The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNovember 8, 1993 Work SessionNOTICE OF OFFICIAL MEETING Notice is hereby given that an official meeting is to be held in the City of Columbia Heights a~ follow~ Meeting of: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, AND CITY MANAGER Date of Meeting: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1993 Time of Meeting: IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING Location of Meeting: CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 590 40TH AVENUE N.E. Purpose of Meeting: WORK SESSION -/6. 7. 52nd Avenue/Clover Pond Drainage Update Business Licenses/Zoning Fees Sheffield Project Update City Manager Evaluation CR 104 Turnback - Update Newsletter Adjournment The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all City of Columbia Heights' services, programs, and activities. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Council Secretary at 782-2800, Extension 209, to make arrangements. (TDD/782-2806 for deaf only) CITY COUNCIL LETTER Neeting of~ October ll, 1993 AGENDA SECTION: Ordi~ances & Resolutions ORIGINATING DEPT. s CITY MANAGER NO, 6 Ps,It/License ~P~OV~ IT~: 199~ Bus~e~ L~cen~e Fee~ ll~ ~~ Pep~ BYe ~0: ~. ~. D&~, October 7, 199~ Attached are the proposed bus~uess License fees for the 1994 license year and a resolution for the same. All fees v£11 reBain the tame except for the folloving~ 1. The change t~ the re-inspection fee for Nultiple Dvell~nss from $40 to $50 as recommended by the F£re Departments F~forcenent Officer. 2. The change Luthe re-Lnspection fee for Rental Housing (one and two untts) from $25 to $40 as recommended by the Fire Departments Enforcement Officer. The addition of a $500 investigation fee upon application for an Arcade license. 4. The addition of a $500 investigation fee upon application for a Pool Hall license. $. The addition of a $1500 investigat~on fee upon application for a Precious Hetals Dealer license. 6. The ~ncrease of a Paenbrokers license fee from $500 to $12,000 plus the addition of a $1500 investigation fee upon application. 7. The addition of a $100 investigation fee upon application for a Hatsage Therapist license. 8. The addition of a $1500 investigation fee upon application for · Hastage Therapist Business license as vell at an increase of the license fee from $200 to $3,000. I~ems f~ through f8 are recommendations ~ade in conjunction v~th the Police Department after revieving fees charged by turroundin~ comnunit£es and also bated on the amount of Staff tiJe involved in the inveetlsationprocese. It is imperative the City Council act on the license fees for 1994 as loon as possible at reneval applications mutt be Bailed by the end of October. COUNCIL ACTXOH: CItY COUHCIL LETTER HeetinS ofz October L1, 1993 AGENDA SECTION: Ordinances & Resolutions O~ZGIN&TING DEPT. e CITY HANAGER NOs 6 APPROVAL ITEH: 199~ License Fee Schedule BYs BYe NOt Pose 2 (cont.d) DATEs ]~ECOH~E~DED HOTION~ Hove to waive the reading of Resolution available. as there are ample copies I~EC0~NDED HOTION: Hove to approve the 1994 License Fee Schedule. COUNCIL ACTIONs RESOLUTION NO. 93- ESTABLISHING 199/~ BUSINESS LICENSE FEES WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, pertaining to coe~nerclal licensing regulations provides for the establishing of annual license fees~ and, WHEREAS, the Clty has participated In a survey of metropolltan munlcipalitles regarding business license fees charged by other communltles; and WHEREAS, the City ls attempting to malntain business licenses which are comparable; and WHEREAS, the City annually reviews lts business license fee schedule; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the attached proposed license fee schedule be adopted and effective January 1, 19~4. Passed this day of , 19~3. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: Mayor I)~nald J. ~u~zyn,' Jr."' Jo-Anne Student, Council S~cretary 19~ LI.CEN$~ FE. ES Effective January 1, 199~ through December CATEGORY Arcades* ($5OO0 Bond/$500 Inv. Fee) (PD) Ill Auct ioneer (PI)) Beer Sales (PD,BI,FI) On Sale* ($150 Inv. Fee if 1st time appl.) Off Sale* ($150 Inv. Fee If 1st time appl.) "Club" Beer ($150 Inv. Fee if 1st tlme eppl.) $inqle Event Club Beer (per day basis) ($500 Appl. Fee & $500 Clean-up Deposit) Bowling Alley* (BI,FI) I:ernivals ($500 deposit & Insurance) (PD) Charltable Gambling Exempt Licenses: Class A & B Class C & D No~-Exempt Licenses: Class A & B Class C & D Children's Amusement Hachines*(kiddle rides) (PD) (Ins.) Transfer to another location Christmas Tree Sales (FI)(P&Z Comm.) ($20D Clean-up Deposit) Cigarettes (S&H) (Also vending llcense if by machine) £o~tractors (If not licensed by State Dept. of Commerce) General Blacktop Excavator flasonry/Concrete flovlng Demolltlon Piaster. Stucco, Ory~a11 #eating/Ventiletlon Refrlg., Gas Piping Plumblng Sign Erectlon $2,000 Bond & Insurance $2,000 Bond &Insurance $2,0.00 Bond $ Insurance $2,000 Bond & Insurance $2,(~)0 Bond & Insurance $2,000 Bond & Insurance $2,000 lond &' Insurance $2,000 Bond & Insurance $2,000 Bond & Insurance $2,000 Bond & Insurance $2,000 Bond & Insurance Soo.tx) So.oo 325.00 100.00 100.00 _ART I..C:LE I¥ II ¥ 15.00/lane IV 50.O0/day 100.00 25.00 250.00 25.00 30.00 IV 15.00 50.00 II 6 20.00 III 2 VI 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.oo 4o.no 4o.oo 40.oo 40.oo 40.00 40.00 40.00 sEc?,to. II I I 7 Courtesy Benches (Insurance)(Eng. Dept.) 25.n0 each CATEGORY Food & Beverage Dealers (S&H,BI,FI,Anoka: Cry.) Class 1 - Itinerant Food Establishment (1st Day) Each Additional Day Class 2 - Food Catering Yehlcle Class J - Food Vending Machines A. Bulk & Vending (aa.machine) (canned/bottle machlnes exempt, handled by State) B. Small rack-mounted machines (1¢-25¢) Ist machine Each additional machine et same location :lass ~ - Restaurants* O-SO seats 51-100 seats over 100 seats Class 5 - Drive-In Restaurants* Tresh Food Store*(catering, bakery, meat nkt.)(FI,BI,AC,S&H) If appllcant has grocery or restaurant license, Games of Skill (PO) Garbage/Rubbish Haulers (Insurance)(S&H) Gasoline Statlons*(FI) First Metering Device [ach Addltional metering device L.P. gas per ~etering device Go Cart* Grocery Stores* (S&H,BI,FI,State Board of Ag.) O-1,O00 s~.ft. 1,001-3,500 s.f. 3,500-7,000 s.f. over 7,000 s.f. GLm Shop* Ke~nel* (PI)) Junk Dealer ($1000 Bond) (PO) Laundry end Dry Cleaning Services (FI) A. Business Establishments* (no machines) J. Cola-operated washers & dryers In r. om~.launderles: I. First IKachine 2. Each Additional at same location £. Coin-operlted dry cleaning machine ~. Other laundry machines E. Cola-operated washers & dryers in apt. bldgs. 1. First machine · . Each additlonal at same location FEES $30.00 5.00 50.00 '~5.00 10.00 3.o0 50.00 75.~0 125.00 5o.oo 50.00 25.00 50.00 50.00 50. OO lO.nO 5o.o0 50.00 50.00 100.00 150.O0 200.00 100.00 100.O0 100.OO 50.00 15.00 5.00 40.O0 20.00 20.00 5.00 Page 2 ARTICLE III IV IV II VI III VI VI II ¥1 SECTION I 8 9 3 9 9 Pa.cje 3 cATEGORY .lquor Saies (PD,FI,BI) "Club Liquor"(Bond & Insurance) On Sale Liquor (Bond & Insurance) (Inv.~ee $500-$10,O003 On Sale Llmlted Liquor (same es On On Sale Wlne (Inv. Fee $250-$2000) Sunday Liquor Sales Sunday Vine Sales Sunday Club Sales Sale) ff, assage Theraplst Business (PD,AZ) Hpssage Therapy Indlvld.ual., (PS,ZA) fl)nlature Golf* (PD) Inv. Fee) ($1001nv. Fee) ~totor Vehicle Sales* (new & used)(PD) ~ultlple Dwellings (FI,BI) First 3-~ units Each additional unit over q Re-inspection fee for code compliance ~usical Devices (PD) Pav~nbroker ($5,000 Bond/$15OOInv. FeeI(PD) Pet Shop* (PD) Pool Hall (PO) (Inv. Fee $5003 m Popcorn, Candy, Ice Cream Vehicles (PD) (Insurance -Public & Vehicle Liability) · reclous fletal Dealers ($5,000 BOND) (PD)(~1500 New Renewal Fee) · ubllc Dances (PO) Rental Housing Licenses: Single Family & Duplex (Per Unit Basis) Re-Inspection Fee (If Corrections not ~ompleted in r. onformance with Enl. Off. compliance order.) Secondhind Merchant Business ($1000 Bond)(PD,FI,BI)" ~xhlbltlon, convention, shows & exposltlons ($5OOO Bond) First Day Each Additional Day Sexually Oriented Business (PO,FI,ZA,AC) (investigation Fee $500-$10,O003 FEES $ 200.00 6,3OO.OO S,~O0.O0 2,0OO.0O 2oo.'x) 200.oo 2o0.00 3,000.00 100.O0 100.00 200.~0 40.00 3.00 '~e?ee}5o.oo So.oo 12,000.O0 5o.oo 100.O0 5o.oo 300.00 200.00 100.00 15.00 So.o0 50.00 lO.OO 5oo.oo ARTICLE V V V V V V V VI II VI IV II VI IV VI VI IV VI II SE CT I ON 2 3 $ 7 8 12 12 9, 7 5 2. 6 2 7 Swhm~ing Pool* (Public) (S&H) SO.O0 IV 9 Pe~e ~ :ATEGORY Tatoo Shop* Taxicab Yehicle (insurance)(PO) Taxitib Orlver Theaters (BI,FI) Indoor Outdoor Transient Merchant/Solicitor (PO) A. Itinerant Hawker/Peddler ~. Transient Herchant £. Itinerant Sollcltor/Peddler Tree Removal & Treatment (Ins.)(PD) Truck and Trailer Rental (ZA) A. New appllcatlon ~. Renewal applicatlon Vending Kach;nes (S&H) A. First ~achlne B. Each additional at same locatlon FEES $ 150.00 75.00 20.00 200.00 250.00 ARTICLE SECTION vi 3 VI 3 IV 3 II 3 $SO.O0/day;$1OO/mo.;$SO0/year $50/dey; $100/mo.;$SOO/yr. $50/day; $100/mo.; $500/yr. SO.D0 VI 10 75.00 50.O0 vi 4 15.00 VI 1 LICENSED APPLIED FOR AFTER JUNE 30 OF THE LICENSE YEAR b1:)ULO PAY HALF (3) THE ORIGINAL LICENSE FEE FOR THOSE INDICATED BY A *. D~PA.RTKENTS RESPONSIBLE FO~.APPROVAL OF LICENSE: PD - Pollce Department FI - Fire Department BI - Building Inspector S&H - Safety & Health Inspector CF - City Forestor/Public Vorks DIr. ZA - Zoning Administrator AC - Anokl County PIK) - Public I~orks Director ALL NEV LICENSES MUST HAVE ZONING ADI~INISTRATOR APPROVAL. bATE PENALTY ON ALL ANNUAL RE.NEVAB~E FEES: 1-15 days late-. ..... 25~ penalty over original fees 16-30 days late .... 50~ penalty over original fees Over 30 days late -- legal procedures begun. RESOLUTION 81- ~7 ESTABLISHING PLANNING AND ZONING FEE SCHEDULE I~IEREAS, the fees fo~ planning end zoning eppllcitlons here not been adjusted for the past seven years during ~lch tim the costs for proGess- lng such Ipp!~cltions has Increased, end VHEREAS. City Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977 (as emended) pro- vides for t~e City Council to edjust the plennlng end zoning eppllcetion fees perlodically, NOV, THEREFORE,'B£ IT P~SOLVED, that the City Counc11 of the City of Columbla Heights here- by adopt the following planning end zoning fee schedule to be effective January 1, 1982. ~ype o~ App11cat]on Fe..~e Application for Rezonlng S250.00 Varlance/Appeal $ 25.00 Conditlonal Use Permit $ 5o.00 P. U. D. $250.00 Privacy Fence $ 15.o0 Passed thls 23rdday of November, 1981. Offered by: Hentges Seconded by: Logacz Ro11 Call: Logacz, 94orberg, Hentges--aye Nawrocki--nay Anne'Student, Coun~ Secretary CITY O; COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FEES CHARGED AND THE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE A. DEPARTMENT _ Plannlnq and Zoni~q/Bu..i. ldinn Insoectlon~ . B. TA$1L/ITEH/FUNCTIOtl CHARGED FOR: Rezonln~ Proposed Fee: $300 19~2 FEE: $250.00 I~IAT STAFF WORK IS PERFORMED FOR THE CITIZENS/COMPANYTOAPPROVE THE LICENSE OB~reparat,on.anaT0 PR0¥1DE T~Ema,.incS[~VIjE~f ~bl'|¢ 'hearing notlces; Review of Information by Zoning Administrator/Building Inspector, City Planner, City Engineer. Preparation of agendas for P&Z Commission and City Councll. Hust be publlshed in newspaper. Involves City Attorney. Do WHAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE TRUE Arid FULL C~ST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC.? SDepends on difficulty of case, individual problems E. H0~ t~UCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARG£ FOR A LIKE LICEIISE OR SERVICE: CITY Blaine ...... ._Br°°klyn. C~n.ter , 790 Brooklyn Park ....... 750, Coon Rapids 285 Fridley 300 Ne~ Brighton 5~0 FEE F. WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SET FEE?. City Councll FORH COMPLETED BY: DATE: 6/30/~3 Kathryn Pepin/Evelyn Ny~aard CITY OF COLUHBIA HEIGHTS FEES CHARGED AND THE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE A. DEPARTMENT .... Plannlnq a,n~ Zon,[n~ Con~,,lssl?/Bu, ilding InspqctJons B. TASK/ITEM/FUNCTIOtl CHARGED FOR: Conditional Use perm1[ ................ P£oposed Fee..: $10~(Res.)~ $250 (others) 1992 FEE: $ ~0.0~ I~AT STA;F WORK IS PERFORMED FOR THE CITIZENS/CORPANYTD APPR°VE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE THE,SERVICE? .... Review of prpposed .develoPment' ~!~n showlng bulldln~s, u~e, parklnq ~ccess loading provi~.ions, utilltiq~, lightlng, landscape & screening plan, signs. Staff. pFe.~ara~.ion of notices, and mail!ng ~f same for pub.l!...c hearing. Agenda preparation. De ~HAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIRATE OF THE TRUE AND FULL C~ST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC.? $ Varies depending on number of notices to be mailed, degree of dlfflculty of case, ~nd"a~o~kt o¥ contact'~ith'applic~. ' ...... E. H0~ MUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICEIISE OR SERVICE: CITY FEE Anoka Blaine ' Brop~l yn ,P~[k Coon Rapids Fridley New Brighton 650. no 3O2. O0 100 Res~ 200 others 235.qO F. Id~10 HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SET FEE? City Councl I ,. FORM COMPLETED BY: Kathryn Pepln, Sec. to P&Z DATE: 6130/93 .C..ITY COLUMBIA ,EIGHTS FEES CHARGED AND THE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT plannlnq and_Zoni.nq/B~]_tdlna Inspections. TASK/ITEM/FUNCTION CHARGED FOR: Proposed: S75(res); $150 (others) ,Varlance/Ao~ea1 of AdmTnlstratlve Denial ,, 1992 FEE: $2~.00 %~AT STAFF WORK IS PERFORHED FOR THE CITIZENS/COHPANY 'r0 APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE? S,taff preparation ~n~,pa~11ng of public hearln~ ,not,,Ice:,,,~reparation of Information provi~l~d for a~l~da to P&Z C~.i.. and site plan provide,~ f~ pin,per Information t~ present ?se. II VHAT IS YOUR BEST ESTII~TE O~ THE TRUE AND FULL C~ST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC.? $ Varies depending on number of notices to be ~led and level of difflcultv 'or case'a~d a~ount ~t'""~0~t~ct With applicant. "' ' ~ £. HO~ MUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICENSE OR SERVICE: CITY FEE Anoka Blaine $100 , , 10,O.(r,.,es) 250 others ,Brooklyn C~,r..$ Bro0klyn Park 100 Coon Rapids 132 Frldley 60 res; 100 others New Brighton 120 res; 355 others Rosev i 11 e 2001 F. k~10 HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SET FEE? Ci.~y..Counc11 FORM COMPLETED BY: DATE: 6/30/93 Kathryn Pepln, S,~c,re,tary to P&Z C~|sslon PROVIDE ~IE SERVICE DEPARTI'tENT, , . ASSESSIN~ TASK/IFFY/FUNCTION CHARGED FORI~ SEPARATION OF 1%/0 PLATTED LOTS Ce De I~d, AT STAFF ~ORX IS PERFORMED FOR ~ CITIZEN/COI~ANY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE THE BERVXCE? Hany discussions with customer,, check surveys,,, easements, labials, stamp - deeds,,,, , , have City Clerk. . or Kanager sl~ln and notarize deed, for separation. After deed is filed, all recor,,ds must ,be ch~,n,~ed and new ones ct,eared both on hard copy and in computer. Sometimes buildinc i. fls~ecter has to check out the site and zoning lot size requirements checked. Separating Specials takes ~T IS YOUR B~ST ~STI~T~ OF ~E ~O~ ~D ~ COST TO ~Ea lot of C~TY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE ~E ~ERVICE, ETC? ti~e. $ 25.00 HOW EUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LXI~ELICENSE OR SERVICE? CITY Crysta~ F, ri,dleyI Anoka! ~nd Coon Rapids Blaine $7~ + $2~ ~r each ~c~1 nve.~ I = S100 minimum -0- have very fe~ Slm~le ~ l~t~ $2~0.00 DlUS Iaea1 fef's WHO F.t,S ~ AUTHORITY TO SET F~I;? POR~ COI~PLETED BY Jane ~.1 easo/1 . DATE .... 8-7~)1 FEES CHARGED ANDTHE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE D£PART EI T ASSESSING TAS /ITr- /ru' CTZC:mCHXRGED COHB I NAT I ONS 1991 -o- Co WHAT STAFF NORK IS PERFOR.W~D FOR THE CITIZEN/COHPAN~ TO APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE TIlE SERVICE? Fill out combination form (see copy attached) and obtain owners sl~nature. I~all to County Auditor and wait for new PIN numbers to be Issued. Pull records and make change? In, eluding comb,lnin~! special assessment records. Do 1~HAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE TRUE AND FULL COST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC? $ $10.00 See explanation on back) HOW MUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICENSE OR SERVICE? $75.00 Crystal combination of 2 lots including notif¥lnq POSt Office & Emeroency Ser. Coon Rapids .,~. Blaine ., Done it,the, County level -0- NHO HAS THE AUTHORIT~ TO SET FEE? FORM COMPLETED BY da.. Clea~nr1 DA~: August 8, Iggl 071891 ..C. ITY OF,,, COLUHB, I A HE I GHTS FEES CHARI~ED AND THE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE A. DEPARTHENT Planning and _Zon, lng/Bulld, in9 ,_lns. pe.c,t.,ions B. TASK/ITEH/FUNCTION CHARGED FOR: Site Plan App,roval ....... Proposing charge of SI00.~10 1992 FEE: No Fee ED WI4AT STAFF WORK IS PERFORHED FOR THE CITIZENS/COHPANY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE? .... Assure plans'meet requirements of. par~in~_ord., $I~ ~r~., llghtin9 s~andards setback r~.qulrem~.nts, traf.flc clrculatlon, d.ra..l, nage, screenin9 and landscaping off-street loading/unloading, pre.pa.rati0n....~f |nfprmat!~ .~.or..presenta~ion to the P&Z Commission. Involves Bldq~ Assessing Dept. ~IHAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIRATE OF THE TRUE ArID FULL C~ST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC.? S Depends on degree of dlffi.g.ult¥ o~ ~ese ..... number of site v;~lt~ ~f 7nn;n~/Rldg. Insp City Engineer, etc., some cases come before Cowrnlsslon a number of times before anything ls built. H0~4 HUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICENSE OR SERVICE: C I TY FEE See attached fees from survey conducted by Assn. ~etro. Hunlcipallties F. VH0 HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SET FEE?' Ci~y.Councll FORH COHPLETED BY: DATE: &/30/93 Kathryn Pepin, Secretary to P & Z SITE PLAN REVIEW CITIES 0 - 2~00 Watertown Woodlar~ COMPREHENSIVE 100.00 N/A AU,. ~lillwlter We~ ~t. Paul NONE CITIES 2,~00. I0,000 An:lan Hills Bayport Circle Pines Day'lon Deephaven Faloon Heights Independence dordan Lauderdale Mahtomedi Mendota Heights Mound Newport Orono Osseo Rosemount THAN AC,150.00 Shorewood Spring Lake Park St. Anthony St. Francis St. Paul Park Wayzata CTTIES 10,000 - 20,000 Champlin Chanha.~en Hastings Mounds ¥iew MIN.100,MAX 500 No~th St. Paul Oakdale Prior Lake Robbirm:lale 200,~?,ONSULT. 100.14/LOT $UBD, NONE 300.00 NA IN SUB FEE N/A N/A 200.00 NONE AC.,. 300;LESS 150.00 100+150 25+COST 150.00 CITY HAS DETAIL 125.00 250~00ESC 250+10/1000SF C;$ RES. NONE ~00.00 N/A 100/AC, N/F ~ + ESC 85+STAFF Appkl VIIley Brcx:ddyn 0artier Bmo~5'n Park Burn,villa Coon Cottage Grove EAgan Eden Prairie Edina Fridley Golden Valley Inver Grove Heights Maple Grove Maplewood Minneapolis Minnetonka New Brighton New Hope Richfield Roseville Shoreview ~Jth St. Paul St. Louis Park White Bear Lake Woodbury 134 75.00 250.00 600.00 NONE ~00.00 ~85.00 25O.O0 N/A CITY HAS DETAIL NONE 225.00 NONE 250.00 N/F 65.00 /SQ FT & TYPE 235.00 150.00 IN PERMIT FEE 100.00 N/F CITY HAS DETAIL N/A INITIAL 300,REV lO0 .Cl O.F COL,U, ,,e A ,HEI=HTS TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE DEPARTHENT Planning and Zoning/Bui!d!.ng Inspections TASK/ITEH/FUNCTION CHARGED FOR: LotspIlt/Hinor Subdivision Proposed: $100(res); $200 (others) 1S92 FEE: $10~00 t~IAT STAFF I~0RK IS PERFORMED. FOR THE ClTIZENS/COHPANY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE THE .SERVICE? - . Preparation and mailing of publlc hearing notices; preparation and typin, g of agenda for approval by P&Z Com~$sslon and City Council: review of proposal by Zoning Adminlstrator/B~ildlng Inspector and City Engineer. See attached info from Assessing Dept. WHAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIRATE OF THE TRUE Arid FULL CnST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC.? Varies on nomSer of.notices to be ~aT]e~0 degree of dlfflculty of case, number of site visits of Bldg. Insp. or City Engineer. E. H01~ MUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICEIISE OR SERVICE: CITY Blaine Coon Rapidg Fridley New Brighton Rosev i Iie Houndsv i ew See a:~acneo for additioha'i '.info. "' ' FEE $ 250 plus legal fees;addl.lots $5 115.00 lOO.OO 120 & 20/acre 100 150 F. ~H0 HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SET. FEE? City Council FORM COHPLLrTED BY: DATE: 6/30/93 *Kathryn Pepln, Sec. to Plannlng and Zoning Co~nisslon CXTY OF COLUMBXA~IGHTS FEES CHARGED ANDTHE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE A · DEPARTHENT ASSESS TASK/ITEM/Ft~CTION CHARGED FORt LOT SPLIT 1991 FEEt $10.00 De WHAT STAFF WORK IS PERFOR2IED FOR THE CITXZEN/COMPANY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVXDE THE SERVICE? Check surveys, easements, zoning requirements and legals. Yerbal oroceedure lnstructtons, tv~e resolutlon from survev, obtain signatures, make notarized copies, file copies, record information on all records, make new files, do split on records and in computer when new PIN comes from County, type new special assessment control cards, correct maps, and have many discussions with customer. Prepare labels for P&Z mailing. WHAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE TRUE AND FULL COST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC? 100.00 & $200.00 for Commercial with long legals that need to be checked . . . Ly the Eng~neerlng Department. ~ HOW 1~UCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICENSE OR SERVICE? CITY Coon Rapids Anoka Blaine SEE ADDITIONAL WORK BY P&Z AND INSPECITIONS. $110.00 75.00 Simple 2 lots 250.00 plus lepta1 fees additional Jots $5.00 each WHO HAS THE AUTHORIT~ 'TO SET FEE? FOR/~ COY~'LETED BY. JANE, GLEAS0N & SHELLEY HANSON DATE, , 8-6-~1 071891 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FE~S CHARGED AND THE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE A. DEPARTtiENT Planning and Zoning Comnlsslon/Bulldlno, Inspections B. TASK/ITEM/FUNCTIOtl CHARGED FOR: Planned Unlt Development 1. Concept Plan Review 2. Prellmlnary Plan Review :). Fine1 Plan Revlew 1992 FEE: $250'n0 q. Amendments to any of l~he above C. %~HAT STAFF WORK IS PERFORMED FOR THE CITIZENS/COMPANY 11) APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE? : Extensive review of each step of' apProval;each step must be reviewed by P&Z Commission; Step 2 & 3 must also be approved by City Council. See attached requirements from Zoning Ordn. for requirements on each step. Staff preparation and mailln~ of Publlc Hearlni~ noticesi Agenda preparation Review of B~i )d)ng/Zo~)~g'A~lm., Publ lc Works Director, City Planner, IIc)tY Attorney Fire Dept.,Assessing Dept. D. ~/HAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIRATE OF THE TRUE ArID FULL CIqST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC.? ED $ Varies on number of times of reviewI numbeT ?f not!cas to be m~iled~ number of ~ite'visits of various departments dependant on dif~i~Ulty of each phase. HO~ HUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICEI4SE OR SERVICE: CITY FEE See attached fees from survey conducted by Assn. Metro. Municipalities F. WHO HAS THE ALrrHORITY TO SET FEE? City Ceenc I 1 FORH COMPLETED BY: Kathryn Pepin, Sec. to P&Z Commission DATE: 6/3o/93 *PROPOSED FEES: $250 per phase Including each ameno~nent, plus Staff Time. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CITIES 0 - 2J00 Spring Watertown Woodland /PERMIT N/A NA CITIES 2J00 - 10,000 Arden Hills Bayport Circle Pines Dayton Deephaven Falcon Heights Independence Jordan Lauderdale Mahtomecli Mendota Heights 500 Mound Newport Orono Osseo Rosemount Shorewoocl Spring Lake Park St. Anthony St. Francis St. Paul Park Wayzata 250+CONSULT 100.00 100.00 N/A 500.00 50.00 N/A NA CUP FOR PUD 200.00 N/A 300+40/UNIT 500;1000ESC 650+350 ESC N/A 150.00 300.00 CITY HAS DETAIL CITIES 10,000.20,000 Champlin C4:)NCEPT 200+500 ESC;PREL.650, 201AC,FINAL 100 ~n 750/MINOR AMEND. lO0 Columbia Heights 250.00 Hastings NONE Hopkins SOO/ORD. Mounds View 350/NEW; AMEND.150 North St. Paul 100.00 Oakdele Prbr Savage COMM;1E0+2.00 RES. ~tillw~ter West ~I. Paul CITIES OYER 20,000 Apple Valley Blaine Bloomir~on Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Bum~ille STAGE 250;DEV. 550 Cc,:~n Rapids Cottage Grove Cry~a~ Eagan , Eden Prairie Fddley Golden Valley Inver Grove Heights Maple Grove 130 65+STAFF ~1~ 400PREL +20AC;FINAL 300 250,E$O.;FINAL 250+ESC. 250+600 DEP. 1000.00 250.00 2~00.00 1200.00 650.00 CONCEPTUAL /PHASE NONE 200.00 250+25 REVIEW 500+5/ACRE ~00 500.00 P 2002.50 GENERAL 225.0l:) CITY HAS DETAIL 400 BASE+5/100 ~.~ ~.M 1~.~ 300.00 ~SE PRELIMINARY PLAT CTTIE$ 0 - 2J00 Sprin~ Watertown Wcx~dla~ CITIES 2,5O0 - 10,000 Arden Hills Bayport Circle Pines Dayton Deephaven Falcon Heights Independence Jordan Lauderdale Mahtomedi Mendota Heights Mound Newport Osseo Rosemount Shorewood Spring Lake Park St. Anthony St. Francis St. Paul Park Wayzata CITIES 10,000 - 20,000 Ohamplin Chanhassen 150;OV.3 400+1S/LOT Columbia Heights Hastings Mounds View North St. Paul Oakdale Pdor Lake Robbinsclale 125+10/LOT 250+ 20/LOT 150.00 100+3/1.0T SUBD. 150.00 N/A 130+20/LOT 100.00 NA IN SUB FEE 150.00 N/A 300.00 NONE 200+3/AC 250+100 150+1/LOT; MAX 200 150.00 150.00+ 5/LOT CITY HAS DETAIL 15q+2/I. OT 225+10/LOT LOTS OR LESS NONE 200+10/I. OT 150.00 100/AC, MIN.100,MAX 500 350 + E$C 85+STAFF Stillwater West ~. P~ul CITIES OVER 20,000 Apple Valley B~aine Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park ESC Bumwille Coon Rapids Cottage Grove Crysta~ Eagan Eden Prairie Edina Friclley Golden Valley Inver Grove Heights Maple Grove Maplewood Minneapolis Minnetonka New Brighton New Hope Richf'mkl Roseville Shomview ~<x.,th St. Paul St. Louis Park White Bear L~ke Woc~bu~y E00+5/LOT MAX 800 300+M. OT OR ~00+ 4/AG /tOTS 250+10/LOT 350.00 S00-a/SIZE 2O0 10/LOT+100/AC 200+10/LOT 225 500/MIN. 100+25/LOT/W/ MAX.OF 500 300.00 CITY HAS DETAIL 350-400 500.00 225.00 200.00 250.00 340.00 325.00 230+20/AC 225.00 500.00 500/B&C 200+ S/LOT 100.00 CITY HAS DETAIL 300.00 300+5/LOT 131 FINAL PLAT Cra:ES 0. Watertown Woodland CITr~-S 2,S00 - 10,000 A~len Hills Bayport Circle Pines Dayton Deephaven Faloon Heights Independence Jordan Lauderdale Mahtomedi Mendota Heights Mound Newport Orono Osseo Rosemount Shomwood Spring Lake Park St. Anthony St. Francis St. Paul Park Wayzata CTT~S lO,O00.20,000 Champlin Chanhassen Oolumbla Heights Ha~ings Mounds View North Bt. Paul Oakdale Prior Lake Robbin~ale Savage 150.00 OONSULT. FEE 100.00 100+3/LOT 150.00 NONE N/A N/A 100.00 NA IN ,SUB FEE 100.00 N/A 175+$TAFF NONE 300,00 500+25/LOT N/A NONE IN PREL PLAT CITY HAS DETAIL 125.00 100.00 'INCLUDED IN ONE TIME FEE NONE 1SO.O0 IO0.O0 0 aS+STAFF 150+2/LOT MAX 150.00 Btillwater Wesl Bt. Paul CITI~..S OVER 20,000 Apple V~lley Brooklyn Park Bumsvme Coon Rapids Ceea~e Grove Eagan Eden Prairie Fridley C.-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -~ ~ a n Valley Inver Grove Heights Maple Grove Maplewood Minneapolis Minnetonka New Brighton New Hope Richfield Shomview ~outh St. Paul Bt. Louis Park White Bear Lake Woocibuly NONE 75+2.SO/OV 10 2:543.00 SO+MOT 115.00 200.00 100+25/LOT/W/ MAX. OF SOO 100+3A.0T 35O-400 500.00 225.00 200.00 250.00 5'7.00 325.00 150.00 120.00 0 SO0.00 N/A 100.00 CITY HAS DETAIL N/A ~00+M.OT fie;ghee In excess of those illo~ed under thls Sectlon'shs11 be permitted only by · spa&Is1 permlt greeted by resolution of the Council determining thee such structure uould not be dingerous end vould not adversely efflct the adjoining or odJacent property. . · , Front Yard ' In any S'lt~* Dlstrlct'vhere the average, depth of the' front yard for buildings wlthln two hundred (200) feet of t~,,. 1or in . question end within the same block front Is les~r or g~uter thin that required by Ordinance., the requTred front yord ~for the 1or In questlon' shell be the average plus or mTnus ten (10~) percent of the depth; h~tver, the depth of the requlred front yird shill ~t be less than ten (10) feot nor ~re than fifty (50) feet. ~nlt Oev~ 1o.p~n~ Thls Section estab~lishes provlslons for the granting of · Conditlonal Use Permit to provide for ~ Planned Unit Development project. The purpose of the PTenned Unit Developfl~. nt Is to encourage · flexibility In the deslf~n end development of. la~d In order to premote Its appropriate use; to facilitate the Idequite Ind econ~l~l provisions of streets t~d utilities; ind to preserve the hi'rural i~d scenic quilltles for open BriBe. ~e ~ner or ~ners of any IA tract of land within the 'R-2"~ e'R'3"~ tad/or "R-4" Use District or any ZA tract In the 'B" Dlstrlct or SA tract In the "i" District my submit Bn application to the Zonlng Administrator for Conditlonl] Use Permit approval to construct I PUD. Ca) Application Review p~0cedure ~) ~omcept Plan; The applicant may request · concept revlew of the proposed development by th~ Planning Commission to gila Inforn~utlon a~d thoughts relevant to the City Plan and hls development, provlded.the followlng dlta is mode available~ to the City In three ()) ~opies. ~) Base. Hop shcMIng appllcantss land, plus 1or Bad use pattern for ell the land within four hundred (~O0) feet or more If necessary to show relationship. Statement Is to the type of use end architecture es to height Bad bulk. Statement on populatlon is to density, number, age, distributlo~, occupency~ etc. ~) Physlcal feature mop showing topography, tree location, dralnege pattern e~d availability of utllltits. 5) Concept Plan in sufficient detall to understand density, use relationship, access, parking, open apace end building mass. LL) PreIimTnsry Pll,n: The tpplicint shall file, wlth the i plicatiohor within six (6) months Iftlr Concept Plen .z... i£~ dave after verification by the ltlTT u'~1 ~----' ----e- I n re ulred plan end supporting data Is idequate, the · q .... '-- -~-~ ~-Id d -ubllc hearing. The StITT fling ~Offl~llilgn lnlll fly · . _ report shall be mide evalleble It lille tin %lVl rear to the public hearing. After the haerlng, the ~iennlng Cc.T~issIon shall lo.etd to t~? Ci~y their recommendatlon In writing, The City disapproval approve or ipprove with modlficltion Ind notify the ippllclnt wlthin sixty (GO) dlyS lfter receipt ~n~:~nd.tlon unless th. ippllcint .gree. L$$) ~in81 Plan: Upon iPprovll of the Preliminary PIIn by the Council, the ippliclnt my file · request for ipprovll of Final Plan for the entire PUD oF for one or mre of the developMnt Stages os Mde · part of the supporting dltl. The Prellmlnory Plan Ipprovll shall bec~e veld wlthin one ytir unless o reques~ Is mde for o Flail PIIn ipprovll. The PIinnlng Co~Jssion shill pllce I request for rial1 PJln ipprovll on the next regular Planning C~issIon igendl i~ter te~ (10) dlys from dire of filing. The findings and reconditions of the Planning ~Isslon shill be fo~irded to the Council for consldero~lon. Fa;lure ~o Se~ln Planned Development: If no construction ~es begun or no use established in the planned development within one (I) year from the ipproval of the finll develop- ment plln, the fine1 development plln shall Ilple lad be of.no further effect. In its discretion lad for good ClUeS, the Planning Commission maY extend for one (I) eddltional year the pe~iod for the beginning of construction or the establishment of · use. If I final development plan lapses under the provisions of this section, the clerk of the ouncll shall remove the plen~ed development from the zoning c .... ., -~- - notice of revocatlo~ wlth the reco~ed ~:~.~n:e:;~~-p~.~. The Zoning r. gul.tlons .ppllcl.,. before the final developmens yes approved shall then be re- vived lad in effect. 9.116 (17) continued Requirements for Pre1 The preliminary plan end supporting data shall Include the The existing topographic character of the land. map sho~ing enough of the surrounding area to demonstrate the relationship of the proposed PUO. iii) A stattmnt on popu.latJon, Is to density, numbers and age distribution. v) A statement o~ the existing public services, such as schools, parks, .fi re protection, playgrounds, bus, etc. A map showlng street systems, plot lines and plot designs. Areas proposed to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for parks, parkways, playgrounds, school sites, public buildings, and similar public end semiopublic uses. A plot plan for each building site and cowT~on open oreo, sho~ing the approximate location Of oll buildings, structures, and Improvements end indicating the open spa:es around buildings and structures. Elevation on~ perspective drawings of oii proposed structures and improvements except single-family resl- dentes and t~eir accessory buildings. The drawings nee~ not be the result of final architectural decisions and need not be in detail. A development schedule lad;coting (!) the approximate date wt~en construction of the pro~ect can be expected to beglfl; (2) the stages in which the project will be built and the approximate dote k~en Construction of each stage con be expected to begin (~) the anticipated rate of development; (&) the approximate dates ~en the developeent of each of the stages in the development ~;11 be completed; and (S) the area end location of com~on open space that will be provided at each Stage, 353 (~) z) Agreements, provisions, or covenants ~ich govern the use, mointensnce, end continued protection of the planned development and any of Its cofl~ofl open areas. The following plans and dlogram, Insofar es the Planning Conrnlsslon finds thor the planned develop- mint crestes spa:lo1 probJoms of traffic, parking, lendscepino or economic feasibility: ~) An off-street perking and loading plan. 2) A circulation dlegrom Indicating the proposed movement of vehicles, goods, and pedestrians within the plsflned development and to and from existing thoroughfares. Any special eflglneerlng features and traffic regulation devices neoded to facllltate ~r Insure the safety of this cir- culation pattern must be shc~n. 3) A landscaping a~d tree planting plan. 4) An econo-lc feasJblJlty report or mlrket analysis. 5) Preliminary Utility Plan Ail of the requirements of the Use District within which the plan is located shall apply,except es herein tmended. ~) The tract of lind shall be served wlth city sewer end water end have not less thin seventy°five (75) feet of public right°of-way frontlge. ND prlnclpel bulldJng shall be nearer thin Its helght to the reit or side lot Iine when such line lbUtS In "~-I" or "R*2" Use District. No building within the development shall be nearer to another building thin one-half (I/2) the sum of the height of the two buildings. Private roadways within the project designed as collector streets (fig drivewsys) shall be twenty- eight (28) feet or more In width, face to face of curb, private eccessweys shall be Ord. 1052, elf. 0/12/83 .vi) x) twenty-four (~&) feet or more In width, face to face of curb ~nd aery{ce roads shell be twenty- two (22) feet or more In width, face to face of curb. aery{ce raids shall not serve more than twenty (20) dee111ng unlts or a use equlvalent in traffic generation. Should guest parking require- me'ts be proposed as on street spaces, the street widths as herein steted shall.be w{dened B x 22 fe~t for each space. Ho bullding shall be located less than fifteen (IS) feet from the back of the curb on road~eys end accessveys, end three (3) feet on service raids. Guest plrking ratio shall be one (I) space for each four (~) units with no unit hiving a distence greater than two hundred (2OD) feet tO such Spice. An open space system shall be deslgn~d sho~Ing recreational eries equal to et least ten (10t) percent of the site erie and served by pedestrian' or{eased pith system. Those natural areas, i.e., woods, hllia, valleys, vet areas, rock outcrops are to be favored as part of the open space system. A iewer-~ater pub1$c utility System to serve the project shall be submitted, sald system shell d{cate a fire hydrant distribution to the approval of the Fire Chief e~d iff tote1 to the City Council. A street I{ght system Shall be a~bmltted ~or approval and all wires shall be belo~ground. NotvLthstand~ the proviitoua of. Section 9.208(5), dvelltu; units erected ~u the "i-2" District shill h~ve a uint~u~ floor area of 750 Bq~ze feet for each~lc eoutaiutns one bedzo~th~u the ~t. Cd) ~e~ulre~ent.~or Final ~{thln slx (&) months following the approval of the prellmlnary development p{an, the applicant shall file wlth the Planning Commission containing in final form the Information required In the prellmlnary plan. In lU discretion and for ~ood cause, the Planning Com~issionmoy extend for slx (~) months the period for. filing of the fins1 development plan. :~S) The Planning Co~r~Jssion shall give notice end provide an opportun!ty to be heard on the fine1 development. plea to: cont~nue~ I) Any person who appeared of record at the hearing on the prelimlnary development plan or at the hearing on the outline development plan, if any. Any other persona ho has Indicated to the Planning Coenlssion in writing that he wishes to be notified. LLL)?he Planning Co~lsslon shall revle~ the fine1 development plan, end shall recoenend approval of the final development plan If It Is In substantial compliance with the prellmlnary development plan. The clerk of the ~uncll shall re,rd the final develop~n~ plan In the manner provided for recording ~la~s of subdlvislons. (e) Enfo~91n~ Develp~ment Schedule ?he construction end provision of all of the carlson open spaces and public and recrestlonal fac111tles ~hich are sho~n on the finll development plan must proceed at the same rate as the construction of d~e111ng units. At least once avery ~nonths follc~ing the approval of the final development plen~ the Zoning Admlnlstrator shall revl~ ill of the building permits Issued for ~he planned develo~n~ end exlmlne construc~ion ~hT~h his tikes pllce on the sl~e. If he shill find chl~ the rice of ~nstruc~1on of dMelling units is gre~er faciSJtles have been ~nstructed an~ provided, he shall fo~ard this lnfor~tion to the council, ~ich ~y revue the planned develop~nt pe~1t. ~onveysnce and flalntensnce o~,Commo~ Open Spice L) All lind shown on the final development plan as co~on open space must be conveyed under one of the follo~lng options: I) It my be conveyed to e public agency whlch w111 agree to maJntaln the com~n open space and any buildings, structures, or improvements ~hlch have been placed on It. z) It may be conveyed to trustees provided In an Identure establishing an association or similar organization for the maintenance of the planned development. The cmnonopen space must be con- rayed to the trustees subject to covenants to be approved by the Planning Com~Isslonwhlch s~rict the c~n open space to the uses s~clfied on the final develo~en~ plan, ond~lch provide for the Nlfltenince of the ~n open I~lce in a mn~r~i~ assures Its ~ntinulng use for Intended pur~se. 356 SECTION 12 ord. 1138 elf. 3/23/87 5.612(1) 5.612(2} 5.612(3} / (&) No person shall periorm mmss~e ther~¥ vi~cut issue~ pur~uan% ~o the provisions d this person shall cperite · ~siness M · tussle therelmist (c) This section shall no~ {~ply ~o ~ny hospital, Mni~orl~ t~ p~vLsL~ o[ Ki~l Scatut6 S144.S0 - S144.?03, ~om ~ly ll~ ~ ~ St·ce ~ Hi--ti ~r~u~Lc, or ~i~ ~v~s. Definitions. For purlx~es c~ this section, the tollo~in~ ~r~s shall ~ave ~ tollo~ir~ means ~scril~,d ~x~ tlmem: (a) '~lassaoe therapist' shall man any pmrson ~ho tot 4 tee ~m, pr~s, s~es, ~ads, ~s, ~lls, ~s, vibrlL~ or ha~s ~ ~y i~~n~. · 'Kassage therapy l~sines$' shall ~ean any person, pertne~ht~ or corporation, either M principal or ~ent, Mbo en~a~es in the ~usiMss d ~ss~e therapy ur the ~ploymen~ ct c~he~ performin~'mss~e ther~y tor· fee. Application. (·) (b) No pez~on ~all rake any mt®rt~l hlse state.hr in ~y application. (0) (o) (P) S.612(4) 5.622(5) 5.622(6) 5.612(7) 5.6)2(8) (h) the Expira~tofl. All ltoerdes issued tnder this 8octio~ 8]~l! exptr~ Decon~r 31 c~ o&~h l~oar. Location. & massage therupist lioermod tr~or this ooc~tofl shall perform massaoe therapy cnl¥ ~t the plaoe cf I~siness Gf · mssaoe t~erapist business lioemee dosignatod in tAe massage ~heraptlt's license, lto nassa~e t~erupist' license may b8 ~rara£ezxo~ ~o · diftererm lc~a~ion c~ · differ~rm porto,. violates any cf tho provis~ cf thio ooc~tofl or mV ef tho Cb) or l~aLe IAv~ (c) Violation ~ &nv srovistom of this ,sISrl.q) oTue6:XJTOflT'L'~l '~l~'~a:bTq3KI 'TO'STgS sl'~n::l,~q,S ~UC)TlW'3TTC~e (e) j 15-181 LICENSES ARTICLE X. ESCORT SERVICES, MASSAGE PARLORS, RAP PARLORS, SAUNA PARLORS AND SERVICES* Sec. 15-181. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to regulate escort services, massage parlors, rap parlors and sauna pazlor~ (Ord. 1~o. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-182. Def'mitions. Whenever the following terms appear in this article, they shall have the meanings assigned to them in thi~ section: (a) Escort: To escort, accompany or provide companion- ship to another person. (b) Escort service: Premises at or in which escort is advertised, offered or performed to or for members of the public or a private club. (c) Massage:. The method of treating the superficial parts of the human body by rubbing, rolling, pressing, stroking, kneading, tapping, pounding, vibrating or stimulation with the hands or any instrument for the exclusive purpose of relaxation, physical fitness or beautification and for no other purposes. (d) Massage parlor: Premises at or in which massage is advertised, offered or performed to or for members of the public or a private club. (e) Garage: To own, manage or conduct. (f) Person: Any individual, corporation, firm, partnership or association. (g) Rap: Unlimited verbal conversation in an endeavor to arrive at a mutual understanding or agreement on a particular subject. *Editor's note--~.gection 1 of Ord. No. 429, adopted Aug. 8, 1978, amended the Code by adding §§ 15-181--15-218, which the editor has designated Art. X. Supp. No. 7, 9-8-81 957 · . ~t-gt ! :tClOO blOJ,HDI~[ ~iN :St-gl ! § 15-184 LICENSES § 15-190 Sec. 15-184. Business license required. No escort service, massage parlor, rap parlor or sauna parlor shall be operated within the city unless such business is cur- rently licensed in accordance with the provisions of this article. A separate license shall be required for each place conducted, operated or maintained by any person engaged in the licensed business. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-'/8) Sec. 15-185. Personal oeFvice license required. No person shall perform or provide any service in conjunc- tion with the operation of an escort service, massage parlor, rap parlor or sauna parlor within the city unless such person is currently licensed in accordance with the provisions of this article. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-186. Term of ficense~ A license shall terminate on the last day of the calendar year during which 'such license was issued. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-187. License fees. The license fees shall be established by resolution and shall not be prorated. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-188. Payment of license fee. The license fee shall be paid when the application is sub- mitted, and no fee shall be refunded. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-189. License nontransferable. No license shall be transferred to any other person or premises. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-190. Age of applicants. An applicant for a license must be at least twenty-one (21) years of age. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Supp. No. 4. 10-24-78 959 O96 9/.-l,~-0I '1, 'oN -ddn~ (S~.-8-8 'I § '6Zt, 'oiq 'P-~O) '{suaoff p!~ ~o uo!l~ooaa-, -,o uo!suadsns 'l~!uap ~,o~ asn~ aq ll~qs uoB~u pzpnIUU!, uo!l~ttuozu! zql u!~tuou l[~qs pu{ ~l.ta zql ,~q pa.qddns uuoz v uo azilemmm ,fl!:~ zql iq p~eu~!s~p uo~.md ~ ol -,o ;~mi{~ -uetu ~gl!;) art ol ap~m aq liS'tls asua;)!! a ~ot uo!curallddv uy · UO!leUlidde asuao!,'l 'I$I'!{I ~ ~6X~g! § ~(I03 I~OJ, HDIHIt -~IN I6I'9! § § 15-192 LICENSES any training or experience in providing the type of service for which the license is requested; and the same information shall be required of the manager if the applicant is a partnership. (c) If the applicant is a partnership, the names and ad- dresses of all partners and all information concerning each partner and the manager as is required of an in- dividual applicant in subparagraph (b) a~ove; the name of the managing partner(s); and the interest of each partner in the business. A true copy of the partnership agreement shall be submitted with the application, and if the partnership is required to file a certificate as to a trade name under the provisions of M.S.A. chapter 333, a copy of such certificate, certified by the clerk of the district court, shall be attached. (d) If the applicant is a corporation or other organization, the name and if incorporated, the state of incorporation; a true copy of the certificate of incorporation, articles of incorporation or association agreement, and bylaws shall be attached to the application, and if a foreign corporation, a certificate of authority, as described in M.S.A. chapter 303 shall be attached; the name of the manager and all information concerning said person as is required by subparagraph (b) above; a list of all parties who control or own an interest in excess of five (5) per cent in such corporation or organization who are officers of the corporation or organization; and all information concerning said person(s) as is required by subparagraph (b) above. (e) Whether the applicant is licensed in other communities and if so, where. (f) The names of those individuals to be licensed and work- lng for the applicant who may work in the City of New Brighton. (g) Whether the applicant has previously been denied a license to conduct the type of business for which a license is requested. Supp. No. 4, 10.24-78 961 ;:96 I{&'t~-Ol '~ 'oi~ -ddn~ ~u!~uetu ~o ~a~u~m aq~ ~q o~ ~o~s pu~ ~u~s aq [l~q~ uo~ -~{[dde aql 'uo{~e{oosse pale~oou{un ue s{ ]u~!ld~ a~ pu~ :~aul~ aql {o auo ~q ol u~o,xs pue pau~!s ~ lteqs uo!l~!Idd~ aql 'd{qs~au~d e s! lu~lldde aql 1!: uo{~odzou aql {o e s{ lu~{idde aql {! :uos~ quns ~q o1 u~o~m pu{ pa~!m · ;u~{idde aql ~q ~ u~o~m pue ~u~!s aq lI~q8 uo!l~!ldde a~ '~!n~ uo{l~U!~a& ')6I'~I '~ (8L'9'9 'I § '61:P 'o1~I 'P~'O) 'asuao!! aa!A-as ieuos~ad ~ :o~ ;mra!ldd~ u~ ~o pa~!nba~t aq iI~qS (~i) pu~ (f) '(q) '(~) '(a) '(q) sqd~ -e~edqns '~6I-g~ uo?,oas ~apun paa!nbaa uop,~tu~oiu! aql llr~r · asuau!! a;)!A~aS ieuos-ad jo slualuo~ '861'gl ';~m9 § 15-194 LICENSES § 15~197 officer thereof. The application shall be verified by a duly authorized notary of the public. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec 15-195. Investigation fee. At the time of submission of an application for a license, an applicant shall pay in full an investigation fee of three hundred dollars ($$00.00). No investigation fee shall be re- funded. The investigation fee may be waived in case of re- newal. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-196. Conditions of license. No license shall be issued, renewed or continue in effect unless there is compliance with the minimum conditions and requirements as set forth herein. Failure to maintain com- pliance shall be cause for denial, suspension or revocation of said license. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-197. Construction requirements. (a) Janitor closets shall be provided for the storage of cleaning supplies. Such closet shall be equipped with a mop and sink and shall have mechanical ventilation with ten (10) cubic feet per minute per square foot of floor space. (b) Restrooms shall be provided with mechanical ventilation and two (2) cubic feet per minute per square foot of floOr area, a washing sink equipped with hot and cold running water under pressure, and a sanitary towel dispenser and soap dispenser. (c) Individual lockers shall be provided for the use of pa- trons with separate keys for locking. (d) Rooms in the licensed premises, including but not lira- ired to the sauna room, massage rooms, restrooms, janitor's closet, hallways and reception area, shall be illuminated with not less than thirty (30) footcandles of illumination. (e) Massage par]ors and sauna parlors shall be constructed of material which is impervious to moisture, bacteria, mold and Supp. No. 4, 10-24-78 963 · ttou! auo to sn!p~u mnm!u!m e tllPa la,~oa l.r~tu~ e ap!ao~d ol pa3,on.tlsuoa aq llvtls ~u!o.: liWa-ol-Ii~2a pus llV~.-ol--zOOLI atLl; -tl~O.~ snlhmt 66I'91 § .';I(IOD I~IO~HDI~I~ .,~.'",i~l A6I-g! § § 15-199 LICENSES (b) No escort service, massage parlor, rap parlor or sauna parlor shall be operated within twenty-six hundred (2600) feet of any other escort service, massage parlor, rap parlor or sauna parlor. (c) lqo escort service, massage parlor, rap parlor, or ~atma parlor shall be operated within six hundred (600) feet of any residentially zoned district, a church, a nursery, elementary, junior high or high school, or any estab- lishment frequented by juveniles. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec~ 15-200. Persons ineligible for license. lqo license shall be issued to an applicant who: (a) Is under twenty-one (21) years of age; (b) Is an alien; (c) Has been convicted of any crime which involves moral turpitude or which relates directly to such person's ability, capacity or fitness to perform the duties and discharge the responsibilities of the licensed activity; or (d) Within five (5) years prior to the date of application, has had a similar license revoked, denied or suspended. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8.8-78) Sec 15-201. Operating hours. No licensed premises shall be open between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. of the following day, and no business shall be operated on Sunday. (Ord. 1%. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec~ 15-202. List of current employees required. The business licensee shall at all times be responsible :~or the safety and operation of the licensed business and premises and shall furnish the city manager with a list of current em- ployees. Said list shall include the name, address, date of birth and any other requested information for each employee. Only Supp. lqo. 4, 10-24-78 965 § 16-202 NEW BRIGHTON' CODE § 15-206 th'~ose persons included on the list of current employees may be employed on the licensed premises. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-?8) Sec. 15-203. Public solicitation prohibited. No person shall solicit business in any public place or in any licensed liquor establishment. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, Sec. 15-204. Service to member of opposite sex restrieted. No person who has been issued a personal service license shall solicit business or offer or agree to perform any licensed service to any member of the public who is of the opposite sex, except that this section shall not apply to any person who has a personal service escort license when said person is perform- lng that licensed service. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-205. Clothing requirements. Any person who shall receive the services licensed herein shall at all times have the sexual or genital parts, or any portion thereof, covered with a nontransparent covering; and any person who shall have a personal service license shall at all times while in the employ thereof have the upper and lower parts of the body completely covered with a nontransparent covering. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-206. Business manageF. A manager must be assigned for the licensed premises, and said manager must have a valid personal service license for that type of service, and no manager shall be employed in any other like business. The business licensee shall designate a person as manager, and the manager shall be responsible for the conduct of the business until another suitable person has been designated in writing by the licensee. The licensee shall promptly notify the city manager in writing of any changes, said notice indicating tb.e name and address of the new man- ager and the effective date of such change. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8`8-78) Supp. No. 4, I0-~4-78 966 § 15-207 LICENSES § Sec~ 15-207. Training r~uirement. An applicant for a personal ~rvice massage license shall furnish a diploma or c~ificat~ of ~raduation from a recog- nized school. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, ~-$-?$) Kec. 15-208. Issuance of licen~. (a) ~n.~s l~e~e. No business license shall be issued except pursuant to council resolution, after a hearing, declar- ing that public convenience and necessity require the proposed business. Council declaration of public convenience and neces- sity shall not be necessary for the renewal of an existing business license; provided that failure to apply for renewal at least thirty ($0) days before the expiration of the existing license shall be considered an abandonment of the right to renewal and a council hearing may be ordered. The council may grant or deny any license request in its discretion. (b) Per~o~l sea,ice license. Applications shall be for- warded to the director of public safety and to such other city officials as the city manager may deem necessary. At the earliest practicable time thereafter, the city manager shall issue or deny the request for a license. (c) Right o! appeal. The decision of the city manager may be appealed to the city council if such appeal is made in writ- ing within ten (10) working days following the date of issu- ance or denial of the license. When appealed, the city council may set aside the decision of the city manager. (Ord. No. 429, § L S-8-?$) Sec. 15-209. Right of inspection. Applicants and licensees shall allow a proper official of the city to inspect and periodically examine the premises for the purpose of ascertaining that said premises conform to all re- quirements and regulations pertaining to health, fire and sanitation, and to ensure the preservation of the good order and peace of the city. Any refusal on the part of the applicant or licensee to allow such inspection or examination shall be Supp. No. 4, 10-24-78 967 § 15-209 NEW BRIGHTON CODE § 15-214 de'creed as sufficient grounds upon which the city manager may deny, suspend or revoke a license. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-210. Display of license. While in force, a business license shall be posted in a con- spicuous place on the licensed premises. A personal service license shall be carried by the licensee on the licensee's person, and the licensee shall present said license for inspection when so requested by a proper official of the city. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15.211. Physics] contact. No person shall, while on the licensed premises, place his or her hand or hands upon or touch with any part of his or her body or fondle in any manner a sexual or genital part of any other person. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-212. Minimum age. No person under the age of eighteen (18) years of age shall be permitted at any time on the licensed premises as a customer or guest unless accompanied by a parent or guardian. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-213. Liquor on premises. No nonintoxicating or intoxicating liquors shall be allowed on any licensed premises at any time. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-214. Insurance required. Each applicant for a business license shall file with the city a public liability insurance policy, insuring the applicant against any and ali loss arising out of the use, operation or main- tenance of the place of business. The policy of insurance shall be in limits of not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) for injury or loss to one person, three hundred Supp. No. 4, 10-24.78 968 § 15-214 LICENSES § 15-21'/ thousand dollars ($300,000.00) for each occun'ence, and twenty- five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) property damage. No can- cellation of any policy shall be valid except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the city manager. Failure to keep in force and effect, the insurance required shall be grounds for revocation of the license. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-215. Right of denial No license sh~ll be granted or renewed' on any premises on which taxes, assessment or other financial claims of the city, county or state are due, delinquent or unpaid. In the event an action has been commenced pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes chapter 278, questioning the amount or validity of taxes, the council may, on appeal by the applicant, waive strict compliance with this provision; no waiver may be granted, however, for taxes or any portion thereof which re- main unpaid for a period exceeding one year after becoming due. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-216. Suspension and revocation of license. A license may be revoked by the council for cause pursuant to a hearing, such hearing to be held after five (5) days notice to the licensee. A license may be suspended temporarily by the city manager, and suspension shall continue until otherwise ordered by the council providing that the charges of the city manager be delivered in writing to the licensee and that the council afford the licensee a hearing at its first scheduled meeting immediately following the suspension order. Upon hearing, the council may continue the suspension for a specific period or may terminate ~ame or may continue the license in effect based upon any additional terms, conditions and stipula- tions which the council may in its sole discretion impose. (Ord. No. 429, § 1, 8-8-78) Sec. 15-217. Solicitation prohibited if business licensee sus- pended. No business licensee shall solicit business or offer or agree to perform any licensed service nor shall licensed employees Supp. No. 9, 12-14.82 969 CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON ORDINANCE NO. ~o~ AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE LICENSURE OF MASSAGE PARLORS AND SERVICES; AMENDING NEW BRIGHTON CITY CODE SECTIONS 15-197, 15-199 AND 15- 2O4 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. New Brighton Code Section 15-197, paragraph (d) is amended as follows: (d) Rooms in the licensed premises, including but not l~m~ted to the sauna room, massage rooms, restrooms, janitor's closet, hallways and reception area, shall be illuminated with not less than *.hir'.y ten (S4110) footcandles of illumination. Section 2. New Brighton Code Section 15-204 is deleted. Section 3. New Brighton Code Section 15-199, paragraph (c) is amended as follows: (c) No escort service, massage parlor, rap parlor, or sauna parlor shall be operated within six hundred (600) feet of any residentially zoned district, a church, a nursery, elementary, ~unior high or high school, or any estab- lishment frequented by juverdles. The provisions of this para~:raph (c) shall not apply to a massage parlor which is accessory to a.primary use of the licensed premises as a barber shop, or hair or beauty salon~ provided all of the followin~ conditions are met: (1) the primary use has at least the equivalent of two full-time employees en~a~ed in the primary, business use. (2) no more than fifteen (15) percent of the premises is devoted to the massage use. (3) the primary use has a capital investment in furniture, fixtures and equi~pment of at least thirtlr thousand dollars ($3(~000). (4) the primary use has been in business in the City for at least three (3) years. ~.L$2258 Section 4. Thi~ ordinanoe shall take affect on the day following its publ/aation. Adopted this _2,.[Lb day of. A.r t ] , 1993. Robert Be~l~e, Mayor ATTEST: David Childs, City Manager" Margaret EaKan, Finance Director/City Clerk (SEAL) Published: May 5, 1993 C:LT,$2258 1~136-98 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PATRICK HENTGES, CITY MANAGER SHEFFH~LD PLAN UPDATE NOVEMBER 8, 1993 From the discussion at the last work session on Sheffield, City staff understands that the following issues are outstanding: 1. Research further the capabilities and fee structures of Affordable Suburban Housing 2. Identify ways to lessen the City investment of $1.2 million in the project 3. Finalized local lender participation in the construction financing or mortgage takeout financing of the perspective buyers 4. Provide comparison of duplex homestead/rental program with other redevelopment alternatives such as land clearance, etc. 5. Identify other companion projects that could work in unison with the thirty-two duplex homestead project Following is an update of City staff's effort to address the above concerns and issues: 1. Other Development Scenarios--Enclosed please find four various tables and tax increment information that compares the proposed homestead rental concept with other development alternatives such as land clearance. 2. Jim Larson Tour--Jim Larson has invited us on a tour of the 20 duplex Hawthorne's neighborhood, the Stevens' Court project, and an 18-unit department project which he has renovated. I need to have a couple of late afternoon dates that the City Council could participate in a City bus tour of the properties. 3. Hawthorne Project- -As I stated previously, Don Schneider and myself did discuss neighborhood revitalization with Northside Housing and also supplied you with further information regarding Northside and Mr. Larson's participation in the Hawthorne project. 4. Local Bank Involvement--I am currently receiving information from the banks regarding their construction financing and mortgage takeout financing for the project. I expect all the information to be in within the next week to ten days. 5. Rchab.ilitation Cost/Fees--I have asked Affordable Housing to "fine tune" their rehabilitation costs and consultant fees for the project, so as to take advantage of any savings so as to lessen the City's financial participation in the project. 6. MHFA Meeting--Wayne Simoneau has offered to host a meeting between Jim Solem of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency in order to determine if greater levels of participation could be made available by MHFA. 7. AFL-CIO Inv~stmen~ Tr~lst--Councilmember Nawrocki previously identified the availability of funding from the AFL-CIO Investment Trust. A packet of information has been forwarded to the City by union officials. It appears their participation will be linked to union job creation and will likely come in the form of mortgage financing. 8. Citizen Update--City staff is in the process of preparing a short article for the next City newsletter and a short cable production that updates the citizens on the status of the Sheffield Neighborhood. Mayor & Council Page 2 November 8, 1993 9. Exclusive Contract Expiration--As a point of information, the redeveloper's exclusive contract will expire on November 16, 1994. 10. Other Fllndin_~ Source--To lower the City's participation in the project, some have suggested soliciting participation by Anoka County, contracting the project with ACCAP, applying for excess Section 8 funds for use in the project, apply for rental rehabilitation funding through MHFA, etc. 11. Other Neighborhood Red0velopment- -Identify other companion projects for the neighborhood such as r~habilitation of single family homes, or rehabilitation/conversion of the larger apartment buildings using revenue bonds/MHFA programs. If you have any additional questions or issues that City staff should be pursuing, please do not hesitate to contact me with your thoughts. PH:bjs CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PATRICK HENTGES, CITY MANAGER INFORMATION ON REDEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES FOR NOVEMBER 8, 1993 SHEFFIELD Attached please find four separate tables that review the development costs, private/public investment, and tax impact of undertaking the different redevelopment scenarios in the Sheffield Neighborhood. For comparison and illustrative purposes, we've only compared undertaking a redevelopment of twenty duplexes on the Pierce/Fillmore block. In the case of the homestead duplex program, it involved thirty-two properties. Similarly, I suspect that the other scenarios would involve more than just the twenty buildings on Pierce/Fillmore block in order to address the problem. In order for the development scenarios to be truly cost effective, a combination of the above programs would also have to be in place for the redevelopment of the properties beyond the Pierce/Fillmore block. If you have any additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to present them to City staff. PH:bjs IMPACT OF REHABILITATION OF 20 DUPLEXES/40 UNITS FOR HOMESTEAD/RENTAL Develovment Cost Property Acquisition ......................................... $ Relocation - 5 tenants ........................................ $ Rehabilitation .............................................. $ Administration/Consultant ..................................... $ Down Payment Assistance ..................................... $ Cost of Financing ........................................... $ Marketing ................................................. $ 1,200,000 25,000 900,000 158,125 158,525 48,000 53,200 TOTAL ................................................. $ 2,542,850 Public Investment Mortgage Financing .......................................... $ 1,920,000 City Share ................................................. $ 622,850 TOTAL ................................................. $ 2,542,850 P..r. ivate Investmen~ Mortgage Takeout by Buyer .................................... $ 1,920,000 Tax Impact Increase Over 20 Years .............................. $ Net Tax Increments - Present Values ............................. $ Tax Impact 231,348 90,830 PH:bjs 110893 IMPACT OF 20 BUILDING CLEARANCE FOR 50 UNIT TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT D~velopment Cost Property Acquisition ......................................... $ Site Demolition/Removal ...................................... $ Relocation ................................................. $ Legal/Administration/Miscellaneous ............................. $ Carry Cost - 1 Year .......................................... $ 1,200,000 80,000 25,000 20,000 96,000 TOTAL ................................................. $ 1,421,000 Public Investment Land Sale Proceeds for $1 as Enticement .......................... $ 1 City Share ................................................. $ 1,421,000 TOTAL ................................................. $ 1,421,001 Private Investment Construction Value, 50 Units at $75,000 each ....................... $ 3,750,000 Tax Impact Increase Over 20 Years .............................. $ Net Tax Increments - Present Values ............................. $ Tax Impact 638,359 247,017 PH:bjs 110893 IMPACT OF 20 BUILDING CLEARANCE FOR 20 SINGLE FAMILY HOMI~_~ Development Cost Property Acquisition ......................................... $ Site Demolition/Removal ...................................... Relocation ................................................. $ Legal/Administration/Miscellaneous ............................. Carry Cost - i Year .......................................... $ 1,200,000 80,000 25,000 20,000 96,000 TOTAL ................................................. $ 1,421,000 Public Investment Sale of 20 Lots at $15,000 Each ................................. $ 300,000 City Share ................................................. $ 1,121,000 TOTAL ................................................. $ 1,421,000 Privi~t~ It~ve~tmen~ Construction Value, 20 Homes at $80,000 Each ..................... $ 1,600,000 Tax Impact Increase Over 20 Years .............................. $ Net Tax Increments - Present Values ............................. $ Tax Impact 99,957 38,000 PH:bjs 110893 o Publi rp Inc. 512 Crown Roller Mill 105 Fifth Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55401 November 1, 1993 (612) 341-3646 FAX (612) 341-414§ TO: Pat Hentges, City of Columbia Heights FR: Mark Ruff RE: Sheffield Tax Increment Projections As requested, attached is a copy of three tax increment projections for the Sheffield Development. The first assumes 20 duplexes or 40 units of total housing with half of the units assessed as rental units and half as homestead units. The second projection assumes 50 units of owner-occupied townhomes valued at $75,000 each. The third projection assumes 20 residential homes valued at $80,000 each. All of the runs assume that the units are constructed in 1995 and that the type of tax increment district would be redevelopment. There is a local government aid penalty associated with redevelopment districts established after 1990 which is equal to approximately 15 percent of the total tax increment. The only type of tax increment district which is not subject to the LGA penalty is a qualified housing tax increment district. This type of district, however, carries fairly significant income restrictions and may not be applicable to this project. Below is a summary of the net tax increment which the City could realize from each of the projections at an assumed rate of 7 percent interest after a 5 % administrative fee is deducted for the administration of the district: Duplexes Townhomes Single Family Tax Increment 105,830 292,017 45,000 Est. LGA Loss 15,000 45,000 ..7,000 Net to City 90,830 247,017 38,000 Please call with any questions or comment. 11/01/93 Columbia Heights - Sheffield Redevelopment with 20 Duplexes Page T.I.F. CASH FLOW ASSUMPTIONS Inflation Rate: Interest Rate: Frozen Tax Extension Rate: Current Tax Extension Rate: 0.0000% 7.000% 125.795% 125.795% Pay 93 Pay 93 BASE VALUE INFORMATION Grow Value Percent Used Net Value Payable Year 25-30-24-34-0045 Original Market Value 73,300 100.00% 73,300 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0046 Original Market Value 68,900 100.00% 68,900 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0047 Odginal Market Value 73,100 100.00% 73,100 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0048 Original Market Value 68,400 100.00% 68,400 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0049 Original Market Value 68,400 100.00% 68,400 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0050 Original Market Value 67,200 100.00% 67,200 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0051 Original Market Value 66,600 100.00% 66,600 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0052 Original Market Value 67,500 100.00% 67,500 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0053 Original Market Value 67,000 100.00% 67,000 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0054 Original Market Value 67,000 100.00% 67,000 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0055 Original Market Value 65,900 100.00% 65,900 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0056 Original Market Value 66,400 100.00% 68,400 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0057 Original Market Value 68,400 100.00% 66,400 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0058 Original Market Value 68,500 100.00% 66,500 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0059 Original Market Value 66,400 100.00% 66,400 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0060 Odginal Market Value 68,900 100.00% 68,900 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0061 Original Market Value 68,900 100.00% 68,900 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0062 Odginal Market Value 68,900 100.00% 68,900 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0063 Odginal Market Value 69,200 100.00% 69,200 Pay 93 25-30-24-34-0064 Original Market Value 67,800 100.00% 67,800 Pay 93 Total Odginal Market Value 1,362,700 1,362,700 Class Rate: Rental <4 Units Homestead <$72,000 Homestead >$72,000 2.3000% Pay 96 1.0000% Pay 96 2.0000% Pay 96 Odginal Tax Capacity: 22,485 Pay 96 PROJECT VALUE INFORMATION Type of Tax Increment District: Type of Development: Number of Units: Number of Square Feet: Redevelopment Dup exes 20 N/A Estimated Market Value On Jan. 2, 1995: Final Market Value: 1,920,000 Pay 96 1,920,000 Pay 96 Class Rate: Rental <4 Units Homestead <$72,000 Homestead >$72,000 2.3000% Pay 96 1.0000% Pay 96 2.0000% Pay 96 Estimated Tax Capacity on Jan. 2. 1995: Total Project Tax Capacity at Completion: 31,680 Pay 96 31,680 Project Taxes Per Unit/Square Foot: Assessor's Market Value Per Unit/Square Foot: Project Total Taxes for Estimate Purposes: Annual Tax Increment Expected at Full Value: $1,992.59 Pay 96 $96,000.00 Pay 96 39,852 Pay 96 11,567 Pay 96 C0100-01 Prepared by Publicorp Inc. SHEF1 11/01193 Columbia Heights - Sheffield Redevelopment with 20 Duplexes TAX INCREMENT CASH FLOW Page 2 Odg. Project Captured Semi-Annual Semi-Annual PERIOD BEGINS Tax Tax Fiscal Tax Gross Tax Admin. Net Tax Yrs. Mth. Yr. Capacity Capacity Disparities Capacity Increment 5.00% Increment 0.0 08-01 1994 22,485 22,485 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 02-01 1995 22,485 22,485 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 08-01 1995 22,485 22,485 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 02-01 1996 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 2.0 08-01 1996 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 2.5 02-01 1997 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 3.0 08-01 1997 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 3.5 02-01 1998 22,485 3i,680 0 9,t95 5,784 289 5,495 4.0 08-01 1998 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 4.5 02-01 1999 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 5.0 08-01 1999 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 5.5 02-01 2000 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 6.0 08-01 2000 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 6.5 02-01 2001 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 7.0 08-01 2001 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 7.5 02-01 2002 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 8.0 08-01 2002 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 8.5 02-01 2003 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 9.0 08-01 2003 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 9.5 02-01 2004 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 10.0 08-01 2004 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 10.5 02-01 2005 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 11.0 08-01 2005 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 11.5 02-01 2006 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 12.0 08-01 2006 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 12.5 02-01 2007 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 13.0 08-01 2007 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 13.5 02-01 2008 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 14.0 08-01 2008 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 14.5 02-01 2009 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 15.0 08-01 2009 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 15.5 02-01 2010 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 16.0 08-01 2010 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 16.5 02-01 2011 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 17.0 08-01 2011 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 17.5 02-01 2012 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 18.0 08-01 2012 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 18.5 02-01 2013 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 19.0 08-01 2013 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 19.5 02-01 2014 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 20.0 08-01 2014 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 20.5 02-01 2015 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 21.0 08-01 2015 22,485 31,680 0 9,195 5,784 289 5,495 Totals 231,348 11,567 219,781 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yrs. of PERIOD ENDING TI Yrs. Mth. Yr. 0.5 02-01 1995 1.0 08-01 1995 1.5 02-01 1996 0.5 2.0 08-01 1996 1.0 2.5 02-01 1997 1.5 3.0 08-01 1997 2.0 3.5 02-01 1998 2.5 4.0 08-01 1998 3.0 4.5 02-01 1999 3.5 5.0 08-01 1999 4.0 5.5 02-01 2000 4.5 6.0 08-01 2000 5.0 6.5 02-01 2001 5.5 7.0 08-01 2001 6.0 7.5 02-01 2002 6.5 8.0 08-01 2002 7.0 8.5 02-01 2003 7.5 9.0 08-01 2003 8.0 9.5 02-01 2004 8.5 10.0 08-01 2004 9.0 10.5 02-01 2005 9.5 11.0 08-01 2005 10.0 11.5 02-01 2006 10.5 12.0 08-01 2006 11.0 12.5 02-01 2007 11.5 13.0 08-01 2007 12.0 13.5 02-01 2008 12.5 14.0 08-01 2008 13.0 14.5 02-01 2009 13.5 15.0 08-01 2009 14.0 15.5 02-01 2010 14.5 16.0 08-01 2010 15.0 16.5 02-01 2011 15.5 17.0 08-01 2011 16.0 17.5 02-01 2012 16.5 18.0 08-01 2012 17.0 18.5 02-01 2013 17.5 19.0 08-01 2013 18.0 19.5 02-01 2014 18.5 20.0 08-01 2014 19.0 20.5 02-01 2015 19.5 21.0 08-01 2015 20.0 21.5 02-01 2016 Present Values 111,400 5,570 105,830 CO100-01 Prepared by Publicorp Inc. SHEF' 11/01193 Columbia Heights - 513effielcl Redevelopment with 50 Owner-Occupied Tow~homes Page 1 T. LF. CASH FLOW ASSUMPTIONS Inflation Rate: Interest Rate: Frozen Tax Extension Rate: Current Tax Extension Rate: 0.000O% 7.000% 125.795% Pay 93 125.795% Pay 93 BASE VALUE E~IFORMATION 25-30-24-34-0045 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0046 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0047 Odginal Market Value 25-30-24-34-0048 Odginal Market Value 25-30-24-34-0049 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0050 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0051 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0052 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0053 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0054 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0055 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0056 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0057 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0058 Odginal Market Value 25-30-24-34-0059 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0060 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0061 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0062 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0063 Original Market Value 25-30-24-34-0064 Original Market Value Total Original Market Value Class Rate: Rental <4 Units Homestead <$72,000 Homestead >$72,000 Gross Percent Net Payable Value Used Value Year 73,300 68,900 73,100 68,400 68,400 67,200 66,600 67,500 67,000 67,000 65,900 66,400 66,4O0 66,500 66,400 68,900 68,900 68,900 69,200 67,800 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 73,300 Pay 93 68,900 Pay 93 73,100 Pay 93 68,400 Pay 93 68,400 Pay 93 67,200 Pay 93 66,600 Pay 93 67,500 Pay 93 67,000 Pay 93 67,000 Pay 93 65,900 Pay 93 68,400 Pay 93 68,400 Pay 93 66,500 Pay 93 66,400 Pay 93 68,900 Pay 93 68,900 Pay 93 68,900 Pay 93 69,200 Pay 93 67,800 Pay 93 1,362,700 1,362,700 2.3000% Pay 96 1.0000% Pay 96 2.0000% Pay 96 Original Tax Capacity: PROJECT VALUE INFORMATION 13,627 Pay 96 Type of Tax Increment District: Type of Development: Number of Units: Number of Square Feet: Estimated Market Value On Jan. 2, 1995: Final Market Value: Class Rate: Rental <4 Units Homestead <$72,000 Homestead >$72,000 Estimated Tax Capacity on Jan. 2. 1995: Total Project Tax Capacity at Completion: Project Taxes Per Unit/Square Foot: Assessor's Market Value Per UnitJSquare Foot: Project Total Taxes for Estimate Purposes: Annual Tax Increment Expected at Full Value: Redevelopment Townhomes N/A 3,750,000 Pay 96 3,750,000 Pay 96 2.3000% Pay 96 1.0000% Pay 96 2.0000% Pay 96 39,000 Pay 96 39,000 $981.20 Pay 96 $75,000.00 Pay 96 49,060 Pay 96 31,918 Pay 96 CO100-01 Prepared by Publicorp Inc. SHEF2 11/01/93 Columbia Heights - Sheffield Redevelopment with 50 Owner-Occupied Townhomes TAX INCREMENT CASH FLOW Page Orig. Project PERIOD BEGINS Tax Tax Fiscal Yrs. Mth. Yr. Capacity Capacity Disparities 0.0 08-01 1994 13,627 13,627 0 0.5 02-01 1995 13,627 13,627 0 1.0 08-01 1995 13,627 13,627 0 1.5 02-01 1996 13,627 39,000 0 2.0 08-01 1996 13,627 39,000 0 2.5 02-01 1997 13,627 39,000 0 3.0 08-01 1997 13,627 39,000 0 3,5 02-01 1998 13,627 39,000 0 4.0 08-01 1998 13,627 39,000 0 4.5 02-01 1999 13,627 39,000 0 5.0 08-01 1999 13,627 39,000 0 5.5 02-01 2000 13,627 39,000 0 6.0 08-01 2000 13,627 39,000 0 6.5 02-01 2001 13,627 39,000 0 7.0 08-01 2001 13,627 39,000 0 7.5 02-01 2002 13,627 39,000 0 8.0 08-01 2002 13,627 39,000 0 8.5 02-01 2003 13,627 39,000 0 9.0 08-01 2003 13,627 39,000 0 9.5 02-01 2004 13,627 39,000 0 10.0 08-01 2004 13,627 39,000 0 10.5 02-01 2005 13,627 39,000 0 11.0 08-01 2005 13,627 39,000 0 11.5 02-01 2006 13,627 39,000 0 12.0 08-01 2006 13,627 39,000 0 12.5 02-01 2007 13,627 39,000 0 13.0 08-01 2007 13,627 39,000 0 13.5 02-01 2008 13,627 39,000 0 14.0 08-01 2008 13,627 39,000 0 14.5 02-01 2009 13,627 39,000 0 15.0 08-01 2009 13,627 39,000 0 15.5 02-01 2010 13,627 39,000 0 16.0 08-01 2010 13,627 39,000 0 16.5 02-01 2011 13,627 39,000 0 17.0 08-01 2011 13,627 39,000 0 17.5 02-01 2012 13,627 39,000 0 18.0 08-01 2012 13,627 39,000 0 18.5 02-01 2013 13,627 39,000 0 19.0 08-01 2013 13,627 39,000 0 19.5 02-01 2014 13,627 39,000 0 20.0 08-01 2014 13,627 39,000 0 20.5 02-01 2015 13,627 39,000 0 21.0 08-01 2015 13,627 39,000 0 Totals Ca~ured Semi-Annual Semi-Annual Tax Gross Tax Admin. Net Tax Capacity Increment 5.00% Increme~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 25,373 15,959 798 15,161 638,359 31,918 606,441 Present Values 307,387 15,369 292,017 0 0 0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yrs. of TI PERIOD ENDING Yrs. Mth. Yr. 0.5 02-01 1995 1.0 08-01 1995 1.5 02-01 1996 0.5 2.0 08-01 1996 1.0 2.5 02-01 1997 1.5 3.0 08-01 1997 2.0 3.5 02-01 1998 2.5 4.0 08-01 1998 3.0 4.5 02-01 1999 3.5 5.0 08-01 1999 4.0 5.5 02-01 2000 4.5 6.0 08-01 2000 5.0 6.5 02-01 2001 5.5 7.0 08-01 2001 6.0 7.5 02-01 2002 6.5 8.0 08-01 2002 7.0 8.5 02-01 2003 7.5 9.0 08-01 2003 8.0 9.5 02-01 2004 8.5 10.0 08-01 2004 9.0 10.5 02-01 2005 9.5 11.0 08-01 2005 10.0 11.5 02-01 2006 10.5 12.0 08-01 2006 11.0 12.5 02-01 2007 11.5 13.0 08-01 2007 12.0 13.5 02-01 2008 12.5 14.0 08-01 2008 13.0 14.5 02-01 2009 13.5 15.0 08-01 2009 14.0 15.5 02-01 2010 14.5 16.0 08-01 2010 15.0 16.5 02-01 2011 15.5 17.0 08-01 2011 16.0 17.5 02-01 2012 16.5 18.0 08-01 2012 17.0 18.5 02-01 2013 17.5 19.0 08-01 2013 18.0 19.5 02-01 2014 18.5 20.0 08-01 2014 19.0 20.5 02-01 2015 19.5 21.0 08-01 2015 20.0 21.5 02-01 2016 C0100-01 Prepared by Publicorp Inc. SHEF2 1110119'3 Columbia Heights - Sheff[e(d Redeve(opment with 20 Sing(e Family Homes Page T.I.F. CASH FLOW ASSUMPTIONS Inflation Rate: interest Rate: Frozen Tax Extension Rate: Current Tax Extension Rate: 0.0000% 7 000% 125.795% Pay 93 125.795% Pay 93 BASE VALUE INFORMATION Gross Value 25-30-24-34-0045 Original Market Value 73,300 25-30-24-34-0046 Original Market Value 68,900 25-30-24-34-0047 Original Market Value 73,100 25-30-24-34-0048 Original Market Value 68,400 25-30-24-34-0049 Original Market Value 68,400 25-30-24-34-0050 Original Market Value 67,200 25-30-24-34-0051 Original Market Value 68,600 25-30-24-34-0052 Original Market Value 67,500 25-30-24-34-0053 Original Market Value 67,000 25-30-24-34-0054 Original Market Value 67,000 25-30-24-34-0055 Original Market Value 65,900 25-30-24-34-0056 Original Market Value 66,400 25-30-24-34-0057 Original Market Value 66,400 25-30-24-34-0058 Original Market Value 66,500 25-30-24-34-0059 Odginal Market Value 66,400 25-30-24-34-0060 Original Market Value 68,900 25-30-24-34-0061 Original Market Value 68,900 25-30-24-34-0062 Original Market Value 68,900 25-30-24-34-0063 Original Market Value 69,200 25-30-24-34-0064 Original Market Value 67,800 Total Original Market Value 1,362,700 Percent Net Payable Used Value Year 100.00% 73,300 Pay 93 100.00% 68,900 Pay 93 t00.00% 73,100 Pay 93 100.00% 68,400 Pay93 100.00% 68,400 Pay 93 100.00% 67,200 Pay 93 100.00% 66,600 Pay93 100.00% 67,500 Pay 93 100.00% 67,000 Pay 93 100.00% 67,000 Pay93 100.00% 65,900 Pay 93 100.00% 66,400 Pay 93 100.00% 66,400 Pay 93 100.00% 66,500 Pay93 100.00% 66,400 Pay 93 100.00% 68,900 Pay 93 100.00% 68,900 Pay 93 100.00% 68,900 Pay 93 100.00% 69,200 Pay 93 100.00% 67,800 Pay 93 1,3.s2,700 Class Rate: Rental <4 Units Homestead <$72,000 Homestead >$72,000 2.3000% Pay 96 1.0000% Pay 96 2.0000% Pay 96 Original Tax Capacity: 13,627 Pay96 PROJECT VALUE INFORMATION Type of Tax Increment District: Type of Development: Number of Units: Number of Square Feet: Redevelopment S ngle Fam y 2O N/A Estimated Market Value On Jan. 2, 1995: Final Market Value: 1,600,000 Pay 96 1,600,000 Pay 96 Class Rate: Rental <4 Units Homestead <$72,000 Homestead >$72,000 2.3000% Pay 96 1.0000% Pay 96 2.0000% Pay 96 Estimated Tax Capacity on Jan. 2. 1995: Total Project Tax Capacity at Completion: Project Taxes Per Ur~it/Square Foot: Assessor's Market Value Per Unit/Square Foot: Project Total Taxes for Estimate Purposes: Annual Tax Increment Expected at Full Value: 17,600 Pay96 17,600 $1,107.00 Pay 96 $80,000.00 Pay 96 22,140 Pay 96 4,998 Pay 96 C0100-01 Prepared by Publicorp Inc. SHEF? 11/01/93 Columbia Heights - Sheffield Redevelopment with 20 Single Family Homes TAX INCREMENT CASH FLOW Page 2 Orig. Project Captured Semi-Annual Semi-Annual PERIOD BEGINS Tax Tax Fiscal Tax Gross Tax Admin. Net Tax Yrs. Mth. Yr. Capacity Capacity Disparities Capacity Increment 5.00% Increment 0.0 08-01 1994 13,627 13,627 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 02-01 1995 13,627 13,627 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 08-01 1995 13,627 13,627 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 02-01 1996 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 2.0 08-01 1996 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 2.5 02-01 1997 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 3.0 08-01 1997 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 3.5 02-01 1998 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 4.0 08-01 1998 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 4.5 02-01 1999 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 5.0 08-01 1999 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 5.5 02-01 2000 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 6.0 08-01 2000 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 6.5 02-01 2001 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 7.0 08-01 2001 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 7.5 02-01 2002 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 8.0 08-01 2002 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 8.5 02-01 2003 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 9.0 08-01 2003 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 9.5 02-01 2004 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 10.0 08-01 2004 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 10.5 02-01 2005 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 11.0 08-01 2005 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 11.5 02-01 2006 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 12.0 08-01 2006 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 12.5 02-01 2007 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 13.0 08-01 2007 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 13.5 02-01 2008 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 14.0 08-01 2008 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 14.5 02-01 2009 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 15.0 08-01 2009 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 15.5 02-01 2010 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 16.0 08-01 2010 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 16.5 02-01 2011 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 17.0 08-01 2011 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 17.5 02-01 2012 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 18.0 08-01 2012 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 18.5 02-01 2013 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 19.0 08-01 2013 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 19.5 02-01 2014 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 20.0 08-01 2014 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 20.5 02-01 2015 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 21.0 08-01 2015 13,627 17,600 0 3,973 2,499 125 2,374 Yrs. of PERIOD ENDING TI Yrs. Mth. Yr. 0 0 0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 0 (0 (0 (o (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 02-01 1995 1.0 o8-01 1995 1.5 o2-01 1996 0.5 2.0 08-01 1996 1.0 2.5 02-01 1997 1.5 3.0 08-01 1997 2.0 3.5 02-01 1998 2.5 4.0 o8-01 1998 3.0 4.5 02-01 1999 3.5 5.0 08-01 1999 4.0 5.5 02-01 2000 4.5 6.0 08-01 2000 5.0 6.5 02-01 2001 5.5 7.0 08-01 20011 6.0 7.5 02-01 2002~ 6.5 8.0 08-01 20021 7.0 8.5 02-01 2003 7.5 9.0 08-01 2003 8.0 9.5 02-01 2004 8.5 10.0 o8-01 2004 9.0 10.5 02-01 2005 9.5 11.0 08-01 2005 10.0 11.5 02-01 2006 10.5 12.0 08-01 2006 11.0 12.5 02-01 2007 11.5 13.0 08-01 2007 12.0 13.5 02-01 2008 12.5 14.0 08-01 2008 13.0 14.5 02-01 2009 13.5 15.0 08-01 2009 14.0 15.5 02-01 2010 14.5 16.0 08-01 2010 15.0 16.5 02-01 2011 15.5 17.0 08-01 2011 16.0 17.5 02-01 2012 16.5 18.0 08-01 2012 17.0 18.5 02-01 2013 17.5 19.0 08-01 2013 18.0 19.5 02-01 2014 18.5 20.0 08-01 2014 19.0 20.5 02-01 2015 19.5 21.0 08-01 2015 20.0 21.5 02-01 2016 Totals 99,957 4,998 94,959 Present Values 48,132 2,407 45,725 C0100-01 Prepared by Publicorp Inc. SHEF;