HomeMy WebLinkAboutDec 12, 1978 (2)OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
DECEMBER 12, 1978
The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m.
Roll Call:
Logacz, Heintz, Norberg, Nawrocki - present
It was noted that Councilman Hentges was attending an HRA meeting
as the Council's representative.
Approximately 30 residents were present.
PURPOSE OF MEETING
Mayor Nawrocki stated that the purpose of the meeting is to conduct a public
hearing for various public improvement projects as proposed for the coming year.
PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION
The City Manager stated that he would go through the proposed improvements by
street and summarize costs and assessments. The estimated cost of the
construction project is $151,766.20, plus 10% inflationary increase, plus 15%
engineering and contingency, plus 15% administration for a total of $220,781.87
to be assessed. The cost per assessable front foot will be $23.46 and the cost
per assessable avenue foot will be $7.82. There are approximately 40 vacant
lots on 42½ and 44½. These lots would be assessed the costs of the water and
sewer service as well.
Slides were shown of the proposed areas to be improved and the driveway con-
struction. The City Manager explained how the assessments were figured and which
homes would be assessed. Earl Gustafson, Public Works Director, described the
type of improvement to be installed, the material which will be used, and the
problems anticipated with existing driveways.
The City Manager stated that the common lot, assuming a front footage of 55',
will be assessed $1,290 plus the avenue footage of $430 for a total typical
assessment of $1,720. A corner lot of 145' depth would be assessed $2,424.00.
This project would be bid with other projects as the work is approved by the
Council.
The Mayor asked Council President Heintz to take over the meeting for awhile
as he was going to speak to a Metropolitan Council meeting in another part of
the building.
DISCUSSION
Mr. Bennek, 1312 44½ Ave.; Mr. Ward, 965 44½ Ave.; and Mr. Kruse, 1038 44½ Ave.
had questions about drainage, grading, and lot settling. Mrs. Kocur, 1213 42nd
Ave., asked for the breakdown of the $23.46 per foot assessment and questioned
the sodding which was being proposed as part of the project. Councilman
Heintz explained that in the past the City has either included the cost of the
sodding in the project or allowed the people to take care of their own sodding.
The City Manager stated that the sodding is recommended by the staff to be a part
of the project costs.
December 12, ] 978
Page 2
Ann galuski, 1006 42nd Ave., asked who wanted the project, the residents or
the Council. The City Hanager responded that the residents in the area have
expressed an interest in the project. This interest brings the process to a
public hearing for input from the neighbors and a decision from the Council on
whether to approve the project. Several residents questioned why the street
couldn't be done in concrete, why the City couldn't get federal funds to defray
some of the cost, what is inc]uded in administration and engineering expenses,
and how the interest on the assessment is figured.
Mayor Nawrocki explained that the project wi]l be completed within the summer
months. Sometime in November all projects that have been completed in the
previous season will have an assessment hearing. At that time the actual costs
will be presented. He explained the process of assessing and the options open
to the residents in paying off the assessment.
Discussion followed on why the project was being proposed now before the area
was fully developed. Mr. Check, lO21 42nd Ave., stated his opposition to the
project. He feels the cost of the material will be extremely high next summer
and probably for the next four or five years. He thinks the City should wait
for a more tolerable time in the business cycle.
Mr. Ward stated he supports the installation of the street but is afraid this
will cause even more problems at 44½ and Tyler Place which he feels is already
!~eing used as a raceway. He would like to see a 3-way stop sign installed
there when 44½ is completed.
Discussion continued on the placement of the driveway aprons on vacant lots,
who pays the assessment on County owned lots, and the possible use of asphalt
or mountable curbs.
Mayor Nawrocki emphasized that the costs given tonight are only estimates. When
the bids come in, before they are awarded and if they are significantly over the
estimate, the policy of the Council is to reopen the hearing and explain what
the costs are to the property owners. Discussion followed on whether the entire
project must be awarded together or whether it can be approved for just one street.
Councilman Hentges joined the meeting at 8:55 p.m.
Counci!man Norberg asked for clarification of how this project would be included
with other bids and how the cost of this project will be segregated from the
larger bid. The City Manager answered that the staff maintained project costs
separately. Councilman Norberg asked the people present if they wanted sodding
to be part of the project. A poll was taken; eleven were for including sodding
and fourteen were against. He also asked if it was feasible to leave out
driveway cuts from the undeveloped lots. A curb cut permit would then have to
be obtained at the time of development. The City Manager answered that this
may be costlier to the property owner.
The City Manager read the proposed resolution.
Offered by: Logacz
Seconded by: Hentges
December 12, 1978
Page 3
Councilman Hentges stated he will vote for the project even though some
residents don't approve because the cost wll increase over the years.
Councilman Norberg noted that the resolution included sod and asked if it
would be possible to just sod the developed property.
Motion by Norberg, seconded by Hentges, to amend the resolution to have
sodding applied only to the developed lots.
Discussion followed on the alternatives to sodding all the lots.
Councilmen Norberg and Hentges withdrew their motion.
Motion by Nawrocki, seconded by Heintz, to amend the resolution to strike
sodding from the project.
Councilman Norberg stated that the sodding is a trivial amount, the rest of
the parcels would benefit, and the project would look much better if the
sodding is done by the contractor.
Roll Call: Logacz, Heintz, Hentges, Nawrocki
Norberg - Nay
Aye
RESOLUTION 78-67
BEING A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights by Motion on the
24th day of October, 1978, ordered notice of a hearing to be given to property
owners, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to a notice of hearing certain residents appeared at a
Council meeting on the 12th day of December, 1978, and
WHEREAS, the Council determines to proceed with this local improvement, a
portion of the cost being defrayed by special assessments under Charter
provisions.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED:
1. That the location and extent of such improvements is as follows:
Curb, gutter and surfacing: (not including sodding)
44½ Ave. N.E., Tyler Place N.E. to East Cul-De-Sac
42½ Ave. N.E., West Cul-De-Sac to East Cul-De-Sac
Buchanan Street N.E., 44½ Ave. N.E. to 45th Ave. N.E.
Fillmore St. N.E., 42nd Ave. N.E. to 42½ Ave. N.E.
Pierce St. N.E., 42½ Ave. N.E. to 43rd Ave. N.E.
2. That the materials to be used are as follows:
Concrete and bituminous materials.
December 12, 1978
Page 4
That a carefu] esLJmate of the cost of the improvements has been made by
the City Manager and the severa] lots and parceJs of land fronting upon
and adjacent to such proposed improvements, which be deemed benefited
thereby, were properly notified of said hearings, and
4. That the City Manager shall also list the names and owners of the several
parcels so improved as nearly as can be ascertained.
5. These improvements shall also be known as Project No. 735.
Passed this 12th day of December, 1978.
Roll Call on amended resolution: All ,^,yes
Motion by Heintz, seconded by Norber9, to adjourn at 9:40 p.m.
Roll Call: All Ayes
'BTm%-~--G. Nawrocki, Mayor
'-'~ouncil Secretary