HomeMy WebLinkAboutSept 12, 1983OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 12, 1983
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Nawrocki at 8:00 pm.
1. Roll Call
Hovland, Petkoff, Norberg, Hentges, Nawrocki--present
2. Invocation
The Invocation was offered by Pastor Kenneth Rice of the Community United Methodist Church.
3. Minutes of Previous Meetings
Motion by Hentges, second by Hovland to approve the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting
of August 22nd as presented in writing and that the reading be dispensed with. Roll call:
All ayes
4. Oral Petitions
A resident inquired why minutes of Council meetings and special meetings were not published
verbatim. He was advised by the Mayor that the City policy is that the minutes of meetings
were not required to be verbatim to meet the publishing requirements but that they merely
record the general order of business that transpired at a given meeting.
5. Ordinances and Resolutions
a. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1050
Motion by Norberg, second by Hentges to waive the reading of the ordinance there being ample
copies available to the public. Roll call: All ayes
representative of the firm proposing to develop the "Zayre" property on 44th and Central
reviewed details of their proposal. Many items of concern regarding the impact that this
development will have on traffic patterns and the surrounding residential area were dis-
cussed by the Council. Councilman Norberg felt this proposal was a good application of
industrial development revenue bonds.
ORDINANCE NO. I050
BEING AN ORDINANCE GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROJECT UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT ACT, REFERRING THE PROPOSAL TO THE MINNESOTA ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY FOR APPROVAL, AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS
The City of Columbia Heights does ordain:
1. It is hereby found, determined and declared as follows:
1.1 The welfare of the State of Minnesota requires active promotion, attraction, en-
couragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce through govern-
mental acts to prevent, so far as possible, emergencies of blighted lands and areas of
chronic unemployment, and it is the policy of the State of Minnesota to facilitate and
encourage action by local government units to prevent the economic deterioration of such
areas to the point where the process can be reversed only by total redevelopment through
the use of local, state and federal funds derived from taxation, with the attendant nec-
essity of relocating displaced persons and of duplicating public services in other areas.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 2
1.2. Technological change has caused a shift to a significant degree
in the area of opportunity for educated youth to processing, transporting,
marketing, service and other industries, and unless existing and related
industries are retained and new industries are developed to use the available
resources of tl~ City of Columbia Heights (the "City"), a large part of the
existing investment of the community and of the state as a whole in
educational and public service facilities will be lost, and the movement of
talented, educated personnel of mature age to areas where their services
may be effectively used and compensated and the lessening attraction of
persons and businesses from other areas for purposes of industry, commerce
and tourism will deprive the City and the State of the economic and human
resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facil-
ities for the remaining population.
· 1.3. The increase in the amount and cost of governmental services
requires the need for more intensive development and use of land to provide
an adequate tax base to finance these costs.
1.4. A representative of Kraus-Anderson, Inc. (hereinafter the
"Applicant"), has' advised this City Council (the "Council") that it desires to
acquire lanit and remodel an existing building for use as a shopping center'
facility (hereinafter referred to as the "Project").
1.5. The existence of the Project tn the City will contribute to more
intensive development and use of land to increase the tax base of the City-
and overlapping taxing authorities and maintatn and provide for an increase
in opportunities for employment for residents of the City, including
economically disadvantaged or unemployed individuals.
1.6. The City has been advised that conventional, commercial
financing to pay the capital cost of the Project is available at such costs of
borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the Project would be
significantly reduced, but that with the aid of municipal financing, and tts
resulting low borrowing cost, the Project is econo, mically more feasible.
1.?. This Council has been advised by a representative of the
Applicant, that on the basis of information submitted to them and their
discussions with representatives of area financial institutions and potential
buyers of tax-exempt bonds, industrial development revenue bonds of the
City could be issued and sold upon favorable rates and terms to finance the
Project.
1.8. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, to
issue its revenue bonds to finance the cost, in whole or in part, of the
acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement or extension of cap-
ital projects consisting of properties used and useful tn connection with a
revenue producing enterprise, such as that of the Applicant, and the
issuance of such bonds by the City would be a substantial inducement to the
Applicant to construct its facility in the City.
2. On the basis of information given the City to date, it appears that it
would be in the best interest of the City to issue its industrial development revenue
bonds under the provisions of Chapter 474 to finance the Project of the Applicant
at a cost presently estimated not to exceed $3,900,000.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 3
3. The Project above referred to is hereby given preliminary approval by
the City and the tssuanee of bonds for such purpose and in such amount approved,
subject to approval of the Project by the Minnesota Energy and Economic
Development Authority and to the mutual agreement of this body, the Applicant
and the initial purchasers of the bonds as to the details of the bond issue and
o. rovisions for their payment. In all events, it is understood, however, that the
bonds of the City shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance legal or
equitable upon any property of the City except the Project and each bond, when,
as, and if issued, shall recite in substance that the bond, including interest thereon,
is payable solely from the revenues received from the Project and property pledged
to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the City.
4. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, Subdivision
?a, the Mayor of the City is hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal
for the Project to the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority for
approval of the Project. The Mayor, Clerk, Treasurer and other officers,
employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Minnesota
Energy and Economic Development Authority with any prelimin..ar_y information
needed for this purpose, and the City Attorney is authorized to initiate and assist
in the preparation of such documents as may be appropriate to the Project, ff it is
approved by the Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Authority.
5. The law firm of Holmes & Graven, Chartered, is authorized to act as
Bond Counsel and to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents-
relating to the Project and bonds issued in connection therewith. The Mayor,
Clerk-Treasurer, City Attorney, and other officers, employees and agents of the
City are hereby authorized to assist Bond Counsel in the preparation of such
documents.
6. In-accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 474.01, .Subdivision
11, the City Manager and other officers, employees and agents of the City are
hereby authorized and directed to encourage the Applicant to provide employment
opportunities to economically disadvantaged or unemployed individuals. Such
individuals may be identified by such mechanisms as are available to the City,
including a first source agreement in which the Applicant agrees to use a
designated State of Minnesota employment office as a first source for employment
recruitment, referral, and placement.
7. The City shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to withdraw from
participation, and accordingly, not issue its revenue bonds for the Project, should
the City at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best
interest of the City not to issue its revenue bonds or should the parties to the
transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of
the documents required for the transaction. The decision of the City Council with
respect to any of the aforementioned matters shall be incontestable.
8. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after thirty
(30) days after its passage.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 4
iFirst reading:
Second reading:
Offered by:
Seconded by:
Roll call:
Date of passage:
August 8, 1983
September 14, 1983
Norberg
Hentges
All ayes
September 12, 1983
Bruce G. Nawrocki, Mayor
Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary
b. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 1052 Pertaining to Planned Unit Development
Motion by Hentges, second by Petkoff to waive the reading of the ordinance there being ample
copies available to the public. Roll call: all ayes
This planned unit development is regarding the conversion of Nelson School into condominiums
by Jake Cadwallader, a developer. Mayor Nawrocki stated that the original plan submitted by
the developer to the School Board was for thirty units. He sees no need for the thirty four
units presently in the plan. Councilman Norberg had concern with the density that this pro-
ject will bring to the neighborhood as well as how the ordinance will impact on other areas
in the entire City. Councilman Hentges felt it was a good use of the present building and
advised that more housing could be built than is presentl~ being proposed.
ORDINANCE NO. 1052
BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 853, CITY CODE OF 1977, PERTAINING TO PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT
City Council of the City of Columbia Heights does ordain:
Section l: Section 9.116(17) of Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, passed June 21, 1977,
which reads as follows, to-wit:
"9.116(17) Planned Unit Development
This section establishes provisions for the granting of a Conditional Use Permit
to provide for a Planned Unit Development project. The purpose of the Planned
Unit Development is to encourage a flexibility in the design and development
of land in order to promote its appropriate use; to facilitate the adequate and
economical provisions of streets and utilities; and to preserve the natural and
scenic qualities of open areas. The owner or owners of any lA tract of land within
the "R-2", "R-3", and/or "R-4" Use District or any 2A tract in the "B" District
or 5A tract in the "1" District may submit an application to the Zoning Adminis-
trator for Conditional Use Permit approval to construct a PUD.
(a) Application Review Procedure
i) Concept Plan: The applicant may request a concept review of the proposed dev-
elopment by the Planning Commission to gain information and thoughts relevant
to the City Plan and his development, provided the following data is made av-
ailable to the City in three (3) copies.
l) Base Map showing applicant's land, plus lot and use pattern for all the land
within four hundred (400) feet or more if necessary to show relationship.
2) Statement as to the type of use and architecture as to heights and bulk.
3) Statement on population as to density, number, age, distribution, occupancy.
4) Physical feature map showing topography, tree location, drainage pattern and
availability of utilities
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 5
5) Concept Plan in sufficient detail to understand
density, use relationship, access~ park'ing, open
space and building mass.
iii)
:tv)
Preliminary Plan: The applicant shall file, with the
application or within six (6) months after Concept Plan
review, a preliminary plan and supporting data. Within
sixty (60) days after verification by the staff that the
required plan and supporting data is adequate, the Plan-
ning Con;nlssion shall hold a publlc hearing. The staff
report shall be made available at least ten (10) days
prior to the public hearing. After the hearing, the
Planning Commission shall forward to the City Council,
their recommendation in writing. The City Council shall
disapprove, approve or approve with modification and
notify the applicant within sixty (60) days after receipt
of recommendation unless the applicant agrees to a con-
tinuance.
Final Plan: Upon approval of the Prellminary Plan by the
Council, the applicant may file a request for approval.of
Final Plan for the entire PUD or for one or more of the
development stages as made a part of the supporting data.
The Preliml.nary Plan approval shall become void within
one year unless a request is made for a Final Plan approval.
The Planning Commission shall place a request for Final
Plan approval on the next regular Planning Commission agenda
after ten (10) days from date of filing. The findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission shall be forwarded
to the Council for consideration.
Failure to Begin Planned Development: If no construction
has begun or no use established in the planned development
within one (1) year from the approval of the final develop-
ment plan, the final development plan shall lapse and be
of no further effect. In its discretion and for good cause,
the Planning Commission may extend for one (!) additional
year the period for the beginning of construction or the
establishment of a use. If a final development plan lapses
under the provisions of this section, the clerk of the
council shall remove the planned development from the zoning
map and shall file a notice of revocation with the recorded
final development plan. The zoning regulations applicable
before the final development was approved shall then be re-
vived and'in effect.
(b)
Requirements for Prelimlhary Plan
The preliminary plan and supporting data shall include the
following:
i) The existing topographic character of the land.
:t±) Map showing enough of the surrounding area t'o demonstrate
the relationship of the proposed PUD.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 6
iii) A statement on population, as to density, numbers and
age distribution.
v)
A statement on the existing public services, such as
schools, parks, fire protection, playgrounds, bus, etc.
A map showing street systems, plot lines and plot
designs.
vi)
viii)
Areas proposed to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved
for parks, parkways, playgrounds, school sites, public
buildings, and similar publlc and semi-public uses.
A plot plan for each building site and common open area,
showing the approximate location of all buildings,
structures, and improvements and indicating the open
spaces around buildings and structures.
Elevation and perspective drawings of all proposed
structures and improvements except single-family resi-
dences and their accessory buildings. The drawings
need not be the result of final architectural decisions
and need not be in detail.
-ix)
A development schedule indicating (l) the approximate
date when construction of the project can be expected
to begin; (2) the stages in which the project will be
built and the approximate date when construction of
each stage can be expected to begin (3) the anticipated.
rate of development; (4) the approximate dates when the
development of each of the stages in the development
will be completed; and (5) the area and location of common
open space that will be provided at each stage.
x)
Agreements, provisions, or covenants which
govern the use, maintenance, and cont{nued
protection of the planned deve]opment and any
of {ts common open areas.
xi) The-following plans and diagrams, insofar as the
Planning Commission finds that the planned develop-
ment creates special problems of traffic, parking,
landscaping or economic feasibility:
1) An off-street parking and loading plan.
2)
A circulation diagram indicating the proposed
movement of vehicles, goods, and pedestrians
within the planned development and to and from
existing thoroughfares. Any special engineering
features and traffic regulation devices needed
to facilitate or insure the safety of this cir-
culation pattern must be shown.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 7
(c)
3) A landscaping and tree planting plan.
An economic feasibility report or market
analysis.
5) Preliminary Utility Plan
Preliminary Plan Standards
All of the requirements of the Use District within which
the plan is located shall apply except as herein amended.
i) The tract of land shall be served with city sewer and
water and have not less than seventy-five (75) feet of
public right-of-way frontage.
No principal building shall be nearer than its height
to the rear or side lot line when such llne abuts an
"E-I" or "R-2" Use District.
iii)
No buildlng within the development shall be nearer to
another buildlng than one-half (1/2) the sum of the
height of the two buildings.
iv)
Private roadways within the project designed as
collector streets (no driveways) shall be twenty-
eight (28) feet or more in width, face to face
of curb, private accessways shall be
twenty-four (24) feet or more in width, face to
face of curb and service roads shall be twenty-
two (22) feet or more in width, face to face of
curb. Service roads shall not serve more than
twenty (20) dwelling units or a use equivalent in
traffic generation. Should guest parking require-
ments be proposed as on street spaces, the street
widths as herein stated shall be widened 8 x 22
feet for each space.
v)
No building shall be located less than fifteen
(15) feet from the back of the curb on roadways
and accessways, and three (3) feet on service
roads.
Guest parking ratio shall be one (I) space for
each four (4) units with no unit having a distance
9reater than two hundred (200) feet to such space.
v~)
An open space system shall be designed showing
recreational areas equal to at least ten (10~)
percent of the site area and served by pedestrian'
oriented path system. Those natural areas,
i.e., woods, hills, valleys, wet areas, rock
outcrops are to be favored as part of the open
space system.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 8
(4)
(el
viii)
ix)
A sewer-water public utility system to serve the
project shall be submitted, said system shall in-
dicate a fire hydrant distribution to the approval
of the Fire Chief and in total to the City Council.
A street light system shall be submitted for
approval and all wires shall be below ground.
~eguirement for Final Plan
i) Within six (6) months following the approval of the
preliminary development plan, the applicant shall file
with the Planning Con~nission a final development plan
containing in final form the information required in
the preliminary plan. In its discretion and for good
cause, the Planning Commission may extend for six (6)
months the period for filing of the final deve]opment
p]an.
ii) The Planning Conmission shall give notice and provide
an opportun!ty to be heard on the final development
plan to:
i) Any person who appeared of record at the
hearing on the prellminary development plan
or at the hearing on the outline development
plan, if any.
2) Any other person who has indicated to the Planning
Commission in writing that he wishes to be notified.
iii) The Planning Commission shall review the final development
plan, and shall recommend approval of the flnal development
plan if it is in substantial compliance with the preliminary
development plan. The clerk of the council shall record the
final development plan in the manner provided for recording
plats of subdivisions.
Enforcing Development Schedule
The construction and provision of all of the common open spaces
and public and recreational facilities which are shown on the
final development plan must proceed at the same rate as the
construction of dwelling units. At least once every six (6)
months following the approval of the final development plan~
the Zoning Administrator shall review all of the building
permits issued for the planned development and examine the
construction which has taken place on the site. If he shall
find that the rate of construction of dwelling units is greater
than the rate at which common open spaces and recreational
facilities have been constructed and provided,, he shall forward
this information to the council, which may revoke the planned
development permit.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 9
(f)
Conveyance and Maintenance of Common Open Space
i) All land shown on the final development plan as common open
space must be conveyed under one of the following options:
1)
It may be conveyed to a public agency which will agree
to maintain the common open space and any buildings,
structures, or improvements which have been placed
on it.
2)
It may be conveyed to trustees provided in an
identure establishing an association or similar
organization for the maintenance of the planned
development. The com~m3n open space must be con-
veyed to the trustees subject to covenants to
be approved by the Planning Commission which re-
strict the common open space to the uses specified
on the final development plan, and which provide
for the maintenance of the common open space in a
manner Which assures its continuing use for its
intended purpose.
No common open space may be put to any use not specified
in the final development plan unless the final development
plan has been amended to permit that use under Section 9.116(17)(d)
of this Ordinance. However, no change of use authorized
under Section 9.116(17)(8) may be considered as a waiver of aay
of the covenants llmltlng the use of cor~non open space areas,
and all rights to enforce these covenants against any use
permitted under Section 9.116(17)(f) are expressly reserved.
iii) If the common open space is not conveyed to a publlc agency,
either one of the followin9 methods of enforcement must be
provided:
1)
The legal right to develop the con,non open space for
the uses not specified in the fina! development plan
must be conveyed to a public agency.
2)
The restrictions governing the use, improvement, and
maintenance of the common open space must be stated
as conditions to the conveyance of the common open
space, the fee title to the common open space to vest
in a public agency in the event of a substantial
default in the stated conditions.
iv) If the common open space is not conveyed to a public
agency, the covenants governing the use, improvement,
and maintenance of the common open space may authorize a
public agency to enforce their provisions.
9.116(17)
(s)
Standards for Common or Public Open Space
No open area may be accepted as common open space under the
provisions of this Ordinance unless it meets the following
standards:
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page l0
The location, shape, size, and character of the common
open space must be suitable for the planned development.
i~) Common open space must be used for amenity or recreational
purposes. The uses authorized for the common open space
must be appropriate to the scale and character of the
planned development, considering its size, density,
expected population, topography, and the number and
type of dwellings to be provided.
Common open space must be suitably improved for its
intended use, but common open space containing natural
features worthy of preservation may be left unimproved.
The bulldings, structure~, and improvements which are
permitted in the common open space must be appropriate
to the uses which are authorized for the common open
space and must conserve and enhance the amenities of
the common open space having regard to its topography
and unimproved condition.
The development schedule which is part of the development
plan must coordinate the improvement of the common open
space, the construction of buildings, structures, and
improvements in the common open space, and the construc-
tion of residential dwellings in the planned development.
If the final development plan provides for buildings,
structures, and improvements in the common open space
of a value in excess of Five Thousand ($5,000) Dollars,
the developer must provide a bond or other adequate
assurance that the buildings, structures, and improve7
ments have been completed according to the development
plan.
(h)
Control of Planned Unit Development Followin~ Completion
The Planning Commission shall issue a certificate
certifying the completion of the planned development,
and the clerk of the Planning Commission shall note
the issuance of the certificate on the recorded final
development plan.
~) After the certificate of completion has been issued, the
use of land and the construction, modification, or
alteration of any buildings or structures within the
planned development will be governed by the approved
final development plan rather than by any other provi-
sions of this Zoning Ordinance.
iii) After the certificate of completion has been issued, no
changes may be made in the approved final development
plan except 6pon application to the appropriate agency
under the procedures provided below:
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page li
1) Any minor extensions, alterations, or modifications
of existing buildings or structures may be authorized
by the Planning Commission if they are consistent
with the purposes and intent of the final plan. No.
change authorized by this section may increase the
cube of any building or structure by more than ten
percent.
2) Any uses not authorized by the approved final plan, but
allowable in the planned development as a permitted
use under the provisions of the zoning ordinance, or
permitted as a conditional use in the zone in which the
planned development is located, may be added to the
final development plan under the procedures provided
by the Zoning Ordinance for the approval of conditional
uses.
3) A building or structure that is totally or substantially
destroyed may be reconstructed only in compliance with
the final development plan unless an amendment to the
final development plan is approved under subsection 5.
4) Changes in the use of common open space may be
authorized by an amendment to the final development
plan under subsection 5.
5) All other changes in the final development plan must
be made by the council, under the procedures authorized
by this ordinance for the amendment of the zoning map.
No changes may be made in the final development plan
unless they are required for the continued successful
functioning of the planned development, or unless they
are required by changes in conditions that have occurred
since the final plan was approved or by changes in the
development policy of the community.
No changes in the final development plan which are approved
under this section are to be considered as a waiver of the
covenents limiting the use of land, buildings, structures, and
improvements within the area of the planned development, and
all rights to enforce these covenants against any changes
permitted by this section are expressly reserved.
is hereafter amended to read as follows, to-wit:
9.116(17) · Planned Unit Development
This Section estabdlshes provisions'for the granting of a Conditlonal Use
Permit to provide for a Planned Unit Development project. The purpose~f
the Planned Unit Development is to encourage a flexibility in the design
and development of land in order to promote its appropriate use; to
facilitate the adequate and economical provisions of streets and utilities;
and to preserve the natural and scenic qualitles for open areas.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 12
The
owner or owners of any IA tract of land within the "R-2", I'R-3'I, and/or
"R-4" Use District or any 2A tract in the "B" District or 5A tract in the
"1" District may submit an applicatlon to the 2onlng Administrator for
Conditional Use Permit approval to construct a PUD.
(al Application Review Procedure
Concept Plan; The applicant may request a concept review
of the proposed development by the Planning Commission to
gain information and thoughts relevant to the City Plan
and his development, provided.the follc~ving data is made
available' to the City in three (3) copies.
1)
Base Map sho~ing applicant's land, plus lot and
use pattern for all the land within four hundred
(400) feet or more if necessary to shc~v relatlonship.
2)
Statement as to the type of use and architecture
as to height and bulk.
3)
Statement on population as to density, number,.age,
distribution, occupancy, etc.
Physical feature map showing topography, tree location,
drainage pattern and availability of utilities.
Concept Plan in sufficient detall to understand
density, use relationshlp, access~'parking, open
space and building mass.
iii)
Preliminary Plan: The applicant shall file, with the
application or within six (6) months after Concept Plan
review, a preliminary plan and supporting data. Within
sixty (60) days after verification by the staff that the
required plan and supporting data is adequate, the Plan-
ning Commission shall hold a public hearing. The staff
report shall be made available at 1east ten (10) days
prior to the public hearing. After the hearing, the
Planning Commission shall forward to the City Council,
their recommendation in writing. The City Council shall
disapprove, approve or approve with modification and
notify the applicant within sixty (60) days after receipt
of recommendation unless the applicant agrees to a con-
tinuance.
Final Plan: Upon approval of the Preliminary Plan by the
Council, the applicant may file a request for approval of
Final Plan for the entire PUD or for one or more of th~
development stages as made a part of the supporting data.
The Prelimi.nary Plan approval shall become void within
one year unless a request is made for a Final Plan approval.
The Planning Commission shall piace a request for Final
Plan approval on the next regular Planning Commission agenda
after ten (10) days from date of filing. The findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission shall be forwarded
to the Council for consideration.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 13
Failure to Begin Planned Development: If no construction
has begun or no use established in the planned development
within one (i) year from the approval of the final develop-
ment plan, the final development plan shall lapse and be
of no further effect. In its discretion and for good cause,
the Planning Commission may extend for one (!) additional
year the period for the beginning of construction or the
establishment of a use. If a final development plan lapses
under the provisions of this section, the clerk of the
council shall remove the planned development from the zoning
map and shall file a notice of revocation with the recorded
final development plan. The zoning regulations applicable
before the final development was approved shall then be re-
vived and in effect.
(bi Requirements for Preliminary Plan
The preliminary plan and supporting data' shall include the
followlng:
i) The existing topographic character of the land.
.ii) Map showing enough of the surrounding area to demonstrate
the relationship of the proposed PUD.
iii) A statement on populatiOn, as to density,, numbers and
age distribution.
iv) A statement on the existing public services, such as
schools, parks, fire protection, playgrounds, bus, etc.
v) A map showing street systems, plot lines and plot
designs.
vi)
Areas proposed to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved
for parks, parkways, playgrounds, school sites, public
buildings, and similar public and semi-public uses.
vii)
viii)
A plot plan for each building site and common open area,
showing the approximate location of a11 buildings,
structures, and improvements and indicating the open
spaces around buildings and structures.
Elevation and perspective drawings of ali proposed
structures and improvements except single-family resi-~
dences and their accessory buildings. The drawings
need not be the result of final architectural decisions
and need not be in detail.
ix)
A development schedule indicating (1) the approximate
date when construction of the'project can be expected
to begin; (2) the stages in which the project will be
built and the approximate date when construction of
each stage can be expected to begin (3) the anticipated
rate of development; (4) the approximate dates when the
development of each of the stages in the development
will be completed; and (5) the area and location of common
open space that will be provided at each stage.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 14
Agreements, provisions, or covenants which
govern the use, maintenance, and continued
protection of the planned development and any
of its common open areas.
The following plans and diagrams, insofar as the
Planning Conrnission finds that the planned develop-
ment creates special problems of traffic, parking,
landscaping or economic feasibility:
1)
2)
An off-street parking and loading plan.
A circulation diagram indicating the propose~
movement of vehicles, goods, and pedestrians
within the planned development and to and from
existing thoroughfares. Any special engineering
features and traffic regulation devices needed
to facilitate or insure the safety of this cir-
culation pattern must be shown.
3) A landscaping and tree planting plan.
4)
An economic feasibility report or market
analysis.
5) Preliminary Utility Plan
(c)
Preliminary Plan Standards
All of the requirements of the Use District within which
the plan is located shall apply except as herein amended.
i)
The tract of land shall be served with city sewer and
water and have not less than seventy-five (75) feet of
public right-of-way frontage.
No principal building shall be nearer than its height
to the rear or side lot line when such line abuts an
"R-I" or "R-2" Use District.
No building within the development shall be nearer to
another building than one-half (1/2) the sum of the
height of the t~o buildings.
:tv)
Private roadways within the project designed as
collector streets (no driveways) shall be twenty-
eight (28) feet or more in width, face to face
of curb, private accessways shall be
twenty-four (24) feet or more in width, face to
face of curb and service roads shall be twenty-
two (22) feet or more in width, face to face of
curb. Service roads shall not serve more than
twenty (20) dwelling units or a use equivalent in
traffic generation. Should guest parking require-
ments be proposed as on street spaces, the street
widths as herein stated shall be widened 8 x 22
feet for each space.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 15
vi)
vii)
×)
No building shall be located less than fifteen
(15) feet from the back of the curb on roadways
and accessways, and three (3) feet on service
roads.
Guest parking ratio shall be one (1) space for
each four (4) units with no unit having a distance
greater than two hundred (200) feet to such space.
An open space system shall be designed showing
recreational areas equal to at least ten
percent of thc sl. te area and served by pedestrian
orlentcd path system. Those natural areas,
i.e., woods, hills, valleys, wet areas, rock
outcrops are to be favored as part of the open
space system.
A sewer-water public utility system to serve the
project shall be submitted, said system shall
cllcate a fire hydrar~t distribution to the approval
of the Fire Chief and in total to the City Council.
A street light system shall be submitted for
aoorgval and all wires shall be below ground.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 9.108 (5), dwelling
units erected in the "R-2" District shall have a minimum
floor area of 750 square feet for each unit containing one
bedroom or less~ plus~120 square feet for each additional
bedroom within the unit· ,
Requirement for Final Plan
Within six (6) months followlng the approval of the
pre:imlnary development plan, the applicant shall file
with the P]anning Conrnisslon a final development plan
containing in final form the informatlon requlr, ed
the prellrninary plan. In ~ts discretion and for good
cause, the Planning Commission ma)' ~xtend for six
months the period for filing of the flnal development'
plan.
ii) The Planning Codmlsslon shall give notice and provide
an opportun!ty to be heard on the final development
plan to:
1) Any person who appeared of record at the
hearing on the prelimlnary development plan
or at .the hearing on the outllne development
plan,"if.any.-
2) Any other person who has Indicated to the Plannlng
Commission in writing that he wishes to be notified.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 16
(f)
iii) The Planning Commission shall review the final development
plan, and shall recommend approval of the final development
plan if it is in substantial compliance with the prellmlnary
development plan. The clerk of the council shall record the
final development plan in the manner provided for recording
plats of subdivisions.
Enforcing Development Schedule
The construction and provision of all of the cor~non open spaces
and publlc and recreational facilities which are shown on the
final development plan must proceed at 'the san~ rate as the
construction of dwe]llng units. At least once every slx
months foilowlng the approval of the final development plan~
the Zoning Administrator shall review all of the building
permits issued for the planned development and examine the
construction which has taken place on the site. If he shall
find that the rate of construction of dwelling units [s greater
than the rate at which common open spaces and recreatlonal
facilitles have been constructed and provided, he shall forward
this information to the council, which may revoke the planned
development permit.
~onveyance and Maintenance of Common Open Space
i) All land shown on the final development plan as common open
space must be conveyed under one of the fo]lowing options:
l)
It may be conveyed to a public agency which will agree
to maintain the conxnon open space and any buildings,
structures, or improvements which have been placed
on it.
2)
It may be conveyed to trustees provided in an
identure establishing an association or similar
organization for the maintenance of the planned
development. The common open space must be con-
veyed to the trustees subject to covenants to
be approved by the Planning Commission which re-
strict the common open space to the uses specified
on the final development plan, and which provide
for the maintenance of the common open space in a
manner which assures its continuing use for its
intended purpose.
ii) No common open space may be put to any use not specified
in the final development plan unless the final development
plan has been amended to permit that use under Section g.ll6(17)(d)
of this Ordinance. However, no change of use authorized
under Section g.ll6(17)(d) ma7 be considered as a ~aiver o£ any
of the covenants limiting the use of common open space areas,
and all rights to enforce these covenants against any use
permitted under Section g.ll6(17)(f) ate e×ptessl7 reserved.
iii) If the common open space is not conveyed to a public agency,
either one of the followi, ng methods of enforcement must be
provided:
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 17
1)
The legal right to develop the con, on open space for
the uses not specified in the final development plan
must be conveyed to a public agency.
2)
The restrictions governing the use, improvement, and
maintenance of the con,non open space must be stated
as conditions to the conveyance of the common open
space, the fee title to the common open space to vest
in a public agency in the event of a substantial
default in the stated conditions.
iv) If the common open space is not conveyed to a public
agency, the covenants governing the use, improvement,
and maintenance of the common open space may authorize a
public agency to enforce their provisions.
9.116(17)
(si
Standards for Common or Public Open Space
'No open area may be accepted as common open space under the
provisions of this Ordinance unless it meets the following
standards:
i) The location, shape, size, and character of the common
open space must be suitable for the planned development.
ii) Common open space must be used for amenity or recreational
purposes. The uses authorized for the con,non open space
must be appropriate to the scale and character of the
planned development, considering its size, density,
expected population, topography, and the number and
type of dwellings to be provided.
iii) Common open space must be suitably improved for its
intended use, but common open space containing natural
features worthy of preservation may be left unimproved.
The buildings, structure~, and improvements which are
permitted in the common open space must be appropriate
to the uses which are authorized for the common open
space and must conserve and enhance the amenities of
the common open space having regard to its topography
and unimproved condition.
The development schedule which is part of the development
plan must coordinate the improvement of the common open
space, the construction of buildings, structures, and
improvements in the common open space, and the construc-
tion of residential dwellings in the planned development.
If the final development plan provides for buildings,
structures, and improvements in the common open space
of a value in excess of Five Thousand ($5,000) Oollars,
the developer must provide a bond or other adequate
assurance that the buildings, structures, and improvey
ments have been completed according to the development
plan.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 18
(h)
Control of Planned Unit Development Followln~ Completion
i) The Planning Commission shall issue a certificate
certifying the completion of the planned development,
and the clerk of the Planning Commission shall note
the issuance of the certificate on the recorded final
development plan.
ii) After the certificate of completion has been issued, the
use of land and the construction, modification, or
alteration of any buildings or structures within the
planned development will be governed by the approved
final development plan rather than by any other provi-
sions of this Zoning Ordinance.
iii) After the certificate of completion has been issued, no
changes may be made in the approved final development
plan except 6pon application to the appropriate agency
under the procedures provided below:
1) Any minor extensions, alterations, or modifications
of existing buildlngs or structures may be authorized
~by the Planning Commission if they are consistent
with the purposes and intent of the flnal plan. No.
change authorized by this section may increase the
cube of any building or structure by more than ten
percent.
2) Any uses not authorized by the approved final plan, but
allowable in the planned development as a permitted
use under the provisions of the zoning ordinance, or
permitted as a conditional use in the zone in which the
planned development is located, may be added to the
final development plan under the procedures provided
by the Zoning Ordinance for the approval of conditional
uSeS.
3) A building or structure that is totally or substantially
destroyed may be reconstructed only in compliance with
the final development plan unless an amendment to the
final development plan is approved under subsection 5.
4) Changes in the use of common open space may be
authorized by an amendment to the final development
plan under subsection 5,
5) All other changes in the final development plan must
be made by the council, under the procedures authorized
by this ordinance for the amendment of the zoning map.
No changes may be made in the final development plan
unless they are required for the continued successful
functioning of the planned development, or unless they
are required by changes in conditions that have occurred
since the final plan was approved or by changes in the
development policy of the community.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 19
iv) No changes in the final development plan which are approved under this
section are to be considered as a waiver of the covenants limiting the use
of the land, buildings, structures, and improvements within the area of the
planned development, and all rights to enforce these covenants against any
changes permitted by this section are expressly reserved.
Section 2: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30)
days after its passage.
First reading:
Second reading:
Date of passage:
August 22, 1983
September 12, 1983
September 12, 1983
Offered by:
Seconded by:
Roll call:
Hentges
Petkoff
Hovland, Petkoff,
Hentges--aye
Norberg, Nawrocki--
nay
Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary
Bruce G. Nawrocki, Mayor
c. First Reading of Ordinance No. 1053
Motion by Norberg, second by Hovland to waive the reading of the ordinance there being
ample copies available to the public. Roll call: All ayes
ORDINANCE NO. 1053
BEING AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MINNEGASCO, INC., A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, ITS SUCCESSORS
AND ASSIGNS, A NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, REPAIR AiID ~tAlilTAIN FAC-
ILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE TRANSPORTATION, DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURE AND SALE OF GAS
ENERGY FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USE AND TO USE THE PUBLIC GROUND OF THE CITY OF COLUMBIA
HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, FOR SUCH PURPOSES; AND PRESCRIBING CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS
THEREOF.
The City Council of the City of Columbia Heights does ordain:
Section l: Chapter 12 of Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, passed June 21, 1977, which
is currently reserved, shall hereafter read as follows, to-wit:
CHAPTER 12
ARTICLE I
SECTION l:
12.101
lZ.lO1 (1)
12. lO1 (2_.)
12.101 (3)
12.1 O1 (4)
UTILITY FRANCHISES
SRA
UNIFORM
GAS FRANCHISE (MIHNEGASCO)
DEFINITIONS
The following terms shall mean:
Comp.any. Minnegasco, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, its successors
and assigns.
Gas. Natural gas, manufactured gas, mixture of natural gas and manu-
factured gas or other forms of gas energy.
Municipality, Municipal Council, Municipal Clerk. These terms mean
respectively, the City of Columbia Heights, the Council of the City
of Columbia Heights and the Clerk of the City of Columbia Heights.
Public Ground. All streets, alleys, public ways, utility easements
and public grounds of the Municipality as to which it has the right
to grant the use to the Company.
SECTION 2: FRANCHISE GENERALLY.
12.102(1) Grant of Franchise.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 20
12.102(1)
Grant of Franchise. There is hereby granted to the Company, from
the effective date hereof through June 30, 2003, the right to
import, manufacture, transport, distribute and sell gas for public
and private use in the Municipality, and for these purposes to
construct, operate, repair and maintain in, on, over, under and
across the Public Ground of the Municipality, all facilities and
equipment used in connection therewith, and to do all things which
are necessary or customary in the accomplishment of these objec-
tives, subject to zoning ordinances, other applicable ordinances,
permit procedures, customary practices, and the provisions of this
franchise.
12.102(2)
12.102(3)
Effective Date; Written .Acceptance. This franchise shall be in
force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and its acceptance by the Company in writing
filed with the Municipal Clerk within 60 days after publication.
Nonexclusive Franchise. This is not an exclusive franchise.
12.4o2(4)
12.102(5)
12.102(6 )
Franchise Fee. The Company may be required to pay to the
Municipality, in the manner and at a rate prescribed by a separate
ordinance, a fee determined by collections from sales of Gas, but
not to exceed 5% of the Company's gross revenue from the sale of
Gas within the Municipality. Such ordinance may be adopted,
amended, repealed or readopted at any time during the term of this
franchise. The fee, if required, shall be effective 90 days after
written notice of the ordinance to the Company. No such fee shall
be effective as to sales made before January 1, 1984. The fee
shall be separately stated on gas bills rendered to customers
within the Municipality.
Publica~ioB Expels~. The expense of publication of this ordinance
shall be paid by the Company.
Default. If the Company is in default in the performance of any
material part of this franchise for more than 90 days after
receiving written notice from the Municipality of such default,
the Municipal Council may, by ordinance, terminate all rights
granted hereunder to the Company. The notice of default shall be
in writing and shall specify the provisions of this franchise
under which the default is claimed and state the basis therefor.
Such notice shall be served on the Company by personally deli-
vering it to an officer thereof at its principal place of business
in Minnesota.
If the Company is in default as to any part of this franchise, the
Municipality may, after reasonable notice to the Company and the
failure of the Company to cure the default within a reasonable
time, take such action as may be reasonably necessary to abate the
condition caused by the default, and the Company agrees to reim-
burse the Municipality for all its reasonable costs and for its
costs of collection, including attorney fees.
Nothing in this section shall bar the Company from challenging the
Municipality's claim that a default has occurred. In the event of
disagreement over the existence of a default, the burden of
proving the default shall be on the Municipality.
SECTION 3 CONDITIONS OF USE.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 21
12.103(1)
12.103(2)
12.103(3)
12.103(4)
Use of Public Ground. All utility facilities and equipment of the
Company shall be located, constructed, installed and maintained so
as not to endanger or unnecessarily interfere with the usual and
customary traffic, travel, and use of public ground, and shall be
subject to permit conditions of the Municipality. The permit com-
ditions may provide for the right of inspection by the
Municipality, and the Company agrees to make its facilities and
equipment available for inspection at all reasonable times and
places.
Permit Required. The Company shall not open or disturb the sur-
face of any public ground for any purpose without first having
obtained a permit from the Municipality, for which the
Municipality may impose a reasonable fee to be paid by the
Company. The mains, services and other property placed pursuant
to such permit shall be located as shall be designated by the
Municipality.
The Company may, however, open and disturb the surface of any
public ground without a permit where an emergency exists requiring
the immediate repair of its facilities. The Company in such event
shall request a permit not later than the second working day
thereafter.
Restoration. Upon completion of any work requiring the opening of
any Public Ground, the Company shall restore the same, including
paving and its foundations, to as good condition as formerly, and
shall exercise reasonable care to maintain the same for two years
thereafter in good condition. Said work shall be completed as
promptly as weather permits, and if the Company shall not promptly
perform and complete the work, remove all dirt, rubbish, equipment
and material, and put the Public Ground in good condition at the
expense of the Company; and the Company shall, upon demand, pay to
the Municipality the cost of such work done for or performed by
the Municipality, including its administrative expense and
overhead, together with 10% additional as liquidated damages.
This remedy shall be in addition to any other remedy available to
the Municipality.
Relocation of Utility Facilities. The Company shall promptly,
with due regard for seasonal working conditions, permanently relo-
cate its facilities or equipment whenever the Municipality orders
such relocation. If the relocation is a result of the proper
exercise of the police power in grading, regrading, changing the
location or shape of or otherwise improving any Public Ground or
constructing or reconstructing any sewer or water system therein,
the relocation shall be at the expense of the Company. If the
relocation is not a result of the proper exercise of the police
power, the relocation shall be at the expense of the Municipality.
If such relocation is done without an agreement first being made
as to who shall pay the relocation cost, such relocation of the
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 22
12.103(5)
12.103(6)
facilities by the Company shall not be construed as a waiver of
its right to be reimbursed for the relocation cost. If the
Company claims that it should be reimbursed for such relocation
costs, it shall notify the Municipality within thirty days after
receipt of such order. The Municipality shall give the Company
reasonable notice of plans requiring such relocation.
Nothing contained in this subsection shall require the Company to
remove and replace its mains or to cut and reconnect its service
pipe running from the main to a customer's premises at its own
expense where the removal and replacement or cutting and recon-
necting is made for the purpose of a more expeditious operation
for the construction or reconstruction of underground facilities;
nor shall anything contained herein relieve any person from liabi-
lity arising out of the failure to exercise reasonable care to
avoid damaging the Company's facilities while performing any work
in any Public Ground.
Relocation When Public Ground Vacated. The vacation of any Public
Ground shall not operate to deprive the Company of the right to
operate and maintain its facilities therein. Unless ordered under
Section 12.103(4), the Company need not relocate until the reaso-
nable cost of relocating and the loss and expense resulting from
such relocation are first paid to the Company. When the vacation
is for the benefit of the Municipality in the furtherance of a
public purpose, the Company shall relocate at its own expense.
Street Improvements, Paving or Resurfaci.ng. The Municipality
shall give the Company reasonable written notice of plans for
street improvements where paving or resurfacing of a permanent
nature is involved. The notice shall contain the nature and
character of the improvements, the streets upon which the improve-
ments are to be made, the extent of the improvements and the time
when the Municipality will start the work, and, if more than one
street is involved, the order in which this work is to proceed.
The notice shall be given to the Company a sufficient length of
time, considering seasonable working conditions, in advance of the
actual commencement of the work to permit the Company to m~We any
additions, alterations or repairs to its facilities the Company
deems necessary.
In cases where streets are at final width and grade, and the
Municipality has installed underground sewer and water mains and
service connections to the property line abutting the streets
prior to a permanent paving or resurfacing of such streets, and
the Company's main is located under such street, the Company may
be required to install gas service connections prior to such
paving or resurfacing, whenever it is apparent that gas service
will be required during the five years following the paving or
resurfacing.
SECTION 4 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
~egular Council Meeting
S~ptember 12, 1983
page 23
12.104(1)
12.104(2)
12.104(3)
12.104(4)
12.104(5)
Indemnification. The Company shall indemnify, keep and hold the
Municipality, its elected officials, officers, employees, and
agents free and harmless from any and all claims and actions on
account of injury or death of persons or damage to property occa-
sioned by the construction, maintenance, repair, removal, or
operation of the Company's property located in, on, over, under,
or across the public ground of the Municipality, unless such
injury or damage is the result of the negligence of the
Municipality, its elected officials, employees, officers, or
agents. The Municipality shall not be entitled to reimbursement
for its costs incurred prior to notification to the Company of
claims or actions and a reasonable opportunity for the Company to
accept and undertake the defense.
If a claim or action shall be brought against the ~micipality
under circumstances where indemnification applies, the Company, at
its sole cost and expense, shall defend the M~nicipality if writ-
ten notice of the claim or action is promptly given to the Company
within a period wherein the Company is not prejudiced by lack of
such notice. The Company shall have complete control of such
claim or action, but it may not settle without the consent of the
Municipality, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. This sec-
tion is not, as to third parties, a waiver of any defense or immu-
nity otherwise available to the Municipality, and the Company in
defending any action on behalf of the Municipality shall be
entitled to assert every defense or ~mmunity that the Mmnicipality
could assert in its own behalf.
Assignment. The Company, upon notice to the Municipality, shall
have the right and authority to assign all rights conferred upon
it by this franchise to any person. The assignee of such rights,
by accepting such assignment, shall become subject to the terms
and provisions of this franchise.
Change in Form of Government. Any change in the form of govern-
ment of the Municipality shall not affect the validity of this
franchise. Any governmental unit succeeding the Municipality
shall, without the consent of the Company, automatically succeed
to all of the rights and obligations of the Municipality provided
in this franchise.
Severability. If any portion of this franchise is found to be
invalid for any reason whatsoever, the validity of the rest of
this franchise shall not be affected.
Notices. Any notice required by this franchise shall be suf-
ficient if, in the case of notice to the Company, it is delivered
to Minnegasco, Inc., Attention: Vice President, Minnesota
Operations, 201 South Seventh Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota
55402, and, in the case of the Municipality, it is delivered to
City of Columbia Heights, Attention: City Manager, 590 - 4Oth
Avenue Northeast, Columbia Heights, Minnesota 55421.
Re§ular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 23 ~!.)
Section 2:
SECTION 5 CHARTER REQUIR~ENTS
12.105(1)
That the Company shall be subject to and will perform on its part
all the terms of Sections 94 to 102, inclusive of the Charter of
the City.
12.105(2)
That the Company shall not issue any capital stock on account of
the franchise or the value thereof, and that the Company shall
have no right to receive, upon condemnation proceedings brought by
the City to acquire the public utility exercising such franchise,
any return on account of the franchise or its value.
12.105(3)
That no sale or lease of said franchise shall be active until the
assignee or leases shall have filed in the office of the City
Clerk an instrument, duly executed, reciting the fact of such sale
or lease, accepting the terms of the franchise, and agreeing to
perform all the conditions required of the Company thereunder.
12.105(4)
That every grant in said franchise contained of permission for the
erection of poles, masts, or other fixtures in the streets and for
the attachment of wires thereto, or for the laying of tracks in,
or of pipes or conduits, under places of any permanent or semi-
permanent fixtures whatsoever, shall be subject to the condition
that the council shall have the power to require such alterations
therein, or relocation or rerouting thereof, as the council may at
any time deem necessary for health, or convenience of the public,
and particularly that it shall have the power to require the remo-
val of poles, masts, and other fixtures bearing wires and the
placing underground of poles, masts, and of other fixtures bearing
wires and the placing underground of all wires for whatsoever pur-
pose used ·
1 2. 105 (5)
This franchise and every extension or renewal thereof must be
accepted in writing by the Company within 30 days after its
passage by the Council and before its submission to a vote of the
people in case of a referendum. This franchise shall not be
binding upon the City until its acceptance by the Company. Such
acceptance shall be construed to be an acceptance of and consent
to all the terms, conditions, and limitations contained in this
ordinance granting the franchise as well as of the provisions of
the Charter of the City of Columbia Heights.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the completion
of all three of the following events, to-wit:
(a) 30 days from and after the passage of this Ordinance;
(b) Acceptance in writing by Company within 30 days after the passage of this
Ordinance; and
(c) This ordinance has been oublished once Der week for four con~e~utlve
weeks in the official newspaper of the City.
First Reading: September 12, 1953
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 24
First Reading of Ordinance No. 1054
Motion by Norberg, second by Petkoff to waive the reading of the ordinance there being
ample copies available to the public. Roll call: All ayes
The City Attorney stated that the presently there is no requirement for insurance for the
sale of beer in off-sale establishments
ORDINANCE NO. IO54
BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 853, CITY CODE OF 1977, PERTAINING TO DRAM
SHOP INSURANCE FOR BEER LICENSES
The City Council of the City of Columbia Heights does ordain:
Section 1: Section 5.501(10) of Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, passed June 21, 1977,
which is currently reserved shall herewith read as follows:
"No person may be licensed hereunder unless the licensee is insured for the
coverages and in at least the amounts required by Minnesota Statute ~ 340.11,
Subd. 21. All licensees must file proof of insurance, or proof of such other
financial responsibility as is provided by Minnesota Statute ~ 340.11, Subd.
21. Any insurance certificates or policies filed with the City shall provide
that the insurer may not cancel coverage without 30 days' written notice to
the City. The certificate or policy must further show the names of the in-
surance company and agency, policy number, and policy expiration date."
ion 2: Section 5.501(11) of Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, passed June 21, 1977
which is currently reserved shall herewith read as follows:
"Off-sale beer licenses with annual beer sales of less than $9,000.00 are exempt
from the insurance provisions of Section 5.5Oi(10). No such exemption shall
be granted unless the licensee:
(a) furnishes proof by accountant's affidavit or other documentary evidence
satisfactory to the Clerk, and
(b) such proof is found satisfactory to the Liquor Control Commission
in demonstrating that the applicant has annual sales of less than $9,000.00"
Section 3: Section 5.501(12) of Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, passed June 21, 1977
which is currently reserved shall herewith read as follows:
"Receipt by the City of a notice of expiration of required insurance or entering
into the final 30 days of any required policy without a renewal or other comply-
ing policy being filed with the Clerk shall result in the immediate revocation
or suspension of the licensee."
Section 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30)
days after its passage.
First reading: September 12, 1983
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 25
First Reading of Ordinance No. 1055 Pertaining to Dram Shop Insurance for Club
nd Wine Licenses
Motion by Norberg, second by Petkoff to waive the reading of the ordinance there being
ample copies available to the public. Roll call: All ayes
Motion by Hentges to amend the reading and require that the holder of a 3.2 license
to carry the same amount of insurance as a holder of a club and wine license. Motion
to amend withdrawn.
Discussion was held regarding the amounts of insurance being required by holders of
licenses.
Motion to waive the reading of Ordinance No. 1055 was withdrawn.
Motion by Norberg, second by Hentges to reconsider the reading of Ordinance No. 1054.
Roll call on reconsideration: Norberg, Hentges--aye Hovland, Petkoff, Nawrocki--nay
Motion to reconsider fails.
f. Resolution 83-44 Lotsplit-4237-4243 Pierce Street
Mo~ion by Norberg, second by Hentges to waive the reading of the ordinance incorporating
the City Attorney's suggested changes there being ample copies available to the public.
Roll call: Ail ayes
The City Attorney advised the Council that the buyer of the property in question had not
as yet signed the purchase agreement. The City Engineer also advised the Council that
there are three stub outs in front of this property and that only two wlll be needed.
He felt the purchaser should be responsible for capping the stub out that will not be
needed. These two conditions were to be included in the resolution. Councilman Hentges
had objection to the street being dug up to do the capping as this is a relatively new
street.
RESOLUTION 83-44
SUBDIVISION REQUEST
Fee $10.00
Date Paid: 8-19-8
Receipt No.:
10091
I, dames E. Prokopowicz hereby request a split of
PLAT 34416, PARCEL 2721 KEY PIN 36 30 24 24 O132
Legally described as:
South 165 feet of Lot 6, Block 3, Reservoir Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the West
llO feet thereof. (Reserving and subject to a roadway and utility easement over the South
30 feet thereof.)
THE DESCRIPTION HENCEFORTH TO BE:
1. North 67.5 feet of the South 165 feet of Lot 6, Block 3, Reservoir Hills, A~oka County,
~innesota, except the West llO feet thereof.
2. South 97.5 feet of Lot 6, Block 3, Reservoir Hills, Anoka County, Minnesota except the
West 110 feet thereof. (Reserving and subject to a roadway and utility easement over the
South 30 feet thereof.)
Be it further resolved that special assessments of record in the office of the City of Col-
umbia Heights as of this day, against the above described property, in the amount of
$ be divided. Paid.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 26
PLANNING AND ZOtlING DEPARTMENT ACTION:
Approved
Offered by: Heintz
Seconded by: Nixon
Roll call: All ayes
LeRoy Goranson
Zoning Officer
James Prokopowicz
Signature of Owner, Notarized
4332 Washington Street N.E., Col Hts.
Owner's Address
Telephone No. 781-8136
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 16th day of September, 1983.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Bonnie A. Jewett, Notary Public
Approved this 12th day of September, 1983, with
the effective date of this resolution contingent on the completion at the applicant's ex-
pense of currently capping the sewer stub out and the removal of the water stub out to the
corporation in accordance with the recommendations of the Public Works Birector and upon
the applicant's execution of the purchase agreement for the property with the £ity of Col-
umbia Heights.
Offered by:
Seconded by:
Roll call:
Norberg
Hentges
Hovland, Petkoff, Norberg, Nawrocki--aye
Hentges---nay
Bruce G. Nawrocki, Mayor
Jo-Anne Student, Council Secretary
6. Communications
a. Planning and Zoning Commission
1. Daniel Whipps, 4356 Madison Street, Special Purpose Fence
Motion by Hovland, second by Petkoff to grant the permit for a special purpose at 4356
Madison Street, based upon recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Roll call:
All ayes
2. Nicholas Vi]lella, 1216 Khyber Lane, Special Purpose Fence
Motion by Petkoff, second by Hov]and to grant permission for the construction of a six foot
high cedar vertical board Special purpose fence at 1216 Khyber Lane as recommended by the
Planning & Zoning Commission. Roll call: All ayes
3. Planned Unit Development Ordinance No. 1052
The Council was advised that the Planning & Zoning Commission has recommended the approval
of the changing of Section 9.108(5) of the Zoning Ordinance to add:
(f) E.U.D. dwelling units shall have a minimum floor area of 750 square feet for each
unit containing one bedroom or less, plus 120 square feet for each additional bed-
room within the unit.
No Council action was needed as this matter had been addressed in Ordinance No. 1052.
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 27
b. Traffic Commission
1. Request for Handicapped Parking Stall
Motion by Hentges, second by Petkoff to authorize the installation of a handicapped park-
ing stall in front of 4216 Seventh Street. Roll call: all ayes
c. Approval of Federal Communications Commission Regarding 5% Cable TV Franchise Fee
This item was informational.
d. Memo from Finance Director Regarding Response to Auditor's Management Letter
This item was informational. Mayor Nawrocki requested that the Auditor meet with the Council
perhaps at a Council work session.
e. MTC Receiving Bids for Sale of Used Transit Buses
This item was informational.
f. State Department of Transportation Permit Approval Regarding Central Avenue Street-
scaping (Westside)
This was an informational item, however the Council did discuss the conditions that are to
be met by the City that were placed on the permit by MN/DOT.
g. Request for a Block Party
A request was received for a block party from Mark Babin of 2303 Maiden Lane. The Police
Chief recommended denial of this request since it is not for a block party but rather for
a private party which would not include people or neighbors in the immediate area.
Motion by Norberg, second by Hentges to deny a block party request submitted by Mark Babin
2303 Maiden Lane , based on the Police Chief's recommendation for denial. Roll call: All
ayes
RECESS: 10:25
RECONVENE: 10:45
7. Old and New Business
a. Old Business
1. Sale of Water to City of Minneapolis
There was discussion on the matter of selling water to the City of Minneapolis based on
some conditions. These conditions dealt with the ability of the City of Columbia Heights
being allowed to continue to supply water to residents of other communities through some
interconnects, a practice from the past. The total number of residents served in this cap-
acity is 76.
Motion by Hentges, second by Hovland to authorize the sale of water to Minneapolis at the
rate of 85¢ per I00 cubic feet subject to an agreement from the City of Minneapolis formal-
izing the resale of water to consumers adjacent to the City of Columbia Heights when water
cannot be reasonably supplied by their respective communities. Roll call: All ayes
2. Bill for Engineering Services from Minneapolis for Reconstruction of 37th Avenue
Motion by Hentges, second by Norberg to authorize the payment of $30,315.71 to the City of
Minneapolis for engineering services associated with Project #8000, 37th Avenue Recon-
struction (Central Avenue to Main Street). Roll call: All ayes
3. Agreement to Participate in Minnesota Emergency Employment Development Act (MEED)
The conditions of this agreement were discussed and it was noted that it is an open agre-
ement until March of 1984.
Motion by Hentges, second by Hovland to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into
an agreement between Anoka County (through the Anoka County Job Training Center) and the
Regular Council Meeting
September 12~ 1983
page 28
City of Columbia Heights for the purpose of employment of persons to fill newly created
porary positions in the City, which will be funded under the Minnesota Emergency Emp-
loyment Development Act. Roll call: All ayes
b. New Business
1. Weed Cutting Agreement
Motion by Petkoff, second by Norberg to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute
a contract between the City and Mr. Stan Jensen for grass and weed cutting during the re-
mainder of calendar year 1983. Roll call: All ayes
2. Purchases
a. Replacement Tires for Police Vehicles
Motion by Norberg, second by Hentges to authorize the purchase of tires for squad cars under
the Hennepin County Purchase Agreement from Suburban Tire in the amount of $746.02. Roll
call: All ayes
b. Grader Blades
Motion by Norberg, second by Hovland to authorize the purchase of 20 3/4" x 8" x 6' grader
blades under the Hennepin County Purchase from Parco Co. of Atwater, Mn. in the amount of
$1,OO5.20. Roll call: Hovland, Petkoff, Hentges, Nawrockl--aye Norberg--abstain
3. Establish Salary for Clerk-Typist ll
Motion by Petkoff, secdnd by Hentges to establish the salary of Clerk-Typist ll, Nancy
French, at $5.52 per hour effective September 28, 1983. Roll call: All ayes
4. Replacement of Door at Liquor Store #3
Motion by Petkoff, second by Hovland to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute
an agreement with Glass Masters in the amount of $1,572.80 to replace the front door and
door frame at 5225 University Avenue based upon low, informal quotation. Roll call: All
ayes
5. Inspection/Training Contract
Motion by Petkoff, second by Norberg to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute
a contract with the State Department of Public Safety to provide inspection services for
hotels in return for training of City firefighters; and furthermore, that such contract
expire June 1, 1986. Roll call: All ayes
6. Market Analysis Regarding New Off-Sale Liquor Store Location
Motion by Petkoff, second by Hovland to authorize the City Manager to seek requests for
proposals for preparation of a retail liquor store market analysis based upon a store
location at the Zayre Shopper City property. Roll call: Hovland, Petkoff, Nawrocki--
aye Norberg--nay Hentges--abstain
7. Authorization to Make Payment Upon Demand for Recreation and Community Education
Self-Sustaining Activities
Motion by Petkoff, second by Hovland to authorize the Recreation and Community Services
Commission to enter into agreements and contracts over $500 for self-sustaining programs
only; and furthermore, that intermim checks be written as needed in payment for such ac -
tivities.
Motion to amend by Norberg, second by Hentges to place an upper limit of $1,O00. Roll call
amendment: Norberg--aye Hovland, Petkoff, Hentges, Nawrocki--nay Motion to amend fails.
Roll call on main motion: Hovland, Petkoff, Hentges, Nawrocki--aye Norberg--nay
Regular Council Meeting
September 12, 1983
page 29
Establishment of Dates for Council Work Sessions
The following dates and times were chosen for Council work sessions: Monday, September
19, 9:00; Wednesday, September 21, 8:00; and, Thursday, September 22, 9:00 pm.
Council work sessions are held in the City Hall unless posted otherwise.
9. Human Services Networking Proclamation
Mayor Nawrocki officially proclaimed Friday, September 23, 1983 as HUMAN SERVICE NET-
WORKING DAY in the City of Columbia Heights
10. Mechanic's Report Regarding the Use of Propane in City Vehicles
Members of the Council received copies of the report on the suggested use of propane in
city vehicles. This report was furnished at the request of the Science, Technology &
Energy Commission. This Commission had conducted an inquiry of its own into this matter.
It also had representatives of propane companies come to its meetings and make present-
ations. Councilman Norberg's comment on the mechanic's report was only an inquiry as to
whether or not he had read the Commission's report.
8. Reports
a. Report of the City Manager
The City Manager's report was presented in writing and most of the items were discussed.
Also, discussed at this time was an item regarding revising the dimensions required pre-
sently by ordinance to accommodate compact cars.
Report of the City Attorney
City Attorney had nothing to report at this time.
9. Licenses
Motion by Petkoff, second by Norberg to approve the licenses as listed upon payment of
proper fee. Roll call: All ayes
10. Payment of Bills
Motion by Hovland, second by Petkoff to pay the bills as listed out of proper fund~. Roll
call: All ayes
Adjournment
Motion by Norberg, second by Hentges to adjourn the meeting at
ayes
-Anne Student, Coun~i~l~ecretary