Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOctober 4, 1993 Work SessionNOTICE OF OFFICIAL MF~F~TING Notice is hereby given that an official meeting is to be held in the City of Columbia Heights as follows: Meeting of: Date of Meeting:. Time of Meeting: Location of Meeting:. Purpose of Meeting:. 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 9:15 PM 9:45 PM 10:00 PM 10:15 PM MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, AND CITY MANAGER MONDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1993 8:00 PM CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 590 40TH AVENUE NE WORK SESSION 1. Sheffield Neighborhood Status 2. Sheffield Financing Plan 3. Housing Maintenance Code Changes 4. Police Grant Application(s) 5. Innovation Grant 6. Police Pension PERA Consolidation 7. Fire Pension PERA Consolidation 8. Business Licenses/Zoning Fees 9. 52nd Avenue Drainage 10. Future Meeting Schedules 11. Adjournment The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all City of Columbia Heights' services, programs, and activities. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. I~lease call the City Council Secretary at '182-2800, Extension 209, to make arrangements. (TDD/782-2806 for deaf only) Account # Address Amount Due 307-0265-00-00 307-0280-00-00 307-0340-00-00 307-0395-00-00 307-0400-00-00 307-0405-00-00 307-0410-00-00 307-0420-00-00 307-0430-00-00 307-0435-00-00 307-0450-00-00 307-0460-00-00 307-0490-00-00 307-0500-00-00 307-0505-00-00 307-0510-00-00 307-0520-00-00 4535 Taylqr St NE -- occu d to 10/1/93 4537 Taylor St NE -- vacant 4519 Taylor St NE -- both sides vacant 4521 Taylor St NE water off 9/27/93 4556 Fillmore St NE-- vacant 4558 Fillmore St NE 4655 Fillmore St NE-- both ~ides vRc~h~ 4657 Fillmore St NE water off 9/30/93 4649 Fillmore St NE-- occupied to 10/1/93 4651 Fillmore St NE-- vacant 4643 Fillmore St NE 4645 Fillmore St NE-- vacant 4637 Fillmore St NE 4639 Fillmore St NE-- vacant 4625 Fillmore St NE-- occupied to 10/1/93 4627 Fillmore St NE 4613 Fillmore St NE-- occupied 4615 Fillmore St NE-- occupied 4607 Fillmore St NE-- both sides vacant 4609 Fillmore St NE water off 9/28/93 4547 Fillmore St NE-- 2 units; both vacant water off 9/28/93 4531 Fillmore St NE-- 2 units; both vacant water off 9/28/93 4618 Pierce St NE -- both sides vacant 4620 Pierce St NE water off 9/28/93 4630 Pierce St NE -- 4632 Pierce St NE vacant 4636 Pierce St NE 4642 Pierce St NE --both sides vacant 4644 Pierce St NE water off 9/28/93 4654 Pierce St NE -- both sides vacant 4656 Pierce St NE water off 9/28/93 Total Amount Due $ 316.44 385.18 351,66 186.90 511.95 186.90 198.71 432.20 155.84 115.08 184.28 270.85 482.23 221.03 434.71 460.02 140,49 $ 5,034.47 The following is information concerning section 8 housh~ tn ~helTield ~elgh'oofhoo/t. The irlformntlon is from lIRA as of ~7-2-93. No tenants are residing in the listed vacant residences. 10'tG[D'qt'3Cerh~¢ 4620 Pierce 4642 Pierce 4644 Pierce 4521 Taylor 4533 Fillmore 4545 Fillmore (nninhabitable) 4556 Fillmore 4558 Fillmore 4607 Fillmore 4639 Fillmore 4637 Fillmore, Clar~e,~-e Jacobs, moving 9-1. Has place elsewhere. 4618 Pierce, Leann Jorgenson 4654 Pierce, Anita Penn ttas place, moved? 4637 Fillmore, Devonna Holmes. Has place, moved? 4531 Fillmore, Sophia Lofton 4547 Fillmore, Akermark Has place, moved ()ccupied, bu! likely to be vacated hy 10-!-93 4535 Taylor, moving 9-30-93, Tracy Billington Oc.-cupied, but not likely to be moving 4630 Pierce, Shirley Barnes 4636 Pierce, Lajonda Burton 4613 Fillmore~ Michelle Anderson Downsta rs, ........... 4615 Fillmore, Wilrna Anderson 4625 Fillmore, Gwen Garrett 4627 Fillmore, Dorothy Brekke ' 4643 Fillmore, Peggy Arthurs 4649 Fillmor.e, Mary Howard Upstairs 2,¸ Columbia Heights, MN 55421 RE: Account Number 3- Dear Resident: The purpose of this letter is to inform you of pending water disconnection at the property address indicated above. The bttilding at this address has one main shut-off valve for the entire building. At this time there exists a utility bill that remains tmpaid and this is considered delinquent. If this past due amount is not resolved within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, water service will be discontinued. You will receive a second notice in twenty-five (25) days if the bill remains unpaid. It is suggested that you contact your landlord to resolve this problem and ensure continued water service. If you have any questions, please call Utility Billing at 782-2822. Sincerely, UTILITY BILLING DEPARTMENT SH:kg 30-DAY Columbia Heights, MN 55421 RE: Account Number Dear Occupant: The purpose of this letter is to inform you that your water service is scheduled to be shut off on October 4, 1993 due to non-payment of a bill on the same shut-off valve as yours. It is suggested that you contact your landlord immediately in order to maintain continued service. If you have any questions, please call Utility Billing at 782-2822. Sincerely, UTILTIY BILLING DEPARTMENT SH:kg 5-DAY PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET OFFICE OF DRUG POLICY & VIOLENCE PREVENTION MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY CY94/FFY931BJA/COMMUNITY POLICING FORM 1. AppF~cant Agenc~ [~'th whic~ contract i~ to Dave Sallman~ Deputy Director 6431 University Ave. NE gl2 ) 572-3629 Rose M. Griep, CCPS 6431 University Avenue NE ~12 ) 572-3638 Project Name: Fridley: A Couau~mity Service Area~n--at Cares City (ies) and/or County (ies} FRIDLEY Districts: U.S. Congressional District # 6 MN. Legislative District # 48 and 52 Project Funds Requested $ ?.7r t20 : Local Match Provided $ 6~780 Minnesota Tax ID # ~n'~N'~N 1 Federal 1D # 4 ]-6007700 S. I ce~ L;ft' that l~e i~rm~ conta~ed~!~ere~ is ~e ~d ~,a~ ~ ~e b~ ~ ~ ~o~ge ~,~-~e o,.~o~ o~:,~: ~.~...,:.~. :~-~ .' .......................... T~e: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC S~ETY Date: 8/2/93 4/93 FRIDLEY: A Community That Cares COMMUNITY NEED:I Fridley is a northern first tier suburb of Minneapolis comprised of a population of 28,335, encompassing approximately 10 square miles. Fridley residents comprise 10,909 households, of which, 3,488 or 32.5% are rental units which on the average were built around 1978'. 382 units or 3.4% are subsidized and an additional 587 (5.4%) receive public assistance. Households with children total 3,677 and of these 1062 are single parent (male or female head of household). Economic indicators show a 59% increase from 1988 to 1992 in AFDC cases in Anoka County as well as a 53% increase in WIC recipients during the same period. The average income for persons in a rental unit is under $20,000 and comprises 20.9% of the general population in Fridley. Currently 6.1% of Fridley's population is living below the poverty threshold which is an identified trend that is projected to increase. Laura Lambert from the Wilder Foundation, in a presentation July 14, 1993 to the Southern Anoka County Community Consortium, identified four areas needing to be addressed as housing stock, diversity, lack of safety and changes in family systems. These concerns emerged from focus groups that were held to identify areas that could be addressed in a collaborative manner. "Those who care about their neighborhood tend to leave for a newer or better maintained area. As property values decline, owner occupied homes change to rental property. This trend coupled with the increasing poverty will be the greatest challenge to Southern Anoka County in the coming years.~' (Excerpt from the report of July 14, 1993 by Laura Lambert) census data shows that the community of Fridley had an increase in' their minority population between 1980 and 1990; currently, 4.9% or 1,398 people are listed as minority in comparison with under 1% in 1980. No specific plan has been identified to address the diversity issues that need attention. Community risk factors as identified by J. David Hawkins at the Safeguarding Our Youth: Violence Prevention for Our Nation's children Conference (July 20/21, 1993 Washington, D.C.) include low neighborhood attachment, transitions and mobility, economic and social deprivation, family management problems and a family history of problems. Mr. Hawkins also identified the need for the entire community to work together to solve these problems. A study of State Prison inmates by the Bureau of Justice several common factors were identified. Among these were included high school dropout, poverty, single parent family, moved frequently,and a parent who abused alcohol or d~lgs. These common factors surface frequently among residents of multi-housing units in Fridley, giving a high risk for youth in these families. The crime index in Fridley has shown a slow, steady increase in crime in the areas of burglary, theft and vandalism since 1989, however, the significant increases occurred in the categories of' other assaults, family and children violations, and disorderly conduct. Although these categories are not in the felony range, they serve to indicate a trend in increasing violence. The only tracked statistic available indicating multihousing:areas as an area for concern is that of burglary. Although our burlary rate has increased only slightly over the past 10 years, we have tracked the shift away from residential burglaries to businesses and multifamily housing areas. In a random sampling of the disorderly conduct complaints, the majority were officers~responding to loud and disturbing neighbors who were either having a loud party or a verbal or physcial fight. Again the locations where officers responded repeatedly were multiple housing locations. Out of 135 assaults occuring between April and June, 1993 in Fridley, 57 were committed by a family member, 54 were committed by an acquaintance, 24 were committed by a stranger. 40 of these had juvenile victims. PROJECT DESCRIPTION "It takes a whole village to rear a child." African Proverb The overall goal of this project is to identify youths in families with a combination of the above mentioned at risk factors and rather than focus on just the youth, work with the family to build a pro-family system that will promote healthier families by providing coordinated services of the government agencies, community programs, and promote self sufficiency. Too often isolation is a factor that contributes to the sense of "hopelessness" and by raising awareness of services available, hope is provided. Also by presenting alternative solutions to access the services, many of the barriers to accessing the services are broken down. At the present time we have a need to identify all the service providers, government, community, volunteer, and so forth. We propose to hire a 3/4 time person in the capacity of a Human Resource Specialist to seek out and identify all service providers and compile a reference guide identifying what services are available, what the qualifications are needed to access the services and facilitate the processing procedures. This position will be supervised by the Police Department where office space, phone, a vehicle, and other equipment will be provided. Once the services are identified, referrals would then be sought. We recognize that because of the confidential nature of client information, agencies and schools would not be able to directly provide names. However, we have been assured of their cooperation in encouraging their clients to contact the Human Resource Specialist. During the planning process of this grant,' "the Fridley Housing Committee consisting of members from Fire, Police, InsPection, Code Enforcement, Housing Assistance, and others, has identified several multi-housing sites that tend to have a heavier concentration of people in need of assistance with a high turnover of residents. The Human Resource Specialist will make contact with the residents at 6 selected sites, as well as management to seek cooperation in maintaining a safe, healthy environment that would encourage residents to stay rather than move, thus lowering a high risk factor. By establishing a more stable, location for a family,. children are more likely to succeed in school. The family would feel a sense of belonging to the community and be more likely to remain at their location. The Human Resource Specialist would also continue to meet bi-monthly with the Fridley Housing Committee to monitor progress made. The Human Resource Specialist, along with the Parks & Recreation Department and the Special Project Unit of the Police Department, will also coordinate selection of 2 youth leaders from each of the selected locations, provide training and plan sum~er activities for 20 youth in grades 3-6 at each of the 6 sites selected. The s~mmer activities will be a collaborative effort of many agencies to provide "mini-safety' camps on site at each of the 6 locations. 20 Youth from each building will receive 6 hours per week for four weeks of selected activities and training that is relevant to their environment such as fire safety, conflict resolution, crime prevention, first aid, and other prevention related topics. Two teenage youth from each building will be selected and trained to assist as peer leaders with the mini-safety camps and will be compensated for their efforts. In addition to service providers, educational opportunities and job training will be sought for the reference manual. Community Education offers many programs from obtaining a G.E.D., to Early Childhood Family Education, day care and more. They also will serve to promote referrals to the Human Resource Specialist for their clients. COORDINATION AND COLLABORATION: The Fridley Housing committee was formed in December 1992 with the intention of coordinating efforts and services. A common goal was shared by representatives from all departments present in that a majority of time and effort from each department was devoted to the same locations. Conditions at selected locations have been monitored for the past 8 months and common characteristics of their residents have surfaced. In addition several barriers to receiving the needed services also were identified. Barriers such as transportation, child care, and educational backgrounds were common. High mobility was another common denominator as was high demand for police services. The question arose "Who's responsibility is it?" The answer was clear that although we all had an interest in solving the problem, we each could only contribute a ~small part. The concept of a Human Resource Specialist was developed and many agencies were contacted to determine what their role would.be. County Service providers such as Social Services, Public Health Nursing, Alexander House (Battered Women's Shelter) and Fridley School District #14 were very supportive of a coordinated effort, but due to the confidential nature of their information, concern was expressed on how to coordinate the program. Discussion led~to the solution that potential clients would be given the phone number for the Human Resource Specialist at the police department and they would contact the specialist directly. Mediation Services of Anoka County already provide mediation services for neighbor, landlord/tenant, and community dispute resolution and are willing to be utilized wherever needed. Unity Hospital provides educational programs covering parenting classes, healthy living, support groups and more on a regular basis and will provide information to the HumanResource Specialist. Because Fridley is a first tier suburb of Minneapolis, there are many culturally relevant programs already established that could be of assistance to our residents. Research will be done to familiarize residents with these programs. The Park and Recreation Department has agreed to assist in providing staff, training and activities for the mini-safety camps. Existing liaisons with Fire, Police, Ambulance and others have shown great interest in providing programs for campers. Also our local churches and service clubs have many activities and services that need to be sought out and identified. Many organizations are looking for opportunities to volunteer services and by identifying gaps in services provided, the potential exists for a strong show of community support. ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY: The project will be staffed 3/4 time with a Human Resource Specialist who will be under the supervision of the Fridley Special Projects Unit. Special Projects is a division of the Police Department with three full time employees. One position is dedicated to working with neigl%borhood residents in organizing neighborhood crime watch programs. This position also works with the business community in crime prevention efforts. The second position presents crime prevention education programs in Fridley's four elementary schools and does some early intervention with families on behalf of the children. The third position in special projects focuses on Emergency Management issues. Top level management is very supportive of the concept of a Human Resource Specialist as officers spend a great deal of time dealing with the same families and problems. Often a criminal arrest is only a stop gap measure and officers are seeking alternative solutions to the problems. Once the manual of resources is developed, it would be made available to the officers to familiarize them with services available, officers would also have someone to refer citikens to for assistance in early stages of a problem and perhaps circumvent 'the need for crisis type services. EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT: Overall in quantitative measures this project would be deemed successful upon completion of the following: Hire and train one Human Resource Specialist Develop and provide a Resource manual for use by officers and others outlining service providers including, food, shelter, clothing, medical care, education, job training,~ mental health programs, support groups and more. Select and monitor 6 multi-housing locations for client turnover, compliance with housing codes, police response, fire response, and use of services identified by Human Resource specialist. Select and train 12 youth as peer leaders for the 6 selected locations. Provide 6 hours a week, for four weeks at 6 locations activities, education and self esteem building programs for a total of 120 youth. By providing the above services, we will have accomplished two major goals. The first being that all service providers will be aware of each other, the services provided, the gaps, the overlaps and the potential for filling the gaps by community response. With a holistic approach to building a profamily system rather than focusing on single issues, the potential for reducing the risks for youth is greatly increased. Second we will have provided 120 at risk youth with life skills to enable them to become more self sufficient. This project has the potential to~ operate in the future with minimal funding as throughout this process we will seek community support wherever possible. 0 0 OFFICE OF DRUG POLICY & VIOLENCE PREVENTION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ANNUAL PROPOSED BUDGET CY941FFY93 BJAICommunity Policing FORM Program: FRIDLEY: A Community That ca~seri°d of Request:oct 1~ 1993 - Sept. Grantee: CITY OF FRIDLEY Preparer Name / Phone: ROSE M. GRIEP 572-3638. ~i:i ?..~i~i~... ~ .! ~ii~ii'''':~':'''~':~ '":'~i:'i~'::~:":~ ~ ~'"~: :i~¢:~':~"¢':~i?~i~ ~':':~i ........................................................... 1 :::~ ....................................................... · Salaries & Fringe 27,120 4,180 31,300 Contracted Services Print/Copy 600 6nn Phone/Postage .. Travel Supplies .': 1,8oo ]. 8oo Equipment Audit 4O0 4OO Other: Other: Other: Other: 30 t994 I certify that the information furnished herein is accurate to the best of my knowledge.and belief. ) //./~__.~ ~/~_.~.... -. Sianature k.xc-.v... ...... ~ ....... Print Name . . I:}I~P,]~C.T01~, OF .PUBLIC .SA~E.TY.. Date Phone .! BUDGET JUSTIFICATION (indicate for GRANT funded project costs only) FORM 4^ 1. Salary and FHnge Title/Name FTE* Amount Fringe Human Resource Specialist .75 21~600 Two Playground Staff Traini~, 8weeks ~nours a week 2,880 , 4 weeks Twelve Peer leaders 6 hours a week plus Jo ours trainin~ 2. Contracted Services (Specify) o Print/Copy 4. Phone/Postage 5. in-State Travel 6. Supplies 7. Equipment 8. Audit 9. Other Expenses (specify) BJA.4A 4/93 BUDGET JUSTIFICATION (indicate for MATCH funded project costs only) FORM 4B Salary and Fringe Title/Name FTE* Amount Fringe Human Resource ~oeci~list ~./,56 nn 2 Playground Lead'rs 460.00 264.00 2. Contracted Services (Specify) Prim/Copy Printing of final ,resource m~Dual for 4. Phone/Postage 5. In-State Travel 6. Supplies Materials~ snacks and $~pplles total of 120 children) 1800.00 7. Equipment 8. Aud~ 9. Other Expenses (specify) BJA.4B 4/93 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Heighfls, MN 55421-3878 (612) 782-2800 September 20, 1993 Mayor Donald J. Murzyn, Jr. Councilmembers Sean T. Clerkin Bruce G. Nawrocki Gary L. Peterson Robert W. Rue~timann City Manager PaTrick Hentges Assam Brown, Project Administrator Regional Transit Board : Mears Park Centre Building 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN $5101 Dear Ms. Brown: Per your request, we are enclosing revised pages of the City of Columbia Heights' application for continued funding of the SHARED RIDE Para-Transit Program currently serving the cities of Columbia Heights, Fridley, and Hilltop. While there has been some discussion concerning the possibility of Fridley dropping its participation in our cooperative program, which has provided very successful transit service to the citizens of our respective communities, we are unaware of any official action taken by the City of Fridley to terminate its participation in providing this service. Since our cooperative program has been shown to provide more cost effective service for the limited amount of available funding, as attested to by the significantly increased patronage, we would sincerely hope that the cooperative service will continue, and that our original application for continued funding, dated June 30, 1993, will be approved by the Regional Transit Board. Should there be further questions or comments, we hope you will not hesitate to contact us. LLM:bs 93/ss Enclosures Assistant to the City M~/g~er d Copy of Letter: Mayor & Councilmembers of Columbia Heights Jim Kordiak, County Commissioner Margo LaBau, Management Operations Bill Hunt, Fridley Asst. City Manager lira Froehle, Public Information Spec. Ruth Nelson, Hilltop City Clerk Pat Hentges, City Manager Paul McCarron, County Commissioner Elwln Tinklenberg, Public Services Bill Burns, Fridley City~ Manager Steve Billings, Fridley Councilmember 'SERVICE IS OUR BUSINESS" EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 1994 APPLICATION FOR CONTINUIgD FUNDING OF THE ~I-IA~ RIDE PROGRAM .Service Plan Other Management Phn Elements Budget Narrative Line Item Budget Forms September 16, 1993 Revision (Subject to City of Fridley Dropping Out of Shnred Ride Program & Becoming Part of the Anoka County Traveler Program) Submitted by:. City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Avenue N.E. Coln_mbia Heights, MN 55421 (612) 782 = 2812 REVISION: SUBJECT TO CITY OF FRIDLEY DROPPING OUT OF SHARED RIDE PROGRAM & BECOMING PART OF ANOKA COUNTY TRAVELER PROGRAM SEPTEMBER 16, 1993 3. SERVICE PLAN Qomm¥!nities Served: Would directly serve Columbia Heights and Hilltop, as well as Holiday Plus, Fridley Plaza Clinic, Skywood Mall, Menards, Target, Apache Shopping Center, Apache New Market, Apache Medical Clinic, and Bakers' Square. Indirectly serves all of Anoka County as the transfer coordination point at Holiday Plus allows residents of northern Anoka County communities to transfer to Shared Ride and travel to Columbia Heights and Hilltop. Squ~ri~ Mil~_~e of Service Area: 3.49+ Total Population of Service Area: 19,659 (1990 census) ~.ocation and Description of Office and Gara_~e Facilities: Program Administration: City of Columbia Heights, 590 40th Avenue NE, Columbia Heights, Minnesota, 55421 Contractor: Suburban Taxi, 3315 Second Street North, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55412 Transfer Coordination Point: Holiday Plus, Fridley, Minnesota s) Typ~ of Service to be Operated The contractor provides para-transit service on a demand-response basis (dial-a-ride). Passengers must provide the contractor with at least two hours' notice before actual time of departure. The service is available to all residents of Columbia Heights and Hilltop. The primary users (70-80%) are the elderly. 'There are no restrictions on the trip purposes. The primary trip purposes appear to be medical appointments and shopping. I) Fare .Structure: The current fare structure is: $ .50 for elderly persons of the age 65 and older $ .50 for handicapped persons who are able to get in and out of the cab by themselves $ .50 for children under the age of 12 $1.00 for all other adults These represent the co'st per ride when prepaid tickets (purchased in books good for ten rides) are used. Cash fares (rides without ticke~) would be $1.50. Shared Ride and the Anoka County Traveler would continue to have a reciprocal fare arrangement which would allow transfers at Holiday Plus with no additional charges. There are no other sources of revenue generated by the system. It is anticipated that the City of Columbia Heights will receive monies from Anoka County to help offset the local share costs of Shared Rido (approximately $2,292 - $7,230). I~EVISION: SUBJECT TO CITY OF FRIDLEY DROPPING OUT OF SHARED RIDE PROGRAM & BECOMING PART OF ANOKA COUNTY TRAVELER PROGRAM SEPTEMBER 16, 1993 8. OTHER MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMEN~ F) Provider Subcontracts The contract with the provider for 1994 will continue to be a full service package to include scheduling, dispatching, vehicle service, and all associated items (ie., fuel, insurance, vehicle repairs, etc.) The contract will call for billings to the City to be in the form of a flat rate charge for each passenger carried to be justified by complete records of the service provided. The current provider is Suburban Taxi. The contract runs from February - December 31, 1993. Bids are solicited for a Shared Ride service provider annually. H) Performance Standards Service Type: Subsidy per Passenger: Community-Based Para-Transit .......................... $$.00 1993: Projected Expenses ........................ $164,731 Less Projected Revenue ...................... $ 20.000 ............................... $144,731 Divided by projected passengers ............... 39,950 Subsidy per passenger ....................... $ 3.62 1994: Projected Expenses ......................... $ 98,342 Less Projected Revenue ...................... $14.000 ................................ $ 84,342 Divided by projected passengers ............... 30,133 Subsidy per passenger ....................... $ 2.80 As is shown above, subsidy per passenger for projected 1993 and proposed 1994 is far below the performance standard of $5.00. REVISION: SUBJECT TO CITY OF FRIDLEY DROPPING OUT OF SHARED RIDE PROGRAM & BECOMING PART OF ANOKA COUNTY TRAVELER PROGRAM SEPTEMBER 16, 1993 BUDGET NARR~'rlV~- 1994 OPERATING EXPENSES 1010 1~40 Administrative/Management/Supervisory Salaries Represents time spent in project by: Assistant to City Manager - Administration 10 hours/month average ........................................ $2,728 General Office Support Wages Secretary to the City Manager - Correspondence and General Information ......................................... $ 34"/ 2 hours/month average Clerk-Typist II - Reports and General Information ......................................... $ .581 4 hours/month average Council Secretary - Ticket Sales and Newsletter ......................................... $ 735 4 hours/month average Switchboard Operator/Receptionist - Ticket Sales & General Information; 10 hours/month average ......................... $1,324 Please note this reflects time ~pent in project by City of Columbia Heights' employees. 1060 Fringe Benefits - Administrative This amount was derived by taking '39% of the cost of Administrative, Management, and Supervisory salaries for 1994. The City of Columbia Heights calculates and budgets for fringe benefits as 39% of wages. 1063 Fringe Benefits - Other This amount was derived by taking 39% of the cost of General Office Support wages for 1994. The City of Columbia Heights calculates and budgets for fringe benefits as 39% of wages. 1120 Tariffs and Traffic Expenses 1130 1140 Reflects cost of printing tickets. This represents projected costs incurred in advertising, such as articles and ads placed in the Cit3r Newsletters, and promotional items. This represents costs associated with the City Attorney's review of the para-transit contract. REVISION: SUBJECT TO CITY OF FRIDLEY DROPPING OUT OF SHARED RIDE PROGRAM & BECOMING PART OF ANOKA COUNTY TRAVELER PROGRAM SEPTEMBER 16, 1993 1160 1190 1310 Office Supplies This represents Kodak duplicating costs attributable to Shared Ride. Kodak costs are charged to each fund at the rate of 3 cents per copy. It is estimated that 1,666 copies will be run off attributable to Shared Ride. Other Direct Administrative Charges This amount represents attendance at conferences, membership fees for transit associations, and parking for attendance at meetings and conferences related to transit and/or sponsored by the Regional Transit Board. Also, includes cost to publish notice of bid for para-transit services. Purchase of Service Proposed 1994 reflects a decrease over estimated 1993. The decrease is based on projected ridership if Fridley no longer is a part of the Shared Ride service area, but rather, part of the Anoka County Traveler. REVENUES AND FUNDING SOURCES 2001 Cash Fares/Passenger Donations Proposed 1994 reflects a decrease based on Fridley not being a part of the Shared Ride service area. 2002 Coupons, Punch Card and Tokens Proposed 1994 reflects a decrease based on Fridley not being a part of the Shared Ride service area. 2104 Other Financial Assistance Proposed 1994 reflects, monies needed from local share. 2105 RTB Subsidy Proposed 1994 based on 60~ of total operating expenses. LLM:bs :P~VISION: SUBJECT TO CITY ~F FRIDLEY DROPPING OUT OF SHARED RID£ PROGRAH S BECOHING PART LINE ITEM BUDGET FORMS OPERATING EXPENSES Personnel Services 1010 1020 1~0 1040 1~0 1060 1~1 1~2 1~3 1000 Administrative, Management ami $t~mtvismy Salaries Opewatots' Wages lViaintenance/~pair Wages General Office Supp~ Wages Other Wages (Imiirect L~b~') Fringe Benefits - Admiuiswafivc Fringe Benefits - Operator Fringe Benefits - Maintenance F~inge Bcncfits- Other Total Personnel Services 4 CY. 2,728 2,9~7 1,064 1,165 7~944 SEPTEHBER Administrative Charges 1110 1120 1130 1140 1141 1142 1150 1160 1170 1180 1190 1100 Management Nec Taziffs and Traffic Expenses Advertising, Marketing and Promotions Legal Fees Auditing Fees Consultant Fees Security Costs Office SuppUes Leases and Rentals (Admin.) Utilities Other Direct Admin. Charges Total Administrative Charges 1,502 1,630 125 5O 4OO 3.707 Vehicle Char~_ es 1210 Fuel and Lubricants 1220 Maintenance and Repair Matctials (,Vehicles) ' 1230 Contract Service Mnintenance REVISION: SUBJECT TO CITY OF FRIDLEY DROPPING OUT OF SHARED RIDE PROGRAM & BECOMING PART OF ANOVA COUNTY TRAVELER PROGRAM 1240 Tir~s 1250 Other Vehicle Charges 1200 TOtal Vehicle Charges Ooerafions Char~es 1310 1320 1330 1340 1350 1360 1300 86,691 86,691 SEPTEMBER 16, 1993 Insurance Charges 1410 Public Liability and Property Damage on YehJcles 1420 Public Liab~ty and Property Damage Other than YehJcles 1400 Total Insurance Charges 98,342 1510 1520 1530 1540 1~00 Vehicle Registration and Permit Fees Federal Fuel and Lubricant Tax State Fuel and Lubricant Tax Other Taxes and Fees Total Taxes and Fees TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES ~.EVISION: SUBJECT TO CITY 'OF FRIDLEY DROPPING O0T OF SHARED RIDE PROGRAM & BECOMING PART OF ANOKA COONTY TRAYELER PROGRAM Farebox Revenues 2001 CashFares/Domuions 2002 Coupons, Passes ~ Tokens 2010 Total Farebox Revenues SEPTEMBER 16, 1993 CY. 199 4 3,500 10,500 14,000 System Revenue 2011 Special Route Guarantees 2o12 Conu Revenues 2013 Advertising and Concessions 2014 Vehicle/Facility leasing Rcwnucs 2015 Inmmst R,~enue 2016 Other Revenues 2020 Total System Revenues ~5~337 59,005 98,3~2 Fundin~ Sources 2101 FTA Section 3, 6, or 18 Funds 2102 Title HI CB) Funds 2103 Other Federal Sources 2104 Other Financial Assistance (Sl~'ify) yund±ng £rora Anoka Coun/y Funding £rom City of Co[umb±a Hts. Fundlng ~rom (J[ty o~ Hi£~to~ 2105 RTl3 Subsidy 60:~ 2100 Total Funding .Sources ~EVISION: SUBJECT TO CITY OF FRIDLEY DROPPING OUT OF SHARED RIDE PROGRAM & BECOMINR PART OF ANOKA COUNTY TRAVELER PROGRAM OPERATING STATLTrICS SEPTEMBER C.Y, 1~) 4 16, 1993 3000 Total Number of Passenger Boardings 30.t133 ]3y Fare Category* 3001 Full Fare 3002 Senior 3003 Student ~04 Disabled 3005 Children 4,408 18t484 4,423 2,818 By Payment Method* 3006 Transfers 3007 Convenience Fares 3008 Cash 3009 Free Rides * Total riders by Fare Categcry must equal ~ riders by Payment Method 1.552 24,854 ~_727 HOURS 3100 Total Vehicle Hours* 3,312 3101 Total Revenue Service Hours* 3102 Reg.,Iht (Fixed) Route 3103 Demand Responsive 3104 Route Deviation 3105 Subscription 3106 Chn~t~r 3107 Contract 3108 Shared Ride Taxi 3109 Van Pool 3110 Volunteer Drivers REVISION: SUBJECT TO CITY OF FRIDLEY DROPPING OUT SEPTEMBER 16, 1993 OF SHARED R'iDE PROGRAM $ BECOMING PART OF ANOKA COUNTY TRAVELER PROGRAH Total VeMcle Miles* C.¥. 199 4 63,592 3201 Total Revenue Service Miles* 63,592 3202 Regular (Fixed) Route 3203 Demand Responsive 3204 Route Deviation 3205 Subscription 320~ Charter 3207 Contract 3208 Shared Ride Taxi 3209 Van Pool 3210 Volunteer Drivers '* Please explain and diff~ between Total Horns and Total Miles versus Revenue Hours and Revenue Miles (driver unining, maintenance deadhead, etc..) TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: CITY OF COLUMBIA I-I~JGHTS MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PATRICK HENTGES, C1TY MANAGER~-[~[, HOUSING MAINTENANCE CODE CHANGES OCTOBER 4, 1993 Attached please find proposed amendments to the Housing Maintenance Code. As part of City staff efforts to improve the administration program, we previously submitted our in-house procedures and documentation used to enforce the actual housing code. Additionally, we are in the process of developing a landlord handbook (see attached outline) that would be distributed to each landlord upon renewal of their license. The intent of the handbook is to not only explain the City's Housing Maintenance Program, but also provide information on the desired or recommended rental management practices. Other ordinance amendments still under review by City staff include the following. Conduct on License Premisos 1. Amend the "conduct on licensed premises" part of the ordinance to include the ability to suspend a rental license after notification and due process on the grounds that there is reasonable suspicion of drug activity. Also, we are researching our ability to suspend a license for repeated domestic disturbance calls whereby a tenant was advised and referred to services, restraining orders, etc. that could assist in remending his/her problem. Fee 2. for Service Surcharge Amend the ordinance to include an additional rental fee surcharge for dwelling units that exceed the level of calls for service customarily averaged from other rental properties. The major concern with implementing the fee for service surcharge is the amount of documentation or record- keeping that the City staff would have to maintain to justify levying the surcharge increase. Additionally, an exception would have to be put in place for landlords who are in the process of evicting a tenant who is the cause of the excessive calls. Rental Licensing Ca~ 3. Provide a maximum cap on the number of rental unit licenses that the City would issue, although the City could justify a reasonable relationship between rental units and owner-occupied mix. We are concerned about the constitutionality of prohibiting an owner from leasing property and the basis or foundation for the maximum allowable licenses issued. Drug Loitering Ordinanc.e 4. The Police Chief and the City Attorney are currently researching constitutionality of an ordinance that provides the Police Department with probable cause to investigate and cite a person loitering for purpose of engaging in drug related activity. Inspection/License R0newal Dates 5. City staff is in the process of evaluating changing the license renewal dates from an expiration of December 31 to different months of the calendar year. The inspection and relicensing of the units would then occur simultaneously. Additionally, this would enable the housing inspectors to do both interior and exterior inspections and undertake the inspection in unison with the fire inspections or Section 8 certifications. Mayor & Council Page 2 October 4, 1993 Rent/Damage Deposit Disputes 6. In researching the City's role in regulating or arbitrating rental/damage deposit disputes, it is felt that we could be most helpful by providing documentation to the parties concerning the condition of the apartment at the time that it was inspected for license renewal. It appears the City would have foundation to require a dwelling'unit to be inspected at the time of a change in occupancy. The availability of the inspection report would serve to document the condition of the condition of the property before and after the occupant change in the event of a deposit dispute. Moreover, many landlords have urged the City to consider citing tenants for excessive damage done to apartments, for dismantled smoke alarms or excessive clutter or nuisances and to originate them to the tenant or occupant. Our current ordinance gives some authority to cite the occupant, but this would have to be further clarified in many cases. PH:bjs COLUMBIA I4~JGHTS LANDLORD RENTAL PROPERTY HANDBOOK OUTLINE OF INFORMATION 1. Tenant screening/occupancy standards - Donna E. Hanbery 2. Protecting yourself - Donna E. Hanbery 3. Guidelines for rental property owners and managers - Minneapolis Safe Unit 4. Tips for screening tenants 5. Tips for showing rental property 6. Activities that may show drug house 7. Noisy neighbors? Loud parties? - Ordinance sheet 8. Conduct on licensed premise ordinance 9. Trespassing ordinance 10. Record checks policy 11. Graffiti removal sheet 12. Security for residents of apartment buildings 13. Other resources available sheet 14. Columbia Heights Rental Licensing Program 15. Housing Maintenance Code Standards 16. Common Inspection Problems 17. Housing Inspection/Enforcement Process lO0493/bjs COLUMBIA HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Greggory Woods, City Attorney ~ David P. Mawhorte?, Chief of Police Review and Opinion on Applicability of Sample Ordinance Regarding Loitering for Drug Activity September 29, 1993 Attached is a copy of the City of Monrovia, California's ordinance pertaining to loitering for drug activities. Please review this ordinance and give me your opinion on its applicability for use in Columbia Heights. I believe this ordinance has been tested and has been upheld in California appeals courts. The ordinance, or some modification of the ordinance, may prove to be of benefit to our drug enforcement efforts in the Heights. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. DPM:mld 93-366 Attachment O~:~Z~C]g NO. 90-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONROVIA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 9.60 TO THE MONROVIA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO LOITERING FOR PURPOSE OF DRUG RELATED ACTIVITIES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF T}LE CITY OF MONROVIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOW.~;: SECTION 1: Chapter 9.60 is hereby added to the Monrovia Municipal Code to read as follows: CHAPTER 9.60 LOITERING FOR DRUG ~CTIVITIE~ 9.60.010 Acts Prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to loiter in, on or near any thoroughfare or place open to the public or near any public or private place in a manner and under circumstances manifesting the purpose of engaging in drug-related activity defined as offenses in Chapters 6 and 6.5 of Division l0 of the California Health and Safety Code. 9.60.0~0 Circumstances. Among circumstances that may be considered in determining whether such purpose is manifested,are that the person: Be Is a known drug user, possessor, or seller. For purpose of this chapter, a "knownunlawful drug user, possessor, or seller" is a person who has, within theknowledge oft he arresting officer, been convicted in any court within this state of any violation involving ~he use, possession or sale of any of the substances' referred to in Chapters 6 and 6.5 of Division ~0 of the California Health and Safety Code, or such person has been convicted of any. violation of any of the provisions of said sections or substantially similar laws of any .... political subdivision of this state or of any other state; or a person who displays physical characteristics of drug intoxication or ~sage, such as "needle tracks"; or a person who ." possesses d~ug paraphernalia pursuant to Chapter 9.04 of this Code;. Is currently subject to an o~der prohibitin~ his or her presence in a hig~ drug activity..,'?.' geographic area; ~-,...'.,.. Behaves in such a manner as to raise a reasonable suspicion that he or she is about ,- D® to engage in or is then engaged in an unlawful drug-related activity, including by way of example only, acting as a "lookout". Is physically identified by the officer as a member of a "gang", or association which has as its purpose illegal drug activity; Transfers small objects or packages currency in a furtive fashion; for Takes flight upon the appearance of a police officer; Tries to conceal himself or herself or any object which reasonably could be involved in an unlawful drug-related activity; H. Is in an area that is known for unlawful drug use and trafficking; I. Is on or in premises that have been ~eported to law enforcement as a place suspected of unlawful drug activity; J. Is in or within six feet of any vehicles registered to a known unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller, or a person for whom there is an outstanding warrant for a crime involving drug-related activity. 9.60.030 Enforcement. Enforcement of this Chapter shall be pursuant to the policy statement dated February 23, 1990, issued by the Chief of Police, as approved by the City Council and Council Resolution No. 90-15 adopted on March 20, 1990. A copy of said Resolution shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 2: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance, and cause the same to be published in the manner'prescribed by law. This ordinance shall be deemed automatically repealed six months from its effective date. ~R~ININ~ Shortly after the adoption of the ordinance, Monrovia's Special Enforcement Team was selected to implement its provisions. These officers, are normally assigned to Narcotics and Gang Suppression. After the trial period, Bicycle Patrol Officers and Narcotics Detectives were also trained and authorized to enforce the ordinance. All officers received four hours of training in the philosophy and goals of the ordinance. The training included; 1) elements of the ordinance, 2) legal background, 3) enforcement guidelines, 4) use and application, 5) reporting elements, 6) department policy and 7) community sensitivity. Once trained, the officers set out to enforce the ordinance in one of Monrovia's high drug sales area. .CITY OF MONROVII~, DRUG LOTTERING ORDTNiqNCE ~R~INTNG OUTLTNE FOUR HOURS OF INSTRUCTTON INTRODUCTION~ By ordinance the City Council of the City of Monrovia has added chapter 9.60 to the Monrovia Municipal Code. The chapter' relates to Loitering for purpose of drug related activities making it a misdemeanor to loiter under certain circumstances. Only Officers who receive a four hour block of instruction relating to chapter 9.60 will be allowed to enforce its provisions. The four hour block of instruction will cover the following: I. Elements of Monrovia Municipal Code sections 9.60.010/9.60.020 A. Loitering. 1. To remain in an area without apparent purpose for a sustained period of time. A period of surveillance is required to establish that the subject is loitering. Citizen information may establish how long the loitering at the location. also be used to subject has been Subjectts conduct/circumstances establish probable cause that the subject intends to engage in illegal drug activity based on your training, experience, and knowledge. Sub~ect Ks ~ known drug user, possessor, or seller. This~ is established through officerWs observations, personal knowledge, and by documents, such as, RAP sheets or court dockets. Sub, eot is currently prohibited by court or~e~ ~rom being ~n high ~_rug activity area. Officer may have personal knowledge of the court order, but must obtain actual c~urt documentation for filing of the case. ~uspicious ~ehavior. Reasonable for the officer to believe that the subject is about to engage in unlawful drug activity, to include acting as a lookout. Gang. members who associate for purpose of ~l!egal drug activity. Personal knowledge by the officer that part of the gangWs activity is to engage in illegal drug activity, and the subject in qa~estion is a known gang member. Dealing. Transfer of small object or packages for currency in a furtive fashion. II. 0 0 10. Flt=ht from Dolice. Subject takes flight upon the appearance of a police officer. Concealment.. subject attempts to conceal himself or any object that could reasonable be involved in unlawful drug activity. Location. subject is in an area that is known for unlawful drug use and trafficking. Premises. Subject is on or in premises that have been reported to law enforcement as a place suspected of unlawful drug activity. Vehicles. subject is in or within six feet of any vehicle registered to a known unlawful drug user, possessor, or seller, or a person for which there is an outstanding warrant for a crime involving drug-related activity. Legal Background. A. Laws which prohibit loitering for a ~pe.cific illegal purpose generally upheld as constitutional. Loitering for purposes of prostitution, and loitering in the area of toilets for lewd purposes are ,,mirror-images" of drug loitering law. III. Enforcement Guidelines. A. Use ordinance conservatively. When the violations occur, officers should initiate an investigation to determine the extent of the violation. When in doubt, do not arrest. Drug loitering law in not to be used indiscriminately to limit the access of persons to public or private areas. Ce Ideally more than one of the listed circumstances should be present for an arrest. IV. Use and Application A. Not intended to be a "catch a11" ordinance. Don't contact a subject with one intent and then fall back on Drug Loitering Ordinance if the criteria does not exist. Only Officers who receive training on the proper · use of the ordinance may enforce this ordinance. Said enforcement shall be completed in a courteous and professional manner. Do not use this ordinance as. a lessor 'included offense to a felony drug charge, however, it may be cited as probable cause if warranted. Do not use to bol.~ter a questionable arrest. Cases involving the use of this ordinance must be able to weather the test of court challenge. Reporting. A. Articulate the elements and conditions that surround the circumstances of the offense and arrest. Incorporate in the arrest report the officer's expertise, for example; schools attended, experience, training, n,,~er of previous drug arrests and search warrants. VI. Department Policy A. Explanation of purpose. B. Procedure for implementation of the ordinance. All arrests made under the provisions ofthe Ordinance are approved by a supervisor who is also trained on the ordinance. ! FROM KALINA~WILLS,WO0~S P.02 licenses available? Police power confers on upon states and lo¢al governments broa~ regulatory powers over public health, welfare morals. Stat~ v. Crabtr.ee, 218 Minn. 36, 15 N.W.2d 98 (1944). Muni~ipalities have been generally accorded wide latitude in the exercise of police powers, t~ being recognized that the more populated areas frequently present conditions requiring the application of more stringent and rigid rules regulating public health and safety. AleMander Co. v. C~ty o£ 0watonna, 222 Minn. 312,! 24 N.Wo2d 244 (1946). ~ntcipal regulations are upheld as legitimate exercise of police power provided that they are rationally related to public health, safety and welfare and operate in ~ manner that ts not arbitrary, oppressive or fraudulent. Wriaht v. woodr~d~e Lake Sewe~ Dist. ~ 588 A.2d 176', 218 Conn. 144 ,~eneraliy, a municipaltty~ under its authorized police power may ~egulate, by license, any business the unrestrained pursuit of whtc~ might affect inJurously the public health, morals, safety or come,rt. See, C!tv o~ SC. Paul v. Dalst~, 245 Minn. 325, 71 N.W.2~ TO: t PAT HENTGES, CITY MANAGER F~O~ LEE ~ BOCWINSKI, CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE t DAT~i: OCTOBER 4, 1993 i LIMITING 'I~E N%ll~ER OF ~EI~AL LICI~ISES 1 lean the City of Col~ia Heights limit th~ number of rental 8S5 t1955); Power ~. Nordstrom, 150 Minn. 228, 184 967 I The question in this case, is whether or n~ ~he City may limi~ the number of licenses it allows for rental units. In researching the topic I was unable to find any case law (state or federal) that is directly on point. However, in 10oking at other~ ragu on ti that valu ~atory case law around T-he U.S. a pattern of broad discretiOn ~e pact of the municipality appears. The Ohio courts have held protection of real estate from impairment and~destruction of e, and maintenance of aesthetics of the co~unity are legitimate governmental interests that may be protected by exercise of municipality's police power, where such bear a substantial relationship to the general welfare reasonable regulations of the public. ~orthe~n~.Ohto.__Si~n_Co_n~ra~ors_Ass'n..v. Ci~v of Laka~ood, 513 N.E.2d 324, 32 Ohio St,3d 316 (1987). Other state i I COUr~ have made similar holdings. In order to prove that an ordi~ance is unreasonable, the defendant must 'show that the ordinance has no substantial relationship to public health, safety, mora~s, or general welfare. State v. Hyland, 431 N.W.2d 868 (Minn. App.1 1988). The "substantial relationship" test is a relatively I easyltest for municipalities to overcome. Clearly, in this case, the ~eductio~ of rental licensee is ~ubstantially related to public safe~y (decreased crime) and general welfare (aesthetics and increased property values). !The City clearly has the authority to limit the number of rent41 licenses available. The challenge will b~ in finding a for granting licenses that will be fair and ~ot arbitrary or capricious. October 1993 City of Columbia Heights SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY I 2 Pay Day 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Yard Signs Can Go 1:00pm Friends of 9:30am Time 7:00pm Police (~ LQ Up the Library Mngm in Field Chief's Forum 7:00pm Traffi0 Seminar Commission 7:00pm P & Z 8:00pm Work Commission Session 7:00pm Library Board Dinner 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Columbus Day ('Not Voter Registration 7:00pm Human 9:00am Office-Time · NM Official Holiday) Deadline Services Management Pay Day 7:00pm City 7:00pm Sheffield Commission Seminar Council Meeting Neighborhood 7:00pm Violence Meeting Prevention Cncl 7:30pm I-IRA Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 8:00pm Budget 9:00am Perf Eval 7:00pm 6:30pm Charter O FQ Work Session- Seminar Beautification 7:00pm Sister City Capital Outlay 9:30am Sister City Committee 7:00pm Violence Corem Prevention Cncl 7:30pm Cable 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Ladies Auxiliary 7:00pm City 9:30am Non-Verbal Chamber Luncheon 7:00pm Sister City Pay Day O FM Craft Show Council Meeting Communication Last Day to Mail Meeting Absentee Voting 1-3 Seminar Absentee Appllc. PM 6:30pm Park and Recreation Comml,qsion 31 Daylight Savings-set September ~ November back 1 hour S M T W T F S Halloween I 2 3 4 i I 2 3 4 5 6 1 :OOpm Youth Halloween Party 5 6 7 8 9 10 11i 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 17 18! 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 19 20 21 22 23 24 25I 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 27 28 29 30 i 28 29 30 Mayor and Council 10/411993 November 1993 City of Columbia Heights SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY I 2 3 4 15 6 l:00pm Friends of Election Day 5:30pm Canvassing Civil Defense the Library General Municipal Election Results Apprec. Dinner 7:00pm Traffic Election Meeting 7:00pm Police Commission 7:00pm P & Z Chief's Forum 8:00pm Budget Commission 7:00pm Sister City Work Session- 7:00pm Library Meeting Water/Sewer/ Board Refuse/Liquor/ Gar. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 (~ LQ 7:00pm City 7:30pm HRA Board 7:00pm Human Veterans Day Pay Day · NM Council Meeting Services Commission 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 8:00pm Budget 7:00pm 7:00pm Sister City ~ FQ Work Session- Beautification Meeting Capital/Infra/ Committee 7:30pm Cable Imprv Corem 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 7:00pm City Chamber Luncheon Thanksgiving Pay Day Council Meeting 6:30pm Park and Holiday Recreation Day After Commission Thanksgiving Holiday 28 29 30 © FM Yard Waste Pickup 7:00pm Special Ends Assessment Levy 7:00pm Budget Hearing Work Session- Finalization Mayor and Council October S M T W T F S I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 I 31 December s M T W T F S I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 10/4/1993 December 1993 City of Columbia Heights DAY M ON DAY T U ES DAY W E D N ES DAY TH U RS DAY FRI DAY SATU R DAY I 2 3 4 7:00pm Budget 7:00pm Police Hearing Chief's Forum 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Fire Dept Cmas (} LQ 7:00pm P & Z 7:00pm Human Hanukah Pay Day Employee Holiday Party 1:00pm Friends of Commission Services 7:00pm Sister City Party the Library 7:00pm Library Commission Meeting 7:00pm Traffic Board 7:00pm Continued Commission Budget Hearing 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 · NM 7:30pm I-IRA Board 7:00pm 7:30pm Cable 7:00pm City Beautification Corem Council Meeting Committee 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~) FQ Winter begins Chamber Luncheon Clzrislmas Eve Christmas Holiday Christmas 9:30am Sister City Holiday Pay Day Committee 26 27 28 29 30 !31 7:00pm City O FM Special Assessments New Year's Day Council Meeting Due w/o Interest Holiday November 1993 S M T W T F S I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2~ 29 ;~0 January 1994 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Mayor and Council 10/4/1993 RESOLUTION 81-67 ESTABLISHING PLANNING AND ZONING FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the fees for planning and zoning appllcatlons have not been adjusted for the past seven years during which time the costs for process- lng such appllcations has increased, and WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977 (as amended) pro- vides for the City Council to adjust the plannlng and zoning applicatlon fees perlodlcally, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights here- by adopt the following planning and zoning fee schedule to be effective January 1, 1982. Type of Application Application for Rezoning Variance/Appeal Conditional Use Permit Fee S250.00 25.00 50.00 P. U. D. Privacy Fence $250. O0 15.00 Passed this 23rdday of November, 1981. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: Hentges Logacz Logacz,'Norberg, Hentges--aye Nawrocki--nay Bruce G. Nawrocki, Mayor ~.~-Anne~Student, Coun~i-1 Secretary CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FEES CHARGED AND THE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE A. DEPARTMENT Planning and Zoninq/Buildinq Inspections B. TASK/ITEM/FUNCTION CHARGED FOR: Rezoning Proposed Fee: $300 1~.92 FEE: $250.O0 WHAT STAFF WORK IS PERFORMED FOR TftE CiTIZENS/COMPANY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PR~¥1DE T~E,S~¥1CE?. ~repara[ion.ano mailing OT p~blic hearing notices; Review of information by Zoning Administrat0rjBuilding Inspector, City Planner, City Engineer. Preparation of agendas for P&Z Commission and City Council. Hust be published in newspaper. Involves City Attorney. WHAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE 'FRUE AND FULL C~ST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC.? SDepends on difficulty of case, individual problems Eo HOW MUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICEUSE OR SERVICE: CITY FEE Blaine $350 Brooklyn Center 700 Brooklyn Park 750 Coon Rapids 285 Frid)ey 300 New Brighton 590 F. WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SET FEE? City Council FORM COMPLETED BY: DATE: 6/30/93 Kathryn Pepln/Evelyn Ny~aard CITY OF COLUHBIA HEIGHTS FEES CHARGED AND THE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE A. DEPARTMENT Plannlnq and Zoning Commission/Buildin9 Inspections B. TASK/ITEM/FUNCTION CHARGED FOR: Conditional Use Permit P[oposed Fee - $100(Re$.); $250 (others) .. 1992 FEE: $ 50.00 WHAT STAFF WORK IS PERFORMED FOR THE CITIZENS/COMPANY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE? Review of proposed development plan showing buildings, use, parking access loading provisions, utilities, lighting, landscape & screening plan, signs. Staff preparation of notices and mailing of same for public hearing. Agenda preparation. D. WHAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE TRUE AND FULL CnST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC.? $ Varies depending on number of notices to be mailed, degree of difficulty bt case, and amount ot contact ~"i~ applicant. E. HOW MUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICENSE OR SERVICE: CITY FEE Anoka S125.00 Blaine 250.00 Brooklyn Park 650.00 Coon Rapids 302.00 Fridley 100 Res; 200 others New Brighton 235.~0 F. WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SET FEE? City Council G. FORM COMPLETED BY: DATE: 6/30/93 Kathryn Pepin, Sec. to P&Z CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FEES CHARGED AND THE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT ,, Plan,n, tn9 and Zoninq~uildinq Inspections TASK/ITEM/FUNCTION CHARGED FOR: Variaq,ce/Appeal o~ Administrative Denial Proposed: $75(res); $150 (others) 1992 FEE: $25.00 WHAT STAFF WORK IS PERFORMED FOR THE CITIZENS/COMPANY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE THE.SERViCE? Staff preparation and mai]ind of public hearing notice: Preparation of information provided for agenda to P&Z Comm. and City Council;review site plan provided for proper information to present case. D. WHAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE TRUE AND FULL C~ST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC.? S Varies depending on number of notices to be mailed and level of difficulty bY case and amount ot contact with ~pplicant. E. HOW MUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICENSE OR SERVICE: CITY FEE Anoka $100 Blaine ~ lO0(res) 250 others Brooklyn Ctr. & Brooklyn Park 100 Coon Rapids 132 Fridiey 60 res; 100 others New Brighton 120 res; 355 others Roseville 200 F. WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SET FEE? City Council G. FORM COMPLETED BY: DATE: 6/30/93 Kathryn Pepin, Secretary to P&Z Commission CITY OF CO~BIA HEIGHTS FEES CHARGED AND THE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE Ae DEPARTMENT ASSESS I NG TASK/ITEM/FUNCTION CHARGED FOR~ SEPARATION OF TWO PLATTED LOTS 1991 FEE: WI{AT STAFF WORK IS PERFOI:tMED FOR THE CITIZEN/COMPANY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE? Many discussions with customer, check surveys, easements, legals, stamp deeds, have City Clerk or Manager sign and notarize deed for separation. De After deed is filed, all records must be changed and new ones created both on hard copy and in computer. Sometimes buildinq inspecter has to check out the site and zoning lot size requirements checked. Separating Specials takes WHAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE TRUE AND FULL COST TO THEe lot of CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENS]~:, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC? time. 25. O0 HOW MUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICENSE OR SERVICE? CITY Crystal Fridley~ Anoka, and Coon Rapids Blaine FEE $75 + $25 for each nnrcel over 1 = S1OO minimum -0- have very few SimDle 2 lot~ ~2~0.o~ ~lus leaal fees I~:IOHAS THE AUTHORITY TO SET FEE? FORM COMPLETEDBY Jane ~leas~n DATE 8-7-91 071891 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FEES CHARGED AND THE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE A. DEPARTMENT ASSESS I NG TASK/ITEM/FUNCTION CHARGED FOR: COMB i NAT I 0NS 1991 FEE: -0- WHAT STAFF WORK IS PERFO]~ED FOR THE CITIZEN/COMPANY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE? Fill out combination form (see copy attached) and obtain owners signature. Mail to County Auditor and wait for new PIN numbers to be issued. Pull records and make changes including combining special assessment records. De WHAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE TRUE AND FULL COST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC? $ $10.00 See explanation on back) HOW MUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICENSE OR SERVICE? CITY FEE $75.00 Crystal combination of 2 lots including] notifyinq Post Office & Emeroency Ser. Coon Rapids -Q- Blaine _ Done at the County level -0- WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SET FEE? FORM COMPLETED BY Jane £%l"~on DATE August 8, 1991 071891 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FEES CHARGED AND THE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT Planning and Zoning/Building Inspections TASK/ITEM/FUNCTION CHARGED FOR: Lotsplit/Minor Subdivision Proposed: $100(res); $200(others) 1992 FEE: 210.00 Ce WHAT STAFF WORK IS PERFORMED FOR THE CITIZENS/COMPANY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE THE:SERVICE? Preparation and mailing of public hearing notices; preparation and typing of agenda for approval by P&Z Commission and City Council: review of proposal by Zoning Administrator/Building Inspector and City Engineer. See attached info from Assessing Dept. De WHAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE TRUE AND FULL CBST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC.? $ Varies on number of notices to be mailed, degree of difficulty of case, number of site visits of Bldg. Insp. or City Engineer. E. HOW MUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICE/4SE OR SERVICE: CITY Blaine FEE 250 plus legal fees;addl.lots $5 Coon Rapid~ 115.O0 Fridley 100.O0 New Brighton 120 & 20/acre Roseville 100 Moundsview See at~acneo for additionai i'nfo. F. WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SET FEE? 150 City Council G. FORM COMPLETED BY: Kathryn Pepin, Sec. to. Planning and Zoning Commission DATE: 6/30/93 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FEES CHARGED AND THE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE De DEPARTMENT ASSESS 1NG TASK/ITEM/FUNCTION CHARGED FOR: LOT SPL~T 1991 FEE: $10.00 WHAT STAFF WORK IS PERFORMED FOR THE CITIZEN/COMPANY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE? Check surveys, easements, zoning requirements and legals. Verbal proceedure instructions, type resolution from survey, obtain all signatures, make notarized copies, file copies, record information on all records, make new files, do split on records and in computer when new PIN comes from County, type new special assessment control cards, correct maps, and have many discussions with customer. Prepare labels for P&Z mailing. WHAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE TRUE AND FULL COST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC? 100.00 & $200.00 for Commercial with long legals that need to be checked by the Engineering Department. HOW MUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICENSE DR SERVICE? CITY FEE SEE ADDITIONAL WORK BY P&Z AND INSPECITiONS. Coon Rapids $110.OO Anoka 75.00 Blaine Simple 2 lots 250.00 plus legal fees additional lots $5.00 each WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SET FEE? FORM COMPLETED BY JANE GLEASON & SHELLEY HANSON DATE 8- 6- 91 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FEES CHARGED AND THE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE A. DEPARTMENT Planning and Zoning/Buildin,q .Inspections B. TASK/ITEM/FUNCTION CHARGED FOR: Site Plan A, pproval Proposlng charge of $100.00 19.92 FEE: No Fee WHAT STAFF WORK IS PERFORMED FOR THE CITIZENS/COMPANY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE THE,SERViCE? Assure plans'meet requirements of parking ord., sign ord., light.i?.9 standards setback requirements, traffic circulation, drainage, screening and landscaping off-street )oading/unloading, preparation of information for presentation to Eo the P&Z Commission. Involves Bldq. Insp,/Z.oninq Adm,.Cltv Enolneer: Flr~ D~pf. Assessing Dept. WHAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE TRUE AND FULL C~ST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC.? $~epends on degree of difficulty .Of case,.number Qf site vi~itn mf 7nnlng/Rldg. Insp. City Engineer, etc., some cases come before Con,mission a number of times before anything is built. HOW MUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICEtlSE OR SERVICE: CITY FEE See attached fees from survey conducted by Assn. Metro. Municipalities F. WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SET FEE? City Council FORM COMPLETED BY: DATE: 6/30/93 Kathryn Pepin, Secretary to P & Z CITIES 0 - 2~500 Spring Park Watertown Woodland COMPREHENSIVE CITIES 2,500.10,000 Arden Hills Bayport Circle Pines Dayton Deephaven Falcon Heights Independence Jordan Lauderdale Mahtomedi Mendota Heights Mound Newport Orono Osseo Rosemount THAN AC,150.00 Shorewood Spring Lake Park St. Anthony St. Francis St. Paul Park Wayzata CITIES 10,000 - 20,000 Champlin Chanhassen Columbia Heights Hastings Hopkins Mounds View MIN. 100,MAX 500 North St. Paul Oakdale Prior Lake Robbinsdale SITE PLAN REVIEW 100.00 N/A ALL Savage Shakopee Stillwater West St. Paul CITIES OVER 20,000 200+CONSUL'T. 100+4/LOT SUBD. NONE 300.00 NA IN SUB FEE N/A N/A 200.00 NONE AC+ 300;LESS 150.00 100+150 25+COST 150.00 ~ople Valley Blaine Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Bumsville Coon Rapids Cottage Grove Crystal Eagan Eden Prairie CITY HAS DETAIL Edina Fridley Golden Valley inver Grove Heights Maple Grove Maplewood Minneapolis Minnetonka New Brighton New Hope Richfield Roseville Shoreview South St. Paul St. Louis Park 125.00 250-~300ESC 250+10/1000SF C;5 RES. NONE 200.00 N/A 100/AC, White Bear Lake Woodbury N/F 350 + ESC 85+STAFF 134 NONE 75.00 250.00 500.00 NONE 200.00 285.00 250.00 N/A CITY HAS DETAIL NONE 225.00 NONE 250.00 N/F 65.00 /SQ FT & TYPE 235.00 150.00 IN PERMIT FEE 100.00 N/F CITY HAS DETAIL N/A INITIAL 300,REV 100 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FEES CHARGED AND THE COST TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT Planning and Zoning Con~nission/Building, Inspections TASK/ITEM/FUNCTION CHARGED FOR: Planned Unit Development 1. Concept Plan Review 2. Prelimlnary Plan Review 5. Final Plan Review 1~)92 FEE: $250-n0 4. Amendments to any of the above ~HAT STAFF WORK IS PERFORMED FOR THE CiTIZENS/COMPANY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE OR TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE? Extensive review of each step of: approval ;each step must be reviewed by P&Z Commission; Step 2 & 3 must also be approved by City Counc)). See attached requirements from Zoning Ordn. for requirements on each step. Staff preparat.ion and mail!g9 of Public Hearin9 notices; Agenda preparation Revie~ of BUilding/Z&ning Adm., Public Works Director, City Planner, City Attorney Fire Dept.,Assessing Dept. WHAT IS YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE TRUE AND FULL CDST TO THE CITY TO APPROVE THE LICENSE, PROVIDE THE SERVICE, ETC.? $ Varies on number of times of review, number of notices to be mailedr number of site visits of'vartous departments dependant on difficulty of each phase. HOW MUCH DO OTHER CITIES CHARGE FOR A LIKE LICEt~SE OR SERVICE: CITY FEE See attached fees from survey conducted by Assn. Metro. Municipalities F. WHO HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SET FEE? City Council G. FORM COMPLETED BY: Kathryn Pepin, Sec. to PSZ Commission DATE: 6/30/93 *PROPOSED FEES: $250 per phase including each amendment, plus Staff Time. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CITIES 0 - 2,~00 Spring Park /PERMIT Watertown N/A Woodland NA Oakclale Prior Lake Robbinsdale Savage COMM;150+2.00 RES. CITIES 2,~00 - 10,000 Stiliwater Arden Hills 250+CONSULT Bayport 100.00 Circle Pines 100.00 Dayton Deephaven N/A Falcon Heights 500.00 Independence 50.00 Jordan N/A Lauderdale NA Mahtomedi Mendota Heights CUP FOR PUD 500 Mound 200.00 Newport N/A Orono 300+40/UNIT Osseo Rosemount 500 ;1000ESC Shorewood 650+350 ESC Spring Lake Park N/A St. Anthony 150.00 St. Francis St. Paul Park 300.00 Wayzata CITY HAS DETAIL CITIES 10,000 - 20,000 Anoka 1000.00 Champlin CONCEPT 200+500 ESC;PREL.650+ 20/AC,FINAL 100 Chanhassen 750/M IN OR Columbia Heights Hastings Hopkins Mounds View North St. Paul AMEND. 100 250.00 NONE 300/ORD. 350/NEW; AMEND.150 100.00 West St. Paul CITIES OVER 20,000 Apple Valley Blaine Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Bumsville STAGE 250;DEV. 550 Coon Rapids Cottage Grove Crystal Eagan Eden Prairie Edina Friclley Golden Valley lnver Grove Heights Maple Grove Maplewood Minneapolis Minnetonka New Brighton New Hope Richfield VALUE MAX 3000 NO HO Roseville Shoreview South St. Paul St. Louis Park White Bear Lake Woodbury 130 300+4/AC. 85+STAFF 300+1 O/AC 400PREL +20AC;FINAL 300 250+ESC.;FINAL 250+ESC. 250+600 DEP. 1000.00 250.00 2,500.00 1200.00 650.00 CONCEPTUAL /PHASE NONE 200.00 250+25 REVIEW 500+5/ACRE 600 500.00 P 200;250 GENERAL 225.00 CITY HAS DETAIL 340.00 500.00 500.00 590.00 500.00 400 BASE+5/100 750.00 200.00 100.00 400.00 300.00 /USE PRELIMINARY PLAT CITIES 0 - 2,500 Spring Park Watertown Woodland CITIES 2~00 - 10,000 Arden Hills Bayport Circle Pines Dayton Deephaven Falcon Heights Independence Jordan Lauderdale Mahtomedi Mendota Heights Mound Newport Orono Osseo Rosemount Shorewood Spring Lake Park St. Anthony St. Francis St. Paul Park Wayzata CITIES 10,000 . 20,000 Arjoka Champlin Chanhassen 150;OV.3 400+1S/LOT Columbia Heights Hastings Hopkins Mounds View North St. Paul Oakdale Prior Lake Robbinsdale 125+10/LOT 250+ 20/LOT 150.00 100+3/LOT SUBD. 150.00 N/A 130+20/LOT 100.00 NA IN SUB FEE 150.00 N/A 300.00 NONE 200+3/AC 250+100 150+1/LOT; MAX 200 150.00 150.00+ 5/LOT CITY HAS DETAIL 150+2/LOT 225+1 O/LOT 3 LOTS OR LESS NONE 200+10/LOT 150.00 100/AC, MIN.100,MAX 500 N/F 350 + ESC 85+STAFF ~vage ,~hakopee ~illwater West St. Paul CITIES OVER 20,000 Apple Valley E~laine Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park ESC Bumsville Coon Rapids Cottage Grove Crystal Eagan Eden Prairie Edina Fridley Golden Valley Inver Grove Heights Maple Grove Maplewood Minneapolis Minnetonka New Brighton New Hope Richfield Roseville Shoreview South St. Paul S~. Louis Park White Bear Lake Woodbury 200+5/LOT MAX 8O0 300+6/LOT OR 200+ 4/AC /LOTS 250 +1 O/LOT 350.00 600-8/SIZE 200 10/LOT+100/AC 200+1 O/LOT 225 500/MIN. 100+25/LOT/W/ MAX.OF 500 300.00 CITY HAS DETAIL 350-400 500.00 225.00 200.00 250.00 340.00 325.00 230+20/AC 225.00 500.00 5O0/B&C 200+ 5/LOT 100.00 CITY HAS DETAIL 300.00 300+5/LOT 131 CITIES 0 - 2,5O0 Spring Park Watertown Woodland CITIES 2,S00 - 10,000 Arden Hills Bayport Circle Pines Dayton Deephaven Falcon Heights Independence Jordan Lauderdale Mahtomedi Mendota Heights Mound Newport Orono Osseo Rosemount Shorewood Spring Lake Park St. Anthony St. Francis St. Paul Park Wayzata CITIES 10,000 - 20,000 Champlin Chanhassen Columbia Heights Hastings Hopkins Mounds View North St. Paul Oakdale Prior Lake Robbinsdale Savage 300 Shakopee FINAL PLAT Stiilwater West St. Paul 150,00 CTI'IES OVER 20,000 CONSULT. FEE 100.00 100 +3/LOT 150.00 NONE N/A N/A 100.00 NA IN SUB FEE 100.00 N/A 175+STAFF NONE 300.00 500+25/LOT N/A NONE IN PREL PLAT CI'I'Y HAS DETAIL Apple Valley Blaine Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Bumsville Coon Rapids Cottage Grove Crystal Eagan Eden Prairie Edina Fridley Golden Valley Inver Grove Heights Maple Grove Maplewood Minneapolis Minnetonka New Brighton New Hope Richfield Roseville Shoreview South St. Paul St. Louis Park White Bear Lake Woodbury 125.00 100.00 INCLUDED IN ONE TIME FEE NONE 100.00 100.00 N/F 0 85+STAFF 150+2/LOT MAX 150.00 127 NONE 75+2.50/OV 10 250.00 50+5/LOT 115.00 200.00 100+25/LOT/W/ MAX. OF 500 100+3/LOT 350-400 500.00 225.00 200.00 250.00 57.00 325.00 150.00 120.00 0 500.00 N/A 100.00 CITY HAS DETAIL N/A 200+5/LOT Heights in excess of those allowed under thls Section shall be permitted only by a special permit granted by resolutlon of the Council determining that such structure~ould nat be dangerous and ~ould not adversely affect the adjolnlng or adjacent proper~y. ' Cb) Front Yar .d.. for buildings within t~o ~unarea %:uuj ,~ ,,- - . · question and wlthln the same block front Is lesser or greater than that required by Ordinance, the required front yard.for the lot In questlon' shell b.e the average plus or minus ten (10~) percent of the depth, h~everp the depth of the required ~ront yard shall ~t be less than ten (10) feet nor ~re than fifty (S0) feet. :?) Planned' Unit Development This Section es. tab~lishes provisions for the granting of a Condltlonal Use. Permit to provide for ~ Planned Unit Development project. The purpose the Planned Unlt Developme. nt Is to encourage a flexibility In the design · land in order to prc~note Its appropriate use; to a. nd de.ve!opme_nt_o_f._ rovlslons of streets and uti Ilties; Tacillzaze the ed~quat.e end economlc.al p ........... The o reserve the natural and scenic qualities TOr open ~_~_~,- ,a,c~dne~ oPr owners of any IA tract of lan~ wl~hln the "R-2,' R-~5 , aaa/or ,,,R~,4 Use District or any 2A tract In the 'B' Dlstrlct or 5A tract In the I District may submit an appllcatlon to the Zoning Admlnlstrator for Conditlonal Use Permit approval to construct a PUl). . (a) Appllcation Review Procedure; L) Concept Plan; The appllcant may request a concept revle~ ~f the proposed development by the Plannlng Contnlsslon to gain Information and thoughts relevant to the City Plan and his development, provided.the follc~vlng data is made available' to the City ~n three (3) copies. Base Kap shc~lng appllcant's land, plus 1or and use pattern for all the land ~lthln four hundred (400) feet or more Jf necessary to sho~ relationship. 2) Statement as to the type of use and architecture as to height and bulk. 3) Statement on populatlon es to denslty, number, age, distribution, occupancy, etC. Physlcal feature r~p showing topography, tree Iocatlon, dralnage pattern and availabillty of utiilties. - 351 -. continued iii) iv) 5) Concept Plan in sufficient detall to understand density, use relationship, access, parking, open space and building mass. Preliminary Plan: The applicant shall file, with the application or within six (6) months after Concept Plan review, a preliminary plan and supporting data. Within sixty (60) days after verification by the staff that the required plan and supporting data is adequate, the Plan- ning Conrnlsslon shall hold ~ public hearing. The staff report shall be made available at least ten (10) days prior to the publlc hearing. After the hearing, the Plannlng Commission shall forward to the City Council, their recommendation in writing. The City Council shall disapprove, approve or approve with modification and notify the applicant within sixty (60) days after receipt of recommendation unless the applicant agrees to a con- tinuance. Final Plan: Upon approval of the Prelimlnary Plan by the Council, ~he applicant may file a request for approval.of Final Plan for the entire PUD or for one or more of the development stages as made a part of the supporting data. The Preliminary Plan approval shall become void within one year unless a request is made for a Final Plan approval. The Planning Commission shall place a request for Final Plan approval on the next regular Planning Commission agenda after ten (10) days from date of filing. The findings and recommendations of the Piannlng Commission shall be forwarded to the Councll for conslderat~on. Failure to Be~in Planned Development: If no construction has begun or no use established in the planned development within one (1) year from the approval of the flnal develop- ment plan, the final development plan shall lapse and be of.no further effect, in its discretion and for good cause, the Planning Commission may extend for one (1) additlonal year the period for the beginning of construction or the establishment of a use. If a final development plan lapses under the provisions of this section, the clerk of the council shall remove the planned development from the zoning map and shall file a notice of revocation with the recorded final development plan. The zoning regulations applicable before the flnal development was approved shall then be re- vived end In effect. 352 9.116 (17) iii) R_equirements for Preliminary The preliminary plan and supporting data shall include the following: i) The existing topographic character of the land. ii) Map showing enough of the surrounding area to demonstrate the relationship of the proposed PUD. A statement on population, as to density, numbers and age distribution. A statement on the existing publlc services, such as schools, parks, ~ire protection, playgrounds, bus, etc. A map showing street systems, plot llnes and plot designs. vi) Areas proposed to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for parks, parkways, playgrounds, school sites, public buildings, and similar public and semi-public uses. vii) A plot plan for each building site and contnon open area, showing the approxlmate location of all buildings, structures, and improvements and indicating the open spaces around buildings and structures. Elevation and perspective drawings of all proposed uctures and improvements except single-family resi- %tr - --~ .h~ir accessory buildings. The d[a~in?~ .... eences e,u ~ need not be the result of final architectural oecms,9-~ and need not be in detail. ix) A development schedule indicating (1) the approximate date when construction of the project can be expected to begin; (2) the stages in which the project w111 be built and the approximate date when construction of each stage can be expected to begln (~) the anticipated rate of-development; (hi the approximate dates when the development of each of the stages in the development will be, CO~pleted; and (5) the area and location of con,non open space that wi11 be provided at each stage. 353 Agreements, provlslonst or covenants which govern the use, maln:enance, and continued protection of the planned development and any of its con,non open areas. The following plans and diagrams, Insofar as the Planning Co~rnisslon finds that the planned develop- ment creates special problems of traffic, parking, landscaping or economic feaslbillty: 1) An off-street parking and loading plan. ~) A circulation diagram Indicating the proposed movement of vehlcles, goods, and pedestrians within the planned development and to and from existing thoroughfares. Any special engineering features and traffic regulation devices needed to facilltate or insure the safety of this clr- culation pattern must be shc~vn. 3) A landscaping and tree planting plan. An economic feasibility report or market analysis. 5) Preliminary Utility Plan Preliminary Plan StaQdards All of the requirements of the Use District within which the plan is located shall apply except as herein amended. i) The tract of land shall be served with city sewer and water and have not less than seventy-five (75) feet of public right-of-way frontage. ii) No prlncipal building shall be nearer than its height to the rear or side lot llne when such llne abuts an ~tR-l~' or "R-2'~ Use District. No building within the development shall be nearer to another buildlng than one-half (I/2) the sum of the height of the two buiidlngs. Private roadways within the pro~ect designed as c011ector streets (no drlv~ays) shall be twenty- eight (28) feet or more in width, face to face of curb, private accessways sha!l be 35~ Ord. 1052, elf. o/12/83 -,,) vi) vii) viii) ix) x) twenty-four (24) feet or"more in width, face to face of curb and service roads shall be twenty- two (22) feet or more In width, face to face of curb. Service roads shall not serve more than twenty (20) dwe11ing units or a use equlvalent.tn traffic generation. Should guest parklng require- me'tS be proposed as on street spaces, the street wldths as hereln stated shall.be wldened 8 x 22 f~et for each space. No buildlng shall be located less than fifteen (15) feet from the back of the curb on roadways and accessways, and three (3) feet on service roads. ' Guest parking ratio shall be one (I) space for each four (~) units with no unit having a distance greater than two hundred (200) feet to such space. An open space system shall be deslgn~d showing recreatlonal areas equal %o at least ten (10%) . percent of the site area and served by pedestrian .. oriented path system. Those natural areas, i.e., woods, hills, valleys, wet areas, rock outcrops are to be favored as part of the open space system. A sewer°water publ$c utillty system to serve the project shall be submitted, said system shall in- dicate s fire hydrant distribution to the approval of the Fire Chief and in total to the City Council. A street llght system shall be sObmltted for approval and all wires shall be below ground. Notwithstanding the provisions of. Sectio~ 9.108(5), dwelling units erected in the "E-2" District shall have a minimum floor area of 750 square feet for.each unit containin8 one bedroom or less, plus 120 square feet for each additional bedroom within the unit. Requirement for Fins1Pla~ i) Withln slx (&) months following the approval of the p~ellmlnary development plan, the applicant shall file with the Planning Commission a flnal development plan contalnlng in flnal form the information required )n the prelimlnary plan. In its discretion and for good cause, the Planning Commission may extend for six (6) months the period for. filing of the final development plan. ii) The Plannlng Comrnlssion shall give notlce and provide an opportun!ty to be heard on the flnal development plan to: con~n~e~ (e) (£) 1) Any person who appeared of record at the hearing on the preliminary development plan or at the hearing on the outline development plan, if any. 2) Any other person who has Indlcated to the P1annlng Commission in writing that he wishes to be notified. ~i~)The Plannlng Commission shall revle~ the final development plan, and shall recommend approval of the flnal development plan if it is in substantlal compliance with the prellmlnary development plan. The clerk of the councll shall record the final development plan in the manner provided for recording plats of subdivisions. Enforc~n~ Development Schedule The construction and provision of all of the common open spaces and public and recreatlonal facilities which are shown on the final development plan must proceed at the same rate as the construction of dwelling units. At least once every six (6) months following the approval of the final development plan~ the Zoning Administrator shall revie~ all of the buildlng permits issued for the planned development and examine the construction which has taken place on the site. If he shall find that the rate of construction of dwelling units is greater than the rate at which common open spaces and recreational facilltles have been constructed and provided, he shall forward this information to the council, which may revoke the planned development permit. Conve ante and Malntenance of I) All land shown on the final development plan as common open space must be conveyed under one of the folio~ng options: 1) it may be conveyed to a public agency whlch w~11 agree to maintain the contnon open space and any bu~idings, structures, or improvements vn~ich have been placed on lt. 2) It may be conveyed to trustees provided in an identure establishing an association or slmllar organization for the maintenance of the planned development. The coetnon open space must be con- veyed to the trustees subject to covenants to be approved by the Planning Co~n~isslon which re- strict the common open space to the uses specified on the flnal development plan, and v/nlch provide for the maintenance of the common open space in a manner which assures its continuing use for lts intended purpose. 356 SEP ~3 ~3 10:06AH USPS LAN DEPARTHEHT September 3, 1993 Mark A. Winson, P.E. Public Works Director ..... City of Columbia Heights 637 38th. Avenue Columbia Heights MN 55421-3806 Dear Mr. Winson: This follows up on our telephone conversation of yesterday morning regarding application of City Regulation 7.201(~) to vehicles carrying u.s. Mail via Tyler Place N.E. and 43½th. Avenue N.E. to the U.S. Post Office on 44th. Avenue To recap the situation as I understand it, the city Regulation in question provides as follows: The Council may regulate the use of streets by vehicles in excess of 15,000 pounds gross vehicle weight as follows: (a) The Council may designate truck routes and require such vehicles to use said routes at all times, except as otherwise provided hereinafter. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as prohibiting any vehicle in excess of 15,000 pounds gross vehicle weight from using any City street where absolutely necessary to reach a particular destination within the City. The U.S. Postal Service has been serving the Post Office with tractor-trailer vehicles, which exceed 15,000 pounds GVW, via the streets identified above, although the the Council has not designated those streets as truck routes. The Postal Service regards the streets in question as "post roads" within the meaning of title 39, U.S. Code section 5003, which provides in pertinent part as follows: The foilowing are post roads: (4) public roads, hig~iys, and toll roads during the time the mail is carried thereon .... SEP 03 '~3 ~:07~M USPS LAW DEPARTMEMT P.3 It is well established that postal vehicles, while operating on post roads, are subject to state and local laws of general applicability relating to the safe operation of vehicles. Postal vehicles are, for example, clearly subject to local speed laws. However, the case law makes it clear that state and local laws other than those relating to the safe operation of vehicles are preempted by federal law the extent that =he federal and state or local schemes are in conflict. The Postal Service would-regard application of Section 7.201(2) to Postal Service vehicles engaged in transportation of mail as preempted by the federal scheme for transporting the Mails in title 39, U.S. Code seotion~ 5003 and 404(a). The latter section provides among the specific po~ers of the Postal Service the power "to provide for the collection, handling, transportation, del~very, forwarding, returning, and holding of mail .... " Indeed, were the Postal Service subject to the local laws of ever community establishing restrictive motor vehicle characteristics, it is difficult to see how we could effectively accomplish our statutory mission under title 39 U.S. Code section lOl(a) to "provide prompt, reliable, and e~ficient services to patrons in all areas and ... render postal services to all communities." The Postal Service places great value in being a good neighbor and citizen. If there are any specific problems regarding vehicle safety, property damage or other matters between the city and the Postal Service, I hope you will bring them to the attention of our Columbia Heights Station Manager Tom Peterson so that they can be addressed in a cooperative manner. If you would like to discuss this or any other matter with me, please feel free to call me on (202)258-3021. Sincerely, Michael J. Vandamm Senior Counsel Purchasing Law CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N. E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (612) 782-2800 ~£~ ? 1993 MANAGER CiTY OF COLU,~4BIA HEIGHTS Mayor Donald J. Murzyn, Jr. Councilmembers Scan T. Clerkin Bruce G. Nawrocki Gary L. Peterson Robert W. Ruettimann City Manager Patrick Hentges DATE: TO: FROM: RE: August 25, 1993 Patrick Hentges, City Manager Kathryn Pepin, License/Permit Clerk 1994 Business License Fees and Ordinance Amendments Attached are the proposed business license fees for the 1994 license year and a resolution for the same. The changes that are being presented to the fee schedule are the following: 1. The addition of a $500 investigation fee upon application for an ARCADE license. 2. The addition of a $500 investigation fee upon application for a POOL HALL license. 3. The addition of a $1500 investigation fee upon application for a PRECIOUS METALS DEALER license. The increase of PAWNBROKERS license fee from $500 to $12,000 plus:the addition of a $1500 investigation fee upon application. 5. The addition of $1OO investigation fee upon application for a MASSAGE THERAPIST license. The addition of a $1500 investigation fee upon application for a MASSAGE THERAPIST BUSINESS license as well as an increase of license fee from $200 to $),000. Attached is a copy of a survey of license fees for other communities pertaining to Pawnbrokers, Hassage Therapists/Businesses. Also attached is a proposed amendment to the License Section of the City Ordinance pertaining to licensing of gaso) ine stations. The amendment eliminates Section 5.208(4) to "clean-up" the Ordinance as thls bond has not been required for a number of years per Robert Bocwinskl, former City Hanager, due to the expense to the station owners to provide this bond. No other city requires this bond. The Ordinance section pertaining to Pawnbrokers, Precious Metal Dealers and Secondhand Merchants are being reviewed by Chief Mawhorter and compared to ordinances from other cities for possible changes at a later date. ~ "SERVICE IS OUR BUSINESS" EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Page 2 Currently, there are not any licenses for Arcades, Pool Halls, Precious Metals Dealers, Pawnbrokers, Massage Therapists or Massage Therapy Businesses. It is imperative that the City Council act on the license fees for 1994 as soon as possible as preparation for the renewal applications will begin the end of September and are done on a manual basis (n~t on computer). Your assistance is appreciated. kp cc: D. Mawhorter, Police Chief City' Pawnbroker License/Investi~.at~on Fees Anoka $1000/110 · Will be Raising Fees soon. Blaine $12,000/yr. Appl./inv. Fee $500 Brooklyn Center $12,000/yr. $1500 Investigation Fee Pawnbroker, Precious Metals Dealer, Secondhand Merchant all one ordinance. Brooklyn Pk. $1000/500 inv.; $5,000 Bond Pawnbroker and Precious Metals Dealer one ordinance. $250 Secondhand Merchant Fridley $8000/yr. and $400 inv. fee Champlin $12,000/250 New Brighton Columbia Hgts. Nothing at this time, but ~n process. $500 plus $5,000 Bond, no investigation fee city ~rook]yn Ctr. Massage Therapy Business/Inv~s~i,gation Fee $3000/$1500 ~assa~e Therapist/Investigation Fe $50/$100 Coon Rapids $3000/1500 $100/100 Have special license for in beauty shops for lndiv|dual of $200/$200 Crystal $1133 first t~o years than $36/yr. Fridley $3,o00/$1500 $50/100 New Brighton $1oo/3oo Anoka Golden Valley Rewriting Ordinance and Fees to increase $500/110;applicatlon fee $55 $1500/1500 $]10/110; application fee $55 $100/300 Roseville $10,000/yr. no investigation fee $500/yr. no inv. fee Columbia Hgts. $200 for Business; $100 for individual. No investigation fee. RESOLUTION NO. 93- ESTABLISHING 1994 BUSINESS LICENSE FEES I~HEREAS, Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, pertaining to commercial licensing regulations provides for the establishing of annual license fees; and, WHEREAS, the City has participated in a survey of metropolitan municipalities regarding business license fees charged by other communities; and WHEREAS, the City is attempting to maintain business licenses which are comparable; and WHEREAS, the City annually reviews i~s business license fee schedule; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the attached proposed license fee schedule be adopted and effective January 1, 1994. Passed this day of , 1993. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: Mayor Donald J. Murzyn, Jr. Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary 1994 LICENSE FEES Effective January 1, 1994 through December 31, 1994. CATEGORY FEES ARTICLE SECTION Arcades* ($5000 Bond/$500 lnv. Fee) (PD) $ 500.00 IV il Auctioneer (PD) 50.oo I! I Beer Sales (PD,BI,FI) On Sale* ($150 inv. Fee if 1st time appl.) Off Sale* ($150 lnv. Fee if 1st time appl.) "Club" Beer ($150 lnv. Fee if 1st time appl.) Sinqle Event Club Beer (per day basis) ($500 Appl. Fee & $500 Clean-up Deposit) 325.00 75.00 100,00 100.00 V I Bowling A]ley* (BI,FI) 15.OO/lane IV Carnivals ($500 deposit & insurance) (PD) 50.O0/day Charitable Gambling Exempt Licenses: Class A & B Class C & D Non-Exempt Licenses: Class A & B Class C $ D 100.00 25.00 250.00 25.00 Children's Amusement Machines*(ktddie rldes)(PD)(Ins.) Transfer to another location 30.00 15.00 IV Christmas Tree Sales (FI)(P&Z Comm.} ($200 Clean-up Deposit) 50.00 II 6 Cigarettes (&&Hi (Also vending license if by machine) 20.00 III Contractors (If not licensed by State Dept. of Commerce) General Blacktop Excavator Hasonry/Concrete Moving Demolition Plaster, Stucco, Drywall Heating/Ventilation Refrlg., Gas Piping Plumbing Sign Erection $2,000 Bond & Insurance $2,000 Bond & Insurance $2,000 Bond S Insurance $2,000 Bond & Insurance $2,0~0 Bond & Insurance $2,000 Bond & Insurance $2,000 Bond & Insurance $2,000 Bond S InsuranCe $2,000 Bond S Insurance $2,000 Bond S Insurance $2,000 Bond S Insurance 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 4o.oo 40.00 40.o0 40.00 40.00 4O.OO vi 7 Courtesy Benches (Insurance) (Eng. Dept.) 25.n0 each Page 2 CATEGORY Food S Beverage Dealers (SSH,BI,FI,Anoka Cty.) Class 1 - Itinerant Food Establishment (1st Day) Each Addltlonal Day Class 2 - Food Catering Vehlc]e Class 3 - Food Vending Machines A. Bulk $ Vending (ea.machlne) (canned/bottle machines exempt, handled by State) B. Small rack-mounted machines (1¢-25¢) 1st machine Each addltional machine at same locatlon Class ~ - Restaurants* 0-50 seats 51-100 seats over 100 seats Class 5 - Drive-in Restaurants* ~resh Food Store*(catering, bakery, meat mkt.)(FI,BI,AC,S&H) if applicant has grocery or restaurant license, Games of Skill (PD) Garbage/Rubbish Haulers (lnsurance)(SSH) Gasoline Stations*(Fl) First Metering Device Each Additional metering device L.P. gas per metering device Go Cart* (PD) Grocery Stores* (S&H,BI,FI,State Board of Ag.) O-1,O00 sq.ft. 1,001-3,500 s.f. , 3,500-7,000 s.f. over 7,000 s.f. Gun Shop* (PD) Kennel* (PO) Junk Dealer ($1000 Bond) (PD) Laundry and Dry Cleaning Services (FI) A. Business Establishments* (no machines) ~. Coin-operated washers & dryers in comm. launderies: 1. First Machine 2. Each Additlonal at same locatlon C. Coin-operated dry cleanlng machine O. Other laundry machines E. Coin-operated washers & dryers in apt. bldgs. 1. First machine 2. Each additional at same location FEES $30.00 5.00 5o.0o '] 5. O0 10.O0 3.00 50.00 75.00 125.O0 50.00 50.00 25.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 50.qO 100.00 15o.oo 200.00 100.00 100.O0 100.00 50.00 15.oo 5.00 40. oo 20. O0 20.00 5.00 ARTICLE III IV IV II VI I!! VI VI II ¥1 SECTION I 3 9 Page CATEGORY Liquor Sales (PO,FI,BI) "Club Liquor"(Bond & Insurance) On Sale Liquor (Bond & Insurance) (lnv. Fee $500-$10,000) On Sale Limited Liquor (same as On On Sale Wine (Inv. Fee $250-$2000) Sunday Liquor Sales Sunday Wine Sales Sunday Club Sales Sale) FEES $ 200.00 6,300.00 5,400.O0 2,000.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 ARTICLE V V V V V V V SECTION 3 5 6 7 8 Hassage Therapist Business (PD,AZ) ($t500 Inv. Fee) Massage Therapy Indlvidual (PS,ZA) ($1001nv. Fee) Hiniature Golf* (PD) Motor Vehicle Sales* (new & used)(PD) Multiple Dwellings (FI,BI) First 3-4 units Each additional unit over 4 Re-inspection fee for code compliance Musical Devices (PD) Pawnbroker ($5,000 Bond/$15OOInv. Fee)(PD) Pet Shop* (PD) Pool Hall (PD) (Inv. Fee $500) Popcorn, Candy, Ice Cream Vehicles (PD) (Insurance -Public $ Vehicle Liability) Precious Metal Dealers ($5,000 BOND) (pD}{SISO0 New Renewal Inv. Fee) Publ lc Dances (PO) Rental Housing Licenses: Single Family & Duplex (Per Unit Basis) Re-lnspectlon Fee (If Corrections not completed in conformance with Enf. Off. compliance order.) Secondhand Merchant Business ($1000 Bond)(PD,FI,BI): Exhibition, convention, shows S expositions ($5000 Bond) First Day Each Additional Day Sexually Oriented Business (PD,FI,ZA,AC) (Investigation Fee $5OO-$10,O00) Swlmmlng Pool* (Public) 3,000.00 100.00 100.00 200.00 40.00 3.oo 40.00 5o.oo 12,ooo.0o 50.00 100.0o SO.D0 3oo.0o 200.00 100.O0 15.00 25.00 50.00 50.OD 10.00 500.00. 50.00 VI II VI IV II V! IV VI Vi IV VI II IV 12 12 7 6 4 5 9 2. 6 7 6 Page CATEGORY Tatoo Shop* Taxicab Vehicle (insurance)(PD) Taxicab Driver (PD) Theaters (BI,FI) Indoor Outdoor Transient Merchant/So]icitor (PD) A. Itinerant Hawker/Peddler Transient Merchant C. Itinerant Solicitor/Peddler Tree Removal & Treatment (Ins.)(PD) Truck and Tral]er Rental (ZA) A. New application B. Renewa] application Vending Machines (SSH) A. First Machine B. Each additional at same location FEES ARTICLE SECTION $ 15o.oo 75.00 VI 3 20.00 Vi 3 3 200.00 250.00 ~l 3 $$O.OO/day;$1OO/mo.;$$OO/year $50/day; $1OO/mo.;$5OO/yr. $50/day; $100/mo.; $500/yr. 50.OO VI 10 75.00 50.00 VI 1 15.00 5.00 LICENSED APPLIED FOR AFTER JUNE 30 OF THE LICENSE YEAR WOULD PAY HALF (½) THE ORIGINAL LICENSE FEE FOR THOSE INDICATED BY A *. DEPARTMENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROVAL OF LICENSF: PD - Po]ice Department FI - Fire Department B! - Building Inspector S&H - Safety & Health Inspector CF - City Forestor/Public Works Oir. ZA - Zoning Administrator AC - Anoka County PWD - Public Works Director ALL NEW LICENSES MUST HAVE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL. LATE PENALTY ON ALL ANNUAL RENEWABLE FEES: 1-15 days late ...... 25~ penalty over origlnal f. ees 16-30 days late .... 50~ penalty over origlnal fees Over 30 days late -- legal procedures begun. EXPLANATION: Section 5.208(4) is being requested for elimination to "clean-up~' the ordinance as this has not been an enforced item dlJe to expense to the station owners for a number of years per Robert BocwJnski, former City Hanager. No other city requires this bonding item. ORDINANCE NO. BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 853, CITY CODE OF 1977, AND PERTAINING TO LICENSING OF GASOLINE STATIONS. The City Council of the City of Columbia Heights does ordain: Section :1: Section 5.208(1-6) of Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977 which reads as follows, to wit: 5.208(1) No person shall engage in or conduct the business of operating a gasoline filling station without a license issued pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter. 5.2o8(2) Applicants for a license under this section shall indicate on the application the number of gasoline pumps to be installed on the premises. 5.208(3) The Clerk shall forward the application to the Chief of the Fire Prevention Bureau for a report indicating whether the proposed operation'will be in compliance with all provisions of the Fire Prevention Code. 5.208(4) An applicant under this section shall furnish the Clerk with a bond in the sum of.$10,000 to indemnify and save harmless the City from and against any claims, damage or expense against the City by reason of the maintenance and operation of a gasoline fi)ling station on any portion of a public street, sidewalk or public way. 5.208(5) No licensee under this section or his agent or employee, shall fill or allow to be filled, the gasoline tank of any motor vehicle while the engine or motor of such vehicle is running or in motion, or while any person is smoking in or about the pump area of the gasoline filling station. 5.208(6) No licensee under this section, or his agent or employee, shall deceptively mislead customers by displaying false or incomplete price figures on signs that are designed to indicate the price of gasoline. is herewith amended to read as follows, to-wit: 5.208(1) No person shall engage in or conduct the business of operating a gasoline filling station without a license issued pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. 5.208(2) Applicants for a license under this section shall indicate on the application the number of gasoline pumps to be installed on the premises. 5.208 (3) The Clerk shall forward the application to the Chief of the Fire Prevention Bureau for a report indicating whether the proposed operation will be in compliance with all provisions of the Fire Prevention Code. 5.208(4) 5.208(5) No licensee under this section or his agent or emp]oyee, shall fill or allow to be filled, the gasoline tank of any motor vehlc]e while the englne or motor of such vehicle is running or in motion, or while any person is smoking in or about ~he pump area of the gasoline filling station. No licensee under this section, or his agent or employee, shall deceptively mislead customers by displaying false or incomplete price figures on signs that are designed to indicate the price of gasoline. Section 2: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days after its, passage. First Reading: Second Reading: Date of passage: Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: Donald J. Murzyn, Jr., Mayor Jo-Anne Student, Secretary to City Council CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY AMBULANCE STUDY OUTLINE September 7, 1993 Citj's Contacted by Phone or Visits: Lower St. Croix Valley ........................ 436-7033 ............ Hastings ................................... 437-5610 ............ Elk River .................................. 441- 2582 ............ Falcon Heights .............................. 644-5575 ............ Woodbury ................................. 731-2680 ............ North St. Paul .............................. 770-4480 ............ Richfield .................................. 866-5061 ............ Edina .................................................... South St. Paul ............................... 450-8740 ............ Received information on: ®charges ®manning ®training needs eequipment needs ®overtime cost due to call backs amedical direction needs EMT EMT EMT EMT EMT EMT Paramedic Paramedic Paramedic Need to Gather Good Data on AH Calls for At Least Three Months- - September, October & November:. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Type of medical ALS=Paramedic system Type of transportation--ALS BLS None BLS=EMT's & First Responders Transportation to where--their choice, "time" While transporting, "call back" to cover station Second medical before first is over; second call back, "overtime" Call back to cover "overtime" manpower Time of day & manpower needs Columbia Heights Rescue Runs: First 230 days of 1993 748 medicals 138 no transport 152 ALS - Paramedics 458 BLS Possible?? EMT's At this rate, possible to have about 650 transports for BLS this year. 650 x $300 base = $195,000 (Less 10%-20% non-collectible) = $156.00 Options To Be Considered: Option I: Hire three more full-time ($42,200) personnel ...................... $126,000 Purchase one more ambulance fully equipped ....................... $120,000 Increase overtime ............................................ $ 20,000 Collection bookkeeping ?? ..................................... $ 10,000 Medical advisor ............................................. $8-10,000 Enclose one more sleeping room ................................. $ Option II: Continue same rescue response Option III: Upgrade to Advance Life Support Services training - Cost same as Option I plus paramedic Alarm By Time of Day: ................ 1988 1989 1990 1991 0001-0259 ........ 126 134 133 177 0300-0559 ......... 85 70 79 93 0600-0859 ........ 116 144 134 142 0900-1159 ........ 203 231 199 219 1200-1459 ........ 207 184 179 236 1500-1759 ........ 218 251 179 262 1800-2059 ........ 250 183 197 283 2100-2400 ........ 182 189 170 228 Highest # of calls: 0900 AM - 1100 PM 1992 168 101 140 210 263 244 272 233 090793 CK:bs MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AMBULANCE REPORT .!_ 098528 'Da te: Destination: Address: Pt.M.D. ~ tM°nitorM-D-/R-N. JReceivingM.D./R.N.~ ~1RefuseTreatment/Tra,sportation AGE ~ LEVEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS MENTAL STATUS PUPILS Medications: ~ R ~ TIME TYPE/DOSE ~ Alert ~ Reacts To Pain ~Constricted History of Present Illness/Injury ~a~t H~story Allerg~s/Meds. - Physic,~ Exam and Treatment Time B/P Pulse Resp. Time-Military ~ J Odometer ] w . called / B ~ Start ~xygen O CPR SLp~c jz~O ~4~ 1~ Enroute AtScene U Limb Splints UCiti~enCP. ¢ ~ Traction Splint ~ Defibrillation Ar Scene / ~ 5 ? At HosD ~Spine Board 0 Pulmonary Lv Scene TREATMENTS ~Cervical Collar Resuscitation ~ I.V. Fluids ~ Suction Ar Hasp - ~ Oral Airway ~ Medications ~ MAST ~ Esophageal Airway ~ Obstetrical ~ EKG ~ Endotracheat Airway ' ~ Restraints ~ Follow-up In Service HE 0025J-04 .... - · 1098526 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AMBUL/~NC'E' REPORT Date: Call ¢ ' ~'? AGE ~ LEVEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS MENTAL STATus PUPILS TIME Medications: R L TYPE/DOSE ~ ~ ~ Constricted WT. ~O B ~,owsy ~ Unresponsive ~ Dilated SEX i,~ ~ Reacts To Voice B Deteriorated ~,Oisoriented ~eacts Enroute ~ ~ Unreactive History of Present Hiness/injury ~, ,~~ ~ & O;~ Psst History Altergi~s/Meds. Other: , Signature+ ' ~A K' ;Time-Military Odometer Time B/P Pulse Resp. Called D ~ O ~ Start ~ Oxygen ~ CPR ' ' ~ Traction Splint ~ Defibrillation - ~r Scene ~ ~ Xi~ ~t HOS, . ~ S,ioe Board _ ~ ~- ~ ~ Cervical ~oll&r' .... Resuscitation TREATMENTS Lv Scene ~ I.V. Fluids ~ Suction ~ Oral Airway ~ Medications t ~ MAST Ar Hosp ~ Esophageal Airway ~ Obstetrical Destination: AGE ~/~ L.VEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS MENTAL STATUS R LPumLS TIME TYP./DosEMe&c~ti°ns: D Alert Q Reacts To Pain ~Oriented OQC°nstricted WT. ~ ~Drowsy D Unresponsive DD Dilated 02: SEX ~ ~ ReactsTo Voic~ ~ Deteriorated ~ Disoriented DB Reacts Enroute D D Unreactive Chief Complaint Past History Allergies/Meds. Time-Military Odometer Time B/P ',,Pulse,, Resp. Called l & 3 0 Start D Oxygen D CPR ~ ....... ~= ~-i [nroute At Scene ~ Limb Splints ~ Citizen CPR :~ ........... ~ ....... -- ~ Traction Splint ~ Defibrillation ' t ~" '~ ~= Ar Scene_ ~ ,' : . ~ Hosp ~ ~_SP.~Oe ~a.r'd¥ 7 ' z ~ Pulmonary Lv Scene TREATMENTS ~ I.V. Fluids ~ Suction D Oral Airway ~ Medications / ~ MAST : _ , _ : . · : ~ Esophageal Airway _ ~ o_~!t~zica~, . ~.EK? HE 00251-04 8/81