HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 24, 2008OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS
CITY illi' COLU1vIiiIA I~EICsriTS
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MARCH 24, 2008
The following are the minutes for the regular meeting of the City Council held at 7:00 p.m. on Monday,
March 24, 2008 in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 590 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights,
MN. Approved Resolutions and Ordinances may be found at the end of this document.
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL/INVOCATION
Jeremiah Rice, Associate Pastor Youth and Young Adults -Oak Hill Baptist Church gave the
Invocation.
Present: Mayor Peterson, Councilmember Williams, Councilmember Nawrocki, Councilmember
Diehm, Councilmember Kelzenberg
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -recited
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO MEETING AGENDA
Mayor Peterson indicated the following:
• Remove tabled Resolution 2008-47 for 600 515` Avenue in that the property has been brought
into compliance.
• Remove Resolution 2008-60 for 3823 Polk Street NE in that the property has been brought
into compliance.
• Remove Resolution 2008-55 for 971 39`" Avenue NE in that the property has been brought
into compliance.
• Address the Sullivan Shores Public Hearing items immediately following the Consent
Agenda.
Dorothy Penate, Sister Cities' member, is here to speak on their upcoming fund raiser.
Councilmember Nawrocki requested to add: salary adjustments discussed at the last meeting, the
pedestrian bridge at 49`" and Central, and Channel 16. Peterson indicated that the salary
adjustments were addressed at the last meeting.
PROCLAMATIONS, PRESENTATIONS, RECOGNITION, ANNOUNCEMENTS AND
~I1F~'TS
A. Peterson introduced Konrad Zeller, exchange student from Stuttgart, Germany, that is staying
with the Tami Diehm family. Peterson presented Konrad a certificate of welcome. Konrad stated
that "it is nice here and the school is cool." Councilmembers asked Konrad questions about his
visit and his country, which he answered.
Peterson read a news release on the upcoming Sister Cities Young Artist's contest to be held at
Murzyn Hall on April 7`", with the theme of "Reflections of your community".
Dorothy Penate, Sister City Committee, and the Chair of this Fundraiser, indicated that last year
$5,900 was raised for our Sister City, Lomianki Poland, children's hospital. The event will be
held on April 20, from 4:00 to 7:00 p.m. at Murzyn Hall. Penate gave the background of our
Sister City relationship with Lomianki, Poland. The event will be sponsored by Jeffls Bobby and
Steve's Auto World. Penate requested donated items for the silent auction. She also
complimented Councilmembers on moving forward to build a gym and public safety building.
Ciry Council Minutes
~ r__a,... u,r.._..~. ~n ~nno
ivivuuay, iviai~u ~.T, ~~~~
Page 2 of 18
CONSENT AGENDA
Fehst took Councilmembers through the consent agenda.
A. Approve minutes of the March 10 2008 Columbia Hei ht_~ s City Council meeting. -Removed
B. Approve the minutes of the March 14 Special City Council meeting.
Motion to approve the minutes of the March 14, 2008 Special City Council meeting.
C. Establish a City Council Work Session meeting on Monday March 31, 2008 at 7:00 p.m.
Fehst listed the items for discussion: 2008 Water main cleaning and lining; review Watershed
Management Joint Powers Agreement; public safety facility; and the Mayor's compensation,
which has not changed in ZO years.
Motion to establish a City Council Work Session meeting on Monday, March 31, 2008
beginning at 7:00 p.m. in Conference Room 1.
D. Approval of the attached list of rental housing license applications in that they have met the
requirements of the Residential Maintenance Code.
Motion to approve the items listed for rental housing license applications for March 24, 2008.
E. Approve Business License Applications
Nawrocki questioned if the wine and beer license dollar amount was correct at $60. Fehst
indicated that amount is an error. Diehm questioned the number of beer and wine licenses
currently issued.
Diehm requested to remove the Rama Enterprises restaurant beer and wine request.
Motion to approve items as listed on the business license agenda for March 24, 2008, with the
exception of the R ama Enterprises request.
F. Approve payment of the bills.
Motion to approve payment of the bills out of the proper fund as listed in the attached check
register covering Check Number 125104 through Check Number 125281 in the amount of
$1,148,934.74.
Motion by Nawrocki, second by Diehm, to approve the Consent Agenda items with the exception of
item A -March 10 meeting minutes and the beer and wine license for Rama Enterprises. Upon vote: All
ayes. Motion carried.
A. Approve minutes of the March 10 2008 Columbia Heights City Council meeting.
Nawrocki stated that he had requested to have the wage related items be held for discussion at this
meeting. He indicated that the City Manager stated the recommendations were within the parameters set
by the Council. There was only discussion at a work session. He stated that when others attended the
NLC Conference, the meeting was cancelled; he did not request the meeting be cancelled, but have the
one item pulled so he could participate in the discussion. Present salary information was not presented,
comparable information relative to salaries of similar positions in other cities of our size were not given,
information. on adjustments in comparable cities was not given, there was not clarification as to which
City Clerk position was being adjusted, and there was no performance review of the City Manager, He
indicated the action was premature.
City Council Minutes
x ,r__a__. a,r___r_ n~ ~nno
1V1V11Udy, 1V1d1411 G`F, GVVO
Page 3 of 18
Diehm stated the parameters discussed were from an executive session, which is different from a work
session.
Motion by Diehm, second by Williams, to approve the minutes of the March 10, 2008 Columbia
Heights City Council meeting. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried.
A. 2nd Reading: Ordinance 1539, Establishing Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area
Scott Clark, Community Development Director, referred to the establishment of a housing
improvement area, and taxable general obligation bonds (GO) to do rehabilitation work of
$2,785,000. This is continuation. of that process. The second reading of the ordinance sets up the
statutory authority for the City to do a fee resolution to call for the special assessment on the
property. Establishment of the fee resolution sets a maximum at $42,285 per housing unit. The
third action would be the issuance and sale of the bonds.
Clark indicated the process has strict guidelines, which allows residents to question the process.
A summary resolution explaining the process will be sent to all homeowners tomorrow. There
will be a 45 day grace period. If 35 percent of the homeowners petition the City, the action
would be vetoed. Following this would be a 30 day period that individual families can elect to
pre-pay the assessment or a partial payment if it is 25 percent of the minimum. There would then
be a development agreement brought before the City Council. There would be an estimated bond
sale date of June 23rd, with the work beginning on June 24th. Payment to them would be
approximately mid-July. The $2,785,000 is a "not to exceed" number. Clark indicated that Steve
Bubul of Kennedy and Graven and Mark Ruff of Ehlers and Associates were present to answer
any questions.
Nawrocki ask the percent of the residents that signed in support of this project. Scott indicated
that 91 percent signed the petition. Nawrocki asked if there could be a petition to halt this
process. Clark stated that if 35 percent of the housing units petitioned the city within the next 45
day period it would veto the action. Nawrocki questioned the time length of the bond and
interest. Clark stated this is a 15 year bond. Nawrocki referred to construction costs and capital
interest. Clark stated that the $43,000 amount is the beginning amount to be assessed. Whatever
the interest rate is, it will be paid over the life of the bond. Nawrocki stated that unless the
homeowner pays this up front they will pay anore than $42,000. Clark agreed that they will pay
the assessment amount plus interest. Nawrocki stated that this could be $60,000 if not paid until
the end of the 15 years. Clark indicated that the Association has met with their members and
communicated these items. After tonight they will receive a summary of the actions taken.
Dwayne Rosenberg, Vice-Chair of the Sullivan Shores Association, 638 Sullivan Lane, stated
that there have been meetings held, and unit owners realize there is work that needs to be done to
get at the underlying problems. It is understood that when you take a loan, you pay the interest.
This General Obligation bond would give owners a good option to pay for improvements.
Williams thanked the association members for the professional way this has been handled, and
stated his wish that others in the community would come together to preserve their homes.
Peterson agreed, and after seeing the pictures of the water intrusion indicated his understanding
that this needs to be done. The City is happy to work with the owners to solve the problems.
Sullivan Shores is a beautiful place.
Deb Johnson., 4626 Pierce Street, stated her memory of the area as a swamp and questioned if
City Council Minutes
w,r,...a,._. rR......u ~~ ~nno
tvivuuay, iviatvu ~-r, cvv~
Page 4 of 18
that was the problem. Peterson stated the problems are from faulty construction. Johnson asked
why this is the City's business, even though there is no risk to the city. Peterson stated that this
would allow all the units to be fixed up at one time, rather than on an individual basis. Johnson
stated that banks should address allowing groups to do this. Fehst gave the history of a similar
situation in Hopkins. We may have similar requests, so we are concerned that this is handled
properly. Johnson asked if this would show as a liability to the city. Fehst stated that it is not
against our full faith in credit limit of three percent.
Nawrocki indicated that the City will receive $75,000 for administrative costs. We do give
money to the Greater Metropolitan Housing Corp. for community improvements. He reiterated
his concerns about this building before the project began and indicated his sorrow that this has
come to pass. Fehst stated that re-roofing of the units may have been partially the cause. Peterson
indicated the window design used for everyone in that time period was changed, and we can not
accuse any one builder. We have to rectify the problems.
Motion by Williams, second by Kelzenberg, to waive the reading of Ordinance No. 1539, there
being ample copies available to the public. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried.
Motion by Williams, second by Kelzenberg, to Adopt Ordinance No. 1539, an Ordinance
Establishing Sullivan Shores Housing hnprovement Area. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried.
B. Adopt Resolution 2008-62, Housing Improvement Fee for Sullivan Shores Housing
Improvement Area.
Motion by Kelzenberg, second by Williams, to waive the reading of Resolution 2008-62, there
being ample copies available to the public. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried.
Motion by Kelzenberg, second by Williams, to Adopt Resolution 2008-62, being a Resolution
approving a Housing Improvement Fee for Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area. Upon
vote: All ayes. Motion carried.
C. 1st Reading Ordinance No. 1540, Issuance and Sale of Taxable G.O. Housing Improvement Area
Bonds Series 2008A
Motion by Williams, second by Kelzenberg, to close the public hearing and waive the reading of
Ordinance No. 1540, there being ample copies available to the public. Upon vote: All ayes.
Motion carried.
Motion by Williams, second by Kelzenberg, to set a Public Hearing for the second reading of
Ordinance No. 1540 for approximately 7:00 pin on April 28, 2008. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion
carried.
ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
A. Other Ordinances and Resolutions
First Reading of Ordinance 1541, Issuance and Sale ofNon-taxable G.O. Public Safetv Center
Bonds Series 2008B
Fehst stated that Mark Ruff of Ehlers and Associates, our financial consultant and Steve Bubul
of Kennedy and Graven were present to answer questions on the borrowing of funds for the
project on 41S` and Jackson, the old NEI site. Also requested is the award of design plans for the
public safety building to Buetow and Associates and construction manager to EDA and
Associates. Fehst referred to project testimonials of work they both have completed.
City Council Minutes
ivivnuu`y, iviaiiu c~.-^r, ~7,.vvQu
Page 5 of 18
Mark Ruff stated that there is a provision in the City's Charter which allows for a reverse
referendum process. That ability to bring forth a petition would be over on May 17, 2008. It also
states that the bonds must be sold within 60 days of the termination of that period, leaving a
narrow window to plan a project. An option to consider is to sell the bonds in July, with the
understanding that if the bids come in and the bonds are not enough to pay for the facility we
would have to have cash or go through another process later on to sell additional bonds. By July
there will be a better understanding of what the costs would be. He stated that Bubul and staff
has structured the ordinance so there is flexibility on the use of bond proceeds for the facility and
site improvements. The second option would be to sell a bond for a lesser amount, knowing you
would go through the process again for a smaller amount in 2009, allowing for change orders.
The City's Charter is very specific and unusual far date of bond sale limitations. Fehst
questioned if there is no statutory authority that would preempt that, as sometimes the Charter is
out of date. Bubul indicated it is an unusual feature of the Charter to approve bonds by
ordinance. Most charters only require a resolution. It might be worth reconsidering.
Nawrocki stated that he would oppose making the Charter less restrictive, as it is too easy for the
city to accrue debt now. He questioned why the amount is now $11,500, as it previously was
$10,500. It was indicated there could be $600,000 to $700,000 in savings on the architectural
fees. Fehst indicated that the site was purchased for $600,000 and there is a question about
replenishing the economic development money spent on the site. This would only be $400,000
over the architect's estimate. It would be up to the City Council if they wish to replenish the
community development fund. Nawrocki stated that we have already paid this architect a lot of
money for this project. The down turn in construction should allow savings. We should also look
at fiscal agent proposals. Our last change represented a savings. Nawrocki questioned "bank
qualification". Bubul indicated that this is where a city can sell bonds that banks are eligible to
buy, but no more than $10 million in a year. The only way to avoid that would be to split the
project over two years. Nawrocki stated the bond would be for 27 years and the interest more
than doubles the project. Fehst stated that the new facility should last 75 years. Nawrocki
referred to the newspaper article indicating the cost would be $45 a month, which was incorrect
and should have read $45 a year. Fehst stated that the larger bond amount would result in an
additional $10 a year on a $194,000 home.
Williams commended the Mayor and City Manager on the excellent jab they did negotiating
these contracts. Nawrocki stated dissatisfaction that the design architect did not give information
on comparable facilities and only exterior drawings were received. Fehst again indicated that
Buetow and Associates have completed over 140 plans, specs and buildings, primarily police and
fire facilities. The initial contract was for site plans. Nawrocki stated concern about getting the
information out to the public. Peterson indicated that public meetings are part of the proposal.
Bill Roddy, Interim Police Chief, indicated that the architect and construction manager have
solicited input from both departments, are receptive to comments, and want to ensure the
building has the ability to absorb the needs of the future. Everyone is concerned about cost. We,
as employees, are looking for a facility that will be usable now and into the future. The impact on
taxpayers has been everyone's concern. Peterson stated that Roddy is not only a 30 year
employee, but has lived here his whole life and is a taxpayer.
Tim Utz, 556 40th Avenue NE, commented on the liquor store change orders and delayed
completion time, and his pleasure that a construction manager will be used. Be sure to take the
time necessary to have complete plans before the project is bid. Don't cut corners on the project,
City Council Minutes
xT.....t,... x,r,.-,.~. n~ ~nno
LVl VltttG'', 1V1U1411 L~~ GVVU
Page 6 of 18
spend the right amount of money, no matter what it is. Do it right the first time. Allow the new
police chief input in the process. Utz thanked the City Council for building nice facilities. The
new liquor stores spruced up the town. Do it right the first time.
Diehm stated that cost consideration has always been at the forefront. One of the first areas
considered was Heritage Heights, but the cost was prohibitive. It is important to note that cost
has been a serious consideration all through this process. We want to be a good steward of the
citizen's tax money.
Motion by Diehm, second by Williams, to waive the reading of Ordinance 1541 there being
ample copies available to the public. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried.
Motion by Diehin, second by Williams, to schedule April 14, 2008 at approximately 7:00 p.m. in
the City Council Chambers for the second reading of Ordinance 1541, being an ordinance
providing for the issuance and sale of approximately $11,500,000 in General Obligation Public
Safety Center Bonds, Series 2008B. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried.
Nawrocki indicated that at the National League of Cities conference he met with members of
Congress regarding possible Federal funding sources for this project. Energy conservation
legislation was also discussed. Congress members Ellison, Coleman, and Klobuchar may tour
our facility.
B. Bid Considerations -none
C. Other Business
Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a contract with EDS for construction
management services on the proposed Public Safety Facility.
Fehst stated this is a proposal to award the contract to EDS. There where three proposals taken
from EDA, Krause-Anderson, and Bossardt. The offer from EDS was a substantial savings at
$286,960. Fehst listed staff members present at the presentations. Fehst gave the background of
Doc Smith of EDS, which included his work with Adolph-Peterson. EDS project booklets were
distributed for review. Fehst stated that Smith has five independent engineers and the Adolph
Peterson Company to back him, if needed.
Nawrocki asked if the contract is limited to twelve months. Fehst stated that it is not limited, but
if the project is completed in ten months there would be a savings to us.
Doc Smith described the timeline: development about five months, bid period -one month,
breaking ground by October 1, 12 months of construction, and one month for finalization.
Williams questioned breaking ground right before winter. Smith stated that it was important, and
less costly, to place footings before winter. Smith indicated that in the meetings with staff, they
were conscientious of price, to be economical, yet well built.
Peterson indicated that many questions were addressed by Mr. Smith, and he stated his
satisfaction. It would have been best to have a construction manager with other projects.
Motion by Kelzenberg, second by Diehm, to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into
a contract with EDS for construction management services on the proposed Public Safety
City Council Minutes
nT,...a~.. n,r....,.~. ~~ ~nno
~~~~~~uuy, ~.~u...~~ «, ~,,.,~
Page 7 of 18
Facility. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried.
Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a contract for Architectural services for the
proposed Public Safety Facility.
Motion by Kelzenberg, second by Diehm, to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into
a contract with Buetow and Associates for architectural services on the proposed Public Safety
Facility. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried.
Nawrocki requested that the $11,500,000 bond amount be reviewed again. Peterson stated that
process would now begin. We will be proud of this project.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A, B, C -addressed earlier in the meeting.
D. Second reading of Ordinance No. 1536 Zoning Amendment as it Relates to Temporary Si~nage
Clark indicated that the prior ordinance was on a sunset clause. This will memorialize that
ordinance. Nawrocki questioned if there any changes and what the definition of temporary is.
Clark referred to the clarification of four temporary signs per year and that two banners do count
as two temporary signs. A temporary sign can be displayed up to 30 days, not including
sandwich boards. Peterson indicated one board is allowed per business and must be taken in each
evening. Nawrocki asked that the signs at Auto World be reviewed. Nawrocki questioned reality
signs. Jim Hoeft, City Attorney, indicated 9.103 lists the definition. Sandwich board placement
was discussed.
Motion by Kelzenberg, second by Williams, to waive the reading of Ordinance No. 1536, being
ample copies available to the public. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried.
Lotion by Kelzenberg, second by `wiliiarns, to adopt Ordinance No. 1636, being an ordinance
amending Ordinance No. 1490 City Code of 2005, adopting the proposed zoning amendments
outlined in Ordinance 1536. Upon vote: All. ayes. Motion carried.
E. Adopt Resolutions 2008-55 971 39th Avenue N.E. 2008-56 4727 Heights Drive N.E., and
2008-57 4641-4643 Taylor Street N.E. being declarations of nuisance and abatement of
violations within the City of Columbia Heights.
Resolution 2008-55 -Removed
Gary Gorman, Fire Chief, stated that 4727 Heights Drive has a broken picture window, and the
property is vacant and for sale. This was rental property. The broken glass is on the inside of the
window, so abatement may be more difficult.
Gorman stated that 4641-4643 Taylor is for abatement for violations on the stnictures.
Motion by Kelzenberg, second by Williams, to close the public hearing and to waive the reading
of Resolution Numbers 2008-56, and 2008-57 there being ample copies available to the public.
Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried.
Motion by Kelzenberg, second by Williams, to adopt Resolution Numbers 2008-56, and 2008-
57, resolutions of the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights declaring the properties
listed a nuisance and approving the abatement of violations from the property pursuant to City
Code section 8.206. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried.
City Council Minutes
~,r__~__. w,r_.__i_ nn nnno
1V1VlllIQy, 1VlAl l.ll GY, GV VO
Page 8 of 18
F. Adopt Resolutions 2008-58 4618 Polk Street N.E. 2008-59, 1000 Peters Place N.E., 2008-60,
3823 Polk Street N.E. and 2008-61 5045 Johnson Street N.E. being Resolutions of the City
Council of the City of Columbia Hei hg~ts approving rental license revocation for failure to meet
the requirements of the Property Maintenance Codes.
Resolution 2008-60 -Removed.
Garman stated the license revocation for 4618 Polk Street is for failure to submit paper work and
schedule an inspection.
Gorman stated that the license has already been revoked 1000 Peters Place. The windows have
been replaced, but these are items are after that fact. A policy change this year requires a
complete inspection of the building before reinstatement of the license. Hoeft stated this request
is during the transition period of the policy, so it would be best to revoke the license again.
Gorman stated that 5045 Johnson had gone through foreclosure and was redeemed. Residents
were not the owner and were requested to obtain a rental license. We were then told that the
owner also lived on site. Currently, they say they have a contract for deed on the property, which
is not registered with the county. They were informed to record the contract for deed or obtain a
rental license.
Nawrocki stated that 1000 Peters Place has a deteriorating fence on the side of the property.
Motion by Kelzenberg, Diehm, to close the public hearing and to waive the reading of
Resolution Numbers 2008-58, 2008-59, and 2008-61 there being ample copies available to the
public. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried.
Motion by Williams, second by Diehm, to adopt Resolution Numbers 2008-58, 2008-59, and
2008-61 being Resolutions of the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights approving
revocation pursuant to City Code, Chapter SA, Article IV, Section SA.408(A) of the rental
licenses listed. Upon vote: All ayes. Motion carried.
Miscellaneous Additions
Channel 16
Nawrocki indicated that the local cable channel was "stuck" over the weekend and he was unable
to watch or find out when the Council meeting would play. Notices of work sessions should be
placed on cable and on the Internet. Diehm indicated that we could stream the council meeting
on the Internet. Fehst stated that there have been technical difficulties and it is essential that we
update our equipment. With the reduced staff position and aging equipment, there have been
difficulties. Nawrocki indicated that originally meetings were to be posted in ten different
locations.
Peterson stated that if we are falling short of expectations to place city business on our cable
channel, maybe we need to pay more or allow snore hours to be worked. He suggested using
cable fund honey to improve our cable system. Peterson directed staff to work on this. If we
need to hire a professional, we should do so.
Pedestrian bride - 49th and Central
Nawrocki referred to the authorization at the last Council meeting to seeking another grant to pay
for the pedestrian bridge cost. This bridge belongs to MNDot, not to us. It should be up to
City Council Minutes
ivionday, iv`~arch ~4, suu8
Page 9 of 18
MNDot to take care of it. Grants are fine, but where would the rest of the money come from.
Half of the bridge is in Hilltop, and there has been no conversation with them. Will they
participate in 50 percent of the cost? Nawrocki referred to handicap usage and issues at other
intersections. Hoeft indicated that ADA is not defined by the number of times we see people go
across the bridge. Iv~awrocki stated that it was not cleared of snow. Nawrocki questioned if the
pedestrian bridge across University Avenue is also to be replaced. Fehst agreed, that to meet
handicap needs it also should be replaced. Fehst stated that this discussion began with the MN
Design Team. We have spoken to Hilltop representatives and they would contribute to the
replacement. Nawrocki stated that with the current needs of the community, this is not a high
priority. Fehst stated that we have requested all possible funding. If you don't ask, you don't get.
Nawrocki referred to funds received for a parking ramp, and questioned where remaining funds
would come from. Fehst stated that sometimes you need three to four, and for bigger projects up
to seven or eight, sources for funds.
Peterson stated that if we want to make improvements to the pedestrian bridge, we would have to
meet current standards. Hilltop would contribute, but could not contribute 50 percent. We need
to consider the safety of our citizens, and be realistic. Nawrocki requested to see the structural
report from the highway department. Nawrocki stated that if the concern is that someone in a
wheelchair can not get across, he agreed, they can not. We say that they can not use the
intersection there as pedestrians are not allowed; maybe we need to get the same authority to
have that kind of person use the intersection just like they have to use it at any other intersection
along Central Avenue. Nawrocki gave the history of the pedestrian bridge.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
Report of the City Manager
Fehst commended the City Council for moving forward on the Public Safety Building.
Nawrocki
• Email request - 1836 39th Avenue -junk cars in the driveway.
• Property between 47th and 49th on Central -the sidewalk did not get shoveled and there is a
big hole that needs screening.
• 4055 University -there is a TV on the curb. Fehst stated that is in the abatement pracess.
• 4612 Polk -there is a TV in the alley.
• 4600 Polk -there is a water heater adjacent to the alley.
• Behind the liquor store on 50th -there is a truck and car with expired license plates.
Report of the City Attorney -nothing to report
CITIZENS FORUM
Deb Johnson, 4626 Pierce, requested an update on the Comforts of Home project. Nothing is
happening at the site. Fehst indicated this was probably in response to the slow down in the economy.
They are looking for additional partners. Johnson stated that is prime property and she would have
rather seen something else there.
Tim Utz, 456 40th Avenue, stated that he has become involved in politics during the last few months,
and now appreciates the City Council. He has learned how slowly things happen and feels that the
City Council is doing an even better job than he thought before.
COUNCIL CORNER
City Council Minutes
Monday, March 24, 2008
Page 10 of 18
Kelzenberg
• Read an article from the Focus on the Columbia Heights Chess team and their
accomplishments. His son is a member of the team.
Williams
• Appreciates the work the Mayor does for our city and the time he spent doing so.
• Referred to the three incredible police chief candidates and the difficult decision the Mayor
had to make a choice.
• Spring is here -new season -new life -appreciate spring.
• Drive carefully; be aware of children that are out and about.
Diehm
• Thanked the Mayor for the process of hiring the police chief, as he went out of his way to
involve the City Council and staff.
• We realize that not a day goes by that our officers aren't in our City doing important work.
Proud of the City Council for moving forward to build a public safety center.
• Values First for March: Value -integrity, Definition -honesty and sincerity.
Nawrocki
• Requested minutes of the executive session to see the parameters referred to. There was no
vote taken. Diehm stated that decision was made at the last meeting and is irrelevant.
• Referred to the delinquent tax list from Anoka County -there are more tax delinquent
properties in Columbia Heights than ever before
• Referred to his tax increase of 12 + percent on city services. Not saying the public safety
building is not needed, but it would add another five percent for 27 years. We need to give
more consideration to the dollars spent, though we do need services.
• He ~,~rill l,.ave tickets available for the Sister City fundraiser.
• Commended the Mayor for the process of hiring a new police chief, by including the Council
in the interview. You can never please everyone, but he did pick a good person. The process
was commendable.
• If the Manager requested more involvement from the rest of the Council - he would
participate.
Peterson
• Exciting time in Columbia Heights with all of the new construction.
• The new gyro will be fantastic, as would a new public safety facility.
• Don't forget our service men and women. We have now lost 4,000 soldiers.
• Interested in holding a spring clean up.
• Do a random act of kindness.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Peterson adjourned the meeting at 9:46 p.m.
r ~-f
Patricia Muscovitz MC
City Clerk/Council Secretary
City Council Minutes
Monday, lviarch 24, 2008
Page 11 of 18
ORDINANCE NO. 1539
CITY OF COLUMBIA. HEIGHTS AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING
SULLIVAN SHORES HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Columbia Heights as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The City of Columbia Heights ("City") is authorized under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 428A.11 to 428A.21 (the
"Housing Improvement Act"} to establish by ordinance a housing improvement area within which housing improvements are made or
constructed and the costs of the improvements are paid in whole or in part from fees imposed within the area.
1.02. The City has determined a need to establish the Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area as further defined herein,
in order to facilitate certain improvements to property known as the "Sullivan Shares Townhouses," all in accordance with the Housuig
Improvement Act.
1.03. The City has consulted with the Sullivan Shores Townhouses, Inc. (the "Association") and with residents in the
Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area regarding the establishment of such area and the housing improvements to be constructed
and financed under this ordinance.
Section 2. Findings.
2.OI. The Council fords that, in accordance with Section 428A.12 of the Housing Improvement Act, owners of at least 25
percent of the housing units within the Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area have filed a petition with the City Clerk requesting
a public hearing regarding establishment of such housing improvement area.
2.02. The Council has on March 10, 2008 conducted a public hearing, duly noticed in accordance with the Housing
Improvement Act, regarding adoption of this ordinance at which all persons, including owners of property within the Sullivan Shores
Housing Improvement were given an opportunity to be heard.
2.03. The Council fords that, without establishment of the Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area, the Housing
Improvements (as hereinafter defined) could not be made by the townhouse association for, or the housing unit owners in, the Sullivan
Shores Townhouses.
2.04. The Council further finds that designation of the Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area is needed to maintain and
preserve the housing units within such area.
Section 3. Housing Improvement Area Defined.
3.01. The Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area is hereby defined as the area of the City legally described as follows:
Lots 1-65, Block 1, Sullivan Shores, Anoka County, MN
3.02. The Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area contains 65 housing units as of the date of adoption of this ordinance,
along with common area.
Section 4. Housing Improvements Defined.
4.01. For the purposes of this ordinance and the Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area, the term "Housing
Improvements" shall mean the following improvements to housing units, garages, and common areas within the Sullivan Shores
Housing Improvement Area:
• Remove all exterior cladding (including siding, soffits, fascia and trim boards), roofing materials and damaged roof
decking.
• Framing repairs, including replacement of deteriorated sheathing, wall studs and damaged framing members.
• Replace window flashing.
• Remove and re-install windows.
• Install new siding, soffits and fascia.
• Install new shingle roof and related ventilation.
• Install new gutters and downspouts at points of entry, entry doors, garage doors and rear entries at decks and patios.
• Miscellaneous mechanical repairs related to above work.
4.02. Housing Improvements shall also be deemed to include:
(a) all costs of architectural and engineering services in connection with the activities described in Section 4.01;
(b) all administration, legal and consultant costs in connection with the Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area; and
City Council Minutes
~s__~__. wR___t. ~n nnno
1~'1VllLLQy, 1~1Q11:11 G`t, LVVO
Page 12 of 18
(c) costs of issuance of bonds to fmance Housing Improvements under the Housing Improvement Act, subject to the
terms of Section 5.04 hereof.
Section S. Housin~Improvement Fee.
S.O1. The City may, by resolution adopted in accordance with the petition, hearing and notice procedures required under the
Housing Improvement Act, impose a fee on the housing units within the Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area, at a rate, term or
amount sufficient to produce revenues required to provide the Housing Improvements (hereinafter referred to as the '°Housing
Improvement Fee"), subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Section.
5.02. Any Housing Improvement Fee shall be imposed on the basis of the total cost of the Housing Improvements to be
fmanced by the Housing Improvement Fee, divided by .the number of housing units in the Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area
as of the date of any fee resolution.
5.03. The Housing Improvement Fee shall be imposed and payable for a period no greater than 1S years after the fast
installment is due and payable.
5.04. Any Housing Improvement Fee shall be prepayable in full or in part by housing unit owners within 30 days after the
effective date of the resolution setting the Housing Improvement Fee, provided that if only a portion is prepaid, the prepayment amount
must be at least 25 percent of the total fee for that unit. After such 30-day period the Housing Improvement Fee (or unpaid portion
thereof) shall not be prepayable.
S.OS. The resolution imposing the Housing Improvement Fee may provide that any fee not prepaid by the housing unit owner
shall be deemed to include interest on unpaid Housing Improvements costs at a rate that will produce total fee revenue collected from
all units in the Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area in an amount that equals l OS percent of the debt service payable each year
on the bonds to be issued under Section 6 hereof.
5.06. The Housing Improvement Fee shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment
and collection of ad valorem taxes, in accordance with Section 428A.15 of the Housing Improvement Act and Minnesota Statutes,
Section 428A.05. As set forth in Section 428A. 14, subd. 2 of the Housing Improvement Act, the Housing Improvement Fee is not
included in the calculation of levies or limits on levies imposed under any law or charter.
5.07. The Housing Improvement Fee shall not exceed the amount specified in the notice of public hearing regarding the
approval of such fee; provided, however, that the Housing Improvement Fee may be reduced after approval of the resolution setting
file Housing Improvement Fee, in the manner specified in such resolution.
Section 6. Issuance of Bonds.
6.01. At any time after a contract with the Association for construction of all or part of the Housing Improvements has been
entered into or the work has been ordered, and the 30-day period for prepayment of the Housing Improvement Fee has expired as
described ul Section 5.04 hereof, the Council may issue bonds in the principal amount necessary to fmance the cost of the Housing
Improvements that have not been prepaid together with costs of issuance of the bonds. Such bonds shall be issued pursuant to and in
accordance with Section 428A.16 of the Housing Improvement Act.
Section 7. Annual Reports.
7.01. On August 15, 2008 and each August 15 thereafter until there are no longer any outstanding bonds (including
refunding bonds) issued under the Housing Improvement Act in connection with the Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area, the
Association (and any successor in interest) shall submit to the City Clerk Treasurer a copy of the Association's audited fmancial
statements.
7.02. The Association (and any successor in interest) shall also submit to the City any other reports or information at the
times and as required by any contract entered into between that entity and the City.
Section 8. Notice of Right to File Objections.
8.01. Within five days after the adoption of this ordinance, the City Clerk Treasurer is authorized and directed to mail to the
owner of each housing unit in the Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area: a summary of this ordinance; notice that owners
subject to the proposed Housing Improvement Fee have a right to veto this ordinance if owners of at least 35 percent of the housing
units within the Sullivan Shores Housing Improvement Area file an objection with the City Clerk before the effective date of this
ordinance; and notice that a copy of this ordinance is on file with the City Clerk for public inspection.
Section 9. Amendment.
City Council Minutes
Iv%onday, iviarch 24, 2008
Page 13 of 18
9.01. This ordinance may be amended by the Council upon compliance with the public hearing and notice requirements set
forth in Section 428A.13 of the Housing Improvement Act.
Section 10. Effective Date.
10.1. This ordinance shall be effective 45 days after adoption hereof, or 30 days after the date of publication of this
ordinance, whichever is later.
RESOLUTION N0.2008-62
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
APPROVING A HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FEE FOR SULLIVAN SHORES HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The City of Columbia Heights ("City") is authorized under Minnesota Statutes, Section 428A.11 to 428A.21 (the
"Housing Improvement Act") to establish by ordinance a housing improvement area within which housing improvements are made or
constructed and the costs of the improvements are paid in whole or in part from fees imposed within the area.
1.02. By Ordinance No. 1539 adopted March 24, 2008 (the "Enabling Ordinance"), the Council established the Sullivan
Shores Housing Improvement Area (the "Housing Improvement Area") in order to facilitate certain improvements to property known
as the "Sullivan Shores Townhouses," all in accordance with the Housing Improvement Act.
1.03. In accordance with Section 428A.12 of the Housing Improvement Act, owners of at least 25 percent of the housing
units within the Housing Improvement Area have filed a petition with the City Clerk-Treasurer requesting a public hearing regarding
imposition of a housing improvement fee for the Housing Improvement Area.
1.04. The Council has on March 24, 2008 conducted a public hearing, duly noticed in accordance with the Housing
Improvement Act, regarding adoption of this resolution at which all persons, including owners of property within the Housing
Improvement Area, were given an opportunity to be heard.
1.05. Prior to the date hereof, Sullivan Shores Townhouses Association, Inc. (the "Association"} has submitted to the City a
financial plan prepared by Gassen Companies, an independent third party, acceptable to the City and the Association, that provides for
the Association to finance maintenance and operation of the common elements in the Sullivan Shores
Townhouses and along-range plan to conduci and fmance capital improvements therein, all in accordance whiz Section 428A.i4 of the
Housing Improvement Act.
1.06. For the purposes of this Resolution, the terms "Housing Improvement Area" and "Housing Improvements" have the
meanings provided ui the Enabling Ordinance.
Section 2. Housin Improvement Fee Imposed.
2.01. The City hereby imposes a fee on each housing unit within the Housing Improvement Area (the "Housing
Improvement Fee"), as specified in Exhibit A attached hereto, which Housing Improvement Fee is imposed on the basis of the total
cost of the Housing Improvements to be financed by the Housing Improvement Fee divided by the number of housing units in Housing
Improvement Area as of the date of this Resolution.
2.02. The owner of any housing unit against which the Housing Improvement Fee is imposed may, at any time within 30
days after the effective date of this Resolution, pay all or a portion of the total Housing Improvement Fee imposed against such
housing unit as specified in Exhibit A hereto to the City Treasurer, without interest thereon; provided that if only a portion is prepaid
the prepayment amount must be at least 25% of the total fee for that unit. Any Housing Improvement Fee (or a portion thereof) not
prepaid in accordance with this Section shall be payable soieiy in accordance with Section 2.03 hereof.
2.03. If not prepaid in accordance with Section 2.02 hereof, the Housing Improvement Fee (or unpaid portion thereof) shall
be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable in calendar year
2009, which annual payment shall be deemed to include interest on unpaid Housing Improvement Fee accruing from June 1, 2008 at
an annual interest rate that will produce total fee revenue collected from all units in the Housing lmprovement Area in an amount that
equals (a) 105 percent of the debt service payable each year on bonds to be issued by the City issued to fmance the Housing
Improvements (the "Bonds") in accordance with the Enabling Ordinance and the Housing Improvement Act; plus (b) $5,000 annually
to compensate the City for administrative costs of the Housing Improvement Area. Upon issuance of the Bonds, the City Clerk-
Treasurer shall cause to be prepared a schedule indicating the annual payment for each housing unit for which the Housing
Improvement Fee has not been prepaid, which schedule shall be attached as Exhibit B to this Resolution in the City's official records.
City Council Minutes
::~Ionday,l:?arch 24, 2008
Page 14 of 1$
2.04. The Housing Improvement Fee, unless prepaid in accordance with Section 2.02 hereof, shall be payable at the same
time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes, as provided in Sections 428A.14 and
428A.15 of the Housing Improvement Act.
2.05. The Housing Improvement Fee unposed against each housing unit shall not exceed the amount specified in Exhibit A
hereto; provided, however, that the Housing Improvement Fee may be reduced at any time before issuance of the Bonds, which
reduction shall be applied pro rata to each housing unit's Housing Improvement Fee on the basis described in Section 2.01 hereof; and
further provided that if any housing unit owners have prepaid the Housing Improvement Fee prior to any reduction in that fee, the City
shall promptly reimburse such housing unit owner in the amount of the pro rata share of any reduction in the fee amount. Upon any
reduction in the Housing Improvement Fee, the City Clerk-Treasurer shall cause to be prepared a revised copy of Exhibit A hereto,
which shall be attached to this Resolution in the City's official records and shall be promptly mailed to all housing unit owners within
the Housing Improvement Area. Within 30 days after issuance of the Bonds the City Clerk-Treasurer shall mail to each housing unit
owner a copy of Exhibit B to this Resolution showing the final annual fee imposed against each housing unit for which the Housing
Improvement Fee has not been prepaid.
Section 3. Notice of Right to File Objections.
3.01. Within five days after the adoption of this Resolution, the City Clerk-Treasurer is authorized and directed to mail to the
owner of each housing unit in the Housing Improvement Area a summary of this Resolution; notice that owners subject to the Housing
Improvement Fee have a right to veto this Resolution if owners of at least 35 percent of the housing units within the Housing
Improvement Area file an objection with the City Clerk-Treasurer before the effective date of this Resolution; and notice that a copy of
this ordinance is on file with the City Clerk-Treasurer for public inspection.
Section 4. Effective Date.
4.01. This Resolution shall be effective 45 days after adoption hereof.
Section 5. Filing of HousinS~rovement Fee.
5.01. Within 30 days after issuance of the Bonds, but it no event later than November 15, 2008, the City Clerk-Treasurer
shall file a certified copy of this resolution together with a final update of Exhibits A and B hereto to the Anoka County Auditor to be
recorded on the property tax lists of the county.
ORDINANCE NO. 1.536
BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1490, CITY CODE OF 2005 RELATING TO THE USE OF
TEMPORARY SIGNAGE IN THE BUSINESS DISTRICTS IN THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
The City of Columbia Heights does ordain: Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9.103 of the Columbia Heights City Code, is thereby
amended to read as follows:
§ 9.103 DEFINITIONS.
For the purpose of this article, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different
meaning.
SIGN, SANDWICH BOARD. A freestanding "A" frame sign, not requiring staking to the ground, placed near the
entrance of a retail store to direct pedestrians to that business.
Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9.106(P)(6) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is amended to read:
(6) Pr•ohibite~l Signs. Signs that are not specifically permitted in this division are hereby prohibited in all districts
unless criteria is presented to allow the Planning Commission to deem that the sign design preserves and maintains the
community's unique historical and cultural elements. Without restricting or limiting the generality of the provisions of the
foregoing, the following signs are specifically prohibited:
(a) A balcony sign and a sign mounted or supported on a balcony.
(b) Any sign that obstructs and part of a doorway or fire escape.
(c) Any sign which, because of its position, movement, shape, illumination or color constitutes a traffic
hazard because it obstructs free and clear vision, or interrupts, confuses or misleads traffic.
(d) A private sign containing words or symbols, which might reasonably be constnied as traffic controls.
(e) An animated or rotating sign, except barber poles and signs displaying time and temperature
information only in the animated or rotating portion thereof.
City Council Minutes
Ivionday, iviarch 24, 2008
Page 15 of 18
(f) A flashing sign, including indoor flashing, electrical signs visible from the public right-of--way, other
than time and temperature signs limited to such time and temperature information.
(g} A sign or graphics painted directly on any exterior surface of a building or structure. However, sign
letters and symbols maybe attached directly to an exterior surface by adhesive or mechanical means.
(h} Any roof sign, unless attached to mansard roof or similar decorative style roof that is vertical in nature.
(i) A projecting sign which either extends more than 18 inches fi°om the building or structure to which it is
attached, or which is larger than three feet in vertical height, other than canopy or marquee signs.
(j} Any sign that does not display the name of the manufacturer or maker permanently attached to, or
painted or printed on, the exterior or structural supports of the sign.
(k) Any sign that is erected, placed or maintained by any person on a rock, fence or trees.
(1) Any sign that interferes with any electric light, or power, telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph
wires, or the supports thereof.
(m) Any sign containing electrical wiring which does not conform to the Electrical Code or the
components thereof do not bear label of an approved testing agency.
(n) Any window sign or signs which exceed 25% of the total area of the window on or in which it is
displayed.
(o) Portable signage, excluding sandwich board signs.
(p) Temporary signage stuck into the ground, excluding political signs regulated per state statute,
professional real estate signs, garage sales signs, and any signs listed in Section 9.106 (P)(5).
Chapter 9, Article I, Section 9.106(P)(7) of the Columbia Heights City Code, is amended to read:
(7) Temporary Signs. The following standards shall apply to temporary signs in all zoning districts:
(a) Each temporary sign, with the exception of sandwich board signs, shall require a sign permit from the City of
Columbia Heights.
(b) No more than four (4) temporary sign permits may be issued per business per calendar year.
(c) No more than two (2) temporary signs shall be displayed per business at any given time. When two temporary signs
are displayed, each sign shall require a permit and each sign will count towards the allotment of temporary signage
permitted per business per calendar year. If the business is located within a shopping center, no more than four (4)
temporary signs maybe displayed throughout the shopping center at any given time.
(d) Any sign not considered permanent shall be considered temporary.
(e) Temporary signage may not be used as permanent wall signage for the business.
(f) Temporary signs or pennants shall not exceed 32 square feet in area for businesses located in the CBD, Central
Business District, and shall not exceed 4$ square feet in area throughout the remainder of the City and shah be
directly and fully attached to the wall of the building.
(g) Each temporary sign shall be limited to a 30-day display period per permit.
(h) No temporary signs shall extend over or into any street, alley, sidewallc or other public thoroughfare, and may not
cover more than 25% of window area such that 75% of the total window area is kept clear at all times.
(i) No temporary sign shall be erected so as to prevent free ingress to or egress from any door, window or fire escape,
nor shall such sign be attached to any standpipe or fire escape.
(j) Unauthorized use of temporary signage shall be subject to the other sanctions as provided herein.
(k} Sandwich Board Signs.
(1) Permitted in the LB, Limited Business, GB, General Business, and CBD, Central Business District
only.
(2) One (1) sandwich board sign is permitted per business.
(3) Sandwich board signs are limited to eight (8) square feet in area per side.
(4) Sandwich board signs are limited to five (5) feet in height.
(5) The sign shall be professionally painted and maintained in a neat and readable manner.
(6) Signs shall be placed on private property only, and shall be setback at least five (5) feet from all
property lines.
(7) Signs shall not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian traffic or visibility and shall not create a safety hazard.
(8) Signs shall not be lighted and shall not utilize noise amplifiers.
(9) In the CBD, Central Business District only, sandwich board signs may be placed on public sidewalks,
directly in front of the business being advertised.
Section 2: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after 30 days after its passage.
RESOLUTION 2008-56
City Council Minutes
,r___~___ ~,r_.__t ne nnnn
1V1VtltlQ.y, 1V1Gt1 Gll G`t. GVVO
Page 16 of 18
Resolution of the City Council for the City of Columbia Heights declaring the property a nuisance and approving abatement of
ordinance violations pursuant to Chapter 8, Article II, of City Code, of the property owned by Bradley Ross (Hereinafter "Owner
of Record").
Whereas, the owner of record is the legal owner of the real property located at 4727 Heights Drive N.E. Columbia Heights,
Minnesota.
And whereas, pursuant to Columbia Heights Code, Chapter 8, Article II, Section 8.206, written notice setting forth the causes and
reasons for the proposed council action contained herein was sent via regular mail to the owner of record on March 5, 2008
Now, therefore, in accordance with the foregoing, and all ordinances and regulations of the City of Columbia Heights, the City
Council of the City of Columbia Heights makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That on January 29, 2008 an inspection was conducted on the property listed above. Inspectors found one violation. A
compliance order was sent via regular mail to the owner at the address.
2. That on March 5, 2008 inspectors re-inspected the property listed above. Inspectors noted that one violation remained
uncorrected. A compliance order and statement of cause was mailed via regular mail to the owner listed in the property
records.
3. That on March 14, 2008 inspectors reinspected the property and found that one violation remained uncorrected.
4. That based upon said records of the Fire Department, the following conditions and violations of City Codes(s) were
found to exist, to wit: Shall repair the broken picture window
5. That all parties, including the owner of record and any occupants or tenants, have been given the appropriate notice of
this hearing according to the provisions of the City Code Section 8.206(A) and 8.206(B).
CONCLUSIONS OF COUNCIL
1. That the property located at 4727 Heights Drive N.E. is in violation of the provisions of the Columbia Heights City Code
as set forth in the Notice of Abatement.
2. That all relevant parties and parties in interest have been duly served notice of this hearing, and any other hearings
relevant to the abatement of violations on the property listed above.
3. That all applicable rights and periods of appeal as relating to the owner of record, occupant, or tenant, as the case may
be, have expired, or such rights have been exercised and completed.
ORDER OF COUNCIL
1. The property located at 472 7 Heights Drive N.E. constitutes a nuisance pursuant to City Code.
2. That a copy of this order shall be served upon all relevant parties and parties in interest.
RE50LUTION 2008-57
Resolution of the City Council for the City of Columbia Heights declaring the property a nuisance and approving abatement of
ordinance violations pursuant to Chapter 8, Article II, of City Code, of the properly owned by Lasalle $ank National Assocciation
(Hereinafter "Owner of Record").
Whereas, the owner of record is the legal owner of the real property located at 4641-4643 Taylor Street N.E. Columbia Heights,
Minnesota.
And whereas, pursuant to Columbia Heights Code, Chapter 8, Article II, Section 8.206, written notice setting forth the causes and
reasons for the proposed council action contained herein was sent via regular mail to the owner of record on March 6, 2008
Now, therefore, in accordance with the foregoing, and all ordinances and regulations of the City of Columbia Heights, the City
Council of the City of Columbia Heights makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That on January 28, 2008 an inspection was conducted on the property listed above. Inspectors found four violations. A
compliance order was sent via regular mail to the owner at the address.
2. That on March 6, 2008 inspectors re-inspected the property listed above. Inspectors noted that four violations remained
uncorrected. A compliance order and statement of cause was mailed via regular mail to the owner listed in the property
records.
3. That on March 12, 2008 inspectors reinspected the property and found that four violations remained uncorrected.
4. That based upon said records of the Fire Department, the following conditions and violations of City Codes(s) were
found to exist, to wit: 4643 -Shall repair or replace the damaged side storm, shall scrape/paint overhead garage doors,
4643 -Shall replace the broken glass in the front door, 4643 -Shall replace or repair the damaged front storm door.
City Council Minutes
Ma„day, ;march 24, 2008
Page 17 of 18
5. That all parties, including the owner of record and any occupants or tenants, have been given the appropriate notice of
this hearing according to the provisions of the City Code Section 8.206(A) and 8.206(B).
CONCLUSIONS OF COUNCIL
1. That the property located at 4641-4643 Taylor Street N.E. is in violation of the provisions of the Columbia Heights City
Code as set forth in the Notice of Abatement.
2. That all relevant parties and parties in interest have been duly served notice of this hearing, and any other hearings
relevant to the abatement of violations on the property listed above.
3. That all applicable rights and periods of appeal as relating to the owner of record, occupant, or tenant, as the case may
be, have expired, or such rights have been exercised and completed.
ORDER OF COUNCIL
1. The property located at 4641-4643 Taylor Street N.E. constitutes a nuisance pursuant to City Code.
2. That a copy of this order shall be served upon all relevant parties and parties in interest.
RESOLUTION 2008-58
Resolution of the City Council for the City of Columbia Heights approving revocation pursuant to City Code, Chapter SA, Article
IV, Section 5A.408(A) of that certain residential rental license held by Craig Young (Hereinafter "License Holder").
Whereas, license holder is the legal owner of the real property located at 4618 Polk Street N.E., Columbia Heights, Minnesota,
Whereas, pursuant to City Code, Chapter SA, Article IV, Section SA.408(B), written notice setting forth the causes and reasons
for the proposed Council action contained herein was given to the License Holder on March 6, 2008 of an public hearing to be
held on March 25, 2008.
Now, therefore, in accordance with the foregoing, and all ordinances and regulations of the City of Columbia Heights, the City
Council of the City of Columbia Heights makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That on January 15, 2008 inspection office staff sent a letter requesting the owner of the property to renew the rental
license for this property. The letter was mailed by regular mail to the owner at the address listed in the property records.
2. That on March 6, 2008 inspection office staff reviewed the property file and noted that the property remained unlicensed.
A Statement of Cause was mailed by regular mail to the owner at the address listed in the property records.
3. That based upon said records of the Enforcement Office, the following conditions and violations of the City's Residential
Maintenance Code were found to exist, to-wit: Failure to schedule a rental property inspection, failure to submit re-
licensing paperwork.
4. That all parties, includuig the License Holder and any occupants or tenants, have been given the appropriate notice of
this hearing according to the provisions of the City Code, Chapter SA, Article III SA.306 and SA.303(A).
ORDER OF COUNCIL
1. The rental license belonging to the License Holder described herein and identified by license number FR215 is hereby
revoked;
2. The City will post for the purpose of preventing occupancy a copy of this order on the buildings covered by the license
held by License Holder;
3. All tenants shall remove themselves from the premises within 60 days from the first day of posting of this Order
revoking the license as held by License Holder.
RESOLUTION 2008-59
Resolution of the City Council for the City of Columbia Heights approving revocation pursuant to City Code, Chapter SA, Article
IV, Section SA.408(A) of that certain residential rental license held by Peters Place Place, LLC (Hereinafter "License Holder").
Whereas, license holder is the legal owner of the real property located at 1000 Peters Place N.E., Columbia Heights, Minnesota,
Whereas, pursuant to City Code, Chapter SA, Article IV, Section SA.408(B), written notice setting forth the causes and reasons
for the proposed Council action contained herein was given to the License Holder on March 5, 2008 of an public hearing to be
held on March 25, 2008.
Now, therefore, in accordance with the foregoing, and all ordinances and regulations of the City of Columbia Heights, the City
Council of the City of Columbia Heights makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That on January 29, 2008 inspectors for the City of Columbia Heights, inspected the property described above and noted
two violations. A compliance letter listing the violations was mailed by regular mail to the owner at the address listed on
the Rental Housing License Application.
City Council Minutes
i:'Icnda~~ ~:'Iarch 2n Anna
y> >
Page 18 of 18
2. That on March 5, 2008, inspectors for the City of Columbia Heights, performed a final inspection at the property and
noted two violations remained uncorrected from the initial license inspection. A statement of cause was mailed via
regular mail to the owner at the address Listed on the rental housing license application.
3. That on March 14, 2008 inspectors for the City of Columbia Heights performed a reinspection and noted that two
violations remained uncorrected.
4. That based upon said records of the Enforcement Office, the following conditions and violations of the City's Residential
Maintenance Code were found to exist, to-wit: Shall paint the repaired part of the railing, shall remove the multiple tree
stumps, below ground level, on the south side of the property.
5. That all parties, including the License Holder and any occupants or tenants, have been given the appropriate notice of
this hearing according to the provisions of the City Code, Chapter SA, Article III SA.306 and SA.303(A}.
ORDER OF COUNCIL
1. The rental license belonging to the License Holder described herein and identified by license number F8435 is hereby
revoked.
2. The City will post for the purpose of preventing occupancy a copy of this order on the buildings covered by the license
held by License Holder.
3. All tenants shall remove themselves from the premises within 60 days from the first day of pasting of this Order
revoking the license as held by License Holder.
RESOLUTION 2008-61
Resolution of the City Council for the City of Columbia Heights approving revocation pursuant to City Code, Chapter SA, Article
IV, Section SA.408(A) of that certain residential rental license held by James J. Dalkaf (Hereinafter "License Holder").
Whereas, license holder is the legal owner of the real property located at 5045 Johnson Street N.E., Columbia Heights, Minnesota,
Whereas, pursuant to City Code, Chapter SA, Article IV, Section SA.408(B), written notice setting forth the causes and reasons
for the proposed Council action contained herein was given to the License Holder on February 28, 2008 of an public hearing to be
held on March 25, 2008.
Now, therefore, in accordance with the foregoing, and all ordinances and regulations of the City of Columbia Heights, the City
Council of the City of Columbia Heights makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That on February ] 1, 2008 inspection office staff sent a letter requesting the new owner of the property to license the
rental property. The Ietter was mailed by regular mail tc the cwner at the address listed in the property reccrds.
2. That on February 28, 2008 inspection office staff reviewed the property file and noted that the property remained
unlicensed. A Statement of Cause was mailed by regular mail to the owner at the address listed in the property records.
3. That based upon said records of the Enforcement Office, the following conditions and violations of the City's Residential
Maintenance Code were found to exist, to-wit: Failure to submit a rental license application, failure to schedule a rental
license inspection.
4. That all parties, including the License Holder and any occupants or tenants, have been given the appropriate notice of
this hearing according to the provisions of the City Code, Chapter SA, Article III SA.306 and SA.303(A).
ORDER OF COUNCIL
1. The rental license belonging to the License Holder described herein and identified by license number U5045 is hereby
revoked;
2. The City will post for the purpose of preventing occupancy a copy of this order on the buildings covered by the license
held by License Holder;
3. All tenants shall remove themselves from the premises within 60 days from the first day of posting of this Order
revoking the license as held by License Holder.