Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNov 29, 192939'7 OFFIGIAL PROGEI~DINGS Special Meetin~ called to order Nov. 29th, 1929 at the High School Building. Ail members Present. Request for dance license, as followsz 'We herelr~make application for a permit to give a _~,ce in the Oakwood SChoOl, Sat. Nov. ~0, 19~9 by the Degree of Honor. ~igned by Mrs. Corbett - Cot. Sth& 42nd Ave. N. E. Motion by Stin~on, seconded by Datfl, that the Degree of ttonor be given a 6 months dance permit. Ail ayes. The "Becall Ordinance" passed it second reading. Motion. by Karrow, seconded by Stinson,. to_amend Sh~ ord.!~ce from_"Oity Council of umbia Heights" to read #City of Columbia Heights". Ail ~es. ~oved by Stinson, seconded by ~ to adopt the above ordinance. Roll Call, all ayes. ~econd reading of Restaurant Ordinance. Offered by Stinson, seconded by amnon for adoption. On Roll Call, Dahl no, Gannon yes, Stins~n yes, Karrow. no, Foster yes. Carried. Second reading of Ordinance prohibltin~ ridings, skating, etc. on the sidewalks of the City. ~etter read f~om Rev. George W. Rol~s, as follows: Gentlemen; 'Per~t me to offer a criticism to a resolution which is inter, ed to beo~ an ordinance, unless serious objections are raised, namely, forbidding bicycle riding, coaster wagons, roller skating, etc. on the sidewalks of the City. It is perfectly proper to forbid bicycle ridln~ on the sidewalks, as also to restrict the use of sidewalks as race tracks for coaster wagons, especially on grades - but as the reso- lution reads,(I read it In the Hecord) it is too drastic a restriction on Some of the sports of ou~. children. Aa I under~tand ~e resolution, it forbids the coaster wafon on the sidewalk no matter for what ~m-pose. ~n this interpretation, I m~y be wrong. But I certainly c a not see what harm is done to the sidewalks by children roller skating on them. Every other youngster in town has roller a~tes. I object to this provision as beinc.., too. drastic, in f~ot, it is unreasonable an~ if thiS' is-passed ~S an ordinance ttie result wi&l be that it will not be observed and it will place additional, unpleasant tasks upon the officers in enforcing the ordinance. In passing, I may surest that an ordinance obligatin~ property h~ghe~s to keep their sidewalks passable at all time would be m~chn~re in order. Some of our sidewalks with overgrown weeds in the summer and snow coveyr~d in the winter, are no asset to our City. I hope the above resolutl~ will be reconsidered and reconstructed before it is passed as an ordinance. · oved by 8tinson '~or.adoption. As there was no second, it was tabled. ,~Au® followin~ resolution w~s offered, by Gannon, seconded by Stins~nz thortzing the City Manager to contract for services of City Attorney" In the matter of authorizl~ the City Man~ger of Columbia Heights to con~ tract for services of Fred A. Ossanna, hsquire, ae City Attorney for the City of Columbia Heigh:.s. Resolved: by the City Council of the City of Columbia Hei~hts, that the City Manager be, and he hereby is instructed and authorized to enter into contract with Fred A. Ossanna, retalnin~ him as City Attorney for the City 398 ~at t~s contract ~th the said attorney a~ll provide that all legal ~tters for the City of Colchis HeiSts are to be perfo~ed by said appointed Oity Atto~ey. On 'Roll Call: yes. Carried. Dahl no, Gannon yes, Stinson yes, Karrow no, Foster Motion by Stinson, seconded by Gannon to reconsider the ordinance on Holler Skating~ etc. on the City s~dewalks. 'i~e Ordinance was again moved for adoption by Stinson, and seconded by Gaunon. On roll call, D~i no, Gannon yes, Stinson yes, Karrow no, Foster yes. Carried. Eotion by G~non, seconded by ~ to adjourn. ~~ Mayor_ / / to ~he 00unciI ' ""- -