The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutJanuary 21, 2003 Work SessionCITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N.E.. Columbia Heights. MN 55421-3878 (763) 706-3600 TDD (763) 706-3692 Visit Oar Website at: wwmci, cohonbia-heights, a:n. us ADMINISTRATION NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING to be held in the CITY OF COL UMBIA HEIGHTS as follows: Mayor Julienne Wyckoff Councilmembers Robert A. Williams Bruce Nawrocki Tammera Ericson Bruce Kelzenberg City Manaoer Walt Fehst Meeting of: Date of Meeting: Time of Meeting: Location of Meeting: Purpose of Meeting: COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 21, 2003 7:00 P.M. CONFERENCE ROOM 1 WORK SESSION (Two Board and Commission interviews will be conducted from 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. in Conference Room 1.) AGENDA 1. Recommending award of proposal for Utility Rate Study (Please save and bring the attached information to the Council meeting) 2. Resolution to increase City Manager's spending limit. 3. Direction of liquor store replacement (discussion) 4. Redevelopment Opportunity- 49th and Central (discussion) 5. Board and Commission appointments (Please bring your interview packets) a. Planning & Zoning Commission b. Economic Development Authority c. Human Services Commission The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all City of Columbia Heights' services, programs, and activities. Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Council Secretary at 706-361 l, to make arrangements. (TDD/706-3692 for deaf or hearing impaired only) THE CiTY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOE5 NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABiLiTY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES ~QUAL OPPORTUniTY EMPLOYER CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: 1/21/03 AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESSION NO: BIDS & OTHER CONSIDERATIONS ITEM: AWARD OF PROPOSAL FOR UTILITY RATE STUDY ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS BY: K. Ha?eh~ DATE: 1/16/03~2,-.'~ CITY MANAGER BY: DATE: Background: The City Council directed staff to prepare Request for Proposals (RFP) at their October 14, 2002 regular meeting. Staffprepared and sent out copies of the RFP to nine frans, a copy of which is attached. Seven proposals were submitted meeting the requirements stated in the RFP. Two fu'rns, PCE and Kimley-Hom, joined forces and submitted a single proposal. Analysis/Conclusions: The City of Columbia Heights desires to conduct a rate study for the development and implementation of equitable rate structures for sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water utilities. This will ensure that the necessary revenues will be available for the uninterrupted operation and continued maintenance of these services. The primary study elements are detailed on page 2 of the RFP and consist generally of the following: · Data Collection · Review and update the 5-year Utilities CIP · Establish Historical Trends and Projections · Determine Revenue Needs · Develop a unit cost of service over a 5-year period · Report production and presentation Staffhas reviewed each of the proposals and prepared a ranking grid based upon the criteria given in the RFP. On this basis, City staffis recording the finn of Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH) to complete the Utility Rate Study. We feel that SEH had the best understanding and approach to the Utility Rate Study, has an excellent scope, detail and program proposed, has a very good experience history in the completion of rate studies in the Metro Area, and submitted the best overall proposal that addressed the requirements of the RFP. SEH also performed and completed the City's storm water utility implementation in 1999/2000. Although the estimated cost of SEH is second highest, the attached table illustrates the estimated hours by each consultant and what the corresponding average hourly rate would be. SEH is 3 of 7 based upon average hourly rate to complete the study. Funding for the Utility rate study is proposed to funded equally from each of the three operating funds from: Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer. Recommended Motion: Move to accept the proposal from SEH for the Utility Rate Study based upon their proposal dated December 27, 2002, in an amount not-to-exceed $26,000; and, furthermore, to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement for the same. KH:jb Attachments: Ranking Grid Cost/Hour comparison table Proposals COUNCIL ACTION: UTILITY RATE STUDY WORK STUDY / COST Time Period (proposed) Proposal Cost Average rate Firm: to Complete Study (Not to Exceed) per hour BRA 193 hours $ 20,898 $108.28/hr Ehlers 85 hours $ 12,500 $147.06/hr PCE & 230 hours $ 19,980 $86.87/hr Kimley Horn 252 hours $ 25,937 $102.92/hr SEH 199 hours $ 29,940 $150.45/hr Springsted 160 hours $ 16,500 $103.13/hr TKDA 190 hours $ 16,580 $87.26/hr URS Prepared by Public Works 1/17/03 Page 1 CITY COUNCIL LETTER MEETING OF: JANUARY 27, 2003 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPT: CITY MANAGER NO: FINANCE APPROVAL ITEM: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CITY BY: ~ELRITE BY: MANAGER'S SPENDING AUTHORITY DAT~.' -J~I~Y 16, 2003 NO: At the General Election on November 5, 2002 voters approved having the City Manager's spending authority set by resolution. Based on this, staff has prepared the attached resolution to increase the City Manager's spending authority. In support of this resolution we have attached a copy of the ballot question, the results of the vote on the question, the League of Minnesota Cities procedure for paying city claims, Minnesota statute Chapter 471 on Uniform Municipal Contracting Law, and a copy of a survey conducted by Schawn Johnson, Public Works Administrative Assistant, in relationship to City Manager spending limits in various surrounding cities. Based on the survey that Schawn conducted, the spending limit for City Managers in surrounding communities ranges from a low of $5,000 to a high of $50,000. The average for the 14 cities surveyed is slightly over $30,000. Subsequently, staff is recommending setting the spending authority level for the City Manager at $25,000. In reference to state statute 471, this amount of $25,000 is well within the allowable parameters of state statutes for purchases handled either upon sealed bids or by direct negotiations by obtaining two more quotations. As you can see from this statute, all purchases in excess of $50,000 must be done using the sealed bid process. The last reference document is page 15 in the manual from the League of Minnesota Cities regarding procedures for paying city claims. Part 5 of this page covers the delegation of authority for paying certain claims. The attached resolution follows the League of Minnesota Cities' recommendation for this delegation. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to waive the reading of Resolution 2003-xx there being ample copies available to the public. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Move to adopt Resolution 2003-xx being a resolution setting the City Manager's spending authority. WE:sms o3m ~63cotmcn. Attachments COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO. 2003 - RESOLUTION SETTING THE CITY MANAGER'S SPENDING AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the City Charter has previously established purchase and contract spending amounts for the City Manager; and : WHEREAS, at the November 5, 2002 General Election the voters approved setting the City Manager spending limit by resolution: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of C°lumbia Heights City Council that the established purchase and contract spending amount be increased to $25,000 for the City Manager of Columbia Heights; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution supersedes the amount set in Chapter 6, Section 56. PURCHASES AND CONTRACTS of the City Charter; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLIVED that the City Council delegates to the City Manager the authority to pay claims for goods and services that is within the City Manager's spending limit or where the contract for the purchase of goods or services has received prior City Council approval. Passed this Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: day of ,2003 Mayor Julienne Wyckoff Patricia Muscovitz, Deputy City Clerk IClAL BALLOT STATE GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 5, 2002 FEDERAL OFFICES UNITED STATES SENATOR VOTE FOR ONE RAY TRICOMO Green ::::)JIM MOORE Independence o NORM COLEMAN Repvblican PAUL WELLSTONE Democratic-Farmer-Labor o MIRO DRAGO KOVATCHEVlCH Constitution ~'l~'~f'~1 ~f any UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 5 VOTE FOR ONE oTIM DAVIS Green ::::::)DANIEL NIELSEN MATHIAS Republican (:::::::::)MARTIN OLAV SABO Democratic-Farmer-Labor O write-in, ff STATE OFFICES STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 50 ~0~ FOR n~ O STEVE MINAR Rep~blicen O SATVEER CHAUDHARY DemocratJc-Farm~r-L_~_h~r_ STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 50A VOTE FOR ~ o PHIL RATTE Independence oADAM DAV'S Republican o BARB GOODWIN Democratic-F,,rmer~'_~ GOVERNOR AND UEUTENANT GOVERNOR VOTE FOR ONE TEAM o KEN PENTEL AND RHODA GILMAN oTIMOTHY J. (TIM) PENNY AND MARTHA R. ROBERTSON ::::::)TIM PAWLENTY AND CAROL MOLNAU INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS To vote, completely fill in the oval(s) next to your choiCe(l) like this: STATE OFFICES ATrORNEY GENERAL VOTE FOR ONE ::::)DALE NATHAN Independence c~TOM KELLY Republican (:~ MIKE HATCH IpNpmoc~atic-F~l rme r-lral:)o~ COUNTY OFFICES COUNTY COMMISSIONER DISTRICT 4 VOTE FOR ONE oGARY MCLAIN O JIM A. KORDIAK COUNTY SHERIFF VOTE FOR ONE O BRUCE ANDERSOHN O DAVE PECCHIA COUNTY ATTORNEY VOTE FOR ONE oWILLIAM J. MARSHALL oROBERT M A JOHNSON O ~.~te~. If a.y SOIL AND WA~R CONSERVATION SUPERVISOR Dk~TRICT 3 VOTE FOR ONE oERNEST LARSEN O w~te-i~, i~ any SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION SUPERVISOR DISTRICT 4 oRANDALL J. ANHORN 0 MARY JO TRUCHON CITY QUESTIONS CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS To vote for a question, fill in the oval next to the word 'YES' for that question. To vote against a question, fill in the oval next to the word 'NO" for that question. CITY QUESTION NO. 1 ADMINISTRATION OF POUCE DEPARTMENT Under t~e CUrTent City Charter, the Police O~partment is under the control of the Mayor. Shall the Home Rule Charter of U~e City of Columbia Heights be amended to )lace control of the Police Department under the City Manager? oYES oNO cn'Y QUESTION NO. 2 READING OF ORDINANCES When considering a new or amended ordinance, shall the Home Rule Charter of the City of Columbia Heights be amended to require a four. rlf~s (415) rather than an unanimous vote of the City Council to waive the public reading of the ordinance, provided all other requirements of the Charter are met? [The practical effect of this amendment would mean that two councilmembers, rather than one, would have to agree to require an ordinance be read.] oYES CITY QUESTION NO. 3 CiTY MANAGER SPENDING AUTHORIZATION Currently the City Ma~Ter must seek authuT'v, at;c.-, [,~.~', the C~ Council before spending more than $3,000. Rather than requiring a Charter amendment any time the City Manager's authorized spending limit is adjusted, shall the Home Rule Charter of Columbia Heights be ,,, amended to authorize the City Coup1 to adjust the City Manager's spending limit by resolution? oYEs (:::)NO SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICES INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 13 (COLUMBIA HEIGHTS) SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER VOTE FOR UP TO THREE MIKE PETERSON DALE BOWEN (--)SCOTT BARDELL RESOLUTION NO. 2002-66 CANVASSING MUNICIPAL GENERAL ELECTION RETURNS WHEREAS, the City of Columbia Heights, did on the 5t~ day of November, 2002, conduct and hold a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing a Mayor and two Council Members; and WHEREAS, the Columbia Heights Charter Commission included three Charter Amendment questions on the ballot; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights at a meeting of said Council held on the 12th day of November, 2002, did canvass the returns and results of said General Municipal Election; and WHEREAS, the following results were determined by said canvass of said General Municipal Election, to wit: TOTAL BALLOTS CAST IN ELECTION: 8,405 Valid Votes Cast for Mayor Gary L. Peterson 3,808 Tammera Ericson 3,934 Julienne Wyckoff 4,002 Bruce Kelzenberg 3,558 Overvotes 1 Tom Rarnsdell 2,212 Times Blank Voted 577 Joe Sturdevant 3,114 Undervotes n/a Overvotes 0 Write-Ins 17 Times Blank Voted 807 Undervotes 2,330 Write-Ins 48 Valid Votes Cast for two 4-Year Council Seats Charter Amendment Question Yes No Blank Voted No. 1 Administration of Police Department 2,939 4,651 815 No. 2 Reading of Ordinances 4,823 2,646 936 No. 3. City Manager Spending Authority 4,075 3,391 939 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights, that Julienne Wyckoffis hereby elected Mayor, and that Tarnmera Ericson and Bruce Kelzenberg are hereby elected members of the City Council, assuming said offices on January 6, 2003; and that Charter Amendment question Number One (1) was defeated; and Charter Amendment questions Number Two (2) and Number Three (3) were approved and shall take effect on December 5, 2002. Passed this 12th day of November, 2002 Offered by: Szurek Seconded by: Wyckoff Roll Call: Ayes: Peterson, Szurek, Wyckoff, Williams, Nawrocki f~ -lVlW r C ary . Pet-ers& Attest: Patricia Muscovitz, Depq{y City Clerk DEC-12-2~2 15:19 LE;~CIUE OF l~q CITIES P.02/29 a research memo for city officials 215c August 2000 Procedures for Paying City Claims Revised by: Marcus Miller, Research Analyst League of Minnesota CItiea League of Minnesota Cities DE¢-12-2002 15:19 LEI:IfilJE OF ~ CITIES P,03/29 The League of Minnesou Cities provfde~ this pebll~on ms m teutrt! ~i~ormtloul BmO. 1I is mot b~emded ~o provide iejml mdvJce iod should nor be ~sed os · subsehte ~or competent le~! ~uJchnce. ibiden Gould conmult with in mttor~y for mdvJ~ ~ncerntng specific sitllat~nL 2000 League o[ Minnesota Cities Reseaz~)~ Fotmc~tion All ~ Leatue o~ ]vlinnesota Cities 145 University Avenue ~Tes-t St. Paul, MN 55103-20~.:~ (6si) (800) Fax (651) 281-1299 DEC-1:~-:~002 15:19 LERF_~ OF ~ CITIES P.04/~ Table of Contents Paying City Chrltns lligAh'gM~ ................................. ~ ............................................ ~ IntFoductJon .................................................................................. 9 Part L Part IL Part !~. Part IV. PM'tV, Part VI. Part VIL Pert VIIL Pert IX. The rok of city officials in disbursing fumb ............................................ 9 A. Standard Plan and Plan-A statutory cities ..................................... 9 K Plan-B statutory cities ........................................................... Paying clainu where prior council approval is requJrect ............................ 11 Paying claims where prior council approval is not required ........................ 12 A. Paying city employees ................................................................. 13 B. Imprest funds (petty cash) ............................................................ 14 C. Imm~llat~ payment of elnim~ ........................................................ 14 D. Independent boards, commissions, and city departments ....................... 15 Delegation of authority for paying certain claims .................................... IS Time consideFaflom in paying claims ................................................... 16 A. Prompt payment of claims ............................................................. 16 B. Claims not paid due to insufficient funds ........................................... 17 C. Lost or destroyed warrants or orders .............................................. 18 Home-rule charter cities. ................................................................. 18 CFedJt cards ................................................................................. 20 Conclusion .................................................................................. 20 DEC-12-2002 15:20 LEI:IGUE OF I'lq CITIES P.06/29 Paying City Claims Highlights 1. What is a claim? A claim is basically a bill to thc city. When a city owes money to a particular person or business, that person or business is said to have a china against the city depository. 2. What procedures mast a city follow to pay · claim? Generally, the following must be done in order for a claim to be paid: · The council authorizes that the claim be paid. An order for thc amount ortho claim is signed by the clerk · Thc order is presented to thc t~casurer. · The treasurer signs thc order and issues it to thc claimant as an order check. * The order check can be deposited or cashed by the claimant. While this is the general procedure for statutory cities, thc~ may be diff~xent procedures for home-rule charter cities. There are also some special limited exceptions to this procedure. Home nde charter cities should check their charters for additional requirements. See the Lcaguc rcSearch memo Payment ofOty Clair,~ (LMC 215C) for a more detailed discussion. 3. Who signs ~he checks? Generally, thc mayor, clerk, and t~asurer will all sign the checks. When the claimant deposits or cashes the chock, it must be endorsed with his or her signature. This endorsement must acknowledge a statemmt tha~ the claim is a correct claim and that it has not already b,~en paid. Must the council approve ~pendltures bt advance? Although there are exceptions, genmlly thc city council must approve all expenditures before they can be paid. Claims for goods and services must have prior council approval before being paid. DEC-12-2002 15:20 LEAr_.,~IJE OF Pll CITIES P.O?/2x9 What expenditures my be made without prior council appFoYid? The followin~ types ofchims do nar need council approval before they ~re paid: 0 Principal or int~est on oblisations where the exact amounts have been previously fixed by coflt~ac~. Other fixed chsr~es determined under a contract which thc council bas previously authorized. Wages that have been previously set by ~he council or state law. The city council, however, should routinely review these types of chims to ensure that the~ are proper. 6. Can the council deleSate authoFit~ to pay bilb? A city council may delegate au~ho~it~ to pay ccmin claims to a city administrative official. In order to delegate this authority, the council must establish certain procedures that ensure review of the officer's actions. Thc city manager in a Plan. B city has the authority to n~ke contracts for purchases that do not exceed $15,000. The city council can set a lower limit by passing a resolution. 7. Are rubber stamp signatures allowed? A robber stamp or facsimile silP~ture ora ci~ olefficial ma)' bc used if~c ~ offs ~ of si~ ~ ~ ~pmv~ by ~e ci~ co~. ~ approval ~ ~i~y ~ne b~ ~c ~l ~hg a r~olu~. ~ ~ ~ ~h ~o ~m~ o/C~ C~ (LMC 2ISC) for n mo~ i~g ~io~ 8. Who controls department funds? Cit~ councils control th~ ~unds ofall cit~ departments unless there is a law that pzovides ol~erwise. This me~s iht the council must apprave all purchascs made for the police, fire, public works, or other similar deptrtments. 6 l.~,ue or Mfnmot~ Cit~ DEC-12-2002 15:28 LEI:~F_IJE OF ~ CITIES P.08/29 9. Mint cities pay bills within a certain period of time? Citie~ are required to make prompt payment of their bills. Generally, ifa city has regularly schMuled meetings at least on~ a month, it must pay within 3~ days of the receipt of the bill. Ifa city does not have reg~y scheduled meetings at least once n month, it must pay within 45 days. If a ~ty is la2 making payment of a bill, it must gay imc, ra~'t o~ ~ lat~ gaymtn~. This intcrest requirement does not apply ifa city disputes thc bill in 8ood fai~ Sec the League ~seatch memo Payment of City Ciaim.~ (LMC 215C) fora more detailed discussion of this requirement. 10. Can dries have credit cards? This issue is still rather uncertain. There is no specific authority for cities to use credit ca~ds. But the 2000 Legislature gave th~s authority to counties. Cities that wish to use credit ca~ls should check with thetr city attorneys. 11. Where can cities get further lnfoFmation? Thc League of Minnesota Cities has several publications that discms issues relating to paymcnt ofcity claims, including the research memo Proce. dure~ for t~aying City Claims (LMC 215c). Call the League's Research and Information Services Dcpa'enent for fu~er information. DEC-12-L;~02 15:22 LE~.W_E OF ~ CITIES P. 16/29 Mmm. Strut. ! 41L~TI, ulbd. k A.O. Oik #~, A4tr. IL Minn, ~t~t, 1 41Y,.~l, m~L Mira,. ~t~t ~ dli,271, n,~d. D. Independent boards, commissions, and departments Some cities have boards and commissions possessin~ in~ent legal authority vo spend public money without council approval. A good example or'this is s library board. In conu'ast, thc council must generally approve expenditures for the city fire department and liquor store. Likewise, a hospital board does not possess independent authority to spend money, and such authority may not be delegated to it. It is worth briefly noting that boa.,ds and commissions, with independent authority to spend money, may establish imprest fimds and make immediate payment of claims as described in the preceding two sections. Thc post-cxpeaditur~ approval dcscribed in those sections would lx: sought from thc independent board or commission, rather than the city council. Part V. Delegation of authority for paying certain claims A city council ma), delegate its authority to ply certain claims. This authority may be ~ivcn by the council to a city administrative official. City administmive o~cials include a city manager, administrator, u'castuer, senior fiscal officer, clerk, or clerk-treasure~. In order to delegate this authority, a city must do the followinj: ~f~pt a ~oluf~pn. Cities delegatin~ authority to pay claims must adopt e resolution speci~ing the type of claims to be paid and the edministnRive official to whom this authority is ~ranted. IS Minnesota Statutes 2000, 471.345 http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/471/345.html Minnesota Statutes 2000, Table of Chapters Table of contents for Chapter 471 471.345 Uniform Municipal Contracting Law. Subdivision 1. Municipality defined. For purposes of this section, "municipality" means a county, town, city, school district or other municipal corporation or political subdivision of the state authorized by law to enter into contracts. Subd. 2. Contract defined. A "contract" means an agreement entered into by a municipality for the sale or purchase of supplies, materials, equipment or the rental thereof, or the construction, alteration, repair or maintenance of real or personal property. Subd. 3. Contracts over $35,000 for municipalities of less than 2,500 population; $50,000 for all others. If the amount of the contract is estimated to exceed $35,000 for municipalities of less than 2,500 population, or $50,000 for all others, sealed bids shall be solicited by public notice in the manner and subject to the requirements of the law governing contracts by the particular municipality or class thereof provided that with regard to repairs and maintenance of ditches, bids shall not be required if the estimated amount of the contract does not exceed the amount specified in section 103E.705, subdivisions 5, 6, and 7. Subd. 4. Contracts from $10,000 to $35,000 for municipalities of less than 2,500 population; $50,000 for all others. If the amount of the contract is estimated to exceed $10,000 but not to exceed $35,000 for municipalities of less than 2,500 population, or $50,000 for all others, the contract may be made either upon sealed bids or by direct negotiation, by obtaining two or more quotations for the purchase or sale when possible, and without advertising for bids or otherwise complying with the requirements of competitive bidding. Ail quotations obtained shall be kept on file for a period of at least one year after receipt thereof. Subd. 5. Contracts less than $10,000. If the amount of the contract is estimated to be $10,000 or less, the contract may be made either upon quotation or in the open market, in the discretion of the governing body. If the contract is made upon quotation it shall be based, so far as practicable, on at least two quotations which shall be kept on file for a period of at least one year after their receipt. Subd. 5a. County or town rental contracts. If the amount of a county or town contract for the rental of equipment is estimated to be $60,000 or less, the contract may, in the discretion of the county or town board, be made by direct negotiation by obtaining two or more quotations for the rental when possible and without advertising for bids or otherwise complying with the requirements of competitive bidding. All quotations shall be kept on file for a period of at least one year after their receipt. Subd. 6. Applicability of other laws. The purpose of this section is to establish for all municipalities, uniform dollar limitations upon contracts which shall or may be entered 1 of 5 10/17/01 10:47 AM Proposed City Manager Spending Limit-2003.xls City of Columbia Heights I Suwey on City Manager Spending Umit By Schawn Johnson 12/20/2002 Muncipal Government Cit7 Manat~ler Spendin~l Umit Other Requirement City of Fridley $ 50,000.00 City of St. Anthony $ 25,000.00 City of New Brighton $ 25,000.00 !City of Andover Council Set's Spending Umit City Administrator City of Cottal;le Grove $ 50,000.00 City of Roseville $ 5,000.00 City of Crystal $ 15,000.00 City of Robbinsdale $ 10,000.00 City of New Hope $ 5,000.00 City of Plymouth $ 50,000.00 City of Minnetonka $ 25,000.00 City of Eden Prarie $ 15,000.00 City of Savage $ 50,000.00 City.of Ramsey Council Set's Spending Emit City Administrator City of Bloomington $ 50,000.00 City of Apple Valley $ 50,000.00 City of Eagan No Spending Umit in Place City Administrator City of Wondbury Pending Call City of Maple Grove Pending Call Avem~le for 14 Cities $ 30,357.14 Proposed City Manager Spending Limit-2003.xls Page I