Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay 30, 1995 RegularCITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (612) 782-2800 Mayor Joseph Sturdcvant Councilmembers Donald G. Jolly Bruce G. Na~rocki Gary L. Peterson Robert W. Ruettimann City' Manager Patrick Hcntges May 26, 1995 The following is the agenda for the regular meeting of the City Council to be held at 7:00 PM on Tuesday, May 30, 1995, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 590 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights, Minnesota. The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in ail City of Columbia Heights' services, programs, and activities. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please cail the City Council Secretary at 782-2800, Extension 209, to make arrangements. (TDD/782-2806 for deaf only) 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance Consent Agenda (All items listed with asterisks [***] are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted as part of the Consent Agenda by one motion.) RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt the consent agenda items as indicated with an asterisk (***)on the Regular Council Agenda. ***4. Minutes of Previous Meeting,s) RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt the minutes of the Regular City Com~cil Meeting of May 8, 1995, as presented in writing, and such reading be dispensed with. 5. Open Mike/Proclamations/Presentations (Open Mike is an opportunity for residents to address or raise any issue to the City Council. However, the City Council asks that the resident provide their name, address, and a statement of the item. The matter will be considered by the City Council or referred to staff for a future response. In order to expedite business, residents will be ailotted five minutes to present their statement or issue.) 6. Public Hearings/Ordinances & Resolutions a. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 1299, Ordinance Requesting Vacation of an Alley Between 37th and 38th Avenues RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the second reading of the ordinance, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Adopt Ordinance No. 1299, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853 City Code of 1977, Vacating a Certain Alley Easement. b. Public Hearing - License Revocation, 4006 4th Street N.E. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Close the Public Hearing Regarding the Revocation or Suspension of the Rental License Held by Julie Klosterich, Regarding Rental Property at 4006 4th Street N.E. in That She Has Complied with Provisions of the Housing Code. "SERVICE IS OUR BUSINESS" EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2 Council Meeting of May 30, 1995 c. Public Hearing - License Revocation, 1439 42nd Avenue N.E. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Close the Public Hearing Regarding the Revocation or Suspension of the Rental License Held by Catherine Stephenson Regarding Rental Property at 1439 42nd Avenue NE in That She Has Complied with Provisions of the Housing Maintenance Code. d. Public Hearing - License Revocation, 4653 Central Avenue N.E. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Close the Public Hearing Regarding the Revocation or Suspension of the Rental License Held by David and Norma Rust Regarding Rental Property at 4653 Central Avenue N.E. in That the Property Owner(s) Have Complied with Provisions of the Housing Maintenance Code. e. Resolution No. 95-30, Resolution Ordering and Levying One Mid-Block Light Located on an Existing Pole at 4711 5th Street RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Adopt Resolution 95-30, Being a Resolution Ordering and Levying One Mid- Block Light Located on an Existing Pole at 4711 5th Street, Known as PIR 677-Area 26-Project 9510. f. Resolution No. 95-29, Resolution Adopting Joint Powers Agreement RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Authorize the Columbia Heights Police Department to Participate in the County Wide Transport Program Using Existing Funds from the Police Department, and Adopt Resolution 95-29, Being a Joint Powers Agreement Entered into With the Anoka Joint Law Enforcement Council. g. Order Tolling Initial Review for Cable Rates RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the Order, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Adopt the Order Tolling the Initial Thirty Day Period for the Review of the Proposed Rates and Other Entries on the Amended FCC Form 1210 for an Additional 90 Days in Order to Complete an Assessment of the Proposed Increase and Issuing an Interim Order Permitting the Basic Increase to go Into Effect July 1, 1995, Subject to Rollback and Refunds. h. Other Ordinances and Resolutions 7. Communications Establish Hearing Date for License Revocation, Rental Property at 4724-6th Street N.E. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Establish a Hearing Date of June 12, 1995, for Revocation or Suspension of a License to Operate a Rental Property Within the City of Columbia Heights Against Roger S. Kelly, Regarding Rental Property at 4724-6th Street N.E. Establish Work Session Dates for June RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Establish June 5 at 8:00 P.M. and June 19, 1995, at 7:00 P.M., as Work Session Dates. COUNCIL AGENDA Page 3 Council Meeting of May 30, 1995 ***c. Accept Donation from the Columbia Heights Athletic Boosters RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Accept a Donation of $125.00 from the Columbia Heights Athletic Boosters to Sponsor a Queen Candidate for the Jamboree Celebration. d. Report Back on Status of 49th/Central Avenue Median Barrier (for information only). e. Other Communications 8. Old Business a. Award of Police Non-Patrol Vehicle RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Appropriate $11,092 ($10,200 Plus $663 Sales Tax and $229 for License Plates) in the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund From Revenue Received for the Sale of Three Old Police Vehicles and to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement with CFL Leasing of Blaine, Minnesota, to Purchase One 1994 Chevrolet Lumina 4 door Sedan Lease/Rental Return Automobile. ALTERNATE MOTION: Move to Appropriate $16,213 ($14,989 Plus $974 Sales Tax, $250 for License Plates) in the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund From Revenue Received for the Sale of Three Old Police Cars, and the Difference of $5,115 from Undesignated Fund Balance of Fund 431-Capital Equipment, and to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement with Polar Chev of White Bear Lake to Purchase One 1995 Chewolet Lumina 4-Door Sedan. b. Award of Bid for Tennis Court Resurfacing - Municipal Project #9303 RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Reject Bids for Tennis Court Resurfacing, Municipal Project #9303, and Authorize Staff to Rebid the Project. ALTERNATE MOTION: Move to Award the Tennis Court Resurfacing, Municipal Project #9303, to C & H Construction of Lonsdale, Minnesota, Based Upon Their Low, Qualified, Responsible Bid in the Amount of $2,995.00 With Funds to be Appropriated From Fund 412-45200-5130; and Furthermore, to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement for the Same. c. Award of Self-Powered Lawn Sweeper RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Award the Bid for a New Self-Propelled, High Dump Turf Sweeper to MTI Distributing the Low, Qualified Responsible Bidder in the Amount of $7,113.13 to be Paid for From the Capital Equipment Fund; and Furthermore, to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Enter into an Agreement for the Same. d. Acceptance of Project #9413 Reroofing Pump Station #3 RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Accept the Roof Replacement Project for Pump Station #3 Completed by Rayco Construction, Inc. of Columbia Heights, Minnesota. e. Other Old Business 9. New Business ***a. Authorization to Seek Quotations for Copier at Library RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Authorize Staff to Obtain Quotations for Purchase and Installation of Departmental Copier at Library. COUNCIL AGENDA Page 4 Council Meeting of May 30, 1995 ***C. ***e. ***f. b. MHFA First Time Homebuyer Minnesota City Participation Program (MCPP) RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Grant Approval (Concurrence) for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to Apply for an Allocation of up to $2,000,000 From the Minnesota Finance Agency Minnesota City Participation Program (First Time Homebuyer Program) and, if Successful in Securing an Allocation, to Provide the Necessary City/HRA Involvement in the Program. Conference Attendance Request for Community Development Director RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Authorize the Community Development Director, Don Schneider, to Attend the NAHRO National Conference and Exposition in Cincinnati, Ohio from October 8-11, 1995, and Such Expenses to be Paid from Budgeted Funds. d. Purchase of C.P. Rail Property at 3725 5th St. N.E. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Enter Into a Purchase Agreement with C.P. Rail System (Soo Line Railroad) for the Purchase of 3725 5th N.E. (PIN #35-30-24-34-0029) for $1.50 per Square Foot With the Total Value to be Determined by a Survey of the Property. Authorization to Seek Bids to Seal Well at Jackson Pond RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Authorize Staff to Seek Bids to Seal the Inverted Well at Jackson Pond. Final Payment for Municipal Projects #9320, #9321, and #9322 1994 Overlay MOTION: Move to Accept the Work for Municipal Projects #9320, #9321, and #9322, 1994 Overlay and to Authorize Final Payment of $8,798.34 to Midwest Asphalt Corporation of Hopkins, Minnesota. Final Payment for 1995 Street and Parking Lane Striping RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Accept the Work for 1995 Street and Parking Lane Striping and to Authorize Payment of $4,601.38 to AAA Striping Service Co. of Rogers, Minnesota. h. Abatement of Annual Interest on Special Assessment of $17.02 RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Deny Abatement of Annual Interest of $17.02 on Special Assessment for 4108/4110 Madison Street for Seal Coating. ALTERNATE MOTION: Move to Approve Abatement of Annual Interest of $17.02 on Special Assessment for 4108/4110 Madison Street for Seal Coating. i. Authorization of Funding for Project Safety Net Participation RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Authorize the Columbia Heights Police Department to Participate in the Fridley "project Safety Net" Program and Provide the Funding of $6,104 to the City of Fridley from Undesignated General Fund Balance, and to Allow the City Manager and Mayor to Enter Into Such an Agreement. j. Application for Premise Permit -Application for Church of Immaculate Conception RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Direct the City Manager to Forward a Letter to the State Charitable Gambling Control Board Indicating that the City of Columbia Heights has no Objection to a Premise Permit for the Church of Immaculate Conception to Conduct Class A Gambling Activities at Tycoon's, 4952 Central Avenue N.E.; and Furthermore, that the City Council hereby Waives the Remainder of the Sixty Day Notice to the Local Governing Body. COUNCIL AGENDA Page 5 Council Meeting of May 30, 1995 k. Other New Business 10. Reports a. Report of the City Manager b. Report of the City Attorney 11. Licenses *** RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the 1995 license applications as listed upon payment of proper funds, and the license applications as listed on the May 30, 1995, memo from Lowell DeMars. 12. Payment of Bills *** RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pay the bills as listed out of proper funds. Adiournment RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adjourn. Pat Hentges, City Manager 95/42 OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 The Council Meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Sturdevant. Jolly, Petkoff, Ruettimann, Sturdevant - present Peterson - absent 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ¢0NSENT AGENDA The following items were approved on the Consent Agenda: Minutes for Approval The Council approved the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of April 24, 1995 as presented. Traffic Commission The minutes of the May 1, 1995 Traffic Commission were for informational purposes only and no Council action was required. ~l~nning and Zoning Commission The minutes of the May 2, 1995 Planning and Zoning Commission were for informational purposes only. Conditional Use Permit. Heights Auto Repair. 5101 University Avenue The Council approved the request for a conditional use permit as submitted by Heights Auto Repair, 5101 University Avenue to allow minor automotive repair provided contingency items were satisfied. Variance Request. Lawrence Nelson. 3923 Polk Street The Council approved the request for a 1.3 foot sideyard variance for 3923 Polk Street. Special Purpose Fence. Francis Brantner. 970 44 1/2 Avenue The Council approved the request to construct a six foot high special purpose fence along and inside the west side property line from the front corner of the house to the rear property line at 970 44 1/2 Avenue. Jefferson Street Closing for Heights Pride Picnic The Council authorized staff to close Jefferson Saturday, May 20, 1995 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Street REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 PAGE 2 Approve Adjustments to Rates for Basic and Other Franchise Cable Fees The Council approved the adjustments to the rates for basic ~Dd other franchise fees requested byMeredith Cable effective April 1, 1995. Accept Donation from the Columbia Heiahts Athletic Boosters The Council accepted the donation of $431.83 from the Columbia Heights Athletic Boosters for purchase of "Anti-Drug/Weapon" signs in the parks. Authorization to Seek Bids for Replacement of Chassis for Sewer Rodder #149 The Council authorized staff to seek bids to replace the chassis of the sewer rodder #149. Authorization to Seek Ouotations for Testing Large Water Meters The Council authorized staff to seek quotations to test large water meters. License Applications The Council approved the 1995 license applications as listed upon payment of proper fees. ~ayme~t of Bills The Council approved the payment of bills as listed out of proper funds. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Ruettimann~ second by Petkoff to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Roll call: All ayes OPEN MIKE/PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS OpeD Mike There was no one present for Open Mike. ~roclamation Mayor Sturdevant read a proclamation designating May 8, 1995 as "John P. Murzyn, Sr. Day" in Columbia Heights. He presented the proclamation and a commemorative clock to John Murzyn in recognition of his service to the City as a member of the Park and Recreation Commission. Presentations Mayor Sturdevant presented a plaque to Larry Poundstone in recognition of his retirement from City employment. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 PAGE 3 Six residents were recognized with commemorative clocks for their service on various boards and commissions. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS/ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS a. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1299. Being an Ordinance Requesting Vacation of an Alley Between 37th and 38th Avenues The City Manager advised that no response has been received from MnDOT regarding this alley vacation. He was directed to contact Commissioner Kordiak on this issue. Motion by Ruettimann, second by Jolly to table the second reading of Ordinance No. 1299. Roll call: All ayes b. Resolution No. 95-26. Being a Resolution Adopting an Ornamental Light Standard The first location selected for these lights is Mill Street. That street will be reconstructed this year using State Aid funds. The cost of these lights can be paid for from State Aid funds. Motion by Ruettimann, second by Petkoff to waive the reading of the resolution there being ample copies available for the public. Roll call: All ayes RESOLUTION NO. 95-26 RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA ADOPTING AN ORNAMENTAL LIGHT STANDARD WHEREAS, the use of ornamental lights can provide illumination along streets that provide safety and security for pedestrians and drivers; and WHEREAS, the use of ornamental lights can provide this safety and security in an aesthetically pleasing manner that enhances the feeling of community in certain significant areas of the City; and WHEREAS, there is a benefit to utilizing the same style of ornamental lighting in the form of cost, replacement and sense of community; and REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 PAGE 4 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the lantern style without decorative spikes in both single and double fixture configuration is appropriate; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, that the lantern style without decorative spikes in both the single and double fixture configurations (see attached example), will be approved ornamental light standard and will be used as ornamental lighting in those significant areas that the City Council shall designate. Dated this Sth day of May, 1995. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll call: Ruettimann Petkoff Ail ayes Mayor Joseph Sturdevant Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Anoka City of Columbia Heights I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Columbia Heights at a meeting thereof held in the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota on the 8th day of May, 1995, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. Jo-Anne Student Deputy City Clerk c. Resolution No. 95-27 Bein~ a Resolution ApDroving ~O~split for Northstar Restaurants. 5050 Central Aven~e The history and responsibility of the oontaminated soil on one of the parcels resulting from the lotsplit was discussed. An August 16th opening is anticipated for the Boston Chicken Restaurant proposed for this site. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 PAGE 5 Motion by Jolly, second byRuettimann to waive the reading of the resolution there being ample copies available for the public. Roll call: All ayes RESOLUTION NO. 95-27 SUBDIVISION REQUEST I, Paul J. Vincent, for School Street Development, a Minnesota General Partnership, hereby request a split of PIN 26 30 24 14 0140, legally described as: That part of the North 165 feet of Lot 14, revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 15, lying West of the East 261 feet thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota (Abstract) AND Lot 13, Revised Auditor's Subdivisions No. 15, Anoka County, Minnesota (Abstract) AND The South one-half of Lot 13, Auditor's Subdivision No. 15, Anoka County, Minnesota, subject to easement of the State of Minnesota on the Easterly 50 feet thereof for public highway purposes, now known as Lot 20, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 15, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County of Anoka and State of Minnesota; subject to easement of the State of Minnesota and the Easterly 50 feet thereof for public highway purposes, being registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 53618 (Torrens). THE DESCRIPTION HENCEFORTH TO BE: 1. That part of the North 165 feet of Lot 14, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 15, lying West of the East 261 feet thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota. (Abstract) Lot 13, Revised Auditor's Subdivisions No. 15, Anoka County, Minnesota, except that part thereof taken for highway purposes, AND The South one-half of Lot 13, Auditor's Subdivision No. 15, Anoka County, Minnesota, subject to easement of the State of Minnesota on the Easterly 50 feet thereof for public highway purposes, now known as Lot 20, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 15, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County of Anoka and State of Minnesota; subject to easement of the State of Minnesota on the Easterly 50 feet thereof for public highway purposes, being registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 53618. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 PAGE 6 Be it further resolved that special assessments of record in the office of the City of Columbia Heights as of this day, against the above described property, in the amount of $ -0- be divided. Paid. Any pending or future assessments will be levied according to the new split as approved this day. Any lotsplit given approval shall become invalid if the resolution, motion or other Council action approving the said lotsplit is not filed with the County Auditor within one (1) year of the date of the Council action. plannin~ & $o~ing Dept. Action Recommend approval contigent upon ingress & egress & driveway easements over and across Lot 14 being recorded at Anoka County. Paul J. Vincent, a partner Signature of Owner, Notarized This 2nd day of May, 1995. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll call: Fowler Larson Ail ayes 11025 Radisson Road Blaine, Mn. 55449 Owner's Address P.# 784-6666 Tina Goodroad (sig.) Zoning Officer City Council Action Approved Jane Ann Gleason Notary Public Notarized 4-21-95 This 8th day of May, 1995 Offered by: Seconded by: Roll call: Jolly Petkoff Ail ayes Mayor Joseph Sturdevant Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary 7 COMMUNICATIONS a. Permits for 1995 Jamboree REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 PAGE 7 Motion by Petkoff, second by Ruettimann to authorize staff to close Jefferson Street from Monday afternoon, June 19 through June 25th. Roll call: All ayes Motion by Petkoff, second by Ruettimann to authorize the Police Department to issue a parade permit for the Jamboree Parade to be held on Friday, June 23, 1995 at 6:30 p.m. after approval from the Minnesota Department of Transportation is received for the following streets; Central Avenue at 45th Avenue to 40th Avenue, West on 40th Avenue to Fifth Street and Fifth Street to Mill Street. Roll call: All ayes Motion by Petkoff, second byRuettimann to authorize fireworks on June 24, 1995 in conjunction with the Jamboree activities and to appropriate up to $2,000 to be earmarked for fireworks display from Fund 101-41110-4377. Roll call: All ayes Se QLD BUSINESS a. Columbia Heights Block Builders Councilmember Ruettimann requested a spokesperson for the Columbia Heights Block Builders review all of the fundraising efforts of the organization. Bob Gross, a CHBB member, told of the many events held by the group. The date for closing on the property is May 10th and presently there is a shortage of funding needed for the purchase price. Councilmember Ruettimann noted that the Council had previously authorized the use of $7,000 from the 1994 CDBG funds for this project. He felt the Council should authorize the additional amount. Motion by Ruettimann, second by Jolly to amend the previous City Council action awarding $7,000 to Columbia Heights Block Builders' project at 675 47th Avenue Northeast by increasing the City's participation not to exceed $13,000 to be taken from the 1995 Community Development Block Grant Funds. Roll call: Ail ayes e NEW BUSINESS a. Approval of Plans and Authorization to Seek Bids for Mill Street's Reconstruction Progect ~9229 Motion by Jolly, second by Petkoff to approve the plans and authorize staff to seek bids for Project ~9229, reconstruction of Mill Street, MSAS ~120. Roll call: All ayes REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 PAGE 8 b. SCBA Purchase Motion by Jolly, second by Petkoff to authorize the purchase of twenty (20) Complete Survivair SCBA Units from Continental Safety Equipment, Inc. at a total cost of $30,413.80 with funding to come from Capital Equipment Replacement Fund 431- 42200-5180 and that an additional amount of up to $400 be authorized for a spare parts inventory. Roll call: All ayes c. Appointment of the Assistant City Engineer as Acting City ~l~L~neer Motion by Ruettimann, second by Petkoff to appoint the Assistant City Engineer, Kathyjean Young, as the Acting City Engineer until such time as the position of City Engineer is filled. Roll call: All ayes d. Approval of Plans and Authorization to Seek Bids for 44th Avenue Sidewalk Installation - Project ~941~ Motion by Petkoff, second by Ruettimann to add the proposed sidewalk on 44th Avenue from Tyler Place to Reservoir Boulevard to the sidewalks maintained by the City and direct staff to modify the annual snow plan to reflect this change. A letter was received from the property owner at 1016 44th Avenue stating his objection to the project proceeding. Other affected property owners, who were in attendance at this meeting, inquired as to the timeliness of the data and survey information being used for this project. Some of them felt the desire to have this sidewalk is no longer valid as many of the affected property owners have moved. Staff reviewed the survey results as well as the timeframe during which it was circulated. The motion was withdrawn. Residents suggested that another meeting be held to discuss resident opinions relative to this project. Motion by Petkoff, second by Ruettimann to table this matter until a Special Council Meeting on Monday, June 5, 1995 at 8:00 p.m. Roll call: All ayes REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 PAGE 9 The City Manager advised that all affected property owners will be notified of this Special Council Meeting and advised as to how they would be impacted by the installation of this sidewalk. police Civil Service Appointment Process The City Manager reviewed the process which will be followed by Labor Relations Associates, Inc., the consulting firm engaged to assist the Civil Service Commission relative to the Police Chief selection. The Mayor stated his support for a specific candidate. Councilmember Ruettimann noted that the Civil Service Commission has certain authority that removes the City Council from the process. Councilmember Jolly concurred. Motion by Ruettimann, second by Petkoff to authorize services of Labor Relations Associates, Inc. at an estimated cost not to exceed $5,850 for testing services in conjunction with the Police Chief appointment process and to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a contract for the same with funding to be appropriated from Undesignated Fund Balance of General Fund 101. Roll call: Jolly, Petkoff, Ruettimann - aye Sturdevant - nay f. Award Contract for Air Conditioning for Cable TV Room Motion by Ruettimann, second by Jolly to appropriate $5,565 in the Cable TV Fund $225 for the air conditioning of the Cable Room with the appropriation coming from the Undesignated Fund Balance in the Cable TV Fund and to include electrical work as well. Roll call: All ayes Motion by Ruettimann, second by Jolly to approve authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to contract with Shar~ Heating and Air Conditioning to provide all necessary equipment. Roll call: All ayes g. visitors at the Council Meeting Some students from the Social Studies class at the Central Middle School were introduced. They had been present for all of the Council Meeting and shared their impressions of how local government operates. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MAY 8, 1995 PAGE 10 10. a. Report of the City Manager The City Manager's report was submitted in written form. No items in the report nor any additional items were discussed. b. Report of the City Attorney The City Attorney had nothing to report at this time. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Ruettimann, second by Sturdevant to adjourn the meeting at 9:15 p.m. Roll call: All ayes Mayor Joseph Sturdevant Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S NO: 6 CITY MANAGER ' S APPROVAL ITEM: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 1299, BY: PATRICK HENTGES BY:~-'~ REQUEST TO VACATE ALLEY BETWEEN 37TH DATE: May 25, 1995 DAT NO: , · On May 31, 1994, Perry Wagamon, who owns the property at 3707 through 3741 3rd Street, brought in a letter requesting that the City vacate the concrete alley adjacent to his east property line and to the neighbor north'of him. Wagamon Brothers and Ernest and Betty Paulson are the only owners of property along this alley located between 37th and 38th Avenues and 3rd Street to University Avenue. Attached are letters from the Police and Public Works Departments stating that they have no objections to closing the alley. However, the Fire Department has concerns that are addressed in the enclosed letter. To avoid an unkept area, because University Avenue right of way is on the East line of the alley, I would recommend that the Ordinance state that the 14 feet of vacated alley be granted to the property owners along the west line of the alley. The attached correspondence was directed to MI~/DOT regarding its interests in the alley R.O.W. To date, the City has not received a response. In light of the uncertainty, I suggest we table the matter for one more meeting. The Wagamon brothers are also in the process of applying for fence permit to enclose portions of their yards for the purpose of providing security for vehicles that are being serviced by their business. I emphasize that these vehicles in some cases are inoperable when they are brought in, and in other cases are repaired and remain in the storage yard until the owner makes arrangements to pay for his or her bill. However, they assured us that they do not impound or store cars for the purpose of salvaging parts. The Wagamons have indicated intentions to plant evergreens adjacent to the south and east boundaries of their properties, and screen their "block" storage area that is in front of their property. Because they are an existing business, and the type of vehicle storage is not of a permanent nature, the screening and fencing does not require the approval of the Planning Commission or the City Council. A first reading of this ordinance was held on March 13, 1995. At the April 10, 1995, City Council meeting, this item was continued to the April 24th Council meeting. At the April 24th meeting, this item was tabled to May 5th, then to tonight's meeting. On May 17th, Phil Keen of MN/DOT said they would give the City of Columbia Heights a Quit Claim Deed to the east 7 feet of the vacated alley as soon as we send them a copy of the passed Ordinance. The Quit Claim Deed will be to the City; therefore, Section 2 of Ordinance 1299 will need to be amended to state that. Per Jim Hoeft, the first reading on March 13, 1995, can still stand since the amended portion does not change the intent of the Ordinance. A third reading is not necessary. Once the City receives the Quit Claim Deed from MN/DOT, we will deed the east 7 feet to the properties adjacent to the west 7 feet of the vacated alley. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the second reading of the ordinance, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Ordinance No. 1299, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853 City Code of 1977, Vacating a Certain Alley Easement. COUNCIL ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 1299 WITH REVISED SECTION 2. ORDINANCE NO. 1299 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE N0.853 CITY CODE OF 1977, VACATING A CERTAIN ALLEY EASEMENT The City of Columbia Heights does ordain: Section 1: The City of Columbia Heights herewith vacates the public alley over, across, and under the following described property, to wit: The alley running North-South, adjacent on the east side to Lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30, Block 91, Columbia Heights Annex to Minneapolis, Columbia Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota, excepting and reserving the authority of any person, corporation or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains and hydrants, thereon or thereunder, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto. Section 2: The east seven (7) feet will be deeded from MNDot to the City of Columbia Heights with the resulting fourteen (]4) feet of vacated alley being added to the lots above described lots that are adjacent to the west line of the alley. Section 3: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after its passage. First Reading: March 13~ 1995 Second Reading: Date of Passage: Offered By: Seconded By: Roll Call: Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary Joseph Sturdevant, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 1299 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 853 CITY CODE OF 1977, VACATING A CERTAIN ALLEY EASEMENT The City of Columbia Heights does ordain: Section 1: The City of Columbia Heights herewith vacates the public alley over, across, and under the following described property, to wit: The alley running North-South, adjacent on the east side to Lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30, Block 91, Columbia Heights Annex to Minneapolis, Columbia Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota, excepting and reserving the authority of any person, corporation or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains and hydrants, thereon or thereunder, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto. Section 2: The fourteen (14) feet of vacated alley shall be added to the above described lots that are adjacent to the west line of the alley. Section 3: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after its passage. First Reading: Second Reading: Date of Passage: March 13, 15395 Offered By: Seconded By: Roll Call: Joseph Sturdevant, Mayor Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (612) 782-2800 Mayor Joseph S'turdevant Councilmembers Donald G. Jolly Bruce G. Nawrocki Gary L. Peterson Robert W. Ruettimann City Manager Patrick Hentges March 21, 1995 Phil Keen 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113. Dear Mr. Keen: The City of Columbia Heights is planning to vacate an alley adjacent to the west side of Highway 47 right of way, north of 37th Avenue. The east seven feet of the fourteen feet of alley would go back to the lots that are part of the highway right of way. The property owners along the west side of the alley have asked for the alley to be vacated and fenced because of vandalism to their property on a regular basis. The City would like to have the vacated alley kept clean of weeds and brush, but if it is fenced the MNDOT would not be able to maintain the seven feet on the west side of their ?~?e~ fence. Therefore, the City would like to give the whole fourteen vacated alley to the property owner on the west. Enclosed is a copy of the Ordinance to vacate the alley, a copy of the of the area from the plat map and a proposed Quit Claim Deed. We would like MN Dot to consider signing the Quit Claim Deed for the east seven feet of the vacated alley adjacent to Highway 47 (Lots I thru 15, Block 91, Columbia Heights Annex to Minneapolis). Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. If you have any questions or if I can be of any assistance, please call me at 782-2814. Jane Gleason JG/st MNDOTU&37.1tr 'SERVICE IS OUR BUSINESS" EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES Quit Claim Deed Corporation to Corporation No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. , 19 County Auditor b~ Deputy STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $1.65 Date: , 1995 FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, a under the laws of Minnesota, Grantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to the City of Columbia Heights, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantee, real property in Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: East Seven (7) feet of vacated alley adjacent to Lots 1 thru 15, Block 91, Columbia Heights Annex to Minneapolis, Anoka County, Minnesota. The Grantor certifies that the Grantor does not know of any wells on the described real property TOTAL CONSIDERATION OF THIS TRANSFER IS $500.00 OR LESS together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY: Its CITY COUNCIL LETYER Meeting of: May 30 ~995 AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearings/ ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER Ordinances & Resolutions APPROVAL NO: Fire ITEM: Close Heating, BY: Lowen Demars BY: License Revocation ~ NO: · · DATE: May 4, 1995 DATE: Previously, the City Council established a hearing date for revocation or suspension of a rental license for May 22, 1995 regarding the rental property at 4006-4th Street NE. The property owner has now complied with the Housing Maintenance Code. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Close the Public Heating Regarding the Revocation or Suspension of the Rental License held by Julie Klosterich, Regarding Rental Property at 4006-4th Street NE in that she has Complied with Provisions of the Housing Maintenance Code. Attachment 95-96 COUNCIL ACTION: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT 555 MILL STREET NE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN. $5421 TELE: 782-2835 TO: TENANT/OCCUPANT 4006 4TH STREET COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN. 55421 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT 555 MILL STREET NE COLUMBIA HEIGttTS, MN. 55421 TELE: 782-2835 KENT or JULIE KLOSTERICH 1609 ROSEVELT STREET ANOKA, MN. 55303 Date: May 1, 19~5 STATEMENT OF CAUSE AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF A LICENSE PLEASE BE ON NOTICE, that on tl~e 30th day of May, 1995, at 7:00 pm, or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, in the City of Columbia Heights, l~q, the Columbia Heights City Council shall consider the revocation, suspension and/or other appropriate disposition of the license to operate a rental dweLling(s) of KENT KLOSTERICH LOCATED AT 4006 4TH STREET. STATEMENT OF CAUSE FAILURE TO SUBMIT RE-INSPECTION FEES OF $80.00 FOR INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED ON DECEMBER 15, 1994 AND JANUARY 30, 1995. As of this date, May 1, 1995, the above outlined violations have not been corrected. Pursuant to Section 5A.408(3) of the Columbia Heights City Code, a violation of any provisions of Chapters 5 or SA, or of state lam, shall be prima facie showing of cause for revocation, suspension, or other such action restricting the privileges of a licensee. PLEASE BE ON NOTICE that on the 30th day of May, 1995, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as may be heard, the City of Columbia Heights City Council shall hold a Public Hearing to address the issue of revocation of your rental license. At the Public Hearing you and your tenants or any other interested parties will be given an opportunity to give testimony and present evidence on the above set forth issues. Lowell G. DeMars Enforcement Officer cc' TENANTS EXHIBIT D AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL ) SS. COUNTY OF ~0~ ) Lowell DeMars , of the City of Columbia Heights, County of Anoka, in the State of Minnesota, being first duly sworn, says that on the / th day of ////~ , 1995, he served a copy of the Compliance Order arfd Notice of Revocation and Statement of Cause upon: Name and address: by mailing to him/her a copy thereof certified mail (return receipt requested), enclosed in an envelope, postage prepaid, and by depositing the same in the post office at Columbia Heights, Minnesota, directed to him at his last known addresses listed above. ('Si~gnature of Affiant) Subscribed and sworn to before me this { ~'-~ th day of Notary Public AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) SS. Lowell DeMars , of the City of Columbia Heights, County of Anoka, in the State of Minnesota, being first duly sworn, says that on the/ th day of /~//~/ , 1995, he served a copy of the Compliance Order ~nd/Notice of Revocation and Statement of Cause upon: Name and address: by mailing to him/her a copy thereof regular mail, enclosed in an envelope, postage prepaid, and by depositing the same in the post office at Columbia Heights, Minnesota, directed to him at his last known addresses listed above. / (~ignature of Affiant) Subscribed and sworn to before me this /~i th day of ~'~. , Notary Public AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) SS. Lowell DeMars , of the City of Columbia Heights, County of Anoka, in ~e State of Minn~s. ota, being first duly sworn, says that on the ( th day of ///~ , 1995, he served a copy of the compliance Order an~ Notice of Revocation and Statement of Cause upon: Name and address:/ by mailing to him/her a copy thereof regular mail, enclosed in an envelope, postage prepaid, and by depositing the same in the post office at Columbia Heights, Minnesota, directed to him at his last known addresses listed above. (~i~ature of Affiant) Subscribed and sworn to before this i-~+ th day of ~~ Notary Public CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER APPROVAL NO: Fire ITEM: Close Hearing, License Revocation BY: Lowell DeMars , ~ BY: ~ 1439-42nd Avenue Previously, the City Council established a hearing date for revocation or suspension of a rental license for Catherine Stephenson regarding the rental property at 1439-42nd Avenue NE. The property owner has now complied with the Housing Maintenance Code. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Close the Public Heating Regarding the Revocation or Suspension of the Rental License held by Catherine Stephenson Regarding Rental Property at 1439-42nd Avenue NE in that she has Complied with Provisions of the Housing Maintenance Code. 95-109 Attachment COUNCIL ACTION: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT 555 MILL STREET NE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN. 55421 TELE: 782-2835 KATI-D' STEPHENSON 6381 SUG.M[ HILLS COURT EDEN PR.MRIE, 504. 55344 Date: Ma), 1, lU05 STATEMENT OF CAUSE AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF A LICENSE PI, EASE BE ON NOTICE, that on the 30th day of May. 1095, at 7:00 pm. {~r as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, in the City of Columbia Heights, 'dN', the Columbia Heights City Council shall consider the revocation, suspensit,n and/or other appropriate disposition of the license to operate a rental dx~'elling(s} of KATHY STEPttENSON LOCATED AT 1430 42ND AVENUE. STATEMENT OF CAUSE I:AiI.llRE TO SUBMIT RENTAL LICENSE APPLICATION AND FIt. E, ANI), t:All~t~Rt~ '1'O SCHEI)UI~E TIlE ANNUAL LICENSING INSPECTION. .~,s (,t' thi:~ date, May 1, l(m5. the above outlined violations have not been ct~rrectcd. Pursuant to Section 5A.408(3} of the ('olumbia Heights City Code. a violation of any. provisions of Chapters 5 or 5A. orof state law, shall be prima facie showing of cause for revocation, suspension, or other such action restrictin~ the privileges of a licensee. PLEASE BE ON NOTICE that on the 30th day of May, 1995, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as may be heard, the City of Columbia Heights City Council shall hold a Public Hearing to address the issue of revocation of your rental license. At the Public Hearing you and ),our tenants or any other interested parties ','ill be given an opportunity to give testimony and present evidence on the above set forth issues. Lowell G. DeMars Enforcement Officer cc' TENANTS CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT 555 MILL STREET NE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN. 55421 TELE: 782-2835 JO[t.¥ - f'ATHY I:OLEY 637;1 SI'GA}-'. H[LI.S C()UR'I- Ei;EN P}<ARIE. MX. 55344 RE: 1439 42ND AVENUE NE ()(.'!()Bt~ 24. 19~4 FINAL NOTICE TH! c'ITV 1t:.. BEE.": INFORMEi) THAT THE ABOVE NAMED PR.?E,,xTI !lAS A 1'2.;i']. R£?TF:\I. ]'RO?ERTYWI'IHINTHECITYOFCOI.UMBIAItEIGHTS MUSTBE LICENSED AND IN',-i't:'TI'[~ .A::NUALI,'~' F'LR CITY ORDINANCt,. r?,;,'ic'SEl3 IS AX APi'iACATION FOR RENTAl HOUSING PROPERTT. PLt. ASE FII.L ~t; }~ O"iI.:L[~ I,[(,RMATION ANI) REIt RN IT ALONG WITH A CHECK IN THE ASIO~'NT ~15.{}{.i:'} :t [-'[.?4'Z'.-',! t l~ PRI()R TO NOVEMBER 4, 1994. IF WE DO NOT RECEIVE THL APPLiCA- ;1~5',, 5',Z~, ~.., ,pi }~,:}i) ]:Et_ PRI,t)R T() NOVEMBER 4, 1994. A CITATION ~VlI. L EL ]SSUL[: ',;} . I ~';l;,:.~ ..xN ['5't,I('ENSEI) REXTAI P},}OPERTY ]N VIOI.AT1ON OF CITY ORI)INANC} 12~J. I't:I> I'}-<)}'LKTY IS Al,NO RIOt.lb, FI ~i() HAVE A., ANNUAL I <~'~ ,'I1~,',. i'lt ..~t'. CAI.I. Tills OFkJCE WlTHIN SEVEN (r) DAYS OF R~ .E~IT t)}' THIS ':~'[¢ t [,., 5.:"Ht l~' l,E THIS I.~.,}'kf?'I1ON. '1'1I! S I,lt :l',N :~; E. ^ P_PIAJ~'ATJON~WILL COVER TItE PERIOD FROM~b_'~_p_T_EEMBL_ R Jz__l_9_~4~;tlg~}_ ..... AIRiI~S'I 30: !995. TOTAL FEE DUE: SIt()UI.I) YoU }lAVE ANT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS NOTICE ['LEASE CALL ME. CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT 555 MILL STREET NE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN. 55421 TELE: 782-2835 JOHN - CATHY FOLEY -6351 SUGAR HILLS COURT EDEN PRARIE, MN. 55344 RE: 1439 42ND AVENUE NE OC'IOBER 4. 1994 1 EAR OWNER, THE CITY HAS BEEN INFORMED THAT THE ABOVE NAMED PROPERTY HAS A RENTAL [;NIT. RENTAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MUST BE LICENSED AND INSPECTED ANNUALLY PER CITY ORDINANCE. ENCLOSED IS AN APPLICATION FOR RENTAL HOUSING PROPERTY. PLEASE FILL IN THE REQUIRED INFORMATION AND RETURN IT ALONG WITH A CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF ]}45.00 PER RENTAL UNIT PRIOR TO OCTOBER 20, 1994. IF WE DO NOT RECEIVE THE APPLICA- TION AN1) REQUIRED FEE PRIOR TO OCTOBER 20, 1994, AN ADDITIONAL LATE FEE OF 25 PERCENT Wll. L BE ADDED. Tills PROPERTY IS ALSO REQUIRED TO HAVE AN ANNUAL INTERIOR/EXTERIOR INSPECTION. PLEASE CALL THIS OFFICE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE TO SCHEDULE THIS INSPECTION. THIS LICENSE APPLICATION WILL COVER THE PERIOD FROM SEPTEMBER 1, 1994 TIIRU g_UG tJ ~'1'~3o.,_19~5; TOTAL FEE DUE: $15.00 PER RENTAL UNIT SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS NOTICE PLEASE CALL ME. RESPECTFULLY, LOWELL G. DEMARS ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF ENI~ORCEMENT OFFICER ~ :STATE OF MINNESOTA · CObqgTY OF ~Ox~k ""-.:)~' ~.: '.-': .' .' '%:'" Lowe 11 ~h~'s , ~'~ ' first , . County of ~oka, in ~he ~tate of ~e~~~ ~uly 'Sworn ~ 'says that on the .'/ %h"~ay [~. ' served a copy of ~he compliance .Or~'~ _~. .~ev°catl~n and ~.. Statement .of Cause upon. . by mailing to him/her .a copy thereo'f ~lar~t:l, .~endlosed ~in an '-. envelope, postage prepaid, and by .deposi~ing ~he :s~e':Xn-~he-post . office at Col~ia Heights, :'Min~s~a, ~re~ed %o..himat. ~s last -- .~ kno~ addresses listed ~ove.":., ~nature .~ -Affi~t) ... . ..::::~: .~.> ,.: _:: :""' .Notary .Public County of Anoka, in t~e State Of MinnesO~,~'bei~ se~ed a copy of the Complian~e by mailing to him/her a copy thereof regular':mail,?.enClo~ed.-in an envelope, postage prepaid, and by::~epositing ~the ~_~ tn'~e :~ost office at Col~ia Heights, -~e~ta, .~ire~ed t:O ~.at..~As :~ast known addresses listed ~ove ..... Subscri.~d and ~worn gnature of Af [66 t eunr 'O08E m=°d Sd AILING CE BY MAIL Lowell DeMars , of the City of Columbia Heights, County of Anoka, in the State of Minn beso~t~ating first duly sworn, says that on the / th day of//~/~ , 1995, he served a copy of the Compliance Order and ~otice of Revocation and Statement of Cause upon: Name and address: requested), depositing Minnesota, above. by mailing to him/her a copy thereof certified mail (return receipt enclosed in an envelope, postage prepaid, and by the same in the post office at Columbia Heights, directed to him at his last known addresses listed ~ignature of Affiant) Subscribed and sworn t~b~re this /~-~ th day of m?~ . ~ ' Notary Public CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGItTS FIRE DEPARTMENT 555 MILL STREET NE COLUMB1A HEIGHTS, MN. 55421 TELE: 782-2835 TO: KATHY STEPHENSON 6381 St;GAR H]LI,S CIRCLE EDEN PRARIL. MN. 340 FINAL NOTICE o~I:I9 IS ~, Rt.,NTAL LICENSE APPLICATION FOR YOUR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1439 42ND AVI.;NllE. PI,EASE COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION AND RETURN IT TO ME WITH A CHECK AMOUNT OF $15.00 NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, MAY 12, 1995. Ali UR[, TO COMPLETE THIS APPLICATION AND RETURN IT Bt' THE DUE DATE WILl, RES['LT IX A ¢'1~1AT~()N BEING ISSUED WHICH XVILI, REQUIRE A COURT APPEAkANCE. sit([7I.t) '~'~;[; HAVE FURTHI:R QUt,STIONS. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTAC7 CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearings/ ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER · Ordinances & Resolutions APPROVAL NO: Fire ITEM: Close Hearing, License Revocation BY: Lowell DeMars BY: 4653 Central Avenue NE NO: (0, D, DATE: 5-25-95 DATE: Previously, the City Council established a hearing date for revocation or suspension of a rental license for David and Norma Rust regarding the rental property at 4653 Central Avenue NE. The property owner(s) have now complied with the Housing Maintenance Code. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Close the Public Hearing Regarding the Revocation or Suspension of the Rental License held by David and Norma Rust Regarding Rental Property at 4653 Central Avenue NE in that the Property Owner(s) have Complied with Provisions of the Housing Maintenance Code. 95-112 Attachment COUNCIL ACTION: CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of : May 30. 1995 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPT.: CITY MANAGER NO: 6 ASSESSING APPROVAL ITEM: RESOLUTION ORDERING AND LEVYING BY: JANE GLEASON BY:,~ AN IMPROVEMENT DATE: MAY 22, 1995 NO: ALLEY MID-BLOCK LIGHT 677-26 Attached is backup information and resolution ordering and levying an improvement for one alley mid-block light between 5th Street and 6th Street, 47th Avenue to 48th Avenue N.E. The proposal is to have the City install one automatic protective light on an existing pole, in the backyard of 4711 5th Street N.E., as shown on the attached sketch. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the Resolution, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Hove to adopt Resolution 95-~ being a Resolution Ordering and Levying one mid-block light located on an existing pole at 4711 5th Street, known as PIR 677-Area26 - Project 9510. 677coun.let COUNCIL ACIIUN: RESOLUT ZON ~. 95-~0 Adopting assessment roll for the following local improvement and determining said improvement will be made and ratifying and confirming all other proceedings, heretofore had: Special Assessment for mid-block alley light numbered 677-Area 26 - Project #9510. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota, met at 7:00 p.m. on the 30th day of May, 1995, in the City Council Chambers, 590 - 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights Minnesota, being the time and place set when and where all persons interested could appear and be heard by the Council with respect to benefits, and to the proportion of the cost of making the local improvement above described, a notice of such hearing having been heretofore duly published as required by law, and a notice mailed to each property owner of record, stating the proposed amount of the assessment; and, WHEREAS, this Council has heretofore estimated the cost of such local improvement and has prepared an assessment roll therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS HEREBY RESOLVES: Section 1. That this Council does hereby adopt the aforesaid assessment roll known and described as "Assessment Roll for Local Improvements" numbered 677- Area 26 - Project 9510 for mid-block alley lighting. Section 2. That this Council hereby finds and determines that each of the lots and parcels of land enumerated in said assessment roll was and is especially benefited by such improvements. This Council further finds and determines that the proper proportion of the cost of such improvement to be especially assessed against each lot or parcel of land is the amount as billed annually by Northern States Power. Section 3. That the annual installment shall be paid in full without interest on or before September 15, 1996 {covering June electric payable July 1995 through 1996}, and in annual installments thereafter, as long as the mid- block light is in place. Failure to pay the annual installment renders the same delinquent and thereafter a 10% penalty is added and the said delinquent special assessment is certified to the County for collection with the real estate tax. Section 4. Section 5. That this Council did hereby determine and redetermine to proceed with said improvement, does ratify and confirm all other proceedings heretofore had in regard to this improvement, and said improvement shall hereafter be known and numbered 677-Area 25 for mid-block alley lighting. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. Passed this 30th day of May, lg95. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: Secretary to the Council Joseph Sturdevant, Mayor P.I.R. 677-26 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PROJECT 9510 PROPOSED ALLEY LIGHTING 5TH STREET N.E. TO 6TH STREET N.E. 47TH AVENUE N.E. TO 48TH AVENUE N.E. CITY POLICY GENERAL LIGHTING PROGRAM Provide street lighting at each intersection, dead end or cul-de-sac, and at least every 400 feet on unintersected street segments. LIGHTING IN ADDITION TO GENERAL LIGHTING PROGRAM Permit property owners requesting additional lighting to set up a mid-block or alley lighting program. This consists of adding street or alley lights, generally to existing poles, and charging the cost as a property benefit. PROPOSAL RETAIN ONE (1) AUTOMATIC PROTECTIVE LIGHT AT 4711 5TH STREET N.E. Current N.S.P. cost for one (1) Protective Light * $96.00 · Costs are subject to increses due to electric rate adjustments by Northern States Power Co. as approved by the Minnesota Utility Services Commission. YEARLY COST PER ASSESSABLE FOOT $96.00 400 Assessable Feet = $0.24 Per Foot ESTIMATED ANNUAL PARCEL COST ESTIMATED BENEFITTED ESTIMATED PARCEL ADDRESS FEET COST/FOOT CHARGE 4701 5TH STREET 60 $0.24 $14.40 4707 5TH STREET 40 $0.24 $9.60 4711 5TH STREET 40 $0.24 $9.60 4715 5TH STREET 60 $0.24 $14.40 4700 MONROE ST 42 $0.24 $10.08 4704 MONROE ST 58 $0.24 $13.92 4712 MONROE ST 60 $0.24 $14.40 4716 MONROE ST 40 $0.24 $9.60 TOTAL 400 $96.00 ALLEY LIGHT BBENEFI'I-i'ED PROPERTIES P.I.R. 677-26 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS PROJECT 9510 ALLEY LIGHTING WITH ONE AUTOMATIC PROTECTIVE LIGHT 5TH STREET TO 6TH STREET 47TH AVENUE TO 48TH AVENUE CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: Resolutions NO. 6 IrEM: Joint Powers Resolution NO. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT POLICE BY: Leonard M. Olson DATE: May 25, 1995 CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: BY' -- After numerous attempts to solve the police transport issue in Anoka County, a plan was implemented by the Sheriff's office to help with this ongoing problem. The plan, sanctioned by the Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council, is as follows: The SheriWs office will provide the transport vehicle(s) and each member community will supply the manpower. Services will be provided starting June 1, 1995, running to approximately September. The hours of operation will be 7:00 P.M. Friday to 3:00 A.M. Saturday, followed by 7:00 P.M. Saturday to 3:00 P.M. Sunday. The duty will rotate from community to community with officers roaming the countywide communities, picking up prisoners for jail and intoxicated individuals for detox. The first Columbia Heights rotation is scheduled for the latter part of June. The frequency of rotation with the numerous cities involved will be minimal. Funding will come from existing police budgets. To participate, Resolution 95-29 is offered for adoption of the transport program. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "Move to authorize the Columbia Heights Police Department to participate in the County wide transport program using existing funds from the Police Department, and adopt Resolution 95-29, being a Joint Powers Agreement entered into with the Anoka Joint Law Enforcement Council." 95-151 COUNCIL ACTION: ~ESOLUTION NO. 95-29 BEING A RESOLUTION APPROVING ENTERING INTO A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH ANOKA COUNTY TO SUPPLY TRANSPORT SERVICES TO MEMBER CITIES OF THE JOINT LAW ENFORCEMENT COUNCIL W~EREAS: Anoka County and the municipalities of Columbia Heights, Anoka, Blaine, Circle Pines, Coon Rapids, Fridley, Lexington, Lino Lakes, St. Francis, and Spring Lake Park have joined together by joint powers agreement to form the Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council (ACJLEC); and WHEREAS: The ACJLEC has recommended that joint arrangements be entered into between interested parties in order to combine efforts to provide transport service to the Anoka County Adult Correctional Facility, the Anoka Metro Regional Treatment Center or the Anoka County Juvenile Shelter during peak hours and perhaps additional times if deemed to be in the best interest of the participating agencies; and WHEREAS: Anoka County is willing to provide a transport vehicle for use in providing such transport service in order to facililtate such an effort; and WHEREAS: The Joint Powers Agreement will be effective June 1, 1995 and remain in effect until terminated in accordance with terms of the Agreement in which any party may terminate participation upon ninety (90) days written notice to the other parties in addition to other considerations as noted in the body of the Agreement; and WHEREAS: Other issues/conditions of this Agreement which include: provision of transport vehicle, personnel rotation, rotation duties, transport availability, arresting officer responsibilities, training opportunities, worker's compensation coverage, indemnification, contracts and purchases, disbursement of funds and property, accountability, agreement amendments and required signatures, will be recognized as valid and necessary parts of the activity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Columbia Heights Police Department is hereby authorized to be the participating agency for the City of Columbia Heights relative to the Joint Powers Agreement between member cities of the ACJLEC and Anoka County to provide transport service under the conditions as cited in the attached Joint Powers Agreement. Passed this 30th day of May, 1995 Offered by: Seconded by: Roll call: Mayor Joseph Sturdevant Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary DISCUSSION DRAFT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT THIS JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, made and entered into between the Cities of Anoka, Blaine, Circle Pines, Columbia Heights, Coon Rapids, Fridley, Lexington, Lino Lakes, and St. Francis, and the County of Anoka, each acting by and through its governing body, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §471.59 providing for the joint exercise of powers. V, TrNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County and the municipalities joined together by joint powers agreement to form the Anoka County Joint Law Enforcement Council (AC. JI.~C); and WI-I~, the ACJLEC has recommended that joint arrangements be entered into between interested parties in order to combine efforts to provide transport serv/ce to the Anoka County Adult Correctional Facility during peak service hours on the weekends; and WHEREAS, Anoka County is willing to provide a transport vehicle for use irt providing such transport service in order to facilitate such an effort; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements contained herein and in exercise of the power granted by Minn. Stat. §471.59, the parties to this agreement do mutually agree as follows: 1. PURPOSE The parties agree that they have joined together for the purpose of providing transport service from the point of arrest to the Anoka County Adult Correctional Facility or the Anoka Metro Regional Treatment Center, or the Anoka County Juvenile Shelter Facility. The law enforcement agency of each party is referred to as the participating agency. This agreement shall begin effective June 1, 1995 and remain in effect until terminated in accordance with the terms of this agreement. 3. TRANSPORT VEHICLE Anoka County agrees to provide a transport vehicle which shall be available for use during the hours from 19:00 (7:00 p.m.) on Friday through 3:00 (3:00 a.m.) on Saturday and from 19:00 (7:00 p.m.) on Saturday through 3:00 (3:00 a.m.) on Sunday for use to provide transport service in accordance with the terms of this agreement. The County may choose to expand the availability of the transport vehicle to include Thursday evening at such time as the ACJLEC makes a determination that the transport service is functioning and the addition of transport serv/ce on Thursday would be in the best interest of the participating agencies. 4. PERSONNEL ROTATIONS DISCUSSION DRAFT Each of the participating agencies shall be respons~Ie, on a rotating basis, to assign personnel who will operate the transport vehicle during thek assigned shifts. Personnel assigned by a party may consist of two licensed law enforcement officers, a licensed law enforcement officer and a reser-,rist, or two reservists in those circumstances when a licensed law enforcement officer is not available. Any reservist assigned by a party to perform duties under the terms of this agreement must satisfy the training requirement specified herein. Each department is respons~le for a weekend rotation in the following order (rotations will begin with the weekend of June 24, 1995): Anoka Blaine Circle Pines-Lexington Columbia Heights Coon Rapids Fridley Lino Lakes St. Francis Spring Lake Park Anoka County The Anoka County Sheriff will maintain a schedule indicating each participating agency's rotation and will provide a copy of the schedule on a quarterly basis (beginning with the July- September 1995 quarter) to participating agencies approximately 30 days prior to the beginning of the quarter. 5. ROTATION DUTIES During the rotation weekend, personnel assigned by the participating agency will be responsible for obtaining the transport vehicle from its location at the Anoka County Sheriff's Office at the beginning of a shift and returning the transport vehicle to this location at the end of a shift. During the shift, the transport vehicle may roam the county as an additional law enforcement vehicle. Personnel operating the transport vehicle will not directly participate in a stop or arrest, but rather are to report any suspicious activity observed to Central Communications for dispatch of a patrol vehicle. Operation of the transport vehicle will be done in accordance with the policy and procedures developed and approved by the ACJLEC. The primary responsible for personnel operating the transport vehicle will be to respond to a request for transport service. Central Communications will provide dispatch instructions to the transport vehicle and an estimated time of arrival to the arresting officer who will have the choice to cancel the request if the arresting officer would rather provide the transport instead of waiting for the transport vehicle. 6. TRANSPORT AVAILABILITY DISCUSSION DRAFT Any participating agency can request dispatch of the transport vehicle for the transport of an individual to the Anoka County Adult Correctional Facility, the Anoka County Juvenile Shelter or the Anoka Metro Regional Treatment Facility detox unit. Use of the transport vehicle is not appropriate when an individual is in need of medical attention. ARRESTING OFFICER RESPONSIBILITIES The arresting officer is respons~le for completing the necessary Booking sheets or other appropriate paperwork prior to the arrival of the transport vehicle. If the officer does not have the necessary, forms, the forms will be available in the transport vehicle for completion by the arresting officer. The arresting officer must assist the transport vehicle personnel in securing the individual to be transported in the transport vehicle. It is the respons~ility of the arresting officer to correctly complete all necessary paperwork for booking an arrested indMdual into the Anoka County Adult Correctional Facility, admitting an indMdual into the detox unit at the Anoka Metro Regional Treatment Center, or admitting a juvenile into the Anoka County Juvenile Shelter. If the transport vehicle personnel experience any problems at a hcility with the paperwork, it is the responsibility of the arresting officer to immediately respond to the facility to complete any necessary paperwork. It is the responsibility of the arresting agency to address any other problems which may arise related to the custody of the individual. o TRAINING Any reservist who is to be assigned to operate the transport vehicle must satisfy minimum training requirements established by the ACJLEC. At a minimum, a reservist must be trained in radio use, first aid, and use of force continuum. Anoka County will make available county- wide training opportunities. WORKER'S COMPENSATION COVERAGE The participating agency responsible for assigning personnel to a rotation is responsible for providing worker's compensation coverage for the personnel assigned by the participating agency during the rotation shift(s) such personnel is operating the transport vehicle. In addition, the participating agency which assigns personnel is responsible for any payment of wages or other remuneration for such personnel. 10. INDEMNIFICATION Each party shall indemnify and hold harmless the other parties against all claims, losses, damage, liability, suits, judgments, costs, and expenses by reason of the actions or inactions of personnel assigned by that party's participating agency to operate the transport vehicle. DISCUSSION DRAFT This agreement to indemnify and hold harmless does not constitute a waiver by any party to this Agreement of limitations on liability provided by Minn. Stat. Chap. 466. 11. CONTRACTS AND PURCHASES Any contracts and purchases made pursuant to this agreement shall be made by the County and shall conform to the requirements applicable to the County. 12. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS AND PROPERTY This agreement does not anticipate disbursement of funds by the parties. Any costs to a participating agency incurred pursuant to this agreement shall be disbursed pursuant by that party in accordance with the method provided by law. The parties do not intend to acquire property under the terms of this Agreement. Any transport vehicle used in providing service pursuant to this agreement shall remain the property of Anoka County. 13. STRICT ACCOUNTABILITY Pursuant to Minn. Stat. {}471.59, a joint powers agreement is to provide for strict accounting of all funds and report of all receipts and disbursements. Any party to this agreement may request a strict accounting at any time. 14. TERMINATION Any party may terminate participation in this Agreement upon ninety (90) days written notice to the other parties. Such notice shall be delivered to the Mayor or Clerk of a city and to the Anoka County Administrator. If Anoka County terminates participation in this Agreement, the Agreement shall terminate effective on the date specified in the written notice. In the case of termination by any other party, the Agreement will continue in effect until such time as either there are fewer than three participating agencies or the parties mutually agree to terminate the agreement. 15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This joint powers agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties on the matter related hereto. The agreement shall not be altered or amended, except by agreement in writing signed by the parties hereto. 16. SIGNATURES All parties to this Agreement need not sign the same copy of the Agreement. An original Agreement signed by each party to tl.is Agreement shall be maintained in the Office of the Anoka County Attorney. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement on the dates below: DISCUSSION DRAFT ANOKA COUNTY By: Dan Erhart, Chair Board of Commissioners Dated: ,1995 Attest: John Uay' McLinden County Administrator *******SHOULD GET EXAMPLE OF HOW EACH OF TH]E CITIES NORMALLY EXECUTES DOCUMENTS! CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S NO: ~ CITY MANAGER' S APPROVA___L NO: , , DATE: 5-23-95 ~)~ · On May 1, 1995, City staff received notice from Meredith Cable 'indicating their intent to adjust basic and preferred rates effective July 1, 1995. This rate adjustment is a result of information released from the FCC, allowing an inflation adjustment of 5.21% instead of the 2.15% taken in April. Meredith intends to change rates to reflect the remaining inflation adjustment effective July 1, 1995; Meredith will not retroactively adjust subscribers' rates for April through June, 1995. Meredith's request would result in the basic rate changing as follows: Previous Current Effective 4-1-95 Requested Effective 7-1-95 Basic Service Other Franchise Fees $7.48 $7.63 $7.85 $1.96 $1.83 $1.83 Total Basic $9.44 $9.46 $9.68 The Columbia Heights City Council (rate regulatory authority) have a 30 day period to review and approve or deny the increase. If the review cannot be completed within the 30 day period, the City can adopt an order tolling the review for an additional 90 days. If a tolling order is adopted, Meredith requests the City adopt an interim order permitting the basic increase to go into effect July 1, 1995, subject to rollback and refunds. At their meeting of May 18, 1995, the Columbia Heights/Hilltop Cable Commission passed a motion recommending that the City Council toll the initial 30 day period for an additional 90 days, and permit the basic increase to go into effect July 1, 1995, subject to rollback and refunds. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the order, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt the order tolling the initial thirty day period for the review of the proposed rates and other entries on the amended FCC Form 1210 for an additional 90 days in order to complete an assessment of the proposed increase and issuing an interim order permitting the basic increase to go into effect July 1, 1995, subject to rollback and refunds. COUNCIL ACTION: ORDER REGARDING THE TOLLING PERIOD FOR THE REVIEW OF PROPOSED RATE INCREASE SUBMITTED BY MEREDITH CABLE COMPANY TO THE CITY ON MAY 1, 1995 WHEREAS, the City of Columbia Heights "City" is certified as a rate regulatory authority pursuant to rules of the Federal Communications Commission (hereinafter "FCC"), WHEREAS, the City has notified Meredith Cable Company (hereinafter "Company") that the company is subject to the rate regulatory authority of the City, WHEREAS, the City has received from the Company a FCC Form 1210 "Update Form", dated May 2, 1995, WHEREAS, the Form 1210 filing implicates the City's authority to regulate basic service rates in requesting an increase in the company's maximum permitted basic service rate, on a going forward basis, WHEREAS, the City has determined that it needs additional time to review FCC Form 1210 to ensure that the proposed rates are within the FCC standards for updating basic service rates, WHEREAS, said additional time is required to solicit, receive, and analyze additional information related to said review by the City and staff. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by the City of Columbia Heights that the initial thirty (30) day period for the review of the proposed rates and other entries on the amended FCC Form 1210 is hereby tolled for an additional ninety (90) days. FURTHER, that this Order shall be effective immediately, however, the tolling period shall not begin until the expiration of the initial thirty (30) day period. FURTHER, that the Company is permitted to put the basic rate increase into effect July 1, 1995, subject to rollback and refunds. ORDERED THIS __ DAY OF MAY, 1995. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll call: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Joseph Sturdevant, Mayor Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary Meredith Cable Kevin C. Griffin President & General Manager 934 Woodhill Drive Roseville, MN 55113 (fax) 612/483-9184 612/483-3233 May 1, 1995 Chairman Dennis Stroik Columbia Heights/Flilltop Cable Commission C/O 3938 Polk Street NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Chairman Stroik: As you know, on April 1, 1995 Meredith Cable raised thc rates for our Basic and Preferred. levels of service, as well as lowering the rate for the PEG Fee. The increases for Basic and Preferred were done in accordance with FCC regulations, and reflected increases in external programming charges and inflation. The inflation taken by Meredith Cable was for the time period of September 30, 1993 to June 30, 1994 and was 2.15%. The Columbia Heights/Hilltop Cable Commission was notified of these changes on February 10, 1995. On March 8, 1995, the FCC released a set of Questions and Answers on Cable Television Rate Regulation addressing issues related to inflation adjustments by "transition rate" systems, such as Meredith. The Q & A indicates that Meredith was entitled to take an inflation adjustment of 5.21% instead of the 2.15% adjustment taken in April. The Q & A goes on to point out that we are actually allowed to recover inflation from September of 1992, and that the figure of 5.21% represents that time frame. Meredith plans on changing its rates to reflect the remaining inflation adjustment effective July 1, 1995; Meredith will ngt retroactively adjust subscribers rates for April through June of 1995. In order to calculate the full 5.21 percent inflation adjustment of our rates, we are revising our initial Form 1210 (using the FCC's March, 1995 version of the form). This approach avoids calculating inflation on inflation, which would be the case if we simply took the Form 1210 rate calculated for April 1, 1995 and adjusted it upward by the rest of the inflation to which we are entitled. The following summarizes the changes in the Basic and Preferred rams: 4/1/95 7/1/95 BASIC $7.63 $7.85 PREFERRED $12.88 $13.13 Ltr./Chairman Sla-oik May 1, 1995 Page Two You may recall that we have already submitted a revised 1210 Form (reflecting the full 5.21 percent inflation) to the FCC. The only notification required for the Preferred service increase is to provide a letter to the FCC indicating that, beginning July 1, 1995, our Preferred service rates will be adjusted to reflect the full inflation. I would like to request that Meredith be allowed to implement the new rate for Basic at the same time as we adjust our Preferred tier on July 1, 1995. Meredith will keep records regarding payments of the increased rate so that, in the unlikely event that the Commission's review subsequently concludes that a rollback and refunds are warranted, refunds can be made back to luly 1, 1995. The same plan for implementing refunds and interest as described to you before would be followed in tiffs event. I would also like to inform you that the FCC has ruled on the must carry status of KXLI, channel 41, and has infonned us that we will be required to can'), them. As a result of their decision, we will be dropping The Nostalgia Network from cable channel 68 to make room for the carriage of KXLI beginning June 1, 1995. We are pleased to let you know that we will be able to do a full re-alignment of our channel line-up on August 1, 1995 and begin the implementation of Universal Service. I've attached a copy of the channel line-up that will go into effect on August 1 for your information. We will also keep the Commission up to date on our plans for subscriber notification on this issue. On July 1, 1995, just prior to the re-alignment, Meredith plans on adding The Home & Garden channel, that effective August 1, 1995 Meredith will replace Prime Sports Network with ESPN II, and begin carriage of The History Channel on May 1, 1995. Should you desire further information or have any questions please feel free to contact me directly. Sincerely, Kevin C. Griffin KCG/grs Attachments cc: Linda Magee, Asst. to City Mgr. Thomas Creighton, Esq. Kathi Donnelly-Cohen Lee Sheehy, Esq. Cable Operator:. FCC FORM 1210 UPDATING MAXIMUM PERMITTED RATES FOR REGULATED CABLE SERVICES ~lame of Cable Operator Meredith Cable ~dailing Address of Cable Operator 934 Woodbill Drive City Ros~vil]e 1. Does thb filing involve · single franch~e authorit~ and · single eommuulty uult? ~fyet, compleu: the franchise authori~ infommio~ below and ~m-~he a~uzd CUID number h~: 2. Does ~ filing involve a alngle franchise authority but multiple community uults? ZIP Code 88112 YES NO YES NO If yes, enter the associatext CUIDs below and complete thc franchise authority information at thc bot~m of this page: MN0232 ] MN0233 3. Does this fding involve multiple franchise authorities? If yes, attach a separate sheet for each franchis~ authority and include thc following franchis~ authority information with it's associated CUID(s): Franchise Authority Information: qame of Local Franchising Authority Columbia Heights/Hilltop Cable Communications Commission ~.ailing Address of Local Franchising Authority 590 40th Avenue NE City Sm~ IZIP Code I Columbia Heights I MN ] 55421 Telephone number ]Fax Number 612~82-2812 [ 612/'782-2801 Page 1 FCC Form 1210: M~u~n 199' F~l~al ~ Cemmission, W~ DC 20~54 Al~ovud by OMB 3060-0595: E3q~ir~ 2J2~J~. 4. Indicate the time period for which this form is being filed. 5. Statu~ of Prtvtous Filing of FCC Form 1210 (enter an "x" in the appropriate box) a. Is this the first FCC Form 1210 filed in any jurisdic6on? b. I-lin an FCC Form 1210 been previously'filed with the ICC? If yes, cn~ct thc date of the most recent filing: c. Has an FCC Form 1210 been previously filed with the Franchising Authority? If yes, cna-n* thc da~c of thc most re~-nt filing: NO · - I ] (mm/dd/yy) NO ] (mm~dd~) 6. Status of FCC Form 1200 Filing (enter an "x" in the appropriate box) a. Is this form being filed along with an FCC Form 12007 b. Has an FCC I:orm 1200 been previously filed with the FCC? I/yes, ~n~r the ds~ filed: c. Has an FCC Form 1200 been previously filed with the Franchising Authority? If yes, ~nter the date filed: YES NO 8/12/94~ (mm/dd/yy) YES NO 8/12/9~ (mm/dd/yy) '7. Cable Programming Services Complaint Stares (enter an "x" in the appropriate box) a. Is this form being filed in response to an FCC Form 329 complaint? If yes, enter the date of thc complaint: YES NO ] (mm/dd/yy) Selection of "Going Forward" Channel Addition Methodology (enter an "x" in the appropriate box) x Check here if you are using the original rules [MARKUP METHOD]. F-~ Check here if you are using the new, alternative [CAPS rules METHOD]. If using the CAPS METHOD, have you elected lo revise recow-ry for channels added during the I~riod May 15, to Dec 31, 19947 YES NO I I 9. Headend Upgrade Methodology *NOTE: Operatorz muzt certify to the Commizsion their eligibibty to u~e thiz module and attach an ~luipment list and depreciation zchedule. Check here if you are a qualifying system using the streamlined headcnd upgrade methodology. FCC Form 1210: Match 19~ Page 2 d e Tier 4 Tier ._ MODULE A: TRANSrTION RATE AND FERMTrTED CIiARGE FROM PREVIOUS FILINGS · b ¢ ~ n~. tier 2 Tier 3 Al Ti--_-~J'~,c.o Rate 5'7.4840 $12.1170 · NOTE: The pmni~d Chaz~ is th~ ra~ 6mmninM by ~ith~r ym~r Frmn 1200 flung (Full ~ Ra~), a lS~ filed 1210 ~ ~ ~ should enter Ix~h lhi~r Tran~on Ra~ and Ii-ir Pmni1~d Charge. MODULE B: HF_.ADEND UPGRADE~ FOR QU~!-IrYI~G° b~STEMS · b c · · ~. p.~-~r-~o__n ~-'"c ~r 2 ~r 3 ~r 4 Tier ~e MODULE C: CALCULATING ONE-TIME ADJUSTMENTS TO PREVIOUS EXTERNAL COSTS PER SUBSCRIBER Line a b c d · Line Description _n-.!c Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier . Hdded Usin mal~e:hodol~ ~Dtp, KUPMZ'17-lOD1Be~weenMa , /S &Dec $I 1994. rFCC Form 1210 C6 ~ of~g ~ Ti~ ~ 12~ ~ Bg) $540.9300 S13,182.08~ C~ M~n ~ 3~ 1~4 ~g ~ [C6 x 0.0'/5] ~ $~ Cg Su~ ~ Ti~ m of3~ 1~4 3g~ 3702 .C9 ~oq~q,in~ M~n Adi. ~ SuCh. [CWCS] S0.0]0~ S0.267: Page 3 FCC Form 1210: March 19~ MODULE C: ONE-TIME ADJUSTMENTS CONTI]qUED · b Line Line DeocrIption Basic Tier 2 c d · Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier On~.2'~rne Aa~u~trnent ofRetran=mi=~on Con=ent F~= ~ortbe l 2 l O F~lm P~od lncb, din~ Octobc, r 6r 1~94. · 4pplicatfon o~Ad[ugrments to Pre~o~s F. rternal Co~s ~r Subscrfber "rr .......... i-'-i .................................. r ............ el4 Pr~vimaEx~ Comp~Ti~rl~rSub. (Seeln~) $0.1592 $3.5g96 MODULE D: CALCULATION OF CURRENT EXTERNAL COSTS PER SUBSCRIBER · b c d · Line Line Description Basic Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier DI Current Cma of Programming P~or to 5/15/94 or Added $577.8600 $15,786.7600 After 5/15/94 Using Markup method D2 Current Retrammi~sion ~t Fees D3 Margin Eligible Pgming/Coment Fee~ [DI+D2] S577.8600 S1~7~7600 D4 Margin Adj. Pgmin~/Coment Fees ID3 x 1,075] $621.1995 $16~70.7670 D~ Taxe~ D6 Franchise Related Co~ D7 Total Cu~em External Co~ [D4+DS+D6] $621,199K D8 Cur~nt Subscribers 3931 3927 139 Co~ of Programming Added Using Ca~ method B~ing Claimed a~ Exl~mal Corn [per sub, per tier] DI0 Current Ext Cos~ per Subscriber [~D~/DS~D9] t S0.1~80 S4.4345 Cost of Progrunmmg ~xlemal Costs (j~ sub, per Uer) MODULE E: TOTAL INCREASE IN CHA~NELS PER RECULATED TIER · b c d · Line line Description Basic Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier E 1 Previous Numbe~ of Channels per Re~ula~d Tier 21 34 E2 Current Number of Channels per Re~ula~d Tier 21 34 E3 Net Change in Channels pe~ Regula~d Tier [E2-E1] $0.00 $0.00 E4 Total Increase in Channels* [E3t..E3e] Page 4 FCC Form 1210: March 19 ~kn] Gammu~,~- ~ Wmhingum. DC '~0554 A~v,d I~, OMB 3060-0595: ~ 2~28,'~ ~ MODULE F: PER CHANNEL AILIUSTMENTS FOR CHANNEL ADDITIONS USING ALTERNATIVE METHODOLOGY [CAPS METHOD] Ammmt * NOT~: O~arors are aNawed to app~ more than .$0 to I~ro~rammin~l haw~v~r a~ ~nt in ~s ~.~0 ~ ~ deletea ~om Me 31.~ ~rmor's cat ~. ~ T~ ~ ~ii~ ~ ~ · ~ F~ R~ ~+~+F~+F~] ~ ~t Li~ F~ R~e R~aind~ [F~F61 T~er Hllocanon of Channel Adlusrmeno & Amount~ Applted Agatnst the I. Jcen~e Fee Reserve · b c d e Line Line Description Basic Tkr 2 Tier 3 T~er 4 Tier FIO Current ~ Channel Ad, jusUnen! po' Tier Fl 1 Current License Fee Reserve AmC per Tier MODULE G: PER CHANNEL ADJUSTMENT PER TIER FOR CHANNEL ADDITIONS [MARKUP METHOD] . b c d · Line Line Description Basic Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier G 1 Previous Numb~ of Channels per Regulated Tier 21 34 G2 Current Numbe~ of Chazmels lx~ Regul~'d Tier 21 34 63 Sum of Previous Channels [G1L..e] S~ : IO4 Sum of Current Channels [G2&..e] 35 Average ofPrevious a~d New Channels [(G3+G4)/2] C~ Adjustmem per Channel (see table) $0.0100 G7 Per Channel Adius~me~! pe~ Tier 0.004} 0.000 0,000 0.000 0.000 Page 5 FCC Form 1210: MMch 199 FM~al ~ ~ Waahingta~ DC 20554 AFlroved by OMB 3060-0595: F..xpirm 2.r28/9 ~ MODULE H: ~TI~G ~UAL FOR CHANNEL DELETION AND MOVEMENT 'l ' Line L~ De~rli~oa B~c Tkr 2 Tkr 3 Tier 4 Tier Calculatm Yanzit~on Rate HI Tmmition Rate IA1] $%4540 S1X12 H3 T~l P~ Cha~l Adj~ ~- $/14/94 fo~ Add~l Using Cqn ~ by Tier H4 Tier Rmidual [HI-H2-H3] S'L31S1 SL2603 [15 Previom Ommels pa- Regulaml Tier [E 1] 21 H6 Pr~ Caps Method Channels per Tier tr; R,,,,,-~Oar, nas [m-~] 21 34 HS Pa' Channel Residual ['H4/H7] ~ S0.34~ $0.2430 ChanneI DeleHon and Channel Mov~rnent ~ee lnstruct~'on$l H9 Residual of Channels Deiced From Tier H10 Residual of Charmels Moved (add~d) to Tier H11 Net Pe~-Ch~nnel Cos~ Adi. per Tie~ [HI0-H9] , Calc~lanr Restdual (Perrntned Char[~e? ........... n n-r H12 Permit*ed Charge [A2] S7.2714! $11.98 H13 Adjusted Previous External ~ [¢15] $0.16S9 ~3.8S67 HI4 Total P~ Charnel Adju~m~nu af~ 5/14/94 fro- Channel. Added Udng Ca~ method by Tier H15 Tier Reaidual [HI2-HI3-H14] $7.1025 $$.1249 HI6 Previou~ Channels per Regulated Tier [Eli 21 34 HI7 Prex~ou~ Cal~ Method Channels per Tier HI8 Remaining:Channels [HI6-H17] 21 34 HI9 Per Channel Residual [HIS/H18] $0..33~2 $0.2390 Channel Delet~on and Channel Movement (See Instrucnons) H20 Residual of Charmels Deleted From Tier H21 Residual of Channels Moved (added) lo Tier H22 Net Per-Channel Cos~ Adi. per Tier [H21-H20] Page 6 FCC Form 1210: March 199' F,ck~ ~ Ccmmb~ W~lm. D~ 20554 AF~ved by O~ ~060..0595: ~ 2J2~ MODULE I: U?DATING TRANSITION RATE FOR INFLATION, CHANGES IN EXTERNAL CO~TS AND CHANNELS · b c d e ~U.d¢ Tkr2 Tkr3 Tkr4 Tier~ MODULE J: LTDATING PERMrrI~£D CKARGE FOR INFLATION, ~A~CF-a IN ~E~ ~S ~ ~~ a b c d · ~e z ]~ ~ ~--~ Tkr 2 T~r 3 Tkr 4 Tier MODULE K: COMPARISON OF TRANSITION RATE AND PERMITTED CHARGE a b c d · Line Description _Rs,k Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier Line KI Current Subscribers IDS] 3931~ 38~7 K2 Weighting Facu~r [KIL..e / Kla] 1.0000 0.9T3-~ K3 I~[~-!~ Trami~.ion Ra~ [I8] ST.~.r.r~2 S13.12S2 1<4 Weighted Transition Rale [K.2*K3] S?.8542 S12.'/?74 K5 Ag~eg~te Transition Rate [K4a...e] S20.6316 K6 up4_-~_~ Permitted Charge [~| $0.]$S0 $4.434~ K7 Weighted Permitted Charge [X.2*K6] $0.1~0 $4.31'70 L'OMP~RE LI~ES KS AND Kg. If KS h hrler than KS, enter the tier rot~ from Line IC1 (.vo~r UlUlated tramition rate) on Line IC~ belo~. If K8 is larler than KS, enter the tier r~_!~ from I Jne K6 (~our updated permitted ehnrle) on Line K9 below. K9 Maximum Permkted Rate $7.85 $13.13 Page 7 FCC Fo~m 1210: March 19' ~ b~ 01~ 306G.0595: Eq~r~ 2J2~~- ~eFtiflcJtion Sttltement ~ FALSE STA~S MADE ON ~ FOP,.M ~ ~J..~ BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. CODE ~ 18, ~ON 1~1), ~/OR ~O~ ~.S. COD~, ~ 47, ~ON 503). I ~ ~tt ~c ~t~ m~ ~ ~s f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~e ~ ofm~ ~e ~d ~Ucf, ~ ~ ~c ~ B~ f~. ,,,... I Kevin C. Griffin Telephone numl~ 612/483-3233 FCC Form 1210: Mm'ch 199' Fede~l Cammmimtiem C, msmlmi~ Wmhial~L DC 20554 ~ed by OMB 30600595: F, xpirm T~LE~ NON-EXTERNAL COST AD~'FId~'2~F FOR CHANGES IN CHANNELS Fram: To: per dmmel '7 ? $0.$2 '7.5 T.$ $0.45 8 8 $0.40 1.5 8.5 $0.36 9 9 $0.33 9.5 9.5 ~0.2~ l0 l0 $0.271 10.5 10.5 $0.24 11 11 $0.22 11.5 11.5 $0.20 12 12 $0.19 12.5 12.5 $0.17 13 13 $0.16 13.5 13.5 $0.15 14 14 $0.14 14.5 14.5 $0.13 15 15.5 $0.12 16 16 $0.11 16.5 17 $0.10 17.5 18 $0.09 18.5 19 $0.08 19.51 21.5 $0.07 22 23.5 $0.06 24 2~ ~.05 26.~ 29.5 ~.~ 30 3~.5 ~.03 3~ ~ ~.02 ~.5 ~ ~.01 Page 9 FCC Form 1210: Match 199t BASIC Z~nith Converter Channel COLUMBIA HEIGHTS HILLTOP Access Libmr~ Access KTCA - PBS IUNMSION WCCO - CBS R_..._n.KSTP - ABC al Access KXIJ KMSP - Ind. Prevue KARE - NBC WTBS WGN KABL Public Access Govt. Access KTCI - PBS QVC BM ~4S) (HSN) KL~..T..-Ind. ~vo ]KITN - Ind. ISneak FJTV ': HISTORY BET Weather C-SPAN HGTV TLC Lifetime Family Channel Nickelodeon TNT ISA ESPN ESPN2 ~ i MSC ' CNN .' : CNN Headline :: CNBC . ::i: : .: Court : . . MT'V VH-1 .:: CMT ~,&E Discovery :, ~,MC : ~ci-Fi : Comedy Central SEGA : ;-SPAN II ~laine Pub. Access EVVTN/INSP. CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: May 30,1995 AGENDA SECTION: COMMUNICATIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER APPROVAL NO: [ Fire ITEM: Establish Hearing Date BY: Lowell DeMars BY: License Revocation, Rental Property No: -'! DATE: DATE: Revocation or suspension of a license to operate a rental property within the City of Columbia Heights is requested against Roger S. Kelly regarding rental property at 4724-6th Street NE. The property owner has failed to submit relicensing application and conduct annual inspection in compliance with Housing Maintenance Codes. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Establish a Hearing Date of June 12, 1995 for Revocation or Suspension of a License to Operate a Rental Property within the City of Columbia Heights against Roger S. Kelly, Regarding Rental Property at 4724-6th Street NE. 95-104 Attachment COUNCIL ACTION: Columbia Heights Fire Department 555 Mill Street N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Date: 02-02-1995 TO: ROGER S. KELLY KELLY DUPLEX RENTALS 4726 6TH STREET NE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS~ MN 55421 RENTAl, PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4724/26 6TH STREET NE ,r~e:~r t:cnta] Property Owner/blanager: Ir', ~cc~rdance with Columbia Heights City Ordinance #11-6. the rental i:.r(':,,.rty identified above is due for an interior/exterior 'Unifc:'m ['irc ~'~;.,.!," :~nd/or "Housing ~laintenance Code" inspectien. this office at ;82-2835 w~thin 7 days to schc. 4ulc v ' i':-,:~-t ::~t tent ion to 'his matter is greatly appreciated ~.,-~,i::t :~t I'irc Chief CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Fire Department 555 Mill Street NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 782-2835 Date: February 1, 1995 TO: ROGER S. KELLY 4726 6th STREET NE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN. 55421 4724/26 6TH STREET NE FINAL NOTICE The Fire Department has been assigned complete responsibility for the licensing and inspection of all rental housing properties within the City of Columbia Heights beginning January 1, 1994. We have attempted to research past applications as submitted by you, the owners. Unfortunately, most applications contain the wording "same as last year", which leaves us with basically nothing. If you will bear with us just one more time, I can assure you this will be the last complete Housing Rental License Application you will have to file with the City of Columbia Heights pertaining to the above described property. All information gathered with this application request will be compiled in a computer system designed for the fire service. The information you supply to us plus the information we gather about your property will be entered into fire department computers, which will enable us to pre-plan your building for most fire related problems which may surface at any time. Enclosed is the new License Application plus an explanation/rationale of the items required on the Rental Housing License Application. This License Application will cover the period from March IT 1995 thru February. 28~ 1996. We have attempted to fill in what little information we have been able to gather from your previous applications in this new application. Please read carefully and make any necessary corrections, additions and/or adjustments to the required information (preferably in red ink) and return your application with the required licensing fee to us prior to February. 28~ 1995. A late fee of 25 percent will be assessed on March 1, 1995. An additional late fee of 50 percent will be attached on March 16, 1995. PLEASE NOTE: All information requested must be submitted. All incomplete applications will be returned, which could result in additional late fees being assessed. Should you have any questions, please call me. Lowell DeMars, Assistant Fire Chief CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: COMMUNICATIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER' S NO: 7 CITY MANAGER' S APPROVAL ITEM: ESTABLISH WORK SESSION DATES ~ 8 BY: PATRICK HENTGES BY: .~~ NO: , , DATE: 5 - 24 - 95 DATE The following work session dates for June should be established: June 5, 1995, at 8:00 P.M. June 19, 1995, at 7:00 P.M. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to establish June 5 at 8:00 P.M. and June 19, 1995, at 7:00 P.M. as work session dates. COUNCIL ACTION: CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: COMMUNICAY~ON$ ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S NO: 7 CITY MANAGER'S APPROVAL ITEM: ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION FROM THE BY: P. HENTGES BY: ~-~\ ~ _ COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ATHLETIC BOOSTERS~ ~% DATE: May 24, 1995 DAT NO: On April 29, 1995, the City was notified that the Columbia Heights Athletic Boosters' finance committee met and agreed to donate $125.00 to sponsor a queen candidate for the Jamboree Celebration. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to accept a donation of $125.00 from the Columbia Heights Athletic Boosters to sponsor a queen candidate for the Jamboree Celebration. COUNCIL ACTION: /~E~HT~ r ~ \ Columbia Heights Athletic Boosters  ~ RfHLEf[ 530 Mill Street N.E. Columbia Heiahts, MN 55421 April 29, 1995 City of Columbia Heights Attn: Pat Hentges, City Manager 590 40th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights MN 55421 RE: QUEEN CANDIDATE SPONSORSHIP/JAMBOREE DAYS (PAT OLYNYK?) Our finance committee members and the membership have agreed to sponsor a queen candidate for %he Jamboree Celebration. We are enclosing a check for $125 and would appreciate your passing it on to Ms. Olynyk if she is the one in charge. Please sign and return the enclosed Form LG503 so that we may submit it to the Minnesota Control Board as required. Thank you. encl.- 2 Sincerely, / King ~lson, Finance Director COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ATHLETIC BOOSTERS CLUB COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ATHLETIC BOOSTERS CLUB, CHARITABLE GAMBLING ACCOUNT I 530 MILL ST,, NE, COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN 55421 INC. PAY TO THE ORDER City of Columbia Heights Royalty Sponsorship One Hundred Twenty-five and no/100 ...... 7428 17-13/910 April 24 19 95 i$ 125.00 DOLLARS FOR Coon Rapids, MN · 7~ 1995 J~r~ Days ~n ~nsorship, ,'OO?h~,' ~:Oq~OOO~5~: ../~L~O SIGNATURES REQUIRED City of ~ _~_~~~~~~ .......... SO0,,, hO ,,~ , ........... :.- , ,--~ . ,--. ............ --, ~ ..... , ,--. ,~ .... ~-~--------~-. 2? ~b-~eso~a Z,a~ful Gambling ° ~r :Request by a Government to Spend G-mbhn= F,, ds N~rne af Govemmem Re<~uesm~g ~un~.s City of Columbia Heights ( } 590 40th Avenue N.E. Col,~bia Heights MN 55421 Chsc~ ,~pe of ;ovemment making request: ~ City [-'-] Coum7 [ ~ Township ~ State of Minnes~ Oep~ent of ~ Un~ Stat~. Oep~em of ~ ~er ~vemment~ ~ - spl~ School Ois~rict No. , Division of , Division of of O~g~zagon Phorm Number COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ATHLETIC BOOSTERS CLUB, INC( 612} 782-2873 A-02072 ACdmss City $~m Zip 530 Mill Street N.E. Columbia Heights MN 55421 The aoove-narned government reques~ lawnJI gamoling pr~its for Ins follow,ng puq:x~se: (explain expenditure - atla~'~ additional sheets if necessary. Amount requested ] $ 125.QQ _ By comole~ing and s~gning flus form. the government's agent corrr~'ms that the requested funds w~l be spent for · lawful purpose. This request expires o.e year [rom, bhe da~e below a~d may be renewed at the request of the Ioc~l goveming body. Us~ of Form: 1. I! an or;~niz3ti~n wishes to c=ntn'bule ;~nbllng funds to a governing body. the ;oveming body must ¢:;mplets this form. 2. Aoorova! of the Gamblln~ Control So.rd Is not re.uired. 3. 'i'ne form should be kept on file by the licensed or;anizagon. 4. Attac~ a co~¥ of ibis form to your Schedule C Rei~or~ for ihs month in which the funds ere $oent. CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting off 5/30/95 AGENDA SECTION: COMMUNICATIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER NO. 7 PUBLIC WORKS ITEM: CENTRAL AVENUE MEDIAN FENCING BY: K. Y°ung ~,o BD~~. As directed by the City Council, staff has contacted Mn/DOT, the School District, City of Hilltop and business owners adjacent to Central Avenue requesting comments with regard to removing the fencing. To date, the following responses have been received: Date From Summary 1. May 2 Hilltop Hilltop is concerned for the safety of pedestrians and agrees that the fence is an eyesore but will not make a recommendation. 2. May 4 School District School district does not support the idea based on an increased potential for school-age pedestrian accidents. 3. May 17 Central Barber The business owner does not support the idea based on an increased potential for pedestrian Stylists accidents. 4. May 22 Mn/DOT Mn/DOT does not support the idea based on an increased potential for pedestrian accidents. Mn/DOT will obtain pedestrian counts and may reconsider based on counts and documentation that removal of fence is acceptable to all parties involved. Final decision may be available by June 12. Based on the comments to date, it appears some sort of barrier will remain in place. Staff has discussed three alternatives and would appreciate your comments at the meeting. Staff can then address these possibilities with Mn/DOT. 1. Remove chain link fence and extend existing guard rail. Remove chain link fence and install new chain link fence with 12" to 18" of clearance at bottom. This should minimize trapping debris at the base. 3. Remove chain link fence and install ornamental fencing similar to the railing on Central Ave. by Rainbow. Both options I and 3 may require contribution of local funds above the cost of a chain link fence. KKY:jb 95-352 COUNCIL ACTION: City of Hilltop REGEIVED 4555 Jackson Street NE Hilltop, Minnesota 5542~AY 0 4 1995 tel: 6121571-2023 FAX: 6121571-4693 TTY: 6121571-2023Public Works Dept. May 2, 1995 Mr. Mark Winson, Director of Public Works City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Avenue NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Re: Central Avenue Median Fence Dear Mr. Winson, In response to your request, the Hilltop City Council discussed your possible removal of the above referenced fencing at its meeting last night. During the discussion, several comments were made regarding safety concerns for school children and other pedestrians who may start crossing Central Avenue at places other than intersections, if the fencing is removed. The Council also agreed that the fencing has become an eyesore due to its deteriorating condition and debris collection. Since the decision and responsibility to remove or replace the fencing ultimately rests with Columbia Heights, the Council did not feel it was appropriate for them to issue a recommendation or anything more conclusive than an expression of the above mentioned concerns. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 571-2023. Sincerely, Ruth J. Nelsen City Clerk p.s. Congratulations on your new job. It has been my pleasure to work with you during the past few years. I appreciate the help you have been able to provide. Good luck! Columbia Heights Public Schools RECEIVED 0 8 1995 Public Works Dept Independent School District #13, 1400 49th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights, Minnesota 55421 Telephone: (612) 574-6505, FAX: (612) 574-6541 Dr. Alain Holt, Superintendent May 4, 1995 Mr. Mark Winson City of Columbia Heights 590 - 40th Avenue NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Mr. Winson: This letter is being written in response to your correspondence of April 26, 1995. In your correspondence you request our opinion of removal of the fencing on the median of Central Avenue from 48th Avenue to 51st Avenue. The following represents the feeling of several District administrators and myself and, therefore, are certainly not founded on a knowledge base of pedestrian safety measures. Our discussions, however, have revolved around student safety issues in that many young people who attend Central Middle School do utilize the pedestrian bridge at Central and 49th Avenues. I fear that some of these young people would be tempted to cross Central at inappropriate locations. The current fencing does deter pedestrians from crossing the highway except at the intersection of Central and 49th. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at 574-6507. Sincerely, main G. Holt Superintendent AGH/kb An Equal Opportunity Employer Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Division Waters Edge Building 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 RECEIVE"' MAY g 3 1995 Public Works b%.,. May 22, 1995 Kathyjean Young Assistant City Engineer City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Avenue North East Columbia Heights, Mn 55421-3878 Dear Kathyjean Young: This letter is in response to Mark Winson's letter of April 26, 1995, regarding removal of the fence in the median of Central Avenue from 48th Avenue to 51st Avenue. At this time the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) does not support removal of the fence based on the increased potential for pedestrian accidents. The number of pedestrian accidents for this length of roadway is probably a little above average but not too unusual considering the volume of traffic on TH 65. It is difficult to say if the fence is a deterrent to pedestrians without knowing the actual pedestrian counts for this two block section. Mn/DOT will obtain pedestrian counts for the adjacent at-grade crossing and the pedestrian bridge to evaluate the potential for uncontrolled or midblock crossing if the fence were removed. We expect it to take approximately three weeks to obtain these counts. At that time we will inform you of our decision. The following is a summary of the pedestrian accidents in this area. From January 1, 1992 through December 31, 1994 there were four pedestrian accidents between 47th Avenue and 51 st Avenue on TH 65. The chain link fence in the median extends from the frontage road leg (left), approximately 275 feet north of 47th Avenue N.E., to 50th Avenue N.E. Of the four accidents the two most serious, a fatal and an incapacitating injury, occurred between 47th Avenue and the frontage road leg (left), which is the block just south of the southern most fence. The other two accidents were possible injuries. One of these occurred at the intersection of 49th Avenue N.E. and the other occurred about 200 feet north of 50th Avenue N.E. This one was beyond the northerly limits of the north fence. There were no accidents adjacent to the chain link fence. An Equal Opportunity Employer Kathyjean Young May 22, 1995 Page Two If Mn/DOT were to allow removal of the fence based on the pedestrian counts, we will need documentation that removal of the fence is acceptable to the city of Columbia Heights, City of Hilltop, school district and the property owners adjacent to this section of TH 65. If you have any questions please call me at 582-1399. Sincerely, Scott McBride, P.E. Division Planning Engineer Terry Zoller, Metro Division Maintenance Rod Pletan, Central Office Maintenance CENT~/IL B,~,~BE,~ ST~LISTS 6915 £E#T~t'IL AVE /~,iE COL. #6TS, P'/ 55z~2/ f6/27 $86-0760 RECEIVED MAY g,l 1995 Public Works ~ept. Ln~ aL ~ c~o~ai~,an~ ~unnLn~ Ln [~on~ o[ ca~. ~e feel ~a~ ~ ~ii ~e ~ar~er for e~er~one. ~ L~ o~ ~Ln2r ~a~ ~ cL~y couid u~ ~.~ money on. Z ~ p~opie~ ~~ needLn~ rcp~Lrz, ali~E~ n~- ~Lnp. mador repaLr~. ~Ve don~ ~an~ ~o run ou~ on C~n~rai and [Lnd ~o~ p.o~ ZL~ by a car. Z ~no~ Z ~n ~ouZd jump Can~ ~re be a ciean up cr~? Sa~ ~Ze /~Ld~ ~c~ooZ~ cZ~an L~ up. T~S~ can c~Lp Ln~o ~Lr communL~.E. ~e are ~orry ~,~a~ ~e don~ a~.r~ ~L~ your Ldea. don~ ~an~ ~o ~ p~opi~ Zur~ ~L~ ~o~ 6u~ C~n~rai L~. ~uL~ CaIL~uLr¢ CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: May 5, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER' S NO: 6 CITY MANAGER' S APPROVAL ITEM: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 1299, BY: PATRICK HENTGES BY: [ REQUEST TO VACATE ALLEY BETWEEN 37TH DATE: May 5, 1995 AND 38TH AVENUES NO: ~ ~ , On May 31, 1994, Perry Wagamon, who owns the property at 3707 through 3741 3rd Street, brought in a letter requesting that the City vacate the concrete alley adjacent to his east property line and to the neighbor north of him. Wagamon Brothers and Ernest and Betty Paulson are the only owners of property along this alley located between 37th and 38th Avenues and 3rd Street to University Avenue. Attached are letters from the Police and Public Works Departments stating that they have no objections to closing the alley. However, the Fire Department has concerns that are addressed in the enclosed letter. To avoid an unkept area, because University Avenue right of way is on the East line of the alley, I would recommend that the Ordinance state that the 14 feet of vacated alley be granted to the property owners along the west line of the alley. The attached correspondence was directed to MNDOT regarding its interests in the alley R.O.W. To date, the City has not received a response. In light of the uncertainty, I suggest we table the matter for one more meeting. The Wagamon brothers are also in the process of applying for fence permit to enclose portions of their yards for the purpose of providing security for vehicles that are being serviced by their business. I emphasize that these vehicles in some cases are inoperable when they are brought in, and in other cases are repaired and remain in the storage yard until the owner makes arrangements to pay for his or her bill. However, they assured us that they do not impound or store cars for the purpose of salvaging parts. The Wagamons have indicated intentions to plant evergreens adjacent to the south and east boundaries of their properties, and screen their "block" storage area that is in front of their property. Because they are an existing business, and the type of vehicle storage is not of a permanent nature, the screening and fencing does not require the approval of the Planning Commission or the City Council. A first reading of this ordinance was held on March 13, 1995. At the April 10, 1995, City Council meeting, this item was continued to the April 24th Council meeting. At the April 24th meeting, this item was tabled to tonight's meeting. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the second reading of the ordinance, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Ordinance No. 1299, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853 City Code of 1977, Vacating a Certain Alley Easement. COUNCIL ACTION: CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: April 24, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER' S NO: 6 CITY MANAGER'S APPROVAL ITEM: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 1299, BY: PATRICK HENTGES BY: REQUEST TO VACATE ALLEY BETWEEN 37TH DATE: April 20, 1995 DATE:~. AND 38TH AVENUES ~ A NO: , , On May 31, 1994, Perry Wagamon, who owns the property at 3707 through 3741 3rd Street, brought in a letter requesting that the City vacate the concrete alley adjacent to his east property line and to the neighbor north of him. Wagamon Brothers and Ernest and Betty Paulson are the only owners of property along this alley located between 37th and 38th Avenues and 3rd Street to University Avenue. Attached are letters from the Police and Public Works Departments stating that they have no objections to closing the alley. However, the Fire Department has concerns that are addressed in the enclosed letter. To avoid an unkept area, because University Avenue right of way is on the East line of the alley, I would recommend that the Ordinance state that the 14 feet of vacated alley be granted to the property owners along the west line of the alley. The attached correspondence was directed to MNDOT regarding its interests in the alley R.O.W. To date, the City has not received a response. In light of the uncertainty, I suggest we table the matter for one more meeting. The Wagamon brothers are also in the process of applying for fence permit to enclose portions of their yards for the purpose of providing security for vehicles that are being serviced by their business. I emphasize that these vehicles in some cases are inoperable when they are brought in, and in other cases are repaired and remain in the storage yard until the owner makes arrangements to pay for his or her bill. However, they assured us that they do not impound or store cars for the purpose of salvaging parts. The Wagamons have indicated intentions to plant evergreens adjacent to the south and east boundaries of their properties, and screen their "block" storage area that is in front of their property. Because they are an existing business, and the type of vehicle storage is not of a permanent nature, the screening and fencing does not require the approval of the Planning Commission or the City Council. A first reading of this ordinance was held on March 13, 1995. At the April 10, 1995, City Council meeting, this item was continued to tonight's meeting. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the second reading of the ordinance, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Ordinance No. 1299, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853 City Code of 1977, Vacating a Certain Alley Easement. COUNCIL ACTION: CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: April 10, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S NO: 6 CITY MANAGER' S APPROVAL ITEM: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 1299, BY: PATRICK HENTGES BY: /~ REQUEST TO VACATE ALLEY BETWEEN 37TH DATE: April 6, 1995 DAT NO: AND 38TH AVENUES ¢ C, , On May 31, 1994, Perry Wagamon, who owns the property at 3707 through 3741 3rd Street, brought in a letter requesting that the City vacate the concrete alley adjacent to his east property line and to the neighbor north of him. Wagamon Brothers and Ernest and Betty Paulson are the only owners of property along this alley located between 37th and 38th Avenues and 3rd Street to University Avenue. Attached are letters from the Police and Public Works Departments stating that they have no objections to closing the alley. However, the Fire Department has concerns that are addressed in the enclosed letter. To avoid an unkept area, because University Avenue right of way is on the East line of the alley, I would recommend that the Ordinance state that the 14 feet of vacated alley be granted to the property owners along the west line of the alley. The attached correspondence was directed to MNDOT regarding its interests in the alley R.O.W. To date, the City has not received a response. In light of the uncertainty, I suggest we table the matter for one more meeting. The Wagamon brothers are also in the process of applying for fence permit to enclose portions of their yards for the purpose of providing security for vehicles that are being serviced by their business. I emphasize that these vehicles in some cases are inoperable when they are brought in, and in other cases are repaired and remain in the storage yard until the owner makes arrangements to pay for his or her bill. However, they assured us that they do not impound or store cars for the purpose of salvaging parts. The Wagamons have indicated intentions to plant evergreens adjacent to the south and east boundaries of their properties, and screen their "block" storage area that is in front of their property. Because they are an existing business, and the type of vehicle storage is not of a permanent nature, the screening and fencing does not require the approval of the Planning Commission or the City Council. A first reading of this ordinance was held on March 13, 1995. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to continue the Public Hearing on Ordinance No. 1299, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853 City Code of 1977, Vacating a Certain Alley Easement until the April 24, 1995, City Council meeting. COUNCIL ACTION: CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: Old Business NO. 8 ITEM: Award of Police Non-patrol NO. Vehicle ~.~. ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT POLICE BY: l~onard M. Olson DATE: May 19, 1995 CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: DATE: Efforts to downsize the Police Department's unmarked vehicles will provide for a more cost effective means of transportation for staff and investigative use. With Council permission, three full-size unmarked Ford LTD's were entered in the City of Columbia Heights spring bicycle auction. The goal was to sell the three to recoup funds to purchase a downsized staff vehicle. Total funds from the sale amounted to $11,100. To develop information to purchase a down-sized automobile, two avenues of thought were explored; one was to find a late model dealer program car (lease or rental return), and the other to research the possible purchase of a new automobile. The new car purchase is based upon the existing discounts available through government bidding contracts. The list is based upon informal bid pricing for fully equipped program cars. Prices invariably paralleled existing vehicle mileages. The new car possibility is based upon the existing state contract M9538 and the availability of only one remaining vehicle comparatively equipped. The Hennepin County contract dealer had no comparably equipped automobiles remaining. The equipment includes power steering, power brakes, air conditioning, power windows, power door locks, tilt steering, etc. Superior Ford '94 Ford Taurus 4-door sedan 20,000 miles $12,368 Walser Chev. '94 Chev. Lumina 4-door sedan 30,000 miles $15,500 Minar Ford '94 Ford Taurus 4-door sedan 30,000 miles $13,900 CFL Leasing '94 Chev. Lumina 4-door sedan 40,000 miles $10,200 Friendly Chev. '94 Chev. Lumina 4-door sedan 28,000 miles $13,000 Polar Chev. '95 Chev. Lumina 4-door sedan new $14,989 Based upon informal bid pricing, the CFL Leasing Company purchase would be least costly; however, there would be no warranty available. Should there be an interest in the purchase of a new vehicle, the state contract dealer, Polar Chev, has an offering and would provide the new car warranty of three years or 36,000 miles. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "Move to Appropriate $11,092 ($10,200 Plus $663 Sales Tax and $229 for License Plates) in the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund From Revenue Received for the Sale of Three Old Police Vehicles and to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement with CFL Leasing of Blaine, Minnesota, to Purchase One 1994 Chevrolet Lumina 4-Door Sedan Lease/Rental Return Automobile." ALTERNATE MOTION: "Move to Appropriate $16,213 ($14,989 Plus $974 Sales Tax, $250 for License Plates) in the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund From Revenue Received for the Sale of Three Old Police Cars, and the Difference of $5,115 from Undesignated Fund Balance of Fund 431-Capitol Equipment, and to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement with Polar Chev of White Bear Lake to Purchase One 1995 Chewolet Lumina 4-Door Sedan. 95-126 COUNCIL ACTION: CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: 5/30/95 AGENDA SECTION: 0 L D BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER NO. ~ PUBLIC WORKS ITEM: AWARD OF BID FOR TENNIS COURT BY: K. Young ~(~ BY: (~~ NO. RESURFACING - MUNICIPAL PROJECT #9303 DATE: 5/22/95 DATE: On March 13, 1995, Council authorized staff to seek bids to resurface the tennis court at Sullivan Lake Park. Specifications were sent to four contractors. Two bids were received for the bid opening on May 11, 1995, at 11:00 a.m. The bid submitted by C & H Construction was $2,995.00. The bid submitted by Sjostrom Inc. was completely filled out except for a dollar amount. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to reject bids for Tennis Court Resurfacing, Municipal Project #9303, and authorize staff to rebid the project. ALTERNATE RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to award the Tennis Court Resurfacing, Municipal Project #9303, to C & H Construction of Lonsdale, Minnesota, based upon their low, qualified, responsible bid in the amount of $2,995.00 with funds to be appropriated from Fund 412-45200-5130; and, furthermore, to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement for the same. KKY:jb 95-338 COUNCIL ACTION: 0 0 0 o o o CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: 5/30/95 AGENDA SECTION: OLD gUS I NESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER NO. ~ PUBLIC WORKS AWARD OF SELF-POWERED LAWN SWEEPER BY: K. Youngx,.) ~[~ BY: E~:x,,.J.~'-'l-~ ITEM: NO.~ ~[~t,'~'- DATE: 5/22/95 DAT On February 21, 1995, the Council authorized staff to seek bids for a self-powered lawn sweeper using tractor #283 as a trade-in. Bids were opened on March 30, 1995. Bid forms were sent to four companies with only one company responding. MTI Distributing submitted a total bid of $7,113.13. The bid tabulation is attached. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to award the bid for a new self-propelled, high dump turf sweeper to MTI Distributing the low, qualified, responsible bidder in the amount of $7,113.13 to be paid for from the Capital Equipment Fund; and, furthermore, to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement for the same. KKY:jb 95-340 COUNCIL ACTION: 0-~ 0 rtl z-o ~ 0 mzm ~m CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: 5/30/95 AGENDA SECTION: OLD BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER NO. ~ PUBLIC WORKS ITEM: ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT #9413 BY: K. Young ~"kl BYTE(~'~-~'~-:~~ NO. REROOFING PUMP STATION #3 DATE: 5/22/95 DA As required by the specifications, staff has received the five-year warranty from Rayco Construction, Inc. and the ten-year warranty from GAF Materials Corporation for the roof replacement on Pump Station #3, 4633 Ivanhoe Place. Staff recommends acceptance of the project. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to accept the roof replacement project for Pump Station #3 completed by Rayco Construction, Inc. of Columbia Heights, Minnesota. KY:ih 95-336 COUNCIL ACTION: ROOFING GUARANTEE Whereas Ray Ellis o/ Rayco Construction, Inc. herein called "Contractor" has completed application of the following roof: Owner: City of Columbia Heights Address of Owner: 590 N.E. 40th Avenue, Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Type and Name of Building: Pump Station g3 Location: 4633 Ivanhoe Place, Columbia Heights, MN 55421 ~aea of Roof: 1,080 Date of Completion: 1-30-95 Date Guarantee Expires: 1-30-00 Whereas, at the inception o/such work, Contractor agreed to guarantee the aforesaid roof/or a limited period and subject to the cotutitioa.¥ herein set forth; Now, Therefore, contractor hereby Guarantees, subject to the conditions herein set forth, that during a period of five years frotn the date of completion of said roof, it will, at its own cost and expense, make or cause to be made such repairs to said roof resulting solely from faults or defects in materials or workmanship applied by or through Contractor as may be necessary to maintain said roof in watertight conditions. This guarantee is made subject to the following conditions: 1. Specifically excluded from this guarantee is any and all damage to said roof, the building or contents caused by the acts or omissions of other trades or contractors; lighting, windstorm, hailstorm, flood, earthquake, or other unusual phenomena of the elements; foundation settlement; failure or cracking of the roof deck; defects or failure of material used as a roof base over which the roof is applied; faulty construction of parapet walls, copings, chimneys, skylights, vents, supports, or other pans of the building; vapor condensation beneath thc roof; penetrations for pitch boxes; water leakage due to erosion and porosity of mortar and brick; dry rot; stoppage of roof drains and gutters; penetration of the roofing from beneath by rising nails, inadequate drainage, slope, or other conditions beyond the control of Contractor which cause ponding or standing of water; termites or other insects; rodents or other animals; or fire. If the roof is damaged by reason of any of the foregoing, this guarantee shall thereupon become null and void for the balance of the guarantee period unless such damage is repaired by Contractor at the expense of the party requesting such repairs. 2. Contractor is not liable for consequential damages to the building or contents resulting from any defects in said roof, including, but without limitation, any interruption of business experienced by Owner or occupants of the building. 3. This guarantee shall become null and void unless the Contractor is promptly notified in writing of any alleged defect iu materials or workmanship and provided an opportunity to inspect and, if required by the terms of this Guarantee, to repair the roof. 4. No work shall be done on said roof, including, but without limited, work in connection with flues, vents, drains, sign braces, railings. platforms, or other equipment fastened to or set on the roof, and no repairs or alterations shall be made to said roof, unless Contractor shall first be notified in writing, shall be given the opportunity to make the necessary roofing application recommendations with respect thereto. and such recommendations are complied with. Failure to observe this condition shall render this guarantee null and void. Contractor shall be paid for time and materials expended in making recommendations or repairs occasioned by the work of others on said roof. 5. This guarantee shall become null and void if the roof is used as a promenade or work deck or is sprayed or flooded, unless such use was originally specified and the specification is noted in paragraph 9, below. 6. This guarantee shall not be or become effective unless and until Contractor has been paid in full for said roof in accordance wi~h the agreement pursuant to which such roof was applied. 7. This guarantee shall accrue only to the benefit of the original Owner named above. It is not transferable to any other person, except with the prior written consent of Contractor. 8. This guarantee is in lieu of all other guarantees or warranties, express or impled. ALL IMPLIED GUARANTEES AND WARRANTIES, AND SPECIFICALLY THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTI( ;1 ILAR PURPOSE, ARE EXPRESSLY EXCLUDED AND DISCLAIMED. 9. Additional conditions or exclusions: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed this 8th day of March , lO 95 Rayco Construction, Inc. ................................................................................................................................................................................... __-__ ........................................... ,, CPGLIOo1790 No. (~J= MATERtALS CORPORATION GAFGLAS Liberty LIBERTY GUARANTEE 10 Year 4633 IVANHOE PL., COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN ,mo~ssl~o~ 11.00 2XBM 50 U"~. r~t t~ 0~ ~l~"l~O CONSTRUCTION, INC. s~)1/09/95 01/09/05 THE GUARANTEE GAF MATERIALS CORPORATION (the 'Company') guarantees to the Building~ Owner'that, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below, the Company will make those repairs to the GAF Materiels Corporation roofing membrane end base flashing used in the construction of the above described roof as are necessary to correct leaks for the Guarantee Period commencing with the Date of Completion. This Guarantee covers such repairs to the GAF Materials Corporation membrane, base flashing, and roof insulation (but not including repair or replacement of roof deck, insulation, or other materials used in conjunction with the roofing system not sold by the Company) as shall be necessary solely in order to correct leaks resulting from any of the causes enumerated below. These repairs will be made at no cost to the Building Owner provided that the Owner gives the GAF Materials Corporation Technical Services Department 2-1, 1361 Alps Road, Wayqe, New Jersey 07470 wdtten notice of any such leaks no later than thirty days after the Owner discovers the leak. Scope of Coverage - Lllkl ClUlld by: 1. Natural deterioration of GAF Materials Corporation 6. Splits not caused by structural failure or movement of or membrane or base flashing cracks in substrata, roof base or insulation over which GAF 2. Blisters Materials Corporation membrane is applied 3. Bare Spots 7. Buckles and wrinkles 4. Fish-mouths 8. Workmanship in applying the membrane or base flashing. 5. Ridges 9. Slippage of membrane or base flashing OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES: In the event of s leak through the roof membrane or flashing, the Owner must notify the GAF Materials Corporation Technical Services Department, Wayne, New Jersey in wdting within thirty days after discovery of the leak. The roofing contractor ia NOT an agent of the Company; notice Io the roofing contractor is NOT notice to GAF Materials Corporation. The Owner shall perform regular inspections and maintenance during the effective period of this Guarantee. In an emergency, the Owner may authorize or perform temporary repairs to minimize damage to the building or its contents. Such work will not result in the cancellation of this Guarantee provided that the temporary repairs are reasonable and customary, and do not result in permanent damage to the GAF Materials Corporation membrane or base flashing. Owner is responsible for all expenses associated with temporary repairs. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE: This Guarantee shall NOT cover the following conditions or any damages which may arise therefrom. 1. Roof maintananca or correction o~ conditionc other Ihan leaks. 2. Natural disasters including, but not limited to, windstorms, hail, floods, hunicanes, lightning, ton'males, and earthquakes. 3. Damage to the roof constructed of the GAF Materials Corporation membrane due to: (a) settlement, distortion, movement, failure or cracking of the roof deck, walls, or foundations of the building; (b) improper installation of insulation or defects or failure of any matadal used in any roof base or insulation not manufactured by the Company over which the GAF Materials Corporation membrane is iLoplied; (c) infiltration or corldensation of moisture in, through or around the walls, corings, building structure, or underlying or surrounding materials; (d) defects in design; (e) Ihs performance, design, or application of non-GAF Materials Corporation materials including, but not limited to, roof decks, metal work, expansion or control joints, welkways, pitch pockets, lta~hing materials, lind roof top units and equipment; (f) expansio~ or contraction of any flashing or metal work; specifications as to roof slopes or other requirements; (h) chemical attack on the membrane; or (i) vandalism. 4. Damage to the building or its conlents. 5. Changes in usage of the building unless approved in writing in advance by the Company. 6. Damage resulting from any new installations on or through the GAF Materials Corporation membrane or from traffic of any nature on the roof. 7. Temporary repairs to the GAF Materials Corporation membrane or base ltashing authorized by the Owner. 8. Any repairs or other applications to the GAF Materials Corporation membrane or base flashing after the date of completion, unless performed in a manner acceptable to and approved by the Company in writing in advance. 9. Any damage occuning mare than thirty days after the discovery by the Owner or its agent of a leak, unless GAF Materials Corporation is notified of such leak within thirty days of its (g) underlying materials or structures having failed or ceased discovery. to conform to GAF Materials Coqx~reflo~'s or cthor applicable 10. Areas of roof which pond water. No representative, employee, or agent of GAF Materials Corporation, or any other person, has any authority to assume for the Company any additional or other liability or responsibility in connection with the roof described above. The Company shall not be responsible for or liable for any change or amendment to the GAF Materials Corporation roof specifications in regard to the construction of the roof described above, unless the change or amendment to the specifications is approved in writing by an authorized GAF Materials Corporation Technical Services Manager. This Guarantee is assignable to another owner of the building for the remaining term if the lollowing conditions are met: 1) Bequest ia in writing within 30 days after owtrerahip transfer; 2) The membrane is inspected and any required repairs are completed at owner's expense; 3) The proposed assignment is approved in writing by an authorized GAF Materials Corporation Technical Services Manager end 4) An assignment fee of $500.00 is paid to the Company. This Guarantee is not otherwise assignable, directly Or indirectly. CANCELLATION OF THIS GUARANTEE WILL RESULT IF THE ROOF IS DAMAGED BY ANY CAUSE LISTED ABOVE UNDER 'EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE" SO AS TO AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OR WATER'rIGHTNESS OF THE ROOF. THIS GUARANTEE l$ EXPRESSLY IN LIEU OFANY OTHER GUARANTEESANDIOR WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND OF ANY OTHER OBLIGATIONS OR LIABILITY ON THE PART OF GAF MATERIALS CORPORATION, WHETHER ANY CLAIM AGAINST IT I~ BASED UPON STRICT LIABILITY, NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR ANY OTHER TkJrpORY OR CAUSE OF ACTION. IN NO EVENT SHALL GAF MATERIALS CORPORATION BE LIABLE FOR ANY CONSEQUEN.,T=:Ij~ OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES OF ANY KIND. GAP1~I~'E~ P~O~'OON _ NOTE: This G ..... tee becomes effecti .... ly when biffs for 1 inatsllation and supplies have been paid in furl to the roofing WAVIdI= NJ nTaTn contractor and materials suppliers, end the Guarantee charge ..... , has been paid to GAF Materials Corporation. By FORM 10446 1/95 Date ,/IVlarCIT ~, ® CPGL10-1790 No. GAF MATERIALS CORPORATION GAFGLAS Liberty TYPE OF ~(~'J'~'"'~T~i"~"'°'" "=- [JL)LUMUlA HI:lUll i ~, L;L,JLUMBIA HUI~, MN OWNER PUMNP STATION #3 LIBERTY GUARANTEE PERIOD OF COVERAGE: 1 0 Year YEARS NAME ANe TYPE OF BUILDING 4633 IVANHOE PL., COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN AODRESS rB~.q~D~NG 1 1,00 SQUARES SPECIFICATION AREA OF ROOF 2 X B M 50 LINEAL FEET TYPE OF Fl~,~l~l~O CONSTRUCTION, INC. APPLIED BY 01/09/95 01/09/05 DATE OF COMPLETION EXPIRATION DATE THE GUARANTEE GAF MATERIALS CORPORATION (the "Company") guarantees to the Building Owner-that, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below, the Company will make those repairs to the GAF Materials Corporation roofing membrane and base flashing used in the construction of the above described roof as are necessary to correct leaks for the Guarantee Period commencing with the Date of Completion. This Guarantee covers such repairs to the GAF Materials Corporation membrane, base flashing, and roof insulation (but not including repair or replacement of roof deck, insulation, or other materials used in conjunction with the roofing system not sold by the Company) as shall be necessary solely in order to correct leaks resulting from any of the causes enumerated below. These repairs will be made at no cost to the Building Owner provided that the Owner gives the GAF Materials Corporation Technical Services Department 2-1, 1361 Alps Road, Wayne, New Jersey 07470 written notice of any such leaks no later than thirty days after the Owner discovers the leak. Scope of Coverage - Leaks Caused by: 1. Natural deterioration of GAF Materials Corporation membrane or base flashing 2. Blisters 3. Bare Spots 4. Fish*mouths 5. Ridges OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES: 6. Splits not caused by structural failure or movement of or cracks in substrate, roof base or insulation over which GAF Materials Corporation membrane is applied 7. Buckles and wrinkles 8. Workmanship in applying the membrane or base flashing. 9. Slippage of membrane or base flashing In the event of a leak through the roof membrane or flashing, the Owner must notify the GAF Materials Corporation Technical Services Department, Wayne, New Jersey in writing within thirty days after discovery of the leak. The roofing contractor is NOT an agent of the Company; notice to the roofing contractor is NOT notice to GAF Materials Corporation. The Owner shall perform regular inspections and maintenance during the effective period of this Guarantee. In an emergency, the Owner may authorize or perform temporary repairs to minimize damage to the building or its contents. Such work will not result in the cancellation of this Guarantee provided that the temporary repairs are reasonable and customary, and do not result in permanent damage to the GAF Materials Corporation membrane or base flashing. Owner is responsible for all expenses associated with temporary repairs. EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE: This Guarantee shall NOT cover the following conditions or any damages which may arise therefrom. 1. Roof maintenance or correction of conditions other than leaks. 2. Natural disasters including, but not limited to, windstorms, hail, floods, hurricanes, lightning, tornados, and earthquakes. 3. Damage to the roof constructed of the GAF Materials Corporation membrane due to: (a) settlement, distortion, movement, failure or cracking of the roof deck, walls, or foundations of the building; (b) improper installation of insulation or defects or failure of any material used in any roof base or insulation not manufactured by the Company over which the GAF Materials Corporation membrane is applied; (c) infiltration or condensation of moisture in, through or around the walls, copings, building structure, or underlying or surrounding materials; (d) defects in design; (e) the performance, design, or application of non-GAF Materials Corporation materials including, but not limited to, roof decks, metal work, expansion or control joints, walkways, pitch pockets, flashing materials, and roof top units and equipment; (f) expansion or contraction of any flashing or metal work; specifications as to roof slopes or other requirements; (h) chemical attack on the membrane; or (i) vandalism. 4. Damage to the building or its contents. 5. Changes in usage of the building unless approved in writing in advance by the Company. 6. Damage resulting from any new installations on or through the GAF Materials Corporation membrane or from traffic of any nature on the roof. 7. Temporary repairs to the GAF Materials Corporation membrane or base flashing authorized by the Owner. 8. Any repairs or other applications to the GAF Materials Corporation membrane or base flashing after the date of completion, unless performed in a manner acceptable to and approved by the Company in writing in advance. 9. Any damage occurring more than thidy days after the discovery by the Owner or its agent of a leak, unless GAF Materials Corporation is notified of such leak within thirty days of its (g) underlying materials or structures having failed or ceased discovery. to conform to GAF Materials Corporation's or other applicable 10. Areas of roof which pond water. No representative, employee, or agent of GAF Materials Corporation, or any other person, has any authority to assume for the Company any additional or other liability or responsibility in connection with the roof described above. The Company shall not be responsible for or liable for any change or amendment to the GAF Materials Corporation roof specifications in regard to the construction of the roof described above, unless the change or amendment to the specifications is approved in writing by an authorized GAF Materials Corporation Technical Services Manager. This Guarantee is assignable to another owner of the building for the remaining term if the following conditions are met: 1) Request is in writing within 30 days after ownership transfer; 2) The membrane is inspected and any required repairs are completed at owner's expense; 3)The proposed assignment is approved in writing by an authorized GAF Materials Corporation Technical Services Manager and 4) An assignment fee of $500.00 is paid to the Company. This Guarantee is not otherwise assignable, directly or indirectly. CANCELLATION OF THIS GUARANTEE WILL RESULT IF THE ROOF IS DAMAGED BY ANY CAUSE LISTED ABOVE UNDER "EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE" SO AS TO AFFECT THE INTEGRITY OR WATERTIGHTNESS OF THE ROOF. THIS GUARANTEE IS EXPRESSLY IN LIEU OFANY OTHER GUARANTEESAND/OR WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND OF ANY OTHER OBLIGATIONS OR LIABILITY ON THE PART OF GAF MATERIALS CORPORATION, WHETHER ANY CLAIM AGAINST IT IS BASED UPON STRICT LIABILITY, NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR ANY OTHER TH~RY OR CAUSE OF ACTION IN NO EVENT SHALL GAF MATERIALS CORPORATION BE LIABLE FOR ANY CONSEQUEN~J;~ OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES OF ANY KIND. GAF1~ lt~l~l~ ~ IM~G pP__~O RBO ~ATJO N I~ N , NOTE: This Guarantee becomes effective only when bills for 136'1~.~ '~1~~-~ installation and supplies have been paid in full to the roofing WAYNE NJ 07470 '~'~'"~'~ contractor and materials suppliers, and the Guarantee charge , ~,'~'-//// / has been paid to GAF Materials Corporation. By / ~[~¢~/~.///~//_// FORM 10446 1/95 J~lar~'°~-.~"~ ~ Date CITY COUNCIL LE'ITER Meetingof: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SEC2]ON: NEW BUSINESS NO.: 9 ITEM: Authorization to ~eek quotations NO.: for purchase and installation of copier at library q.~ o , ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: Library BY: M. Rebecca Loader ~'.~ DATE: May 17, 1995 CITY MANAGER APPROVAL BDYATE.~~-- In the 1995 budget the library has $6,500 in line item #5170 to purchase a copier for departmental use. The library currently owns a Gestetner 2240Z copier which was purchased in 1988 for $4,814.23. The Gestetner has 414,441 copies registered on the counter as of 5/15/95, which averages out to about 60,000 per year. The service contract costs $800/40,000 copies and includes a set amount of supplies. This machine has experienced numerous breakdowns and repairs since it was purchased. It is unreliable and cannot handle either long runs or dual-sided copies well. It has averaged three service calls per month over the past three months. Replacement needs to be considered because of: 1. Age of the machine 2. Rising cost of maintenance agreement for an old machine 3. Frequency of break-downs It is the intent of staff to examine various models of machines, types of options (including leasing), and copiers available through State/County contracts to determine what features are necessary to meet the library's copying requirements most effectively. Staff has looked at some options prior to requesting permission to seek quotes and has come to the conclusion that a mid-range copier would be suitable for most library copy jobs with major copying hms being reserved for the Kodak copier at City Hall. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to authorize staff to obtain quotations for purchase and installation of departmental copier at library. COUNCIL ACTION: CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Meeting of: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPT.: CITY MANAGER NO: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL ITEM: MHFA FIRST TIME HOMEBUYER BY: Tina Goodroa~ BY: ~ MINNESOTA CITY PARTICIPATION PROGRAM~%6~ DATE: May 15, 1995 v - (MCPP) The HRA/City has been invited by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) to participate in the 1995-96 Minnesota City Participation Program (MCPP) first time homebuyer program. Since starting to participate in this yearly program in 1991, 84 loans have been completed for a total of $5,787,331. These loans with reduced interest rates are enabling 84 low to moderate income first time homebuyers to purchase homes in Columbia Heights. In prior years, under the MHFA MCPP, HRA's and/or cities could apply for a specific allocation amount for providing loans at reduced interest rates (1 to 1 1/2% below market mortgage interest rates). The 1995 program is expected to have $43.75 million available for the program, however, the allocation rules have changed. This year's allocation will be based on a per capita allocation. This is roughly estimated at $34.00 per resident X 18,910 residents (1990 census) = $642,940. This would be sufficient for approximately 9 loans. However, this will depend upon the number of cities that apply and what their total population base is. MHFA is asking cities to either specify a dollar allocation request or indicate a request for the "maximum allowable." This year, based on past experience with this program and high expectation of usage this year, the HRA is applying for $2,000,000. This should provide sufficient mortgage money through participating lenders for 27 loans at an average of $74,074 per loan. Information about the program and a copy of the proposed application are enclosed for your information in appendix A and Appendix B. The HRA will furnish the necessary $400 (or lesser amount if HRA/City is funded for less than the $2,000,000) processing fee and the necessary 1% proposal deposit which will be refunded upon sale of bonds for the program. The processing fee is $20.00 for every $100,000 of the MCPP funds allocated for the HRA/City. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to grant approval (concurrence) for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to apply for an allocation of up to $2,000,000 from the Minnesota Finance Agency Minnesota City Participation Program (First Time Homebuyer Program) and, if successful in securing an allocation, to provide the necessary City/HRA involvement in the program. cc: HRA Commissioners COUNCIL ACTION: \bt\council.for Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Columbia Heights 590 N.E. 40th Avenue, Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Fax: (612) 782-2857. (612) 782-2854 June 1, 1995 Mr. Michael Haley Director of Home Mortgage Programs Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 St. Paul, MN 55101 RE: APPLICATION FOR 1995 MINNESOTA CITY PARTICIPATION PROGRAM (MCPP) (Allocation Requested: $2,000,000) Dear Mr. Haley: As per your invitation for application for the above referenced program, enclosed is our 1995 MCPP Applicaion for Funding ($2,000,000). Please call me at 782-2855 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Donald R. Schneider Executive Director Enclosure: Equal Opportunity Employer Equal Housing Opportunity Agency MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY 1995 MINNESOTA CITY P~RTICIPATION PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR FUNDING Col~m~ia Heights, Minnesota Prepared by: Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Columbia Heights 590 - 40th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421 May 1995 Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 1995 Minnesota City Participation Program APPLICATION FOR FUNDING I. ELIGIBLE ORGANIZATION ae Be Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Columbia Heights 590 - 40th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, Minnesota 55421 Donald R. Schneider, Executive Director - 782-2855 Scott McKinney, Housing Coordinator - 782-2858 C. See B. above. D. $2,000,000 Estimate 28 loans at an average amount of $70,750; median selling price as calculated by the Anoka County Association of Realtors. E. $250,000 F. Not applied II. ORIGINATING LENDERS See attached letters of commitment (Appendix A). III. HOUSING PLAN The City of Columbia Heights is a first-ring suburb located just north of Minneapolis. It is bordered by the cities of Minneapolis (south), Fridley (north and west), and St. Anthony and New Brighton (east). The city encompasses approximately 3.7 square miles and has a population of 18,910. (Source: 1990 U.S. Census) The City is characterized by its predominance of housing. below provides a breakdown of the city's housing inventory. (Source: 1990 U.S. Census). The table Total Owner- Renter- Unit Type Units Vacant Occupied Occupied Single-Family 5,634 101 5,053 480 Multi-Family 2,280 108 385 1,787 Mobile Home or Trailer 5 0 4 1 Other 56 0 23 33 7,975 209 5,465 Percentage 2% 69% 2,301 29% - 1 of 6 - Minnesota City Participation Program City of Columbia Heights III. HOUSING PLAN (cont.) Much of the City's housing stock is aging and such issues as mainte- nance have become an ever increasing problem. Columbia Heights has a significant percentage of its housing stock which is more than 30 years old. The table below provides a distribution of the housing stock for selected years. (Source: 1990 U.S. Census) Year Built Number of Units Percentage of Housinq Stock 1959 to 1950 1949 to 1940 1239 and Older Total Housing Units = 2,498 31% 782 10% 1,161 15% 4,441 56% 7,975 In addition, the City's population is also aging. Between 1980 and 1990 the total number of persons age 65 and older increased 70% from 1,996 to 3,381. During the same period the number of housing units occupied by owners over the age of 65 also increased from 837 to 1,427. As these owners grow older, they find maintaining their homes to be a greater burden, both physically and financially. The table below shows the tenure by age of householder (Source: 1990 U.S. Census). Age Occupied Owner Renter Cateqory Units % Occupied % Occupied % 15 - 24 yrs. 314 4% 73 1.3% 241 10.5% 25 - 34 yrs. 1,622 20.9% 889 16.3% 733 31.9% 35 - 44 yrs. 1,436 18.5% 1,029 18.8% 407 17.7% 45 - 54 yrs. 1,115 14.4% 908 16.6% 207 9.0% 55 - 64 yrs. 1,276 16.4% 1,130 20.7% 146 6.3% 65 - 74 yrs. 1,167 15.0% 962 17.6% 205 8.9% 75+ 836 10.8% 474 8.7% 362 15.7% 7,766 5,465 2,301 Perhaps the most telling statistic is the number of owner-occupied householders over the age of 55 and the number of renter-occupied householders under the age 55. Based on the data shown above, almost 1/3 of all owner-occupants are over age 55, while 2/3 of all renter occupants are in the 15 - 54 age category. - 2 of 6 - Minnesota city Participation Program City of Col~mbia Heights III. HOUSING PLAN (cont.) In response to these trends, the City adopted the following Housing Plan (Source: 1992 Columbia Heights Comprehensive Plan Update): Goals and Policies: Goal: Goal: Maintain and enhance the quality of the single-family detached housing stock and the neighborhoods in which it is located. Upgrade and improve attractive multiple-family housing for those segments of the population that cannot afford or do not desire to live in detached housing. Since Columbia Heights is predominately residential, the City regards the preservation and enhancement of the housing stock as its most important task. ae Sinqle-Family Code Enforcement: The city shall strive to maintain the physical quality of single-family housing through Code enforcement. Be Ce Spot Clearance: The City shall remove and replace the most seriously deteriorated single-family houses so that they do not continue to harm the value of nearby housing. Multiple-Family Housinq Maintenance Standards: The City shall maintain minimum standards for multiple housing through a program of regular inspections and Code enforcement. De Housinq Assistance: The City shall continue to provide adequate housing programs. Equal Opportunity: The City shall continue to promote and protect equal housing opportunity in publicly assisted and private housing. Neiqhborhood Protection: The City shall work to protect the integrity and long-term viability of its neighbor- hoods and strive to reduce the potential negative effects of nearby commercial or industrial development through zoning, site plan reviews and Code enforcement. Go Site Maintenance: The City shall strictly enforce its municipal regulations pertaining to yard and building maintenance so as to protect residential property values. He Land Use Plan: Land uses that are inconsistent with the Land Use Plan and incompatible with housing will be improved or removed over time where possible and the land reused in conformance with the Land Use Plan. - 3 of 6 - Minnesota city Participation Program City of Columbia Heights III. HOUSING PLAN (cont.) Multiple-Family Housinq Standards: The city shall enforce high standards for all multiple-family housing development. Included will be aspects of building massing, parking location, access, traffic impact, landscaping exterior architectural design, fencing, trash handling and parking ratios. Alternative Housinq: The City shall promote the develop- ment of medium density, owner-occupied and rental housing for one and two-person households. This would provide an opportunity for large households to acquire housing made available by the one and two person households owning detached single-family housing. Duplexes: The city shall allow "zero-lot-line" duplex units to encourage individual ownership of the units. Architectural Desiqn: The design of new housing on infill and redevelopment sites should be compatible in scale, materials, and rooflines with any single-family housing on the same block or immediate vicinity. Financial Tools: The City will continue to use such tools as mortgage revenue bonds, tax increment financing and the Community Development Block Grant Program (along with either public funding source as may be available) to assist decent, affordable housing in the community, especially the elderly. The City will enter partnerships in a business-like fashion, seeking to improve the quality of such housing and/or ensure that rents remain affordable. However, the City will not jeopardize the quality of existing housing and neighborhoods through the siting of subsidized housing. The goals and policies were developed as a result of an opinion survey conducted in October of 1991. Residents were asked to respond to a variety of questions concerning such topics as employment, education, housing, local government, community image and crime. To assist the preservation of the housing stock, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority has provided more than $26,870,382 in housing rehab and mortgage assistance funds via the following programs: HOUSING REHABILITATION Proqram MHFA Home Improvement Loans MHFA Home Energy Loans MHFA Deferred Loan MHFA Rental Rehab Grants MHFA Rental Rehab Loans CDBG/HOME Home Improvement Grants Number of Loans Dollar Value 169 $ 943,901 47 163,891 122 439,660 12 82,925 8 105,000 154 939,674 485 $2,675,051 - 4 of 6 - Minnesota city Participation Program city of Columbia Heights III. HOUSING PLAN (cont.) MORTGAGE ASSISTANCE Fundinq Year 1982 - 1983 1987 - 1988 1991 (MCPP) 1992 (MCPP) 1993 (MCPP) 1994 (MCPP) (Sources: Columbia Heights HRA) Dollar Value 8,408,000 10,000,000 1,477,000 1,400,309 1,632,000 (Estimated) 1,278,022 24,195,331 IV. PROGRAM SPECIFICS The Columbia Heights First time Homebuyer Program will complement efforts by the City to preserve its housing stock and increase the opportunities for new families to move into the community. The end result will hopefully be more diverse and vibrant neighborhoods which are attractive to live in. Borrower Income Limits: 80% of HUD Median Income; allowed under the MCPP. maximum Currently: $ 40,800 (5/95) Home Purchase Price Limits: 80% of HUD "Safe Harbor" limits; maximum allowed under the MCPP. Targeting Portion of Funds: $400,000 of the MCPP funds will be reserved for five (5) months for use in the Sheffield Neighborhood for mortgages for new construction. V. ECONOMIC VIABILITY The MCPP program has worked well in the City of Columbia Heights. Since first participating in the program in 1991 (and again in 1992, 1993 & 1994) more than 84 loans with a total dollar value of $5,787,331 have been made to date, approximately 77% of the funds were utilized during the 1991, 1992, 1993 and 1994 programs. It is anticipated, based on figures provided by the Anoka County Association of Realtors (ACAR), that there will be continued demand for the MCPP. - 5 of 6 - Minnesota city Participation Program City of Columbia Heights A comparison of home sales for 1992 and 1993 is shown below (Source: ACAR) 1994 1993 * Total number of units sold * Sales as a % of the total market * Total dollar value * Average listing price * Average selling price * Selling price as a % of listing price * Median selling price 214 212 1.79% 1.77% $16,016,190 $15,750,283 $ 76,703 $ 76,386 $ 74,842 $ 74,293 97.57% 97.26% $ 75,106 $ 73,500 VI. NEW CONSTRUCTION Although the City anticipates that MCPP funds will be used primarily for the purchase of existing homes, some funds may be used for new construc- tion in a City wide basis. VII. SIGNATURES X Donald J. Murzyn, Jr. Chair X Donald R. Schneider Executive Director Date Date mnhsfina - 6 of 6 - CHEMlCAL Margaretten & Company A Division of Chemical Residential Mortgage Corporation 7900 Xerxes Avenue S., Suite 170 Bloomington, MN 55431 612/844-1700 612/844-1751 FAX May 15, 1995 Ms. Tina Goodroed City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Ave NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Ms. Goodroed, I am taking this opportunity to request permission for Chemical Residential Mortgage Corporation to ta~ part in the Minnesota City Participation Program. We are and have been an approved lender for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency program for over a year. Plea.se contact me for any additional information that you may need. Sia~rely. AVP Branch Manager MORTGAGE Norwest Mortgage, Inc. 100 North Park Corporate Center 8 Pine Tree Drive Arden Hills, MN 55112-3744 612/483-8211 Fax 612/483-3303 ? 5° Inland Mortgage Corporation 5100 Gamble Drive Suite 470 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416-1522 An Ir~wn Financial Company May 16, 1995 Mr. Donald Schneider Columbia Heights HR.A 590 40th Avenue East Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Mr. Schneider: This letter is a follow-up to my letter of January 25, 1995 requesting Inland Mortgage Corporation be a participating lender in the 1995 Minnesota City Participation Program with Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for your City. We are very interested in working with you on this program. Thank you for your consideration. S~cerely,/~ Tom Leland Branch Manager 612 546 1520 HOMEOWNERS MORTGA GE CORPORA TION May 16, 1995 Mr. Don Schneider City of Columbia Heights 590 46th Ave. NE Columbia Heights, Mn. 55421 Re: MCPP Financing Dear Mr. Schneider, This letter is to noyify you of our intent to originate MCPP loans in Columbia Heights. We request that you add our name to your list of approved lenders. Robert Sund~t 3450 Lexington Avenue/Shoreview, MN 55126/'(612) 481-0722 MidAmerica Bank Mortgage Banldng Services November 09, 1994 City of Columbia Heights 590 - 40th Ave NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 attn: Donald Schneider re: MHFA-MCPP Dear Donald, We currently are doing mortgage business in your City. We have many past, current and, hopefully, future customers that have inquired about MHFA money. We have also had many of those customers ask about MCP? money for Columbia Heights. Since we participate in both programs, we would like to be put on your Lender List. This would enable us to better serve our future customers and encourage home ownership in the City of Columbia Heights. If you have any questions, please call either of us at 948- 0156. Your help in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely Mark Roe Loan Officer 1600 West 82nd Street · Suite 120 · Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (612) 948-0156 · (800) 440-8655 · Fax (612) 948-0257 Inland Mortgage Corporation 5100 Gamble Drive Suite 470 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416-1522 JanUary 25, 1995 An Irwin Financial Coml~any Mr. Donald Schneider Columbia Heights HKA 590 40th Avenue East Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Mr. Schneider: Thank you for allowing Inland Mortgage Corporation to be one of your lenders in the 1994 Minnesota Cities Participation Program with Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. We would like to be a participating lender in the 1995 program if you are applying for it. If you need any information we would be happy to provide it. You can reach me at 546- 1520. S~ZF,6 m Leland Branch Manager 612 546 1520 Mortgage FBS Mortgage Corporation P.O. Box 1199 Minneapolis, Minnesota 554~0 612 641-3800 April 29, 1995 David Schneider City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Avenue NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Mr. Schneider: Please accept this as our request for our participation in the 1995 Minnesota City Participation Program with the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. We would be pleased to participate in this program and look forward to working with the City. of Columbia Heights. The contact at FBS Mortgage Corporation will be: Jon Peterson FBS Mortgage Corporation 200 Coon Rapids Boulevard, Suite 200 Coon Rapids, MN 55433 phone: (612) 786-0466 fax: (612) 786-0854. We look forward to a mutually beneficial program. Sincerely, Tricia Landers Program Coordinator cc; Jon Peterson Gene Aho, MI-IFA Columbia Heights Office 5250 C, enlral Avenue NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 612 572-32OO May 9, 1995 Don Schneider Columbia Heights lIRA 590 40th Avenue NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Mr. Schneider: First Bank National Association, Columbia Heights office has and will continue to participate in the 1995 MCPP program for First Time Home Buyers funding. Thank you for allowing us to participate in the program. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 572-3200. Thank you ~stin K. Peter Person~ B~er Marquette Mortgage A Division of Marquette Bank, N.A. 4301 Winnetka Avenue North New Hope, MN 55428-4926 (612)536-6262 Outside Metro Area (800)295-6270 May 12, 1995 Tina Goodroad City ofColumbia Heights 590 N.E. 40thAvenue Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Tina: This letter is to advise you of Marquette Bank Brookdale's (dba Marquette Mortgage) desire to originate mortgage loans for City of Columbia Heights under the MHFA City Participation Program. Our participation in the program is, of course, subject to the approval of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. Thank you for the oppommity to assist in providing financing for low and moderate income first time homebuyers in the Columbia Heights area. Feel free to contact me at (612) 536-6261 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Vice President c. Karen DuCharme BELL MORTGAGE COMPANY MORTGAGE BANKERS SINCE 1880 May 15, 1995 Columbia Heights HRA Mr. Donald Schneider 590 40th Ave. NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 RE: Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Cities Program Dear Mr. Schneider, Please accept Bell Mortgage Company's letter of intent to originate mortgage loans for the city of Columbia Heights under the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 1995 Minnesota City Participation Prograrm Bell Mortgage Company is familiar with MHFA program guides and has experience processing loans under MHFA's first time homebuyer programs. Bell Mortgage Company understands that we will be required to enter into a contract with MHFA as to adherence to the requirements of the program and loan origination. Bell Mortgage requests that applications for loans under the Minnesota Community Participation Program be taken at these Bell Mortgages offices: 1000 Shelard Parkway, Suite 500, Minneapolis, MN 55426 Phone: 591-1880 Fax: 591-5801 3601 Minnesota Drive, Suite 550, Bloomington, MN 554-35 Phone: 893-0865 Fax: 897-1892 *6235 Earle Brown Drive, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Phone: 560-1880 Fax: 560-3003 If you have any questiom, correspondence, etc. please direct to: Barb Cardinal, MCPP Coordinator Bell Mortgage Company 3601 Minnesota Drive, Suite 550 Bloomington, MN 55435 Phone: 893-0865 Fax: '897~ 1892 We appreciate the opportunity you have given us. Thank you. // IO00SHELARD PARK\VAY, SUITE 50o · MINNE.\POI. IS, MN -35426 · (612) -391-t880 360l MINNESOTA DRIVE, SUITE 550 * BLOOMINGTON, MN .3'3435 * (612)S93-086-5 6233 E,-\RLE BI/OXVN DRIVE · BROOKLYN CENTER, MN -55430 · (612) -360-I,~80 c~445 EAST RIX'Ell. ROAI') · COON RAPIDS, MN -354~ · (612) 767-18~0 1O-- APPLICATION FOR ~ING MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY 1995 MINNESOTA CITY PARTICIPATION (MCPP) ($EVEN-¢OUNZY TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA (Anoka, C~, ,rver, Dai~ota~:~ Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott or Washington counties) The following is an Application for Funding under MHFA's Minnesota. City Participation Program. As opposed to providing an application blank, tiffs request is provided in the form of an outline which includes areas and questions that must be addressed by the applicant. This has been done to accommodate the variety of word processing systems that may be used to respond to this offering. Entities responding to the MCPP should carefully follow the format in the outline and type both each area or question for which information is requested as well k-~i-~res_rSonse, ad;i~:~ssing each question in sufficient d-~tail. Review the attached cover letter for details on program restrictions before completing this application. Final determination of the total amount of program funds available and individual allotments will be made by MHFA in compliance with a per capita distribution method specified in statute. Any questions may be directed to Gene A.ho in MHFA's Homeownership Opportunity Division at 297-3129 or by dialing 1-800-657-3802 if you are located in Greater Minnesota. Applications must be delivered to MHFA offices between 8:00 a.m., June I and 4:30 p.m., June 8, 1995 for funding consideration under this program phase. (a) (b) '(c) (d) (e) Name and address of your organization. Name and phone number of your contact person. Type of organization (City Department, Port Authority, HRA, or EDA). Amount of funds requested, and the estimated number of loans to be provided. If preferred, state "maximum allowable" (by population formula). If desired, spec/fy the minimum sized allocation you will accept for your 1995 program. If the new per capita allocation formula does not provide this level, MHFA will cancel your application. Information on any unused Mortgage Revenue Bond (MRB) or Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) resources st/il available in your community (non-MHFA). II. Cities must designate at least one lender who will take mortgage applications and process loans for your program. Attach a letter from each lender confirming their willingness to participate in your orogram. -3- demand, such as real estate sales over the past year; Realtor, builder or lender information; indicators of a housing shortage; and recent area business/economic expansion. Newly constructed homes may only be financed with funds under the MCPP if one of the three following criteria is met. If your program involves new construction, indicate which category (a, b or c, below) will be incorporated into your program, and include appropriate details on area, type of structure, or affordability initiative as is applicable. (a) New construction located in a qualified redevelopment area. Include a brief description and/or map defining the boundaries of your city's redevelopment area. * (b) New construction to replace a structurally substandard structure or structures. (c) New construction which will be developed under one or more of the "affordability initiatives" allowed under administrative rules (see Attachment 1). ' "Redevelopment area" means a compact and contiguous area within which 70% of the parcels are developed (buildings, street, s, utilities, etc.), and where more than 25% of the buildings are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. Provide authorized signature(s) from the organization placing this application, including printed or typewritten name, title and phone number. MCPP-I-TC 3/1~9a, CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Meeting of: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPT.: CITY MANAGER NO: 9 COMMUN I TY~_D. EVELOPME~. APPROVAL ITEM: CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE REQUEST BY: D~-ho~"~a~ Sc~ider BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: May 10, 1995 Authorization is requested for the attendance of Don Schneider, Community Development Director at the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials (NAHRO) National Conference and Exposition. The conference will be held in Cincinnati, Ohio, from October 8-11, 1995. This conference provides attendees with perspectives of public and private experts from around the United States on today's critical housing and redevelopment issues. Attendees will learn how to cope with the rapidly changing information and programs in regard to housing and redevelopment and how to implement new changes and programs in Columbia Heights. The amount requested for this conference is under $1,200 including transportation, meals, lodging, registration fee, and incidentals. Money has been budgeted. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to authorize the Community Development Director, Don Schneider to attend the NAHRO National Conference and Exposition in Cincinnati, Ohio from October 8- 11, 1995 and such expenses to be paid from bud§eted funds. COUNCIL ACTION: \bt\council.for Cincinnati, Ohio October ,~8,.~:..,1 I, 1995 Discover What the Future Will Hotd'' s um the challenges of the future into opportu- niQes for your hometown when you join us at NAHRO's NaQonai Conference in Cincinnati for a realistic, practical examination of what the future holds. Profound changes in our profession are reshaping standard operating procedures. What wiiI that mean to the future of your community? Already, innovative programs and approaches have been developed that your agency can use to meet the future with confidence and success. Master them land more) at over 70 dynamic sessions. Plus, throughout the Conference you'll have ample opportunity to share practical experiences with your colleagues. It's the ideal way to learn how you can meet and shape the future in housing, commu- nity deve!opment, policy, organizational manage- meat. and international services. Here's a sample of some of the more than 70 ses- sions that will be presented at this exciting Nauonai Conference. essions · Developing Downtown Housing - Explore how public-private partnerships provide eco- nomic and social benefit through downtown housing · Welfare Reform and Its Impact on Public and Assisted Housing - Hear from professionals operating in states that have implemented welfare reform · Maintenance Systems and Training Reality Check: Managing the Future- Visit a first-rate maintenance facility to see training in action · Operating Public and Assisted Housing in a Deregulated Environment- Find out how to set rents when there are no regulations · Creating Home Ownership Opportunities for Renters - Learn how an innovative "lease to own" program elimi- nates the biggest stum- bling blocks for home-ownership - the down payment and closing costs · Arts and Economic Development- Discover the hottest trend in downtown redevel- opment which is attracting people back to the urban core · Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities- Assess these tools for eco- nomic development "one year after" · Home: Putting the Pieces Together- Meet the "guru" who has broken the code and can teach you how to use this seemingly difficult program · Leading and Managing Changes into the 2000s - Improve your ability to understand. deal with, and initiate change in a positive way · The Gifts of Adversity and the Benefits of Stress - And you thought it was bad! Hear how you can use adversity and stress to your advantage · What Business Are We In, Anyway? - Examine ways your agency can develop a mean- ingful business plan to take it to the next century · Competing in the Private Sector- No regs! Plan now to compete for residents with the guys down the street · Evaluation in a Results-oriented Environment - Gain the tools and techniques you will need to measure your performance · Working the Community Interfaces - Do the Commissioners Have a Role?- Take an in-depth look at how commissioners fit into this vital function · Long-term Goal-setting and Strate~c Planning- Learn how to get buy-in from the maior players - the board, staff, residents, and the community · Project Delivery Methods for Public Housing - Focus on an analysis of the various methods available to design and build public housing · What Every Executive Director Should Know About Personnel Administration- Can't afford a human resources department? Learn the do's and don'ts from experienced pro- fessionals · Back to the Future in Section 8 Administration -Section 8 is now 21 years old. Is it an adult? Or a step-child? · Developing Affordable Housing Through the Federal Home Loan Bank-Investigate the potentials for funding development Turn Tomorrow's Challenges into Today's Opportunities !, 1. Complete the attached form. All participants, guests, speakers, and press must register for the conference on the official NAHRO Registration Form. Please enter the appropriate registration fee on your Registration Form. Your registration fee does not include meals or hotei. 2. Calculate your savings! Savings Category Individual AND Individual A~ency Non- Agency Member Member Member Member Early Bird ~ [uly 15 S370 $370 S415 Postmark Regular August 1 ~ $365 S395 $395 Postmark Late* September 8 S390 S420 S420 Postmark On-Site S415 S445 $445 Spouse/ $140 Guest Resident S255 attending with re~stered staff: or commissionen · Nttr S~ttm~r 8. ~oa must reps~ on-sim P.e~s~ now and saw mon~! 3. Include your payment instructions. S440 $465 $490 Full payment must accompany your form. You may pay by check, agency purchase order, claim voucher, VISA. or MasterCard. Note: You mast enclose payment in full. your pun:hose order, or claim voucher for NAHRO to pr0~$ your registra~n. 4. Bring a guest! Registered spouses and guests of NAHRO delegates may a~tend the following activities for a registration fee of S140. · NAHRQ Welcoming Reception -- Sunday, October 8 · Continental Breakfast -- Monday and Tuesday · Exhibition Receptions -- Monday and Tuesday · Full Breakfast- Wednesday, October II · Dinner Show ~ Wednesday, October l I · All Conference sessions 5. Send in your form. Mail your Registration Form, together with full payment. purchase order, or claim voucher to: NAHRQ Conference Registration Center. P.O. Box 809254, Chicago, IL 60680. Note: Please duplicate the form for each individual registrant. 6. Questions? NAHRQ cannot accept any telephone registrations. Registration questions? Call 312-782-2958. 7. Watch for confirmation. Your registration will be confirmed by NAHRO in writing. You must receive official confirmation to attend. 8. Register early and save! Registration must be paid in full and postmarked before September 8. 1995. Registrations postmarked a~ter that date must pay the on-site fee. CanceR~tlor~ and Refunds Cancellations must be in writing and should be sent to: NAHRO Conference Registration Center, P.O. Box 809254, Chicago, IL 60680. Sorry, no telephone cancellations. To receive a full refund, your cancellation must be post- marked by August 15, 1995. Cancellations postmarked by September 22, 1995, will receive a full refund minus a $50 cancellation fee. No refunds after September 22, 1995. No partiai refunds for functions you did not attend. Stay at a NAHRO hotel and save To receive your Iow room rate, you must complete the accom- modations section of your Registration Form. You will receive confirmation of your room reservation by return mail. All rooms must be guaranteed by czedit card or check. Please see form for details. Please Note: No request for reservations can be processed a~ter September 8, 1995. After that date, please contact the hotel directly. Changes to your room request must be sent in wdting to the NAHRO Conference Registration Center by September 8. 1995. Changes not confirmed in writing may result in cancelled reservations and lost deposit. Receive the Lowest Fare Available to the NAHRO National Conference Receive the lowest fare available. NAHRO and our travel part- ner. Omega World Travel. have negotiated special discount air- fares for NAHRO meetings and conferences. These exclusive fares can save you be.~veen 5% and 10% off the lowest available a~rfare. We guarantee that you will receive the lowest fare avail- able at time of ticketing or you will be refunded the difference plus $25 Th~s se~ice is available only through NAHRQ and Omega World Travel. Vis~[ any one of the 200 nationwide Omega World Travel offices or call (800) 229-8542 18:30-5:30 ESTI or ~8001 685-6342 124 hours a day.) Use code NHIUQ- NAHRQ S a v e - M o n ey-.~;; '.".,R e § i s t e r Early*. 1. Complete the attached form. All partidpants, guests, speakers, and press must register for the conference on the official NAHRO Registration Form. Please enter the appropriate registration fee on your Registration Form. Your registration fee does not include meals or hotet. 2. Calculate your savings! Savings Category Individual AND Individual Al[eno/ Non- A/eno/Member Member Member Member Early Bird ~ luly 15 S370 S370 $415 Postmark Regular August [ ~ $365 S395 $395 Postmark l~te* September 8 S390 $420 S420 Postmark On-Site S415 $445 $445 Spouse/ S 140 Guest Resident $255 attending with re~stered staff or commissioner. :3. Include your payment instructions. $440 $465 $490 Full payment: must accompany your form. You may pay by check, agency purchase order, claim voucher, VISA, or MasterCard. Note.. You must enclose payment in full. your purchase order, or claim voucher for NAHRO to prn~ss your registra~.. 4. Bring a guest! Registered spouses and guests of NAHRO delegates may attend the following actMties for a registration fee of $140. ® NAHRO Welcoming Reception -- Sunday, October 8 ® Continental Breakfast -- Monday and Tuesday · Exhibition Receptions -- Monday and Tuesday · Full Breakfast- Wednesday, October I 1 · Dinner Show --Wednesday, October 1 1 · All Conference sessions 5. Send in your form. Mail your Registration Form. together with full payment, purchase order, or claim voucher to: NAHRO Conference Registration Center, P.O. Box 809254, Chicago, IL 60680. No~e: Plg~e du~liccite the form for each individual registranL 6. Questions? NAHRO cannot accept any telephone registrations. Registration questions? Call 312-782-2958. 7. Watch for confirmation. Your registration will be confirmed by NAHRO in writing. You must receive official confirmation to attend. 8. Register early and save! Registration must be paid in full and postmarked before September 8. 1995. Registrations postmarked after that date must pay the on-site fee. Cancellations and Refunds Cancellations must be in writing and should be sent to: NAHRO Conference Registration Center, RO. Box 809254, Chicago, IL 60680. Sorry, no telephone cancellations. To receive a full refund, your cancellation must be post- marked byAugust 15, 1995. Cancellations postmarked by September 22, 1995, will receive a full refund minus a S50 cancellation fee. No refunds after September 22, 1995. No pattiai refunds for functions you did not attend. Stay at a NAHRO hotel and save To receive your low rO°m rate, you must complete the accom- modations section of your Registration Form. You will receive confirmation of your room reservation by return mail Ail rooms must be guaranteed by credit card or check. Please see form for details. Please Note: No request for reservations can be processed after September 8, 1995. Mter that date, please contact the hotel directly. Changes to your room request must be sent in wdting to the NAHRQ Conference Registration Center by September 8, 1995. Changes not confirmed in wdting may result in cancelled reservations and lost deposit. Receive the Lowest Fare Available to the NAHRO National Conference Receive the lowest fare available. NAHRO and our travel part- ner, Omega World Travel. have negotiated special discount air- fares for NAHRQ meetings and conferences. These exclusive fares can save you between 5°,6 and 10% off the lowest available aiffare. We guarantee that you will receive the lowest fare avail- able at time of ticketing or you will be refunded the difference plus $25 This service is available only through NAHRQ and Omega World Travel. Visit any one of the 200 nationwide Omega World Travel offices or call (800) 22%8542 (8:30-5:30 ESTt or 1800) 685-6342 ~24 hours a day.) Use code NHIUQ- NAHRQ. S a v e - M o n ey:,~'; '.'!R egi st e r Early! F 2__ NAHRO's Registration Form 1995 Conference & Exhibition 1~ YES! I want to register for NAHR©'s 1995 National Conference 8- Exhibition. Please print or type:. IP~o~c0~9 this form [or mul~/e .r~s~mli0ns. I Name .Nid~ame for Badge l~tle NAHRO Member Number Organization Address Agenc~ Member Number City, S~ate. Zip Telephone ( ). .Spouse/Guest Name ~3 This is my first NAHRO National Conference I am a O Commissioner C~ Executive/Deputy Director 0 Supe~sor CJ Technical Professional O Purchaser O Consultant O Resident ~ Other: Special Services O ptea_~ ched~ r, er~ if Faa are disabled or r~u~re S~c~I S~vir, es. P~g.~e a~ft '~ written description of needs. Registration Payment Full payment must accompany this form! Please see the Registration Instructions to determine your Registration Fee. C3 My check in the amount of U.S. S ~ Charge my reglstration to my CI VISA O MasterCard Card No. O My purchase order/claim voucher in the amount of S Hotel Accommodations Rankyour first and second choice hotels and check the room rate you prefer. Need a suite? Call NAHRO's Registrar. lill Ouaid. 202-42%2960. Distance to the Convenuon Center is listed beiow each hotel. Rank NAHRO Hote~ Sln~te Double/T~flt I-I~att Regency I~ S 107 ~ S I 18 (Co-Headauarte~ H0~) Regency Club Rooms (~] S200 O S200 Con,tat to the C0nvenli0n Ceate~. two restaurants, health dub. indoor pooL. Omni Nethedand I~,~ C3 5103 (C0-Hmiauarters H0~) I bl0ck k0r, U~ C~,v~uo, Ce,~. a~ ~mra,s. ~ dub. i~/o0r ~a~ The Cincinnattan Hotel Standard Room I~I S122 ~ S122 Supenor King Room CI S1~2 CI S142 Execu'ave King Room I~ S162 [~ S162 2 b~i~ ~%m ~ Cb.ream, Ceme~. Foumtar. Four-diamo.d full co,derge two r~tauranrs. ~mpiimr~r~ health club. Regal Cincinnati Hotel O Sg~ O 5109 Executive Level O S 129 {~ $ i 39 Adjacent to the Convert,on Cen~.~, thr~ ~taurants. fimith club. The Terrace Hotel ~ $89 ~ $89 O $109 Cincinnati (Ctowne pl~?~ Cincinnati) I ~ b~cks ~m ~he C~nvenUOn C, zntee three resuurants, health club. The Westin Hotel C~ S103 ~ SI 13 3 b~ ~om the Con~emion Center: tu,v restaurants, health club. indoor pool. O Non-smoking Room O Smoking Room Room Occur, ant Co-©ccuoant Arnvai Date For Olfice Use ID Batch is enclosed. (Make your check payable to NAHRO Conference Registration Center.) .Exp. Date Cardholder's Signature is enclosed. Register Early and EBMI415 Save Money Reservation Guarantee To guarantee your room. include your credit card information: O VISA O Diners Club ~ MasterCard [~ Cane Blanche [~ American Ex~ress Cardholder's Name Card No. Ex32. Date The NAHRO Conference Rel~s~muon Center ts au~onZeo to use the above card to guarantee my hoce~ reservations to attend this conferencel l understand that one nights room charge ~ntl be billect thmu~ chis card if I fail to show up for my ass~ed hotel on the confirmed date unless I have cancelled my reservations unth the hotel at least 4~ hours in advance. Cardhoider's Signature C~ I do not wish to guarantee my room with a credit card. instead. I will send my one-night deposit check direcdy ~o the hotel immediately a~r [ receive wdtten confirmation. I ~mderstand that non-guaranteed reservations will be automati~allF canalled ~ the hoWL I~ sare ~a complzte ~t4 ~ctions of form Mail this form, to~ether with your full Registration Fee, to: NAHRO Conference Registration Center P.O. Box 809254, Chicago, IL 60680 Questions? Call 312-782-2958 C~ctm~u CITY OF COLU~BIA I4~GHTS AUTHORIZATION REO~ I~R CONFERENCI~ WORg~HOP~ This completed form must be presented to the City Manager by the Monday preceding the regular Council Meeting foi approval of attendance. DATE OF p~QUEST: Ma 10 1~ NAME OF ACTIVITY: Association of Housing & Redevelopment Officials (NAHRO~ Conference and Exposition ESTIMATED COST: ACCOUNT ~: 201-46310-3320/3105' , ... NO SI/FFICIENT FUNDS REMAINING: x . YES NO Donald R. Schneider 201-46325-3320/3105, 203-46330-332~ National National $1,150 BUDGETED FOPc x .. YES NAME OF INDIVIDUALS ATTENDING: ,201-46324-3320/3105, October 8-11, 1995 ~ WHEN: ~m~ERE: cincinnati, Ohio PUP. POSE OF EVENT: Provides attendees with the latest information on housing and . redevelopment issues from the national perspective. ~ Learn how to access HOW WILL THIS ACTIVITY HELP YOU AND/OR YOUR DEPARTMENT? _ new programs and to better manage and operate existing housing, community and economic__._ development programs. PLEASE ATTACH ANY BROCHURES OR INFORMATION RELATED TO THIS EVENT.. DEPARTMENT HEAD. DIVISION HEAD CITY MANAGER IF REQUIRED, APPROVAL BY CITY COUNCIL: Upon approval by the City Manaser, or City Council (if applicable), a copy of this form will be submitted to the Finance Department and appropriate Division Head. This form is not a registration form or a request for pre- registration monies. DATE DATE DATE DATE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS Meeting of: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPT.: CITY MANAGER NO: 9 COMMUN I ~Y~DEVE LOPME NT APPROVAL C.P. RAIL PROPERTY AT BY: ,~a~-Schneider BY'~~_ ITEM: PURCHASE OF 3725 5TH ST. N.E. q ~ DATE: May 4, 1995 (PIN #35-30-24-34-0029) · · To facilitate the sale of 500 38th Avenue N.E. to Metro Assemblies (Robert & Priscilla Barnick) and make their development feasible, it is necessary to acquire the 18.5' by 130' parcel of land immediately to the west of 500 38th Avenue N.E. Staff has been negotiating with the C.P. Rail on the purchase and has negotiated a price of $1.50 per square foot (from $2.50/s.f.). For the approximately 2,405 square foot parcel this means a total cost of approximately $3,608 (subject to completion of survey of site at our cost of approximately $250). In addition, to facilitate the sale of the property (500 38th and C.P. Rail property) to Robert Barnick and to check on the environmental status of the C.P. Rail property, an environmental assessment must be completed. The cost will be $700 to $1,900 depending on whether or not an update of the 1989 Environmental Report will be acceptable by Barnick's lender. Whether or not the Barnick development proceeds, it would be advantagous for the City to own the property. The City will have a more usable parcel for itself or for resale (500 38th Avenue N.E. and C.P. Rail property). Enclosed is a copy of the proposed purchase agreement and background information. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a purchase agreement with C.P. Rail System (Soo Line Railroad) for the purchase of 3725 5th N.E. (PIN #35-30-24-34-0029) for $1.50 per square foot with the total value to be determined by a survey of the property. COUNCIL ACTION: bt\council.for CP Rail System P.O. Box 530 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Attn: Director Real Estate Development 1. BUYER AND SELLER: The undersigned (Buyer) offers to purchase certain Property (as defined in paragraph 3) from Soo Line Railroad Company (Seller). 2. ACCEPTANCE: This offer shall be void if not accepted by Seller within 90 days of its date. The accepted offer is sometimes referred to as "this agreement." 3. PROPERTY: The Property consists of the land shown in approximation on Exhibit A (the Land) and the improvements thereon (the Improvements); provided, however, that the Improvements do not include those improvements which are excluded from the purchase by other provisions of this offer. The legal description of the Land will be generated from the survey described in paragraph 15. 4. DEED; RESERVATIONS AND COVENANTS; BILL OF SALE: The Property will be conveyed at the closing by quitclaim deed. Upon written notice from Buyer requesting same, given at least 10 days in advance of the closing, Seller will deliver at the closing a quitclaim bill of sale for any personal property included in the purchase. The following reservations and covenants will be included in the deed (in these reservations and covenants, Seller is referred to as Grantor, Buyer is referred to as Grantee, and the Property is referred to as the real property): None 5. [not applicable] 6. [not applicable] 7. PURCHASE PRICE: The purchase price of the Land is $1.50 per square foot, net to the Seller. The square footage shall be certified in the survey required by paragraph 15. 8. CLOSING: Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 9, this transaction shall close at a mutually agreeable time and place no later than 90 days after Seller's acceptance of this offer. 9. GOVERNMENTAL APPROVAL: If Seller is required to obtain governmental approval or exemption in lieu thereof (collectively, Authorization) in order to consummate this transaction, this agreement shall be contingent upon the granting of Authorization, and Buyer will cooperate with Seller to obtain Authorization. If Authorization is not obtained within 180 days after Seller's acceptance of this offer (the Contingency Period), this agreement shall automatically terminate at the end of the Contingency Period. 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -1- ~ If Authorization is not obtained prior to the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 8, the date for closing shall be delayed to a date no later than 15 days after Authorization is obtained; however, under no circumstances shall the closing be delayed to a date later than 180 days after Seller's acceptance of this offer. If this agreement terminates pursuant to this paragraph, Seller shall refund the Deposit, without interest. 10. ESCROW: Should the parties agree to close in escrow, Buyer will pay all fees and charges in connection with the escrow. 11. DEPOSIT: Buyer encloses $1.000.00 (the Deposit) in the form of a certified check or cashier's check payable to Seller. Seller shall refund the Deposit, without interest, if this offer is not timely accepted by Seller; otherwise, the Deposit shall be applied to the purchase price. The balance of the purchase price shall be paid to Seller at the closing by a certified or cashier's check payable to Seller. 12. ENCUMBP~NCES: The Property will be conveyed subject to facts which would be disclosed by a comprehensive survey, rights and claims of parties in possession, rights of the public, and easements, leases, licenses, and permits. Buyer may object to the marketability of Seller's title on the basis of such matters. 13. SELLER'S MORTGAGES: Within 90 days after the closing, Seller shall cause to be recorded partial releases or satisfactions of any mortgages or deeds of trust of Seller which may appear of record as a lien against the Property, and Seller shall indemnify Buyer, and Buyer's title insurer, for any loss or expense sustained by either of them as a result of Seller's failure to have any such lien so released or satisfied. Buyer may object to the marketability of Seller's title on the basis of such matters. 14. JUDGMENT LIENS: Any judgment against Seller which may appear of record as a lien against the Property shall be settled and satisfied by Seller within 30 days after it becomes final and unappealable, and Seller shall indemnify Buyer, and Buyer's title insurer, for any loss sustained by either of them as a result of Seller's failure to have any such judgment lien so settled and satisfied. Buyer may object to the marketability of Seller's title on the basis of such matters. 15. SURVEY: Buyer shall, at its expense, have a survey of the Land prepared by a surveyor registered in the State in which the Land is located. If the Land is registered (i.e., Torrens) land, or if a certified survey is required by law, the survey shall be duly certified. The survey shall show the location of all known easements and improvements, including (but not limited to) all railroad tracks. The survey shall also show the location of all Seller's railroad tracks within 50 feet of the outer boundaries of the Land. If the purchase price requires a certification as to square footage, the same shall be certified by the surveyor. The 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -2- survey shall be subject to Seller's approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Buyer shall deliver the survey to Seller no later than 45 days after Seller's acceptance of this offer. Seller shall have 10 days in which to disapprove the survey by giving notice to Buyer of the matters which render the survey unacceptable. If Seller fails to give such notice, the survey shall be deemed approved. If Seller gives such notice, Buyer shall make a good faith attempt to remedy such matters and shall, within 10 days of Seller's notice, deliver a revised survey to Seller. Seller shall have 10 days in which to disapprove the revised survey by giving Buyer notice of the matters which render it unacceptable. If Seller fails to give such notice, the survey shall be deemed approved. If Seller gives such notice, this agreement shall thereupon terminate unless Seller, at its option, shall agree in writing to permit Buyer to make additional revisions to the survey. If this agreement is terminated pursuant to this paragraph, Seller shall refund the Deposit without interest; provided, however, that Seller may retain the Deposit, as liquidated damages, in the event such termination results from Buyer's bad faith failure to comply with the spirit and intent of this paragraph. 16. SUBDIVISION PLATS: Buyer will be responsible for preparing, at its expense, any survey or plat required by any governmental authority (including any survey or plat of Seller's property contiguous to the Land, where such survey or plat is required in connection with, or as a consequence of, Buyer's purchase of the Land). The survey or plat shall not be filed or recorded until Seller has approved it. 17. RIGHT OF ENTRY: During the first 45 days after Seller's acceptance of this offer, Buyer (and its employees, agents, and contractors) may enter the Property and, to the extent necessary to effectuate the purposes of this paragraph, Seller's land in the vicinity of the Property (such land and the Property being referred to, collectively, as the Site), for the purpose of conducting soil tests, environmental tests, and a survey, subject to the following conditions: (a) Buyer shall give Seller advance notice of the date and time of each entry and the nature of the activities to be conducted on the Site at each such date and time. (b) Seller may elect to be present during the conduct of such activities and to monitor same. Such monitoring shall not relieve Buyer of any liability under this paragraph 17. (c) Prior to entering the Property, Buyer shall secure the permission of any tenant then in possession of same. 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -3- (d) (e) Upon the completion of its activities on the Site, Buyer shall remove any debris resulting from such activities and shall restore the Site to the condition it was in prior to the commencement of such activities. Buyer shall indemnify and defend the Indemnitees (as defined below) against all claims, demands, actions, suits, judgments, losses, damages (including, but not limited to, actual, compensatory, direct, consequential, punitive, and exemplary damages), expenses, penalties, fines, sanctions, court costs, litigation costs, environmental response and remediation costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees (collectively, Claims) arising out of or relating to any loss of (or damage to) any property or business or any injury to (or death of) any person, where such loss, damage, injury, or death actually or allegedly arises (whether directly or indirectly, wholly or in part) from: (a) any action or omission of Buyer (or its employees, agents, or contractors) while on the Site pursuant to this paragraph 17; or (b) the exercise by Buyer (or its employees, agents, or contractors) of the permission granted by this paragraph 17; or (c) the escape or release of any pollutant, contaminant, or hazardous substance resulting (directly or indirectly, wholly or in part) from any action or omission of Buyer (or its employees, agents, or contractors) while on the Site pursuant to this paragraph 17. Indemnitees means the following companies and their directors, officers, employees, and agents: Soo Line Corporation, Soo Line Railroad Company, Tri-State Land Company, Tri-State Management Company, The Milwaukee Motor Transportation Company, Hiawatha Transfer Company, Canadian Pacific Limited, CP Rail System, and their subsidiaries, affiliated companies, and parent companies. (f) Buyer (and its employees, agents, and contractors) shall comply with all applicable laws while on the Site. (g) Buyer will provide Seller with complete copies of the test data and test reports as soon as they are available to Buyer. 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -4- (h) The cost of any test or survey will be borne solely by Buyer. (i) Test holes shall be located no closer than 10 feet from the nearest rail of any railroad track located on or adjacent to the Site. Drilling equipment and related equipment shall not be placed closer than 10 feet from the nearest rail of any such track. (J) While on the Site, Buyer (and its employees, agents, and contractors) shall comply with Seller's safety rules, including any requirement regarding the use of flagmen. All costs associated with compliance with such rules shall be borne by Buyer. If Seller shall incur any costs in connection therewith, Buyer shall reimburse Seller within 30 days after receipt of Seller's invoice. (k) Unless disclosure is required by court order or applicable law, Buyer shall maintain, and shall cause its employees, agents, and contractors to maintain, the confidentiality of all information pertaining to any environmental test performed on the Site. (1) If any mechanics or materialmens lien, or similar lien, is asserted against the Site, the Property, or any other property of Seller or the Indemnitees as a result of the exercise of the permission granted in this paragraph 17, Buyer shall immediately satisfy and/or obtain the release of such lien, all at Buyer's expense, and Buyer shall indemnify and defend the Indemnitees from and against all Claims arising out of or connected with such lien. 18. TITLB MATTERS: Seller makes no warranty or representation with respect to the marketability or quality of its title and is not under any obligation to furnish abstracts of title, title reports, or title insurance policies in respect of the Property. Buyer shall have 45 days after Seller's acceptance of this offer in which to raise objections to the marketability of Seller's title. If Buyer objects to Seller's title, it must give Seller notice within such time specifying the precise nature of the alleged title defects. The notice must be accompanied by evidence of the alleged defects, in the form of a copy of an abstract of title or a title company's title commitment. If Buyer fails to give proper or timely notice, it shall be deemed to have waived its right to object (except that defects which arise subsequent to the 45-day period shall not be deemed waived unless Buyer fails to give Seller notice 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -5- of same promptly after it learns, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have learned, of them); furthermore, even if Buyer gives proper and timely notice, it shall be deemed to have waived its right to object on the basis of then-existing defects not specified in the notice. Seller shall have 45 days or until the closing, whichever is less (the Cure Period), in which it may, if it so chooses, attempt to cure any defect specified in a timely and otherwise proper notice. Seller has no obligation or responsibility whatsoever to cure (or attempt to cure) any title defect. If Seller shall undertake to cure or attempt to cure any title defect, it may withdraw from such undertaking at any time without penalty; such undertaking shall not create, nor shall it under any circumstance be construed to create, any obligation whatsoever on the part of Seller to cure any such defect. If Seller is unable or unwilling to cure any specified defect, Buyer may terminate this agreement by giving Seller notice of termination at any time prior to the actual delivery and acceptance of the deed, which notice shall state that this agreement is being terminated by reason of Seller's failure to cure title defects. If Buyer gives proper and timely notice of termination, Seller shall refund the Deposit, without interest, and shall reimburse Buyer for the actual amount paid by Buyer for the abstract of title or title commitment, provided that the abstract or commitment is delivered and assigned to Seller. By accepting delivery of the quitclaim deed, Buyer shall be deemed to waive any and all uncured title defects. 19. REAL ESTATE TAXES: The total real estate tax bill payable in the year of the sale will be prorated on a per diem basis as of the closing, using the most recent tax bill; such proration shall be final and binding on Seller and Buyer and there shall be no post-closing adjustment. There will be no proration to the extent the payment of such taxes has been assumed by a lessee under a lease that will be assigned to Buyer or merged into the purchase. 20. TRANSFER TAXES AND FEES: Buyer will purchase, affix, and cancel any and all documentary stamps in the amount prescribed by statute, and will pay any and all transfer taxes, excise taxes, sales taxes, use taxes, and fees incidental to the transfer of the Property or the recordation or filing of the deed. 21. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: Buyer will assume responsibility for paying any special assessment (or installment thereof) where the due date for payment is on or after the date of this offer, irrespective of the date of the improvement. 22. NOTICES: Notices Permitted or required by this agreement must be in writing and shall be deemed given when delivered in legible form to the business address of the party to whom addressed. If delivered at the closing, a notice shall be deemed 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -6- given when hand-delivered to the party's representative at the closing. The business addresses of the parties are as follows: Seller -- mailing address: P.O. Box 530 Minneapolis, MN 55440 Attn: Director Real Estate Development delivery address: 1380 Soo Line Building 105 South 5th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Attn: Director Real Estate Development telecopier: (612) 347-8170 Attn: Director Real Estate Development Buyer -- mailing address: city of Columbia Heiqhts 590 40th Ave NE Columbia Heiqhtst MN 55421 Attn: City Manager delivery address: city of Columbia Heiqhts 590 40th Ave NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Attn: city Manager telecopier: 612-782-2857 Attn: Director, Community Development Notices not given in the manner or within the time limits set forth in this agreement are of no effect and may be disregarded by the party to whom they are directed. 23. REAL ESTATE BROKERS: Seller represents that it has not retained any real estate broker or agent in connection with this transaction. If any real estate broker or agent can establish a valid claim for commission or other compensation in connection with this transaction, such commission or other compensation shall be paid by Buyer. 24. [not-applicable] 25. EASEMENTS, LICENSES, AND PERMITS: At and as of the closing, Seller will assign to Buyer Seller's rights, and Buyer will assume 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -7- Seller's obligations, under existing easements, licenses, and permits (collectively, instruments) which: (a) were granted by Seller (or its predecessors in interest), (b) are known to Seller, and (c) include or burden any portion of the Property. There shall be no proration of prepaid rentals, prepaid fees, or other prepaid charges in respect of any such instrument. If such an instrument pertains in part to property other than the Property, the assignment and assumption shall be limited to the interest the instrument creates in the Property. In the event of such partial assignment, the rentals, fees, and other charges which come due after the closing shall be allocated between Seller and Buyer on the basis of the square footage of the land area of their respective interests in the property affected by the instrument; provided, however, that where the rental, fee, or other charge was established on a basis other than square footage, the adjustment shall be determined using such other basis. The assignment and assumption contemplated by this paragraph shall be limited to rights and obligations accruing as of and after the closing. Seller will provide a copy of each such instrument to Buyer within 30 days after Seller accepts this offer. At the closing, the parties will execute an assignment and assumption agreement incorporating the terms of this paragraph and identifying such instrument or instruments. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Seller reserves to itself 100% of the gross revenues attributable to any fiber optic agreement of whatever nature, including gross revenues in respect of any renewal term or extended term contemplated by said agreement. 26. [not-applicable] 27. NO REPRESENTATION BY SELLER; AS IS, WHERE IS: Seller makes no representation or warranty of any kind with respect to the Property (including, but not limited to, express or implied warranties of title, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose). The sale of the Property is strictly on an "as is, where is" basis. By closing this transaction, Buyer will be deemed to represent and warrant that it is satisfied with the condition of the Property and that it will take full responsibility for the Property from and after the closing. Without limiting the foregoing, Buyer represents and warrants that it has not relied upon nor been induced by any statements or representations of any person in respect of the physical condition of the Property, including the environmental conditions present on the Property, or of any other matter affecting or relating to the physical condition of the Property. By closing this transaction, Buyer shall be deemed to represent and warrant that, as respects the environmental and physical condition of the property, it has relied solely on such investigations, examinations, and inspections as Buyer has made or will make prior to the closing. By closing this transaction, Buyer shall be deemed to represent that it has been afforded the opportunity for full and complete investigations, examinations, and inspections of the Property. Without limiting the generality of this paragraph, the parties specifically intend that this paragraph shall bar all 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -8- Claims that Buyer (and its successors, assigns, grantees, and vendees) might otherwise have against the Indemnitees relating to the environmental condition of the Property, including (but not limited to) Claims brought pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (commonly known as the Federal Superfund Act) and analogous state statues. Buyer shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Indemnitees against all such Claims. 28. ENVIRONMENTAL; SELLER'S RIGHT TO TERMINATE: Seller may terminate this agreement at any time prior to the delivery of the deed if it determines, in the exercise of its discretion, that circumstances related to hazardous or toxic substances, hazardous wastes, pollution, or environmental contamination (collectively, Contamination) render the sale inadvisable. In the event of such termination, Seller will refund the Deposit, without interest. The closing of the sale, if it occurs, is not, and shall not be construed as, an actual or implied representation or warranty by Seller as to the condition of the Property or the absence of Contamination. 29. ENVIRONMENTAL; BUYER'S RIGHT TO TERMINATE: The closing of this transaction is contingent upon Buyer determining, in the good faith exercise of its discretion, that the results of soil tests and environmental tests are acceptable. Buyer shall be deemed to have waived this contingency unless it gives notice of termination to Seller no later than 50 days after Seller's acceptance of this offer, which notice shall specify that Buyer is terminating this agreement pursuant to this paragraph. If timely and proper notice of termination is given, Seller shall refund the Deposit, without interest. 30. LITIGATION EXPENSES: In any action brought in connection with this agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its litigation expenses, including, but not limited to, court costs, disbursements, witness fees, experts' fees, and attorneys, fees. 31. TIME OF THE ESSENCE: Time is of the essence of this agreement. 32. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AND SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE: If Buyer fails to perform any of the terms or conditions of this agreement within the specified time limits, Seller may retain the Deposit as agreed liquidated damages and may declare this agreement terminated, or Seller may have this agreement specifically enforced. Likewise, if Seller fails to perform any of the terms or conditions of this agreement within the specified time limits, Buyer may declare this agreement terminated (in which event Seller shall refund the Deposit, without interest) or may have this agreement specifically enforced. The rights and remedies granted to the parties in this paragraph 32 are intended to be cumulative to all other rights and remedies available to the parties (whether under this agreement, at law, in equity, or otherwise); accordingly, the exercise by either 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -9- party of any such right or remedy shall not preclude it from exercising any other such right or remedy. 33. COMPUTATION OF TIME: For the purpose of computing the time periods specified in this agreement, Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays shall be counted. However, where the last day for performing any act falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, that act may be performed on the next succeeding day which is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. 34. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the sale and purchase of the Property. Buyer has not relied on any statements or representations by Seller except as are set forth in this agreement. 35. NON-ASSIGNABILITY: Buyer may not assign its rights under this agreement without the advance written consent of Seller. 36. SURVIVAL OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The terms and conditions of this agreement shall survive the delivery of the deed. 37. SURVIVAL OF INDEMNIFICATION, LITIGATION EXPENSE, AND CONFIDENTIALITY PROVISIONS: The indemnification, litigation expense, and confidentiality provisions of this agreement shall survive its termination. 38. APPLICABLE LAW: This agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State in which the Land is located. 39. RAIL SERVICE; NO OBLIGATION: Nothing in this agreement is intended to create, nor shall it be construed to create, any express or implied obligation on the part of Seller to provide (or continue to provide) rail service to Buyer and/or the Property. Nothing in this agreement is intended to prevent or limit, nor shall it be construed to prevent or limit, the discontinuance, by Seller, of rail service over any railroad line or trackage by which rail service is or may be provided to Buyer and/or the Property. 40. WELL CERTIFICATION: Seller certifies that to the best of Seller's knowledge there are no wells on the Property. 41. HEADINGS: The paragraph headings used in this agreement are used solely for the purpose of convenience. They are not intended to, and do not, modify or limit the wording of the paragraphs to which they are appended, and they shall not be used or construed as guides to the interpretation of said paragraphs. 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -10- 42. OFFER DATE: This offer is dated , 19 · (Buyer's name as it should appear in deed) By OFFER ACCEPTED SO0 LINE RAILROAD COMPANY By Its (title) Its Date (type of company, e.g., corporation, partnership) (state of incorporation or formation) 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -11- Suite 1380 Box 530 Minneapolis MN 55440 Tel (612) 347-8238 Fax (612) 347-8170 CP Rail System Eric R. Holm Account Executive Land Marketing - Soo Line April 25, 1995 Don Schneider City of Columbia Heights, MN 590 40th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 Dear Mr. Schneider: This is in response to your April 6, 1995 letter to me. I will recommend to railroad management that we sell the subject property for $1.50 per square foot and I have enclosed a revised page two of the offer for you to insert into our current offer. With regard to the trackage removal. I have enclosed the railroads copies of the documents and map. Would you please call D. W. Anderson (Buz), Manager Asset Disposition at 414-274-8578 and forward the document to him if need be. I will look forward to receiving both copies of the offer and the deposit so that I may present all to railroad management. Sincerely, Eric R. Holm Suite 1380 Box 530 Minneapolis MN 55440 Tel (612) 347-8238 Fax (612) 347-8170 Eric R. Holm Account Executive Land Marketing - Soo Line CP Rail System March 23, 1995 Mr. Don Schneider city of Columbia Heights, MN 590 40th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 RE: POTENTIAL SALE OF RAILROAD PROPERTY COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA - TO THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN Dear Mr. Schneider: This is in response to our recent letters and conversations. I believe the property we have been dealing on in Columbia Heights is fairly valued at $2.00 per square foot. This is based on sales in the area and information from Carol McCain of the Anoka County Assessors office. The subject properties tax identification number is 35-30-24-34-0024 and is currently valued at $4,600.00 with the County. Also, would you depict on the enclosed map the trackage that you desire to have removed. Looking forward to closing this transaction. Sincerely, Eric R. Holm MFR: AS PER ERIC HOLM, 3-31-95, C.P. RAIL IS NOT ALLOWED TO GO LOWER THAN THE COUNTY ASSESSORS VALUE. HE CANNOT GO THE $1.50/square foot offered verbally earlier. ADVISED ERIC THAT I WOULD GET A MAP BACK TO HIM NEXT WEEK ON THE RAIL THAT NEED TO BE REMOVED YET. DON S./3-31-95 CP Rail System P.O. Box 530 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Attn: Director Real Estate Development 1. BUYER AND SELLER: The undersigned (Buyer) offers to purchase certain Property (as defined in paragraph 3) from Soo Line Railroad Company (Seller). 2. ACCEPTANCE: This offer shall be void if not accepted by Seller within 90 days of its date. The accepted offer is sometimes referred to as "this agreement." 3. PROPERTY: The Property consists of the land shown in approximation on Exhibit A (the Land) and the improvements thereon (the Improvements); provided, however, that the Improvements do not include those improvements which are excluded from the purchase by other provisions of this offer. The legal description of the Land will be generated from the survey described in paragraph 15. 4. DEED; RESERVATIONS AND COVENANTS; BILL OF SALE: The Property will be conveyed at the closing by quitclaim deed. Upon written notice from Buyer requesting same, given at least 10 days in advance of the closing, Seller will deliver at the closing a quitclaim bill of sale for any personal property included in the purchase. The following reservations and covenants will be included in the deed (in these reservations and covenants, Seller is referred to as Grantor, Buyer is referred to as Grantee, and the Property is referred to as the real property): None 5. [not applicable] 6. [not applicable] 7. PURCHASE PRICE: The purchase price of the Land is $2.00 per square foot, net to the Seller. The square footage shall be certified in the survey required by paragraph 15. 8. CLOSING: Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 9, this transaction shall close at a mutually agreeable time and place no later than 90 days after Seller's acceptance of this offer. 9. GOVERNMENTAL APPROVAL: If Seller is required to obtain governmental approval or exemption in lieu thereof (collectively, Authorization) in order to consummate this transaction, this agreement shall be contingent upon the granting of Authorization, and Buyer will cooperate with Seller to obtain Authorization. If Authorization is not obtained within 180 days after Seller's acceptance of this offer (the Contingency Period), this agreement shall automatically terminate at the end of the Contingency Period. 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -1- CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (612) 782-2800 Mayor Joseph Sturdevant Councilmembers Donald G. Jolly Bruce G. Nawrocki Gary L. Peterson Robert W. Ruettimann City Manager Patrick Hentges March 9, 1995 Mr. Eric Holm, Account Executive Land Marketing - Soo Line CP Rail System P.O. Box 530 Mpls., MN 55440 RE: RAILROAD PROPERTY COLUMBIA HEIGHTS (Your letter of February 28, 1995) Dear Eric: The City is interested in the purchase of the Soo Line property at the corner of 5th Street N.E. and 38th Avenue N.E. in Columbia Heights (see enclosed map) $1.00 per square foot. We feel that the parcel is unusable as is and is of no use to the Soo Line or C.P. Rail. If you are interested in selling the property for $1.00 per square foot we will complete and return the purchase agreement to you. Please call me at 782-2855 if you are ready to sell the property at this time for $1.00 per square foot or if you have any questions in regard to the above. Sincerely, Donald R. Schneider Community Development Director Enclosure cc: City Manager "SERVICE IS OUR BUSINESS" EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGr~TS DOES N©'F DISCRIMINATE orq THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE ,~:ROVIStON OF SERVICES Suite 1380 Box 530 Minneapolis MN 55440 Tel (612) 347-8238 Fax (612) 347-8170 Eric R. Holm Account Executive Land Marketing - Soo Line CP Rail System February 28, 1995 Mr. Don Schneider city of Columbia Heights, MN 590 40th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 RE: POTENTIAL SALE OF RAILROAD PROPERTY COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA - TO THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN Dear Mr. Schneider: Does the city intend to progress this land sale? I will look forward to your response. Sincerely, Eric R. Holm Suite 1380 Box 530 Minneapolis MN 55440 Tel (612) 347-8238 Fax (612) 347-8170 CP Rail System Eric R. Holm Account Executive Land Marketing - Soo Line December 15, 1994 Mr. Don Schneider City of Columbia Heights, MN 590 40th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 RE: POTENTIAL SALE OF RAILROAD PROPERTY COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA - TO THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN Dear Mr. Schneider: In response to our conversation this morning, I have enclosed a revised first page of your offer to purchase, to be inserted into the current offer. Looking forward to closing this transaction early next year. Sincerely, Eric R. Holm CP Rail System P.O. Box 530 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Attn: Director Real Estate Development 1. BUYER AND SELLER: The undersigned (Buyer) offers to purchase certain Property (as defined in paragraph 3) from Soo Line Railroad Company (Seller). 2. ACCEPTANCE: This offer shall be void if not accepted by Seller within 90 days of its date. The accepted offer is sometimes referred to as "this agreement." 3. PROPERTY: The Property consists of the land shown in approximation on Exhibit A (the Land) and the improvements thereon (the Improvements); provided, however, that the Improvements do not include those improvements which are excluded from the purchase by other provisions of this offer. The legal description of the Land will be generated from the survey described in paragraph 15. 4. DEED' RESERVATIONS AND COVENANTS' BILL OF SALE: The Property will be conveyed at the closing by quitclaim deed. Upon written notice from Buyer requesting same, given at least 10 days in advance of the closing, Seller will deliver at the closing a quitclaim bill of sale for any personal property included in the purchase. The following reservations and covenants will be included in the deed (in these reservations and covenants, Seller is referred to as Grantor, Buyer is referred to as Grantee, and the Property is referred to as the real property): None 5. [not applicable] 6. [not applicable] 7. PURCHASE PRICE~ The purchase price of the Land is $2.2~ per square foot, net to the Seller. The square footage shall be certified in the survey required by paragraph 15. 8. CLOSING: Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 9, this transaction shall close at a mutually agreeable time and place no later than 90 days after Seller's acceptance of this offer. 9. GOVERNMENTAL APPROVAL:. If Seller is required to obtain governmental approval or exemption in lieu thereof (collectively, Authorization) in order to consummate this transaction, this agreement shall be contingent upon the granting of Authorization, and Buyer will cooperate with Seller to obtain Authorization. If Authorization is not obtained within 180 days after Seller's acceptance of this offer (the Contingency Period), this agreement shall automatically terminate at the end of the Contingency Period. 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -1- Suite 1380 Box 530 Minneapolis MN 55440 Tel (612) 347-8238 Fax (612) 347-8170 CP Rail System Eric R. Holm Account Executive Land Marketing - Soo Line October 25, 1994 Mr. Don Schneider City of Columbia Heights, MN 590 40th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 RE: POTENTIAL SALE OF RAILROAD PROPERTY COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA - TO THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN Dear Mr. Schneider: In response to your expressed interest in a parcel of land at Columbia Heights, MN, attached is our standard form Offer to Purchase. If the proposal is satisfactory, kindly arrange for execution of both copies of offer on behalf of the City of Columbia Heights, MN, returning both to me together with the specified deposit. Upon receipt, the proposal will be submitted to management for its approval. I will look forward to your Sincerely, Eric R. Holm CP Rail System P.O. Box 530 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 Attn: Director Real Estate Development 1. BUYER AND SELLER: The undersigned (Buyer) offers to purchase certain Property (as defined in paragraph 3) from Soo Line Railroad Company (Seller). 2. ACCEPTANCE: This offer shall be void if not accepted by Seller within 90 days of its date. The accepted offer is sometimes referred to as "this agreement." 3. PROPERTY: The Property consists of the land shown in approximation on Exhibit A (the Land) and the improvements thereon (the Improvements); provided, however, that the Improvements do not include those improvements which are excluded from the purchase by other provisions of this offer. The legal description of the Land will be generated from the survey described in paragraph 15. 4. DEED; RESERVATIONS AND COVENANTS; BILL OF SALE: The Property will be conveyed at the closing by quitclaim deed. Upon written notice from Buyer requesting same, given at least 10 days in advance of the closing, Seller will deliver at the closing a quitclaim bill of sale for any personal property included in the purchase. The following reservations and covenants will be included in the deed (in these reservations and covenants, Seller is referred to as Grantor, Buyer is referred to as Grantee, and the Property is referred to as the real property): None 5. [not applicable] 6. [not applicable] 7. PURCHASE PRICE: The purchase price of the Land is $2.50 per square foot, net to the Seller. The square footage shall be certified in the survey required by paragraph 15. 8. CLOSING: Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 9, this transaction shall close at a mutually agreeable time and place no later than 90 days after Seller's acceptance of this offer. 9. GOVERNMENTAL APPROVAL: If Seller is required to obtain governmental approval or exemption in lieu thereof (collectively, Authorization) in order to consummate this transaction, this agreement shall be contingent upon the granting of Authorization, and Buyer will cooperate with Seller to obtain Authorization. If Authorization is not obtained within 180 days after Seller's acceptance of this offer (the Contingency Period), this agreement shall automatically terminate at the end of the Contingency Period. 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -1- If Authorization is not obtained prior to the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 8, the date for closing shall be delayed to a date no later than 15 days after Authorization is obtained; however, under no circumstances shall the closing be delayed to a date later than 180 days after Seller's acceptance of this offer. If this agreement terminates pursuant to this paragraph, Seller shall refund the Deposit, without interest. 10. ESCROW: Should the parties agree to close in escrow, Buyer will pay all fees and charges in connection with the escrow. 11. DEPOSIT: Buyer encloses $1.000.00 (the Deposit) in the form of a certified check or cashier's check payable to Seller. Seller shall refund the Deposit, without interest, if this offer is not timely accepted by Seller; otherwise, the Deposit shall be applied to the purchase price. The balance of the purchase price shall be paid to Seller at the closing by a certified or cashier's check payable to Seller. 12. ENCUMBRANCES: The Property will be conveyed subject to facts which would be disclosed by a comprehensive survey, rights and claims of parties in possession, rights of the public, and easements, leases, licenses, and permits. Buyer may object to the marketability of Seller's title on the basis of such matters. 13. SELLER'S MORTGAGES: Within 90 days after the closing, Seller shall cause to be recorded partial releases or satisfactions of any mortgages or deeds of trust of Seller which may appear of record as a lien against the Property, and Seller shall indemnify Buyer, and Buyer's title insurer, for any loss or expense sustained by either of them as a result of Seller's failure to have any such lien so released or satisfied. Buyer may object to the marketability of Seller's title on the basis of such matters. 14. JUDGMENT LIENS: Any judgment against Seller which may appear of record as a lien against the Property shall be settled and satisfied by Seller within 30 days after it becomes final and unappealable, and Seller shall indemnify Buyer, and Buyer's title insurer, for any loss sustained by either of them as a result of Seller's failure to have any such judgment lien so settled and satisfied. Buyer may object to the marketability of Seller's title on the basis of such matters. 15. SURVEY: Buyer shall, at its expense, have a survey of the Land prepared by a surveyor registered in the State in which the Land is located. If the Land is registered (i.e., Torrens) land, or if a certified survey is required by law, the survey shall be duly certified. The survey shall show the location of all known easements and improvements, including (but not limited to) all railroad tracks. The survey shall also show the location of all Seller's railroad tracks within 50 feet of the outer boundaries of the Land. If the purchase price requires a certification as to square footage, the same shall be certified by the surveyor. The 9211-Columbia Heights, MN-1 -2- C.P. RAIL(SOO LINE) PROPERTY ADJACENT TO 500 38th AVE NE 3725 5th Street NE/PARCEL ID#35-30-24-34-0029 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of Lot 31 described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said lot thence proceeding along the North line thereof a distance of 18.5', then southerly parallel with west line of said lot to point of beginning, Block 89, Columbia Heights Annex to Columbia Heights including 1/2 of vacated alley. 18.5' x 130' = 2,405 square feet CITY COUNCIL LETFER Meeting of: 5/30/95 AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER NO. 9 PUBLIC WORKS ITEM: AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK BIDS DATE:BY: 5/22/95K' Young ~ DABY~ NO. TO SEAL WELL AT JACKSON PONDq --, ~. The inverted well was installed in 1943. The well is 290' deep. The purpose of the well was to drain Jackson Pond into the ground water. The pond water entered the well through perforated pipe at the north end of the pond, refer to attached plan. The well has been valved off since the mid-sixties. Both the Minnesota Health Department and the MPCA have knowledge of the well and are interested in having it sealed and abandoned. The estimated cost to abandon the well is $15,000. Funds are available for this work in line item 652-49499-5130, seal Jackson Pond well. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to authorize staff to seek bids to seal the inverted well at Jackson Pond. MAW:jb 95-338 COUNCIL ACTION: I I I I I I ! I ! CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: 5/30/95 AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER NO. 9 PUBLIC WORKS ITEM: FINAL PAYMENT FOR MUNICIPAL BY: K. Youngk~X BY: E(~~-..x~-~ ~ NO. PROJECTS #9320, #9321, AND #9322 DATE: 5/22/95 DAT 1994 OVERLAY Attached is the Certificate for Final Payment for the 1994 Overlay - Municipal Projects #9320, #9321 and #9322. $175,966.83. The final payment amount is $8,798.34. Staff is recommending approval of final payment to Midwest Asphalt Corp. and acceptance of the work. Total project cost was RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to accept the work for Municipal Projects #9320, #9321 and $9322, 1994 Overlay and to authorize final payment of $8,798.34 to Midwest Asphalt Corporation of Hopkins, Minnesota. KKY:jb 95-339 COUNCIL ACTION: PAGE 1 22-May-95 FINAL PAYMENT MUNICIPAL PROJECTS 9320-9321-9322 1994 MSAS BITUMINOUS OVERLAY MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. P.O. BOX 5477 HOPKINS, MN. 55343 NO. UNIT QUANT. DESCRIPTION i S.Y. 43539.0 Mill pavement surface 2 TON 3 TON 4 S.Y. 5 GAL 6 Ea. 7 L.F. 8 L.F. 9 L.S. 4696.0 2331 Type 41 wearing course 0.0 2331 Type 41 leveling course 0.0 Patch bituminous street 1913.0 Bituminous tack coat 1.0 Loop detector 6862.0 4" Solid line white-paint 9679.0 4" Broken line yellow-paint 1.0 Supplemental agreement TOTAL BID COMPLETED TO DATE MINUS WITHHOLDING (5%) MINUS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS TOTAL DUE UNIT PRICE $0.68 $24.00 $29.00 $14.00 $1.60 $55o.00 $O.ll $0.11 $28,226.00 TOTAL $29,606.52 $112,704.00 $0.0o $0.00 $3,060.80 $55o.0o $754.82 $1,064.69 $28,226.00 $175,966.83 $o.oo $167,168.49 $8,798.34 I hereby certifify to the City Council of Columbia Heights that I have been in charge of the work required by the above contract; that all work has been done and performed as measured by and in accordance with and pursuant to the terms of said contract. Da~e Ka%hyj~ K. Young, P.~ Reg. No. 17212 I accept the above payment as final for the work done under this contract. MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. Date CITY COUNCIL LETYER Meeting of: 5/30/95 AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER NO. 9 PUBLIC WORKS ITEM: FINAL PAYMENT FOR 1995 BY:DATE: 5/22/95K' Y°ung g0~ DABY:TE~ NO. STREET AND PARKING LANE STRIPING q . ~. Attached is the invoice for payment of 1995 Street and Parking Lane Striping for $4,601.38. The invoice total equals the bid amount and is comprised of $3,983.80 for striping the State Aid Streets and $617.58 for striping the local streets. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to accept the work for 1995 Street and Parking Lane Striping and to authorize payment of $4,601.38 to AAA Striping Service Co. of Rogers, Minnesota. KY:jb 95-337 Attachment COUNCIL ACTION: ~ Striping Service Co. 5392 Quam Avenue, P.O. Box 349, Rogers, MN 55374 (612) 428-4322 INVOICE PAGE: 1 INVOICE NUMBER: 0090042-IN INVOICE DATE: 05/11/95 1995 STREET & PARK LN STRIPING CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 - 40TH AVENUE NE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MN 55421 CUSTOMER NO: 99COLU CUSTOMER P.O.: TERMS: NET 30 DESCRIPTION 1 - BROKEN YELLOW CENTERLINE MILE 2 - BROKEN WHITE CENTERLINE MILE 3 - SOLID WHITE PARKING LANE MILE 4 - B" SOLID WHITE TAPER MILE 5 - SOLID YELLOW CENTERLINE MILE 6 - DOUBLE YELLOW CENTERLINE MILE QUANTITY 11 5 PRICE AMOUNT 173.999 1,930.00 174.000 71.17 384.000 2,264.06 768.000 49.92 290.000 68.73 580.000 217.50 .00 REC-..,V,::D MAY I '~ """" Public Works NET INVOICE: 4,601.38 FREIGHT: SALES TAX: INVOICE TOTAL: 4~601.38 CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S NO: CITY MANAGER'S APPROVAL BY: ~ SPECIAL BY: ITEM: ABATEMENT OF ANNUAL INTEREST ON PATRICK HENTGES ASSESSMENT OF $17.02-4108/4110 MADISO_~N ST- DATE: MAY 24, 1995 DATE: NO: On May 15, 1995, I was contacted by Stephen Hague of 4108 Madison St. N.E. Our conversation was followed up by a letter I received from Mr. Hague dated May 23, 1995. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Deny Abatement of Annual Interest of $17.02 on Special Assessment for 4108/4110 Madison Street for Seal Coating. ALTERNATE MOTION: Move to Approve Abatement of Annual Interest of $17.02 on Special Assessment for 4108/4110 Madison Street for Seal Coating. COUNCIL ACTION: May 23,1995 Mr. Patrick Hentges Columbia Heights City Office Assessing Dept. 590 40th Av. NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear Mr. Hentges, Per our telephone conversation on May 15, 1995, I would like to formally request an abatement of the annual interest of my Special Assessment dated 5/8/95. As we discussed, the following events have occurred; · In spring of 1994 I received a notice that a special assessment would be charged to my residence at 4108/4110 Madison St. for seal coating. · On November 8, 1994, according to city records, a billing of this assessment was sent to 4108 Madison St., addressed to me. A due date of 12/31/1995 was given to avoid interest or penalty. I did not receive this statement. · On approximately May 10, 1995, A second Special Assessments statement was sent to me at 4108 Madison St. indicating outstanding balance ($179.20) and interest penalty ($17.02). Payment by September 15, 1995 avoids any further penalty. · On May 15, I contacted you to discuss this issue. Unfortunately, I cannot provide evidence that I did not receive the November 1994 billing. In fact it is impossible to prove an incident that I claim, did not occur. However, The city of Columbia Heights also cannot prove that I did receive this statement. The city can prove that a billing was generated and mailed on November 8, 1994, but this does not prove that I received it. I would like you to consider my bill paying history over the last 3 and half years for evidence that when I am billed for services, they are paid promptly. If I had known a special assessment was due on 12/31/94, it would have been paid. As fairly new residents of Columbia Heights, my wife and I have made an effort to be a positive influence on the neighborhood. The rental property we own is also our home. We have invested over $10,000 dollars in painting, remodeling, new appliances, new furnaces and central airconditioners, new fence and landscaping. Permits have been pulled when required and we pride ourselves in the condition of our home. We have made many new friends and feel very welcome in this city. Therefore, you should know the $17.02 penalty is not the main issue, it's the principle. We are productive and contributing citizens to Columbia Heights and when informed, we pay our bills. Finally, I would like to point out that the annual interest charge based on the 9.5% annual interest rate is not correct. If the interest accruing period is from November 8, 1994 to September 15, 1995, this is not a full year (or annual) and the interest penalty should be prorated to reflect this fact. Actually, a more appropriate billing period would be based on a 12/31/95 start date and then prorated to 9/15/95, or extend the due date to reflect a full year of interest charges or don't refer to the penalty as annual interest but a 9.5% fee for late payment. We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and are looking forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Attached is a copy of the Special Assessment Statement. Please feel free to contact me at home 781-6735, or during business hours at 574-3724. Stephen Hague 4108 Madison St. NE Columbia Heights MN 55421 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 - 40th AVENUE N.E. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 55421 (612) 782-2814 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS STATEMENT Owner ID 00012620 HAGUE,STEPHEN D. 4108 MADISON ST NE COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN 55421-2811 Regarding PIN 35-30-24-13-0134 4108 MADISON ST AMOUNTENCLOSED$ MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS RETURN REMITTANCE COPY WITH PAYMENT YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT. PROJECT NUMBER 889 FULL STATEMENT - PROJECT NAME Seal Coat Annual Interest Payments Received TOTAL ASSESSMENTS Year to Date OUTSTANDING 8 May 1995 INTEREST RATE 9.50000 OUTSTANDING BALANCE 179.20 17.02 0.00 196.22 MINIMUM AMOUNT DUE Must Be Received By September To Avoid Penalty Charges. 15, 1995 PLEASE NOTE: IF PAYMENT IS NOT RECEIVED BY SEPTEMBER 15TH, A 10% PENALTY WILL BE ADDED AND CERTIFIED TO THE REAL ESTATE TAXES. White: remittance copy Yellow: customer copy CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: New Business NO. 9 Authorization of ~undin9 for ITEM: Project Safety Net Participauon q. :r... ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT POLICE BY: Leonard M. Olson DATE: May 23, 1995 CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: BY: DATE: The City of Fridley implemented a special program to deal with juvenile issues such as curfew, runaways, and youth in crisis. The program carries two components, one of which is the staffed drop-in center that police officers can use. The other component is a recreation center located in Fridley and unlikely that other community youth would use such as service. Other city police departments, including Columbia Heights, have been invited to participate in this drop-in center system. Our department's share in the program is based upon our population. Other communities expressing the desire to join this program are New Brighton, Spring Lake Park, Mounds View, and St. Anthony. Fridley's drop-in center currently is operational and staffed by professional youth workers. The hours of operation are 10:00 P.M. to 3:00 A.M. Friday and Saturday nights while school is in session. When school is out, the center will be operated every night. This center, should our city wish to participate, will afford our officers with a readily available location to drop off any juvenile who is taken into custody for a variety of reasons. The only exceptions to this would be the intoxicated and the violent. The youth would be counseled and held until parents or guardians arrive. This means that our officers would be merely out of our city dealing with the young offender on a temporary basis. Other cities across the country who have similar programs such as Phoenix, Arizona, have provided statistics as favorable as noted decreases of 81 per cent in juvenile victimization and 64 per cent less in juvenile crimes. North Little Rock, Arkansas, started their program which literally drove juvenile offenders into surrounding communities, thus forcing those communities to participate in efforts to control the influx of youth. The formula to fund our share of the program facilities is $6,104. This will provide the drop-in center facility to our officers for the full month of June and through to December 31, 1995. This equates to seven months of participation. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "Move to authorize the Columbia Heights Police Department to participate in the Fridley "Project Safety Net" program and provide the funding of $6,104 to the City of Fridley from Undesignated General Fund balance, and to allow the City Manager and Mayor to enter into such an agreement." 95-145 COUNCIL ACTION: Project Safety Net Mission Statement: To promote a safe and healthy community for Fridley youth. Objectives: 1. To develop an after hours cLrop off center (after hours being post curfew). 2. To develop positive recreational opportunities for youth ages 14 and over on late Friday and Saturday evenings. Description: Project Safety Net is a comprehensive approach to developing healthy youth during non-school hours through a collaboration between PoLice, Recreation a_nd Schools. The program will consist of two components. The first being an after hours drop off center where police officers may drop off youth in violation of the curfew ordinance. The drop off center will be open from 10:00 p.m. to 3:00 a.m. and staffed by youth workers experienced in worldng with at risk youth and families. The youth workers will be responsible for making assessments as to appropriate referral services including counseling, recreation, health, employment and community service. The center wLEl offer peer and adult mentor services to assist youth who are frequent curfew violators. The second component of Project Safety Net will be to provide positive recreation opportunities for youth on weekend evenings between 9:30 p.m. and 11:30 p.m. This component gives youth an alterna- tive to the consequences of un.structured leisure time resulting in problematic behaviors. Activities will range fi'om sports to hobbies, thus ~--eating an opportuni~ to build healthy relationships with peers and adults. The activities will be staffed by youth workers experienced in working with youth from diverse backgrou.nds. Lastly, an Advisory Board will be established to assist staff in meeting the needs of the Fridley commurtity. It will be comprised equally of youth and adults representing the many faces of the dry. This board would meet initially monthly to provide direction and structure to the staff responsible for the development and implementation of Project Safety Net. We look forward to meeting with you and addressing any questions or concerns you may have regard- ing this new cooperative venture. - Kevin Thomas, Youth & Family Outreach Worker - Police Depa~:~ent - Sharie Aiders, Administrative Secretary/Crisis Intervention - Police Department - Debi Campobasso, Program Specialist - Recreation & Natural Resource Depa~t~ent Fridley Police Department Curfew Enforcement Process Stop juveniles 17 and under. Determine if in violation. I~ Violated ~ curfew' Drop juvenile off' at center with citation & police report. Repeat offender or on probation Juvenile released to parent, guardian, or pre-approved responsible adult. Citation given to responsible adult. Aaoka County Juvenile Corrections notified. Letter sent to parent(s) fi.om Anoka County Attorney. If no violation then release. First time & no probation .._n, I Youth released to 7' parent or guardian & citation given to parent or guardian. IParent sent letter from Fr/dley Pol/ce Department Follow up call to parents from safety Net next day and ongoing as needed. The following information is for those cities interested in participating in the curfew drop off center of PROJECT SAFETY NET. The City of Fridley will provide the location and administrative costs of the program to 1-1-96. The figures below represent an estimate of a percentage of the cost of the program to 1-1-96. We are researching the necessity of a Joint Powers Agreement, etc. This should not be viewed as a contract or promise at this time but we believe that these will be accurate figures. The costs were calculated by a population allocation of participating cities. PROJECTED COST OF PROGRAM (JUNE 1, 1995 TO JANUARY 1, 1996) COLUMBIA HEIGHTS (POP. 18,700) 24.5% X $24,915=$6,104. FRIDLEY (POP. 28,000) 36.8% X $24,915=$9,169 NEW BRIGHTON (POP. 22,500) 29.5% X $24,915=$7,350 SPRING LAKE PARK (POP. 7,000) 9.2% X $24,915=$2,292 Payments will be made to the City of Fridley. We can discuss later the issue of monthly, etc. Each City will be asked to provide a Certificate of Insurance. If there is some requirement for Fridley to increase insurance coverage (we don't believe that will be the case), there could be additional expense. If other cities are added (i.e. Moundsview) the financial situation can be reconsidered, but some additional staff may have to be added. Please call me with questions. DAVE SALLMAN-572-3625 CITY OF COLUMBIA H~I(]HTS Meeting of: May 30, 1995 AGENDA SECTION: NEW BUSINESS ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S NO: 9 CITY MANAGER ' S APPROVAL ITEM: APPLICATION FOR PREMISE PERMIT BY: C. BLOWERS BY: ( ,~--~ Attached is a premise application for the Church of Immaculate Conception to hold gambling activities at Tycoon's, 4952 Central Avenue N.E. Also, the organization has submitted a copy of the floor plan and lease agreement with Tycoon's. Since the organization satisfies the City Council's resolution regarding charitable gambling and has paid the $250 permit fee, the City Manager recommends the following action. (It should be noted that the Church of Immaculate Conception already does hold a gambling license to conduct gambling activities at Mady's Bowling Lounge, 3919 Central Avenue, Columbia Heights. This application is for an additional premise site.) RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to direct the City Manager to forward a letter to the State Charitable Gambling Control Board indicating that the City of Columbia Heights has no objection to a premise permit for the Church of I~naculate Conception to conduct Class A gambling activities at Tycoon's, 4952 Central Avenue N.E.; and furthermore, that the City Council hereby waives the remainder of the sixty day notice to the local governing body. COUNCIL ACTION: ~ESOLUTION N0. 88- 41 BEING A ~ESOLUTION &UT~ORIZING CERTAIN BE IT ~ESOLVED by the City of Columbia Heights that sa~bl~n$, as described ~n Minnesota Statute 326 shall be prohibited Ln all bars and liquor establish- Bents within the City which are licensed pursuant to Section 5.501, 5.503, 5.$04, 5.505, 5.506, or 5.507 of the City Code unless~ 1. The organization wtsh~ng'to sa~ble obtains the per~lssion of the M~-esota Charitable Ga~bl~ng Control Board; 2. The organization wishing to gamble obtains the per~ission of the Council of the City of Columbia Heights; 3. The orsanizatton wishing to gamble has been in existence ~n Columbia Heights for not less than ten yearsj The orsanization wishins to.~a~ble ts a bona fide club; The organization wishing to ga~ble does not pay the proprietor of the l~censed premises a rental or lease payment in excess of the lesser of $400 per month, or the amount authorized by the Sta~e Charitable Gambling Control Board for Class & and Class B l~censes. No o~her remuneration shall be paid to the proprietor for per~ittinS the gambling activity or device to be located on the licensed prenises. A license fee not subject to a vaiver shall be paid to the City of Colmabia Heights in the amount of $250 for Class A and Class B licenses and $25 for Class C and Class D licenses. License fees shall not prorated or refundable. N0~, THEI~EF01~E, BE IT RESOLVED that this resolution shall take effect on July 1, 1988, and shall replace Resolution 86-11. Passed the 9th day of Hay, 1988. Offered By, Carlson Seconded By, Paterson Roll Call, All ayes Jo-Anne Student, Co~cil Secretar7 Dale V. liadtrath, ~ayor LG214 Prem~_~es Permit Application Part 1 of 2 ~'~' FOR BOARD USE ONLY OHECK , INITIALS DATE Pmmi~es perrnJ~ number [] O (~15o) to to to Name of esmbiJsL~ment where gamb~ng will be ~ . ~rpet Addmr, a~do not u~e · ix~t/off=e bo~.n _umber) Tyi~ of pm~linS ~cdvi~, ~ ~i]t be co~dm~ed ~ b'~ ~blln~ i~m~m (C~k Mi ~1~ q~ to this [~3 B,-So r-~ R. rrb. ~LP.dd~.d, Ji~.~l--be ~TIpbo..b Rent InformAtion (Sa: Rule 7861.0060, Sub9 2D) Rent for i~8o nd &il off)ct samblin during tl~ b~ngo occ&~fl may not c2ux~: $~00 for up to 6,000 squm~ foct~ $300 for up t~ 12,000 sqtmm $400 for mo~ th~n 12,000 squa~ m~ m exooM a ~um of S1000 per month. I Rent to bc paid per bingo occ&sion S J Rent may not be bi.Md ou n percentnle or ru:eipls frum bwful pmblinl or ntteudmJce at a binlo occmton. An or~ninfion my not psy ITut to fOelf or to sly of lis ·fllibtes for spice used for line Collduct or ilwfid Immbibf, Effective Date for Amended Lease Agreements Pie. me list the cffcclivc d~tc on which thc 8meudmen~s to the ofiginsl Jmse will ~ place. ]~st dim~nsiom of~ll &rc&s k:ucd by ~o~~ for pmblins I~vi~ om thb pannil~ Thc Jcascd nrc~ nrc: feet by ~d. id for · MUl or x4~-~ Submit · sketch (druwing) of die Imublinl preadteL -This must show thc location oryour ~ Jetted gus f(w thc conduct of h~t*ul pmblins includir~ src~ kmed for nionSe or,ur pmblins lmxh~en ~is pmb~ premba .Be sure to 2279 IMMACULATE CONCEPTION BOOSTERS 4030 JACKSON ST., NE. COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN 55421 o~. o _- ~ ..... CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PATRICK HENTGES, CITY MANAGER MAY 25, 1995 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 30, 1995 1) SHARED RIDE REPORT Attached please find Shared Ride statistics through March, 1995. 2) STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS I have received a number of positive comments towards the strategic plan as developed and presented by the City Council during Heights Pride week. The next "Heights Highlights" newsletter will feature the strategic plan. I expect that mailing be disseminated around the end of June. 3) HEIGHTS PRIDE WEEK I am preparing an accounting of Heights Pride Week activities and will be forwarding the status of the budget to the City Council in the very near future. The Heights Pride Committee had a recap meeting on Thursday. One of the major discussions was the potential consolidation in proximity of the Housing Fair activities with the Community Picnic. Overall, we received many favorable comments concerning the activities. 4) CITY LOT SALES STATUS We received proposals from Habitat, First Choice Homes, and an individual for the purchase and/or the construction of homes on various surplus lots. We've extended the date to approximately May 16th, so that a few additional builders or contractors could make proposals. At the June 19th work session, the Council is scheduled to review the various proposals. In the meantime, City staff is also evaluating steps necessary to implement a scattered site tax increment project for the city-owned lots, together with various houses in the housing inventory that would be included in a voluntary acquisition program. 5) BLOCK BUILDERS HOUSE PURCHASE Be advised that Block Builders (through ACCAP) has successfully closed on the acquisition of the home at 675 47th Avenue N.E. As a point of information, it should be noted that the County also participated in the project in the amount of $2,000. The $2,000 that the County contributed was deducted from Columbia Heights'. In fact, the City of Columbia Heights really contributed $15,000 towards the project. 6) CORRESPONDENCE AND REPORTS Attached please find correspondence from various agencies: Anoka County Association of Realtors--Sales Recaps Greater Anoka County Humane Society--Fee Charges Metropolitan Council/Wastewater Services 1994 Final Sewer Cost Allocation Metropolitan Council/Wastewater Services 1995 First Quarter Flow Calculation North Metro Mayors Association--Transportation and Economic Development Study. FBI--Uniform Crime Index 7) BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT - STATUS REPORT Attached please find the status of the Beautification Budget as of May 23, 1995. As you can see, the Heights Pride Week's efforts were quite successful. Further into the year, City staff will discuss alternatives for the Old Fashioned Skating Rink mound including the possible construction of a gazebo. It is hoped that volunteer and service groups would assist with a project of this nature. 8) PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER SEARCH I have been less than satisfied with the applicants for the Public Works Director position. I have discussed interim management alternatives with the senior supervisory staff of the Public Works Department. I will also be monitoring the search for Public Works Director in Lino Lakes, in that it has been similarly advertised and near the salary range of Columbia Heights. At the June 19th work session, I will brief the Council in further detail as to the alternatives. 9) HONEYWELL/HILLCREST PROPERTY I have scheduled June 5th as further discussion on the redevelopment proposal with Honeywell/Hillcrest property. All the parties involved will be present to discuss the redevelopment proposal. Additionally, the City has had discussions with Hillcrest confirming the sale of the parcel adjacent to Huset Park and will have a final position developed by the meeting. 10) CITY HALL 40TH AVENUE PARKING/BUS STOP Be advised that the MTC shelter is now moved. It is City Staff's intention to discuss the possibility of rearranging their parking on 40th Avenue to better accommodate the bus stop, and the possibility of a curbside utility/City Hall dropbox, and mailbox site. We have found that the current utility box has anywhere from 350 to 400 utility bills dropped per month, despite the fact that you do have to get out of your car. Additionally, the U.S. postal box also gets a fair amount of usage. An auto drop may further increase the utilization and provides for the possibility of other utility drops such as NSP, Minnegasco, Cable, etc. The proposal also intends to provide at least one or two short term customer parking spaces. 11) CITY ATTORNEY ON SITE OFFICE We hope to have an on-site office for the City Attorney in the next two weeks. The hold-up to this date has been the remodeling and the installation of a computer terminal in the office. The office hours for the attorney will likely be Wednesday morning for civil matters and perhaps another block of hours during the week for the criminal attorney to meet with the police officers. cb 95/ 0 ~ CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (612) 782-2800 Mayor Joseph Sturdevant Counciimembers Donald G. Jolly Bruce G. Nawrocki Gary L. Peterson Rob'err W. Ruettimann City Manager Patrick Hentges May 23, 1995 Ms. Alyce Osborne Community Development Manager Anoka County Government Center 2100 3rd Avenue Anoka, MN 55303-2265 RE: 675 47TH AVENUE N.E. (Acquisition by ACCAP) Dear Alyce: Enclosed as per our telephone conversation yesterday following on 675 47th Avenue N.E.: A. Notice to State Historic Preservation Office B. Copy of Purchase Agreement C. Copy of Letter from property owner on resi- dence being vacant for over 1 year. Please call me at 782-2855 if you need anything further. Sincerely, // . ..~..- - x 7 Donald R. Schneider Director Community Development Enclosure: cc: City Manager/ACCAP (Steve Kline) are the "SERVICE iS OUR BUS!NESS' EQUAL OPPC, PTi/,iITTM EL4PLOYEN THE CITY OF COLUI~,IB1A HbZ!QHTS DOES NOT Di/-.-'Ci~It,I!N.~,TE CN THE ~.:~.3ic OF DtSABIL',7"( 'N EMPLOYMENT OR T~E PRO','!SiGN OF SERVICES 1994-95 OFFICERS President Gerry Holies President Elect Dean Gasser Secretary/Treasurer Jim Corm,er IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT Gary Robertson 1994-95 DIRECTORS Sharon Allen Mel Beaudry Shirlee Heitz Steve Kelley Bob Littman Susan Sundahl Mark Unsta Pat Von Moscr~ Matt Wolfe AFFILIATE DIRECTOR Mari~yn Roeiofs N.A.R. DIRECTOR Jerry R Teeson M.A.R. REGIONAL VICE PRESIDENT Jeff Johnson M.A.R. DIRECTORS Dean Gasser Gary Robertson EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT BettyAnn D. Croteau COMMITTEE CHAIRS Affihate Advisory Marilyn Roelofs Awards Pat Moerke Education Colleen Johnson Equal Qpportunity John Thorpe Finance J~m Corm~er Golf J~m Schafer Governmental Affairs Mike Jungbauer Grievance Betty Tarr Member Services Jay J, Jackson Multiple Lishng Service Tracey Douglas Personnel Gary Robertson Professtonal Standards Judy Helin Scholarship Jill Erickson Strategic Planning Carl Youngquist Toys For Joy Elise Zajac Staff Apprectat/on Luncheon Gayle Miller DeLayne Muehlbauer ANOKA COUNTY ASSOCIATION of REA1,TORS® 11460 ROBINSON DRIVE NW, COON RAPIDS, MN 55433 (612) 757-7230, FAX (612) 757-7296 May 17, 1995 Mr. Pat Hentges, Manager City of Columbia Heights 590 - 40th Avenue NE Columbia Heights, l~',I 55421-3878 Dear Mr. Hentges; Enclosed are the recaps of real estate sales for single family homes in the communities of Anoka County, as well as, the municipalities of Elk River and Big Lake. The figures, which reflect the activities for the "1 st Quarter 1995 and April 1995 compared to the same periods in 1994, are gathered from the Regional Multiple Listing Service of Minnesota. This information does not account for sales of non-REALTORS®. The comparative figures indicate approximately a 33% decline in the number of Anoka County sales, while the median sold price increased approximately by 7% to 9%. When reviewing this information, please keep in mind that some new construction sold figures never get entered into the Regional Multiple Listing Service. Please distribute all the information to other parties you feel would be interested in this type of information. Feel free to reprint any of the information in your community newsletters or other publications. If we can assist you with other housing statistics or more detailed information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Director oftrublic Affairs Enclosures REALTOR~* -- is a registered mark which identifies a professional in real estate who subscribes to a strict Code of Ethics as a member of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS% 1995 FIRST QUARTER HOME SALES Comparison: Jan.-~glarch 1995 to Jan.-March 1994 Current Activity: Single Family Homes Prepared by: The Anoka County Association of REAL TORS (~ Jean M. Gage, Director of Public Affairs This sales recap shows a comparison between "1st Quarter" activity for both 1994 and 1995. The information is updated monthly, and is provided to you as a service of the Anoka County Association of REALTORS®. Unit Sales Jan~March 94 Unit Sales .lan-March 95 Andover 76 56 Anoka 32 a" 1 Bethel, East Bethel 19 13 Blaine 73 45 CenLerville, Lino Lakes 51 30 Circle Pines, Lexin~on 15 11 Columbia Hei,2hts, Hilltop 33 28 Columbus Township, Median Median Sold Price Sold Price thru March 94 thru March 95 Average Sale Price Jan.-March 95 108,267 11~,240 130,624 83,900 91,900 91,333 83,900 88,000 103,875 94,000 95,500 118,192 138,140 106,250 123,996 81,500 ~5,000 94,436 76,900 75,250 75,260 Linwood Township 11 11 82,900 Coon Rapids 109 91 92,000 Fridlev 36 20 86.250 Ham Lake 27 11 114,900 Ramsev 4.4 24 109,900 St. Francis, Oak Grove, Bums Township 22 16 93,700 Spring Lake Park 12 4 82,250 124,~900 123,761 91,000 99,518 83,750 94,150 123,900 1~6,>~9 112,950 114,556 106,750 108,128 94.750 88,625 Am~ka Carng, 560 38! 89:!25 Eik River 35 25 98,900 Big Lake 16 17 79,700 Metro Area 5, 721 3.779 103~500 05,125 !o~358 98,000 101,443 87,500 92,585 103~900 122T484 This information was gathered from the Regional Monthly Sold Book. March 1995, of the Regional Multiple Lisa'ng Service of 3,tinnesota. This information outlines the activities of REALTORS® within the metropolitan area, and does not account for sales by non-REALTORS~ The Anoka County Association of RF~L TORS ® is "The Voice for Real Estate" representing over 1,100 members involved in all aspects of the real estate industry. ACAR is the northern metropolitans largest trade and professional association, representing members in Anoka and Sherburne Counties. 1995 45VOKA COUNTY MONTH END HOME SALES Comparison: Jan.-April J995 to Jan.-April 1994 Current Activity: Single Family Homes Prepared by: The Anoka County Association of REALTORS® Jean M. Gage, Director of Public Affairs This sales recap shows a comparison between year-to-date activity for both 1994 and 1995. The information is updated monthly, and is provided to you as a service of the Anoka County Association of REALTORS®. Andover 3an-April 94 Jan-April 95 110 84 )moka 49 33 Bethel, East Bethel 31 22 Blaine 110 65 Centervitle, Lino Lakes 85 42 Circle Pines, Lexington 26 18 Columbia Heiehts. _.H_ j.l! t_~o2 44 42 Median Median Sold Price Sold Price thru April 94 thru April 108,745 117,500 83,'900 88,800 85,500 105,200 94,450 95,500 126,500 110,647 89.500 87,000 95 Average Sale Price Jan.-April 95 13L955 90.252 112,671 111,117 92,830 7~,700 74,900 73.211 c~lu..b,,s Township, ~- 9~,50u Linwood Township 23 Coon Rapids 181 141 93,000 Fridley 59 38 88,000 Ham Lake 37 19 114,900 Ramsev 70 34 109,992 St Francis, Oak Grove, Bums Township Spring Lake Park :34 23 99,985 22 6 85,425 122,246 125.429 95,000 102.474 88,000 94.307 122,500 t35.160 108,330 I17,34~ 107,500 108,880 77,92! ' !0!.500 107 6t~2 Elk River 55 45 94,500 Big Lake 26 24 84,450 Metro A rea 8~ 718 5. 922 102,500 100,000 104,201 87,000 89,334 102,900 121.816 This information was gathered from the Regional Monthly Sold Book, April 1995. of the Regional Multiple Listing Service of Minnesota. This information outlines the activities of REALTORS® within the metropolitan area. and does not account for sales by non-REALTO~. The Anoka County Association of REAL TORS ~ is "The Voice for Real Estate" representing over 1,100 members involved in all aspects of the real estate industry. ACAR is the northern metropolitans largest trade and professional association, representing members in Anoka and Sherburne Counties. Humane Society 1411 Main Street · Coon Rapids, MN 55448 · (612) 754-1642 ]:or lJl05f' without words May 16, 1995 > ~. ~..~. Dear Administrator, In February, 1995, the Greater Anoka County Humane S~ciety sent you a letter informing you that we would be mailing the 1995-96 Animal Control/Impound Service contract in June for an August 1st implementation date. During the spring we planned to review our costs in relation to the contract. If increases were being contemplated, we could then arrange to meet with you well before the contract implementation date to discuss any proposed increases. Our goal is to submit the new contracts to you in June to allow time to go over the proposed changes well before the final contract is prepared. We are enclosing a list of possible areas of increase. Please let us have your feedback as soon as possible so we can discuss the contract with you. After you review this letter and study the list of proposed increases, call us to arrange a personal visit. Naturally, we would like to maintain contract costs at current levels, but it is not financially possible. The shelter is losing money each month in its attempts to meet contract obligations and to provide a good quality of care for the animals and strong adoption/receiving and education programs. Because of lack of funds, we have not been able to provide any wage or salary increases for over a year. Private support has not expanded to help meet the need. We are increasing our efforts in this area, but improved results take time. Because of these factors, we must propose a modest contract increase described in the attached list. We are proud of the fact that we were able to find loving homes for about 75% of the animals entrusted to our care, whether given or strays. We thank you for your continued help and support. We look forward to your input on these contract changes. Sincerely, Giles Kobilka Executive Director P.S. I thought you should know that at its May 2nd meeting, the Coon Rapids City Council voted to support our reques~ for an extension of time before closing our current access/egress road to Highway 242. We really appreciate that decision which helps us continue our operations here at our current location. Humane Society 1411 Main Street · Coon Rapids, MN 55448 · (612) 754-1642 l"or tIIos~, willloltt t~'ords IV. Greater. Anoka County Humane Society Possible Contract Fee Changes for 1995-96 Compensation 1. Impound Fee - an increase from $30.00 to 32.00 per animal for the first day of impound. 2. Boardinq Fee - an increase from $9.00 per day to $10.O0 per day, per animal, for each day after the first day of impound. 3. ~uarantine Fee - an increase from $5.00 per day per animal to $5.50 in addition to the regular boarding fee. Total boarding & quarantine increase would be from $14.O0 to $15.50 per day. Transportation Fee - a flat rate increase based on an increase from $30.00 to $32.00 per hour. 5. Vet Services Fee - an increase from $30.00 to $32.00 per hour. 6. Disposal Fee - an increase from $.31 to $.35 per pound disposal. 7. Vaccination Fee - an increase from $2.00 to $3.00 per animal (all animals). 8. Euthanasia Solution Fee - icc increase from $3.74 to $3.80. Each additional .5cc increase from $.07 to $.08. * 4. NO OTHER COMPENSATION CHANGES <70.a l,Zt J' Humane Society 1411 Main Street · Coon Rapids, MN 55448 ° (612) 754-1642 For those ,vithout words !{ay 16, 1995 Dear Administrator, We ara reviewing our policies regarding animals we receive who either have bitten or are suspected of biting. Would you send us a copy of your city ordinance regarding q~a~a,~ ..... g animals. Thanks very muck. Sincerely, Giles Kobilka Executive Director Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future May 15, 1995 TO ALL CITY FINANCE OFFICERS: Metropolitan Council/Wastewater Services (MCWS) recently closed out 1994 revenues and expenditures and completed the 1994 Final Cost Allocation. The enclosed statement shows both the estimated sewer service billing your city paid for 1994 and the final billing to your city for the same year. The bottom line shown on the accompanying statement is the amount your city underpaid or overpaid in 1994. This amount will appear as a credit or a debit on the city's 1996 statement of sewer service. For 1994, MCWS had a favorable variance of $7.5 million, composed of $1 million in unanticipated revenue and $6.5 million in spending below budget. The variance occurred by design. As budget and merger activity became more define, spending was constrained to allow MCWS more leeway to balance competing needs. The Council decided that the variance should be used to reduce costs in the mid-and long-term, working toward stability in billings to communities. The variance is being used to finance capital budget projects (in lieu of debt), prepay a loan, set up an allowance for obsolete inventory, assist in re-engineering an essential activity and buy out some of the older workers' compensation policies. This use of the variance also means there will not be an across-the-board rebate on our 1996 sewer service bill, which is another step toward long-term stability. At this time, I would also like to provide an update of the Cost Allocation/Rate Study Task Force appointed by the Metropolitan Council Chair and chaired by Russ Susag, Council member of Richfield and former Metropolitan Waste Control Commissioner. The Task Force and its Technical Advisory Committee are conducting a full study of virtually every aspect not only of the cost allocation system but of SAC, inflow and infiltration and other rates such as industrial strength. Their target date for reporting is early fall, 1995. They welcome questions or comments, and we would be happy to put you in touch with them. As always, your questions or comments are welcome. For specific questions about this statement or other matters, please contact Steve $ielaff at 229-2021 or myself at 229-2017. Sincerefly, · oi~ I. Spear Controller LIS:CG~:kme A;\FNLCA94.LIS cc: City Nanager Nayor Enclosure 230 East Fifth Street Metroln~ L~e 229-3780 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TDD/TTY 291-0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER SERVICES 1994 Final Sewer Service Statement 5034 Columbia Hts 1994 EST. ACTUAL Gallonage Processed (in million gallons) ~_2_4 5403 24 .... 578 !.Cost per Million Gallons -. ......... _._. :1~2_52.76 Total Sewer Ser~i~'C-°St '--'-~'" 671 ,.349 724,093 I Other (Credits) or Charges: Current Value Credit (22,2721 (2_2;272) Debt Payment Credit 0 :0 1992 Final (Credit)/Amount Due (98~7881 (98i788) Total Other (Credits) or Charges (121,060 (121i060) Amount Paid by Customer 550,284 :550;284: Reduction of 1994 Billin~ via Cash Rebate to Customer 0 Net Amount Paid by Customer 550,284 550;284 Amount Unde aid or Over aid b Customer ~ 52749 Note: ,,,,s is not an ii, voice or credit memo The amount underpaid or overpaid will be added/subtracted on your 1996 Statement of Estimated Sewer Service Charges. Metropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future May 18, 1995 Patrick Hentges city Manager city of Columbia Heights 590 - 40th Ave NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 RE: 1995 First Quarter Flow Calculation Dear Mr. Hentges: The Metropolitan Council Environment Division has measured and/or calculated the first quarter flows for 1995 generated within your community to be 130 million gallons. This information is considered to be preliminary and may be adjusted based on further review. The Council's estimated total 1995 flow for your community is 585 million gallons. The above first quarter flow calculation, and the estimated flow for 1995, includes estimates for any unmetered connections that either entWr or leave your community. Attached is a graph showing only the metered flow for your com/~unity, by month, for the past three years. Therefore, the first quarter flow volume shown above may not equate to the total 3 month flow volume given in the chart. If you have any questions or require additional information, please don't hesitate to call me at 229-2116. Municipal Services Manager Environment Division Wastewater Services Department DSB:JLE FLOWLTR CC: Curt Johnson, Metropolitan Council District 10 Lois Spear, Metropolitan Council Environment Division 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TDD/TFY 291-0904 Metro Info Line 229-3780 An Equal Opptwllmity Employer 0 0 0 0 03 OJ ~-- 0 b qu mom low L qR tC a st"a u ,am Table of Contents I. Introduction H. Summary of Findings IH. Demographics of the North Metro Area IV. Highsvay Availability. in the North Metro Area V. Highsvay Funding Needs in the North Metro Area VI. Furore Plans for Highways VII. Transit in the T~vin Cities Metropolitan Area VIH. Transit Needs and Improvements in the North Metro Area IX. Future Plans for Transit Appendix A. 3 4 7 13 15 21 22 27 33 35 2 I. Introduction Purpose of the Study Transportation is a kev dement in the econormc development and prosperity, of an area. Whether transportation drives devetopmemu or development demands transportation (both have been true), it is impossible to have a healthy economic svste~n in the absemce of a transportation system that is capable of mo~4ng people to and from work and other destinations. This report will pro,~4de an evaluation of public high~vay and transit mvesunent and needs over time for the north metro area. xmh comparisons to the south metro area to determine if, in fact, transportation needs have been met equitably throughout the T~4n Cities region. The report will also examine ~ox~xh rotes and forecasts for households, emplo.wnerrc and other key economic indicators as measures of future needs. Organization of the Report The report will begin with an examination of the demographics of the north metro area, including household and population trends and forecasts, employmemt trmds and forecasts, and other measures of the economic health of this subregion. Comparable figures ~vill be provided for the south metro area. and kev differences will be noted. The next section will describe current highway transportation availability and funding in the north metro area..-~ain, comparisons to the south metro area will be draxvn. Unmet and furore transportat/on needs in the north metro area will then be outlined. The transit s'~xtem in the region XXqll be described, and transit needs and improvements in the north metro area X~qll be covered Data companng the north and south metro areas includes all cities in both areas (except Minneapolis and St. Paul). However. the focus of much of the report is on the areas served by the North Metro Mavors .kssociation. II. Summary of Findings Population and Households Employment Tax Base Unemployment Poverty Lower-Cost Housing Current Highway Availability The Twin Cities MetropolitanArea is just about evenly divided between the north and the south in population and households. Although the north metro area has about the same number of people as the south metro area, the north trails far behind the south in jobs, with 141,000 fewer jobs. This disparity is projected to continue through the year 2015, when the north metro area will have 143,000 fewer j obs. This strong employment disadvantage is accompanied by a number of additional indicators of the economic health of the north metro area. Less than one third of the commumties with above-average per capita property tax base are in the north metro area. At the same time, more than two thirds of communities with below-average tax base are in the north. Lower tax base puts communities and their school districts at a disadvantage for providing basic local govemment services and education. At the time of the 1990 Census, 36,994 people were unemployed in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (excluding Minneapolis and St. Paul). Of these, 53.5 percent were in the north metro area, and 46.5 percent were in the south, a difference of 2,556 people. The poverty population in the north metro area is 22 percent higher than in the south metro area. Of the 73,458 people living in poverty outside of the central cities, 40,354 lived in the north metro area. This was 7,250 more people in poverty than in the south. The north metro area has 13 percent more rental housing affordable to lower-income households (50 percent of median income or less) than the south metro area, and 11 percent more housing of all types affordable to households with incomes of $20,000 per year or less. One way to move toward a more equitable economic balance between the north and south metro areas is to provide transportation resources that will encourage or preserve economic development in the north metro area. As of January, 1995, the north metro area had 8 percent fewer lane miles of trunk highway than the south metro area, a difference of 142 lane miles. Age of Highways Importance of Highways to Businesses Traffic Congestion Highway Project Progress Report Future Plans for Highways Transit Service Transit Funding Reverse-Commute Need for Local Transit Service Suburb to Suburb Transit Service Transit for Suburban Work Trips Among the major highways, the north metro area has more of the older lane miles built before 1980 (615 miles, to 434 in the south). More of the newer, post-1980 lane miles are located in the south (335 miles, to 191 miles in the north). Access to transportation has been identified as the top priority in determining business location by businesses surveyed in many dries in the north metro area. Severe traffic congestion affects many of the major highways in the north metro area. The Trunk Highway 10/610 project appears to be progressing on (the revised) schedule, as is the 1-94 HOV lane project. Portions of Highway 169 are on schedule. The Highway 100 project schedule needs to be accelerated, and the funding level stabilized at an adequate amount. Other highway priorities of the North Metro Mayors Association have not been scheduled or allocated funding to date. Major highway projects should have ongoing committees of local representatives, as well as representatives of MnDOT and the Metropolitan Council, to oversee them at every stage. The North Metro Mayors Association should develop a priority system for future highway projects. Area businesses should be involved in highway planning" The transit system in the region has not been able to keep up with changes in location of residential and employment areas over time, malting it difficult for both central city and suburban residents to use transit for many of their work trips. Because of an anticipated shortfall in the regional transit budget, many needed transit improvements will not be funded. Reverse-commute transit service allows central city residents to nde buses to suburban employment centers. To date, most reverse-commute service has been offered in the south and southwest metro areas. However, Maple Grove now offers reverse-commute service for one large employer. Many communities in the north metro area have no local transit service for shopping, medical appointments, work trips or other local travel needs. Most transit routes in the north metro area lead to either Minneapolis or St. Paul. To go from suburb to suburb usually requires a trip downtown and a transfer to another bus. Many suburban employers have indicated that transit service is important, particularly for entry-level jobs. Transit-Dependent Population The north metro area has a large transit-dependent population in need of all types of transit service. Transit Hubs Transit hubs, located primarily at major suburban shopping malls, can become important transfer points for suburb to suburb transit service. Additional transit hubs are needed in the north metro area. Future Plans for Transit Future transit planning should involve aries, businesses, and transit riders. Transit rules and r~--~ulations should be reviewed. A variety of transit demonstration programs should be implemented and momtored. HI. Demographics of the North Metro Area: Population, Household and Employment Forecasts, and Other Key Economic Indicators To understand the transportation needs of the North Metro Area, it is important to have information on population, household and employment trends and forecasts, and other information on the economic health of the area. Defmition of the North Metro Area The North Metro Area includes all of Anoka County, all of Ramsey County except St. Paul, and the north portion of Hennepin (excluding Minneapolis) and Washington Counties. The north/south dividing line is roughly 1-94/394 (12). See Map One. Growth Trends and Forecasts _P_o~pulation In 1940, the north half of the Metro Area accounted for only 40 percent of the population of the Twin Cities region. The south metro area had the other 60 percent. It took four decades for the north metro area to catch up, with 50.7 percent of the population of the region in 1980. The north and south halves of the region remained virtually equal in population in 1990, with 50.1 and 49.8 percent, respectively/ See Table One. Table One North/South Share of Twin Cities Population 1940- 1990 Year 1940 North Metro Areapercent 40.0 South Metro Area percent 1950 41.9 58.1 1960 45.9 54.2 1970 49.0 51.0 1980 50.7 49.3 1990 50.1 49.8 Source: Metropolitan Council t Twin Cities Region Year 2020 Subregional Forecasts, Metropolitan Council, 1992. 7 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BOUNDARY - NORTH/SOUTH METRO AREAS HENNEPIN CO. ',mtos[.o ST FIANCIS ~ i, CARVER CO [ ANOKA CO. HAH LANE RAMSEY CO. SAINT PAUL HOPKINS [UlNSYILL[ E&GAN HEIGHTS DAKOTA CO. LNNE¥1LL[ FSIMINGTON SCOTT CO. ...... CE I Jo .... I .[~ __ ~ .... Twin Oitios Motropolitan ^roa ¢olitical BounOarios, 1 @@3 WASHINGTON CO I ! wOOOlUlY PAUL COTTAGE GLOVE lOS[MOUNT I II~-NDOLP~ ~NO~_~_....__ County Boundary Municipal Boundary Township Boundary Households While the population of the north metro area was slightly ahead of the south metro area in 1980 and 1990, the number of households in the north metro area was slightly below the south metro area and projected to remain so into the twenty-first century. In 1970, the north metro area had 147,000 households, while there were 161,000 households in the south metro area. Household growth was almost equal between 1970 and 1990 in the north and south, with 148,000 and 149,000 households adde& respectively. The south metro area is projected to add more households than the north between 1990 and 2015, when the north metro area is projected to have 420,000 households, compared to 469,000 in the south.2 See Table Two. Table Two North/South Share of Twin Cities Households 1970 - 2015 Year North Metro Area South Metro Area Households Households 1970 147,000 (47.7%) 161,000 (52.3%) 1990 295,000 (48.8%) 310,000 (51.2%) 2015 420,000 (47.2%) 469,000 (52.8%) Source: Metropolitan Council Em~lo~ent While the north and south metro areas are almost eqtml in population, and not far apart in households, the south metro area has substantially more jobs than the north metro area and is projected to continue to have more jobs through the year 2015. Of the 813,000 jobs in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area in 1990, the north metro area had 336,000 jobs, while the south metro area had 477,000 jobs, a difference of 141,000. The north metro area has 41.3 percent of area jobs, while 58.7 percent are in the south. By 2015, the north metro area will have 499,000 jobs, while the south has 642,000, a difference of 143,000jobs. See Figure One, page 9. Ibid. 8 500,000 400,000 !"--'<->-:-:------:-_-:--:-:-: · 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 1990 Figure One Number of Jobs -1990 -2015 North and South Metro Areas 2015 Source: Metropolitan Council Ill North Metro Area • South Metro Area The smaller number of jobs in the north metro area leads to a lower number of jobs per household. In 1990, the north metro area had 295,000 households and 336,000 jobs, a ratio of 1.14 jobs per household. At the same time, the ratio of jobs per household in the south metro area was 1.54 jobs per household. By 2015, the north will have 1.19 jobs per household, and the south will have 1.37 jobs per household. Other Key Economic Indicators Tax Base An important measure of the economic health of a community or area is its property tax base. In this category, the north metro area falls well below the south metro area. The average 1994 per capita property tax base in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, before tax base sharing, was $848. Of the 56 suburban communities in the Twin Cities with population over 9,000, 22 had per capita tax base above that figure, but only 7 of them (31.8 percent) were north metro area communities. The remaining 15 communities (68.2 percent) were in the south metro area. Thirty-four communities had below average tax bases, 23 in the north metro area (67.6 percent) and 11 in the south (32.4 percent)_3 See Table Three, page 10. 3 Citizens League, 1994. 9 North Metro Below Table Three Per Capita Tax Base - 1994 Above South Metro Below Above Bumsville Chanhass~n Chaska Andover Anoka Blame Park Columbia Hts. Ham Lake Lmo Lakes Little Canada Grove Mounds View New N. St. Paul Oakdale Ramsev Robbinsdale Shoreview Stillwater White Bear Lk. White Bear Arden Hills Brooklyn Ctr. Roseville Vadnais Hts. Inver Grv. Hts. Lakeville Mound Prior Lake Richfield S. St. Paul W. St. Paul Eden Prairie Edma Gold. Valley_ 3kins Mendota Hts. 1,343 936 Mmnetonka Rosemount St. Louis Pk. 1,358 Source: Citizens League While unemployment rates throughout the region and the state can fluctuate with the economy, the number of people unemployed m communities m the region can be considered an indicator of the overall economic health of those communities. Unemployment totals for all commumties outside of Minneapolis and St. Paul at the time of the 1990 Census have been listed, and totals computed for the north metro area communities and the south metro area commumties. 10 Communities in the north metro area had 19,775 people unemployed, while there were 17,219 people unemployed in the south metro area, a difference of 2,556 people. Of people unemployed at the time of the 1990 Census, 53.5 percent were residents of the north metro area, and 46.5 percent 4 lived in the south metro area. Pover02 In addition to a higher rate of unemployment, the communities in the north metro area have a greater number of residents living below the poverty level. At the time of the 1990 Census, 40,354 north metro area residents hved below the poverty level, while 33,104 residents of the south metro area were living in poverty. Excluding Mmneapolis and St. Paul, 55 percent of all citizens living in poverty were residents of the north metro area, and 45 percent lived in the south metro area.5 The poverty population in the north metro area exceeds the south metro area by 22 percent. A poverty-level income is defined by the Census as $6,300 for 1 person, $8,076 for a 2-person family, $9,885 for a 3-person family, and $12,674 for a family of 4. Lower-Cost Homing Communities in the north metro area have more rental housing affordable to households with incomes at 50 percent of the median, or less, than communities in the south metro area. According to the 1990 Census, there were 21,663 rental units affordable to households with incomes at 50 percent of the median or less in the north metro area, and 19,232 comparable rental units in the south metro area.6 The supply of affordable rental units is almost 13 percent greater in the north metro area. Looking at both rental and ownership housing affordable to households with incomes of $20,000 per year or less, the north metro area has 53,442 umts, while the south metro area has only 47,968 umts, a difference of 5,474 units or 11.4 percent.7 Conclusions The north and south halves of the Metro Area are comparable in their shares of the region's population and households. However, they are quite different in a number of key economic indicators, all of which favor the south metro area. Perhaps no one of these characteristics alone is sufficient to put the north metro area at a disadvantage; but taken together, a picture emerges which demonstrates a strong need for increased economic development in the north metro area. These factors are summarized on page 12. aU. S. Census, 1990. 5 Ibid. ~ Minnesota Planmng, Makin~ the Connection: Linkin Housin Jobs and Trans rtation 1993. Metropolitan Council, ~ Doors to Affordable/Lifecycle Housing, Draft, 1995. 11 Economic Indicators -North Metro Area 12 IV. Highway Availability in the North Metro Area In order to bring about a better economic balance between the communities of the north and south metro areas, additional employment opportunities are badly needed in the north metro area. To support additional economic development and employment, improvements in highway transportation routes are required for business access and visibility. Background Information - Highway Availability Studies Does the north metro area have adequate highway service? Is it comparable to the south metro area? It is difficult to compare levels of highway availability in the north and south metro areas. Three different sources of data have been used to analyze current highway availability. Comparisons have been made using dollars spent and lane miles available. Comparisons of dollars spent do not lead to easily comparable results because of the different time periods during which highways were constructed. (A 1992 freeway mile cost more to build than a 1962 freeway mile.) Lane miles, on the other hand, treat all highways the same, regardless of when they were built. Lane miles do, however, measure the amount of roadway available to service an area, and both the north and south portions of the metropolitan area have a mixture of older and newer highways. The three methods of compahson are summarized below. 1995 Lane Miles (MnDOT) Using 1995 information provided by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), lane miles were measured for every tnmk highway in the metropolitan area, with the exception of all of 1-394/12 and 1-94 that serve as boundary lines between the north and south metro areas. The approximate ntanber of lane miles available were as follows: North Metro Area South Metro Area 1,642 lane rmles (47.9 percent) 1,784 lane miles (52.1 percent) Total 3,426 lane miles Using this method of measurement, the north metro area has 142 fewer lane miles of trunk highway than the south metro area, an 8 percent difference. See Appendix A for a listing of highways included in this tabulation. 13 Dollars .~pent 1980 - 1990 Using the "dollars spent" method, the cost of highway investments between 1980 and 1990 were compared in a report prepared by Datanet and MnDOT, as follows: Area Dollars_Spent Percent of Total Minneapolis/St. Paul $ 347,940,000 32 % North Suburban 213,298,000 20 % South Suburban 427,338,000 39 % East Metro 69,130,000 6 % Ramsey County 30,084,000 3 % Total $1,087,790,000 Clearly, the south metro area had a greater share of public highway funds invested during that decade than the north, even if East Metro and Ramsey County are added to the North Metro Area. Metropolitan Council Lane Miles Studv- 1959- 1992 Using lane miles, Metropolitan Council figures appear to corroborate the "dollars spent" finding, indicating that 335 lane miles were provided in the south metro area between 1980 and 1992, while only 191 lane miles were added in the north. However, during the earlier period from 1959 to 1979, Metropolitan Council records show that the north metro area received 615.5 lane miles, while the south metro area gained only 434.5 lane miles. Overall, between 1959 and 1992, the Metropolitan Council shows the north metro area having 806.5 lane miles, slightly more than the south metro area's 769.5 lane miles. It should be noted that the Metropolitan Council figures for lane miles include only the major arterials, whereas the MnDOT figures include all trunk highways. This accounts for the larger numbers of lane miles in the MnDOT totals for both the north and the south metro areas. The Metropolitan Council figures do, however, include lane miles for the 1-394/94 boundary between north and south, allotmg equal shares of their lane miles to the north and south metro areas. Conclusion 14 V. Highway Funding Needs in the North Metro Area "In selecting the locations of commercial and industrial development, investors evaluate three sets of factors: (1) relative accessibility within a regional marketplace; (2) site characteristics; and (3) improvements that include infrastructure and ancillary uses on which the new use depends. Accessibility. has always been the critical influence in shaping urban land use patterns. Access to (and visibility from) major freeways and arterials continues to be the key location factor.''s Highway access is a very important element m the future economic development of the north metro area. Without adequate highway transportation, the north metro area will remain well behind the south metro area m jobs, as well as commercial and industrial tax base. The shortage of both overall lane miles and newer, more up to date highways m the north metro area supports the need for additional highway construction to support badly-needed economic development. During the past two decades, while more public highway funds were being invested m the south metro area, it was the north metro area that provided more affordable housing opportunities. Public policy that rewards communities for the provision of affordable housing was not being implemented. Imoortance of HighwavTransportation to Business Locations As noted above, access to and visibility from major freeways and arterials continues to be a key location factor for businesses. This statement is supported by several recent studies m the north metro area. The largest of these studies, conducted by Community Resource Partnerships, Inc., included all businesses m Blame, Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, New Hope and Mounds View. A total of 2,600 businesses were surveyed in 1993 and 1994. Of these, 1,603 businesses ranked a list of 20 factors for significance m deciding on altemate or new locations for their businesses. "Roads" were ranked important or very important by more businesses than any of the other 20 factors. For every business that ranked roads not important or insignificant, 5.6 businesses ranked them important or very important. The next highest factor, "property taxes", was ranked important or very important by only 2.81 businesses for every one that ranked them not important or insignificant. Businesses in all five cities included in the survey ranked roads their highest priority. A 1989 Coon Rapids Business Retention and Expansion Study surveyed 35 local businesses. The availability of adequate roadways was among the top 6 factors (out of 19) m importance for survey respondents, being ranked as important or very important by more than 75 percent of the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, An Examination of Factors Controlling the Location of Commerical and Industrial Develol~ment with the Metropolitan Area, 1993. 15 respondents. Only utilities, property taxes, other imposed costs, and quality of life ranked slightly higher. Labor availability was equal to roads m importance. The other 13 factors ranked considerably lower. Businesses m Coon Rapids were also asked which public services were not satisfactory. Both manufacturing and retail/service businesses noted roads as a problem more often than almost any other on a list of 13 problems. Among manufacturing firms, the only other problem noted as often as roads was "facihty space". Among retail/service finns, the only other problems noted as often as roads were emergency medical and electric/gas utilities. The importance of highway access for businesses was also mentioned by representatives of other communities and businesses m the north metro area. A Blame survey of businesses ranked access to transportation the number one priority. It was described as an investment that produced jobs and tax base. Larson Engineering, a Blame manufacturing company, cited the need to have access to both markets and sources of supplies needed m the manufacture of its products. Hi hwa Traffic Co estion Highway traffic congestion causes loss of time and considerable frustration for travelers trying to get to work or other destinations on time. It increases fuel consumption and is a major source of air pollution wherever it is present. Vehicle travel m the Twin Cities metropolitan area has increased far more than population between 1970 and 1990. During that time, daily vehicle miles traveled increased by 130 percent, while the population grew by only 20 percent. The phenomenal growth in travel reflects the dispersal of population and employment away from the central cities. In 1970, 54 percent of the region's households lived outside the central cities. In 1990, the figure was 69 percent. In 1970, 44 percent of the jobs were outside of Minneapolis and St. Paul. In 1990, the number was 63 percent.9 The region's major highway system expanded considerably during that time, from 798 lane miles m 1970 to 1,578 lane miles m 1992. However, this 98 percent increase in lane miles was considerably less than the 130 percent increase m miles traveled, thus providing a rationale for the often-heard remark that the more highways are built, the more congestion increases. Traffic congestion occurs throughout the region, generally during moming and afternoon rush hours. Between 1970 and 1992, the number of freeway miles of severe traffic congestion quadrupled, from 24 miles to 106 miles. If nothing is done to increase the people-moving capacity of the system, the number of miles experiencing severe congestion will nearly double again between now and 2015, to 200 miles. ~0 9 Metropolitan Council, 1990 Travel Behavior Inventor~ Sunun Rary__~_~_~ 1994. ~0 Metropolitan Council, 1995-1997 Transportation Iml~rovement Program for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Are_a, 1994. 16 Severely-congested routes in the north metro area at this time include: 1-94 from County Road 81 to 1-494/694 1-494 throughout the north metro area Highway 169 throughout the north metro area 252 from Highway 610 to 1-94 10 from 1-35W to Highway 47 280 from 1-94 to 1-35W 36 from Highway 280 to 1-35E 100 from Highway 55 to 1-694 55 from Highway 100 to 1-494 There are also a number of severely-congested intersections in the area, where stop and go traffic generates high levels of pollution. Two of these intersections are on Highway 100, where it crosses County Road 81 in Robbinsdale and 36th Avenue North in Crystal/Robbinsdale. Another is the area where County Road 81, Highway 169 and 85th Avenue North converge in Brooklyn Park. Hi hwa Priorities in the North Metro Area Highway priorities established by the North Metro Mayors Association include a number of projects. Topping the list are Trunk Highways 610/10 and Highway 100. Trunk The completion of Trunk Highways 610/10 will open up important commercial and industrial development sites in the north metro area, particularly in Brooklyn Park and Maple Grove. When completed, the Trunk Highway 610 portion of this project will serve almost 20 million square feet of commercial and industrial space in these two cities, with a potential for up to 21,400 additional jobs by the year 2015. City staff have reported inquiries from potential commercial/industrial developers interested in this space upon completion of the highway. MnDot reports that the plans for this important northem crosstown, between Highway 252 and 1- 94, are on or ahead of the current schedule, with completion between Highways 252 and 169 expected as early as 1999. However, Highway 610 was delayed during earlier planning stages, making it difficult for the cities involved to plan for its development. The cost for Highway 610 between 252 and Highway 169 is estimated at $60 million. Another $70 million is the estimated cost of Highway 610 between 169 and 1-94, with completion scheduled after the year 2000.~ If Highway 610 is not completed, there will be tremendous pressure for costly improvements on other roadways in the area, including County Road 30, which is already heavily congested. As a new highway, 610 will have the benefit of modem technology and innovations that can serve as a demonstration for other future highway development. n Estimated costs for Highway 610, and the other highways described below, do not include right of way costs, unless otherwise indicated. 17 Highway 610 will run through Maple Grove and Brooklyn Park and provide convement connections to highways m Blame, Osseo, Brooklyn Center, Champlm, Coon Rapids, and Dayton. A major expansion project is already underway for Trunk Highway 10 from 1-35W to the 169 River Bridge. Communities served by this project include Mounds View, Blame, Coon Rapids and Anoka. Highway 10 has been identified by MnDOT as severely congested. The first stage of this project, from Long Lake Road to Trunk Highway 65, has already been completed at a cost of $29.6 million. Additional work is scheduled by MnDOT m 1998 and 1999 at a cost of about $45 million, including T.H. 10 from T.H. 65 to Egret, and T.H. 610 from University Avenue to Coon Rapids Boulevard. This work was originally scheduled to begin m 1996. The eventual connection of Highways 10 and 610 will open new transportation opportunities for both businesses and personal travel m the north metro area. Trunk ltillhwav 100 Highway 100 is a study in contrasts. The south pomon of this highway has been upgraded to freeway standards. But as one travels north of Glenwood Avenue, the highway reverts to its old form. Originally constructed m the 1930s and upgraded m the 1940s, this portion of Highway 100 and its bridges are visibly deteriorating. One one and a half mile stretch boasts five traffic signals, with major congestion, pollution and safety hazards. The north portion of Highway 100, from Glenwood Avenue North to 50th Avenue North, has been designated for upgrading for more than 30 years. Houses and other buildm~ along some sections of Highway 100 have lost value and been difficult to sell for years because they are, or may be, m the planned highway expansion area. One block m Robbmsdale has only one house lelt. New businesses moving into the area need improved interchanges, and existing businesses have had to live with this uncertainty for years. The resultant reductions m property values have affected city tax bases as well. Cities served by this section of Highway 100 include Golden Valley, Robbmsdale, Crystal and Brooklyn Center. The proposed reconstruction of Highway 100 will benefit adjacent homes, businesses and neighborhoods m these communities by improving drainage, noise levels, air quality, and pedestrian mobility. At this point, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is m process, scheduled for completion in 1998. The Highway 100 Council has urged that the EIS be completed by 1997. The current MnDOT schedule indicates that it will be alter the year 2000 before work on Highway 100 begins. Funding m the amount of $23 million is designated for Highway 100 on the MnDOT post-2000 list, which does not specify, years. This figure is down from the $45 million previously indicated by MnDOT. The $23 million is designated for work from 29th to 39th Avenues and from 39th to Indiana. Additional costs for right of way for these segments are estimated at $23.5 million. The other segments, from Glenwood to 29th Avenue North and from Indiana Avenue to 50th Avenue North do not appear on the MnDOT post-2000 list. The Highway 100 Council estimates costs for these two segments at $25 million for construction and $15.5 rmllion for right of way. 18 The Highway 100 Council urges that, because of the hardships this long-delayed project has caused, and because of pollution and safety considerations at several intersections, construction proceed as quickly as possible to upgrade Highway 100 to freeway standards. Additional Hi~ Priorities in the North Metro Area Additional highway funding priorities m the north metro area include Trunk Highway 169, 1-94 HOV lanes, and several other proposed projects for which no funding has been allocated to date. Tnmk The entire length of Highway 169 m the north metro area has been identified as being severely congested. The proposed project runs from 93rd Avenue to Highway 10. Cities served by the project include Brooklyn Park, Osseo, Champlm and Anoka. Work on the first stage, from Osseo to Champlm, has been scheduled, at a cost of $6 million. The next stage, completion of a permanent Anoka/Champlin Bridge, has been scheduled by MnDOT for 1998 at a cost of $6.8 million. The remaining stages, from 93rd Avenue to the Anoka/Champlm Bridge and an upgrade of the 77th Avenue intersection, are not included in the MnDOT schedule at this time. 1-94 rookl Park to Ma le Grove) This project addresses one of the most severely congested roadways m the metropolitan area. The project would add a third lane on 1-94 from Brooklyn Boulevard to 93rd Avenue. The lane would be an HOV lane. Currently m the design stage, this project is scheduled by MnDOT for the year 2000. The project is allocated $25 million. Communities served by the project are Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, and Maple Grove. Five priority projects remain, for which no funding has been allocated to date. They are: 1-35W (Northeast 1W_anneapolis to Lino Lakes). The proposal is for a Corridor Study, additional lanes from County Road I North to Lake Drive, and improvement of the County Road 14 interchange. This proposal affects the dries of Minneapolis, St. Anthony, New Brighton, Mounds View, Blame and Lmo Lakes. Trunk Highway 65 (I-694 to Anoka County Road 22). The proposal is to complete an access study and long range plan. This proposal affects the cities of Fridley, Spring Lake Park and Blame. Trunk Highway 242 (from Trunk Highway I0 to Trunk Highway 65). The proposal is to upgrade Highway 242. This proposal affects the cities of Coon Rapids and Blame. Trunk Highway 252 (73rd Avenue to Highway 610 Bridge). The proposal is to add additional lanes. This proposal affects the city of Brooklyn Park. Highway 252 has been identified as severely congested. 19 County Road 121. The traffic congestion on the Anoka/Champlin Bridge has led to recognition in this area of the need for a second bridge over the Mississippi River somewhere between Highways 610 and 101. Several locations for this bridge have been considered, but a location has not been selected to date. The 1992 traffic count for the Anoka/Champlin Bridge was 33,000 cars per day, and the forecast for 2010 is 52,800 cars per day if an additional bridge is not built. The proposal would add the additional river crossing in this area and expand the existing roadway. This proposal directly affects the cities of Dayton and Ramsey, as well as residents of other nearby communities who could use the bridge. Conclusions 20 VI. Future Plans for Highways Funding for major new highway projects will be in short supply in the coming years. Not all of the identified highway needs of the north metro area will be met.. Because resources are scarce, it is important that they be used wisely, and that the north metro area be involved in deciding how they are used. The North Metro Mayors Association recommends the following procedures for future highway planmng and funding in the north metro area. (1) Establish a permanent committee for each major highway proposal under consideration for funding by MnDOT in the north metro area, similar to the North Metro 610 Crossing Coalition and the North Metro Highway 100 Council. (a) Membership on each committee shall include representatives of MnDOT, the Metropolitan Council, and ciries, counties, and others affected by the proposal. (b) All major decisions regarding the proposal shall be considered by the committee before final action is taken, including the timing of each stage of the proposal and the level of funding to be allocated. This will address the problem of unanticipated shifts in scheduling and funding amounts, which have been experienced with Highways 610/10, 100 and 169. (c) Each committee will nm from the time a proposal is under consideration at MnDOT until completion of the project. Committees will also be established for projects currently in process. (d) In addition to the current Highway 610 and 100 committees, committees should be established for Highway t 69 and 1-94. Other committees will follow as needed. (2) Develop a priority-setting mechanism for future highway planning in the north metro Under the leadership of the North Metro Mayors Association, establish review criteria for ranking various highway proposals. Using the criteria, prepare a priontized list of proposals to be presented to MnDOT periodically for their consideration. This procedure can strengthen the position of the north metro area by presenting a umfied proposal to MnDOT and the Metropolitan Council. (3) Continue to communicate with businesses regarding their transportation needs. Under the leadership of the North Metro Mayors Association, survey area businesses periodically for their assessment of transportation availability and needs. Include their input in setting priorities for future highway projects. 21 VI. Transit in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area In~oduction While highway access is important in supporting both new and existing economic development, the availability of public transportation (transit) is also an important factor in providing access to employment and other destinations. The relatively low population density of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, and particularly its suburban communities, creates a difficult environment in which to provide a transit system to serve the needs of widely-scattered businesses and residential areas. With growth continuing ou~vard in all directions, the challenges facing the transit system can only increase. This section describes the basic transit system in the Twin Cities area, who provides transit services, and how much the system costs. Transit priorities and plans for changes and improvements in the system are also discussed. The following section covers transit needs and improvements in the north metro area, and the importance of transit to businesses and the transit- dependent population. The Twin Cities Transit System The transit system, as described in this section, is made up of all of the various large and small bus systems in the Twin Cities area, including regular and express route service, as well as local paratransit and specialized transit services. Taken together, these transit services provided more than 67 million rides in 1994, as follows: Table Four 1994 Transit System Ridership Regular Route Services: Metropolitan Council Transit Operations (MCTO) Other Regular Route Subtotal Regular Route Metro Mobility Community-Based Services Annual Boardings 62,487,000 1,966,074 1,573,000 66,026,074 1,078,025 530,909 Total AllServices 67,366,798 Source: Metropolitan Council Transit Operations 22 Re~lar Route Service The largest provider of transit services, MCTO, provides 94.6 percent of all regular route service. Opt-Out providers provide 3 percent, and other providers provide the remaining 2.4 percent. Opt-Out transit service providers include the Cities of Maple Grove, Plymouth, and Shakopee, the Southwest Metro Transit Commission (serving Chaska, Chanhassen and Eden Prairie), and the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority (MVTA), which includes Rosemount, Bumsville, Apple Valley, Eagan, Savage, and Prior Lake. Ridership for the Opt-Out transit services is as follows: Provider 1994 Ridership MVTA 1,036,577 Southwest Metro 420,825 Maple Grove 247,903 Plymouth 208,317 Shakopee 52,452 Total 1,966,074 Ridership on the Opt-Out regular route transit services has increased steadily in these rapidly- growing commumfies. Other regular route transit service providers include Umversity of Minnesota Route 52, Route 55, North Suburban, BE Line, Roseville Circulator, and Valley Transit. Ridership on these private transit services during 1994 was as follows: Provider 1994 Ridership Route 52 490,651 Route 55 238,794 North Suburban 174,464 BE Line 225,104 Roseville Circulator 146,269 Valley Transit 29,508 Total 1,304,790 Unlike the Opt-Out services, these private transit services as a group lost ridership over the past year. Only the BE Line and the Roseville Circulator increased their ridership from 1993. Between 1993 and 1994, MCTO ridership decreased by over 1 million boardings. Paratran.~it Services Included in this category are general public dial-a-ride services and specialized transportation services for people with disabilities. 23 General Public Dial-a-Ride Several commumties provide demand-respomive transit service to their residents. These are usually smaller urban commumties with limited transit service or rural areas where there is no other transit service available. General Public Dial-a-Ride services are provided by the Anoka County Traveler, the Cities of Plymouth and Shakopee, Columbia Heights Shared Ride Paratransit Program, Dakota County Volunteer Transportation Program, I-Iastmgs "TRAC", Hopkins "Hop- A-Ride, Lake Area Bus, Lakeville Volunteer Program, Northeast Suburban Transit (NEST), and Southwest Metro Transit Commission. _S~pecialized Transportation Services Specialized transportation services are provided through the Metro Mobility program and several county paratransit programs. Metro Mobility is the prmdpal paratransit service for people with disabilities in the Twin Cities area. Metro Mobility serves 60 communities in the metropolitan transit taxing district, offering door-to-door service on an advanced reservation basis. In 1994, Metro Mobility provided 1,078,025 rides. For a significant portion of riders (67 percent), Metro Mobility is their only means of transportation. More than half of the riders are at least 70 years old. County providers provide specialized transportation services in Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Scott and Washington Counties, similar to Metro Mobility service. These programs use a mix of lift- equipped vans and volunteer drivers with personal automobiles. Many nonprofit agencies also provide specialized transportation services throughout the metropolitan area. The Cost of Transit Services Proposed public transit expenditures for 1995 total $170,481,256, while anticipated revenues equal $162,712,921, a shortfall of $7,768,335. Efforts to balance the budget include an Opt-Out contribution of $2,000,000, carryover funds from 1994, and an increase in state appropriations, among others. Funding sources for transit include the property tax, state appropriations, federal funds, fares, and other sources. For Regular Route transit, operating revenue sources are in the following proportions: Revenue Source Percent of Budget Property Tax 46 percent Fares 31 percent State appropriations 12 percent Other 6 percent Federal funds 5 percent ~2 Regional Transit Boar& Vision '99, Regional Transit Service and Capital Plan, 1995-1999. 24 For Metro Mobility, operating revenue sources are as follows: Revenue Source Percent of Budget State appropriations 86 percent Fares 10 percent Other 4 percent Community-Based programs have the following sources of revenue: Revenue Source Percent of Budget State appropriations 43 percent Property tax 31 percent Fares, local 25 percent The largest share of property tax revenues is used for Regular Route transit, which is also the only category receiving federal transit funds. Metro Mobility receives no funds from the property tax, realizing the bulk of its funding from state appropriations. Fares account for almost one-third of the budget for Regular Route transit, but only 10 percent of the budget for Metro Mobility. The Community-Based programs receive a higher percent of their funding from state appropriations, and a lower percent from property taxes, compared to Regular Route transit. Because of the 1995 budget shortfall, a number of existing Regular Route transit routes are proposed for elimination or cutbacks in service. These routes currently experience low ridership and have well above average subsidy costs per rider. Final decisions on proposed cutbacks have not been made at the time of this report. Of the transit routes requesting expansion in 1995, only the Opt-Out expansions have been approved, reflecting their growing ridership trends and carryover funds from previous years. Fare increases have not been proposed for 1995 because they would result in decreased ridership. The main competator to transit, the private automobile, continues to enjoy low operating costs. In 1979, the base transit fare was $.30, and the price of gas was near $1.00 per gallon. In 1994, the base transit fare was $1.00, and the cost of gas remained near $1.00.13 Transit Priorities and Plans for Improvements in the System Regional transit policy includes three major priorities for transit service delivery: Service to Transit Dependent People. This goal calls for targeting regular route service to areas with high numbers of transit dependent people, such as the central cities. Paratransit service will be enhanced in areas not served by regular route service. Service to Underserved Areas. This goal responds to legislative direction to increase suburban transit services, including regular route and dial-a-ride services. ~3 Transit budget information from the Metropolitan Council Transit Operating Budget Review, November, 1994. 25 Congestion Relief. This goal is to provide express services that attract new transit users in congested corndors. These services are most effective where preferential treatments, such as ramp bypasses and high-occupancy vehicle lanes, are provided. ~4 These priorities support several transit approaches, including reverse-commute services for lower- income, central city residents seeking employment in expanding suburban job markets; HOV lanes on busy suburban highway; and increases in local transit in many suburban commumties. In response to increasing concems that, because both population and employment have dispersed throughout the metropolitan area, transit does not go where people need to go any more, the Regional Transit Board (now a part of the Metropolitan Council) has designed a Hub and Spoke system to replace the current radial transit system. Under the radial system, most transit routes center on the downtown areas of Minneapolis and St. Paul. Service from suburb to suburb usually involves riding from one suburb to the downtown area and transfermg to another route to reach the suburban destination. The proposed Hub and Spoke System includes 19 transit hubs around the metropolitan area, including the two downtowns and a number of major regional shopping centers, as well as the airport and the University of Minnesota. At each of these hubs, a number of regular transit routes would be scheduled to stop at the same times, making transfers convement and reliable and cutting the time necessary for suburb to suburb transit travel. In many cases, local circulator routes are also planned to take passengers to the transit hubs. See Map 2, provided by the Regional Transit Board, now the Metropolitan Council. Several of the designated transit hubs are already in use, including those at Northtown, Rosedale, Southdale, and Mall of America. Additional discussion of transit hubs appears in the next section. Sullllnarv The Twin Cities transit system consists of both regular route and specialized transit services which provided more than 67 nUllion rides in 1994 Most transit serWce is prov/ded in the developed and developing portions of the region. Paratransit services are provided in rural parts of the region, primarily for people with disabilities. Transit funding comes from several sources, including property taxes, fares, state appropriations, other, and federal funds. Metro Mobility is funded almost entirely by state appropriations and receives no property tax revenue. The proposed 1995 transit budget has a $7.8 million shortfall, making it difficult to fund proposed system improvements. Priorities for the transit system include serving the transit-dependent population, increasing service in poorly-served areas, and relief of traffic congestion. To improve transit service, particularly among suburban locations, a new hub and spoke system has been proposed to replace the current radial system. Regional Transit Board, Op. Cit., Pages 4-5. 26 ~ TWO. VISION FOR TRANSIT Mi~es WEST HENNEPIN AREA SERV1CES HF~N NO~ HENNEP1N AREA C~NTRAL ANOI~ AREA SERVICES NORTHEAST RAMSEY AND NORTH WASHINGTON AREA $F. RVIC~S LEGEND · = Transit Hubs = Core Se~ce Area ; = Su~ur~n Se~ce Area ~ : =_~ress Serwce = Hub Connemor Se~ce · .-.. : Trans,, Taxing Dism~ -, - : .~o;~ose~ LF:T comaors VH. Transit Needs and Improvements in the North Metro Area Employers in Maple Grove were surveyed regarding the need for transit to their job sites. Responses included: "Would improve ability to attract entry-level employees." "Low-income persons/employees would benefit from a transit service." "Fewer car parking problems." "We can't always fill all openings." "As a part of the energy-conservation movement." "Some would like to work for us but don't have a car.''~s A review of transit needs assessments in several north metro area communities, as well as interviews with a number of suburban officials in the north metro area, indicates that transit needs fall into one or more of the following categories: · Better transit service within suburban communities Better suburb-to-suburb transit service · Better service to suburban employment locations Better service for transit-dependeut populations Better Transit Service Within Suburban Communities and from Suburb to Suburb Local Transit Needs Assessments A number of local transit needs assessments have indicated interest in local service for shopping. medical appointments, work trips, and as feeders to other transit routes.~6 The service most ofl;en discussed was dial-a-ride service. Fixed-route service was less popular because it offered less flexibility and was unlikely to be supported by sufficient demand. However, none of the cities included in these needs assessments has been able to secure dial-a-ride service to date. Fixed-route service has been added in Brooklyn Center, Route 82C, which began as a Demonstration Route and has now become a permanent route from Brookdale to 69th Avenue and Humboldt, serving Brookdale, Shingle Creek Parkway, Brookdale Library, Hennepin County Service Center, Brooklyn Center City Hall, and the Hennepin Care North Women and Children's Clinic. ~ Maple Grove Transit System, Transit Needs Assessment. 1995. ~6Local transit studies covered the cities of Brooklyn Park, Maple Grove, Osseo, Crystal and Brooklyn Center. 27 Anoka Count,~ Traveler In response to the need for local transit service in Anoka County, the Anoka County Traveler is a paratransit (dial-a-ride) service available to all cotmty residents except Columbia Heights and Hilltop, which have their own local service. Demand for the service is great, with 50 or more calls for service tumed down each day. People using the service may ride to any destination within the county or to a transfer point where regular route transit is available. The Anoka County Traveler currently operates 12 buses and plans to request additional buses when renegotiating its contract later this year. A large share of its ridership is older people and people with disabilities. Families are eligible to use the service. However, car seats are required for young children, which excludes families that do not have them. Northwest Comdor Transit Summit Needs for local transit service were also identified at the Northwest Comdor Transit Summit meeting hosted by the MTC (now Metropolitan Council) in 1994. Local representatives at this meeting identified five new transit service segments they would like to see added, including: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Downtown Osseo to North Hennepin Community College Connection from Boone to Broadway along Brooklyn Boulevard Link Southern Zane Avenue to North Hennepin Community College Provide service the length of Brooklyn Boulevard Service along 85th Avenue from Zane to Highway 252 All of these services affect Brooklyn Park, although Osseo and Brooklyn Center are also included in (a) and (d), respectively. While none of these new transit service segments have been implemented to date, the City of Brooklyn Park is working with the MCTO on local transit services at this time. Success _bX Six Transit Study Perhaps the most extensive transit study affecting local transit service has been the study undertaken by the Success by Six Northwest Transportation Committee in 1992. This study covered the transportation needs of primarily lower-income families with children in Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, Crystal, Maple Grove, New Hope, Osseo, Plymouth, Robbinsdale, and, to a smaller extent, the other commumties served by the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council. The study identified important transportation needs for a large segment of potential suburban transit riders, lower-income families with children, by mapping the residential locations and transportation destinations of these families. Survey responses indicated transit needs similar to those in the local needs assessments, including primarily travel within the community and from suburb to suburb. Destinations most often cited were health care providers, grocery stores, post- secondary classes, child's school, work, and welfare office/govemment center. 28 The study recommended a continuing effort to work with the MTC and RTB (now Metropolitan Council) to redesign existing transit routes in the area, with strong support for the proposed Hub and Spoke system. Other specific route changes were also recommended, along with the use of regular surveys of prospective customers before finalizing new route plans. The report strongly urged human service providers to offer transportation services, to locate near transit routes, and to consider well-located shared facilities. The need for paratransit services (circulators, dial-a-ride) was also cited, noting that there are currently 23 paratransit services for older people in the area, but none for families. Rule changes were urged to allow current paratransit services to be available for families, and to allow other transit options such as off-hours use of school buses. Changes to current insurance and licensing requirements were also suggested as ways to increase paratransit options. The Success by Six Transportation Committee continues to meet and to be available to work with transit providers. Some of its recommendations for route changes have been implemented. One of its recommendations, to extend transit service to the Target/Cub area on Brooklyn Boulevard, has been broadened to create a mini transit hub at that location for four transit routes. ~7 The Brookdale Transit Hub The Brookdale regional shopping center already serves as a hub for a number of transit routes in its area. However, the goal is to have 12 transit routes converge at the site for convenient transfering. The 1995 transit budget includes $1,650,000 to develop this hub, the largest expenditure proposed for any transit hub in the 1995-97 capital improvements budget. The Brookdale Hub has not developed as rapidly as planned, despite its potential to greatly enhance transit service in the area, particulatly service to other suburbs. The Brookdale Center management has expressed concerns regarding excessive wear and tear on the parking lots from large buses, and concerns that the transit hub will attract large numbers of young people to congregate in the area, potentially driving away Brookdale customers. The use of smaller buses for some routes, and increased policing services have been suggested as possible solutions to these problems. Other Transit Hubs The 1995-97 transit capital improvements budget also contains funding for the transit hubs at Northtown ($998,000) and Broadway Boulevard/42nd ($200,000) in the north metro area, along with funding for transit hubs in Eden Prairie, Bumsville, Bloomington, and Southdale in the south metro area. The total cost budgeted for the 1995-97 north metro area transit hubs is $2,848,000. The cost budgeted for the transit hubs in the south metro area for the same period is $5,062,000. By 1997, the region will have invested almost $28 million in public funds (including federal, as well as state and local funds) for the development of transit hubs. The south metro area received the largest share of the funds, a total of $12,798,000. The north metro area's share was $5,210,000. The remaining $9,926,000 was spent in Minneapolis and St. Paul. See Table Five. Information for this section was taken from the Success by Six Northwest Transportation Report, 1992. 29 Success by Six and other groups in the north metro area have proposed several locations for additional transit hubs in the north metro area. It is recommended that they be given consideration. Table Five Transit Hubs Devdoped or Budgeted in the Twin Cities Area through 1997 Transit Hub Location Total Public Cost Brookdale $ 1,650,000 Bumsville 3,500,000 Eden Prairie 1,512,000 Louisiana Avenue (St. Louis Park) 2,200,000 Mall of America 1,100,000 Minnea olis (Leamm on Ram ) Northtown Pl_Lymouth Road (Rid~edale) Rosedale 5,600,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 360,000 St. Paul (downtown) 1,700,000 Southdale 986,000 Sub<oral $24,108,000 Smaller TransRHubs: Broadway_ Blvd./42nd (Robbinsdale) Hiawatha/38th (Minneapolis) ~Minneapolis) 1-35W at 46th (Minneapolis) 1-35W at Lyndale (Minneapolis) Hi___-g:,hland Village/Hillcrest (St. Paul) 1-35W at 82nd (Bloomm on) 1-35W at 98th (Bloomington) 200,000 270,000 507,000 450,000 800,000 599,000 700,000 300,000 Sub<oral $ 3,826,000 Total Pub~c Funds $27,934,000 Source: Metropolitan Council Transit Operations Better Service to Suburban Em loglg_vment Locations A large number of workers rely on transit to take them to and from their jobs every day. As employment opportunities continue to expand out from the central cities to the developing suburbs, it is difficult for the regular route transit system to adjust to demands for expanded service. This situation places central city residents who rely on public transit at a disadvantage for new suburban job opportunities. And, it places many suburban employers at a disadvantage by decreasing their pool of potential employees and maximizing the space they must provide for employee parking. 30 Reverse-Commute In recent years, a number of reverse-commute transit routes have been established to serve businesses in suburban areas. Reverse-commuting refers to providing transit service from the central dries out to suburban employment areas during mommg rush hours, and retummg to the central dries a~er work, at just the times when most buses are going in the other directions. The Southwest Metro transit service transports about 400 workers per day from Minneapolis to jobs in Chaska, Eden Praihe and Chanhassen. Southwest Metro would like to expand the service if additional buses could be made available. They have not marketed the service heavily to employers because of the lack of buses, but they feel that up to 500 additional jobs could be available for central city workers if the service could be expanded. Reverse-commute service has also been provided by the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority and other Opt-Out transit services. The Maple Grove system began a small reverse-commute program in 1994, serving one of the largest local businesses, The Printer of Minnesota. Maple Grove worked with a Minneapolis social service organization to identify potential employees for this company. The Radisson South Hotel in Bloomington has requested reverse-commute service to help fill 20 to 30 job openings, but the service has not been available to date in that area, although buses from Minneapolis are routed to the transit hub at the Mall of America. To date, most reverse-commute services have been offered to employers in the south and southwest metro areas through their Opt-Out transit service providers. Only Maple Grove has been able to provide this service in the north metro area. Other Transit Services for Businesses Although there is very little reverse-commute service for businesses in the north metro area, regular bus service has been expanded to meet the needs of some businesses. For example, the City of Brooklyn Park worked with MCTO to gain expansion of transit service to Damark, its largest employer. That service is now available. And, as part of the transit hub system at Rosedale, mimbuses now feed out to local employers, providing transit service for the first time to Mag-Con, Inc., and other businesses in Roseville. Transit hubs will greatly increase access to suburban employment opportunities by coordinating transfers, making suburb to suburb bus trips faster and more convement. Affordable Housing In addition to reverse-commute transit services, suburban employers may also benefit from lower- cost housing available near their businesses, especially if local transit service is also available nearby. Cities in the north metro area could benefit from increased transit service near lower-cost housing areas, traveling to local employment areas. Employers seeking sites for their businesses might be likely to select sites in communities with affordable housing available nearby. 31 Better Service forTransit-Del~endent Pooulations A major priority of the transit system is providing service to the transit-dependent population. This population includes five groups, as follows: Low-income people (200 percent of poverty or less) Older people (ages 55 and up) Youth (ages 18 and under) Households with no automobile People with Disabilities These population groups are not mutually exclusive, however, so they cannot be totalled to arrive at a single number for any given city or area. Both the north and south metro areas have large transit-dependent populations. See Table Six. Table Six Transit-Dependent Populations Category North Metro Area South Metro Area Low-Income People 112,921 103,706 63,392 76,315 Youth 231,760 217,607 HouseholdswithNo Car 12,976 13,044 ~bilities 12,636 14,326 Source: 1990 Census One of the most important population groups, the low-income population, is considerably higher in the north metro area, which has 9,215 more low-income people than the south metro area. The north metro area also has a larger youth population, a group that is generally too young to drive, and for which specialized transit service is rarely available. Specialized transit service for older people is far more common. In the Northwest Hennepin County area, for example, there are 23 specialized transit services for older people, but none for younger families or youth. Many low-income people rely on transit to ride to and from work. It is very important that transit service be available near their residential locations, and that there be convement transfer points, as needed, to a variety of employment locations throughout the area. Summary Most transit routes in the north metro area lead to either Minneapolis or St. Paul. Transit service from suburb to suburb is less often available, usually requiting a trip downtown and a transfer to another bus to reach the suburban destination. Many communities in the north metro area have no local transit service for shopping, medical appointments, work trips or other local travel needs. 32 Specialized transit service is often available for older people and people with disabilities, but less often for families with children. Transit service is important to many suburban employers, particularly for entry-level jobs. Very little reverse-commute semce is available to the north metro area. The noah metro area has a large transit-dependent population in need of all types of transit services. 33 VIH. Future Plans for Transit Funding for public transit service has not been adequate to provide all needed transit improvements in recent years, and it is not anticipated that funding levels will increase significantly in the near future. Because of this, it is improtant that scarce dollars be used as wisely as possible to increase efficiency and obtain the best possible service. The following are ideas for improvements suggested by many of the sources that contributed information for this report. (1) Increase local and community involvement in planning transit services. Transit service in the opt-out commumties has been successful in attracting increasing levels of ridership. Management of the opt-out systems involves both local management and the involvement of the MCTO. A management model similar to this could be extended to other communities. If funding for transit shifts from the property tax to the proposed half-cent sales tax, local communities should be involved in determimng how the funds are used. Also, commumties should retain the option of levying a property tax for local transit services. Committees of citizens, such as the Success by Six Northwest Transportation Committee, should be established throughout the area to provide ongoing input into transit route planning, specialized services, and other transit issues. (2) Increase the involvement of transit riders, potential riders, and businesses in planning transit services. Surveys of these groups should be conducted regularly, at least annually, to determine changes in transit needs in light of changing demographics and development pattems. Clearinghouses should be established to receive information from businesses needing transit service. Potential transit riders should also be able to call the cleannghouses. (3) Review rules and regulations affecting the provision of transit service. Many private, nonprofit organizations might be able to provide specialized transit services for people of all ages if licensing and insurance regulations could be adjusted to be less costly and to permit the use of volunteer drivers. School buses might also be available during off-peak hours. (4) Encourage employers to subsidize the cost of transit services for their employees. Employers that benefit from transit services for their employees, including Metro Mobility riders, should be encouraged to subsidize the cost of transit services through reduced-cost bus passes or direct payments to the transit service. Employers may prefer to establish their own transit services through van pools or similar programs. 34 (s) Support the prompt development of transit hubs in various locations throughout the north metro area. Transit hubs allow passengers to travel from suburb to suburb far more convemently than the old radial system of transit routes. To be successful, they need convenient local feeder service, as well as adequate maintenance and safety provisions. Cities and businesses should be involved in their development and assist with the ongoing support of transit hubs. (6) Support transit demonstration programs that explore a variety of options for transit service. An example of a successful transit demonstration program is the Route 82C service in Brooklyn Center, which is now a permanent local transit route. Other types of transit programs that should be considered, particularly in areas of lower population density, include van service from various population centers to transit hubs, local dial-a-ride services, preferential parking spaces for carpools, cab vouchers for off-hours travel, and other options. Local transportation committees should be given the opportunity to explore various options and propose them to transit systems. 35 Appendix A. Highways Included in the 1995 Lane Miles Tabulation (MnDOT) Trunk Highway Anoka Count2~ 35 35E 35W 694 10 169 810A 969B 47 49 65 118 242 288 610 Carver Countx 169 212 5 7 25 41 101 284 90lB Dakota Count2g 35 35E 35W 494 52 61 3 13 20 Lane Miles 15.222 28.152 44.180 15.775 70.952 3.568 0.156 2.468 61.356 10.660 105.076 5.248 10.906 2.754 6.012 3.076 62.002 41.984 19.288 20.760 16.610 9.966 12.190 2.554 29.736 78.302 23.431 58.895 118.230 30.276 70.989 51.516 8.814 36 Dakota County_(cont'd.) 50 55 56 77 103 110 149 156 291 316 910B 913A 955A 956A Hennepm County 94 35W 494 694 169 212 5 7 47 55 62 65 77 100 101 121 252 610 35E 35W 694 10 52 61 3 5 36 30.164 57.094 12.306 33.059 15.667 20.424 18.032 10.158 2.636 15.620 3.796 4.376 9.949 11.310 188.670 98.747 131.735 7.235 108.845 12.185 30.897 60.354 8.442 117.239 47.172 26.935 28.855 79.336 22.523 3.263 19.857 2.568 85.354 54.665 51.807 19.260 32.757 70.287 10.583 37.112 44.510 37 Kamse¥ County (cont'd.) 49 51 88 96 118 120 149 156 244 280 Scott County 35 169 13 19 21 41 101 282 300 Washington County 35 494 694 8 10 61 5 36 95 96 97 120 244 26.243 46.161 6.768 24.755 5.176 19.878 2.930 2.572 10.100 14.840 15.972 104.396 54.768 2.214 21.387 3.018 30.696 15.310 1.830 16.159 23.228 27.624 6.944 6.482 82.278 22.830 42.860 83.311 18.078 26.307 2.412 9.410 Transportation and Economic Developmen! in the North Metro Ar¢.a ADDENDUM Per the reference to County Road 121 -page 20 Dayton City Council has passed a resolution removing County Road 121 from their Comprehensive Plan. Currently the city is reviewing an alternate bridge crossing location, County Road 13, which is west of County Road 121. I I I MAP TWO. VISION FOR TRANSIT Miles WEST HENNEPIN AREA SERV1CES SOUTHWEST Eden Pm~e HENNEPIN EAST CARVER AND NORTH SCOTT AREA ~: .. CENTRAL ANOKA AREA SERVICES EAST ANOKA AND NORTHEAST RAMSEY AND NORTH WASHINGTON AREA SERVICES W~S'T DAKOTA AND EAST SCOTT AR~-A S, ERVIC~S LEGEND · = Transit Hubs = Core Set. ce Area ; . = Suour~.n Service Area -- = Ex~ress SennCe = Hub Connec:or Service ~ = Tre~.sA Taxing Distnc - - = Pro~ose~ LRT Comaors BOUNDARY ..... NORTH/SOUTH METRO AREAS , ~ WASHIN6TO CO ' ~ VICTORIA ~ ' I ~ " SCOTT CO. I ____~ .... z__~ ~_____~ .... + ..... ~---;---~-~- Twin Cities Metropolitan Area ' .......... Political Boundaries, 1993 4 TONKA BAY ~2 U S QOVT 20 G"[~ CLOUt 28 .,Y,O,T 0,0.0 Municipal Bounda~ ~ ~D z~ ~L~N~N~[,~HTS ~ ~,~,~GS 3~ ~[~s c,.o~, Township Bounda~ COLUMBIA HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Mayor Joseph Sturdevant City Council Members Patrick Hent,.ges, City Manager v/' Le m(~/~"~' Olson, Acting Police Chief FBI Crime Statistics Information May 22, 1995 Attached you will find the FBI Uniform Crime Reports, 1994 Preliminary Annual Release. This report shows the percent of change 1994 over 1993 nationally. The first three sentences at the top of the form explain what you would be looking at. I felt this data could be of interest to each of you. You may note that the crime in this report is generally that of violence. 95-144 Attachment UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS 1994 PRELIMINARY ANNUAL RELEASE FOR RELEASE 6 RM. EDT, SUNDAY MAY 21, 1995 The number of Crime Index offenses reported to law enforcement agencies throughout the United States decreased 3 percent during 1994 when compared to 1993. The violent crimes of murder, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault decreased 4 percent while the property crimes of burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft decreased 3 percent. During the first, third, and fourth quarters of 1994, decreases of 3 percent were reported when compared with the same quarters of 1993, while the second quarter decreased 2 percent. Crime Index trends by population groups and by geographic regions appear in Tables 1 and 2 below. Popu- Population lation Crime Modi-* Vio- Prop-* For- Aggra- Motor Group Number of (thou- Index fled lent erty cible Rob- vated Bur- Larceny vehicle and Area agencies sands) total total crime crime Murder rape bery assault glary -theft theft Arson* Total 10,576 212,873 -3 -3 -4 -3 -5 -5 -6 -2 -5 -1 -2 -1 Cities: Over 1,000,000 9 21,338 -6 -6 -7 -5 -8 -8 -10 -4 -7 ,-4 -6 -11 500,000 to 999,999 19 12,329 -4 -4 -5 -4 -12 -5 -9 0 -7 -3 -5 +4 250,000 to 499,999 37 13,153 -1 -1 -2 -1 -3 -4 -4 -1 -4 +1 -2 +2 100,000 to 249,999 135 19,935 -1 -1 -2 -1 +4 -6 -2 -3 -5 0 +3 +1 50,000 to 99,999 313 21,505 -2 -2 -2 -2 +3 -3 -1 -3 -5 -2 -3 +4 25,000 to 49,999 565 19,592 -1 -1 ~1 -1 -12 -1 -1 -2 -4 -1 0 +4 __ 10,000 to 24,999 1,295 20,402 0 0 +1 0 -2 -8 +2 0 -5 +1 0 +3 Under 10,000 4,917 17,165 -1 -1 -4 0 -16 -3 -6 -5 -4 +1 +1 +4 Counties: Suburban~ 1,148 45,915 0 0 0 0 -4 -7 -4 +1 -5 +1 +1 +1 Rural2 2,138 21,538 +1 +1 +6 +1 -12 +1 +3 +3 -2 +2 +6 -5 Areas: Suburban Area3 5,269 84,720 -1 -1 -1 -1 -6 -6 -3 0 -5 +1 +1 +2 Cities outside Metropolitan Areas 2,656 18,354 -1 -1 -2 0 -11 -4 +1 -3 -3 0 +2 +5 (1) Includes crimes reported to sheriffs' departments, county police departments, and state police within Metropolitan Statistical Areas. (2) Includes crimes reported to sheriffs' departments, county police departments, and state police outside Metropolitan Statistical Areas. (3) Includes crimes reported to city, county, and state law enforcement agencies within Metropolitan Statistical Areas, but outside the central cities. TABLE 2- cRIME INDEX TRENDs BY GEOGRApHiC REGION :::: ;::i: iI ::i :i i: :;:::i Crime Modi-* Prop-* For- Aggra- Motor Index fled Violent erty cible vated Larceny vehicle Region total total crime crime Murder rape Robbery assault Burglary -theft theft Arson* Total -3 -3 -4 -3 -5 -5 -6 -2 -5 - 1 -2 - 1 Northeast -5 -5 -5 -5 -7 -5 -5 -4 -8 -4 -8 +8 Midwest -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -3 -3 +1 -2 0 -1 +5 ~outh -2 -2 -4 -2 -6 -5 -6 -3 -6 -1 -2 West -1 -1 -4 0 -7 -7 -8 0 -4 +1 +2 -5 Crime Modi-* Prop-* For- Aggra- Motor Index fled Violent erty cible vated Larceny vehicle Years total total crime crime Murder rape Robbery assault Burglary -theft theft Arson* 1991/1990 +3 +3 +5 +2 +5 +4 +8 +4 +3 +2 +2 +1 1992/1991 -3 -3 +1 -4 -4 +2 -2 +3 -6 -3 -3 0 1993/1992 -2 -2 0 -2 +3 -4 -2 +1 -5 -1 -3 -5 1994/1993 -3 -3 -4 -3 -5 -5 -6 -2 -5 -1 -2 -1 * The Modified Crime Index total is the sum of the Crime Index offenses, including arson. Data for arson are not included in the property crime totals. The number of agencies used in arson trends is less than used in compiling trends for other Crime Index offenses. ISSUED BY Louis J. Freeh, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20535 Advisory: Committee on Uniform Crime Records, International Association of Chiefs of Police; Committee on Uniform Crime Reporting, National Sheriffs' Association; Criminal Justice Information Services Advisory Policy Board Data users are cautioned against comparisons of crime trends presented in this report and those estimated by the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), administered by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Because of differences in methodology and crime coverage, the two programs examine the Nation's crime problem from somewhat different perspectives, and their results are not strictly comparable. The definitional and procedural differences can account for many of the apparent discrepancies in results from the two programs. The Department of Justice fact sheet, "The Nation's Two Crime Measures," contains a detailed description of the NCVS and UCR. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Wa~hingto.. D.C. 20535-000! O~lict,.d Bu .mcx, FIRST-CLASS MAIL POSTAGE & FEES PAID Federal Bureau of Investigation Permit No. G-168 FOR RELEASE 6 P.M. EDT, SUNDAY May 21, 1995 CHIEF CF 55q MILL CCLGMBIA 55q2x PGLi£c HE.iGHIS* h,hh,,Ih,lhh,h,,hh,hhh hhh,l,,hl PLEASE NOTE Figures used in this release are submitted voluntarily by law enforcement agencies throughout the country. Individuals using these tabulations are cautioned against drawing conclusions by making direct comparisons between cities due to the many factors which affect the amount and type of crime from place to place. Some of these factors are listed in the annual Uniform Crime Reports. More valid use can be made of these figures by determining deviations from national averages and through compar- isons with averages for cities in similar population groups. (Table 1) It is important to remember that crime is a social problem, and therefore, a concern of the entire community. The efforts of law enforcement are limited to factors within its control. Data users can obtain assistance by calling (202) 324-5015. May23,1995 Mr. Pat Hentges, City Manager City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Avenue N.E Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 Dear Mr. Itentges, As you are well aware, the Beatification Project's planting day coincided with this years "Heights Pride" celebration. The planting was well organized and went as planned. Two areas have yet to be planted but will be complete by May 26, 1995. This was our third planting since we became organized. In this one event 43 people volunteered to participate (this does not include people in groups such as "Girl Scouts" or "Women of Today", only the group contact person was counted). Our sights are now set on the remaining projects for 1995 as previously outlined. Following is the Beautification Projects budget accounting to date: BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT BUDGET REPORT AS OF MAY 23, 1995: Adopted Expended Plant material 1200.00 944.31 Rototiller 200.00 200.00 Edging 225.00 19.15 Fertilizer 200.00 10.15 Preen 50.00 0.00 Black dirt 500.00 0.00 Recognition T-Shirts 375.00 347.50 Refreshments 125.00 33.60 Advertising/Posters 200.00 0.00 Work at ttuset Park 2000.00 0.00 Rainbow Project 350.00 0.130 Consultant 1000.00 0.00 Administrative Costs 1800.00 ~ Totals $8225.00 $2777.71 Sincerely, Michelle L. Murzyn 1300 Lincoln Terrace N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421 TO CITY COUNCIL MAY 30, 1995 *Signed Waiver Form Accompanied Application ~PPROVED BY POLICE DEPT. CLUB ON SALE BEER SINGLE EVENT *Columbia Heights Lions Club Russ Paulson, Pres. 1995 LICENSE AGENDA LICENSED LOCATION FEES Huset Park for Jamboree 6/21-25/95 REQUEST ' .' FEES BE WAIVED POLICE DEPT. ON & OFF SALE BEER SALES *Barbara Jean Carroll. 4711 Fremont Ave. N. Minneapolis, Mn. 547 N.E. 40th Avenue 75.0O 325.00 POLICE DEPT. CARN I VAL *Serie Fun Shows Mankato, Mn. Huset Park for Jamboree 6/21-25/95 250.00 BUILDING INSP. II II II II II II II II II II II II II Il II II II tt CONTRACTORS Arnold & Madson, Inc. Coty Construction D & M Excavating D.W. Fence Eide Pl~mbi'ng Co. Groth Sewer & Water J.B. D~ggers Midwest F~replace Co. NS/I Plumbing Quick Set Panels Corp. 2511Ventura Dr., Woodbury 1001 - 6th St. S., Hopkins 5551 Hwy. 55 S.E., Buffalo 17060 Zeolite , Ramsey 2868 - 135th Ave. N.W, Andover 775 Tower Drive, Hamel 6957 W. Hwy. 10, Anoka 5205 N. Hwy. 169, Plymouth 791 Hampden, St. Paul 815 Hubbard Ave., St. Paul 40.00 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO 4O.OO SAFETY & HEALTH, ANOKA COUNTY HEALTH II II ITINERANT FOOD CONCESSIONS Col. Hgts. Boosters Helene Bartlett Col. Hgts. Boosters Huset Park for Jamboree 6/21-25/95 REQUEST FE~S BE WAIVEI Huset Park for Softball Tournament REQUEST 7/22/95 FEES BE WAIVED FIRE, BUILDING, SAFETY & HEALTH, ANOKA COUNTY HEALTH RESTAURANT Barbara Carroll 547 N.E. 40th Avenue 50.00 Page 2 APPROVED BY POLICE DEPT. GAMES OF SKILL Minnesota Music LICENSED LOCATION 501N.E. 4Oth Avenue 2 machines FEES $100.00 POLICE DEPT. II II II II SOLICITORS *Gerald Brian Johnson 1298 N.E. 52nd Ave. Fridley, Mn. *Jennifer Lyn Carlson 4605 Merrywood Ln Excelsior, Mn. *Jason Robert Truckenbrod 1300 N.E. 52nd Ave. Along Parade Route 6/23, 1995 REQUEST Huset Park during fireworks 6/24/95 FEES WAIVED Along Parade Route 6/23/95 REQUEST Huset Park during fireworks 6/24/95 FEES WAIVED A}ong Parade Route 6/23/95 REQUEST Huset Park during fireworks 6/24/95 FEES WAIVED PUBLIC WORKS DIR. II II II TREE SERVICES William F. Nelson Residential Tree 13055 Riverdale Dr., Coon Rapids 474 William Street, Excelsior 50.00 5o.oo HEIGHTS LIONS CLUB .~iil ~ ':il !~ii~!'~iiii~i!::'!: COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN 55421 · ... ...... ?~;?::Z ?~'~'X'¥'::::;::.~q::~X.?. : - '":!~i; :::-'. · :!ii ::: A¢fi!ii28~iiit!~5!i!i. :i!!:!::. .:.. % :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 5::' " ':~' :":"~ ? ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~:~:}:[:~:5:}:i:~:~:~:~'::~:J:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~ ~: ':':~'~j¥?'.:: ...:.:-'.::~: · .-.-., .; ;.;:;:;.;.;.;.2.;.;.;.:;.;.;. ..... ...... . ..... ....... . ,, .......... . ....... :~?E:: ..................... :: :j:~:~ :::~j~ ~ :'"'%:......:5" ::~:~'::~ ::. ;;::~:.:.;~:~:~°~:.~bi:~h~s, ~nnesota 55421 '":?:::... ~."::i:::"'"' De~ Council Members: The Lions Club would like to request all licensing fees be waived for the sale of beer at Huset Park for the period June 21 - 25, 1995. These are the dates of the Jamboree. Should you have questions/concerns please don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, i~~ia Heig~s L~ons Club Russ Paulson, President We Serve Printed on Recycled Paper ~IEIGHTfi~ ~: ~\ Columbia Heights Athletic. Boosters k.~txRTHLETII~ 530 Mill Streel~ N~ E. Columb,a He,ghts, MN 55421 May 8, 1995 Mayor Sturde~-ant and Councel Members City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights MN 55421 RE: License Fee Waivers: Jamboree Days 6/21-25 '95, and Special Youth Softball Tournament 7/22/95 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: The Columbia Heights Athletic Boosters Club respectfully request a w~iver of the license fees for operating our concession trailer on the following days: Jamboree Days June 21-25 '95 Youth Softball Tournament July 22 '95 Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Gerald F. Foss, Secretary COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ATHLETIC BOOSTERS CLUB GF/h JERRY JOHNSON MATT MILNER SALES 1298 52ND AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421 May 2, 1995 City Council City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Dear City Council Members: I respectfully request authorization to sell novelties at the Columbia Heights Jamboree Parade and Firework's Display June 24th. For the Jamboree Parade my intention is to sell toys and balloons along the parade route the evening of June 23, 1995. We usually use 2 or 3 grocery carts for this purpose. We will only be selling 1 hour before the parade and until the parade is completed, a total of 2 to 3 hours. For the June 24th Firework Display I request permission to sell novelties, such as Glow Necklaces and Silly String, starting a couple of hours before the firework display. I am a active Columbia Heights Lion's member and participation in many community functions. I would appreciate special consideration on a blanket permit, totaling $50.00; to cover the 2 or 3 selling units at the Jamboree Parade and consent to sell novelties at the Firework Display. A $100.00 permit for each unit would cost me $200 or $300 and would be prohibitive, because of the cost and nature of the business, i.e. weather conditions, etc. Thank you for any consideration you can give me in this matter. Sincerely, Jerry Johnson Matt Milner Sales BRC F1;NANC];AL. SYSTEY:I F:'I..JI,ID F;,'IECAP :: F:'t. JN:O ]DE:SCF;,' I F:'T I ON 202. ~hlOKA COUNTY CbBG 203 PAF~:KV]:E"_'H V.'[I...L.A I'-ICIRTH 2:1.2'. ,S"f'A'I"Ei: AID MAIN'TENANCE? 2.2.5 CABL. E 4:1.2. CAF:'ITAI... IMF:'ROVE:ME:NT F:'ARK.S 609 L. ]: Qi.J 0 F;:. 'T'O-r'AI._ AI...L. F:UNDS BAI,I I.( F;:IEC:AF:' BAN I<: NAME: BAl--lf( C:I-.I [.i: C I-.'. I Iq t'E~ AC(E C '.,... NT 1 t.] '! ~--d_ ~--,...L BANKS C h e ,:: I..'. History D I SBURSEME:NTS 54,968.2 ':i ,:., ;:~.k 39 1. 9,8.-?7.43 12,482.. i6 2,548 .. 28 dS :, 899 .. 54 '"".,:. 79'.. 89 8,683.2.':6 i , 8';.'! 6.02 30,762 .. -"'-'/~:. 2,172 .. 67 · ~" ~' ~" . (') ~"~ J. 9,672., .5 ',5 6:1. ,91.5,99 .1.00, :L ]. ':..., .. 43 210,60 ~ 07 ":'"" J. 09 4'1.4. O0 ,.~, 46 ...... :.0 1,074., :.'~';,'2., :1.6./::,. :L4 5'..'.'2 ~ 110. ,60 :L, 003,29:!. ,, 06 D I ~':; I, U Fi.: .3 E: FI Ei: N T S 1.,003,29].. ()6 :L, 003,29 :L .. 06 Check History o., .... >- ,., COUI,tC:ll L i_ I S'i' CITY OF COL. UMB!A HE].GHi'c., GI...540I'7-V04.30 F"AGIi!; ]. B A N K V EN D OF;,' CHISCK NtJMBEI:( AMOI. jI,IT BAI:iI< CHI:SC i(I fig ACC~.O.JI,IT AA E~OUIPMENT CC)MF:'A!,IY A'f' & T )3ELL. I~-K]Y BAF,: SLJF'F'LY B IE I-7 O t=" 0 t.7 D T I:;: U C I< :[ I',I G BEI:d3L. UI',ID & VARCO LTD BI_ O Oi'tlEI'?/lq Z I.. DI:;:E O ;.R L LIIE H ['2 L.,'-;; T I:','fE E S IE R V ]; C E }3OY}:) I-tOUSF.'T~ CAI'.IDY & TOBA C 0 C/';..- iS 0 I._ A B 0"1" T L. :[ Iq G M :[ i) L~OIq Z.~iE L. ]: N G IE F;,' / F;:O BIE F,:T I~;;qS'l ,%];DIE; BI~'Vi!~IRAGE CO FOCUS t,!i~ bJSPAI:"IERS 61_ ~' ~'~" ¥ '~' ....... i'~'' Gr.Y,? ' T Tt:;,'A ] I',I I I,IB SE RV i CIE G F'. 15 IE lq W O R 1< S GIT[ OGS--- COOF'EiF;: & C'.C) HAUSW ;17 F:," f t--I/.0 A V ;[ )5 OOIII',ISOt,I BNOS, I...]70. UOF¢ CC)., JOIqi:ZS?iqlEATHiSF~ t< L ]i ,% C: l..I/F,,' E E; ill I',l A l-:, O1Ti' S/STEVEN I(UEI-II,I/JE;AXl I<UIETHI!~R D;[S'I, CCi,. I...EJ:i.F i:;t,.'OS ,, LOHI.,. ~ EEIqTI~'.AL BOWI..IERS MAi..~I:.. VT]. DiS'I,. -- ,~/,= l:., t I - q 1. I= M 't. t'..l T E R- W IS I S M A l',l t,iORTH STAF;,' .T. CIE l,,:.~ = - I../DEBO,-,,':qH F;'AF;:TS F'LUS F'I:TPS 1-,-.COL A-7 UF' F't:ETWY CASH .... ,3'Of4NNIS BAI<E i:'I:L-fTY CASH .... KAt:,,'E],t MOEL. L. I:'H T LI_ ill F'S W :Il t,iE .& .'..'iii::' ]~ RTS F'(~STA(:iE BY F:'HOI',IE SYSTEM F"I;,' .[ (:.'Ilk W :[ IqlF_' QUAL];'I"Y 1,,,I];I,IE & REX D ;[ SiT' F:: t BUT :[ t'4 G CO I'~C) :OD Y/I;..I ILL :t; AM S C HM ! :l.) T / F;,' ]: C'I"!AI'TD S r-;I--IHIZ ]' ~:,1:{ F(/}.) OI,IAL I) S T Al:;,' T I:l ;[ B UI'-IIE 'T'AU'I (.~iZS :. l:','lSLq:h::fl]"l, & E;O, U S WIEST C'.I!!]..tJJLAIR U ,~!; WIE,S7 COMMUI'I]:CATtCtI'tS 260 ,, 74. 52899 5 ,, 50 52900 71 s o- .. b .. 4 0 5290'2 15 ,, 00 5YC90B 2;5.00 5P. 909 ;?0.00 .... ? .,. (. . ~:..1. ,, 14 .... ;' .,. ~:, :1. 63 ,, O0 ,, ~;' ..o 258 ,, O0 ..... ,c', ~ -/ '[ O0 ,, ('~r~ ,. ,:, ';. <.0 ,:'""'7. 97 52924 14 :, 8,.~x.. 54 ~ ......... ' '"' 2 O ,, O 0 o~: :: ~. 65~0 ,, ,:~6 ,, ...... o 33 ,. 54 52'.930 650 ,, 7 5 .. ~: 7 o o 4 :, 2': t 0 ,, 2'55 52938 'i. 86 ,, 47:'; ,52:': 9 <l 0 40 ,, ~3 }5 r' .";,'",~':'- :: , BRC I"-'[NANCIAI.. SYSTEM 05/2, / '~ .., 08: 3 Chec:k History 5/30/95 COUI,ICI L.. I._ IST B A N I< V E hi D 0 R CHECK NUMBER BAIqI< (]I..IE:CK;[I,I(3 ACCOUI'-IT LJPTON ADVERTISING ANO I<A COUIq'f'Y AI,IOI<A COLJNTY MOTOR VEHIC AIqOKA COUN'f'Y SOCIal._ SE;RM F'];RS;T COMMUNITY CREDIT U GF~IEAT WEST LZF'E & ANNUZ'r HE;AL. TH PARTNE:RS ]:CMA RET]:IMEMEIqT TRUST MIZ i) :[ C A CI-.tO t C E M :1: C KIEI...SC}N: TRUSTE]E/J M;I;NNE;SC)TA MUTUAl... L. ZF'E MIq STATE RETIIMEMiENT SYST NC)F;~THEAST ,::, I ~--~ I E. BANK l' ¢4 t's..)L.I... ACCO IIqT I" ~::.L.~--~ I::'IERA .... DEF:' :[ NED CC)Iq'f'R Z BUT I::'EFbr:~ F:'CB..ZCE: RELIEF:' COIqSO I::'I~;;TTY CASH .... GARY BRAATE; I::'U}31...!C IdAI'!A(3ERS ASSOCtAT STATE C:AF:'ITOL. CRIEDIT UN {.iN ];ON 1216 Ol"l;[ ON 320 UN];TIED WAY AI,IDE~:RSC)N/C(iOODW];N M AUTOMCYf' ]:VIE RE]:' I N ];SH TECH )BIEL..L..BOY BAR SLJF'PL..Y BIEL. LBOY CORi::'ORATION G F:: I G G S"" C 00 F:' E: R & C 0 JOH!'-iSOIq BROS, L_IQLJC)I~ CO, JOSW I C K/F:'AUL. KL.JtETHE]~ DIST. CO, L.E}IMANN F'ARMS L.. ]; NDIEN/W I L..L Z AM M];I)WIEST BUS];NE;SS PRODUCT M I NTIER-WIE I SMAN MN DE;F:'T OF' RE:VE:NUE; I'-t S F:' F'ARTS F:'L. US I" I::.l'd'~k / I...01 ~ l F'E;TTY CASH-' OANICE MC:GH F:'E:TTY CASH - RETBI~;CCA LOA F:'I'-J];L.L. iPS WINE; & SF:'IF;:TS F:'R ;[ OR W I 1,1E Q...AI..ITY WINE 8-: SF:'IRZTS RUIETT ]; MANN/JLJL_ IIE 52945 529'53 52954 52955 52956 52957 52960 ~,~:.961 52963 52964 52966 52968 52969 52970 52972 .... :. ~ 7o 52974 52976 52977 52978 52979 52980 5298:L 52983 52984 52985 52986 52987 52989 52990 52991 52994 52995 CITY OF:' COLUMBIA I"Ili:_':[GHTS GL. 540R-V04.30 F:'AGEi: 2 AMOUNT 150.00 17,802.46 42.00 379 ,, 00 1,654.00 14 :, 124 ,, 34 15,794.28 6,558,, 69 ,:.£ , 289.37 350 ,, 00 441 ,, 00 84 :L ,, 00 35 :, 339.6:1. :L :L 1,005 ,, 09 :L 8,942 ,, 43 94,,62 378,74 117.93 40 ,, 00 970.00 100.00 821.00 74 .. 50 64.00 :L 5 ,, :L 3 243.54 23 'V'" ,.,-1 67' 1.6 '"""' .... ,,09 3,095. ,.'.46 229 7':: 99.60 352 .. 80 23.67 i, 470.83 8,588.00 72..25 6].. 34 45 ,, 00 77,90 48 ,, 06 4,3:L5,,94 1 .,, 449 ,, 63 74,95 22(;;' ,, 75 BRC F:'INANCI Al.. SYSTIEI~ 05/25/:? 5 08: 3 Check History 5/30/95 COLtI,IC]iI_ I_IST BAN K VENDOR CHECK NUMBER BAN I< CHI:.:.,'C I< itl I,IG AC;COUI,!"f' SIGI,I I_ANGUAGE/JIMMY L GO ,S T U FL'Di~. V A N T / J 0 FZ A STLJRDLEVANT/JOSEF'H WII,IE COMI:'AI,IY/THt!~ WI FIE MEIkCHAI"ITS C) L..STAD/STIJAF'C¥' At'IOI':,A CO~,INTY COMM ACTION BE]..I. BOY BAI:~ ,SIJI>F:'L'd ]r'~iZL t_BOY CORPORATION DEMAFL'S/I_C) W!St.J_ Ir IS t~YT '[ M I X, I t',IC GF:,'IGGS-.-COOF-'I:ZF,: & CO HI<i',ITt3ES/F'ATR I C I< OOI.-II".I~OI'-! BI-,,L,-.~. I..]~qUOi::,' CO MC I< il: I',tl-It:: ¥/,SCOT] M tS Y tS R S /F,' I C H A R D M ~ll NT I:T, F~-WIS :Il S M AI',I M 0 IS L.. L IS R/l< Air,.. E l',I OMI'ii Ho-r EL_ I::'AUST Z S & F'I~]"fTY' CAS;HI-'- GARY BI:::AATli~: F'I-STT'~'~ CASH - !<AtRIS, N MOEI_L I:'I-tlL, L]F'S WIf',II:T. &. SF.'iRTS P ZTI'.tEY BOWES t_OU ]] SV I I_ I...IZ F'R ;[ NT WE. AR SF'E C I ALT ]; IF..S F-'I~,' I OR I4 I · (:!~.JAL ] TY b,l].J,lE &: SF'iI:,:ITS ROD!)Y/W ! L.L I AM SCHM i DT/W ILI._ ]; AM S I Vli~l:~TOtq/I._ OF~,'Y C L::i S L 0 bJ P :[ 'i" C H M ]: 1',! N E: S 0 T A UN i VEI:~:S.T TY OF M :[ IqNli~.-5;OT'A UI'.IIVEI:;,'S]:TY OF' ST 't"FIOMAS WEIqTLAI'.tD /F'A T T ]: AF',S;ChI£ ANC)I<'A C'OUNTY SOC]:AI.. SI"SI'",:V DCA I I',IC ,, FIRST COMMUI"I]LTY CF':EDIT U GI:~.:EAT WI<ST L]:F"E & AI',t!',IL.I]:T :I:CMA RIi:TT ]:I:::IEPIE:']qT TRL.IST 45 M]:C:I<.F:I...SON:,'TRUSTE:E?J J !,'l I I-.!t',!E,5;OTA MI. JTUAL l_ Z Iql,! ,STATIS REYT]iI:~EMEt-,IT SYST NOI~THIEAST STATIF BAI'.-~K F:'Ei:::'A I:'ISRA "-' DEFINED C'8N"rRIBUT 52999 53000 53001 53002 53003 53004 53006 53007 53008 53009 ~:':"-' 0 53012 53014 530:l. 5 S3016 53017 53018 53019 5 'C."; 020 53021 53022 53023 53025 53026 530:~'~7 5302'.8 53029 53030 53031 530:/.:;3 53036 53037 53038 53039 53040 53041 53042 53043 53044 53045 530q6 53047 CZTY OF:' COLUMB:[A I"tt'S:[(3HTS GL,=.,qOR-'V04.30 F'AGE: 3 AMOUNT 2:L. 30 20 ,, 00 :1.7.48 88.00 49.00 8'" '; 37 13 :, 000 ,, 00 404 ,, 87 8 ~ 515.03 1: .... 70 '" 809, ',53 4,047 .. 4. 5 .761.79 20.00 :1..66,90 363,,35 61 ,, ].0 96.09 1 :, 696 ,, 07 414 ,, 00 o= 4.64 1,304. :l 3 15 ,, 37 11 ,, 35 80.00 280.00 100.00 ' '"' ~'i 00 20 ,, 00 ii,) 15.00 579 ,, 00 1,975 ,, 11 :l,, 604.00 4 :, o.c. ,..~.. ':'" 6 :, 523 ,. 1 ~ '.'~ 50.0() 44 :L. O0 84 t. 00 ..~ ~, :, 171.50 :t. 0I-3 :, 963.46 :L 8,593.0 :L 94 ,, 62 BI:;,'(; F :r I'-IAt'-tC I Al... SYSTEM 05/25/95 08:3 Check Flistory 5/30/95 COLJI'.IC I I... L. :1: S'T' B A N I-,': V E: N I) 0 R CI--IEC K NLJHBER BANK CHECK]:?-I[') ACCOUt'TT' PE:RA -. F:'I RE F:,'E]_ I E:F:' F:'Iii:I:L'.A L I I::'1!': I N,SI. JFGqlqCIF F:'Ii!:F;,'A POL. ICE: REL. IEF CONSO F:,'AMSDIE]_L ,SCHOI...AI=(SI-41 F:' I=UN SOS OFi::' ICI!!: I::'LJRI'q I TLJRF': STA'i"E CAF']:TOI._ CIkED]:T UNI UI'..I 101',1 49 LJI,.I:I:TIiED WAY A "l' ~i'..: T C:ONSLJME:F;: PRO):)LICT AA E:QUIF:'MI:=.I'-IT COMF:'AI--IY ABRAS]:VE: Ei;YS-I"EM II',IC ACE: C':HIE]'I:[CAL F'RODUCTS:. I AC:iii: A(](]UST' :[ CS ~'-~_-,.::~LJC 1 ~.~ ) I::..:~ ACT Ei]...tii:CTI:;,'ON]:CS:, ]:NC. A)} T AI...E×AN.~)E]:;,' & AL.E:XANDE:F;,', I At...F:¥:~× WHOI...ESAL. E F:'I. JF;.'.N]:TI. JF;: AI...I.',::r.T F:'I:;,'O CAMEF;,'A II',IC ALI... C]:T'Y "-'i"c'c'.., ~.: CO AI...I... F:' I F;,'lii: "' t::.o I NC AME]:;: ]: CAN Al;lEI'--ICY I Iq(:; AME]:;:ICAN L.]:NE:N SUPF:'L.Y CO AMI!!]:;t I CAN F:'H']TOC'.OF:'Y I I',IC AI',IACOMF:' AI',IC:HOF;: F:'AF:'E]:;: AI',K]I,'.:A '::011N-i"Y AI-,!OI<A C,'CKJNTY F:'Fb])I::'I-ZF~I"Y F,:E." AI::,'AMAR K AT & T BARI',IA GI. JZ'~-' & STE:FF'Eht LTI) BAI. JE]:;~ BUII...T ]"IFd!-: & BATTE: Blii: A C;Ot'..I F'F;,'ODUCTS Blii:I:~tN]:(::K AND I._IF:SON B :i: F:'F' ' S, :1: FI(:;. BITUMINOUS F,'OADWAYS, INC BI...AZ I NA/]"H[]MAS BOB KI'..K)WLANS BI..JStNE:SS RECORI)S CORF'-M]: CA F;:F:'Ii= 1" CL. EAI'-I CATCO F:'ARTS SE:RVICE Clii:N T F;.'.A L. S T OF..'.E S C: H Ii!: M S E: A F;,' C: H CiTY OF:' ST F'ALJL. C ]: TY W I)}E: L.[]C KSM I TH I FIG L,I...~--,-.:~o :1: C CATF:]:;t I NG COBB GF. tOUF:'/'T'HE: CI'¥Y OF:' COI._LJMBIA HEIGH'T'S GLD40F::-'V04.30 PAGE: 4 AMOLJNT 53048 379 . 10 53049 1617. ,, 00 ..~0.0 1,506.03 5305.1. 45..25 53052 2,303.60 53053 970.00 53054 540.00 53055 59 ,, 50 53056 47.82 53057 7,359.26 .,..,(.) .,~: 67.90 53059 181 ,, 58 53060 442.11 53061 289 .. 00 "~ .... ~ C'C" ":~"-'~r~ z. -? ]. ~ .~:..7t:., 5.3()63 155 ,, 85 53064 12., 90 53065 562.50 ": -- .... .~F':' 53067 :i, 5 ."; ,, 36 ,~",:.':; 06,'.:~ 31.. 66 ..... :. (.),..~ -,- 1.60 (Y') 53070 :1. 62 ,, 75 53071 835 ,. 00 5:.'.";072 27,,99 ~¥'-,. () --', '-.,- ~.]., ~.-1 :' 53074 3,29'0. O0 53075 483., 00 53076 133.0'7 53077 62.97 53078 51.. 00 53079 152 ,, 86 53080 297 ,, 60 53081 250 ,, 00 53082 391.56 53083 112.63 53084 630.00 53085 660 ,, 30 53086 53.25 53087 335.54 53088 167 ,, 19 53089 81 ,, 23 53090 654.3'7 530(? 1 680 ,, 00 53092 72. ].5 53093 250 ,, 00 53094 59.00 BI:;.'C FINANC]:AL SYSTEM 05/25/95 08:3 C' h e c k 5/30/95 BANK VENDOR BAI',I K CHEC I< :tlt',IG ACCOLII',IT COCA-COLA BOTTL]:NG MIDWE COLUMBIA CI::.:AF:TSMAI'4 CO?JI'"J]i S,~i)iJl C'IN!%R OJ::' TRAN,C.;POR COJ'"JJ'"JUJ".J :[ TY I::'ARThJE]::~S I J"'JC C 0 J~'Je O"t"J]~]'~ C OR J::' COhII'-IIELI_Y I IqDL.ISTF:: I AL.. E]...EC CO!4TZI'-IE'hITAL SAF'E:TY EiQUIF' C: F;: IEY:F[' I VIE I...AM [[ NAT :[ Ct\'IZST VIEW LL.ITI--IE]:RAhl HOME CSC CRED]:T ('PJR'f I ?, :L 000 )) NOC:K CIEhlTf~'F:..' Y)¢'~L CO E]"-FT'Ii[RF'i~'. :IT ~:;f!]S DAV]:IES b,IATEI-X,' EQUIF' CC). ]} :t: ('d~'}Ol".l),') V[I(%EL I:'A :1: IYTS )') 't: S(]:OLJI'.tT ST!SEt_ tNC L-t ~, LLM I...l] I.~.t~ t,:.l..:,f o !I',IC: I' A.~) ~ Ir.,l'-lMl.. CC}MF'AI'.IY I::'L. At'IIi. ff;~]'Y I~,i(~,~LJ:IiI::'MEf,tT CCi FLE Y C OMF'I~]"-iSAT :l: Ol"l :, ill I'.',C FCICUS Iq E bJ S t::' A F'iS l:"..' S FT~!.r'bL EY HIS ]: Gl'ITS CYCLlii]:;:Y Ft,,'I }~>I...EY/C] TY OF' GAF~'EI_ICK S'f'iEtEI_ CO ~>~A YL(]F,~(? P,F::C)S C~E'Nt..JINEi "· .... ¢., z, ,, _ I" Al", f'.'.~ th~ I- p~ AUTO O il. L L 1..Jl'.lP iZlYT'E F;.~I:'R :l: SIES GLASS M A S T I~.- F;,'S GLI:2Nb,~OC~'~ ]' NGI._EWOOI? G L 0 B ~ L.. C C)M i::' U T FL' 0 N ]: C S GC]KJ:O VI.O/ )}R G~RY GOODIN (:.'-fO,, GOF'HEI:;,' STATE ONE-CALL. ZI"I O"l-I'S SUI'-I DIRECTOF','IIES I-tAI'.ICE COMF'AN~Ii ES HAF,:C)OLff'T¥ BI'i.'ACE JOVAt'-IOV iI:C I-IAIJ[.")E]'3 KART ,C.;ERV!CE l'IE'.ll GH T'S IS LIS CTR Z C I lq C .. I"IIZ ]' GHTS-NC)RTHE;AST WELD.'Ii N I"lI TES I=I_OF.'.AI.. I'tOL ]; DAY HONEYWELl,.. If-lC II,IDUSTRZIAL DOOR C;O If,lC ZNTEI:dqATIC)I'-tAL CRYSTAL MF:' ) F'C F:'R]: NT ] t',IG 14 MART I<AL ]: NA :, WI L_t...S, WOODS ~, g:l; SVO History COUNC :1: !... I_ ]; S T CHECt< NUMBEF;: 53096 53097 53098 53099 53100 53:l O:i. 53102 53:t. 03 53104 53:L05 53106 .... ~.1. o / 53:L08 53109 53110 53:I. 1 :l 53112 531:1.4 5311 5 53 :l. 16 53117 53118 53119 53120 ,. ,~ 121 53123 53~24 53125 ...~ .t. ,:. 6 55128 53129 53130 53131 53132 53133 53~34 53136 53;I. 37 53139 . ,~ 140 53J, 41 CiTY OF COI_LJIqBZA HIEIGHTS GL S40R-V04 .. 30 PAGE 5 381 ,, 50 2,864.25 54E~,. 44 1 :, 500 ,, 00 78 ,. 70 69',99 7,42:1..7':~ 30 ,, 00 ,::.!.39.76 45,,74 :L 38 ,, 79 16O ,, 78 5., :L 91.50 40O ,, 00 284 ,, "4-9 15,, 00 2'0 ,, 77 :1.9,50 65,, 1:1. ~-~ ,. ::;, ,, (20 13,42 ~: :, 942 ,, 00 140 ,, 00 33 .....8 457,,20 83,,.5'6 105 ,, 44 88.16 4~,]3,, 74 46,,86 1;.-?,,00 14, :.363.50 :[':"~ 1 131 38.~,, 6 :L 4:3 ,, 96 i, 035.0 () BRC I=INAI'ICIAI... SYSTEM = '"": '"":: 08 "" 0 ~,/~. ,.,/7 ,., : ,:3 C~hec k History '5/30/95 COUIqCII... I...IST B A N K V E I',1D CI Fie CHECK NUMBER BANI< CHEX3K ]]bIG ACCOUIqT KI::]_I...Y PROMOTIObIS I<IIqG F'IN BORING INC KODA K/EASTMAI,I I_.AGEF~:(L.I..JI ST CORF'. I_.ANGE: TANI<, ]:FIE:: I._EF:]:= BF;.'OS. t...C~RE}IZ BUS SERVIC:E: INC. MC:C BI'-HA g I C)F~:.,'::,I._ IZ:Al:~,'lii: I IqC M C F' C) A - T FieFZ A S LJFie E R Mlii:CA ,SI::'ORTSWE:AIR Mlii:I>'T'OX I...ABC~RATORIE:8:, IblC: ME],IAF;:.DS CASHWAY L..I. JMBF=]F;: Mlii:'T'RC) AF;:EA MANAEiEYlE]qT AS MI!!:TFIe(:)Mli!]} I A ,STL=.]A KI"IOLJE;li!: Mi!iTY'I::.:C)F:'C)L.. I'T'AN WAS'i"Ei: C(]NTI:Ie M ]: ):) W !!!: S'I" B Ij S :1: t'-lliE S S F:' R Ii) I> U C;'T' lq]:NAR F:'CIRI> M 71: I'-Ib!EAPC)L.. I ?.'B OXYGI:_:]'-t C(] ~ M ]: btblI!i:(3ASCCI M]:I'-IJqESC)TA DE:F:'AR'i-ME]qT (:il::' .::.l.J.~ F L J.',.I.C..~ IC) M):IqlqEi:SOTA ..... ' '"" ' ..... '- MN COMM F:'AI:'-.i]:NC-) MIq I)l!i:r-:"i" (::ii::' F:'L.IBL.]:C SAF:'ETY MI'-! Dlii:F:'T O1= F:'LJBI...IC SAF:'Ii:"I"Y I'--i S f:' blAT .1..JI-, -- L_ ,SE]~I I NARS GF(OLJI=' t'.ICd:Ui'H Mlii:'T'l:~O MAYC)RS ASSOC I-.lO t:;:"l" Hlii:J:~'. N A I R OI::'F' I C:E]':iA X OI_YIq'F I</F:'AT I::'AM Ci]:L. 'I:NC i::'Iii]:;,'I:=OF~:MAN(:)E COMF:'LJTI:--R FOR F:'L..AblIqE:RS BC)O KEYT'ORE: I::'M I CONST'FkLJCTIOI'-t I='I::.;YOR F::E:SOLJF~CE:E~, IMC; I:kAI::'ID GF.'.AI='HICS & MAIL. ING RAI='I T PR I bit I NG -- F'RI DI_E:Y F;,'l!i:l... I ABL..E C)F:F:' ICL= SI. JI='I='L_Y Rlii:NTAL.. RE:SEARCH SERVICES R :1: ME AUCT I C)NEE]~:./MAI=,.' K S C:O T T/V Iii: R N CI N ,Slii:AI:;:S CX3MMI:=.I=~C Z AL CRED I T SHARP I-ilii]::'FT'IN(3 & AIR COblT> St.-tIE L..I... I T O / B R U C liE: SI.ilE:F,'Ld I N W I L..L.. I AMS S:I:GIq LANGUAGL-7/J.T. MMY I... G(] S]:Gbl E;OI...IJT]:C)NS, ]:hiE:: 53142 53143 53,1.44 53145 53146 ~ o147 53.1.48 5.3149 53 ,1. 50 . ...~151 52';]..,4 .... ).1. 55 ...... I...,6 .... .~1:3? 53 .1. 58 S'""' 59 ~: '"~ ' 60 .... .) .L 6 :L 57; .1. 6'2 .... 163 .,.>164 . ..3165 53 ,1. 66 .,..) 169 53:1.70 5:3171 5317:3 53'1.74 5..-:;,1.75 .,o ]. ? 6 53.1.77 53,1.78 531.79 53,1.80 53181 ~. o 182 53183 . ~:, J. 84 ": ':~" 85 ~:.. · ;) c) .L 87 CITY O1: COI..IJMBIA HI:ZIGHTS GL_540R-V04.30 PAGE'] 6 AMOUNI" '1., 506.07 175., 00 700.00 615 ,. 89 4,1.8.50 152.43 484.00 497.61. 30 ,, O0 .1. , 030 ,, 50 28 .... (.: 334..99 ,1.3.50 18 ,, 93 57,530. O0 320.48 42.62 28.02 8, ,..,. I 60 8, :L 5 :L ,, 00 . ,:. ,. 6(') 177 ,, 32 200., 00 630.00 ,1.0,339..49 79.00 43.08 (~ ,..) (":::, ,, ,. J, 610.22 1 ,: ~ ,, 00 ,,:.z. 7.96 659.86 ,1.05.95 33,276 ,, 03 :1.95.00 3, ~:.,:,.> ,, 60 266.3,1. 36 ,, 57 1. 5.00 700 ,, 00 ,1.54.43 2'"' 05 4-95.32 15 ,, 00 2.8.01 27/6 ,, 90 44,=.', . 00 BFL'C FINANC]]AL SYSTIEM 05/25/95 08::3 Check History 5/30/95 COUNC]]L L][ST CITY OF COLUMBIA HE]]GHTS GL540R-V04.30 PAGE 7 B A N t,'. V I:'!] N I) 0 R CHECK NLIMBEF~ AMOUNT BANK CHECK ]]]',K?) AC~CO~ JNT SOFTWARE STATE F'AI:~'M I.':'IF[.'E & CASUAl.. S"I"A]'E: E;UF:'I:'LY CE) STF~-:LE :[ CHI'SIR GL.tN ' S :l:tqC/DoIq St J)..',I. JI:,'):-~AN Fd.,IBBE:t:,: STAMP SUt:~UF(BAtq CL)txl- CI~ SUF"IEF,: :t: OR F' I i']'E F'I-~OCT'ECT :[ 0 SYCCi'E. IqS SI. jF"F'L.Y ]:I',IC:, THOMAS COI"-tTF~.'ACT:I:NG C & D ]"OWN 8: C(]I..INTRY OFF]:CE CL Y'WI:I,I CITY HAPDWARE TId]'H L"tTY ]:I'4DI. JSTI:,.'tAL MOT TW]'I'-t CITY PI-'~OTOCOF'Y U i") WEEi~]" CELLUI_AR U S WES]' COI"[MUN]:CATIONS 1.,tl..i :1: F'OF~,'MS I. JNL :[ M :I:"FIED ]: NC IJt.l:ll 't 1::.0 E L ECTI:,:]:C UNIVEF,.',S]:TY 01'": MIq .... MES I) VOSS L]'GHT bi ,"b W GIEt,ilEI:~'.ATOFk' W W UI'~,'A:I.N(]ER bt.i. LI._ ]' AM MATT,SOI,.I COIqSTF<UC W' d]:OI,.A Kt£ SAN]: TAF.,'Y SI.'<I:~:V ]i C ZAi:d'.IOTH BF~U.SH WOF~,'I<S:, :[NC 53189 227 . 70 531.90 435.22'. 53191 74,,45 5 3.1. 9 2 101. :L 7 53:1. 93 68.70 53:1. 94 8 .,, 209 ,, 50 ..... ~.1. 95 53196 '71. 7.0() 53197 316 ,, 73 53198 6, :.'378 ,, O0 -- 2)£- ,:~ ':~. ,'>c: 5320() 5320 :l 327 ,, ]]:7 53202 :L 07.57 5:Z, 2C)3 53204 :1. 6 ,. :1. 2 53205 3 :, 095 ,, 65 53206 3 :, 655.70 53208 4. ,, 2,6 53209 53210 2:1. :t. 532t :L 43.46 532:L 3 95 :~ 607.93 53214 317.37 003 :, 291 ,, 06 **:?'. CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PATRICK HENTGES, CITY MANAGER MAY 25, 1995 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 30, 1995 1) SHARED RIDE REPORT Attached please find Shared Ride statistics through March, 1995. 2) STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS I have received a number of positive comments towards the strategic plan as developed and presented by the City Council during Heights Pride week. The next "Heights Highlights" newsletter will feature the strategic plan. I expect that mailing will be disseminated around the end of June. 3) HEIGHTS PRIDE WEEK I am preparing an accounting of Heights Pride Week activities and will be forwarding the status of the budget to the City Council in the very near future. The Heights Pride Coramittee had a recap meeting on Thursday. One of the major discussions was the proximity of the Housing Fair activities with the Community Picnic. Overall, many favorable comments were received. 4) CITY LOT SALES STATUS The City received proposals from Habitat, First Choice Homes, and an individual for the purchase and/or the construction of homes on various surplus City lots. We've extended the date to approximately June 16th, so that a few additional builders or contractors could make proposals. At the June 19th work session, the Council is scheduled to review the proposals. In the meantime, City staff is also evaluating steps necessary to implement a scattered site tax increment project for the city-owned lots, together with various properties in the housing inventory report that could be included in a voluntary acquisition program. 5) BLOCK BUILDERS HOUSE PURCHASE Be advised that Block Builders (through ACCAP) has successfully closed on the acquisition of the home at 675 47th Avenue N.E. As a point of information, the County also participated in the project in the amount of $2,000. It is my understanding that the $2,000 that the County contributed was deducted from Columbia Heights' CDBG funds. Thus, the City of Colurabia Heights really contributed $15,000 towards the project. 6) CORRESPONDENCE AND REPORTS Attached please find correspondence from various agencies: Anoka County Association of Realtors--Sales Recaps Greater Anoka County Humane Society--Fee Charges Metropolitan Council/Wastewater Services 1994 Final Sewer Cost Allocation Metropolitan Council/Wastewater Services 1995 First Quarter Flow Calculation North Metro Mayors Association--Transportation and Economic Development Study. FBI--Uniform Crime Index 7) BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT - STATUS REPORT Attached please find the status of the Beautification Budget as of May 23, 1995. As you can see, the Heights Pride Week's planting efforts were quite successful, Further into the year, City staff will discuss with the Committee alternatives for the Old Fashioned Skating Rink mound including the possible construction of a gazebo. It is hoped that volunteer and service groups would assist with a project of this nature. 8) PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER SEARCH I have been less than satisfied with the applicants for the Public Works Director position. I am told that the extensive turnover in other city Public Works Director positions last year have limited interest in Columbia Heights' position. I have discussed interim management alternatives with the senior supervisory staff of the Public Works Department. I will also be monitoring the search for Public Works Director in Lino Lakes, in that it has been similarly advertised and near the salary range of Columbia Heights. At the June 19th work session, I will brief the Council in further detail, as to staffing alternatives. 9) HONEYWELL/HILLCREST PROPERTY I have scheduled June 5th as further discussion on the redevelopment proposal with Honeywell/Hillcrest property. All the parties involved will be present to discuss the redevelopment proposal. Additionally, the City has had discussions with Hillcrest confirming the sale of the parcel adjacent to Huset Park and will have a final position developed by the meeting. 10) CITY HALL 40TH AVF_,NUE PARKING/BUS STOP Be advised that the MTC shelter is now moved. It is City Staff's intention to discuss with the Traffic Commission the rearrangement of parking on 40th Avenue to better accommodate the bus stop, and the possibility of a curbside utility/City Hall clropbox, and U.S. mailbox space. We have found that the current utility box has anywhere from 350 to 400 utility bills dropped per month, despite the fact that customers do have to get out of their car. Additionally, the U.S. postal box also gets a fair amount of usage. An auto drop may further increase the utilization and provides for the possibility of other utility drops such as NSP, Minnegasco, Cable, etc. The proposal also intends to provide at least one or two short term customer parking spaces. 11) CITY ATTORNEY ON SITE OFFICE City staff will have an on-site office for the City Attorney in the next two weeks. The hold-up to this date has been the remodeling and the installation of a computer terminal in the office. The office hours for the attorney will likely be Wednesday morning for civil matters and perhaps another block of hours during the week for the criminal attorney to meet with the police officers. I will formally advise you when the office is in operation. cb 95/41 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (612) 782-2800 Mayor Joseph Sturdevant Councilmembers Donald G. Joll.x Bruce G. Na~'rocki Gar.,,' L. Peterson Robert W. Ruettimann City Manager Patrick Hentges May 26, 1995 The following is the agenda for the regular meeting of the City Council to be held at 7:00 PM on Tuesday, May 30, 1995, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 590 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights, Minnesota. The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in ail City of Columbia Heights' services, programs, and activities. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Council Secretary at 782-2800, Extension 209, to make arrangements. (TDD/782-2806 for deaf only) 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance Consent Agenda (All items listed with asterisks [***] are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted as pan of the Consent Agenda by one motion.) RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt the consent agenda items as indicated with an asterisk (***)on the Regular Council Agenda. ***4. Minutes of Previous Meeting(s) RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of May 8, 1995, as presented in writing, and such reading be dispensed with. 5. Open Mike/Proclamations/Presentations (Open Mike is an opportunity for residents to address or raise any issue to the City Council. However, the City Council asks that the resident provide their name, address, and a statement of the item. The matter will be considered by the City Council or referred to staff for a future response. In order to expedite business, residents will be ailotted five minutes to present their statement or issue.) 6. Public Hearings/Ordinances & Resolutions a. Second Reading - Ordinance No. 1299, Ordinance Requesting Vacation of an Alley Between 37th and 38th Avenues bo RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the second reading of the ordinance, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Adopt Ordinance No. 1299, an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 853 City Code of 1977, Vacating a Certain Alley Easement. Public Hearing - License Revocaiion, 4006 4th Street N.E. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Close the Public Hearing Regarding the Revocation or Suspension of the Rental License Held by Julie Klosterich, Regarding Rental Property at 4006 4th Street N.E. in That She Has Complied with Provisions of the Housing Code. "SERVICE IS OUR BUSINESS" EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES COUNCIl AGENDA Page 2 Council Meeting of May 30, 1995 c. Public Hearing - License Revocation, 1439 42nd Avenue N.E. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Close the Public Hearing Regarding the Revocation or Suspension of the Rental License Held by Catherine Stephenson Regarding Rental Property at 1439 42nd Avenue NE in That She Has Complied with Provisions of the Housing Maintenance Code. Public Hearing - License Revocation, 4653 Central Avenue N.E. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Close the Public Hearing Regarding the Revocation or Suspension of the Rental License Held by David and Norma Rust Regarding Rental Property at 4653 Central Avenue N.E. in That the Property Owner(s) Have Complied with Provisions of the Housing Maintenance Code. e. Resolution No. 95-30, Resolution Ordering and Levying One Mid-Block Light Located on an Existing Pole at 4711 5th Street RECOMMENDD MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Adopt Resolution 95-30, Being a Resolution Ordering and Levying One Mid- Block Light Located on an Existing Pole at 4711 5th Street, Known as PiR 677-Area 26-Project 9510. f. Resolution No. 95-29, Resolution Adopting Joint Powers Agreement RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the resolution, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Authorize the Columbia Heights Police Department to Participate in the County Wide Transport Program Using Existing Funds from the Police Department, and Adopt Resolution 95-29, Being a Joint Powers Agreement Entered into With the Anoka Joint Law Enforcement Council. g, Order Toiling Initial Review for Cable Rates RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of the Order, there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Adopt the Order Tolling the Initial Thirty Day Period for the Review of the Proposed Rates and Other Entries on the Amended FCC Form 1210 for an Additional 90 Days in Order to Complete an Assessment of the Proposed Increase and Issuing an Interim Order Permitting the Basic Increase to go Into Effect July 1, 1995, Subject to Rollback and Refunds. h. Other Ordinances and Resolutions 7. Communications Establish Hearing Date for License Revocation, Rental Property at 4724-6th Street N.E. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Establish a Hearing Date of June 12, 1995, for Revocation or Suspension of a License to Operate a Rental Property Within the City of Columbia Heights Against Roger S. Kelly, Regarding Rental Property at 4724-6th Street N.E. Establish Work Session Dates for June RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Establish June 5 at 8:00 P.M, and June 19, 1995, at 7:00 P.M., as Work Session Dates. COUNCIL AGENDA Page 3 Council Meeting of May 30, 1995 ***c. ***a. Accept Donation from the Columbia Heights Athletic Boosters RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Accept a Donation of $125.00 from the Columbia Heights Athletic Boosters to Sponsor a Queen Candidate for the Jamboree Celebration. d. Report Back on Status of 49th/Central Avenue Median Barrier (for information only). e. Other Communications 8. Old Business a. Award of Police Non-Patrol Vehicle RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Appropriate $11,092 ($10,200 Plus $663 Sales Tax and $229 for License Plates) in the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund From Revenue Received for the Sale of Three Old Police Vehicles and to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement with CFL Leasing of Blaine, Minnesota, to Purchase One 1994 Chevrolet Lumina 4 door Sedan Lease/Rental Return Automobile. ALTERNATE MOTION: Move to Appropriate $16,213 ($14,989 Plus $974 Sales Tax, $250 for License Plates) in the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund From Revenue Received for the Sale of Three Old Police Cars, and the Difference of $5,115 from Undesignated Fund Balance of Fund 431-Capital Equipment, and to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement with Polar Chev of White Bear Lake to Purchase One 1995 Chewolet Lumina 4-Door Sedan. b. Award of Bid for Tennis Court Resurfacing - Municipal Project #9303 RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Reject Bids for Tennis Court Resurfacing, Municipal Project #9303, and Authorize Staff to Rebid the Project. ALTERNATE MOTION: Move to Award the Tennis Court Resurfacing, Municipal Project #9303, to C & H Construction of Lonsdale, Minnesota, Based Upon Their Low, Qualified, Responsible Bid in the Amount of $2,995.00 With Funds to be Appropriated From Fund 412-45200-5130; and Furthermore, to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Enter Into an Agreement for the Same. c. Award of Self-Powered Lawn Sweeper RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Award the Bid for a New Self-Propelled, High Dump Turf Sweeper to MTI Distributing the Low, Qualified Responsible Bidder in the Amount of $7,113.13 to be Paid for From the Capital Eqtdpment Fund; and Furthermore, to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Enter into an Agreement for the Same. d. Acceptance of Project #9413 Reroofing Pump Station #3 RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Accept the Roof Replacement Project for Pump Station #3 Completed by Rayco Construction, Inc. of Columbia Heights, Minnesota. e. Other Old Business 9. New Business Authorization to Seek Quotations for Copier at Library RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Authorize Staff to Obtain Quotations for Purchase and Installation of Departmental Copier at Library. COUNCIL AGENDA Page 4 Council Meeting of May 30, 1995 ***C. ***g. b. MHFA First Time Homebuyer Minnesota City Participation Program (MCPP) RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Grant Approval (Concurrence) for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to Apply for an Allocation of up to $2,000,000 From the Minnesota Finance Agency Minnesota City Participation Program (First Time Homebuyer Program) and, if Successful in Securing an Allocation, to Provide the Necessary City/I-IRA Involvement in the Program. Conference Attendance Request for Community Development Director RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Authorize the Community Development Director, Don Schneider, to Attend the NAHRO National Conference and Exposition in Cincinnati, Ohio from October 8-11, 1995, and Such Expenses to be Paid from Budgeted Funds. d. Purchase of C.P. Rail Property at 3725 5th St. N.E. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to Enter Into a Purchase Agreement with C.P. Rail System (Soo Line Railroad) for the Purchase of 3725 5th N.E. (PEN #35-30-24-34-0029) for $1.50 per Square Foot With the Total Value to be Determined by a Survey of the Property. Authorization to Seek Bids to Seal Well at Jackson Pond RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Authorize Staff to Seek Bids to Seal the Inverted Well at Jackson Pond. Final Payment for Municipal Projects #9320, #9321, and #9322 1994 Overlay MOTION: Move to Accept the Work for Municipal Projects #9320. #9321, and #9322, 1994 Overlay and to Authorize Final Payment of $8,798,34 to Midwest Asphalt Corporation of Hopkins, Minnesota. Final Pa3maent for 1995 Street and Parking Lane Striping RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Accept the Work for 1995 Street and Parking Lane Striping and to Authorize Payment of $4.601.38 to AAA Striping Service Co. of Rogers. Minnesota. h. Abatement of Annual Interest on Special Assessment of $17.02 RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Deny Abatement of Annual Interest of $17.02 on Special Assessment for 4108/4110 Madison Street for Seal Coating. ALTERNATE MOTION: Move to Approve Abatement of Annual Interest of $17.02 on Special Assessment l~r 4108/4110 Madison Street for Seal Coating. i. Authorization of Funding for Project Safety Net Participation RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Authorize the Columbia Heights Police Department to Participate in the Fridley "project Safety Net" Program and Provide the Funding of $6,104 to the City of Fridley from Undesignated General Fund Balance. and to Allow the City Manager and Mayor to Enter Into Such an Agreement. j. Application for Premise Permit -Application for Church of Immaculate Conception RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to Direct the City Manager to Forward a Letter to the State Charitable Gambling Control Board Indicating that the City of Columbia Heights has no Objection to a Premise Permit for the Church of Immaculate Conception to Conduct Class A Gambling Activities at Tycoon's, 4952 Central Avenue N.E.; and Furthermore, that the City Council hereby Waives the Remainder of the Sixty Day Notice to the Local Governing Body. COUNCIL AGENDA Page 5 Council Meeting of May 30, 1995 k. Other New Business 10. Reports a. Report of the City Manager b. Report of the City Attorney 11. Licenses *** RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to approve the 1995 license applications as listed upon payment of proper funds, and the license applications as listed on the May 30, 1995, memo from Lowell DeMars. 12. Payment of Bills *** RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to pay the bills as listed out of proper funds. Adiournment RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adjourn. Pat Hentges, City Manager 95/42 BRC F'INAN[.'-IAL. SYSTEM 0 o/,-a/9 ~. 08: 38: 23 Check History FUND I'-diiZ)AF:' :: F'LJNI> DESCF~ I PTI ON DISBURSEMENTS ],0.1. G£i:NERAL. 20'1. HI'"<A CENTRAL OFFICE FUND 202 ANOKA COLJNTY CDBG 203 I-'AF~I<VII!"'W VII_.LA NORTH 2.1.2 STA'¥E~ AID MAINTEiNANCE 2.1.3 F:'ARI<VIIF_'W VII_I_A SOUTH 225 C:Ai'.;.:L..E: 'i"E]_E:V ]: S '1: ON 2.30 F'AF.:A TRANSIT 240 L..IBRAFkY 40.1. CAF:' I'T'AI... I I"!F'I~:OVI'ZMIZNTS 4:1.0 ,SHlii: F' F' ]:Ei]... i::' R F:I) E VEil... 0 F'MF:N-F 4,1..1. CAF'ITAL IMP---(~li:-.Iq GOV'T. BL,DG 4:1.2 CAF;'ITAI... 'I:MF'ROVE]'qE:NT PARKS 60:1. W r-"-YT' F2 Fk UT'II_ T. TY 60 ,'.?. Slii;Wi!i'R LITIL. ITY 60.'.'S IRI!~.I:IJ Sli!: 1"~ LJiqD 609 l,. I 70.1. CIE]'g'TFLiAI... [')AF;.'.~'qGIiE 7:1. C, E r, ilii]:;,' [¥Y' MANA Gi![Y,IE:i-,I'T' 881 C: Oi'..!T F~.: ]i B LJT liil i) F:'RocrI!:CTS--F~FiC 883 (":OHT'F~: I I.i.~UTF_.'iD I--.ROJIi--C-I-S--(~I-':iN 884 I l',l~i;i..IRAI',IC El 085 lii:SCl:~:O W "F" · l[ ....... 887 FI...Ii::X I:.,,::. I ,, ,::. F ]. T -FRL.IST FUNI) 54,968.2'1. 5,351 ..39 19,877.43 12,482. :L6 2,548.28 ~, 899 ,, 54 2-x9.89 8,683 .. 26 1,826.02 30,762.72 5 o9. Oo 2 ~ 550.00 ~9~472.55 2~0.405.07 414.00 3,46 ..... 2.0 1,074.18 392,166.14 22,110.60 :L, 003,29 :L., 06 BAt',Il< RE:CAF:' :: BAN K I I~.tPIE:. D I SBURSE:ME:NTIi; BAl',ll( CI--ll:i:[: K I IqG ACCOL.IblT T[]TAL_ Al_L_ BANKS ]. ,003,29'1..06 1,003,29 :L., 06 BRC F'INANrZ:rA. SYSTEM 05/25/95 08:3 Check History 5/30/95 COUNCIL LIST CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGFITS GL540R-V04.30 F'AGI:~; CHECK NtJMBEF~ AMOUNT AA EQU];PMENT COMPANY AT & T BELLBOY BAR SUF'F'LY BERGFORD TRUCKING )31:.RGL.UhlD & VARCO LTl) BL 00 MFZ F,'/M I LDRED BLUEMELS TREE SERVICE I:",OYD HOUSIEf--~ CANDY & TOBA CC)CA-COLA BOTTL]:I',IG MIDWE DOI4DEI.. :[ NGER/ROB1ERT EAS] S]:)')E BEVERAGE CO 1r (]CUS FIIZWSF'A.r."E:RS GLASS IdASTIERS E,O'..,' ' T TF;A:I hlI NG ~.LR v ]. CE GF'I.FIE N WOF,,' I<S 3Fdll-.I.c~Ul,I i':q~tOS. L]iQUOF;,' CO. 0 DNE. S/HEATHE-R KL t !3C:H/FdLBt hlA I,:: 0 R't'S / S T E V I:::N t.';UEI-Ih!/J E:AN Id. JE"THER bIS1". C8. t...F;L 1: BI.::OS ,, LOWRY CIENTF,'AL BOWI.,F_'.F;tS l'h'.':d:,.:lq VI :1 D]:S'i . MCCL. IEt_L. AN/STEF'HAN I E M I NT E F::-- WE.I. ,~1 t~. ,,, I-,tORTH S'¥AR ICE NOVAI{/DE:BORAH PAl?TS F'LUS F'EF:'SI-COLA--7 UF:' F:'ETTY CASH - JOANNE BAKE F'Z]'TY CASFI-.. KAREN MDELL F'H]'I..I..ZF'S WIt,.IF: & SF.']:RTS F'O!?f'AGE BY PHONE SYSTEM F'F.:;[ OF~ WINE QLJALITY WINE & SF'IRITS F,'EX DISTI-'.,:IBUTING CO I:~ODDY/W :1; LL I AM ,SCHM I DT/R I CHAF.'D S~ ;HNE; I DEF,:/I)ONAL, t) S]"AF~ Tt"',: I ECJNE TAUT[:)ES.., RE:I)?'C. Ff'FI, & CO, , U S ~I.'E. ST CELLLJL. AR U S WES] CCJMMUNICATIONE; 52898 268.72 52899 5.30 52900 715.91 52901 458 .. 40 52902 15.00 52903 33.00 52904 2,204.55 52905 392.45 52906 ]. ,488.85 52907 19.00 52908 39,722.83 52909 20., 00 52910 9c"1,.. ,, ].4 52911 1170 ,, 00 5292.2 ].63 ,, 00 52913 258.00 ~-',~,,",-, z, ".',%%o 63 52915 16,,39 52916 ~:, 8].0 96 52917 100 .. 00 52918 88., 75 52919 253., 88 52920 29.97 5292]. 13,289 .. 5t 52922 50.82 52924 14,832 52925 20 ,, 00 ..:. ,:.o 4,599 03 52927 690,,36 52928 33.54 52929 80.30 52930 650.75 . ,:9ol 86 52932 46.4]. ~ ,:9oo 4,210 ~' .... 52934 2,116.16 . ,:~¢., 119., 20 52936 3,795.73 52937 20,184.35 52938 186.45 52939 157 ,. 40 52940 40.85 52941 :[, 559,.21 52942 13,597., 75 52943 11.79 52944 279 . 10 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/25/95 08:3 Check History 5/30/95 COUNCIL I.]'ST BANK VENDOR CHECK NUMBER BANK CHI-'..]CK][NG ACCOUNT UF:'TON ADVERTISING AN(]KA COUNTY AI',IOI<A [;OUNTY MOTOR VEHIC AHK)KA COUNTY SOCIAl_ SERV F];RST C[)MMUNITY CREDIT U GREAT WEST LIF~ & ANNUIT I"II::.~-~L.] F'I F:'ARTNE~RS ICMA I~E'I"II~IEMIENT TRUST 45 MIZi) ICA CHOICE MICKELSOIq,TRUSTEE/J O M];NhJE;SO'TA MLITUAL LIFE MN STATE RETIREMENT SYST Iq(]RTFI[~]AST S;'T'A]'E BANK F:'AYROL_I... ACCOIJNT F' iZ ~:;.'. A F:'ERA .... DEF I f-lED COIq'rR I BUT F"iZF;.:A ....F:' i I:<E REI_ I EF:' I::'IERA F:'OLZCE~: RELZIEF CC}I,.ISO F:'EJ'FTY CASH -- GARY BRAATIE: F:'I.J)~-~I...IC MANAGtZRS ASSOCIAI" STATE C:AP].TOL. CREDIT UNI LJI'..! i (iH 1216 L I I,~ ]~ 0 hi ~'S 20 U i'--! Z 'T'E[ D W A Y AI'.IDERSON/GOOI)W]]N M AI.J]"(]MOT]:VE REFINISH TECH .h~:..L. LbU~ BAR SUPPI...Y ]3E!...I_BOY COF,'.F:'OIRATION GI'::I[};[3S-'C[]OPE:R &: CO JOHNS(]Iq BRO~. L~QUO~ JOSW I C K/F:'~UL KLJETHE]~ D~T. L.E:HMANN F:'~RMS L. ]: NDEN~ ~ ~ LL ~ ~-.,M M]:DWEST BLJ~IN~S~ F'RO~LJ~T h'l :(: N'I"ER- WE I SMAN MI,I DE:PT OF REVENUE PARTS F:'L..LJS F:'IERRY/LOR ~ I='iE]'TY CASH--JANICE: MCGFI F:'ET'i"Y CASH - REBECCA LOA I:'H).L.L. IF:'S WI:NE & SF:'IRTS I::'R I OF;: W I I',IE Qi. JAL. I"FY WINE & SF:'IFt~T8 RUETT I MANN/JUL_ I E S CH~"J :1: TZ/'I-AMARA 52945 52952 52953 52954 52955 52956 52957 52958 52959 52960 52961 52963 52964 52965 52966 c~;o~' ..v 52968 52.969 52970 52971. 52972 52973 52974 52976 52977 52978 52979 52980 52981 52982 52983 52984 52985 52986 52987 52988 52989 52990 52991 52992 52993 52994 52995 52996 52997 52998 CITY 01= COLUMBIA I"II'ZIGH'T'S GL540R-V04.30 F'AGE 2 AMOUNT 150.00 17,802.46 42.00 379.00 1,654.00 14,124.34 15,794.28 6,558.69 20,289.37 350.00 441.00 841..00 ~ 339 61 111,005.09 18,942.43 94.62 378.74 1,506.03 117.93 40 .. 00 970.00 100 .. 00 821.00 74 .. 50 64.00 15,, :L3 243.54 23,521.67 16,385.09 3,095.56 229.75 7,882.82 99.60 352.80 23.67 1,470.83 8,~88.00 72.25 61.34 45.00 77.90 48.06 4,315.94 1,449..63 74~95 229.75 8.00 BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/25/95 08:3 Check 5/30/95 BANK VENI)OR BANK CHECKING A[;COLJhtT History COUHCIL LIST CITY OF COLUMBIA HIEIGHTS GL540R-V04.30 PAGE 3 CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT SIGN LANGUAGE/JIMMY L GO 52999 21.30 STURDEVANT/JOE A 53000 20.00 STURI)EVANT/J OSEF'H S 53001~ 17.48 WINIF~ COMF'ANY/THE 53002 88.00 W:i;NE ME]RCHANTS 53003 49. O0 OLSTAD/STLIART 53004 825.37 AhlOKA COUNTY COMM ACTION 53006 13,000.00 BELL BOY BAR SUF'F'LY 53007 404..87 BIZI...LBOY CORF'ORATIOJq 53008 8,515.03 DEMARS/I_OWELL 53009 833.85 I=IZRTIMIX, INC 53010 1,570.26 CJ?IGGS-COOF'ER ¢ CO 53011 809.. 53 I'IIEhl-f GE~:~/F'A'~'R ]: C K 53012 448.92. ¢OHI'~SC)tq BF;:OS. LIQUOR CO. 53013 4,047..45 I'I~: ;1( :[ F. IFIE: i'/~;6:6)'T7 53014 261.79 MEYIEF<S/R:[CHARD ._ ,~0 ~ ,. 20 00 M t: NT E.F~-WE ]. SI'lAN 5302. 6 4,760.87 I'lOlZ I_LE F:/1< ARITIq 53017 ~. 66 .. 90 OMI.ti HOTEl_ 53018 528.64 F'AUST;[S ¢~. SONS 53019 363..35 I:'r.:"f'TY CASH - L.,~al.,, ~' BRAATE .... ' 61.10 I:'IETTY CASH I,[-d'd:.N MOIEI_.L ~,~0,:1 96 09 Fq'-I1LL]F'S W:[NE & SPIRTS 53022 1~696.07 F'ITNiEY BOWES I_OUISVZI_L.E 53023 207.68 1:"1,: :I. hlTWE AR SPEC I ALT I ES 53024 414.00 F'R :1: OR W :[: hie 53025 894 .. 64 (:~1¢~1 :}TY W:LNE; &: SF']:RITS 53026 t,304.J. 3 i;;~ODDY/W :[ L.L i AH 53027 ~ 5 ,, 37 SC~ IM:[ DT/W I L.L. I AM 53028 11.35 S :!: VERTON/LQRYCE 53029 80 ,. 00 SLOW P:[TCH MINNE:SOTA 53030 280.00 UN:[VEF~SITY OF MINNESOTA 53031 100.00 UI.I:I. VE:RS:I:TY OF ST TFIOMAS 53032 135.00 WIENTLAND/F'ATTZ 530~3 20.00 AF'SE:ME. 53035 815. O0 ANOt<:A COUNTY SOCIAl_ SERV 53036 ~'79..00 DCA IhlC. 53037 1,973 I=II:~ST COMMUNITY CREDIT U 53038 1,604.00 GREAT WEST LIFE: & ANNUIT 53039 4,524.34 :I:CMA RET:I:REME:NT TRUST 45 53040 6,523,,12 M :1: [:.: KE:I..,SON ~, TRUSTE:E/J O 53041 350.00 M:I:NtqlESOTA MUTUAL LIFE 53042 441..00 I'ih! STATE F(E:T]:REMEt',F[' SYST 53043 841.00 I .............. 5:3r'~ ?'=, :[71 ,, 50 F'AYROL L. ACCOUNT 53045 108,963.46 I::'EITA 53046 I:.'IE:RA ....DEFINED CONTRIBLJT 53047 94.62 BRC FINANCIAl_ SYSTEM 05/25/95 08:3 Check History 5/30/95 COtJNCIL LIST CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS GL.540R-V04.30 PAGE 4 BANK VENI)OR CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT BANK CHECKING ACCCIUNT F'ERA - FIRE RELIEF PERA LIFE INSURANCE F'EiRA POLICE RELIEF CONSO RAM.SDELL SCHOLARSHIP FUN SOS OFTICF FURNITURE STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNI L~I.[I O1'.1 49 UNITED WAY A 7 & ~ CONSUME~R F'RODUCT AA EQUIPMENT COMPANY ABRASIVE SYSTEM INC ACE CHEMICAL_ PRODUCTS, ACE HARI)WARE ACOUSTICS ASSOCIATES ACT E~]L..E~CTF~ON]~CS, INC. A)])"I" AL.I~?XANI)E]:~ & AL.E]XANI)E]R, A [. F:' A X W 1-[ 0 I... E S A L E F U R N I T U R ALI<IT F:'RO CAMERA INC ALI_ CI'TY GI..ASS CG ALL F:'IRE~ TEST INC AM[ZRICAN AGENCY INC AP1]~]::;]]CAN LINE]q SLJF'PLY CO AME]::~ICAN F'HOTOCOF:'Y INC AhlACOMP ANCHOR A!'.-IO I(A COUNTY AIqOI<'A COUIqTY F:'I~OPERTY RE AT & T BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD BAUIEI:~ BUILT TIRE & BATTE BIEACON F'RODUCTS BE]:~:NZ~I( AND I_II:SON B :i: FF' ' S, I NC. B]:TI. JMZNOUS ROADWAYS, ZNC BI...AZ I NA/THOMAS BOB KNOWLANS BUSINESS RECORDS CORF'-MI CARF'ET CLEAN CATCO PARTS SERVICE CIEIq'i"RAI._ STORES C I..IE: M S El A R C ~ ,I CITY OF: ST PAUl_ CI]Y WIDE LOCKSMITH]:NG CLASSIC CATERING COBB GROL.IF'/THE: 53048 579.10 53049 162.00 53050 1., 506.03 53051 45.25 53052 2,303.60 53053 970.00 53054 540.00 53055 59 ,, 50 53056 47.82 53057 7,359.26 .,.~O 58 67.90 53059 181.58 [",.3060 442. ]. J. 53061 289 ,, 00 53062 I, 278.00 53063 155 ,, 85 .,.~0.>4 ]. 2 90 53065 562 ,, 50 53066 53.50 53067 153.36 53068 31.66 53069 160.00 53070 162.75 .o071 835.00 53073 465.45 53074 3,290.00 53075 483.00 53076 133.07 53077 62,,97 53078 51.00 53079 152.86 53080 297.60 53081 250.00 53082 391.56 53083 112.63 53084 630.00 53085 660.30 53086 53.25 53087 335.54 53088 167.19 53089 81 ,,23 53090 654.37 53091 680 ,, 00 53092 72.15 53093 250.00 53094 59.00 BRC FINANCIAL. SYSTEM 0~' ..... ;o,,, 08:3 Check 5/30/95 BANI< VENDOR BANK CHECKZtqG ACCOUNT [;OCA-COLA BOTTLING MIDWE COLUMBIA CRAFTSMAN COMMZSS]iONE~R OF TRANSPOR COMMUNITY F'ARTNERS INC CC)MF'UTE[R CORF' CONNELI_Y INDUSTRIAL_ EL. EC C 0 I'IT ]2 N E N T A L. S A F' E: T Y E Q U I F' CREATZVE I_.&IdZNATZNG CREST VZEW LUTHERAN HOME CSC CREDIT SIERVICES CLJI:("~ 2[ S 2. 000 )) ROCK CIENTEI;: J~(il.. CO EbI'TE:I:~F'f:~ISE:S II"IC DAVIES NATER IECiUIF' D]tAb'IOFID VOGEL. PAZNTS D I;SEO.JIqT S'I-IEEL_ IIqC I; FIB[ E;M ETblTIERF'RI SES ]:hlC F"ASTENAI.. CC)MF'ANY I~I_AI'IEf:;t"I'Y I:'QU]iF'MENT CO b'LIE'X COMF'IENSAT];ON, IlqC FOCUS htE;WSF:'APERS F:'P:I'):'>LE:Y HEIGHTS CYCL, ERY FRIDLE:Y/CITY OF' GAPELICK STEEl.. CO GAYLOI:4D BRC)S GE]'tUINE I:'ARTS/IqAF'A AUTO 0 ;t: L L UI.ID tEIqTEF~F:'R :1; SES GL ASS MASTE'I;~S GL. IEhIWOOD ]7 hlGLEWOOI) GL OBAI_ COMF:'UTRONICS GOOD MD/ I)R GARY GOODIIq CO. GOF'HE~R STATE ONE-CALL IN GTE SUN DIR[ECTORIES HANCE COMPAN I"IARCOURT BRACE JOVANOVIC HAtJEiELS KART SE:RV]:CE: HEIGHTS EI_ECTRZC INC. t"11~ I GHTS--NORTHEAST WELDI N H ];'f'ES FLORAL_ HOL ]: DAY I"IONEYWEI-L_ INC It'IDUSTR];AI... DC)OR CO INC ];NTEF(NAT l ONAI- CIRYSTAI_ IF'C F"R]ZNT]~NG K MART KAL.~[ NA :, WZ LI...S ~ WOODS, G ]; SVO History CouIqCIL LIST CHECK NUMBER 53095 53096 53097 53098 53099 53100 531.01 531.02 53103 53104 53105 53106 53107 53108 3c>J. 09 53:L10 ~.)11 53113 53114 53115 531.16 53117 53118 531].9 53120 53121 53124 53125 53126 53127 53128 53130 53132 53135 53134 53136 53137 53138 53139 53140 53].41 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS GL540R-V04.30 PAGE 5 AMOUNT 381.50 2,864.25 548.44 1,500. O0 2,109.76 78.70 69.99 33 ,, 74 7,42]..74 30 ,, 00 439.76 45.74 37.89 138 .. 79 160.78 5,, 1.1. 322.72 31.67 92.., 50 400 ,, 00 284.49 83. :L 5 15.00 20.77 19.50 65.11 8 58 ,, 00 13.42': 2,942.00 t. 40.00 33.58 457.20 63.76 105.44 88.16 423.74 266.25 46.86 12. OO , ,~6~ ,, 125.14 131 ,,75 388.6:1. 43.96 i , 0~,. O0 BRC FINANCIAL_ SYSTEM 0,,/.,:. 5/95 ~:, ~..),: 3 Check Flistory 5/30/95 COUNCIL_ LIST CITY OF COLUMBIA HF'IGH'f'S GL_540R-V04.30 F'AGE 6 BAN K VE;NI) OR CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT BANI< CHIi:'CK.1;I,IG ACCOUNT KELLY PROMOTIONS I<ING PIN BORING INC KOI)A I</EASTMAN I_AGIERQUIST CORF'. I_ANGE TANI<, INC LEEF= BROS. I...OREi;hlZ BUS SERVICE INC. MCC BEHAVIOF(AL CARE INC MCF:'OA '" TRE;ASLJRE:F~ MECA SF'ORTSWEAR IqE;I)TOX I...ABORATORIES, INC MIENARDS CASHWAY [_UMBER ME;TR:O AREA MANAGEMENT AS ME]TFCC:qqE;D I A STEAKHOUSE METY'ROPOL]:TAN WASTE CONTR MI);)WE;ST BUS;[IqESS F'RODt]CT IqtlqNEAF'OLIS OXY(31EIq CO. Iq :i: Nt',!E:GASCO M:I:IqI'.!ESO'fA DEF:'ARTMIENT OF' M):NhI[~:[J;O'i"A SUN PUBL.]:CATIO I'11'-t C(31dM F:'AG MN I)E:F'T OF' PUBL. IC SAF'ETY !'11-1DEPT OF F'tJBI._IC SAFETY I',~ S P HAT]:OI'.IAL_ 8EIdINARS GROUF' I,tOI:i'.TH ME:TF(O MAYORS ASSOC I,IOI:;;'f'HIEFUq AIR OI:"F' OI._YI,IY K/F'AT I:'AM O];L. INC F:'IEF;~I:7ORMANCE COMF'UTER FOR F'I...ANNERS BOO KSTORE I::'Mi CONSTRUCTION CO F'RYOR RESOURCES~ INC I;:AF:'ID GRAF'HICS & MAILING IRAF'IT PRINTING -. FRIDLEY I:~IEL. IABI_E OFFICE SUPPLY RIZNTAL RESEARCH SERVICES R :I: MIE AUCTIONEER/MARl( SCOTT/VERNON SE;AF;~S C(3MMERCIAL CREDIT SHARP HEATING & AIR CONI) SHIELI_ I TO/BRUCE SI"IE;RW ]: N WILl_lAMS S;[GIq I_ANGUAGE/JIMMY L GO SIGN SOL. UT]:ONS, INC 53142 1,506.07 53143 175.00 53144 700.00 53145 615.89 53146 418.50 55147 "~ -" 1 ;~,,:. 4..., 531.48 484. OO 53149 497.6.1. 531.50 30.00 53151 I ,030.50 ;.~)'1. ~ ,.. 28.50 531~..~ 334 99 53154 13.50 ;-'~,.~ ]. 55 18 .. 93 .... 1.~6 ~ 7,530. O0 o..., .1. 57 52.0.48 55.1. 58 42.62 53 i ~ 9 28.02 ,. 1.60 o.¢ .161 8 ~ 1 .. 1.00 ~,~ 16,:. 525.60 ~ .¢163 177.32 53].64 ,:00.0(. 53165 630.00 53166 1.0, ~,9 . 4-. ~,¢167 79 00 531. 68 43.08 53169 836 .. 53170 6.10.22 53.171 1 ,'_ .... O0 53172 .-...7.96 53173 6~9.86 53174 105.95 53175 33,276.03 ~,¢176 195.00 53177 3,223.60 531.78 266.31. 53179 36 ..7 53180 15.00 53181 700 .. 00 ~ ~ 18~:. 1. 54.43 53183 27., 05 531 84 495 ..... " 53185 .1. 5 .. O0 53186 28.0'1. 53187 276 ,. 90 53.1. 88 44.5 . 00 BI:lC FINANCIAL SYSTEM 05/25/95 08:3 Check History 5/30/95 COUIqCII... LIST CITY OF COLUMBIA HIEI(']HTS GL540R-V04.30 PAGE 7 BANK VENI)OR CHECK NUMBER AMOUNT BANI( CHIECKING ACCOUIqT SOFTWARE TAILORS STATE FARM FIRE & CASUAL STATE: SLJF:'F:'LY CO S]"RI;~ICt-IF]:( GL!N'S INC/DON SUBURBAN RLJBBER STAMP SUBUR)SAN T~XZ CORF'OR~TZO SUBURBAN TIRE SERV]:CE SL~FtEI:~]:OF~ FZITE PROCTECTZO o,~,'[E, llo SUF'F'L.Y INC THOMAS COtqTRACTING C & D 'fOWt,I /~,: COt!HTI:::Y OFF'ICE CL TWTI,I CZTY I-~AF:DWAF(E TW]'H C]'TY ]:I',IDUSTRIAL. MOT 7W:tN CITY F:'I'-;OTOCOF:'Y U E; ]'] l:4E & EXHALIST U S WEST CI~LLULAI:;: U S WES"[ COMMLJHI]:CATIOhlS Ui'II F'OF,:MS UNL I M I TED I I,.IC UI~:I:T[LD ELIEIgTR]:C CO. L]I,itVIEI:;~S]:TY OF t"1t-4 '- MiSS D VU:]~; L ]' Gl'IT ] bt & W GIEtqERATOF( RIEBL]]:LDIE W [,.I E,F;:A]FIGER W ]: L, t.,~ ;i' A !d Id A'I' T S O Iq C O N S T R U C ht:~L~i)l..At<E: SANITARY SERV];C YAI:i'I-.IOTI4 BRUSH WOF(KS, INC 53189 227.70 53190 4.35.22 5319]. 74.45 53192 101.17 53193 68.70 53194 8,209.50 ~,~ 1. 9 ~, 1, Oz.~. ,,: .t. 575196 717 ,, 00 53197 316.73 53198 6,378.00 53 ]. 99 3,207.38 53200 I, 025., 18 5320]. 327.27 .,..~,:0,'. 107 ,,o/"-' 53203 59.69 53204 16.12 3~,:.0 ~ 3,095.65 53206 3,655.70 53207 556.36 ~ ....~o 878 11 ,: .L 1 ,, 83 532:L0 "~' 5 ~ ~. 1 53212 365,,00 53213 95,607.93 53214 517.37 I :, 0()3,29:t..06