Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFebruary 7, 2005 Work SessionCITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS 590 40th Avenue N.E., Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3878 (763) 706-3600 TDD (763) 706-3692 Visit Our Website at: www. ci. columbia-heights, mn.us ADMINISTRATION NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING t'o be held in the CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS as followers: Ma yor Gary L. Peterson Councilrnernbers Robert A. l, Filliams B/'~tce Ncm,rocki Tammera El'its'o/1 Bruce Kelzenberg City Manager l'Yc/lt Fehst Meeting of: Date of Meeting: Time of Meeting: Location of Meeting: Purpose of Meeting: COLUMBIA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 7, 2005 5:30 P.M. CONFERENCE ROOM 1 WORK SESSION AGENDA 2. 3. 4. 5. Star Bm'- 2:00 a.m. closing Lead water services (6:00 p.m.) MSC Architect proposals Capital Equipment replacement: pavement roller Planning and Zoning Commission applicants The City of Columbia Heights does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access tq or treatment or employment in, its services, pr~rams, or activities. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in all City of Columbia Heights' services, programs, and activities. Auxilim7 aick for handicapped persons are available upon request when the request is made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Council Secretary at 706-3611, to make arrangements. (TDD/706-3692 for deaf or hearing impaired only) THE CiTY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT OR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER COLUMBIA HEIGHTS - CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: February 7, 2005 AGENDA SECTION: ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S NO: Administration APPROVAL ITEM: Star Bar BY: W. Fehst/P. Muscovitz BY: 2:00 a.m. closing request DATE: Februm3~ 4, 2005 DATE: NO: The Star Bar is requesting the City Council consider allowing a 2:00 a.m. bm' closing. Attached is information relative to this request put together by Police Chief Tom Johnson last October. Billiard COUNCIL ACTION: COLUMBIA HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT TO: Mayor Julienne Wyckoff Council Member Bruce Nawrocki Council Member Tammera Ericson Council Member Bruce Kelzenberg Council Member Robert Williams FROM: Thomas M. Johnson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Request for 2:00 a.m. Bar Closing DATE: October 12, 2004 As each of you is aware, Ken Kautz, club manager of Star Central Bar and Grill, submitted a letter to the City Council on behalf of Star Central's owner Bruce Hilsen requesting the City Council consider moving to a 2:00 a.m. bar closing. Because of this request, I have checked with the cities around us to see what they are doing reference this issue. St. Anthony Police reports they currently have no on-sale establishments and have not changed their current 1:00 a.m. closing. They do not plan to address this until they have an on-sale establishment some time in the future. Fridley Police Department reports they have enacted a new ordinance that allows on-sale liquor establishments to apply for extended hours and they are looking at these · applications individually as they come in. Their ordinance also has a sunset provision in 2006 and their city council will be looking at the ordinance at that time to detem~ine if they wish to continue xvith it or not. There is also a provision for an additional fee for this privilege, but the council has not set the fee at this time. I was advised that two of their on-sale establisl~nents have applied for and have been given permission to stay open until 2:00 a.m. At the time of this memo, I have not heard back from the New Brighton Police. I have looked at a very narrow picture of DWI activity in our city near Star Central during the year 2003. We looked at DWIs occurring from 37th to 45th on Central Avenue between 1:00 a.m. and 3:00 a.m. There were 32 DWI arrests in 2003 in this area. I think it is safe to conclude that these arrests would probably move to 2:00 a.m. if the bar closing were moved to that time. With our current schedule, this would create additional overtime in order to process these DWIs. I would estimate that a routine DWI takes one and one-half to two hours to complete. At this time, the department's schedule is built around a 1:00 a.m. bar closing. Our shifts run as follows: 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Special shift, noon to 1:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. to 3:00 a.m. 9:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Minimum two officers on shift Minimum one officer Minimum two officers Minimum two officers Mayor and City Council Page 2 October 14, 2004 As you can see from this schedule, we have a minimum of four officers on the street from 10:00 p.m. to 3:00 a.m. With a 1:00 a.m. bar closing, the bar rush and drunk driver rush is under control by 3:00 a.m. This is not to say that there are not drunk drivers after 3:00 a.m. It is saying that the bulk of the bar business--including drunk drivers, bar fights, domestics, detoxification, runs from over consumption, public urination in the parking lots, etc.--takes place during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 3:00 a.m. when we have our highest number of officers available. If we change to a 2:00 a.m. closing, this pushes everything forward for us, which would result in paying overtime or major scheduling adjustments. I personally do not agree with the 2:00 a.m. bar closings, as I believe all this does in encourage additional consumption and creates an even more dangerous bar closing environment. I would ask the City Council to consider leaving bar closing at 1:00 a.m. so that we may continue to adequately cover the bar rush time. If the Council decides to push the time forward to 2:00 a.m., I would ask that we proceed as the City of Fridley has, requiring each bar to apply for the extended hours and charging an extra fee for staying open later. I would also ask that we sunset any ordinance change so that if we find this process does not work, the extended hours ordinance will simply go away. I will report back annually to the Council on the number of incidents or issues we have related to the 2:00 a.m. bar closing. Lastly, if we were to give Star Central an extended hours permit, I would like to see it conditional to all music stopping at 1:00 a.m. We have a long history of noise complaints with this location from the senior building located behind this establishment. I think the seniors deserve to have 1:00 a.m. as the breaking point for noise in the area. TMJ:mld 04-128 Columbia Heights Police Department 2004 Liquor License Holders VFTM Post 230 4446 Central Ave NE (Duane Running, Bruce Nawrocki, etc.) Mady's Bowl and Lounge (Bart Mady, Bret Mady) 3919 Central Ave NE Star Central (Bruce Hilsen) 4005 Central Ave NE Mr. Steak (Robert Wolfe, Thomas Leverentz) LaCasita Restaurant (Anvary Behrooz) 4545 Central Ave NE 5085 Central Ave NE Buffalo Wild Wings (Sally Jean Smith, etc.) 4811 Central Ave NE Columbia Heights Lions Club 530 Mill Street NE (Donald Laufenberg, Joseph Sturdevant, etc.) Star Central 4001 Central Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421 October 8, 2004 City Council City of Columbia Heights Columbia Heights, MN 55421 RE: 2 am Close Dear Columbia Heights City Council, We believe Star Central has tried very hard over the last 10 months to become a good neighbor to the Columbia Heights Community. We have taken many steps to improve the sound problems of the previous owner and hosted Senior Citizen Luncheons to improve relations with our close neighbors. We have worked very hard to educate our personnel to take a more kinder, gentler approach to our patrons who may be experiencing a difficult evening. In short, we have tried to be cooperative, community aware and prove ourselves capable of working within the system. Thnf hninn _~nirt ~^¢~ nrn ~¥n~_ric_nninn n Innn nf nnfrnnnn~_ rh ~_ tn n~ ~r nl ~rrn~ indinn communities ability to serve our customers until 2am per the recently enacted State Statute. At approximately 11:30pm, our customers begin their pilgrimage to locations that better serve their needs. We want to be the location of choice for our patrons. We are asking the City Council of Columbia Heights to enact the 2am close to allow us to more fully compete on a level playing field with our competition. Respectfully, Ken Kautz Club Manager On behalf of Bruce Hilsen fTom Johnson - RE: 2:00 AM Bar Closing Page 1 ~ From: To: Date: Subject: John Ohl <JOhl@ci.saint-anthony.mn.us> 'Tom Johnson' <Tom.Johnson@ci.columbia-heights.mn.us> 10/13/2004 7:28:14 AM RE: 2:00 AM Bar Closing Tom, We no longer have any on sale establishments in St. Anthony, except for a wine and cheese shop that keeps very conservative hours. The Apache Wells was torn down years ago, and the Stonehouse was recently demolished as part of a redevelopment project. We still have 2 liquor stores, and a bar/restaurant is supposedly coming. John ..... Original Message ..... From: Tom Johnson [SMTP:Tom.Johnson@ci.columbia-heights.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 4:24 PM To: johl@ci.saint-anthony.m n.us Subject: 2:00 AM Bar Closing John, copy AM Has St Anthony gone to a 2:00 AM Bar closing? If so could I get a of your new ordinance and the number of bars that switched to 2:00 and how many did not? Thanks Tom J Thomas M. Johnson City of Columbia Heights Chiefof Police (763) 706-3755 Tom Johnson - RE: 2:00 AM Bar Closing Page From: To: Date: Subject: "Abbott, Don" <AbbottD@ci.fridley.mn.us> "Tom Johnson" <Tom.Johnson@ci.columbia-heights.mn.us> 10/13/2004 10:12:14 AM RE: 2:00 AM Bar Closing There's no fee specified for the City yet. We're going to evaluate that if and when the ordinance is made permanent in 2006, based upon finance and police expenses due to the late hour closing. Don Abbott, Public Safety Director City of Fridley Police Department 6431 University Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 763-572-3625 abbottd@ci.fridley, mn.us ..... Original Message ..... From: Tom Johnson [mailto:Tom.Johnson@ci.columbia-heights.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 9:40 AM To: Abbott, Don Subject: RE: 2:00 AM Bar Closing Don, It mentions in your revised ordinance a late hour fee. Could you advise me what you charge in addition to the regular liquor license in order to obtain the late hour closing license? Thanks Tom J Thomas M. Johnson City of Columbia Heights Chief of Police (763) 706-3755 >>> "Abbott, Don" <AbbottD@ci.fridley.mn.us> 10/12/2004 4:58:04 PM >>> Hi Tom, The full text of our ordinance without the 2:00 a.m. revisions is available here: http :llwww2.ci.fridley. mn.uslcitycodelCodeSections1600%20Liquorl The revisions are included in the attachment. Two establishments have received the endorsement to remain open - The Main Event and the American Legion, and began doing so last weekend. No problems yet. Take care, Don ..... Original Message ..... From: Tom Johnson [mailto:Tom.Johnson@ci.columbia-heights.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 4:21 PM To: Abbott, Don Tom Johnson - RE: 2:00 AM Bar Closing Page 2 j Subject: 2:00 AM Bar Closing Don, Could you send me a copy of your new ordinance on 2:00 AM bar closing? When did this §o into affect and how many bars have gone to 2:00 AM? Did you support this change and if so could you let me know why? Also did you have to change any of your schedules to accommodate this? Thanks Tom J. Thomas M. Johnson City of Columbia Heights Chief of Police (763) 706-3755 Tom Johnson - 2 am Endorsement 2nd reading.doc Page 1 Q'TY OF FRIDLEY AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF To: From: Date: Re: William W. Bums, City Manager 'Don Abbott, Public Safety Director September 9, 2004 Second reading of an ordinance amending Chapters 602,603, and 606. This memo provides for the second reading of ordinance revisions amending Chapter 602, Chapter 603, and Chapter 606 of the Fridley City Code. This will allow establisl2nents licensed for on-sale beer, on-sale liquor, and on-sale clubs to apply for permits to extend their hours of sale until 2:00 a.m. The first reading was held during the August 23, 2004 meeting of the Fridley City Council. The ordinance has been revised as directed by Council during the first reading. The revised language clarifies the requirement for holders of Late Hour License Endorsements to submit semi-annual certification of their ratio of food sales as a part of total sales. Establishments holding licenses to sell liquor that do not apply for a Late Hour Endorsement will continue to be required to submit annual certification of their food sales as part of total sales at license renewal. Staff recommends proceeding with the second reading. ITom Johnson - 2 am Endorsement 2nd reading.doc Page 2 Ordinance No. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CODE BY ALLOWING CERTAIN HOLDERS OF LIQUOR LICENSES TO SELL INTOXICATING LIQUOR UNTIL 2:00 A.M. The City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, hereby ORDAINS: That Chapter 602 of the Fridley City Code shall be amended to include the following language: 602.02 LICENSES REQUIRED 6. Late Nitht License Endorsement An On-Sale license may be amended to include a Late Night License Endorsement subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the City Council within its discretion and otherwise in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. No person may sell any beer under any pen2it issued pursuant to this chapter after 1:00 a.m. without first obtaining a Late Hour License endorsement. No Late Night License Endorsement shall be effective after April 30, 2006. 602.05 GRANTING OF LICENSES 3. Late Night License Endorsement. An On-Sale license may be amended to include a Late Nitht License Endorsement subject to 602.09 the terms and conditions imposed by the City Council within its discretion and otherwise in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. 2M~ application for a Late Hour License Endorsement shall be made at the same time as, but separate from, an initial license or license renewal. No Late Hour Endorsement ~anted by the City of Fridley will be effective after April 30. 2006. HOURS 3. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a sale of beer or 3.2 percent malt liquor may occur on a licensed premises between the hours of 1:00 AM m~d 2:00 AM if the licensee has been ~anted by the City a Late Hour Endorsement for that license. No sale of beer or 3.2 percent intoxicating liquor for consumption on any license premises for which a Late Hour Endorsement has been .granted by the City shall occur between 2:00 AM and 8:00 AM on the days of Monday through Saturday. It shall be unlawful for an,/persons or customers, other than the licensees or their employees, to remain on a licensed premises for which a Late Hour Endorsement has been ~anted by the City, nor shall there be any consumption by any persons. including the licensees and their employees on such premises, more than one half-hour after closing of operations for that da,/and, in no event, later than 2:30 AM. Tom Johnson - 2 am Endorsement 2nd reading.doc Page 3 I That Chapter 603 of the Fridley City Code shall be amended to include the following language: 603.02 LICENSE REQUIRED No person, except wholesalers or manufacturers to the extent authorized under State License, shall directly or indirectly deal in, sell, or keep for sale any intoxicating liquor without first having received a license to do so as provided in this Chapter. No person shall sell any intoxicating liquor on Sundays without obtaining a separate license for Sunday sales, as required by Minnesota State Statutes. No person shall sell any intoxicating liquor after 1:00 a.m. without obtainin~ a special Late Hour License Endorsement for an existing liquor license as provided in this Chapter. No Late Hour License Endorsement ~anted pursuant to this Chapter will be effective after April 30, 2006. 603.06 SUNDAY AND LATE HOUR LIQUOR SALES The annual license fee for "Sunday Liquor Sales" shall be provided in Chapter 11. The annual fee for a license endorsement for Late Hour Liquor sales after 1:00 a.m., but before 2:00 a.m., shall be provided in Chapter 11. These fees are in addition to the fee charged for an "on-Sale" license. All provisions of this Chapter pertaining to the "on-Sale license shall apply to the "Sunday Liquor Sales'" license, and the Late Hour Endorsement, insofar as practicable. 603.07 GRANTING OF LICENSES 2. Renewal Licenses At the earliest practicable time after application is made for a renewal of an "on- sale" license, and in any event prior to the time the application is approved by the City Council, the applicant shall file semiannaally with the City Clerk a statement made by a Certified Public Accountant that shows the total gross sales and the total food sales. A foreign corporation shall file a current Certificate Authority. 603.10 CONDITIONS OF LICENSE 19. At the time of application for renewal of application of an "on-sale" license mxd an'r' Late Hcar Endcrsement tc t!:at !iccnse, the applicant shall submit proof to the City that the minimum percentage provided in Section 603.10.18 of the gross sales, derived from the sale of food and intoxicating liquors of the establisNnent, for which the "on-sale" license cr r ,,= rs .... ~,,,~ .......... to *~'"* ~; ...... is to be used, is in the serving of food. Late Hour License Endorsement In addition to any other reportin~ requirement that may be imposed by the municipal code, any licensee holding a Late Hour License Endorsement shall also provide proof to the city that the minimum percentage provided in Section 603.10.18 of the ~oss sales, derived from the sale of food and intoxicating liquors of the establisN2ent, for which the "on-sale" license is to be used, is in the serving of food. "Proof' for purposes of this section, shall consist of not less that a statement of accuracy, attested to by a certified public accountant, accompanying a verifiable, semiam~ual report of' sales receipts based upon acceptable and recognized accounting and bookkeeping standards. Separate statements are required for a license renewal and the renewal of Tom Johnson - 2 am Endorsement 2nd reading.doc Page 4 ] 603.11 any Late Hour Endorsement to that license. HOURS OF OPERATION 2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a sale of intoxicating liquor for consumption may occur on a licensed premises between the hours of 1:00 AM and 2:00 AM if the licensee has been granted by the City a Late Hour Endorsement for that license. No sale of intoxicating liquor for consumption on any license premises for which a Late Hour Endorsement has been granted by the Ci_ty shall occur between 2:00 AM and 8:00 AM on the days of Monday through Saturday. It shall be unlawful for any persons or customers, other than the licensees or their employees, to remain on a licensed premises for which a Late Hour Endorsement has been ~anted by the City, nor shall there be any consumption by any persons, including the licensees and their employees on such premises, more than one half-hour after closing of operations for that day and, in no event, later than 2:30 AM. That Chapter 606 of the Fridley City Code shall be amended to include the following language: 606.02 LICENSES REQUIRED No person shall sell, deal in or dispose of by gift, sale or otherwise, any liquor without first having obtained a license to do so from the City Council; provided, however, that this section shall not prohibit the given or serving thereof to guests in a private home, shall not prohibit the sale thereof by a manufacturer or distributor to a person holding a license thereunder, and shall in no way effect the operation of the municipal liquor stores. In addition to the foregoing, no person shall sell any intoxicating liquor after 1:00 a.m. without obtaining a special Late Hour License Endorsement for an existing liquor license as provided in this Chapter. No Late Hour License Endorsement granted pursuant to this Chapter will be effective after April 30, 2006. 606.03 606.11 SUNDAY LIQUOR AND LATE HOUR SALES No person or organization shall sell any intoxicating liquor on Sundays without obtaining a separate iicense for said Sunday sales. The mmual license fee for "Sunday Liquor Sales" shall be as provided in Chapter 11. The annual fee for a license endorsement for Late Hour Liquor Sales after 1:00 a.m., but before 2:00 a.m. shall be provided in Chapter 11. These fees are in addition to the fee charged for an "On-Sale" license. All provisions of the Chapter pertaining to the "On-Sale" license shall apply to the "Sunday Liquor Sales" license, and the Late Hour Liquor Sales endorsement, insofar as practicable. HOURS OF OPERATION 3. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a sale of intoxicating liquor for consumption may occur on a licensed premises between the hours of 1:00 AM and 2:00 AM if the licensee has been granted by the City a Late Hour Endorsement for that license. No sale of intoxicating liquor for consumption on any license premises for which a Late Hour Endorsement has been granted by the City shall occur between 2:00 AM and 8:00 AM on the days of Monday through Saturday. It shall be unlawful for any persons or customers, other than the licensees or their employees, to remain on a licensed premises for ~vhich a Late Hour Endorsement has been granted by the Cig,, nor shall there be mW consumption by any persons, including the Tom Johnson - 2 am Endorsement 2nd reading.doc Page 5 ] licensees and their employees on such premises, more than one half-hour after closure of operations for that day and. in no event, later than 2:30 AM. Passed and adopted this __ day of ., 2004 by the City Council of thc City of Fridley. Attest: Scott J. Lund, Mayor Debra A. Skogen, City Clerk First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: L Tom Johnson - FW: 2:00 AM Bar Closing Page 1 _I From: To: Date: Subject: "Julie Forbord" <Julie. Forbord@newbrightonmn.gov> <tom.johnson@ci.columbia-heights.mn.us> 10/18~2004 11:13:06 AM FW: 2:00 AM Bar Closing Tom - Bob has asked me to respond to this question. Champps and Jake's are the only two restaurants/bars that are licensed to be open until 2 am; and, Champps is only open until 2 am Thurs-Sun. We have 4 other restaurants/bars that still close at 1 am. I did not count the restaurants that have just wine licenses as they tend to close by 10 pm. (Not much night life there!i) I will fax you the ordinance. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Julie Julie Forbord Office Supervisor New Brighton Department of Public Safety 651-288-4104 651-288-4110 Fax ..... Original Message ..... From: Bob Jacobson Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 7:41 AM To: Julie Forbord Subject: FW: 2:00 AM Bar Closing At your convenience, could you respond to Tom Johnson on this one?? Thanks. Director Bob Jacobson New Brighton Department of Public Safety 785 Old Hwy 8 NW New Brighton, MN 55112 651-288-4101 (direct) 651-288-4110(fax) 651-775-1883(Ce11) ..... Original Message ..... From: Tom Johnson [mailto:Tom.Johnson@ci.columbia-heights.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 4:26 PM To: Bob Jacobson Subject: 2:00 AM Bar Closing Bob, Did New Brighton go to a 2:00 AM Bar Closing time? If so could you send me a copy of your new ordinance and could you advise how many bars are closing at 2:00 AM and how many are closing at 1:00 AM. Thanks Tom J NEW B~GHTO Director {Public COMMUNI?'[ POB[C~NG TH~OUO[-I PUBLIC SA,'.ETY - POLICE, FIRE AND EMERGENCY .¥fANAGZ'hMENT FACSIIvI!LE COVER P-AGE DATE: PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGE(S) TO: Tot~ Number of P~es Onduding tNs gov~ page:-- ~ . FROM':' ~~' CAS~ If you cio not receive att-th~page~,- ptease-eatl~u~ as soon-a~-poshbt=-at (651) 288-41 iX):, 785 Old Highway 8 NW ?Jew brighton, ~?fN 55l 12 Ottice: (651) 2~84t00 Fax-: (65 l}28g-~:t l0 internee. 'www.-c.,i.new~bngh~a ORDtNANEENO:' 708- STATE OF M~ESOTA COUNTY OFF. AMSEY~ CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON AN ORDINANCE AMENDLNG CHAPTER 4 OF THE CITY CODE-RELA-TING TO LIQUOR-SAL-E$~, - THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON ORDAINS as follows: Sectien--t. The-New-Bfighten¢ity C ode. Se~tie~ 4-9~rm-m~d a~ fo!!o?~., See, 4-96._ Sunday_Sa[es. (1) Notwithma6ing-the provisions-of Section 4-9-5-~.on-~e in~xicating--tiquo~.. licensees that are hotels, motels, restaurants, or clubs with facilities for serving not less than fifty guests.at one time, or forty guests in the case of brewpubs, may serve-:~ intoxicating liquors between the hours of 10:00 a.m. on Sunday and ~ ¢ ..... ; 2.00 a.m. on Monday in conjunction with the serving o£food. Section2. The-NewBfi~mn City Code Section4-t-04-is-amended as--follow-~ Sec. 4-104. Classifications. The-~Wpes-of--ticemes-au~orized by ~-hisDivision-a~e "on-sale?, %n-sale.. club", "_.'v3 '=off-sale" and "off-sale brewpub", The conditions of ~his Section shall apply to the issuance of the~: licenses. (t)- On-Sa!e. - Lieenses-shalt-l~- issued-only to~hetels~ and restaura~s.. (2) 0~ CI~. Licenses shall be issued only to clubg, (3) o e. ~ 0~~-L~n~-~ ~b~ll ~-issued-o~tobre~bs. S~ction Y,~ MDT-23379?vl NEL36-21-- The-New-Bri~toaCity-Code-Section 44t 2 is amended as-follows:., Sec, 4-112, License fees, (1) The-annuaN~e ense-fees- shalt-~~ A. Small restaurant, B. M~'timn-r~:a~nt~ Section 5, ¥ Section-6.- - C. Large restaurant. 12). Hotel-and motet.---, E. Club. F-: Exierior--publie-ar-e a~,,, O. Public promises. H, B~ewpub on-sal~, I. Brcw~_ub off-sale. The New Brighton City CodeSe~tion 44-23 is amended as-follows;-.. See. 4-123. Sales Restricted. (2) NcromsaletiCemeeshatt-selt-intoxk:afing-liquor off-sate~, No off-sale licensee shall sell intoxicating liquor on-sale,.'exce_m an on-sale licensed 15rewtmb mar' ob'rain an off.Sale license to sell '~fllt liquor on the licensed l:)remises. A brew~gty liec~sed--to-sot-l- matt--liquor off-s~v-is-.s-ubject- to. all-of-the, c_ondititms, set._fg.r~in Minn. Stat. Sec. 340A.301, subd. 7. The New Brighton City Code Section 4-150 is amended as follows: Sec. 4-150. Hours of Operation. Consumptioia-of into>dcating liquor sh~l- not-be altoweak (1) Between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 12:00 noon on Sunday. (2) Before 8:0Opera. tm any-~tectionday in-the-City. (3) Behveenthehourvof 2:00 a.m. and 8~00 a.m, on.any weekday, y. This Enactment-is- in-effect-from and a-t~er-the date fo!towing its pubtieat-iom. Ci_ty of Columbia Heights Public Works Department Work Session Discussion Item Work Session Date: February 7, 2005 Prepared by: Kevin Hansen, Public Works Director/City Engine Item: Lead Water Service Replacement Background: A property owner in the Zone 7A construction area appeared at the Assessment Hearing in October with concerns about the cost of replacing the lead water service from the stop box to the house. In accordance with State and local regulations, lead water services must be replaced within one year of discovery. Council directed staff to present options for financing the replacement of these services and to invite the five (5) affected property owners from the 2004 program to a future work session. Analysis/Conclusions: Our work in the Street Rehabilitation Program indicates that the number of lead water services from the stop box to the house is small. We had 5 in 2004, but fewer in each of the previous years since street rehabilitation construction began in 1997. Several cities were surveyed concerning this issue. During a street construction project, about half of the surveyed cities allow the cost of replacing the service on the property taxes through an assessment process. Options for lead service replacement are presented as follows: 1. No Change from past practice. Homeowners would be responsible for hiring a contractor and paying for the work. Public Conduct Work with Financing Options. a. The City would conduct the work and assess the property owner over a period of time. Since we would be working on private property we would need to arrange for access, in writing. The work would then be done as part of the street reconstruction project. Work Session Item: February 7, 2005 Lead Water Service Replacement Page 2 bo The work could also be bid separately on an annual basis, similar to our Miscellaneous Concrete Program. This would involve a public bidding process. After City approval of the low-bid submitted by responsible bidders, the work could be conducted and assessed to the property owner. An issue with this type of arrangement would be the requirements of the 429 process (public hearings). A Waiver of the 429 Process could be used when signed by the affected property owners. c. Interest rates and terms for the assessment period could be established exclusively for this work. Requested Action: Direction on the desired alternative to accommodate lead line service replacements. Attachments: Survey City Main to Stop Box Stop Box to House Assessment Term Columbia Included in construction Homeowner is responsible 10 or 15 Years Heights project-assessed to to hire plumber and pay for property owner work Minneapolis Homeowner is responsible Homeowner is responsible to hire contractor and pay to hire contractor and pay for work for work St Paul - St. Paul SPRWS pays Homeowner is responsible 7 Years Regional Water to hire plumber. City pays Services for work and assesses (SPRWS) property owner. Maplewood Included in construction Option to include with 7 Years (Owned and project- SPRWS pays construction project- operated by assessed to property owner SPRWS) Mendota Heights Included in construction Homeowner is responsible project-City pays to hire contractor and pay for work Prior Lake Included in construction Option to include with 10 Years project-assessed to construction project- property owner assessed to property owner Roseville Last service was replaced Homeowner was in 1987- City paid responsible to hire contractor and pay for work Provide the option to Provide the option to 10 Years include with construction include with construction project-assessed to project-assessed to property owner property owner South St. Paul Included in construction Occasionally include with 10 Years project-assessed to construction project- property owner assessed to property owner In case of financial In case of financial 3 Years at 7% hardship will add to utility hardship will add to utility interest bill bill The following cities reported no lead services in their system: Bloomington Crystal Richfield Roseville ROSEVILLE: In 1987 the City replaced the last section of lead pipe within City right-of- way. The City paid for and replaced the portion from the main to the property line. It is unclear if the property owners ever replaced the line from the property line to the house. City code is that the water and sanitary service from the main to the house is the property owner's responsibility. When we are reconstructing a street, and a homeowner wants to replace their service as a part of the project we will provide assessment as a possible way to finance their improvement. The payoff time is 10 years. If they are doing it outside of a City project, we will not offer them this option. MAPLEWOOD: No longer owns our water system. We have an agreement that St. Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) owns and operates our entire water system. Their program, which we experienced in one of our reconstruction projects last year, provides for the utility to replace the service between the main and the stop box. While we haven't incorporated any projects in the past five years, Maplewood would allow a property to replace their lead water service between the stop box and the house on to have the cost assessed back to them over a 7-year period. This is a SPRWS program that we would follow, we just haven't used it. MENDOTA HEIGHTS: We only replace services when the watermain is replaced. The city pays for the portion of the service from the main to the stop box. The portion from the stop box to the house is the homeowner's responsibility. PRIOR LAKE: When I worked in Prior Lake, we had a project where we gave residents the option of replacing their services all the way into their house and we did add that amount to their assessments to be repaid over a 10 year period. SOUTH ST. PAUL: In South St. Paul when we rebuild a street we investigate the condition of the water and sewer service lines. If the water service is lead we replace it and assess 100% of the costs the homeowner. It is spread over 10 years, but it is normally in addition to their street assessment. We have, on occasion, and with a signed agreement, gone all the way up to the house with our contractor doing the work, but that is very rare. We have no program for reimbursement of work homeowners do on their own or with their own contractor. We have in the case of financial hardship done it for a homeowner on an emergency basis and charged it over three years to their utility bill at 7% interest. We are contemplating taking over the service lines from the property line to the main in the street. Currently the owners are responsible for all costs all the way to the main in the street. CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: 2/7/05 AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESSION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER PUBLIC WORKS ITEM: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2005-08 AND BY: K. Hansen~ BY: ACCEPTANCE OF BIDS AND AWARD OF CONTRACT DATE: 2/3/05~ DATE: FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE MUNICIPAL SERVICE CENTER Background: On September 27, 2004, the City Council authorized staffto seek proposals for architectural services for various building maintenance needs at the Municipal Service Center (MSC). City staff prepared a Request for Proposal (RFP) for architectural services distributed to 11 firms. Six firms submitted proposals with five meeting the requirements of the RFP. Phillips Architects' proposal did not meet the requirements of the RFP. Copies of all six proposals are attached for review. Analysis/Conclusions: The MSC building was generally well designed and has served the needs of Public Works and the City. Based upon meeting future City needs, demands, and Public Works operations, a major expansion of the primary facility is not anticipated. But over the course of the last 4 - 7 years, staff has identified significant maintenance and use deficiencies in the MSC building. Addressing theses needs in one comprehensive project is intended to maintain and preserve the use of the facility for the next 25 years, and correct current maintenance deficiencies of the facility. To accomplish this, Public Works has been contributing to the Capital Improvement- General Government Buildings Fund 411 over the last five years to establish funds to provide for the identified maintenance needs for the Municipal Services Center (MSC). As presented in past budget discussions, Public Works proposed to set aside approximately one half the cost of the necessary work and then proceed to plan preparation and construction. Staff has estimated the total cost of the project at $750,000, with over ½ or approximately $450,000 of that now established in the Building Fund. The proposed project schedule has construction plan development this spring, early summer bidding, a mid year 2005 construction project with completion by the end of the year. The project scope involves the following major items: Description - 1. Complete Roof Replacement: 2. Building Exterior: a. Repair Deteriorated Masonry, moisture intrusion: b. RepaintingofExterior: c. Add Wash Bay to Basement (Heavy Equipment): 3. Gender, ADA and Security Needs: a. Add 3-level elevator b. Add Main Floor Women's Restroom/Changing area c. Building security: card reader system control 4. HVAC System Balancing Needs: 5. Interior Repairs/Public Access / Electrical: a. Main Floor structural concrete repair/recoating b. Electrical Panel upgrade c. Reconfigure main entrance lobby (secure access) 6. Architectural: Plans/Inspections Stq~Estimated Cost $250,000 $140,000 $225,000 $55,000 $30,000 $54,750 Total: $754,750 Council Action CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting off 2/7/05 AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESSION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER PUBLIC WORKS ITEM: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2005-08 AND BY: K. Hansen BY: ACCEPTANCE OF BIDS AND AWARD OF CONTRACT DATE: 2/3/05 DATE: FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE MUNICIPAL SERVICE CENTER A detailed roof analysis was conducted in 2004 that details why the roof cannot be repaired and is in need of replacement. A copy of that report is attached. The City also conducted a HVAC study that details the problems we are having with our system, especially in the negative pressures that exist in the building. A copy of the summary/recommendations is attached. The Building Official also commented that the negative pressures can draw moisture into the building envelope, further contributing to the exterior degradation of the masonry. Comments received by several of the architects looking at the building during their site visit(s) speculated that weep holes in the masonry are not draining properly, exacerbating the moisture and degradation of masonry. Our current electrical service into the building is overburdened and does not have any space for any additional circuits nor expansion. The total project budget only focuses on what we feel are absolute essentials and is not all inclusive of the staff identified, or complete maintenance needs of the building. What is not included in the project budget is environmental issues and hard surfacing of the basement floor, window replacement in the shop repair bay areas, replacing fueling pumps and dispensers, correcting the welding bay ventilation, inadequate on-site conference room space (space needs study recommendation), and replacing the galvanized water lines in the entire building. Prior to the RFP submittal date of January 28m, 4 of the 6 firms that submitted proposals requested building tours and to meet with stafffor further information (Hay Dobbs and Phillips did not request a meeting). Public Works staff and the Building Official have reviewed each of the proposals and prepared a ranking grid based upon the criteria given in the RFP. On this basis, City staff is recommending the firm of Buetow and Associates to perform the MSC Architectural Services. Buetow presented a good understanding of the project, had excellent reference letters from other communities, and was the lowest responsible firm meeting all of the conditions of the RFP. We feel that Buetow has a demonstrated history designing a project within budget and has very good experience in the completion of similar projects in the Metro Area. As a matter of fact, three of their recently completed projects were Public Works renovation/remodeling projects of similar size and scope. Seventy percent of their work is involved with renovation, remodeling and building addition projects. Buetow was also the firm that conducted the Space Needs Study for the City of Columbia Heights in 1999 and is familiar with the Public Works operations. The estimated cost from each Architect is shown on the ranking sheet. The attached table illustrates the estimated hours by each consultant and what the corresponding average hourly rate would be. Funding for the project is as detailed in past budget discussions: staffwould propose to use $450,000 already set aside in Fund 411, and then use internal borrowing from Fund 411 for the balance, and Public Works paying back the internal loan over the next 4 years. Recommended Motion: Move to waive the reading of Resolution No. 2005-08, there being ample copies available to the public. Recommended Motion: Move to adopt Resolution No. 2005-28 and accept the bids for Architectural Services and award the bid to Buetow & Associates of St. Paul, Minnesota, based on their qualified bid in the amount of $54,750; and, authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement for the same. KH:jb Attachments: Resolution Proposals Ranking Grid Roof Analysis Report HVAC Study Recommendations Council Action RESOLUTION NO. 2005-08 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSALS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROJECT AT THE MUNICIPAL SERVICE CENTER (MSC) PROJECT//0503 WHEREAS, the City of Columbia Heights prepared a Request for Proposals (RFP) for City Project No. 0503, Architectural Services for a building maintenance project at the Municipal Service Center (MSC), proposals were received, opened and reviewed by staff. The following proposals were received by the due date stipulated in the RFP: Bidder Phillips Architects & Contractors Buetow & Associates Hay Dobbs Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik Oertel Architects JEA Architects Total Bid $52,500.00* $54,750.00 $62,035.00 $65,OOO.OO $68,550.00 $73,780.00 WHEREAS, it appears that Buetow & Associates Architects, 2345 Rice Street, Suite 210, St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 is the lowest responsible bidder. (*Bidder did not meet RFP requirements.) NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA: The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Buetwo &Associates Architects, in the name of the City of Columbia Heights, for the Architectural Services for Building Maintenance Project at the Municipal Service Center City Project No. 0503, for the preparation of plans and specifications and construction administration. 2. The Architectural Firm of Buetow and Associates is hereby named the Project Architect. City Project 0503 shall be funded with existing funds from City Fund 411, Capital Improvement - General Government Buildings. Dated this 14th day of February, 2005. Offered by: Seconded by: Roll Call: Patricia Muscovitz, Deputy City Clerk CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS By: Gary Peterson, Mayor MSC BUILDING MAJOR MAINTENANCE - ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES City Project 2005-03 REVIEW MATRIX: Rating of 1 - 10, 10 being the highest. CRITERIA Approach: Detail, Representative References: Understands Written Project Costs Scope & Project Qualifications Public Works Past Company ~ Firm: Requirements Proposal & Rates Program Schedule of Personnel Experience Performance ResourcesI TOTAL: Bonestroo 8.5 8.75 6 8.5 7 8 8.5 9.25 8.5 73 Buetow 9 7.75 8.5 7.75 8 8.5 8.5 9.25 8.75 76 Hay Dobbs 5.25 5.5 6.5 6.5 7.25 7.75 7.75 8.25 8.25 63 JEA Architects 7 6.75 3.5 6.25 7.25 7.25 7.75 8.25 7.25 61.25 Ortel 10 9.75 6 9.5 8 9 10 9.75 9.75 81.75 Phillips 5.5 4 8.75 3.25 4.75 6.75 3 8.25 6 50.25 Sub- Base Complies % of Manhours Total hourly Optional Time Frame Consultants Cost w/RFP Base Work Assigned Equivalent Work Tasks To Complete Project Identified Bonestroo $65,000 yes 8.67% 765 $85.00 $8,000 Feb 05 - April 06 Yes Buetow $54,750 yes 7.30% 630 $86.90 $7,200 Feb 05 - Dec 05 Yes Hay Dobbs $62,035 yes 8.27% 630 $98.47 $6,785 Feb 05 - Sept 05 Yes JEA Architects $73,780 yes 9.84% 745 $99.03 $10,800 Feb 05 - Dec 05 Yes Ortel $68,550 yes 9.14% 779 $88.00 $6,000 Feb 05- Dec 05 Yes Phillips $52,500 no 7.00% Not Given Not Given Not Given Feb 05 - ? Yes Completion date Not Given AAC Roof Corlsu lting, Inc. 6-27-04 City of Columbia Heights Public Works Department Steve Synowczynski - Supervisor Lauren McClanahan - Superintendent Kevin Hansen- Director 637 38th Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421-3806 Gentlemen; This is to confirm my recent closed inspection of your Public Works Garage roof area. As per your request please find enclosed report of the conditions present and our recommendations for corrective repairs. The ex/sting system is composed of a concrete deck (preformed), Urethane insulation, four ply asphalt and gravel roofing system with most of its gravel still in place, 4-6 inches of expanded poly styrene (bead board) loose laid, with a 45 mill E.P.D.M. robber roo£mg system. There is moisture trapped between the single ply and original roof. The field seams are starting to separate in most areas. The glue they used to seam is water soluble glue that fails with constant contact with water. The entire system is shrinking dramatically as is evidence from the metal edge detail and how it is being pulled up onto the roof. RECOMMENDATIONS: There are several reasons that this roofmg system can not be repaired and must be replaced at this time. The first reason is that the roofing system is shrin!dng and will continue to shrink after repairs are made. The second reason is the live load of the present system may very well exceed the load limits on the deck. The old roofing system weighs approximately 6-8# and the EPDM system weighs 14-20 #, if you add the weight of the A/C units, and add a snow load you could be over or right at the capacity of the deck. The third reason is that the average life of an EPDM system in the USA (according to Project Pin Point done by the NRCA) is 11 years. Once the membrane gets that old we will see tiny pin holes develop in the system creating phantom leaks. There are three systems that I would recommend you considering. The first system is as follows: 1. Remove both roofs down to a clean deck and examine for deterioration (none expected). If damage is found contact the specifier as soon as possible. 2. Install a slope to drain isocyanerate insulation system meeting current codes. Adhere the insulation using a 100% layer of low rise urethane foam. Hold board in place until the foam has flashed off. An optional way would be to install a two ply vapor barrier with a premium asphalt and polyester ply base sheet materials. 3. Install a ½" layer of fiber board over the top of the isocyanerate insulation staggering all joints using a hot layer of Premium Asphalt with 100% coverage. 4709Aspasia Circle, Suite B · Edina, Minnesota 55435 · (612) 252-2500 · 826 Golf Course Parkway, Suite D · Davenport, Florida 33837 · (863) 424-7510 billholman @ usinternet.corn FAX (612) 252-2501 · FAX (863) 420-8301 4. Install one layer of coated or uncoated polyester felt via mopping into fresh premium asphalt. 5. Install three plies of type IV felt as per specifications using premium asphalt. 6. Install a flood coat of premium asphalt broadcasting fresh clean gravel meeting ASTM 1863 type 7 or 8 at a rate of 450 -500# per 100 sq. ft. 7. Install a mineral surfaced APP modified two ply flashing meeting the specification requirements. 8. Install overflow scuppers to meet code (no less than two) including down spouts. 9. Install roof crickets where needed to accommodate the proper flow of water. 10. Furnish a ten year warranty covering the entire roof system from the deck up. Pro ratings and dollar 1/mits will not be acceptable. All subsidiaries must have parent company issue and sign the warranty. 11. The entire system must meet FM Global requirements in all categories. 12. Install Ky-nar coated per/meter fascia, and interior counter flashing metals in accordance with SMACNA and the NRCA. The metal must be included in the warranty. 13. Budget for this type of roofing system approximately $7.35 per foot or approx/mately $228,000.00 plus the A/C & heating unit. The second system is identical to the first except for the flood coat of Emulsified Coal Tar that will give you twice the life of an asphak product because water does not deteriorate the Coal Tar Coating like it does any asphalt product. The budget would increase another $20,000.00 aprox. Or $.65 per foot for a total sq. ft. price of $8.00 or $248,000.00 for the total roofmg project plus the A/C & heating unit. The third system would be identical to the first two except using modified asphalt in place of premium asphalt. This would increase the price of the roof an additional $21,000.00 approximately or $.68 per sq. ft. for a total of $8.68 per sq ft. for a total roofing project cost of $269,000.00 plus the A/C & heating unit. The third system is the system we used on the Police Station - Fire House & the Park Villa roofs. It is a 35 yrs. + service roof that will perform well and can be restored after 35 years to get another 20 years. The second system will give you 25 years of service and can then be resurfaced to get another 10-15 years. The first system will give you 18 years of service and then it can be restored for an additional 10-15 years. The cost per sq. ft. per year is the most reasonable for the third type of roof with modified asphalt and a coal tar flood coat @ $.25 cents per ft. per year. The next most economical system is the second type of roof with the premium asphalt and coal tar flood coat for a cost per year per foot of $.32. The second one seems to fit your budget needs the best. The cost per sq. fr. of the first system is$.41 per sq ft. per year. A single ply system would be in the $.55 - .60 range with interim problems. I do not know at this t/me what you're A/C heater unit will nm however, I will fmd out in the near future. The size of this project dictates that we will need an Architect to review and approve the specification. Unless one of your civil Engineers would work with me to save the 5 to 7% fee. That fact alone will increase the budget by $12,000.00 to $17,000.00. The State of MN says any project over $35,000.00 must have an Architect or Engineer oversee the specification preparation. I have asked RHA Architects to submit a quote to you. We have used them in the past successfully on the Park Plaza and the City Hall. Their insurance like everybody else's has gone up considerably. However, I think he will do it for around the 5% figure. If we can do this in house let me know as soon as possible. Thank you for this oppommity to serve your roof management needs. If there are any questions please contact me. Bill Holh/ah PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA HVAC SYSTEM INVESTIGATION PREPARED FOR CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS AUGUST 14, 2002 Prepared By Nelson-Rudie & Associates. Inc. 2635 University Avenue, Suite 180 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 651-644-2400 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNESOT AUGUST 14, 2002 HVA C SYSTEM INVES TIGA TION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Columbia Heights Public Works building is a two story building consisting of garages on two levels and an office area. Diesel trucks and road construction vehicles are stored in the lower level garage. Cars and light trucks are stored and maintained in the main level garage. The main level also includes a paint booth, a welding hood, flammable storage and miscellaneous storage. The office area is adjacent to the main level garage and includes a mezzanine. The building has a long history of pressure-related problems resulting in odor problems and staff complaints. Doors are difficult to open and odors from diesel equipment and vehicle exhaust infiltrate to the office area. The pressurization problems are the result of air balance between the three main areas of the building: the lower level garage, the main level garage and the office area. We have recommended the following system renovations to correct the pressure problems: 1. Ventilating equipment in both garages should be rebalanced. 2. The blower motor of make-up air unit MAU-1 in the lower level needs to repaired and may need to be replaced. The unit trips on overload. Rebalancing the unit by Nelson-Rudie & Associates, Inc. PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNES O I AUGUST 14, 2002 HVA C SYSTEM INVES TIGA TION reducing its supply air quantity may fix the problem. Note this unit is old and may have exceeded its useful life and may need to be replaced. 3. Diesel sensors should be installed in the lower level where diesel-engine vehicle are operated. 4. We recommend the replacement of one make-up air unit in the main level garage with one make-up air unit of higher capacity and a variable speed drive controlled by a static pressure sensor in the space. This approach, referred as dynamic, will automatically adjusts the pressure in the building with respect to the outside by modulating the differential between the amount of supply air and the amount of exhaust air to accommodate for pressure fluctuations caused by intermittent exhaust loads and varying wind effects on the building. 5. The controls should be reviewed and modified to allow a proper air balance in the building. 6. The office area ventilation system should be reviewed and modified to separate it from the garage area. It will require ductwork modification and air rebalance. Transfer air ducts will need to be installed. The roof top unit minimum position of the outside air damper will need be reset. The supply ductwork system will need to be rebalanced. We recommend that all modifications be implemented in the near future. The modifications should help reduce the pressure fluctuations in the facility. Nelson-Rudie & Associates, Inc. 2 CITY COUNCIL LETTER Meeting of: 2/7/05 AGENDA SECTION: WORK SESSION ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER PUBLIC WORKS ITEM: AUTHORIZE THE CAPITAL EQUIPMENT BY: K. Hanser~ BY: REPLACEMENT OF UNIT#23 INGERSOL RAND DATE: 2/3/05 ~______..,--~/ DATE: STREET PAVEMENT ROLLER Background: Existing Unit #23 is an Ingersol Rand 5-ton pavement roller purchased in 1991 for $23,400, with a projected life expectancy of 10 years. This vehicle is powered by a diesel engine and has recorded hours of 1,326. It is used as the primary pavement roller for compacting hot mixed asphalt and bituminous pavements and can be used for compacting the subgrade materials prior to paving. Over the last couple of years, vehicle maintenance and repair records indicate that $4,269 has been spent on Unit #23. The Shop Foreman has rated the condition of this vehicle as poor. The 2005 Streets Department Capital Equipment Budget has allocated $22,000 for the replacement of unit #23. Analysis/Conclusions: Public Works staff has carefully reviewed past, current and projected use of Unit #23. A summary of those findings is as follows: Unit #23, Ingersol Rand 5-ton pavement roller is in poor operating condition. Both the front and rear roller drums are dented and cracked. These drums have been repaired by welding and patching multiple times and are now beyond repair and must be replaced. The estimated cost of replacement is $9,000, plus installation. The hydraulic system is also in poor condition and the estimated cost of repair is $2,000-$3,000. Staff recommends replacing Unit #23 with a Bomag BW 120AD-3 diesel powered 5-ton roller. It is available off the State of Minnesota purchasing contract, through Sweeney Brothers, in the amount of $15,850, plus tax. Due to condition of the existing pavement roller, it is recommended to trade in the Ingersol Rand roller. Sweeney Brothers has offered a trade-in value of $2,000 for the unit, which staff recommends, bringing the purchase price down to $13,850 plus tax. Recommended Motion: Move to approve the Capital Equipment Replacement of Unit #23, an Ingersol Rand 5-ton pavement roller, with a Bomag BW 120AD-3 5-ton roller from the State of Minnesota Purchasing contract, held by Sweeney Brothers of Burnsville, Minnesota, in the amount of $15,850, plus tax, subtracting a trade-in of $2,000; with funding appropriated from the Streets Capital Equipment Fund 431-43121-5180. KH:jb COUNCIL ACTION: Lockable engine hoed and instrument panel cover Travel control with integrated vibration control for easy operation Corrosion-resistant water spray system Electric blower and sound insulated engine hood for lower noise levels Easy access to maintenance points and test ports Suspended operator's platform for fatigue-free operation Support leds designed for minimal lateral overhanD, high curb clearance and excellent drum visibility git-on heavy-duty oscillating, articulation joint Dash 3 series - continuing the Maintenance-free Spring-Applied, Hydraulically-Released (SAHR) brakes and vibration bearings tradition of excellence... Since its introduction in the early 1980's, the BW120AD series of tandem vibratory rollers has been one of the fastest growing BOMAG roller classes. The original BW120AD and later BW120AD-2 have dominated world markets for over a decade. In many situations, the BW 120AD series has replaced the traditional 8 - 10 ton static roller due to greater compaction efficiency and economy. Achieving good compaction results is dependent on operator comfort and efficiency, and the BW120AD-3 features more responsive controls for sensitive acceleration and braking, delivering optimal pr.oductivity. Applications: · Highway construction and maintenance · Walkways, bicycle and cart paths · Driveways · Parking lots ... · Asphalt repairs and resurfacing BW 120AD-3 in action on chip and seal application. Excellent visibility makes handling easy and avoid~ damage Handling Easier & Safer: · New support leg design offers better visibility of drum edges, avoiding costly damages~vhiie compacting around obstructions. · Enlarged integrated lifting points makes transporting easier with less risk of body damage. · The vibration isolated operator's platform delivers fatigue-free operation on longer shifts and increases productivity. · Hydraulic oil cooler with electric fan motor reduces noise emissions, providing better operating conditions for both the driver and other workers. · The travel lever is mounted in a lower position for more comfortable operation. · Sauer/Sundstrand travel pump offers a smoother and more responsive travel control. · Standard ROPS with seat belts deliver additional operator safety. Light du y tandem models provide maximum versatility Achieve Maximum Productivity: · The BOMAG BW120AD-3 has two vibrating frequencies for better compaction on a Wider range of materials and higher working speeds on asphalt. · Vibration is automatically shut off if working speeds are too high, eliminating operator error resulting in rippling of asphalt and costly rework. · Large diameter drums reduce pushing and cracking of mat, delivering a high quality finish. · High curb clearance and minimal lateral overhang allow for working close to obstructions. · Two scrapers per drum ensure clean drums in either forward or reverse travel direction. · Drum shell thickness and end plates designed to give maximum strength for long life and durability. · Vandal protected instrument panel and covered ignition switch guard against on site electrical problems. Bo/t-on center-joint for long life and easy replacement or repairs Less Service & Maintenance: The purchase price is important, but so are the operating costs. Check these features: · Bolt-on oscillating, articulation joint provides long life and simple replace- ment. · 2000 hour hydraulic oil change with fine filtration. · Maintenance free vibration bearings and SAHR brakes. · Wide opening engine cover allows easy access for servicing. MEMORANDUM DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 2005 TO: FROM: MAYOR PETERSON COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS COUNCILMEMBER NAWROCKI COUNCILMEMBER ERICSON COUNCILMEMBER KELZENBERG ~'x PATTY MUSCOVITZ, DEPUTY CITY CLERK/COUNCIL SECRETAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT At this time, I have two applicants for the Planning and Zoning Commission. There is currently only one opening, until Mr. Baker submits his resignation. Attached are copies of the applications. Both of these candidates have been previously interviewed. Two additional application requests have been mailed this week. If they are returned by Monday night's work session, I will make the applications available. CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARD OR COMMISSION BOARDS(S) OR COMMISSIONS(S) ON WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE TO SERVE: (INDICATE PREFERENCE: 1, 2, 3, IF MORE THAN ONE) TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION CHARTER COMMISSION (Note: ~f applying for this commission, please indicate if you are a qualified voter: ._Yes __ No LIBRARY BOARD TRAFFIC COMMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION X. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION POLICE/FIRE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION ZI2 CODE: LIVED IN COLUMBIA HEIGHTS SINCE: 1~ ~7 PROPERTY OWNED IN COLUMBIA HEIGHTS (OTHER THAN RESIDENCE) PRESENT EMPLOYER: WORK PHONE: POSITION TITLE: /~c_j.,~r vle..,X/ EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: CIVIC EXPERIENCE: PLEASE STATE BRIEFLY WHY YOU ARE INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THIS BOARD/COMMISSION FOR WHICH YOU ARE SUBMITTING THIS APPLICATION AND WHY YOU FEEL YOU ARE QUALIFIED' MONDAY ' TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY PLEASE LIST THREE REFERENCES: PHONE J NAME ADDRESS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FACTS WITHIN THE FOREGOING APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. Signature Remm application to: Deputy City'Clerk City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Avenue NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 (763) 706-3611 TDD (763) 706-3692 For Office Use Onlv: Date received: ~,2, 0 0_3 12-17-01 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARD OR COMMISSION BOARDS(S) OR COMMISSIONS(S) ON WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE TO SERVE: (INDICATE PREFERENCE: 1, 2, 3, IF MORE THAN ONE) TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION CHARTER COMMISSION (Note: If applying for this commission, please indicate if you are a qualified voter: __yes __ No ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION POLICE/FIRE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION LIBRARY BOARD TRAFFIC COMMISSION PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION HOME PHONE: L~D ~ COL~~ ~IGHTS S~CE: /F~ PROPERTY O~D ~ COL~~ ~IGHTS (OTHER T~ ~S~ENCE) ... PRESENT EMPLOYER:- WORK PHONE: POSITION TITLE: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: CIVIC EXPERIENCE: PLEASE STATE BRIEFLY WHY YOU ARE INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THIS BOARD/COMMISSION FOR WHICH YOU ARE SUBMITTING THIS APPLICATION AND WHY YOU FEEL YOU ARE QUALIFIED: I AM NOT AVAILABLE FOR BOARD/COMMISSION MEETINGS ON THE FOLLOWING EVENINGS (CIRCLE): MONDAY .TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY PLEASE LIST T~E ~FE~NCES: N~ ~D~gS PHO~ i HEREBY CERTiFY THAT THE FACTS .V~ITI-m~J THE FOP~EGODJG ,~PL!CATION ARE T~J. JE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. Signature Return application to: DePuty City Clerk City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Avenue NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 (763) 706-3611 TDD (763) 706-3692 For Office Use Only: Date received: J- ~ 0 12-17-01