Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 84-13 RESOLUTION 84- BEING A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE PROIECTION OF LOCAL AUTHORITY AND CONSUMER INTERESTS IN CABLE LEGISLATION WHEREAS, provision of cable television service has proven to be a valuable service to the City of Columbia Heights and holds great promise to all cities in the United States; and WHEREAS, the City of Columbia Heights and other local govern- ments have had the responsibility for franchising cable televi- sion systems in their cities and for overseeing the implementation of those franchises once awarded; and WHEREAS, the presence of a strong local governmental role in the overseeing of franchise agreements has worked to ensure that contractual obligations are carried out and the public interest served; and WHEREAS, the United States House of Representatives has been deliberating on federal cable television legislation; and WHEREAS, H.R. 4103, The Cable Communications Act of 1983, represents a shift of control and oversight of local cable franchises from local government control to federal government control; and WHEREAS, the City of Columbia Heights does not necessarily oppose all cable legislation° NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Columbia Heights opposes H.R. 4103, The Cable Communications Act of 1983, in its present form and urges the United States House of Representatives to continue its efforts to formulate cable legislation con- sistent with the following goals: 1. That local and state governments not be limited in their option to negotiate the definition of basic services and to regulate the rates charged by cable television com- panies for basic service~ should they believe it to be in the public interest; 2. That at the time of franchise renewal, cities be able to obtain reasonable upgrades of system hardware to "state-of-the-art" standards; be able to refuse renewal to an operator which has given poor service during the life of the franchise; be able to negotiate the purchase price of a cable franchise when a municipality buys back a cable system or the system is transferred to a third party through a forced sale; and that any court review will not be de novo and court review of renewal or nonrenewal decisions be the same as that accorded other legislative decisions; 3. That all existing franchises and their terms and -1- conditions and all franchise processes in which a Request for Proposals has been issued be grandfathered; 4. That the legislation protects cities from anti- trust liability for compliance with federal law; 5. That any limitation on franchise fees not apply to fees, charges and taxes charged to or through a cable opera- tor as part of a larger class, for example, utility user taxes; 6. That federal cable legislation not restrict the ability of cities to require public, educational, governmen- tal and leased access to cable television; 7. That cable companies not be provided with the power to abrogate contractual obligations based on a unilateral assertion of a "significant change in circumstances;" and 8. That local governments not be restricted from muni- cipal ownership and operation of cable systems. Adopted by the City of 27th day of February Columbia Heights , 1984. on the Offered by: Hovland Seconded by: Peterson Roll call: All ayes Bruce'.~ Nawrocki, Mayor ATTEST: William Elrite, City Clerk -2-