stated in this article. When the bottom edge of the freestanding pylon
sign is eight feet or more above grade, the leading edge of the sign may extend within. one
foot of the property line. Provided, however, no freestanding sign shall invade the area
required for traffic visibility by this division,
Section 2:
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days after its
passage.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Date of Passage:
Offered by:
Seconded by:
Roll Call:
Attest:
2008
2008
1`~layor Cary L. Peterson
Patricia Muscovitz, Deputy City Clerk
~.
CITY COUNCIL LETTER
Meeting af: 8/4/08
AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESSION
NO:
ITEM: EVALUATION OF ~~~ATER TURN OFFS AND
ONS
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGEK
PUBLIC WORKS ~ ~,r'
BY: K. Hansen. BY: ~'r ~.~°
DATE: 7/31 / DATE:
Background: Public Works performs water turn offs and turn ons for various properties upon request and for nonpayment of bills.
This process has traditionally focused on shutting off water service to the house at the curb stop, located near the property line.
Besides nonpayment of bills, property owners may request a shut off for interior plumbing repairs or seasonal use (snowbirds). The
fees for this type of service is minimal at $20.00 when requested and $75.00 for delinquent accounts.
Analysis /Conclusions: In the last two years (or more) staff time has significantly increased relating to water shut offs and ons.
When properties have been foreclosed, closed or are heading to foreclosure, public works time spent has increased. Examples of
additional time include:
• Winterization shutoff and/or turn on, checking inside the house.
• Realtor or bank requests for operability, valve and meter check (multiple) for showing.
• Missed appointments by property holder maintenance companies to turn on/off.
• Emergency shutoffs due to interior broken pipe.
The City's water ordinance stipulates that water meters should be installed or removed by only Public Works staff or licensed
plumbers. When foreclosed properties are winterized, staff often does not know who has removed or reinserted the meter. To
account for increased staff time (Public Works and Finance), I would recommend the following changes to the current fee structure:
1. Add a $50.00 fee for meter disconnect or reconnect.
2. Add a $25.00 fee for a no show to turn on or meter reconmect appointment.
I do recommend any changes to the current fee structure for delinquent accounts or requested (snowbirds).
Recornn:ended Motfion: Establish the following fees for service for water turn ons and turn offs:
1. $50.00 fee for meter disconnect or reconnect.
2. $25.00 fee for a no show to turn on or meter reconnect appointment.
KH:cb
COUNCIL ACTION: