Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEDA AGN 04-16-02CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS COMMISSIONMERS uettim Robert W. Ruettimann nn Patricia Jindra 590 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights, MN 55421 -3878 (763) 706 -3600 TDD (763) 706 -3692 Marlaine Szurek Visit Our Website at: wwwci.columbia- heights.mmus Julienne Wyckoff Gary L. Peterson Bruce Nawrocki Bobby Williams ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY April 16, 2002 The following is the Agenda for the regular meeting of the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (EDA) to be held IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE HRA MEETING on Tuesday, April 16, 2002, in Conference Room A, Parkview Villa, 965 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights, MN 55421 The EDA does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all EDA services, programs, and activities. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the EDA Secretary at 706 -3669 to make arrangements (TDD 706 -2806) for deaf or hearing impaired ..,,it, CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO MEETING AGENDA. CONSENT AGENDA.(These items are considered to be routine by the EDA Board of Commissioners and will be enacted as part of the Consent Agenda by one motion.) A. Move to adopt the consent agenda items as listed below: 1) Approval of Minutes. a. The Regular Meeting of March 19, 2002. 2) Financial Report and Payment of Bills. a. Financial Statement for March, 2002. b. Payment of Bills for March, 2002. MOTION: Move to approve Resolution 2002 -07, Resolution of the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (EDA) approving the financial statement for March, 2002 and approving payment of bills for the month of March, 2002. RECOGNITION, PROCLAMATIONS, PRESENTATIONS, GUESTS ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION. Presentation by Dunbar Corporation- Walt Fehst 2. Adopt Resolution 2002 -04, Approving and Ratifying the Terms of an Interfund Loan Policy and Approving the Interfund Loan Implementation Memorandum in Connection with Housing Redevelopment TIF District No. 1 (P3)- Mark Nagel. MOTION: Move to Adopt Resolution 2002 -04, a Resolution Approving and Ratifying the terms of an Interfund Loan Policy and Memorandum in connection with Housing Redevelopment TIF District No. 1 (P3); and furthermore, to authorize the President and Executive Director to enter into an agreement for the same. THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 3. Approve Business Revolving Loan Fund Revisions- Mark Nagel MOTION: Move to approve the revised BRLF Bylaws, Plan, Participation Agreement, Guidelines and Loan Application forms and direct staff to implement. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Report of the Acting Deputy Executive Director — Randy Schumacher. 1. Sullivan Lake Settlement Agreement 2. Status of 322 & 325 Summit Avenue 3. Cost Benefit Analysis for 401h & University 4. Tax Base for Industrial Park 5. Kmart Update 6. 325 -40th Avenue MGS 7. RFQ's Mailed Out & Advertised 8. Lomianki Park Update 9. Memo on 51St Court Plans Report of the Executive Director — Walt Fehst. OTHER REPORTS 1. Housing Update 2. Resident Council Minutes ADJOURNMENT Walter R Fehst, Executive Director H AedaAgenda2002 \4 -16 -2002 The mission of the Cofum6ia .heights Economic (Development Authority is to provide financial and technical assistance and resources to residential commercial and industrial interests to promote health, safety, we fare, economic development and redevelopment. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 19, 2002 CALL TO ORDER - The Regular Meeting of the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (EDA) was called to order by President, Ruettimann at 6:36 p.m., Tuesday, March 19, 2002, in the City Hall, Conference Room 1, 590 40th Avenue NE, Columbia Heights, Minnesota. ROLL CALL Commission Members Present: Robert Ruettimann, Patricia Jindra, Marlaine Szurek, Gary Peterson, Julienne Wyckoff, Bruce Nawrocki, and Bobby Williams Commission Members Absent: Staff Present: Walt Fehst, Executive Director Randy Schumacher, Acting Deputy Executive Director Cheryl Bakken, Secretary Mark Nagel, Housing Assistant ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO MEETING AGENDA- Bakken passed out revised agenda items 4 and 5. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Minutes Move to adopt the minutes of the February 19, 2002, regular meeting as presented in writing. Financial Report and Payment of Bills Move to approve Resolution 2002 -06, Resolution of the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (EDA) approving the financial statements for February, 2002 and approving payment of bills for February, 2002. Nawrocki asked what the disbursements for Columbia Heights Housing and Jay Brothers were for. Schumacher stated the Columbia Heights Housing was the sixth and last payment on the Transition Block Townhome Project using Liveable Community Funding and Jay Brothers was for the demolition of 828 40`h Avenue, the old TV shop. MOTION by Peterson, second by Szurek, to adopt the consent agenda items as listed. All ayes. Motion Carried. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS RELATING TO THE REDEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ZONING PROPERTIES Schumacher indicated in February, the City Council and EDA approved a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process for redevelopment of the industrial area east of University bounded by Jefferson Street, 37`" Avenue, University Avenue, and 39' Avenue /Lookout Place. The RFQ process is a faster and more streamlined approach than the RFP. The draft RFQ is a combination of several examples from metro area cities. After the EDA Board and City Council approve the document, it will be mailed out to interested developers. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes March 19, 2002 Page 2 of 6 Ruettimann asked if we would be requesting qualifications for the entire Industrial Area. Schumacher indicated it was very possible and is recommended. Nawrocki asked if it was staff's intent to find a developer that would rebuild the entire area, and is it anticipated that the developer will receive their compensation from the redevelopment, or would the City be responsible for a portion of the cost. Schumacher stated the first step is for the Board to find a developer's proposal acceptable, and the next step in the process would be to determine the funding for the redevelopment. Wyckoff was concerned that the business and homeowners should be notified prior to sending out the RFQ. Fehst indicated other cities usually do not to send out notices for this step of the redevelopment process. Ruettimann asked if the commercial redevelopment area along Central Avenue should also be sent out with the proposals. Schumacher explained the Industrial area is a very large portion of land and combining the two may be too much to attempt at one time. Once the RFQ's are received, the Board can determine which area to work on first, what developer, etc. After some discussion, the consensus of the Board was to extend the Industrial Development area to 40&' Avenue on the east side of University. Staff will make the change to the maps prior to mailing out the RFQ's. MOTION by Peterson, second by Szurek, to recommend to the City Council approval of the RFQ document for the Columbia Heights Industrial Center Redevelopment Project amending the following: 1. Under 4.5 it should read: The City of Columbia Heights City Council will consider the Economic Development Authority's recommendation at their July 8, 2002 meeting. 2. Under 1. Project Context, should read: The City of Columbia Heights is initiating redevelopment of an industrial area generally bounded by 37' Avenue on the south, Jackson Street on the east, 39' Avenue and Lookout Place on the north and all Industrial and General Business areas to the west of University extending from 37th to 40"' Avenue (see Appendix A for map). The City of Columbia Heights is seeking qualifications from interested development teams to assist the City in redeveloping the property described in Appendix A. 3. Under number 2.3 it should read: 56 Parcels- 2 City - owned, housing about 20 companies. All Ayes. Motion Carried. Williams asked if we have any idea what the tax base is currently or what we can expect if the area is redeveloped. Schumacher stated staff does have some figures available. Ruettimann requested staff provide the figures to the Board. ACTION STEPS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MCCOMB STUDY Nagel stated that priority #7 of the 2002 Community Development Goals is to increase the City's tax base, which includes a step to evaluate and implement recommendations from the McComb Study. The mission statement and six objectives with steps for implementation are listed in the packet. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes March 19, 2002 Page 3 of 6 Nawrocki asked what the Rainbow Project was. Fehst indicated Rainbow submitted plans for a gas station and strip mall to be constructed on their site last fall and due to employee changes, the project was put on hold. Schumacher indicated staff has approved the plans for the gas station, which should start in another month or so. Nawrocki was concerned that Kmart has a year lease on the building and wondered if the building would be left vacant for 6 months. He asked if staff has an idea of what the property owner plans to do with the building. Schumacher stated he has contacted the owners and they are not ready to address their intentions for the building at this time. MOTION by Peterson, second by Szurek, to approve the Implementation Plan for the McComb Group, Ltd. Downtown Market Study. All ayes. Motion Carried. BUSINESS REVOLVING LOAN DOCUMENTS Nagel indicated that in November of 2001, the EDA approved the formation of a three - member committee to review and revise the BRLF Loan documents. Staff has prepared a draft version of the Bylaws, Plan, Application, and Guidelines for the committee to review. Staff recommended setting a meeting of April 8, 2002 for the Committee to meet, revise the documents, and submit them to the EDA at a future meeting for approval. Ruettimann requested staff send a copy of the revised documents to Ery Bednard for review and comment and schedule a meeting of the committee for April 8, 2002 in the Community Development Blue Room at 4:00 p.m. Nagel will confirm the meeting with the committee. MOTION by Peterson, second by Williams, to establish a meeting date of April 8, 2002, in the Community Development Department Blue Room at 4:00 p.m. for the BRLF Loan Review Committee to review, compare, and revise the guidelines, bylaws, plan and application and submit the final draft to the EDA Board at a future meeting for further consideration. All ayes. Motion Carried. APPLICATION C1998 -08, CDBG HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM Schumacher reported staff has been working with Dave King from CEE for the past six months to finalize the Rehabilitation Grants for 1998 and 99. Anoka County has made many extensions to the grant funding for the City and has given the last and final extension date of April 1". Staff requested an additional extension until the two final grants are completed sometime this spring, but in the letter from Anoka County addressing the issue it states they have been receiving a lot of pressure from the state in releasing the funds and could not promise reimbursement. Schumacher indicated that because the grants before the board are not complete, he asked for an amendment to the original motion for these two grants presented tonight to read as follows: Contingent upon Anoka County signing a Procedure to Work Authorization, and guaranteeing full funding of the project. Fehst stated he and staff have contacted various officials in the County for assistance. Ruettimann requested Schumacher and Fehst set up a meeting with Jim Kordiak and Paul McCarron to get a commitment on behalf of Anoka County. Schumacher indicated CEE has processed a CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Deferred Grant for the property at 4036 6`" Street in the amount of $15,908 to Windows America, Roof Partners, and Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes March 19, 2002 Page 4 of 6 Otogawa - Anschel for replacing windows, performing ceiling and roof repairs to the home. MOTION by Peterson, second by Williams, to approve the CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Deferred Grant/Loan Application for Grant #1998 -08 in the amount of $15,908 for housing rehabilitation to Windows America, Roof Partners, and Otogawa - Anschel, and the Center for Energy and Environment subject to meeting all program requirements; and furthermore to direct staff to submit the loan application to Anoka County and to authorize all related expenses to be reimbursed from Fund 202 - 46350- 4600/3050, contingent upon Anoka County signing a Procedure to Work Authorization, and guaranteeing full funding of the project. All ayes. Motion Carried. APPLICATION C1998 -10, CDBG HOUSING REHABITATION PROGRAM Schumacher indicated CEE has processed a CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Deferred Grant for the property at 3752 2 i Street in the amount of $20,833 to Custom Home Remodeling for replacing the furnace, windows and frames, repair ceiling, install fascia, gutters, roof on the garage, and sidewalk and patio repairs that will be made to the property. MOTION by Peterson, second by Williams, to approve the CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Deferred Grant/Loan Application for Grant #1998 -10, in the amount of $20,833 for housing rehabilitation to Custom Home Remodeling, and the Center for Energy and Environment subject to meeting all program requirements; and furthermore, to direct staff to submit the loan application to Anoka County and to authorize all related expenses to be reimbursed from Fund 202 - 46350- 4600/3050, contingent upon Anoka County signing a Procedure to Work Authorization, and guaranteeing full funding of the project. All ayes. Motion Carried. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 40TH AND LOOKOUT PLACE Schumacher indicated the preliminary redevelopment proposal for the southeast corner of University and 40`" Avenue in the packet is made up of five parcels of property and a partial vacation of Lookout Place. The City owns the vacant lots on the west side of Lookout, and is in the process of purchasing the Conoco Station directly to the north. The single-family home at 325 Summit Street is vacant and will soon be put up for sale. Michael Sweat, the general business parcel at 322 40`h Avenue, has indicated they would like to relocate to a larger building in Columbia Heights. The proposal has been discussed with the City Engineers. Schumacher pointed out the area on a map for discussion. Schumacher indicated funding would come from 1) the resale of the home on Summit Avenue; 2) the $35, 000 from Monroe property; 3) $30, 000 approximately, left over from Central Avenue property purchases; and 4) CDBG funding. Nawrocki recommended the property owners on Summit be advised of the City's intentions, due to more traffic being routed down Summit if 40'h and Lookout Place access is blocked off and he would like staff to submit a Cost Benefit Analysis of the project. Ruettimann stated the owners on Summit will be notified at the proper time, but didn't feel that they would experience anymore traffic on the block. He then directed staff prepare a Cost Benefit Analysis for the project. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes March 19, 2002 Page 5 of 6 MOTION by Ruettimann, second by Williams, to direct Schumacher to negotiate an agreement with the two property owners on Summit Avenue on behalf of the City and for staff to prepare a Cost Benefit Analysis. All ayes. Motion Carried. LOMIANKI PARK UPDATE Schumacher indicated City Council has been involved in discussions regarding potential development of portions of Lomianki Park. Bruce Nedegaard approached City Council with a concept development plan for high - density townhomes. The plan included the entire portion of south Lomianki Park, as well as a portion of land extending up 37`h Avenue on the south. Nedegaard met with the owner of the small industrial business located at 82 38`h Avenue, and the owner of the residential home at 3702 Main Street, and is pursuing negotiations for both properties. The owner of the industrial property indicated he would like to sell the building and land. Staff outlined the steps necessary to develop the land and provided a copy of the appraisal for the north and south parcels. The first step for redevelopment is a public open house, which is scheduled for March 26`h at 7: 00 p. m. in the Council Chambers, where Nedegaard will present the townhome concept plan for south Lomianki Park. 3722 CENTRAL AVENUE UPDATE Schumacher reported the closing of Vera Johnson's property at 3722 Central Avenue was delayed due to some family issues related to the signing of the deed, but felt confident the closing should be finalized within the next week. Johnson has taken an apartment in Parkview Villa south. The property at 3718 Central Avenue (VonHeidemann's), was acquired a couple of months ago. Staff has already discussed options with some developers interested in the two properties. ANNUAL REPORT Schumacher presented the Board with a copy of the Community Development Department's Annual Report for 2001, which provided a description of the highlights that occurred, some data and documentation for informational purposes only. TOUR WITH DUNBAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Fehst indicated he and the Community Development Department staff took a tour of Shakopee on March 5`h with Dunbar Corporation to see some of the facilities they have developed in the area. The purpose of the tour was to check out possibilities for the Mady s site on Central Avenue in Columbia Heights. The plan included three floors of senior housing above City offices, public space for the Library and possibly some room for the Police and Fire Department. He felt this was a concept that could work for Columbia Heights. Fehst received a development package from Dunbar that he directed staff to copy and distribute to the Board members for review and would like to see Dunbar's development concept placed on the April agenda for discussion. OTHER BUSINESS Nawrocki received a call from the Ostlund brothers that own the property behind White Castle on Central Avenue. They asked Nawrocki to get feedback from the EDA and City Council on the idea of building townhomes on the site. Ostlund indicated they have already talked to a couple of developers on the townhome idea. Peterson indicated he felt if anything was built on the site, access to the property would have to come from 52 nd Avenue, which is Fridley owned. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes March 19, 2002 Page 6 of 6 Szurek and Wyckoff remembered a motel that submitted plans for the site approximately four years ago. It was going to be called the Baymont Hotel, but was never developed due to the lack of visibility. Ruettimann directed staff look up the plans and give copies to the Board. Nawrocki will convey to the Ostlund brothers that the consensus of the Board was that townhomes or restaurants would be nice for the site. ADJOURNMENT President, Ruettimann, adjourned the meeting at 9:06 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Cheryl Bakken Recording Secretary H: \EDAminutes2002 \3 -19 -2002 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) Meeting of. April 16, 2002 AGENDA SECTION: Consent Agenda ORIGINATING EXECUTIVE NO: DEPARTMENT: EDA DIRECTOR APPROVAL ITEM: Financial Report and Payment of Bills BY: Randy Schumacher BY: DATE: Aril 10, 2002 BACKGROUND: The bound Financial Report for March 1, 2002 Check Listing (green sheets), and draft Resolution 2002- 07 are attached for review. The enclosed Financial Report lists the Revenue Guideline (pink sheets), the Expenditure Guideline (yellow sheets), Expenditure Guideline with Detail (white sheets), and Balance Sheet (blue sheets), for each fund and department. The report covers the activity in the calendar (fiscal) year from January 1 through March 31, 2002. The Check History shows each fund with an expenditure history during the month of March, 2002. The total disbursements by fund are shown at the top of the listing. RECOMMENDATION: Staff will be available to answer specific questions. If the report is satisfactorily complete, we recommend the Board take affirmative action to receive the Financial Report and approve the payment of bills. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve Resolution 2002 -07, Resolution of the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (EDA) approving the Financial Statement for March, 2002 and Payment of Bills for the month of March, 2002. EDA ACTION: H: \Consent2002 \March.FinRep2002 EDA RESOLUTION 2002 -07 RESOLUTION OF THE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) APPROVING THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR MARCH, 2002 AND PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH, 2002. WHEREAS, the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (EDA) is required by Minnesota Statutes Section 469.096, Subd. 9, to prepare a detailed financial statement which shows all receipts and disbursements, their nature, the money on hand, the purposes to which the money on hand is to be applied, the EDA's credits and assets and its outstanding liabilities; and WHEREAS, said Statute also requires the EDA to examine the statement and treasurer's vouchers or bills and if correct, to approve them by resolution and enter the resolution in its records; and WHEREAS, the financial statement for the month of March, 2002 and the list of bills for the month of March, 2002 are attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and WHEREAS, the EDA has examined the financial statement and the list of bills and finds them to be acceptable as to both form and accuracy. NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority that it has examined the attached financial statements and list of bills, which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, and they are found to be correct, as to form and content; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the financial statements are acknowledged and received and the list of bills as presented in writing are approved for payment out of proper funds; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED this resolution and attachments are to be made a part of the permanent records of the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority. Passed this _ day of , 2002. MOTION BY: 6=601M:1103 AYES: NAYS: Robert Ruettimann, President Attest by: Cheryl Bakken, Secretary H; \Resolutions2002\2002 -07 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) Meeting of. April 16, 2002 AGENDA SECTION: Items for Consideration ORIGINATING EXECUTIVE NO: DEPARTMENT: EDA DIRECTOR APPROVAL ITEM: Adopt Resolution 2002 -04, Approving BY: Mark Nagel BY: and Ratifying the Terms of an Interfund Loan DATE: April 10, 2002 Policy and Approving the Interfund Loan Implementation Memorandum in Connection with Housing Redevelopment TIF District No.I (P3) h: BACKGROUND: On December 17, 2001, the EDA Board adopted Resolution 2001 -20, modifying the Downtown Central Business District (CBD) Revitalization Plan for the CBD Development Project and adopting a modification to TIF District No. 1, the scattered site district. Shelley Eldridge,. Ehlers & Associates has prepared the attached documents to establish an Interfund Loan and Memorandum. The principal of $268,000 assumes no interest rate including $81,000 already spent in the District, which leaves $187,000 to purchase blighted properties. The $81,000 repayment includes: $34,000 for 3855 Main Street acquisition; $17,500 for 4401 Quincy Street acquisition; and $29,500 for 3913 Polk Street acquisition and demolition. If these repayments were not made, then there would be a total of $268,000 available for purchase of blighted properties. This policy decision is up to the EDA Board. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board adoption of Resolution 2002 -04, approving and ratifying the terms of an Interfund Loan Policy and Memorandum in connection with TIF District No. 1 (P3). RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of Resolution 2002 -04, there being an ample amount of copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Adopt Resolution 2002 -04, a Resolution Approving and Ratifying the terms of an Interfund Loan Policy and Memorandum in connection with Housing Redevelopment TIF District No. 1 (P3); and furthermore, authorize the President and Executive Director to enter into an agreement for the same. Attachments EDA ACTION: \consent Form2002 \Adopt Res. 2002 -04 Interfund Loan (P3) COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY INTERFUND LOAN IMPLEMENTATION MEMORANDUM From: Mark Nagel Date: April 10, 2002 Project: Housing Redevelopment TIF Pursuant to Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority Resolution No. 2002 -04, an interfund loan is being proposed to pay costs to be incurred in relation to Housing Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District No. 1. The loan is proposed to be made under the following terms and conditions: 1. Amount: $268,000 2. Source: Parkview Villa South's Reserve Fund 3. Duration: 22 years (District expires 12/31/23) 4. Date of first payment: August 1, 2002 5. Repayment source: Tax Increments 6. Interest rate: None Approved this day of , 2002. Robert Ruettimann- President ATTEST: Walter R. Fehst- Executive Director HATIF2002\Interfund Loan Implementation Memo DJG- 210041v1 CL205 -3 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04 APPROVING AND RATIFYING THE TERMS OF AN INTERFUND LOAN POLICY IN CONNECTION WITH HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT TIF DISTRICT NO. 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ( "BOARD ") OF THE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( "AUTHORITY ") AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Background. 1.01. The Authority has heretofore approved the establishment of the Housing Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 (the "TIF District ") within Central Business Redevelopment District (the "Project "), and has adopted a tax increment financing plan (the "TIF Plan") for the purpose of financing certain improvements within the Project. 1.02. Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, Subdivision 7, the Authority is authorized to advance or loan money from the Authority's general fund or any other fund from which such advances may be legally made, in order to finance costs which may otherwise be paid pursuant to the TIF Plan (the "Qualified Costs "). 1.03. The Authority intends to reimburse itself for the Qualified Costs from tax increments derived from the TIF District in accordance with the terms of the Policy set forth in this Resolution. Section 2. Terms of TIF Loan. 2.01. The Authority is hereby authorized to make one or more loans from its general fund, or any other source from which such loans may be made, to pay Qualified Costs. 2.02. The maximum principal amount of any single loan made pursuant to this Policy shall be $268,000 (each such loan is referred to herein as a "Loan"). 2.03. Principal ( "Payments ") on a Loan shall be paid semi - annually on each August 1 and February 1 commencing on such date as may be determined by the Authority and continuing thereafter to and including the earlier of (a) the date the principal of the TIF Loan is paid in full, or (b) the date of last receipt of tax increment from the TIF District ( "Payment Dates "). Payments will be made in the amount and only to the extent of Available Tax Increment as hereinafter defined. Payments shall be applied to unpaid principal. 2.04. Unless otherwise determined by the Authority, Payments on a Loan shall be payable solely from "Available Tax Increment," which shall mean, on each Payment Date, all of the tax increment generated in the preceding six (6) months with respect to the property within the TIF District and remitted to the Authority by Anoka County, all in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179. Unless otherwise approved by the Authority, payments on a Loan are subordinate to any outstanding or future bonds, notes, or contracts secured in whole or in part with nT(-T_? 1 ( )97 ,1 Available Tax Increment, and are on parity with any other outstanding or future interfund loans secured in whole or in part with Available Tax Increment. 2.05. The principal sum payable under this TIF Loan are pre - payable in whole or in part at any time by the Authority without premium or penalty. No partial prepayment shall affect the amount or timing of any other regular payment otherwise required to be made under this TIF Loan. 2.06. Unless otherwise approved by the Authority, a Loan shall be a limited obligation payable solely from Available Tax Increment pledged to the payment hereof under this resolution. Unless otherwise approved by the Authority: (i) a Loan shall not be deemed to constitute a general obligation of the State of Minnesota or any political subdivision thereof, including, without limitation, the Authority; (ii) neither the State of Minnesota, nor any political subdivision thereof shall be obligated to pay the principal of this TIF Loan or other costs incident hereto except out of Available Tax Increment; (iii) neither the full faith and credit nor the taxing power of the State of Minnesota or any political subdivision thereof shall be pledged to the payment of the principal of this TIF Loan or other costs incident hereto; and (iv) the Authority shall have no obligation to pay any principal amount of the TIF Loan, which may remain unpaid after the final Payment Date. 2.07. The Authority may amend the terms of this Policy at any time by resolution of the Authority's Board of Commissioners, including a determination to forgive the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest to the extent permissible under law. Section 3. Implementation. Prior to any Loan being made, the Board's staff and consultants are directed to submit to the Board of the Authority the amount, use, duration, repayment source, and other relevant terms of the proposed loan, at which time the Board may either approve, deny, or modify the proposed terms. Section 4. Effective Date. This resolution is effective upon the date of its approval. Adopted this day of , 2002. ATTEST: Robert Ruettimann- President Walter R. Fehst- Executive Director 2 rnr(-_? 1 0077.1 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 17, 2001 CALL TO ORDER - The Regular Meeting of the Columbia Heights Economic Development Authority (EDA) was called to order by Vice President, Jindra at 6:01 p.m., Monday, December 17, 2001, in Conference Room 1, City Hall, 590 40`h Avenue NE, Columbia Heights, Minnesota. ROLL CALL Commission Members Present: Patricia Jindra, Marlaine Szurek, Gary Peterson, Julienne Wyckoff, Bruce Nawrocki, and Bobby Williams Commission Members Absent: Robert Ruettimann Staff Present: Walt Fehst, Executive Director Randy Schumacher, Acting Community Dev. Director Cheryl Bakken, Secretary Tim Johnson, City Planner Mark Nagel, Housing Assistant ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION Other Resolutions. Approve Resolution 2001 -20, Modifying the Downtown Central Business District (CBD) Revitalization Plan for the CBD Redevelopment Project and the Modification of Housing Redevelopment TIF District #1 (P3) Schumacher indicated that on May 27, 1997, the Columbia Heights City Council approved a scattered site redevelopment TIF District to facilitate redevelopment of substandard single - family homes. Tax increments from the 56 parcels were to be used to finance land acquisition, demolition, relocation, and related development costs. Shelley Eldridge, Ehlers & Associates explained that after reviewing progress of the district, it was determined the City needs to show activity and any modifications be completed on each of the 56 parcels by September 8, 2002 or they will be dropped from the District. This would reduce the TIF revenue generated. The following steps can be taken: 1) add 10 parcels to the District to increase the revenue stream; 2) complete a projection of funds; 3) expend the projected funds prior to the September 8, 2002 deadline; and 4) City funds spent in the past 4 years on the parcels will be reimbursed by the District and spent on other housing activities within the District. Nawrocki asked if the District encompassed the entire City, or certain areas. Eldridge explained that the maps in the agenda packet show where the properties are located, and explained that they are scattered throughout the City. Peterson indicated that if any of the affected property owners would upgrade their home, the City would receive the tax credits. VMOTION by Peterson, second by Szurek, to waive the reading of Resolution 2001 -20, there being ample copies available to the public. All ayes. Motion Carried. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes December 17, 2001 Page 2 of 3 MOTION by Nawrocki, second by Wyckoff, to adopt Resolution 2001 -20, a Resolution Modifying the Downtown Central Business District (CBD) Revitalization Plan for the CBD Redevelopment Project and the Modification of Housing Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 (P3). All ayes. Motion Carried. Other Business. CDBG Program Application for 2002 Schumacher indicated that the EDA is required to submit the 2002 CDBG Program Application to Anoka County requesting funds for potential projects no later than January 11, 2002. The application will also be presented to City Council for approval. Anoka County's total grant amount for 2002 is approximately $1,864, 000, of which $1,114,500 is available for cities and townships. Each project submitted is limited to a maximum amount of $300, 000. In order to qualify for the CDBG Program funds the project must meet one of three objects; 1) benefit low to moderate income families; 2) show prevention or elimination of slums or blighted areas; and 3) provide an urgent need in the City. Federal regulations include Davis -Bacon labor standards, environmental, fair housing, relocation, lead -based paint, equal opportunity, record keeping and auditing. Staff considered the following plans: • A planning study for an Industrial Parr which would provide an inventory of existing businesses, market analysis ofproperties, and facts to determine the highest and best use of land and buildings for approximately S65,000- 70, 000 based on the proposal from Hoisington Koegler Group. • The acquisition of deteriorated/non- conforming properties in the City. • Additional funds to support Community Fix -Up Loans for a maximum of $300, 000. Schumacher indicated that ACCAP has initiated two of the ten total grants received and will continue to finalize them, whereas, CEE has only processed, a total of three all year, with five left to finalize. Of the three possible plans, staff recommended submittal of the Industrial Park Redevelopment Planning Study to Anoka County. Wyckoff felt that the City has had too many studies done on it with no action taken. She would like to see an industrial park or a townhome project put in the vicinity of 37" and University. Williams indicated that he drove through the City's industrial area at 37" and University, and was embarrassed at the way it's underdeveloped, run down and dirty. Williams stated the Board, needs to focus on this area, as it is the gateway to our City on University Avenue. He would like to see a new industrial park redevelopment put in. Johnson explained there was little time to prepare this application, therefore, he chose to get a proposal from Hoisington Koegler, a firm he has worked with before, but will pursue another proposal or two for Board approval, if they choose to approve the motion for the Industrial Park Redevelopment Planning Study. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ANOKA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2001-20 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MODIFICATION TO THE DOWNTOWN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) REVITALIZATION PLAN FOR THE CBD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND ADOPTING A MODIFICATION TO THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT TAX. INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 THEREIN. WHEREAS, it has been proposed by the Board of Commissioners (the "Board ") of the Economic Development Authority (the "EDA ") and the City of Columbia Heights (the "City") that the EDA adopt a Modification to the Downtown Central Business District (CBD) Revitalization Plan for the CBD Redevelopment Project and adopt a Modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Modifications ") for Housing Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 therein (the "District "), all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 through 469.1081, and Sections 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended (the "Act "), all as reflected in the Modifications and presented for the Board's consideration; and WHEREAS, the EDA has investigated the facts relating to the Modifications and has caused the Modifications to be prepared; and WHEREAS, the EDA has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the adoption of the Modifications. The EDA has also requested the City Planning Commission to provide for review of and written comment on the Modifications and that the Council schedule a public hearing on the Modifications upon published notice as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board as follows: 1. The EDA hereby reaffirms that the District as modified herein is in the public interest and is a "redevelopment district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 10 (a) (1) and finds that the Modifications conform in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the Sate of Minnesota which is already built up and that the adoption of the propose Modifications will help provide redevelopment to the housing stock and thereby serves a public proposed. 2. The EDA further finds that the Modifications will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs for the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the project area by private enterprise in that the intent is to provide only that public assistance necessary to make the private developments financially feasible. 3. Conditioned upon the approval thereof by the City Council following its public hearing thereon, the Modifications, as presented to the EDA on this date, are hereby approved, established and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the Deputy Clerk. 4. Upon approval of the Modifications by the City Council, the staff, the EDA advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Modifications and for this purpose to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Board for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. Approval of the Modifications does not constitute approval of any project or a Development Agreement with any developer. 5. Upon approval of the Modifications by the City Council, the Deputy Clerk is authorized and directed to forward a copy of the Modifications to the Minnesota Department of Revenue. 6. The Deputy Clerk is authorized and directed to forward a copy of the Modifications to the Anoka County Auditor and request that the Auditor certify the original tax capacity of the District as described in the Modifications, all in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 469.177. Approved by the Board of Commissioners of the Economic Development Authority this 17" day of December, 2001. Robert Ruettimann, Presi ATTEST: Cheryl akken, Secretary COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) Meeting o£ , 2002 AGENDA SECTION: Items for Consideration ORIGINATING EXECUTIVE NO: DEPARTMENT: EDA DIRECTOR 43 APPROVAL ITEM: Approve Business Revolving Loan Fund BY: Mark Nagel BY: Revisions I DATE: April 9, 2002 BACKGROUND: With the sale of the Neilsen and Chartraw Home Mortgage loans to Community Reinvestment Fund, Inc. for $33,343.67 and the early repayment of the Warrick loan of $1,811.89 last October, there is approximately $35,155.56 in the Business Revolving Loan Fund (BRLF) account, plus an undetermined amount from the repayments of the outstanding business loans over the past seven years. As you may recall, the last time the BRLF Loan Review Committee meeting was on February 29, 1996. At the October 17, 2001 EDA meeting, a Committee was established to review and update the BRLF materials. The Committee consisting of Councilmember Julienne Wyckoff, EDA President, Bob Ruettimann, and former banker Ery Bernard, met on Monday, April 8' to review and update these guidelines. The final draft, which differs little from the original, is attached for your consideration. The Committee was in agreement with the revisions. If approved, according to the bylaws, two more members need to be named, and discussion will need to be held with the Finance Department to establish an exact amount in the BRLF. The program would then be marketed to area banks and businesses this Spring, in order to take advantage of this year's construction season. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the BRLF Loan revised BRLF Bylaws, Plan, Participation Agreement, Guidelines and Loan Application forms. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the revised BRLF Bylaws, Plan, Participation Agreement, Guidelines and Loan Application forms and direct staff to implement. Attachments EDA ACTION: BRLF Document CITY OF QOLUMBIA HEIGHTS 59040th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights, MN 55421 -3878 (763) 706 -3600 TDD (763) 706 -3692 Visit Our Website at: wwci.columbia- heiAhts.mn.us Community Development To: EDA Board Members From: Tim Johnson, City Planner Date: 4/10/2002 Re: Lomianki Park Development Update As you are aware, the City Council has identified the development of property south of Lomianki Park (37th Ave to 38th Ave) as one of its priority projects for 2002. Following this direction, the City of Columbia Heights hosted an open house on the potential development of this property on March 26, 2002. Approximately 25 residents attended the open house as well as several City Council and Planning Commission members. The following action steps will be necessary before any additional land use decisions can be made: • The Park and Recreation Commission will be meeting on April 24, 2002, to discuss and provide a recommendation on whether or not to continue recognizing this area as part of Lomianki Park. • The Planning Commission will be meeting on May 7, 2002, to discuss and provide a recommendation on whether or not to continue recognizing this area as part of Lomianki Park. • The City Council will be meeting sometime in May 2002, to look at the recommendations of both the Park and Recreation Commission and the Planning Commission, in order to make a determination on whether or not to continue recognizing this area as part of Lomianki Park. THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights, MN 55421 -3878 (763) 706 -3600 TDD (763) 706 -3692 Visit Our Website at: wvIw.ci.coiumbia- heights.mn.us Community Development To: EDA Board Members From: Tim Johnson, City Planner Date: 4/10/2002 Re: 51St Court Properties The properties located at 5045, 5065, and 5075 51St Court (behind White Castle and La Casita) have been recently considered for possible residential development, but currently are zoned as General Business. Under General Business guidelines potential uses include: offices, personal and professional services, retail, restaurant, hotel, funeral home, etc. The properties have been vacant for a number of years, and as such have not generated any commercial development of any kind. However, there have been a number of interesting proposals that have been submitted over the years. A site plan was approved in 1990 for a two -story office building to be built at 5065 51St Court, but never materialized. A Baymont Hotel concept was also preliminarily submitted to staff in Winter of 2000, but was never followed through on. It should be noted that staff continues to receive plenty of inquiries regarding these properties, from interested commercial and residential parties. THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION R. MEET NG - AGENDA PTUF -2 B. Public Hearing James Seubert Variance 3988 Hayes Street N.E. Case 19004 -11 Columbia Heights, Mn. Mr. Seubert is requesting a seven (7) foot side yard variance to install a 24' x 36' detached garage at 3988 Hayes Street. The reason for the request is to keep the driveway between the garages as long as possible. The existing garage on the north side of the property is located three feet from the side property line along 40th Avenue. The existing garage on the south side of the property is located three feet from the side property line. The requested variance would allow a distance of 51 feet between the garages. Without the variance, there would be 44 feet between garages. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the request due to the lack of a hardship as defined by the City Ordinance. C. Site Plan Approval Kalina, Wills and Woods Case 19004 -12 5" N:'. Slat 'Court Columbia Heights, Mn. Ron Kalina, representing Kalina, Wills and Woods, is requesting a Site Plan approval to allow the 4t of'a two story office building at 31# t Court. The total square footage of the building is 9,452 square feet plus the basement. The Parking Ordinance requires 40 parking spaces on the site based on net floor area of the proposed building. The site plan indicates that 58 parking spaces would be provided in two parking lots. Due to the location of the two parking lots, one on the north and one on the south, it is Staff's opinion that the three driveway entrances /exits are acceptable. Circulation throughout the parking lots is adequate. The required landscape area is 560 square feet with the site plan indicating approximately 7,800 square feet of landscaped area being provided. Screening is being provided along the residential property to the east by the installation of planting materials as shown on the site plan. Parking lot lighting and signage have not been addressed in the Site Plan. Staff would recommend a plan be submitted addressing these two items. Enclosed in your agenda packets are memos from the Fire Department and Engineering Department addressing their concerns regarding the Site Plan and proposed construction. The Traffic Commission will be reviewing the site plan at their meeting of April 2, 1990. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Site Plan provided requirements of the Engineering Department, Fire Department and Traffic Commission are met and lighting and signage plans are submitted and approved by Staff. W". 9I-01 (rrprA, O 145AW' 6. as• m'ol' M 4%3' PAD Mtk= TP-**ROIQI" • pwMPoR o CCHCRM 1-AD Fw-j" 04=-Oam LM "T" 4'-3' .45". W-W tW-V, D'-3" L 24'-0' @ O 145AW' 6. as• m'ol' M 4%3' PAD Mtk= TP-**ROIQI" • pwMPoR o CCHCRM 1-AD Fw-j" 04=-Oam LM "T" - 0 5085 o: nao' 51ST Lo = 5055 - COURT z0a.o 0 5025 w z a J Q 0= F— z W U 9�. 5075 5065 5045 Egg 4955 1000 1- 4924 ° 4915 4920 4918 I 1091 1087 1105 \125 1135 1 1145 1 1165 /1175 /1195112 1095 L Ac 1 � � � X150 1ja0 1150 "xo 1110 1170 1081 � a' 5080 1075• 1100 1069 1090 5040 5050 5060 Q g a> 50 $ 1074 5030 ti 1065 0 a 5055 8 1070 5020 0' 1061 - °5025 5035 5045 $ 1060 5010 Q Y 1057 o J 1 O °1085 1101 5000= ;5005 1185 1205 1225 1051 = ° o e0. 1043 o PIERCE I... 1' 6.0 da d&0' 90.0 90.0 90.E 1035 9 1100 1220 1120 1140 1160 1180 1200 0 1005 1030 502 a 1085 1105 1125 1145 11165 1185 11'205 9�_o 5 s . ' tea. 50TH HOUSING UPDATE APRIL, 2002 BY: MARK NAGEL, HOUSING ASSISTANT 1. The agreement with the Greater Metropolitan housing Corporation has been signed. Columbia Heights residents have had access to the free services of the Housing Resource Center since April lst. The attached brochure, which is available to residents in the Community Development Department, explains more on the services. 2. Since it began in September 2000, the Columbia Heights Discount Loan Program for housing rehab, administered by Community Revitalization Resources (CRR), has closed 48 loans totaling $635,935 ( see attached breakdown). While there are a third of the City's matching funds left, I don't expect them to last longer than this summer, so the Board and Council will likely need to make a decision on continuing this program before the end of the year. 3. Kristin DeGrande, Program Administrator for CRR, and I videotaped an inform- ational program on housing rehab resources for Cable TV on Wednesday, April 10th If you get a chance, please watch it. I hope to tape one on the Housing Resource Center and on homebuying, as well. 4. As you can see from the attached memorandum, the Blue Earth Environmental Davis - Bacon problem has been resolved. The demolition of 4150 Central Avenue did not "trigger" the need for Davis -Bacon documentation, because no federal funds were used in the construction of the 50 -unit building by Crestview ONDC I. As a result, the company can now be paid the $5,000 in CDBG funds withheld due to assumed Davis -Bacon violations. 5. The Metropolitan Council has come up with an interesting new housing program — the "Smart Commute Mortgage ". They are attempting to promote Smart Growth principles of affordable housing and reduced traffic congestion by linking housing choice to public transit. The mortgages offer low downpayments and loan quali- fication breaks, plus a 2 year free transit pass, for purchasing a home within a quarter of a mile of any public transit route in the metro area. Clearly, nearly every home in Columbia Heights could qualify for this program. Attached is more information. 6. The Cape Cod and Rambler Community Fix -up Fund income requirement has been raised to $88,000, while the interest rate remains at the same low interest rate of 6 %. If your income is less than $35,000 per year, the interest rate is 5 %. We hope this will increase the number of loans this summer. 7. The interest rate for a home improvement loan through the MHFA Fix -up Fund was recently lowered to 6.5 %, while the household income limit was raised to $77,000 per year. The real plus for this program is that it can be used for improve- ments owner- occupied duplexes, triplexes, and quads. 8. The Towle Report for 2002, the most comprehensive market report for the Twin Cities area, notes that Anoka County has one of the lowest vacancy rates in the Twin Cities for office space. Coupled with good commercial and industrial markets, the EDA's RFQ may exceed expectations. o� L s 4 rj L o ��. ul o cy a m ca)0) a)0) o0)a)a) O} c E c c C c �E 3 c w Q2 U C> C L C) O �L ? te a p 2 U} O '1 a] n a C Z E C 0), vD w Z U a a O a) y a S-5-0 E N= } E ` O o2 a a c A y c p(D 0 c �� Ca a O)c Z r C a �o s U C 2C O a) aa � 3 Op.N c o c r 0 3 C �o a 0Z o O} CL in 0 '►abo fa. 'io te- Q O 'O aO > C O 9 a te} 0 N _O _ C a) � aO O Q Ow a O 00 a — Q ° �0) E a0 0 a U c C � c - C C.0 U a -C O — O�� E� c v E °P U >E 3 rr o .O ai ��-2 a -I2 a a7- c U,-O O i C a'O N as OC W d Z lu H p a U V 0 oyi 0 a f -O no z 0 _ > o O 2 N .y 0 m B B OC O a_o O' 0 0 as N c m Q 0 O� N� = =3m Zv'Z o Q a a cj a �-aa a Q 'W W U ` oc >0 N Z aui� OW W zOZ "I VU y0 N Z a 10 co 0 a U n E co n 00 00 `) co) N I v t L 0 z z X C) � z a 0 Lo co z� ca 0 o, 00 O c_ c a2 N U u c O c_ 0 C Q � O L N CL a f -O no z 0 _ > o O 2 N .y 0 m B B OC O a_o O' 0 0 as N c m Q 0 O� N� = =3m Zv'Z o Q a a cj a �-aa a Q 'W W U ` oc >0 N Z aui� OW W zOZ "I VU y0 N Z a co N 0 a O E M 00 00 u t N n z 0— _N ° v � z a 0 C O .0 O m 0> O C 0 E "�� Nc c c Fyi O o Q M o ; zQC) FD 0 0 N a N c O c_ LO Q � N N 10 O 0 O 4 O != U 7 0 ii z N c L C c0) 000 0:3 O C -C c 0 O L �L O U z= a a f -O no z 0 _ > o O 2 N .y 0 m B B OC O a_o O' 0 0 as N c m Q 0 O� N� = =3m Zv'Z o Q a a cj a �-aa a Q 'W W U ` oc >0 N Z aui� OW W zOZ "I VU y0 N Z a 0 a E co �O To u U c — c O c fl a` Q c m c 0 c O U O U `c '- > U O .0 O m 0> O C 0 E "�� Nc c c 0 a �E o> o i�A FD 0 0 N a N 0 U = > O = Q cn c o O p 0 O O c N 0 O 4 O != U 7 0 ii z N c L c0) 000 0:3 To cEzcc' °c a ° E m.- Q� `cU C Q0-0 ULL �' c 0 O L �L O U z= U o° 3; ' �cU mp c O m O z c o c o z m mCU�Zcc ES� 0 p 0 � O O-O.O O "0 '0 c��c 0 0 0 0 0 0 E _�_ C C) EEc --00 0-0 C U Q O 0 0 0 L L z 0 -p } M '- �3E5,l,w O >>a } } c� _cc_ctt _ =`= '222Z> °C��» -m UUUUUUU - oLL 2zzzza c O a f -O no z 0 _ > o O 2 N .y 0 m B B OC O a_o O' 0 0 as N c m Q 0 O� N� = =3m Zv'Z o Q a a cj a �-aa a Q 'W W U ` oc >0 N Z aui� OW W zOZ "I VU y0 N Z a 10 co �O L N N 7 ^O n N U) jul L c z X i�A Q 3 0 0 o m C, v o 0) C N o c_ O N c n 0 c O C a a f -O no z 0 _ > o O 2 N .y 0 m B B OC O a_o O' 0 0 as N c m Q 0 O� N� = =3m Zv'Z o Q a a cj a �-aa a Q 'W W U ` oc >0 N Z aui� OW W zOZ "I VU y0 N Z a W W U W N 0 0 cn c U •- �' C u C u - U 0 0 O w 0 Oyi � to 0 0 x m U) a 0 h v_i U m 0 G a c c 4) (1) >. Y � 0 D. 0 90 z c c 0 0> a o ti C C .O E p O o0 ,n N c O D N E m 0 O CD a U O C O w 0) O -D O N a N O N O. �_ O Q 7 n N C O- C 0 C Q p h a,0 a O E ��� 0 a o cm o`0 o ° c� o 'o ��� � o c } 0 0 -x d O O w C N O O C O C O Q T O C ii N E N Q) a) of a c Eo 3� °� N�o ono a _ =c 0 j C E 9 y p 0 d C U o CL O O 47 0 O a 0 o a m Y c T o c o° c 3 0 3 E 00 N n m a o f �Q o, a 0- 3No w � 3 0-0 �a xc oar E � c-°' a E �� o �U o 0� - o C) 0 6 o -C QE a o c 0) cC U �E Evc >_ da �c o 000 asEQ °moo` y o° oo3 00 = rQ °Na c° ° o o E d -° H v o � 3 o N o � c- y° ° m .0 3 3 n a c �0 o•� a) 3 E E a� ° 0° z aE o�6 E o a �C5aN � =p C y Od O O s 6 OO 0 O Lu aQ Qw U : 5 > m OL w QL a N // /tt Q �t t44 // U t t ¢a // V 0 • c O `a C c .7 0 x U d 0 U C D O L m o� c a N � U C N m O U c m w off' L '0 p C) o- -0 o m � U •O z c 44.4 c O d U O it u y a u U .y 0 x �0 L y O +- U O C o •c y 0 U o > N CID O 0 � U w�1 N xE m 6 c c p p� O> Q `c E p opc E c E c L o o O.a .� N o—UU 0 n� 0 3 9 c H= oocTfco 4 Q = p C S N < d ; �pE" E u C p._ a c> c N U c(D C a ° d O S O N aOi I) -- � a p °p �°. �ooa °92 0 } c 3 c 3 0 L 0 0 c 0 += 0 c N N c N Q p O c 0 E O � N cn i C C O O L O L N o,c (D E 3x3 >Oa 3 a0 ° Q ass N O V) O 0 N O O Q Q U Q U Q +- Q%,- L C en t+ �E-C o U c ° :� U) 3 Q >c� 00 a)a c }- UE�Looc c 0�0)� O Ca) UO0a_)°°'- }�ONCDC E°)0 a a) U ��j O -> D aaa - o 0 0 o-0 " Q L •O� o•c U� � � � � o � ° mom} O Q -�o 0� - -� •- ��oNco� V�� � OL a) •N� � U' o a) O E O a) c U C a) d 3 (Dmss C: aO ma �- c a O� 0U a> a) } tuo� =} �L o:- c OL 0 a) E a) �+ h C O a) u U D •U C U U L E C9.cn N °��jo C 0 `n O o O c cO E� a) -0 °ooc0)0-"' c c 0-0 c .co it =x a0 0 0 0 0 oa�0° U 0 m U> V 0 • c O `a C c .7 0 x U d 0 U C D O L m o� c a N � U C N m O U c m w off' L '0 p C) o- -0 o m � U •O z c 44.4 c O d U O it u y a u U .y 0 x �0 L y O +- U O C o •c y 0 U o > N CID O 0 � U w�1 N xE m 6 c c p p� O> Q `c E p opc E c E c L o o O.a .� N o—UU 0 n� 0 3 9 c H= oocTfco 4 Q = p C S N < d ; �pE" E u C p._ a c> c N U c(D C a ° d O S O N aOi I) -- � a p °p �°. �ooa °92 0 } c 3 c 3 0 L 0 0 c 0 += 0 c N N c N Q p O c 0 E O � N cn i C C O O L O L N o,c (D E 3x3 >Oa 3 a0 ° Q ass N O V) O 0 N O O Q Q U Q U Q +- Q%,- L C en Community Revitalization Resources wvr,%v.,nncee.orY 211 North I" Street, Suite 455. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 . Phone: (612) 335 -5880 . Fax: (612) 335 -2650 March 14, 2002 City of Columbia Heights Tim Johnson 59040 1h Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Tim: Enclosed you will find the most recent report summarizing all loan activity through the Columbia Heights 6% discount program. This report is broken down into two categories: one for loans closed through the Community Fix -up Fund and the other through the Fix -up /Home Improvement Loan Fund. The end of the report highlights total funds used and funds remaining to date. This version of the report includes all activity through March 1, 2002. Also, given that we've had such a mild winter and construction season is virtually upon us, if you have any city newsletter or other form of media going out (i.e. water bill), this would be a great opportunity to market the availability of this home improvement loan program. I will be calling you within this next week to discuss some options for marketing this program and others to property owners in Columbia Heights. If you have any questions regarding this report or need any additional information, please feel free to call me at 612- 335 -5881. Sincerely, Kristin DeGrande CEE /CRR Program Administrator 12t r EOUAL HOUSING LENDER A division of the Center for F,nerw and Environment • Equal Opportunity Employer u .5 N u O O N M tl) V fp (MO 00 N t V O H H 4646! 3 A C C S N 3 3 a •' w d 3 V tp C $ o h W A � .5 3 .9 N C .9 3 a2 eo ,s Se t] V H9 f/! 49 ia a�aa a�8� O O m ..� $$ v° ,,;.; �N � � .9 ,� b egg •" e� ,`c� o egg n lL O N 0 8 r O. h eo eo O N N et v� vi V1 o � M ..•. V S �O �n r oo n � r, N N �n n N v�ni n r M vi 00 ^� a N N N C �G C C M 46V v1 r O %0 O. 1- %0 p M O� OO S H N M n Oro W .N. N O !NO ,"'•� Vii H C7 M N t0 r H H H H H N 4604 H H H H H H H H H H H H H vI O r O, v1 00 00 O O N N �' kn vl on o o r M -. 'V o o n r eo r N Y pa en n N OI Oro 00 N M O s� Vii M 10 H H H H H H H H H H" H H H H 49 H 4604 H r Yi O r O C �n 7 O O O •-� t�l v1 r M o0 O N O a l� v� O � o, 00 h h � .M.. O O vi N 1O %0 N �/1 r o0 O. �p O t0 .r. �vry nr oeq �o N M H H H H H H H H H . H. H 64 H H H 46.04 W N nH p S N n O h n b S h a VM,' S O� ci ^ O^ 8 N h OMi V1 :t M M m I ONO VMi ^ V• M M M r•1 46!i Lo N LO w H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H Yi S S S S pH p p p p O O S S S O S S S O O S O S pS S O Oro 00 h Q p N M 00 M C C r m M N N O+ N .r M 469 H H H H 4604 469 69 H H H H H H 469 H H 46.9 H 464 Soso SoSooS8S8go88 ^ ^ ^ h y co 5 u cr v a N b a, Zu u o ° Jw d 12 s 12 12 °o C < b' O W Vii ^. 3 N .pL" .°�i � Po.. ��-pNs �r (+pV O •^-• ii in p� v M O_ N ^ M N QT vri N M 7 h M M M M O M. ,r u O N C O O N M tl) V fp (MO 00 N t V H H 4646! S N n LL•IO tp N — H9 f/! H O O m �N n lL O N 0 M r, V H H O H C7 N N vI 72 Y OI s� V L� a.+ T 3 0 b A >_ O .L T N V U b a y C Q .O M A s 0 _7 O V 0 v� .5 3 a 0 u ° u to aN"o v$ y C v ° 3 3 u 3 H b " s 5 g w a '� 8 ° °y3 on b a 3 o 3 m °' .emu g 3 Ha e%N off.° a 3 .loo o�00 .bo 4.T .b b$ g .5 y5 err h ••• ao t.. to vl N O w w vl M M M w t- r h n 1D r O 00 V N 00 I� M O� -It %0 N,r t- w 7 w w w Vl DD M 00 Vl N N ch N w M N M M M t- ^ �o - t- 7 �o �D v1 10 M --� m M ..r N ^ O eT O ^ ^� .N. M .--� H H H H H H H H H H H H H 44 H H V% H H H H H H H 49 fn H H 44 H H vl 00 ti v) vl N O ^ q N n O� v1 O 00 q v1 M M M ^ v1 o! 0. l� l . N [l N �-+ N N n 00 vl O n t� O C t� v1 t� O �O o0 v1 O M M O: O^ ^ N O N M O. �C N d' t� oo 'I oo 00 oo C M vl oo O K v1 �o t.4 .. o0 V1 o. M h N N m 7 N eq M N M M M t- ^ 8� t� � g 7 �Y C 0% C 'D et vl lD M T M M .-+ N H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H O " oo 'D O O �o M e} �D n vl n !, M p �o °1 ^� oo t� Ol M r vl �o t` In h ID vl O M M v1 V vl M vl n vl N M r! a ry O 'D oo vi f` w vl 'p o0 T M N °, to t- oo r` t` t` N C %D �D C N W O V t- oo t- n b vl M 2 'D '�t 00 M Q1 00 N O M vl N ^ O� O M M^ oo ^ M N t- N O+ N �o N N cq H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H O C, oo t` T n M pp N v1 n v1 a r N Ol Ol O o. t-: O O M '7 O f` (� oo oo N M O O M �O M . V o. O vl oo O M t- 6 C cV 10 oo �6 s�t{ .. m O vi 10 vt 7 R M M " O �O O� 10 N.. °, vl V1 M l� l� N 0o n b Ol 1D lO N V1 n I-- M � v1 --� V1 N O^ ^ N Vl e l vn '+ 't cA Vl N ^•' o. H H H H H H Hpp Hpp H H H H H in H H H H H Hpp Hpp H 64 H H H H H Hp Hp H p p p p p S O S O O S O O S S O S O O O O O O O S O S S O O S O O O S O Cl M* O " eD to 8 C N N V ^' M N Ol M C O M Q P; C$ C N O Ol Ol 00 S V'1 S V1 .. M O t� V1 M .�-i b N M'n �O $ M O O M O O 00 N W h lD M O� ^ ww M o. h ID �D h M e�1 �--� l� °� l� 1D vt n p: n N N M �D Mme. vl N N a e�i vi oo vi �D r M oo b w N O n vl .M-. Hp H Hp H H H H H H H H H H H H Hp H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H p p O O O O O O S O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 �O �DOVV�o�,tav��ormoc��lovoCg�nv o�lvlo\rnlo�o`�D a^ M` g Ct��t��� m oo lo oo in c7l u d � dr 3 �, d d R d o 441 cx°1 Eu�, •�� NHS t7 aa00�ap°nAAwc7xTrT7ir ?axa%ulaaaaw������, z z z3zz W z {x� W u N > 5 a c� aU deb u A.5 �' b a b vyQ N > ° 1.i � N % I x D°. Q � � � LD b �°. E� � .�". N CIO � � r'7 . .'L'i O� �.1 . = .. oo .-. � vl t` t 8 O O N 8 M VMl %o t- r of �o oo .o w p N ^ n Ol M O vl �Mp O t� O. T M 0�0 N .M.. .N. M+ �N{ M o0 Ol N O r {N{ O c1 c M b •t N M vt < h V' 4 M M v M ^ E M v d• l N •t .r N M et Vl %D t- w 0% .^-� N.. .M-��+ h �p .n-. o. O N M Q vl lD t- N N 01, O ^' .-. .--� •--� N N N N N N N N N N M M 0 v ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) DATE: March 25, 2002 TO: Walt Fehst, City Manager Randy Schumacher, Acting Community Development Director FROM: Mark Nagel, Housing Assistant RE: Blue Earth Environment Bill The source of this bill goes back to the Summer of 1999, when Blue Earth Environmental Company was the low bidder to demolish several buildings, including 4150 Central Avenue NE. This building was demolished, as per contract, and the company submitted a bill for payment of the work. On October 19, 1999, the company was told that $5,000 was being withheld until damage to the fencing on the property adjacent to 4150 Central Avenue NE was repaired. This was subsequently completed in 2000 and the company again requested payment but this time, through a letter from their attorney dated December 6, 2000. The City continued to withhold payment because Davis -Bacon paperwork had apparently, not been submitted by the company. The issue has been at a standstill since January 2001 and was subsequently listed as an audit finding in the 1999 Columbia Heights Financial Audit (see Attachment #1). To resolve the stalemate, I began by reviewing all of the files related to this project and found that the CDBG reimbursement request was missing. Anoka County still had the form and in their files and faxed it to me. As you can see from Attachment #2, Mr. Hollman, the City Planner at the time, along with Anoka County, made the determination on or before December 28, 1999 that Davis -Bacon did not apply to this project. Since the use of federal funds in a project over $2,000 is the usual "trigger" for Davis -Bacon regulations, I asked Judy McIntyre, who handles Davis -Bacon regulations for HUD, to give me a confirmation that documentation of wages and fringes was not necessary on this project. As you can see from our E -mail correspondence in Attachment #3, demolition of 4150 Central Avenue NE would only be covered under Davis -Bacon if the 50 senior building, which is currently under construction, was being financed, at least in part, by federal funds; therefore, Davis -Bacon regulations did not need to be followed by the City on this project. For backup purposes, I requested Ms. McIntyre to provide the citation from the Handbook — Attachment #4 contains the citation. Specifically, HUD Handbook 1344.1 REV -1, Section 7 -5, Page 7 -2 clearly confirms that Davis -Bacon documentation was unnecessary for this project, since the construction of the senior building is being completed without the use of federal funds. To sum, I would recommend that Blue Earth Environmental Company be paid the $5,000 that has been owed to them for past 27 months, since Davis -Bacon documentation was not required for this demolition project. Further, I would recommend that the city auditors issue a correction of the financial audits in which this finding was contained, since they were incorrect. Please let me know if you have any questions m CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Year Ended December 31, 1999 1999 -3: Section 8 Rental Voucher and Certificate Programs, CFDA #14.855 and 14.857, direct from HUD Condition and Criteria : The Section 8 cluster compliance requires that the utility rate data be reviewed each year. If there is a rate change of 10 percent or more, the utility allowance schedule should be revised. A utility rate survey and review has not been performed since 1997. Questioned Costs: None Recommendation: A utility rate survey should be conducted in 2000 and the utility rate allowance adjusted if appropriate. 19994: CDBG Program, CFDA No. 14.218, passed - through Anoka Countv Criteria: The Davis -Bacon Act requires that all laborers who work on construction contracts in excess of $2,000 be paid not less than the prevailing wage rates. Condition: During 1999 the City entered into one contract that required compliance with the provision of the Davis -Bacon Act. The City was unable to provide information to verify compliance with Davis- Bacon. Questioned Cost: Not determined. Recommendation: The City should develop internal control procedures to ensure that all construction projects that are covered by the Davis -Bacon Act use prevailing wage rates and that this information is maintained by the City. COUNTY OF ANOKA- Office of County Administration GOVERNMENT CENTER 2100 3rd Avenue • Anoka, Minnesota 55303 -2265 (763) 323 -6700 FAX: (763) 323 -5682 FAX TRANSMITTAL MEMO Date: March 20, 2002 Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 1 TO: Mark Nagel Fax 763 - 706 -3672 Ref: Proiect 9830 FROM: Angela Stamper Fax #: (763) 323 -6682 Phone #: (763) 323 -5714 E -Mail: angela.stamperoco.anoka.inn.us MESSAGE: Attached is the document that I have stating that Davis Bacon does not apply to this project. if you need more information please call. If problems are experienced in receiving this data, or If pages are incomplete, call Operator: Cindy Telephone * (763) 323 -5700 Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunity Employer TDDIM 763 - 323 -5289 HNOKH (CxJNT)' :ax:9- 763 - 323 -5682 w, 0 °o oh A "~ O O Q1 O -4 � ae H H Q cLn �y = C C ice! � � � N d ul� cn A^ to era U V U Q W Sw -..� o ~ as r, v+ rn rn ao C) C.) 0 z 004-) ) C) o `' Y� r r VP 4j 4J := py s, C +� 41 a W +J GJ W EO W O LJ O W CC mo d. �i �> » r G CO W m W m W CL Q d z 2 z -� W C � C 0= > > > E alko 4-) 4-3 4j Qj Q u 0LL. VV O MIT -:r Q b O O O O ii Ts L) C R1 C O O O UJ W` C$ r r 0 Q W Q'� 4 a--) + u u gEE a.zz' E d E u u L>� A, 0 0 0 en M M Mar 20 '02 16:02 ai C a �o m Y. P. 02 m � d ~o O q q C ZL E Eo c�� a C v d m C L sW ° off'$ r ZC C C m Q r eC V y U z� ne C „a ?I C rn vi m E � O C) to O C) o m LO to ai C a �o m Y. P. 02 m � d ~o O q q C ZL E Eo c�� a C v d m C L sW ° off'$ r ZC C C m Q r eC V y U z� ne C „a Mark Nagel - Re: Blue Earth Environmental Page 1 From: <Judy_Mclntire @HUD.GOV> To: <Mark. Nagel@ci.columbia-heights. mn. us> Date: 3/19/02 2:26PM Subject: Re: Blue Earth Environmental It appears that the funding for the new construction did not trigger Davis - Bacon; therefore, the demolition would not be covered by prevailing wages either. The demolition would be covered only if there was subsequent construction work that was subject to Davis - Bacon. (I don't think we discussed the funding of the construction work when we spoke). "Mark Nagel" <Mark. Nagel @ ci.columbia -heig hts.mn.us> cc: Subject: 03/19/02 09:18 AM Judy - To: <Judy_Mclntire @HUD.GOV> Re: Blue Earth Environmental The senior building was funded through Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds and Notes totalling $5.31 million issued on behalf of Crestview ONDC I for the construction - no city funding involved. The land aquisition and relocation was done by the private company, who is responsible for all bond payments. To my knowledge, Judy, the only CDBG funds that were used were in the demolition. I hope this helps. Mark Nagel >>> <Judy_Mclntire @HUD.GOV> 03/18/02 08:24AM >>> Mark - How was the 50 -unit Senior building funded? Judy "Mark Nagel" <Mark.Nagel @ci.columbia -heig To: <Judy_Mclntire @HUD.GOV> hts. mn. us> cc: Subject: Blue Earth Environmental 03/15/02 01:59 PM Mark Nagel - Re: Blue Earth Environmental Page 2 Judy - I have learned that the property after demolition was sold, along with another 2 lots, for a 50 -unit senior building. The demolition was done on a commercial building located 4150 Central Avenue. I'm not sure this makes any difference in terms of Davis -Bacon requirements. I have located the Wage Decision for the project dated 4/19/99, page 12, Laborers, Asbestos Abatement $16.56/hr. with $5.61 for fringes. I've got names and adresses for 2 of the 5 workers of of the interview sheets, but willnot write them a letter until you confirm that the right wage decision was approved. It does look like the hourly wage paid was OK, since the 2 interviewed received $20 /hour. I hope to locate the names and adresses of the other 3 - if there were 3 others - shortly. Thanks for your help and any other guidance you can give me based on the above would be appreciated. Mark Nagel `s% °` " *° U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Nvelopment Minnesota State Office 220 Second Street South a It Minneapolis, Minnesota 55=Gi -2153 ��a•` htt p:!l www .hud.pov /localimin /minhome.html Labor Relations Fax Cover Sheet Date: 3 -?L # of Pages (including cover sheet): From: Judv L. McIntire Office: Labor Relations, 5KS Telephone #: 612/370 -3000 Extension 2284 Fax #: 612/370 -3218 To: it /, ,L� 4-4A, Office: A _._. Telephone #: Fax #: ?�a.. -7 DG, — 37 -1-- -- - Subject: F1344.1 REV -1 3 WORKING SUBCONTRACTORS Contractual relationships between contractors and alleged bcontractors (who perform mechanic's work) which are formed fo the purpose of evading the application of prevailing wage requi ments ae expressly prohibited and may provide a basis for deb ment. Where there is any doubt as to the bona -fid nature o self - employed subcontractor who has no other 5 �r employees, a following must be checked: n� 1. Does the s ontractor'have a registered trad name and is'there.a to ephone listing under that na 2. Does the subcont for have a license? 3. Does the subcontract have liabili insurance or a " V subcontractor's bond? X` 4. Federal Tax Identification ber. Any of these criteria in con ncti with a signed contract containing HUD Federal La Standar Provisions from each such subcontractor shou be sufficien to establish that he or she is a bona -fid ubcontractor. S h a subcontractor will submit payrol indicating only that a /she is the owner, the hours worke and the classification. phrase "self - employe owner" shall be written under he name, address, a Social Security Number (See Colum 1 on the Optional orm WH -347). Nonbona -fide self employ subco ractors must be carried as employees on the ayroll of the ontractor who engaged him /her, and must be pai the veiling wage rate for the classification of work p formed. 7 -4 CLEANING. Cleaning performed during construction is subject, To prevailing wage provisions. In the absence of a specific wage rate for the cleaning classification, or if DOL disapproves a conformance request, the cleaners must be paid the predetermined wage rate for laborers. Cleaning performed after the completion of construction in order to prepare the premises for occupancy which is not being done under the construction contract is not subject to the prevailing wage requirements. 7 -5 DEMOLITION. Demolition work, which is not related to constru t on, is not subject to the prevailing wage requirements of DBRA. For example, the demolition of a 7 -2 12/86 1344.1 REV-1 building because'such structure is no longer needed would not in itself be a covered construction activity. However, where an existing building is being demolished as a phase of a construction project subject to OARA, the demolition would also be covered, as in the case of demolition performed to permit construction of a new building. 7 -6 DETERMINING PROPER CLASSIFICATIONS FOR VARIOUS WORK. Questions as to the proper classi ication of a laborer or mechanic for various types of work are resolved by making an area practice determination. In determining the proper classification for work performed on a project, it is immaterial whether the contractor is union or nonunion. On projects where the. prevailing wage rates for classifications in question on the applicable wage decision are based on negotiated rates, the prevailing practice concerning work performed in those classifications is that Practice observed on projects built by contractors who are signatory to the collective bargaining agreements. Therefore, unless there is a jurisdictional dispute between the crafts, the duties ascribed to any job classification will be the same as those outlined in the appropriate collective bargaining agreements or, if the collective bargaining agreements are silent on this issue, the local unions involved must be consulted. Conversely, in areas where open shop (nonunion) rates are determined to prevail for the classifications in question, those prevailing job practices fo.ilowed on projectt by open shop contractors in the same area become area practice. 7 -7 HELPERS. The use of helpers who use tools in assisting mec—' hanics and who are paid below the minimum rates for mechanics is ordinarily not proper, since the apprentice or trainee is recognized as the individual who is to perform the less skilled craft work during his /her training period. Helpers are not recognized on a DBRA contract unless they are contained in the wage determination or a conformable rate is approved by the Department of Labor. 7 -8 RELATIVES. There are no exceptions made in the enforcement of DBR on the basis of family relationship for relatives who are performing the work of laborers or mechanics. They must be paid the prevailing wage rate for the classification of work Performed and be Included on the certified payrolls. 7 -3 12/86 ** TOTAL PAGE.03 ** 4A i.7 a 4 x r � n O '17 u �1 •.n 41 ~O 14 .^ zl y c• � L b � b � .n .n .� G • .N. pp C, u v � •—• rn y� C � i o U V R cli C11 ►� � -O 0 cwe .0 � � to O 4J U OAS, It 404 A U w a 0 I'u V m H �, 1J 4! y ° F- r�.0 d cn i.7 a 4 x r � :J U ti L � O �A cc c v .tn v \j • ti c r � O CCU C � u � � � � � >, "5 r � 14 � A CS- ci O � "' •� u � W � � v � ca 5' ` x � v � °. a '� ° O O 14 ', c�a ••+ � y £ zt v O 7J u bA •� U I.1 avi rr. W C AAGE� ^ ^ �I :J U w L � O �A cc c v .tn v ,� •[ c r L' CCU C � u � � � � � >, "5 r � 14 � O •o o � � v � �L�4� � v :J yu w L y r•rV c v .tn v c r L' CCU C � u � � � � � >, "5 r � c � O •o o � � v � u � � v � °. a '� ° 0 �y y £ C v O 7J u bA •� U I.1 avi rr. W C AAGE� ^ ^ �I O O �Or rC c t-5 :� ce ui a + b O u u • • • a° 0 w b y u yu �% L o c v .tn v c r L' CCU C � u � � � � � >, "5 0 c � O •o o � � v � u � � v � °. a '� a y £ C C • � � 7J u bA i I.1 C •� � W y O •n•I ^ ^ �I O O �Or rC c t-5 :� ce ;� v I yu o c v .tn v L' CCU � � � u � � � � � >, "5 0 �o v°"'�•� O •o o � � v � u � � v � °. a '� a y +r a v i O •n•I cn 14 O O U 'l7 cc �I O O O :� ce ;� v cq a° 0 w b y � y • y v U 't r, O ~2 ' � v C O A, 0 O v v R" O � cd y 'O y V O v Y a. Coo i L u i, D O E ^L" C aU O> (A cd O v a C m 0 PARKVIEW VILLA RESIDENT COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES APRIL 8, 2002 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. Anita gave her Management Report: • The Mobil Post Office service may be cut because of budget cust. • Surge protection equipment will be installed soon for lightning strikes. • Residents should not take parts out of the newspaper or cut coupons out. • Residents should dispose of their trash during trash hours. • Residents should do their laundry during laundry hours. • Residents should not put personal notes or letters on the Bulletin Boards • Business bulletins should not be put on the Bulletin Board but, should be put on the bench. Jackie Ovshak gave the Treasurers Report. Marion Johnson gave the Entertainment Report about going to Old Country Buffet, Wednesday, April 24th, 2002 for the April Birthdays. D. Powell, Bill and Anita, will be driving. Muriel McCellan gave the Sunshine Report. She sent a card and $5.00 to Wes Hallgren and Teri Saice. John Super welcomed new resident Jean Horshbuger. Residents voted to send $250 check, to the Fire Department and Police Department for their services to the community. Helen Myhre, volunteered to help Katie with decorations. Betty Fina drew Bev Layes name for $5, and Ryszard Lanouski drew Donna Pouliot's name for the other $5. The guest speaker for the meeting was Karen Moeller, Senior Coordinator. Karen spoke to residents about all activities available to residents through the Senior Center. The meeting was moved to adjourn and seconded at 8:20 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Leo Mollenmaster Resident Council Secretary 2002