Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrected Apr. 22, 1975-g6- April 22, 1975 Official Proceedings Special Meeting Hearing on Street Improvements April 22, 1975 The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. Roll Call - Logacz, Heintz, Land, and Nawrocki -present. It was pointed out that Councilman Norberg had been called out of town and would not be present at the meeting. Motion by Heintz, Second by Land to appoint Vicki Maternowsky Secretary Pro-Tem for the meeting. Ro11 Call - All Ayes Mayor Nawrocki began the meeting by discussing what the purpose of the meet- ing was and stating what the order of business for the meeting would be. First, the Engineering Department would discuss the plans for this work. Following that, the floor would be open for general questions regarding the Engineering Departmentfs presentation. After that, each proposed project would be taken individually for discussion in the order that they appeared on the agenda. After all of the projects were heard, then the City Council would make their decision on whether or not td make the necessary improve- ments for the streets and alleys. Mayor Nawrocki pointed out that there were quite a few petitions brought in, and these would be handled during the discussion of .each individual project. Mayor Nawrocki also asked that any questions and comments be confined to the specific project under considera- tion. After the hearing, should the people have any questions or comments on other matters, the Council would stay to answer them. Approximately 125 residents were present at the hearing. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REPORT Clayton Berg from the Engineering Department was present to give an overall presentation on the proposed projects. He started out by showing a slide of the City on which the various projects for this year were pointed out. The next slide showed the proposed state aid and unpaved street improvements for the next four years, thereby pointing out to the people that these improve- ments are part of a five year construction plan, and that their streets and alleys are not the only ones being considered for improvement. Mr. Berg then went on to show slides of a typical street cross section, a typical curb and driveway, typical surfacing of a new street, a typical alley section, a typical city block, and typical estimated costs, respectively. He pointed out that the street right-of-way is normally 60 feet although it can vary and that the proposed curb width would be 33 feet. The type of I curb proposed is a B618, known as a barrier curb, which has a vertical face and is 6~inches high. Driveways will be provided by cutting 4 inches off the curb thereby leaving a Z inch lip. Also, the materials used in replacing the _9~_ April 22, 1975 driveway will be the same. as what originally existed. The proposed bitu- minous surfacing for the street includes a 3 inch base followed by a paver laid binder course which is 12 inches. Before the 12 inch wearing course is laid, which is the last step, all utilities are adjusted and any bad spots are repaired. A typical alley normally has a 14 foot right-of-way, but because of the cost involved and the difficulty in construction, the Engineering Department is recommending a 10 foot concrete .alley. This work will also include the necessary driveway repairs to ensure proper access. The purpose for the concrete alleys is to ensure proper drainage. Mr. Berg pointed out that the estimated costs for the street surfacing are $12.00 per front foot and $4.00 per avenue foot. The estimated cost for the alley paving is $9.00 per front foot. Mr. Berg stated that bids were taken on the approved construction projects,and that they looked very favorable. Therefore, this will probably result in lower prices from what was estimated. Following the presentation, the floor was opened for questions on the work proposed and the method of assessment. QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION One gentleman wanted to know about the method of assessing. Mr. Watson pointed out. that assessments are spread over a period of time. On these projects, a five year assessment is proposed at 8% interest. Mayor Nawrocki asked about the restoration work. Mr. Berg stated that it is up to the people to decide at this hearing whether or not they wanb. to place the sod themselves or have it contracted. Should they want it contracted, the estimated cost for sodding would be $1.00 per assessable foot. He pointed out that sodding can be done much better and at a cheaper cost if individuals do it themselves. One gentleman asked if the people paying for street charges would also have to pay for avenue charges. Mr. Berg explained the method of assessing to him. The gentleman from. 604 38th Avenue wanted to know when the sod was going to be put back in around the hydrant that was removed. It was explained to him that this is apart of maintenance and will be taken care of this summer. Another gentleman asked if the street was an avenue. Mayor Nawrocki explained that it was not and that in order to avoid any confusion, it may be better to call the avenue a side street. A gentleman asked if the total amount of the project would be assessed. He pointed out that Minneapolis used federal funds to pay for part of a street project. The Mayor stated that it all will be assessed since the City does not have access to any federal money for this project. One gentleman wanted to know why the vertical curb was being put in. Mr. Berg explained that this is the type of curb that is recommended by the Highway Department. He also stated that the vertical curb will keep cars April 22, 1975 _qg_ off the boulevard and will help maintain drainage for any nominal rainstorm. Another gentleman questioned the breakage of the curb. Mr. Berg stated that it would be very hard for this type of curb to break sincb. there is 8 inches of concrete there. One gentleman wondered if putting in a storm sewer and paving the alley would result in a lot of debris and sand going into the storm sewer. Mr. Watson pointed out that there already is a large amount of debris going into the storm drain from the alley. By putting in a concrete alley, the amount of debris and sand will be far less compared to what there is now. Another gentleman wanted to know if the alleys would be paved 10 feet wide instead of 12, and also how they arrived at an estimate of $9.00. Mr. Berg explained to him that normally the alley R.O.W. is 14 feet wide,.so.'~:therefore,l2 foot paving is recommended. Due to the cost and difficulty in construction, they are recommending 10 foot paving. He pointed out that the. 10 foot alley will serve as good of a purpose as the 12 foot and will also cost less. The $9.00 per assessable foot is simply an estimate based on a 12 foot alley, so a 10 foot alley will be less. Following these discussions, each street and alley, as proposed, was discussed separately. 39th Avenue, Main Street to 2nd Street Mr. Berg explained the current conditions of this street. Mr. Thomas, 3906 2nd Street, felt that the City does a poor job maintaining the street. If the City would only maintain the street better then it would not be necessary to have the street paved. He stated that he would like to have a good street, but he wonders if the cost warrants the construction. Therefore, he is opposed to the construction. Mr. Meyer, 3909 Main Street, agreed with Mr. Thomas. He felt that the cost is too expensive. Mr. Bixler, 3855 Main Street, stated that it is a short street with little traffic, and is therefore against the construction. Mr. Hagen, 3852 2nd Street, and Mr. Englund, 3837 Main Street, were opposed to the construction. Mr. Shaw, 3849 Main Street, opposed the project because he felt that it was too expensive, and he doesn't think the people can afford it now. Mr. Nelson, 3836 2nd Street., agreed with Mr. Shaw. He felt that it is too much money for the use they will get out of it. Mrs. Wachter, 3848 2nd Street, agreed with the others. Summit Street, 5th Street to 40th Avenue Mr. Anderson, 510 Summit, was opposed to the proposed construction. -99- April 22, 1975 Mr. Ley, 522 Summit, stated he would like to see the work done and also some sidewalks put in. One gentleman wanted to know how this street would be assessed since there are houses on only one side of the street. Malcolm Watson, City Manager, explained the procedure to him. 2nd Street, 42nd Avenue to 43rd .Avenue Mayor Nawrocki stated that a petition with nine signatures was received. The petition was signed in opposition to the proposed curb and gutter and surfacing. Motion by Heintz, Second by Logacz that the petition be placed on file. Roll Call - All Ayes. Mr. Wicklacz, 4233 2nd Street, stated that when he b.xoug~t the petition around, he noticed very little erosion on the yards, and he felt that curb and gutter would not improve the situation. A gentleman from 4305 2nd Street and Mr. Fay, 4253 2nd Street, felt that the work should be done since there is evidence of water running onto their property. Mr. Misik, 4301 2nd Street, is not directly involved, yet he feels that some- ` thing. should be done sinue he gets dirt, glass and water on his property. ~ 3rd Street, 44th Avenue to 45th Avenue Mayor Nawrocki stated that a petition with 14 signatures was received. The petition was signed in opposition to the proposed project. Motion by Heintz, Second by Logacz that the petition be placed on file. Roll Call - All Ayes. Mr. Rude, 4411 3rd Street, is opposed to the project. He felt that it is a nice street with just a couple of small holes. Mr. Pierson, 4416 3rd Street, is opposed to the project because he felt that he could not afford it. Tyler Place, 44th Avenue to 45th Avenue Mr. Berg stated that the hearing was being considered because the street is extremely rough and is a constant maintenance problem. He also stated that this was not being considered because of the new post office, but because of the street conditions. Mayor Nawrocki stated that a petition with 13 signatures was received opposing the equity of the assessments. Motion by Logacz, Second by Land that the petition be placed on file. Roll Call - All Ayes. April 22z 1975 -100- Mr. Eckenroth, 1101 4412 Avenue, objected to the equity of the assessment. Since Midas Muffler and the Car Wash use Tyler Place for their commercial endeavor, he felt that these properties should be assessed a street frontage rate instead of Avenue rate as proposed. Mr. Ward, 965 442 Avenue, was not opposed to the assessment itself nor the proposed improvements, but he did object to the equity of the assessment. He wanted to thank the Engineering Department for the informal session they had prior- to the hearing. He felt that this opened up abetter rapport between the City and the people, and that this type of thing should be done in the future. Mr. Larson, 1016 442 Avenue, agreed with the-other two gentlemen, and he does want the curb and gutter to go through. He pointed out that some of the properties on 442 Avenue front on 45th Avenue and therefore will prob- ably be assessed for the work on 442• He felt that since the Car Wash and Midas Muffler front on both Central Avenue and Tyler Place, they too should be assessed. at full rate. This is simply a matter of principle and fairness. Mayor Nawrocki suggested that the attorney look into the possibility of assessing the properties along Tyler Place differently, yet he felt that there may be a problem in legally justifying this action. Hayes Street, 37th Avenue to 39th Avenue Mayor Nawrocki stated that a petition with 25 properties opposing the con- struction was received. Motion by Heintz, Second by Land that the petition be placed on file. Roll Ca11 - All Ayes Mayor Nawrocki also stated a letter was received from Mr. Urspringer opposing the construction. The letter is a copy of the one he sent on April 14, 1972. Mayor Nawrocki asked that this letter be placed with the petition. Mr. Berg explained the current conditions of this street. Mr. Anderson, 3728 Hayes, stated that the people can't afford it at this time. Mr. Birch, 1703 37th Avenue, and Mr. Olson, 1625 37th Avenue, were opposed to the proposed project. Mr. Chow, 3801 Hayes, wanted to know what will be done about the sewer back- ups he has every year. Mayor Nawrocki asked the Engineering Department if they were aware of this problem. Mr. Berg reported that the sewer is out of line and has sags in it. This was not reported because it was felt that it is a part of maintenance and not something that is to be assese.ed to the people. Mayor Nawrocki asked that the Engineering Department send a letter within the next month to Mr. Chow regarding this problem. Also, a copy of that letter and a copy of the report sent to Mr. Watson by Donald Jolly, Sewer and Water Superintendent, be sent to members of the Council. Mayor Nawrocki assured the people that this street would be restored to the same condition it was in before the work started. A hearing was held in 1974 authorizing the reworking of this street, but it was not done, just maintained. April 22, 1975 Mr. Urspringer, 3719 Hayes, was opposed to the proposed project. He felt that it had a gentle grade, no water problems existed, and there are very few chuckholes. Mrs. Ashford, 3813 Hayes, wanted to know what they proposed to do with the present banks. Mr. Berg explained what would be done. She was opposed to the project at this time since they just had an assessment for storm sewer. 7th Street, 44th Avenue to 45th Avenue -101- Mr. Cerny, 4440 7th Street, wanted to know where the sewer was put in. Mr. Berg explained this to him. Mr. Burback, 4436 7th Street, felt that it is a good street with just a few holes. He wanted to know how the street was going to be leveled. Mr. Berg explained what was going to be done. Mr. Burback also commented on the poor job that is done maintaining the street. Mr. Birch, 1703 37th Avenue, felt they should leave well enough alone. One gentleman stated that before the sewer was put in the street was fine, and since the sewer installation the street has not been level. 41st Avenue, Central Avenue to LaBelle Park Mayor Nawrocki stated that a letter was received from Mrs. Bertha Buckley, 957 41st Avenue, opposing this type of construction costing $12.00 per front foot. Mr. Berg explained the current condition of the street and that instead of total reconstruction they are proposing to overlay the street. Mr. O'Donnell, 971 41st Avenue, stated that after the City made the water main repairs, they did not put the street back in the same condition as it was before. D4r. Bolling., 1002 41st Avenue, felt that the City did a poor job of replac- ing the street after the water main repairs. It is a short, dead end street and is in good shape. He believed that the construction of the street is simply for the purpose of beautifying LaBelle Park. Therefore, he felt that the people on the street shouldn't have to pay for it. Mr. Ritzko, 1000 41st Avenue, agreed with the other two gentlemen. George Brown, City Engineer, stated that without the overlay, the street will not stand up much longer than a couple of years. Malcolm Watson stated that this street does not have much base. In order for the street to really hold up, they are proposing to do the type of thing that was done on Gould Avenue; and that is an overlay that will give a good, smooth surface and one that will preserve the surface. Mayor Nawrocki pointed out that it's not that the street is in bad shape now, but that it is basically in decent shape. Unless there is some preventive maintenance done to the street, it will get bad and deteriorate to the point -102- April 22, 1975 where the overlay will do no good. hurts the street. 1 Weather, above anything else, is what ALLEY University Avenue to 4th Street, 52nd Avenue to 53rd Avenue Mayor Nawrocki stated that a letter was received from Mr. John Miller in support of the project. Also, a petition of 12 signatures in opposition to the work was received. Motion by Heintz, Second by Logacz that the petition be placed on file. Roll Call - A11 Ayes Mr. Hoch, 5218 4th Street, was opposed to the project. He stated that the reason this alley hasn't held up is because trucks use that alley to go to the liquor store and meat market. He asked if semis were allowed to travel in the alleys. Mr. Watson said they were no t, and that this matter would be looked into. Mr. Hoch also felt that if they are going to be assessed for this work, he wished they would build a public toilet at the liquor store because of all the filth that goes on there. ALLEY Main Street to Znd Street, 44th Avenue to 45th Avenue Mayor Nawrocki stated that a petition with 15 signatures opposing the pro- ject was received. Motion by Land, Second by Heintz that the petition be placed on file. Roll Call - A11 Ayes Mr. Hentges wondered why the eight foot drop in the alley between 44th and 45th Avenue could not be built up. Mr. Berg pointed out that a number of garages would be buried, and that it would involve a lot of yard work for the people on the east side. Mr. Hadden, 4441 Main Street, asked why an easement could not be put between the two properties that have a low spot. Mr. Berg atated that it is feasible, but connections would have to be made into the main line. Mr. Stewart, 4420 2nd Street, thinks that there is a desperate need for a new alley, preferably a concrete one. However, he felt that the sewer is out of line and should be put someplace else, Mr. Freund, 4408 2nd Street, was greatly opposed to the construction. He stated many reasons for his opposition, including the problems of putting concrete in. Mr. Gause, 4416 2nd Street, would like to see the alley go in, but he is not in favor of the storm sewer. ALLEY 37th Avenue to 38th Avenue, Madison Place to Cargill Mayor Nawrocki stated that a petition with 13 signatures opposing the pro- posed construction, but wishing to have the alley properly maintained was received. -103- April 22, 1975 Motion by Land, Second by Heintz that the petition be placed on file. Roll Call - All Ayes Mayor Nawrocki also stated that a letter with no signatures was received from some residents who were in favor of the project. Mr. Kolodzienski, 601 37th Avenue, commented on how blacktop had been laid and in the spring they graded it up. Mr. Berg reported that the alley was probably being reworked. Mr. Kusler, 604 38th Avenue, stated he would like to have more ~.no~: truck signs placed on 38th Avenue and that these signs point out the truck routes. Also, on the west side of 38th Avenue in front of Cargill there is a bunch of junk and barrels which makes it hard for cars to get through. Mr. Watson said that these matters would be checked into. Mr. Perry, 588 38th Avenue, is opposed to the project because very few people use the alley. Mr. Grech, 584 38th Avenue, was very much opposed to paving the alley since there are only about ten cars in the alley per day. Mr. Nalezny, 609 37th Avenue, agreed with Mr. Gerch and further stated that it is not an average alley because it is a dead end alley. One gentleman wanted to know if sometime in the future the Council would simply say you have to have it no matter how many people are opposed to it. Mayor Nawrocki replied that it was possible. ALLEY Reservoir Boulevard to Tyler Street, 39th Avenue to 40th Avenue Mr. Berg explained the current conditions of this alley. Mrs. Briclzman, 3932 Tyler Street, was in favor of the project for she felt that it would be a great improvement. Mrs. Dahlstrom, 3970 Tyler Street, had been waiting for 25 years for this alley to be paved. Councilman Logacz, 3951 Reservoir Boulevard would very much like to see this alley paved even though he doesn't use the alley. Mr. Bolstad, 3941 Reservoir Boulevard, was also in favor of the project. Mrs. Hazen, 3906 Tyler Street, was opposed to the project. Mr. Olson, 3942 Tyler Street, thought the alley should be fixed since it is in bad shape. Mr. Morin, 3916 Tyler Street, and Mr. Stuhr, 3922 Tyler Street, were in favor of the project. Mr. Terbay, 3905 Reservoir Boulevard, wanted the alley paved as soon as possible. -104- April 22, 1975 Following the discussion of each project, each Councilman spoke at length on their views of the proposed projects. Councilman Land believed that the people opposing the projects had valid and sincere reasons on an individual basis, yet he didn't happen to believe in these arguments. He felt that it takes a good street and a good alley to make a good piece of property. Basically what has to be decided is whether or not all of Columbia Heights will benefit from this work. Since many people have already paid for a good street and/or alley, he would like to see others do the same thing since there is a definite need for improvements on these streets and alleys. Councilman Logacz stated he was very sympathetic with the problems the people are facing now. He gave an example of how his parents had to pay for things that did not directly benefit them, yet it benefited many other people. He cited that even though he does not use the alley where he lives, he felt .that if other people will benefit from it he would be more than happy to help them achieve what they are trying to do. Paying for this work within five years rather than all at one time is a good idea. Councilman Heintz concurred with what Councilman Land stated. He felt that the beautification of the City has been long overdue. These improvements should be continued until all streets have curb and gutter and surfacing, and then a reasonable maintenance schedule should be set up so that these streets will not deteriorate. Mayor Nawrocki felt that consideration must be taken on the comments and feelings of the people and just how much need there is for this work on an individual basis. Again, Mr. Freund, 4408 2nd Street, heatedly spoke against the proposed projects. COLTNCIL DECISION ON PROPOSED WORK At this time Mayor Nawrocki asked that the Council give their opinion on '.~.:'~ which projects should be considered in the resolution. First the project would be stated followed by each member's opinion. 39th Avenue, Main Street to 2nd Street--Councilmen Land, Heintz and Logacz were in favor and Mayor Nawrocki was opposed. Summit Street, 5th Street to 40th Avenue--All were in favor. 2nd Street, 42nd Avenue, to 43rd Avenue--Councilmen Land, Heintz and Logacz were in .favor and Mayor Nawrocki was opposed. Tyler Place, 44th Avenue to 45th Avenue--All were in favor. Hayes Street, 37th Avenue to 39th Avenue--Councilman Land was in favor and Councilmen Heintz, Logacz and Mayor Nawrocki were opposed. 7th Street, 44th Avenue to 45th Avenue--Councilmen Land, Heintz, and Logacz were in favor and Mayor Nawrocki was opposed. -105- April 22, 1975 41st Avenue, Central Avenue east to LaBelle Park--Councilmen Land, Heintz, and Logacz were in favor and Mayor Nawrocki was opposed. University Avenue and 4th Street from 52nd Avenue to 53rd Avenue--Cou.ncil- men Land, Heintz, and Logacz were in favor and Mayor Nawrocki was opposed. Main Street and 2nd Street from 44th Avenue to 45th Avenue--Councilmen Land, Heintz and Logacz were in favor and Mayor Nawrocki was opposed. 37th Avenue to 38th Avenue, Madison Place to Cargill--Councilman Land was in .favor and Councilmen Heintz, Logacz and Mayor Nawrocki were opposed. Reservoir Boulevard and Tyler Street, 39th Avenue to 40th Avenue--All were in favor, Following this, one gentleman asked when this work would be started. Mr. Berg stated that work would begin sometime this summer and assessed in the fall. Another gentleman asked 3:f. sodding would be part of the project. Again, the sodding work was explained, and it was decided that sodding would not be a part of the project. A recess was called at 10:10 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 10:25 p.m. RESOLUTION 975-25 BEING A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS Offered by Logacz, Second by Land .Roll Call - A11 Ayes BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights by motion on the 18th day of February, 1975 ordered notice of a hearing to be given to property owners, .and WHEREAS, pursuant to a notice of hearing certain residents appeared at a Council Meeting on the 22nd day of April, 1975, and WHEREAS, the Council determines to proceed with this local improvement, a por- tion of the cost being defrayed by special assessments under Charter provisions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT TS HEREBY RESOLVED 1. That the location and extent of such improvements is as follows: 39th Avenue Main to 2nd (Curb, Gutter, and Asphalt Mat) Summit Street 5th to 40th 2nd Street 42nd to 43rd 3rd Street 44th to 45th Tyler Place 44th to 45th 2. That the materials to be used are as follows: Curb, gutter and concrete construction to conform with state standards for concrete construction. Bituminous materials shall meet A.S.T.M. standards and conform with Highway Dept... specifications governing same. 3. That a careful estimate of the cost of the improvement has been made by the City Manager and the several lots and parcels of land fronting upon and adjacent to such proposed improvement, which he deemed benefited thereby, were properly notified of said hearings, and -106- April 22, 1975 4. That the City Manager shall also list the names and owners of the several parcels so improved as nearly as can be ascertained. 5. These improvements shall also be known as Project No. 698. RESOLUTION 75-26 BEING A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS Offered by Land, Second by Heintz Roll Call - All .Ayes BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights by motion on the 18th day of February, 1975 ordered notice of a hearing to be given to property owners, and WHEREAS, pursuant to a notice of hearing certain residents appeared at a Council Meeting on the 22nd day of April, 1975, and WHEREAS, the Council determines to proceed with this local improvement, a portion of the cost being defrayed by special assessments under Charter provisions. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED 1. That the location and extent of such improvements is as follows: 7th Street 44th to 45th (Bituminous Overlay) 41st Avenue Central Avenue east to LaBelle Park 2. That the materials to be used are as follows: Bituminous materials shall meet A.S.T.M. standards and conform with Highway Dept. specifications governing the same. 3. That a careful estimate of the cost of the improvement has been made by the City Manager and the several lots and parcels of land fronting upon and adjacent to such proposed improvement, which he deemed benefited thereby, were properly notified of said hearings, and 4. That the City Manager shall also list the names and owners of the several parcels so improved as nearly as can be ascertained. 5. These improvements shall also be known as Project No. 699 RESOLUTION 75-27 BEING A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS Offered by Land, Second by Heintz Roll Call - All Ayes BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights by motion on the 18th day of February, 1975 ordered notice of a hearing to be given to property owners, and WHEREAS, pursuant to a notice of hearing certain residents appeared at a Council Meeting on the 22nd day of April, 1975, and WHEREAS, the Council determines to proceed with this local improvement, a por- tion of the cost being defrayed by special assessments under Charter provisions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED 1. That the location and extent of such improvements is as follows: University to 4th 52nd to 53rd (Concrete Alley Surfacing) Main St. to 2nd 44th to 45th Res. Blvd. to Tyler 39th to 40th 2. That the materials to be used -are:. as follows: Concrete 3. That a careful estimate of the cost of the improvement has been made by the City Manager and the several lots and parcels of land fronting upon and adjacent to such proposed improvements, which he deemed benefited thereby, were properly notified of said hearings, and -107- April 22, 1975 4. That the City Manager shall also list the names and owners of the several parcels so improved as nearly as can be ascertained. 5. These improvements shall also be known as Project No. 700. Following the reading of the resolutions, Mayor Nawrocki asked that the matter o~assessing Tyler..Pl,.differently be looked into. This will then be brought before the council at a regular meeting for additional discussion and notices will be-given to all property owners affected by this assess- ment. He also asked that the Engineering Department check out the possibility of getting easements for the overland flow rather than storm drain as suggested at this hearing for the alley between Main Street and 2nd Street from 44th Avenue to 45th Avenue. This is to be reported back to the Council before construction begins. BIDS ON CONCRETE WORK AND BITUMINOUS PAVING City Manager Watson reported that bids were taken on concrete work including curb and gutter and on bituminous paving on April 17, 1975. A11 of the bids were quite favorable and comparable to those of last year's bids. 1. Concrete Work Bids were received from Alexander Construction of Apple Valley, and Victor Carlson of Minneapolis in the amounts of $2.90 per foot by Alex- ander and $3.40 per foot by Victor Carlson. Based on these bids, Mr. Watson recommended that award be made to the low-bidder, Alexander Construction. Motion by Land, Second by Heintz to accept the bid of Alexander Con- struction for concrete curb and gutter work, based on low competitive bids and that the Mayor and City Manager be authorized to enter into contract for same. Roll Call - All Ayes Mayor Nawrocki asked what kind of estimates we had and if these bids were tied. Mr. Brown explained this to him. Councilman Heintz wanted to know where the V-6 curb was going to be put. Mr. Brown stated that it would be used at the high school. Mayor Nawrocki wanted to be sure that the actual cost of this work will not exceed the estimates given at the hearing. 2. Bituminous Paving City Manager Watson reported that bids were received from six companies for bituminous street surfacing and miscellaneous bituminous work. A11 of the bids were close, but H. & S. Asphalt was the low bidder. Based on these bids, Mr. Watson recommended that award be made to the low bidder, H. & S. Asphalt. -ios- April 22, 1975 Motion by Logacz, Second by Heintz to accept the bid of H. & S. Asphalt for bituminous street surfacing and miscellaneous bituminous work, based on low competitive bids and that the Mayor and City Manager by authorized to enter into contract for same. Roll Call - All Ayes Motion by Heintz, Second by Logacz to adjourn at 10:45 p.m. Roll Call - All Ayes Bruce G. Nawrocki, Mayor Secretary P o-Tem