HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecember 2, 2002 RegularCITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
590 40~h Avenue N.E.. Columbia Heights. MN 55421-3878 (763) 706-3600 TDD (763) 706-3692
Visit Or: Website at: .,.'n'.ci. coh.nbia-heights.mn.us
ADMINISTRATION
Mayor
Gar), L. Peterson
Coun¢ilmembers
Marlaine Szurek
Julienne Wyckoff
Bruce Nawrocki
Robert A, Williams
City Manager
The following is the agenda for the regular meeting of the City Council to be held at 7:00 p.m. on Monday,
December 2, 2002 in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 590 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights,
Minnesota.
The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or
employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with
disabilities to participate in all City of Cohmbia Heights' services, programs, and activities. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are
available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the Deputy City Clerk at 763-706-3611,
to make arrangements. (TDD/706-3692 for deaf or hearing impaired only)
Call to Order - Roll Call
Pledge of Allegiance
Presentation of 2003 Budget and Tax Levy Information
Linda Magee, Assistant to the City Manager and William J. Elrite, Finance Director,
will present information.
Adjournment
Walter R. Fehst, City Manager
THE CITY Of COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS Of DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES
EQUAl OPPOrtUniTY EMPLOYER
General Fund
Parks
Police
Recreation
Fire
Engineering
Traffic Signs & Signals
Finance
Civil Defense
Street Lighting
Weed Control
Tree Care & Maintenance
Senior Citizens
Mayor-Council
City Manager
Murzyn Hall
Youth Athletics
Adult Athletics
Youth Enrichment
Traveling Athletics
Assessing
Legal Services
Elections
General Government Bldgs
Recognition/Special Events
Transfers
Contingencies
Animal Control
Trips & Outings
Streets
Total General Fund
City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota
2003 Budget Personal Services
2002 2003
Budget Budget
Difference
Percent
Increase/Decrease
414,678 471,937 57,259 12%
2,209,176 2,469,424 260,248 11%
184,075 199,210 15,135 8%
748,876 799,447 50,571 6%
252,787 266,893 14,106 5%
46,920 49,328 2,408 5%
537,384 558,221 20,837 4%
17,328 17,994 666 4%
4,424 4,588 164 4%
11,947 12,389 442 4%
45,883 47,542 1,659 3%
65,269 67,516 2,247 3%
108,001 111,102 3,101 3%
350,911 359,803 8,892 2%
156,732 159,104 2,372 1%
13,237 13,237 0 0%
7,761 7,761 0 0%
15,544 15,544 0 0%
7,443 7,443 0 0%
36,073 0 (36,073) 0%
0 0 0 0%
27,624 0 (27,624) 0%
0 0 0 0%
0 0 0 0%
0 0 0 0%
0 0 0 0%
0 0 0 0%
0 0 0 0%
367,361 355,810 (11,551 ) -3%
5,629,434 5,994,293 364,859
Library
Library Fund
412,645 428,302 15,657
4%
EDA
EDA Fund
75,828 72,999 (2,829)
-4%
Total Tax Supported Funds
6,117,907 6,495,594 377,687
6%
Community Development Fund
Community Development
Protective Inspections
86,253 106,041 19,788
167,161 173,846 6,685
19%
4%
Total Community Development Fund 253,414
Summary Data/Budget by Fund/Personal Services
279,887
26,473
9%
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
TAX LEVIES PAYABLE 2000-2003
General Fund
Library
EDA
Total Levy
2,000
Actual
2,001 2,002 2,003
Adopted Adopted Adopted
2,958,490 4,095,527 4,243,830
547,767 591,588 433,585
119,295 137,015 140,569
2,676,416
500,244
119,296
Amount
of Change
148,303
(158,003)
3,554
3,295,956 3,625,552 4,824,130 4,817,984
(6,146)
MARKET VALUE (PAYABLE 2002)
MARKET VALUE (PAYABLE 2003)
2002 Taxes
2003 Proposed Taxes
Amount of Increase/Decrease
51,400
56,500
Sch°(~194
137
(57)
MARKET VALUE (PAYABLE 2002)
MARKET VALUE/PAYABLE 2003)
2002 Taxes
2003 Proposed Taxes
Amount of Increase/Decrease
Coun~ I gib/'
128 174
130 160
2 (14)
84,200
92,60O
Sch°°~30 I
239 I
(91)1
Other17161 I Total
512
444
JMARKET VALUE (PAYABLE 2002)
MARKET VALUE (PAYABLE 2003)
2002 Taxes
2003 Proposed Taxes
Amount of Increase/Decrease
Coun~ City
221 300
241 297
20 (3
113,500
124,900
School I 486 I
348 I
038)1
Other28324 I
T°ta1879 I
809 ]
(70)1
Coun~ [ Ci~
334 454
369 455
35 1
Other
Total
41 1,315
49 1,221
8 (94)[
MARKET VALUE (PAYABLE 2002)
MARKET VALUE (PAYABLE 2003)
2002 Taxes
2003 Proposed Taxes
Amountoflncrease/Decrease
140,200
154,200
Coun~ Ci~
438 595
486 600
48 5
Sch°°~26 I
446 I
(180)1
Other
Total
69 1,728
80 1,612
11 (116)l
JMARKET VALUE (PAYABLE 2002)
MARKET VALUE (PAYABLE 2003I
2002 Taxes
2003 Proposed Taxes
Amount of Increase/Decrease
169,400
186,300
Coun~ I Ci~
551 748
613 756
62 8
Sch°°~78 I
554 ]
(224)1
Other
Total
68 2,145
80 2,003
12 (142)l
Budget Charts/Taxes Payable
City of Columbia Heights, Minnesota
2003 Budget
Insurance Costs
Cost of Insurance premium Total Increase from
2000 to 2003
Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 Amount ~ Percent
Cost of Family
Medical Coverage 401.52 501.13 741.67 862.50 460.98 115%
Amount of Increase 99.61 240.54 120,83
Percent of Increase 25% 48% 16%
Insurance premium paid by the City Total Increase from
2000 to 2003
Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 Amount ~ Percent
Amount paid 455 475 535 535 80 18%
Amount of Increase 20 60 0
Percent of Increase 4.40% 12.63% 0.00%
Insurance premium paid by the employee Total Increase from
2000 to 2003
Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 Amount ~ Percent
Paid by Employee 0 26.13 206.67 327.50 327.50 327.5%
Amount of Increase 0 26.13 160.54 120.83
Percent of Increase 690.93% 58.47%
INote 1:
From 2000 to 2003 the City's contribution to employees fringe benefits for health insurance
increased by $80.00 or 18% per month. At the same time the total cost of health insurance
went up by $460.98 or 115%. This resulted in a cost increase to the employee of $327.50 per
month.
Note 2:
For 2003 an employee earning $40,000 a year and receiving a 3.5% increase would receive an
increse of $116.67 per month. At the same time health insurance costs went up by $120.83.
This results in the employee having $4.16 less in income each month for 2003.
Using this same example for 2002 the employee's health insurance cost increase was $63.87
more per month than the 3.5% pay increase. For the two years combined the employee's
income decreased by $68.04.
Smmary Data/Budget by Fund/Insurance
TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
ON THE 2003 PROPOSED BUDGET
AND PROPERTY TAXES
Table of Contents
2003 Budget Message ...................................................................................................... 1-1
2003 Revenue by Source ................................................................................................... 1-13
2003 All Budgetary Funds Expenditures By Functional Area .......................................... 1-14
2003 All Budgetary Funds Expenditures By Classification .............................................. 1-15
2003 Sources of General Fund, Library Fund, and EDA Revenue ................................... 1-16
2003 General and Library Fund Expenditures by Classification ...................................... 1-17
Major Expenditure Increases ............................................................................................ 1-18
Class Rate Percentages By Real Property Type ................................................................ 1-19
Changes in State Aid ......................................................................................................... 1-20
Proposed Property Taxes .................................................................................................. 1-21
Changes in Tax Levy 2001-2003 ...................................................................................... 1-22
Where Your Property Taxes Go ........................................................................................ 1-23
What will $30 a Month Buy? ............................................................................................ 1-24
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
2003 BUDGET MESSAGE
This budget message accompanies the 2003 budget document prepared for the Truth in Taxation
meetings which is distributed to the City Council and available to the public. The purpose of this
document is to touch on the highlights of the 2003 budget overall as well as each functional area
of the City.
Budget Format
Several years ago the budget format was revised in an attempt to provide more useful information
to the City Council and the public in a summarized, user-friendly format. Under the new format
the budget was broken down into ten functional areas and is prepared with a summary for each of
these functional areas along with a detailed budget workbook for the City Council to utilize during
their budget review. The summary budget book is then again summarized in a public document
that is used for the City's public budget adoption meeting and for any required Truth in Taxation
hearings. The budget message follows the format of the overall budget and provides a narrative
section summarizing each of the functional areas along with overall summary information on the
budget document, total budget, property taxes, and other revenue sources.
Budget Overview
Budget Highlights
To fully understand the 2003 budget highlights we must first reflect on the significant happenings
in the 2002 budget. As is reflected in the budget, the City Manager's overall proposed budget for
tax-supported funds was down for 2002 from 2001. For 2001 the total General Fund, Library
Fund and EDA budgets equaled $8,674,001. For 2002 the City Manager's proposed budget was
$8,660,490. The principal reason for the reduction in the budget was the new state legislation
that reduced state aid to the city by $800,566. It was the state legislature's recommendation that
this aid reduction be passed on to residents in the form of a property tax levy. With these
changes and reductions in state aid together with inflation and the additional financial needs of
the City, it was necessary to take a hard look at all departmental budgets and make some
significant reductions. These budget reductions included the elimination of four positions from the
City payroll (one policeman and one community service officer from the Police Department, and
one assessment clerk and one secretary from the City Manager's office). Cutbacks were also
made to capital equipment purchases.
After a vital attempt to hold the line on the 2002 budget, it was difficult to make further cuts in the
2003 budget. However, staff put forth every effort to keep expenses to a minimum with the only
significant increases being for personal cost of living and pay scale increases. These efforts
resulted in a City Manager proposed budget that utilizes $384,733 in fund balance but also
reflects a reduction of $6,146 in the property tax levy.
Page 1-!
Increase/Decrease
2001 Budget 2002 Budget from 2001
Police 2,417,842 2,499,952 82,110
Streets 642,019 681,712 39,693
Elections 6,823 40,548 33,725
Administration & General 189,556 206,434 16,878
General Government Building 130,000 142,216 12,216
City Manager 391,945 403,841 11,896
Parks 644,403 654,215 9,812
Senior Citizens 72,121 76,238 4,117
Street Lighting 124,989 128,088 3,099
Civil Defense 32,352 33,836 1,484
Trips & Outings 37,530 36,603 1,073
Weed Control 14,953 15,959 1,006
Increase/Decrease
2002 Budget 2003 Budget from 2002
Police 2,499,952 2,786,587 286,635
Parks 654,215 751,437 97,222
Transfers 400,000 480,000 80,000
Fire 843,223 916,572 73,349
Library 609,402 676,456 67,054
Civil Defense 33,836 84,973 51,137
Finance 606,272 643,973 37,701
Administration & General 206,434 224,417 17,983
Recognition/Special Events 52,100 71,368 19,268
General Government Building 142,216 158,546 16,330
Murzyn Hall 235,172 249,022 13,850
Streets 681,712 695,369 13,657
As mentioned above, the state legislature significantly reduced state aid to the City in 2002. The
following chart reflects what the City received in state aid for the years 2001 through 2003. As
you can see, there was an $800,566 reduction in 2002. In 2003 aid increased by $62,579, which
is still $737,987 less than the City received in 2001.
2001 Budget 2002 Budget 2003 Budget
HACA 1,004,368 0 0
LGA 2,385,618 2,589,420 2,651,999
Total 3,389,986 2,589,420 2,651,999
Change from Prior Year 60,835 (800,566) 62,579
Page 1-2
As was recommended by the state legislature, the 2002 aid reduction was passed on to residents
in the form of a property tax levy increase. It should be noted that although the city and county
had property tax levy increases as a result of state legislation, there was a significant offset to this
in the fact that the state drastically increased aid to school districts and the levy reduction by
school districts was greater than the levy increase from the city and county. The net result, as
projected by the state, was that homes saw a total property tax levy reduction. The following
chart shows the breakdown of the City's levy for the years 2000 through 2002 and the proposed
levy for 2003. As the chart reflects, the City's levy increase for the year 2000 was very minimal.
To finance expenses in this year the City relied heavily on reserves that were accumulated in the
City's General Fund balance. The levy for 2002 was increased to cover expenses and actually
resulted in a General Fund Balance increase of $274,601. For 2003 the levy has decreased
resulting in the use of $384,733 in General Fund reserves.
PROPERTY TAXES, 2000 - 2003
Proposed Property Taxes 2000 2001 2002 2003
Adopted Adopted Adopted Proposed
Library 500,244 547,767 591,588 433,585
EDA 119,296 119,295 137,015 140,569
General Fund 2,676,416 2,958,490 4,095,527 4,243,830
Total Levy 3,295,956 3,625,552 4,824,130 4,817,984
Levy Increase from Prior Year57,331 329,596 1,198,578 (6,146)
The next major factor in the property tax formula is the state legislature's restructuring of class
rate percentages for real property taxes payable in 1997 through 2003. The class rate changes
made during this period of time will affect property taxes in all future years. A major change was
a significant shift in the tax capacity value from commercial industrial and residential non-
homestead to residential homestead property. As you can see from the following table, for
residential homestead property there is no change in the class rate for the first $72,000 of value.
There was a slight decrease in class rate for higher priced homes. However, there was a
significant decrease in class rate for commercial industrial property and residential non-
homesteaded property. The net result of this is that although there was a small reduction on
residential property, there was a far greater reduction on non-residential property that, in effect,
shifts a significant amount of the property tax payment to residential homestead property from
other properties.
Page 1-3
CLASS RATE PERCENTAGES BY REAL PROPERTY TYPE
TAXES PAYABLE 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003
Real Property Payable Payable Payable Payable Payable Payable
Description 1997 1998 1999 2000 and 2001 2002 2003
Class Class Class Class Rate Class Class
Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate
Residential homestead
First $72,000 1.00%
Over $72,000 2.00%
First $75,000 1.00% 1.00%
Over $75,000 1.85% 1.70%
First $76,000 1.00% 1.00%
$76,000 - $500,000 1.65% 1.00% 1.00%
Over $500,000 1.25% 1.25%
Commercial-Industrial
and public utility
First $100,000
Over $100,000
First $150,000 2.70% 2.45% 2.40% 1.50% 1.50%
Over $150,000 4.00% 3.50% 3.40% 2.00% 2.00%
Residential non-homestead, 1 unit
First $72,000 2.30%
Over $72,000 2.30%
First $75,000 1.90% 1.25%
Over $75,000 2.10% 1.70%
First $76,000 1.20% 1.00%
$76,000 - $500,000 1.65% 1.00% 1.00%
Over $500,000 1.25% 1.25%
Residential non-homestead, 2-3
units and undeveloped land 2.30% 2.10% 1.70% 1.65% 1.50% 1.25%
Residential non-homestead
4 or more units 3.40% 2.90% 2.50% 2.40% 1.80% 1.50%
Low Income 1.00% 0.90% 1.00%
Economic Environment
As indicated in the Moody's Municipal Credit Report for the City of Columbia Heights, our
finances remain satisfactory with reasonable General Fund reserves. As a result, the City has
maintained an A1 bond rating. Our revenue structure is somewhat vulnerable to economic
pressure since approximately 30% of our General Fund revenue base comes from state aid and
50% of our General Fund revenue base is from local property taxes. As these aids and the City's
property tax revenue are received in the last six months of the year, the City has been
maintaining a cash flow fund balance equal to 40% of the General Fund operating budget.
Subsequently, although it may appear that we have a significant fund balance reserve, it is
actually dedicated to cash flow purposes.
The City's primary source for increased revenue is through property tax levies. Over the past
several years, the City Council has maintained a very conservative profile in increasing taxes by
minimal percentages. To maintain the quality of services provided to the residents of Columbia
Page 1-4
Heights, it may be necessary to develop a policy of a slightly higher property tax increase.
However, due to state imposed levy limits for the years 1998 through 2000, the City was
restricted from implementing minimal property tax increases. These levy limits were removed for
the year 2001 but are back in place for the years 2002 and 2003. As a result of this legislative
restriction, the City was forced to look at severe budget cuts and a reduction of services in the
2002 budget preparation process. For 2003 the City has looked at using approximately $384,733
in Fund Balance reserves to avoid further cuts to services and to also afford residents a small
reduction ($6,146) in the property tax levy. At the present time it is anticipated that the property
tax legislation passed in the 2001 legislative session will only worsen the future property tax
burden on cities. As part of the City's property tax revenue, the City does receive an area wide
fiscal disparities tax distribution from commercial property in other communities. The basis of this
area-wide fiscal disparities tax distribution is to collect property taxes on commercial property
throughout the metropolitan area and then redistribute this area-wide property tax to communities
such as Columbia Heights that have a limited commercial property tax base. Under the fiscal
disparities area wide tax system, the City of Columbia Heights benefits significantly. It is
projected that the City will receive approximately $1,000,000 in property taxes from the tax on
commercial property in other communities. As part of the recent legislation, the City may see a
reduction in this area wide tax revenue in future years. This would result in the residents of
Columbia Heights picking up an even larger portion of the property taxes.
Page 1-5
Significant Highlights on Expenditures by Functional Area
Administration
The Administration function includes Mayor, City Council,
City Manager, Assessing, and the Legal budgets. The total
proposed 2003 budget for this functional area is $921,292.
This is down $25,421 from the adopted 2002 budget of
$946,713. The most significant areas of change in the
budget are in personnel services and liability insurance
coverage. The Mayor/Council budget increased by $3,101
due to wage and benefit adjustments for 2003. In addition to
this, insurance and bonding costs increased by $6,267.
These increases were offset by a $4,000 decrease in
contingencies. This combined with other smaller
adjustments to the budget resulted in a net increase of
$3,772 to the Mayor/Council budget. The City Manager
budget also saw an increase of $9,000 for wage and fringe
adjustments. This increase also included $5,410 for an
ADMINISTRATION
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
· Contingencies & Transfers
intern position to offset the loss of the part-time clerk typist position that was moved to
Community Development. The Assessing Department budget decreased by $40,620 from 2002
to 2003. This is primarily due to the retirement of the Accounting Clerk II in Assessing and the
City contracting with Anoka County to replace some of these services and spreading the
remaining duties of the special assessment clerk to the Finance and Engineering departments.
The Legal Department budget increased by $2,562 based on the current contract and past
expenditure history. The net result of all this was a total functional area decrease of $25,421.
Community Development
This functional area covers all services previously provided
by the Housing & Redevelopment Authority in addition to
expanded services. The specific departments covered by this
functional area are Building Inspections, Administration,
Community Development Block Grant, Parkview Villa,
Economic Development Authority, Housing Redevelopment
Authority, multi-use redevelopment, and some miscellaneous
housing programs. This functional area of the City was
created in 1996 with the establishment of the EDA and the
transfer of the previous HRA staff to the EDA as a City
department. In recent years this budget has seen several
changes and modifications with the increases and decreases
to the Community Development Block Grant programs. In
mid-2002 a new director was hired for the Community
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Personal Services O Supplies
· Other Services and Charges ICapital Outlay
~Contingencies & Transfers
Development Department. Under his guidance, the primary objectives for 2002 and 2003 are the
redevelopment of the City's industrial area and the development of a specific budget and funding
sources to cover this redevelopment project.
Page 1-d
Finance Department
This functional area covers Elections, Finance, Information
Systems, and Utility Billing Administration for the water,
sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and refuse departments. The
total budget for 2003 is $643,973, which is up $37,701 from
the 2002 budget of $606,272. The most significant change
in this budget is in the area of personnel. Due to cost of
living and progression through the pay scale, personnel
costs are up $20,837. The other significant cost item in this
department is capital outlay at $10,000. This capital outlay
covers two items, the first item being a new mailing machine.
The current mailing machine is over 10 years old and has
broken down repeatedly. During the year 2002 the Finance
Department underwent considerable restructuring in
preparation for the new financial reporting and accounting
standards set by the Governmental Accounting Standards
FINANCE
EXPENDITURE
SUMMARY
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 AdoptedProposed
2002 2003
· Personal Services a Supplies
IOther Services and Charges ·Capital Outlay
· Contingencies & Transfers
Board. This restructuring has been very successful and made the department much more
efficient. With the City holding even year elections, the need for an odd year election budget has
been eliminated. For 2003 this results in a savings to the City of approximately $34,000 in cost
and a considerable savings in staff time. The IS Department budget remains status quo with the
IS Department's primary functions being to maintain the City's network of computers, software,
and computer training along with the maintenance of the City's Web site and Internet
connections. During 2002 the City purchased the CityView program that is centralized, database
software. The primary goal of this program is to create a central property database that will link
the assessing software, building inspections, and Fire Department programs. The first phases of
this program will be brought on-line in 2003. With this and the elimination of the special
assessment billing clerk position, it is anticipated that the IS staff will spend a significant amount
of time in 2003 enhancing and fully implementing the CityView software.
Fire
This functional area is comprised of the Fire and Civil
Defense departments. The Fire Department budget has
increased by $73,349 for 2003. The primary increase is in
the area of personnel for cost of living and pay scale
increases under the pay plan. The other large cost factor in
personnel is the projected increase for overtime. The
overtime budget for 2002 was $28,200. This has been
increased to $43,000 in 2003, which falls more in line with
the actual overtime cost of $55,800 in 2001. Overtime is a
fluctuating cost for the Fire Department due to the fact that it
cannot be controlled, it is determined by the number of fire
and other emergency callbacks of staff. Another
uncontrolled factor in this department is insurance costs,
which have literally doubled since 2001 with the current
FIRE
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Actual Actual Adopted Proposed
2000 2001 2002 2003
I Personal Services D Supplies
· Other Services & Charges aCapital Outlay
· Contingencies & Transfers
budget of $21,600 for liability and property coverage. The last item is a slight increase for
computer equipment and an additional software license for the CityView program. In 2003 a
major objective is to convert the current Firehouse software to CityView software to track fire calls
and other related Fire Department information. The other function under the functional area of
Fire is the Civil Defense Department. For 2003 the most significant item is the replacement of the
City Hall generator. The cost of this is estimated at approximately $50,000. The current
Page 1-?
generator in City Hall is an early 1960's vintage that is no longer functional or safe to operate.
This generator maintains primary services to the Fire and Police departments, as well as other
areas of City Hall in the case of a disaster or emergency and could prove to be an essential item
in continued emergency public safety operations. Due to budget restraints in prior years the
generator replacement has repeatedly been removed from the Civil Defense budget. It is the
goal to accomplish the generator replacement in 2003.
General Govemment
This functional area as a grouping was created new for the
1998 budget process. It is a collection of all the departmental
areas that are not specifically assigned to one division head.
This functional area includes the following departments:
General Government Buildings, Recognition/Special Events,
Contingencies and Transfers, Cable Television, Refuse and
Hazardous Waste funds. For 2003 one of the items to note is
under the Recognition/Special Events budget. This budget
funds the City float and royalty events. For approximately 30
years the City's float has used a secondhand, homemade
trailer. Also, there have been frequent problems with having a
tow vehicle available to pull the float. For the 2003 budget,
$18,000 has been included to purchase a new, heavy-duty,
lightweight trailer for the float and/or acquire a used vehicle to
be dedicated primarily to towing the float. The next area to
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Adopted Proposed
2002 2003
· Personal Services El Supplies
· Other Services & Charges ·Capital Outlay
· Contingencies & Transfers
note is in this functional area is the Cable Television fund. The major goal for 2003 is to purchase
new equipment to replace existing equipment as needed to enhance in-house and public
presentation and communications over the City's cable channel. The final item is related to
General Government Buildings. The budget for this department in 2002 included $30,000 to
improve and enhance security at City Hall. Due to a number of reasons, it does not appear that
this objective will be accomplished in 2002. Subsequently, this is an item that will be revisited in
2003, as overall security for City Hall employees, residents and visitors is a major concern to be
dealt with as a high priority.
Library
The City's library is located at 820 40th Avenue. The library's
main goal is to provide free access to informational and
recreational materials for patrons in a pleasant environment
conducive to the acquisition of knowledge. A variety of library-
related programs (e.g. storytimes, reading clubs, filmtimes,
homebound delivery, etc.) are offered for patrons of all ages
from preschool through senior citizen. As a city-supported
library, Columbia Heights participates in the MELSA regional
system through a contract with the Anoka County library
system, State-wide Borrowers Compact, and METRONET.
This enables Columbia Heights patrons to gain access to
special services and scholarly materials available to other
participating libraries. For 2003, the department proposed
library budget is up from $609,402 to $676,456, an increase of
$67,054. Some of the main highlights in the budget are $1,500
Page 1-8
LIBRARY
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Adopted Proposed
2002 2003
El Personal Services El Supplies
· Other Services & Charges ·Capital Outlay
· Contingencies & Transfers
to replace one staff PC, creating a new line item for DVD's to accommodate the new technology,
and general cost of living increases for items such as telephone, utilities, and insurance. Capital
outlay items include the replacement of the public use copier, the departmental copier, the carpet
tile in the main floor entry, the ballast in the East Room, the re-sensitizing unit for the security
system in the Children's Department, and additional lighting in the Adult Reading Room.
Liquor
The liquor function is comprised of three liquor stores,
Top Valu I, Top Valu II, and Heights Liquor, along with a
capital equipment replacement fund for each of the three
stores. Top Valu I is located at 4340 Central Avenue. This
store opened in November of 1984 and was the City's first
endeavor into a large volume discount liquor operation. Since
it's opening it has been very successful. The City's second
endeavor along this line was Top Valu II at 2241 37th Avenue.
This store follows the same concept as Top Valu I and
opened in April of 1994. As this store is located in a lower
traffic area, its growth has been slower but very steady. Each
year it shows a progressive increase in sales and profitability.
Heights Liquor is the third store and is located at 5225
University Avenue. This store was opened in 1964 and has
remained a very small, traditional municipal liquor operation.
It does not operate on a high volume discount basis. Markups
LIQUOR
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Adopted Proposed
2002 2003
· Personal Services m Supplies
· Other Services & Charges · Capital Outlay
· Contingencies & Transfers
are higher at this store, along with profitability, which is due primarily to taking advantage of high
volume purchasing discounts based on the volume purchased at Top Valu and the lower
overhead expenses of a city-owned operation. For several years, an important discussion item
regarding the liquor operation has been building a new, larger, state of the art, liquor store on
University Avenue. The current store is very small and has seen significant deterioration over the
years. Its size is inadequate to handle the high volume of customers and traffic. Building a new
store on University Avenue could be extremely profitable to the City as we, once again, could
compete with the new liquor store in Fridley and other more modern operations. Along this line,
another major concern is the store we are renting on Central Avenue. Here the City spends
approximately $150,000 each year on rent and CAM expenses. These unnecessary expenses
could be eliminated if the City owned its liquor store on Central Avenue, which would make the
operation more profitable. Currently the profits generated from the liquor operation are equivalent
to a 16% property tax reduction. With newer, more cost-effective, City-owned stores on
University and Central Avenues, the profitability could be increased with the net income being
utilized to further offset property tax levies. Subsequently, acquiring a building on Central Avenue
and constructing a building on University Avenue are major priorities for 2003.
Page 1-9
Police
This functional area is comprised of the Police Department,
Animal Control, DARE, and Capital Equipment Replacement
budgets. The most significant item in this area is personnel
costs. Over the past several years departmental staffing was
increased from 22 sworn officers to 26 with the addition of
three officers by federal grants, and one additional officer
over and above the grant requirements. In 1999 all grant
funding and the requirement to maintain this staffing level
ended. The City Council has annually reviewed the costs of
maintaining this higher staffing level and in the 2002 budget
decided to cut back by one officer to a staffing level of 25
sworn officers. This staffing level was again reviewed for the
2003 budget and the decision was made to maintain the staff
level at 25 sworn officers. The proposed Police Department
budget for 2003 is $2,927,023, which is up $286,996 from
2002. The major increase is in the personnel category,
which is up $260,248 and is for cost of living increases and
POLICE
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
Actual 2000 Actual 2001 Adopted Proposed
2002 2003
· Personal Services m Supplies
aaOther Services and Charges ·Capital Outlay
· Contingencies & Transfers
employees in the department progressing through the pay scale. Another significant item is the
capital equipment budget. The proposed 2003 capital equipment budget is $109,500. This
includes two full-size and one town-size vehicle for $84,500. Also included in the capital
equipment budget is the final payment for the Visions Records Management system in the
amount of $25,000.
Pubfic Works
This functional area is comprised of several departments
crossing several funds. One of the significant advantages of
the functional area budget format adopted in 1998 is that it
shows the entire Public Works function in one area. Areas
covered are engineering, streets, weed control, parks, tree
programs, water utility, sanitary sewer utility, storm sewer
utility, garage, and capital equipment replacement funds for the
Public Works operation. For 2003 the total Public Works
budget is $6,884,305, which is up $823,258 from 2002. Here
the most significant budget item is personnel costs. The 2003
Public Works personnel budget is $2,001,610, which is up
$110,661 from 2002 and is due to cost of living pay increases
and employees progressing through the pay scale. One
notable highlight of the 2003 Public Works budget is that
previously there were three departments dedicated to tree
PUBLIC WORKS
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
· Contingencies & Transfers
· Capital Outlay
· Other Services and Charges
mSupplies
· Personal Services
trimming, Dutch Elm sanitation and Dutch Elm replacement. For the 2003 budget all of these
departments have been combined into one new Tree Care and Maintenance Department. This
will allow the Public Works Department more flexibility in utilizing dollars dedicated to tree
maintenance throughout the city. In the Street Department major items are the capital equipment
replacement of the Ford 350 4x4 1-ton dump truck at $50,000 and the replacement of the trailer
for the small roller at $4,500. In Parks the budget includes the replacement of the Dodge 250 3/4
-ton pickup at a cost of $38,000. In the Water and Sewer funds a major concern is utility rates.
The City has put forth every effort over the years to maintain Iow rates. This has been done even
Page 1-]0
though our costs to the City of Minneapolis for the purchase of water have increased 6-7% every
year. Going into 2003, a consulting firm will be hired to perform a professional, long-term rate
study for the City. This study is designed to establish a long-range plan for rate increases to
cover operating costs and capital equipment replacement. One of the significant long-term cost
effects to water will be the new filtration system that Minneapolis is installing. This will provide the
City of Columbia Heights with a purer, better source of water but will greatly increase the cost for
the water we purchase from them. In the General Garage fund there is minimal change from
2002. The major goal here is to continue funding the Capital Outlay fund for future building
improvements to the Municipal Service Center building. In summary, several other areas of the
Public Works budget saw changes that are presented in more detail in the Public Works budget
document.
Recreation
Recreation is comprised of several departments including
administration, youth athletics, youth enrichment, adult
athletics, traveling teams, trips and outings, senior citizens,
CHASE, and Murzyn Hall management. Over the years the
recreation program has seen steady growth in their budget.
One of the most notable areas is the Senior Citizen program.
Over the years this program has continued to grow in
popularity and success. While several senior programs in
other communities are stagnant, through the excellent
management of our Senior Coordinator, Karen Moeller, the
program in Columbia Heights has grown consistently and is
well received by all seniors. Other items of notable mention in
the Recreation budget are that the administrative component
has increased by $17,983 primarily due to cost of living
increases and progression of personnel through the pay plan.
The Youth Athletics, Adult Athletics, Youth Enrichment and
RECREATION
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
· Contingencies & Transfers
· Capital Outlay
· Other Services and Charges
DSupplies
m Personal Services
Traveling Athletics are relatively the same for 2003 as 2002. The Trips and Outings program is a
subcomponent of the Senior Citizen Department. This program includes one day and extended
trips for seniors. These are advertised through quarterly trip flyers mailed to participants. This
continues to be one of the most popular offerings and is a self-sustaining program as the fees
charged cover the operating costs. Murzyn Hall maintenance is another significant item in the
recreation program. Murzyn Hall is utilized approximately 2,500 hours for classes and activities,
1,500 hours for weddings, and 1,000 hours for meetings. Approximately 15% of the users are
charged a fee while the remaining 85% are fee-waived organizations. JPM operates seven days
a week and runs nearly full capacity throughout the year. The cost of operating and maintaining
Murzyn Hall is $249,000 for 2003. Through its operation and fees charged, it will generate
revenue of $71,500 leaving expense of $177,500 to be covered by property taxes and local
government aid. With increasingly tighter budgets and reductions in state aid, fees for Murzyn
Hall usage should be increased to more adequately cover the operating expenses.
Conclusion
The above narrative should provide an overview of the most salient changes and assumptions
included in the budget. As much as possible, this is a hold-the-line budget. The property tax
format in the state saw significant changes in 2002 and prior years with state legislation shifting
local government aid from cities to schools. This resulted in a significant increase in the City
Page 1-11
portion of the property tax bill. However, it also resulted in a significant decrease in the school
property tax levy, which overall for 2002 resulted in reduced property taxes. On a preliminary
basis, we anticipate this scenario to continue for 2003, at least at a City property tax level. With
the reduction in the City property tax levy for 2003 from 2002 the average home in Columbia
Heights should see a reduction in city property taxes. However, the City still receives 32% of our
General Fund budget from state aids. With the significant state deficit, it can be anticipated that
the state will cut back on aid to the city and that in future years we will look to cities to make up
this aid cutback through increased property taxes. The City, for several years, has been at a
hold-the-line budgeting concept, and each year has looked at City staffing and wherever feasible
reduced staff and services. Because of this ongoing process of holding back on expenses, it is
virtually impossible to make further reductions. Subsequently, the only alternative may be to pass
the state aid cuts on to residents in the form of property taxes to cover basic services and
inflation.
The budget process is a major undertaking by City staff and the City Council that requires a great
deal of work performed by all involved to bring the process to a successful conclusion. I extend
my appreciation in this endeavor to all department directors and their staff, and a special thanks
to Barb Kelzenberg and Sue Schmidtbauer for their time in compiling the budget and their
extensive efforts to ensure the accuracy of the entire document. This is a very trying and
exhausting endeavor, and their extensive efforts are greatly appreciated.
Page 1-12
2003 REVENUE BY SOURC
ALL FUNDS
Allocations
$80,000
Net Sales - Liquor
$1,694,714
Transfers In &
Non Rev Receipts
$3,103,161
Sales & Related
Charges
$4,191,669
Miscellaneous
$1,380,395
Charges for
Services
$454,400
Taxes
$4,817,984
Debt Service
Funds and HRA
$1,099,083
Licenses &
Permits
$305,320
Inter-
governmental
$3,391,564
Fines & Forfeits
$105,000
Page 1-13
2003 ALL BUDGETARY FUNDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTIONAL AREA
Administration
$921,292
Recreation
$680,519
Public Works
$6,884,3O5
Police
$2,927,O23
Liquor
$1,169,547
Debt Service
$2,412,822
Community
Development
$1,2O6,8OO
Finance
~1,204,437
GFire
$1,187,958
eneral
Government
$2,464,408
_Library
$676,456
Page 1-14
2003 All Budgetary Funds
Expenditures by Classification
Capital Outlay
$8,658,813
Contingencies &
Transfers
$3,OO4,892
Personal
Services
$8,484,218
Other Services
Charges
$3,988,650
Supplies
$9,680,495
Page 1-15
Sources of General Fund,
Library Fund and EDA Revenue
2O03 BUDGET
Other
$619,820
Transfers
$485,888
Charge for
Services
$454,400
Inter-
governmental
$2,927,982
Taxes
$4,817,984
Page 1-16
2003 GENERAL FUND AND
LIBRARY FUND EXPENDITURES
Expenditures by Classification
Capital
Outlay
1.9%
Other
Services &
Charges
19.4%
! I
I I I
Supplies
5.8%
Contingencies &
Transfers
6.0%
Personal
Services
67.0%
Page 1-17
Major Expenditure Increases
2002 2003 Increase/Decrease
Budget Budget from 2002
Police 2,499,952 2,786,587 286,635
Parks 654,215 751,437 97,222
Transfers 400,000 480,000 80,000
Fire 843,223 916,572 73,349
Library 609,402 676,456 67,054
Civil Defense 33,836 84,973 51,137
Finance 606,272 643,973 37,701
Administration & 206,434 224,417 17,983
General
Recognition/Special 52,100 71,368 19,268
Events
General Government
142,216 158,546 16,330
Building
Murzyn Hall 235,172 249,022 13,850
Streets 681,712 695,369 13,657
Page 1-18
CLASS RATE PERCENTAGES BY REAL PROPERTY TYPE
TAXES PAYABLE 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003
Real Property Payable Payable Payable Payable Payable Payable
Description 1997 1998 1999 2000 and 2001 2002 2003
Class Class Class Class Rate Class Class
Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate
Residential homestead
First $72,000 1.00%
Over $72,000 2.00%
First $75,000 1.00% 1.00%
Over $75,000 1.85% 1.70%
First $76,000 1.00% 1.00%
$76,000 - $500,000 1.65% 1.00% 1.00%
Over $500,000 1.25% 1.25%
Commercial-Industrial
and Public Utility
First $100,000
Over $100,000
First $150,000 2.70% 2.45% 2.40% 1.50% 1.50%
Over $150,000 4.00% 3.50% 3.40% 2.00% 2.00%
Residential non-homestead, 1 unit
First $72,000 2.30%
Over $72,000 2.30%
First $75,000 1.90% 1.25%
Over $75,000 2.10% 1.70%
First $76,000 1.20% 1.00%
$76,000 - $500,000 1.65% 1.00% 1.00%
Over $500,000 1.25% 1.25%
Residential non-homestead, 2-3
units and undeveloped land 2.30% 2.10% 1.70% 1.65% 1.50% 1.25%
Residential non-homestead
4 or more units 3.40% 2.90% 2.50% 2.40% 1.80% 1.50%
Low Income 1.00% 0.90% 1.00%
Page 1-19
'~0 o .c:
Changes in Tax Levy
2001 - 2003
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
o ~--- ~---- ~
2001 2002 2003
General Fund 2,958,4904,095,5274,243,830
Library Fund __ 547,767 591,588 433,585
EDA Fund 119,295 137,015 140,569
Page 1-22
WHERE YOUR PROPERTY TAXES GO
Payable 2002
County
27%
Miscellaneous
5%
City
38%
School
3O%
WHERE YOUR PROPERTY TAXES GO
Payable 2003
County
32%
Miscellaneous City
7% 42%
School
19%
Page 1-23
WHAT WILL $30 A MONTH BUY?
(Based on 2003 Property Tax)
$30 a Month Buys Quality and Quantity
in the City of Columbia Heights
Telephone
Dinner for 4
Garbage Pick-Up
Columbia Heights City Services
Basic Cable TV
Parks Streets Police Fire Library
The average home in Columbia Heights pays $30 per month in city real estate taxes. The average Columbia Heights'
resident will spend $30 every month on various services and pleasures, i.e., pizza and pop for four at a local restaurant,
basic cable TV for the family, monthly phone services, etc. The best value for your money in Columbia Heights is still all
of the city services that $30 of your monthly property tax will buy! (Based on a $94,300 home in Columbia Heights.)
CITYSERV Page 1-24