Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecember 27, 1994 RegularCITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (612) 782-2800 December 22, 1994 Mayor Joseph Sturdevanr Councilmembers Donald G. Jolly Bruce G. Nawrocki Gary L. Peterson Robert W. Ruettimann City Manager Patrick Hentges The following is the agenda for the regular meeting of the City Council to be held at 7:00 PM on Tuesday, December 27, 1994, in the City Council Chambers of City Hail at 590 40th Avenue NE, Columbia Heights, Minnesota. The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all City of Columbia Heights' services, programs, and activities. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Council Secretary at 782-2800, Extension 209, to make arrangements. (TDD/782-2806 for deaf only) 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance o Consent Agenda (All items listed with asterisks [***] are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted as part of the Consent Agenda by one motion.) RECOMMENDED MOTION: Moye to adopt the consent agenda items as indicated with an asterisk (***)on the Regular Council Agenda. 4. Minutes of Previous Meeting(s) *** RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of December 12, 1994, Meeting, as presented in writing, and such reading be dispensed with. 5. Open Mike/Procl.amations/Presentations (Open Mike is an opportunity for residents to address or raise any issue to the City Council. However, the City Council asks that the resident provide their name, address, and a statement of the'item. The matter will be considered by the City Council or referred to staff for a future response. In order to expedite business, residents will be allotted five minutes to present their statement or issue.) a. Presentation of Plaque to Bruce Nawrocki 6o ac Public Hearings/Ordinances & Resolutions Public Hearing - License Revocation, Rental Property (4429 3rd Street N.E.) RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Close the Public Hearing Regarding the Revocation or Suspension of the Rental License Held by Pamela J. Francis Regarding Rental Property at 4429 NE 3rd Street in That the Property is Vacant and on the Market for Sale. "SERVICE IS OUR BUS1NESS' EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY 1N EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2 Council Meeting of December 27, 1994 bo do Public Hearing - License Revocation, Rental Property (4541/43 Taylor Street N.E.) RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Close the Public Hearing Regarding the Revocation or Suspension of the Rental License Held by Jeffrey S. McNair Regarding Rental Property at 4541/43 Taylor Street NE in that the Property has been Relicensed. Public Hearing - First Reading of Ordinance No. 1296, Exempting From Massage Therapist Requirements a Person Who is Employed By or Under Contract of a Licensed Medical Person. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the first reading of the ordinance, there being ample copies available for the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Schedule the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1296, Exempting From Massage Therapist Requirements a Person Who is Employed By or Under Contract of a Licensed Medical Person, for January 9, 1995, at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers. Resolution 94-84 - Regarding the Labor Agreement Between the City of Columbia Heights and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Effective January t, 1995 - December 31, 1996. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Adopt Resolution 94-84, Regarding the Labor Agreement Between the City of Columbia Heights and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Effective January 1, 1995-December 31, 1996. e. Resolution 94-85 - Ordering and Levying an Improvement RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the Resolution, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Adopt Resolution 94-85, Being a Resolution Ordering and Levying One Mid-Block Light Located in the Backyards Between Royce Street and Leander Lane, South of 44th Avenue N.E., on an Existing Pole Between 4332 and 4233 Leander Lane, Known as PIR 677-Area 25 - Project 9427. Resolution 94-86 - Regarding the Labor Agreement Between the City of Columbia Heights, and the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 49, Effective January 1, 1995-December 31, 1996 RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Adopt Resolution 94-86, Regarding the Labor Agreement Between the City of Columbia Heights, and the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 49, Effective January 1, 1995-December 31, 1996. Resolution 94- 87 - Adopting 1995-1996 Salary and Fringe Benefit Adjustments for Non ~ Union Supervisory Employees RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available for the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Adopt Resolution 94-87, Adopting Changes in Non-Union Group Salary Ranges, and Establishing Salaries and Changes in Fringe Benefits for Non-Unionized Supervisory City Positions for Calendar Year 1995 and 1996. COUNCIL AGENDA Page 3 Council Meeting of December 27, 1994 h. Resolution 94-88 - Adopting 1995-1996 Salary & Fringe Benefit Adjustments for Non-Union Essential and Confidential Employees RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available for the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Adopt Resolution 94-88, Adopting Changes in Non-Union Group Salary Ranges, and Establishing Salaries and Changes in Fringe Benefits for Non- Unionized Essential and Confidential City Positions for Calendar Year 1995 and 1996. i. Resolution 94-89 - Requesting the Charter Commission to Consider Amendment to the City Charter Providing for an Even Year Municipal Election RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available for the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Adopt Resolution 94-89, Requesting the Charter Commission to Consider Amendment to the City Charter Providing for an Even Year Municipal Election. j. Other Ordinances and Resolutions 7. Communications Establish Public Hearing Date Regarding Revocation or Suspension of a Rental License for 621-23 N.E. 51st Avenue and 4628 and 4634 Tyler Street N.E. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Establish a Hearing Date of January 23, 1995, for Revocation or Suspension of a License to Operate a Rental Property Within the City of Columbia Heights Against Bonnie D. O'Donnell, Regarding Rental Property at 621-23 N.E. 51st Avenue and Against Gary Eugene Hegenes, dba/Esquire Properties, Regarding Rental Property at 4628 and 4634 Tyler Street N.E. b. Other Communications 8. Old Business ***a. Authorization to Seek Bids for Dredging of LaBelle Pond RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Authorize Staff to Advertise for Bids to Dredge LaBelle Pond, Project #9312. b. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 1) Authorization of HR_A/City Staff Office Consolidation Agreement RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Enter into an Agreement with the Columbia Heights HRA Regarding Office Consolidation of HRA Staff and City Building Department Staff. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Approve the Job Description of Zoning/Grant Coordinator and Establish the 1994 Wage Range for the Position of: Entry 6 Months 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years $2,077 $2,148 $2,218 $2,289 $2,360 c. Other Old Business COUNCIL AGENDA Page 4 Council Meeting of December 27, 1994 9. New Business a. Award of Building Accessibility Improvements, Municipal Projects #9425, #9212, #9216, #9218, & #9219 RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Award the Building Accessibility Improvements to Municipal Project Numbers #9425, #9212, #9216, #9218, and #9219 to PMI Construction Company of St. Paul, Minnesota, Based upon Their Low, (~ualified, Responsible Bid in the Amount of $56,700 with Funds to be Appropriated from 1993-1994. Community Development Block Grant; and, Furthermore, to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Enter into an Agreement for the Same. ***b. Siren Maintenance Contract RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move That the City Enter Into a Maintenance Agreement With Doradus Corporation for Time and Materials Service of the City's Siren Decoder/Receivers and That the Mayor and City Manager Be Authorized to Sign the Agreement. ***c. Final Payment For Municipal Project 9401-Seal Coating SE (~uadrant RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Accept the Work for Municipal Project #9401 and to Authorize Final Payment From Fund 415-59401-5130 to Bituminous Roadways, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minnesota, in an Amount of $15,923.90. d. Establish January, 1995, Work Session Dates RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Establish Tuesday, January 3, 1995 at 8 P.M.; Saturday, January 7, 1995, at 8:30 A.M.; and Tuesday, January 17, 1995, at 7 P.M. as Work Session Dates. e. Other New Business 10. Reports a. Report of the City Manager b. Report of the City Attorney 11. Licenses *** RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the 1995 license applications as listed upon payment of proper fees, and to approve the rental property license applications as listed on the memorandum from Lowell DeMars dated December 27, 1994. 12. Payment of Bills *** RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pay the bills as listed out of proper funds. Adjournment RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adjourn. Pat Hentges, City Manager 94/137 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 12, 1994 The Council Meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Sturdevant. ~OLL CALL Jolly, Nawrocki, Ruettimann, Peterson, Sturdevant - present 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ~ONSENT AGENDA The following items were appproved on the Consent Agenda: Minutes .of Previous MeetinGs The Council approved the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of November 28, 1994 and the Truth in Taxation Meeting of November 30, 1994. ~oDditional Use permit - Teddy Bear Preschool, 1555 40th Avenue The Council approved the conditional use permit to allow the operation of the Teddy Bear Preschool in the First Lutheran Church at 1555 40th Avenue Northeast. Designating an Official.Newpaper for 1995 The Council designated the Columbia Heights Focus as the official City newspaper for 1995 and authorized the Mayor and city Manager to enter into an agreement with the Columbia Heights Focus for required publications. Authorization to Obtain Ouotes for T-Shirts. Baseball Caps and Athletic E_~uipment The Council authorized staff to obtain quotes for t-shirts, baseball caps and athletic equipment for the Recreation Program. ~icense Applications The Council approved the 1995 license applications as listed upon payment of proper fees and approved the rental property license applications as listed on the December 12, 1994 memorandum from Lowell DeMars. Pa_vment of Bills The Council approved the payment of bills as listed out of proper funds. 4. ~pPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 12, 1994 PAGE 2 Motion by Nawrocki, second by Jolly to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Roll call: All ayes 5. OPEN MIKE a. Silver Lake Homeowners Association - Request the RCWD. to Fund Feasibility and Diagnostic Study of Silver Lake Representatives of the Silver Lake Homeowners Association explained their request. One resident had three questions regarding a water study, further development of Apache Plaza and the modification of the pond at the boat landing. The Public Works Director advised that the pond will be rehabed in a way similar to the plan drafted by the Watershed District~ This project is included in the 1995 budget. Discussion'continued regarding the implications of supporting the petition sent to the RCWD by the Silver Lake Homeowners, previous studies which may have been done and safety issues relative to the lake. Motion by Nawrocki, second by Jolly to direct staff to continue research of various mattersconcerning this issue and prepare responses to the three questions as posed by a resident. Roll call: Ail ayes b. Disposition of Vacant. Parcel at 4215 M~eod Tim Chies, representing his father who owns a vacant piece of property at 4215 McLeod, advised the Council that his father desires to donate this parcel to the City. The City Manager stated he is aware of this proposal and has requested ~ staff to review the possible uses for the parcel. Staff will also contact the three property owners adjacent to this lot regarding any interest they may have in the property. Current easements and topography of the land may be issues which need discussion. The City Manager advised there are some outstanding assessment and maintenance costs for this parcel. Motion by Nawrocki, second by Jolly that the City Manager be directed to prepare additional information on this matter and return it to the City Council. Roll call: All ayes REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 12, 1994 PAGE 3 A citation has been issued by one of the City's CSO's for a public nuisance associated with this property. A court date has been set for this citation. The citation addresses grass clippings and tree branches on the parcel. Mr. Chies disagrees that this debris constitutes a public nuisance and suggested the citation has no merit. Councilmember Jolly recalled the City having received several complaints on this vacant property and the difficulties in · getting any response from the owner. He felt the condition of the property was a possible hazard for children. PUBLIC HEARINGS/ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS a. Resolution No. 94-80; Adopting a Budget for the Year 1995 and.Setting the Tax Levy_ Collectable for the Year 1995 Motion by Ruettimann, second by Peterson to waive the reading of the resolution there being ample copies available for the public. Roll call: All ayes RESOLUTION NO. 94-80 BEING A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 1995 AND SETTING THE TAX LEVY COLLECTABLE FOR THE YEAR 1995 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights as follows: Section A. The budget for the City of Columbia Heights for the year 1995 is hereby approved and adopted with appropriations for each of the funds as follows: General Fund Para Transit Fund State Aid Cable Television Fund Library DARE Project Police Grant Project Pride Capital Improvements Fund Infrastructure Fund Capital Equipment Replacement Funds: General Fund Water Fund Sewer-Fund 6,604,775 89,609 79,394 102,629 418,679 5,781 98,569 1,850 695,165 0 506,460 49,374 48,319 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 12, 1994 PAGE 4 Central Garage Fund Central Garage Fund Liquor Fund Water Utility Fund Sewer Utility Fund Refuse Fund Water & Sewer Construction Funds Energy Management Data Processing Pension Reserve Debt Service Fund 0 345,999 6,255,408 1,304,211 1,274,888 1,309,758 292,500 340,196 94,470 175,000 2,875,977 Total Expense Including Interfund Transfers 22,969,011 Section B. The estimated gross revenue to fund the budget of the City of Columbia Heights for all funds, including general ad valorem tax levies as hereinafter set forth for the year 1995: General Fund Para Transit Fund State Aid Cable Television Fund Library DARE Project Police Grant Project Pride Capital Improvements Fund Infrastructure Fund Capital Equipment Replacement Funds: General Fund Water Fund Sewer Fund Central Garage Fund Central Garage Fund Liquor Fund Water Utility Fund Sewer Utility Fund Refuse Fund Water & Sewer Construction Funds Energy Management Data Processing Pension Reserve Debt Service Fund Revenue Available 6,604,775 89,609 79,394 102,629 418,679 5,781 98,569 1,850 695,165 0 506,460 49,374 48,319 0 345,999 6,255,408 1,304,211 1,274,888 1,309,758 292,500 340,~96 94,470 175,000 2,875,977 Total Revenue Including Interfund Transfers 22,969,011 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 12, 1994 PAGE 5 Section C. The following sUms of money are levied for the current year, collectable in 1995, upon the taxable property in said City of Columbia Heights, for the following purpose: Estimated Area-Wide 2,005,078 Estimated Local Levy 603,621 Certified Levy 2,608,699 The city Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Anoka County, Minnesota. Passed this 12th day of December, 1994. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll call: Ruettimann Peterson Ail ayes Mayor Joseph Sturdevant Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary b. Resolution No. 94-81; Being a Resolution Increasing Income Guidelines Motion byRuettimann, second by Nawrocki to waive the reading of the resolution there being ample copies available for the public. Roll call: All ayes RESOLUTION.NO. 94-81 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SENIOR CITIZEN ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS FOR REFUSE, SEWAGE DISPOSAL AND WATER SUPPLY UTILITY RATES WHEREAS, the City Council has previously established eligibility standards for senior citizens for refuse service, disposal and water supply; and WHEREAS, it has been the city's practice to maintain uniform eligibility standards whenever possible: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEDbythe city of Columbia Heights as follows: That anyone over 62 years of age with a maximum household income of $15,636 will be eligible for reduced rates. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 12, 1994 PAGE 6 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above eligibility standard be effective January l, 1995. Passed this 12th day of December, 1994. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll call: Ruettimann Nawrocki Ail ayes Mayor Joseph Sturdevant Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary c. Resolution No .... 94-82; Beina a Resolution Designating Depositories for Funds of the.~C~ty of Columbia He.i~ht.s Motion byRuettimann, second byPeterson to waive the reading of the resolution there being ample copies available for the public. Roll call: All ayes RESOLUTION NO, 94-8.2 DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES FOR FUNDS OF THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS BE IT RESOLVED, that the First Bank National AssoCiation and the Northeast State Bank be hereby designated as the depositories for monies of the City of Columbia Heights, and the Treasurer of this City is hereby directed to deposit monies of this City in said banks, and the First Bank National~ Association and Northeast State Bank are hereby authorized and directed to honor and pay any checks or orders, when signed by the Mayor, City Manager and Treasurer, for the withdrawal or transfer of funds on deposit in said banks in whatever form. AND, that the following financial institutions be designated as official depositories of the City of Columbia Heights for investment purposes: First Trust, Northeast State Bank, Twin City Federal, Norwest Bank, American National Bank of St. Paul, First Bank National Association, Merrill Lynch Government Securities, Inc., Prudential Securities, Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund, Piper Jaffray Companies, Juran & Moody, Inc., Shearson-Lehman Brothers. AND, that the Treasurer shall have the authority to wire transfer funds from one offiical depository to another for the purpose of investing City funds. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 12, 1994 PAGE 7 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in case such deposit shall at any time exceed the sum for which its deposits are insured under the acts of Congress of the United States relating to insurance of bank deposits, said depository shall immediately furnish bond or securities in lieu of bond. The following are hereby designated as the places for safekeeping of all securities in lieu of such bond: The Federal Reserve Bank, Norwest Bank, Manufacturers Hanover Bank, Midland National Bank, American National Bank of St. Paul, First Bank National Association, Piper Jaffray Companies, Juran & Moody, Inc. Passed this 12th day of December, 1994. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll call: Ruettimann Peterson Ail ayes Mayor Joseph Sturdevant Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary d. Resolution No, 9~-83; Being a Reso!ution Calling .For a Public Hearing on the Proposed Establishment of.~he Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District Motion by Ruettimann, second by Peterson to waive the reading of the resolution there being ample copies available for the public. Roll call: All ayes RESOLUTION NO. 94-83 BEING A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SHEFFIELD TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT (A REDEVELOPEMENT DISTRICT) AND THE ADOPTION OFT HE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO BE IT RESOLVED by the city Council (the "Council") of the city of Columbia Heights, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Public Hearing. This Council shall meet on Monday, January 23, 1995, at approximately 7:00 p.m. to hold a public hearing on the proposed adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District all pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive,.as amended. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 12, 1994 PAGE 8 Section 2. Notice of. Hearing; Filing of PrQgrs~. Staff is authorized and directed to forward documents, to the appropriate taxing jurisdictions including Anoka County and Independent School District No. 13 of the hearing, and to prepare a notice substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, together with' an appropriate map as required by law, to be published in the official newspaper of the City not later than 10 days prior to January 23, 1995, and to place a copy of the Plan on file in the City Clerk's office at City Hall and to make such copy available for inspection by the public. Passed this 12th day of December, 1994. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll call: Ruettimann Peterson All ayes Mayor Joseph Sturdevant e Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary COMMUNICATIONS a. Traffic Commission Minutes of the December 5, 1994 Traffic Commission Meeting were included in the agenda packet. No Council action was required. b. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of the December 6, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting were included in the agenda packet. c. Resignation by Councilmember Nawrocki Councilmember Nawrocki read his letter of resignation which will be effective December 31, 1994. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business. NEW BUSINESS a. Award of Building Signs REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 12, 1994 PAGE 9 Motion by Jolly, second Peterson to award building signs, Municipal Project #9315 to Image Now Signs, Inc. based upon their low, qualified, responsible bid in the amount of $7,225.00 with funds to be appropriated from 1993-1994 Community Development Block Grant, and furthermore, to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement for the same. Roll call: All ayes b. Award of.Building Accessibility Improvements. Municipal Projects #9425. #9212. #9216. ~9218. and #9219 There was some discussion regarding spliting the bid to realize some cost savings. Motion by Nawrocki, second by Peterson further consideration of bids be deferred until the next meeting. Roll call: All ayes c. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 1. Authorization of HRA/City Staff Office Consolidation ~_~L~eement Motion by Nawrocki, second byRuettimann to discuss this issue at the Council work session on December 19, 1994~. Roll call: All ayes 2. Approval of Sheffield Redevelopment House Floor Plans/Designs Motion by Peterson, second by Ruettimann to approve the four house floor plan designs for Sheffield Redevelopment Block as submitted by First Choice Homes, Inc. Roll call: All ayes d. Renew Worker's Compensation Insurance Policy from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Motion by Peterson, second by Ruettimann to authorize the City Manager to renew the Worker's Compensation Insurance Policy from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust under the retrospectivelyrated premium option using a maximum factor of 130% at the rates specified in their guotation. Roll call: All ayes REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 12, 1994 PAGE 10 e. ~oftware Support Agreement with Business Records Corporation Motion by Ruettimann, second by Peterson to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a three year software support agreement with Business Records Corporation for maintenance of financial software packages at a cost not to exceed $22,872, billed annually at $7,624 per year. Roll call; All ayes Science. Technology and Energy_ Commission Richard Nowak, a member of the Science, Technology and Energy Commission, approached Councilmember Ruettimann to express his willingness to work with the Public Works Department's Geographic Information System. He also proposed using interested high school students to work on this project. He will approach the appropriate staff members at the school. 10. REPORTS a. Report of the City Manager The city Manager's report was submitted in written form and the following items were discussed: University Heights Truth in Taxation Value Complaints: Included in the City Manager's written report was a spreadsheet which explained the differential in tax dollars · paid on the separate garage statements for this development. House on 47th Avenue: Staff has ~een advised that the neighborhood group in the area of 47th Avenue has approached AACAP to be the non-profit conduit to facilitate the purchase of this house and land. An agreement has been entered into and the Habitat for Humanity organization has been approached regarding development of this parcel. b. Report of ~he City Attorney The City A~torney had nothing to report at this time. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 12, 1994 PAGE 11 ADJOURN Motion by Ruettimann, second by Nawrocki to adjourn the meeting at 9:15 p.m. Roll call; All ayes Mayor Joseph Sturdevant Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary CITY COUNCIL LETrER Meeling of: December 27, 1994 r AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER PUBL! C HEAR I NGS/RESOLUTI ONS & ORD 1 NANCES APPROVAL NO: 6 Fire ITEM: License Revocation, Close Hearing BY: Lowell DeMars BY~ .~_.~ 4429 NE 3rd Street NO: (~ ~ DATE: Dec 19, 1994 DATE: Revocation or suspension of a license to operate a rental property within the City. of Columbia Heights is no longer being requested against Pamela J. Francis regarding rental property at · 4429 NE 3rd Street. The property is now vacant and on the market for sale. The property owner has been notified that should the property not be sold, it must be licensed and inspected per City Ordinance before it can be rented. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Close the Public Hearing Regarding the Revocation or Suspension of the Rental License Held by Pamela J. Francis Regarding Rental Property at 4429 NE 3rd Street in that the property is vacant and on the market for sale. 94-215 COUNCIL ACTION: CITY OF COLUMBIA I-IEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT 555 MILL STREET NE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN. 55421 TELE: 782-2835 TO: PATRICK HENTGES CITY MANAGER FROM: LOWELL DEMARS SUBJECT: REVOCATION HEARING PAMELA J. FRANCIS RENTAL PROPERTY 4429 3RD STREET NE DATE: DECEMBER 19, 1994 PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT MS. FRANCIS HAS EVICTED THE TENANTS OF THIS RENTAL PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY IS NOW VACANT AND MS. FRANCIS HAS PLACED THE PROPERTY ON THE MARKET FOR SALE. IN ADDITION~ SHE WAS ADVISED THAT SHOULD THE PROPERTY NOT BE SOLD, IT COULD NO LONGER BE RENTED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE PROPERTY WAS LICENSED AND INSPECTED PER CITY ORDINANCE. I AM RECOMMENDING THAT THE REVOCATION HEARING BE CLOSED AT THIS TIME. SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL ME. CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeling of: December 27, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEAR1NGS/RESOLU- ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER TIONS AND 0RDINANCES APPROVAL NO: 6 Fire ITEM: License Revocation, Close Hearing BY: Lowell DeMars/f/~ BY: ('~'~c~ 4541/43 Taylor Street NE NO: 6f~ DATE: Dec 19, 1994 DATE: Revocation or suspension of a license to operate a rental property within the City of Columbia Heights is no longer being requested against Jeffrey S. McNair regarding rental property at 4541/43 Taylor Street NE. The property owner has renewed the rental license for this property as of December 19, 1994 and is, therefore, in compliance with the Housing Maintenance Code. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Close the Public Hearing Regarding the Revocation or Suspension of the Rental License held by Jeffrey S. McNair Regarding Rental Property at 4541/43 Taylor Street NE in that the Property has been Relicensed. 94-218 ]COUNCIL ACTION: t CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: December 27, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS, ORDINANCES, ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S & RESOLUTIONS CITY MANAGER' S APPROVAL NO: 6 ITEM: ORDINANCE NO. 1296, EXEMPTING FROM BY: PAT HENTGES BY: MASSAGE THERAPIST REQUIREMENTS A PERSON DATE: 12-22-94 DATE WHO IS EMPLOYED BY OR UNDER CONTRACT OF NO: A LICENSED MEDICAL PERSON & C. , As discussed at work session, it was recently revealed that licensed medical personnel such as a physician, orthopedic surgeons, and chiropractors, etc. occasionally employ or contract the services of a massage therapist within their clinics. The current ordinance exempts certain institutions such as hospitals and the actual licensed physician from the requirements of the massage therapist licensing. The ordinance is silent on whether or not massage therapist technicians working under the direction of a licensed physician or at a clinic are required to obtain a massage therapist license or clinic essentially is required to have a massage therapist business license. In order to accommodate massage therapist treatments to be conducted by persons other than licensed physicians, but in cases where they are operating under their employment or on a contract basis, the City Attorney has prepared an ordinance amendment at the City Manager's request. Please find attached a proposed first reading of an ordinance calling for the exemption. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the first reading of the ordinance, there being ample copies available for the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Schedule the Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1296, Exempting From Massage Therapist Requirements a Person Who is Employed by or Under Contract of a Licensed Medical Person, for January 9, 1995, at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers. COUNCIL ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 1296 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1138, PERTAINING TO SECTION 12, EXEMPTING FROM MESSAGE THERAPIST REQUIREMENTS A PERSON WHO IS EMPLOYED BY OR UNDER CONTRACT OF A LICENSED MEDICAL PERSON The City of Columbia Heights does ordain: SECTION 1: SECTION 2: Chapter 5, Article 1, Section 12 (5.612(2)) of Ordinance No. 1138, City Code of 1977, shall hereafter read as follows, to wit: (C) This section shall not apply to any hospital, sanitorium, rest home, nursing home, boarding home, or other institution for the hospitalization or care of human beings, duly licensed under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 144.50 144.703, or to persons duly licensed, or in the employment of or under contract with persons duly licensed by the State of Minnesota to practice' medicine, surgery, osteopathy, chiropractic, physical therapy or podiatry, with or without the use of mechanical, therapeutic, or bathing devices. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after its passage. First Reading: Second Reading: Date of Passage: Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: Mayor Joseph Sturdevant JoAnne Student, Council Secretary CI~ CO~C~ ~T~R Meeting of: December 27, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER' S NO: 6 CITY MANAGER' S APPROVAL ITEM: 1995-1996 AFSCME LABOR AGREEMENT BY: LINDA L. MAGEE NO: &, D. DATE: 12-14-94 DA.~~~ The current labor agreement between the City and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, representing clerical and technical employees, terminates on December 31, 1994. Negotiations between the City negotiating team and AFSCME have resulted in a mutually acceptable labor agreement for calendar years 1995 and 1996. The proposed changes are as follows: Wages: 1995: 1996: 2.75% adjustment over 1994 wages 2.75% adjustment over 1995 wages Insurance: 1995: $285 per month (1994 = $270 per month) 1996: $300 per month Deferred Compensation: Employer shall pay on a dollar-for-dollar matching basis; $300 per full-time employee for 1995; $300 per full-time employee for 1996 (1994=$300). For part-time employees working 1,560 hours or more per year, employer shall pay on a dollar for dollar matching basis up to $225 per employee for 1995 and up to $225 per employee for 1996. Sick Leave: Changes in definition of immediate family to include grandchildren. personnel policy.) (Consistent with Funeral Leave: Change in how many days can be taken for death in the immediate family (previously up to $ days for spouse, mother, father, or children not chargeable to vacation or sick leave; up to B days for brothers, sisters, and in-laws (spouse's family), deductible from vacation or sick leave as the employee may choose; 1 day with pay and up to B days, for death of grandchildren or grandparents, deductible from sick leave or vacation leave at the sole discretion of the employer). The change is consistent with the personnel policy and allows up to 5 days at the sole discretion of the City Manager. Attached is a resolution which would adopt and establish the changes as negotiated for calendar year 1995 and 1996. The total cost package over the two years is 5.6I. COUNCIL ACTION: CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: December 27, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S NO: 6 CITY MANAGER'S APPROVAL ITEM: 1995-1996 AFSCME LABOR AGREEMENT BY: LINDA L. MAGEE BY: NO: DATE: 12-14-94 DATE: Page 2 of 2 Pages Also attached is a uniform settlement form. Minnesota Statute 179A.04, Subdivision 3, paragraph (n) requires completion of a Uniform Settlement Form (Form). The Form is applicable to contract negotiations between exclusive representatives and all public employers, other than Townships. The Bureau of Mediation Services (Bureau) is charged with developing the Form and related instructions for compliance with the statute. Pursuant to that charge, the Bureau has adopted the attached Form to meet the requirements of this legislation. The Form is not intended to be a report of a public employer's labor costs or a substitute for the costing by labor or management of their collective bargaining proposals. Its purpose is limited to fulfilling the requirements of Minnesota Statutes 179A.04, Subdivision 3, paragraph (n). It is the intention of this legislation to provide a standard basis for public employers and the public to compare the economic elements of collective bargaining settlements. The attached Form must be presented to the governing body of each public employer at the time it ratifies a collective bargaining contract. The Form must be available for public inspection during normal business hours within five (5) calendar days after ratification by the public employer. The difference between the percentage change from baseline reflected on the Uniform Settlement Form and the total cost package is attributable to the fact that the form includes cost of movement through the wage schedule. This is not included as a part of the total cost package of the City unless there is a change in the wage schedule (ex., added step, etc.). Thus, if the new dollars for wage schedule movement and the corresponding social security, and retirement contribution attributable to the wage schedule movement was subtracted, the change in baseline would be the same as the total cost package. Likewise, if all members of the bargaining unit were at the maximum of their range, the change from baseline and the total cost package would be the same. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution 94-84 , regarding the Labor Agreement between the City of Columbia Heights and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, effective January 1, 1995 - December 31, 1996. COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION 94- 8/~ REGARDING LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS AND AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL NO. 495 WHEREAS, negotiations have proceeded between the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council No. 14, Local No. 495, representing clerical and technical employees of the City, and members of the City negotiating team, and said negotiations have resulted in a mutually acceptable contract for calendar Years 1995 and 1996; WHEREAS, a copy of said contract is available for inspection at the Office of the City Manager and is made a part hereof by reference; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the contract agreement as negotiated, be and is hereby established as the salary and fringe benefit program for calendar years 1995 and 1996 for AFSCME bargaining unit employees of the City; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager be authorized to execute this agreement. Passed this Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: __day of , 1994. Joseph Sturdevant, Mayor Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary ARTICLE XVII. 17.1 11-7-94 CITY OF COLUMBIA I4~JGHTS PROPOSAL TO AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYI~F-q INSURANCE The EMPLOYER will contribute up to a maximum of two-hundred and eighty-five dollars ($285.00) per month per (permanent and probationary full-time) employee for calendar year 1995, and up to a maximum of three hundred ($300.00) per month per (permanent and probationary full-time) employee for calendar year 1996, for employee life insurance and group health insurance (including dependent coverage). No retroactive insurance benefit payments will be made to any employee terminating employment during calendar year 1995 prior to Council ratification of a 1995 employer contribution rate for insurance. ARTICLE XX. SICK LEAVE 20.3 Sick leave shall be granted for absence from duty because of personal illness, injury or disability, (necessary medical, dental or chiropractic care), legal quarantine, or serious illness in the immediate family. The immediate family is defined as the sponse and the following of either the employee or the employee's spouse: mother, father, children, sister, brother, grandparents, grandchildren, or dependents. ARTICLE XXI. FUNERAL LEAVE An employee may be entitled to a maximum of five (5) days leave with pay, at the sole discretion of the City Manager for death in the immediate family as defined in Article XX, Section 20.3 This time is not chargeable against any accrued vacation or sick leave. ARTICLE XXV. WAGES See Appendix A and B. As a form of additional compensation, the City will contribute $1 per permanent and ~probationary full-time employee toward the ICMA deferred compensation program for every $1 contributed by such employee toward the ICMA deferred compensation program. Such contribution will not exceed $300 for calendar year 1995, and $300 for calendar year 1996. As a form of additional compensation, the City will contribute $1 per permanent and probationary part-time employee, who is regularly scheduled to work 1,560 .hours or more per year, toward the ICMA deferred compensation program. Such contribution will not exceed $225 for calendar year 1995 and $225 for calendar year 1996. ARTICLE XXVI. DURATION. This AGREEMENT shall be effective as of January 1, 1995, and shall remain in force and effect until December 31, 1996. CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of : December 27, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPT.: CITY MANAGER NO: 6 AS SE S SING APPROVAL ITEM: RESOLUTION ORDERING AND LEVYING BY: JANE GLEASON B~: ~~ AN IMPROVEMENT DATE: DECEMBER 15,1994 ALLEY MID-BLOCK LIGHT 677-25 Attached is backup information and resolution ordering and levying an improvement for backyard mid-block light between Royce St. and Leander Lane, south of 44th Avenue N.E. The proposal is to have the City install one high pressure sodium street light on an existing pole between 4332 and 4338 Leander Lane, in the backyard, as shown on the attached sketch. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the Resolution, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution 94- 8~, being a Resolution Ordering and Levying one mid-block light located in the backyards between Royce Street and Leander Lane, south of 44th Avenue N.E., on an existing pole between 4332 and 4233 Leander Lane, known as PIR 677-Area 25 - Project 9427. 677coun.let COUNCIL ACTION: R E S O L U T I O N NO. 94 -85 Adopting assessment roll for the following local improvement and determining said improvement will be made and ratifying and confirming all other proceedings, heretofore had: Special Assessment for mid-block backyard lighting numbered 677-Area 25 - Project ~9427. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, met at 7:00 p.m. on the 27th day of December, 1994, in the City Council Chambers, 590 - 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights Minnesota, being the time and place set when and where all persons interested could appear and be heard by the Council with respect to benefits, and to the proportion of the cost of making the local improvement above described, a notice of such hearing having been heretofore duly published as required by law, and a notice mailed to each property owner of record, stating the proposed amount of the assessment; and, WHEREAS, this Council has heretofore estimated the cost of such local improvement and has prepared an assessment roll therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS HEREBY RESOLVES: Section 1. That this Council does hereby adopt the aforesaid assessment roll known and described as "Assessment Roll for Local Improvements" numbered 677- Area 25 - Project 9427 for mid-block backyard lighting. Section 2. That this Council hereby finds and determines that each of the lots and parcels of land enumerated in said assessment roll was and is especially benefited by such improvements. This Council further finds and determines that the proper proportion of the cost of such improvement to be especially assessed against each lot or parcel of land is the amount as billed annually by Northern States Power. Section 3. That the annual installment shall be paid in full without interest on or before September 15, 1995, and in annual installments thereafter, as long as the mid-block light is in place. Failure to pay the annual installment renders the same delinquent and thereafter a 10% penalty is added and the said delinquent special assessment is certified to the County for collection with the real estate tax. Section 4. That this Council did hereby determine and redetermine to proceed with said improvement, does ratify and confirm all other proceedings heretofore had in regard to this improvement, and said improvement shall hereafter be known and numbered 677-Area 25 for mid-block alley lighting. Section 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. Passed this 27th day of December, 1994. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: Secretary to the Council Joseph Sturdevant, Mayor CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS NOTICE FOR PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City Council has determined that the following Public Hearing be held on Tuesday, December 27, 1994, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers/Court Room, 590 40th Avenue N.E. to consider the following: P.I.R. #677-25 PROJECT ~9427 The installation of one (1) high pressure sodium street light in the back yard area between Royce St. and Leander Lane, south of 44th Avenue N.E., on the existing pole between 4332 and 4338 Leander Lane. Notice is hereby given that all persons having an interest therein will be given an opportunity to be heard, and such information pertaining to the said installation may also be considered at that time. Notice is hereby given that this Public Hearing will also include the adoption of the assessment roll #677-25 for the area of mid-block back yard lighting. The proposed assessment is presently on file for public inspection at the City Manager's Office. Notices are being mailed to all affected property owners. The cost as billed by Northern States Power Company will be billed each year. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Section 429.081 by serving notice of appeal on the Mayor or Clerk of Columbia Heights within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and ~ing such notice with the District Court within 10 days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. This assessment may be paid in full without interest on or before the 15th day of September of each year. Failure to pay the annual installment renders the same delinquent and thereafter a 10% penalty is added and the said delinquent special assessment is certified to the County for collection with the real estate tax. The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admissions or access to, or treatment or employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all City of Columbia Heights' services, programs, and activities. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Council Secretary at 782-2800, Extension 209, to make arrangements, fIT)D/782-2806 for deaf only) CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PATRICK HENTGES CITY MANAGER Published in Focus on 12/13/94 and 12/20/94 P.I.R. 677-25 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PROJECT 9427 PROPOSED BACKYARD LIGHTING ROYCE STREET TO LEANDER LANE SOUTH OF 44TH AVENUE N.E. CITY POLICY GENERAL LIGHTING PROGRAM Provide street lighting at each intersection, dead end or cul-de-sac, and at least every 400 feet on unintersected street segments. LIGHTING IN ADDITION TO GENERAL UGHTING PROGRAM Permit property owners requesting additional lighting to set up a mid-block or alley (backyard) lighting program. This consists of adding street or alley (backyard) lights, generally to existing poles, and charging the cost as a property benefit. PROPOSAL INSTALL ONE (1) 100 WATT HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM STREET LIGHT 1N THE BACKYARDS ON THE EXISTING POLE BETWEEN 4332 AND 4338 LEANDER LANE Current N.S.P. cost for one (1) 100 watt street light ** $113.80 ** Costs are subject to increses due to electric rate adjustments by Northern States Power Company as approved by the Minnesota Utility Services Commission. YEARLY COST PER ASSESSABLE FOOT $113.80 569"Assessable Feet = $0.20 Per Foot P.I.R. 677-25 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PROJECT 9427 PROPOSED BACKYARD UGHTING ROYCE STREET TO LEANDER LANE SOUTH OF 44TH AVENUE N.E. (ON EXISTING POLE BETWEEN 4332 AND 4338 LEANDER LANE) ESTIMATED ANNUAL PARCEL COST ESTIMATED BENEFITTED ESTIMATED PARCEL ADDRESS FEET COST/FOOT CHARGE 4317 ROYCE ST. * 21 $0.20 $4.20 4325 ROYCE ST. * 63 $0.20 $12_60 4331 ROYCE ST. * 64 $0.20 $12_80 4337 ROYCE ST. * 63 $0.20 $12_60 4343 ROYCE ST. * 60 $0.20 $12_00 4349 ROYCE ST. 29 $0.20 $5.80 4326 LEANDER LA.* 60 $0.20 $12_00 4332 LEANDER LA.* 60 $0.20 $12-00 4338 LEANDER LA.* 60 $0.20 $12_00 4344 LEANDER LA.* 60 $0.20 $12-00 4350 LEANDER LA.* 2~9 $0.20 $5.80 TOTAL 569 $113.80 * PROPERTY OWNER SIGNED PETITION IN FAVOR OF LIGHT We the undersigned petition the City Council of Columbia Heights to instal[ one 100 watt HPS street light in the backyard area. The light will be installed on the pole between 4332 and 4338 Leader Lane. We understand that we will be assessed annually for the light. For a 60' wide lot, the current cost is approximately $13.50 per property per year. This cost will increase with increases in the electric rate. INSTALL NAME ADDRESS LIGHT DO NOT INSTALL LIGHT NOV ~S 1994 MANAGER ".~ffY OF OOLtJM~IA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: December 27, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S NO: 6 CITY MANAGER'S APPRO~. ITEM: 1995-1996 IUOE LABOR AGREEMENT__ ~,, BY: LINDA L. MAGEE BY:~~ ~_.p, DATE: 12-15-94 DAT NO: The current labor agreement between the City and the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 49, representing public works employees, terminates on December 31, 1994. Negotiations between the City negotiating team and IUOE have resulted in a mutually acceptable labor agreement for calendar years 1995 and 1996. The proposed changes are as follows: ~age.s 1995: 1996: 2.75Z adjustment over 1994 wages 2.50Z adjustment over 1995 wages Insurance 1995: $285 per month (1994 = $270 per month) 1996: $300 per month Deferred Comoensation Employer shall pay on a dollar-for-two dollar matching basis; $300 per employee for 1995; $300 per employee for 1996 (1994=$300) Promotion Change in number of years it takes a Maintenance I to be promoted to a Maintenance II from nine years to six years, effective January 1, 1996. Vacation Change in monthly vacation accrual during 16-19 years From 16 years - 19 years 1.667 day 16 years 17 years 18 years 19 years T__qo 1.750 day 1. 833 day 1. 916 day 2. 000 day The vacation accrual schedule is consistent with the current vacation schedule of the AFSCME bargaining unit. Apoendix E In the absence of a Maintenance II and Foreman and at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER, empioyees in the Maintenance II classification who a~e adjudged by the EMPLOYER to be qualified to perform the duties of a Leadworker, will be paid $.70 per hour above their base hourly rate of pay for those hours assigned by the EMPLOYER to perform the duties of a Leadworker in the absence of a Maintenance III and Foreman. COUNCIL ACTION: CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: December 27, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S NO: 6 CITY MANAGER'S APPROVAL ITEM: 1995-1996 IUOE LABOR AGREEMENT BY: LINDA L. MAGEE BY: NO: DATE: 12-15-94 DATE: Page 2 oi ~ .ges Attached are the changes in the affected sections of the contract and a resolution which would adopt and establish the changes as negotiated for calendar year 1995 and 1996. The total cost package over the two years is 5.6Z. Also attached is a uniform settlement form. Minnesota Statute [79A.04, subdivision 3, paragraph (n) requires completion of a Uniform Settlement Form (Form). The Form is applicable to contract negotiations between exclusive representatives and all public employers, other than Townships. The Bureau of Mediation Services (Bureau) is charged with developing the Form and related instructions for compliance with the statute. Pursuant to that charge,the Bureau has adopted the attached Form to meet the requirements of this legislation. The Form is not intended to be a report of a public employer's labor costs or a substitute for the costing by labor or management of their collective bargaining proposals. Its purpose is limited to fulfilling the requirements of Minnesota Statutes 179A.04, subdivision 3, paragraph (n). It is the intention of this legislation to provide a standard basis for public employers and the public to compare the economic elements of collective bargaining settlements. The attached Form must be presented to the governing body of each public employer at the time it ratifies a collective bargaining contract. The Form must be available for public inspection during normal business hours within five (5) calendar days after ratification by the public employer. The difference between the percentage change from baseline reflected on the Uniform Settlement Form and the total cost package is attributable to the fact that the form includes cost of movement through the wage schedule. This is not included as a part of the total cost package of the City unless there is a change in the wage schedule (ex., added step, collapsing of the steps, etc.). In this case, the cost of collapsing the wage schedule, i.e., time it takes a Maintenance I to move to Maintenance II, is included in the total cost package. Thus, if the new dollars for wage schedule movement not attributable to the collapsing of the schedule and the corresponding social security and retirement contribution attributable to the wage schedule movement was subtracted, the change in baseline would be the same as the total cost package. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution 94- 86 , regarding the Labor Agreement between the City of Columbia Heights, and the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 49, effective January l, 1995 - December $!, 1996. COUNCIL ACTION: KESOLUTION 94- 86 REGARDING LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL NO. 49 WHEREAS, negotiations have proceeded between the International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE), Local No. 49, representing employees of the Public Works Department and members of the City negotiating team, and said negotiations have resulted in a mutually acceptable contract for calendar years 1995 and 1996; WHEREAS, a copy of said contract is available for inspection at the Office of the City Manager and is made a part hereof by reference; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the contract agreement as negotiated, be and is hereby established as the salary and fringe benefit program for calendar years 1995 and 1996 for IUOE bargaining unit employees of the City; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager be authorized to execute this agreement. Passed this Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: __day of , 1994. Joseph Sturdevant, Mayor Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary 12-12-94 CITY OF COLUHBIA HEIGHTS PROPOSAL TO INTERNATIONAL ~NION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 49 .AR?ICL.~ XVIII JOB POSTING AND PROMOTION 18.4 Upon reaching the ninth year of employment with the City of Columbia Heights in the classification of Maintenance I, such employee will be promoted to the classification of Maintenance II, provided that the number of employees in the Maintenance II classi- fication does not exceed two-thirds of the bargaining unit work force· Effective Jan- uar~ 1, 1996, upon reaching the sixth year of emplolment with the City of Columbia Heights in the classification of Maintenance I, such employee will be promoted to the classification of Maintenance II, provided that the number of employees in the Main- tenance II classification does not exceed two-thirds of the bargaining unit work force. ~TICLE XIX INSURANCE 19·1 19.2 The EHPLOYER will contribute up to a maximum of two-hundred eighty-five dollars ($285.00) per month per (permanent and probationar~ full-time) employee for group health and life insurance including dependent coverage for calendar year 1995. No retroactive insurance benefits payments will be made to any employee terminating employment during calendar year 1995 prior to Council ratification of a 1995 employer contribution rate for insurance· The EMPLOYEE will contribute up to a maximum of three hundred dollars ($300) per month per (permanent and probationary full-time) employee for §roup health and life insurance /ncluding dependent coverage for calendar year 1996. ~RTICLE XXI VACATION · - 21.1 Each permanent and probations.t7 employee shall earn and accrue vacation time on the ya~a~!on Accrued Per Month following basis: Dur£n~ Employment Year 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 &+ .833 day .833 day .833 day .833 day .833 day .917 day 1.000 day 1.083 day 1.167 day , 1.250 day 1.333 day 1.417 day .1.500 day 1.583 day 1.667 day 1.750 day 1.833 day 1.916 day 2.000 day 2.083 day ARTICLE XXVI rAGES See Appendix A for 1995 and 1996 waEe rates. As a form of additional compensation, the City will contribute $1 per permanent and probationary full-time employee toward the State Deferred Compensation ProEram for every $2 contributed by such employee toward the State Deferred Compensation ProEram. Such contribution will not exceed $300 for calendar year 1995, and $300 for calendar year 1996. ARTICLE XXVIII DURATION This AGREEMENT shall be effective as of January 1, 1995, and shall remain in full force and effect until December 31, 1996. APPENDIX YAGES A 12-12-94 ~995 Adjustments shall be effective January 1, 1995. No retroactive wage p~yments will be made to any employee terminating employment during calendar year 1995, prior to Council ratification of a 1995 wage schedule. Movement~hroughthe wage schedule is contingent upon satisfactory performance as adjudged by the E~PLOYER. Maintenance I Maintenance II Maintenance III Foreman Ste° I Sten II Step III Step I~ Step V StenVI Entry 6 Months I Year 2Years 3 Years 4Years $10.42 $10.94 $11.46 11.98 12.50 13.02 $12.42 $13.05 $13.67 14.29 14.91 15.53 $12.99 $13.64 $14.29 14.94 15.59 16.24 $13.62 $14.30 $14.98 15.66 16.34 17.02 Laborer & Part-Time $ 5.50 - $ 7.25 1996 Adjustments shall be effective January 1, 1996. Movement through the wage schedule is contingent upon satisfactory performance as adjudged by the E~PLOYEE. Maintenance I Maintenance II Maintenance III Foreman Laborer & Part-Time Step I Step II Sten III SteD IV Step ,V StenV~ Entry ~ Months 1Year 2 Years 3 Years 4Years $1o.68 $11.21 $11.75 $12.28 $12.82 $13.35 $i2.74 $13.37 $14.oi $14.65 $15.28 $15.92 $13.32 $13.99 $14.65 $15.32 $15.98 $18.65 $13.96 $14.66 $15.36 $16.05 $16.78 $~?.45 $ 5.50 - $ 7.25 ~2-~2-94 APPENDIX E In the absence of a Maintenance HI and Foreman and at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER, employees in the Maintenance H classification who are adjudged by the EMPLOYER to be qualified to perform the duties of a Leadworker, will be paid $.70 per hour above their base hourly rate of pay for those hours assigned by the EMPLOYER to perform the duties of a Leadworker in the absence of a Maintenance HI and Foreman. When performing such Leadworker duties, the Maintenance II assigned is ineligible to receive out of classification pay under Appendix C and Appendix D. CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: December 27, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER' S NO: 6 CITY MANAGER' S APPROVAL ITEM: ADOPTING 1995-1996 SALARY & FRINGE BY: LINDA L. MAGE, E~ BENEFIT ADJUSTMENTS FOR NON-UNION DATE: 12-15-94j~/~' --DATE: Attached is a resolution and schedule reflecting proposed salary and fringe benefits adjustments for non-union supervisory employees. These adjustments are consistent with the adjustments negotiated for other employee groups. The proposed changes are as follows: Wazes i995: 1996: 2.75Z adjustment over lgg4 wages 2.75Z adjustment over lg95 wages Insurance 1995: $285 per month (1994 = $270 per month) 1996: $300 per month RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available for the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adoPt Resolution 94- 87, adopting changes in non-union group salary ranges, and establishing salaries and changes in fringe benefits for non-unionized supervisory City positions for calendar year 1995 and 1996. COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION 94- 87 ADOPTING CHANGES IN NON-UNION SUPERVISORY SALARY RANGES, ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR NON-UNIONIZED SUPERVISORY POSITIONS, AND CHANGES IN FRINGE BENEFITS WHEREAS, the City of Columbia Heights adopted a Wage Compensation Program for Non-Unionized City Employees effective January 1, 1980 (Resolution 80-47), which indicated that on an annual basis changes will be adopted in Group Salary Ranges based upon reliable survey data; and, WHEREAS, the City of Columbia Heights adopted a Comparable Worth Implementation Plan effective January 1, 1988 (Resolution 88-50), to assure comparable compensation for positions with comparable skill, effort, responsibilities, and working conditions, and proportional compensation for positions where such factors are different; and, WHEREAS, the City of Columbia Heights annually reviews the Employer's share for various insurance programs for its non-unionized supervisory employees to compare what is paid for other employee groups in the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Columbia Heights establishes salary ranges and fringe benefits for non-unionized supervisory City positions, as indicated on Schedule A which is on file in the Office of the City Manager, for calendar years 1995 and 1996; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Columbia Heights establishes the salary for specific non-unionized supervisory City employee positions to be effective upon such affected City employee fulfilling the requirements specified in the Wage Compensation Program for a salary change for such employee. Passed this __ day of , 1994. Offered By: Seconded By: Roll Call: Joseph Sturdevant, Mayor Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary SCI-IFI~ULE A 1995 MONTHLY sALARY SCI4FJ)ULE EFFECTIVE JANUARY1, 1995 Page 1 of 3 STORE SUPERVISOR ASSISTANT LIOUOR OPERATIONS MANAGER ACCOUNTING COORDINATOR · SPECIAL PROJECTS COORDINATOR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT- PUBLIC WORKS SENIOR CITIZENS COORDINATOR CHILDREN'S LIBRARIAN/ ADULT SERVICE SPECIALIST SENIOR POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN FOREMAN-VEHICLE MAINT. ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR BUILDING INSPECTOR RECREATION DIRECTOR ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT LIQUOR OPERATIONS MANAGER Entry 6 Months 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years $1,952 $2,018 $2,085 $2,151 $2,218 $2, 382 $2,463 $2, 545 $2, 626 $ 2, 707 $2,439 $2,523 $2,606 $2,689 $2,772 $2,517 $2,603 $2,688 $2,774. $2,860 $2, 517 $2, 603 $2, 688 $ 2, 774. $2, 860 $2, 543 $2, 630 $2,717 $2, 803 $ 2, 890 $2,600 $2,688 $2,777 $2,865 $2.954 $2, 600 $2, 688 $2, 777 $2, 865 $ 2, 954 $2,894 $2,993 $3,092 $3,190 $3,289 $3,186 $3,294 $3,403 $ 3,511 $3,620 $3,218 $3,328 $3,438 $3,547 $3,657 $3, 505 $3,625 $3,744 $ 3,864 $3,983 $3, 626 $ 3,750 $3,874 $3,997 $4,121 $3,642 $3,766 $3,891 $4,015 $4,139 $ 4, 246 $4, 391 $4, 536 $ 4, 680 $ 4, 825 LLM/CB SCI4'I~DULE A 1996 MONTI-ILY SALARY SCI4~DULE EFFECTIVE JANUARY1, 1996 Page 2 of 3 STOKE SUPERVISOR ASSISTANT LIQUOR OPERATIONS MANAGER ACCOUNTING COORDINATOR SPECIAL PROJECTS COORDINATOR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT- PUBLIC WORKS SENIOR CITIZENS COORDINATOR CHILDREN'S LIBRARIAN/ ADULT SERVICE SPECIALIST SENIOR POLICE RECORDS TECHNICIAN FOREMAN-VEHICLE MAINT. ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR BUILDING INSPECTOR RECREATION DIRECTOR Entry 6 Months 1 Year 2 Year. s. 3 Years $2,006 $2,074 $2,142 $2,211 $2,279 $2,447 $2,531 $2,614 $2,698 $2,781 $2,506 · $2,592 $2,677 $2,763 $2,848 $2,586 $2,674 $2,763 $2,851 $2,939 $2,586 $2,674 $2,763 $2,851 $2, 939 $2, 613 $2,702 $ 2,791 $2,880 $2,969 $2,671 $2,762 $2,853 $2,944 $3,035 $2,671 $2, 762 $2, 853 $2,944 $3,035 $2,974 $3,075 $3,'176 $3,278 $3,379 $3,274 $3,385 $3,497 $3,608 $3,720 $3,307 $3,420 $3,533 $3,645 $3,758 $3,602 $3,725 $3,847 $3,970 $4,093 ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT LIQUOR OPERATIONS MANAGER $3,726 $3,853 $3,980 $4,107 $4,234 $3,743 $3,870 $3,998 $4,125 $4,253 $4,363 $4,512 $4,66t $4,809 $4,958 LLM/CB SCHEDULE A Page 3 of 3 INSURANCE The EMPLOYER will contribute up to a maximum of two-hundred and eighty-five dollars ($285) per month per employee for calendar year 1995 for employee life insurance, group health insurance, and dental insurance. Should the cost of such benefits be less than $285 per month, the difference may be used toward any other City- provided insurance benefit and or ICMA deferred compensation. The EMPLOYER will contribute up to a maximum of three hundred dollars ($300) per month per employee for calendar year 1996 for employee life insurance, group health insurance, and dental insurance. Should the cost of such benefits be less than $300 per month, the difference may be used toward any other City-provided · insurance benefit and/or ICMA deferred compensation. LLM/cb CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: December 27, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER' S NO: 6 CITY MANAGER' S APPROVAL ITEM: ADOPTING 1995-1996 SALARY & FRINGE BY: LINDA L. MAGEE BY:~ BENEFIT ADJUSTMENTS FOR NON-UNION ESSENTIAL DATE: 12-15-~~ ~AT AND CONF!DENTIAL EMPLOYEES ~ ~ NO: 6 ' ' Attached is a resolution and schedule reflecting proposed salary and fringe benefits adjustments for non-union essential and confidential employees. These adjustments are consistent with the adjustments negotiated for other employee groups. The proposed changes are as follows: ~aRes 1995: 1996: 2.75% adjustment over 1994 wages 2.75Z adjustment over 1995 wages !nsuranc__ e 1995: $285 per month (1994 = $270 per month) 1996: $300 per month RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available for the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution 94-88 , adopting changes in non-union group salary ranges, and establishing salaries and changes in fringe benefits for non-unionized essential and confidential City positions for calendar year 1995 and 1996. COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION 94- 88 ADOPTING CHANGES IN NON-UNION ESSENTIAL AND cONFIDENTIAL SALARY RANGES, ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR NON-UNIONIZED ESSENTIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL POSITIONS, AND CHANGES IN FRINGE BENEFITS WHEREAS, the City of Columbia Heights adopted a Wage Compensation Program for Non-Unionized City Employees effective January 1, 1980 (Resolution 80-47), which indicated that on an annual basis changes will be adopted in Group Salary Ranges based upon reliable survey data; and, WHEREAS, the City of Columbia Heights adopted a Comparable Worth Implementation Plan effective January 1,~ 1988 (Resolution 88-50), to assure comparable compensation for positions with comparable skill, effort, responsibilities, and working conditions, and proportional compensation for positions where such factors are different; and, WHEREAS, the City of Columbia Heights'annually reviews the Employer's share for various insurance programs for its non-unionized essential and confidential employees to compare what is paid for other employee groups in the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Columbia Heights establishes salary ranges and fringe benefits for non-unionized essential and confidential City positions, as indicated on Schedule B which is on file in the Office of the City Manager, for calendar years 1995 and 1996; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Columbia Heights establishes the salary for specific non-unionized essential and confidential City employee positions to be effective upon such affected City employee fulfilling the requirements specified in the Wage Compensation Program for a salary change for such employee. Passed this day of , 1994. Offered By: Seconded By: Roll Call: Joseph Sturdevant, Mayor Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary Page 1 of 3 PAYROLL/ACCOUNTING CLERK SECRETARY TO THE CITY MANAGER COUNCIL SECRETARY* ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF* ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER POLICE CAPTAIN* 1995 SCI-I~J)ULE B MONTHLY SALARY SCI4~-~UI.E EFFECTIVE JANUARY1, 1995 Entry 6 Months ! Ye~ar 2 Year~s 3 Years $2,248 $2,324 $2,401 $2,477 $2,554 $2,226 $2,302 $2,378 $2,454 $2,530 $2,241 $2,318 $2,394 $2,471 $2,547 $3,382 $3,497 $3,612 $3,728 $3,843 $3,575 $3,697 $3,819 $3,941 $4,063 $3,642 $3,766 $3,891 $4,015 $4,139 *Those employees in the position of Council Secretary, Assistant Fire Chief, and Police Captain hired prior to Council ratification of the City's Comparable Worth Implementation Plan (July 25, 1988) will progress on the following schedule for 1995: COUNCIL SECRETARY ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF POLICE CAPTAIN Entry 6 Months I Year ,2 Years 3 Years $2,362 $2,442 $ 2, 523 $ 2, 603 $2,684 $3,804 $3,934 $4,064 $4,193 $4,323 $4,163 $4,305 $4,447 $4,589 $4,731 LLM/CB SCHEDULE B '1996 MONTHLY SP~LARY SCI4~DULE EFFECTIVE JANUARY1, 1996 Page 2 of 3 PAYROLL/ACCOUNTING CLERK SECRETARY TO THE CITY MANAGER COUNCIL SECRETARY* ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF* ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER POLICE CAPTAIN* Entry 6 Months 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years, $2,309 $2,388 $2,467 $2,545 $2,624 $2,288 $2,366 $2,444 $2,522 $2,600 $2,303 $2,381 $2,460 $2,538 $2,617 $3,475 $3,594 $3,712 $ 3,831 $3,949 $3,674 $3,799 $3,925 $4,050 $4,175 $3,743 $3,870 $3,998 $ 4,125 $ 4, 253 *Those employees in the position of .Council Secretary, Assistant Fire Chief, and Police Captain hired prior to Council ratification of the City's Comparable Worth Implementation Plan (July 25, 1988) will progress on the following schedule for 1996: COUNCIL SECRETARY ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF POLICE CAPTAIN Entry 6 Months 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years $2,427 $2,510 $2,593 $2,675 $2,758 $3,909 $ 4,042 $4,175 $4,309 $4,442. $4,278 $4,424 $4,569 $4,715 $4,861 LLM/CB SCHEDULE B Page 3 of 3 INSURANCE The EMPLOYER will contribute up to a maximum of two-hundred and eighty-five dollars ($285) per month per employee for calendar year 1995 for employe~ life insurance, group health insurance, and dental insurance. Should the cost of such benefits be less than $285 per month, the difference may be used toward any other City- provided insurance benefit and or ICMA deferred compensation. The EMPLOYER will contribute up to a maximum of three hundred dollars ($300) per month per employee for calendar year 1996 for employee life insurance, group health insurance, and dental insurance. Should the cost of such benefits :be less than $300 per month, the difference may be used toward any other City-provided insurance benefit and/or ICMA deferred compensation. LLM/cb CiTY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: December 2?, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARINGS, ORDINANCES, ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER' S AND RESOLUTIONS CITY MANAGER' S APPROVAL NO: 6 ITEM: REQUESTING CHARTER COMMISSION TO BY: PAT HENTGES BY: CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO THE CITY CHARTER DATE: 12-22-94 DATE: PROVIDING FOR AN EVEN YEAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION ~ ,~, NO: Attached please find a resolution requesting that the Charter Commission present a charter amendment allowing for the regular municipal election to be changed from odd numbered years to even numbered years. Further, there are a number of other changes in our election process that could be incorporated into the Charter change, including: - Establishing the date of the primary election as the first Tuesday after the second Monday in September. - Changing the candidate filing period. - Establishing a phasing or transition schedule throuKh 1997. calling for the lengthening or shortening of terms to three and five years respectively for City Council and three years for Mayor. The Charter Commission meets on 3anuary 19th. In the event the City Council passes the resolution, I will request that the City Attorney prepare a charter change for first reading consideration by the Commission. It may be advisable that the Charter Commission consider a second reading of the charter amendment prior to their regularly scheduled March meeting so as to keep the process moving along in a timely basis and to assure that final ordinance amendments on the part of the Council would be resolved prior to the first day of municipal election filings. Please find attached questions that were posed to the Secretary of State concerning transition schedule and a table outlining the even year election transition schedule for a five member council. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available for the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Adopt Resolution 94-89, Requesting the Charter Commission to Consider Amendment to the City Charter Providing for an Even Year Municipal Election. COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION 94 - 89 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT TO THE CITY CHARTER PROVIDING FOR AN EVEN YEAR MUNICIPAL ELECTION WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes establish a uniform set of election procedures; and, WHEREAS, the 1993 Legislature enacted procedures allowing for a Local Government transition from odd-year municipal elections to even-year elections; and, WHEREAS, Independent School District #13 has authorized a conversion to an even-year fall election; and, WHEREAS, a change to an even-year election on the part of the City of Columbia Heights would afford more convenient voting opportunities and save the cost of conducting odd-year elections; and WHEREAS, Chapter 4, Nominations and EleCtions of the City Charter provides for an odd- year municipal election, together with certain other election procedures that are inconsistent with the uniform municipal election laws as prescribed by Minnesota Statute. NOW, THEREFORE, THE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES: Section 1. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute, the City Council hereby desires to change from an odd numbered year election to an even numbered year election pursuant to the transition schedule set forth in the law. Section 2. The Columbia Heights Charter Commission is hereby requested to present appropriate amendments to the Columbia Heights Charter so as to accomplish a transition to an even numbered year municipal election and to provide for the conduct of said election consistent with the uniform municipal election laws. Passed this ~ day of ,1994. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: Joseph Sturdevant, Mayor Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DATE: TO: FROM: RE: DECEMBER 21, 1994 Patrick Hentges Questions For Secretary of State's Office These questions relate to the transition schedule if the City chooses to change to an even-year election after January 1, 1995. The City of Columbia Heights does not have a ward system. All Council Members are elected at large. In 1995, there will be two Council seats and the Mayor seat up for election. In addition, one Council Member has resigned. There are currently two years remaining on his seat. This vacancy will also be filled at the 1995 election. Based on this: 1. Q. For a transition schedule on the three seats, would there be a 3-year term, a 5-year term, and a remaining 2-year term from the vacant seat, or could the 2-year term also be adjusted to 3 or 5 years? A. The 2-year term would stay 2 years. Ao As the Mayor is a 2-year term, would that go to a 3-year term and then in 1998 go back to a 2-year term? Yes, it would go back to a 2-year terrm If it is drawn by lot as to which seat is a 3-year term and which one is a 5-year term, and it is done before the election, do the incumbents in those seats have to run respectively for a 3- and 5-year term, or could both incumbents run for the 5-year term seat? The candidate must specify on filing which seat they are running for. It will show on the ballot the 3-year and the 5-year seat. We cannot draw by lot. Can all three seats be elected at the election and then after the election is completed draw by lot as to which one is the 3-year seat, the 5-year seat, and the 2-year seat? No, see answer to #3. 5. Q. Ao WE:dn 9412132 Rather than drawing by lot for the three Council Member seats, can the top vote getter be the 5-year seat, the next vote getter be the 3-year seat, .and the next vote getter be the 2-year seat? No, see answer to #3. ...... ~,: 7:.~zCITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ~/~:-~EVE YEAR ELECTION 5 MEMBERS Year of Number -Members Term - Next Election ~ , Elected ' Elected Expires -Election · ~.',. : 1 (three years) ,,.Seat #1 ~ 1995 .~ 1 (five years)' Seat #2 2001 -. 2000 ':. -t995 . I (three years) ~;,Mayor :- '~ ~1999 .-1998 ~ : -'"' ---":': :' 1 (three years) .:~ Seat #3 "2001 ' 2000 .~ ' 1997 ' -.~., · ' 1(five'years) -~.,~Seat #4 -' ??2003 ;~' ~"' . ~:2002 ..... '; '~ 1 (tw Yearn) ' ' Mayor 2001 , '-2000. " ''1998 · ,', .... ,-" "'1 (four years) , :;Seat #1 :~2003 2002 · I (two years) '-?-' :., ~2000 I (four years) . .-~-Seat #2".: ~¢"- ' :'?-' ' ?-'*:~-:'1 (four years) ' ~Seat #3 "~,' '-,," "- ' 2002 I (four years) _, :-,._.,: '' I (fouryears CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: December 27, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: COMMUNICATIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER APPROVAL NO: ~7 Fire ITEM: License Revocation, Rental Properties BY: Lowell DeMars BY: 621-23 NE 51st Avenue 4628 and 4634 Tyler Street NE DATE: Dec 19, 1994 DATE. Revocation or suspension of a license to operate a rental property within the City of Columbia Heights is requested against the following property owners. 1) Bonnie D. O'Donnell, regarding rental propery at 621-23 NE 51st Avenue. The property owner has failed to allow the property to be inspected in compliance with Housing Maintenance Codes. The attachment summarizes violations. 2) Gary Eugene Hegenes, dba/Esquire Properties, regarding rental propery at 4628 and 4634 Tyler Street NE. The property owner has failed to correct violations to bring the property into compliance with Housing Maintenance Codes. The attachment summarizes violations. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Establish a Hearing Date of January 23, 1995 for Revocation or Suspension of a License to Operate a Rental Property within the City of Columbia Heights against Bonnie D. O'Donnell, Regarding Rental Proper~ at 621-23 NE 51st Avenue and against Gary Eugene Hegenes, dba/Esquire Properties, regarding rental propery at 4628 and 4634 Tyler Street NE. 94-217 1 1COUNCm ACTION: I 1 I Columbia Heights Fire Department 555 Mill Street Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Date: 12-05-1994 TO: BONNIE D. O'DONNELL O'DONNELL DUPLEX RENTALS 3108 FIARWAY OAKS DRIVE DEKALB, IL 60115 RENTAL PROPERTY ADDRESS: 621 51ST AVENUE NE FINAL NOTIC Dear Rental Property Owner/Manager: In accordance with Columbia Heights City Ordinance ~1176, the rental property identified above is due for an interior/exterior "Uniform Fire Code" and/or "Housing Maintenance Code" inspection. Please contact this office at 782-2835 within 7 days to schedule an appointment. Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Lowell G. DeMars Assistant Fire Chie¢ Columbia Heights Fire Department 555 Mill Street N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55422 Date: 09-25-1994 TO: BONNIE D. O'DONNELL O'DONNELL DUPLEX RENTALS 3108 FIARWAY OAKS DRIVE DEKALB, IL 60115 FINAL . ',tOTICE RENTAL PROPERTY ADDRESS: 621 51ST ~VENUE NE Dear Rental ProPerty Own~¢/M~nager: ¥' :~ '-~ ..... ": In accordance with Columbia Heights City Ordinance ~1175~ the rental property identified above is due for an interior/exterior "Uniform Fire Code" and/or "Housing Maintenance Code"-inspection.' Please contact ~his of¢ice at 782-2835 ~thi'n- 7 days to ~chedule an appointment. ; Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated, Lowell G. DeMars ¢.;. ~ .... .., ! ~s$istant Fire Chief Cotumb~a He~9hts Ffire Department Cotumb~a Heights, MN 55421 DaL~: TO: 09-01-1994 BONNIE D. O'DONNELL O'DONNELL DUPLEX RENTALS 3108 FiAR~AY OAKS DRIVE DEKALB, IL 60115 RENTAL PROPERTY ADDRESS: 621 51S¥ AVENUE NE Dear Rental Properl:,y Owner/idanager: In a~:c:o~dance ~ith Cotumb~a He~,ghts City Ordinance ~ti7(,, p~ opeFL~' :Ldmnt~f~.ed above is due for an interior/exterior "Un~i:orm F~re ~,:~dc" and/or "Housing ~a~ntenance Cod~¢" inspection. P]6~m:~;e contact this otfice at 782-2835 ~ithin 7 days to Yotll prompt st~.ention to this mmtter is greatly apprec~atr:d. Lo~ell G. DeMars Assistant Fire Chief ~.~ ~k~af Co I umb i a Heights Fire Department CH Violations by Inspection From Date: 11-10-1994 To Date: 11-10-t994 Date: 11-14-1994 Violation Number Restv? OWNER ID: (CH*A01) Follo~-up Date Inspection Activity 30119 OWNER ORGANIZATION: ESQUIRE PROPERTIES Yarning Referred To Ltr Date CONTACT NA~E: Page $: 1 Injunction Citation Date Number HEGENES, GARY EUGENE PROPERTY ID: 30119 PROPERTY NANE/DESC: 4628 TYLER OCCUPANCY ID: 0 ORGANIZATION NAME: ESQUIRE PROPERTIES OCCUP CONTACT: PATNODE, CHARLES INSPECTION DATE: 11-10-I994 INSPECTION TYPE: 94 H.N,C,FOLLOW-UP FINA START TIldE: 1430 FINISH TINE: DATE/NEXT INSP: t2-t6-1994 INSP D'ISTRICT: 804 ~'PARCEL NUMBER: 25 30 24 33 0046 1 11-10-I994 5 CITY ORDINANCE 1t-I4-1994 1500 Viol, Code Section: Violation Detalia : VIOLATIONS REMAINING FRO~ APRIL 20, 1994 INSPECTION: 1.,.STORAGE LOCKERS UNSECURED, COI~BUSTIBLE STORAGE UNSECURED 2..,STORAGE LOCKERS UN-NUI~BERED FOR IDENTIFICATION OF RENTAL UNIT 3,, ,LAUNDRY ROO~ FIRE DOOR FOUND PROPPED OPEN 4...COMBUSTIBLE STORAGE IN LAUNDRY ROO~. LOCKERS AND I~ATER BED PARTS 5..,$100,00 IN RE-INSPECTION FEES OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTtONS: 1., ,SHALL LOCK ALL STORAGE LOCKERS OR REMOVE ALL CONTENTS ~o't-t'''°m~- 2.,.SHALL NUMBER ALL STORAGE LOCKERS TO CONFOR~ ~ITH RENTAL UNITS 3...SHALL KEEP LAUNDRY ROO~ DOOR CLOSED AT ALL TI~E8 4,,,SHALL RENOVE ALL COMBUSTIBLE STORAGE FRO~ LAUNDRY RO0~ 5...SHALL SUB~IT THE A~OUNT OF $100.00 DUE FOR RE-iNSPECTION FEES OF THIS PROPERTY, :. .. IF THE FEES ARE NOT PAID PRIOR TO DECEMBER 16, 1994, WE WILL PETITION THE ~ ' CITY COUNCIL FOR A HEARING DATE TO REVOKE THE RENTAL LICENSE OF THIS PROPERTY, THE ABOVE NOTED tTE~S ARE VIOLATIONS OF THE FOLLOWING HOUSt CODE SECTIONS: CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: 12/27/94 .. AGENDA SECTION: OLD BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER NO. 8 PUBLIC WORKS TE..~,~ ITEM: AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK BIDS FOR BY: M. Winsonfl~l~~j BY: * NO. DREDGING OF LABELLE POND ~. ~ o DATE: 12/19/94 DA It is anticipated that the required permits for the dredging of LaBelle Pond will be obtained within the next week. This project was originally bid a year ago to remove sediment from approximately one acre of the pond. Due to the small area and the requirement that the sediment be removed by hydraulic means, no bids were received at that time. In order to provide economy of scale and open the project to more potential bidders, staff and the Consultant, HNTB, have been working to obtain a permit to dredge by mechanical means approximately 3 acres of the pond. Staff is requesting authorization to advertise for bids so that a contract could be let at the January 27, 1995 Council meeting, allowing construction to occur in February and March. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to authorize staff to advertise for bids to dredge LaBelle Pond, Project #9312. MAW:jb 94-835 COUNCIL ACTION: CITY GOUNGIL LETTER Meeting of: December 27, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: OLD BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER' S NO: ~ CITY MANAGER' S APPROVAL STAFF OFFICE CONSOLIDATION BY: PAT HENTGES BY:E~~ ITEM: HRA/CITY NO: ~ ~ I~' v DATE: DECEMBER 21, 1994 DAT Attached please find an agreement calling for the office consolidation of the City Building Department and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Essentially, the proposal involves integrating the City Building Inspector, Licensing Clerk/Secretary, and a new Zoning/Grant Coordinator (replacing the Assistant Building Inspector), into the HRA offices in the lower level of City Hall. The HRA staff members involved in the office consolidation include the Executive Director, Housing Coordinator, HRA Secretary, and a new one-half time Occupancy Specialist (who will assist in the administration of Family Self Sufficiency Certificate Program). The current budgets for both entities involve reimbursement for services provided by staff members of the HRA or City. The proposed agreement, for the most, leaves the reimbursements in place, as follows: 1. City reimburses the HRA for planning, business recruitment and office administration services in the amount of $21,240. 2. The HRA reimburses the City for Section 8 inspections and housing rehabilitation/project management inspections in the amount of $12,716. 3. The HRA reimburses the City for accounting financial services in the amount of $13,200. 4. The HRA reimburses the City for the actual cost of its audit in the amount of $5,900. At the work session, the City Council discussed the possibility of not only consolidating the office staff, but potentially consolidating the financial and personnel records. Under the terms of this consolidation alternative, the HRA would remain responsible and have authority over personnel and budgetary/expenditure matters. Essentially, the City will serve as a financial trustee on behalf of the HRA. City staff discussed this concept with the City's auditors, and they concurred that it should meet state, governmental, and GFOA accounting standards. Upon full implementation, the HRA's reimbursement to the City for accounting and audit costs should be reduced by approximately $7,500. After the consolidation of financial records occurs, it is likely that the Finance Department could also reduce staff accounting hours, and as such, an additional $12,000 savings will be realized in the 1996 budget. Additionally, the HRA will eliminate approximately $15,000 from its budget by not hiring a one half-time Community Development position. At the last work session, the City Council discussed at length, the impact on wages that either the office consolidation or full consolidation would have on various positions. The initial study showed that initial pay adjustments of $2,984 annually are necessary to make the HRA positions comparable with City counterparts. The proposed pay adjustments were done by comparing the consolidated jobs, with their comparable City counterparts, using the Hay job evaluation system. In any event, the HRA employees will remain under the authority of the HRA Board of Commissioners, and will only be a part of the City's payroll processing system and COUNCIL ACTION: CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: December 27, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: OLD BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S NO: CITY MANAGER'S APPROVAL ITEM: HRA/CITY STAFF OFFICE CONSOLIDATION BY: PAT HENTGES BY: NO: DATE: DECEMBER 21, 1994 DATE: Page 2 of 2 Pages PERA. Therefore, there is not the need at this time to make the salary adjustment. In any case, the City would maintain an underpayment ratio considerably above the 80% minimum as required by the State (Department of Employee Relations) for compliance with pay equity. It is true, however, that the office consolidation would likely place more pressure on the need to adjust wages for the various HRA positions. On a related item, City staff is also requesting approval of the job description and wage range for the Zoning/Grant Coordinator position. Again, this position is a replacement and reclassification of duties of the former Assistant Building Inspector position. It will enable the current Building Inspector to more fully concentrate on inspection activities. In turn, the Zoning/Grant Coordinator will concentrate on zoning, CDBG, and community development activities. The position will fall under the non-union employee group. In summary, the office consolidation represents an interim step to full consolidation. It will likely afford the City and HRA all the economies and savings of a full consolidation through the maximum use of staff time and more efficient budget/personnel recordkeeping. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement with the Columbia Heights HRA regarding office consolidation of HRA staff and City Building Department staff. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the job description of the Zoning/Grant Coordinator and establish the 1994 wage range for the position at: Entry 6 Months 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years $2,077 $2,148 $2,218 $2,289 $2,360 COUNCIL ACTION: 0 0 0 o 0 0 .< < < AGREEMENT FOR CONSOLIDATION OF CITY BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY STAFF This agreement made this day of _, 1994, by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Columbia Heights, a body corporate and politic, organized and existing under and by the virtue of the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "HRA" and the City of Columbia Heights, hereinafter referred to as the "City". WHEREAS the City and the HRA have determined that it is desirable to share staffs from the current city Building Department and HRA in a combined city office functioning as the Community Development Department; and WHEREAS to facilitate this combining of the offices of the City Building Department and the HRA on a temporary basis without the HRA employees becoming City employees, it is necessary to have an agreement between the HRA and City in regard to issues, cost reimbursement, equipment use, and the matters as enumerated below. THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows: Personnel: The City and HRA agree to share personnel in the combined City office functioning as Community Development Depart- ment with the City and HRA sharing personnel costs on the basis of HRA/City services provided. Following are the personnel the City and HRA witl provide for the combined office, with new personnel to be employed within sixty (60) days: HRA Executive Director (Community Development Director) Housing Coordinator (Housing Administrator) Secretary Occupancy Specialist/Family Self Sufficiency Coordinator CITY Building official Zoning/Grant Administrator Secretary Duties of current City Building Department/HRA personnel may be adjusted by the HRA Executive Director and City Manager as is necessary for the efficient operation of the combined office. The city agrees to provide personnel services for the HRA includ- ing, but not limited to, maintaining personnel records, hiring and pay equity. To enable an orderly transition of the HRA and Building Department staffs into a combined office, the HRA Executive Director will be in charge of the combined office. The Director will be directly responsible to the City Manager for the actions of the City employees. Until the HRA employees actually become employees of the City, the HRA Executive Director shall also be responsible to and report to the HRA Board of Commissioners for the activi- ties/actions of the HRA and its employees. (i) CONSOLIDATION - CITY BLDG. DEPT. & HRA STAFF The City agrees to employ an additional full-time employee for the combined office to serve as the zoning/Grants Administrator. The HRA agrees to hire a part-time (20 hr/wk) Occupancy Specialist/FSS Coordinator. 2. Cost Proration:. The proration of costs for personnel/office supplies and equipment shall be established jointly by the City Manager and HRA Executive Director on an equitable, justifiable basis. Where costs for personnel services are reimbursed by federal programs (e.g. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Comprehensive Improvement Assistance Program (CIAP), & HOME), only property documented (on time basis) services will be reimbursed to the HRA/City. The budget for the operation of the combined office shall be that included in this agreement as Exhibit "A". · Additional cit Contract Services to be Provided: In accordance 3 with the City/HRA agreement for computerized accounting services (dated 23 February 1993), the city agrees to continue providing accounting services for the HRA. In accordance with the HRA/City agreement for Building Inspection /Rehabilitation Specification writing Service, dated 30 June 1993, as amended here, the City Fire Department Housing Inspection personnel will continue to provide all necessary (HRA requested) Section 8 Rent Assistance program inspections. In accordance with the same 30 June 1993 agreement, the city agrees to continue to provide Housing Rehabilitation Program inspections/ work write-ups. Due to the city elimination of the Assistant Building Inspector position and creation of the Zoning/Grants administrator position, the Building official will provide these services. Where the subject 30 June 1993 Agreement states ,,Assistant Building Inspector", the subject agreement is hereby amended to read "City Inspector". city Inspector is defined as city Fire Department Housing Inspector in regard to Section 8 Rental Assistance Program inspections and city Building official in regard to Housing Rehabilitation program inspections/work write- ups. 4. office Space/Equipment:. To enable the efficient operation of the combined office, the city agrees to remove its maintenance storage from the former city jail cells area and Finance Department storage from the office between the former jail cell area and Conference Room in the area currently used by the HRA as their office. The city agrees to remove the jail doors, etc. to enable better utilization of the former jail cells area by the combined office. This is to be completed within sixty (60) days of the signing of this agreement. Any additional (in addition to that already in the current HRA office) furniture, files and other equipment (including computers) necessary for the efficient operation of the combined offices of Community Development Department are to be furnished by the City on an as needed basis (as approved by both the CD Director and city Manager). CONSOLIDATION - CITY BLDG. DEPT. & HRA STAFF Work Hours, office Procedures/Policiest Standard work hours for the Community Development Department sh~ll be the same as the City work hours. At the CD Director's discretion, individual staff members may be allowed to work on flexible time schedules. However, the office must have adequate staffing at all times to serve the combined offices customers in an efficient manner. Current and any new HRA personnel will be under the HRA Personnel Policy. Current and any new City personnel will be under the City Personnel Policy. Agreement to Consolidate Accounting and Personnel RecordsL In order to further increase the efficiency of the combined office, the HRA and City agrees to integrate its financial, accounting, and personnel records into the city system. The city shall hold in trust the records and provide the necessary reporting consistent with State, Federal, and GFOA Reporting Standards. The records integration shall be accomplished with the following items: A. The financial accounting records as required by Federal and State programs. B. Pursuant to GFOA Accounting, State and Federal accounting standards, the City shall establish a series of accounts and funds to provide accounting activities of the HRA including a Central office Fund, Parkview Funds, CDBG Fund, and M~FA Fund, etc. C. Accounts Payable activities, including checks, vouchers, and purchase orders shall be issued by the city of Columbia Heights on behalf of the HRA; only upon approval and direction of the HRA, provided the HRA has sufficient funds encumbered to cover said financial transactions. D. The City will conduct as part of its annual audit, a financial audit of the HRA funds that are included within the City's financial records. If necessary, the HRA will prepare an independent audit document. In any event, the City's costs for the HRA's portion of its audit, combined with a indepen- dent audit document as required by the HI{A, will not exceed $4,000 annually. E. The HRA will regularly submit to the city on a timely basis, any HRA Commissioners' approvals necessary to authorize HRA transactions. F. The payroll records of the current HRA employees shall be transferred to the City. The City will be responsible for preparing payroll, upon direction of the HRA. G. The HRA shall remain responsible for the hiring, discipline, and discharge, together with compensation adjustments of those employees transferred to the city payroll. H. Upon transfer, the HRA employees and the HRA would be respon- sible for enrollment into the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA). The HRA retirement contribution to PERA shall come from any remaining proceeds of the HRA current retirement contribution, with any remaining amount being available to the employee as deferred compensation. I. The current agreement providing for accounting services shall remain in place. In the event full consolidation of financial records is achieved, the City's current accounting and financial services charge of $13 200 and audit cost of $5,900 will be reduced and replaced with a general adm!nlstra~iv overhead charge of $6,600 and audit cost not exceeding $4,000. (3) CONSOLIDATION - CITY BLDG. DEPT. & HRA STAFF ~ Consolidation of the offices of the City Building Department and HRA is to start immediately upon HRA Board and City council approval of this agreement. The consolidation of the HRA accounting and personnel ~ecord~ shall occur retroactive to January 1, 1995. It is understood by both the City and the HRA that it may take a month to two months to make the office changes necessary and to accomplish the physical move of equipment and personnel necessary. The consolidation is to be completed within sixty (60) days of the signing of this agreement. Cancellation: In the event the consolidation effort cited in this agreement is determined to be non-workable by either party, it may be canceled by either party by a sixty (60) day notice to the other party; provided however that the actual termination will occur at the end of the nearest budget year. Dated this day of , 1994. Housing and Redevelopment Authority 590 40th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421 City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421 D. J. Murzyn, Jr., Chair Joseph Sturdevant, Mayor Donald A. Schneider, Executive Directo~ Patrick W. Hentges, City Manager agrstaff12/22/94 AGREEMENT FOR BUILDING INSPECTION/REHABILITATION SPECIFICATION WRITING SERVICE This agreement made this_~?~r..day o~ ~/J~' , 1993, by and between the Housing and Redeve£opmen= Authority of Columbia Heights, a body corporate and politic, organized and existing under and by the virtue of the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "HRA" and the City of Columbia Heights, hereinafter referred to as the "City". Whereas, the ERA desires to avail itself of certain building inspection and rehabilitation specification writing services; Now, therefore, the HRA and the City do mutually agree as follows: RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INSPECTIONS: A. Initial Lease-uD Inspections: The initial lease-up inspections are to be completed within two (2) working days of the request placed by the HRA. These inspections will be coordinated by the Occupancy Specialist/Housing Coordinator, hereinafter referred to as the "HRA staff member." If violations of the program Housing Quality Standards are found, the ~~ant L~ild~'~_ i~pe~u~, .hcrai..~~-c-- rcfcrre~ ~ z~ ~City Inspector~,~ is to immediately notify the owner of the property being inspected via a copy of the inspection report and a written indication as to what work must be performed on the property in order to meet HQS requirements. Further, within twenty-four (24) hours after being notified by the owner that the required repairs have been completed, the City Inspector is to complete a follow-up inspection· If the work meets all specifications, a final inspection report is to be furnished to the HRA. The city Inspector shall continue to inspect the property until such time as the property meets all HQS requirements and a final inspection report has been furnished. B. Special/Interim Inspections: If a tenant of a unit being assisted through the Rental Assistance Program requests that a special inspection be performed on the rental unit, the City Inspector shall inspect said unit within two (2) working days after receipt of the request. If the unit is in violation of HQS requirements the City Inspector shall notify the property manager/owner of the violations and normally indicate that they have thirty (30) days in which to correct the violations and meet the HQS requirements. The unit is to be reinspected .until such ~ime as the violations have been corrected and the unit meets all HQS requirements. A· copy of the inspection report and all subsequent correspondence on the matter is to be provided to the HRA. C. Annual HQS InsQection: The City Inspector shall perform an annual HQS inspection of each of the Rent Assisted Units· The HRA staff person will provide the City Inspector with a comprehensive list of the names, addresses, and phone numbers of the tenants and landlords who require an annual HQS inspection· The inspections are to be scheduled, by the City Inspector, with each tenant, and are to be completed within ten (10) working days of the date of the request from the HI~A staff member. Property owners/ managers are to be notified immediately of any HQS violations and wi!! normally be allowed thirty (30) days in which to correct any violations. The City Inspector shall reinspect the units as necessary and until such time as all violations are corrected. D. Damage Inspection: Upon request of an owner, and within twenty-four (24) hours of the owner's request during the first three working days of month, the City Inspector shall complete a damage inspection of any vacated units where the owner anticipates ~hat damages to the unit will exceed the damage deposit for the unit· The City Inspector will record the inspection report of the required Metro HRADamage Inspection Form. The original of the completed inspection form is to be furnished to the H!RA staff member within 24 hours of the completed inspection. HOUSING REPLABILITATION PROGRAM INSPECT!ONS/WORKWRITE-UPS: The City Inspector,~upon request of the ~ staff member and within three (3) working days of the request, shall complete an inspection of any and all houses and rental buildings/units being proposed for rehabilitation with funds provided by or through the HRA. Within three (3) working days of the completion of the inspection, the City Inspector shall provide a written specification of the work that must be completed. Additionally, the City Inspector will provide bid alternatives as necessary. The HRA staff member will coordinate the receipt of bids. The City Inspector will review and comment on the bids received, as necessary. As necessary during, and upon completion of the rehabilitation~ the City Inspector will inspect the work. The City Inspector will sign the necessary Certificate of Completion when the work on the property is completed. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS A. Forms: The City Inspector shall use alt required Metro HRA forms and furnish copies of all completed forms and letters to the ~ staff person. B. Quality Control: Metro Hl~Acompletes 5% Quality Control HQS inspections each year to insure that units are being properly inspected. Additionally, the HRA staff person will be allowed to accompany the City Inspector for the purpose of completing rent comparisons. C. Traininq:. The City Inspector shall attend any required Metro HRA HQS training/workshop. REIMBURSEMENT BY P~RA TO CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS In consideration for the above-listed services the KRA shall reimburse the City of Columbia Heights, on a monthly basis, forty percent of the salary and benefits of the City inspector~ Further, the City of Columbia Heights shall, as far as possible between the date of this contract and December 31, 1993, track the hours expended by the City Inspector on the tasks outlined above. The purpose of t_his tracking is to enable the parties to better evaluate the reimbursement provisions of this agreement. Dated this~T//day of ~z~ COLUMBIA HEIGHTS HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY s ~eintz~ ~Chairge~son ~Do~ald Schneider, Executive D~r. , !993. CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Donat~J. Patrick Hen:~ City Manager CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of:~ AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS NO. 9 ITEM: AWARD OF BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY NO. IMPROVEMENTS, MUNICIPAL PROJECTS #9425, #9212, #9216, #9218 & #9219 ~ ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS BY: M. Winson DATE: 12/19/94 CITY MANAGER On April 11, 1994, and October 24, 1994, Council authorized staff to seek sealed bids to Install Automatic Door Operators, Municipal Project #9425, at four locations. On November 14, 1994, Council authorized staff to seek sealed bids for Building Accessibility Improvements, Municipal Project Number #9212, #9216, #9218 and #9219, at four park buildings. The improvements to the park buildings include wider doorways and rearrangement of plumbing fixtures to provide access by handicap individuals as mandated by the Americans with Disability Act. This item was tabled at the December 12, 1994, meeting to the December 27, 1994, meeting to allow staff to further investigate a non-compliant bid. The bid documents specifically state that the award will be made on the basis of a total bid. Additionally, the Stan's Door Service bid excluded the electrical work necessary to provide power to the operators. For these items of non-compliance, the bid of Stan's Door Service was disqualified. Specifications were sent to six companies. Four sealed bids were received for the bid opening on December 2, 1994, at 11:130 A.M. Stan's Door Service submitted a bid to install the door operators only. The remaining three bids are shown below. The bid tabulation is attached. Company Total Bid PMt Construction Co. Lund Martin Construction, Inc. CM Construction Co. $56,700.00 $60,674.00 $68,243.00 Staff is recommending award of the projects to PMI Construction Company of St. Paul, Minnesota, for the low bid of $56,700.00. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to award the Building Accessibility Improvements to Municipal Project Numbers #9425, #9212, #9216, #9218 and #9219 to PMI Construction Company of St. Paul, Minnesota, based upon their low, qualified, responsible bid in the amount of $56,700.00 with funds to be appropriated from 1993-1994 Community Development Block Grant; and, furthermore, to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement for the same. MAW:jb 94-833 Attachment COUNCIL ACTION: CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: December 27, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: New Business NO. 9 ITEM: Siren Maintenance Contract NO. ~ ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Civil Defense BY: Charles Kewatt (g.i/-, DATE: December 16, 1994 CITY MANAGER APPROV/~'N BY: DATE: ~ The City of Columbia Heights has contracted with Doradus Corporation, of 6095 East River Road, Fridley, for maintenance and repair of its siren decoder/receivers since 1991. The contract is up for renewal at this time. The contract covers the eight sirens currently located in the city. Unit #1 4855 Washington Street Unit #2 1455 49th Avenue Unit #3 4329 Central Avenue Unit #4 322 40th Avenue Unit #5 1726 41st Avenue Unit #6 4457 4th Street Unit #7 4d46 Arthur Street Unit #8 3901 Jackson Street Doradus shall provide preventive maintenance inspection of each unit at the time of battery replacement at a cost of $140.00 per unit. Monthly data analysis reports will be provided at a cost of $6.00 per unit per month. All preventive and corrective maintenance service calls and emergency service and repairs requested by the City will be billed on a time and materials basis according to the following fee schedule: Labor @ $80.00/hour, including travel time; Parts @ cost plus 20%; Repairs @ cost plus 20%. Doradus will charge a one time inspection charge of $140/unit before the start of the contract. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move that the City enter into a maintenance agreement with Doradus Corporation for time and materials service of the City's siren decoder/receivers and that the Mayor and City Manager be authorized to sign the agreement. mid cd94-10 COUNCIL ACTION: DORADUS CORPORATION 6095 East River Road · Minneapolis, MN 55432 (612) 572-1000. Fax (612) 572-3927 September 19, 1994 City of Columbia Heights 559 Mill Street NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Attn: Fire ChiefCharlieKewatt Dear Fire Chief Charlie Kewatt: Attached is the 1995 "MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SIREN DECODER/RECEI~R" - "TIME AND MATERIALS SERVICE". Please refer to this agreement for changes in terms and pricing. Please sign the agreement and return it prior to December 15, 1994, if you wish to have Doradus maintaining your siren receiver/decoders for 1995. Doradus also has available a "FIXED-PRICE SERVICE" agreement. Please contact us if you would like to convert to the "FIXED-PRICE SERVICE" or if you have any questions. Sincerely, Doradus Corporation MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SIREN RF_I2EIVER/DECODERS AND MATERIALS SERVICE This maintenance services agreement is made and entered into as of this day of ,19 , by and between Domdus Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, of 6095 East River Road, Fridley, Minnesota 55432, hereinafter referred to as "Doradus" and the municipality of , County), Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City". DEFINITIONS The terms "Unit", "Receiver/Decoder", and "Service Call" shall be defined as follows in this Agreement: UNIT "Unit" consists of the entire siren installation, including the pole, siren, receiver/decoder, electrical service and connections, area around the pole and access to the site. RECEIVER/DECODF_.,R "Receiver/Decoder" is the portion of the siren system which is responsible for the receipt and transmission of control commands and information and the activation of the circuitry which actually sounds the siren. This includes the radio transceiver, the decoder board and its power supply (including the battery backup), the antenna, the interconnecting cables and connectors and the control box. SERVICE CALL A "Service Call" is a visit to a unit with the intention and capability of performing either preventive maintenance or corrective action to the receiver/decoder. A technician making a service call shall have with him/her the tools and spare parts necessary to reasonably assure a fully operational receiver/decoder at the end of the service call. It is agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. SERVICES Doradus shall provide and the City shall compensate Domdus as hereinafter provided for the following: 1.1 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE-A Doradus technician shall perform a preventive maintenance inspection of each unit described on Attachment 1 attached hereto. This inspection will coincide with the battery replacement schedule. such in~tion, the Doradus technician shall perform the following operations: Durin~ 1.1.1 BATTERY REPLACEM~-NT-The receiver/decoder battery will be replaced on a regularly scheduled basis for preventive maintenance. Battery replacement will occur during the preventive maintenance inspection once every 2 years for Hennepin County and once every three years for Anoka County for all units maintained by Doradus under this maintenance agreement, including those batteries which may have been replaced since the last scheduled replacement because of failure. Battery replacement for units in Hennepin County is scheduled for 1995. The next scheduled battery replacement for units in Anoka County is 1997. 1.1.2 VISUAL INSPF_,CTION-The unit will be visually inspected for damage or signs of deterioration. 1.1.3 PREVENTIVE ACTIONS-The receiver/d~er will be inspected and actions will be taken to assure the continued reliability of the receiver/decoder. Except as specifically provided herein Doradus will not be responsible for providing preventive actions or service to the siren or to the electrical service to the unit. 1.1.4 FUNCTIONAL TEST-The unit will be checked for proper operation. 1.1.5 INSPECTION REPORT-Following the inspection visit, Doradus will prepare an inspection report of the unit, noting condition of the receiver/decoder as well as other pertinent unit data. This report will be forwarded to the City immediately if the unit is not then operable or if, in the reasonable opinion of the technician .conducting such inspection, the unit will, within the following 12 month period, become inoperable; otherwise, the report will be forwarded to the City within 45 days following such inspections. 1.2 EMF~RG~CY SERVICE-Doradus will provide emergency service to the receiver/decoder units on the following terms: 1.2.1 RESPONSE TIME-Doradus will respond to a need for emergency service based upon either the results of a routine test analysis (see paragraph 1.3 below) or a written request from the City stating the apparent failure of a unit. A request stating the suspected problem with the unit, sent to Doradus by the City, by facsimile machine, the receipt of which request is acknowledged by Doradus either by telephone or by facsimile machine, shall be deemed to be in writing if such report is substantially in the form of Attachment 2. Doradus will use its best efforts to inspect and repair the units in a timely manner. 1.2.2 SERVICF_,S PERFORMl~l)-Services performed pursuant to this paragraph 1.2 will consist of analysis of the apparent problem, repair or replacement of the pans which appear to be failed, and retest of the unit. In the case of failures to parts other than those covered by this agreement (including, but not limited to, failure of the siren itself or electrical service to the unit), the City and/or its electrician will be notified as specified by the City. 1.2.3 REPORTING-Following each emergency service response, a report will be immediately prepared by the Doradus technician and forwarded to the City describing the problem reported, the analysis of the problem and corrective actions taken, ff any. 1.2.4 PRIORITY-City acknowledges that it has been offered by Doradus a service maintenance agreement under which Doradus would provide, on a prepaid basis, regular inspections and maintenance of the units within the boundaries of. City. City has elected not to obtain such prepaid maintenance service. City further acknowledges that municipalities and counties other than City have contracted with Doradus for such prepaid maintenance service. City will be provided emergency service after those municipalities and counties which have contracted with Doradus for prepaid maintenance service have received emergency service requested by them. All emergency service requested by any City will receive emergency service response prior to preventive service calls, regardless of whether or not Doradus has agreed to provide prepaid maintenance service to such municipality or county. 1.3 MONITORING OF TEST REPORTS- Doradus shall monitor the following test reports on sirens covered by this agreement resulting from silent tests run by the City or by the County in which the City is located on units described in Attachment 2: 1.3.1 FREQUENCY- Doradus will monitor silent test reports a minimum of once per week, generally on the day following the running of a silent test. 1.3.2 ANALYSIS-Doradus will monitor these test reports for items which represent to Doradus known failure modes of the units and for events not previously seen or explained. Whenever a suspected failure of a unit is detected from such reports, such suspected failure will be reported to the City. It will be the responsibility of the City to initiate all calls for either routine or emergency service. F_ach City and County is encouraged to continue to monitor the operation of each siren in any manner currently used (including but not limited to live observers of monthly tests, analysis of silent test results, etc.). 1.3.3 REPORTING- Doradus will provide to the City a monthly summary of all pertinent data gathered as a result of such tests. 2. HA_RDWAR~ AND HAR.DWAR~ FA.I~ AND D~ECT$ COVERED 2.1 HARDWARE COVERED- Doradus shall provide repair and/or replacement for the following components of the system: 2.1.1 CONTROL BOX- The box housing the controls for the receiver/decoder unit. 2.1.2 SIREN DECODER BOARD- The receiver/decoder board, including its integral power supply. 2.1.3 BATTERY-The battery which is used to provide backup to the siren receiver/decoder board and power to the radio. 2.1.4 RADIO-The two-way radio transceiver installed as part of the unit. 2.1.5 INTERCONNECTIONS- All internal connections within the control box including cables, fuses, and antennas which form part of the receiver/decoder system. 2.2. COVEI~GE 2.2.1 CAUSES AND CONDITIONS COVERED UNDER NORMAL M.M2qTENANCE CHARGE- Doradus will repair or replace items listed in paragraph 2.1 which fail for any cause whatsoever. 2.2.2 UNSERVICEAJ3LE UNITS- In the event that, for any reason, the Doradus technician determines that a unit is unsafe to approach or to work on, including, without limitation, improperly grounded units, units not shut off or improperly shut off, and unsafe environmental conditions of any kind, Doradus will notify the City of the problem. Until the situation is corrected and Doradus is notified by the City, no service will be attempted on that unit. Doradus shall not be responsible for providing a service call until such unit ks serviceable and Doradus is notified of such fact. This agreement is effective from January 1, 1995 thru December 31, 1995. At the end of each calendar year the agreement will be renewed automatically for one additional year. Either party may terminate this agreement without cause by providing the other party written notice of such termination a minimum of 60 days prior to the renewal date of this agreement. Doradus will provide any changes in price or terms of this agreement a minimum of 90 days prior to the renewal date of this agreement. This agreement may be terminated by either party for cause upon 30 days' written notice. The City shall pay Doradus the amounts set forth in this paragraph 4 for the following services: A preventive and corrective inspection of each unit as described in paragraph 1.1 at the rate set forth at paragraph 4.1, if applicable, and a monthly data analysis as described in paragraph 1.3 at the rate set forth at paragraph 4.2. In addition Doradus will provide time and materials service at the request of the City in a manner described in section 4.3. 4.1 FIXED PRICE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE INSPECTION-If applicable, Doradus will provide a preventive maintenance inspection as described in paragraph 1.1 on units at a fLxed price of $140.00 per unit. Time and Material charges as described in paragraph 4.3 will apply to units requiring corrective maintenance. 4.2 DATA ANALYSIS CHARGE-The City shall pay a sum of $6.00 per unit per month. The City shall pay in advance on a annual basis and payment will be due and payable 30 days from the date of the billing statement. Interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum shall commence to accrue on unpaid amounts on the date such amount are due and payable. 4.3 TIME AND MATERIALS CHARGES-All preventive and corrective maintenance service calls and emergency service and repairs will be billed and shall be payable by the City on a time and materials basis according to the following fee schedule: Labor Parts Repairs $80.00/hour including travel time Cost + 20 % (Including without limitation, batteries) Cost + 20 % (Including without limitation, radio repairs) Failed receiver/decoder circuit boards will be replaced with equivalent working boards. The City will be invoiced for time and materials charges per the above schedule for the repair or replacement of the failed board. Time and materials invoices will be delivered to the City when the siren returns to service and will be due and payable 30 days from the date of the billing statement. Interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum shall commence to accrue on unpaid amounts on the date such amounts are due and payable. 4.3 BUY IN INSPECTION cHARGE- On a one-time basis, prior to the time a receiver/decoder is included in this maintenance agreement, Doradus shall perform an inspection of the unit as per section 1.1. Doradus shall charge $140 for the inspection. In the event the receiver/decoder is inoperable Doradus will repair the unit on a time- and-material basis. This charge shall be due and payable net 30 days from the date of the billing statement. Interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18 %) per annum shall commence to accrue on unpaid amounts on the date such amounts are due and payable. 5. DORADUS RF_~PONSIBILITIES AND WARRANTIES All Services and products furnished to the City by Doradus shall be deemed satisfactory upon City's acceptance thereof and such services and products shall be deemed accepted and satisfactory by the City unless written notice of deficiency or non-acceptance is delivered by City to Doradus within 30 days following receipt by City of a report from Doradus pursuant to paragraph 1.1.5 or paragraph 1.2.3 of this agreement. Receipt of such report by the City shall be conclusively presumed to have occurred on the third day subsequent to the date the report is mailed by Doradus, postage prepaid and properly addressed to the City Manager of the City. No other express warranty is given and no agent, employee or representative of Doradus is authorized to bind Doradus for any other or additional warranty. In the event the City provides Doradus with timely written notice of deficiency or non- acceptance of the operation of a receiver/decoder, Doradus shall use its best efforts to remedy the deficiency and/or the cause of City's non-acceptance of the receiver/dec, oder. Doradus shall be entitled to continue to attempt to remedy any deficiencies for so long a period of time as, in the reasonable judgment of Doradus, such attempt is justified. If Doradus further reasonably determines that the nature of the deficiency precludes remedy by correction or modification then Doradus shall have the right to fully satisfy its warranty obligation hereunder by refunding to the City all sums incurred and paid for maintenance service of the unit since the most recent inspection or test which indicated such unit to be operating improperly. Doradus shall have a continuing duty to supply the City with the telephone and facsimile machine numbers of Doradus and of any changes of such numbers. 6. CITY RF, SPONSIBIIITIF_S AND WARItANTIF~ City shall have the continuing duty to designate one or more persons employed by or under the control of the City who shall have the duty of acting on behalf of the City as a point(s) of contact with Doradus personnel to assure the expeditious execution of the work required by this agreement. Further, the City shall have the continuing duty to supply Doradus at all times with a current, up-to-date list of such persons. Such list shall include, at a minimum, the name, telephone number, facsimile machine number and address of each such person and the times of the day and week that each such person can be contacted by Doradus personnel for purposes set out in this agreement. City shall make easily available to Doradus, in emergency situations, on holidays, and otherwise, any keys, permissions, or other requirements for access to the equipment to be maintained under this agreement. City shall at its expense provide Doradus with siren numbers and locations for all units covered by this agreement. City further warrants that it is free, as of the date of this agreement, of any contractual obligations that would prevent it from entering into this agreement, and that the offer of Doradus to provide maintenance services and/or products in connection with this agreement in no way has caused or induced or will cause or induce City to breach any C°ntracmal duties or obligations. 7. INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLF_SS Doradus shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City from and against any and all liability, damage, claims, or loss, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, occurring during the term of this agreement arising from a breach by Doradus of the performance of its obligations under this agreement. City shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Doradus from and against any and all liability, damage, claims, or loss including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, arising from or related in any way to the ownership, operation or use by City of the units and related equipment covered by this agreement, or arising from or related in any way to the neglect or failure of the City to properly maintain the parts of the unit other than the receiver/decoder. The obligations of the parties under this paragraph 7 shall continue in full force and effect notwithstanding the termination of this agreement. 8. GENERAL 8.1 Any assignment of this agreement without the express written mutual consent of City and Doradus shall be void. 8.2 Any notice herein required or permitted to be given or served by either party hereto upon the other shall be deemed given or served in accordance with the provisions of this agreement if delivered personally, if to Doradus, to an officer of Doradus or, if to the City, to the City Manager, Treasurer, or Finance Director of the City or if mailed, in a sealed envelope by United States Postal Service mail, by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage paid and addressed to the party to whom the notice is directed at the location designated for such party on the face of this agreement, or such other location as either party may designate in writing. 8.3 Neither party shall be liable for failure to comply with any of the terms of this agreement when such failure has been caused by fire, war, insurrection, government restrictions, force majeure, Act of God or other cause, beyond the control and not due to the fault of either party involved, provided such party uses due diligence to remedy such default. 8.4 In the event any one or more of the provisions of this agreement should be ruled by a court of competent jurisdiction in the State of Minnesota to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions contained herein shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. 8.5 This Agreement may be amended only by an instrument in writing executed by City and Doradus. 8.6 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. %.7 City acknowledges that it has read this .agreement, understands it and agrees to be bound by its terms, and further agrees that it represents the entire Agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior oral and written proposals and communications. The individuals executing this agreement by and on behalf of the respective parties hereby specifically represent that they are acting officers of such parties authorized to execute this agreement, holding the offices indicated by the official titles beneath their signatures below, and further represent that upon the complete execution of this agreement the party intended to be bound by this agreement by such individual will in fact be bound. 8.8 This agreement may be executed in several identical counterparts, and all of said counterparts executed and delivered, each as an original and complete in itself, shall constitute but one and the same instrument, and any such counterpart may be introduced in evidence, proved, recorded or used for any purpose without the production of any other counterparts. IN WITNF_~S WItE~F, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. CITY DORADUS CORPORATION By: Title: Accepted by City this Accepted by Domdus this day of ,19 day of ,19 ATTACHMENT I - UNITS COVERED City Name: COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Unit Number II Location 1 4855 Washington Street 2 1455 49th Avenue 8/21/91 3 4329 Central Avenue 4 i322 40th Avenue 5 1726 41st Avenue 6 4457 4th Street 7 4446 Arthur Street 8 3901 Jackson Street CITY DORADUS CORPORATION By' By' Title · Its · Dated · ATTACHMENT 2 - REQ~ TO DORADUS CORPORATION FOR EMERGENCY SERVICE OF SIREN RECEIVER/DECODER Date requested for emergency service is made: Entity making request (Name of City or County): Name of person and title of person making request: Name, title, telephone number and facsimile machine number of person Doradus should contact regarding this request: Name of person Title of person - Telephone number Facsimile (fax) machine number Emergency service is requested for the following unit: Unit number City in which unit is located Location of unit Description of problem with unit.. (Provide as much detail as possible): The telephone number of Doradus is (612) 572-1000 as of September 1, 1994. The facsimile (fax) number of Doradus is (612) 572-3927 as of September 1, 1994. Doradus acknowledges receipt of this request on (date) Name and title of Doradus personnel acknowledging receipt: CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: 12/27/94 AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER NO. 9 PUBLIC WORKS ITEM: FINAL PAYMENT FOR MUNICIPAL BY: M. Wins on /.~r~ BY: E NO. PROJECT 9401 -SEAL COATING ~ ~ DATE: 12/19/94 DAT SE QUADRANT~. ~ Attached is a Certificate of Completion of work for Municipal Project #9401 seal coating the streets in the Southeast Quadrant of the City. The work has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications and is being certified to the City Council for acceptance and final payment. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to accept the work for Municipal Project #9401 and to authorize final payment from fund 415- 59401-5130 to Bituminous Roadways, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minnesota in an amount of $15,923.90. MAW:ih 94-834 Attachment COUNCIL ACTION: Page I 20-Sep-94 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN FINAL PAYMENT MUNICIPAL PROJECT #9401 STREET SEALCOATING - SOUTHWEST QUADRANT BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS, INC. 2825 CEDAR AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407 NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PR1CE TOTAL 1 Sweep streets before sealcoating 320,382 S.Y. $0.01280 $4,100.89 2 Sealcoat M.S.A.S. streets (FA-3 Agg.) 97636 S.Y. $0.47240 $46,123.25 3 Sealcoat residential streets (FA-2 Agg.) 222,746 S.Y. $0.30880 $68,783.96 4 Sweep streets after sealcoating 320,382 S.Y. $0.03113 $9,973.49 TOTAL BID COMPLETED TO DATE MINUS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS TOTAL DUE $128,981.59 ($113,057.69) $15,923.90 I hereby certify to the City Council of Columbia Heights that I have been in charge of the work required byj, he above contract; that all work has been done and performed as measured by and in acc,e'fdance with and pursuant to the terms of said contract. Ma~/A. Winson, P. E. Reg. No. 18829 D~ [ I accept the above payment as [inal for the work done under this contract. Bitumindus~oa~w~ys, tn~. D~te ' ' CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: December 27, 1994 AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S NO: 9 CITY MANAGER' S APPROVAL ITEM: ESTABLISH WORK SESSIONS ~D BY: P. HENTGES BY: NO: DATE: 12-21-94 DATE: I am recommending that regular Work Sessions be established for Tuesday, January 3, 1995 at 8 P.M. and Tuesday, January 17, 1995, at 7 P.M. I am also recommendin§ that a Work Session also be scheduled on Saturday, January 7, 1995, at 8:30 A.M. to hold interviews for Board and Commission openings. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to establish Tuesday, January 3, 1995 at 8 P.M.; Saturday, January 7, 1995 at 8:30 A.M.; and Tuesday, January 17, 1995, at 7 P.M. as Work Session Dates. COUNCIL ACTION: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PATRICK HENTGES, CITY MANAGER DECEMBER 21, 1994 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 27, 1994 1) SHARED RIDE REPORT Attached please find the Shared Ride Report through November, 1994. 2) PROPERTY TAXES FOR CONDOMINIUMS Attached please find a letter sent to a number of property owners from University Heights Condominiums in response to their concerns at the Truth in Taxation Hearing. As the letter discusses, the property division issue concerning the living unit on one tax statement and the garages on another, is a product of how the property was subdivided and approved upon its conception. Apparently this issue was discussed some years back by the City and the Association. With regards to the property taxes, I earlier reported that the tax amount on the garages changes because of the homestead cut-off amount and the fact that the garages are placed in as the last value as opposed to the first value. In any case, the tax amount would be same, but the amount of taxes paid on $3,000 changes because the first $72,000 is calculated at 1%, and any remaining market value is calculated at 2%. 3) SILVER LAKE HOMEOWNERS CONCERNS Attached please find a draft responses to the Silver Lake Homeowners Association concerning the questions they posed at Open Mike. In the event the answers are satisfactory, I will forward a final response to the Homeowners Association. 4) STATUS OF RAILROAD CROSSING AT STINSON BOULEVARD The project to improve the railroad crossing was delayed this year due to the Soo Line strike. As you may recall, the agreement between St. Anthony, Columbia Heights, and the Soo Line was that the two cities would purchase the rubberized material, and the Soo Line would do the installation. The material has been purchased and is currently being stockpiled by the City of St. Anthony. Now that the Soo Line strike is settled, we will make arrangements with the railroad to do the installation when weather conditions allow. 5) STATUS OF SIGNAL AT STINSON BOULEVARD AND 39TH AVENUE This project was put on hold until 1995 in order to allow St. Anthony to budget the funds for their portion of the project. It is anticipated that a part of St. Anthony's funding would come from the TIF district for the redevelopment of Apache Plaza. In the interim, we have become aware of a potential change in the State Aid rules that would allow 100% funding by State Aid if any leg of an intersection is on a State Aid route. These rules have not been finalized and adopted, but staff feel that it is prudent to wait and see if this will be adopted as it would result in considerable savings to the City. 6) STATUS OF LION'S CLUB IMPROVEMENT AT 37TH AVENUE/STINSON BOULEVARD Staff has been coordinating some requested additional improvements to this triangle with the Soo Line. The Lions Club's wish to install additional landscaping which required an amendment to the current agreement. Within the last week, we have received documents from the Soo Line to allow these additional improvements and currently those documents are being circulated to the involved clubs for signature before being returned to the City. Additionally, staff has developed estimates for provision of water to this parcel of land for use in maintaining the landscaping. We have estimated that the cost to bring sufficient service to the parcel would be approximately $3,000 and have informed the Lion's of this to see if they wish to pursue this matter. 7) SHEFFIELD TAX INCREMENT PLAN Attached please find copies of two letters sent to Anoka County Chairman Dan Erhart and Superintendent A1 Holt. The School District and the County are required by law to be notified and have an opportunity to comment on any tax increment plan adoption. You will also find enclosed a copy of the proposed plan. The hearing is scheduled for January 23rd, 1995. It is hoped that we can review in work session a variety of issues associated with Sheffield in advance of the hearing. 8) COUNCILMEMBER NAWROCKI'S RESIGNATION I have consulted with the City Attorney concerning proper procedures concerning the resignation of Councilmember Nawrocki from the balance of his term, and the reappointment process associated with identifying a person to complete the term. The City Attorney has advised me that at the next regularly scheduled meeting, the City Council in January (January 9th, 1995) that the Council should by resolution declare a vacancy in the term. I've requested that the City Attorney forward his opinion as to any required process to be followed regarding the appointment of an "eligible person". I suggest that this be reviewed at a future work session. 9) CHIES PROPERTY DONATION ON MCLEOD Attached please find a copy of a letter sent to three adjacent property owners of the Chies property located on McLeod Street. I have received one response back from the property owners, indicating that they would be interested in the acquisition of the property for the elm tree costs ($500) and legal charges (about $375) necessary to transfer the property, but he is concerned about the future street assessments. The property owner indicated that he would be willing to acquire the property, if the City would guarantee a waiver on any future street assessment costs. I responded this may be difficult on the part of the Council to waive street assessment costs on an unconditional basis. Additionally, I further investigated Tim Chics' complaint concerning the maintenance of the property. I have copies of photos that were taken concerning the condition of the property. If you wish to review them, please contact the Police Department. In any event, the matter needs to be resolved through the court system, as the owner has been cited. ~ Have a very Happy Holiday! cb 94/138 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (612) 782-2800 Mayor Joseph Sturdevant Councilmembers Donald G. Jolly Bruce G. Nawrocki Gary L. Peterson Robert W. Ruettimann City Manager Patrick Hemges December 20, 1994 Letter also sent to: Lucille E. Thomas 4040 Maureen Dr #201 Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Ms. Thomas: Kathleen Gardner Charles Wiosky At the Columbia Heights budget hearing on November 30, 1994, questions were asked regarding property taxes for condominiums. I have been in contact with Anoka County to get clarification on some of the questions asked. Enclosed please find a copy of the letter from Anoka County explaining the way taxes are determined for a homestead condominium and garage. Questions about property values and the time to discuss them was brought up. Valuation cards with Board of Review date are no longer sent out from Anoka County. The information is enclosed as part of your tax statement. A sample copy from a page of the 1994 tax statement shows the value for the next year, the time and place of Board of Review at the ~ity and County Level. Regarding the combining of Condominium and garage units, Larry Dalien at Anoka County said that: 1. Check Association By Laws as to whether or not they can be combined. 2. A majority of the owners in the Association would need to petition the City to combine the residential and garage units. 3. The City Council would then have to approve the combination. 4. If approved, the City would then have to send it to Anoka County for the combinations and new property identification numbers. 5. Once the condominium and garage units are combined, they NEVER can he split again. I trust this covers some of your concerns, however, if you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me or Jane' Gleason, at 782-2814. City Manager PH:jg Enc. CC: Larry Dalien, Anoka County Robert Sankey, Association President condohs.pat "SERVICE IS OUR BUSINESS" EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES COUNTY OF ANOKA O~ce or,he Count), Asse.~sor Government Center 2100 3rd Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2281 612-323-5475 Fax: 612G23-5421 December 1994 Condominium Owners: The following explains the way the real estate tax is calculated on a condominium and garage that are individual parcels of record: HOMESTEAD CLASSIFICATION The first $72,000 of market value is calculated at 1% and any remaining market value is calculated at 2%. EXAMPLE #1: Condominium Market Value $71,200 $71,200 e 1%: $712.00 Ga_rage_ Market Value $3,900 $800 ~ 1% = $ 8.00 $3,100 @ 2% = $62.00 Multiplied by the Proposed Payable 1995 Tax Rate: 139.136 Proposed Tax - $990.65 + $97.40 EXAMPLE f2: Condominium Market Value $68,100 $68,100 ~ 1% = $681.00 G_~_ra~e_ Market Value $3,900 $3,900 e 1%,= $39.00 Multiplied by the Proposed Payable 1995 Tax Rate = 139.136 Proposed Tax = $947.52 + $54.26 -Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer ' ' NOTICE OF YOUR PROPERTY'S ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE AND PROPERTY CLASS FOR PROPERTY TAXES YOU WILL PAY IN 1995 ~r6per~ Owner, PIN:I~4 3! 24 33~11 0035~79~~' I ~ 3 3 Property ~: RES NO-HST RAPIDS, · ~ Limited Market Value for 1994 .................. : ..................... ..~ 0 C~N ~IDS CI~ ~L ~RIL 19, 1994 AT 7:00 PM TO ~P~ ~L L~ ~SR AT (6~2) 780 6446 ~-~U~ o~ r~lusll~tion M~tins ANOKA COUNTY GOV CENTER JUNE 17, 1994 AT .9:00 AM TO APPEAR CALL (612) 323 5475 __~I~KET VAI,UE AID PROPERTY CLASS ~. HOWDOTH~~ YOUR PROPERTY TAX Property Clus is the ~1,~ that has been assigned ~o your p~openy based upon the' u~ of the properly. Different class zatcs for various uses of property have been cstablith~ by state law. The, sc class rates arc the .frame throushou~ F~tlmated Market Value represents thc defined as thc most probable price tha~ ~ ~ informed buym- would pay · w~ll i~formed r~ll~r for · property without either party be. lug unduly forced to buy or sell. In offer ,lvorch, wha~ the propert7 would likely sell for sold [u au arm's-l~ngth Llml~l Market Value - Certain cla.ss~ of property (agricultural homestead or monhom~tead, r~.id~nfial l~t~ad l;~;tccl to · rnav~mum increase of ten percent over Lest ~.ar'~ value or one-third of thc dfffcrcnc~ between last Fear's market valu~ and this y~r's market value, whlchewr is ~reater. This lhnh docs not apply W aa incr~ [u your valtt~ due to improvements made ~o your property. . Value Exemption For Certain Improvements - ~ ~ 35 ~ or oklcr, arc now el~%l~ to receive · · temporary exemption on all or · portion of th~ ar~r's vzl~ ~ ~ ~ ~ constructed improvements. To qusli~ for exemption of impro~menU from the property ~ ~h~ property must be 35 years of abe or older at tim: the improvements comme~__r~_- and the property must be r~ceivln~ tbe homered clas.s~cafiom This includes · -properties ~ as reiidcnH*l homestead (includi~ dupt*~-_, and trlp!;~:), blind/paraplegic v~tcran/dlsabled ..homestead and agricultural home~t~cL In addition, you must hav~ r~ken ont · buil41~S permit and/or filed an ~coumy as~,essor's  . ~ De~c:h Her~ V W~q~h H~ V ~iANOKA C~)~J'I~'~'I~,YABLE 1994 PROPERTY TAX REFUND INFORMATION lIN: STATE PAID 1993 1994 Owner: ~t4arketValue: R14 33. 24:3:3' Jew Construction Value: t'~roperty class: N/A '~31ES NO-liST '- 55700 0 COON RAPIDS, MN [33 Taxpayer: ', I~,~S NO-liST ~FLEET MORTGAGE BOX 542 . -MILWAUKEE, W! 53201 '--inet ~mount to use in filling out your ~ tax · )fund form M-1PR. if eligible ...................................... ........ 0.00 ~ine 2 Amount to use ~ tilting out sch~lle 1 of fo~n M.1PR, if eligible .................. 0.00 .~f this box is checl~ed, you owe delinquent taxes ........ ~ -~t~ mu ~ ·.~ ~ n ~uh ~our ~ M-IPR form when ·pplylng for · refund CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Public Works Department TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: PATRICK HENTGES CITY MANAGER MARK A. WINSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER SILVER LAKE HOMEOWNERS CONCERNS DECEMBER 21, 1994 At the December 12, 1994 meeting, the Council was addressed by Mr. Ray Zurek regarding the recent events surrounding the redevelopment of Apache Plaza in St. Anthony and the effect on Silver Lake. Mr. Zurek posed three questions to the Council which the Council then directed staff to answer. Does the City of Columbia Heights believe that St. Anthony did enough to protect the water quality of Silver Lake with regard to the approval of the redevelopment at Apache Plaza? The City of Columbia Heights has a vested interest in the quality of Silver Lake due to the use of the lake by its residents and the City maintains both a beach and boat landing on the lake. As such, the City staff monitored the developments surrounding the redevelopment of Apache Plaza, along with development of Wexford Heights in New Brighton and the proposed improvements to Silver Lake Road. The City of Columbia Heights has no regulatory or permitting authority over these developments and therefore relies on the Rice Creek Watershed District and the governing city or county to judiciously apply all the applicable rules, regulations and practices to these projects. The City of Columbia Heights wilt notify the appropriate agency of the City's concerns that become apparent during the review of these projects or if there are observed violations of standard practice. With regard to the recent decisions by the City of St. Anthony on the Apache Plaza redevelopment, the City of Columbia Heights recognizes that there needs to be a balance struck between maintaining the property values, and its inherent effect on services, and providing environmental stewardship. The City of Columbia Heights is not in the position to judge whether another city has done enough in any situation, the City can only expect that another city has done as much as it can within the constraints imposed on it. Memorandum to Patrick Hentges December 21, 1994 Page 2 o Is the City of Columbia Heights willing to participate with the Cities of St. Anthony and New Brighton, the Rice Creek Watershed and Ramsey County on a study of the quality of Silver Lake and any projects to improve the quality? Yes, the City has always taken an active interest in maintaining or improving the quality of Silver Lake as it is a major recreational attraction of the City. City staff has recently met with the involved parties to discuss a diagnostic study of the lake and the contributing watershed. The result of that meeting was to request an estimate of the cost for such a study of the Rice Creek Watershed District and Ramsey County. Once the cost of the study is known, the individual parties will negotiate cost sharing of the study for approval by the affected parties. The level of participation by the City of Columbia Heights in any projects for the improvement of the water quality will depend on what projects m'e identified in the study and, as always, budget constraints. What is the City's intentions with regard to the existing detention pond at the boat landing? Approximately $10,000 has been budgeted for 1995 to improve the ability of this pond to provide treatment of storm water runoff. The intent is to deepen the pond and modify the outlet to provide longer detention time and removal of phosphorus. It is intended that this improvement will be done in mid 1995. Additionally City staff, through the efforts of numerous volunteers, has caused a majority of the catch basins in the City to be stenciled with a message that runoff goes directly to various waterbodies including Silver Lake. As part of this effort, doorhangers containing information related to water quality were distributed. City staff is intending to distribute a brochure throughout the City in 1995 that wilt cover what individuals can do to reduce non-point pollution. MAW:jb 94-846 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PATRICK HENTGES, CITY MANAGER DECEMBER 21, 1994 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 27, 1994 1) SHARED RIDE REPORT Attached please find the Shared Ride Report through November, 1994. 2) PROPERTY TAXES FOR CONDOMINIUMS Attached please find a letter sent to a number of property owners from University Heights Condominiums in response to their concerns at the Truth in Taxation Hearing. As the letter discusses, the property division issue concerning the living unit on one tax statement and the garages on another, is a product of how the property was subdivided and approved upon its conception. Apparently this issue was discussed some years back by the City and the Association. With regards to the property taxes, I earlier reported that the tax amount on the garages changes because of the homestead cut-off amount and the fact that the garages are placed in as the last value as opposed to the first value. In any case, the tax amount would be same, but the amount of taxes paid on $3,000 changes because the first $72,000 is calculated at 1%, and any remaining market value is calculated at 2%. 3) SILVER LAKE HOMEOWNERS CONCERNS Attached please find a draft responses to the Silver Lake Homeowners Association concerning the questions they posed at Open Mike. In the event the answers are satisfactory, I will forward a final response to the Homeowners Association. 4) STATUS OF RAILROAD CROSSING AT STINSON BOULEVARD The project to improve the railroad crossing was delayed this year due to the Soo Line strike. As you may recall, the agreement between St. Anthony, Columbia Heights, and the Soo Line was that the two cities would purchase the rubberized material, and the Soo Line would do the installation. The material has been purchased and is currently being stockpiled by the City of St. Anthony. Now that the Soo Line strike is settled, we will make arrangements with the railroad to do the installation when weather conditions allow. 5) STATUS OF SIGNAL AT STINSON BOULEVARD AND 39TH AVENUE This project was put on hold until 1995 in order to allow St. Anthony to budget the funds for their portion of the project. It is anticipated that a part of St. Anthony's funding would come from the TIF district for the redevelopment of Apache Plaza. In the interim, we have become aware of a potential change in the State Aid rules that would allow 100% funding by State Aid if any leg of an intersection is on a State Aid route. These rules have not been finalized and adopted, but staff feel that it is prudent to wait and see if this will be adopted as it would result in considerable savings to the City. 6) STATUS OF LION'S CLUB IMPROVEMENT AT 37TH AVENUE/STINSON BOULEVARD Staff has been coordinating some requested additional improvements to this triangle with the Soo Line. The Lions Club's wish to install additional landscaping which required an amendment to the current agreement. Within the last week, we have received documents from the Soo Line to allow these additional improvements and currently those documents are being circulated to the involved clubs for signature before being returned to the City. Additionally, staff has developed estimates for provision of water to this parcel of land for use in maintaining the landscaping. We have estimated that the cost to bring sufficient service to the parcel would be approximately $3,000 and have informed the Lion's of this to see if they wish to pursue this matter. 7) SHEFFIELD TAX INCREMENT PLAN Attached please find copies of two letters sent to Anoka County Chairman Dan Erhart and Superintendent A1 Holt. The School District and the County are required by law to be notified and have an opportunity to comment on any tax increment plan adoption. You will also find enclosed a copy of the proposed plan. The hearing is scheduled for January 23rd, 1995. It is hoped that we can review in work session a variety of issues associated with Sheffield in advance of the hearing. 8) COUNCILMEMBER NAWROCKI'S 1LESIGNATION I have consulted with the City Attorney concerning proper procedures concerning the resignation of Councilmember Nawrocki from the balance of his term, and the reappointment process associated with identifying a person to complete the term. The City Attorney has advised me that at the next regularly scheduled meeting, the City Council in January (January 9th, 1995) that the Council should by resolution declare a vacancy in the term. I've requested that '~he City Attorney forward his opinion as to any required process to be followed regarding the appointment of an "eligible person". I suggest that this be reviewed at a future work session. 9) CHIES PROPERTY DONATION ON MCLEOD Attached please find a copy of a letter sent to three adjacent property owners of the Chics property located on McLeod Street. I have received one response back from the property owners, indicating that they would be interested in the acquisition of the property for the elm tree costs ($500) and legal charges (about $375) necessary to transfer the property, but he is concerned about the future street assessments. The property owner indicated that he would be willing to acquire the property, if the City would guarantee a waiver on any future street assessment costs. I responded this may be difficult on the part of the Council to waive street assessment costs on an unconditional basis. Additionally, I further investigated Tim Chics' complaint concerning the maintenance of the property. I have copies of photos that were taken concerning the condition of the property. If you wish to review them, please contact the Police Department. In any event, the matter needs to be resolved through the court system, as the owner has been cited. Have a very Happy Holiday! cb 94/138 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Hei§hts, MN 55421-3878 (612) 782-2800 Mayor Joseph Sturdevant Councilmembers Donald G. Jolly Bruce G. Nawrocki Gary L. Peterson Robert W. Ruettimann City Manager Patrick Hentges December 20, 1994 Letter also sent to: Luctlle E. Thomas 4040 Maureen Dr #201 Columbia Heights, ~N 55421 Dear Ms. Thomas: Kathleen Gardner Charles Wiosky At the COlumbia Heights budget hearing on November 30, 1994, questions were asked regarding property taxes for condominiums. I have been in contact with Anoka County to get clarification on some of the questions asked. Enclosed please find a copy of the letter from Anoka County explaining the way taxes are determined for a homestead condominium and garage. Questions about property values and the time to discuss them was brought up. Valuation cards with Board of Review date are no longer sent out from Anoka County. The information is enclosed as part of your tax statement. A sample copy from a page of the 1994 tax statement shows the value for the next year, the time and place of Board of Review at the ~ity and County Level. Regarding the combining of Condominium and garage units, Larry Dalien at Anoka County said that: 1. Check Association By Laws as to whether or not they can be combined. 2. A majority of the o~ners in the Association vould need to petition the City to combine the residential and garage units. 3. The City Council would then have to approve the combination. 4. If approved, the City would then have to send it to Anoka County for the combinations and new property identification numbers. 5. Once the c~ndominiumand garage u~tts are combined, they NEVER can be split again. I trust this covers some of your concerns, however, if you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me or Jane' Gleason, at 782-2814. City Manager PH:Jg Enc. ¢C: Larry Dalien, Anoka County Eobert Sankey, Association President 9.4/136 condohs . pat "S¢:RVICE IS OUR BUSINESS" EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE B,~,SIS . ~. , :~ ::~ .~: != ~D]~,A~3!LFJ'Y' IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES COUNTY OF ANOKA Government Center 2100 8rd Avenue. Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2281 612-323-5475 Fax: 612-323-5421 December 1994 Condo~tntu~ Owners: The follo~ng explains the ~a7 the:-real estate tax is calculated on a - condomfnfum and garage that are individual parcels of record: : HOH£ST~AO CLRSSlFiCAT_~0N_ The first $72,000 of mrket value iS calculated at 1[ and an7 retaining market value ts calculated at 2[. EXN4PLE ~1: C_on._d_ornf nt.u~ G_a r_age_ ~larket Value $71,200 ~ Harket Value $3,900 $71,200 e 1~ ' $712.00 SBO0 e 15 ' $ 8.00 : ~ $3,100 ~ 2~ ' ~ -$70.OO Multiplied by ttie Proposed pa~&ble 1995 Tax Rate - 139.136 Proposed Tax - $990.65 ~ ~97. 40 EXAMPLE ~2: * .COMomtn~ um G_.a r_.~..q.e_ .-;.~larket Value $68,100 ~arket Value $3.900 $68,100 e 1~ = $681.00 $3,900 e Z~,= $39.00 I~ulttplted by the Proposed P~Yable 1995 Tax Rate - 139.136 · -Proposed Tax" $947.52 + --~Affirmative Action"[ ' $54.26 Equal Opportunity Er~ployer -:-/:~-NOTICE OF YOUR PROPERTY'S ESTIMATED MARY~T VALUE AND PROPERTY CLASS FOR PROPERTY TAXES YOU WILL PAY IN 19~)5 COON RAPIDS CITY HALL APRIL 19, 199¢ AT ?~00 PM TO APPEAR CALL LOCAL ASSR AT (61'2) 780 6446 ANOKA COUNTY GOV CENTER JUNE 17, 199~ AT 9~00 AM TO APPEAR CALL (612) 323 $&75 ~ as tl~ mo~t probabl~ 1~ tim a well i~ buy~ w~u~l l~y a w~ in~ ~ hr n Frop~ ~ut Umlted Market V~ne - ~ ~ of ~o~ (~ ~ ~ ~ ~;~? ~d ' To q~ ~ ~p~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~m~t ~ ~ ~~ ~ o~r at ~ N' 1993 1994 ~er: ,Sa~etValue: ~4 3Z 24 33 ..~ew C, onstruction Value: ' - 55700 t~roperty class: N/A 0 C~N ~IDS, ~ ,433 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Public Works Department TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: PATRICK HENTGES CITY MANAGER 1 mar ^. wr soN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER SILVER LAKE HOMEOWNERS CONCERNS DECEMBER 21, 1994 At the December 12, 1994 meeting, the Council was addressed by Mr. Ray Zurek regarding the recent events surrounding the redevelopment of Apache Plaza in St. Anthony and the effect on Silver Lake. Mr. Zurek posed three questions to the Council which the Council then directed staff to answer. Does the City of Columbia Heights believe that St. Anthony did enough to protect the water quality of Silver Lake with regard to the approval of the redevelopment at Apache Plaza? The City of Columbia Heights has a vested interest in the quality of Silver Lake due to the use of the lake by its residents and the City maintains both a beach and boat landing on the lake. As such, the City staff monitored the developments surrounding the redevelopment of Apache Plaza, along with development of Wexford Heights in New Brighton and the proposed improvements to Silver Lake Road. The City of Columbia Heights has no regulatory or permitting authority over these developments and therefore relies on the Rice Creek Watershed District and the governing city or county to judiciously apply all the applicable rules, regulations and practices to these projects. The City of Columbia Heights will notify the appropriate agency of the City's concerns that become apparent during the review of these projects or if there are observed violations of standard practice. With regard to the recent decisions by the City of St. Anthony on the Apache Plaza redevelopment, the City of Columbia Heights recognizes that there needs to be a balance struck between maintaining the property values, and its inherent effect on services, and providing environmental stewardship. The City of Columbia Heights is not in the position to judge whether another city has done enough in any situation, the City can only expect that another city has done as much as it can within the constraints imposed on it. Memorandum to Patrick Hentges December 21, 1994 Page 2 Is the City of Columbia Heights willing to participat~ with the Cities of St. Anthony and New Brighton, the Rice Creek Watershed and Ramsey County on a study of the quality of Silver Lake and any projects to improve the quality? Yes, the City has always taken an active interest in maintaining or improving the quality of Silver Lake as it is a major recreational attraction of the City. City staff has recently met with the involved parties to discuss a diagnostic study of the lake and the contributing watershed. The result of that meeting was to request an estimate of the cost for such a study of the Rice Creek Watershed District and Ramsey County. Once the Cost of the study is known, the individual parties will negotiate cost sharing of the study for approval by the affected parties. The level of p~cipation by the City of Columbia Heights in any projects for the improvement of the water quality will depend on what projects are identified in the study and, as always, budget constraints. What is the City's intentions with regard to the existing detention pond at the boat landing? Approximately $10,000 has been budgeted for 1995 to improve the ability of this pond to provide treatment of storm water runoff. The intent is to deepen the pond and modify the outlet to provide longer detention time and removal of phosphorus. It is intended that this improvement will be done in mid 1995. Additionally City staff, through the efforts of numerOus volunteers, has caused a majority of the catch basins in the City to be stenciled with a message that runoff goes directly to various waterbodies including Silver Lake. As part of this effort, doorhangers containing information related to water quality were distributed. City staff is intending to distribute a brochure throughout the City in 1995 that will coVer what individuals can do to reduce non-point pollution. ~ MAW:jb 94-846 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (612) 782-2800 Mayor Joseph Sturdevant Couneilmembers Donald G. Jolly Bruce G. Nawrocki Gary L. Peterson Robert W. Ruettimann City Manager Patrick Hentges December 21, 1994 Chairman Dan Erhart Anoka County Board of Commissioners Anoka County Courthouse 325 East Main Street Anoka, MN 55303 RE: Proposed Adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing (a redevelopment district) in the-City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota Dear Chairman Erhart: Enclosed please find one copy of the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District C'Sheffield TIF District"). These actions are to be considered by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights at a public hearing to be held on Monday, January 23, 1995, at approximately 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers in the Columbia Heights City Hall, 590 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights, Minnesota. The Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act at Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 and 4, requires that prior to the holding of a public hearing on the adoption or modification of a tax increment financing plan, the City must provide an opportunity to the members of the affected county board to review the fiscal and economic implications of the proposed modified or new tax increment financing plan 30 days from the transmittal of the enclosed tax increment financing plan or until the county board has presented written comment on the proposal, whichever is less. The establishment of the Sheffield TIF District will enable the City to provide assistance for the reconstruction or rehabilitation of over 60 single-family and rental units in Sheffield's Neighborhood. The City proposed to adopt the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Sheffield TIF District for the following purposes: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Land acquisition, demolition, and relocation Public improvements Site preparation Interest; and Administrative costs The subsection of particular interest to the county board is Subsection M titled "Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions" in the plan. We invite you to attend the public hearing to be held by the City Council on January 23, 1995, beginning at approximately 7:00 P.M. or to direct any comments or questions that you may have to me at 782-2800. Thank you for consideration in reviewing the enclosed proposal. Patrick Hentges City Manager "SERVICE IS OUR BUSINESS" EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER THE CITY OF CQLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DfSAEI/LfTY' fN EMPLOYMENT O~ THE PROVISION OF SEFtVICIES December 21, 1994 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (612) 782-2800 Mayor Joseph Sturdevan! Councilmembers Donald G. Jolly Bruce G. Nawrocki Gary L. Peterson Robert W. Ruettimann City Manager Patrick Hentges Superintendent Alain Holt and School Board Members Independent School District No. 13 (Columbia Heights) 1400 49th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421 RE: Proposed Adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing (a redevelopment district) in the City Of Columbia Heights, Minnesota Dear Superintendent Holt: Enclosed please find one copy of the proposed Tax Increment Financing lan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District ("Sheffield TIF District"). These actions are to be considered by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights at a public hearing to be held on Monday, January 23, 1995, at approximately 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers in the Columbia Heights City Hall, 590 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights, Minnesota. The Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act at Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 2 and 4, requires that prior to the holding of a public hearing on the adol~tion or modification of a tax increment financing plan, the City must provide an opportunity to the members of the affected county board to review the fiscal and economic implications of the proposed modified or new tax increment financing plan 30 days from the transmittal of the enclosed tax increment financing plan or until the county board has presented written comment on the proposal, whichever is less. The establishment 'of the Sheffield TIF District will enable the City to provide assistance for the reconstruction or rehabilitation of over 60 single-f.amily and rental units in Sheffield's Neighborhood. The City proposed to adopt the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Sheffield TIF District for the following purposes: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Land acquisition, demolition, and relocation Public improvements Site preparation Interest; and Administrative costs The subsection of particular interest to the county board is Subsection M titled "Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions" in the plan. We invite you to attend the public hearing to be held by the City Council on January 23, 1995, beginning at approximately 7:00 P.M. or to direct any comments Or questions that you may have to me at 782-2800. Thank you for consideration in reviewing the enclosed proposal. City Manager "SERVICE IS OUR BUSINESS" EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District (A Redevelopment District) Columbia Heights Housing and Redevelopment Authority Anoka County City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota Drafted: December 21, 1994 Adopted: January 23, 1995 Prepared by: PUBLICORP, INC. 512 Crown Roller Mill 105 Fifth Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612) 341-3641 MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN (This section is not part of the Tax Increment Financing Plan and is only for convenience of reference.) Based upon the statutory authority described in the Development Plan of the Sheffield Neighborhood Redevelopment and Housing Developmen~ Project attached hereto, the public purpose findings by the City Council and the Columbia Heights Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority") and for the purpose of fulfilling the City's and Authority's redevelopment and housing objectives as set forth in the Development- Plan, the City Council and Authority have created, established and !designated the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and Sections 469.174 to 469.179. The following municipal action was taken in connection therewith: Sheffield Neighborhood Redevelopment and Housing Development Project February 8. 1994: The Development Plan for the Sheffield Neighborhood Redevelopment and Housing Development Project was adopted by the Columbia Heights Housing and Redevelopment Authority Board of Commissioners. February 28. 1994: The Development Plan for the Sheffield Neighborhood Redevelopment and Housing Development Project was adopted by the Columbia Heights City Council. Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District lanuary 10, 1995: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing :District was adopted by the Columbia Heights Housing and Redevelopment Authority. i]anuary 23, 1995: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District was adopted by the Columbia Heights City Council. TABLE OF CONTENTS (This Table of Contents is not part of the Redevelopment Plan and is only for convenience of reference.) TAX INCREMENT FINANCING' PLAN FOR THE SHEFFIELD TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT Section 11: Tax Increment Plan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District ...... I1-1 Ao B. C. D. E. F. G, H, I. J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. Ro S. T. U. V. W. X. Y. Z. AA. Statutory Authority ' . ........ 11-I Statement of Obiectives ...................................... I1-1 Housin~ Development and Redevelopment Plan Overview ............. 11-2 Description of Property in the Sheffield TIF District ................... I1-2 Classification of the Tax Increment Financir:g District ................. 11-3 Property To Be Acquired ...................................... 11-4 Estimate of Costs ........................................... 11-4 Estimated Amount of Loan/Bonded Indebtedness .................... 11-5 Sources of Revenue ......................................... 11-5 Original Tax Capacity ........................................ tl-5 Amount of Captured Tax Capacity ............................... 11-6 Duration of the Sheffield TIF District ............................. 11-6 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing turisdictions ...................... 11-6 Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing District ................. 11-7 Administrative Expenses ...................................... I1-8 Necessary Improvements in the Sheffield TIF District .................. 11-8 Limitation on Qualification of Property in Tax Increment District Not Subiect to Improvement .............................. 11-8 Limitation on the Use of Tax Increment ........................... 11-9 Notification of Prior Planned Improvements ........................ 11-9 Excess Tax Increments ....................................... 11-9 Requirement for Agreements with the Developer ................... I1-10 Assessment Agreements ..................................... 11-10 Administration of District and Maintenance of the Tax Increment Account I1-10 Financial Reporting Requirements .............................. t1-1t Municipal Approval ........................................ I1-11 County Road Costs ......................................... I1-11 Reduction in State Tax Increment Financing Aid .................... 11-12 EXHIBIT I1-A EXHIBIT II-B Boundary Map of the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District .. II-A-1 Cashflow Analysis and Base Value Analysis ................. II-B-1 TAX INCREMENT 'FINANCING PLAN'FOR THE SHEFFIELD TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 'A. STATUTORY AUTI~IORITY Within the City of Columbia Heights (the "City") there exis{ areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. To this end, the City Council established the Columbia Heights Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority"). The City faces various existing land use Problems that require corrective action by the City or Authority before development by private enterprise becomes fihancially feasible or desirable. The Authority and City are authorized to establish a tax increment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended, to assist in financing public costs related to this project. Tax increments are derived only from the increased amount of taxes which are paid on a parcel of property after the construction of a new structure on the parcel. Tax increment districts encompass the parcels from which tax increments are paid for a period of time. Below is the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plan") for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District ("Sheffield TIF District"). Other relevant information is contained in the Development Plan for the Sheffield Redevelopment and Housing Development Project, originally adopted by the HRA on February 28, 1994. A modification of the Development Plan is contemplated in the Tax increment Plan. The Sheffield Redevelopment and Housing De~velopment and Project includes the area proposed for the Sheffield TIF District. The Authority or tee City reserves the right to approve all or a portion of the property as proposed to be included in the Sheffield TIF District on the date of the first public hearing, January 23, 1995. B. STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES The Sheffield TIF District is a redevelopment tax increment district which currently consists of 54 parcels of land and adjacent and internal right-of ways. Present plans for the new development on the site include reconstruction or renovation of over 60 single-family and rental units in Sheffield's Neighborhood. 'The Sheffield TIF District is expected to achieve many of the objectives set forth in the Redevelopment Plan in regard to land use. These objectives include: To enhance the tax base of' the City. o To provide maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City, for development by private enterprise. To better utilize vacant or underdeveloped land. To attract new businesses. To acquire blighted or deteriorated residential property for rehabili.tation or clearance and redevelopment. I1-1 To develop housing opportunities for market segments underserved in the City, including housing for the disabled and ~lderly. HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW Property to be Acquired - Selected property lOCated within the Sheffield TIF District may be acquired by the City or the Authority and is further described in Subsection F of this Plan. Relocation - Complete relocation services are available pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws. Upon approval of the developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary legal requirements, the City or the Authority may sell to the developer selected properties it may acquire within the Sheffield TIF District. The City or the Authority may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition, relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public streets work within the Sheffield TIF District. The Sheffield TIF District contains residential zoned property. All development in the area will conform to applicable state and local codes and ordinances. D. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IN SHEFFIELD DISTRICT The Sheffield TIF District encompasses the parcels and all adjacent and interior right-of-ways as identified below: PID #25-30.24.34.0090 1234 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34-0089 1240 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34.0086 1260 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34-0087 1270 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34-0081 1300 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34-0082 1306 46th Avenue NE P1D #25-30.24-34-0078 1312 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34-0079 1400 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34-0097 453t Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-340095 4555 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0135 4600 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0134 4606 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0133 4610 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0132 4618 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0131 4624 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0130 4630 Fillmore Street P1D #25-30-24-33-0129 4636 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0128 4642 Fillmore Street P1D #25-30-24-33-0127 4648 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0126 4654 Fillmore .Street 11-2 PID #25-30-24-34-0070 PID #25-30-24-34-0069 4601 Pierce Street 4607 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24-34-0068 PID #25-30-24-34-0067 PID #25-30-24-34-0066 PID #25-30-24-34-0004 PID #25-30-24-34-0003 PID #25-30-24-34-0002 PID #25-30-24-34-0001 PID #25-30-24-33-0116 PID #25-30-24-33-0119 PID #25-30-24-33-0122 PID #25-30-24-33-0125 PID #25-30-24-33-0008 4613 Pierce Street 4619 Pierce Street 4625 Pierce Street 4631 Pierce Street 4637 Pierce Street 4643 Pierce Street 4655 Pierce Street 4501 Taylor Street 4519 Taylor Street 4535 Taylor Street 4555 Taylor Street 4612 Taylor Street PID #25-30-24-34-0055 PI D #25-30-24-34-0057 PID #25-30-24-34-0059 PID #25-30-24-34-0058 PID #25-30-24-34-0056 PID #25-30-24-34-0050 PID #25-30-24-34-0051 PID #25-30-24-34-0052 PID #25-30-24-34-0053 PID #25-30-24-34-0054 PID #25-30-24-34-0064 PID #25-30-24-34-0063 PID #25-30-24-34-0062 PID #25-30-24-34-0061 PID #25-30-24-34-0060 PID #25-30-24-34-0047 PID #25-30-24-34-0046 PID #25-30-24-34-0045 PID #25-30-24-34-0048 PID #25-30-24-34-0049 4601 Fillmore Street 4607 Fillmore Street 4613 Fillmore Street 4619 Fillmore Street 4625 Fillmore Street 4633 Fillmore Street 4637 Fillmore Street 4643 Fillmore Street 4649 Fillmore Street 4655 Fillmore Street 4600 Pierce Street 4606 Pierce Street 4612 Pierce Street 4618 Pierce Street 4624 Pierce Street 4630 Pierce Street 4636 Pierce Street 4642 Pierce Street 4648 Pierce Street 4654 Pierce Street The City or the Authority reserves a right to approve all or a portion of the area of the parcels listed as designation for the Sheffield TIF District. See the map in Exhibit II-A for further information on the location of the Sheffield TIF District. E. CLASSIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT The City and the Authority, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in accordance with Minnesota Stat~es, Section 469.174 to 469.179, as amended, inclusive, finds that 11-3 the Sheffield T1F District to be established is a redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 as defined below: (a) "Redevelopment district" means a type of tax increment financing district consisting of a project, or portions of a project, within which the authority finds by resolution that one of the following conditions, reasonably distributed throughout the d~strict, exists: (7) parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area in the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or other improvements and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance; or (2) The property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used railyards, rail storage facilities or excessive or vacated railroad rights-of-way. For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs or other similar reliable evidence. If the evidence supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is not disqualified as structurally substandard, the municipality may make such a determination without an interior inspection or an independent, expert appraisal of the cost of repair and rehabilitation of the building... For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements until I5 percent of the area of the parcel contains improvements. The 54 parcels have been investigated by City and Authority staff and consultants and have been found to meet all requirements of a redevelopment district. Some parcels are not currently, but were formerly occupied by buildings which the Authority and the City found to be substandard based upon the multiple building code violations associated with each structure. These structures were removed in accordance with the "early acquisition" provision of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.028, Subd. 5. F. PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED 11-4 The City or Authority may acquire any parcel within the Sheffield TIF District including interior street and railway right-of-ways. G. ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimate of public costs associated with the Sheffield TIF District is outlined in the following line item budget: Estimate of Public Costs :Qualified Costs Land Acquisition Public Improvements Demolition and Relocation Site Preparation Administrative, Legal, Engineering, and Consulting Fees Contingency 500,000 50,000 50,000 Total Estimated Project Costs: 600,000 Any funds to be expended for off-site improvements outside the boundaries of the Sheffield TIF District, but within the boundaries of the Sheffield Neighborhood Redevelopment and Housing . Development Project would be less than 25 percent of total tax increment generated by the Sheffield TIF District, including administrative costs. H. ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF LOAN/BONDED INDEBTEDNESS It is anticipated that the City or Authority may issue a revenue bond, general obligation bond, or other type of obligation in one or more series to finance costs public costs. The original principal amount of all indebtedness pledged solely from tax increments is not expected to exceed $550,000 with additional increments to be paid to capitalized and other interest determined at the time of issuance. 1. SOURCES OF REVENUE The major source of revenue to be used to finance public costs associated with the public development projects in the Sheffield Redevelopment and Housing Development Project is tax increment generated as a result of the taxation of the land and improvements in the Sheffield TIF District. Tax increment financing refers to a funding technique that utilizes increases in valuation and the property taxes attributable to new develOpment to finance, or assist in the financing of public 'development costs. Additional sources of revenue may include but are not limited to investment income and land sales. This does not preclude the City, the Authority, or the developer from using other funds, at its discretion, to pay such costs. J. ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY !1-5 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.174, Subdivision 7 and Section 469.177, Subdivision 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity (OTC) for the ~heffield TIF District is based on the value placed on the property by the assessor in 1994 for taxes payable 1995. The tax capacity as certified is estimated to be $34,642. The original tax rate for the Sheffield TIF District will be the tax rate for taxes payable in 1995 estimated for purposes of the Plan to be the estimated 1995 rate of 139.719%. Each year, the Anoka County Auditor will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total tax capacity of the Sheffield TIF District to calculate the tax increment payable to the City and the Authority. In any year in which there is an increase in total tax capacity in the tax increment financing district above the annual percentage of annual increase, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total tax capacity in the Sheffield TIF District declines below the original tax capacity, no additional valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the OTC was certified, the amount the OTC has increased or decreased as a result of: 2. 3. 4. 5. change in tax exempt status of property; reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements; change in the use of the property and classification; or change in state law governing class rates. K. AMOUNT OF CAPTURED TAX CAPACITY Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 Subdivision 4 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 2, the estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of the Sheffield TIF District, upon completion of all phases of the project, will annually approximate $44,240. The City requests 100 percent of the available increase in tax capacity for repayment of debt and current expenditures. The original tax capacity and project tax calSacity are estimated at current market values and class rates to be the total amount when all development is in place and uses of the property have changed. Estimated Project Tax Capacity less Original Tax Capacity Estimated Captured Tax Capacity $78,882 34,642 44,240 L. DURATION OF THE DISTRICT Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 1, the duration of the Sheffield TIF District must be indicated within the Plan. The duration of the Sheffield TIF District will be 25 years from payment of the first tax increment expected in 1997. Thus, it is estimated that the Sheffield TIF District, including any modifications of the Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate at the end of the year 2022. The City and the Authority does reserve the right to decertify the Sheffield T1F District prior to the legally required date. M. ESTIMATED IMPACT ON OTHER TAXING [URISDICTIONS 11-6 .The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes construction would have occurred without the creation of the Sheffield TIF District. If the construction is a result of tax increment financing, the impact is $0 to other entities. Notwithstanding the fact that the fiscal impact on the other taxing jurisdictions is $0 due to the fact that the construction would not have occurred without the assistance of the city, the following estimated impact of the Sheffield TIF District would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met: ENTITY Anoka CounTM City of Columbia Heights 'School District No. 13 IMPACT ON TAX BASE ENTITY'S TOTAL N ET CAPTU RE D TAX CAPACITY TAX CAPACITY 156,029,389 44,240 9,956,092 44,240 15,509,210 44,240 % OF CAPTURED TAX CAPACITY TO ENTITY TOTAL .03% .44% .29% IMPACT ON TAX RATES CURRENT CAPTURED POTENTIAL ENTITY TAX RATE TAX CAPACITY TAXES Anoka County .29746 44,240 13,160 City of Columbia Heights .26802 44,240 11,857 School District No. 13 .77281 44,240 34,189 Other .05890 44,240 2,606 TOTAL 1.39719 61,812 The estimates listed above display captured tax capacity when all construction is completed. The 'tax rates are estimated payable 1995 figures and tax capacities are the payable 1995 figures for all jurisdictions. The Sheffield TIF District Will be certified under rates for tax year payable 1995. In addition, the impact on School District No. 13 does not include the effect of state aids for education upon school district funding. N. MODIFICATIONS OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 11-7 In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 4, any reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of the project or tax increment financing district, increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a determination to capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original plan, or to increase or decrease the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized, increase in the portion of the captured tax capacity to be retained by the City or Authority, increase in total estimated tax increment expenditures or designation of additional property to be acquired by the City or Authority shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original plan. The geographic area of a tax increment financing district may be reduced, but shall not' be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original tax capacity by the county auditor or by approximately February, 2000. Modifications to the Sheffield TIF District, in the form of a budget modification or a expansion of the boundaries, will be recorded in this Plan. O. LIMITATION ON ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 14 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 3, administrative expenses means all expenditures of an authority other than amounts paid for the purchase of land or amounts paid to contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real property in' the district, relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the district or amounts used to pay interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to Section 469.178. Administrative expenses include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development consultants. No tax increment shall be used to pay any administrative expenses for a project which exceed ten percent of the total tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax increment financing plan or the total tax increment expenditures for the project, whichever is less. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 4h, tax increments may be used to pay for the county's actual administrative expenses incurred in connection with the Sheffield TIF District. The county may require payment of those expenses by February 15 of the year following the year the expenses were incurred. P. DURATION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 1, "no tax increment shall be paid to an authority three years from the date of certification by the County Auditor unless within the three-year period (1) bonds have been issued pursuant to Section 469.178, or in aid of a project pursuant to any other law, except revenue bonds issued pursuant to Chapter 469.152 to 469.165, prior to the effective date of the Act; or (2) the authority has acquired property within the district; or (3) the authority has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvements within the district... "The City or Authority must therefore issue bonds, or acquire property, or construct or cause public improvements in 'the Sheffield TIF District by approximately February, 1998. Q. LIMITATION ON Q)UALIFICATION OF PROPERTY IN TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NOT SUBIECT TO IMPROVEMENT 11-8 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 6, if, after four years from the date of certification of the original tax capacity of the tax increment financing district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469. i ZT, no demolition, rehabili~tion or renovation of property or other site preparation, including improvement of a street adjacent to-a parcel but not installation of utility service including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a parcel located within a tax increment financing district by the authority or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, no additional tax increment ma)/be taken from that parcel and the original tax capacity of that parcel shall be exclUded from the original tax capacity of the tax increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site preparation on that parcel including improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the county auditor in the annual .disclosure report that the activity has commenced. The county auditor shall certify the tax capacity thereof as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue and add it to the original tax capacity of the tax increment financing district. The county auditor must enforce the provisions of ~is subdivision... For purposes of this subdivision, qualified improvements are limited to (1) construction or opening ora new street, (2) relocation ora street, and (3) substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing.street~ .R. LIMITATION ON THE USE OF TAXlINCREMENT 'Pursuant to Minnesota Statues, 469.176, Subd. 4, at least 90 percent of the revenues derived from tax increments from a redevelopment district must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation of redevelopment districts under section 469.174, Subdivision 10. These costs include acquiring properties containing strt~cturally substandard buildings or improvements, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition of structures, clearing of the land and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site. The revenues shall be used to finance or otherwise pay public redevelopment and housing .development costs pursuant to the HRA Act. These revenues shall not be used to circumvent any 'levy limit law. No revenues derived frOm tax increment shall be used for the construction or renovation of a municipally owned building used primarily and'regularly for conducting the business , of the municipality; this provision shall not' prohibit the use of ~evenues derived from tax increments for the construction or renovation of a pa~king structure, a commons area used as a public park or a facility used for social, recreational or conference purposes and not primarily for conducting the business of the municipality. For tax increment financing districts for which certification was requested after April 30, 1990, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1763, Subdivisions 1 and 2, an amount equal to at least 75 percent of the revenue d~rived from tax increments from the district's parcels must be expended on activities in the district. S. NOTIFICATION OF PRIOR PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS ' Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1 77, Subdivision 4, the City is reviewing the area to be included in the Sheffield TIF District and any prior planned improvements will be listed in this section prior to certification. T. EXCESS TAX INCREMENTS 11-9 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 2, in any year in which the tax increment exceeds the amount necessary to.,pay the co. sts authorized by the tax increment plan, including the amount necessary to cancel any tax levy as prOvided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3, the authority shall use the excess amount to do any of the following: 2. 3. 4. prepay the outstanding bonds; discharge the pledge of tax increment therefore; pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bond; or return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in proportion to their tax capacity rate. U. REQUIREMENT FOR AGREEMENTS WITH THE DEVELOPER The City or Authority will review any Developer's proposal to determine its conformance with the Development Plan and with applicable municipal ordinances and codes. To facilitate this effort, the following documents may be requested for review and approval: site plan, construction, mechanical, and electrical system drawings, landscaping plan, grading and storm drainage plan, signage system plan, and any other drawings or narrative deemed necessary by the City or Authority to demonstrate the conformance of the development with city plans and ordinances. Land acquired by the City or Authority may be subject to a Contract for Sale upon disposition to the Developer. The general' requirements to be imposed upon the developer by the Contract for Sale are: To redevelop the land purchased in accordance with this development plan. To commence and complete the building of improvements on the land within a reasonable period of time as determined by the City or Authority. Not to resell the land before improvements are made without the prior consent of the City or Authority. Not to discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, creed or national origin on the sale, lease, transfer or occupancy of the land purchased from the City or Authority. The requirements to be imposed upon the Developer and the City's or Authority's exact participation in the project will be negotiated as part of the Development Agreement between the City or the Authority and the Developer. V. ASSESSMENT AGREEMENTS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 8, the City or Authority may enter into an agreement in recordable form with the developer of property within the tax increment financing district which establishes a minimum market value of the land and completed improvements for the duration of the tax increment district. The assessment agreement shall be presented to the county assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land upon which the improvements are to be constructed and, so lohg as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appear, in the judgment of the assessor, to be a reasonable estimate, the assessor may certify the minimum market value agreement. 11-10 W. ADMINISTRATION OF DISTRICT AND OF THE TAX INCREMENT MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT Administration of the Sheffield TIF District will be handled by the City Manager or the Executive Director of the Authority. The tax increment received as a resblt of increases in the tax capacity of the Sheffield TIF District will be maintained in a special account separate from all other municipal accounts and expended only upon sanctioned municipal activities identified in the tax increment financing plan. X. FINANCIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 'Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision~ 6, and 6a; an authority must file an 'annual disclosure report for all tax increment financing districts with the Office of the State Auditor, the county board, school board, and Department of Revenue. Y. MUNICIPAL APPROVAL Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3, before or at the time of approval of the tax increment financing plan, the municipality shall make tee following findings and shall set forth in writing the reasons and supporting facts for each determination. 1. Finding that the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District is a redevelopment district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, SeCtion 469.175, Subd. 10. The Sheffield TIF District consists Of 54 Parcels of property. Parcels consisting of more than 70 percent of the area are occupied by buildings and improvements. Buildings have been reviewed Dy city staff and consultants and more than 50 percent have been found to be structurally substandard. 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council and the Authority, would not occur solely through Private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future . and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. Due to the high cost of redevelopment on parcels currently occupied by substandard buildings, the incompatible land uses at close proximity, and the cost of financing the proposed improvements, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The site is appropriately zoned. The Tax Increment Financing Plan has been reviewed by the Planning Commission and been found to confirm to the general development plan of the c~ty. i1-11 Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District will afford maximum opportun..ity, conqi~tent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Sheffield Neighborhood Redevelopment and Housing Development by private enterprise. The establishment of the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District will result in increased availability of safe and decent housing in the City. C. OUNTY ROAD COSTS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision la, the county board may require the authority to pay for all or part of the cost of county road improvements if the proposed development to be assisted by tax increment will, in the judgement of the county, substantially increase the use of county roads requiring construction of road improvements or other road costs and if the road improvements are not scheduled within the next five years under a capital improvement plan or other county plan. The improvements outlined in the Plan serve as notice to the county that the development of the retail facility will be assisted with tax increment. In the opinion of the City, the Authority, and consultants, the proposed development will have little or no impact upon county roads. If the county elects to use increments to improve county roads, it must notify the City within thirty days of receipt of this plan. AA. REDUCTION IN STATE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AID Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 273.1399 for tax increment financing districts for which certification was requested after April 30, 1990, a municipality incurs a reduction in state tax increment financing aid (RISTI FA) applied to the municipality's Local Government Aid (LGA) first and Homestead and Agricultural Aid (HACA) second, in an amount equal to a formula based upon the equalized qualifying captured tax capacity (QCTC) of the tax increment financing district. The total amount of RISTIFA expected for the project amounts to less than 10 to 20 percent of the total tax increment. The City and Authority may also seek special legislation in the 1995 state legislative session to exempt the Sheffield District from Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399. Any such legislation will be recorded in this section prior to certification. EXHIBIT II-A Boundary Map of the Sheffield Tax Incremenir Financing District as established January 23, 1995 ii-A-1 J.33~lJ.$ NOSNHO¢' J.33aJ. S 30~13td 3aOYt .~ J~3a.LS a3'1,tJ, z C]037 12/22/94 Columbia Heights - Sheffield District BASF_. ¥ AJ_,'[.TE, 1 25-30-24-34-0045 Odginal Market Value 2 2530-24-,34-0046 Original Market Value 3 25-30-24-34-0047 Odginal Market Value 4 25-30-24-34-0048 Original Market Value 5 25.30.24-34-0049 Origtnal Market Value 6 25-30-24-34-0050 Original Market Value 7 25-30-24-34-0051 Original Market Value 8 25-30-24-~2 Original Market Value 9 25-30-24-,34-0053 Original Market Value 10 25-30-24-34-0054 Original Market Value 11 25-30-24-34-0055 Original Market Value 12 25-30-24-34-0056 Original Market Value 13 25-30-24-34-0057 Original Market Value 14 25-30-24-34-0058 Odginal Market Value 15 25-3024-34-0059 Odginal Market Value 16 25-30.24-34-0060 Original Market Value 17 25-30-24-340061 Original Market Value 18 25-30-24-34-0062 Original Market Value 19 25-30-24-34-0063 Original Market Value 20 25-30-24-340064 Original Market Value 21 25-30-24-34-0097 Odgtnal Market Value 22 25-30-24-33-0119 Original Market Value 23 25-3024-34-0001 Original Market Value 24 25-30-24-34-0002 Original Market Value 25 25-30-24-34-0003 Original Market Value 26 25-3024-,34-0004 Original Market Value 27 25-30-24-34-0066 Odginal Market Value 28 25-30-24-34-0067 Odglnal Market Value 29 25-30-24-34-0068 Original Market Value 30 25-30.24-34-0(~90dginal Market Value 31 25-30-24-34-0070 Odginat Market Value 32 25-30-24-~78 Original Market Value 33 25-30-24-34-0079 Odginal Market Value 34 25-30-24-34-0081 Odginal Market Value 35 25-30-24-34-0082 Odginal Market Value 36 25-3024-.34-0086 Original Market Value 37 25-30-24-34-0087 Original Market Value 38 25-30-24-34-0089 Original Market Value 39 25-30-24-34-0090 Odginal Market Value 40 25-30-24-34-0095 Original Market Value 41 25.30-24-33-0(X~80dginat Market Value 42 25-30-24-~116 Original Market Value 43 25.30-24-33-0122 Original Market Value 44 25-30-24-33-0125 Original Market Value 45 25-30-24-33-0126 Odginal Market Value 46 25-30-24-33-0127 Odginal Market Value 47 25-30-24-33-0128 Odginal Market Value 48 25-3024-33-0129 Original Market Value 49 25.30.24-33~130 Original Market Value 50 25-30-24-33-0131 Original Market Value 51 25-30-24-33-0132 Original Market Value 52 25-30-24-33-0133 Odginal Market Value 53 25-30-24-3.3-0134 Original Market Value 54 25-30-24-3.3-0135 Original Market Value Total Original Market Value Average Single Farr~ly MV pdor to Reconstruction: Average Single Family MV prior to Rehabilitation: Class Rate: Rental <4 Units Homestead <$72,000 Homestead >$72,000 Exempt: Original Tax Capacity (When certified): Original Tax Capacity (When construction complete): Gross Value Percent Used Net Current Payable Value Tax Cap. Class Year 65,300 0 E Pay 95 62,300 0 E Pay 95 66,000 0 E Pay 95 63,800 1,467 NHS Pay 95 co8,800 0 E Pay 95 60,700 1,396 NHS Pay 95 60,900 0 E Pay 95 61,000 0 E Pay 95 60,500 0 E Pay 95 60,60O 0 E Pay 95 60,200 1,385 NHS Pay 95 60,100 0 E Pay 95 60,100 0 E Pay 95 60,300 1,357 NHS Pay 95 60,200 0 E Pay 95 62,500 1,438 NHS Pay 95 61,400 0 E Pay 95 56,700 0 E Pay 95 62,500 0 E Pay 95 61,300 0 E Pay 95 59,100 0 E Pay 95 62,300 1,433 NHS Pay 95 60,100 60,300 60,200 62,500 61,400 66,700 62,500 61,300 59,100 62,300 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% !00.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 103,100 100.00% 103,100 2,371 NHS Pay 95 101,200 100.00% 101,20'0 2,328 NHS Pay 95 80,700 100.00% 80,700 1,856 NHS Pay 95 56,200 100.00% 86,200 1,983 NHS Pay 95 62,500 100.00% 62,500 1,438 NHS Pay 95 62,500 100.00% 62,500 1,438 NHS Pay 95 62,500 100.00% 62,500 1,438 NHS Pay 95 64,100 100.00% 64,100 1,474 NHS Pay 95 69,900 100.00% 69,900 1,608 NHS Pay 95 70,200 100.00% 70,200 702 H Pay 95 76,800 100.00% 76,800 816 H Pay 95 67,300 I00.00% 67,300 673 H Pay 95 69,300 100.00% 69,300 693 H Pay 95 42,700 100.00% 42,700 427 H Pay 95 51,800 100.00% 51,800 518 H Pay 95 73,300 100.00% 73,300 746 H Pay 95 63,000 100.00% 63,000 630 H Pay 95 60,000 100.00% 60,000 1,380 NHS Pay 95 44,600 100.00% 44,600 446 H Pay 95 62,100 100.00% 62,100 1,428 NHS Pay 95 62,400 100.00% 62,400 1,435 NHS Pay 95 62,300 100.00% 62,300 1,433 NHS Pay 95 72,700 100.00% 72,700 734 H Pay 95 74,700 100,00% 74,700 774 H Pay 95 73,700 100.00% 73,700 754 H Pay 95 75,300 100.00% 75,300 786 H Pay 95 69,800 100,00% 69,800 698 H Pay 95 56,200 100.00% 68,200 682 H Pay 95 63,600 100.00% 63,600 636 H Pay 95 69,800 100.00% 6g,800 698 H Pay 95 70,200 100.00% 70,200 702 H Pay g5 81,g00 100.00% 81,g00 g18 H Pay g5 1~366T600 62,118 67,137 2.30% 1.00% 2.00% 0.O0% 43,147 34,642 431147 Pay 95 Pay 99 Page 1 CO-¢OO-O~' Frepe~e~ by Pub. co~p in~. '12/22/94 Columbia Heights - Sheffield District Page 2 Inflation Rate': T. LF. CASH FLOW ASSUMPTIONS 0.0000% Interest Rate: Frozen Tax F_.xtension Rate: School District No. '13 Basic Rate: School District No. '13 Sales Ratio: L.G.A. as a Percent of Tax Increment: PROJECT VALUE INFORMATION 8.000% '139,7'19% Pay 95 Est. 37.020% Pay 94 98.200% Pay 94 26.98% Pay 94 Type of Tax increment District: Type of Development: Number of Units (Single Family & Rental): Estimated Market Value On Jan. 2, 1996 (,9 units reconstruct):~ Estimated New Market Value On Jan. 2, 1~97 (9 reconstruct + '14 rahab): Estimated New Market Value On Jan. 2, 1998 ('14 reconstruct + '14 mh;'b): Final Market Value: Class Rate: Rental <4 Units Homestead <$72,000 Homestead >$7 ~2,000 Estimated Tax Capacity on Jan. 2. 1996: Estimated Tax Capacity on Jan. 2. '1997: Estimated Tax Capacity on Jan. 2. '1998: Total New Project Tax Capacity at Completion (All Homestead): Project Taxes Per Unit (Higher Value)i Assessor's Market Value Per Unit - Reconstruction Assessor's Market Value Per Unit - Rehabilitation Redevelopment Single Family/Rental Rehab 60 828,000 Pay 97 '1,010,000 Pay 98 1,470,000 Pay 99 3T308t000 Pay 99 2_30% 1.00% 2.00% 10,080 14,280 19,880 44T240 Pay gg $1,564.85 $92,000.00 CO100-01 Prepared by Publicorp Inc. PLANRUN Odg. Project ~,apt~red Columbia Heights - Sheffield District TAX I~CRE1VI2ENT CASI:~ FLOW S~rr~-Annual Semi-Annual Cum. NPV Page 3 PERIOD BEGINS Tax Tax Tax Yrs. Mth. Yr. Capacity Capac~y Capacity 0.0 02-01 1995 43,147 43,147 0 0.5 08-01 1995 43,147 43,147 0 1.0 02-01 1996 43,147 43,147 0 1.5 08-01 1996 43,147 43,147 0 2.0 02-01 1997 34,642 44,722 10,080 2.5 08-01 1997 34,642 44,722 10,080 3.0 02-01 19<98 34,642 59,002 24,360 3.5 08-01 1998 34,642 59,002 24,360 4.0 02-01 1999 34,642 78,882 44,240 4.5 08-01 1999 34,642 78,882 44,240 5.0 02-01 2000 34,642 78,882 44,240 5.5 08431 2000 34,642 78,882 44,240 6.0 02-01 2001 34,642 78,882 44,240 6.5 08-01 2001 34,642 78,882 44,240 7.0 02-01 2002 34,642 78,882 44,240 7.5 08-01 2002 34,642 78,882 44,240 8.0 02-01 2003 34,642 78,882 44,240 8.5 08-01 2003 34,642 78,882 44,240 9.0 02-01 2004 34,642 78,882 44,240 9.5 08-01 2004 34,642 78,882 44,240 10.0 02-01 2005 34,642 78,882 44,240 10.5 08-01 2005 34,642 78,682 44,240 11.0 02-01 2006 34,642 78,882 44,240 11.5 08-01 2006 34,642 78,882 44,240 12_0 02-01 2007 34,642 78,882 44,240 12.5 0801 2007 34,642 78,882 44,240 13.0 02-01 2008 34,642 78,882 44,240 13.5 08-01 2008 34,642 78,882 44,240 14.0 02-01 2009 34,642 78,882 44,240 14.5 08-01 2009 34,642 78,882 44,240 15.0 02-01 2010 34,642 78,882 44,240 15.5 08431 2010 34,642 78,882 44,240 16.0 02-01 2011 34,642 78,882 44,240 16.5 08-01 2011 34,642 78,882 44,240 17.0 02-01 2012 34,642 78,882 44,240 17.5 08-01 2012 34,642 78,882 44,240 18.0 02-01 2013 34,642 78,882 44,240 18.5 08-01 2013 34,642 78,882 44,240 19.0 02-01 2014 34,642 78,882 44,240 19.5 08-01 2014 34,642 78,882 44,240 20.0 02-01 2015 34,642 78,882 44,240 20.5 08-01 2015 34,642 78,882 44,240 21.0 02-01 2016 34,642 78,882 44,240 21.5 08-01 2016 34,642 78,882 44,240 22.0 02-01 2017 34,642 78,882 44,240 22.5 08-01 2017 34,642 78,882 44,240 23.0 02431 2018 34,642 78,882 44,240 23.5 08-01 2018 34,642 78,882 44,240 24.0 02-01 2019 34,642 78,882 44,240 24.5 08-01 2019 34,642 78,882 44,240 25.0 02-01 2020 34,642 78,882 44,240 25.5 08-01 2020 34,642 78,882 44,240 26.0 02-01 2021 34,642 78,882 44,240 26.5 08-01 2021 34,642 78,882 44,240 Totals Present Values Gross Tax Admin. Net Tax Net Tax LGA/HACA Increment 10.00% Increment Increment Penalty 0 0 0 0 .0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 7,042 704 6,338 7,042 704 6,338 17,018 1,702 15,316 17,018 1,702 15,316 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,81'5 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,g06 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,g06 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,691 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,908 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 20,906 3,091 27,815 30,g06 3,091 27,815 30,90B 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,591 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,g06 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,09t 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,691 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 1,469,788 146,979 1,322,809 508,359 50~835 457,515 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,2O9 0 10,218 0 21,857 0 33,048 0 52,591 0 71,382 0 89,450 0 106,823 521 I23,528 521 I39,591 1,042 155,036 1,042 169,887 1,564 184,166 1,584 197,897 2,085 211,099 2,085 223,793 2,606 236,000 2,606 247,736 3,127 259,022 3,127 269,873 3,648 280,307 3,648 290,340 4,169 299,987 4,169 309,262 4,691 318,181 4,691 326,757 5,212 335,003 5,212 342,932 5,733 350,556 5,733 357,887 6,254 364,936 6,254 371,714 6,775 378,231 6,775 384,497 7,297 390,522 7,297 396,316 7,818 401,887 7,818 407,243 8,339 412,394 8,339 417 346 8,339 422 108 8,339 426 687 8,339 431 090 8,339 435 323 8,339 439 393 8,339 443 307 8,339 447 071 8,339 450 690 8,339 454 169 8,339 457,515 8,339 233,490 55,131 Yrs. of PERIOD ENDING TI Yrs. Mth. Yr. 0.5 08-01 1995 1.0 02-01 1996 1.5 08-01 1996 2.0 02-01 1997 0.5 2.5 08-.01 1997 1.0 3.0 02-01 1998 1.5 3.5 08431 1998 2.0 4.0 02-01 1999 2.5 4.5 08.-01 1999 3.0 5.0 02.-01 2000 3.5 5.5 08-01 2000 4.0 6.0 02-01 2001 4.5 6.5 08-01 2001 5.0 7.0 02-01 2002 5.5 7.5 08-01 2002 6.0 8.0 02-01 2003 6.5 8.5 08-01 2003 7.0 9.0 02-01 2004 7.5 9.5 08-01 2004 8.0 10.0 02-01 2005 8.5 10.5 08-01 2005 g.o 11.0 02..01 2006 9.5 11.5 08-01 2006 10.0 12.0 02-01 2007 10.5 12.5 08-01 2007 11.0 13.0 02-01 2008 11.5 13.5 08-01 2008 12.0 14.0 02--01 2009 12.5 14.5 08-01 2009 13.0 15.0 02-01 2010 13.5 15.5 08-01 2010 14.0 16.0 02-01 2011 14.5 16.5 08-01 2011 15.0 17.0 02-01 2012 15.5 17.5 08-01 2012 16.0 18.0 02-01 2013 16.5 18.5 08-01 2013 17.0 19.0 02-01 2014 17.5 19.5 08-01 2014 18.0 20.0 02-01 2015 18.5 20.5 08-01 2015; 19.0 21.0 02-01 2016. 19.5 21.5 08-01 2016 20.0 22.0 02-01 2017 20.5 22.5 08-01 2017 21.0 23.0 02-01 2018 21.5 23.5 08-01 2018 22.0 24.0 02-01 2019 22.5 24.5 08-01 2019 23.0 25.0 02-01 2020 23.5 25.5 08-01 2020 24.0 26.0 02-01 2021 24.5 26.5 08-01 2021 25.0 27.0 02431 2022 C~f0GGf Pret:~.red by Pubfic, oq~ lr~, PLANRUN 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (~1.2) 782-2800 ~ OF COL~IA HEIGHTS Joseph Sturdevant . , ~ Councilmembers Donald O. Jolly Bruce G. Nawrock/ Gary L. Peterson Robert W. Ruettimann CRy Manager Patrick Hentges g TO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 27, 1'994 :~igned ~aiver Form Accompanied Application 1995 LICENSE AGENDA IF. ~PPROVED BY ~OLICE DEPT. II I! ON & OFF SALE BEER *Peter C. Budzlelek *Sadiq Punjani LICENSED AT 4952 Central Avenue 5011 University Avenue On Sale Off Sale FEES $ 325.00 75.oo II 11 11 III1 I! II !1 II II Il 11 II il II tl II II II tl 11 11 I1 11 I1 II 11 II II- II I1 II II I,I II 11 II II I1 II .!1 II II !1 11 II 11 11 It II 11 11 II I1 II II *AAA-Abbott Plumbing *Ray Anderson & Sons Co. *Asphalt DPfveway Co. *Assoc. Mech. Cont. *Automatic Sprinkler Co. *Blaine Heating & A/C *Boedeker Plumbing & Htg. *Budget Plumbing Centralre, lne. *Const. Labor Force *Custom Heating *DelHar Furnace Exchange *Doody Mechanical *Egan & Sons Co. *F~reside Corner *Golden Valley Mtg. & A/C *S.M. Hedler'Plmg. Home Energy Ctr. Hilton Johnson RoofTng R~chard A. Johnson *Kraus-Anderson Const. *Randy Lane & Son~ Plmg. *Lawrence'Sign *Leroy Signs, Inc. *HcPhilllps Bros. Roofing *Ron's Mechanical, inc. *Royalton Htg. & ~ooling *Sharp HeatTng & AC *Standard Heating & AC *Superior Cont. Yale, Inc. 1126 N.E. 2nd St. 930 Duluth St. 1211E. Hwy. 36 1257 Marschall Rd. 1000 E. Edgerton Rd. 13562 Central Ave. 2905 Garfield Ave. S. 6420 Flying Cloud Dr. 7402 Washington Ave. 448 Lilac St. 2524 N.E. 29th Ave. 4080 - 83rd Ave. N. 520 Front Avenue 7100 Medlcine Lk. Rd. 2700 N. Falrview AVe. 5182 W. Broadway 2519 N.E. 4th St. 15200 - 25th Ave. N. 525 Lowry Ave. N.E. 25 Crescent St. 525 S. 8th St. 1501W. Beoadway 945 Pierce Butler Rt. 6325 Welcome Ave. N. 2590 Centennlal Dr. 1 . 1812 E. Shakopee Ave. ~120 - 85th Ave. N. 4854 Central Ave. 410 W. Lake St. 6121 - 42nd Ave. N. 9649 Girard Ave. S. 40.00 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO qO.O0 4O.0O 4o.oo 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 40.00' 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4o.oo 4O.0O 4O.OO 4O.OO 4o.oo SAFETY & HEALTH II II CIGARETTE SALES *Peter Budzielek *Hot Market 4952 Central Avenue 5011 University Avenue 35.00 20.00 COURTESY BENCHES ASST.CITY ENG. *U.S. Bench Corp. ~4r~'rious locations 600.90 Page 2 ~.PPROVED BY SAFETY & HEALTH II Ii il II il II FOOD/BEVERAGE t~CHINES Donald J. Lee Donald J. Lee Steven L. Persons Distinctive Laundrles LICENSED AT 637 N.E. 38th Ave. 590 N.E. 40th Ave. 4637. Central Ave. 5241 University Ate. FEES $ 15.00 15.00 15.00 30.00 SAFETY & HEALTH, F I RETBLDG. !! II FRESH FOOD SALES Stytjes Pannekoeken Huis Hot Market 4920 Central Ave. 5011Unlverslty Ave. 25.00 25.00 POLICE DEPT. II II II II GAMES OF SKILL/JUKEBOXES *Paul Helm *Summit Amusement *Paddle & Pool, Inc. 547 N.E. 40th Ave. 3951 Central Avenue 4040 Central Avenue 100.00 250.00 1,650.00 SAFETY & HEALTH I1 II GARBAGE/RUBB! SH HAULERS *Browning-Ferris Ind. *t~oodlame Sanitary Service 9813 Flying Cloud Dr. 8661Rendove St. 50.00 50.00 SAFETY & HEALTH, FIRE/BLDG. GROCERY SALES *Hot Market 5011Unlversity Ave. 100.00 FIRE DEPARTMENT !i II tl II II II II I! I1 II II II 11 II LAUNDR~'SERV ICES Anoka .County Comm. Action Steven L. Persons Robert Holger All, Inc. All, Inc. Maynard Nielsen Distinctive Laundries Distinctive Laundries 3932 Central Avenue 4637 Central Avenue 3849 Edgemoor'Place 4628 Tyler St. .4634 Tyler St. 4733 Universlty Ave. 5241 University Ave. 5241 University Ave. 35.00 180.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 50.00 220.00 ~PROVED BY POLICE DEPT. POOL/BILLARD HALL *Paddle & Pool, inc. LICENSED AT 4040 Central Avenue Page 3 FEES $100.O0 SAFETY & HEALTH, FIRE/BLDG. INSP. ~ 14 II RESTAURANTS/SNACK BARS *Stytjes Pannekoeken Huls *Peter Budzielek 4920 Central Avenue 4952 Central Avenue 125.00 50.00 POLICE DEPT., FIRE DEPT. SECONDHAND SALES Virginla Cramble 4050 Central Avenue **Jake Ambrose 828 N.E. l)Oth Avenue (**Pending correction of Fire Code ~iolatlons.) 50.00 50.O0 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TREE SERVICES *Davey Tree Co. 1500 N. Mantua St., Ohio 50.00 SAFETY & HEALTH Il II VENDING MACHINES Steven L. Persons Distinctive Laundries 4637 Central Avenue 5241 University Ave. 15.00 15.O0 POLICE DEPT. Il II II II Il II II II II II II il II TAX 1 CAB DR IVERS *Hicha~l Dennis Healey *James Lee Gulladge *Douglas Lee Allsup *Ellen Mary Martin *Ricky Christopher Ruse *Claudia Judy Green' *Thomas Ellis Hawes *Clifford Piper, Jr. 2404 N. Sheridan Ave. 2414 Fremont Ave. N. 760 - 8th Ave. N.g. 4060 - N.E. l)th St. 544 Fairmont St. '8816 Austin S~. 3867 Minutem~n Ln 117 - ll6th Ave. 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.gO 20.00 APPROVED BY TAXICAB VEHICLES LICENSED AT Page FEES POLICE DEPT. Il II *James Thomas LeTourneau Yellow Taxi Service Corp. *Suburban Taxi Corporation 6 taxicab vehic]es within the City 26 taxi vehicles within the City $75.00 et $75.00 es TO: COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL FROM: LOWELL DEMARS SUBJECTj RENTAL?ROPERTY LICBNSE~_AP~LICATt0N~ . DATE: DECEMBER 27, 1994 THE FOLLOWING LIST OF OWNERS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE RENTAL PROPERTIES HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE PROVISIONAL LICENSING REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS. I AM RECOMMENDING THAT THESE LICENSES BE ISSUED: CHIES, DONALD DALSETH, MARILYN DEMARS, MITCHELL E. GROSSLEIN, EDWARD A. HAGUE, STEPHEN D. HINRICHS, GERALD H. INGALDSON, GERALD G. INGALDSON, GERALD G. JONES, LORNA M. KOLOSKY, STEPHEN F. KORTAS, MARGARET LARSON, LARRY R. McGREGOR, JOSEPH E. McNAIR, JEFFREY S. MEISSNER, RICHARD J. NAROG, DUANE F. OLSON, CHARLES E. OLSON, DEAN M. PELTIER, HELEN E. PELTIER, HELEN E. 970 44th AVENUE 4607 PIERCE 4101 6th STREET 4201 6th STREET 4110 MADISON 4349 ARTHUR 4008-10 CLEVELAND 4014-16 CLEVELAND 4002 CLEVELAND 1521 39th AVENUE 4308 4th STREET 1087 POLK CIRCLE 1222-24 45-t/2 4541-43 TAYLOR 4028 CLEVELAND 1313-15 CIRCLE TERR 4997 TYLER 1005-07 50th AVE 4918 TYLER 4975-77 TYLER 7/1/94--6/30/95 9/1/94--8/31/95 1t/1/94--10/31/95 11/1/94--10/31/95 8/1/94--7/31/95 11/1/94--10/31/95 11/1/94--10/31/95 11/1/94--10/3t/95 11/1/94--10/31/95 11/1/94--10/3t/95 8/1/94--7/31/95 8/1/94--7/31/95 8/1/94--7/31/95 8/1/94--7/31/95 11/1/94--10/31/95 t/1/94--5/31/95 11/1/94--10/31/95 1/1/95--12/31/96 tl/t/94--10/31/95 11/1/94--10/31/95 B F;,'C F' ]; t'.IA N iii: Z A L. S Y S'i" E M C:l":e c ?,:. H :J. :s to I"y FUN):) F.:.I:']Z:AF:: F:'t..ll"J i) t) E S C R Z F:'T Z ON :L©]. 2:i.2 .STATI:-: A]:D MA :[ N'T't::I,IAN(:::I:L' 225 (:.'./:'; ?, [.. J::: ::..:] ..-:~; 0 PARA 24C, L.. ]: :(:'fl:;~' A F;..' ¥ 4() ! CAF:':t:'¥'AL ]: 4:L0 SHE:F:'F' ]: E:L.'C' 4:L :I. CAF:' :!: T'AL :[MF:'"'-C';E:N (::OVT ,, ):':".L.D(.":: 4:L 2 CAF':t: TAL. ]: 4.3:1. CAF:' EC:U ]: F:' F;d:::F'LACE'"'GI:i:t':.E:F:.'.AL 60:1. N A]"li: F:: LJ"I" ]: L. :I: T¥ 6() 2 St::Wi:::t:;-: UT :l: L ]: ]"Y 603 l::..' t:::]:'" {..J.<.::; ~:: F'UNB 60",".:' L. ]: Q U C-: Fi: 652 Slii:WE: F;~' C 0 N S ]"F,' LJ!:::: T ]: C) N 70 :L C:ENT'F:.:AL.. ::::::::::::::::::::::: 7:L0 E ]',Ii:::I-:.:{:-)Y 7:'::0 DA'T'A F'F.:O '::' E':::: f.;".L ],:' ':"'....~ ~<::~ ~.~ :[ (::: 0 N 'T' J:;,[ ]: :({'l U ]" ii: ,'C' :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ql:: ": ]' lq.c: :.:: .,:: -,- ::!:: ~::: 5 887 F:T.I:-":X .T.{:I::N[::I:::[]" TF;.'.U:.::'YT' F:'UNB TOTAL, ALL, F'LJI".IDS D ]: ':: :'; B L .{ F(' S ,'-.':: {'q l::: N T S J. :[ 2 :, 7].4 ,, 39 ].00 ,. :L2 2,215,7.:::!: :.".: :, 538 ,, 50 .3 :, 06'7 ,: 66 345 ,, :L ..':.q. 6 :, 23 :I. ,, 8 :i. 4 .,, :[ 6 ::f.". ,, 2.7 :L 0,2. :5 () ,, 50 :l. 50 ,, ,.'.)0 7 ,., 9(Y.¢:', 6.:..:'" .I. :, 7" '.:-:' ~ii: ,, 57 'fg.'? ,'fJ. "}: '::.:' ~t :L49,50C, ,, 5,.') 2 :, 000 ,, 00 Z .~ 05::5 ,, ,'.'.::4 3 :: 4B3,82 ]., 694,40 B:[O, 00 :::B':',:,- :, :::':.: 4::? ,, 50 :[90,254,56 562 ,, 8 :L 585 :., 603 ,, 33 BAN K ::::::::::::::::::::: :: )BAN 1'.'.flAME: BAt',Il<: CHt:::C:K ]: NG ACC:C)LJNT TOTAL :qL.L BANKS Y.." ]: S B U F;-: S E: F{ F.:: t',l ]" S 5~i,' 5 .:, 603 ,, 33 585,603,, 33 i2/21/94 i0:5 C h e c I,.: H .t s 't: o r y 12 / 2 7 / 9 4 C': 0 U N C Z I... L Z S T BAN K VENDOR BAI".!I'-,' Ct-.tlii:C 1< ]:I',IG AC'.COLII',iT COL. r..i; 4¢,: I'"[AF;,'KE:T F.:EAL*¥Y/Br.L'C AMFZI:;,' ]: C'Ai,.t I_ I 1-..11!.]t,.1 SUF:'F:'LY CO AhlO t<A C':OUhFf'Y M(:Y¥OF.: VIEH:I:C': )..-.',Eli'_'.' KS TROM/V :[ V Bii.]I...L.):{-:OY ):-:.:AR SUF'F'L.Y BIEL.LBOY C'-ORF:'ORAT :[ 0I'--t Blii;i:;:G/iii:Vli.] L Yf'--I BE:F.'.(:-;FOF.:D TF;~UC~ K ]: t'-l(:..'i ):.:{ L. 00 M Iii: F,' /l'"i ].' I... D RE I) B 0 L. A N D FZ F;-~/G r::'d:;.: Y BF.'.AA"f'E:N/GA RY C 0 M E:T C L. A S S ]: C i} A V ]: ,S / ..'.'r A H ii:; S )}AV ]: S/JAM ]: Ii-'_' F'ti.]I:;.:R :I: E F;,'/:O A V .]; :0 F:' 0 C U.':--]; I'--t ti.] W.{-~ F:' A I::' 1E I:;..' S (.'(:I...EI',iWO0:O :[ hlGL. E:WOOD GF;.::[ GGS--.COOF:'tEF;: & C'.O GUT :[ EF;:i:;,'EZ/MAI',IUE]_A & :E;AUt... l..ltii;R B iiEF.'.'f'/..'.¥O l..l ;[ & C OF'F:']:C['i: I::'RODUCT,'.-~; ,.]' :[ F:' F:' Y - ,_"r I:;~ ,, F:'F;.:ODUCT,'.i; JOHNSON ):-.'.:ROS, 1... ]: Qt..IOR CCI. ,;3' (3 I-.i N S T (3 I-.i / ,_]' U I'.It?_' JOL. LY/:OOI--IAL1} 1<.' 0 FZ L. F:' G E 1'-.1 / C 0 t'--I I:I ]: ii'] KO... F;.'.MAhl/YANG T KUii.]i.-;N/JEAN I.:::UETHIER LA KE COUI'-ITRY CHAF'TI-ZF;.: I...tEI'--IZ ME: L 0 A D I:ZI:;.'./F,.: E B E C C A HARK VI:i: :()]:ST,, M ]: N TEF;.:-.--W E ]: StdAN 1',I S F' I',IOF;.:TH s'rAR :iCE r', H JOHNSON'S C/O F:' A F;,'"f'.'.':~ F'L LJ ,~-~ F'IEF'S :r. -C'OLA--.7 UF:' PETTY CASH - t(AREI'-I MOE]_L F:'H:[ L.I... :r. F'S WI: hie & SF"[ I:C'f'S F:'LUNKE:TT ' S, :[IGC F'R :[ 0 R W ]: t'--Itii: QUAL]:TY W];I~-IE & SF']:F.'.]:T:B F,'E:DWO0:O FALL. S HOOF'S CLUB SAL. LY D :i: STR :1; BUTORS S I".'.'0 Vi:;.:A I".I/T OM CITY OF' COL..UMB]:A HE]:GHTS GL 540R-V04 ,, :i. 5 F'AGE 1 CHECK NUMBI:::R AMOUNT 50435 i :, 000,00 50437 :1. ! ,, 66 50438 :t. 9.50 504.'.'~9 35 ,, 00 50440 7.]';. 42 5044 :L 10 :, 170 ,, 18 50442 35 ,, 00 5044:.':; 688 ,, 80 50444 35,, 00 50445 288 ,, 00 50446 36 ,, 28 5(.'.'447 100 ,, 00 50448 750.00 50449 :1.68 ,, 29 50450 1 :, 530 ,, 00 5()45~L 1 :, :1.99 ,, 91 50452.': 13,42 50453 :.'~0 :, 42¢", ,, 42 50454 527 ,, 28 50455 4 ,, 86 50456 45 ,, 00 50457 115 .. 92 504 ~";8 4 :, 276 ,, 57 50459 :.':'..;0 ,. i 50460 15.00 5046:1. 35 ,, 00 50462 68 ,, 75 5046:.":!; :.35,87 50464 8 .,, 822 ,, :.'.';2 50465 40 ,, 00 50466 49.50 50467 555,, 9.1. 504¢a8 24 :, 421.40 50469 4 :, 529 ,, 53 50470 73,2:7 50471 725 ,, 04 50472 66.]'; ,, 50 50473 5,,42 50474 8.1.4 ,, 70 50475 88 ,, 46 50476 :I. 2 :, 577.25 504-77 60 ,, 71 504'7~:3 2,265,15 50479 2 :, 001 ,, ;".;2 50480 1 :I. 0 ,, 00 50481 2;:; ,, 42 50482 :1. O0 , 00 )}. ..... i::':[NANCIAL ~?':::, 1::.11 :I. 2:Y'2:1./94 :I.O: 5 C.;heck tq i.!~.'L o ry 2/27/94 COUNC]:i... L]]ST B A N K V Iii N i) 0 F;,' HE.dER }.'.~AN I,::.' CHI!!X]: 1< :[ I,IG AC':COUI,FT' LJ S bJIEST [.'.E]...L.UL. AFL~ VAUGIdlq/STIEVE],i ACIZ !"hq l:t'.TC, W A F;Z liiJ C I]]i'q F:' U TI!ii:;.: C'. O F,'F:' I'IlED]]CA C:H HN ];]]:,!Et::"(' OF: I.~.:IEVFZNUIE 1,1 S F' r:'~ T ~5~:'. '¥ CON:ii~I.JHIZR F'F~O7tT.:,UCT ):?,A I'(Ei:F;.'./' F:' H :[ L.. Jr.':: r":q :::. T L I!.'7 T'T ../F;.'. A N .D Y E:tEI..t...BOY )BAF:'.: SUF:'F:'L.Y :8 Iii: L L. :(.-'~ (:) Y (7; 0 F;.: F:' E)F.'. A'T' :[ 0 N .'t'.' ',' E: F:. (Fi F:O }: ;-.' );?OY:O !"K:)U:E;I!.".F,' C. AN):)Y & 'TO.T:.'O~ D :[ i~iT'f'Z/V Al... F:'OCU:E; (})F:,']; (3 G :Z; --. C: O (] F ' IE t:;:. & CO EOI..It,P..:i?,ON :f:.'.q:;:.O:ii:; ,, I.. ;1: C':'U. OR CO ,, KLJI!iT'f'i-.IE]:;-: D]:'.Z';T,, C..'.'(:)., M ]; 1'4 NIEGA SC C) M ;1; I, IT Iii:F;,'- W E: ]7 SM A I',I F:'iETTY C:.A.SH .... GAR'r' F-"H ]; LL. ];t::"ii.:; & SONS C'O/'IE.'O F:'I"".: ;t: (;)F;.: W I7,.: IZ ]; N IE F;.'. E!; T EI t,I/E-,' F;,' A ~ .':., I... !ii Y F;:. 0 )} ;0 Y / W :[ t...1.. :I; A M ::'!.:; T A F;..' T I:;: ;17 );.) U:',liii; STATE; U iii; WE:ST COMMLJN];CAT]:ONS V At.J (;.)t..II,I/S TI?] V tEI,t A F:'S C Ai,IOI<A C, OUI,ITY SOC];AL '.:.F.;tEF;.:V DC':A :t7 I,!C'; ,, F:];RST COI'4HUNiTY CF;.:E])}];T U L..,,.. ,...,: .. ., 1::'?:;T ,-%. * ~ ,, . ..... .q,.::..- .,,. t...];F:'E_ r.-,,~rq .i ]1C'.MA RET ;[I:;:IEMiENT 'T'I:;.'.U:E;'T' 45 K t..I Ei;l..ll-t/4.1'E7 A N r,1 ~[ C: I(IL:;LS(]qq :, TRU:BTE]E/,Sf ,..1' I','I]:t,INIii:SOTA MUTLJAL. LT. FE Mt,t ';3TATE; F;..'!ZT]:RE]"it!!]'--tT ::BYST NCd:?."f'HEAST S'¥ATtZ BAN t'::.' F:'AYROL.L ACCOLJNT F:'tii]:;.'. A F:'EF;:.A ....()IEF' 7[ NE:D C:Ot,iTF;..' ]i BUT F:'iZF;.'.A .... F:' :[ FL'F::: F;,'E:L. ]; Iii]::' I::'I:!X:;7:~ LIFE INSUIRA. I',KT:f!:~ F:'I!!:in.'.A F:'OL 7. CE I:;.:EL t EF:' CC)NSO 504,'.c.i: 3 50484 50486 50488 50489 50490 50492 50493 50494 50495 50496 50497 50498 50499 50 500 5 C, b 0 ]. 505','.)3 5350,':'.t 50505 50506 50507 50508 50509 505 :L 0 505]. :L 505:I. 2 505 :i..3 505:L4 505:I. 5 505:k6 505.1.8 505 :~. 9 ',5, D 52. () 5052]. 50522 50524 50527 50528 50529 5 0 5 31 C:[TY 0I.7 COLUHYz:ZA GL. 540F,:-.--V04. :L 5 F'AGiE 2 AFiOUNT 132.52 :I. :L ,, 88 55.79 i :, .1.38 ,, 49 'q "- 5,499 ,, C'0 669 ,, 00 47 ,, 82 40,,00 :L 3 ,, 46 2:L9. -:~ ...... (') 7.:': / :~ "Y'~),."::* ,, ..... 39 ,, 60 ! .7..', O 0 5? ,, 29 2 :, :L 3,q ,, d, 3 ;l. 5 :, (ii: 1t. ;L., 96 2 ]. :, 4: -2..,:.;,, ':.i. :: :!. 753 5 :, 0:i. 4 ,, Z-';4 107 ,, 66 · I ~ ";,:;:,j ,, ,:. ,n,:,v, ,, 62 20 ,, 00 15 ,, :L ,57, 74,46 :L 4L-7-: ,, 00 ~' ':",-~ 56 245 ,, 00 9 .I...~ ,, 30 36 :L ,, 0,.'.) i, 936.69 :L, 3 :L 4 ,, 00 4 :, 27.7:;. 50 6 :, ,q. 5 '.:'),, 44 ,, 49 35(,", 00 200 ,, 00 87C, ,, 00 36 :, 62.'2, ,, 35 2 :I. 2,76.'.'.'; ,, 19 :, 734 ,, 09 64.62 36S ,, 92 :L 6;i?. ,, ':.') 0 ]. :,612~65 :1.2/2:1./94 :I. 0:5 Check H :i. s'l:.o ry :t. 2/27/94 COU!',t(.";]:I... t...];S'T BAN K CHE:C K ]: hll:;.) AC:COUI'--I'/" F:'F;.:UDE]',Ft" ]: Al... L.:I: F'E: :i:t',fSLJF~ANC I:;..'AMS):)I!!]...L.. SC'HOL. AF;,','-!;H ]:F:' F:'UI'-f S"f'ATE C':AF:'];TOL C't:;,'ED]:T tJhl :!: (:)lq 4':? UI',! ]: TIE:() WAY AC':E H AI:;-'.D W A F;-:E A ]; F;:. E; ]: G l"h':':'d.. Z NC..': A I'-'.'.Z O t'..IO Bl...ti:' A!...L F:' ]:I:;.:IZ 'i"E:ST ]: t'-lC': A M iii:t:;,' ]: C': A 1"-! A (.".',:!ii:l'-I C Y ;[ 1'-I C AM[i:I:;.'. ]: C':Ai'.-! B ]: I',I):)E:F;..'Y AME'F;,' ]: C:AI".I I... :[).'-:':Fb::'d:;,'Y A:i3SOC: AME:F:.:r. C:AI'.IL. ]: h!E:N SUPPLY A fdtii:F;,' :[ CA!'.-I F'U B L ]: C W O F;..' K S A S AI'-.1DE:RSOI'.f'S NEW C,,'.':'d:;..'F'[-i:T At'--IO KA COLtl'-I"f'Y Et...ECT]: At',IO KA C:OL.If',ITY L.].'BRAF;.'.Y AF;-:ATEX A:i!i;F'E]',[ M]:t...I...S :, ]:t',tC'., A.':..:;'TF;.'.L?/F;.'.OE',E]:;.:T F:' ~'.'::..' F:'ATF;..']:C AU)} :1: O Iii::() :1; T :t: B & ):-) SE:AT if:Al<El:;,'& 'I"AYI...OF~ BAF;.:I'-IA (31...fZY & STtEF:'F:IF.I'-I l...Tl') BAUfZi:;.: E-~LI]:I...T "f']:l:;,:IE & t-.'.:AT"f'[-!: BE:F;.:I'--I ]: C'. K AI'-I).') t... :[ l::'SOt'q .B :I; I::'F ".'."i; :, :i: I'-IC: ,, Bi:~:ODART BI:;,'OTH1EI:;..' ]: t'T't"IEF;,'t'-h:'-',,T ]: ONAL. CO I-.','US]:I'.IE-]SS F;,'tEC:OF;.'.DS COF;d::',, C..::]:TY 0t::' ..:.~l F:'At. Jl... C.':L. AF;,' K t::OODSE]:~V :[ CIE ]:lq(:) COl,l"f' ]: t'qlEI'TYA!... SAF."ETY t:]:OLI:[ F' CC)t'-iTF;-'.ACTORS CAL. CL.IL. AT l fq(3 CI:;..'OWN l::'lii:l'--tCl:'i: ,.~.'::-: W]:F;-.'E DAVE: t::'iEF;,' K :[ NS C:OIqTF;.tAC:T ]:t'-I(3 D Iii: Fi C O D!ii]::'AIR"r'MIEt,.tT OF t,.IATUF;.:AI... RE DI!i]::'Et-,IDABt...E C'.OLJR].'E]:;,' OF' MN D :[ C: T A F'I-.i O f'-I iii: DUO [.'.':t..ltii:l"l ]:t',tC': E]'-ITF;.'.ADA I I'-IC F'AC"f'S OI'..1 F:']:LiE F'OU]":E;/W]:i...I...]:AM B & OAt'-ItET t'"" I::,' [C S r..::: 0 F:'I:;: :[ C";C H M Cd'.i/M :[ KE. GIZt'.ILJ :r. t'--IiE F:'ARTS/N-AF:'A AUTO CHECI< NUf;'[BE:F;.: 50532 50533 50534 50535 505..](;6 50538 505.:~ 9 50540 5054:t. 50542 50543 · . 0 544 50545 50546 50 ,., :~- o 50549 50550 5055:L 50553 50554 50555 50556 50557 50558 50559 50560 5056]. 50563 50564 5056-5 50566 50567 50568 50569 oOo. 0 5057:[ 50572 5057:3 50574 50576 50577 50578' 5'.., 5 C ]:'f'Y OF:' COLL.IMB ]: A t'-lti'.': :[ GI-'tT'E; GL. 540R-V04.1. 5 PAGE: 3 AMC1UNT 817,76 45.25 970 ,, 00 567 ,, 00 120,00 350 ,, 24 2 Z~. 4:.':?; 1 :, 549 ,, 48 2:i. ,, 66 8 .:, 08 :L ,, 00 29 :I. ,, :.'] 65., 00 69,73 5:.':'.';6 ,, 00 2,571 ,, 35 100 ,, 18 366.39 188 ,, :L 0 258 ,, 93 1 :, 000 ,, 00 15:'7.26 :I..'.39 ,, (5.1. 15 :, 606 ,, [:::.1. 30:t.. 24 2 :, :L 48 ,, 60 294 ,, i C' 38 ,, 96 67.79 :1.85 ,, 90 550.00 17 ,, 68 89 ,, 00 .1.0,250 ,, 50 6,,2':,/::, 50 ,, 00 2.8.70 3:t ,,6~ 80 ,, 9q .5 :.'i; :, 154 ,, 19 ! :, 000 ,, C, 0 ::.2'.' 56.02. 500.00 76.5:1. BI:b:'..: i::' :i; IqA!'-iC;: .I; Ai... SYS]"Iii]'I :t. 2/2:i./94 :i. 0:5 C]:TY OF' COLiJMB]:A I"!IE];GH't"E; GI...540i:;..'-V04 ,, ]. 5 I::'A(:'.iE 4 B A I".t t< V !ii; t',1 !) 0 i:;,' CI"IEC i< I".t!.JI"IBE;F;,' AMOUNT .BAtqK CI-IIECI<];NG ACCOI...tNT (}.'q..Yl'lN"..~i; I',IC)R]"HEA'.:'~;]" Et...tEC.':'i"i:;.: HAi".tC::E; C:OMI::'AI't.1; E'.;;: i.'ttii] ]] C'.iHT'.':_::; I'ZI...Ii'ZCTi:;..' ]: C ]; i'-IC'. ,, !"i(]'i"H(:) & C::O,, ".~;::, ~ I::'I:;.'.]]t".I]"S I( M A't:;,' T' i.. Iii: A C') U E; 01":' M i'.t C :i: 'i" :!: i!!;.'.':~; ;[ i"-i S M!i:_'NAF;.:D.':'!; CA?.~;HWAY i...UM):i,'tii]:;,' M ;I:i',IAI:;.'. F:'Ot:~D I'1 S ,~:' I".IAT ]: Ot".h':-]I... F ]; f:;.'.IE F:'F;~OTIECT .Z t".h':'-]T'l_ CI...];MAT];C Y;'ATA CfEi"-ITE OL. SC)N ~ S F:'LUMB:[PIG I::' A D C'.iIE T T-T H O M F:"..:i; O I".t F:' Iii]:;..' A 50580 485 ,, 00 5058.I. 5,':'~ ,, 25 50582 50583 5;:', 5C',,',,--,-~" '~ :i. ~]~7 ,, 7' 5 50585 :I. :, 75Z; ,, 85 :'.:.", () 5E~6 ,':'.,".,:'~. ,, 50587 :I. 6 ,, 89 505,'iiixiii', t 42 ,, 72. 50589 2 () ,, ! 9 ':: '"' 59C, ...... .... t., . 22 ':"::' 5059 :t. 70() ,, 00 50592 89, ,Er:;.." 50593 2.6,7,.'-.Bi.3 ,, 50 50594 :I. 37 ,, 87 50594 52 ,, 34 50 L-','.}~'7 4 !:: ,, ()0 50'.:'!,9 E~ 85 ,, 50 5().59:'9 431 ,, 2..I. 50600 50,.60 :I. :!. :.'.':;; (),, 7 :.'.'; 50602 50603 49 ,, ;! 0 50604 :i. 7 50605 ;?.9 ,, 51i! 50606 7,fi ,, 54 ~ ~.,- ,;::, ,..,, .,- 5060 (ii~ :i. 3 .:~,, 0 C, 506©9 20 ,, 00 506 t 0 5,."~ ,, 08 506:t. :i. ,2,-,:;)7' ,, 50 '..::,06 :i. 2 50 ,, 90 506.1. :.'.'!; ;7'.':2 ,, 00 50614 49 ,, 7:'.-'.' 506 :I. 5 :.347 ,, 94 506:i. 6 506.1.7 345 ,, 58 50418 29,'.'.! ,, 40 506:t. 9 :1.45 ,, 00 50620 80, -.'.'-~ 36 ,, 00 5062 :L .?;0 ,, 6 50622 ;.'.-':7:';7 ,, 50 5062.¥ ,'-'I-62 ,, :t. 3 506;:..':':,,'-I. :!. 9,? ,, 0(':, 50625 7:i. 7 ,, i 5 50826 :I. BF-:C.: F']~NAI'K::]~AL_ SYE~TEM ].2/2]°/94 I0:5 C he c i--.'. H i s.~'tc:,ry :L2/27/94 COUNC,~]~L_ L..]~,9;T C :L'TY OF' C:OL..UMB Z A HE Z GI"ITS GI...5'.'~OF~-V04. ,, :L 5 I::'AGtii: 5 BAi,fi<] VEbIDOR C.':HF.!:C K NUMB[':R AMOLII,I'I" BANI< Ci-.Iti:C K ]:I,I1'.3 ACCOUI,iT F('.A!---']TD GRAF'H]]CS & F;.'.AP :[ 'I" J::'R ]2 N'¥ ]] Ne --- F:'I:;.: .'[ I::..'E:C-i ROCISTI!i]::.'. AU'¥O I:U!:_'I... ]: A}?.'.,'I...L::.: OF.-F :[ [.':I!i: :iL~[.JF:'i'-"I...Y SAJ::'EYl"Y F' :[ I:;.'.,~BT .S El':.'. C O L.A B.':~ S J"l E 1... i... :[ "i' 0 / B !::.'. U C': E: SHt!:F:-:W .'[ t'-I I.:J :[ I..L...T. AMS S ]2 MPt...EX T ]: J'"ili: {'~:OL}THAM BUS ]:l',llF~S~!i; {::C:.'I'"?i St...IBUR':{'.::AN F:.'.I...i!..'.JY.',ER' '..'Ti-I"AMP SL}Y':L.IF;.'BAI'J TAX :[ C:'OF;.'.F:'OF;-'.AT .'[ 0 SUF:'EI:;.'. :J: CB:~.'. F'C)F:.:'I) :1: J".IC:. SYS"I"i:_:]~'i~:': {L:;L.tF:'J::'LY ]]'-JC;, 't"A F.:{Bt!i:T .:'B T 0 F,' E:,'i; - A C C T S 'l"t!i: (T:~ L.f ]: i... A B I!.:: F;.'. t::,"f' ' S F..'ii: S T A LJ F;.' A l"-I '¥'01..,.',I-I ~i:-: COUhI"I"F;.'.Y C)F:'F']:CiiE C:L.. U :i']: [::'O~!:;]"MAS"I"F]:;,'J'"JF:'t...S _ U S b. II:~E:T C.'.EL..t...UL..AF:~ UJ'.I :[ F:'C)J::.'.P'iE'~; I...ft:IL :[ i'"J :[ -t"Ii::() :[ !"-J f. JI".I]EV[':F:.'.::]i;]:TY O[::' M.T. NN!!:.'.-.-.';O"f-A V A J~-J "" O "' I.. ]] T t.g A "t" Ei] F;.'. I::'RO j..LI Iii] {E:; T f..g j'~']... D WOOI)L..A I'"..'E S;AN :1: TAF:.'.Y 8EF::V Zli:l'-" i"[~':::NUF:¥-~C'.'I"UIR:]iNG COMPAt,f 50627 170 ,, 78 506;:'~8 371 ,, 73 5062? ~8 ,, 44 50630 {i.~0 ,, 48 5063 J. 300 ,, 00 5,..;,~:~,:~,:: :.':;0 ,, 00 50633 25.00 50634 1 ~b.' ,, 67 506.35 :I. 7 :L ,, 60 ~.s0636 .%-'_ 9 i).. ].0 50638 2'5 :, 5::'~:8.50 50639 1 ',:.so ,, 00 .50640 :L05 ,, 96 5064;T:'. :LO0 ,, 42:, 5064-75 2':: :, ..':'::,9 :L. :':':'. E: 50644 :.:.; :, 600.00 5()645 66.60 ~:.~0646 594-,, 05 50647 2:90,00 50648 :i..'.~; .'.:.", ,, 90 50649 62.';6 ,, 7'2" · 506.50 89.65 ',:.:,065 J. 46 :, ].49 ,, 46 5065:',.':~ 58, ,q-5 585 :, 6()2~, 33 Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District (A Redevelopment District) Columbia Heights Housing and Redevelopment Authority Anoka County City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota Drafted: December 21, 1994 Adopted: January 23, 1995 Prepared by: PUBLICORP, INC. 512 Crown Roller Mill 105 Fifth Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55401 (6t2) 341-3641 MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN (This section is not part of the Tax Increment Financing Plan and is only for convenience of reference.) Based upon the statutory authority described in the Development Plan of the Sheffield Neighborhood Redevelopment and Housing Development Project attached hereto, the public purpose findings by the City Council and the Columbia Heights Housing and Redevelopment Authority' (the "Authority") and for the purpose of fulfilling the City's and Authority's redevelopment and housing objectives as set forth in the Development Plan, the City Council and Authority have created, established and designated the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and Sections 469.1 74 to 469.1 79. The following municipal action was taken in connection therewith: Sheffield Neighborhood Redevelopment and Housing Development Project February 8, 1994: The Development Plan for the Sheffield Neighborhood Redevelopment and Housing Development Project was adopted by the Columbia Heights Housing and Redevelopment Authority Board of Commissioners. February 28, 1994: The Development Plan for the Sheffield Neighborhood Redevelopment and Housing Development Project was adopted by the Columbia Heights City Counci]. Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District lanuarv 10, 1995: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District was adopted by the Columbia Heights Housing and Redevelopment Authority. [anuarv 23, 1995: The Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District was adopted by the Columbia Heights City Council. TABLE OF CONTENTS (This Table of Contents is not part of the Redevelopment Plan and is only for convenience of reference.) TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR THE SHEFFIELD TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT Section I1: Tax Increment Plan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District ...... I1-1 Ao B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. Ro S. T. U. V. W. Statutory Authorit-v .......................................... I1-1 Statement of Obiectives ...................................... I1-1 Housing Development and Redevelopment Plan Overview ............. 11-2 Description of Property in the Sheffield TIF District ................... tl-2 Classification of the Tax Increment Financing District ................. 11-3 ProDerty To Be Acquired ...................................... 11-4 Estimate of Costs ........................................... 11-4 Estimated Amount of Loan/Bonded Indebtedness .................... 11-5 Sources of Revenue ......................................... 1l-5 Original Tax Capaci~ ........................................ 11-5 Amount of Captured Tax Capacity ............................... 11-6 Duration of the Sheffield TIF District ............................. 11-6 Estimated Impact on Other Taxing lurisdictions ...................... 11-6 Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing District ................. 11-7 Administrative Expenses ...................................... 11-8 Necessary ImDrovements in the Sheffield T1F District .................. 11-8 Limitation on Qualification of Property in Tax Increment District Not Subject to Improvement .............................. 11-8 Limitation on the Use of Tax Increment ........................... 1t-9 Notification of Prior Planned Improvements ........................ 11-9 Excess Tax Increments ....................................... 11-9 Requirement for Agreements with the Developer ................... 11-10 Assessment Agreements ..................................... 11-10 Administration of District and Maintenance of the Tax Increment Account 11-10 Xo Financial Reporting Requirements .............................. I1-11 Municipal Approval ........................................ I1-11 County Road Costs ......................................... 11-11 Reduction in State Tax Increment Financing Aid .................... 1t-12 EXHIBIT II-A EXHIBIT II-B Boundary Map of the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District .. II-A-1 Cashflow Analysis and Base Value Analysis ................. II-B-1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR THE SHEFFIELD TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT A. STATUTORY AUTHORITY Within the City of Columbia Heights (the "City") there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. To this end, the City Council established the Columbia Heights Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority"). The City faces various existing land use problems that require corrective action by the City or Authority before development by private enterprise becomes financially feasible or desirable. The Authority and City are authorized to establish a tax increment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended, to assist in financing public costs related to this project. Tax increments are derived only from the increased amount of taxes which are paid on a parcel of property after the construction of a new structure on the parcel. Tax increment districts encompass the parcels from which tax increments are paid for a period of time. Below is the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plan") for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District ("Sheffield TIF District"). Other relevant information is contained in the Development Plan for the Sheffield Redevelopment and Housing Development Project, originally adopted by the HRA on February 28, 1994. A modification of the Development Plan is contemplated in the Tax Increment Plan. The Sheffield Redevelopment and Housing Development and Project includes the area proposed for the Sheffield TtF District. The Authority or the City reserves the right to approve all or a portion of the property as proposed to be included in the Sheffield TIF District on the date of the first public hearing, January 23, 1995. B. STATEMENT OF OBIECTIVES The Sheffield TIF District is a redevelopment tax increment district which currently consists of 54 parcels of land and adjacent and internal right-of ways. Present plans for the new development on the site include reconstruction or renovation of over 60 single-family and rental units in Sheffield's Neighborhood. The Sheffield TIF District is expected to achieve many of the objectives set forth in the Redevelopment Plan in regard to land use. These objectives include: To enhance the tax base of the City. To provide maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City, for development by private enterprise. o To better utilize vacant or underdeveloped land. o To attract new businesses. To acquire blighted or deteriorated residential property for rehabilitation or clearance and redevelopment. 11-1 To develop housing opportunities for market segments underserved in the City, including housing for the disabled and elderly. C. HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OVERVIEW Property to be Acquired - Selected property located within the Sheffield TIF District may be acquired by the City or the Authority and is further described in Subsection F of this Plan. Relocation - Complete relocation services are available pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws. o Upon approval of the developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary legal requirements, the City or the Authority may sell to the developer selected properties it may acquire within the Sheffield TIF District. The City or the Authority may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition, relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public streets work within the Sheffield TIF District. o The Sheffield TIF District contains residential zoned property. All development in the area will conform to applicable state and local codes and ordinances. D. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY IN SHEFFIELD DISTRICT The Sheffield TIF District encompasses the parcels and all adjacent and interior right-of-ways as identified below: PID #25-30-24-34-0090 1234 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34-0089 1240 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34-0086 1260 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34-0087 1270 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34-0081 1300 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34-0082 1306 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34-0078 1312 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34-0079 1400 46th Avenue NE PID #25-30-24-34-0097 4531 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-34-0095 4555 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0135 4600 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0134 4606 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0133 4610 Fillmore Street P1D #25-30-24-33-0132 4618 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0t31 4624 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0130 4630 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0129 4636 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0128 4642 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0127 4648 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-33-0126 4654 Fillmore Street P1D #25-30-24.34-0070 P1D #25-30-24.34.0069 4601 Pierce Street 4607 Pierce Street PID ~25-30-24.34.0068 46t3 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24.34-0067 4619 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24-34-0066 4625 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24-34-0004 4631 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24-34-0003 4637 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24.34.0002 4643 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24-34-0001 4655 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24-33-0116 4501 Taylor Street PID #25-30-24-33-0119 4519 Taylor Street PID #25-30-24-33-0122 4535 Taylor Street PID #25-30-24-33-0125 4555 Taylor Street PID #25-30-24-33-0008 4612 Taylor Street PID #25-30-24-34-0055 4601 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-34-0057 4607 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24.34-0059 4613 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-34-0058 4619 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-34-0056 4625 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-34-0050 4633 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-34-0051 4637 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-34-0052 4643 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-34-0053 4649 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-34-0054 4655 Fillmore Street PID #25-30-24-34-0064 4600 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24-34-0063 4606 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24-34-0062 4612 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24.34.0061 4618 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24-34-0060 4624 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24-34-0047 4630 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24-34-0046 4636 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24-34-0045 4642 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24-34-0048 4648 Pierce Street PID #25-30-24-34-0049 4654 Pierce Street The City or the Authority reserves a right to approve all or a portion of the area of the parcels listed as designation for the Sheffield TIF District. See the map in Exhibit II-A for further information on the location of the Sheffield TIF District. E. CLASSIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT The City and the Authority, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in accordance with Minnesota StatL~es, Section 469.174 to 469. t 79, as amended, inclusive, finds that 11-3 the Sheffield T1F District to be established is a redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 as defined below: (a) "Redevelopment district" means a type of tax increment financing district consisting of a project, or portions of a project, within which the authority finds by resolution that one of the following conditions, reasonably distributed throughout the district, exists: (1) parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area in the district are occul~ied by buildings, streets, utilities, or other improvements and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance; or (2) The property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used railyards, rail storage facilities or excessive or vacated railroad rights-of-way. For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality ma)/ find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs or other similar reliable evidence. If the evidence supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is not disqualified as structurally substandard, the municipality may make such a determination without an interior inspection or an independent, expert appraisal of the cost of repair and rehabilitation of the building... For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements until 15 percent of the area of the parcel contains improvements. The 54 parcels have been investigated by City and Authority staff and consultants and have been found to meet all requirements of a redevelopment district. Some parcels are not currently, but were formerly occupied by buildings which the Authority and the City found to be substandard based upon the multiple building code violations associated with each structure. These structures were removed in accordance with the "early acquisition" provision of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.028, Subd. 5. F. PROPERTY TO BE ACQUIRED Il-4 The City or Authority may acquire any parcel within the Sheffield TIF District including interior street and railway right-of-ways. G. ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimate of public costs associated with the Sheffield TIF District is outlined in the following line item budget: Estimate of Public Costs Qualified Costs Land Acquisition Public Improvements Demolition and Relocation Site Preparation Administrative, Legal, Engineering, and Consulting Fees Contingency 500,000 50,000 50,000 Total Estimated Project Costs: 600,000 Any funds to be expended for off-site improvements outside the boundaries of the Sheffield TIF District, but within the boundaries of the Sheffield Neighborhood Redevelopment and Housing Development Project would be less than 25 percent of total tax increment generated by the Sheffield TIF District, including administrative costs. H. ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF LOAN/BONDED INDEBTEDNESS It is anticipated that the City or Authority may issue a revenue bond, general obligation bond, or other type of obligation in one or more series to finance costs public costs. The original principal amount of all indebtedness pledged solely from tax increments is not expected to exceed $550,000 with additional increments to be paid to capitalized and other interest determined at the time of issuance. I. SOURCES OF REVENUE The major source of revenue to be used to finance public costs associated with the public development projects in the Sheffield Redevelopment and Housing Development Project is tax increment generated as a result of the taxation of the land and improvements in the Sheffield TIF District. Tax increment financing refers to a funding technique that utilizes increases in valuation and the property taxes attributable to new development to finance, or assist in the financing of public development costs. Additional sources of revenue may include but are not limited to investment income and land sales. This does not preclude the City, the Authority, or the developer from using other funds, at its discretion, to pay such costs. J. ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY 11-5 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.174, Subdivision 7 and Section 469.17'7, Subdivision 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity (OTC) for the Sheffield TtF District is based on th(., value placed on the property by the assessor in 1994 for taxes payable 199.5. The tax capacity as certified is estimated to be $34,642. The original tax rate for the Sheffield TIF District will be the tax rate for taxes payable in 1995 estimated for purposes of the Plan to be the estimated 199.5 rate of 139.719%. Each year, the Anoka County Auditor will measure the amount of increase or decrease in the total tax capacity of the Sheffield TIF District to calculate the tax increment payable to the City and the Authority. In any year in which there is an increase in total tax capacity in the tax increment financing district above the annual percentage of annual increase, a tax increment will be payable. In any year in which the total tax capacity in the Sheffield TIF District declines below the original tax capacity, no additional valuation will be captured and no tax increment will be payable. The County Auditor shall certify in each year after the date the OTC was certified, the amount the OTC has increased or decreased as a result of: 2. 3. 4. 5. change in tax exempt status of property; reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; change due to stipulations, adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements; change in the use of the property and classification; or change in state law governing class rates. K. AMOUNT OF CAPTURED TAX CAPACITY Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 Subdivision 4 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 2, the estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of the Sheffield TIF District, upon completion of all phases of the project, will annually approximate $44,240. The City requests 100 percent of the available increase in tax capacity for repayment of debt and current expenditures. The original tax capacity and project tax cat~acity are estimated at current market values and class rates to be the total amount when all development is in place and uses of the property have changed. Estimated Project Tax Capacity less Original Tax Capacity Estimated Captured Tax Capacity $78,882 34,642 44,240 L. DURATION OF THE DISTRICT Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.17.5, Subdivision 1, the duration of the Sheffield TIF District must be indicated within the Plan. The duration of the Sheffield T1F District will be 2.5 years from payment of the first tax increment expected in t997. Thus, it is estimated that the Sheffield TIF District, including any modifications of the Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate at the end of the year 2022. The City and the Authority does reserve the right to decertify the Sheffield TIF District prior to the legally required date. M. ESTIMATED IMPACT ON OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS 11-6 The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes construction would have occurred without the creation of the Sheffield TIF District. If the construction is a result of tax increment financing, the impact is $0 to other entities. Notwithstanding the fact that the fiscal impact on the other taxing jurisdictions is $0 due to the fact that the construction would not have occurred without the assistance of the city, the following estimated impact of the Sheffield TIF District would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met: IMPACT ON TA~ BASE ENTITY'S % OF CAPTURED TOTAL NET CAPTU RED TAX CAPACITY ENTITY TAX CAPACITY TAX CAPACITY TO ENTITY TOTAL Anoka County 156,029,389 44,240 .03% City of Columbia Heights 9,956,092 44,240 .44% School District No. 13 15,509,210 44,240 .29% IMPACT ON TAX RATES CURRENT CAPTURED POTENTIAL ENTITY TAX RATE TAX CAPACITY TAXES Anoka County .29746 44,240 13,160 City of Columbia Heights .26802 44,240 11,857 School District No. 13 .77281 44,240 34,189 Other .05890 44,240 2,606 TOTAL 1.39719 61,812 The estimates listed above display captured tax capacity when all construction is completed. The tax rates are estimated payable 1995 figures and tax capacities are the payable 1995 figures for all jurisdictions. The Sheffield TIF District will be certified under rates for tax year payable t995. In addition, the impact on School District No. 13 does not include the effect of state aids for education upon school district funding. N. MODIFICATIONS OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT 11-7 tn accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 4, any reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of the project or tax increment financing district, increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a determination to capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original plan, or to increase or decrease the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized, increase in the portion of the captured tax capacity to be retained by the City or Authority, increase in total estimated tax increment expenditures or designation of additional property to be acquired by the City or Authority shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original plan. The geographic area of a tax increment financing district may be reduced, but shall not' be enlarged after five years following the date of certificaltion of the original tax capacity by the county auditor or by approximately February, 2000. Modifications to the Sheffield T1F District, in the form of a budget modification or a expansion of the boundaries, will be recorded in this Plan. O. LIMITATION ON ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 14 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 3, administrative expenses means all expenditures of an authority other than amounts paid for the purchase of land or amounts paid to contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real property in' the district, relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the district or amounts used to pay interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to Section 469.1 78. Administrative expenses include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development consultants. No tax increment shall be used to pay any administrative expenses for a project which exceed ten percent of the total tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax increment financing plan or the total tax increment expenditures for the project, whichever is less. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 4h, tax increments may be used to pay for the county's actual administrative expenses incurred in connection with the Sheffield TIF District. The county may require payment of those expenses by February 15 of the year following the year the expenses were incurred. P. DURATION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1 76, Subdivision 1, "no tax increment shall be paid to an authority three years from the date of certification by the County Auditor unless within the three-year period (t) bonds have been issued pursuant to Section 469.178, or in aid of a project pursuant to any other law, except revenue bonds issued pursuant to Chapter 469.152 to 469.165, prior to the effective date of the Act; or (2) the authority has acquired property within the district; or (3) the authority has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvements within the district... "The City or Authority must therefore issue bonds, or acquire property, or construct or cause public improvements in the Sheffield TIF District by approximately February, 1998. Q. LIMITATION ON QUALIFICATION OF PROPERTY IN TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NOT SUBIECT TO IMPROVEMENT 11-8 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 6, if, after four years from the date of certification of the original tax capacity of the tax increment financing district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.17.7, no demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of property or other site preparation, including improvement of a street adjacent to a parcel but not installation of utility service including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a parcel located within a tax increment financing district by the authority or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel and the original tax capacity of that parcel shall be excluded from the original tax capacity of the tax increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the parcel subsequently/commences demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site preparation on that parcel including improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the county auditor in the annual disclosure report that the activity has commenced. The county auditor shall cert/fy the tax capacity thereof as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue and add it to the original tax capacity of the tax increment financing district. The county auditor must enforce the provisions of this subdivision... For purposes of this subdivision, qualified improvements are limited to (l) construction or opening of a new street, (2) relocation ora street, and (3) substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. R. LIMITATION ON THE USE OF TAX INCREMENT Pursuant to Minnesota Statues, 469.176, Subd. 4, at least 90 percent of the revenues derived from tax increments from a redevelopment district must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation of redevelopment districts under section 469.1 74, Subdivision 10. These costs include acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or improvements, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition of structures, clearing of the land and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site. The revenues shall be used to finance or otherwise pay public redevelopment and housing development costs pursuant to the HRA Act. These revenues shall not be used to circumvent any levy limit law. No revenues derived from tax increment shall be used for the construction or renovation of a municipally owned building used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of the municipality; this provision shall not prohibit the use of revenues derived from tax increments for the construction or renovation of a parking structure, a commons area used as a public park or a facility used for social, recreational or conference purposes and not primarily for conducting the business of the municipality. For tax increment financing districts for which certification was requested afterApril 30, 1990, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1763, Subdivisions t and 2, an amount equal to at least 75 percent of the revenue derived from tax increments from the district's parcels must be expended on activities in the district. S. NOTIFICATION OF PRIOR PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 4, the City is reviewing the area to be included in the Sheffield TIF District and any prior planned improvements will be listed in this section prior to certification. T. EXCESS TAX INCREMENTS 11-9 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469. t76, Subdivision 2, in any year in which the tax increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the tax increment plan, including the amount necessary to cancel any tax levy as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3, the authority shall use the excess amount to do any of the following: 2. 3. 4. prepay the outstanding bonds; discharge the pledge of tax increment therefore; pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bond; or return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in proportion to their tax capacity rate. U. REQUIREMENT FOR AGREEMENTS WITH THE DEVELOPER The City or Authority will review any Developer's proposal to determine its conformance with the Development Plan and with applicable municipal ordinances and codes. To facilitate this effort, the following documents may be requested for review and approval: site plan, construction, mechanical, and electrical system drawings, landscaping plan, grading and storm drainage plan, signage system plan, and any other drawings or narrative deemed necessary by the City or Authority to demonstrate the conformance of the development with city plans and ordinances. Land acquired by the City or Authority may be subject to a Contract for Sale upon disposition to the Developer. The general requirements to be imposed upon the developer by the Contract for Sale are: To redevelop the land purchased in accordance with this development plan. To commence and complete the building of improvements on lhe land within a reasonable period of time as determined by the City or Authority~ Not to resell the land before improvements are made without the prior consent of the City or Authority. Not to discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, creed or national origin on the sale, lease, transfer or occupancy of the land purchased from the City or Authority. The requirements to be imposed upon the Developer and the City's or Authority's exact participation in the project will be negotiated as part of the Development Agreement between the City or the Authority and the Developer. V. ASSESSMENT AGREEMENTS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 8, the City or Authority may enter into an agreement in recordable form with the developer of property within the tax increment financing district which establishes a minimum market value of the land and completed improvements for the duration of the tax increment district. The assessment agreement shall be presented to the county assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land upon which the improvements are to be constructed and, so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appear, in the judgment of the assessor, to be a reasonable estimate, the assessor may certify the minimum market value agreement. W. ADMINISTRATION OF DISTRICT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE TAX INCREMENT ACCOUNT Administration of the Sheffield T1F District will be handled by the City Manager or the Executive Director of the Authority. The tax increment received as a result of increases in the tax capacity of the Sheffield TIF District will be maintained in a special account separate from all other municipal accounts and expended only upon sanctioned municipal activities identified in the tax increment financing plan. X. FINANCIAL REPORTING RE©UIREMENTS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivisions 6, and 6a; an authority must file an annual disclosure report for all tax increment financing districts with the Office of the State Auditor, the county board, school board, and Department of Revenue. Y. MUNICIPAL APPROVAL Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1 75, Subdivision 3, before or at the time of approval of the tax increment financing plan, the municipality shall make the following findings and shall set forth in writing the reasons and supporting facts for each determination. Finding that the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District is a redevelopment district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 10. The Sheffield TIF District consists of 54 parcels of property. Parcels consisting of more than 70 percent of the area are occupied by buildings and improvements. Buildings have been reviewed by city staff and consultants and more than 50 percent have been found to be structurally substandard. o Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council and the Authority, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. Due to the high cost of redevelopment on parcels currently occupied by substandard buildings, the incompatible land uses at close proximity, and the cost of financing the proposed improvements, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. o Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The site is appropriately zoned. The Tax Increment Financing Plan has been reviewed by the Planning Commission and been found to confirm to the general development plan of the city. o Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Sheffield Neighborhood Redevelopment and Housing Development by private enterprise. The establishment of the Sheffield Tax Increment Financing District will result in increased availability of safe and decent housing in the City. Z. COUNTY ROAD COSTS Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1 75, Subdivision la, the county board may require the authority to pay for all or part of the cost of county road improvements if the proposed development to be assisted by tax increment will, in the judgement of the county, substantially increase the use of county roads requiring construction of road improvements or other road costs and if the road improvements are not scheduled within the next five years under a capital improvement plan or other county plan. The improvements outlined in the Plan serve as notice to the county that the development of the retail facility will be assisted with tax increment. In the opinion of the City, the Authority, and consultants, the proposed development will have little or no impact upon county roads. If the county elects to use increments to improve county roads, it must notify the City within thirty days of receipt of this plan. AA. REDUCTION IN STATE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AID Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 273.1399 for tax increment financing districts for which certification was requested after April 30, 1990, a municipality incurs a reduction in state tax increment financing aid (RISTI FA) applied to the municipality's Local Government Aid (LGA) first and Homestead and Agricultural Aid (HACA) second, in an amount equal to a formula based upon the equalized qualifying captured tax capacity (QCTC) of the tax increment financing district. The total amount of RISTIFA expected for the project amounts to less than 10 to 20 percent of the total tax increment. The City and Authority may also seek special legislation in the 1995 state legislative session to exempt the Sheffield District from Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399. Any such legislation will be recorded in this section prior to certification. rd .L~3~.I.S NODNHOt~ Oi~A2"ffl08 ~'iOA,!:t3 S3~ .LD2~J.c: ~"I,,LL 12./22/94 Columbia Heights - Sheffield District BASE VALUE INFORMATION 1 25-30-24-34-0045 Odginat Market Value 2 25-30-24-34-0046 Original Market Value 3 25-30-24-34-0047 Odginat Market Value 4 25-30-24-34-0048 Original Market Value 5 25-30-24-34-0049 Odginal Market Value 6 25-30-24-34-0050 Odginal Market Value 7 25-30-24-34-0051 Odginal Market Value 8 25-30-24-34-0052 Odginal Market Value 9 25-30-24-34-0053 Odginal Market Value 10 25-30-24-34-0054 Odginal Market Value t I 25-30-24-34-0055 Odginal Market Value 12 25-30-24-34-0056 Odginal Market Value 13 25-30-24-344:)057 Odginal Market Value 14 25-30-24-34-0058 Odginat Market Value 15 25-30-24-34-0059 Odginat Market Value 16 25-30-24-34-0060 Odginal Market Value 17 25-30-24-34-0061 Odginal Market Value 18 25-30-24-34-0062 Odginal Market Value 19 25-30-24-34-0063 Original Market Value 20 25-30-24-34-0064 Odginal Market Value 21 25-30-24-34-O097 Odginal Market Value 22 25-30-24-33-0t 19 Original Market Value 23 25-30-24-344:)OOl Original Market Value 24 25-30-24-34-0002 Original Market Value 25 25-30-24-344)4~3 Original Market Value 26 25-30-24-34-0004 Odginal Market Value 27 25-30-24-3443066 Odginat Market Value 28 25-30-24-34-0067 Odginal Market Value 29 25-30-24-34-0068 Odginat Market Value 30 25-30-24-34-0069 Odginal Market Value 31 25-30-24-34-0070 Original Market Value 32 25-30-24-3443078 Odginal Market Value 33 25-30-24-34-0079 Odginal Market Value 34 25-30-24-344:)081 Original Market Value 35 25-30-24-34-0082 Odginal Market Value 36 25-30-24-34-0086 Odginal Market Value 37 25-30-24-34-0087 Odginal Market Value 38 25-30-24-34-0089 Original Market Value 39 25-30-24-34-0090 Original Market Value 40 25-30-24-34-0095 Odginal Market Value 41 25-30-24-33-0008 Odginat Market Value 42 25-30-24-33-0116 Original Market Value 43 25-30-24-33-0122 Odginal Market Value 44 25-30-24-33-0125 Odginal Market Value 45 25-30-24-33-0126 Odginal Market Value 46 25-30-24-33-0127 Odginal Market Value 47 25-30-24-33-0128 Odginal Market Value 48 25-30-24-33-0129 Odginal Market Value 49 25-30-24-33-0130 Odginal Market Value 50 25-30-24~3-0131 Original Market Value 51 25-30-24-33-0132 Original Market Value 52 25-30-24-33-0133 Odginal Market Value 53 25-30-24-33-0134 Odginal Market Value 54 25-30-24-33-0135 Original Market Value Total Odginat Market Value Average Single Family MV pdor to Reconstruction: Average Single Family MV pdor to Rehabilitation: Class Rate: Rental <4 Units Homestead <$72,000 Homestead >$72,000 Exempt: Odginal Tax Capacity (When certified): Odginal Tax Capacity (When construction complete): Gross Value Pement Used Net Current Payable Value Tax Cap. Class Year 65,300 0 E Pay 95 62,300 0 E Pay 95 66,000 0 E Pay 95 63,800 1,467 NHS Pay 95 68,800 0 E Pay 95 60,700 1,396 NHS Pay 95 60,900 0 E Pay 95 61,000 0 E Pay 95 60,500 0 E Pay 95 60,600 0 E Pay 95 60,200 1,385 NHS Pay 95 60,100 0 E Pay 95 60,100 0 E Pay 95 60,300 1,387 NHS Pay 95 60,200 0 E Pay 95 62,500 1,438 NHS Pay 95 61,400 0 E Pay 95 66,700 0 E Pay 95 62,5OO 0 E Pay 95 61,300 0 E[ Pay 95 59,100 0 E Pay 95 62,300 1,433 NHS Pay 95 65,3OO 62,300 66,000 63,80O 68,800 60,700 60,900 61,000 60,500 60,6OO 60,200 60,100 60,100 60,300 60,200 62,500 61,400 66,700 62,500 61,300 59,100 62,300 1OO.00% loo.00% 100.00% 100.00% loo. OO% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% lO0.00% 1OO.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% loo.00% 100.00% 100.00% 1OO.00% 100.00% 100.00% 103,100 100.00% 103,100 2,371 NHS Pay 95 101,200 100.00% 101,200 2,328 NHS Pay 95 80,700 100.00% 80,700 1,856 NHS Pay 95 86,200 loo.OO% 86,200 1,983 NHS Pay 95 62,500 100.OO% 62,500 1,438 NHS Pay 95 62,500 100.00% 6-'2,500 1,438 NHS Pay 95 62,500 100.00% 62,500 1,438 NHS Pay 95 64,100 100.00% 64,100 1,474 NHS Pay 95 69,900 loo. OO% 69,900 1,608 NHS Pay 95 70,200 100.00% 70,200 702 H Pay 95 76,800 100.00% 76,800 816 H Pay 95 67,300 100.00% 67,300 673 H Pay 95 69,300 100.00% 69,300 693 H Pay 95 42,700 100.00% 42,700 427 H Pay 95 51,800 100.00% 51,8OO 518 H Pay 95 73,300 100.00% 73,300 746 H Pay 95 63,000 loo.00% 63,000 630 H Pay 95 60,0OO 100.00% 60,0OO 1,380 NHS Pay 95 44,600 100.00% 44,600 446 H Pay 95 62,100 100.00% 62,100 1,428 NHS Pay 95 62,400 lOo.OO% 62,400 1,435 NHS Pay 95 62,300 100.00% 62,300 1,433 NHS Pay 95 72,700 100.00% 72,700 734 H Pay 95 74,700 100.00% 74,700 774 H Pay 95 73,700 100.00% 73,700 754 H Pay 95 75,300 100.00% 75,300 786 H Pay 95 69,800 100.00% 69,800 698 H Pay 95 68,200 100.OO% 68,200 682 H Pay 95 63,600 100.00% 63,600 636 H Pay 95 69,800 loo.OO% 69,800 698 H Pay 95 70,200 loo. OO% 70,200 702 H Pay 95 81,900 IOO.OO% 81,900 918 H Pay 95 1,366,600 1,366,6OO 62,118 67,137 2.30% 1.00% 2.00% 0.00% 43,147 34,642 43,147 Pay 95 Pay 99 Page I CO100-01 Prepared by Publicorp inc. PLANRUN 12/22]94- Columbia Heights - Sheffietd Distdct T.LF. CASH FLOW ASSU1V~TIONS Inflation Rate: Interest Rate: Frozen Tax Extension Rate: School Distdct No. 13 Basic Rate: School Distdct No. 13 Sales Ratio: LG.A. as a Percent of Tax Increment: PROJECT VALUE INFORMATION 0.0000% 8.000% 139.719% Pay 95 Est. 37.020% Pay 94 98.200% Pay 94 26.98% Pay 94 Type of Tax Increment District: Type of Development: Number of Units (Single Family & Rental): Estimated Market Value On Jan. 2, 1996 (9 units reconstruct): Estimated New Market Value On Jan. 2, 1997 (9 reconstruct + 14 rehab): Estimated New Market Value On Jan. 2, 1998 (14 reconstruct + 14 rehab): Final Market Value: Class Rate: Rental <4 Units Homestead <$72,000 Homestead >$72,000 Estimated Tax Capacity on Jan. 2. 1996: Estimated Tax Capacity on Jan. 2. 1997: Estimated Tax Capacity on Jan. 2. 1998: Total New Project Tax Capacity at Completion (All Homestead): Project Taxes Per Unit (Higher Value): Assessor's Market Value Per Unit - Reconstruction Assessor's Market Value Per Unit - Rehabilitation Redevelopment Single Family/Rental Rehab 60 828,000 Pay 97 1,010,000 Pay 98 1,470,000 Pay 99 3,308,000 Pay 99 2.30% 1.00% 2.00% I0,080 14,280 19,880 44.240 Pay 99 $1,564.85 $92,OOO.OO $80,000.00 Page 2 CO'JO0-O1 J=repared by Pubi~corp Inc. 1~2~94 Columbia Heights - Sheffield Distdct TAX INCI:~MENT CASYI FLOW Page 3 Odg. Project Captured PERIOD BEGINS Tax Tax Tax Yin. Mth. Y~ Capacity Capacity Capacity 0.0 02-01 1995 43,147 43,147 0 0.5 08-01 1995 43,147 43,147 0 1.0 02-01 1996 43,147 43,147 0 1.5 08-01 1996 43,147 43,147 0 2.0 02-01 1997 34,642 44,722 10,080 2.5 08-01 1997 34,642 44,722 10,080 3.0 02-01 1998 34,642 59,002 24,360 3.5 08-01 1998 34,642 59,002 24,360 4.0 02-01 1999 34,642 78,882 44,240 4.5 08-01 1999 34,642 78,882 44,240 5.0 02-01 2000 34,642 78,882 44,240 5.5 08-01 2000 34,642 78,882 44,240 6.0 02-01 2001 34,642 78,882 44,240 6.5 08-01 2001 34,642 78,882 44,240 7.0 02-01 2002 34,642 78,882 44,240 7.5 08-01 2002 34,642 78,882 44,240 8.0 02-01 2003 34,642 78,882 44,240 8.5 08-01 2003 34,642 78,882 44,240 9.0 02-01 2004 34,642 78,882 44,240 9.5 08-01 2004 34,642 78,882 44,240 10.0 02-01 2005 34,642 78,882 44,240 10.5 08-01 2005 34,642 78,882 44,240 11.0 02-01 2006 34,642 78,882 44,240 11.5 08-01 2006 34,642 78,882 44,240 12.0 02-01 2007 34,642 78,882 44,240 12.5 08-01 2007 34,642 78,882 44,240 13.0 02-01 2008 34,642 78,882 44,240 I3.5 08-01 2008 34,642 78,882 44,240 14.0 02-01 2009 34,642 78,882 44,240 14.5 08-01 2009 34,642 78,882 44,240 15.0 02-01 2010 34,642 78,882 44,240 15.5 08-01 2010 34,642 78,882 44,240 16.0 02-01 2011 34,642 78,882 44,240 16.5 08-01 2011 34,642 78,882 44,240 17.0 02-01 2012 34,642 78,882 44,240 17.5 08-01 2012 34,642 78,882 44,240 18.0 02-01 2013 34,642 78,882 44,240 18.5 08-01 2013 34,642 78,882 44,240 19.0 02-01 2014 34,642 78,882 44,240 19.5 08-01 2014 34,642 78,882 44,240 20.0 02-01 2015 34,642 78,882 44,240 20.5 08-01 2015 34,642 78,882 44,240 21.0 02-01 2016 34,642 78,882 44,240 21.5 08-01 2016 34,642 78,882 44,240 22.0 02-01 2017 34,642 78,882 44,240 22.5 08-01 2017 34,642 78,882 44,240 23.0 02-01 2018 34,642 78,882 44,240 23.5 08-01 2018 34,642 78,882 44,240 24.0 02-01 2019 34,642 78,882 44,240 24.5 08-01 2019 34,642 78,882 44,240 25.0 02-01 2020 34,642 78,882 44,240 25.5 08-01 2020 34,642 78,882 44,240 26.0 02-01 2021 34,642 78,882 44,240 26.5 08-01 2021 34,642 78,882 44,240 Totals Present Values Semi-Annual Semi-Annual Gross Tax Admin. Net Tax Increment 10.00% Increment 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 7,042 704 6,338 7,042 704 6,338 17,018 1,702 15,316 17,018 1,702 15,316 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,81'5 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,906 3,091 27,815 30,908 3,091 27,815 30,908 3,091 27,815 30,908 3,091 27,815 30,908 3,091 27,815 30,908 3,091 27,815 Cum. NPV Net Tax increment 0 0 0 0 5,209 10,2t8 21,857 33,048 52,591 71,382 89,450 106,823 123,528 139,591 155,036 169,887 184,166 197897 211 099 223793 236 000 247 736 259 O22 269 873 280 307 290 340 299 987 309 262 318 181 326 757 335003 34; 932 350,556 357,887 364,936 371,714 378,231 384,497 390,522 396,316 401,887 407,243 412,394 417,346 422,108 426,687 431,090 435,323 439,393 443,307 447,071 450,690 454,169 457,515 1,469,788 146,979 1,322,809 508,350 50,835 457,515 LGAJHACA Penalty 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 521 521 1,042 1,042 1,564 1,564 2,085 2,085 2,606 2,606 3,127 3,127 3,648 3,648 4,169 4,169 4,691 4,691 5,2t2 5,212 5,733 5,733 6,254 6,254 6,775 6,775 7,297 7,297 7,818 7,818 8,339 8,339 8,339 8,339 8,339 8,339 8,339 8,339 8,339 8,339 8,339 8,339 8,339 233,490 55,131 Yrs. of PERIOD ENDING TI Yrs. Mth. Yr. 0.5 08--01 1995 1.0 02-01 1996 1.5 08-01 1996 2.0 02-01 1997 0.5 2.5 08-01 1997 1.0 3.0 02-01 1998 1.5 3.5 08-01 1998 2.0 4.0 02-01 1999 2.5 4.5 08-01 1999 3.0 5.0 02-01 2000 3.5 5.5 08-01 2000 4.0 6.0 0201 2001 4.5 6.5 08-01 2001 5.0 7.0 02-01 2002 5.5 7.5 08-01 200~ 6.0 8.0 02-01 2003 6.5 8.5 08-01 2003 7.0 9.0 02-01 2004 7.5 9.5 08-01 2004 8.0 10.0 02-01 2005 8.5 10.5 08-01 2005 9.0 11.0 02-01 2096 9.5 11.5 08-01 2006 10.0 12.0 02-01 2007 10.5 12.5 08-01 2007 11.0 13.0 02-01 2008 11.5 13.5 08-01 2008 12.0 14.0 02-01 2009 12.5 14.5 08-01 2009 13.0 15.0 02-01 2010 13.5 15.5 08-01 2010 14.0 16.0 0201 2011 14.5 16.5 08-01 2011 15.0 17.0 02-01 2012 15.5 17.5 08-01 2012 16.0 18.0 02-01 2013 16.5 18.5 08-01 2013; 17.0 19.0 02-01 2014 17.5 19.5 08-01 2014 18.0 20.0 02-01 2015; 18.5 20.5 08-01 2015 19.0 21.0 02-01 2016 19.5 21.5 08-01 2016 20.0 22.0 02-01 2017 20.5 22.5 08-01 2017 21.0 23.0 02-01 2018 21.5 23.5 08-01 20181 22.0 24.0 02-01 2019 i 22.5 24.5 08-01 2019 23.0 25.0 02-01 2020 23.5 25.5 08-01 2020 24.0 26.0 02-01 2021 24.5 26.5 08-01 2021 25.0 27.0 02-01 ?072 0010001 Prepared by Pubticorp Inc. PL.AN~,UN TO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 27, ?994 *Signed Waiver Form Accompanied Application IL 1995 LICENSE AGENDA APPROVED BY POLICE DEPT. 11 II ON & OFF SALE BEER *Peter C. Budzielek *Sadiq Punjani LICENSED AT 4952 Central Avenue 5011 University Avenue On Sale Off Sale FEES $ 325.00 75.oo 11 11 II 1111 II II II II II II 1t 11 II II II I! Il II I.I 11 11 II II I1 II !1 ll- Il Il Il Il l.l Il Il Il Il Il Il II II II I1 It It 11 II II II II Il Il Il Il il Il *AAA-Abbott Plumbing *Ray Anderson & Sons Co. *Asphalt DPfveway Co. *Assoc. Mech. Cont. *Automatic SPrinkler Co. *Blaine Heating & A/C *Boedeker Plumbing & Htg. *Budget Plumbing Centra}re, ina. *Const. Labor Force *Custom Heating *DelHar Furnace Exchange *Doody Mechanical *Egan & Sons Co. *F~reside Corner *Golden Valley Mtg. & A/C *S.M. Hedler'Plmg.- Home Energy Ctr. Hilton Johnson Roof}ng Richard A. dohnson *Kraus-Anderson Const. *Randy Lane $ Son~ Plmg. *Lawrence Sign *Leroy Signs, Inc. *HcPhillips Bros. Roofing *Ron's Mechanical, Inc. *Royalton Htg. & Cooling *Sharp Heati'ng & AC *Standard Heating & AC *Super$or Cont. Yale, Inc. 1126 N.E. 2nd St. 930 Duluth St. 12tl E. Hwy. 36 1257 Marschall Rd. 1000 E. Edgerton Rd. 13562 Central Ave. 2905 Garfield Ave. S. 6420 Flying Cloud Dr. 7402 ~ashington Ave. 448 Lilac St. 2524 N.E. 29th Ave. 4080 - 83rd Ave. N. 520 Front Avenue 7100 Medicine Lk. Rd. 2700 N. Falrview AVe. 5182 W. Broadway 2519 N.E. 4th St. 15200 - 25th Ave. N. 525 Lowry Ave. N.E. 25 Crescent St. 525 S. 8th St. 1501 ~. B~oadway 945 Pierce Butler Rt. 6325 Welcome Ave. N. 2590 Centennial Dr. 1812 E. Shakopee Ave. ~]20 - 85th Ave. N. 4854 Central Ave. 410 W. Lake St. 6121 - 42nd Ave. N. 9649 Girard Ave. S. 40.00 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo ~o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4o. OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo SAFETY & HEALTH II II C 1 GARETTE SALES *Peter Budzietek *Hot Market 4952 Central Avenue 5011 University Avenue 35.00 20.00 COURTESY BENCHES ASST.CITY ENG. *U.S. Bench Corp. ~4':-garious locations 600.90 Page 2 APPROVED BY SAFETY & HEALTH 1! Il II 11 Il I1 FOOD/BEVERAGE ~CHINES Donald d. Lee Donald d. Lee Steven L. Persons Distinctive Laundries LICENSED AT 637 N.E. 38th Ave. 590 N.E. 40th Ave. 4637. Central Ave.. 5241 University Ave. FEES $ 15.0o 15.oo 15.OO 30.00 SAFETY & HEALTH, F I RE)'BLDG, I1 II FRESH FOOD SALES Stytjes Pannekoeken Huis Hot Market 4920 Central Ave. 5011 University Ave. 25.00 25.00 POLICE DEPT. II II II GAMES OF SKILL/JUKEBOXES *Paul Helm *Sub,nit Amusement *Paddle & Pool, Inc. 547 N.E. 40th Ave. 3951 Central Avenue 4040 Central Avenue 100.O0 250.00 1,650.00 SAFETY & HEALTH II II GARBAGE/RUBBI SH HAULERS *Browhlng-Ferris Ind. *Woodlame Sanitary Service 9813 Flying Cloud Dr. 8661Rendove St. 50.00 50.00 SAFETY & HEALTH, FIRE/BLDG. GROCERY SALES *Hot Market 501t University Ave. 100.O0 FIRE DEPARTMENT II I1 1t II II I1 II II II II Il Il Il Il LAUNDRY. 'SERV ICES Anoka County Comm. Action Steven L. Persons Robert Holger All, Inc. All, Inc. Maynard Nielsen Distinctive Laundries Distinctive Laundries 3932 Central Avenue 4637 Central Avenue 3849 Edgemoor'Place 4628 Tyler St. 4634 Tyler St. 4733 University Ave. 5241 University Ave. 5241 University Ave. 35.00 180.00 25.00 25.OO 25.00 25.00 50.O0 220.00 Page APPROVED BY POLICE DEPT. POOL/BILLARD HALL *Paddle & Pool, Inc. LICENSED AT 4040 Central Avenue FEES $100.O0 SAFETY & HEALTH, FIRE/BLDG. INSP. II RESTAURANTS/SNACK BARS *Stytjes Pannekoeken Huis *Peter Budzielek 4920 Central Avenue 4952 Central Avenue 125.O0 50.00 POLICE DEPT., FIRE DEPT. SECONDHAND SALES Virginia Cramble 4050 Central Avenue **Jake Ambrose 828 N.E. bOth Avenue (**Pending correction of Fire Code Violations.) 50.~0 50.00 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TREE SERVICES *Davey Tree Co. 1500 N. Mantua St., Ohio 50.00 SAFETY & HEALTH l1 II VENDING MACHINES Steven L. Persons Distinctive Laundries 4637 Central Avenue 5241 University Ave. 15.00 15.oO POLICE DEPT. II II It Il II II Il II 11 It II II 11 II TAXICAB DRIVERS *Hicha~l Dennis Healey *James Lee Gulladge *Douglas Lee Allsup *Ellen Mary Martin *Ricky Christopher Ruse *Claudia Judy Green *Thomas Ellis Hawes *Clifford Piper, Jr. 2404 N. Sheridan Ave. 2414 Fremont Ave. N. 760 - 8th Ave. N,~d. 4060 - N.E. /)th St. 544 Fairmont St. 8816 Austin St. ~.E. 3867 Minuteman Ln 1t7 - ll6th Ave. 20.00 20.00 20.0O 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 Page APPROVED BY TAXICAB VEHICLES LICENSED AT FEES POLICE DEPT. II I| *James Thomas LeTourneau Yellow Taxi Service Corp. *Suburban Taxi Corporation 6 taxicab vehicles within the City 26 taxi vehicles within the City $75.O0 ea $75.O0 ea