HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeptember 4, 2001 Work SessionCITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
590 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (763) 706-3600 TDD (763) 706-3692
Visit Our Website at: www. ci. columbia-heights, mn. us
ADMINISTRATION
Mayor
Gary L. Peterson
Councllmembers
Marlaine Szurek
Julienne Wyckoff
Bruce Nawrocki
Robert A. Williams
City Manager
Wali Fehsi
NOTICE:
GA TEWA Y PARK DEDICATION WILL BE HELD TUESDA Y, SEPTEMBER 4, 2001
BEGINNING AT 6:00 P.M. AT GATEWAY PARK.
Notice is hereby given that a City Council Work Session
is to be hem in the
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
as follows: PLEASE NOTE TIME CHANGE TO 7:00 P.M.
Meeting of:
Date of Meeting:
Time of Meeting:
Location of Meeting:
Purpose of Meeting:
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2001
7:00 P.M.
CONFERENCE ROOM 1
WORK SESSION
AGENDA
Consent Items
1. 2002BusinessLicense Fees
Discussion Items
1. Consider resolution approving median change on Central Avenue @ 51st Avenue, by MNDOT.
2. Minneapolis Water Works Proposed Filtration Plant - general discussion, to the agenda.
3. Draft ordinance establishing Courtesy Bench Policy
4. Resolution approving the housing revenue bonds for the construction of 50 units of assisted senior
housing by Crest View.
5. Preliminary Budget Resolution
The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or
employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with
disabilities to participate in all City of Columbia Heights' services, programs, and activities. Auxiliary aids for handicapped
persons axe available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Council Secretary
at 706-361 t, to make arrangements. (TDD/706-3692 for deaf or hearing impaired only)
THE CITY Of COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICE5
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
CITY COUNCIL LETTER
Meeting of: September 10, 2001
AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT.: CITY MANAGER
NO: License Department APPROVAL
Shelley Hanson ~.. ~.~"~/~,~'~z~.
ITEM: 2002 Business License Fees BY: BY: >,;.:.~
NO: DATE: September 7, 2001
BACKGROUND
Attached are the proposed business license fees for the 2002 license year and a resolution for the same.
These fees on the attached schedule are the same as for calendar year 2001. The fees charged are to cover
time staff spends in reviewing, processing, and performing record checks, etc.
ANALYSIS/RECOMMENDATION
The fees for Cigarette/Tobacco Sales and Beer and Liquor were increased last year as recommended by
the License Review Committee. I have not been involved in the License Review Committee since taldng
on the responsibilities of this position. Since the committee reviewed the fees last year and made changes
at that time, I am recorranending the license fees remain the same for 2002.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Move to waive the reading of Resolution No. 2001-
RE COMMENDED MOTION:
Move to approve the Resolution #2001-
Schedule as presented.
, as there are ample copies available to the public.
being a Resolution adopting the 2002 Business License Fee
COUNCIL ACTION:
attachments: Resolution 2001-
Fee schedule
2002 BUSINESS LICENSE FEES
Effective January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002.
CATEGORY
FEES
ARTICLE SECTION
Amusement Centers/Arcades
($5,000 Bond'S 100 Inv. Fee) (PD)
$500 IV 2
Auto Recycling Dealer/Yard
($1000 Bond) PD,FD, ZA
$500 II 2
Beer Sales (PD, BI, FI)
On Sale ($150 Inv. Fee 1st time appl.)
OffSale ($150 Inv. Fee 1st time appl.)
Temporary Beer (per day basis)
($500 Appl. Fee; $150 Investigation Fee)
$400
$150
$I00
V 1
Carnivals ($500 deposit & insurance) (PD)
$50/day V 8
Christmas Tree Sales (FI) (P&Z Comm)
($200 Clean-up Deposit)
$50 II 6
Cigarettes/Tobacco Sales (S&H)
$200 III 2
Contractors (Bond and Insurance)
General (if not licensed by State)
Blacktop
Excavator
Masonry/Concrete
Moving
Demolition
Plaster/Stucco
Heating/Cooling
Gas Piping
Plumbing
Sign Installation
$5O
$5O
$5O
$50
$5O
$5O
$50
$5O
$5O
$5O
$50
$5O
IV '7
Courtesy Benches (Insurance)(Eng. Dept.)
$25/each VI 6
Games Of Skill (PD)
$15/Locafion
Plus $15/machine
IV 4
VI 9
Kennels, Commercial (PD) $50
Plus, per cage $10
Page 2
CATEGORY
Liquor Sales (PD, FI, BI)
Class A (Inv. Fee $500-$2000)
Class B (Inv. Fee $500-$2000)
Class C (Inv. Fee $500-$2000)
Class D (Inv. Fee $500-$2000)
Class E (inv. Fee $500-$2000)
On Sale Wine (Inv. Fee $500-$2000)
Sunday Liquor Sales
Temporary On Sale (Inv. Fee $500-$2000)
AClub On Sale Liquor (Inv. Fee$500-$2000)
up to 200 members
201 to 500 members
501 to 1,000 members
1,001 to 2,000 members
2,001 to 4,000 members
4,001 to 6,000 members
Over 6,000 members
Massage Therapist Business (PD,ZA)
($250 Investigation Fee)
Massage Therapy, Individual (PD, ZA)
($250 Investigation Fee)
Motor Vehicle Fuel Dispensing Stations (FI)
First Metering Device
Each Add'l. Metering Device
L.P. Gas Per Metering Device
Motor Vehicle Rental/Leasing (ZA)
A. New Application
B. Renewal Application
Motor Vehicle Sales (New & Used) (FD)
Multiple Dwellings (FI,BI)
First 3-4 Units
Each Additional Unit Over 4
Re-inspection Fee for Code Compliance
Paxvnbroker ($5,000 Bond/$100 Inv. Fee) (PD)
Pet Shop (PD)(Humane Officer)
Pool/Billiard Hall ($100 Inv. Fee) (FD)
FEES ARTICLE SECTION
$8,000
86,500 V
$6,500 V
$8,000 V
$5,500 V
$2,000 V
$200 V
$100/day
Per membership V
$ 300
$ 500
$ 650
$ 800
51,000
$2,00O
$3,000
3
3
3
3
5
6
$500 V 12
$100 V 12
II
$50
$10
$50
VI
$75
$50
$200 II
VI
$ 50
$ 5
$ 70
7
6
4
$12,000 II 5
$50 VI 9
$100 IV 2
Page 3
CATEGORY
FEES
ARTICLE SECTION
Popcorn, Candy, Food Catering Vehicles (PD)
(Insurance - Public & Vehicle Liability)
$50 VI 6
Precious Metal Dealers ($5,000 Bond)(PD)
($100 Investigation Fee)
New Applicant
Renewal
$300
$200
VI 2
Rental Housing Licenses
Single Family & Duplex (Per Unit Basis)
Re-Inspection Fee
$15
$5O
VI 6
Secondhand Merchant Business ($5,000 Bond) $100
(investigation Fee $100) (PD, FI, BI)
Exhibition/Convention/Shows/Expo ($5,000 Bond)
First Day $50
Each Additional Day $10
H 4
H 4
Sexually Oriented/Adult Business (PD,FI,ZA,AC) $10,000
(Investigation Fee $500-$10,000)
V 6
Taxicab Driver (PD) $25
VI 3
Taxicab Vehicle (PD)
$75 VI 3
Transient Merchant/Peddlers (PD) A. Itinerant Hawker/Peddler
B. Transient Merchant
H
$50/day; $100/mo.; $500/yr.
$50/day; $100/mo.; $500/yr.
Tree Removal & Treatment (Ins.) (PWD)
$50 VI 10
LATE PENALTY ON ALL ANNUALLY RENEWABLE FEES
FEE
FEE
BEGUN.
1 - 15 DAYS LATE
16-30 DAYS LATE
OVER 30 DAYS LATE
25% PENALTY OVER ORIGINAL
50% PENALTY OVER ORiGINAL
LEGAL PROCEDURES
DEPARTMENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROVAL OF LICENSE
PD Police Department FI
BI - Building Inspector PWD -
S&H - Safety and Health Inspector CF
ZA - Zoning Administrator AC
Fire Depa, hnent
Public Works Dept
City Forestor
Anoka County
All New Licenses Must Have Zonin~ Administrator's Approval.
RESOLUTION NO. #2001-
ADOPTING 2002 BUSINESS LICENSE FEE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS:
Ordinance No. 853, City Code of 1977, pertaining to commercial
licensing regulations provides for the establishing of annual
license fees; and
WHEREAS:
The City has participated in a survey of metropolitan
municipalities regarding business license fees charged by other
communities; and
WHEREAS: The City is attempting to maintain business license fees which are
comparable to other communities; and
WHEREAS:
The City annually reviews its business license fee schedule and
has concluded that our fees are comparable to other communities
in the metro area;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the attached proposed license fee schedule be
adopted and effective January 1, 2002.
Passed this
Offered by:
Seconded by:
Roll Call:
__day of ,2001.
Mayor Gary L. Peterson
Patricia Muscovitz, Council Secretary
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
TO:
WALT FEHST, CITY MANAGER
RANDY SCHUMACHER, ACTING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIR.
FROM: SHELLEY HANSON
DATE:
AUGUST 17, 2001
SUBJECT: LICENSING FOR 2002
I have done some research on the licensing. I do know we need to pass a resolution each year establishing the
fees. This needs to go to the Council the first meeting in September. I then have to begin the process of the
renewals in September and October.
The following is a list of the licenses that were issued for the year 2001 and the amount of Revenue received:
Amusement Centers/Arcades:
Auto Dealer/Yard
Carnivals:
Christmas Tree Sales:
Cigarette/Tobacco Sales:
Courtesy Benches:
0 for 2001
0 for 2001
I for 2001 $250
0 for 2001
21 for 2001 $200/each
22 for 2001 $ 25/each = $550
will be $50/each
3 were waived (City)
Contractor Licenses:
General:
Asphalt:
Excav/demo:
Cone/masonry:
Stucco:
Heating:
Plumbing:
Windows/siding:
Sign Installers:
Comm. Roofing:
Fuel Tank Contr.
31 for 2001 $50/each
4 for 2001 $50/each
7 for 2001 $50/each
9 for 2001 $50/each
2 for 2001 $50/each
59 for 2001 $50/each
57 for 2001 $50/each
8 for 2001 $50/each
13 for 2001 $50/each
5 for 2001 $50/each
1 for 2001 $50/each
Games of Skill:
Apache Theater
Dick's Place
VFW
K Mart
BW3
Pro Billiards
Dennys
Star Bar
Mady's
500 Club
Tycoon's
5 games $90
4 games $75
3 games $60
1 game $30
8 games $135
30 games $465
1 game $30
8 games $150
5 games $90
1 game $30
4 games $75
Kennels:
Massage License
Motor Vehicle Rental
Vehicle Sales:
Credit Union
30 Min Auto Seer.
Motor Vehicle Fuel Dispensing:
Jeff, Bobby...
SA
Emerson's
Col. Hts. Rental-LP
Avanti-Food n Fuel
Holiday
Conoco
Univ Auto
0 for 2001
0 for 2001
1 for 2001
$ 50
$200
$200
$160
$140
$100
$ 5O
$200
$180
$100
$ 80
Pool Hall/Billiards
Pet Shops
Pawnbrokers
Popcorn, food catering vehicles:
Precious Metals Dealers
Second Hand Merchants:
Unique thrift
Salvation Army
Budget Computer
Savers
Junklin Jewels
l for2001
l for2001
0for2001
0for2001
0for2001
$100
$ 50
$I00
$100
$100
$100
$100 + $100Invest.
Sex Oriented Business
0 for 2001
Taxi Cab Drivers 23 for 2001 $25/each
Taxi Cab Vehicles 19 for 2001 $75/each
(Suburban-I 5/Mealey- I/Gopher-1/Boumich-1/Green & Wht-1)
Transient Merchants/Peddlers:
D. Froehlich 4 days $250
Erik Johnson 1 day $ 50
Justin Tmckenbrod 1 day $ 50
Jerry Johnson 2 days $100
Should have been$200???
Tree Contractors:
12 for 2001 $50/each
Beer Sales: OffSales
On Sales & OffSales
Tycoon's
Dick's Place
500 Club
Temp On Sale
6for2001 $150/each
$687.50
$550.00
$550.00
Of or2001
Liquor Licenses:
TEMPORARY ON SALE:
ICC Fun Fest
ICC Fundraising Dinner
Lions Jamboree
Fees waived
$100
Fees waived
CLUB ON SALE:
VFW $500
LIONS $300 + $500 Invest fee
SUNDAY LIQUOR-0 FOR 2001-SEE OTHER LIQUOR LICENSES
ON SALE LIMITED LIQUOR AND SUNDAY LIQUOR:
Mr. Steak (Class E) $5,500
ON SALE LIQUOR AND SUNDAY LIQUOR
Star Bar Class B/C $6,500
Mady's Class B/C $6,500
BW3 Class B/C $6,500
LaCasita Class B/C $6,500
ON SALE WINE
Udupi $2,000
Tycoon's $2,000
Sahib's $2,000
Jang Won $2,000
Puerto Vallano $2,000
Udupi $2,000
+ $400 Beer
+ $400 Beer
+ $400 Beer + Invest $550
+ $400 Beer
+ $400 Beer + Invest $2,000
+ $400 Beer NEW LOCATION
City of Columbia Heights
Public Works Department
Work Session Discussion Item
Work Session Date: September 4, 2001
Prepared by: Kevin Hansen, Public Works Director/City Engine
Item: Limited Median Access on TH 65 at 51't Avenue
Background:
Due to a fatality accident at the intersection of 51st Avenue on Central Avenue in the early 1990's,
Mn/DOT evaluated traffic data and determined the fidl access at this intersection should be closed
to improve safety. This work was placed in the Mn/DOT construction program in 1995 as a future
project. Access to businesses at this intersection was a concern and City staff requested Mn/DOT
delay any work until alternate access routes could be explored.
Analysis & Conclusions:
An alternative access that was evaluated by staff was a new "backage" road extending to the north
behind LaCasita connecting to 52no Street in Fridley, which is signalized. This new roadway would
have required ROW acquisition from both communities. Due to the land and cost sharing issues, the
proposal lingered until late 1999 when Mn/DOT again contacted staff. Staff prepared a ROW map
and forwarded it to the City of Fridley for preliminary discussions. The City of Fridley indicated no
opposition to the proposed alignment but again did not support cost sharing due to benefit issues.
Staff met with Mn/DOT again in March of 2001 to discuss the proposed median closure. Mn/DOT
had met with business owners on both sides of 51st Avenue/Court and indicated opposition to the
proposed full median closure, most strongly from LaCasita and White Castle. Staff asked Mn/DOT
to prepare an alternative design that allowed left in access, but restricted left out access across
opposing traffic (similar to the approved design at AutoWorld/Puerto Vallerta).
Attached is a revised layout fi.om Mn/DOT that allows left tums in from Central Avenue, but
prohibits left mm movements outJ?om 51st Avenue. According to Mn/DOT's traffic study, this
movement is the source of the majority of conflicts and reported accidents at this intersection.
MnDOT proposes this work for construction in 2002. Mn/DOT has sent this information to the
adjoining property owners for comments.
Requested Action:
Consider a Resolution, which approves the layout of a revised median on Central Avenue at 5 ISt
Avenue.
Attachments: MnDOT Letter & Site Plan
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B2
Roseville, MN 55113
August 21, 2001
RECEIVED
AUG 2 3 2001
PUBLIC WORKS
Mr. Kevin Hansen
Director of Public Works
637-38th Avenue N.E.
Columbia Heights, Minnesota 55421
SUBJECT: S.P. 0207-71, T.H. 65 Median Closure at 51st
Dear Mr. Hansen:
Enclosed for municipal consent, please find the layout for the redesign of the median on
TH 65 at 51st Ave. NE, proposed for letting on January 25, 200Z. The key feature of the
layout is the limited access intersection at 51st Ave. NE. This limited access intersection
allows left tums from TH 65 onto 51st Ave. NE only. It prevents through traffic movement
on 51st Ave. NE from driving straight across TH 65 and from making left tums from 51st
Ave. NE to TH 65. This new intersection configuration will eliminate the right angle crashes
taking place here while still providing access to the businesses. Please send us the city
council resolution approving of the layout.
If you should have any questions, please feel free to call me at 582-1314.
Sincerely,
Robert Evbayekha, P.E
Project Manager
c: Greg Coughlin
Beth Neuendorf
Project file
An equal opportunity employer
N
City of Columbia Heights
Public Works Department
Work Session Discussion Item
Work Session Date: September 4, 2001 X~---~ i
Prepared by: Kevin Hansen, Public Works Director/City Enginee~_.,~~
Item: Minneapolis Water Works - Membrane Filtration Plant
Attached please find correspondence from the Minneapolis Water Works (MWW) requesting
comments on the proposed Membrane Filtration Plant at the Columbia Heights Plant Complex. A
brief project description and project background is enclosed with the attachment. For additional
background, the MWW supplies the City's of Minneapolis, Bloomington (partial), Crystal, New
Hope, Golden Valley, Columbia Heights and Hilltop. The source water is the Mississippi River. The
Fridley Softening Plant processes the raw water and then sends it to either the Fridley Filtration
(2/3) or Columbia Heights Filtration (1/3) Plants for finishing and distribution. This form of
treatment requires significant chemical processing including chlorine, ammonia and
polyphosphates. Because of health related outbreaks in the 1990's from surface water sources, the
Federal EPA will be mandating complete removal or inactivation of these contaminants. The
membrane or Ultra Filtration that the MWW is proposing can accomplish this.
A Feasibility Study and Value Engineering Study have been completed by the MWW. Based upon
these reports, the Minneapolis City Council has approved proceeding with the Ultra Filtration
Program as described in the attached letter. Currently, the MWW has released a request for
proposals (RFP) nationwide for preliminary design the Membrane Filtration plants. Consequently,
no detailed plans or even a site map are available. The program provides that the 70 mgd Columbia
Heights plant would come on line in 2004, and operate jointly with the existing plant for one year
until accepted by the MN Department of Health. The 90 mgd Fridley Plant would follow coming
online in 2007.
I have contacted the Director of the Minneapolis Water Works, Adam Kramer, for additional
information, including the Feasibility Study and additional financial information detailing rate
impacts to the consumers. I do not expect to have any of that information prior to the September 4~
work session.
Based upon the level of information that we currently have, the brief statements on the attached
sheet represent initial comments or questions related to an environmental assessment review of the
proposed Ultra Filtration Plant.
City of Columbia Heights
Environmental Assessment Comments
Proposed Membrane Filtration Plant
2.
3.
4.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
What is the financial impact to the ratepayers and when would it take effect?
What will be the noise, or additional noise generated by the new facility?
Is there additional waste product? If so, where and how will it be discharged?
What are the maintenance requirements of this type of plant compared to a conventional
treatment plant?
Will the daily traffic change to the facility? Identify truck traffic separately.
What are the plans for auxiliary power or backup power?
a. What is the noise associated with this power soume?
What happens to the existing filtration system?
Will there be any change to the source of supply of Columbia Heights water?
Will any distribution system modifications be required?
What are the projected benefits/improvements to the finished product?
Have aesthetic constraints been established for the new plant building?
What are the chemical changes to the finished product?
a. How will any chemical constituency changes affect aged distribution piping systems?
City of Minneapolis
Department of Public Works
DavJd J. Sonnenbe~g
Cily Engineer
Director
Brian J Lokkesmoe
Depuly Direclor
350 South 5th Street - Room 203
Minneapolis MN 55415-1390
Office (612) 673-2352
Fax 673-3565
TTY 673-2157
Managemen~ Services
R H Smith, Director
(612) 673-2411
August 7, 2001
Mr. Tim Johnson, City Planner
City of Columbia Heights
590 - 40th Avenue N.E.
Columbia Heights, MN 55421
Dear Mr. Johnson:
REGARDING: Request for Environmental Assessment Comments
The City of Minneapolis is requesting public comments on the potential
environmental impact of a proposed Membrane Filtration Plant at
Columbia Heights Filtration Plant Complex. Comments must be in
writing and received by September 13, 2001.
Enclosed is a description of the project and a map showing its location.
The City intends to finance the project with a $60 Million Iow interest
loan from the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority (PFA). Funds are
being requested through the Drinking Water Revolving Fund which is
administered by the PFA and the Minnesota Department of Health. To
receive funds an environmental review must be conducted in accordance
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
Comments are to be sent to Adam J. Kramer at the following address:
Minneapolis Water Works
Public Service Center - #206
250 South 4th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55415-1339
If we do not receive comments, we will assume there is no foreseen
impact. Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Director
AJK/JTC:gmp
Enclosures
copy - Mayor Sharon Sayles Belton
www ci.minneapolis mn .us
Affirmative Action Employer
Project Description and Background Information
The Minneapolis Water Works (MWW) was established in 1867 for fire fighting and in 1872 for drinking
water. During the past 129 years it has developed from a single pump station, taking water from the
Mississippi River at FiRh Avenue South and delivering it to a small distribution system, to the largest water
utility in the upper Midwest with approximately !,000 miles of pipe in the distribution system.
The sole source of water supply for the MWW is the Mississippi River with an average annual withdrawal
of approximately 25 billion gallons. The MWW produces an average of 70 million gallons per day. Peak
rates in the summer are as high as 180 million gallons per day.
The current treatment system utilizes lime sofiening, conventional sand filtration, and chloramine
disinfection processes. The Minneapolis Water Works has two txeatment facilities, the main plant at
Fridley and a smaller capacity plant at Columbia Heights. The Fridley SoPtening Plant processes all of the
raw water for both the Fridley Filtration Plant and the Columbia Heights Filtration Plant. Chemical
treatment at the Softening Plant consists of lime, alum, carbon, potassium permanganate, carbon dioxide,
and calcium carbonate. Softened water is routed to either (or both) the Columbia Heights Filtration Plant
or the Fridley Filtration Plant. At the Filtration Plants, water is filtered through sand media. Chemical
treatment at the Filtration Plants consists of chlorine, ammonia, fluoride, ferric chloride, and liquid
polyphosphate.
The usable finished water reservoir storage capacity equals one and one half days of average daily demand.
A new reservoir is currently under construction that will bring the finished water storage capacity to two
days of average daily demand. In 2007, another new reservoir is scheduled for construction, which will
increase the storage capacity by another one-half of a day. The distribution system includes 14,000 valves,
8000 fire hydrants, and over 1,000 miles of cast iron, ductile iron, and steel watermain pipe.
Since the cryptosporidium outbreak in Milwaukee, WI, in 1993, there has been an increased awareness of
this health hazard. The upcoming EPA Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (ESWTR) requires
complete inactivation or removal of these contaminants, and membrane ultrafiltration can accomplish this.
The Minneapolis Water Works with the technical assistance of the engineering consulting firms of HDR
Engineering, Inc. and Malcolm Pirnie conducted a treatment feasibiIity study for the Water Works. A
number of alteraatives were considered including ozone disinfection, which provides cryptosporidium
inactivation but has other operational problems. The feasibility study recommendation was to install an
ultrafiltration membrane plant at both the Columbia Heights Filtration Plant (CHFP) and the Fridley
Filtration Plant (FFP).
The Value Engineering Study by six environmental engineering consultants and a Citizen's Advisory
Committee (which included members from the health community, suburban customers, and Minneapolis
citizens) reviewed and concurred with the recommendation for an ultrafiltration membrane system for the
Minneapolis Water Works facilities. The results of the Value Engineering Study were presented to
Minneapolis' Mayor and City Council. As a result, the Ultra Filtration Program was approved (in 2000).
The ultrafiltration program for the removal of microbial contaminants at the Minneapolis Water Works
includes the following:
· Performance testing and selection of a membrane supplier for the Columbia Heights facility based on the
capacity, performance, energy consumption, cost, and other parameters of various manufacturers' units.
This is currently underway
· Construction of a 70 million-gallon per day system at Columbia Heights site.
City of Columbia Heights
Public Works Department
Work Session Discussion Item Ah
Work Session Date: September 4, 2001 r~
Prepared by: Kevin Hanscn, Public Works Director/City Enginec
Schawn Johnson, Administrative Assistant
Item: Courtesy Bench Policy
Background:
Earlier this year, the Public Works Department received a letter from a Business Owner regarding
safety and nuisance concerns for the bus bench located north of 37th on Central Avenue. The bench
was 130 feet north of37~ Avenue, on a sidewalk that is only 5 fcct wide, and was less than 3 feet
away from oncoming traffic. This bench was subsequently removed when permission from the
adjacent property owner to move thc bench back offthe sidewalk was not obtained.
Metro Transit and the Bus Bench Company do not provide maintenance of the bench area for snow
removal and liter/debris removal. Public Works is currently not designated responsibility for snow
or trash removal at bus bench locations.
Analysis/Conclusions:
City staffcontacted other cities and largely on information from the City of New Hope, created a
draft Courtesy Bench Ordinance. This initial ordinance was distributed for discussion at the City's
Codes and Compliance Meeting on February 8, 2001. The committee members discussed the
benefits that a revised ordinance would provide to better regulate the placement and maintenance of
courtesy benches on Metro Transit Bus Routes throughout the City. The proposed ordinance was
again reviewed at the April 15t~ Code Enforcement Meeting to include advertising paper stands.
Based upon these two meetings and staff review, minor revisions have been made to the draft
ordinance now before the Council.
The City currently has 22 sites that are designated courtesy benches and are currently owned by US
Bench Company. The proposed ordinance would concentrate on the following seven areas and
mandate that all bus bench owners comply with these regulations:
2.
3.
4.
Courtesy Bench owners may not place a bus bench within the public right-of-way or on
private property without first obtaining a permit from the City of Columbia Heights.
A separate permit is required for each Courtesy Bench.
Permits for benches will be granted on existing and approved Metro Transit bus routes
within the City.
The City Manager has the authority to revoke or deny any permit for failure to comply with
the provision of this ordinance, for misrepresentation of material facts in the original
application, failure to maintain the Courtesy Bench, denial because the bench is considered a
safety hazard or the bench location is no longer served by the public transportation system,
or because the transit route on which the bench is located has or will be included in a street
renovation project, and for any reason which would be grounds for denial of the original
application.
Work Session Item: Courtesy Bench Policy
Work Session Date: September 4, 2001
Page 2
5. Place bus bench restrictions in designated "Streetseape Areas" in order to maximize the
benefits of the proposed streetscape improvements. (Ex.: Central Avenue, 37~ to 43~d)
6. Place restrictions that minimize and/or designate the location of advertising paper boxes at
bus bench locations.
7. A Courtesy Bench placed in the public right-of-way in the City may be summarily removed
by the City Manager if the provisions of this ordinance are not followed or if the bench does
not meet the standards set forth by Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.27, Subdivision 6.
Staff has reviewed bus bench ordinances used by the cities of New Hope and Plymouth. A draft
courtesy bench ordinance is attached for the City Council's review.
Requested Action:
Consider adopting a revised ordinance that would implement a new bus bench policy requiring all
courtesy bench owners to maintain their benches in a safe and orderly manner and designate
restrictions that will:
1. Prohibit bus bench locations that may obstruct vehicular and/or pedestrian traffic, and
2. Minimize liter caused by advertising paper boxes, and
3. Prohibit bus bench locations that pose a snow or ice control problem, or otherwise be
potentially detrimental to the safety of the public.
Attachment: Draft of Courtesy Bench Ordinance
Courtesy Bench Ordinance
ORDINANCE #
BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COURTESY BENCH SECTION OF THE
CITY CODE AND ESTABLISHING AN EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING
PAPER STAND ORDINANCE
The City
amend City Code Section 6.303 to read as follows:
Purpose.
The purpose of~ ordinance is to regulate the placement and maintenance of Courtesy
Benches for public transit in public-rights-of-way and on private property if the bench is
feet of the
within three (3) ~[~i~ght-of-way. Benches without advertising signs that are
located on private p~cr~e than three (3) feet from the public right-of-way are
exempt from the provis~ set~l~ in the advertisement restriction section of this
ordinance, but are subje~~l~c_able sections of this code.
Permit Required.
It is unlawful for a person to place a Courtesy Bench in a public right-of-way or on private
property within three (3) feet of the )ublic right-of-way without first obtaining a permit as
provided in this section.
(1) This section shall app
within said City. Th~
issued annually.
(2) The permit period
g and future Courtesy Benches installed
owner shall renew the permit once
from April 1 to March 31 annually.
(3)
Permits for courtesy benches
Metro Transit bus routes
locations
and
~et forth by the City.
Permits and Applications.
Application for permits shall be made to
Manager. The application shall contain the following information:
(1)
(2)
of the City
Scale drawing showing the size and~Courtesy Bench relative to
all other objects on the property in~ng~layout of applicable adjacent
roadways, intersections, traffic si .gnl/ge, sid~lks, trails, utility poles, fences
and other objects within the vicinity; ~
Name, address and phone number of applic~
(3)
Detailed plans and specifications of each proposed bench including the
general nature of advertising matter, if any, to be posted thereon and total
surface area intended as signage not to exceed square feet using the front,
Printed: 8/30/01
Cou~esy Bench Ordinance
(4)
or seating side surface only of the bench back. Advertising material may not
exceed the length of the bench.
, Certificate of Insurance from an insurance company
' or better by A.M. Best Company and authorized to conduct
g the City as additional insured in
as follows:
(5)
~ch Permits Limit of Liabilit~
$250,000
ii. 11-50 Benches $500,000
iii. 50 or more $1,000,000
for a~ ~ arising out of the use or existence of the Courtesy
Bench(s) ~d a~ed by the City Manager. The certificate shall provide for
automati. ~ofthe City with a minimum 30 days advance notice in
the event
A graphic~ ~ng the public transportation bus service that serves the
proposed Courtesy Bench and the specific bus stop location and number, if
applicable.
(6)
An executed
City Manager,
use and existence of'
permittee. Approved by the
from any and all claims arising out of the
(7)
abutting property owner for placement of any bench
on (3) feet of the public fight-of-way. The
abutting property owners shall be deemed to be the person or entity shown as
such on the Anoka County tax
(8) The application
recommendation.
City Engineer for review and
(9) Such other information that the
require
Conditions Governing Issuance of Permits.
This section governs the issuance of a permit for a~
(1) Permit for Each Bench. A separate't~ermit~
(2)
Bench, but renewals may be granted for m~
a single application - provided that the City
information required by this section has be~
Courtesy Bench.
required for each Courtesy
eOne location on the basis of
r is satisfied that all the
d for each proposed
Transfer: New Permit. If a Courtesy Bench for which a permit has been issued
is sold or title or control thereof is transferred or assigned, a new permit shall
be required.
2 Printed: 8/30/01
Courtesy Bench Ordinance
(3)
Location. No permit may be issued for the installation of Courtesy Benches,
on approved transit routes in the following places:
(A) on a transit route upon which the City has constructed or has let a contract to
~ ~ublic street beautification (streetscaping) project.
~ [ on a publt~tewalk where the right-of-way is less than nine (9) feet in width or
~ [on any. p~ sidewalk or trail without the written consent of the abutting
(~ ~lley;
(D) at any location more than 50 feet from the nearest point of intersections with a
street, City Manager so authorizes;
(E)
intersection or other locations as the City Manager may
safety by obstructing the vision of pedestrians or
(F) other 1, which the City Manager determines would potentially restrict
traffic, pose a snow and ice control problem, obstruct vehicular
traffic or otherwise be detrimental to the public safety, convenience or welfare.
Permit Fees.
Fccs for Courtesy Benches shall be
Fcc section.
Insurance Requirements.
City of Columbia Heights Licensing
Permit holders s
general liability Certificate
the City of Columbia Heights as an
its original amount by the permit
for which the permit is in effect. When two oJ
insurance policy may be furnished to cover two --
loss from which liability may hereafter accrue.
?s Finance Department a current
of this ordinance, naming
.. maintained in
~ense at all times during the period
permits are issued to one person one
' Benches, and the policy
tpon occurrence or any accident or
Permits: Approval and Issuance.
If the City Manager is satisfied that all of the in this section have been met
and that the creation and maintenance location will
not restrict pedestrian traffic or otherwise be detrimental to r, he shall approve
the application. The License/Permit Clerk shall not insurance and
hold harmless agreement are provided and approved by the City.
3 Printed: 8/30/01
Courtesy Bench Ordinance
Revocation of Permit.
The City Manager n
provision of l
on
considered a s
orl
or deny renewal of any permit for failure to comply with the
Zoning Code, for misrepresentation of material facts in the
the Courtesy Bench, because the bench is
the bench location is no longer served by the public
any reason which would have been grounds for denial of the
Installation and Mainten
(1) Location. C°'~~
and set back at 1
minimmn clearan
landscaping along
Any bench install~
mall be installed parallel with the curb, sidewalk or trail,
the back of the curb. Further, there shall be a
m the back of the bench to any structure or
lk to provide for sidewalk snowplow clearance.
trail nine (9) feet or more in width must also
(2)
(3)
(A). height- 42 inches ma~
(B). width- 30 inches ma
(C) length- 7 feet max~
provide a minimum clearance of six (6) feet between the back of the curb and front of
the bench.
Size. Size limitations on Cou ~enches are as follows:
hum ~
Constnlction. A Courtesy Bench shall be installed and maintained on a durable level
surface including, but not limited to, c
durable surface shall
Further, the durable surface in front
The Courtesy Bench
minimize the potential
be fastened, secured, or anchored
or decorative brick. The
and in back of the bench.
t must extend to the back of the curb.
shall be secured in a manner to
or vandalism. No Courtesy Bench shall
(4)
(5)
(6)
Materials. A Courtesy Bench shall be constructed of durable materials including but
not limited to concrete, wood, steel, plastic, or comb
limited to whites, earth tones of subdued gr~
Permit Display. Each Courtesy Bench shall display~
conspicuous place.
~n thereof, with colors
wns, reddish-browns, and
rmit number in a
Conditions. It is the responsibility of the permittee to maintain each bench in a safe
condition and to keep benches neat, clean and in usable condition. The permittee
shall keep the Courtesy Bench and bench base free of ice and snow and accessible.
4 Printed: 8/30/01
Courtesy Bench Ordinance
(7)
Advertising Matter. Advertising matter may be displayed only on the front (roadway
side) surface of the backrest of a Courtesy Bench and shall not exceed __ square feet
in surface area. Advertisement of obscene, immoral, indecent or illegal matter is
prohibited on ~ , Benches. No advertising matter on any Courtesy Bench
"Look", "Drive In", "Danger", or any other word,
device which might interfere
with, ] Any political advertising displayed on a Courtesy
Bench: -- the time restriction for such advertising or political signs as
set forth City Code.
Removal
(1)
(2) Summary Removal. A Courl
contrary to the provisions of
Manager, pursuant to Minne
Registration of permits Obtaine~
Notice. Upon the r~ ~n or expiration of any permit without renewal, the
p~itee sha~,ljl~ ~ ~l~punesy Bench promptly. The permittee shall also be
required to rem~~.th, ~.ete slab and reseed the slab area at its cost if so directed
by the City Man ~ ~ Manager may remove the bench after ten days mailed
notice to the peru] anan~ll~ofremoval, including removal of the slab and
resodding of the sl: ~ shaffbe paid by the permittee. If the permittee fails to pay
the cost within 6C rafter receiving notice from the City Manager, the bench shall
become the property of the City, but the permittee will remain liable for the cost of
removal, restoration and storage of the bench. No permit or renewal shall be granted
to the permittee until all such ~e paid in full.
[y l~j~Ikplaced in the public right-of-way in the City,
~ be summarily removed by the City
Ia Statut~lill~tion 160.27, subdivision 6.
)~m Other Road Authorities.
(1) When a Courtesy Bench is
subj
Statues, Section 160.02, the
from the other road authority with the
the limits of a street or roadway
the City as defined in Minnesota
file proof of permission
EMPLOYMENT ADVERTISING
General Operation. ~
The purpose of this ordinance is to regulate the pl nance of news stands in
public-rights-of-way on private property if the new'~stand~[ith'ln the public right-of-way.
This ordinance was created to promote the public health, s/t~ and welfare through the
regulation of placement, type, appearance and servicing of~cks on public rights-of-
ways so as to:
(1)
Provide for pedestrian and driving safety, convenience, and comply with
local, state, or federal handicapped accessibility regulations.
5 Printed: 8/30/01
Courtesy Bench Ordinance
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
0o)
Restrict unreasonable interference with the public use of the public fight-of-
way and with the flow of pedestrian or vehicular traffic from any residence or
business, or from the street to the sidewalk by persons exiting or entering
vehicles.
and property during periods of heavy snow,
· adverse weather conditions, and for the proper functioning
' and sanitation forces.
For the use and maintenance of poles, posts, traffic
hydrants, utility openings, delivery chutes, trash receptacles,
benches, United States postal services mailboxes, parking meters
public fixtures; and to locations used for public transportation
purposes.
Relocate ~lace news racks which result in a visual blight and/or
exce~ ~ation on the public rights-of-ways of which unreasonably
detract fl [the, g~etics of store window displays, adjacent landscaping and
other im ~t~l~oth public and private, as well as to remove abandoned
news rack
Maintain a ~ct th~ values of surrounding properties, and protect and
preserve 1~ [~l~property.
Reduce unnecessary exposure of the public to personal injury or property
damage.
Treat all publications,
frequency of publicati
Maintain and preserw
Protect and enhance t
serve as a support to
visual and aesthetic,
~f spardless of their size, content, circulation, or
eech and freedom of the press.
~n to residents, tourists and visitors, and
~nuhis tO~l~l~ss and industry, by enhancing the
~cter and interest of the city.
Newsstands used for the purpose
restrictions found in section 3.
Advertising Newsstands ma3
the City of Columbia Heights. Furthermore,
be placed in enclosed spaces, such as private
trash receptacles are available.
~ are subject to same location
ordinance. Employment
' to Courtesy Benches permitted by
advertising newsstands may only
corridors or bus shelters, provided
Installation and Maintenance.
(1)
(2)
(3)
News racks shall not exceed (60) sixty inch~
twenty-four (24) inches in depth. Multile~w~.~
and width. ~ ~
No advertising signs or materials, other than those
publications contained within the news rack, shall lc
news rack. ~
~) thirty inches in width, or
:ks shall be of uniform depth
ng the name of the
yed on the outside of any
Each news rack shall have stenciled or otherwise >ermanently affixed to it, in a
readily visible place, a notice setting forth the name, address, and telephone number
of the news rack owner.
6 Printed: 8/30/01
Courtesy Bench Ordinance
(4)
(5) News racks for fi'e~
attached to t~
(2)
(3)
Each news rack shall be maintained in a neat and clean condition and in good repair
at all times. Each news rack shall be serviced and maintained and/or replaced if
necessary, so that: (1) it is reasonably free of dirt and grease; (2) it is reasonably free
of chipped, : and cracked paint in the visible painted area thereof; (3) if
is g or pictures added without the permission of the
free of mst and corrosion in the visible metal areas; (5) the
clear if any, through which the publication therein are viewed
are ably flee of cracks, dents, blemishes and discoloration; (6)
the parts thereof are not broken, do not contain holes; (7) the
>f each box shall be fully enclosed and weatherproof so as to keep
dry and free of snow and dirt; (8) all surfaces shall be of sturdy impact
resistant materials; and (9) it shall contain no sharp comers or sharp protrusions.
n OnS may omit the coin box and may have the pull bar
or rack.
~ln violation of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
tagged with an administrative tag stating the violation, date of tagging, and notice of
intention to remove the news rack if the violation is not corrected within (10) days.
The City Manager may remm
owner by mail. If the permitt
from the City Manager, the n
permittee will remain liable t
news rack. No permit or ren
are paid in full. j
Any news rack in violatior~
an immediate and substantial dan
which violation cannot be c
repositioning the news rack, may~
eliminate the danger to the health,
News rack placed in the public
provisions of this Section, may
to Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.27,
ews rack ten days after notifying the news rack
move the news rack after receiving notice
become the property of the City, but the
oval, restoration and storage of the
ted to the permittee until all such costs
:~e provisions of this chapter, which violation creates
safety, or welfare of the public,
otherwise
~ location so as to
public.
r, contrary to the
removed by the City Manager, pursuant
6.
Abandoned News Racks
(1) A news rack shall be deemed abandoned~
registered news rack owner is in the new~
consecutive days, or when the news rack md locl
master list as required under this chapter.
(2) In the event a news rack is found abandoned on th
city, the City Manager or designee shall cause the~
~ions provided by
period of more than thirty (30)
.have not been included on a
~right-of-way within the
~al of said news rack.
Registration of permits Obtained from Other Road Authorities.
7 Printed: 8/30/01
Courtesy Bench Ordinance
(1)
When a news rack is placed in the City within the limits of a street or roadway subject
to the control of a road authority other than the City as defined in Minnesota Statues,
Section 160.02, and the person placing the news rack shall file proof of permission
from the ' with the City Manager.
8 Printed: 8/30/01
From-KENNEDY & GRAVEN
CHARTERED
470 Bl|sbury Center
200 South Sixth SL~e¢I
Minneapolis MN ~402
{612} 337 9300 telephone
(612) 33%0310 fax
hup://var~ kennedy-
graven, eom
Atlgust 31, 2001
Ml~yor and Councilmemhers
City of Blaine
Blaine, Minnesota 55434-3421
BY E-MAIL
Dear Mayor and Councilmcmbers:
Randy Schumacher has ~ked ~hat I provide you with a short exphmation ot' revenue bond financing
as the Cre~t Vie prolect moves t~r~ard. That particular prolect involves specific consideralionS
{hat John Ufley of mir off,ce will explain in ~ore detail at the time that the relevant docmllents are
presented tn you for considerauon. In the meantime, however, it might be helpful for you Io have
an ovcmew of how flus type of financing works.
When a city issues revenue ~nds, ~ is being contemplated m the Crest View development, it ~s not
pledging ~ts general obligation to payment of the bonds. Inste',sd, the purchaser ol the bonds ~s
looking to the developer (or project owner, or operator) l~.~r repaymem. Hence, the wilhngness of
people to buy them is based on an evaluanon of the developer's abihty to meet ~ts obligations,
Furthermore, except for reserving certain rights 1o indemnification and collection of some fees
and reimbursementS for undertaking its role in the process, the city generally removes itself
almost entirely from the transaction, with a trustee lakinfi on responsibilily for managing hhe
process of collecting payments from the owner and makang payments to bondholders. In short, if
a developer cannot make the payments necessary to pay off l. he bonds, the city is not be obligated
to make up the shortfall.
Finally, a potential purchaser of a bond will look for more than just a sheer promise by the
developer that tt will pay it~ debts. Ot~entimes a mortgage on thc properly will be taken, a
security mteres! will be granted m personal properly, or any of a number of other techniques will
Og-3]-01 ]E:O3 Frr~-KENNEDY & GRAVEN +$1Z337~3i0 T-40~ P03/03 F-$1~
Aagu*~ ti, 2001
P~ltc 2 of 2
be used to provide adequam security to the bondholders.
Again. however, the c~ty i~ not asked to pledge irs propeny a~ security for the bonds, lnslead, Iht
cily serves as a "conduiC for the fin~cing, issuing ~e bonds, on which interest is gener~ly
exempl, but turning over lhe de~ls to be worked out belween ~ developer ~d ~hc poten~
purcha~rs, subiec~ w the city's approval.
~is ~ ob~iou~y ~ very brief ore. Jew of rev~ue bond fin~mg ~ ~ only inten~d m pro~dc
you wilh enough relocation w help ~ou fo~ula~ your questions wilh respa Io ~ C~ View
tingeing, lo~ U~ey w~l provide you wi~h much more de,mi abou~ ~e Crest View
when you mc ~kud w comider ~c d~n~ ~t ~e ~ ~he pr~ess of being prc~ed, bu~ tn
meanume, ple~ do not hesit~ to con.ct either Jo~ or me Il' you would I~ more mlb~afion
aDoul revenue bond hnancing in
Sincerely,
DanlelJ. Greensweig
DIG:
Cc: Walt Fehst
Randy $chum~cher
Jolm Udey
CITY OF COLUMBI.4 HEIGHTS
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
AUGUST 30, 2001
WALT FEHST
CITY MANAGER
WILLIAM ELRITE
FINANCE DIRECTOR
INFORMATION FOR BUDGET REVIEW AT THE WORK SESSION OF
SEPTEMBER 4, 2001
I have attached some additional information for review at the budget meeting of September 4th.
First, we have received our final levy limit information fxom the state. I have attached a copy of
that letter along with the internal worksheet that I have used in the past showing the final
calculation in the format we've previously distributed to the council. In addition to this, I have
attached the summary expenditure sheet by department showing the proposed city manager cuts.
Following that are individual sheets for each functional area showing the summary expenses for
each functional area broken down into personnel services, supplies, other services, and sources
of revenue to support the expenses. The bottom summary portion of these pages shows the total
revenue, expenses, and change to fund balance. It should be noted that these pages are based on
the department proposed budgets prior to the city manager's cuts. These pages demonstrate
where we would be on the depaahnental budgets without any cuts and the amount of the fund
balance that would need to be used in each one of the departments to balance the budget without
cuts. If there is any additional information that you would like distributed at the work session,
please let me know.
WE:sms
0108302CM
Attachment
MINNESOTA Department of Revenue
Property Tax Divisionj~v~
Mail Station 3340
Phone (612) 296-3155
St. Paul, MN 55146-3340
Fax (612) 29%2166
Payable 2002 Overall Levy Limitation Notice
August 22, 2001
COLI. gVIBIA HEIGHTS CITY OF
CLERK-TREASURER
CITY HALL 590 40TH AVE NE
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MN 55421
The payable 2002 overall levy limitation for your city is:
$ 4,839,314
The following is a listing of the factors used in determining your city's payable 2002
overall levy limitation. See the enclosed letter for an explanation of these factors and for
additional information concerning your city's overall levy limitation.
1. Adjusted Levy Limit Base for Payable 2000:
2. Payable 2000 Matching Funds Special Levy:
3. Beginning Levy Limit Base for Payable 2002 (1 + 2):
4. Implicit Price Deflator Adjustment (March 2000/March 1999):
5. Household Growth Adjustment
a. 1998 Households:
b. 1999 Households:
c. Ratio of 1999 to 1998 Households (b/a, but not less than 1.000):
6. Adjustment for Pay' 2000 Market Value of New C/I Construction
a. Payable 1999 Total Taxable Market Value:
b. Payable 2000 Market Value of New C/I Construction:
c. 50% of Line b (6b x 0.5):
d. Adjustment (1 + Ratio of 6c to 6a):
7. Levy Limit Base Adjusted for Pay' 2001 Factors ( 3 x 4 x 5c x 6d):
8. Alternative Levy Limit Base for Payable 2001 (Detail on Page 2):
9. Effective Levy Limit Base for Payable 2001 (Greater of 7 or 8):
10. Payable 2001 Opt-Out City Transit Services Levy:
11. Levy Limit Base after Transit Services Levy Adj. (9 - 10):
12. Implicit Price Deflator Adjustment (March 2001/March 2000):
13. Household Growth Adjustment
a. 1999 Households:
b. 2000 Households:
c. Ratio of 2000 to 1999 Households (b/a, but not less than 1.000):
14. Adjustment for Pay' 2001 Market Value of New C/I Construction
a. Payable 2000 Total Taxable Market Value:
b. Payable 2001 Market Value of New C/I Construction:
c. 50% of Line b (14b x 0.5):
d. Adjustment (I + Ratio ofl4c to 14a):
$ 6,634,406
$
$ 6,634,406
1.043041
7,806
7,847
1.005252
$ 612,856,500
$ 676,438
$ 338,219
1.000552
$ 6,960,141
$ 7,015,538
$ 7,015,538
$
$ 7,015,538
1.033630
7,847
8,033
1.023703
$ 657,804,700
$ 954,119
$ 477,060
1.000725
An equal opportunity ernployer
~IT/TDD : (612) 215.0069
15. Adjusted Levy Limit Base for Payable 2002 (11 x 12 x 13c x 14d): $
16. New Net Tax Capacity-Based Referendum Levies: $
17. 2002 Property Tax Aids
a. 2002 Local Government Aid (LGA): $
b. 2002 Estimated Taconite Aids: $
c. 2002 Existing Low Income Housing Aid: $
d. 2002 New Construction Low Ificome Housing Aid: $
e. 2002 Transit Property Tax Replacement Aid: $
f. Total (a+b + c + d + e): $
18. Adjustment for 2001 Local Tax Rate Excess Tax Increment Taxes: $
19. Payable 2002 Overall Levy Limitation (15 + 16 - 17f- 18): $
7,428,734
2,588,641
779
2,589,420
0
4,839,314
Detail of Alternative Levy Limit Base Calculation (for Line 8 Above):
1. Payable 2001 Total Certified Levy:
2. Payable 2001 Debt Special Levies
a. Bonded Indebtedness: $
b. Certificates of Indebtedness: $
c. Bonds of Another Local Unit of Government: $
d. Principal and Interest on Armory Bonds: $
e. Total Debt Special Levies (a + b + c + d): $
3. Payable 2001 Market Value Based Referendum Levies: $
4. Payable 2001 Natural Disasters Special Levy: $
5. Pay' 2001 Levy to Correct fox ErrOrs in Pay' 2000 Cert. Levy: $
6. Payable 2001 Economic Development Tax Abatement Levies: $
7. Payable 2001 Levy to Repay State or Federal Loan: $
8. Total Payable 2001 Special Levies Reported (2e+3+4+5+6+7): $
9. 2001 Property Tax Aids
a. 2001 Certified Local Government Aid (LGA): $
b. 2001 Cert. Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (HACA): $
c. 2001 Taconite Aids: $
d. 2001 Certified Existing Low Income Housing Aid: $
e. 2001 Certified New Construction Low Income Housing Aid: $
f. Total (a+b + c+ d + e): $
10. Alternative Levy Limit Base for Payable 2001 (1 - 8 + 90
(To Line 8 on Page 1): $
3,625,552
0
2,385,618
1,004,368
3,389,986
7,015,538
2
MINNESOTA Department of Revenue
Property Tax Division
Mail Station 3340
Phone (651) 296-3155
St. Paul. MN 55146-3340
Fax (651) 297-2166
August 21,2001
To: Finance Officials of Cities Over 2,500 Population
Re: Payable 2002 Overall Levy Limitation
Enclosed is the Payable 2002 Overall ZeD, I. imitation Notice for your city. The factors
involved in the calculation of your city's payable 2002 overall levy limitation are shown
on the notice. The following is an explanation of the calculation factors. (Note: Lines 1
through 7 do not apply to a eiB' that was not subject to the overall lex3' limitation
for the taxes payable )'ear 2000.)
Line 1 - Adjusted Lev3.' Limit Base for Payable 2000: This amount is from line 5 of
your city's "Payable 2000 Overall Lex'3' Limitation Notice" that you received in 1999.
Line 2 - Payable 2000 Matching Funds Special Lex3': This is the total amount of your
city's special levy for the increases in matching fund requirements for state or federal
grants that was approved by the Department of Revenue, based on your city's special
levy claims on its Payable 2000 PTForm 280. This amount is added to the levy limit
base since the new special levy for matching funds is based on the increase in the
required local share over the payable 2001 amount.
Line 3 - Beginning Lex3' Limit Base for Payable 2002: This is the sum of Line 1 and
Line 2.
Line 4 - Implicit Price Deflator Adjustment (March 2000~larch 1999): This is the
ratio of the implicit price deflator for government consumption expenditures and gross
investment for state and local governments prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis
of the United States Deparhuent of Commeme for March 2000 compared to March 1999.
Line 5 - Household Growth Adjustment: Line 5a is the April 1, 1998 household
estimate for your city az determin~ by the State Demographer (for nonmetropolitan
cities) or by the Metropolitan Council (for cities within the seven county metropolitan
area). Line 5b ia the April 1, 1999 household estimate for your city as determined by the
State Demographer (for nonmetropolitan cities) or by the Metropolitan Council (for cities
within the seven county metropolitan area). Line 5c is the ratio of the 1999 household
estimate for your city to the 1998 household estimate for your city. If the calculated ratio
for your city is less than 1.000000 it has been changed to 1.000000.
Line 6 - Adjustment for Pa)" 2000 Market Value of New C/I Construction: Line 6a
is the payable 1999 total taxable market value of all property for your city. Line 6b is the
Contina.d ....
.4n ~ lual opportunity employer FfYffDD : (651) 215-0069
indusUqal propertS' for your city. Line 14c is 50% of Line 14b. Line 14d is 1.000000
plus the ratio of Line 14c to Line
Line 15 - Adjusted Le~3' Limit Base for Payable 2002: This is the Levy Limit Base
after Transit Services Lex3' Adj. (Line 11), multiplied by the Implicit Price Deflator
Adjustment (Line 12), multiplied by the Household Growth Adjustment (Line 13c), and
multiplied by the Adjustment for Pay' 2001 Market Value of New Ca Construction (Line
1~).
Line 16 - New Net Tax Capacity-Based Referendum Levies: This is the amount of
your city's new net tax capacity-based referendum levies, if any, for payable 2002
including (1) those that were approved by the voters at a referendum held in 1997, 1998,
or 1999, provided that a levy is authorized for the taxes payable year 2002, and (2) those
approved by the voters in 2001 that are effective for the taxes payable year 2002.
Under M.S. 2?5.?3 a count)' or a levy limit city may choose to go to the voters for
approval to levy an additional tax on net tax capacity rather than on market value. In
order to be effective for levy year 2001, taxes payable year 2002, a referendum under this
provision in 2001 would have to be held prior to September 1, 2001. A referendum held
after this date in 2001 could not be levied until levy year 2002, taxes payable year 2003.
If voter approval for the desired tax is required under another general or special law or
the provisions of a city charter, the levy would have to be on market value instead of on
net tax capacity. For example, if the city wants to issue new bonds and levy a property
tax for them, and the city is required to hold an election on the bonds and property tax
levy under the provisions of M.S. 475.58, any levy for the bonds would have to be on
market value instead of on net tax capacity.
If your city has a new net tax capacity-based referendum levy for payable 2002, it is to be
added to your city's levy limit base since it is an authorized additional levy rather than a
special levy authorized outside of your city's overall levy limitation.
Line 17 - 2002 Property Tax Aids: This is the amount of your city's proper'o' tax aids
for calendar year 2002. Line 17a is your city's certified amount of 2002 local
government aid (LGA). Line 17b is your city's estimated amount of 2002 taconite aids,
if any, under M.S. 298.28 and 298.282. Line 17c is your city's certified amount of 2002
existing low income housing aid, if any, under M.S. 477A.06. Line 17d is your city's
certified amount of 2002 new construction low income housing aid, if any, under M.S.
477A.065. Line 17e is your city's 2002 transit property tax replacement aid. Line 17lis
the sum of Lines 17a through 17e. The 2002 property tax aids are to be deducted fi-om
your city's adjusted levy limit base for payable 2002 since your city's overall levy
limitation is to change inversely with the change in your city's property tax aids.
Line 18 - Adjustment for 2001 Local Tax Rate Excess Tax Increment Taxes: M.S.
469.177, Subd. 9 provides that a tax increment (TIF) district does not get to keep the
portion of tax increments that are based on an increase in the total local tax rate over the
total rate that existed for the year in which the original local tax rates for the TIY: district
were certified. These local mx rate excess tax increment taxes are to be distributed tO the
county, the city, and the school district (but not special taxing districts) based on their
respective percentages of the total local tax rate increase. This statute further provides
Line 6 - Payable 2001 Economic Development Tax Abatement Levies: Th~s is your
city's special levy (if any) for economic development tax abatements under M.S.
469.1815 reported on your city's Certification of Payable 2001 Special .Levies.
Line 7 - Payable 2001 Levy to Repay State or Federal Loan: This is your city's
special levy (if any) to repay a state or federal loan used to fund local goverra-nent
spending due to a state or federal transportation project or other state or federal capital
project, as reported on your city's Certification of Payable 2001 Special Levies.
Line 8 - Total Payable 2001 Special Levies Reported: This is the sum of Line 2e and
Lines 3 through 7.
Line 9 - 2001 Property Tax Aids: Ti-tis is the amount of your city's property tax aids
for calendar year 2001. Line 9a is your city's certified amount of 2001 local government
aid (LGA) before TIF aid reduction under M.S. 273.1399. Line 9b is your city's certified
amount of 2001 homestead and agricultural credit aid (HACA) before TIF aid reduction
under M.S. 273.1399. Line 9c is your city's 2001 taconite aids, if any, under M.S.
298.28 and 298.282. Line 9d is your city's certified amount of 2001 existing low income
housing aid, if any, under M.S. 477A.06. Line 9e is your city's certified amoum of 2001
new construction low income housing aid, if any, under M.S. 477A.065. Line 9fis the
sum of Lines 9a Ou'ough 9e.
Line 10 - Alternative Levy Limit Base for Payable 2001 (1 - 8 + 90: Th.is is your
city's Payable 2001 Total Certified Levy (Line 1) minus Total Payable 2001 Special
Levies Reported (Line 8) plus 2001 Property Tax A.ids (Line 90.
If you have any questions concerning this letter or the enclosed Payable 2002 Overall
Levy Limitation Notice, please con,act me a! (651) 296-3155 or Mike Bernard of the
Department of Revenue at (615) 297-1577.
Sincerely,
Richard B. Gardner
Research Analyst Supervisor Senior
Enclosures
City of Columbia Heights
Prepared 30-Aug-01
1
2
3
4
EDA
Library
City
Total
2OOO
Levy
119,296
500,244
2,676,416
3,295,956
10%
Increase
11,930
47,523
270,143
329,596
Proposed
2001 Levy
131,226
547,767
2,946,559
3,625,552
Adopted
2001 Levy
119,295
547,767
2,958,490
3,625,552
Proposed
2002 Levy
137,015
591,588
4,110,711
4,839,314
2001 Adj Levy Limit Base
2001 Levy
2001 HACA
2001 LGA
Effective Levy Limit Base for Payable 2001
Implicit Price Deflator Adjustment Amount
Adj Base
Household Groth Adj
Adj Base
Adj for Pay 2001 Market Val of new C/I Const.
Adj Levy Limit Base Pay 2002
~002 LGA
!002 Low Income Housing Aid
)tal Aids
Maximum Levy
Library Levy
EDA Levy
City Lev,/
Base
3,625,552
1,004,368
2,385,618
7,015,538
235,933
7,251,471
171,882
7,423,352
5,382
7,428,734
2,588,641
779
2,589,420
4,839,314
591588
137015
4,110,711
Rate
1.03363
1.023703
1.000725
General Fund
2001 Levy
2001 HACA
2001 LGA
Total
2002 Levy
2002 HACA
2002 LGA & Housing Aid
Total
2,958,490
1,004,122
2,325,029
6,287,641
4,110,711
2,589,4201
6,700,131;
29 Total Increase from 2001
General Fund Increase from 2001
30 Library Increase from 2001
31 EDA Increase from 2001
32 Tota ncre~--~e
412,4901
17,720
43,821
474,031
Department City Manager City Manager Projected Increase
!Proposed Cuts Proposed Revenud (Decrease)
2002 2002 2002 To Fund Bal
33 Total General Fund 8,635,753 (755,014] 7,880,739 8,404,029 523,290
34 Total Community Development 317,487 0 317,463 284,702 (32,761)
35 Total Library 648,002 (64,8001 583,202 618,538 35,336
36 TotaITax Supported Funds 9,601,218 1819,8141 8,761,404 9,307,269 525,865
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA
BUDGET 2002
Summary by Fund Prepared fopr worksession of 04-Sep-01
Department Possible City Manager SAmount
Actual Actual Adopted Proposed Cuts Proposed of Change
1999 2000 2001 2002 2002 2002 2001-2002
Expensea
101 General Fund
Mayor-Council 41110 211,599 198,582 205,631 214,142 (21,415) 192,727 (12,904)
City Manager 41320 364,227 355,085 391,945 412,341 (18,000) 394,341 2,396
Elections 41410 9,654 42,538 6,823 40,548 40,548 33,725
Finance 41510 509.272 495,967 563,138 616.272 (56,634] 559,638 (3,500)
Assessing 41550 125,925 129,975 145,923 160,564 (18,944] 141,620 (4,303)
Legal Services 41610 201,931 191,572 216,460 215,567 (21,5571 194,010 (22,450)
General Gev. Building 41940 140,544 157,530 130,000 142,216 142,216 12,216
Police 42100 2,120,412 2,140,719 2,417,842 2,600,058 (157,1861 2,442,872 25,030
Fire 42200 751,559 829.951 805,299 889,223 (116.590] 772,633 (32.666)
Civil Defense 42500 25,876 29,040 32,352 83.836 (50,000] 33,836 1,484
Animal Control 42700 12,391 10,456 16,150 16,150 16.150
Public Works 43000 (2) (2) (2]
Engineering 43100 355,828 311,891 355,083 380,140 (69,072'~ 311,068 (44,015]
Streets 43121 526,816 556,599 642,019 690,512 (19,700'~ 670,812 28,793
Street Lighting 43160 124,580 119,990 124,989 128,088 -, 128,088 3,099
Traffic Signs & Signals 43170 55,150 59,299 70,252 73,559 (5,000) 68,559 (1,693]
Weed Conffol 43260 12,133 13,149 14,953 15,959 15.959 1,006
Administration & General 45000 185,612 185,975 189,556 206,434 (1,500) 204,934 15,378
Youth Athletics 45001 14,287 8.105 19,940 19,630 19,630 (310',
Adult Athletics 45003 16,799 22,148 26,477 25,290 25,290 (1,187'~
Youth Enrichment 45004 21,632 19,111 22,231 22,169 22,169 (62)
Travel Athletics 45005 12,526 21,035 22,775 22,597 22,597 (178):
Back to the Parks 45006 10,000 10,000 (10,000) (10,000)
Project Pride 45007
Tdps & Outings 45030 40.665 40,715 37,530 38,603 38.603 1,073
Senior Citizens 45040 64,132 66,074 72,121 76,238 76,238 4,117
Recognition/Special Ev'ts 45050 62,836 47,683 52,220 52,100 52,100 (120)
Mu~zyn Hall 45129 181,916 219,344 246,166 247,472 (37,300) 210,172 (35,994)
Parks 45200 564,490 609,472 644,403 705,565 (55,282) 650,283 5,880
Tree Trimming 46102 37,872 47,549 46,198 49,754 (3,800) 45,954 (244)
Dutch Elm Sanitation 46103 45,331 49,035 53,327 54,633 (22,500) 32,133 (21.194)
Dutch Elm Replanting 46104 10,082 8,072 25,528 26,093 (11,000) 15,093 (10,435)
Contingencies 49200 4,684
Transfers 49300 517,396 1,080,572 415,000 400,000 400,000 (15,000)
Police Capital Equipment Fund (59,534)
Total 7,328,157 8,067,233 8,022,331 8,635,751 (755,014) 7,940,271 (82,060)
201 Community Davlopment
Protective Inspection 42400 234,010 199,853 205,190 208,401 208,401 3,211
Community Dev Adm 4631 130,800 76,021 102,572 109,062 109,062 6,490
Total Community Dev. 364,810 275,874 307,762 317,463 317,463 9,701
i240Library 114,032)
Total Libra~ 45500 496,285 531,526 597,234 648,002 164,800) 583.202
City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota
Budget 2002
31010
31014
33401
33402
33405
34107
35101
36210
39207
39210
39212
39214
39215
39216
39217
39218
Total Revenue
Administration Revenue
Mayor-Council Cib/Mana{~er
101 101
Revenue
Current Ad Valorem
Area-Wide Taxes
Local Government Aid
Homestead
PERA Increase Aid
Special Assessment Searches
Court Fines
Interest on Investments
Admin Overhead-Comm. Dev.
Administration Overhead-Library
Administration Overhead-Cable TV
Administration Overhead-Liquor Fund
Administration Overhead-Water Fund
Administration Overhead-Sewer Fund
Administration Overhead-Refuse Fun(
Administration Overhead-Recycling
Legal
Assessin~ Se~ices
101 101
88,053 116,138 64,437 70,135
27,843 36,723 20,375 22,177
77,500 102,220 56,714 61,730
0 0 0 0
626 825 458 498
0 0 200 0
0 0 0 45,000
5,988 7,898 4,382 4,769
0 5,204 0 0
0 1,301 0 0
0 54,893 3,656 0
0 3,252 0 0
0 3,252 0 0
0 3,252 0 0
0 29,370 0 0
0 29,370 0 0
200,010 393,698 150,222 204,309
Expenses
Personal Services
Supplies
Other Services and Charges
Capital Outlay
Contingencies & Transfers
Total Expenses
108,001 350,911 55,017 0
2,350 4,250 750 0
87,291 53,180 94,797 215,567
0 4,000 10,000 0
16,500 0 0 0
214,142 412,341 160,564 215,567
Summary
Total Revenue
Total Expenses
Change to Fund Balance
200,010 393,698
214,142 412,341
(14,132)
150,222 204,309
160,564 215,567
(18,643) (10,342) (11,258)
8/30/01 Page 3-8
City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota
Budget 2002
Finance Revenue
Elections Finance Water Sewer Storm Sewer IS
101 101 601 602 604 720
31010 Current Ad Valorem 16,673 142,195 0 0 0 0
31014 A~ea-Wide Taxes 5,272 44,963 0 0 0 0
32182 Pet Licenses 0 700 0 0 0 0
33401 Local Government Aid 14,675 125,153 0 0 0 0
33405 PEP, A Increase Aid 118 1,010 0 0 0 0
36210 Interest on Investments 1,134 9,669 0 25,000 8,000 0
36211 Interest Current Value C 0 0 0 12,000 0 0
36219 Change in Fair Value 0 0 0 50 0 0
36290 Other Miscellaneous Re, 0 0 0 50 0 0
36400 Principal Repayment-Lo; 0 0 0 10,000 0 0
37100 Water Service Charge 0 0 1,300,934 0 0 0
37110 Interdepartmental Water 0 0 12,000 0 0 0
37150 Water Turn Off/On 0 0 2,500 0 0 0
37160 Penalties 0 0 29,000 0 0 0
37165 Water Connection Fee 0 0 10.000 0 0 0
37170 Repair Water Meters, C; 0 0 2,000 0 0 0
37175 Customer Service 0 0 250 0 0 0
37181 Radio Meter Surcharge 0 0 4,500 0 0 0
37210 Sewer Service Charge 0 0 0 1,211,777 0 0
37211 Interdepartmental Sewe~ 0 0 0 12,000 0 0
37270 Interceptor Maintenance 0 0 0 7,885 0 0
37410 Storm Sewer Service Ch 0 0 0 0 180,000 0
39207 Admin Overhead-Comm 0 34,217 0 0 0 0
39208 Transfer in-Cable TV 0 0 0 0 0 50.000
39210 Administration Overheat 0 7,991 0 0 0 0
39214 Administration Overheat 0 22,379 0 0 0 0
39215 Administration Overheat 0 71,114 0 0 0 0
39216 Administration Overheat 0 71,112 0 0 0 0
39217 Administration Overheat 0 31.473 0 0 0 0
39218 Administration Overheat 0 31,473 0 0 0 0
39219 Transfer in-Liquor Fund 0 0 0 0 0 45,000
39221 Transfer In-Sewer Fund 0 0 0 0 0 45,000
39222 Transfer In-Water Fund 0 0 0 0 0 45,000
39223 Transfer In-Garage Fun( 0 0 0 0 0 30,000
39225 Transfer In-Refuse 0 0 0 0 0 45.000
39237 Transfer In-Storm Sewe! 0 0 0 10,000 0 0
37,872 593,449 1,361,184 1,288,762 188,000 310,000
Per,s~nal Sewices 27,624 537,384 0 0 0 133,070
Suoplies 4,400 8,950 2,000 2,000 0 8,100
Other Se~ces and Charg~ 1,701 59,938 10,370 12,335 1,900 93,422
Capital Outlay 6,823 10,000 1,000 1,000 0 30,000
Contingencies & Transfem 0 0 119,366 119,364 0 10,000
Total Expense~ 40,548 616,272 132,736 134,699 1,900 274,592
Sumrna~
Total Revenue 37,872 593,449 1,361,184 1,288,762 188,000 310,000
Total Experme~ 40,548 616,272 132,736 134,699 1,900 274,592
Change to Fund Balance (2,676) (22,823) 1,228,448 1,154,063 186,100 35,408
8/30/01
City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota
Budget 2002
FJ~ Revenue
Fire
Civil Defense
31010
31014
32125
33170
33401
33402
33405
34202
36210
39203
39219
Current Ad Valorem
Area-Wide Taxes
Multiple Dwellings
Civil Defense Reimbursement
Local Government Aid
Homestead
PERA Increase Aid
Special Fire Services
Interest on Investments
Transfer In-General Fund
Transfer In-Liquor Fund
Total Revenue
347,958 32,828 0
110,026 10,380 0
23,000 0 0
0 4,000 0
306,255 28,893 0
0 0 0
2,473 233 0
20,000 0 0
23,661 2,232 12,000
0 0 12,875
0 0 25,751
833,373 78,566 50,626
Expenses
Personal Services 758,876 17,328 0
Supplies 49,000 3,695 0
Other Services and Charges 55,347 12,813 0
Capital Outlay 26,000 50,000 74,000
Contingencies & Transfers 0 0 0
Totsl Expenses 889,223 83,836 74,000
Summary
Total Revenue 833,373 78,566 50,626
Total Expanses 889,223 83,836 74,000
Change to Fund Balance (55,850) (5,270) (23,374)
8/30/01
City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota
Budget 2002
General Government Revenue
General Govt Recognition
Buildings Special Events Transfers
I 101 101 101
Revenue
31010 Current Ad Valorem 53,502 21,423 78,911
31014 Area-Wide Taxes 16,918 6,774 24,951
33401 Local Government Aid 47,090 18,855 69,450
33405 PERA Increase Aid 380 152 561
33600 County Grant 0 0 0
36210 Interest on Investments 3,638 1,457 5,367
36220 General Government Rents 600 0 0
36250 Franchise Fees 0 0 0
36290 Other Miscellaneous Revenue 4,500 0 0
37310 Refuse Service Charge 0 0 0
37311 Interdepartmental Refuse Charge 0 0 0
39100 Sale of Land 500 0 0
39101 Gain/Loss Sale Fixed Asset 5,000 0 0
39120 Recovery Damage City Property 500 0 0
39140 Other Refunds & Reimbursements 1,000 0 0
Total Revenue 133,628 48,661 387.340
Cable TV Refuse
225 603
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 50,000
10,000 20,000
0 0
128,000 0
0 0
0 1,200,000
0 4,800
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
138,000 1,274,800
Expenses
Personal Services
Supplies
Other Services and Charges
Capital Outlay
Contingencies & Transfers
Total Expenses
0 0 0 6,431 1,800
19,000 0 0 5,550 1,285,025
93,216 52,100 0 42,366 46,906
30,000 0 0 0 800
0 0 400,000 108,549 177,552
142,216 52,100 400,000 162,896 1,512,083
Summary
Total Revenue
Total Expenses
Change to Fund Balance
133,628 48,661 387,340
142,216 52,100 400,000
138,000 1,274,800
162,896 1.512,083
(237,283)
(8,588) (3,439) (12,660) (24,896)
8/30/01
City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota
Budget 2002
31010
31014
32110
32120
32166
33401
33405
33416
33421
33630
34201
34203
35101
36210
39203
39214
39217
39218
39219
Total Revenue
Police Revenue
Cap Equip
Police Animal Control DARE Police
101 101 270 431
Revenue
Current Ad Valorem
Area-Wide Taxes
Liquor, Wine & Beer License
Cigarettes
Taxi
Local Government Aid
PERA Increase Aid
State Law Officer Training
Insurance Premium Tax-Polica
School District
Special Police Services
Public Safety-Police Report
Court Fines
Interest on Investments
Transfer In-General Fund
Administration Overhead-Liquor Fund
Administration Overhead-Refuse Fund
Administration Overhead-Recycling
Transfer In-Liquor Fund
856,783 6,641 0 0
270,918 2,100 0 0
40,000 0 0 0
1,500 0 0 0
1,200 0 0 0
764,097 5,845 0 0
6,088 47 0 0
7,500 0 0 0
150,000 0 0 0
28,000 0 0 0
180,000 0 0 0
4.000 0 0 0
45,000 0 0 0
58,262 452 0 12,000
0 0 0 20,026
38,323 0 0 0
5,433 0 0 0
5,433 0 0 0
0 0 9,000 40,052
2,462,537 15,085 9,000 72,078
Expenses
Persona; Services
Supplies
Other Services and Charges
Capital Outlay
Contingencies & Transfers
Total Expenses
2,309,282 0 0 0
84,100 550 5,850 23,500
202,176 15,600 2,975 4,600
4,500 0 0 87,000
0 0 0 0
2,600,058 16.150 8,825 115,100
2,462,537 15,085 9,000 72,078
2.600,058 16,150 8,825 115,100
(137,521) (1,065) 175 (43,022)
Summar~
Total Revenue
Total Expenses
Change to Fund Balance
8/30/01
City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota
Budget 2001
Library Revenue
31010
34110
34120
34130
34140
34150
34160
35103
36210
36290
39101
39140
I
Revenue
Current Ad Valorem
Library-Photocopies
Library-Other
Library-Video
Library-Collections
Library-Book Bags
Library-Printer Copies
Library Fines
Interest on Investments
Other Miscellaneous Revenue
Gain/Loss Sale Fixed Asset
Other Refunds & Reimbursements
Total Revenue
Library
240
591,588
3,000
1,000
2,000
100
100
500
15,000
5,000
200
25
25
618,538
Expenses
Personal Services
Supplies
Other Services and Charges
Capital Outlay
Contingencies & Transfers
Total Expenses
412,645
91,650
74,615
59,300
9,792
648,002
Summary
Total Revenue
Total Expenaea
Change to Fund Balance
618,538
648,002
(29,464)
8/30/01